The exploitation of the systems will happen in software, so unless they deliver ALL of their source and that sourceâ(TM)s resulting compiled binaries are verified for backdoors / exploitable vulns, this offer is disingenuous bullshit.
If you actually read the paper:
Impact
Due to the fact this vulnerability was mitigated in iOS version 10, a full exploit was not developed by us. Despite this, this vulnerability still poses a great risk to any iOS device prior to version 10, as it is does not require any user interaction or configuration of any sort on the targeted device, and can be leveraged by an attacker to gain remote code execution in a very high privileged context (the Bluetooth process).
They care about integrating the features very well as opposed to just having the newest shiny stuff that's just thrown into the device. Samsung has gotten better at thinking, but still can't hold a candle to Apple's hardware/software integration.
This is such a fucking farce. He's already made up his mind, but it's clear he's trying to make it look like he cares about comments. Fucking travesty.
Only jagoff financial "analysts" can spin this as bad news. That's a massive number of new devices sold, and that's WITH people holding back for the 10th anniversary iPhone. If they don't raise Jesus from the dead each quarter they're panned. What horseshit.
This is exactly why truecrypt (or similar) unstructured volumes should be used-- they provide deniability that there is even a volume present on a given device since the "data" appears to be just a bunch of random bytes.
Slashdot Mirror
Play a sample of someone screaming and yelling "DONT LET THIS PERSON STEAL ME!!"
The exploitation of the systems will happen in software, so unless they deliver ALL of their source and that sourceâ(TM)s resulting compiled binaries are verified for backdoors / exploitable vulns, this offer is disingenuous bullshit.
It's Unicode for a "smart" apostrophe.
It would have been a much more satisfying experiment.
Exactly! If you want speed, directly use the metal APIs!
There might be some cash missing.
Citation please.
I corrected myself :). It was from iOS's smart punctuation, which I subsequently disabled.
"That's"
No, no, thatâ(TM)s Amagosa.
Before this thing gets here and starts tearing up the oceans.
Wow. That was an awesome read. Thank you!
Hint: the backdoor isn't in the source, it's in the compiler used to build the source.
No problem. All they need is a race of slave people to do the work.
If you actually read the paper: Impact Due to the fact this vulnerability was mitigated in iOS version 10, a full exploit was not developed by us. Despite this, this vulnerability still poses a great risk to any iOS device prior to version 10, as it is does not require any user interaction or configuration of any sort on the targeted device, and can be leveraged by an attacker to gain remote code execution in a very high privileged context (the Bluetooth process).
They care about integrating the features very well as opposed to just having the newest shiny stuff that's just thrown into the device. Samsung has gotten better at thinking, but still can't hold a candle to Apple's hardware/software integration.
This is such a fucking farce. He's already made up his mind, but it's clear he's trying to make it look like he cares about comments. Fucking travesty.
Hey, Everybody, It's Joshua from Wargames!
Finally someone who actually knows what they're talking about. I wish I could upvote you 10000x.
Only jagoff financial "analysts" can spin this as bad news. That's a massive number of new devices sold, and that's WITH people holding back for the 10th anniversary iPhone. If they don't raise Jesus from the dead each quarter they're panned. What horseshit.
This is exactly why truecrypt (or similar) unstructured volumes should be used-- they provide deniability that there is even a volume present on a given device since the "data" appears to be just a bunch of random bytes.
ROTFL!!!!
Exactly.
Huh? ECC corrects 1-bit errors and detects >1-bit errors. There is no corruption. Stop the nonsense and get off the crack pipe.
They totally missed the point of RPi. AFFORDABILITY and ACCESSIBILITY were the main goals. This $200 monster is neither. It will fail BIG time.