Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Delivering Groceries? It's Coming, Thanks To Sales-Tax Politics

curtwoodward writes "Amazon has been delivering groceries to people in its hometown of Seattle for a half-dozen years, but the experiment has never spread any further. But this year, rumors about Amazon Fresh expanding to new cities are coming out every month — Reuters just reported that Amazon could start the service in L.A. within a week, and in San Francisco in the coming months. What gives? Why expand now? Look no further than Amazon's long-running battle with state and federal governments over sales tax policy. After more than a decade of resistance, Amazon has spent the last two years cutting deals to collect sales taxes in states all over the country. And it's pushing for a national online sales-tax system, which appears to be within reach. That's the last obstacle to Amazon getting into the grocery-delivery game — a step that should worry not only grocers, but UPS and FedEx, too."

30 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. More regulation = less choices by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So in other words, Amazon has managed to lobby legislators into having a national internet sales tax which it can fairly easily implement (since it designed it and is a large company after all) in order to screw over both the average Joe AND make the playing field less competitive (the US tax code is far from simple...)

    Gee thanks Amazon!

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:More regulation = less choices by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Incorrect.
      Amazon would do this if there was no sales tax too.

      The only reason they did not is that by only enforcing sales tax on business operating in that state they had more to lose than to gain by opening this new line of business.

    2. Re:More regulation = less choices by hibiki_r · · Score: 2

      It'll be very easy: All you have to do is, instead of opening your own online store, you just list your items in Amazon, and they'll collect the tax for you!

      So much money to be made being a middleman.

    3. Re:More regulation = less choices by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      easy to implement.

      Easy for a large multinational with full-time tax attorneys on staff to implement.

      Painful for small businesses.

      (not too unlike Health Care - which is easy if you have a HR department with nothing better to do; but is really painful if everyone in your company is trying to get work down that's relevant to your main business)

    4. Re:More regulation = less choices by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its easy to implement for Amazon because Amazon is a large company with a team of lawyers and helped design it. In 2012 Amazon had revenue of about 60 billion or so, spending a couple hundred thousand (or more) on compliance with this proposal is a very small dent. However, the cost of compliance will be felt much more for smaller companies or individuals who sell online and may very well put them out of business. After all if you're selling something as a hobby, its not going to be much fun or profitable if you have to spend hundreds of dollars on either talking to a tax attorney or several man-hours trying to figure out the taxes on your own. Amazon can afford that, they've got the personnel and the spare cash, your "mom and pop" style internet store may not.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:More regulation = less choices by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      So before, Amazon was unfairly competing with local brick & mortar stores because they didn't have to pay the same sales tax.

      And now you're saying that they're unfairly competing because they do have to pay the same sales tax?

    6. Re:More regulation = less choices by Mitreya · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easy for a large multinational with full-time tax attorneys on staff to implement.
      Painful for small businesses.

      Isn't it funny how that works?
      Same with tax-code -- theoretically, everyone is subject to the same tax codes. However, people with several full-time attorneys on staff seems to do a lot better in minimizing their tax bills.
      Coincidence?

    7. Re:More regulation = less choices by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      So before, Amazon was unfairly competing with local brick & mortar stores because they didn't have to pay the same sales tax.
      And now you're saying that they're unfairly competing because they do have to pay the same sales tax?

      No, Amazon will unfairly compete with other online stores, because small online stores will not be able to afford a dedicated department (with several attorneys) for the sole purpose of online tax collection.

      The playing field with brick&mortar stores may even out a bit as a result, but B&M stores probably still wouldn't have enough in-stock items to remain competitive.

    8. Re:More regulation = less choices by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Amazon has fought against internet sales tax (or, rather, the idiocy of making people who don't live or work in one state paying taxes in it) for quite a long time. They only recently caved in and gave up bothering to fight. Remember, they even went so far as to shut down their affiliates program in response to states trying to force out of state companies into paying their sales taxes (the residents' duty to do so).

      It seemed clear that when they gave up bothering to fight against it, they had something planned. This seems like what it was. "Well, if you can't beat them - join them".

      I say, good on them. All of these idiots out there perpetuating this myth that the lack of enforcing out of state collection on state sales taxes was harming the little mom and pop stores in cities . . . little mom and pop stores that no longer exist. Not because of "the intarwebs", but because of the big national chains that already squeezed them out decades ago. They had this crazy idea that if you suddenly had to pay sales tax online, you would stop shopping at Amazon and Newegg and other outlets online and trudge across town into their stores to deal with their shitty staff and shitty stores and shitty checkouts and shitty parking lots and all the other BS that goes along with it.

      Instead, they're going to find that people who weren't going to shop at Best Buy, Walmart, Target, Lowes, Home Depot, Ralph's and so on without sales tax collection will *still* do so . . . because if you're going to pay sales taxes either way, you might as well have the pleasure of the things showing up effortlessly at your door step the next day or two. In fact, they'll probably find a lot of people who will do whatever they can to throw their business to online services just to spite them.

    9. Re:More regulation = less choices by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      I've spent probably $500 at Amazon in the last few months and I have to pay sales tax (KY). It shows up in 2 days. (And if it ships from the distribution center in town the next day). Excellent return policies. Usually the cheapest price and I can do it from my couch without having to drive to the store.

    10. Re:More regulation = less choices by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      The internet sales tax law doesn't require any company selling less than a million dollars to collect tax. That's not a mom and pop internet store. They can afford a developer.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    11. Re:More regulation = less choices by DogDude · · Score: 2

      Oh, quit with the "several attorneys" FUD. It's simple software.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    12. Re:More regulation = less choices by edb · · Score: 2

      Be careful whereof you pontificate. Different states have different laws.

      In California, what you said is largely correct. The seller is responsible for remitting the sales tax to the state, whether it was collected from the purchaser or not. In fact, if the seller collects less than is due, the seller must remit the full amount due; if the seller collects more than the amount due, the seller must remit the entire amount collected (i.e. can not keep any overcharged tax).

      In Pennsylvania, and perhaps other states, it is specifically ILLEGAL for the seller to include the sales tax amount in the retail price. The seller is legally REQUIRED to collect the sales tax as a separate amount from the purchaser. Or at least this was true a few years ago when my company was selling at a conference in Pennsylvania; it may not be true today, but the law was made quite clear to sellers at the event.

      This is just a tiny, tiny hint of the complexity of the sales tax situation nationally. Also consider that a specific food item may be taxable in some states and not in others. Indeed, that same food item might be taxable in some jurisdictions (city, county) within a state, and not in others within that same state.

      And then get into whether the purchaser is exempt from sales tax or not. For example, in many states, schools do not pay sales tax. In others, they do. It gets very interesting when a teacher goes to a professional conference in another state, and will not be reimbursed for any amount charged for sales tax even though the sale is not exempt in the state where it took place.

      --
      In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they rarely are.
    13. Re:More regulation = less choices by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      And because Mom and Pop stores suck. I worked for a few in my teen years. Without fail they were the ones most likely to scam customers, paid workers far less, generally treated them worse, had worse prices and terrible selections.

      I am not sure why anyone pines for them.

  2. Live Free or Die by tedgyz · · Score: 2

    No worries here in NH if they ever offer the service here. No sales tax.

    Now with regards to our no-motorcycle-helmet law, "Live Free and Die" is a more appropriate slogan.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:Live Free or Die by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look on the bright side, lots of possible organ donors.

    2. Re:Live Free or Die by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Look on the bright side, lots of possible organ donors.

      And Amazon will deliver them while they're still fresh!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  3. Re:Groceries: Amazon's Iceberg? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    None of them had the resources and the know how.
    I already order hard to find grocery items from amazon. Mostly imported products not available in the USA that I enjoyed as a child.

  4. Re:Good-Bye "No Sales Tax" by EvanED · · Score: 3, Informative

    wonder what part of "national sales tax" you missed. Everyone gets to pay sales tax on internet purchases going forward.

    The part where that didn't happen.

    As I just said in another post, there's no "internet sales tax", just the ability for states to require internet retailers to collect sales tax on sales to residents. If a state has no sales tax, there will continue to be no sales tax.

    (I make no statement on whether the federal bill/law is good or bad, just that the name "internet sales tax" is apparently incredibly misleading.)

  5. Amazon requires UPC by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except Amazon doesn't sell anything unless it has a UPC. Handmade? Micro-business? Too bad. Get your own shopping cart and implement TaxCloud.net.

  6. TaxCloud.net by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Easy for a large multinational with full-time tax attorneys on staff to implement.

    Painful for small businesses.

    Part of the deal in this interstate sales tax bill is that participating states will make TaxCloud.net available to online retailers without charge. Integrating TaxCloud.net into a cart is supposed to be no more painful than integrating a payment processor or a shipping rate service.

    1. Re:TaxCloud.net by bongey · · Score: 2

      supposed to be no more painful a payment processor or a shipping rate

      Try telling that to anyone that works in tax with multiple states, they wouldn't stop laughing at you.

  7. Be Careful What You Wish For by sehlat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The brick-and-mortar brigade has been bitching for years about the supposed "unfairness" of "they don't pay sales taxes but we do." They finally browbeat Congress into doing something.

    Amazon's argument was about the burden of having to keep track of over seven thousand districts (I looked this number up.), having to update them the moment things change, and the legal penalties for any failure to keep track of changes. So they asked for, and got, a national single-tax regime, which, presumably, any business selling online can keep track of and meet, including the brick-and-mortarsaurs.

    And if this is a disaster for the mortarsaurs, they will have only themselves to blame for the new K-T boundary.

    1. Re:Be Careful What You Wish For by dlgeek · · Score: 2

      It's not just that there are 7000+ districts, but they all have their own rules. Back in 2010, Washington had an extra tax on candy. However, Kit-Kat bars were exempt and charged at a normal food tax rate. Why? Because they happened to contain flour and were considered a baked good. Imagine trying to handle thousands of different jurisdictional rules across the millions of products Amazon carries. It'd be insane!

  8. Re:Good by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You do if you want to keep your grand children out of the coal mine. The plutocrats who abuse their employees are still in power and work day and night to undo the protections that the unions have put in place for American workers. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

  9. It's about robots, not sales taxes. by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This has nothing to do with sales taxes. That's a few percent. It's all about efficient warehouse and distribution operations. Doing that wrong can double operating costs.

    WebVan was a popular service during the dot-com boom. They just had an operating cost problem. They had about 3% market share in 30 cities, instead of 30% market share in 3 cities. So their order processing and delivery costs were too high.

    One of WebVan's former executives realized that order processing had to be much more automated for this concept to work. So he founded Kiva Robotics. Upwards of 15% of online orders are handled by Kiva robots. If you've ordered from a major online retailer, (Acumen Brands, Drugstore.com, Gap, Toys-R-Us, Walgreens...) a Kiva robot probably handled the order.

    Last year, Amazon bought Kiva Robotics. The whole company. Then they started building warehouses near major US cities and talking about same-day delivery. Those warehouses will have a lot of Kiva robots and not too many humans.

    While some grocery chains like Safeway do delivery, they're not very good at it. They're picking from store shelves. So they don't know, when the order is taken, if the item is in stock. Safeway tends to deliver with some items missing. Automated warehousing operations know what they have in stock when the system takes the order.

    It's going to be like Webvan again. But this time, it will be profitable. The retailers who see this coming are very afraid.

  10. Fed Ex is non union and most drivers are not even by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fed Ex is non union and most drivers are not even employees.

  11. TaxCloud.net by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Integrating TaxCloud.net into a cart is supposed to be no more painful than integrating a payment processor or a shipping rate service.

    When someone else assures you across the board that integrating something of theirs is [some level of difficult], into something of yours, where they know exactly nothing about your situation, work load, code, or available resources, you can be absolutely certain they have no idea whatsoever what they're talking about.

    Further, for systems that implement home-grown shipping and payment, even the context is meaningless. "no more difficult" could be extremely difficult.

    There are systems out there for whom the developers aren't even available any longer.

    Whenever the government decides they're going to make every business, everywhere, do something, the load will neither be equal nor fair, and further, it may be fatal to the business for any number of reasons.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  12. Re:Good by CRCulver · · Score: 2

    What you are describing is (with the exception of generous holidays) a feature of Western Europe. Come to the EU countries in Central and Eastern Europe and it's not so rosy. I'm in Romania, and I can assure you that business owners are out to screw you any way they can.

  13. Tax Jurisdictions of Record by tepples · · Score: 2

    sales tax is far far more than states, counties and cities all have their own extras.

    The impression I get from the TaxCloud.net TOS is that participating states have entered applicable data for their respective counties and cities into the TaxCloud.net system:

    1.11 "Tax Jurisdictions of Record" means all applicable state, county, regional, tribal, or special tax district jurisdictions for a particular TaxCloud Transaction, as determined by at least Section 309 and Section 310 of the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement.