Slashdot Mirror


Engineering the $325,000 Burger

Dr. Mark Post hopes to bring the dream of cultured meat one step closer to reality when he unveils his high tech hamburger in London. The five ounce burger is composed of 20,000 strips of beef muscle tissue grown in a laboratory at a cost of $325,000 (provided by an anonymous donor.) From the article: "The hamburger, assembled from tiny bits of beef muscle tissue grown in a laboratory and to be cooked and eaten at an event in London, perhaps in a few weeks, is meant to show the world — including potential sources of research funds — that so-called in-Vitro meat, or cultured meat, is a reality."

70 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. I hope by rossdee · · Score: 5, Funny

    You get lots of fries for that price

    (And your coke in a real glass, not a plastic cup)

    1. Re:I hope by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      But then, it's not made out of animals. So it's clearly vegetarian food.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:I hope by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      You get lots of fries for that price

      Yep, you get plenty of fries from a parallel research project, codenamed "raise dolphins that grow potato tumors and kill them to make fries," thanks to a generous donation from the Society for the Promotion of Cruelty to Animals.

    3. Re:I hope by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some people don't eat meat and animal products for health reasons, others for ethical reasons. So I think this will split the vegetarians and vegans into four groups:
      - health issues vegetarian
      - health issues vegan
      - ethical vegetarian
      - ethical vegan

    4. Re:I hope by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      I think you mean real coke in a real glass.

    5. Re:I hope by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course there are also the people who think that any food that has even just come close to a lab is the devil. That group might have a considerable (but not complete) overlap with the ethical vegetarians/vegans.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:I hope by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I also wouldn't accept imaginary coke. Nor complex coke, because it always has an imaginary part.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:I hope by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the health-issues variety. "Vat grown meat exacerbates my wifi allergy!"

    8. Re:I hope by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 2

      Um, wouldn't the ethical vegetarian become ethical non-vegetarians...

      This interests me greatly. I have never had meat in my life, for ethical reasons. I'd eat this thing, though.

      I'm curious if this would one day allow human muscle tissue to be sold. I saw this weird movie where most, if not all diseases were cured, and there was a obsession with celebrities. If they got a virus, it would be sold at a high price. And their vat grown muscle tissue was sold at a local deli.

      --
      Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    9. Re:I hope by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      - ethical vegetarian
      - ethical vegan

      Things that I eat include:
      - edible vegetarian
      - edible vegan

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    10. Re:I hope by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure it would. For people who adhere to vegetarianism on an ethical basis strictly founded in the idea that they do not want to contribute to the death and/or suffering of animals, there is no reason why they would have any issues with meat, taken in the absence of animals, nor any reason why they would deny the "meatness" of this material. They're issue isn't with the meat itself: it's with the way that the meat is gathered. Lab grown meat would still be meat and would likely circumvent those objections.

      Of course, I recall an episode of Better of Ted where the geeks try to grow meat in the lab. When the tester eventually eats it, they ask how it tastes, and from my recollection, I believe the answer was, "like despair".

    11. Re:I hope by guttentag · · Score: 2

      But then, it's not made out of animals. So it's clearly vegetarian food.

      No, it is made out of animals. From TFA:

      But the meat is produced with materials — including fetal calf serum, used as a medium in which to grow the cells — that eventually would have to be replaced by similar materials of non-animal origin.

      Vegetarians love fetal calf serum. It just sounds so tasty, natural and cruelty-free!

    12. Re:I hope by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to work in a company that grows animal tissue cultures. You certainly CAN grow lots of tissue types without horse serum or any animal-related products. In fact, lots of lab protocols require that.

    13. Re:I hope by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Funny

      My own concern is: how will I know for sure it's fake beef and not fake horse?

    14. Re:I hope by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      And if you want to have some fun eat uncooked red kidney beans. Note: be sure to stay in the bath tub as you will be projectile vomiting out of both ends.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:I hope by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whether or not you buy it from the UK?

    16. Re:I hope by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Some people don't eat meat and animal products for health reasons, others for ethical reasons. So I think this will split the vegetarians and vegans into four groups:
      - health issues vegetarian
      - health issues vegan
      - ethical vegetarian
      - ethical vegan

      Theres also political. I've known many vegans and the ones I've known treat it more like a political movement than a dietary discipline. I guess you might put that under 'ethical' but I think they get so carried away on their ethics that really it becomes political.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    17. Re:I hope by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Funny

      Early experiments with in vitro meat had no muscle tone. (Past stories here have pointed this out.) The closest natural experience would be eating a fetus—not exactly good steak.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    18. Re:I hope by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      What about quaternion coke? What then?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    19. Re:I hope by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course there are also the people who think that any food that has even just come close to a lab is the devil.

      And I guarantee those people will say vat grown causes everything from cancer to autism. If we don't watch out this will become the next frankenfood scare

    20. Re:I hope by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2

      If I recall correctly, awhile back PETA stepped into this and offered some prize for whoever could make commercially viable vat grown meat, and a bunch of PETA members flipped out. I'm not sure what exactly their reasonings were, but they didn't like it.

    21. Re:I hope by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What about real human?

      Would that be either legal or ethical?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    22. Re:I hope by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed, which is something that has been done here. Hence the "early" qualifier.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    23. Re:I hope by AdamWill · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot '- think that eating seafood and the occasional hamburger counts as vegetarian'

    24. Re:I hope by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny thing is "quorn", which is factory grown fungus, seems to have a big enough vegetarian following that I've seen it at the major supermarket chains and it's the most artifical food in the place. I presume that the same people that are eating that wouldn't have much of a problem with vat grown meat.

    25. Re:I hope by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 2

      And of course:

      - religious vegetarian
      - religious vegan

      --
      Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    26. Re:I hope by Vintermann · · Score: 2

      It's unlikely that your meat is grazed at all, let alone that it came from a wild population in an overgrazed area.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    27. Re:I hope by tburkhol · · Score: 2

      Ethical vegetarians will eat this but still won't eat meat from animals. They would still be vegetarians. This wouldn't be "meat" to them.

      These cells are grown in a soup with a high concentration of fetal bovine serum. ie, the fake meat is fed mostly from real meat. There's no reduction in harm to animals in this stuff. Probably a relative increase: it likely takes 2-5 liters of FBS to grow that much cell mass, and a 40 pound fetal calf only has so much serum.

    28. Re: I hope by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Pesco-Vegetarianism is the closest thing that most anyone of european descent can actually move to without drastic detrimental health-related side effects.

      Vegan is difficult, but it's not especially hard to be vegetarian without ill effects.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    29. Re:I hope by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Because there's plenty of people who do things like eat vegetarian just to have an identity and a common interest with other people.

    30. Re:I hope by avandesande · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heck, maybe you could market it based on donor identity? Beyonce rump roast anyone?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  2. a couple of problems by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the nanny-state mentality that is gripping government first world countries will soon forbid the growing of beef-life tissue because of its increasing the risk of arterial clogging, etc.

    the second is a quality consideration, I will accept nothing less than the flavor and texture of the very finest beef cuts in vat cultured tissue. else I will continue to support the inhumane raising and slaughtering of cattle. Also, I reserve the right to throw tissue cultures on the grill over charcoal, concerns of carcinogens be damned.

  3. Re:Japanese by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    if it tastes as good as dead animal muscles and has equivalent or better nutritional value, I'm all for it

  4. So... by centipedes.in.my.vag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this meat technically qualify as vegetarian, as no animal was killed to make it?

    --
    Only on /. can I lose karma with 2x "5, Funny" posts.
    1. Re:So... by femtobyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given the wide range of positions that fall under the broad banner "vegetarian" (do you eat eggs? dairy? fish?), there is no one correct "technical qualification". Likely, vegetarians closer to the "fundamentalist vegan" side will consider this an unacceptable animal product, while vegetarians closer to the "I still sometimes have a BLT because bacon tastes so good" school will embrace the concept.

    2. Re:So... by kwerle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes*

      * Unless you don't think so.

      I don't eat meat because I find animal food farming in this country (the US) abhorrant. I don't eat well treated food animals (free range, wild hunted, etc) because I find it simpler to draw the line at "I don't eat meat".

      I'm looking forward to commonly available vat-grown beef. Once the price point hits a reasonable level, I think I will partake. Other people won't feel the same way.

    3. Re:So... by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      I don't eat well treated food animals (free range, wild hunted, etc) because I find it simpler to draw the line at "I don't eat meat".

      It's your choice, of course, and I totally understand why you would say that while in public (it does simplify the explanation), but there's no reason to deny yourself those things at home. I have a local source for pastured chickens. They're delicious.

  5. Re:Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This might be a very cardboard and dry burger - all meat tissues, no fat.
    Japanese would prefer something of quality and not just because something is expensive. They have their Kobe beef. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_beef

  6. Reminds me of an old joke by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Q: How can you know why somebody is a vegan?

    A: Don't worry. He'll tell you.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  7. Re:At $325K a burger that is not reality by NettiWelho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, just because the first computer took millions to build and maintain didn't make it real.

  8. Re:I dont want to live on this planet anymore by dingen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are you so negative about lab grown meat? No more animal suffering, a lot less impact on the environment, what's not to like?

    --
    Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
  9. Re:Should I throw up now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Common additional "ingredients" in your "normal" burger:

    * puss
    * feces
    * lead and other hazardous materials
    * human hair
    * insect parts
    * insect larva
    * bacterial waste
    * lots of other disgusting things

    And you want to complain about something grown in a nice clean lab?

  10. Re:At $325K a burger that is not reality by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

    Also the expensive things are affordable. Not for everyone, of course, but for the upper 1%.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  11. The price is perfectly realistic, really... by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Funny

    The price is perfectly realistic, really; in fact, it's quite well thought-out. By the time these are ready for large-scale roll-out, inflation will have caught up nicely.

  12. Re:I dont want to live on this planet anymore by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    GMO agriculture by a fascist system (Monsanto and govt) HFCS in one form or another is in almost everything, now this (lab grown meat), i seen enough of this planet and i want off

    The upside is that you're still going to be able to have burgers without having to figure out how to herd cattle in space.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  13. Re:I dont want to live on this planet anymore by Extremus · · Score: 2

    I guess both of you have a point. I can summarize the issue stating the obvious: the techniques (on vitro beef, GMO, etc) are not the problem; the problem consists of the organizations controlling these techniques (Monsanto, etc). And the problem is this: monopoly.

  14. Re:The dream? Really? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So, you only eat meat from wild Aurochs you caught yourself? How is modern agri-business farming not cultured? From selectively breeding only the "best" animals, to force-growing them with anti-biotics and raising them in CAFO

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAFO

    Yup, not cultured at all.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  15. Obligatory by guttentag · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ted: "We're talking about growing meat in a lab without cows."
    Linda: "Ugh! That's creepy!... Right?... Oh, I see, we're doing that."

    Artificial Beef Taste Tester: "It tastes... familiar..."
    Ted: "Beef?"
    Taste Tester: "No..."
    Linda: "Chicken? We'll take chicken."
    Taste Tester: Shakes his head
    Ted: "What does it taste like?"
    Taste Tester: "Despair?"
    Ted: "Is it possible it just needs salt?"
    Taste Tester: Shakes his head very slowly

    Better Off Ted, Season 1 Episode 2

  16. Speaking as a meat eater... by multiben · · Score: 2

    I feel that eating meat which was not once running through the fields, robs me of the deep sense of superiority I get from being at the top of the food chain. Who knows how long we may remain here (alien invasion or pending zombie apocalypse)? I say let's enjoy our dominant position while we have it and not waste our time on defenseless lab meat.

    1. Re:Speaking as a meat eater... by blue+trane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Were you a slave-owner in a previous life?

    2. Re:Speaking as a meat eater... by multiben · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not my fault if my employees fail to negotiate good working conditions.

  17. Re:I dont want to live on this planet anymore by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GMO agriculture increases crop yields

    Unless and until we get unpatented GMO crops, and no more lawsuits against farmers who got cross-pollination from GMO crops, I'll be against GMO crops, regardless of its other merits or non-merits. Buying GM crops means supporting an abusive industry.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  18. Bacon ftw. by Nyder · · Score: 5, Funny

    First they replaced my natural flavor with imitation, and I ate it anyways.
    Second they replaced sugar with corn syrup, and I kept on getting fatter.
    Then they replaced my natural crops with genetic modified crops, and I kept eating.
    Now they are trying to replace my natural cow grown meat with vat grown meat? WTF?
    When will this stop? We are very close to losing bacon in the name of progress.

    Think of the bacon, this must be stopped.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:Bacon ftw. by labnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think of the bacon, this must be stopped.

      Ten years ago we had Steve Jobs, Johnny Cash, and Bob Hope. Now we have no Jobs, no Cash and no Hope. Please God don't let Kevin Bacon die!

      --
      46137
  19. Re:The dream? Really? by Jartan · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I dream of a juicy hamburger its sure the hell ain't cultured meat.

    Eventually there could be several advantages over your "real" burger actually.

    1) No need to grind it up. Grow it in the proper shape/texture and cook.
    2) You can cook it as rare as you like.
    3) Get the exact amount of fat you want so your burger is in fact juicy.
    4) High quality cuts might be mass producible.

  20. Re:Is this the best way? by cbhacking · · Score: 2

    Taste, texture, and have the nutritional charactersitics of beef? Not without engineering them well past anything you could properly call a soybean anymore...

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  21. Re:At $325K a burger that is not reality by JustOK · · Score: 2

    I only use virtual machines

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  22. all beef patty by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    How much worse can it be than what you get at McDonald's?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  23. Re: I dont want to live on this planet anymore by crmarvin42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't jump to conclusions. Every attempt I've ever heard of at cultured meat, or any other tissue for that matter, has been highly dependent upon nutrient solutions derived from living animals. Many are based on animal blood, some on liver or other tissue. I'd bet far FAR more animals went into this over prices burger than would have been necessary for the McDonalds my family had for lunch yesterday.

    --
    Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
  24. great news for the environment by hibji · · Score: 2

    If vat grown becomes a reality. Beef production produces huge amounts of methane which is a big contributor to climate change. You don't have to be animal welfare nut to advocate for this development.

    1. Re:great news for the environment by hibji · · Score: 2

      So what exactly are you calling bullshit on?

      Cattle don't produce significant methane? Is the EPA not authoratative enough for you?
      http://www.epa.gov/rlep/faq.html

      Or that methane causes climate change? I can't really help you if you believe climate change is a hippie conspiracy, but maybe this:
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/climate/evidence/methane.shtml

      Human beings causes a huge, measureable impact on the environment in may other ways, it is not a leap of logic to believe in anthropological climate change.

  25. Re:I dont want to live on this planet anymore by excelsior_gr · · Score: 2

    Actually, the suffering makes the meat taste worse :

    Here the animal is subjected to severe anxiety and fright caused by manhandling, fighting in the pens and bad stunning techniques. All this may result in biochemical processes in the muscle in particular in rapid breakdown of muscle glycogen and the meat becoming very pale with pronounced acidity (pH values of 5.4-5.6 immediately after slaughter) and poor flavour.

  26. Re:What about human flesh? by jbeaupre · · Score: 2

    There was a short story in Analog long ago that touched on that. A husband-wife team were famous for selling the best and most exotic cloned meat. He was the scientist, she was marketing. In a competitive industry, everyone was trying to out do each other.

    In the end, he confessed to his wife that their latest blockbuster was cloned from a sample taken from her ass.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  27. FDA driving the shift to "defined-medium" culture by Guppy · · Score: 2

    I used to work in a company that grows animal tissue cultures. You certainly CAN grow lots of tissue types without horse serum or any animal-related products. In fact, lots of lab protocols require that.

    Cyberax is correct, and the main driving force behind the shift has been the FDA; they've been pushing hard for chemically-defined culture media, with elimination of serum-type materials whenever possible. Although bio-pharm materials are closely examined for both known and unknown pathogens, their concern is that animal derived substances may yet harbor pathogens too novel to be detected by conventional methods. We're used to defined media for microbes being simple and cheap, but the ones used for mammalian cells are more complex and frequently must be tailored to each particular cell lineage, with comparatively exorbitant costs.

    In any case, if you've got the capability to do large-scale mammalian cell culture, you'd be a fool to use it for a product that sells for dollars-per-pound, when that capacity could be put to work performing contract manufacturing of bio-pharmaceuticals that sell for for thousands-of-dollars-per-gram.

  28. Not exactly meat free by ahem · · Score: 2

    From the article: "starting with a particular type of cell removed from cow necks obtained at a slaughterhouse."

    There was also a mention that there's an ongoing need for animal products to produce the growth medium.

    There's work going on to be animal independent, but for now this meat is also slightly murderous.

    --
    Not A Sig
  29. Re:Japanese by DasSquid · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The main issue with Kobe beef is that... well... it is all marketing. I live in Japan and I import meat from Australia, I know the industry well. The cultural difference between here and Australia in regards to agriculture is mind blowing. In Japan, tradition is king. If you do not do what your region/your family tells you, then the price of your cow will plummet, I've been to the cattle auctions here and they really are an interesting artifact.

    As per the wiki article, the Tajima cow is the only cow considered for this meat, what it fails to mention is that the Tajima is just an Angus, and indeed an Angus that is brought up in conditions I do not agree with. They are brought up in a very small area, not allowed to exercise so as to get that delicious marbling. After visiting these farms I feel much better about how my cows are brought up in Australia, with one cow having an average of 2 acres as opposed to 20 square feet.

    Anyway, rant aside Kobe beef just isn't all that good in comparison to the other meats available in Japan as they're all the same damned breed being brought up exactly the same, Japanese tradition just dictates that it's more expensive and 'better'.

  30. Did I hear... by grumpyman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anonymous McDonor?

  31. Today we are men! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    1. Meat tastes terrible. It's the fat that tastes good. Go make a burger from steak tartar, no cheese, if you don't believe me.

    2. Red meat, because of carnetines and gut bacterial, may be causing the lion's share of heart disease problems.

    So we've been fooled by science fiction for 80 years. Meat is a useless substrate to convey delicious fats to the mouth, and give you something to chew on while savoring them. And it's a hideously unhealthy substrate.

    Some tofu burger, but with beef fat, is probably the way to go. Lack of fats is why tofu, like plain baked taters, taste...boring, to be kind to both.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  32. Re: I dont want to live on this planet anymore by cffrost · · Score: 2

    Not only do you eat McDonald's for lunch, you bring your family there?
    Do you want your children to be obese and have health problems?

    Do poor people simply dislike money?

    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan