Class Action Suit Goodies Await Tech Users

jfruh writes "Did you buy an Acer laptop with Vista and less than 1 GB of RAM? The company has a thumb drive it would like to send you. Did you get an unwanted text from Papa John's? The company would like to make it up with you with $50 worth of free pizza. These and other little rewards are available as a result of class action lawsuits that have wound their ways through the court systems and now, years later, are paying off for very large groups of tech users." I wonder how many USB drives the lawyers took as their share.

Comments

Paying off for whom?

[SirGarlon]

It sounds more like these settlements are paying off for the defendants. Papa John's pulled off an especially neat trick there, getting the court to accept pizza the customers don't want in lieu of statutory damages.

Re:Paying off for whom?

[CastrTroy]

Them and the lawyers who brought the case to the court. In most of these class action lawsuits, the lawyers "fighting for the little guy" end up getting huge amounts of money. Sure they have to pay their own bills, but it often goes a lot further than that. There shouldn't be any options to give out free stuff in these class action suits. The payouts should be cash only. $50 worth of pizza doesn't cost Poppa John's $50.

Re:Paying off for whom?

[h4rr4r]

Good, the lawyers did the work.

The whole point of class actions is to make small individual claims able to be handled by the courts. No one is going to sue Papa Johns for $50. Papa Johns got a nice $25 per customer punishment.

Reminder

[Anonymous Coward]

These aren't the results of judgments, they're the rewards for settlements. So if you ever wondered why the end result is so awful it's because the actual money goes to the lawyers while the people for which the lawsuit was intended to provide justice get cheap plastic kazoos. This is supposed to be okay, though, because "class action lawsuits are intended to punish companies, not restore damages." The best part is that by accepting your cheap plastic kazoo you're also signing away any other legal recourse you may have had.

Re:Reminder

[fast turtle]

it's called small claims court and the chance of winning is far better they you'd think. I'll take $250 dollars - depends on the state - EG California now allows $2500 for spam and such per incident. Now if we'd all simply take advantage of these laws and start collecting from the most egregarious offenders.

Re:Reminder

[Bob the Super Hamste]

I had a run in with small claims years ago just after I graduated from college. The insurance company didn't want to pay anywhere near the fair market value of a vehicle that was totaled as determined by various objective not involved 3rd parties (NADA, KBB, and an independent appraisal). I paid my $35 filing fee which you could as part of your requested damages. The car sat in storage with the insurance company for 6 months as they stone walled me and I went to court. I went in with a stack of paper to prove my point that included:
The KBB value of the car
The NADA value of the car
The independent appraisers valuation of the car
Examples of very similar cars and their asking price with pictures they were all in really bad condition and/or had really high mileages even by my standards with one having 750,000+ miles on it
Examples of the same vehicle in the price range the insurance company was claiming my vehicle was worth
The data and method the insurance company used to come up with a valuation

I presented my stuff and picked apart their valuation making sure to point out where they had deducted things multiple times. The judge then asked the insurance company to justify their valuation in which they presented their method and data that I had presented. The judge looked at the insurance company lawyer and told them they should have just settled as what I was asking was perfectly reasonable. The whole court proceeding took about half an hour. After that the insurance company still stalled on getting me my money and I had to threaten to get a lien against their assets as I had a court order to have my money by a certain date which had passed and I was now legally allowed to do so and if I didn't have my check by the end of the day I would be doing that. About an hour later my check was hand delivered. In the end they ended up paying the fair market value of the car, storage for 6 months, what ever it cost to have someone go to court, what ever it cost to prepare for court, and what ever it cost to have someone hand deliver a check to me when it should have only cost them the fair market value of the vehicle.

More people need to put the screws to companies like this and things would get better quick because what ever it costs you in your time it will cost the company more. If a kid just out of college can force a big insurance company to pony up just about anyone can.

eMachines settlement

[ThatsLoseNotLoose]

If you purchased an eMachines computer with a floppy drive way back in the late 90s, you can get either $62.50 in cash, or $365 worth of Gateway or Acer stuff from their refurb outlet.

http://www.emachinesfloppydisksettlement.com/CaseInfo.aspx?pas=EMS

I'd forgotten I ever bought an eMachine until I got the notice last month.

Missing the point

[KingSkippus]

The point of a class action lawsuit isn't, unfortunately, to compensate the members of the class. The point of a class action lawsuit is that there are too many people who suffered minor damages to really be able to logistically handle that.

The primary point of a class action lawsuit isn't to "fight for the little guy," it is to punish companies that do wrong. If lawyers end up making $2 billion off a lawsuit, well, that's $2 billion out of the company's coffers. And before you go spouting off about how ultimately they pass that cost on to customers, maybe they do, but if so, that puts them at a disadvantage compared to other companies. Or put another way, if Domino's is giving their customers good quality pizza while Papa John's is skimping because they are trying to pass a $2 billion lawsuit judgment on to their customers, they'll lose market share. But I digress...

Anyway, I don't necessarily agree that the lawyers should make so much off of a class action lawsuit, although they really should make a lot, since they're handling the details of compensation which costs a lot more than most people think. What I'd like to see is some kind of public fund set up for money like this to go into, such as to build parks or something, so that the end effect of punishing the companies is maintained but the incredible amount of time, effort, and money that goes towards mailing a few people checks for a buck or two isn't wasted. At least that way, you also avoid the problem that class action payouts usually aren't that high since most eligible claimants won't bother to jump through the hoops to get their judgment.

Re:Missing the point

[pepty]

The primary point of a class action lawsuit isn't to "fight for the little guy," it is to punish companies that do wrong. If lawyers end up making $2 billion off a lawsuit, well, that's $2 billion out of the company's coffers.

No.

Punitive damages do that. Compensatory damages are intended to make the plaintiffs "whole". The jury or judge will make it clear which damages are intended to do what. Remember, class actions aren't just for pizzas, they're also for injuries and death caused by negligence.

Either way, I think there should be parity in awards to the attorneys and the plaintiffs in a class action suit, both in time and monetary value. If the class is paid in coupons, the attorneys are paid in coupons.

The attorneys are free to sell the coupons for cash.

If the plaintiffs are paid cash over a period of time - say a trust has been established that pays medical bills- the attorneys should be paid incrementally as the trust is used up. The attorneys certainly have the option to sell that revenue stream for an immediate payment - they'll probably get 50-70 cents on the dollar.

The point is that class action attorneys should have their interests tightly aligned with those of the class, otherwise they will cut deals that benefit only themselves. The best and simplest way to do that is to reward them as a percentage of the net present value of the market value (not face value) of the plaintiff's share of the award.

Re:How many thumb drives did the lawyers get?

[2gravey]

The sad truth of it is that the poor lawyers probably did not get any thumb drives at all and had to make due with nothing more than millions of dollars for their trouble.

Re:not to be a buzzkill but this isnt free.

[Anonymous Coward]

Product paid for by future cuts = free product now and none of my business later when the company cuts quality or raises prices to compensate.

A free pizza from Papa Johns today that will result in higher prices tomorrow means I buy Little Caesars tomorrow.
A "windfall" ACER USB drive in my hand today that raises Acer prices across means I buy a Dell PC instead.

It's called the free market. You're free to charge whatever you want, and I'm free to buy from someone else.

Re:not to be a buzzkill but this isnt free.

[Antipater]

If the penalty is reflected in the price of next year's line of Acer laptops, then more people will buy from Toshiba instead. "Passing it on to the consumers" only works when the entire market is passing it on, not just one company.

Do the flash drives have text on them saying...

[jkflying]

"I won a class action lawsuit against Acer and all I got was this stupid flash drive."