Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Police Urge ISPs To Block Tor

hypnosec writes "Authorities in Japan are presumably worried about their inability to tackle cybercrime and, in a bid to stem one of the sources of anonymous traffic, the National Police Agency (NPA) is asking ISPs to block Tor. The recommendation comes from the special panel formed by the NPA after a hacker going by the name Demon Killer was found to regularly use Tor to anonymize his online activities, like posting of death threats on public message boards."

48 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Sure, go ahead. by juliohm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If only that was enough to stop illegal activities....

    --
    Julio Henrique Morimoto juliohm@gmail.com
    1. Re:Sure, go ahead. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Informative

      TOR is not the problem... Well, not the problem the Japanese police claim.

      It IS a problem for the corporate/government control of information. It probably bothers TEPCO greatly, that this is out there - and damned near impossible to filter.

      Cybercrime. The great Emmanuel Goldstein, needed to keep in place, proles and party members alike.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Sure, go ahead. by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Two problems here.

      (1) The article has nothing to do with Fukushima or TEPCO. It's about someone who sent anonymous death threats.

      (2) Sherman and Mangano, the authors of the paper you linked to an article about, are kooks. Just google on their names together, and you'll find plenty of info discrediting their claims, e.g.: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/12/20/researchers-trumpet-another-flawed-fukushima-death-study/

      (3) The Open Journal of Pediatrics appears to be one of the many open-access journals these days that have no standards for publication. See http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html for more about these journals. I support the concept of open-access journals, but many of them are junk journals.

      (4) Sherman and Mangano's junk science didn't get blocked by evil governments or evil corporations. They put it on the internet and nobody interfered with them.

    3. Re:Sure, go ahead. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just as an informative point, the headline on the TEPCO link is a gross mis-statement of the actual facts.

      One third of US born west coast babies are NOT suffering from hyperthyroidism.

      What happened is the RATE of hyperthyroidism, which is quite low, increased by 28% for a couple of months, and to a level 16% higher than normal for a period of 9 months.

      That corresponds to about 40 cases in 600,000 births. Still a problem but about 1/5,000th of what the headline claims.

    4. Re:Sure, go ahead. by gmanterry · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If only that was enough to stop illegal activities....

      That's the problem. The Lawmakers seem to feel that passing laws will accomplish what they want. They never seem to take into account that criminals, who by definition, are 'law breakers' will ignore laws. Therefore the laws they create only really effect law abiding citizens. I swear that the Senators (American House of Lords) believe they are so powerful that they could pass a law to outlaw tornadoes and expect that tornadoes would disappear as soon as the President signed it into law. For instance, correct me if I'm wrong, I believe it is already illegal to kill people with bombs made from pressure cookers. However I expect Congress to pass a law either outlawing pressure cookers or requiring that all people who purchase pressure cookers first pass a background check. Such is the state of knee jerk legislation in the U.S.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    5. Re:Sure, go ahead. by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two problems here.

      (1) The article has nothing to do with Fukushima or TEPCO. It's about someone who sent anonymous death threats.

      While the rest of your comments may or may not be true; The reason and the excuse can be mutually exclusive.

    6. Re:Sure, go ahead. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (1) The article has nothing to do with Fukushima or TEPCO. It's about someone who sent anonymous death threats.

      Death threats are already illegal.

      So no, it's not "about death threats". Someone can write a death threat on a piece of paper and send it in the mail, but paper, pen and mail are all still legal.

      (4) Sherman and Mangano's junk science didn't get blocked by evil governments or evil corporations. They put it on the internet and nobody interfered with them.

      Still has nothing to do with Tor.

      Blocking Tor is not going to stop death threats, nor will it stop junk science. Blocking Tor is about controlling the free flow of private information. Period.

      Yes, this is about protecting the elites. Blocking Tor is certainly not about keeping us safe, because blacking Tor does nothing to make any of us safer from threats that only exist because of Tor.

      Sometimes, figuring out right and wrong are really just about asking yourself: "Who benefits?"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Sure, go ahead. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Should we just outlaw politics?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Sure, go ahead. by lightknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. I'm just going to do the usual (I'm in a hurry):

      1.) This assumes that there are no legitimate usages of Tor. Nice to see Western countries are still holding the torch for freedom, liberty, and all that jazz; the people in various countries with tighter freedom of speech laws thank you for making it easier for their Thought Police to track them down and kill them.

      2.) Common carrier / safe harbor clauses / legality fun. Start blocking traffic...legal issues. Plus your customers aren't paying you to monitor their shit, they're paying you to provide a pipe. If you're watching their data, reading their emails, taking note of the websites they're visiting...well, that's a new level of creepy. And unwelcome.

      3.) Will not stop / deter illegal activities and / or Tor. Give it a rest guys...you've been fighting and losing non-stop for years. ISPs start blocking Tor, Tor implements some slight changes, hey look, Tor is back! You've solved nothing. And with or without Tor, illegal stuff is going to go on...and the vast majority of it is being done without Tor. The reality is that this focus on Tor is simply a diversion, a chance to talk about something 'safe,' because you can't do anything about the stuff that actually needs changing.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    9. Re:Sure, go ahead. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Blocking Tor would, in principle, make it easier to track people who send death threats, so that the existing law can be applied.

      And if you kept people in their homes, street crime would plummet.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Sure, go ahead. by Reschekle · · Score: 4, Informative

      They caught the guy who sent them so I'm not sure why Tor needs to be blocked.

    11. Re:Sure, go ahead. by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What part of "anonymous death threats" didn't you understand? Oh, right. Anonymous.

      Death threats being illegal doesn't help if you can't track who sent them. Blocking Tor would, in principle, make it easier to track people who send death threats, so that the existing law can be applied.

      And again. Death threats through the mail are anonymous. Since they're in an envelope in which source information is completely optional.

      So, while you're at it, ban envelopes. Everyone uses postcards.

      Not that I approve of blocking it, but you seem to have completely missed the point.

      Not that I approve of your last-moment and half-hearted disavowal of your obvious support for blocking TOR, but you seem to have completely missed the real point: outlawing encryption solves NO law enforcement problem but denies law-abiding citizens their rightful privacy.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  2. Freedom is a two edged sword... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yep... We want all people to be free. Unless we don't like them, then we have to know who they are. But if someone else we don't like does not like them, then THEY NEED TO BE FREE! Being a part of the ruling class would be so much easier if it were not for all these darned peasants...

    1. Re:Freedom is a two edged sword... by naff89 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe that's why single-edged swords are more popular in Japan.

    2. Re:Freedom is a two edged sword... by fredprado · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure you can. The correlation between freedom and responsibility exists only in your head. In a world where it is impossible to restrict the freedom of others, like a completely anonymous Internet, everybody would be completely free and nobody would be responsible for anything.

  3. Japan by tmosley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like Japan is now cruising down the road to a police state. Remember that in a police state, policies are implemented to make things easier on police. This means freedoms are crushed in favor of eliminating crime, real or imagined. You know, like shutting down the third most populous city while searching for a single person/evil terrorist.

    Absolutely disgusting.

    1. Re:Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really? Having lived here for over a decade, you could have fooled me. It's not much different to any other country, and the authorities are arguably less intrusive in many areas than they are in the U.S.

      But let's be honest, throwing around this kind of ridiculous bullshit hyperbole has always been a popular sport for self-appointed internet experts who have no fucking idea or experience of what they're talking about.

    2. Re:Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd rather risk a terrorist bombing than allow the TSA to exist (and that hypothetical depends on a reality where the TSA is actually effective, and it is most certainly not). You, however, do not value your freedoms and would rather sacrifice everything to save some amount of people; foolish indeed.

    3. Re:Japan by flayzernax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The funny thing is in most tyrannies people can say the same thing. You don't know what you've lost until you lose it or have it used against you or become one of the oppressed.

      This is the hardest concept to get across to people who say "this is no big deal" "I never was stopped from watching my official youtube video". Thats right you never were. But when you are because you happen to be one of those "other people" you read about.

      When your looking for a reliable source of journalism and that source gets shut down, bought out, shoved 25 pages back on google and replaced with shit. When you have to spend 20 hours researching something instead of 5 minutes to find real sources citing real incidents that matter. You will understand. Information is becoming MUCH harder to get without peeling through layers of government and corporate propaganda and advertisement. The next step is to make it even harder to go outside of regular plain web google.

      The saddest things is TOR is used for a lot of crap and very little good stuff, there still is better information outside of tor pertaining to real world events. So tor gets little love from the people that SHOULD be supporting it and all the attention of the people that hate it.

      Don't be all excited about loosing it before you had a chance to need it.

    4. Re:Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the other hand, they have an extremely low rate of violent crime, and the Japanese people seem to be satisfied with that.

      At least the ones who haven't thrown themselves onto one of Japan's many excellent train lines.

    5. Re:Japan by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

      You would be very wrong.

      Boston has the lowest rate of gun violence in the US at 3.6 / 100k each year.

      Since the population is about 600K, that's 22 per year.

      These people were killing at a rate of about 1 per day.

    6. Re:Japan by Alex+Belits · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The funny thing is in most tyrannies people can say the same thing. You don't know what you've lost until you lose it or have it used against you or become one of the oppressed.

      It's the same in all countries. There are no "tyrannies" and "free countries", and never were. For most of the world/history (except some egregious things like Nazi and Somalia) it's just propaganda you grew up with vs. propaganda someone else grew up with. You just believe that whatever your own government considers unacceptable is something that no one would ever want to do.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    7. Re:Japan by yet+another+SanTiago · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, the referred wikipedia article says a different story:

      In murder, U.S. police arrested 19,000 people for 26,000 murders, in which 75% were prosecuted and courts convicted 12,000 people. In Japan, 1,800 people were arrested for 1,300 murders, but prosecutors tried only 43%. Had the allegation that Japanese prosecutors use weak evidence mostly based on (forced) confessions to achieve convictions been true, the larger proportion of arrests would have resulted in prosecutions and eventual conviction. But the opposite is true. In fact, the data indicates that Japanese prosecutors bring charges only when the evidence is overwhelming and likelihood of conviction is near absolute, which gives a greater incentive for the accused to confess and aim for a lighter sentence, which, in turn, results in a high rate for confession.

    8. Re:Japan by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really? Having lived here for over a decade, you could have fooled me.

      True it's not really a police state, though it does have exceptionally limited freedoms. It also doesn't help that the justice system is so inherently broken to the point that they started appointing lay judges for criminal cases, because the sentences handed out were so weak compared to the crimes committed. While it's not bad per-se, as compared to oh...the UK for instance, there are areas where what would pass in the west as a slap on the wrist will get you into those comfy 3x8' cells.

      And really jumping back to the topic at hand, it's not just TOR they're running afraid of but sneaker nets.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Japan by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The amount of money that was lost because of the lockdown could have fed all the starving people in the world for a week.

      But it wouldn't have. Just like my brussels sprouts when I was 5 wouldn't have fed starving children in China.

    10. Re:Japan by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which is why most of their cops don't even carry guns.

      I believe you may have confused Japan with the U.K. Cops I saw on the street in my months in Osaka routinely carried revolvers. Not that it matters; a police state has nothing to do with whether police carry firearms, it has to do with totalitarian government -- which, when the population has been disarmed, can function quite well even with low-level functionaries not carrying firearms.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    11. Re:Japan by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong, as another person said gun death rate in Boston is 22 per year.

      These people who were caught/shot were throwing yet more bombs at the authorities as they were being chased. They had a whole house full of them as well.
      Do you think they stock piled them just for fun?

    12. Re:Japan by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think GP's point might have been that Google would be a valuable tool to a police state, or something like that. And, in fact, Google is resisting government's attempt to turn it into such a tool. Google cooperates with some government requests, and denies others. It seems they actually look at those requests, individually, trying to weed out overbearing bullshit - unlike some other corporations that honor every request, no matter how plainly overbearing.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  4. Thank you by Weezul · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thank you for reminding us about TEPCO as well as posting that specific link.

    After Fukushima, the Japanese government lied about the radiation until a hacker space started building GPS radiation sensor devices. They gave an excellent talk from 29c3 :
    Safecast: DIY and citizen-sensing of radiation [29c3]

    Did I mention they used Open Street Map? Open Street Map rocks! It's basically the wikipedia of maps, blows away google maps.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Thank you by Bearhouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not so fast; I contribute to Open Street Maps because I like the idea, but where I live, for the moment, it still sucks. Does for a lot of Europe, in fact.
      Nowhere near as complete and useful as Google maps, and of course no 'Street View'.
      Still, if we all contribute, one day it will be better...

  5. idiotic by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can't "block tor." It's just 100% encrypted SSL web traffic. You'd have to block all SSL web traffic. Good luck with that.

    1. Re:idiotic by cultiv8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can block known exit nodes.

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    2. Re:idiotic by utkonos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They can still block any traffic from the exit nodes. All the ISPs in Japan can null route all traffic from Tor exit node IP addresses. The list of addresses is published by Tor so people can do just this (it's not meant for the ISP level, rather, they publish it so people can block Tor from message boards and such). This would prevent all Tor traffic from entering Japan's networks directly

      Using a proxy immediately after Tor would be the only solution to this, but even this could be blocked since lists of public open proxies are maintained in a number of locations such as XRoxy.

  6. Iran and Syria Cannot Stop Tor by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Informative

    If violent and repressive regimes, willing to kill without trial or mercy, cannot stop Tor then how much less will a western style constitution democracy be able to stop it? Unless the Japanese are prepared to cut off all electronic communications with the outside world, which would be tantamount to economic suicide, they will fail. Blocking known relay nodes will slow Tor down, it won't stop it because people will still be able to use bridges to get onto the network.

    1. Re:Iran and Syria Cannot Stop Tor by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Informative

      The TOR network is designed to make two things very difficult: tracking packets back to their source and shutting down the network itself. In addition to the well known relay nodes there's an ever changing list of bridge nodes, private operators who forward traffic to and from the well know relay nodes. It's these bridge nodes especially that make TOR difficult to stop completely. Even the Chinese, with their great firewall, haven't been able to stamp it out completely because it's a constant game of whack-a-mole with the bridge nodes on dynamic IPs.

    2. Re:Iran and Syria Cannot Stop Tor by Koutarou · · Score: 3, Informative

      FLET's is not filtered at NTT's level. It all gets passed off to the individual ISPs who have to handle transit and filtering themselves.

      au Hikari is a different situation.

      Disclaimer: I work for a japanese ISP.

  7. a freedom that's also a problem by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the 18th century, privacy was a pretty straightforward thing. That's why, in the 18th-century US, it was straightforward to write the 4th amendment. As a result, the government can't open my snail mail without a warrant, and can't come into my house and search it without a warrant.

    The technological reality is very different in the 21st century. I support individuals' rights to use strong crypto and to control their own computer hardware and software. But it's undeniable that these rights carry collateral damage.

    In 2012, the University of Pittsburgh was basically shut down for several months by a series of 145 bomb threats that were sent by email, anonymized via Mixmaster. This is not a good outcome.

    If someone is using Tor to post death threats anonymously, that's not a good outcome.

    Despite these bad outcomes, I still support the individual freedoms that let them happen. But that doesn't mean that it's not a real problem. It's very much like gun violence in the US. I support the 2nd amendement, but I recognize that that comes at a cost.

    1. Re:a freedom that's also a problem by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > But it's undeniable that these rights carry collateral damage.

      In the 17th century, bad people could hide stolen stuff in houses, hide in houses, and send crime-oriented information by snail mail.

      The reason to forbid the government from peeking has nothing to do with legitimate crimes, nor misusing government power investigating legitimate crimes.

      The reason is to stop the slippery slope before it begins, when the government officials end up abusing power to maintain their power.

      That's why a lot of this Patriot Act stuff is disturbing -- it lacks even cursory oversight in hindsight. It could indeed be being misused to spy on political opponents. How would you know? You wouldn't, and that is the problem.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:a freedom that's also a problem by starcraftsicko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The technological reality is very different in the 21st century. I support individuals' rights to use strong crypto and to control their own computer hardware and software. But it's undeniable that these rights carry collateral damage.

      The approach of law enforcers in the 21st century is to assert that nothing a person might do with digital technologies is protected by the need for reasonable searches. We see this with dragnet monitoring of cellular networks, with casual roadside searches of personal electronics, with the FBI attaching a f***ing tracking device to a car and asserting that this should be allowed without oversight, and so much more.

      Law enforcers assert that theu need these powers to enforce the laws and to catch the law breakers... and they're right. Bad police behavior is simply more efficient. It allows the Bushes and the Obamas and Merkels (and Camerons and Blairs and Assads and Ahmadinejads too, but there's another place for that discussion.) to make more laws that would take more money to enforce reasonably and constitutionally. Since the money isn't there, the enforcers must get more efficient, which means rights and ethical behavior must go by the wayside.

      I've moved beyond which laws we need or don't need when considering civil rights. I firmly believe that every time Congress passes a law or Obama signs an order, no matter how well meaning, civil rights are violated. It's just like the kitten meme - http://static.portent.com/images/2007/08/God-kills-kitten.png . This applies to state legislatures, governors, mayors, HOAs...

      If we ban or regulate or protect less, our rights will be violated less. Think about it. Think of the children. Think of... the kittens. lol

  8. Freedom is not a free-for-all ... by MacTO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not sure what kids are learning these days, but freedom and responsibility went hand-in-hand when I grew up. That is to say, you have freedom but you have to be responsible in your actions and take responsibility for your actions. Unfortunately, anonymity is frequently used to "exercise freedoms" while avoiding responsibility for your actions. I stuck exercise freedoms in quotes because some people are using that as an excuse to commit crimes or impinge upon the freedoms of others.

    Of course I realise that equating crime to anonymity is only sometimes true. I also realise that anonymity is necessary in a free society. On the other hand, I do see why law enforcement agencies are deeply concerned by anonymity and encryption. I understand why judicial systems and governments have similar concerns. I understand why many ordinary citizens are concerned.

    1. Re:Freedom is not a free-for-all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, I do see why law enforcement agencies are deeply concerned by anonymity and encryption. I understand why judicial systems and governments have similar concerns.

      Yes, I too understand why they have these concerns. But the propositions they make because of these concerns are ridiculous!

      To use an IMO appropriate analogy: I understand why police have concerns about criminals using gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints -- but I think we'd all agree it was ridiculous for police to try to dissuade stores from selling gloves!

  9. Re:Japan, a new Iran ? by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, so is the US, UK and every other country.

    Not US, nor UK, nor most other countries, TOR are not officially blocked, at the ISP level

    At least, not yet

    Maybe not blocked, but people are being arrested or sued for what others do via their exit node. "Yeah, we know you didn't do it, but it came from your house. Guilty."

  10. Re:Japan, a new Iran ? by elashish14 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, but Japan makes the US copyright industry happy, so they're not terrists.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  11. Re:Slashdot blocks TOR by green1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The good thing about TOR is that anyone can use it, and your traffic can come from the same node as someone else, so you can't identify people based on IP
    The bad thing about TOR is that anyone can use it, and your traffic can come from the same node as someone else, so when someone else does something stupid, you pay the price of the ban...

    Of course it's interesting that you see "BANNED" where as my work IP just get's an error saying that I'm "not allowed to use this resource" when I try to post a comment... I had always figured that what I saw at work was Slashdot's ban method, apparently it's something completely different.

  12. pay attention, this will happen here by davydagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pay attention, right now the US tollerates tor because its used by dissidents in countries we don't like. If it wasn't for western intellegence agencies. Europe would have banned TOR a long time ago.

    In fact, if it wasn't for those agencies, the US would have shut down exit nodes, by simply arresting the owners for whatever illegal content poured through them.

    It doesn't take much for press/mainstream media to start attacking the internet and everyone on it, and especially the unmonied, unwashed, unconnected 99%

    If you think I am exageraterating.

    This is the TOR project's official blog:
    https://blog.torproject.org/

    some excerpts:
    https://blog.torproject.org/blog/trip-report-tor-trainings-dutch-and-belgian-police
    "In January I did Tor talks for the Dutch regional police, the Dutch national police, and the Belgian national police. Jake and I also did a brief inspirational talk at Bits of Freedom, as well as the closing keynote for the Dutch National Cyber Security Centre's yearly conference.

    You may recall that one of my side hobbies lately has been teaching law enforcement about Tor â€" see my previous entries about teaching the FBI about Tor in 2012 and visiting the Stuttgart detectives in 2008 back when we were discussing data retention in Germany. Before this blog started I also did several Tor talks for the US DoJ, and even one for the Norwegian Kripos."

    "One regional Dutch police woman told us that they know how to check if it's a Tor exit IP, but sometimes they do the raid anyway "to discourage people from helping Tor.""

    Its the only reason its not banned, and all users rounded up and thrown in jail on suspicion of hacking, child porn, and terrorism, or whatever other bad shit ever happened to float out one exit node.

  13. Re:Japan, a new Iran ? by silviuc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "How do they know they didn't do it?"

    It's the point of "innocent until proven guilty". The burden of providing proof of guilt rests on those that accuse not the ones that defend themselves against accusations.

  14. Re:Japan, a new Iran ? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "innocent until proven guilty" is replaced by the "content industry" with "guilty even if proved innocent". For quite some time already.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  15. Re:Demon Killer Hacker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I live in Japan. There's 3 hardware stores within 5 kilometers of me. All of them carry axes. Of multiple varieties. You're full of bullshit.