Slashdot Mirror


Australia Makes Asian Language Learning a Priority

An anonymous reader writes "The Australian government came a step closer to formalising its plans to make Asian language study compulsory for schools this week. It has released a draft curriculum for public consultation which reveals plans to include Indonesian, Korean and french language in the curriculum. Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard publicly stated in September 2012 that in response to the "staggering growth" in the region, the government would be instigating 25 key measures to strengthen and exploit links with Asia. The plan includes the requirement that one third of civil servants and company directors have a "deep knowledge," thousands of scholarships for Asian students, and the opportunity for every schoolchild to learn one of four "priority" languages- Chinese, Hindi, Japanese or Indonesian."

37 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Indonesian, Korean and french by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Funny

    French is an asian language now?

    (And why no capital for the poor old frogs?)

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
    1. Re:Indonesian, Korean and french by wmac1 · · Score: 2

      and Why not the most common language of the region (i.e. Chinese) is included as an option. I am aware that there are many different dialects but Mandarin could possibly being used by a very large number of Asian (hundreds of millions or even near to a billion?).

    2. Re:Indonesian, Korean and french by benjfowler · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was very surprised when I ran into French speakers while working in a supermarket in Surfers Paradise. There are quite a few French speakers around the Pacific Rim, and French isn't as useless as one would be lead to think.

    3. Re:Indonesian, Korean and french by GerryHattrick · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My work colleague had rudimentary Mandarin. Whenever we had an official Chinese delegation in London, she would help me in the Boardroom. They were hugely delighted with her greetings, and the meetings became much more sociable. I was amazed that Chinese/Brit subtle humour had much in common, too. Of course we had a professional interpreter also on the team, but do NOT underrate the value of effort to learn some sounds in Mandarin, and (never mind the business) to laugh along with your ancient-world counterparts.

    4. Re:Indonesian, Korean and french by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      you would still not be accepted by native Chinese, because you're not one of them.

      I can speak and read Chinese, and it is indeed a very difficult language. But you are wrong about cultural acceptance. Chinese people are very welcoming, and will be delighted and helpful if you make an effort to speak even a little of their language. China is a multicultural and multilingual country, and even some Chinese people speak Mandarin poorly, so they have flexible expectations about fluency. This is in contrast to Japan, which is like France, where they expect you to speak their language perfectly or not at all, and even then, will never accept you as one of their own.

    5. Re:Indonesian, Korean and french by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Our former, deposed, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd bignoted himself by declaring himself fluent in Mandarin. Needless to say, as PM he gave a few scripted speeches in the language, appearing prominently on the TV.

      But when push came to shove, Beijing told him to get stuffed in terms of foreign policy, so a fat load of good his supposed fluency did him.

      You'll hence probably find the average Australian is quite sceptical of the motives for this legislation. Learning languages is a good thing in itself but still... With Rudd still as a member of the government, the policy seems motivated by appeasing his supporters more than simply learning an Asian language for the greater good.

    6. Re:Indonesian, Korean and french by JanneM · · Score: 2

      If you look at the bottom of the post (I know, I know) you'll find that Chinese, Hindi, Japanese and Indonesian are already the highest priority, and the other languages are considered in addition to them.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  2. Re:Exactly Backwards by Camembert · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course English is the primary language in Australia. But your comment is in fact what is backwards. The modern world conducts more and more business in Chinese. It is a good idea to have knowledge of Chinese.

  3. Learning is great by Uber+Banker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the opportunity for every schoolchild to learn one of four "priority" languages- Chinese, Hindi, Japanese or Indonesian.

    Learning is surely great in all forms. But I am confused why Hindi is a 'priority language'. Every corporate senior person I've met from India - Director type level - not only speaks several Indian languages, but also has flawless English in terms of grammar and vocabulary mixed with a somewhat local accent depending on where they're from in India, unless, as an in-joke among Indian colleagues goes, they're walked past the US Embassy and are suddenly embroiled with a thick US accent.

    Chinese, for dealing with anyone outside the BPO / ITO / major trade companies: government, state owned and specialists yes.

    Japanese, things in Japan tend to happen in Japanese despite the speaker's English ability, whatever the industry, so yes.

    Indonesian, honestly have no experience.

