Is Anonymous Going Mainstream Following Website Funding?
DavidGilbert99 writes "For a completely online movement, the lack of an official Anonymous website is certainly strange. The reason, according to Anonymous itself is down to the lack of a hierarchical structure. However, one Anonymous-linked group could be about to change all that, having succeeded in securing $55,000 in funding for a website. Is this the beginning of Anonymous going mainstream? From the article: 'The @YourAnonNews (YAN) Twitter account has over one million followers and has leveraged its popularity to successfully raise over $55,000 (£34,000) through a crowd-funding campaign on the Indiegogo website.
The funding drive was established to allow those behind the YAN account to set up a website of its own which will allow it "to collect breaking reports and blog postings from the best independent reporters online."'"
The idea of an official Anonymous anything is absurd.
And for an unofficial Anonymous site, there's 4chan.
... it just happens to have other people's content on it sometimes.
The cybercrime division of the FBI is the very first subscriber, remarkably enough.
This is probably the most stupid thing I've ever seen in my life. And I used to go to church...
Do you really think that posting anonymously online reaches the standard of 'probable cause,' or even 'reasonable suspicion'? Because that's what they're going to need if they're going to prosecute them (in the US, Australia might have different standards).
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
An Anonymous website...the whole point is there can be no single website. This project is a bunch of posers, and it will be DoSed as soon as it goes up. In any case, 4chan is about as close to an Anonymous web site as is wanted, needed, or possible.
Anonymous went mainstream circa 2007. Anyone thinking anything different has no understanding of what is actually going on.
RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
You don't need "probable cause" or even evidence, in "terrorism" cases, apparently.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Do you really think that posting anonymously online reaches the standard of 'probable cause,' or even 'reasonable suspicion'?
Yes.. What makes you think that it doesn't? We now have, and probably always did have, a 'public safety exception' to all constitutional law. Our facade of 'freedom' is really quite flimsy and crumbling fast.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
In a similar case somebody ran of with the server and donations:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Why_We_Protest_Forums#11.2F29.2F08_The_Day_Enturb_Stood_Still
Anyone who thinks that this represents or is backed by the core activists who are part of the collective is, well.. a fool parted with their money.
It would paint a massive bulls-eye target on anyone associated with it, pretty much saying "here I am, come get me!".
-SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
Someone on 4chan said it best: "Anyone claiming to represent anon is not anon."
The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
I believe you just posted the first comment ever which was ever voted to +5 insightful, whose only contribution to the discussion is a quote from "someone on 4chan".
You win the Internet for today.
sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});