Slashdot Mirror


TSA Accepting Public Comments On Whole Body Airport Screening

New submitter trims writes "The TSA is now in the public comment stage of its project to roll out Advanced Imaging Technology (i.e. full-body X-ray) scanners. The TSA wants your feedback as to whether or not this project should be continued or cancelled. Now is your chance to tell the TSA that this is a huge porkbarrel project and nothing more than Security Theater. You can comment at http:///www.regulations.gov and reference the docket ID TSA-2013-0004." Note: the backscatter X-ray machines are being phased out, in favor of millimeter-wave systems; the linked documents give the government's side of the story when it comes to efficacy, safety, privacy, and worth. The comment period runs until June 24.

142 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Yes but... by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it detect a pressure cooker?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Yes but... by c0lo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will it detect a pressure cooker?

      If you swallow it, no.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:Yes but... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      i get confused... the machine i see most commonly is the one that's like a phone booth, and the column swings around. what kind is this? is this the kind that is backscatter, or millimeter?

    3. Re:Yes but... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Is that a pressure cooker or are you just looking forward to participating in our voluntary pat-down?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      backscatter, or millimeter?

      "Unnecessary" is the word you're looking for.

    5. Re:Yes but... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ALWAYS opt-out.

      If they ask you why - which has happened to me in a very challenging fashion - say: "Because I want to."

      Plan an extra 20-30 minutes on your arrival. It never takes that long. Have everything empty from your pockets and take off a belt, if any.

      It's not as intrusive as the panicky say. Make sure you are clear that you want the screening in place, not in a private area.

      "And friends, somewhere in Washington, enshrined in some little folder, is a study in black and white of my fingerprints. And the only reason I'm singing you this song now is cause you may know somebody in a similar situation, or you may be in a similar situation, and if your in a situation like that there's only one thing you can do and that's walk into the shrink wherever you are, just walk in say 'Shrink, You can get anything you want, at Alice's restaurant.' And walk out. You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people, two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're both faggots and they won't take either of them. And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singin' a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. They may think it's an organization. And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement.

      And that's what it is, the Alice's Restaurant Anti-Massacree Movement, and all you got to do to join is sing it the next time it come's around on the guitar."

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:Yes but... by NekoYasha · · Score: 1

      I think that's a millimeter wave scanner. Backscatter X-ray machines are like two boxes that you walk through.

    7. Re:Yes but... by SniperJoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I take a bit of the opposite tact, as I prefer to be treated like a criminal in private rather than in full display of the public. That and it forces them to use additional resources, as now two people have to be monitoring the pat-down.

      Frankly, my largest problem (aside from the constitutionality of said pat-down) is the fact that the TSA agents seem to ask a lot of questions that they haven't thought about and don't really seem to want honest answers to. For instance, after opting out, I was once asked if I was I understood what would happen to me and if I was "comfortable with this process". When I answered "No, I think it's a waste of time and a violation of my Constitutional rights," that started a bit of a scene.

      Another favorite is when they ask if I have any medical devices or implants on my body and I answer "Yes" and then they stand there looking at me in silence. Oh, you want me to describe them, well in that case, you shouldn't asked it as a yes/no question then!

      Then we get to "Do you have any areas on your body that are sensitive to the touch?" "Yeah, mate, my whole body."

      I realize I'm being difficult and something of a jerk, but I have no reason why I have to make it EASY to take my rights away. Sigh, now I'm probably on some list.

    8. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone should tell the Republicans that a millimeter is something French. That will thwart the TSA!

    9. Re:Yes but... by iamgnat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I take a bit of the opposite tact, as I prefer to be treated like a criminal in private rather than in full display of the public. That and it forces them to use additional resources, as now two people have to be monitoring the pat-down.

      There are two reasons I choose to do it in public. The first is that in private it's your word against a bunch of TSA screeners. There are no other possible witnesses and I don't trust them not to side with each other given that you've already irritated them by singling yourself out. I'm not saying they are going to be out to do anything wrong, but if there is an issue then you are on the wrong side.

      The second is that it is shocking how many people still don't understand they have an option (or have believed the FUD that it is some horribly demeaning and invasive process). By staying in the public space you help educate those that don't know.

    10. Re:Yes but... by mellon · · Score: 2

      The only time I've ever had a TSA person give me a hard time about opting out was in the International terminal in San Francisco, and the hard time he gave me was "oh come on, it's perfectly safe"—once he got that I wasn't going to give in, he stopped hassling me. Just be polite, act like you're sympathetic rather than annoyed, and it's very unlikely that you will have a bad time of it.

      I don't think that it actually makes us any safer to have these searches, but that's an argument to have at a policy level, not with the folks at the TSA checkpoint.

    11. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > I take a bit of the opposite tact

      That should be "opposite tack," as in tacking a sail to go in a different direction. "Tact" is what you use in dealing with people in delicate situations, so as not to offend or anger them through criticism or accusations.

      We now return you to your regularly scheduled semi-anonymous Slashdot flamefest!

    12. Re:Yes but... by Scorch_Mechanic · · Score: 2

      The second is that it is shocking how many people still don't understand they have an option (or have believed the FUD that it is some horribly demeaning and invasive process). By staying in the public space you help educate those that don't know.

      You don't get it, do you? It is a horribly demeaning and invasive process. I've had the patdown before (only once so far, I've been able to avoid it and the scanners since). Even though the agent who did the patdown was extremely courteous and detailed exactly what each step was before he did it, I still felt invaded and demeaned. I have nothing against the man, he was very professional about it. I felt weird and violated for the rest of the day. As Sonic says, "That's no good!"

      If you're gonna opt for the patdown, wear shorts if you can. They don't have to pat down your legs if they're bare.

      --
      You should turn signatures off.
    13. Re:Yes but... by skegg · · Score: 1

      Sigh, now I'm probably on some list.

              SniperJoe

    14. Re:Yes but... by iamgnat · · Score: 1

      You don't get it, do you? It is a horribly demeaning and invasive process.

      I do get it and feel exactly the same about it. I find it even more horribly demeaning to have the scanners used on me though. I, however, choose not to hide my "shame" about this process and want everyone that is around to see it so they can understand as well.

      As with your experience, so far all my agents have been courteous and professional about it all. They even seem to be as put off by the whole thing as I am. I don't hassle them or make a scene about it, but I won't go through the scanners (for both philosophical and medical reasons).

    15. Re:Yes but... by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

      Agree but it is hard to define the line - I always 'opt out' and while they always repeat the scripted speech to me, it is the other questions that I am asked that add more insult to injury. For example, I am often asked 'where are you going?' or 'Are you from ?' or 'Are you traveling alone?'

      While I have no choice of the nudy scan or the indecent behavior, what am I to do about these fishing for fodder attempts? The Law (as I understand it) is so ambiguous that it is hard to understand what I am obligated to answer and what not.

      They have searched me and found me not carrying anything illegal, why the further interrogation? There is not one person in my local government who will even listen to my gripe, much less promise even the minimum of raising this as an issue at any low/local level of policy.

      Any advice would be welcome.

    16. Re:Yes but... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      It's not as intrusive as the panicky say. Make sure you are clear that you want the screening in place, not in a private area.

      I always opt out, and my experience has been as follows:

      1. I've never had a TSA screener give me a hard time about opting out. I had one tell me that the machine was safe, and I just smiled and told him that my information says that they're not. That is the only "argument" I've ever had with TSA over this.
      2. I have personally never been treated rudely by TSA, but I'm generally a pretty nice guy, so maybe that has something to do with it. I'm sure like anything else, most screeners are decent people who just want to do their job as best they can, but there are a few that are assholes.
      3. I've never had my opt-out pat down take very long. Maybe an extra 5 minutes. 10 minutes, tops.
      4. The intrusive/non-intrusive thing is a function of which agent you get and how sensitive you are to unwanted touching of your groin area (and for women, I think chest area is included). (TMI alert...) I've definitely had screeners touch all the way up my leg to where they touched the side of my scrotum, while some stop just short of "touching my junk" because hell, I'm sure this is one of their least-favorite things to do, also.

      (more TMI alert) I was actually a bit surprised with my reaction the first time I had a more aggressive pat down. I'm no prude, but that was the first time I've ever felt violated, sexually. It really shocked me to have felt this way because, seriously, having the sides of my scrotum touched, briefly, and through two thick layers of clothing, is such a minor thing in the grand scheme. It really sucked for me, though. YMMV.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    17. Re:Yes but... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I realize I'm being difficult and something of a jerk, but I have no reason why I have to make it EASY to take my rights away. Sigh, now I'm probably on some list.

      I suppose it's your right to be a bit of a jerk, but I don't think that making life difficult for an individual TSA screener here or there is going to have much effect. I'm sure they already hate that part of their job, and it's not like the peon at the x-ray machine sets policy.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    18. Re:Yes but... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      Someone should tell the Republicans that a millimeter is something French. That will thwart the TSA!

      In case you haven't noticed, the Democrats are currently in power. If you have complaints, you should take them to the governing party, no?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    19. Re:Yes but... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      Well, that's certainly their right. Nobody's forcing TSA screeners to be TSA screeners.

      Personally, if my job involved touching other men's scrota all day long, I'd find another line of work, ASAP.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    20. Re:Yes but... by almitydave · · Score: 1

      "Pressure cooker? I 'ardly know 'er!"

      Sorry, had to do it.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    21. Re:Yes but... by snadrus · · Score: 1

      I was hassled in Austin. During waiting an extra 30 minutes, a heckler TSA agent come by asking if I wanted the full massage treatment & if I enjoyed opting for the pat-down. No problems in SF though.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    22. Re:Yes but... by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      In case you haven't noticed, the Democrats are currently in power. If you have complaints, you should take them to the governing party, no?

      If that's the case, then how come everything is stalled in Congress, the sequester is now in it's second month, and Obama's attempts to regulate guns have all failed? Having the majority in this country in only the executive branch and one of the houses of Congress doesn't make them "in power".

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    23. Re:Yes but... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      The sequester was President Obama's idea, and he had no trouble ramming an extremely unpopular Affordable Care Act through Congress. If he cared about gun control he'd ram that through, too.

      Gun control is a bit of a special case, however, because what the President really wants would require a Constitutional amendment.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  2. Ah, now the delays make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Years of delays, violating a court other many wondered what the heck was up with the TSA delaying this public comment.

    Now it's clear: They were waiting for a terrorist attack.

    1. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by jhoegl · · Score: 5, Informative

      Homegrown Terrorist attack.
      But I will still not give up my liberty for my security. I will die for my Freedom and rights, including being a victim of an attack.
      Unfortunately, I am not the only one in this country... so I must yield to societies decision.

    2. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Letting your children grow up with their liberties pre-sacrificed for the appearance of security is just downright irresponsible. If you think terrorism is a major threat to them please take statistics classes or start crusades against the long list of more dangerous things first.

    3. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Years of delays, violating a court other many wondered what the heck was up with the TSA delaying this public comment.

      Now it's clear: They were waiting for a terrorist attack.

      Give them some credit.
      They may also be looking for reasons to phase out millimeter-wave systems for super-duper-wave systems. These machines cost $250K/pop and don't do shit to detect anything. The contractors who made the first batch and then the replacement batch must be salivating already.

      Where do I sign up to deliver machines without any quality control? I can do it much cheaper.

    4. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But I will still not give up my liberty for my security. I will die for my Freedom and rights, including being a victim of an attack.

      So, you don't have a wife and children who depend on you?

      Does that mean people that went to fight Hitler didn't have children and wives? They did. They went to fight the Nazis to preserve security in the US and the western world for their kids and wives.

      Just like the GP, he's ready to die to liberty maybe so his/her children can enjoy some of it too. It is not just whether you survive, but whether the bits of the laws that survive you are worth it.

      PS. If you are so worried about getting blown up, perhaps you should be worried about getting killed by some moron texting on their phone while driving, or drunk/drugged driver, or some moron speeding and T-boning your car. Or if you have a gun, perhaps you should be worried that you will die because of that gun (98%+ of all domestic deaths are caused by a gun in the house, not by external gun).

      But perhaps you think you are special and statistics do not apply to you. That's what most people think too.

    5. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now it's clear: They were waiting for a terrorist attack.

      And yet I couldn't find a single comment in support, even right after a terrorist attack, on the webpage, until about 10 pages in. And you know what? It'd still be a bad idea even if there was a boston bomber situation every month from now until doomsday. But you know what they say about our most inept public agency... "You can't cure stupid."

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by elashish14 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having a family is not an excuse for being a coward. If anything, it's a reason not to be a coward, so you can set an example for others and the future.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    7. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you like your kids to grow up in a world without freedom?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI, the public comment period began nearly a month ago (26 March)

    9. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      + + + + + wisdom

      Telling your children that they should be brave, while acting like a wimpy douche is nothing short of hypocricy.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can deliver witching sticks for less than ten dollars each. THEN, I can train agents to use those sticks for less than a hundred dollars each!

      Or, if you prefer, I can supply magic wands, with or without pixie dust, for less than fifty dollars each. I don't offer training for magic wands though - it will be the government's responsibility to locate and/or train qualified wizards.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      But I will still not give up my liberty for my security. I will die for my Freedom and rights, including being a victim of an attack.
      Unfortunately, I am not the only one in this country... so I must yield to societies decision.

      Now you're jumping to conclusions, and ignoring the obvious solution.
      Do you think it a futile endeavor to convince society to make the right decisions by sharing your mind with others?
      Have you no drive to become everyone in the society? This is why you will be assimilated: As predicted, your resistance is futile.

    12. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If they'd had backscatter machines at the race, the bombing wouldn't have happened. Right?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where do I sign up to deliver machines without any quality control? I can do it much cheaper.

      US Department of Homeland Security
      ATTN: Office of Security Technology System Planning and Evaluation Group
      Transportation Security Administration
      601 South 12th Street
      Arlington, VA 22202-4220

      Make sure you ask for their blanket immunity from prosecution plan, which also has options to avoid house oversight committees and contractual exemptions that all other federal agencies must comply with, like, for example, a requirement to choose the lowest-cost contract that meets requirements.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    14. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%. We send our young men and women in the armed forces to die everyday to defend our freedom, but yet we're too cowardly to get on an airplane without being virtually strip searched and allowing our children to be molested by federal agents? We should all be ashamed of ourselves.

    15. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by erroneus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Liberty has NEVER been something you "give up." You can't give it up while the next person keeps his. It is something everyone has or no one has. So to correct your statement, your liberty is being TAKEN with apologies and excuses given. So what you're saying is you're not accepting of their apologies or excuses. What follows is what you plan to DO about your liberties being taken.

      It's probably already too late for me to secure firearms -- I don't have any now but I might be attending the next gun show in my area. But I will be practicing my head shots because I am quite sure my next enemy will be wearing a vest and may even be wearing a riot mask. But a head shot at a riot mask will give someone cause to pause. I probably won't last long after that but still. I expect to be one of many.

      The government is not "the people" and I get offended every time I hear the government referred to in that way. (You know, "the people vs. ....") The people are the people and when government employees take arms against "the people" they become enemies of "the people." *I* am the people. I pay taxes. I work for a living. I harm no one. *I* am no one's enemy. And *I* will not be the one making the first aggressive moves. We've got a big problem building and I find it HARD to believe that anyone would feel safer with a bunch of uniformed jackboots walking around with "assault weapons."

    16. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by erroneus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Two immigrants have had excessive contact with the FBI. It is well documented. Either (a) those immigrants were believed to be "okay" and passed into society after the FBI's scrutiny making them members of society here or (b) they are patsies sponsored by the FBI.

      We have more pictorial evidence of the "Craft" contractors being invovled than we have of these two immigrants. Think on what information is available instead of what you are told you should believe. The information available doesn't look like the information we are being given.

    17. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by erroneus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'd like to see a new program put into place:

      Forget "air marshalls" Start handing pistols to people with willingness and a profile that works when you board a plane. Screw searching people for weapons and dangerous items. Make sure a deterrent is available. So far, the only REAL terrorist threats have been defeated by civilians beating the crap out of assholes. The people believe the threats are real and so far, people have demonstrated a willingness to take action against those threats. Proof that there are not quite as many sheeple as the government seems to think is right out there for everyone to see. Someone will be there to step up. And presently... those are the people the government is watching. That's military/ex-military (like me) and Christians. It makes sense if you think about it.

    18. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You're not addressing what I said at all. I stated that these are immigrants, and that they are not "home grown". I might be from Zimbabwe, or Canada, or Mars, - if I wasn't born and raised in Moscow, then I can't claim to be a "home grown" Muscovite, now can I? It wouldn't matter how many times the successors of the KGB interviewed me - I still wouldn't be a native Muscovite.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    19. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by mianne · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily. However the standard security apparatus from the 1970's, known as the "Walk-Through Metal Detector", would have easily detected these devices.

      --
      Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
    20. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by narcc · · Score: 4, Funny

      98%+ of all domestic deaths are caused by a gun in the house

      Citation Needed

    21. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      They immigrated in 2002 when one was 9 and the other 16 it's not like they showed up six months ago. Dzhokhar especially was Americanized, although it seems pretty plain his crazy brother was the one who set everything up.

    22. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

      I think 98% of all deaths in the house are more likely to be the shower. I'm presuming you meant 98% of untrained firearms deaths. The stats for cops are more like a third, but that's the only one I can think of off the top of my head. Where are you getting this number anyway?

      --
      Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    23. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      The Congressional Research Service's definition of an HVE (Homegrown Violent Extremist) event is a "terrorist activity or plots perpetrated within the United States or abroad by American citizens, legal permanent residents, or visitors radicalized largely within the United States."

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    24. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      These machines at least can give terrorists cancer, witching sticks are not even good at beating someone. You don't want terrorists to have cancer?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    25. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      98%+ of all domestic deaths are caused by a gun in the house, not by external gun

      To give some context for how dumb this remark is, in 2000 in the US, accidental firearms discharge killed 776 people. Falls killed over 13k people. Drowning in a bathtub killed 341.

      It's also worth noting that the presence of so many guns in homes discourages the kind of activities that would result in external gun deaths. After all, the usual goal for breaking into homes isn't to get shot. I guess an analogy would be accidental deaths in the military. It's not a good thing for your military to be suffering more deaths from enemy action than from accidents and friendly fire because it means you're in a serious fight.

    26. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by khallow · · Score: 1

      although it seems pretty plain his crazy brother was the one who set everything up.

      The "home grown" brother who entered the US at 16? And I'm sure it's all due to the US not the strife and tyranny (or for that matter, training) in Chechnya. This argument just doesn't work.

    27. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by flyneye · · Score: 1

      98% of all domestic deaths are caused by citation-less assertions.
      Be sure to read all cautions and observe instructions on back of container.
      You'll shoot your eye out kid!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    28. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by khallow · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I am not the only one in this country... so I must yield to societies decision.

      What's the reason? Society can and does make bad decisions all the time which aren't respected by the members of that society. There's plenty of law is that is more honored in the breach (and sometimes more honorable to do so - such as US abolitionists refusing to turn in runaway slaves in the mid 19th century).

      I think it's a poor excuse myself.

    29. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder how many people die of natural causes in their home. I'm betting it's the largest number.

      Sudden death is 98% of the cause of domestic death in the home. Film @ 11...

      Did you know, dying is the leading cause of death in the U.S.? Here at the Federal Research Center, where experts wear lab coats all day long, we have found, by use of your tax dollars, that at least one in three are susceptible to death. ONE IN THREE. Write your congressperson and demand that we are funded for research to end this death by dying. It could be your wife, it could be your kids, it could be your dog, It could be YOU!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    30. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by flyneye · · Score: 1

      hypocricidity.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    31. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      You're not addressing what I said at all. I stated that these are immigrants, and that they are not "home grown". I might be from Zimbabwe, or Canada, or Mars, - if I wasn't born and raised in Moscow, then I can't claim to be a "home grown" Muscovite, now can I? It wouldn't matter how many times the successors of the KGB interviewed me - I still wouldn't be a native Muscovite.

      So. Is John McCain "home grown"?

    32. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Christians beat the crap out of assholes?

    33. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      So, you don't have a wife and children who depend on you?

      Did the Founding Fathers?

    34. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Having lived most of their lives here and developed their Boston accent to perfection, they grew it in Boston, their home, ergo, homegrown.
      Maybe you should familiarize yourself with the mechanics of an enema bag before you strap on the cajones of The Pedantic Police.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    35. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by flyneye · · Score: 1

      "Have you no drive to become everyone in the society?"

      Hell, NO! Do you realize how many out there don't brush their teeth, change their underwear daily and do pick their nose and eat it?
      Recant that silly statement NOW!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    36. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or if you have a gun, perhaps you should be worried that you will die because of that gun (98%+ of all domestic deaths are caused by a gun in the house, not by external gun).

      I'm in favor of gun control laws, but Jesus Christ that's a stupid claim to make.

      Here are the real statistics for cause of death and suicide is the most common cause of firearm related death., but suicide is only the tenth most common cause of death and makes up only 2% of the most common deaths and firearm related sucides are only about half of that, so that would put them around 1%

      Perhaps you meant that 98% of firearm related deaths are due to the homeowner's firearm? Once again, no. Out of the 11,078 homicides in 2010, you're claiming that 10,855 were committed with the homeowner's gun and only 223 involved a gun owned by someone else.

      That is an insane claim to make and there is absolutely no evidence to back it up.

    37. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      I have a beautiful wife and two beautiful daughters. My wife and I understood one another when we married, meaning she understood the fact that I am willing to give my life for for both my family and my principles. There's a certain relationship between those factors when you have children, and if you already have one or more but still don't understand what I'm talking about, I probably can't help you. I also served in the US Navy. Have you served in either a military or civil capacity? I may work as a systems engineer now, but my principles have not changed. Are you a coward?

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    38. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Homegrown Terrorist attack.

      I miss the good ole days when people went on a random killing spree and were labeled mass murderers if they killed more than one at a time, or a serial bomber if they killed one at a time.

    39. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by mellon · · Score: 1

      Cojones, dude. Cojones.

    40. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by gutnor · · Score: 2

      You are a lousy business man, you are destroying the market for the good, honest to God, snake oil vendors.

    41. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Philip Paradis answered quite well. In fact, that question has been addressed multiple times by congress. The offspring of military parents, born anywhere in the world while on active duty, is "naturally born". Further - the offspring of two American parents, born anywhere in the world is "naturally born". An American mother quite naturally gives birth to an American child.

      A child born overseas, who spends his entire youth outside the United States is still just as much a citizen as anyone, unless and until he renounces his citizenship. But, in that case, I might not claim him as "home grown". If he never enters the United States, he isn't exactly part of mainstream American life.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    42. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well, I've always said that we'd probably live longer if we got rid of all this death.

    43. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Ever heard someone from Boston say "Cojones"?
      Picture a Kennedy....sounds like "cajones"
      Picture John having cojones to face down the Cubans and Russians.
      Picture Robert having cojones to take on organized crime.
      Picture Teddy exposing his cojones to a girl scout troop, while having a drunken piss in an alley.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    44. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if only the people in power were stupid, unfortunately for us they are very smart and getting their desired results. The head of homeland security at the time, Micheal Chertoff, made a killing from the no bid contract with the company Rapiscan that he was heavily invested in. No conflict of interest there right? We get treated like cattle while the guy who decided to make us "safer" made out like a bandit.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

    45. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      I did not say I would go through TSA checkpoints unless I had no other choice, did I?
      I said if that is Societies decision, I will not harp on society for its decision. But I will not agree with it.
      You see, there are two lines of thinking on this. The first is, we live in a society, and as a member of that society, I must respect its rules, laws, and regs while in that society. If I do not agree, I should find another society.
      However, the other is, I am in a society that I disagree with and my opinion and thoughts trump the majority. Therefor I am right and have every right to disobey. Even though I am in a society, I chose not to be apart of it.
      So one line of thinking acknowledges society, the other acknowledges personal freedom. These two can not coexist and therefor will always be at odds.
      This would be fine, except that it is inevitable that the personal freedoms people have to interact with society. It is what living in a country, any country, is all about.
      So grow up, it isnt about you anymore.

    46. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by khallow · · Score: 1

      So one line of thinking acknowledges society, the other acknowledges personal freedom.

      That's a typical false dilemma. One can have a way of thinking that acknowledges both society and personal freedom. I also see that you confuse government and law with society. They aren't equivalent. I don't confuse a law or a bureaucratic decision with society.

    47. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Society makes the law and enforces the law.
      To view law as separate from society shows that one has a disregard for the law of society, and believes that one can then disregard them at will based on how one "feels" about them.
      Sure there are some extreme or rare cases where the law causes problems, but that is for a judge and jury to decide.

      You are making a point to make yourself above the law when you feel it is necessary, not when society does. Therefore, you do not want to be apart of society, and will be punished accordingly when caught.
      This is how it is, if you dont like it... move.

    48. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by sabri · · Score: 1

      I have a beautiful wife and two beautiful daughters.

      Having two daughters at home already justifies owning at least a shotgun. At the Dads against daughters dating club, there is one slogan: shoot the first one, and the word will follow.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    49. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by Agripa · · Score: 1

      For the sake of argument in this case I will stipulate the above.

      Now how many self defense incidents in a home involving a firearm did not result in anybody being shot? None? Zero? You mean self defense using a firearm without anybody being shot does not happen? Your selected statistics completely miss the point.

      If only 13 shootings out of 626 were legally justified, then where are the arrest records for incidents where nobody was shot?

      What would their conclusion be if self defense with a firearm in general was taken into account?

    50. Re:Ah, now the delays make sense by khallow · · Score: 1

      Society makes the law and enforces the law.

      No, government does. Sometimes that imperfectly reflects the will of the society (such as it is) and sometimes it grossly runs counter to the will of society. And government even has the power to influence the will of society (sometimes at the point of a gun!) to reflect the desires of government.

      To view law as separate from society shows that one has a disregard for the law of society,

      Not at all. It's merely a correct observation. There are huge conflicts of interest between society, government, and the members that make up society and government. This conflict shows most clearly in the laws that are broken on a widespread and routine basis, such as (in the US) drug possession (both illegal drugs and drugs obtained without a prescription), speed laws, illegal downloads of protected media, tax evasion, etc.

      For example, according to this poll, almost half of adults polled in the US (48%) have used marijuana. While it's possible that some have only used marijuana outside of the US, it's likely that virtually all of these people committed a federal felony of possession of a controlled substance. When violation of law is that extreme and pervasive, you don't have the laws reflecting the will of society.

      Therefore, you do not want to be apart of society, and will be punished accordingly when caught. This is how it is, if you dont like it... move.

      Does not follow. Aside from illogical assumptions that mean nothing ("do not want to be apart of society"), where am I going to move? I think I'd rather just fix my society.

  3. Timing? by mosb1000 · · Score: 2

    Isn't it a little late for a public comment period?

    1. Re:Timing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just the right timing after the Boston incident to gain supporters for the TSA's agenda...

    2. Re:Timing? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Isn't it a little late for a public comment period?

      Welcome to America. We shoot first then ask question later.
      If you're far enough north we'll do it half in French, then apologize.

    3. Re:Timing? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Huh? The French-speaking part of America is in the south, Louisiana. Though that French can hardly be called French at all.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Timing? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Nope. America can refer to either, but only one has a French speaking nation in the north.

    5. Re:Timing? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      You must mean Saint Pierre and Miquelon though strictly speaking they're part of France so of course they speak French.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Pierre_and_Miquelon
      Or perhaps rereading your comment you're thinking of French Guinea which is in the north of South America? Seems there are parts of France scattered all around the Americas as well as places like Haiti which also speak French.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Guiana

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:Timing? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Quebec?

    7. Re:Timing? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're one of those idiots who confuses "America" with the continent of "North America" or the supercontinent of "the Americas". We can safely continue the discussion without your willfully ignorant opinions. DERP DERP

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Timing? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I misunderstood your usage of nation. Of course if you're going to count the Quebecois you also have to count the Acadians of New Brunswick who have the same Constitutional protections of their French .

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  4. A+++++ Loss of rights! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Body scan was of the most high-standard quality! Great holding pen. Quality of the internment was superior. TSA is exceptional.

  5. Why Can't We All Just Get Along? by flyneye · · Score: 1

    I'd like to comment first, by saying " We should re-purpose the units and the TSA to the Mexican border immediately" . At best they'll deter a few from crossing. At worst they'll make them submit to an intrusive search and check their junk out with the units and do a body search before permitting them to cross,due to anti-profiling regulations.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  6. What are comments going to do? by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are the TSA just going to say "We have listened to your comments, and are continuing to pursue security theater^W practices as they best "serve" our country", or is there some sort of accountability set up for what the comments are saying?

    It's nice to see that even right after the Boston bombing, the comments appear to still be 100% against AIT scanners.

    1. Re:What are comments going to do? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I was pondering pretty much the same. But I guess in Soviet USA it's a step ahead when the government starts to actually listen to its people. Nobody said anything about acting upon what is heard, though.

      The lack of support for those scanners is, I hope, no surprise. If they actually DID anything to increase security, you might see some support for them after an attack, but since they're as useful for detecting something capable of blowing ship up as Lisa's rock is for defending against tigers, even a bomb that had blown away 90% of Boston including the MIT wouldn't change that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. More Security Theatre by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am afraid that Michael Chertoff only made hundreds of millions with the old backscatter machines and needed even more government money, so his company decided to come out with some new units which the TSA will spend over a billion dollars to acquire. The military industrial complex will bankrupt us as Eisenhower predicted.

    1. Re:More Security Theatre by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Can't we dig up Ike and put him in charge again? Even as a corpse he's more competent than any other choice we have right now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:More Security Theatre by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      ... not to be confused with Melanie Chartoff of course. TFA claims that backscatter machines are being phased out. Last I read this was not true, they were being shifted to less-prominent airports.

  8. like it or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, MMW systems are the new metal detector; albeit with some issues that need to be addressed technologically speaking. They're literally light years ahead of your conventional metal detector with AFAIK far less false positives and sensitivity issues (I can walk through a metal detector at the airport with a lighter in my pocket, but not the PMMW systems-- which understandably is a bad example of what I'm trying to express).

    That all said, I find it mildly absurd that any security we don't like we just classify as security theater.. How on earth can we on one hand argue that Bush et al had ample warning and did nothing and then on the other bitch when they do something? The back-scatter and active MMW systems and their ilk concern me mostly for health reasons, but the passive systems? that's quicker and AFAIK more efficient than the conventional systems with a much better detection rate, they're less of a hassle overall and eh, 'quit your bitching'.

    That said, there is going to be road bumps, I can think of a few off-hand, but such is life with all new technologies.

    1. Re:like it or not... by Arker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "That all said, I find it mildly absurd that any security we don't like we just classify as security theater.. How on earth can we on one hand argue that Bush et al had ample warning and did nothing and then on the other bitch when they do something? "

      Here's the thing. They had all the information they needed to stop it - the problem was not too little information, it was too much. They had far more information than they had the capacity to analyze.

      So the response? Not to upgrade ability to analyze the information already collectable, no. Instead, let's collect a few thousand times MORE information. Let's throw a dragnet over anyone and everyone and store every email on the net forever, in case we need to search back through it later.

      This is security theatre. We all get used to being less free, to being herded around more like cattle, on the assurance it will make us more safe. It will not. The same agencies that HAD the information to stop the crime, but not the analytical facilities to recognise the fact in time, now have EVEN MORE info to sift through. The vast majority of it completely irrelevant to stopping terrorists - but a wonderful treasure trove for anyone looking for something to use against their political enemies.

      In the meantime the terrorists are even less likely to be detected, since we are throwing roughly the same analytic capabilities at a ridiculously expanded data set.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:like it or not... by Skreems · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that approximately zero of the units being pushed by the TSA are of the passive variety. They're either X-ray based (for the past 5 years or so) or Active Millimeter Wave (apparently the new money waster).

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    3. Re:like it or not... by Skreems · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This particular upgraded equipment is security theater because numerous experiments have shown that it's easy to smuggle very nasty things past it without detection, and with fairly little effort. Knives, molded plastic explosives (simulated, if I recall correctly), handguns, etc. have all been successfully concealed from this technology. There are plenty of articles on-line detailing how it was done.

      The purpose of these machines is to prevent those with malicious intent from getting dangerous materials onto a plane which they could use to hijack it and repeat the 9/11 approach. But since these machines have been shown to be remarkably bad at actually achieving this goal, going forward with the ludicrously expensive purchase and the continued privacy-invading operation of said machines is clearly not ACTUALLY making air travel more secure. However, it looks shiny, and to the average person who doesn't work with security and isn't used to thinking in "black hat" mode it can seem effective. Which is basically the definition of security theater.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    4. Re:like it or not... by narcc · · Score: 1

      They're literally light years ahead of your conventional metal detector

      Wow, that's pretty far away. This controversy seems silly, considering how long it'll take them to get here.

    5. Re:like it or not... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      How on earth can we on one hand argue that Bush et al had ample warning and did nothing and then on the other bitch when they do something?

      Even if someone was angry that Bush did nothing and then later became angry about what the government chose to do, that doesn't mean that the actions the government took was what they wanted. Cockpit doors have been secured and citizens are willing to fight back; that's all we need.

      And this is security theater, but even if it weren't, it violates our rights and therefore I believe the TSA should be destroyed. How so many people can be afraid of a nearly nonexistent threat is beyond me, but I think it's sad to see how little most people seem to value the constitution (it's like the second amendment is all that exists for some people).

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  9. Re:I found their formmail code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You missed the part where they added your details to their 'Watch' list first...

  10. Let's start a petition to end the TSA altogether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Millimeter wave scanners are dangerous to medical equipment, and have too many shortcomings to be useful. It's been proven that they can be fooled by placing items along the sides of your body, and they nearly killed a young diabetic girl when it caused her insulin pump to malfunction after the retard in the TSA costume told her it was safe, without any knowledge of how the scanner worked, or what it would do to the expensive, life necessary pump.
    That TSA retard should have faced attempted murder charges because it nearly killed her, also should have had to pay for the replacement unit out of their own paycheck, even if it would take 14 years to pay for it, as they were responsible for it's destruction due to their own ineptitude.

  11. Prediction... by flimflammer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow, I jokingly made comments a long while back that it wouldn't surprise me if the TSA opened up these comments the moment a bomb went off somewhere, considering how long they've just been sitting on it.

    But now that it's happened, I am surprised. If there really is a connection to the timing, that's downright shameful. However that's not entirely anything new for the TSA.

  12. Israel airport security by cervo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In any case I found this fascinating article http://www.internationalpolicydigest.org/2012/06/19/what-israeli-airport-security-teaches-the-world/ that Israel does not have x-ray machines, or taking off your shoes to go in the airport. They have behavioral based interviews. And in the end everyone wants to blow up Israel, and yet I cannot remember hearing of planes crashing into buildings, or even being hijacked. It's really quite amazing. I would cut the security theatre and go do what Israel is doing.... Which seems to be behavioral based interviews and paying attention to how people act.

    Also they do a ton of screening on cars. In some US airports, the parking lot is right near the terminal. Drive in a car full of explosive material and you could do a lot of damage. Or even pull right up to the terminal unchecked for dropping bags. In some terminals you could even crash the car right through the glass doors and then go do something..... That's not security.

    1. Re:Israel airport security by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You are aware that for such interviews you need highly skilled, highly trained people. How the heck does this double as the job creation scheme for the unemployable the TSA is now?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Israel airport security by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      The "behavioral based interviews" are thinly veiled racial profiling. Illegal in America, so we can't use that method.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Israel airport security by Rich0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is definitely an issue. Israel only has two international airports, and spends quite a bit of money on security in general, with every citizen serving in the military.

      That makes the entire society far more security conscious, and military training means that people know how to follow procedures and generally stay alert. The fact that everybody serves in the military also means that the guards are diverse and not just those who couldn't find a job or get a scholarship.

      The result is that a security program that works in Israel will not necessarily work in the US, and certainly not with bottom-dollar security guards.

      Also, Israel has a lot of defense in depth. Maybe the airport security isn't as tight, but they have far more border security at drive-in points, and even checkpoints at places like malls. All of this makes it a lot harder to get weapons to the airport in the first place. There is also a much higher state of vigilance - when bombs have been planted on buses in the past they've generally been noticed resulting in immediate evacuation before they go off.

      Oh, and the last I heard El Al depressurizes every bag before putting it on a plane to set off altimeter-triggered bombs. So, some of the security is behind the scenes.

    4. Re:Israel airport security by garcia · · Score: 1

      I did my masters thesis on this subject and the TSA is doing the same thing the Israelis are. In fact, they spend a lot more than you would think on doing it. The problem seems to be that because people A) don't recognize this effort, B) because it's just as expensive as the machines, and C) it's just as ineffective because it ignores the fact that terrorists could walk into the building strapped with explosives in front of the screening area and kill hundreds+ of people.

    5. Re:Israel airport security by garcia · · Score: 1

      My bad, I meant to include the source: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/budget_bib_fy2011.pdf

      Behavior Detection Officers (BDOs): An increase of $20M and 350 BDOs (210 FTE) is
      requested to further enhance TSAâ(TM)s Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques
      program. The FY 2011 request includes a total of 3,350 officers, to enhance coverage at
      lanes and shifts at high risk Category X and I airports, and expand coverage to smaller
      airports.

      [...]

      Transitioned validated multi-cultural indicators of hostile intent, and demonstrated a
      mobile device that enables TSA Behavioral Detection Officers to record observations,
      automatically calculate behavior-based scoring, and share information among peers
      and with supervisors in near-real time. This potentially saves TSA an estimated 60 -
      120 FTEs.

    6. Re:Israel airport security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're completely forgetting the fact that in Israel's eyes, the airport is the LAST and LEAST EFFECTIVE point to stop an attack at. That's why security is so layered there. And no, the TSA might implement a minor subset of Israel's tactics, but they do NOT employ the same tactics as Israel (notwithstanding those that cannot simply be implemented outside of Israel or Israeli-controlled areas).

      El Al, to the last of my knowledge (and very close friends of mine were actual security personnel for El Al), packs bags into a secondary container that is installed into the cargo bay. This provides extra protection in case of a bomb in a bag scenario at the expense of some cargo hold room.

      Remember about 10 years ago or so when that guy at LAX started shooting up the El Al counter? Despite the fact that at every airport in this country the local police and other law enforcement agencies have demanded that El Al security be unarmed, it was an El Al security officer who shot that limo driver dead even before the LAPD could drop their donuts... And at natba"g (Ben Gurion Airport, code TLV), there are people who are constantly walking the area scanning and scoping (including trash cans). Leave a bag unattended in Israel, and the whole area will be cordoned off faster than you can say "felafel, Humus, chips".

      Every car is stopped before it even enters the airport territory, and the whole security process didn't just start there (if you were the one flying at least).

      I could keep going, and even mention that Richard Reid attempted to blow his shoes up on an El Al flight and was unable to. But hey, you did your masters thesis on this subject, so you know more than I would - one who has lived for extended periods of time in both the USA and Israel...

    7. Re:Israel airport security by sootman · · Score: 2

      And every time someone posts that, someone else has to post a reply saying that just does not scale. I guess it's my turn. Even Bruce Schneier says so. Bruce, quoting someone else with whom he agrees: "...no matter how safe or how wonderful the flying experience on El Al, it is TINY airline by U.S. standards, with only 38 aircraft, 46 destinations, and fewer than two million passengers in 2008. As near as I can tell, Cairo is their only destination in a majority Muslim country. Delta, before the Northwest merger is included, reported 449 aircraft and 375 destinations."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    8. Re:Israel airport security by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      The Israeli airport security model would be difficult to pull off here in the States. Here are some issues:
      1. Israel is a tiny country. Most travel is done by bus, car, or train. There is some domestic air travel, but the overwhelming majority is international. Here in the US, we have ridiculously more air travel being done by ridiculously more people. I don't know that we could scale their system to our levels of air travel.
      2. Because most travel is international with higher ticket prices, they can afford to spend more on security, proportionally. I can't imagine what domestic flights would cost here if we spent that much. What do you think it'd cost to implement this at O'Hare?
      3. Israel has compulsory military service, and therefore it has a higher percentage of its population trained in questioning and spotting suspicious behavior.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    9. Re:Israel airport security by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      The "behavioral based interviews" are thinly veiled racial profiling. Illegal in America, so we can't use that method.

      Believe it or not, this isn't quite true.

      When I was a kid, we took a family trip to Israel, and on the way home, during the interview, the person asked if we packed our bags and if they had been with us the entire time since we packed them. Well, the truth was, they had not. We packed them, and then we left them with the hotel while we toured a bit before leaving for the airport. My mom equivocated a bit in her answer (because, well, they really weren't in our possession), and they inspected every article in every bag and every detail of our bag. Absolutely down to every last pair of underwear. Took forever. But anyway, we don't look even remotely Middle Eastern... that didn't stop them from tearing through every last thing on our person.

      If we were Arab, would they have just done that automatically? I don't know the answer to that. Just saying they're perfectly ready and willing to tear through folks who are obviously Americans of European descent.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  13. Official TSA Statement (JOKE) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ''We ignored you all along but now that we have been forced to remove those scanners anyway we will consult you for your retrospective opinions. Signed, TSA.''

  14. Re:Let's start a petition to end the TSA altogethe by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Erh... careful, the blame might well be not on the retard but on the retard training him. If he was told that this scanner is safe for all medical equipment, he cannot but act on this information.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Re:Jail Bait by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Bah, fail. If you wanted to be accurate, you'd have to hold the Führer sacrosanct and blame everything just on his overbearing subordinates. That's what it was like in Germany. A common saying was "Oh if the Führer only knew...".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. They can look all they want. by edibobb · · Score: 1

    I couldn't care less if they see my nekkid body. I JUST WANT TO KEEP MY SHOES ON!!!!

    1. Re:They can look all they want. by edibobb · · Score: 1

      Prude.

  17. 4th amendment by White+Flame · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The law disallows certain behaviors, regardless of technology empowering them. These scanners are unreasonable search of my person and effects. Traveling is not suspicious behavior.

  18. Must be replaced by better options. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    We know why these damn things sell so well. They're every teenager's dream come true: X-Ray Glasses!
    The problem is they were build by morons, and have no adequate safety testing.

    We must replace the scanners with better options, while considering the actual target market.
    It's clear we need non-ionizing under the clothes imagining systems that replace people's bodies with those of a supermodel's.

    Put out a call for engineers married for at least seven years, or with children. They have the required experience.

  19. Re:Try conducting a physical search for a weapon by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    You do realize that with your support of a security state to try to prevent bombings, you also give support to major investigation of these types of threats of mass murder:

    I used to be a nice person, but then I got turned onto slashdot. Now I wan't to kill you all.

  20. Meet you on the No Fly list! by bradorsomething · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My Comment to Them:

    "I travel about twice a month and have been a regular traveler most of my life, and because of this, the deployment of this technology has had a major impact on my life.

    This technology is not wanted by air travelers, and was put in place with less testing than the shampoo I am no longer allowed to carry through security. Experts have found that shadowing can cause items to slip through this screening, and these devices cannot detect anything inside the body. They have also created long, bunched up lines of people at airports, outside of the "secure" cordon, which would allow a terrorist to kill many more people than would be on a single airplane... and these deaths could ironically be attributed directly to the delays caused by these devices, which regularly slow the lines and require pat-downs when they don't read properly (my experience when waiting).

    Security at airports has become a reactive reflex which always fights the last threat. I am confident I am not the only tax payer who feels their money was completely wasted on these devices, whose only value, I feel, was to make some contractor rich, and get some person re-elected by convincing the under-informed that they were "safe."

    1. Re:Meet you on the No Fly list! by SniperJoe · · Score: 1

      To further your argument, as another frequent flyer, you're absolutely right about the slowdown that the scanners present to passing through security. If you've ever noticed that when the line backs up, they'll open up the metal detectors again rather than forcing everyone through the millimeter wave scanners. That's hypocrisy in and of itself, as their actions demonstrate that there is negligible difference in security provided, even in their own minds! If you only force people to go through the scanners when it's convenient for you, that tells me that even you don't think they help. If you truly thought they were absolutely critical for security, you'd have additional lines ready to go rather than switching.

  21. It depends on weather they work by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Have these machines ever stopped an actual terrorist? What were the results when undercover security testers tried to smuggle simulated explosives? I am not sacrificing my liberty for security, but I can sacrifice my modesty for security, if that security is any good.

  22. Stop the scanners, please! by quantalrabbit · · Score: 1

    Hoping this issue goes viral so that they're flooded them with comments against AIT.

  23. Re:Try conducting a physical search for a weapon by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    It is pretty much 100% certain at this point that THz radiation can selectively activate genes ... it interacts with DNA. Whether there are carcinogenic effects is a bit contested, but the gene activation in and of itself is scary enough to wait a little fucking longer before we make all the airline passengers (except VIPs I'm sure) guinea pigs.

  24. Filibuster it by spectrokid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everybody here should enter the same comment: "I would like an independent body to calculate the cost vs. saved lives and compare it to other possible investments like traffic safety, cancer research, or promoting healthier lifestyles to school children."

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  25. Yeah, we are accepting comments by Starfleet+Command · · Score: 1

    We will probably tell you to bugger off afterwards, but we are accepting comments..

  26. Re:Let's start a petition to end the TSA altogethe by Grashnak · · Score: 1

    So your theory is that people should be allowed to bypass security as long as they claim to have a reason to do so? Or that the minimum wage people working these devices should have a complete understanding of their interaction with every other piece of technology on earth?

    Clearly a near-tragic mistake was made, but your over-the-top rage is ridiculous.

    How about this - if you depend upon a piece of technology to keep you alive, YOU should never subject it to anything that YOU don't know is safe. That's at least as reasonable as your attack on the "retard".

    --
    Life needs more saving throws.
  27. Back scatter X-ray is NOT being phased out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Only the machines from Rapiscan are being phased out. It's not because of safety, rather it's because Rapiscan can't deliver software to remove human-in-the-loop (eg removing the need for a human to look at you naked).

    They've awarded additional contracts to both Smiths (makers of the garbage "puffer" machines) and AESi (in addition to the current millimeter wave machines from Level3). I believe that AESi's devices are back scatter x-ray.

  28. Re:Try conducting a physical search for a weapon by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    When another bomb goes off, you will all be asking why didn't the TSA do something about it.

    I didn't do any such thing on 9/11, and I certainly wouldn't now. Just because many people seem to be cowards who are afraid of the terrorist bogeyman and don't mind sacrificing everyone's rights just so they can feel safe doesn't mean I'm the same way.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  29. Re:Try conducting a physical search for a weapon by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    My position is that the TSA should be destroyed outright.

    Another thing you guys keep complaining about is the TSA allowing short knives

    No, I don't. When you speak like this, I'm not even sure who you're arguing with.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  30. stupid idea for dealing with a stupid idea by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I am, and always have been, completely opposed to the existence of the TSA and their Security Theatre.
    However, I'm equally opposed to the concept that public input to what should be a scientific decision (assuming you include demographic studies and threat assessment as potentially scientific) is a good idea at all. You can't vote on reality, and the overwhelming majority of people are nto qualified to make an educated assessment of nearly any issue. It's like asking your neurosurgeon to attend a design review for your Saturn V rocket engine. The only thing a public comments collection can do is provide a 'vote' on whether people want to be bodyscanned (or TSA-ed at all). And if that's the intent, then why not just let people decide at the point of entry to the aircraft in the first place?

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    1. Re:stupid idea for dealing with a stupid idea by SniperJoe · · Score: 1

      At this point, based on the TSA's actions in implementing this whole scheme, the public comment may be the most informed and knowledgeable input in the entire process!

  31. Perception is everything by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    They don't want your comments, they want you to think they want your comments. To which they'll respond that the public demanded more awesome scanners.

    Only slashdot would post such an incredibly naive headline. Must be timothy ... yep, scroll back to the top and see its slashdots' #1 moron.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  32. I'm confused by LordNimon · · Score: 1

    The TSA is now in the public comment stage of its project to roll out Advanced Imaging Technology scanners. The TSA wants your feedback as to whether or not this project should be continued or cancelled.

    If we convince the TSA to cancel the project, does that mean that the TSA will keep the x-ray machines, and not replace them with millimeter-wave systems? That's actually a bad thing. Given a choice, I would prefer the millimeter-wave scanners over an x-ray scanner.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  33. Re:Ask Slashdot ... what to think by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    And while I hear what you're saying, if you disagree with the groupthink at this point, it does make you a moron. This is one of the rare places where the standard slashdot ignorance that normally gets it so incredibly wrong is actually right.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  34. Re:Website doesn't work on lynx! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    And we care less about you and your ignorant vote than some random nut job living in a cabin in the middle of the woods.

    If you're too stupid to use a website, your thoughts and votes are not wanted in this situation. You clearly can't cope with the world around you in general if posting on slashdot is a proper response to a website not working in lynx. It shows you're too stupid to recognize the difference a tool designed to be used as a backup in a pinch and one thats actually meant to be used everyday.

    Your comment being a shitty joke or not, it just demonstrates that you shouldn't be allowed to use the internet due to insufficient IQ.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  35. Re:Let's start a petition to end the TSA altogethe by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    It did nothing to the pump, it overloaded the sensor.

    You're right, they shouldn't have scanned it, but their purpose is to find odd devices that might be bombs and when in doubt they are protecting everyone in the airport/air system, not one girl. They did the right thing as far as protocol was concerned, it would only be wrong if they were working under the impression that x-ray scanners are a waste of time ... which presumably TSA employees themselves are not evil people in general, so probably just misinformed.

    Its more her fault than theirs.

    Trusting your life to a single human designed system without any backup? That makes you pretty fucking stupid, more so than the TSA agent following the rules of his job. Of course, it really came no where near ever being any sort of threat to her life, but if we're going to pretend she nearly died then lets put the pretend blame where it belongs. And lets face it, you know nothing of what its like living as a diabetic or you wouldn't be sounding so silly.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  36. Re:Try conducting a physical search for a weapon by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Seriously listening to you guys talk about the TSA is like watching the episode of the simpsons where they institute the anti-bear patroll.

    You realize the TSA *is* the bear patrol?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  37. Re:TSA protects "important" people, not passengers by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    no, the tsa is really about making some well connected people money selling scanners and other services.

  38. No They Don't by mlookaba · · Score: 1

    The TSA wants your feedback as to whether or not this project should be continued or cancelled.

    No they don't.

    They were required to set up the public hearing by some law or administrator demanding that they do so. They'll politely pretend to listen, and then ignore the result and do whatever they wanted to in the first place.

  39. Re:Try conducting a physical search for a weapon by Arker · · Score: 1

    "When another bomb goes off, you will all be asking why didn't the TSA do something about it."

    The next time there is a bomb killing air travelers, I expect I will be asking why the TSA forced the victims to form up in a tight group outside the security cordon and thus gave the bomber such an easy way target.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  40. A Simple Solution Here by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    T.S.A. should stand by its word and get body scanned everyday; also, they should let some psycodic moron put their hands on their reproductive areas and comment about their body shape out loud in front a group of strangers. Of course if this were to happen lets say in a public area, all I would have to do is file a criminal complaint. it means going to the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Law, but hay; the T.S.A. has deep pockets.

    Movie idea, "Women walks up to the TSA offical, dressed in a TSA uniform. Has all the credentials that TSA types have. BOOOOOM". Want to know the ending, buy the rights. - apologies to OMC

  41. Dude, please register with the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude, please register with the FBI before you go completely batshit crazy and start killing people and blowing shit up.