Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Home Flagship Phone, HTC First, May Be Discontinued

zacharye writes "The HTC First, or 'Facebook phone' as many prefer to call it, is officially a flop. It certainly wasn't a good sign when AT&T dropped the price of HTC's First to $0.99 just one month after its debut, and now BGR has confirmed that HTC and Facebook's little experiment is nearing its end. BGR has learned from a trusted source that sales of the HTC First have been shockingly bad. So bad, in fact, that AT&T has already decided to discontinue the phone. Our source at AT&T has confirmed that the HTC First, which is the first smartphone to ship with Facebook Home pre-installed, will soon be discontinued and unsold inventory will be returned to HTC. How much unsold inventory is there? We don’t have an exact figure, but things aren’t looking good. According to our source, AT&T sold fewer than 15,000 units nationwide through last week when the phone’s price was slashed to $0.99."

192 comments

  1. Misread their market. by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have charged extra and made them sign up for a waiting list.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Misread their market. by guises · · Score: 2

      I laughed, but this is sadly true. People seem to love being exploited if it means they'll feel just a little bit special for having the newest thing.

    2. Re:Misread their market. by crutchy · · Score: 3, Funny

      not everyone's phone gets discontinued so quickly... they should feel special

    3. Re:Misread their market. by technomom · · Score: 2

      People don't mind being exploited if you give away stuff in exchange for being exploited. Google gives away very good services for email, calendaring, mapping, news consolidation, search, etc. and oh yeah, a mobile OS!

      Just being made to feel special isn't enough, as Facebook is starting to find out.

    4. Re:Misread their market. by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Before that, they should have made ten, zuckerberg should have bought all of them before they were made. They should announce that it sold out in record time, and that demand vastly exceeded what they could make, but fortunately the second model will be coming out soon.

    5. Re:Misread their market. by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      The 15,000 people who bought this phone are "special"

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    6. Re:Misread their market. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Giving away something in exchange for being exploited, no matter how bad that sounds, is just trade. Are you using the word "exploited" in the US cultish anti-economic anti-capitalistic sense, or were you not being a troll?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  2. Old news ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chop chop editors ..

  3. Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought that the Facebook phone would have been the ultimate iPhone killer. It is, after all, the social media age and Facebook integration should have ensured success.

    1. Re:Unbelievable. by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      its not samsung

      the smartphone market is Apple and Samsung control more than 95% of the market. everyone else is table scraps

    2. Re:Unbelievable. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every phone is already integrated into facebook to a certain degree. If this were the only phone to ever allow you to see or update facebook, then yes it would be a smashing success. However, it is not. Even the marquee feature of the the "facebook home launcher" is available on other phones. There is nothing the phone can do that others can not.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    3. Re:Unbelievable. by WillKemp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everybody hates Facebook - they only use it because everyone else does and they have to use it to keep in touch.

    4. Re:Unbelievable. by interval1066 · · Score: 2

      And they laughed at me when I warned them about buying facebook stock...

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    5. Re:Unbelievable. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      facebook is already integrated into every phone to a certain degree

      ftfy

    6. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Facebook. I especially love the clueless marketeers bumbling about all trying to be the first movers. I've gotten 6 (no shit) free pairs of glasses, 2 cruises, tickets to two different show in the theater, and countless discounts on other crap. All because these fuckwits have no fucking clue how to act in this new digital land some of us have inhabited for decades before they found it.

    7. Re:Unbelievable. by csumpi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Smart people hate it and don't use it.
      Some in the middle hate it, but use it because they fear being left out.
      Morons love it it and use it.

    8. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All phones?

      My phone is in no way integrated with failbook. How could it be? I have AV, firewall, and I don't even have a fb account.

    9. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      facebook is already integrated into every phone to a certain degree

      ftfy

      That statement is easily proven false. Neither of my phones (my Uniden cordless and my 1980s vintage duck phone) don't have Facebook integrated into them in any way shape or form.

      Ehh, what?

    10. Re:Unbelievable. by Scarletdown · · Score: 0

      I was refuting the statement that Facebook is integrated somehow into every phone. Since there are countless phones that predate Facebook by a long long time, said statement is thus refuted.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    11. Re:Unbelievable. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      since i didn't specify the type of phone, my statement is subject to interpretation, not refuted

    12. Re:Unbelievable. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i also didn't specify the degree in which facebook is integrated

      regarding your 1980s vintage duck phone, the degree in which facebook is integrated is zero

    13. Re:Unbelievable. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Point taken. Did not consider it in that light. :)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    14. Re:Unbelievable. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Everybody hates Facebook - they only use it because everyone else does and they have to use it to keep in touch.

      The last time I checked, no government in the world had made signing up for facebook a legal requirement.

      To say you're a follower of fashion then moan about people following fashion is...illogical.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the nicest slap-fight I've seen in a long time. Are you British, or something?

    16. Re:Unbelievable. by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Obviously you have never used the Facebook app on Android. Then they released Home, and it only works on something like 4 Android phones. My understanding of the HTC phone was that it officially supported all the features of Facebook, without crashing and giving you "connection errors" every few seconds. No, I am not the only one, read the reviews in Google Play for the Facebook app.

      Apparently, Facebook overestimated how popular they were - as frustrated as I am with the Facebook app, it is not enough to make me want to give up my Galaxy (although 99 cents sounds like a bargain - until I saw that it was AT&T, and I will never have another cell phone on a contract again!)

    17. Re:Unbelievable. by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      LOL!!

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    18. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously what seems obvious to you is obviously incorrect. Now, Assuming that your username is a reference to the date in the time of Eranus the Great, then it becomes clear the third moon is made out of Borax.

    19. Re:Unbelievable. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I would hardly consider Motorolla "table scraps." Their phones work flawlessly.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    20. Re:Unbelievable. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is just a tool. Regular everyday people think about it as much as they think about how much they love their phone company or internet provider. It is just something that is there that they need to use. Nothing more, a utility.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  4. so sad by X0563511 · · Score: 1
    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  5. Here Today, Gone Today by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    Even the BlinkFeed missed it, it came and went so fast.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Here Today, Gone Today by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Even the BlinkFeed missed it, it came and went so fast.

      Who? I'm sorry, I'm not surgically attached to Internet Blogs...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  6. Facebook is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Once everyone's pet, mom and grandma jumped on facebook it began its decline. Now its just a marketing platform, not unlike slashdot since its acquisition by dice.
    The facebook phone is about as relevant as a FROSTY PISS.

    1. Re:Facebook is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does Netcraft confirm it?

    2. Re:Facebook is dying by kernelistic · · Score: 1

      Should we cue in the "Facebook is dying" jokes?

    3. Re:Facebook is dying by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Its not dying. But its no longer cool.

    4. Re:Facebook is dying by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      Yup. I'm out, and so are more and more people that I know. I'm almost scared by what might replace it.....

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    5. Re:Facebook is dying by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I don't think facebook was ever cool.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    6. Re:Facebook is dying by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I don't think facebook was ever cool.

      He meant 'cool' as in the temperature of a corpse.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Facebook is dying by Xest · · Score: 1

      A new social networking I'm working on called LifeSpy, it tracks everything about your life and broadcasts it to all your friends.

      Found a small lump on your testicles that you fear may be cancer? Thinking of telling your close friends about it? Now there's no need, thanks to LifeSpy we already recorded the conversation you had with your doctor using the phone in your pocket and broadcast it over the whole of the internet for you, whilst also debiting your account for $10,000 a visit to the worst foremost expert in testicular cancer who will examine you streamed live to everyone you know and everyone else whose paid us to watch.

      LifeSpy, the social network without Ads - we don't need them, we just bill you for products our algorithms determine you need and have them delivered to your hand by our StalkerCourier service that tracks you down using the GPS signal provided by your mobile.

      LifeSpy. Coming soon to a world near you.

    8. Re:Facebook is dying by robogun · · Score: 1

      Not just grandma jumped on (thereby making you have to watch what you say), but every pet cause, minor event, megacorporation and local shop, all clamoring for you to sign up for something or at least LIKE them and shoving ads in your face

  7. Hacking Facebook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see an open market for some new hardware to hack.

  8. Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by dcollins · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Facebook phone flops like few phones have ever flopped. Zuckerberg's lobbying group is collapsing like few lobbying groups have ever collapsed (http://techcrunch.com/2013/05/12/why-zuckerbergs-lobby-fwd-is-collapsing-like-a-house-of-cards-outside-of-dc/).

    Many of us are stuck with Facebook due its powerful networking effects (much like AT&T in the old days). But still the FB brand is renowned as being member-abusive, terrible about privacy, cavalier about interface changes and wiping out settings, etc. Perhaps this is a sign that few people are interested in letting FB expand its grip on their lives.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't have facebook and I network just fine, you know by talking to people and shit. About the only people who ask me about facebook are women, and I just get an "oh" back when I say I don't have one.

      So, in conclusion: facebook is for 13 year olds, family, and posers (I went to the bar last night check out how badass I am). None of my family uses it making it a complete waste of time.

    2. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Facebook actually did anything useful, I'd see the point in signing up. As it is, it's just a way to harvest marketing data without providing anything in return that is actually useful. Its UI is horrible, the function it serves is nonexistent, the company is abusive, and the CEO is hostile.

      The emperor has been going full monty for several years now.

    3. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many of us are stuck with Facebook due its powerful networking effects

      I don't understand this. I dropped Facebook over a year ago and have never even been tempted to look back. What's powerful about it? I don't know anyone that gives a flying shit about Facebook. My wife uses it but mostly because her friends are on it. If everyone just stopped going I doubt my wife would even notice or care.

      No one is a Facebook fanboy. I don't see people clogging forums saying :Wow Facebook is the bee's knees!" there aren't Facebook vs Google+ flame wars like with iOS and Android.

      Facebook is just sorta there. People use it but usually can't tell you why. It's like the fucking AOL of this generation. Tons of people have it, not because they asked for it specifically but because a bunch of assholes bombarded their mailbox with CD's (or preinstalled it on their cell phones).

      If Facebook disappeared right now, would people really notice? I guess the brain dead teenagers and young adults may notice but they would have it replaced within hours with something else.

      I guess what I'm saying is, Facebook as a brand is worthless. No one gives a shit. Everyone knows Mark Zuckerberg is a fucking douche bag. People only use it to catch up on old high school aquaintences to see how fucked up their lives are now they are adults. There is no value to it and therefor no brand loyalty.

    4. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > But still the FB brand is renowned as being member-abusive, terrible about privacy,
      > cavalier about interface changes and wiping out settings, etc. ...on Slashdot, yes. But I doubt more than 0.0001% of its daily user base give a shit about any of those features. Be honest - privacy? It's Facebook - you tell the world what you're up to. "Member-abusive"? Yeah, I saw a Facebook user with a black eye the other day - the things they put up with to use a free website!

      People don't need to get a special Facebook phone, because you can use the site of the app on loads of existing phones. It doesn't make any sense.

    5. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks so much for the strong data behind your assertion. I can now tell my marketing director to ignore all of our user surveys, because an AC told me that facebook is for 13 year olds family and posers.

      Just because you don't do something does not mean that there is no value in it

    6. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The way I see it, the facebook brand is in a similiar position to the Windows brand. They're popular in the sense that they're ubiquitous, but not in the sense that they elicit passion. Unlike, for instance, Apple, you won't see "facebook fanboys" who'll defend the site to the death. It's used because just about everyone knows someone on it (as you said, the networking effects), but not because it has any particular strength or marketing genius.

      The question you need to ask yourself is that if all of a sudden facebook was replaced by another website fulfilling similar/identical needs, would people care? I think not. If you asked the same for Apple, though, I think a lot of people would cry out at their iDevices being taken away. That, right there, is brand power.

    7. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by fermion · · Score: 2
      Except for Kin, and I doubt facebook spent a billion developing the phone. Failed phones are not uncommon. Facebook better spend it capital figuring out how it is going to survive the next five years. If not a phone, then something.

      It is not uncommon for lobbying group, particularly new groups with little political expertise, to flop. Even groups that should be politically savvy, such as Freedomworks, which got almost no one elected during the last cycle, can be flops, though well funded as they provide means for the middle class to launder money. The problem with groups such as this, as can also be seen in the Susan G. Komen group, is it is high profile and corporate interests don't want to be associated with high profile groups that do things the customer base may object to. Corporate type do objectionable things low profile.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's powerful about it?... My wife uses it but mostly because her friends are on it.

      I love when people answer their own questions.

      The GP post said Facebook had "powerful networking effects", which means, as explained by the Wikipedia:

      In economics and business, a network effect (also called network externality or demand-side economies of scale) is the effect that one user of a good or service has on the value of that product to other people. When network effect is present, the value of a product or service is dependent on the number of others using it.

    9. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Then again - many of us refuse to do some things because we realize there is no value in it.

      I'll admit, I have an account. I go for weeks without signing in. When I do sign in, I just scan over some of the stupid shit my family and acquaintances are doing. Occasionally, I'll sign in to post a petition to kill bankers, or kill pharmaceutical corporate officers, or kill all lawyers and politicians. Oh, Monsanto, too.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when Facebook first came out. It was a great way to send invites to college parties without having to remember a bunch of number and not worrying about "Responsible" adults finding out about your crazy ass house party. However, that only really lasted until they let just anyone join not just college students so cops could join and the free ride was over. That's about the time I stopped caring about Facebook.

    11. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      I never got the appeal -- it was just MySpace with access control for your friends. Hence it took off as "safer" for students.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    12. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      I don't think Facebook itself is a toxic brand, I just thing people didn't want a phone that was kind of "Facebook all the time".

      I can think of one phone that flopped as hard as the Facebook phone - the Rokr. That thing was a disaster too, but it didn't mean either Motorola or Apple had bad brands. Just the implementation of that one phone was poor.

      I think Home will do better after Facebook figures out how to dial it back away from 11. But they probably will not be doing custom hardware anytime soon.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    13. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Because you could connect with classmates that you didn't necessarily know. There was a good 18-month period where FB was very useful for setting up study sessions and whatnot.

      (Also, you could find out if that redhead two rows down was single)

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    14. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I don't have facebook and I network just fine, you know by talking to people and shit.

      And even talking to shit is probably optional.

    15. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Because you could connect with classmates that you didn't necessarily know. There was a good 18-month period where FB was very useful for setting up study sessions and whatnot.

      Maybe US colleges are different than here in the UK, but how fucking difficult is it to talk to people in your class? Out of all the times in your life, college is where it's easiest to meet new people.

      Christ knows what you were like when you started working, did you literally never talk to any of your colleagues except over the internet? Even if they were sitting next to you?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When I do sign in, I just scan over some of the stupid shit my family and acquaintances are doing. Occasionally, I'll sign in to post a petition to kill bankers, or kill pharmaceutical corporate officers, or kill all lawyers and politicians

      So your family and friends posting photos of interest, discussing topics of mutual interest or just having a few giggles is "stupid shit" but signing a totally meaningless and juvenile petition to kill strangers is somehow a good use of your time and the resources of the internet?

      Gotcha.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      People only use it to catch up on old high school aquaintences to see how fucked up their lives are now they are adults.

      Yes, people often forget about the valuable aid to stalking that facebook has become. Any replacement would need to replicate that functionality if nothing else.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by DesertJazz · · Score: 1

      Personally I saw it take off at my college my last year or so there. It was a university that has many umm... socially awkward... individuals. We also used AIM a lot at that point and I can remember times when we had conversations over it, even though the person was in the same room as us. (Granted that was mostly pure laziness too...) For that kind of setting the idea of being able to 'meet' over Facebook was a lot more comfortable.

      The one thing I find myself still on Facebook for more than anything is a professional group that's started up. There are about 10k members and it's a pretty good professional development tool.

    19. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      I've worked in X industry in both union and non-union companies. I think unions are better for me and better for everyone else.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    20. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Few people even post on Facebook anymore - they just reshare cat pics and George Takai's meme of the day. The few people I do want to make sure I keep up with, I set up notifications, and Facebook keeps turning them off. Really annoying, because you only know they are turned off if you check your notifications on a PC, or when you start wondering why your friends haven't posted in a while and head over to their page on your phone.

      You would think that now that Facebook has gone public, they would find ways to stop pissing off their users.

    21. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Geez, Louise - how many poses of the same child can you look at, with ice cream dripping down her face, over her blouse, down her thighs, and onto her shoes? Uhhhh - yeah, stupid shit. That's a single snapshot moment, you throw the snapshot into an album, then drag it out years later to embarrass the girl. You don't take 300 shots, and post them ALL to Facebook.

      Killing some of those people would be a service to humanity. Alright, so maybe I exaggerate some - the petitions don't call for their deaths. Think, numbskull - what do petitions actually call for? Yeah, I sign some of those petitions, and I forward them to the mindless sheep, despite the fact that few will care enough to even read them.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    22. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has their fanbois too (albeit not as many as Apple). Where are the Facebook fanbois?

      See the thing is, Microsoft's evil was limited to developers and partners initially (less so recently). So the user was largely shielded from these tales of woe. Facebook, on the other hand, was user-facing from day one, and treated them like crap from day one.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    23. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I agree, one of the major value points of FaceBook is the sharing of cat-centric media. Seriously. My family has had good times consuming many a cat video or meme shared on FB. I think I'm going over to the oatmeal right now.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    24. Re:Is Facebook a Toxic Brand? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Our classes apparently are different. We didn't have TIME to talk. Lecture started at 1:00 PM. Lecture is supposed to be out at 1:50. Lecture runs over until 1:57 because that's how chemists roll. Next prof is waiting outside tapping his or her foot impatiently. No time for tea and crumpets when there's science afoot!

      We also had course administrators, so there could be six sections of general chemistry lecture that all did the same assignments, and therefore could work together and study together. FB brought us all into the same loop, and it let us all communicate with each other.

      Nowadays, our university uses Blackboard to give us the same option to email classmates, so it's not like it was just a trend for introverts.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  9. Facebook is shedding users every quarter in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people are dropping Facebook. The key demographic that this phone targeted are the ones leaving in droves.

  10. let's make the stock price go down. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    let's make the stock price go down.

    1. Re:let's make the stock price go down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok i'll go press the make-facebook-stock-go-down button.

    2. Re:let's make the stock price go down. by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 2

      I believe it's called the "sell" button in your stock portfolio. Either that or make something bad happen for them.

      --
      Rawr
    3. Re:let's make the stock price go down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since I don't own any stocks guess there's only one answer left!

    4. Re:let's make the stock price go down. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I believe it's called the "sell" button in your stock portfolio. Either that or make something bad happen for them.

      I trust Zuckerburg's ego will do that for me.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  11. Nood android question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not an android user, but is it possible to wipe the facebook front end and just add generic android rom to it?

    1. Re:Nood android question by fcmeneg · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you install a new rom you will lose your warranty period. But you don't have to do it, you can just install a new launcher (a new start screen).

    2. Re:Nood android question by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

      Probably, depending on the hardware, the security of the boot-loader lockdown, if HTC was planning to unlock this one, and if the drivers are available.

      --
      Rawr
    3. Re:Nood android question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes!

      If my CM ROM bricks the phone I'll be out 99 cents?

      Oh heavens to Betsy! Whatever shall I do?

    4. Re:Nood android question by raburton · · Score: 1

      > If my CM ROM bricks the phone I'll be out 99 cents?

      I'm assuming 99 cents is just the deposit on a 2 year hire-purchase agreement with mobile service. If you brick your phone you'll still paying for it for the next 2 years and not being able to use the service you are also paying for without forking out the retail price of another phone.

      If they really were 99 cents a phone there would be no shortage of people buying them.

    5. Re:Nood android question by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Its better than that. There is a check box to completely disable the facebook home screen and it leaves you with a bone stock android install.

      I was considering buying one (it compares to the nexus 4 favorably in specs) since I don't want a huge phone and samsung is taking their time with the S4 Mini (ditto for the HTC M4). Turning off home leaves you with what is actually quite a nice device--well designed and good build quality--that easily fits in my pants pocket.

      Of course I think the facebook home thing scared everybody away--even the facebook addicts I see on the train don't want to admit it by buying the facebook phone. This phone is way better than any other midrange devices and was a steal at $99 on contract (and should have gone like hotcakes when they dropped it to 99 cents)...so the only explanation I can come up with is that people actively disliked the idea of facebook home and purchased lower-quality midrange phones that didn't include it. Unfortunately this means that I can't buy one...with so few units sold, there won't be any updates coming from HTC and there won't be a modding community to release updated unofficial roms.

      --
      Bottles.
  12. The light is on but nobody's home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTC - Horrible Taiwanese Crap

    Seriously has anyone ever had a positive experience with an HTC?

    captcha: cellular

    1. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. I loved my HTC s620 (AKA: "Excalibur," and "T-Mobile Dash"). Except for some of the limitations of Windows Mobile it was some really solid hardware. And reviews for the Nexus One, also built by HTC, were stellar, the Tytn II was pretty popular, and people seemed to like the T-Mobile G1. For the longest time there, HTC really did rule the roost. It's only relatively recently, if I remember correctly, that Samsung started to totally dominate, right around the time they launched the Galaxy platform.

      --
      Rawr
    2. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by WillKemp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      [......] has anyone ever had a positive experience with an HTC?

      Yes. I used an HTC Desire for two years and never had any problems with it at all. It was the best phone i'd had up to that point by far.When it came to replacing it, the Galaxy S3 only won out over the One X because it had a replaceable battery and an SD card.

    3. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      **T-Mobile** Dash

      That's where HTC went wrong. I had 3 HTC phone, and I was happy with all 3. All of them were branded as T-Mobile phones.

      I'm sure most HTC phone owners have no idea who HTC is.

    4. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by TheEyes · · Score: 1

      My HTC Sensation was my first smartphone, so that may bias me a little. I've moved on to a Note 2 now, but I constantly find myself missing features from Sense 3.5, and bewildered by "features" of Touchwiz (MMS messages as slideshows that you can't zoom in on? WTF Samsung, WTF.)

    5. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I used to roll with a Touch Pro 2, and aside from the horrific memory management that came courtesy of WM6.something, it was an alright device.

      LOVED the built in stylus and full keyboard.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by kwark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Coming from the G1 and Desire Z, new HTC phones lack a lot of features:
      -no replacable battery
      -no trackpad
      -no SD
      -no keyboard
      all these features are missing on any "modern" phone, the trend is to make all buttons disappear at the cost of screen real-estate. So when it was time to get a new phone I went for the one with the biggest screen and most of the disappearing features, I went for Samsung.

    7. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by rta · · Score: 1

      I had a t-mobile g1 and now am using a t-mobile g2. They were both fine. Since all these things are Android the difference is relatively minor. I like Samsung in general as a brand and have been buying their stuff for over a decade, but my tilt currently is that they've currently become the expensive brand. Like Sony was back in the day when they were on top.

      That said i don't really understand the phone market. Except for hated Apple who has a decent product lifecycle and longish term support all these manufacturers just pump out and endless stream of nearly identical phones and then abandon them after a few months anyway. Hopefully now that we're at 2-4 cores and ~1gb of ram things will stabilize some.

      On the FB specifically (and i am a strong detractor of FB and haven't used it in over a year)... i similarly don't understand why they're bailing so soon. Give the thing a chance. It's not like it's HURTING people or something. For example, relatively few people actually buy the Nexus phones and tablets from Google, but they're still around and serve their purpose.

    8. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTC Sense is by far the best UI on top of andriod in the market. Their virtual keyboard is far beyond what Samsung or Sony can do. The only downside to the HTCs I've owned are the battery life (due to Sense I guess).

    9. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      HTC - Horrible Taiwanese Crap

      Seriously has anyone ever had a positive experience with an HTC?

      Yes. My first Android phone was the HTC Dream. An excellent little phone (albeit with not quite enough ram), and a much nicer keyboard than any other device I've used. These days I've settled on a Samsung Captivate Glide, but the keyboard isn't as nice, the phone's a little too big and the software support from Samsung is abysmal - I'm still on Gingerbread; they did eventually release an ICS firmware after a very long wait, but it is widely regarded as unusably buggy. The xda-developers community have been reasonably successful at porting CyanogenMod to it, but there are still some serious bugs (notably with bluetooth and GPS) which are holding me back from upgrading.

    10. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by CodeheadUK · · Score: 1

      My first Android phones was a HTC Hero, cracking bit of kit. The wife had a Desire that she loved and converted her to Android too.

      Its a shame to see that HTC have lost their way recently, but that doesn't mean that they can't be great again.

    11. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by zequav · · Score: 1

      Yep, if it wasn't for the ridiculous 512 MB of internal storage (lower than RAM!!) that forced almost anybody who wanted to have a few apps to use the hackish ext2sd, it would still be a nice phone today. I gave it to my sister when I bought the Galaxy Nexus; she's still using it as main phone. Built as a tank.

    12. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by cgomezr · · Score: 1

      I have an HTC Desire HD since early 2011 and I'm very happy with it (in spite of not having an official upgrade to Android 4... but seriously, who cares, I haven't seen any Android 4-only app I'd like to have at the moment).

      The screen is perfect, the phone is responsive, the camera is great, but above all, the default Android configuration and the Sense UI are top notch. I have tried new Sony, Samsung and LG phones and I don't like their UI half as much (Sony's is quite good, Samsung's especially crappy). HTC gets a lot of little things right that I now take for granted - for example, when I take a train, the weather widget will automatically update and show the weather for the new city if configured to do so. In the Samsung UI, I have to go to the weather app and tell it explicitly to get my new location from the GPS, which is a pain if you are constantly moving.

      When I get a new phone, it's going to be HTC.

    13. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      HTC - Horrible Taiwanese Crap

      Seriously has anyone ever had a positive experience with an HTC?

      captcha: cellular

      My HTC One makes the Samsung Galaxy look like a kid's plastic toy in terms of construction quality. I've no idea why people rate Samsung so highly, their phones look as though they'd disintegrate if you put them down on a table too hard.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:The light is on but nobody's home by mlk · · Score: 1

      HTC Blue Angel and HTC Wizard were both great devices.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  13. Does anybody know? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Is it normal for a contract between a carrier and an OEM to be structured such that unsold inventory would be sent back to the OEM?

    Logistically, that seems like it would be pretty wasteful(especially since there presumably exists an 'Android-base-build' firmware that HTC put together before adding 'Home' on, so they could push that over the internet and convert the units in the field into perfectly servicable stock-Android handsets, in about the time it takes AT&T sales to sell an overpriced case and insurance plan), unless the contract is sufficiently one-sided that HTC was begging AT&T to offer shelf space and accepting all the downside risk in exchange for whatever margin they managed on sales...

    Is HTC just too weak to get decent deals? Is it normal for the carrier to not outright buy the phone until they sell it? How does that channel work?

    1. Re:Does anybody know? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Is it normal for a contract between a carrier and an OEM to be structured such that unsold inventory would be sent back to the OEM?

      Isn't that pretty much how auto dealerships work?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Does anybody know? by slew · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is it normal for the carrier to not outright buy the phone until they sell it?

      I don't know about phones, but in the distribution world, it is very common for a reseller to not actually buy a product before it is sold.

      Many companies these days work on a virtual inventory basis with their primary supply chain. The basic idea is that the seller of the product effectively leases space in the warehouse to the supplier with a contract such that the supplier agrees to maintain a certain amount of virtual inventory. When the seller sells-through a product, they don't actually have to pay for the inventory until the second the unit is "pulled" from this hub and then the supplier bills the seller and is on the hook to replenish this inventory. Of course the seller discontinues that product, then it just never pulls any more units from hub and the supplier is left holding the bag (even though the inventory is in the seller's warehouse). On the sale, the seller often still has "net-90" days to pay for it as well. As you can see, the life of the supplier isn't easy, nowdays they need to pay for both the inventory and the account receivables side...

      For the inventory on the shelf there is a similar paradigm, as part of the shelf stocking agreement, a repurchase agreement is made that the seller can require the supplier to purchase back some or all of the inventory (although usually at a discounted rate), if the inventory hasn't been sold in a certain number of days. This type of stock/repurchase agreements happens in industries far and wide, supermarkets to bookseller to electronic's retailers.

      The rationale for the seller offering a high repurchase price and percentages is for the seller and supplier to maximise the amount of product on the shelves (to prevent out-of-stock sales loss) given the seller's risk tolerance for the product. Of course the supplier may be irrational, but the seller is covered a bit in this case... Usually the seller says I'll risk $X to stock your product on the shelf and the agreement is structured by the supplier that although $Y of inventory is stocked, $Y - #units X repurchase_price = $X.

  14. Opinion: more Facebook than HTC fault by Pecisk · · Score: 1

    I really don't see how Facebook can go but down. It's not cool new thing. Everyone capable enough to use it from phone already does it. How many people are there without smartphones and with active Facebook account?

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    1. Re:Opinion: more Facebook than HTC fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that a real question? is Ubuntu a good flavor?

    2. Re:Opinion: more Facebook than HTC fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are thinking way to intelligently in relation to how equities... We are talking about Wall Street. Facebook has allot of ownership by VCs and Investment funds who were caught off guard when its IPO fell flat. I mean even Goldman owns 1% of the company.

      In short.. IMO, FB isnt going to fall very far as long as big players (including market makers) own it (and still have access to the Fed's 0.25% window).

  15. Facebook better learn... by nick357 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...the ONLY reason they have the number of users that they do is because everyone's friends are on Facebook.

    People do not like Facebook. They hate the lack of security, the constant changing of format, the increasingly annoying advertising, etc, etc, etc.

    One day (and I believe it will be soon), a viable alternative will appear and their collective mass of users will leave practically overnight.

    No one loves Facebook. Its not cool. Its just where everyone is hanging until something better comes along.

    1. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, Google+ certainly wasn't the "something better". It has its points, but we certainly didn't see a mass migration. I'm not sure anything else would succeed either.

      Part of the problem is there's no easy way to mass-migrate all your friends, photos, comment history etc. from FB to whatever might be its successor. It will have to be not merely a replacement, but something new and really improved.

      What I'd like to see (maybe it's out there, I haven't looked) is a social-media aggregating client that will let me read and update FB, G+, LinkedIn, et bloody cetera through a single email-like interface.

    2. Re:Facebook better learn... by geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One day (and I believe it will be soon), a viable alternative will appear and their collective mass of users will leave practically overnight.

      No one loves Facebook. Its not cool. Its just where everyone is hanging until something better comes along.

      I went over to Google+ and have never looked back. All the high school bullshit from 20 years ago that somehow found me on Facebook is now long gone. I honestly hope Facebook stays alive for a while so as to keep all the fuckers I hate from my high school years away from my social networking.

    3. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If high school bullshit found you on Facebook, that is kind of your problem for friending it (and then not un-friending it) in the first place.

    4. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      facebook meet myspace, myspace meet facebook.

      myspace has its niche market, music and bands... facebook will, too.... businesses spamming comments and begging for 'likes', along with the overweight homebound and unemployed playing farmville.

      will the next social network, come on town, it's YOUR time to scam shareholders or get bought out by murdick.

    5. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FB is just a self-updating phone book. It's a tool. Now stop staring at your tools, fbidiots.

    6. Re:Facebook better learn... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      One thing stopped me using Google+ more when it was the rage a couple years ago: lack of an events calendar.

      At the time you needed a separate calendar account and then tie it to Plus. I had zero desire to do this. I logged in recently and IIRC this is no longer required, but it was a huge momentum killer among my circle(s) of friends.

    7. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm living in a podunk midwestern town at the moment, where it's normal for people in their 20s and 30s not to have a smartphone or even an iPod. Despite never going out besides the gym or groceries, I still managed to overhear a conversation about how the gym owner and another woman hate Facebook and even how the security policies change so often that setting things to private doesn't mean anything.
       
      I don't think Facebook comprehend how much reach their dickish behavior has had.

    8. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMFAO. It's pretty easy to get along with EVERYONE in the sandbox...when you're the only ONE.

    9. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story, bro.

    10. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than yours, brah.

    11. Re:Facebook better learn... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      All the high school bullshit from 20 years ago that somehow found me on Facebook is now long gone.

      That's funny, because I think that's a huge proportion of what people like from FB. (I'm not saying it's what *I* like from FB, though I have ended up playing Words With Friends with people I knew in high school, indirectly because we were friends on FB.)

    12. Re:Facebook better learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you should probably explain how Facebook got the number of users it did, BEFORE everyone and their friends, parents, grandparents, dogs, gerbils, and cats were using it. ?
      They weren't the first company to harvest personal data, nor the first social networking site.

      Further; you're off in saying that people hate it. The vast majority of users treat it as a service for communicating with 'friends' and family. It's an appliance. It conjures up the same amount of emotional attachment as a toaster. (minus delicious output.)

      It does what they want (sharing photos of kids and dogs, spreading incredibly dumb chain-letter type communications, and internet meme/groupthink). Most people do not care/notice/worry about the privacy implications like the average slashdotter. (unfortunately.)

    13. Re:Facebook better learn... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One day (and I believe it will be soon), a viable alternative will appear and their collective mass of users will leave practically overnight.

      G+ is a viable alternative. I'm not exactly in love with it, but it works. Like most google stuff it is unnecessarily bandwidth-hungry, but that's pretty much the only thing wrong with it after the real name policy, which doesn't differentiate it from facebook.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Facebook better learn... by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      One day (and I believe it will be soon), a viable alternative will appear and their collective mass of users will leave practically overnight.

      just like happened to ebay when they jacked their fees up?

    15. Re:Facebook better learn... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm living in a podunk midwestern town at the moment, where it's normal for people in their 20s and 30s not to have a smartphone or even an iPod. Despite never going out besides the gym or groceries, I still managed to overhear a conversation about how the gym owner and another woman hate Facebook and even how the security policies change so often that setting things to private doesn't mean anything. I don't think Facebook comprehend how much reach their dickish behavior has had.

      The almost hyper-realism of your anecdote certainly had me convinced. It was almost as though I was there listening to these two non-geeks bitch and whine about security policies and online privacy concerns. I'm surprised they didn't mention their favourite Linux distro and how fucking awesome bitcoins are too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Facebook better learn... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It does what they want (sharing photos of kids and dogs, spreading incredibly dumb chain-letter type communications, and internet meme/groupthink)

      So if it's some psychotic geek on reddit or 4chan it's cool to keep reduplicating memes, but if a pleb on facebook does it it's dumb?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. The most pointless phone ever is a flop by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can anybody name me a smartphone that doesn't have Facebook integration already? It's hard to build a phone around a killer feature when literally every competitor already has that feature.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:The most pointless phone ever is a flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine dies not. I have no facebook apps what so ever. So can any phone that you do not install facebook on it.

    2. Re:The most pointless phone ever is a flop by raburton · · Score: 1

      > Mine does not. I have no facebook apps what so ever.

      Ditto. But if you are the type of person that uses facebook and would like to access it on your phone you are type of person who already has a smartphone and does just that, therefore there is one to sell this device too.

    3. Re: The most pointless phone ever is a flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool story, bro.

      GP's point was that all other smartphones CAN integrate with facebook, not that literally everyone with a smartphone actually downloads an available facebook app. obviously, if someone doesn't want to use facebook, they won't download the app.

    4. Re: The most pointless phone ever is a flop by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      But virtually every single competitor phone out there that anybody would care about *can* do Facebook. Thus, if you care about Facebook, you already have it in your hand.

      It doesn't matter if the competitor's products are used that way, it's whether or not they are capable of it. And pretty much any smart phone is 100% FB capable, so no reason at all to buy a "FB Phone". And ask yourself which is worth more: The option of having FB installed on your phone, or the requirement of having it installed?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:The most pointless phone ever is a flop by hurfy · · Score: 1

      > Mine does not. I have no facebook apps what so ever.

      Ditto. But if you are the type of person that uses facebook and would like to access it on your phone you are type of person who already has a smartphone and does just that, therefore there is one to sell this device too.

      Especially if it is not on the market long enough for many of those people to finish the contract on their current phone :O

    6. Re:The most pointless phone ever is a flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some phones are defaulting to having Facebook preinstalled (as an un-uninstallable type app at that!)

  17. Never heard of it. Not even on Facebook. by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's one of the reasons why it flopped?

    1. Re:Never heard of it. Not even on Facebook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's one of the reasons why it flopped?

      I'm betting you also don't own a TV, and you're itching for some excuse to explain this fact in excruciating detail.

    2. Re:Never heard of it. Not even on Facebook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's one of the reasons why it flopped?

      Maybe it never even existed to begin with.

    3. Re:Never heard of it. Not even on Facebook. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's one of the reasons why it flopped?

      I'm betting you also don't own a TV, and you're itching for some excuse to explain this fact in excruciating detail.

      Well, like me, he may own a TV, but either (a) doesn't watch broadcast TV at all, or (b) timeshifts and doesn't watch the commercials, or some combination of (a) and (b).

      I've seen articles on the Facebook phone here, on The Register, and (I think) in Yahoo News, but only as articles, not ever as marketing. I don't even know what the desktop looks like. (Of course, I could google it and find out, but I don't care to do that. The Facebook phone is in my mind in the same class as Windows Phone; something I'd never own and in which I have absolutely no interest.)

      So yeah, if they only marketed the device on TV, there are lots of people (more every day) who wouldn't have been in a position to see an advertisement.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Never heard of it. Not even on Facebook. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's one of the reasons why it flopped?

      I'm betting you also don't own a TV, and you're itching for some excuse to explain this fact in excruciating detail.

      Well, like me, he may own a TV, but either (a) doesn't watch broadcast TV at all, or (b) timeshifts and doesn't watch the commercials, or some combination of (a) and (b).

      Or possibly just for use with video game consoles, DVD/VCR machines, or to output classic arcade games via MAME from a PC onto a larger screen.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    5. Re:Never heard of it. Not even on Facebook. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The point being, one can own a TV and not sit there watching the off-air feed in real time from beginning of prime time to the 11:00 news, clutching the remote in one's cheeto-powder-encrusted mitts. That's so... seventies. Back when "kill your tv" really meant something, because TV only had three providers of content and so much of it was mindless dreck. Now you get to... well, at least *pick* your mindless dreck.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  18. Blame HTC by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    There was a translation problem when the order came in,

    "We want a smart, flip-phone" got translated to "We want a smart, flopped-phone".

    And boy, did HTC deliver!

    1. Re:Blame HTC by geek · · Score: 4, Informative

      The phone is actually very good. The hardware that is. If you stripped out Facebook Home you would basically have stock android on it. At .99 cents on contract thats a damn good buy if Cyanogen Mod supported it.

    2. Re:Blame HTC by deadl0ck · · Score: 1

      I have two android "phones" with no service, I'd buy this one if they sold it without service and cheap. I use mine as a mini tablet and the other as a PDA.

      --
      --
    3. Re:Blame HTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The HTC Evo 4G LTE has been available from Sprint for a while now, $0 on contract, 1.7 GHz dual core processor (vs. 1.4 in the HTC First), same amount of RAM, 4.7 inch display instead of 4.3 (and both 720p), better camera. Plus, the Evo 4G LTE is, of course, 4G and the HTC First is not.

      I would bet the Facebook integration isn't the problem, the problem is that this is a mid-range phone. The iPhone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy S4 are selling very well. I think Facebook and HTC should have made Facebook Home part of the new HTC One (which is getting rave reviews), not this. The HTC One has a better camera, better processor, more RAM, larger display, higher display resolution, and 4G. I'm baffled that Facebook and HTC went this route.

    4. Re:Blame HTC by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it has the qualifications to run for public office.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  19. Promo & Hype vs User Needs by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    People don't get sucked into a "gadget" when they have real needs. Users want a product with a real answer they can RELY on.

    1. Re:Promo & Hype vs User Needs by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      People don't get sucked into a "gadget" when they have real needs. Users want a product with a real answer they can RELY on.

      ...or if it's from Apple.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  20. $.99? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was really that price it would have sold, the reality was that you needed a contract to get one.

  21. Phillip Phillips said it best..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold on, to your brand new phone
    As we roll down this unfamiliar road
    And although this carrier is stringing us along
    Just know you've got a phone
    It's too bad your running home

    Settle down, it'll all be clear
    Don't pay no mind to the carriers
    They fill you with fear
    On your screen you can still drag and drop
    and the ads they will never stop

    Just know you’re not alone
    Lots of other people's phones run home

    Settle down, wipe the cache clear
    your carriers
    They fill you with fear
    There are plenty of mods all around
    If you get lost, help can always be found

    Just know you’re not alone
    Cause lots of people jailbreak their phones....

  22. Not an OS. by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    They might have been better off when sales started taking if they highlighted it's just a launcher on an Android based phone and not a full blown Operating System. The problem was the launcher was optimized to enhance social networking and (from what I hear) wasn't good at working with other Apps.

    This is a bad hit for HTC. The specs on the hardware are pretty good, so dumping a re-flash to the feature phone market is going to hurt. I don't think there's been a fail like this snce the MS Kin.

  23. Good riddance... by ndtechnologies · · Score: 1

    This was a stupid idea anyway. I don't know of any smartphone that doesn't have some sort of Facebook integration. It's just too bad that Samsung wasn't the one making these devices. I'd rather see them lose money than HTC.

    --
    I have nothing clever to put here...
  24. How long before by randomErr · · Score: 1

    How long before they're offered as TracFone's for $19.95 with 20 minutes free?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:How long before by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      How long before they're offered as TracFone's for $19.95 with 20 minutes free?

      I think you have something there. The "facebook phone" concept was tailor made for prepaid blister-pack impulse buys displayed near the register.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  25. Not surprising in the least by m.dillon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because, really, there was never a 'Facebook' phone in the first place. It was just an annoying app launcher that should never have been bundled with a phone. This also demonstrates the sheer power that the default app launcher has to make or break perfectly fine hardware. Even though the customer can easily replace the launcher, bundling a phone with a messed up launcher basically destroys sales of the phone.

    Vendors try to lock people into these sorts of things all the time, it just usually isn't quite so blatant and most people don't even realize that it is happening. Buy a Motorola phone and you get some minor but interesting stuff that is generic but locked into the platform (can't be downloaded and run on other android phones). Same with all vendors, but they have to tread carefully or risk alienating their entire user base. The FB stuff was so in-your-face that even a 5-year-old could turn away from the foul stench.

    -Matt

  26. Re:Noob Android Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would be out $350. Unless you are a sucker and somehow believe that AT&T is giving you the phone for $0.99 out of the goodness of their heart.

  27. Can't this be unlocked, flashed, and repurposed? by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

    I've got an older HTC Supersonic and I could go for a 0.99 upgrade as long as I could move it over to my current Sprint account. Why can't this be unlocked and reflashed with a decent version of Android?

  28. 99c without a contract? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Sure, the price is dropped to less than a dollar, but you'd be paying the phone back twice in the monthly contract fees. Wake me up when the phone is 99 cents without a contract or a lock.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:99c without a contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When that happens I'll buy 5 just to mess around with, because why not it's just 5 bucks. I spent more than that for breakfast this morning.

    2. Re:99c without a contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sleep long, my friend.

  29. Facebook is a utility. by xaxa · · Score: 0

    I think you're probably correct about the lack of brand loyalty. Might most people think of Facebook roughly the way they think of email, or the telephone? Everyone has is, except some people who like to say they don't have it, since for some things it's the normal / easiest way to do something. It's just a utility though, and a better utility will replace it when it gets enough momentum.

    I guess the brain dead teenagers

    Teenagers don't use Facebook (though they have an account). Their parents do (which is why they don't), but it's most popular with the 18-24 and 25-35 groups.

    1. Re:Facebook is a utility. by oztiks · · Score: 1

      I beg to agree to disagree. Everyone may have it, even the people who say they don't, but from both a capitalistic and consumer perspective it doesn't help the value of Facebook.

      For those who have Facebook who wish to not use it do so out of necessity E.G me. I have a Facebook account which is a complete sock puppet (yes against the Terms of Use please ban me I'm so worried) which I use as a developer to create Facebook integration services for my customers', which is hardly ever. My wife uses Facebook to communicate with friends but holds no loyalty and is waiting for the next big thing to take everyone off Facebook so she doesn't have to see any more painful ads polluting her screen.

      Do either of us give value to Facebook? Maybe my wife does because she keys data into it about herself but even then she states that half of what she puts in is crap. She refuses to click on the ads so no value there and as for that 90% of the stuff she keys into Facebook you certainly cannot use that data effectively and sell it with guarantee that the information is in anyway useful and I think this statement goes for MOST Facebook users.

      See, Facebook is all about socialising and everyone has a social side, likewise everyone has a personal side. Facebook's BIGGEST downfall is assuming the both are the same. People put information on Facebook that they want the rest of the world (network) to see. They do so because they want to show certain information. When Graph search came out and Facebook was expecting people to key in their dentists for example I was like "never gonna work" and it's because of this very reason.

      So what is the value of Facebook.

      a) It holds an unregulated metric of data which is purely dependent on the "desire" of the user, this is wholly proven by celebrities or any public figure because they wont have their Mom added to a public Facebook account which has 1,000's of fans a linked into.
      b) That metric of data can only be used as a significant speculative indicator for marketers. Where as Google has built quite cleverly an affective metric in the ways to gauge popularity of websites and information. In fact there is an entire industry out there called the SEO / SEM industry based on these metrics.
      c) Social Networking as an industry has legs but what we've found is that it's not with FaceBook. FaceBook works great for selling travel, restaurants or places of interest and even events. Not so good for retail or actual products and absolutely useless for B2B sales.

      So all that's left is the mobile market and this is like Apple deciding to sell routers and server hardware, not a strong point of theirs. The mobile market is held by the device manufacturers and more particularly the SEO / SEM industry.

      The only real way for FB to make any long term money is to abandon social networking and use the money they have which is kinda what they are doing. Graph was a good idea but Google Places has been there for years now and is directly built into your phone. FaceBook Home was a small half backed investment trying to take on the likes of Apple and Samsung and it really buckles chance.

  30. Re:Can't this be unlocked, flashed, and repurposed by Kyokugenryu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This being a GSM AT&T phone might be a big roadblock in you activating it on Sprint's CDMA network

  31. Will it be supported ? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    They might have only sold 15,000 units but for those that bought them it is their 'phone and many of them will be locked into a 2 year contract. So they will want the 'phone supported by HTC & Facebook for at least 2 years, preferably 4 -- OS upgrades, security/bug fixes, etc.

    However I suspect that HTC will not bother. I bought an HTC 'phone, I got one OS upgrade and then they refused to do any more. They had my money so why bother to spend money supporting me ? It would not bring them any more income and might result that I might delay buying a new 'phone. Well: they are right on that last point, but as a result of the derisory way that they have treated me I will not buy another HTC 'phone, so (long term) they loose - plonkers.

  32. Re:Use some logic, dude. by crutchy · · Score: 2

    i think the problem is that the number of people that actively use facebook is grossly overstated by the additional number of users (probably far more) that have merely joined up at some point and then forgot it

    i log into facebook maybe once a month, but i'm sure there are plenty of registered users that use it less or not at all

    facebook is an ok platform for sharing photos... that's probably about it. eventually something simpler and less commercialized will take over and i'll move to that after the rest of my friends and family migrate.

  33. Re:Use some logic, dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure just like everyone who uses Windows just can't wait to run out and buy the newest version every time it is release... oh wait..

  34. Re:Use some logic, dude. by citylivin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Everybody hates it and everybody uses it? That doesn't make any sense."

    OIL, Coal, Microsoft Windows, inkjet printers, Fiat Currencies, cable television, pop with glucose/fructose. There are lots of things that people don't like, but merely put up with because they do not have (or perceive to have) a better alternative.

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  35. Apple's first foray into cell phones was the ROKR by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

    Apple's first foray into cell phones was the ROKR made in conjunction with Motorola. It was just a rebadged Motorola E398 with the Apple iTunes music store accessible directly from the phone via licensed Apple software. It launched in September 2005.

    Apple severely cut motorola off at the knees by soon announcing the iPhone and discontinuing support of the ROKR in September 2006, with the iTunes software being set up and configured to work with the as yet undisclosed iPhone hardware. So even Apple had a mis-step with Motorola on its first time out on the cell-phone dance floor. Why shouldn't Facebook make a misstep or two? (Not that I condone facebook's existence, the utility of facebook pages, or even any point to checking up on facebook at all. I just have an opinion about 1st generation hardware attempts! ! !)

        It's also like the Zune phone. Just when MS started its advertising blitz with ?uestLove a.k.a. Questlove, the stores started discounting and discontinuing the damn useless phone and music player.

  36. HTC Desire and keyboard weirdness solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, i really like my HTC desire Z, but unfortunately the screen broke about a year ago (dropped it on the road) and now I have to be careful that no splinters fall out. It still works good, though.

    There was a very bad problem a while ago when an update went wrong and whenever I typed the letters g, s and another one, it would switch me from the SMS app to the browser :-(
    I let my annoyance build up by trying to use words without those letters in my SMSes, but eventually I surfed for a solution and found out that some guy or lady with a Chinese name on some forum (yes, [citation needed], found it, it was HERE) gave a clear explanation and solution.

    However I was shocked that such an *annoying* bug made it past their quality control.

    And HTC should track down "Zhu Lee" from that forum and hire him/her!

  37. Facebook doesn't suck, just in the wrong place by caywen · · Score: 2

    Facebook isn't where users want it to be. We like Facebook in the browser and as an app, but collectively users don't feel it belongs as their shell. Consumers had the same reaction to Chrome OS: phenomenal as a browser, but we're rejecting it as the OS, hence, Chromebook has floundered. Same thing goes for Windows - consumers like it on their desktops and laptops, but so far looks like we don't really want it on a phone and tablets. Same thing for Linux - we flocked to it for server apps, but overall avoided it on our desktops.

    It's not that I feel they made a mistake, though. I think it's very worthwhile to bump software experiences up and down the stack to see if there's a better fit. But when consumers reject the positioning, it also makes sense to go back to what works.

    1. Re:Facebook doesn't suck, just in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most people want Linux on their phone, too... (Not GNU, until they come packaged with something phenomenal: Firefox, Ubuntu? ) It is obvious that Unix based phones annihilate all competition.

  38. Re:Use some logic, dude. by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    Everybody hates it and everybody uses it? That doesn't make any sense.

    Mind = Blown @ how much you must think everyone loves the shitter...

  39. Re:Can't this be unlocked, flashed, and repurposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's CDMA? Is that something like Betamax?

  40. jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we look back this will be the moment Facebook “jumped the shark”

  41. Registered user here by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    I'm a registered user on facebook. I use it for a few applications that demand facebook credentials, but other than that it's locked down as tight as I can get it - no friends, no sharing, etc...

    I'm sure there's lots like me. Heck, many of my coworkers have TWO facebook accounts -one for friends/family, one for work. I know it violates the TOS, but they don't care.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Registered user here by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Yes, it makes a great OpenID substitute. However, I have preference for Google as my single sign on.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  42. Facebook phone had good hardware - RIP. by technomom · · Score: 1

    Shocked. Just shocked to hear this.

    Funny thing is, I wonder how many people bought it and immediately discarded the Facebook crap on it. For all it's warts, it was a pretty good phone hardwarewise.

  43. Re:Use some logic, dude. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Everybody hates it and everybody uses it? That doesn't make any sense.

    You're applying "sense" to the world? This one? Good gravy...

  44. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was the phone really so bad they couldn't sell it at 99c????
    I mean, apart from FB Home, it's a normal android phone right?

  45. Re:Use some logic, dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OIL, Coal, Microsoft Windows, inkjet printers, Fiat Currencies...

    TEA BAG ALERT!

  46. Re:Apple's first foray into cell phones was the RO by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Apple's first foray into cell phones was the ROKR made in conjunction with Motorola. It was just a rebadged Motorola E398 with the Apple iTunes music store accessible directly from the phone via licensed Apple software. It launched in September 2005.

    Apple severely cut motorola off at the knees by soon announcing the iPhone and discontinuing support of the ROKR in September 2006, with the iTunes software being set up and configured to work with the as yet undisclosed iPhone hardware. So even Apple had a mis-step with Motorola on its first time out on the cell-phone dance floor. Why shouldn't Facebook make a misstep or two? (Not that I condone facebook's existence, the utility of facebook pages, or even any point to checking up on facebook at all. I just have an opinion about 1st generation hardware attempts! ! !)

        It's also like the Zune phone. Just when MS started its advertising blitz with ?uestLove a.k.a. Questlove, the stores started discounting and discontinuing the damn useless phone and music player.

    Your timeline is off - the ROKR was born and died before the iPhone was even announced (which happened in Jan 2007). I think both Moto and Apple knew the ROKR was doomed to failure before it even arrived but kept up for different reasons: Apple was desperate to break into the mobile industry (some say ROKR was Apple's stalking horse), while Moto was feeling the heat from RIMM and PALM feeling their RAZR hit was fading.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  47. Why didnt they learn from the Status phone by John+Bodin · · Score: 1

    Also from HTC that was out a number a years ago with a dedicated button to post what was on screen to facebook.

    https://support.htc.com/en-us/HTC_Status_ATT

    --
    John
  48. Re:Use some logic, dude. by markjhood2003 · · Score: 2

    Actually, it appearz that Facebook is one of the most hated companies in America:

    http://247wallst.com/2013/01/09/the-10-most-hated-companies-in-america-2/2/

    Facebook has had customer satisfaction issues for some time, but recently did a particularly good job of alienating a portion of its nearly one billion members. According to the ACSI, Facebook is one of the most strongly disliked American companies, beaten out only by three public utilities companies. This comes in part from the company’s continuing user privacy concerns. Mark Zuckerberg’s company did not help itself in this regard in 2012, after it announced that it had the right to republish any and all photos in the accounts of its Instagram users.

  49. Gay Phone is Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shocking.

  50. Re:Use some logic, dude. by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    Everybody hates it and everybody uses it? That doesn't make any sense.

    Really? Because everybody hates driving in rush hour traffic, and pretty much everybody has to.

    (Yes, I'm being Amerocentric)

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  51. 99c huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US phone companies will continue to get away with this misleading nonsense while journalists continue to post articles like this. You couldn't just pay 99c and get the phone, right? You had to sign a contract to spend a certain amount each month for a certain number of months, right? How much a month, for how many months? Stop toeing the company line.

  52. I miss email... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I remember back in the day all my friends had an email account and that was how you could reach them. Now you have to remember how to reach each friend. Some of them are Facebook People, so you have to message there. Some use SMS. For some of them all you have is their @ISP email, which languishes for months when you fail to realize they've moved to gmail... Not only do you have to know their address, you have to know the conduit...

  53. Ok I'm spending all my time on FB but don't .... by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

    It seems that the kind of people who where supposed to buy the HTC felt that : Ok so I'm spending all my time on FB, but it's rude to rub it in .... And didn't want to be tagged: Facebookista ... Moreover I guess there was some kind of subliminal feeling that if the phone had "Facebook Home" on top you might not see the other allerts like viber, watsapp, SMS, etc.... On the technical side the phone seems to be not bad, maybe it will find a second market as a cheap cyanogen platform ...

  54. Re:Use some logic, dude. by flyingfsck · · Score: 0

    What is this facebook thing everybody is talking about?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  55. FB by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    Everybody hates Facebook - they only use it because everyone else does and they have to use it to keep in touch

    I won't say everybody hates Facebook

    I do not hate Facebook, but that does not translate to mean I have to use Facebook

    I do not

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  56. This is how much they want to spy on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a free phone that's setup to spy on you. Talk about a Faustian deal. Fuck Facebook I say, their service is not nearly as valuable as your privacy.

  57. Re:Use some logic, dude. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I think you're wrong. Most people I know under 40 use facebook every day.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  58. Re:Use some logic, dude. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Everybody hates it and everybody uses it? That doesn't make any sense.

    Mind = Blown @ how much you must think everyone loves the shitter...

    Last time I checked, shitting wasn't optional.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  59. Re:Use some logic, dude. by tehcyder · · Score: 0

    Everybody hates it and everybody uses it? That doesn't make any sense.

    Really? Because everybody hates driving in rush hour traffic, and pretty much everybody has to.

    (Yes, I'm being Amerocentric)

    Unless everyone were forced to use facebook for their work, your analogy is profoundly unhelpful, verging on idiotic.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  60. bad phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low sells, does not mean its a bad phone, it means bad marketing.

  61. Re:Use some logic, dude. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    OIL, Coal, Microsoft Windows, inkjet printers, Fiat Currencies...

    TEA BAG ALERT!

    Tea bagger or someone who invested his life savings in bitcoin?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  62. elizabethtown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the shoes that went whoosh!

  63. HTC by slash.jit · · Score: 1

    HTC must have realized that the sales of that phone could have been better had it not put "Facebook" name on it.

  64. wrong! by dougster123 · · Score: 1

    Why is it no one who reviewed this piece (FaceBook Home) didn't blast it as deserved? I installed it on my phone and started laughing in 2 minutes. It doesn't do anything but show random posts as a pretty layer on top of the same old crappy FaceBook app. Zuck deserves some kudos for the start of FB, but beyond that I dont trust him. Had a chance to make the app we all complain about better, but just crapped on it instead. ...after playing games with our security settings...cmon!