Slashdot Mirror


Google Unable To Keep Paying App Developers In Argentina

An anonymous reader writes "Google has sent letters to app developers registered in Argentina saying they won't be able to accept payments on developers' behalf after June 27th. 'The change applies to both paid apps and apps that use in-app purchases. The move appears to be related to new, restrictive regulations the Argentine government has imposed on currency exchanges.' According to the Telegraph, 'The new regulations required anyone wanting to change Argentine pesos into another currency to submit an online request for permission to AFIP, the Argentine equivalent of HM Revenue & Customs. To submit the request, however, you first needed to get a PIN from AFIP, either online or in person. Having finally obtained your number, submitted your online request and printed out your permission slip, you could then present it at the bank or official cambio and buy your dollars. Well, that was the theory. In practice, the result was chaos. ... damming the flood has come at a huge cost to the economy, especially since the currency restrictions were coupled with another set of regulations that effectively imposed a near-total ban on any imported goods.'"

169 comments

  1. Nicely done Cristina by mmarcottulio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cristina Kirchner, destroying Argentina since 2007.

    1. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun how you don't mention her husband.

      Nobody knows the exact motive yet, so let's not jump to conclusions, there isn't any measure announced by around that date to make Google take this instance sudden of all. One of the theories is that Google may be trying to force everybody into Google Wallet, though the fact you'd need a foreign account makes me doubt it. Another is that since Google does all operations in dollars they may be trying to bail out of the country to avoid dealing with the legal process for converting them to pesos.

      Worth nothing that it isn't just Argentine developers that got this notice, it's just that Argentina was the only country that was in the list of countries where they could send payments before (developers from other countries that got notified were never in the list in the first place, which makes it quite suspicious that they were sent the message in the first place).

    2. Re:Nicely done Cristina by alantus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Venezuela has had a similar currency exchange regulation system for 10 years now.
      The limits are ridiculous:
      - 400$ for traveling abroad, the paperwork has to be submitted 20 days in advance
      - 400$ for internet shopping *per year*
      - credit card usage abroad has a different limit depending on the destination and duration. On average 100$ per day, the paperwork has to be submitted 30 days in advance

      Basically the government wants to control everything, not only for businesses but also individuals, and it does a crappy job at both. The end result is investments going elsewhere and the economy suffers.

      The country has never before been in such a bad shape. Since Chavez took office, the Bolivar lost its value by 992%. This is in the country with the second biggest proven oil reserves in the world, and an oil price of more than 100$.

    3. Re:Nicely done Cristina by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes but... look Malvinas!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Nicely done Cristina by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Since Chavez took office, the Bolivar lost its value by 992%.

      So... people pay you dollars if you agree to take their bolivars away?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Nicely done Cristina by alexander_686 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, but it implies a very high rate of inflation. And it matters if you are trying to import anything – like toilet paper, where there has been a recent run.

    6. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Falklands you insensitive clod.

    7. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Espectr0 · · Score: 2

      It's 3000$ a year, depending on the travel location, which may make it less.

      We are currently experiencing heavy scarcity on products. I can't find soap, toilet paper or powder milk.

    8. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what bitcoin is for. And the adoption rate in Argentina has been spiking quite nicely.

    9. Re:Nicely done Cristina by chilvence · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why don't those dirty imperialist Dutch hand back Aruba to the rightful Venezuelan Heirs!

      Oh sorry wrong chatroom...

    10. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My wife and her family (the latter still stuck there unfortunately) second your emotion. Reminds me of a colloquial definition of insanity that Einstein guy said once. Socialism seems like a great idea on the surface, but for whatever reason it continues to fail and is generally trumpeted by the incompetent and corrupt (sorta like capitalism, but with a greater fail coefficient).

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    11. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that when any person or entity gets too much power, either in Socialism or Capitalism, it generally leads to abuse. Power, profit, ego.

      I was once joking when I thought we should be governed by robots that cannot deviate from their programming to serve and protect citizens. But then I realized that's what the purpose of a Constitution is, any Constitution. A set of relatively static laws meant to protect, serve, and guarantee rights.

    12. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We are currently experiencing heavy scarcity on products. I can't find soap, toilet paper or powder milk.

      Welcome to socialism. -- Central Europe here, handing over to you the reins of history.

    13. Re:Nicely done Cristina by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I was once joking when I thought we should be governed by robots that cannot deviate from their programming to serve and protect citizens.

      That vaguely reminds me of the society in Clarke's The Songs of Distant Earth. The president was a boring administrative position, without opportunities to actually screw things up. The position was filled by means of a bi-annual lottery. The only way you could get exempted from the lottery was by means of having a mental handicap or by having committed a severe felony. (Trying to weasel out after having been drawn to be the next president was a serious felony in itself. :-))

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:Nicely done Cristina by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think that when any person or entity gets too much power, either in Socialism or Capitalism, it generally leads to abuse.

      Two big differences:
      1. Socialism requires the concentration of power in one entity. That is what socialism is.
      2. In capitalism, even though corporations may become powerful, they don't have the power to arrest or kill you.

    15. Re:Nicely done Cristina by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Ew. That's a bad image to picture in your mind.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    16. Re:Nicely done Cristina by xenoc_1 · · Score: 2

      2. In capitalism, even though corporations may become powerful, they don't have the power to arrest or kill you.

      Oh really? Why don't you tell it to these people, threatened with arrest, or in fact arrested for trying to close accounts at Citi and BofA.

    17. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... lost its value by 992% ...

      If one loses 100% of something, one is empty-handed. You are saying Bolivar lost more than it ever owned, it is 'in the red'!

    18. Re:Nicely done Cristina by alantus · · Score: 1

      I realize the 992% figure is confusing, but I didn't make up that figure, I read it in an article. The term used is "accumulated devaluation", maybe some economist can make more sense of this.

    19. Re:Nicely done Cristina by khallow · · Score: 1

      Citibank didn't arrest the protesters. The police did. And they did so because the protesters were trespassing. Just because you have legitimate reasons for being in a space doesn't allow you to protest there.

      Second, in the Citibank case there might be a case of police overstepping their authority (the claim there is that the protesters tried to comply with orders to leave, but were prevented from doing so), but in that case, it is the police doing the overstepping not the business.

    20. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Venezuela to 'saturate market' with 50 million rolls of toilet paper - CNN.com

      Actually, there are shortages of many products deemed basic, because of underproduction and hiccups in the supply chain, caused in turn by moronic gov't intervention, expropriations and incompetent exchange control.

    21. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow, +5 insightful is not enough.

    22. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Shrug) The only power they have to do that kind of stuff comes from the government. Did you have a point?

    23. Re:Nicely done Cristina by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      How many Pinkertons were prosecuted for those they killed? I didn't find any indications there were prosecutions, but maybe they are downplayed so long after the fact. No, under capitalism, the corporations can kill you with impunity. At most, a small fine for murder, but you have to spend many millions of dollars before you can fine them for less than they make in a day. That's capitalism.

    24. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any examples from the last 75 years?

    25. Re:Nicely done Cristina by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Does it count where Ford stated that they expect the Pinto to kill, but the $5 fix with a recall would be more than just waiting for the lawsuits? They knowingly killed people for money, and no charges were filed. Or are you choosing to ignore one of the most pure capitalism periods ever because it was so horrible for anyone who wasn't a capital owner? The socialist movement in the US owes its beginning to the horrors of capitalism. Socialism is horrible, but better than capitalism.

    26. Re:Nicely done Cristina by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      This is in the country with the second biggest proven oil reserves in the world

      Which does you no good if you cannot get it out of the ground. Chavez misappropriated the funds earmarked for repair, replacement and maintenance of oil field equipment and operations and diverted them instead to social programs. The result was a bit like eating your seed corn. Now the oil fields are only producing a fraction of the oil that they should be and no foreign firm wants to touch Venezuela with a ten foot pole because of the recent nationalizations by the Venezuelan government which is still packed with the disciples of Chavez and socialism. If I were a foreign investor and the Venezuelan state oil company wanted either goods or services I would demand payment in full up front in either dollars or gold. Nationalizing property owned by foreigners is a good way to scare off all international investment as Venezuelans are now discovering to their collective misery.

    27. Re:Nicely done Cristina by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      I think that when any person or entity gets too much power, either in Socialism or Capitalism, it generally leads to abuse. Power, profit, ego.

      A corrupt capitalism still produces things, albeit at less than full capacity or optimum efficiency, whereas a corrupt socialism simply wastes resources to little or no effect because nobody gives a shit individually about the fate of the collective property.

    28. Re:Nicely done Cristina by TuringCheck · · Score: 1

      We are currently experiencing heavy scarcity on products. I can't find soap, toilet paper or powder milk.

      Been there, done that.

      That's not heavy scarcity, unfortunately that's just the beginning.

    29. Re:Nicely done Cristina by raju1kabir · · Score: 2

      1. Socialism requires the concentration of power in one entity. That is what socialism is.

      In theory (I won't argue that it's the case in practice), this entity is "the people" which includes everyone.

      2. In capitalism, even though corporations may become powerful, they don't have the power to arrest or kill you.

      Private security forces detail and kill people every day, very often with either explicit legal cover, or at least effective immunity because there are no consequences for the perpetrators and/or their paymasters.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    30. Re:Nicely done Cristina by vac65 · · Score: 1

      The socialist movement in the US owes its beginning to the horrors of capitalism. Socialism is horrible, but better than capitalism.

      Hmm...
      Probably you never found yourself to experience socialism (the Central Europe variant at least) first hand. I have. It sucks. BIIIIIG TIME!!!!

      In fact, the single country where raw capitalism is "on line", in my opinion, is China. Yep, China.

    31. Re:Nicely done Cristina by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      He's probably referring to the social democratic state, which is right next to communism for many Americans.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    32. Re:Nicely done Cristina by ultranova · · Score: 0

      I realize the 992% figure is confusing, but I didn't make up that figure, I read it in an article. The term used is "accumulated devaluation", maybe some economist can make more sense of this.

      So you don't know what it means, if anything, but "an article" provides it as evidence for a claim so it must be so?

      *Facepalm.jpg*

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    33. Re:Nicely done Cristina by OurDailyFred · · Score: 1

      If there are record runs - no wonder there is a shortage of toilet paper!

      --
      If your only tool is a hammer, you'll approach every problem as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    34. Re:Nicely done Cristina by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Socialist dictatorship (central European, and south American) is bad, socialist democracy (English, Australian) is better. Just because your teacher beat you in school doesn't mean all school is bad, you just had a bad one.

    35. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It WAS the beginning, because now it's not only soap, tp and milk, but also chicken, eggs, flour, cooking oil, a good variety of medicines, even electricity is scarce.

      I know someone who was "close"* to Chavez and he mentioned in an informal setting about the electricity issue and how it affected venezuelan Industry, Chavez's response was literally "qué se jodan!" (fuck them!).

      It's really hard for a country to move in any kind of "forward" when that's the president's attitude towards Industry and the Economy in general.

      -----
      (*)When I say "close", think Corpoelec close. Venezuelans would know what I mean

      Disclaimer: I'm venezuelan, but living abroad for some years now

    36. Re:Nicely done Cristina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of "Colossis: The Forbin Project"

  2. Another currency? by kasperd · · Score: 2

    If the problem is caused by Google not being able to buy the correct kind of currency, couldn't they have offered to pay the developers in a different currency?

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    1. Re:Another currency? by kasperd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Couldn't they have offered to pay the developers in a different currency?

      Turns out they are sort of doing that. You just have to change which country the account is registered in.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    2. Re:Another currency? by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they just have two profile settings, country and currency?

    3. Re:Another currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just a field which said "bank account". Currency is not really an important factor.

    4. Re:Another currency? by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or just a field which said "bank account". Currency is not really an important factor.

      If you don't get paid in your bank accounts native currency they nickle and dime you on the exchange rate; so it does matter.

      I have multiple accounts at the same bank in different currencies. I direct funds based on the currency and do bulk exchanges ONLY if I need to and at a time when the rate is desirable.

    5. Re:Another currency? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      That would just shift the burden of conversion from Google to the local developers, so that is not really the answer. The point of this is to artificial restrict the transfer for foreign funds into / out of the contry so the government can get a favorable FX rate to pay off it's bills.

    6. Re:Another currency? by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Still better than "sorry we can't give you any money anymore" which seams to be the case here.

    7. Re:Another currency? by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they just have two profile settings, country and currency?

      I was wondering about that as well. Might be they just couldn't add that feature to their system at such short notice. Alternatively it might be they are worried about the legal ramifications of such a change.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    8. Re:Another currency? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Or just a field which said "bank account". Currency is not really an important factor.

      Of course it is. If I am receiving payments made in USD, to a USD account in a bank in Europe, I sure don't want them making any stupid assumptions and sending the money in EUR. That will cost me several percent.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    9. Re:Another currency? by vgerclover · · Score: 1

      Because that is considered illegal in the country, and would make Google, which has an office in country, liable.

    10. Re:Another currency? by kasperd · · Score: 2

      Because that is considered illegal in the country, and would make Google, which has an office in country, liable.

      And how exactly do they pay the employees in that office?

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  3. Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by alexgieg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here in Brazil we had this kind of policy in the middle '80s. It brought incalculable damage to our economy and to our global competitiveness, together with hyperinflation and other such funny stuff. We finally abandoned this idiocy in the beginning of the '90s and haven't looked back since. Too bad South American countries in general are firm believers in the "But We Are Special!" School of Economics and don't like to do basic stuff such as looking around to see what worked and what didn't to then decide on policies. Argentina is going to suffer a lot in the following years until its government learn the lesson.

    For other troubled countries to then disregard, after all, they're special too!

    --
    Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    1. Re:Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd love to tell you more about the meaning of "kind of"

      It starts with "Don't be a pedantic idiot and consider a broader view"

    2. Re:Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      To submit the request, however, you first needed to get a PIN from AFIP, either online or in person.

      Not being from Brazil I don't know for sure but I assume 25 years ago it would all have to be done in person. Unless "on a computer" makes it a totally different kind of policy.

    3. Re:Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just South American countries. Every country believes they are something special.

    4. Re:Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't looked back because you didn't suffer as we did from the neo-liberalism process. We currently can't buy a house in pesos, we can only buy it in dollars. Does that happen now in Brazil?
      Your judgment is so shallow that it makes me sick.

      Let's talk about taking the other countries example, then let's make a general recipe to overcome any economy breakdown, oups! that didn't went well in Greece nor Spain nor any other place where general recipes DONT WORK.

      There is no problem for dolar imports, we have no permission to remove dollars from the system not otherwise.

    5. Re:Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by alexgieg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does that happen now in Brazil?

      It happened back when we didn't have a stable currency. Then we adopted policies which created a stable currency and it stopped. Amazingly, the US dollar is a stable currency. See a trend there?

      There is no problem for dolar imports, we have no permission to remove dollars from the system not otherwise.

      Yes, because adopting the economic doctrine of the 18th century (mercantilism) is smart. Here's a notion for you: there is no such thing as actually exchanging dollars for pesos. When someone who has dollars wants pesos that's for the sole purpose of purchasing stuff valued in pesos, When someone who has pesos wants dollars that's for the sole purpose of purchasing stuff valued in dollars. This means that the exchange of currencies goes like this: pesos go, meet dollars, and after a while return to Argentina where they belong; dollars go, meet pesos, and after a while return to the US, where they belong; meanwhile, stuff go from the US to Argentina and and stay in their new home, and stuff go from Argentina to the US and stay in their new home. In other words, currencies are tourists, goods are migrants. If you block one half of one side of the equation, you block the other half, and then the whole equation. The exchange of goods, which is what matters, stops both ways, and you're left with whatever exists within your country and no more. Your oligarchs, monopolies and cartels all thank you gladly, your population is left purchasing overpriced trash (but they all can work in exchange for said trash, woohoo!), and after a few years you're technologically broken.

      Have fun!

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    6. Re:Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

      Money is just not a unit of exchange, it is a store of value, so there is something in the exchange from pesos to US dollars.

      Now, currency can't leave the country – but money is a bigger then then currency.

      Argentinians may prefer to exchange their goods and invest abroad where returns are higher. (high taxes, inflation, and regulation decreases returns.) Now, yes, those funds have to eventually be returned (unless the person emigrates) but that could be decades from now.

    7. Re:Argetina today equals Brazil of 25 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But sometimes what they want to buy with dollars is pesos and what they want to buy with pesos is dollars.

  4. ralph lauren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Argentina (and other South American bureaucracy) are corrupt. Some, more than others. This is the reason why Ralph Lauren had to bribe officials (but got a backlash from the US citizens), just in order to do business in Argentina.

    http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/22/news/companies/ralph-lauren-bribery/index.html

    1. Re:ralph lauren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All governments and bureaucracies are corrupt. Some, more than others.

      FTFY, just take a look at capitol hill.

  5. We're from the government, and here to help you by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yay for protectionist, isolationist, centrally-managed, paternalistic government-crawling-up-your-pant-legs regulatory over-reach! So stimulating to the economy.

    And imagine the opportunities for bureaucratic mischief as more and more layers are added in between someone who has something to sell, and someone who wants to pay for it.

    When people complain about "big government," it's exactly this sort of (somewhat) unintended consequence and life-squashing administrative death by a thousand cuts that is really the concern. Too many byzantine rules and hoops to jump through, with too many low-level, unaccountable functionaries being gatekeepers in their own little fiefdoms. In the US, it looks like the IRS's increasing ugliness (to say nothing of what it will look like when they're policing everyone's individual compliance with ObamaCare requirements).

    Domestically, this is what's being referred to as the rise of the Fourth Branch. And it's deadly.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by nickmalthus · · Score: 0

      Only time will tell if Argentina's monetary policies further the interest of the Argentinian people. Bear in mind that central banks like the federal reserve corporation are creating money from thin air at zero percent interest rates with no end in site for years. There is no reason for banks to solicit investment from the free market when they can just go to the central bank to print more money. Additionally there is marginal benefit for people to save money in a bank with near zero interest rates. Who knows what the long term effects will be of this major shift in investment and glut of global currencies? If a global economic collapse is imminent can Argentina be blamed for try to isolate itself in preparation?

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be-T J
    2. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your name seriously "Nick Malthus"?

      That would explain a lot about your comment :P

    3. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by paulpach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is even worse in Venezuela,

      The government printed money like crazy which caused really high inflation. So how does the government fight inflation? they add price control, which causes scarcity, and currency control which kills imports. Here is a video showing people that got wind that there was corn meal, chicken and some other products in a supermarket

    4. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Governments exists solely for oppressing people, making sure they are "in line". There is no such thing as government that serves the people, by definition. It's the people which serve and obey the government.

    5. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by goruka · · Score: 1

      Yay for protectionist, isolationist, centrally-managed, paternalistic government-crawling-up-your-pant-legs regulatory over-reach! So stimulating to the economy.

      There really were big efforts to move the country to a more open economy, almost 25 years of effort that resulted in chaos and riots.

      In other countries, such as Chile, Uruguay or Ecuador, this process was successful, but Argentina failed to shrink the government role enough to not contract more and more foreign debt. This is the same shitty situation that is now happening in Spain and Greece. If you shrink the role of the government, the government has less income, but if you have a huge foreign debt, the government needs more income to pay it so it has to raise taxes and that hurts the economy a lot.

      Argentina instead closed the economy, enlarged the government role (and the income) and is now paying it's foreign debt religiously. A horrible regression but not much of a choice.

    6. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by kwbauer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Currency control... done (just with higher limits)
      Printing money like crazy... done.
      Price controls... started with rent, then health care

      Looks like Obama has us moving in that direction.

      Yes, currency export restrictions greatly preceded Obama but his "brothers in ideology" are behind all the rent control policies.

    7. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by loneDreamer · · Score: 1

      The case of Argentina is peculiar. I this case, corruption is not an unintentional consequence... it is pretty intentional. If you look at Argentina's economic policy, you see plenty of hardcore measures that everybody knew would not work, implemented time and again. They have seen and done everything under the sun. Forcing dollar parity, frozen people's accounts, took people's retirement savings, defaulted on their debt, etc etc. The only constant: people in power benefited. That's why most people in there prefer to work FOR the government (i remember hearing 60%), since at least being somewhat in the loop is better than being on the outside.

    8. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by ScentCone · · Score: 0

      The case of Argentina is peculiar. I this case, corruption is not an unintentional consequence... it is pretty intentional.

      But it's intentional here (in the US) too. The people who want more and bigger and more intrusive and more involved-in-everything government want it because they're fans of having the people who fill in that growth to have more power and personal influence. The people who most push the expansion of the government in size are those who consider being part of that vast middle-man organization to be a natural fit for their instincts and disposition. There are people who really don't aspire to create or produce anything, but rather to be the career gatekeepers who take it from one place, and dole it out to another. They really do think that's a good thing to do, and they're the ones to do it and make the judgement calls surrounding it, and to grow in their power throughout a career of lording over it.

      plenty of hardcore measures that everybody knew would not work, implemented time and again

      Just like in the US. We're about to watch yet another giant tax/spend social engineering program come swinging in to cause more dependency and more economic wreckage. It's never "worked" before - here or anywhere else - and yet here it is again, about to ratchet up taxes and mammoth new piles of debt. All while tens of thousands of new IRS employees are being hired specifically to assess the legal standing of every person and company in the country, every year, as it relates to whether they're compliant with an inscrutable new healthcare law - and thus whether they need to be fined or have their wages garnished (or worse) based on an agent's rather subjective take on each person's relationship with still undefined massive new bureaucracies at the state, local, and business level. And what, right now, how we see the mid-level, ass-covering micro-power-players in that agency twist and turn trying to explain away exactly the sort of corruption that isn't - at all - peculiar to Argentina.

      This sort of thing always happens when voters who want free stuff vote for the people who promise they'll take it from someone else and give it to them.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Currency control... done (just with higher limits)

      Looks like Obama has us moving in that direction.

      The US has no currency controls. There are reporting requirements at various thresholds but no restrictions on how much money can be sent in or out.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    10. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by vgerclover · · Score: 1

      It's exactly the same in Argentina. Venezuela just started doing it before.

    11. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Healthcare mandated by the government never worked anywhere else before?

      Australia/Canada/United Kingdom would like a word with your revision of history.

    12. Re:We're from the government, and here to help you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Healthcare mandated by the government never worked anywhere else before?

      Right. In each and every place where it's been put into place, it's slowly collapsing under the weight of an aging population. The burden of the entitlements keeps getting pushed onto a smaller and smaller group of people, and the services delivered continue to erode or outright vanish. Pay attention.

  6. Point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is good news for us Americans here in the United States.

  7. I don't understand... by plerner · · Score: 1

    ... why Google cannot pay to someone? The restrictions are for the Argentinian (yes, like me) that want to buy foreign currency. The company can send the money to the persons bank account, and the developer will get the money in local currency. Besides, in the link above, in spanish, Google does not say it's reasons. For the moment, with these information at hand, I really don't think these restrictions are the reason. Maybe when Google explain them selfs.

    1. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can be sure it is due to the government regulations. After all, Google gets a 30% cut of the money - they won't cut off their revenue stream unless they need to. Now, it is completely possible that there are workarounds for the new rules but that implementing said workarounds would cost more than the amount of return - based on the number and profitability of the developers and apps coming from Argentina. Whatever the issue, it will come down to "protectionist government regulations ruining the economy". Hell, my company has employees in Argentina. We can't even get HP or Lenovo computers there. You aren't allowed to import computers. We have to buy these silly BangHo white boxes (which are really just assembled there; all the parts are made in the usual places). Aside: Apparently BangHo didn't know what their name meant in English.

    2. Re:I don't understand... by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

      Google works in dollars, developer's in pesos. Unless Google's local operations are in balance, at some point somebody has to do a conversion.

      Kirchner want's it done at the official rate, which is favorable to the government, (They have lots of bills from abroad, and want to force the locals to sell dollars cheaply to them.)

    3. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Computers aren't even assembled in Argentina, just packaged. It's a massive scam there.

      As for the 30% cut, that can easily happen before Google even deals with the developer, really. The developer just sees the remaining 70% in the transaction, and that means that for regulation purposes only those should count as well. So no, that shouldn't cut Google's bottom line. If anything, only the developer should be affected.

    4. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's up to the developer to do the conversion, Google doesn't have to deal with it.

  8. Not always corruption... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2

    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice.

    Other variations are available.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  9. Summary is Crap by goruka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live over there. Here's what's going on, I'll try to explain it because even fellow Argentinians don't really understand:

    Argentina is a country that is very culturally different to the rest of Latin America, and even the world and likely the right place to look at when you want to see the results of a government being more involved instead of less. By the time of the second world war, Peron did a deep change to the country, created public health, public education (made public university free), public retirement funds, changed labor laws to highly benefit the employees (employeers must pay them many sort of benefits and can't fire them without paying compensation), etc.

    Peron tried to made it clear that he wasn't going towards fascism/socialism/communism, but his model was more of creating a capitalism with more social equity through the intervention of the government. Most of the "upper class" did naturally not like this and tried to fight this by financing coup d'etats by the military (It's a little more complex than, but that goes beyond what i'm trying to explain and there's plenty of material to read about dictatorships in Latin America).

    My point is that Argentinians are sort of "spoiled" and that has even been transmitted from generation to generation. There is this strange belief that everything that happens is the fault of the government, and that the government should take care of it.

    For example, beyond public health, retirement, education, etc. If you are homeless, the government will build you a house. If you are poor and your children can't study, the government will give you money to send them to school. If you are unemployed, you just receive money. Transport is dirt cheap because it's subsidized too, some products are price-fixed to be made more accessible and now the government is even making a line of clothes that is more cheaper and accessible.

    The government spends a fortune in social help and taxes are high as the result. But it goes beyond that. The economic model is also designed to ensure that unemployment is really low. They do this by forcing people to spend their money and not keep it, so there is constant inflation and purchasing foreign currency is forbidden. By spending the earned money constantly, the local economy is always very active, restaurants are packed full, and everyone is using credits to buy stuff.

    The right wing media opposition to the government is strong and focuses on mainly on corruption and insecurity, to make people feel they are being constantly robbed and freak them out. However, people is employed and is earning decently nowadays so this has a limited effect, which gives place to the saying ("roban pero hacen", translated to "they might steal but they still do for the country") Even the media themselves know they can't mention anything related to a right wing point of view (less state intervention) or people will label them as traitors.

    So the big question is if economical stability by this means are worthy. Buenos Aires is a production powerhouse and generates a lot of income, but there is a large part of the population that would not be able to be sustained in a more open economy. As a result, the country is very closed do the rest of the world economy. The rest of the world isn't very healthy economically either.

    What's going on with Google is really nothing new. It's extremely hard for Argentinians to be entrepreneurs in this context, so we just open offshore companies in Panama, Delaware or other places and get paid there (otherwise we can't get get paid in us dollars or euros), then transfer our money to the country either illegally (black market price is higher), or legally (needed if you run a company and need to pay your employees). It's not impossible, just harder.

    1. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Summary is not crap.

      >So the big question is if economical stability by this means are worthy. Buenos Aires is a production powerhouse and generates a lot of income, but there is a
      > large part of the population that would not be able to be sustained in a more open economy. As a result, the country is very closed do the rest of the world > economy. The rest of the world isn't very healthy economically either.

      Economical stability ? what ?????? where?? in Argentina? there's 25-30% inflation, Argentina has no US dollars to import energy and other services and so they are taking idiotic measures to obtain those US dollars, like not letting the common man buy things aboard in US dollars, they are now asking people with illegally obtained US dollars to give those US dollars to the government, and in exchange the government will forgive and forget all illegal actions performed to obtain that money... stability? please!

      Also, you are basically saying that Argentinian people are stupid and cannot live in an open economy? are you crazy??? who are you to decide what 40 million people are able or are not able to do? are you god?

      >What's going on with Google is really nothing new. It's extremely hard for Argentinians to be entrepreneurs in this context, so we just open offshore companies in
      >Panama, Delaware or other places and get paid there (otherwise we can't get get paid in us dollars or euros), then transfer our money to the country either illegally
      >(black market price is higher), or legally (needed if you run a company and need to pay your employees). It's not impossible, just harder.

      ?? being forced to do illegal activities to be an entrepreneur basically means you cannot be one.. Also, you are contradicting yourself in the same sentence.. if you can legally take the money to the country, why would you need to illegally open an account abroad? ..

    2. Re:Summary is Crap by hsmith · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a wonderland!

    3. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not impossible, just harder.

      ?? being forced to do illegal activities to be an entrepreneur basically means you cannot be one.. Also, you are contradicting yourself in the same sentence.. if you can legally take the money to the country, why would you need to illegally open an account abroad? ..

      which part of "It's not impossible, just harder" did you not understand ? you do it illegally when it it's easier to do so ... it's easier to do the illegal stuff than to take the money back to Argentina ... just like downloading Game of Thrones is easier using bittorrent than through HBO ... even if you're willing to pay for it legally.

    4. Re:Summary is Crap by goruka · · Score: 1

      > Economical stability ? what ?????? where?? in Argentina? there's 25-30% inflation,

      Inflation is intended and on purpose.

      > Argentina has no US dollars to import energy and other services and so they are taking idiotic measures to obtain those US dollars

      That was indeed stupid, and the government should have acted before. But then again, do you realize it's the *government* importing the energy? That is not a common scenario, it's usually just the private sector in charge of that.

      > Also, you are basically saying that Argentinian people are stupid and cannot live in an open economy? are you crazy?

      Were you alive in the 90s? Argentinians clearly cannot live in an open economy.

      > they are now asking people with illegally obtained US dollars to give those US dollars to the government, and in exchange the government will forgive and forget all illegal actions performed to obtain that money... stability? please!

      I'm really starting to wonder how old are you. Safe Boxes in banks are packed full of US dollars because, after 2001 (foreign banks decided to flee the country and keep the USD savings of their clients), people does not trust the system. It's not really illegal money, just money out of the system.

      > being forced to do illegal activities to be an entrepreneur basically means you cannot be one.

      Or, that the government does not really care about some illegal activities.

    5. Re:Summary is Crap by goruka · · Score: 1

      It's like a wonderland without the candy

    6. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Inflation is intended and on purpose.

      Plus inflation is only a problem for banks and people who hoard money, not for the masses who live with around with what they get every month. When people cry rivers about inflation you immediately know if they serve the rich or the poor.

    7. Re:Summary is Crap by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      "not going towards fascism/socialism/communism" A rose by any other name...

    8. Re:Summary is Crap by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      So, you can't save for the future which means you will have no money when you are too old to work or hard times come. The only choice is to rely on others to take care of you. All personal responsibility is gone and you are a slave to your government. This sort of thing used to happen back in the day in the States but it was private companies running company towns where the company owned everything and made sure you were always in debt to the company. (Your statement about having to buy on credit fits right in). The big difference besides private company versus government doing it. We, as a people in the States, said the practice was immoral, unethical and illegal because it was essentially a form of slavery. But I guess slavery is okay as long as the few at the top of the government are the owners cause government never abuses its people.

    9. Re:Summary is Crap by LiENUS · · Score: 2

      So you think life is best lived paycheck to paycheck with no backup in case of an emergency?

    10. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out for government astroturfing.

      seriously.

    11. Re:Summary is Crap by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1

      No unemployment? No homelessness? So all those people I saw living in tents by the railroad tracks the last time I was in Bs As were there just because... they like trains?

    12. Re:Summary is Crap by SEE · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Corrected version of above:

      Argentina is likely the right place to look at when you want to see the results of a government being more involved instead of less. Shocked by the Great Depression, like many other countries Argentina turned to a strongman. Once in power, Peron did a deep change to the country, and Argentina swiftly fell from being one of the wealthiest countries in the world to a basket case. Now, instead of being as rich per capita as the US or Switzerland (like it was in the 1920s), it's in the same economic class as Russia and Botswana.

      Despite this abject failure, the media can't point this out, because people will label them as traitors. It's extremely hard for Argentinians to be entrepreneurs in this context of unremediated Peronism, which has wrecked the Argentine economy.

    13. Re:Summary is Crap by xenoc_1 · · Score: 1

      Cristina? Sra. Presidenta, está usted?

    14. Re:Summary is Crap by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 4, Informative

      THIS. I own a software company in Argentina. We used to design our own hardware too, and we manufactured overseas. We did some manufacturing and all of the assembling in Argentina. We were steadily moving towards more local manufacturing. The low Shenzhen prices made it hard, but we where making progress in that direction. All of a sudden, getting dollars and sending them overseas was more expensive and harder every month. Then the overreach of non-automatic licenses destroyed us (you have to request permission 90 days in advance to maybe get a limited import quota of certain items). In the meanwhile, the big hardware stores (Garbarino, Fravega, etc.) continued to bring all-chinese products into the country without issues, even those competing with our products. We had to shut down most of our hardware operations. We put more emphasis on our SAS products. We almost went bankrupt several times, in the end, we made it, but it left us weak and in debt. Some of that debt where taxes. They quickly froze our accounts and took their toll. We've paid most of it, and we're growing again. Well, until the government decides to change the rules in favor of the owners of this country again.

      I hear people accusing the Kirschner administracion of being socialists. This isn't fucking socialism, this is a systematic plan to destroy what's left of our economy, while spending more and more money every day on free lunches for the unwashed masses that keep voting for this fucking stupid cunt.

      I will be very fucking surprised if anything is left after this bastards are done with our country.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    15. Re:Summary is Crap by goruka · · Score: 1

      The country has public retirement funds. You get paid by the government when you retire depending on how much taxes you paid while you worked.
      It's still not very much and you still need help by your familiy anyway.

    16. Re:Summary is Crap by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      It's a nice place with welcoming friendly people.

      But their economy went bust around 2001 with the collapse of the peso and is now struggling again with rampant inflation and such currency restrictions.

    17. Re:Summary is Crap by arcade · · Score: 1

      Bollocks on the "rich or the poor".

      You immediately know whether they're a saver or a spender.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    18. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the top rated comment here is a commie one. Good job, slashdot, bunch of mediocre, retarded, disfunctional socialist scum!

    19. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear people accusing the Kirschner administracion of being socialists. This isn't fucking socialism, this is a systematic plan to destroy what's left of our economy, while spending more and more money every day on free lunches for the unwashed masses that keep voting for this fucking stupid cunt.

      What did you think socialism is?

    20. Re:Summary is Crap by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the middle class. Eva Peron couldn't stand the middle class, and things haven't changed.

      I'm sort-of-middleclass, and get the worst of everything. I'm excluded from government house plans, or similar, but it takes 100% of 12 years of salary for me to pay an actual flat near where I live.
      I don't use public transportation, either (I walk everywhere), but I end up paying a huge deal of it in taxes.
      I also pay a fortune in health care and another fortune in taxes every month, but I don't really get any of the benefits.

      It's actually cheaper for me to move abroad and buy a flat in EU/Canada than try to achieve something here, especially due to the huge inflation rate. Sure, salaries keep up, but saving money for the future makes no sence, since it'll be less than 50% it's value in two years.

    21. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and let me add something to further reinforce your argument:

      "fuckity fuck fuck ubercunt fucking FUCK!"

      there. you don't need to fucking thank me

    22. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha ha ...

        All this comment is the sh*t that the goverment uses to justify the attack over the citizens.
      There is no free media except Clarin and La Nación. There is no welfare state except you belong to the goverment party and be connected to powerful politics "operators".

        This guy is just another fuck*ing "Kirchnerista"

    23. Re:Summary is Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on how much taxes you paid while you worked.
      Hah! Nice one!
      My mother always worked and paid taxes in the maximun category, and was expecting the maximum pension. My friend's mother, being a housewife, never paid anything and was not expecting to retire. They both got the same retirement, the minimum.
      They certainly didn't care how much taxes they paid while they worked. Equity is not justice.

  10. Re: We're from the government, and here to help yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. They already don't serve the peoples interests. No need to be reserved about judgement.

  11. Wait, does this mean....my god.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...does this mean...BitCoin might actually be...good for something!?

    .

  12. Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Im from Argetina, and i can tell u, there is almost no1 that likes this kind of goverment but its dificult for the middle-class people to fight them back. The buy votes and voters... send ppl to kill you or, if u have a store they will break it down and make u pay for thinking an speaking against the goverment.

    Almost no1 wants to be like venezuela, we here hated Chavez and we widely hate the venezuela goverment, but sadly enough, we are going to be there... a 2nd venezuela and then, who the fuck knows.... maybe a cuba like country.

    Here u r zed that a dollar = 5.60 pesos for the goverment, but u cant buy it... they dont sell.... and be careful not to say out loud u have some dollars at home or u will become an instant target.

    Then there is the "blue" dollar, in xchange stores... one dollar = 8.95 pesos but is way too xpensive to buy... imagine buying gadget, a phone, tv, almost anything... take in consideration we have a 21% taxes over the stuff u buy, and a plus 10% for tech stuff, we are doomed.

    A 250 dollars item here cost 250x3x7 or 8 or 9.... it depends of the item and the blue dollar... but u can see where im going with this.

    1. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everything this anonymous coward posted is an outright LIE and need to be modded down.

    2. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No se en que parte de Argentina vives, pero por favor mudate rapidamente a la realidad.
      Si hay en latinoamerica algo definitivamente distinto a Venezuela o Cuba, eso es Argentina.

      I don't know which part of Argentina you live, but please move in quickly to reality.
      If there is something definitely different in Latin America to Venezuela or Cuba, that is Argentina.

  13. low taxes, justice and peace = wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Argentina is poor because of it's government.

    Simple as that.

    You need three things, for a country to be wealthy;

    1. low taxes
    2. tolerable administration of justice
    3. peace

    Argentina lacks #1 and #2, where #2 involves for example the Government *not* interfering in your freedom to buy and sell currency.

    1. Re:low taxes, justice and peace = wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argentina is poor because the south won here during our "civil war" during the 19 century.

    2. Re:low taxes, justice and peace = wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argentina is poor because the south won here during our "civil war" during the 19 century.

      There is a saying that "God created Argentina to the image of paradise. To balance things out he also created the Argentinians".
      Please, Argentina has always been a rich country in the 19th century and the 20th century.
      I lived in Argentina for many years in the late seventies and early eighties, I love the country, the people, their culture. But most problems Argentinians experience, are created by them in the first place (save for a few exceptions).

  14. More accurate headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Argentinian govt bars citizen developers from earning money by developing Google Apps

  15. A much simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would be to do away with the peso all together and switch to using US dollars as standard currency. Nationalistic currency makes as little sense as city specific currency in the modern connected age. A shame the bitcoin is unregulated and unable to inflate/deflate in a manner that would be required to promote the stability required of a global currency.

    1. Re:A much simpler solution by drwho · · Score: 1

      Argentina tried pegging its currency to the US dollar. It was a disaster, because the US dollar rose in relation to other currencies at the time (late 1990s) and so did the Argentine peso. As a result, Argentine goods became expensive to the outside world and imports were cheap to Argentines, and this led to economic collapse. The effects were really bad as it gave a bad name to the economic liberalism which was being introduced at the time.

      The country is now totally fucked and will probably invade the Falkland Islands within the next five years, and then loose, again. Except this time they are going to make it a dirty war. The old regime honoured (even worshiped) military tradition. This one, not so much

    2. Re:A much simpler solution by chilvence · · Score: 1

      It really is sad that our two countries can be dragged into war over an island full of not much other than sheep. It's even a little bit comical that a country the size of Argentina would consider that an 'invasion'. We think of it more along the lines of 'punching a baby in the face'

      In the second world war, we gave up the channel islands for a bit, Guernsey, Jersey, and so on. Then we went suicidally against the strongest, proudest country in Europe, with the most awe inspiring and powerful army the world had ever seen, all because we didn't much like what they were doing to the the Poles and the French, the first of which we hardly have a connection to, and the latter of which used to own our country's soil and make our rules. Best of luck!

    3. Re:A much simpler solution by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      "Probably invade the Falkland Islands within the next five years."

      Bring it on. We're ready.

      The politicians of the UK might not want a(nother) war, but the public and the press wouldn't give them much choice in the matter.

    4. Re:A much simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You went crazy if you think that Argentina is able to move any of it's rusted ship, planes to even try to invade Punta del Este in Uruguay. Really, get ride of you CNN, FoxNews and anothers delirant journalist.

    5. Re:A much simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets worse than that. The last time, the US couldn't pile in because we were in the middle of the Cold War and we seriously had to worry about accidentally touching off World War Last in any confrontation that could bring in the Soviets (and the Soviets were not above cynically donning the mantle of anti-imperialism in the same way the sea is not above the clouds). This time... not so much.

      Sure, the UK's military has taken some hits, but they also have more veterans than they did in '82, and the Argentinians still haven't recovered militarily; the disparity between their firepower and a US carrier group is -scary-.

      Nor has Kirchner forgotten the lessons of that war. Sure, you can use the issue to whip up support, but if you pick that fight and lose it, your entire government is going down hard.

    6. Re:A much simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You poor bastards almost lost the last one, I look forward to watching UK politicos commint the political hara-kiri that is starting a new Falklands war.

    7. Re:A much simpler solution by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, the Americans would not get involved in Argentina, the NATO operation in Libya was commanded by a Canadian and even with half the world begging them they're not touching Syria with a barge pole.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:A much simpler solution by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Oh, what a great idea! Menem did almost that for a decade. Wanna know how it went?

      The US keeps going to war and threatening countries to keep the dollar as the worldwide currency. What a great idea! Use this fiat currency everywhere, and we'll keep the printers right here!. We're subsidizing your lifestyle.

      It won't last very long. The oil market is steadily moving towards the Euro, and bombs won't help the US this time.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    9. Re:A much simpler solution by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      We invade punta del este every year, but we do it with the white, fat, rich cocksuckers that exploit Argentina until the last fucking dime.

      Taking the Malvinas back by force is fucking propaganda, and every government has used them for that purpose. Only Galtieri was insane (and drunk) enough to actually do it.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    10. Re:A much simpler solution by HJED · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those are very politically different situations. 'interfering' with local affairs of another country is very different from aiding an ally, both politically and in terms of clean-up (the US wouldn't need to as the British government would take care of it).

      --
      null
    11. Re:A much simpler solution by arcade · · Score: 1

      Look at the European Union and the Euro.

      Then look at Greece.

      That is how Argentina would look if they started using the dollar.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    12. Re:A much simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not matter much which currency is used.
      The transaction only takes a few minutes anyway.
      The free market will prevail in the long run no matter what.

      Oil and other raw materials and other Products can be bought and sold involving whatever currency
      buyer and seller agrees upon.
      There is no monopoly regulation upon a free transaction in a free market.
      If I want to buy a 40 foot container With toothbrushes from China and buyer and seller agrees upon payment in Hong Kong dollars then there is no Third party to stop that.
      I might resell the container With toothbrushes while it is on its way to a European Port aboard a Danish Container Ship.
      Some of the toothbrushes might be put up for sale in a supermarket in Praha. I would not know. I will buy my next toothbrush at the local supermarket like most People do.
      And I might sell a few containers With toilet paper made in Canada heading for USA due to diminishing Stocks due to all that toiletpaper sold to Venezuela. Someone might buy 2 containers of .22LR ammo from Brazil and ship it to Canada to compensate for US made ammo that did not arrive on time last week. There is always a free market out there. Full Free Float - like it or not. If someone prefers to do their business elsewhere in a different way - so be it. The free market will prevail even if the majority dislikes it. And if there is a 4 year long war in Yugoslavia, just take a very long vacation unless you prefer to hang about and see some Deadly action.

    13. Re:A much simpler solution by stm2 · · Score: 1

      "will probably invade the Falkland Islands within the next five years".

      Have you ever seen the state of our army? It is a bad joke. Even Bolivia could invade us if they wish to.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  16. Pay them in Bitcoin. by beltsbear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Problem solved.

    Seriously. It is better then having nothing and it is possible the dev could actually cash it in. Bigger devs could have an overseas bank account and get payment into that. Smaller devs could get products delivered to them internationally. It does not solve every problem, but it is better then no payment.

    1. Re:Pay them in Bitcoin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is the future, paper money is the past.

    2. Re:Pay them in Bitcoin. by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Actually, I store all my savings in bitcoins since I can't legally buy dollars.

      Sure, bitcoin's future is uncertain. Buy I prefer the uncertanity of BTC, instead of the certain devaluation of ARS:

  17. Oh dear.... by GrunthosThePoet · · Score: 2

    The Argentinian government is going to need something to distract the populous - time for the Falklanders to start digging bomb shelters.

    1. Re:Oh dear.... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      distract british people with another Falklands/Malvinas war...

      I do hope you're not suggesting that Argentina did NOT invade the Falklands in the 1980s.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:Oh dear.... by GrunthosThePoet · · Score: 1

      Nothing beats going into an election with a successful war behind you.

    3. Re:Oh dear.... by msi · · Score: 1

      It would also make the UK government happy at the moment.

  18. My wife is an Argentinian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And we travel every year to visit the family. If you say nobody likes the government, but at the same time I see most of my family support it (yes, we are a very small portion of the population), and Cristina Fernández won the last elections (and the economic measures we are arguing here were already in place) with 58% (against 16% of the second-best candidate)... I find it quite hard to swallow that you say "nobody likes the government". No, there is no suc violence or vote buying as you mention (and I as a Mexican can very well spot vote buying and coertion). What happens is that we seldom see beyond our class-level. The country has over 40 million people, many of them way poorer than your average Slashdot poster. And they have really got their lives better since the ultra-free-market nonsense of the 1990s was stopped, after the big 2001-2002 crisis.

    As a middle-class Mexican, I'd love to have the public education, health and security systems Argentina has. In fact, those three are important reasons why we regularly consider moving there.

    1. Re:My wife is an Argentinian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ive been through many crisis the country has had in the past. trust me. stay in mexico. at least for 3 years.
      the cycle usually is: produce - steal - loan - print - crash.
      we are now at print.

    2. Re:My wife is an Argentinian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. I'm argentinian and while the government isn't by far perfect, and it does have corruption and gross mistakes like in every other country, what the GP says is just naive crap. No one is coerced nor their bussiness destroyed for speaking against the government. In fact if that were the case, well at least in the Buenos Aires area most bussiness would be destroyed as most people around here is highly vocal and highly manipulated by the not less criminal gang conformed by the media blocs and opposition.

      I'm amused by the need to reinforce arguments by introducing words like "fuck", but that doesn't automatically make them true. What this guy describes is a tirannic state, and that is just fantasy. I suggest you stop a bit the neurotic feedback between you and the media.

    3. Re:My wife is an Argentinian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Cristina Fernández won the last elections (and the economic measures we are arguing here were already in place)

      This is wrong. She won the election prevoius to the exchange restrictions.

    4. Re:My wife is an Argentinian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a middle-class Mexican, I'd love to have the public education, health and security systems Argentina has. In fact, those three are important reasons why we regularly consider moving there."

      You could get free health care here, and it's a lot better than nothing, but if you really want *good* health care you will need to subscribe to a company.
      OSDE (osde.com.ar) and Swiss Medical (swissmedical.com.ar) are the best, but there are many. Some of them, specially those two provide world class service and technology. Also they are really expensive. All of them, not just those. Most of the middle class is subscribed to one, and yet they support the public health care system through their taxes.

      It's worth to mention that It's not that the doctors at the public hospitals aren't good. They are very good. In fact they are the same doctors you will find in private institutions. The problem is that you won't find the same level of equipment, usually you won't find any equipment at all, and the public hospitals are really crowded with people that require medical attention way urgently than you. Poor people from all Latin America come to Argentina to get free medical treatment (wich is -again- a lot better than nothing). But if you are having an emergency and you need some equipment, you would end up undertreated (probably with cronic consequences) or not treated at all.

  19. Government Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be to maintain a level playing field in the U.S.

    Now it has become a way to get unionized government workers of all stripes to get paid so high (twice the average worker pay) with such good benefits that those workers will automatically vote in more politicians who give them even more pay, while those politicians and ex-politicians and their staffers get exhobitant "benefits" in lobbying, executing and running the "government" programs, however inefficient & duplicative.

    Welcome to the USA, United Socialists of America. We change or we merge with Argentina into a true USofA.

  20. What does currency exchange have to do with this? by Punto · · Score: 1

    While I love bashing the govenment and their stupid monetary policy as much as the next guy (I honestly don't think the president understands how money works), currency exchange policies have nothing to do with this particular situation. Google pays the local developers in local currency, and there's no restrictions to exchange USD to Pesos, you can just walk into any bank with foreign currency, and they'll exchange it for you (at a shitty rate, but again, that's not Google's problem, they're just paying the developers in compliance with the local laws). Money is coming into the country, not going out, the govenment has no problem with that.

    If I had to guess (which I do because there's no information about this so far) I'd say it's not worth it for them to keep offices here to deal with paying the local developers, since they're not allowed to take their profits from other services out of the country (due to the exchange restrictions), so there's no point in having local operations.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  21. Could somebody please explain? by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 2

    I don't see the connection. How can a law designed to strengthen the peso (by prohibiting ARS -> USD conversion) be a problem for developers selling apps priced in USD? (This would imply USD -> ARS conversion, which is what the Argentine goverment wants.)

    1. Re:Could somebody please explain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google send theirs dollars at the official currency (this is very bad for google) and not the real value

    2. Re:Could somebody please explain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a problem. Developers will simply avoid using their dollars in Argentina.
      I suggest you read up on economy.
      Free To Choose by Milton and Kari Friedman might do the trick,
      It served well for Estonia.

    3. Re:Could somebody please explain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doesn't make sense, TFA is simply misleading, I don't know the cause for google to do that, but I receive monthly transfer from US to ARG, and never had any problems, the only limitation is that you have to exchange the dollars to pesos in order to credit them in your account, but that's a law passed by Carlos Menem in the early 90's.

    4. Re:Could somebody please explain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly it has nothing to do with that. People are just taking this chance to whine about the government but I found no explanation about why this happened so far.

  22. Re:What does currency exchange have to do with thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally. Someone with some senses.

    this not only happens with Google. all foreing operations in the country are halted.

  23. No, no and no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Argentina THERE ISN'T ANY RESTRICTION if you are receiving foreign payments in any currency!!! IT'S a lie!!
    I live in Argentina working for european and asiatic companys, in the last 11 years they pay me with bank transfers in u$s and euros then i got AR$ at the official rate in my local bank.
    I don't really understand what Google is doing here...

  24. real perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what you people dont really understand is that the goverment is using those dollars to PAY the WORLD the debt the FMI forced the argentine goverment to adquire in the 90's (corrupt goverment, failed neo-con policies, just like europe now) . its not like "uh goverment is bad, restricting free US dollar hoarding" its like they need those dollars to actually pay DEBT, tons of dollars to pay debt and energy the country need for its blooming economy

  25. Re:What does currency exchange have to do with thi by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    So, basically, if you want to host the files yourself, and do the e-commerce yourself and get the shitty exchange rate yourself, then the government is totally OK with that. But if you want to pay Google to do the e-commerce and currency exchange and file hosting by taking a cut of your profit, then the government will make that very hard. One of the benefits of the international market is discoverability. I don't have to get folks to come to my website to buy my product, they can buy it in the world wide app market via simple search term. This is a benefit the government is making harder for the people to leverage. That is an issue. The end result is that since you can't get any discovery, or take advantage of the cheap hosting and commerce and customer relations (refunds), etc., you can't afford to develop apps.

    Isolated economies are over. This is the Information Age. Adapt or become Extinct.

  26. Bye bye ches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even you don't have map information. Argentina is a weak and old country respect to IT.

    1. Re: Bye bye ches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no clue of what Argentina is.

  27. Kirchner's neo Peronist Regime wins again by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I'm in the outsourcing business and we're fleeing Argentina ASAP. They seem bent on some kind of fascist autarky.

  28. Temporary Solution, Bitcoin Is Deflationary by cmholm · · Score: 1

    By design, the number of bitcoins will level out at 21 million, ergo deflationary. End of story (but not the arguments). As a short term salve for Argentine devs, bitcoin payment is better than nothing, but nothing more than yet another ephemeral method of flight from the peso.

    Ultimately, Argentina's monetary problems will continue their traditional cycles until its social spending is ramped down to something its economy's surplus value can sustain. Given that the financing machinations haven't yet hit a wall too high to climb (as it almost did in the early 'aughts) and that it maintains an income stream to the mass of Argentines, I don't foresee a change in the general flow of the thing.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  29. Simple solution by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Just pay through secret Swiss bank accounts.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Simple solution by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was going to reply something extremely similar.
      Just open a bank account in Uruguay. A ferry costs ~500ARS (~100USD for those unfamiliar with local currency).
      Have google pay you in UY, and keep your money there. UY is like the latinamerican Switzerland, they love to keep you money, and ask little questions.

    2. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember that uruguay is not a option.
      https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/150324?hl=en
      Should we go to mexico to develop an android app? It is a shame

  30. confusion by jjohn_h · · Score: 1

    It is not the figure given that is confusing, it's the concept.

    Start with 1 unit of currencyA equivalent to 2.2 units of currencyB.

    After a while currencyB has depreciated by 900%. And what the hell does that mean? Don't ask journalists, ask yourself.

    1. Re:confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You end up with 1 unit of currencyA being equivalent to 22 units of currencyB.

  31. About already proven and failed theories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The orthodox theory that if big capitals are happy the economy will be ok has already failed here un Argentina, and ended up with 25% unemployment. Perhaps not Google or JP Morgan, but someone is happy with Kirchner's economic model, as it's party won it's third-in-a-row presidential election with 54% of the votes. No crisis here, at least for the working class. When some economist critizes Argentina or Ecuador or Bolivia or Venezuela for that matter, go see what that genius said about the US before the sub-prime crisis, or about Spain or Greece. You might find those oracles have interests, which probably are not your own.

    1. Re:About already proven and failed theories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yikes!

      When you fight 25% unemployment using direct subsidy on that 25% and then you move that people out of the unemployment statistics...financing the whole thing thru printing fresh money ... Voila! Now you have a happy working class and some new "working" class that will vote you untill the whole "modelo" explodes.
      It's magic, i wonder why the whole world is not doing the same.

  32. so, unbridled capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will fix this?

  33. All analysis of this looks wrong - its accounting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google are not trading in Argentina, because they have effectively closed the loop hole that allows them to pass the buck on to App Developers to pay all local taxes. Google Play is quite different to the other stores, where Google work as a "payment provider", not "point of sale". It looks like Argentina's rules require companies to be more closely linked to Argentina. With Apple/Blackberry/Microsoft this does not cause an issue - they already have a strong presence in selling services there. Google operate much more virtually, choosing not to be present in any jurisdiction that might cause issues, and providing their services over the wire. With Play they charge 32.6% (yes they also charge you in addition to the 30% a 1.6-3.2% "handling fee" depending on volume!), and then offer the developers nothing - no support, tax, administration etc. They effectively give you a download site linked to Paypal in a unified spot, and then play "sloped shoulders" on their responsibilities. All other Appstores offer considerable value for sorting out selling internationally for steep entry fee of 30%. Actually at low volumes the 30% is a steal, given the complexities of dealing with places like Argentina. Google are once again trying to strong arm Governments around the world to go with their world view - as they are in many other areas. When the government in question doesn't like Google's view, they pull back and it becomes a stand off. Such is the breadth of their power they can even do this in the first world - though they then to fold quicker. Luckily there are many other equally rich companies willing to take them on (qv Apple, Microsoft, Samsung et al), but we seem to be entering a phase where national governments are looking increasingly toothless against the internet giants. Some may see this response this is a corporate dystopian view of the world, and perhaps it is. However until governments begin to reassert and more importantly adapt their rules with these companies we'll continue to slide in this direction. Why do I think this is bad? Because large companies goals are ultimately competitive. Even the best intentioned company is aligned to different objectives. Google have smashed competition in many areas unrelated to theirs. They have been allowed to because of the pleasure they give to the public with their drug-dealer style approach to business (first hit is free). Its not a vote winner to tell the populi "You can't have this for free". Far easier to give them the latitude to grow uncontrolled, and then pick up the pieces afterwards. Take a look at Maps, App for business, and Gmail/Google Drive etc to see where its going. Superb products - don't get me wrong, but the free has slowly become a hook of free "for a while". It means the market becomes moribund to new players after a certain level of saturation has been achieved. This is not a good thing.

  34. OrigoTerra can help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello Argentinian google play developers,
    OrigoTerra can help by funnelling your earnings back to you in dollars in Argentina for a small fee. Contact us for more info at http://en.origoterra.com/contact-us/
    OT Team