    But Hindi. Seems odd to be a priority.

    1. Re:Learning is great by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every corporate senior person I've met from India - Director type level - not only speaks several Indian languages, but also has flawless English in terms of grammar and vocabulary

      If you were dealing with workers on a factory floor, even skilled ones, your experience would be different

    2. Re:Learning is great by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Learning is surely great in all forms.

      . . . plus by learning the language . . . you also learn the culture. And be able to understand it better. That makes real business sense.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Learning is great by fazig · · Score: 2

      Perhaps. But English already is an official, although not primary, language in India. You can assume that more and more people will most likely learn to speak English rather than to expect the rest of the world to learn their over 20 different native languages. Indians also shouldn't have a hard time to grasp English since their languages are still part of the Indo-European languages and share similarities.

      In general: It will be a sad day for international communication when Chinese languages becomes the language of trade, English is fairly easy to learn and doesn't require a large vocabulary of speaker and listener to get their points across. The Chinese language on the other hand ... well, lets say it rises the barrier for communication on an entirely different level.

    4. Re:Learning is great by Millennium · · Score: 4, Informative

      Abram de Swaan identified a list of twelve "supercentral languages" that he believed serve as extremely common bridges among speakers of different languages in their native dialects. If one considers the region that people in English-speaking countries typically think of as "Asia," four of the supercentral languages are native to that region: Chinese (specifically Mandarin), Hindi, Malay (of which Indonesian is a dialect), and Japanese. This list was probably a strong factor when they were deciding which languages to use.

      Geographically speaking, there are actually two other languages on the list that are native to the Asian continent: Arabic and Russian. I doubt, however, that the people drawing up these lists considered the regions these languages are from to be "real Asia." Make of that what you will.

      (Incidentally, the other six languages are English, French, German, Portuguese, Spanish, and Swahili).

    5. Re:Learning is great by Teun · · Score: 2
      Indonesia (Pop. 240 M.) shares it's language with Malaysia (Pop. 30 M.) , though there are local differences the countries do have a joint language commission. For westerners it's easy to get a basic grasp of the language.

      Both countries have a rapid economic growth and especially Malaysia has a reasonable average level of income.

      Indonesia is in size the worlds fourth largest country, all reasons to keep good neighbourly contacts with them and if the economy isn't interesting then it is at least because half of Australia goes on holidays in Kuta.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  4. A good idea by Camembert · · Score: 2

    I currently live in South East Asia (born European), and the economic dynamism is remarkable. It is a good idea to prepare young people to "the century of Asia". I wish that I had started learning Mandarin and Japanese earlier in life.

  5. Re:Won't do much good by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well it is a step in the right direction. If you look at a globe Australia south of Far East Asia.
    Sure they can do business with the Yanks and the Brits, but they are missing their closest neighbors.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  6. English... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Interestingly, throughout Asia English is taught in schools. In Taiwan it's become a mandatory part of the curriculum, and that may also be the case elsewhere. When it's not, many parents go out of their ways to get their kids to learn the language.

    In the US, however, a second language seems to be selected based on whatever the prevailing language spoken by the dominant ethnic group in the area. And that's assuming they offer a second language at all. More often than not the language ends up being Spanish, which all too frequently becomes more of a service to ESL students than value to anyone else.

    I find that to be a persistent problem with the American educational system, there's no goal and thinking is often too insular. The difference between systems is that overseas they're trying to make people competitive internationally but still expecting their citizens speak the official language. Meanwhile, Americans, instead of stressing the importance of English for success keep making accommodations for non-speakers.

    I suppose someday the US might become a Spanish speaking nation, and that's totally fine. But we're far from that reality and currently Asian nations are economically dominant and on the rise. Of course, it's not feasible to keep switching languages every time some new nation rises in influence, which is why we've got English as the standard and why everyone continues to learn that.

    1. Re:English... by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that's assuming they offer a second language at all. More often than not the language ends up being Spanish, which all too frequently becomes more of a service to ESL students than value to anyone else.

      First - I appreciate the value of knowing a second language. I don't mean this as a "speak English or die" rant...

      But learning a second language while living in the US counts as a complete and utter waste of time. If you don't use a language, you lose it, simple as that - Personally, I took seven years of French in school, starting from a young age (2nd grade), and I can just barely read it, painfully slow. Despite having wasted somewhere on the order of thousands of hours of instructional time cramming that language into my head, I have very nearly no ability whatsoever to carry on a conversation with someone who only speaks French.

      Now, if you live in an area (even in the US) that has a large Spanish-speaking population - Perhaps you can use it enough that it will "stick". If you live in Europe, where they have multiple languages spoken regularly, a second or even third language makes functional sense. If you live somewhere that doesn't speak English (and again, I don't mean this as a pro-English screed), it makes sense to learn English as a second language, as the lingua Franca of international business (and yes, I appreciate the irony of that phrase).

      Australia will have the exact same problem we have in the US. They can mandate kids pass a proficiency test, but three years after highschool, it will have made no difference in the number of languages known.

    2. Re:English... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      I suppose someday the US might become a Spanish speaking nation, and that's totally fine. But we're far from that reality and currently Asian nations are economically dominant and on the rise. Of course, it's not feasible to keep switching languages every time some new nation rises in influence, which is why we've got English as the standard and why everyone continues to learn that.

      One of the really great things going for Spanish is that to native speakers of a Western European language like English, Spanish is very easy to learn. Spelling is phonetic. Grammar is essentially simple with the possible exception of reflexive verbs, but those are easy enough to learn. That's in no way a criticism of Spanish to call it "easy to learn". In fact, I'd argue that it's a great strength. One of the reasons that English became a world language is that while there are complicated aspects (strange spelling, incredible number of verb tenses), on the whole it's a fairly simple language (ie. plurals are usually simple, there's no grammatical gender).

      The Asian languages are pretty strange for speakers of European languages. The various Chinese "dialects" (that's how they see them rather than as different languages) are tonal, which creates its own set of problems for speakers who don't speak tonal languages. Chinese grammar is for the most part very simple, although measure words can be difficult for some people and the strange "topic-comment" word order is quite a bit different from English in particular. Japanese and Korean mercifully don't have tones, but they instead have rather complicated grammars, with Japanese being the worse. They also use "topic-comment" word order. My experience is that grammar in all of the English speaking countries is abysmally bad in the educational systems and I just don't know how realistic it is to expect kids who don't even know or understand the grammar of their native language to successfully grasp languages that require complicated grammar rules. Pick your poison - tones or grammar. I don't know anything about Hindi, but as it's an old language I'd expect that very likely it's got quite complicated grammar too. Australian English is rather infamous for its incomprehensible slang (Strine) so I wish them a lot of luck. I'm not going to be surprised at all if this program fails. We can't even graduate Americans with a correct understanding of English (you'd be shocked at how many students seriously believe that "prolly" is a real word) and based on what I'm seeing in posts on the internet in various forums, I don't think the Aussies are doing any better.

    3. Re:English... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They can mandate kids pass a proficiency test, but three years after highschool, it will have made no difference

      So, it is just like biology and physics and math beyond first year algebra.

      The point is it does make a difference, for they are better for having learned it, because basic concepts aren't forgotten and they will be that much less ignorant (and provincial), and some of the kids will make use of what they learn, thus advancing their country's interests in international trade.

    4. Re:English... by thoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Japanese language does have tone accents which do distinguish meanings. Although context will sort things out in all but extreme cases, improper tone is one of the primary markers of a non-native speaker. Perhaps Japanese grammar is complicated compared with Chinese or Korean (I wouldn't know) it is certainly far more regular (ie easier) than European languages (like English.) Now the writing system on the other hand...

      All in all, it probably takes the same amount of effort to learn either eg English or Japanese as a second-language.

      No. You need to study/speak a language like Mandarin to really appreciate that tones are fundamentally different that merely pronouncing vowels differently or having an accent or conveying mood (occasionally). English speakers might pronounce 'tomato' differently between the US and UK, might raise their voices at the end when angry or yelling, Japanese might "swallow" a trailing -u, everyone might have a regional accent that pronounces words "funny" compared to elsewhere, but none of that is tonal in the sense that Mandarin is a tonal language.

      In Mandarin, tones are part of the correct pronunciation of a word. Different tone = different word. As in "shi" with a rising tone can mean "10" and "shi" with a falling tone can mean "vision" and "shi" with a neutral tone can mean "poem". Japanese and English are not like this.

      Yes, somebody with a US southern drawl may pronounce ten, the number, close to tan, the color, but that's a regional access a not a tone. Somebody emphasizing a syllable or raising the voice (mad or asking a question) is also not a tone - it is not part of the correct pronunciation of the word.

      Japanese grammar is more complicated that English or Mandarin in a few ways (I don't know about Korean, I never studied that language), but at the same time it is highly regular. One example is verb/adjective conjugation. In English, if a car is red or was red, the adjective "red" stays the same, present or past tense. Similarly, in Mandarin, the chejì would be hóng, same word form. In Japanese, the kuruma would be akai or akakatta (or akakunai or akakunakatta to complete the conjugations). On the other hand, there are basically 2 kinds of adjectives in Japanese (-i and -na) and they follow fairly regular patterns with only a handful of exceptions.

      English is complicated because so many words have multiple meanings, wildly different (spring as coiled metal, a season of the year, jumping) so almost everything requires context to decode, it is highly idiomatic, has a large number of exceptions to almost any grammar rule from conjugations to pluralizing and so on, pronunciation is a crap shoot with general rules about sounds and again as many exceptions as their are rules. One thing about Japanese and Mandarin is the pronunciation is consistent (and you start by studying pinyin or hiragana/katakana) even if it is difficult.

  7. Re:Nice. by benjfowler · · Score: 2

    Agreed. The language du jour is just that -- a fad.

    When I was going through school in Australia (and experiencing it's utterly stupid and incoherent foreign-language system), the fad went from French and German, to Japanese, to Indonesian to Chinese. Education types have just as many dumb, pointless industry fads as IT.

    Pick one useful language and stick with it. And try and have the system reformed to support that.

  8. Re:Exactly Backwards by lightknight · · Score: 2

    Mmmm, vegemite....so tasty, so good, so impossible for me to find when I actually have a spare dollar.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  9. Re:Exactly Backwards by donscarletti · · Score: 4, Informative

    Australia's balance of trade with China is extremely positive at the moment. China buys almost twice as much Australian stuff as Australia buys Chinese stuff, as opposed to trade with the US which is 3-1 in the red. So, hao hao xuexi ba.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  10. Re:Exactly Backwards by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    English is the first language. The whole article was about secondary languages. Your comment smacks of someone who doesn't get outside of English speaking countries very often. While you can find English in other countries, Australia, being closer to Asia geographically, it makes sense for them to learn Asian languages. In European countries, students normally learn a second language most likely another European language. Like the Dutch who learn up to four languages as they live in the middle of four countries.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  11. Re:Exactly Backwards by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

    English is used worldwide when conducting business between two people with otherwise dissimilar language, but Chinese is still mostly limited to conducting business with China.

    This. Before, people were mostly concerned with learning the language of the bordering countries because that's what was most useful. Today people have the Internet and want/need a global language of communication. While this graphic is also in many ways biased, English in the World shows most of the world has English as their first foreign language. That trend is only going to grow stronger because there are huge network effects at play here. While the US may be seeing a big influx of Spanish, here in Europe the trend is opposite - few people learn Spanish and the Spaniards learn more and more English. And I don't think it has any traction in Africa, Asia or Oceania.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. Makes me want to move to Australia by davidannis · · Score: 2
    Put any 5 year old in China for a year and he'll speak Chinese in a year. The research shows significant cognitive advantages are gained from bilingual education.

    As a parent who desperately wants his children to become fluent in at least two languages I am stuck with horrible choices because I live in America. I have cobbled together language training for my two older sons while they were young enough to learn but it was extremely difficult. Now, to get an immersion Chinese program for him, I am using school of choice to send my youngest to an inner city school where they are so poor that they just fired all of the elementary school art, music, and PE teachers to close a budget gap. When will we make education a priority in this country?

  13. Re:Exactly Backwards by smash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you ever been in a business meeting with people who speak another language? Have you seen them confer amongst themselves, in your presence in said language? I haven't, but my ex has - and they didn't know that one of the english speakers actually knew French. The conversation that they thought was private was quite revealing, to say the least.

