Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Hackers Infiltrate US Army Database, Compromise Safety of Dams

coolnumbr12 writes "Chinese hackers have infiltrated a sensitive U.S. Army database that contains information about the vulnerabilities of thousands of dams located throughout the United States. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' National Inventory of Dams (NID) has raised concerns that information gathered in the hack could help China carry out a cyber-attack on the national electrical power grid."

32 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. This crosses one of Obama's famous red lines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You guys have nine years to knock that shit off or there is gonna be trouble.

    1. Re:This crosses one of Obama's famous red lines. by davester666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, we might stop letting them lend us money!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    quoted from "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5642408"

    Of course they can, what makes you think they aren't?

    But a more interesting question is to look at what information is presented and what is missing. How much is new, how much is old. Then on policy stories like this one I sometimes pop over to the senate web site and look at what's coming up on the senate calendar [1] and oh look, on May 7th they are having a hearing to talk about

          Hearings to examine the Department of the Air Force in
          review of the Defense Authorization Request for fiscal
          year 2014 and the Future Years Defense Program.

    Hmm, who is in charge of Cyber Command? Why it's the Air Force! Who would have guessed.

    (yes I can be that cynical)

    1. Re:Real reason by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In this case you would get more insight from a calculator or spreadsheet than from cynicism. The US Cyber Command budget isn't that large compared to either the Air Force budget or the DoD budget. Finding some justification to bump it up wouldn't make much difference - it isn't going to be the tail that wags the dog.

      Misplaced cynicism can also mislead you by pointing you in the wrong direction, as above. If you started digging into the question of Chinese espionage against the United States, you would quickly and easily lean that it is a huge effort against wide ranging targets. Why you would think this relatively minor event is in some way inconsistent wtih the total Chinese effort, and therefore not real, is baffling. Interesting who you effectively trust.

      China also has more than 3,000 front companies in the U.S. “for the sole purpose of acquiring our technology,” . . .
      Inside the Chinese Boom in Corporate Espionage
      Chinese Army Directing Cyber Espionage Against Western Businesses
      China military unit 'behind prolific hacking'
      The China Problem

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. What Information? by Alex+Pennace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article it isn't clear exactly what information was deemed sensitive. Does this information include very specific details (like, "here is the password to that plant's SCADA system?" Or does it cover broader details that the public had free access to prior to the September 11 attacks, such information now being withheld as "critical infrastructure information?"

    1. Re: What Information? by AG+the+other · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually army network passwords have or at least had to be when I worked for them 15 letters long, contain no dictionary words and have a minimum of 2 small letters, to caps and two symbols. They are also changed every 30 days and can not be reused.
      Also at random times all passwords are just set to be reset because that is what the admins are told to do.

      --
      Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
    2. Re: What Information? by xQx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Meaning the three most effective ways to gain access are:
      1. Take high res photos of people's desks as you walk past and read use the passwords that will be written on yellow sticky notes around the place.
      2. Steal someone's phone or diary and look for the passwords they've noted in their contacts or notes.
      3. When you find the password, which will be something like "skldjfsldfjsklfjsf!@*(#3-Feb13" and it's now 30 days later, try "skldjfsldfjsklfjsf!@*(#3-Mar13" or "skldjfsldfjsklfjsf!@*(#3-Mar14"

      Because at the end of the day a human needs to remember these ridiculous passwords, and they will revert to either writing it down or using a pattern.

    3. Re: What Information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Army Corps of Engineers manages public waterways & dams in the eastern states.

    4. Re: What Information? by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The human memory thing is why we should have moved to pass phrases a LONG time ago. You can get far more entropy with a phrase than you can ever get with a password, no matter how complex.

      A simple four word phrase with capitalized words and some punctuation would easily have 4x the number of characters as that impossible to remember 15 letter password. And as you noted, 30 day changes ensure there is a date, or number that allows the use of the same password with a slight variation.

    5. Re: What Information? by AG+the+other · · Score: 4, Informative

      They operate at least 4 or 5 in the state or Arkansas alone. During the 50s and 60s they just about damed up everything bigger than a trickle from a water hose here.
      That's the Core of Engineers. That are where the guys that build for the Army get practice for digging in the USA for when they go other places.
      They have a totally cool model of the Mississippi river in Vicksburg that they use to simulate floods, droughts and other projects in the entire Mississippi river drainage.
      That's a big area in case you didn't know.

      --
      Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
  4. Just got to say by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dam these Chinese!

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Lazy execs or engineers? by grantspassalan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand why anyone would want to connect really important things such as power plants and dams to the Internet. We have been running such things for about a century now and they work just fine. Anything behind a barbed wire fence should never be connected to the Internet. Why do people do this? Just for the convenience of some fat executive or lazy engineer who doesn't want to get his fat @$$ out of this office and see what is really going on with the machinery?

    --
    A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    1. Re:Lazy execs or engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anything behind a barbed wire fence should never be connected to the Internet.

      Earl! Unplug the cows!

    2. Re:Lazy execs or engineers? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand why anyone would want to connect really important things such as power plants and dams to the Internet. We have been running such things for about a century now and they work just fine. Anything behind a barbed wire fence should never be connected to the Internet. Why do people do this? Just for the convenience of some fat executive or lazy engineer who doesn't want to get his fat @$$ out of this office and see what is really going on with the machinery?

      The issue isn't that individual devices are connected to the Internet per se, the problem is that many of these networks are not designed to isolate the sensitive systems from "vanilla" office computers. The problem is people in operations centers need access to weather, news etc and while they have news channels on video wall with various other readouts, sometimes they need to confirm stuff. If it really is going to freeze suddenly, that will require extra capacity as heaters, water heaters, and engine block-heaters get switched back on by some people.

      They could run parallel LANs, with separate workstations and networks for the "sensitive" operational machines and the "regular" vanilla workstations where people do email and crap.

      The risk is at the touch points, and good luck shutting them all down. How will the administrators receive alerts if the "sensitive" systems can't send SNMP pops to a monitoring system outside the virtual-wire--or to one inside of it that then emails you outside the wire. At some point, PEOPLE become the touch point and sneaker net with USB tokens becomes a problem. You can shutdown and cement over the USB ports but some applications require dongles somewhere and eventually something gets plugged into something and autorun.exe happens and the next thing you know, they're hacked by Chinese.

      This problem runs many, many layers deep. If only "unplugging it" was that easy.

      --
      Who did what now?
  6. Not the hack compromises the safety by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The vulnerabilities of the dams are the real problem, but for some reason the government prefers to lie about that. Most of these vulnerabilities are probably pretty obvious to an expert (and, yes, the Chinese have experts on damns and these can go to the US for vacation), so hiding these problems is pretty stupid in the first place.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. Article translation by hugg · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/05/hacker-breached-dam-database/:

    "Chinese hackers" = “the Chinese government or military cyber warriors” according to unnamed officials

    "sensitive U.S. army database" is a database where users are emailed their username and password in cleartext

    "Non-government users can query the database but cannot download data from it" (???)

  8. Re:how is this not an act of war? by sabri · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is there proof that it actually was a Chinese citizen behind the keyboard? All they did so far is trace the origin back to a Chinese IP address.

    Even if the culprit turned out to be a person with Chinese citizenship, it could very well be the same thing as some pimply faced youth somewhere in a fly-over state hacking into a Chinese database. It does not have to be related to the government. However, if it is, China has some explanation to do.

    I'm also wondering whether or not the DOD is purposely saying "it's the Chinese" to avoid people asking them "why don't you secure your shit better?".

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  9. Re:Fucking hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Either the Chinese are excellent hackers or we suck at security.

    The software was probably written by a Chinese outsourcing firm in the first place.

  10. Re:All your dam are belong to us! We now take wate by Genda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's because if we actually made too big a stink, we'd have to deal with the dirty deeds we did in the first place to prompt such a response and the last thing we really want to do is to begin airing our dirty laundry. Grumbling under our breath about what a bunch of douches the Chinese are is about as far as we can go without having to scrape large amounts of egg off of our collective faces.

  11. Re:Oh yeah, thats a great idea by Genda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, because the Chinese have bases in countries all over the world... Oh, wait that's us. No, it's the Chinese who are spending themselves into oblivion on weapons of war... Oh, wait, that's us again. We spend more on our military than the next 13 nations combined (but we can't afford to educate our children... bright.) I dunno, perhaps if we moved from offense to defense, these things wouldn't be issues?

    Just a thought.

  12. Public Information by edibobb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers doesn't keep classified information on civilian projects online, do they? Electrical distribution control systems are not accessible over the internet, are they? It looks to me like someone, whether Chinese, Lebanese, or Portuguese, got some not-so-sensitive information from the Corps of Engineers site, and the U.S. government is using it in its publicity campaign to pass laws giving the government (gasp!) more control over the internet.

  13. Re:Oh yeah, thats a great idea by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 3, Funny

    Even more funny is the fact is that since we can't educate our chidlren, we'll have to import our talent to run our war machines since we'll be nothing but a bunch of ignoramous who believe that dinosaurs and Jesus got along or something silly that or that the earth is only 5000 years old.

  14. Re:how is this not an act of war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about the Iranian scientist who was assassinated? People thought it was CIA/Mossad, but it turned out that he was working undercover for the US, and was assassinated by the Iranian intelligence service.

    By your logic, that single event should exonerate the US for any future occurrences of assassination inside Iran.

  15. Re:Oh yeah, thats a great idea by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The issues with the US education system do not appear to be the result of insufficient funding.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  16. Re:how is this not an act of war? by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even if the culprit turned out to be a person with Chinese citizenship, it could very well be the same thing as some pimply faced youth somewhere in a fly-over state hacking into a Chinese database. It does not have to be related to the government. However, if it is, China has some explanation to do.

    The great firewall of china won't allow any access to foreign sites that they don't like, but turns a blind eye to wholesale hacking by pimply faced kids? Who is THAT naive any more?

    That it came from their IP and means nothing in and of itself. Especially when you RTFA and find this nugget

    “The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is aware that access to the National Inventory of Dams (NID), to include sensitive fields of information not generally available to the public, was GIVEN to an unauthorized individual in January 2013 who was subsequently determined to not to have proper level of access for the information,” Pierce said in a statement.

    “[U.S. Army Corps of Engineers] immediately revoked this user’s access to the database upon learning that the individual was not, in fact, authorized full access to the NID,” he said.

    So there was no hacking involved. Simply someone handing out a password to a database to someone else who was not authorized. Since someone in the US Army or someone the Army authorized handed over the credentials you can hardly call it an act of war.

    Someone screwed up, and it took months to find out about it. It may well have been something entirely innocent (if ill advised) as allowing hydrological engineers to compare notes on some aspect of dam construction or dam safety.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  17. Re:Oh yeah, thats a great idea by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/year_spending_2013USbn_14bs1n_3036508031#usgs302

    Looks like defense is ahead of education. That defense budget seems a little suspicious too. Lots of zeros. And does it include funding the wars?

  18. Re:how is this not an act of war? by fazey · · Score: 5, Informative

    You clearly dont own a server. There are always IPs belonging to China poking and prodding your server. Then when you report it, they dont respond at all, and the IP is never AUP'd. So yes... it was probably f'ing China.

  19. Re:Been going on for at least a decade by WGFCrafty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    “I know not what weapons world war III will be fought with, but world war IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert Einstein

  20. Re:how is this not an act of war? by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So there was no hacking involved. Simply someone handing out a password to a database to someone else who was not authorized.

    It's called social engineering, and it is a well recognized hacking technique used in some infamous cases.

    Since someone in the US Army or someone the Army authorized handed over the credentials you can hardly call it an act of war.

    War, no. But it is still espionage apparently conducted by one of the last countries controlled by a Communist government whose officials periodically make public statements about attacking the United States with nuclear weapons.

    The nature of the information they sought access to, and apparently obtained, isn't benign.

    Dam - Sensitive Army database of U.S. dams compromised

    . . . The database categorizes U.S. dams by the number of people that would be killed if a dam fails. They include “significant” and “high” hazard levels. . .

    “In the wrong hands, the Army Corps of Engineers’ database could be a cyber attack roadmap for a hostile state or terrorist group to disrupt power grids or target dams in this country,” Van Cleave said in an email.

    Gen. Keith Alexander, commander of the U.S. Cyber Command, warned in a 2011 speech that cyber attacks were escalating from causing disruptions to actual destructive strikes, including cyber attacks on hydroelectric dams.

    Alexander provided what he said were indirect examples of two types of anticipated cyber attacks. . . The second involved the catastrophic destruction of a water-driven electrical generator at Russia’s Sayano-Shushenskaya dam, near the far eastern city of Cheremushki, in August 2009. One of the dam’s 10 650-megawatt hydro turbine generators, weighing more than 1,000 tons, was mistakenly started by a computer operator 500 miles away.

    As a result, the generator began spinning, rose 50 feet in the air, and exploded, killing 75 people and destroying eight of the remaining nine turbines at the dam. . . more

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  21. Re:how is this not an act of war? by kosty · · Score: 3, Funny

    Proof? Who gives two $hits? I'm f$cking relieved that they haven't tried to pin it on Syria, Iran, Chechnya(?), The Tea Party, Occupy*, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Mexican Drug Lords, Canadian pharmacies, poor people, rich people, unions, PETA, gun owners, gun makers, Muslims, drug addicts, Social Security, or Medicaid & Medicare, or smokers.

    --
    "Democracy." It's just a slogan.
  22. Re:how is this not an act of war? by oobayly · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wow, so a computer operator 500 miles away badly repaired a 29yr 10mo old turbine which had a history of vibration, and caused it to lift out of its seat (by 15ft, not 50ft), and caused it to explode and kill 75. Well at least the Washington Times got one part correct. The accident happened in August 2009 and a report was released in October 2009, and in 2013 the Washington Post made up a fictional story on cause of the accident. I'm going to jump to conclusions here and say the they needed to pad out a shitty article with an example of "Cyber Terrorism" to reel naive reader in.

    From Wikipedia

    The report states that the accident was primarily caused by the turbine vibrations which led to the fatigue damage of the mountings of the turbine 2, including the cover of the turbine. It was also found that at the moment of accident at least six nuts were missing from the bolts securing the turbine cover. After the accident 49 recovered bolts were investigated from which 41 had fatigue cracks. On 8 bolts, the fatigue damaged area exceeded 90% of the total cross-sectional area.[2]

    I've already made this reply once, but seeing as two people have used the exploding turbine as an example of "what could go wrong", I felt I needed to correct somebody who was "wrong on the internet".

  23. Re:Oh yeah, thats a great idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah, because the Chinese have bases in countries all over the world...

    The People's Republic of China, A.K.A. communist China, has a growing number of military bases and access to facilities around the world. The Chinese fleet has been participating in anti-piracy actions around Somalia, giving them experience in extended naval deployments. The Chinese navy is planning to build something like four aircraft carriers and is currently flying aircraft off their first one that they are bringing into operation now after learning much from the Brazilian navy. Chinese special forces have been training the military in Venezuela. The Chinese are active in Africa.

    The Chinese have also been bullying many of their neighbors, laying claim to distant islands and extensive land areas. Why don't you ask the Indians what they think of China's behavior, they are forming several new airborne infantry units to help deal with the threat? Or the Japanese, who are suffering a growing number of incursions by Chinese aircraft and sea vessels? Of perhaps the Philippines, which is seeing Chinese territory grabs on their doorstep?

    No, it's the Chinese who are spending themselves into oblivion on weapons of war... Oh, wait, that's us again.

    US military spending has recently generally been between 4% to 5% of GDP, well below historic levels. The army and navy and rumps of what they were at the end of the Cold War. Spending on social welfare programs is several times the military budget and is continuing to grow, and will grow for decades to come. It is Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, now joined by Obamacare which really starts kicking in this year, that will bankrupt the US, not the military spending.

    I'm afraid you don't know what you are talking about there.

    We spend more on our military than the next 13 nations combined

    A large part of that is personnel costs. The US has an all volunteer military that pays its members a salary competitive with the civilian sector unlike many other major nations that use conscription to fill their armies. An American corporal in the Army or Marines makes about what a Chinese general makes per month. I'm sure you can figure the impact of that out. Same thing applies to weapons purchases. Maybe you've heard that Chinese engineering staff and factory labor is cheaper than American?

    On the other hand pretty much all European countries allied with the United States spend less than they should by treaty goals. As a result they had a hard time with the intervention in Libya without American assistance.

    If it makes you feel better the Chinese are upping their military budget by 10.7% this year.

    (but we can't afford to educate our children... bright.)

    The US throws large amounts of money at education. The problem isn't with how much money, but what it is spent on, like growing numbers of administrators. There are also social factors that come into play that the education budget itself can't fix. The teachers unions don't help much either.

    You don't really have this right either.

    I dunno, perhaps if we moved from offense to defense, these things wouldn't be issues?

    If platitudes could solve things they wouldn't be issues either.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell