Slashdot Mirror


Nearest Alien Planet Gets New Name

SchrodingerZ writes "The nearest planet outside our solar system has recently been named Albertus Alauda. Originally named Alpha Centauri Bb, the planet is the closest known planet not orbiting the Sun, being a mere 4.3 light years away. The name comes from Jay Lark, who won the naming contest held by Uwingu starting last month and ending on April 22. Lark remarks that the name comes from the Latin name of his late grandfather, stating, "My grandfather passed away after a lengthy and valiant battle with cancer; his name in Latin means noble or bright and to praise or extol." The competition for naming the planet came from Uwing, a company which used the buying of name proposals and votes to fund grants for future space exploration ventures. Albertus Alauda won the competition with 751 votes, followed by Rakhat with 684 votes, and Caleo, with 622 votes."

185 comments

  1. Points at Nearest Alien Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hideki!

    1. Re:Points at Nearest Alien Planet by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      No Chii, that's the planet Albertus Alauda

    2. Re:Points at Nearest Alien Planet by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, this actually feels on-topic for once.

      Because Chii has as much authority to name a planet as this "Uwing" company does.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  2. Sid Meier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only known planet in Alpha Centauri should naturally have been named "Sid Meier". Any other name will be forgotten in no time by most people.

    1. Re:Sid Meier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Who the fuck is Sid Meier?

    2. Re:Sid Meier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's called, "The Google", Grandpa. Learn it, love it, use it.

    3. Re:Sid Meier by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sid Meier was one of the founding members of Pink Floyd, according to Bing.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Sid Meier by Gertlex · · Score: 1

      Or more tastefully, Chiron, as it is called in Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri, if I recall correctly.

      Also you can still play SMAC! GOG link

    5. Re:Sid Meier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i really don't give a crap what we call it today. by the time one of us gets there, we'll be calling it something else...and the people that get there will call it something else entirely.

    6. Re:Sid Meier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bing

      You disgust me.

    7. Re:Sid Meier by keytoe · · Score: 1

      It's odd to find this here just two days after I discovered that for the low, low price of $5.99 GOG would allow me to once again effortlessly lose track of an entire weekend. I had forgotten how great that game was.

    8. Re:Sid Meier by Gertlex · · Score: 1

      That was myself about 3 weekends ago... though I've never lost my copy of the original CDs. Cheers.

    9. Re:Sid Meier by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Sid Meier is 59 years old. He's old enough to BE a Grandpa!

    10. Re:Sid Meier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sid Meier you say?

      "Following the light of the sun, we left the Old World." - Christopher Columbus

      (Yes, you read it in the narrator's voice)

    11. Re:Sid Meier by AaronLS · · Score: 1

      Highly recommend Master of Orion 2 from GOG if you liked that game.

    12. Re:Sid Meier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lies. Bing finds Sid Meier just fine and does not conflate him with Syd Barrett.

  3. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not sure what to be more surprised about, that 751 suckers paid money to vote on a meaningless name competition, or that slashdot got duped into publishing it as if anyone other than Uwing will actually use the name.

    This is just another variant on those "name a star after your mom" scams.

    1. Re:Amazing by Smallpond · · Score: 5, Informative

      The IAU called it a scam and space.com called it a scam. So its a scam.

    2. Re:Amazing by Cow+Jones · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod this man up.

      From the space.com article, here's what Uwingu's CEO had to say...

      "They basically said we're conducting a scam, and nothing could be further from the truth," [...] "They basically put us out of business, and they've ruined our reputation."

      "To claim what they claimed — that we're somehow misrepresenting that these were IAU names — has just about put us out of business," Stern told SPACE.com. "It's unbelievable."

      "They've spent 18 years with no forward movement — ask planet hunter extraordinaire [and Uwingu adviser] Geoff Marcy," Stern said. "Then somebody else comes along and does something harmless, fun and engaging, and now they're slandering us."

      Oh cry me a river...

      CJ

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    3. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's that easy why not have a planet naming contest here? I hereby name this exoplanet "Taco's World."

    4. Re:Amazing by meerling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Correct.
      Anybody can claim to be running a contest to name anything, legality not withstanding, however, only the body/organization that is internationally recognized as the valid naming registrar can actually place or change names. In this case, it's the IAU (International Astronomical Union).
      Uwing claims they didn't say they were sanctioned to do so by IAU, but then again, they didn't say they weren't, and most people will assume that you had obtained permission to do something you are taking money for unless you say otherwise. To not point out that it is an unofficial name choosing, is the first sign of a scam.

      Another thing, if you see anyone wanting money for ANYTHING not within the confines of the Earths Troposphere, it's about 99.999% probably it's a scam. You won't get any property, rights, or official naming of anything. There are international treaties that cover a lot of this stuff, and one of the first rules in that whole thing is if you don't have people their, you definitely have no rights to sell it, period. (Even if you do have people there, you still have lots of limits on what you can do.)

      By the way, horrible name choice in my opinion. Nice to honor your grandfather, but still, that name sucks.

    5. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Space.com did not call it a scam. They quoted Uwingu expressing concern that IAU called it a scam.
      You're as bad as CNN, taking a perfectly adequate report, and adding false crap to it to make it "more true".

    6. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and one of the first rules in that whole thing is if you don't have people their, you definitely have no rights to sell it, period. (Even if you do have people there, you still have lots of limits on what you can do.)

      To be exact, the treaty says you don't own it at all even if you live there.

    7. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Because they only way to say what you mean is to say it explicitly.

    8. Re:Amazing by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "The IAU called it a scam"

      But then they also called Pluto not-a-planet

      I propose that the first human(s) to land on it, or at least orbit it, get to name it.

      Unless it is inhabited already, in which case they get to name it.

      did anybody asl Peter Jurasik and Stephen Furst ?

    9. Re:Amazing by simonbp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To quite honest, and speaking as a working professional astronomer, the IAU itself is a bit of scam. It has no actual authority, no actual acountability, and no real sway on science. It's more a bunch of astronomers who should have been lawyers and who occasionally meet and pretend they are important. Oh and they charge an arm and leg for membership, which is why the vast majority of astronomers are not members.

      In reality astronomy doesn't really need an "international authority". The sky is the sky and observations are almost always reproducible. If someone doesn't believe you, they can go and observe it themselves. That's called the scientific method. It does not need nor is enhanced by lawyers-cum-astronomers.

    10. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a standards-setting body. Without it, or something like it, every astronomical body would have a half-dozen regionally-variable names, and international space science would be hampered by the misunderstandings and confusion.

    11. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a lot like the W3C.

    12. Re:Amazing by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      the IAU are like taxonomists, they are only noticed when they fail, and there is a dispute or confusion over a name ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    13. Re:Amazing by jfanning · · Score: 1

      Before joining in the beating maybe you should actually check who is involved. I think these people know the issues about the naming of astronomical bodies...

      Dr. Alan Stern. Alan is an aerospace consultant and an Associate Vice President at the Southwest Research Institute, a large non-profit R&D institution with over 3400 employees, and operates a successful private aerospace consulting practice. Formerly, he directed all science program and missions at NASA.

    14. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, but how do you know they don't have people there. For example, I am selling property on the moon and I do have a bunch of pretty evil space mercenaries with phaser canons stationed on the dark side of the moon, so my certificates ARE legitimate!

    15. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really you just need to bold the word 'formerly'.

    16. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't charge anything. I have been an IAU member for a decade and never paid a cent. Look at the website too. Maybe you are thinking of the AAS?

    17. Re:Amazing by Kentari · · Score: 1

      Aerospace consultant? Did the shipbuilders also get to name the discoveries of explorers? But I highly doubt he was even involved in building the HARPS instrument or the ESO 3.6m Telescope. So it would be like some random ship builder in England naming Hispaniola "Some bloke's passed away granddad's place" after doing a contest about it and expect it to be accepted. What these Uwingu guys are doing is disrespectful for the discoverers, the IAU and the granddad. I wouldn't like it if people attached my name to a celestial body illegitimately.

    18. Re:Amazing by simonbp · · Score: 1

      They do already have regionally variable names, as English names rarely translate properly. I'm reminded of this every time a French college refers to Pluton.

      The true gatekeepers of standards in science are the journal editorial boards. The standards they set are what everyone has to follow, not what some third-party "international authority" says.

    19. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of that matters. What matters is that this is not a formal, agreed upon name, but they represented their contest as being an official name.
      Just because you know what's going on doesn't mean it's not a scam.

    20. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the displeasure of dealing with Stern. I will grant that he is a top-notch scientist, but he also is a grade-A douche and loves to play favorites. He got ousted in 2008 because his cuts would've basically ended the Mars program and he had made too many enemies already. That Stern advises this outfit is mark against them, in my book at least.

    21. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The standards they set are what everyone has to follow, not what some third-party "international authority" says.

      Except when they designate a third party as the standard maker, especially when several of them all designate the same third party.

      And I don't think I've ever remembered bumping into another astronomer that thought naming and designations changed the results of science or conflicted with what can be seen in the sky. Of course that isn't meant to impact the science; the whole point is to affect the communication of science as a mere convenience. It is rather nice to refer to a group or category and not have to define it every time it gets used if there is a formal definition somewhere.

      And there are no fees or dues of individual members of the IAU by the way. The reason more astronomers are not in it, at least in the US, is because of the difficulty of getting appointments via the National Academy of Sciences.

    22. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shall continue to call it Alpha Centauri B-flat.

    23. Re:Amazing by Teancum · · Score: 1

      This is no different than people who sell parcels of land on the Moon or Mars, or name stars with a "Star Registry registered with the U.S. Copyright Office" (aka they put the book together and "registered" a "copyright" on the list of names with the Library of Congress... something that costs about $50 and doesn't mean a damn thing other than you can't publish those names elsewhere without permission).

      I should note there are geographical naming boards like the IAU who work with terrestrial landmarks as well. For the most part, you really can't "name" random mountain peaks or even one inch squares in your back yard without quite a bit of legal hassle and in most cases going through either a legislative body of some sort (like the U.S. Congress, a state legislature, or even a municipal council) or somebody appointed by those legislative bodies to act in their behalf to administer such geographical names.

      For the USA, the current agency to decide the name of geographic features is the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. This agency also coordinates its activities with other similar agencies operated by other members of the United Nations, and it should be pointed out that money being paid is not a consideration for if the name sticks or not. There are even then some restrictions, such as you can't give names to things in wilderness areas, and generally names must be of good taste as well (as determined by the board).

    24. Re:Amazing by Teancum · · Score: 1

      and one of the first rules in that whole thing is if you don't have people their, you definitely have no rights to sell it, period. (Even if you do have people there, you still have lots of limits on what you can do.)

      To be exact, the treaty says you don't own it at all even if you live there.

      If you are talking about the Outer Space Treaty, all it says is that it can't be claimed by a sovereign entity (actually, just the signature countries of the treaty) for national appropriation or territorial claim. Real estate can be claimed by private individuals though.... or at least that is real murky if anybody can actually claim extra-terrestrial real estate. Then again, ownership at the point of a gun is likely going to be recognized regardless of whatever some stupid treaty may or may not claim.

  4. Authority... by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, that fine.

    But I name that planet Bob. And seeing that have just as much authority to name extraterestial bodies as this company that isn't even important enough to have a wikipedia article.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Authority... by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 2

      No, sorry matey, my authority outranks yours, as I have 3 ex-wives.
      I hereby name this planet: Eric

      --
      If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    2. Re:Authority... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have have it from at least three sources that you are always wrong.

    3. Re:Authority... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you're having it with one of the sources right now.

    4. Re:Authority... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      But I name that planet Bob...seeing that I have just as much authority to name...

      Just to tick you off, I'm going to rename it "Bob" spelled backwards! Take that!

    5. Re:Authority... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet that at least 1000 people would consider the naming company to have more authority than you. If for no other reason than the fact that they paid money to that company.

      However, given that there would be 1000 of them, to one of you, I don't think that you can actually claim to have more authority.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    6. Re:Authority... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      But I name that planet Bob...seeing that I have just as much authority to name...

      Just to tick you off, I'm going to rename it "Bob" spelled backwards! Take that!

      "boB" ... has a nice look to it ..

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    7. Re:Authority... by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      The owls are not what they seem.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    8. Re:Authority... by dwye · · Score: 1

      e. e. cummings would second that.

    9. Re:Authority... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      while using dBASE III+

  5. This is like those selling names for stars by jmauro · · Score: 4, Informative

    You get a nice certificate and nothing else. The IAU hasn't even started the process to create the procedure to name exoplanets.

    1. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Relevant link: The Fullness of Time

    2. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The IAU hasn't even started the process to create the procedure to name exoplanets [iau.org].

      Which means nothing.

      Popular names are rooted in non-scientific language. You know, that thing that Slashdotters hate which doesn't play by the rules, but plays by rule of majority; where hacker means evildoer and ATM Machine isn't redundant.

      Words mean whatever the majority of people say they mean. In a similar vein, popular names are whatever the majority of people say they are. If a billion or two people started calling the sun Bob, we'd be checking the news to what time tomorrow's Bobrise and Bobset are.

    3. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      The IAU hasn't even started the process to create the procedure to name exoplanets.

      Oh Oh Oh !
      I got one!

      First person on the planet gets to name it

    4. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by tftp · · Score: 1

      First person on the planet gets to name it

      What is the chance that an international committee of 100 professional bureaucrats will voluntarily cede their self-assigned right to name planets to some sort of intrepid Captain Lone Starr and his mawg?

    5. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's pronounced suh-ZAHN.

    6. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I can't see a two word grandpa name being very popular. I'd rather call it Chiron.

    7. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Fine, the ship's computer of the first IAU survey ship to arrive in-system gets to assign it a name from the next entry on its IAU approved names list. Better?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    8. Re:This is like those selling names for stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but just as some committee can't have complete control over popular usage of a name, do you expect some small company to instead be able to enforce rules on popular names?

      And practically speaking, how often do people use slang/popular names for something like an exoplanet versus just reading about it in a news piece that is derived from a research paper that is likely expected by the publishing journal to use IAU names?

  6. Total bullshit by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    The recognized standards body is the International Astronomical Union and their policy is:

    Exoplanets
    In 2009, the Organizing Committee of IAU Commission 53 Extrasolar Planets (WGESP) on exoplanets discussed the possibility of giving popular names to exoplanets in addition to their existing catalogue designation (for instance HD 85512 b). Although no consensus was reached, the majority was not in favour of this possibility at the time.

    However, considering the ever increasing interest of the general public in being involved in the discovery and understanding of the Universe, the IAU decided in 2013 to restart the discussion of the naming procedure for exoplanets and assess the need to have popular names as well. In 2013 the members of Commission 53 will be consulted in this respect and the result of this will be made public on this page.

    This is just a company click-baiting by holding naming contests, they have no official standing whatsoever. Is this more dice.com crap?

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Total bullshit by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 2

      If the IAU can't get off their collective asses and start doing their job properly, then they'll soon find themselves outvoted by the likes of Uwingu who are going to do it for them. The IAU only has the position it has because they did a good job of gaining consensus until recently with the whole Pluto fiasco. And if you don't think that was a fiasco, then you don't know enough about it. If they screw up exoplanet naming, then people are going to start looking to someone else or just ignore the IAU. Nobody wants that, so perhaps the IAU should stop acting like entitled pricks and do their damn job.

      http://www.space.com/20665-planet-naming-controversy-iau-uwingu.html

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    2. Re:Total bullshit by awrc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Get off their collective asses? What's the urgency? Are the names of these exoplanets going to have any significance to *anybody* other than astronomers anytime soon? For values of "soon" that could measure in centuries. It's not as if somebody's desperately waiting on this information so they can put out bus timetables.

    3. Re:Total bullshit by bryonak · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think it was a fiasco at all. Keep in mind that having 9 planets is out of question.
      For starters, you'd have a hard time arguing that Pluto is a planet while Ceres isn't.

      Either we designate Pluto, Haumea, Makemake, Eris (notably bigger and more massive than Pluto) and possibly Orcus, Quaoar, OR and Sedna as planets... or we stay with Mercury up to Neptune.
      There's a clear orbital distinction between the first 8 and the other 9+, so it really makes sense to group them in two categories, especially since we aren't sure at all that we have found all dwarf planets yet.

    4. Re:Total bullshit by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Eris (notably bigger and more massive than Pluto)

      Higher mass, yes. Bigger, no. Eris and Pluto are almost exactly the same size, and it's up in the air which one is actually a tiny bit bigger. Eris is most certainly not "notably bigger".
      The mass of the Eris and Pluto systems are also close enough that "notably" shouldn't be used.

      But what makes Eris less of a planet candidate than Pluto is that Eris' orbit is way way more eccentric than Pluto's. Yes, Pluto moves at an angle to the ecliptic, and in an elliptic orbit too, but not nearly to the same degrees as Eris. At least Pluto is in lockstep with Neptune, and thus clearly belong in the solar system. Eris moves almost twice the distance away from Neptune, at a 45 degree angle to the ecliptic (more than twice that of Pluto). That's not what I'd think of as planetary motion.

    5. Re:Total bullshit by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      The recognized standards body is the International Astronomical Union and their policy is:

      Exoplanets In 2009, the Organizing Committee of IAU Commission 53 Extrasolar Planets (WGESP) on exoplanets discussed the possibility of giving popular names to exoplanets in addition to their existing catalogue designation (for instance HD 85512 b). Although no consensus was reached, the majority was not in favour of this possibility at the time.

      However, considering the ever increasing interest of the general public in being involved in the discovery and understanding of the Universe, the IAU decided in 2013 to restart the discussion of the naming procedure for exoplanets and assess the need to have popular names as well. In 2013 the members of Commission 53 will be consulted in this respect and the result of this will be made public on this page.

      This is just a company click-baiting by holding naming contests, they have no official standing whatsoever. Is this more dice.com crap?

      Was this started by the public wish of one of the discoverers of remote ice dwarfs beyond Pluto to have his discovery named Xena?

    6. Re:Total bullshit by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      .

      At least Pluto is in lockstep with Neptune, and thus clearly belong in the solar system. Eris moves almost twice the distance away from Neptune, at a 45 degree angle to the ecliptic (more than twice that of Pluto). That's not what I'd think of as planetary motion.

      As I understand it, being in "lockstep" with another planet is not part of the scientific definition of planethood. If it were, then we'd have some problems. Anything that orbits the Sun is by definition, a "proper member of the solar system." The thing here is about differentiating all these "proper" members into more useful divisions. Neither Pluto, nor Eris have cleared out the areas bordering their orbits. While they are circular bodies, numbers alone have demonstrated that that by itself would result in the solar system having thousands of "planets", with the conventional planets Mercury to Neptune, now being designated as the "freaks" of the lot.

    7. Re:Total bullshit by arth1 · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, being in "lockstep" with another planet is not part of the scientific definition of planethood. If it were, then we'd have some problems.

      No, but having an orbit that's been stable for and will continue to be stable for millions of years is a good start. Neptune won't suddenly pull Pluto out of its orbit, because their orbits are synchronized at a 2:3 rate. It's less clear how long-term stable Eris' orbit is.

      Neither Pluto, nor Eris have cleared out the areas bordering their orbits.

      Neither has Mars. Jupiter and Tellus keep Mars' orbit relatively clean, which it's too small to do itself, but there's still enough debris in its orbit that it occasionally runs into it (which Phobos and Deimos prove). The definition of keeping the orbit clean was added to specifically exclude Pluto and Ceres, but has to some extent backfired.
      It would have been far better to just say straight out that they want to cap it at the gas and ice giants, plus the four historically known inner planets. I could live with that, but making up rules that don't even work in order to give a veneer of legitimacy to excluding some bodies and including others to match their desire, and pushing it through in a session after most of the opponents have left, that's what deserves derision and ridicule.

  7. Naminf of Astronomical Objects by jmpace2017 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the International Astronomical union is the only "Earthly" organization to assign official names to astronomical objects...

    1. Re:Naminf of Astronomical Objects by Radak · · Score: 1

      There should be a Slashdot achievement for "Got typo modded up". :)

  8. Re:Vulcan by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    It's been blown up by the Romulans, remember?

  9. Name it samzenpus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name it samzenpus in the hope that one day soon he will go there and never come back.

  10. NEVER SEEN ANOTHER, NON-ALIEN PLANET !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    By def.

  11. 751? We didn't have enough ballot box stuffers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the Slashdot entry, Phokenaye.

  12. Here's an idea by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about ... the first person to set foot on the planet gets to name it?

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Here's an idea by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      How about asking the native Alaudans? We should now better by now than to continue our colonial past.

    2. Re:Here's an idea by cynop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When deep space exploration ramps up it'll be the corporations that name everything... the "IBM Stellar Sphere", the "Microsoft Galaxy", "Planet Starbucks".

    3. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about asking the native Alaudans?

      Do they have feet?

    4. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Planet Starbucks"

      The natives of that planet didn't get the memo as they still call it "Earth".

    5. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about ... the first person to set foot on the planet gets to name it?

      If we do that then mars will get some unpronounceable Chinese name.

    6. Re:Here's an idea by kperson · · Score: 1

      If it has no name until you get there, what are you going to enter into your nav computer?

    7. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about asking the native Alaudans? We should now better by now than to continue our colonial past.

      Do they have a flag? No flag, no planet.

    8. Re:Here's an idea by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      So we can't name any gas giants?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    9. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unpronouncable to 1344 million Chinese, though - the largest population on earth.

    10. Re:Here's an idea by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      "First star to the right and straight on till morning."

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    11. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Target you numpty, why would a nav computer care about a name at all? Its just a set of coordinates you need to reach.

    12. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They all get called "arg I'm falling".

    13. Re:Here's an idea by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I'd have gone with the Samsung Galaxy.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  13. His name is Dirt.. by sstamps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When the native Alaudans were asked "what does the name of your planet mean in your tongue?"

    "Dirt", they replied.

    --
    -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    1. Re:His name is Dirt.. by NettiWelho · · Score: 2

      When the native Alaudans were asked "what does the name of your planet mean in your tongue?"

      "Dirt", they replied.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_(mythology)

      In ancient Roman religion and myth, Tellus or Terra Mater ("Mother Earth") is a goddess of the earth.

    2. Re:His name is Dirt.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That gag is a little simplistic. Earth doesn't just mean "dirt". It's a term encompassing all forms of stone and soil. It's also used yo refer to land, particularly arable land. It's also an element in classical philosophy.

      Basically the term "earth" is an idealized catch all term for what's under our feet.

    3. Re:His name is Dirt.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 pedantic ?

    4. Re:His name is Dirt.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But by bizarre happenstance, they still pronounce it exactly like "Albertus Alauda".

  14. I will call it Albertus Alauda... by JonathanPlaster · · Score: 1

    when they pry the planet Pluto from my cold, dead hands.

    1. Re:I will call it Albertus Alauda... by VortexCortex · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      when they pry the planet Pluto from my cold, dead hands.

      Eris is 27% more massive than Pluto. You can have Pluto as a Planet if you're willing to agree humans are all blind as bats because they didn't see THE OTHER PLANET that was hovering about your star, even after all those centuries looking, you only just spotted it 8 years ago...

      Or, you can just de-list Pluto and save some of your pathetic face, human. Hell, you wouldn't even raise an eyebrow if there were thousands of colony ships just sitting right in your back yard, gravitationally maneuvering a small moon into just the right orbit to create a nice warm magma-world where you sit now... You study such small patches of the sky at great distances, and ignore the much nearer and real threat of assured extinction. "It's not a question of 'if', It's only a matter of time" I hear your broadcasts say about repeating the events that destroyed the previous dominant life on your planet. Oh, but what if the next time is worse? It could be MUCH worse for you, indeed. How many dwarf planets are left unseen, unnamed, right in your own solar system? Wouldn't you like to know?! No, obviously not.

      You had your chance: You made it to the closest easiest target, but then parked your waste-holes for over 40 stellar orbits. Had you shown promise, been prodigiously diligent or at least sensible enough to expend the small cultural effort to develop the tech to colonize beyond your planet's safe magnetosphere then maybe things would have worked out differently for you... The Universe has neither love nor sympathy for lazy complacent races such as yours.

      "Cold, dead hands" -- Ha! They might as well be for all the good you've done with them.

    2. Re:I will call it Albertus Alauda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BOO HOO! The only "planet" discovered by an American has officially been delisted as an actual planet. Oh, the shame! The horror! Next they'll take our frickin' jobs, too! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    3. Re:I will call it Albertus Alauda... by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      You had your chance: You made it to the closest easiest target, but then parked your waste-holes for over 40 stellar orbits. Had you shown promise, been prodigiously diligent or at least sensible enough to expend the small cultural effort to develop the tech to colonize beyond your planet's safe magnetosphere then maybe things would have worked out differently for you... The Universe has neither love nor sympathy for lazy complacent races such as yours.

      "Cold, dead hands" -- Ha! They might as well be for all the good you've done with them.

      Actually the Universe has neither love nor sympathy for anyone, whether lazy, or competent. Sometimes extremely fit species are laid low, and extremely silly ones are preserved through nothing more significant than blind luck.

    4. Re:I will call it Albertus Alauda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, you wouldn't even raise an eyebrow if there were thousands of colony ships just sitting right in your back yard, gravitationally maneuvering a small moon into just the right orbit to create a nice warm magma-world where you sit now... You study such small patches of the sky at great distances, and ignore the much nearer and real threat of assured extinction.

      We tried that with Mars. The Atlanteans noticed and objected so by the galactic sentient species system colonization treaty we had to back off and respect their sovereignty. We did help them move the moon into an orbit that regulated the tides a bit better and positioned it such that total solar eclipses would happen on a semi-regular basis, but unfortunately doing that caused a gravitational flux that caused one of their warp-drive experiments to blow their civilization back to the stone age.

      We're still filling out paperwork over that. I've been working with the seventh generation catch-up teams to try and get humanity back where they were before we screwed up their civilization with what essentially amounts to vanity.

      So anyway. Yeah you sound like either one of those crop-circle making teenagers out joyriding to spook the locals (and if so, stop it or you *will* be fired upon when caught), or you're one of those extremists that doesn't see the value in salvaging a species that's stuck so far behind (and if so remember that we screwed them over like this, we have to try and preserve as much diversity as possible).

  15. Koozebane by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Damn he won the contest. As a former member of a team that discovered planets using gravitational microlensing I always wanted to get the chance to name a planet "Koozebane", which is the planet many muppet aliens (supposedly) come from. Instead they got named boring things like "MACHO-98-BLG-35". Lucky guy to name the planet.

    1. Re:Koozebane by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is precisely why I want scientists naming planets according to an accepted method of taxonomy. Koozebane? Seriously? Because muppets? I like the muppets as much as the next man but come on - a heavenly object stuck with a ridiculous name like that forever just because some guy thought it would be funny? Ugh no.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Koozebane by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fair enough, but there is no accepted taxonomy for planets. In the case of the gravitational microlensing planetary events it is an accident of project, year and event within the year. In short, arbitrary and meaningless. Then we can take plenty of the traditional star names out there, eg. "Algol" from Arabic Al Gol "The ghoul" or "winking demon" from its variable nature. That is no less ridiculous than Koozebane, and less funny.

    3. Re:Koozebane by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      This happens anyway. You do know why Eris's moon is called Dysnomia, right?

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    4. Re:Koozebane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had ever witnessed the native Koozebane mating ritual, you wouldn't be that quick to dismiss the name...

    5. Re:Koozebane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn he won the contest. As a former member of a team that discovered planets using gravitational microlensing I always wanted to get the chance to name a planet "Koozebane", which is the planet many muppet aliens (supposedly) come from. Instead they got named boring things like "MACHO-98-BLG-35". Lucky guy to name the planet.

      Good news! You have just as much authority to name planets as this company does, so if you want to call it Koozebane then by all means, do so. It's a lot better than that crap name the contest "winner" chose, so you stand a good chance in the "court of public opinion" as well.

    6. Re:Koozebane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, have you not seen how scientist named things in the past? There are joke names in everything from zoology, to molecular biology, to particle physics. At some point you realize that there are so many things that end up needing a name, many of which there is no concise descriptive name for, you just end up picking whatever. About all it needs to be is unambiguous and potentially being short.

  16. They are missing out on a real opportunity. by Anarchduke · · Score: 1
    They could lease naming rights to companies. I can see it now.

    The intersteller transport to the nearby colony planet of Godaddy.com will depart shortly. There will be a brief layover on the forest moon of Playtex Gentle Glide. I remind you again that exporting any sentient vegetation from the planet Monsanto is strictly forbidden.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  17. TXPNONBTSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The eXoPlanet Not Officially Named By That Scam Company

  18. Re:NEVER SEEN ANOTHER, NON-ALIEN PLANET !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a retard. By def.

    The term "alien planet" is actually quite commonly used, which you would have know if you had just taken one fucking minute to Google it.

    It means, of course, a planet outside our solar system.

  19. I thnk it's tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We live in our fantasy worlds more guys. Just think that all our planets are named after deities, who may have actually just been masters in the Greek world that felt enamored by having their slaves name planets after them in the future.

    I've always felt that there's something much more noble about fantasy and gaming than I first thought. It's empowering you to say no t the representations forced upon you that mean nothing. Alpha centauri Bb is an entirely more respectable name for a planet. It's alpha donating -1 (first), centauri - constellation shaped liked centaur and Bb being the designation of not being Aa - whatever Aa is. It's a selfish name that's even worse, naming it after his late Father.

    Here on Earth, we should have the chance to use the language to shape and condition naming conventions based on something more ambitious and inspiring - like for example actual properties of the planet or quirkiness of it, based on a deeper understanding, rather than naming a boy after his father, how about investigating hos star sign.

    For example, did you know Io is the only moon in our solar system that makes a noise, like other planets with magnetic fields. Io, doesn't have a magnetic field either but it interacts so strongly with Jupiter that it makes it makes its own sound. (You can google 'sound of Jupiter' etc. ).

    So, for Io, lets assume a thoughtful and endearing name for Io (what makes it distinct in one thoughtful way) is some play on the word 'conductor'.
    Jupiter generates a very beautiful sound from its electromagnetic waves when its frequency is shifted and shifted into the audible spectrum. Io makes a sound because it dances inside the EM field of Jupiter and is so in a way like an instrument or a conductor. I like to think of Jupiter as a great symphony and Io, (which also makes nice sounds) is a conductor. The Greek name for conductor is 'Agowash'

    There have been many great music conductors, but there's one named 'Rattle' which also happens to be a child's instrument, and would make a decent name.
    Or we could say that because Io is a very volcanic planet from this EM interaction and gravitational effect of Jupiter that is like an active volcano. Active volcanoes on Earth are ones that have been active in our current geological epoch, so you could name it after this epoch - 'Holocene'

    Live more in your fantasy and your mind, I say guys, because there's very little in this world that will inspire you. These days, that which is interesting is inversely proportional to that which is popular.

    Or you could name it Albertus Alauda......

  20. Better idea. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

    When I learned that a tanker was named after Condoleezza Rice, I got an idea:

    What if we dedicated a kind of object (fuel delivery vehicle or installation may be a good choice, but it can be anything, even exoplanets) to be named after the worst people we know, but the person or organization naming it must be confined to someone close in origin, to avoid obvious abuse? Maybe specifically exclude Hitler from available choices, but imagine living in a colony on the planet Malyuta Skuratov or Andrei Chikatilo...

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dad once said and I agree that toilets should have a picture of Stalin in them.

      Just for you, I'm going to name my next dump after Malyuta Skuratov.

      especially if it's diarrhea (sounds a bit like Skuratov) : )

    2. Re:Better idea. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      But only if you are Russian or at least from former Russian Empire or USSR, following the proposed rule. Otherwise, everyone will name things after foreign leaders and politicians, diluting the intended disgrace and derision. For example, I should not be able to name things after the above mentioned Condoleezza Rice.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    3. Re:Better idea. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You do realize that 99.999% of the people in the universe will have no idea what you're talking about ... right? That of course would completely defeat the purpose of the naming scheme, don't you think?

      Don't try so hard to be clever and maybe you will actually be clever.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  21. Re:Vulcan by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    It's been blown up by the Romulans, remember?

    No, it was blown up by Young Darth Vader in an odd shaped Death Star. The names were changed to protect the innocent. That was just a practice round to prove to Disney that the director was capable of making Star-Wars movies.

  22. Wait a second... by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    What do the residents of the planet have to say about this?

    --
    /* No Comment */
  23. Who gave IAU naming authority anyway? by caseih · · Score: 1

    Was this by international treaty? As they say, "I don't remember voting for you."

    1. Re:Who gave IAU naming authority anyway? by kinthalas · · Score: 2

      So we vote for science now? Whatever is most popular gets to be true?

      Who would you want to be in charge of this? I tend to think that an international committee of actual astronomers is probably going to do a better job than letting a company decide.

    2. Re:Who gave IAU naming authority anyway? by schnell · · Score: 1

      So we vote for science now? Whatever is most popular gets to be true?

      Not about what is true, about what things are named. Scientific truth is objective, names are not. Is it "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" or "North Korea?" "Denali" or "Mount McKinley?" "Strategic Defense Initiative" or "Star Wars?" "Gravina Island Bridge" or "Bridge to Nowhere?"

      The moral of the story is that a thing is called what people want to call it. Even if your name is the "official" one, it doesn't matter much if everybody else calls it something else.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
  24. 700 votes? by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Only 700 votes? We could easily have had a planet named SlashDot!

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:700 votes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 700 votes? We could easily have had a planet named SlashDot!

      But do we want SlashDot to be that far away? I image it would cause some serious lag with those ping times.

  25. Slashdot keeps getting shittier by Nimey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fuck, man? Posting a story that 700-some idiots paid actual money to have a chance to give an exoplanet a non-official name and pretending like it means something?

    Is this Slashdot or is it Entertainment Weekly?

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:Slashdot keeps getting shittier by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      I have no mod points laying around, but I'd mod parent up. Just because space.com picks up a story doesn't make it newsworthy. What's next? Dig up some story about how you can plots of land on the Moon?

      Anybody want to buy an Asteroid? I'm giving a $25,000 discount to the first 10 buyers!

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    2. Re:Slashdot keeps getting shittier by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

      Dig up some story about how you can plots of land on the Moon?

      That sounds like an awesome story! Those must be some big cans. How do you get them to the Moon and what do you do with them afterward?

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    3. Re:Slashdot keeps getting shittier by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      The fuck, man? Posting a story that 700-some idiots paid actual money to have a chance to give an exoplanet a non-official name and pretending like it means something?

      Is this Slashdot or is it Entertainment Weekly?

      You mean there's a difference?

    4. Re:Slashdot keeps getting shittier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the plots are very tiny, that's how they get you with this scam.

  26. Not the full name by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    It's Albertus Alauda, powered by Dice (TM).

  27. not gonna happen by dnorman · · Score: 2

    um. no. some dotcom doesn't get to sell naming rights to planets. and some dude doesn't get to immortalize his papa because he can fill in an online form. gramps may have been awesome, but he doesn't get the nearest extra-solar planet named after him...

    --


    It is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  28. Wasted Planet II by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    The second planet now known to be wasted by humans.

  29. Funny? Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how this is rated "Funny" by people who most likely will forget the name within an hour. What was the name again? Albertus... something. At least Sid Meier is something we can remember with minimal effort.

  30. Nobody suggested this? by xenoc_1 · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't the obvious choice be Zephram? After all, he was from Alpha Centuri before he was from Montana.

    Well, depending on your subjective timeline, that is.

    Either that, or name it Londo.

    1. Re:Nobody suggested this? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the obvious choice be Zephram? After all, he was from Alpha Centuri before he was from Montana.

      He was always born on Earth, regardless of time-line. When TOS referred to him as "Zefram Cochrane from Alpha Centauri" they were referring to the location where he eventually settled. As the inventor of Warp Drive, there's no way any humans could have gotten to Alpha Centauri before Cochrane was born.

      Let's focus our First Contact continuity complaints on the Borg Queen. What a horrible idea that was...

    2. Re:Nobody suggested this? by kst · · Score: 1

      In the original episode "Metamorphosis", it wasn't clear where Cochrane was originally from. He could have been a humanoid native of a planet in the the Alpha Centauri system (at the time I thought "Zefram Cochrane" was a sufficiently exotic name that he could have been non-human). Or, more likely, he could have been born in a colony established by sublight ships; we know from "Space Seed" that there were sublight sleeper ships before the invention of warp drive.

      Annoying quibble: Kirk's line was "Zefram Cochrane? Of Alpha Centauri?" (The "of" might have a subtly different implication than "from".)

    3. Re:Nobody suggested this? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      (at the time I thought "Zefram Cochrane" was a sufficiently exotic name that he could have been non-human)

      I was going to point out how this doesn't make any sense, when I was suddenly reminded almost every alien in TOS looked exactly like a human. Including Klingons, which looked like bearded humans. It's been too long, I think it's time for me to rewatch those episodes.

      we know from "Space Seed" that there were sublight sleeper ships before the invention of warp drive.

      Like I said, it's been a while, but I could have sworn Spock said the DY-100 class of ships was meant for traveling within the Solar System, and that the cryogenic chambers were meant to keep humans alive for months, not centuries. I always figured Kahn used his superior intellect to modify the ship for his purposes when escaping Earth.

      Annoying quibble: Kirk's line was "Zefram Cochrane? Of Alpha Centauri?" (The "of" might have a subtly different implication than "from".)

      You are right, sir. I stand corrected. My memory is far more accurate for TNG episodes.

    4. Re:Nobody suggested this? by dwye · · Score: 1

      As per the Star Fleet Technical Manual era books, the Terrans reached Alpha Centuri via a 50 year trip on a sleeper ship, and discovered that the Preservers had made a colony of North Africans (Carthaginians by culture), and Western Med Greek coloni and Celts. Zephram Cochrane was a local mathematician that postulated a space warp without the technology to build it, which the Terrans had. Construction of the return ship was so fast that it preceded the report that they were going to build one and return to Earth.

      I HATE ST:TNG!

  31. IAU, Please by Dereck1701 · · Score: 2

    "the International Astronomical Union issued a press release stressing its authority as the sole arbiter of the exoplanet-naming process"

    While this of course is at best a PR/Fundraising scheme, and at worst a scam, I don't particularly have much respect for the IAU either. Some of their past decisions are less about science, and more about politics. They CONSIDER themselves the "official" naming organization but in the annals of history I don't think their decisions are going to mean a hole lot.

    1. Re:IAU, Please by Nimey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is your butt still hurt about Pluto?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:IAU, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your butt still hurt about Pluto?

      Who cares if Pluto is a planet? That's the least of my concerns. That definition was one of the worst and most confusing definitions I've ever seen. Among the biggest problems:
      - Dwarf planet is not a planet. Prefix-X should be Type-Of-X.
      - Planets orbit the sun, not their parent star...so that means extrasolar planets aren't really planets either by the literal definition

      My understanding is the vote was taken on the last day with a lot of people having left early. The draft definition previously tabled made much more sense.

    3. Re:IAU, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ** Insert Uranus joke here **

    4. Re:IAU, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next one in Uranus

    5. Re:IAU, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The setting of internationally-recognized astronomical standards, including the naming of astronomical objects and features, was one of the key reasons the IAU was founded. They don't need to consider themselves the "official" naming organization because they _are_ such by international agreement. You may not like the IAU, but if not an international body of renowned astronomers setting these issues, then whom? The United Nations? Some small business running out of Joe's soap factory?

  32. Re:Vulcan by TrollstonButtersbean · · Score: 1

    Star Wars happened "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away ..."

  33. Ok. by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    I can live with the name, but I thought "Caleo" was a nie choice as well. "Caleo" is "flame" in latin.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  34. The real most important thing: by RMingin · · Score: 1

    While it's cute that Uwingu let this guy believe he named a planet for his dead grandpa, it's not cool that they seem to be presenting it as an official, authoritative name.

    Uwingu chooses names, sure, but they are official only to Uwingu itself and optionally, some of their users.

    Until and unless the IAU gives some authority to Uwingu, they have none. IAU says it's still AlphaCent-Bb.

    --
    The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    1. Re:The real most important thing: by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Until and unless the IAU gives some authority to Uwingu, they have none. IAU says it's still AlphaCent-Bb.

      Lark remarks that the name comes from the Latin name of his late grandfather, stating

      And with an etymological justification like that ... it's going to remain Alpha Centauri-Bb for quite a while yet.

      All very fine and good for the guy to attempt to remember his grandfather, but to name a whole planet for him? Hubris! If he'd restrained his etymology to "bright", then he'd have had a much better chance of getting it (and he'd have had the private reason too. But by publishing an etymology like this, he has completely shot himself down. And in the process, he's destroyed Uwingu and their attempt to raise money for science. What a result! (And not in a good sense!)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  35. Mnemonic Device for Quag Meier's brother by rmdingler · · Score: 2

    Do you have a lot of Prince Albert in a U.S. can?

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  36. So aliens there will be called "Albertans"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We Canucks would love that :)

    1. Re:So aliens there will be called "Albertans"? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      We Canucks would love that :)

      There are no aliens there. If we go there, then there will be aliens there.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  37. Re:Vulcan by xstonedogx · · Score: 2

    Star Wars happened "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away ..."

    ...from the person telling the story.

    "Luke, you're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view."

  38. The local race is not going to be happy by jonfr · · Score: 1

    The local race in that area (Alpha Century) is not going to be happy about it once they find out, in about 75 years time or so.

  39. Niven FTW! Come on, guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We must call it Wunderland, I think that should be obvious to this crowd...

  40. No need to wait by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is already a Disney World. ;-)

  41. there's something important to do first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we know there is a planet by Alpha Centauri hadn't we better check out their local planning department to find out when that damn hyperspace bypass is coming through?

    1. Re:there's something important to do first... by rossdee · · Score: 1

      The Vogons are due on Thursday

  42. It is on the same elvel as claiming a moon parcel by aepervius · · Score: 1

    As long as you can't set foot and have a permanent presence on the moon/exoplanet, it is just fun. Unless people pay money then it is a scam.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  43. Don't worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe an American will finally discover an actual planet one day. Everyone else already has.

    1. Re:Don't worry. by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Maybe an American will finally discover an actual planet one day. Everyone else already has.

      Everyone? You can't really count the visible planets, or if you do, then every American is descended from an ethnic group that "discovered" them. As to the Extra Saturnian Planets, Uranus was discovered by an Englishman, and Neptune's discovery was the collaborative result of two Frenchmen, an actual telespcope guy and a mathematician who gave out the clues of where to look. That's hardly everyone.

      Pluto's demotion was the result of the fact that up to now, the only definition of "planet" was the non-scientific one of "wanderer in the sky". Any scientific definition that would have kept Pluto as designated a planet would have immediately ballooned the number planets in the solarystem to over thirty, potentially thousands, with the majority of planets being bodies smaller than the Moon, and little more than dirty snowballs.

      "Because an American discovered it." is not a valid reason to not move science forward in this area. It should also be noted that Pluto did not fit the criteria for success for answering the question that originally inspired the search, correcting perceived anomalies in Neptune's orbit. Discrepancies by the way which have been resolved as being observational errors of the time, and an incorrect figure for Neptune's mass which was refined by the Voyager flyby.

      Pluto is not even the most massive dwarf planet, that honor going to the recently named Eris. It does bear the honor of being the signatory body of a new class of solary system body, the Ice Dwarf.

      If Clyde Tombaugh's living descendants can accept the name change with dignity and grace, (they even gave a warm welcome to Nat History's Dr. Tyson who made the issue public by taking Pluto out of his Hall of Planets,), I would hope that any person who puts science in front of national breast-beating would as well.

    2. Re:Don't worry. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Uranus was discovered by an Englishman

      As a consequence, we English get to decide on the pronunciation. It's "Yer Anus".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Don't worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the hundreds of exoplanets discovered by US projects? One day, maybe someone not from the USA will set foot on another planetary body, build a rover or create a space telescope that lasts longer than a couple years one day.

      Know all of those pretty pictures of Saturn or those awe inspiring deep field shots with all of the galaxies? Taken by Americans.

  44. The man just can't stop misrepresenting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the space.com article:

    Uwingu has never maintained that the winning name will be anything other than a popular or common moniker, he says.

    With only a couple of thousand people taking part, it's not even honest to call it a "popular" or "common" name.

  45. Albert by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

    is not a Latin name.

  46. planet naming taxonomy by pne · · Score: 1

    This is precisely why I want scientists naming planets according to an accepted method of taxonomy. Koozebane? Seriously? Because muppets? I like the muppets as much as the next man but come on - a heavenly object stuck with a ridiculous name like that forever just because some guy thought it would be funny? Ugh no.

    Then you had better not look at the names of asteroids... some of them are pretty whimsical. "19383 Rolling Stones" is just an example.

    --
    Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
  47. Now renamed Augustus Gloop II by Doghouse13 · · Score: 1

    Who by? Me. I expect everyone to start using the revised name immediately. Yeah, right. Let's be real - I have just as much right (or more accurately, as little) as anyone else to give it a name. Uwingu certainly don't have any more standing to do so than I do. Even the IAU only comes closest because most people who're seriously involved in astronomy are inclined to give deference to it. Until and unless that's underpinned by an international treaty with legal backing, though, this is simple drivel.

  48. Alpha Centauri B flat? Seriously? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Who thought that one up?

    1. Re:Alpha Centauri B flat? Seriously? by dwye · · Score: 1

      Who thought that one up?

      Johann Sebastian Bach, actually.

  49. but.. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they register your name with the copyright office!!!

    Y'know, like the place you pay 35 bucks to register your poetry or a novel... or a meaningless list of suckers. I mean star registers.

  50. Re:Vulcan by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Not so far away that travel was impossible between ours and theirs. Remember, ET's race has been to Earth, and was also a member of the Senate.

  51. Re:Vulcan by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    We've already got a Vulcan. And it's closer than that.

    Einstein sort of took care of that. Mercury is deep enough in the Sun's gravity well that the Newtonian discrepancies which would support the existence of Vulcan are explained away by the curvature of space-time.

  52. What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Texas?

  53. Legitimacy by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    What gives this particular company any legitimate right to name planets? I say that the first one to land on it should get naming rights. That'll show whether they're serious about sponsoring space exploration, or are just ripping off feeble-minded individuals who think they also own a piece of the Moon and a star named after their cat.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  54. It's been named for decades... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actual name is Rann, according to the inhabitants.

    And Adam Strange, who's been there....

                      mark

  55. Not your grandpa's planet...naming ways. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    In the year 2263:

    Teacher: Well, class. Let's all welcome our new student Jimmy. His family just moved here to Mars from Alpha Centauri. Jimmy, why don't you tell us what it was like. What planet did your family live on?

    Jimmy: mumble mumble

    Teacher: I'm sorry, I didn't get that.

    Jimmy: Albertus Alauda

    Nelson: Your planet is named after some dead guy's grandpa who won a contest! Ha ha!

    Teacher: That's enough. It's true, all seventeen billion Albertus Alaudans live on a planet named in a contest by a bunch of people who might as well been carrying spears.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  56. Double word is stupid. by jacekm · · Score: 0

    Planet should have single word name. Albertus would be perfectly fine. Adding second word make thing too long and cubersome.

  57. only a rube pust money down on uwing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have NO official standing anywhere - you spend your time just as wisely voting for dancing with the stars *gags*

    I guess some primates have really low thresholds of entertainment.

  58. NOT Vulcan by dwye · · Score: 1

    Would have been the obvious choice.

    Vulcan circled Tau Ceti, about 10 light years away. Alpha Centuri had a colony of Celts, Greeks, and North Africans that were transported there by the Preservers.

    Ye Gods! Does no one read the Star Trek Technical Manual, anymore?

  59. Pluto by Dabido · · Score: 1

    I think we should name it Pluto ... after Mickey Mouse's dog. I heard that name wasn't being used by a planet any more.

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)