    Knowledge is power. That very much includes knowing how to communicate.

    Remaining wilfully ignorant of the language spoken by those you trade or otherwise conduct business with is pretty fucking foolish, irrespective of whatever "standard" language there may be.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  14. Re:Exactly Backwards by SJHillman · · Score: 2

    In today's world economy, you could be doing business with a French speaker today, a Spanish speaker tomorrow, a Hindii speaker next week and a Russian speaker the week after. If nothing else, it's pretty impractical to learn every language in the world when English is already fairly standard. Sure, it helps if you're moving into a new market but then you'll probably at least have locals on your team to help smooth things along.

  15. Re:Exactly Backwards by fufufang · · Score: 2

    Australia's balance of trade with China is extremely positive at the moment. China buys almost twice as much Australian stuff as Australia buys Chinese stuff, as opposed to trade with the US which is 3-1 in the red. So, hao hao xuexi ba.

    The stuff that China buys from Australia are mostly natural resources.

  16. Re:Nice. by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

    And by useful, that means whichever language group has girls you think are the hottest, learn that one.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  17. Re:Won't do much good by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

    Well it is a step in the right direction.

    I agree, but I wish they'd learn proper English first.

  18. Re:Exactly Backwards by Crimey+McBiggles · · Score: 2

    WHOOSH. You completely missed the point. It's certainly not impractical for the average computer geek to learn about fifteen different programming languages, why should it be impractical for the average business person to learn one or two spoken languages other than the native one? We all know that language shapes the way we understand the world, therefore it follows that understanding a second language leads to a greater understanding of the world. It doesn't matter that English is predominant, you'll still come off as elitist by saying that English is all you need. Eventually, there may be another language that takes predominance, and those elitists who failed to learn a second language will be at a severe disadvantage.

    --
    Crimey
  19. Re:Exactly Backwards by Teun · · Score: 2
    As a Dutchman I am rather fluent in Dutch, German, French and English and get along in Danish/Norwegian, Italian and Spanish.

    For work I travel a lot and I can assure you in business some other language than English can often be the difference between success and failure.

    And as someone else here already stated overhearing the off-line chatter between business partners can be quite revealing, even when your command of the language is not so very good.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  20. Re:Won't do much good by Kittenman · · Score: 2

    Well it is a step in the right direction. If you look at a globe Australia south of Far East Asia. Sure they can do business with the Yanks and the Brits, but they are missing their closest neighbors.

    No it's ok - we talk English in New Zealand too.

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  21. Re:Won't do much good by bane2571 · · Score: 2

    Indonesian, German and French have been mandatory parts of the Australian languages other than English syllabus since I was in high school 16 years ago.

    Shifting the focus to more useful languages (IE those spoken in China) can only be a good thing for our future as a nation.

  22. Re:Exactly Backwards by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2

    In today's world economy, you could be doing business with a French speaker today, a Spanish speaker tomorrow, a Hindii speaker next week and a Russian speaker the week after.

    Have you actually tried that? Even if there are no language problems, cultural differences are going to be a wellspring of headaches for a long time to come. The world isn't nearly as small as some people believe.

    Can't speak for the GP, but yes - I have tried it, and it's fairly common to do in international companies within Europe.

    I work for the European HQ (based in Germany) of a large multinational with a Japanese parent company. On a daily basis, I deal with at least 3 or 4 different EU cultures plus Japanese culture. At least once every couple of weeks, I deal with India. Generally a few times a month, there'll be something I need to deal with in North Africa, Middle East, or Russia.

    Yep, there's a lot of cultural differences, but the other side of the coin to remember is that most people in these situations are forgiving of cultural mistakes. They are aware that they and you are probably not 100% familiar with each others' cultures and there's a mutual understanding to politely ignore cultural faux pas.

    Linguistically by the way, I speak around 5 languages with varying degrees of proficiency, or up to 15 if you count languages where I know some, but couldn't really talk to someone about any particular topic. Nevertheless, the people commenting that English tends to be the language used are quite right - it's our official language for business in my company (despite being, as said, based in Germany) and if I see a Frenchman and a Russian talking to each other, I'd put pretty high odds they'll be speaking English to each other. I personally even speak German at home with my wife, but English to my German colleagues at work...

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan