Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Releases 1.7TB Treasure Trove of Gaming Info

mvar writes "According to Kotaku, a hacker named SuperDaeE who breached multiple gaming companies (Valve, Sony, MS to name a few) has released a 1.7TB treasure trove file for download. The file which contains source code for older titles plus development kits for the PS4 and Xbox One consoles, is encrypted and SuperDaeE claims that it is his insurance in case he gets arrested."

189 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Insurance Policy? by Orestesx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right...cause if he gets in trouble, blackmail will surely get him out of it.

    1. Re:Insurance Policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Listen up, world! I've got evidence that the senator's been holding a human trafficking and slavery ring in the #7 warehouse on the docks, as well as papers showing the exact schedules of these activities and how they've helped his campaigns! And here's all of that evidence for download! I'm using this as insurance against him arresting me for my breaking and entering into his office to get this information!"
      "So... how is this insurance?"
      "Because if he tries to arrest me, I'll release all the information to the world!"
      "But you just did that."
      "Of course I did! That way he knows I'm not bluffing! If he tries something stupid, I'll release it all again! So you see, Senator, I hold all the cards!"

    2. Re:Insurance Policy? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Besides that, that is a big So What in data.

      Ok Source code for OLD GAMES, So games that have already been pirated and hacked, but lets the the source so we could compile it before we play it.
      SDK, that would be handy, if only you wanted to be licensed with the gaming company, to you know distribute your code. Even OSS projects would avoid it as to not get sued for using a pirated SDK.

      So when he gets arrested for hacking, they will just add Pirating to the list too. Good thinking!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Insurance Policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just for reference, if you look at the summary you'll see that what he's released is that trove... encrypted. The idea is that if he gets arrested, he yells out the passphrase, but until then this might as well be 1.7TiB of /dev/random

    4. Re:Insurance Policy? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just for reference, if you look at the summary you'll see that what he's released is that trove... encrypted. The idea is that if he gets arrested, he yells out the passphrase, but until then this might as well be 1.7TiB of /dev/random

      My guess is it's 1.7GB of /dev/random anyway.

    5. Re:Insurance Policy? by firex726 · · Score: 2

      So neither we nor the companies may even know the extent of what he has.
      Kinda shitty plan on his part it seems.

      And even then, why release it to begin with?
      Had he kept quiet he might never have been caught, by putting it out there he all but guaranteed his arrest.

      Also what good is the Dev SW for a PS4 or XBone without the hardware? We already know what the HW will be like, does anyone give a shit what SW the consoles will use? The people who could make use of it, developers; already have their Dev kits in hand.

    6. Re:Insurance Policy? by lbmouse · · Score: 2

      It might help determine how rapey his cellmate will be.

    7. Re:Insurance Policy? by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      So he is safe. Released, the info gets spread on the interweb. No way to destroy it.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    8. Re:Insurance Policy? by dantotheman · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the fact that these new consoles will be running on x86 processors will come into play here...

    9. Re:Insurance Policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Repeated 1024 times to account for the 1.7TiB of data?

    10. Re:Insurance Policy? by tattood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure, the game companies may not want this released, but does the FBI care? If they investigate, and find and arrest the hacker, it's up to the D.A. whether or not to prosecute, not the game companies. This seems like a worthless insurance policy/blackmail, because the people going after him are unaffected by the action of him releasing the encryption key.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    11. Re:Insurance Policy? by firex726 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, but Dev kits are also much more open than a release console. They need to be to let the Dev run unsigned code of their own while it's being made; any exploits you may find in this code may not be usable in the final product; especially since the consoles are possibly still being made.

    12. Re:Insurance Policy? by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because yelling a passphrase is easier than yelling out 1.7TB of data on the spot?

    13. Re:Insurance Policy? by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Except for those consoles, the Dev kits are both HARDWARE and software.
      Any exploit the "scene" may find may not be usable at launch. Software dev kits are purposely made to be more open.

      > Hey look, I can run whatever code I want without having it signed!

      Yea, you can bet after this last gen Sony and MS will require all the code to be signed.

    14. Re:Insurance Policy? by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because yelling a passphrase is easier than yelling out 1.7TB of data on the spot?

      They're trashing our rights, man! They're trashing the flow of data! Hack the planet!

    15. Re:Insurance Policy? by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Which would be even worse for him, since right now it's only a threat with no confirmation, if he thought doing that gives MS and Sony access to each other's copyrighted material, he'll be fucked.

      And even then, so what? He's got a lot of proprietary SW that requires proprietary HW with it to be usable. Unless he's going to handout the PS4 and XBone hardware dev kits too.

    16. Re:Insurance Policy? by jzilla · · Score: 1

      Nah maybe /dev/urandom but 1.7 TiB of /dev/random would take forever.

    17. Re:Insurance Policy? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      Almost.
      Does the FBI work through U. S. Attorneys?
      Yes. Although the FBI is responsible for investigating possible violations of federal law, the FBI does not give an opinion or decide if an individual will be prosecuted. The federal prosecutors employed by the Department of Justice or the U.S. Attorneys offices are responsible for making this decision and for conducting the prosecution of the case.
      http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs

      Local stuff is handled by a D.A. (District Attorney) or City. County, or State Prosecutor.

      I agree his "insurance policy is useless... It's akin to soaking himself in a flammable liquid and threatening to light it. All he can do by releasing the decryption key is provide more evidence against himself.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    18. Re:Insurance Policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He has a Beowulf cluster of geiger counters!

    19. Re:Insurance Policy? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or his personal porn collection.

      Why back it up if you can get the world to do it?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    20. Re:Insurance Policy? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Must post the obligatory reply:

      "I didn't do it."

    21. Re:Insurance Policy? by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Safe how? It sounds like he is being charged for possession of kiddy porn among other things. He'll be tried and convicted regardless of his "threat" (which in itself is a offence) and if he's fucking stupid enough to release the key he can expect to receive fresh charges on top since he has just incriminated himself. So he'll probably go from 3-5 years up to 10+ years. Doubtless all sentencing to be served consecutively. Great plan that.

    22. Re:Insurance Policy? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      And in doing so open himself up to charges of hacking, blackmail, extortion, wire fraud and anything else they can pin on him. It's a stupid plan.

    23. Re:Insurance Policy? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Depends if his spitefulness outweighs his long-term planning - if he gets a long enough sentence to effectively ruin his life, revenge is going to look very appealing indeed. He also said that his 'inability to access a computer' would release the passphrase, suggesting he is paranoid enough to have a dead-man's-handle - either tucked away on a server no-one knows about, or a few friends with orders to release it if he goes out of contact.

      The charges are so diverse they look suspiciously like the result of a trawling - someone in law enforcement decided he has to go down and did a through rummage through his home and computers to hunt of any useful dirt they could charge him for. That means his blackmail ploy isn't going to work: While it could convince game companies to back down from the path of mutual destruction, a prosecutor would have little to lose from the leak and a lot to lose politically if seen to be giving in to the demands of criminals. Espicially now the kiddie porn card has been played - even if, as is more likely than not, it's nothing but a naked selfie his girlfriend sent him. He is seventeen.

    24. Re:Insurance Policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's 1.7 GB of /dev/random. All he needs to do is release the correct one-time pad!

    25. Re:Insurance Policy? by Zencyde · · Score: 2

      I'm under the impression that he has something automatically set up to yell the passphrase for him if he isn't there to stop it once every arbitrary schedule of time. I imagine that this is some sort of timer system, possibly set on a weekly basis. Easier to guarantee it working as this situation, in which he is behind bars, would be expected. If he's as smart as he comes off, he even has this trigger set across multiple locations through sources that he's accessed only anonymously. He could even have a botnet set to pull this trigger for him, as botnets seem to be super popular in some circles.

      Did he do this? I don't know. But he likely knows enough about the world to know that he'd have to to have any hope of his plan working. I don't imagine he expects to save himself with this.

      It reminds me of this movie/show I saw a long time ago, in which a trigger was tied to this person's heartbeat. Should his heart stop, something catastrophic was to happen. Sort of a guarantee that people would want him alive. It's always tied to something beyond the control of everyone else. Him yelling a passphrase? Easily within the control of the prison system. Computers yelling out a passphrase for him? Not worth the resources to try to stop.

      Yes, this is all conjecture. But it would work a little better than what you suggested, and I'm sure this guy knows that.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    26. Re:Insurance Policy? by interval1066 · · Score: 2

      whatever. I think the dude is funny as hell. I hope they don't murder him.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    27. Re:Insurance Policy? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Well if it was just his girlfriend he'd be even dumber since they court would probably go easy on him. They don't go so easy on people who attempt to subvert justice. If he went through with his grand plan he'd be stewing in jail long after anyone else gave a damn.

    28. Re:Insurance Policy? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Just for reference, if you look at the summary you'll see that what he's released is that trove... encrypted. The idea is that if he gets arrested, he yells out the passphrase, but until then this might as well be 1.7TiB of /dev/random

      For all we know, it might indeed just be 1.7TB of /dev/random.

      BTW, was there any hint that the file size is closer to 1.7*2^40 bytes than to 1.7*10^12 bytes, or do you just blindly add the "i" to "TB" whether it makes sense or not?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    29. Re:Insurance Policy? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So all those who download the file actually download kiddy porn, and when the encryption key gets released, they get into much bigger trouble than the gaming companies could ever cause them? Well, that would be an interesting twist. ;-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    30. Re:Insurance Policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An off-brand Asian video game company might decide that it's worth $500 (for the hit) to find out.

    31. Re:Insurance Policy? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Such a case would have game companies driving it. If game companies are extremely interested in this package not getting decrypted by everyone, they will not make crime reports, they will stall their help for any ongoing cases and may even ask authorities to drop the case entirely.

      It's not so much blackmail as holding a hostage.

    32. Re:Insurance Policy? by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      Oh Jesus! The wrench thing again... doesn't apply here.

    33. Re:Insurance Policy? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What? Who in the fuck is soooo damned retarded they will download 1.7 fricking TB of data that is completely fucking useless because its encrypted? Hell how in the fuck do you know this isn't just his way of railing against the possession laws by seeing how many dumb fucks he can get to download child pron huh?

      You have NO idea, ZERO, what the fuck is in this stuff, you only have the word of one single person who is already an admitted criminal who has broken into countless companies, caused who knows how many people to have to deal with the "fun"of having to replace their credit cards, and we are just supposed to take his word for it? There is stupid and then there is plain old ignorant, and if you download 1.7Tb without even knowing WTF it is you are firmly in the latter column.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    34. Re:Insurance Policy? by pipatron · · Score: 1

      I would easily do it if I hadn't filled my hard drive with crap movies I'll never watch. I'd just put a wget in a screen on my server and go on with my life. In a few days it'll be on my HD, ready to be removed the instant I need the space for more crap movies I'll never watch. It's not really a big deal.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    35. Re: Insurance Policy? by madprof · · Score: 2

      The 5th what? US constitutional amendment? Do they even have such an equivalent law in Australia?

    36. Re:Insurance Policy? by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

      Backups are free. Restores, not free. Call me!

    37. Re:Insurance Policy? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Then I'm sorry but you sir are ignorant, again you have NO CLUE what is in this shit, could be state secrets, could be a huge cache of kiddie porn, you have ZERO way of knowing WTF it is except by taking this guy's word at face value...do YOU know this guy? Because I sure as hell don't, not enough to know whether he is telling the truth, just being a dick because he can be, hell we've had an asshole on this very site use links to child porn like a fucking rickroll just because they were douchebags and thought that was funny.

      If it turned out to be something nasty i doubt seriously any court is gonna believe you downloaded THAT much shit without even the tiniest clue as to what it is just for the hell of it, that would be a seriously hard sell to any jury, so WTF would make you want to take that risk for some douchebag you wouldn't know if you ran into on the street?

      Again you have NO idea what you are getting into, NO clue as to what the contents are, you could be opening yourself up to years in PMITA prison and for what? What do you possibly gain by giving this asshole 1.7TB of storage for his shit on your PC?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    38. Re:Insurance Policy? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      encryption...

    39. Re:Insurance Policy? by Eyeball97 · · Score: 1

      It's 1.7 TB - TERABYTES - you fucking retard

      Take your fucking poncy Tibibytes and shove them up your arse.

      "Oh, but we have to have the bi to specify it's BINARY Terabytes you see!"

      No, you don't, you foul smelling infected festering gonad. ONLY YOU insignificant fucking worms get confused as to whether kilo is 1,000 or 1,024 depending on context.

    40. Re:Insurance Policy? by tftp · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, "your wrong" © on all accounts. You may be not convicted if after several years of arrest and bond and trial you will prove that it's not your {CP,cocaine,whatever}. Even that is not obvious because your opposition is not empty-handed either.

      There were many instances of innocent people, one even being mayor of the town where it happened, receiving an unexpected package - and when they touched it they were arrested by cops who were lying in wait. Sometimes drug dealers ship drugs not to their own address, but to someone nearby, who receives packages at the door. If you get caught with illegal items, like a bag of drugs in your car, under the carpet, you will be presumed to be the owner of the contraband. If you think that the bag was dropped by a hitchhiker who you gave a lift a year ago, good luck proving that - you will never prove that it wasn't you.

    41. Re:Insurance Policy? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      ...

      Also what good is the Dev SW for a PS4 or XBone without the hardware? We already know what the HW will be like, does anyone give a shit what SW the consoles will use? The people who could make use of it, developers; already have their Dev kits in hand.

      Console hackers would love access to the Dev SW. While sure, it's not the hardware, it might show possible bugs they can use to gain access to the machine.

      Plus when they do figure out how to run homebrew on it, a lot of times the first public (internal releases usually for the scene) "dev kits" are based, or hacked Dev SW.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    42. Re:Insurance Policy? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      by putting it out there he all but guaranteed his arrest

      From TFA:

      Last Kotaku heard SuperDaE was out on bail.

      So it looks like he is already arrested.

    43. Re: Insurance Policy? by freman · · Score: 1

      No

    44. Re:Insurance Policy? by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's kind of my point. It pisses off a lot of people who I'd like to be pissed off. Would be even more awesome if it were a single 1.7TB file, but I guess that's unlikely.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    45. Re:Insurance Policy? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      FTFA- He's Australian. I don't think the FBI has jurisdiction.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    46. Re:Insurance Policy? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 2

      You never, ever go to the cops if you come across CP. Ever. Most police forces have proven themselves completely untrustworthy when it comes to CP. If you come across CP, you destroy it and keep your mouth shut.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    47. Re:Insurance Policy? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      The FBI (or USA, for that matter), always has jurisdiction, no matter where. Didn't you get the memo?

    48. Re:Insurance Policy? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how this works in Australia, but where I live, it's not ilegal for a seventeen year old to have sex with a sixteen year old. I'm pretty sure we're not the only country where this is legal.

    49. Re:Insurance Policy? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      But is it legal for a seventeen year old to possess a photo of a naked sixteen year old? Probably not.

    50. Re:Insurance Policy? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Well, they can have sex, I don't think it's illegal [for them] to take photographs of it. Distributing them probably is.

    51. Re:Insurance Policy? by Heretic2 · · Score: 2

      Just for reference, if you look at the summary you'll see that what he's released is that trove... encrypted. The idea is that if he gets arrested, he yells out the passphrase, but until then this might as well be 1.7TiB of /dev/random

      If you read the article, you'll see that it gets auto-decrypted if he fails to check in. So if he gets arrested and can't access the failsafe to reset it the timer, it gets released.

    52. Re:Insurance Policy? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      It just shows that if you could turn stupid people into electricity you'd solve the energy problem tomorrow.

      I mean do i personally give a wet fuck if after it was pointed out you could be downloading anything, state secrets, child porn, terrorist crap that could get you several years in PMITA prison, that some retard goes "huh huh, I'll download it anyway, just to show I'm retarded huh huh"? Nope, not my IP address that will trace back to it, not my hard drive it will be found on, I won't be the one looking at time so i really don't give a fuck, zero fucks to give here.

      Hell if you "really want to show me" why don't you go download some CP and visit some terrorist websites, boy I bet that would really show me who is boss huh...dumbass.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    53. Re:Insurance Policy? by pipatron · · Score: 1

      So what if you go to a website and it's serving javascript with an embedded and encrypted child porn jpeg? You should stop browsing the internet because it could happen, and then you'll go to jail.

      It must be difficult living in such perpetual fear.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    54. Re:Insurance Policy? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      So what if you go to a website and it's serving javascript with an embedded and encrypted child porn jpeg?

      Your lawyer will have to do one fantastic job to convince a jury of that.

    55. Re:Insurance Policy? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      So let's assume he's being truthful and he actually has "source code for older titles plus development kits for the PS4 and Xbox One consoles". Um... So what? How is that damaging to the companies involved? Source code for older titles? Who cares? Dev kits? They hand those things out like candy to development studios. Sure, under NDA, but it's not like their business plan is toast if the dev kit gets leaked.

      It sounds like a small price to pay to pick off and make an example of some pissant little self-proclaimed l33t h4x0r. With blackmail that weak I'd nail him to the wall just because he sounds like a prick.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    56. Re:Insurance Policy? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Not to mention there is a pretty big fucking difference between the cops finding a single JPG in a web browser cache and the fact that you have a 1.7 FRICKING TB PILE sitting right there on your hard drive, don't ya think?

      Again it just shows that if you could turn stupidity like the guy above you into electricity? We'd solve the energy crisis tomorrow. I mean this is "getting into a van with a stranger that offers candy" levels of dumbshit, you don't know this guy from the man in the moon, in fact ALL we know about the guy is that he has done several website break ins, so obviously what the law thinks about what he is doing is not something he gives a rat's ass about, yet he is gonna blindly trust to download 1.7TB from this guy, sight unseen, and store it for this fucker just because he SAYS its something good, and he thinks it MIGHT piss off some guy he don't even know who doesn't give a shit about him and whom he never met?

      There is stupid and then there is people that need to be kept from breeding because they are the piss in the gene pool, that dumbass is squarely in the latter.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. Unintended Consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now hackers everywhere have a reason to get SuperDaeE arrested.

    1. Re:Unintended Consequences by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Or at least find a Hammer

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  3. FTP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > using centralized resource to distribute "insurance"
    >> 2013

  4. OMG by lesincompetent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Valve too?
    Please SuperDaeE tell me: can they count to three?

  5. Too large to be useful... by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sounds like too large of an "insurance" to be useful. Most people don't have the bandwidth or the space to hold 1.7 TB of encrypted info. Smaller files might make sense but not huge ones like this.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Too large to be useful... by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      Just uploading that must have been a real bitch.

    2. Re:Too large to be useful... by VorpalRodent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And even if they did...what's the value? Please explain to me if I'm missing something, but if I can't decrypt it, then my having a copy is just to protect his "insurance policy", in which case I'm aiding and abetting. I assume additional risk with zero potential benefit, except perhaps helping "stick it to the corporate blah blah blah"?

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    3. Re:Too large to be useful... by dittbub · · Score: 2

      Perhaps he will take a wikileaks like approach. Release individual games slowly over time but have the larger file available should he be interupted

    4. Re:Too large to be useful... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      It takes about two days at 100Mb/s

    5. Re:Too large to be useful... by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet he's too young to have ever used alt.binaries to know how it's done.

    6. Re:Too large to be useful... by HybridST · · Score: 2

      If I were to start the download on my home connection which tops out at about 100kb/s(fastest in my area) it won't be finished before I receive the 4 year degree I start in the fall. Then there's the keyfile to think about. I think I'll skip this one.

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    7. Re:Too large to be useful... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      You probably mean 100kB/s, not 100kb/s.
      It will still take you about 200 days.

    8. Re:Too large to be useful... by Grave · · Score: 2

      Or he actually did mean 100kb/s, which puts it at 4.3 years, fitting the timeline he stated.

    9. Re:Too large to be useful... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Only one person needs to keep a copy, though.

    10. Re:Too large to be useful... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Any old copper telephone line supports at least 512kbit/s.

    11. Re:Too large to be useful... by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Game developers in countries not so encumbered by copyright law will happily look at it the moment they can free from repercussions too.

      If you're in china, and make games for the chinese market why do you care what some 'murican game developer has to say? Like every other knock off and counterfeiter in china, they don't care in the slightest.

    12. Re:Too large to be useful... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 56kbit/s? And really, 52kbit/s?

      Pulling a 1.7TB file over a modem would be quite the achievement though. I imagine you getting to 1.6TB and then mom picks up the phone and makes the carrier drop and you have to start all over again.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    13. Re:Too large to be useful... by HybridST · · Score: 1

      Correct- It is indeed only 100kb/s peak download where I live.

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    14. Re:Too large to be useful... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      56 kbit/s is what you get with dial-up. 512 kbit/s is the minimum of what you get with DSL.

    15. Re:Too large to be useful... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      You're betting on him being captured and giving the pass-phrase out when the companies he hacked don't show up to rescue him, or some other hacker breaking the encryption key so you can look at it while he goes to jail anyway.

      The idea is that once he gets arrested, the other people who downloaded it may hoard the information they get out of it and his site will get shut down when you're 1/2lf way through downloading it. Then you'll have to sit around for a few years waiting for those guys to release portions of what they decrypted.

      In the mean time, you're just humoring a 17year old prankster that fancies himself a l33t hax0r, haha, wouldn't it be funny if he really DID have all the data he says he has? Downloading a bunch of random data isn't abetting.

    16. Re:Too large to be useful... by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      I envy the rest of the world then. The best upload speed we get here is about 2Mb/s meaning about 3 months to complete.

      Is it very common for people to have ISP's offer high upload speeds like that?

    17. Re:Too large to be useful... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Actually, even FTTH ISPs usually only provide 50Mb/s up (100Mb/s down).
      FTTH is of course not very common outside of important cities.

    18. Re:Too large to be useful... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "512 kbit/s is the minimum of what you get with DSL."

      Wroooooong.

      Call me back when you live more than a few thousand feet from the phone company office.

      Still got friends buying '3 mbit' packages and only getting 256 kbit download.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    19. Re:Too large to be useful... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      a 2TB drive can be had for less than $100 nowadays.

      I am sure a lot of people are willing to temporarily use $100 of equipment to hold this kind of info, especially those who are interested in this sort of thing.

      As long as one anonymous person has downloaded it, he can reupload the data if it turns out there is anything desirable in it.

      I actually have about 8TB free on my server. I might actually download it if I didn't care about being on some FBI list. If you have the free space, then using it for this trove until you need the space for something else is not a big deal.

    20. Re:Too large to be useful... by tftp · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how much the phone line can theoretically support if there is no DSLAM within a few miles from your home, and a fiber from the said DSLAM to a better connected facility.

    21. Re:Too large to be useful... by tftp · · Score: 1

      Downloading a bunch of random data isn't abetting.

      Recent decisions of courts with regard to terrorism do not lend credence to this theory. If you take a gun, load it, point at a man and fire - but the gun fails to fire because of bad primer in that one round - you are still guilty.

      Considering the situation, there is no lawful reason for you to download that file. It can be always shown that you hoped for a chance to gain access to illegally obtained software (if you get the key) or to threaten others with release of that software (if you don't yet have the key.) The latter becomes aiding, abetting, and probably conspiracy as well. If the judge asks you why you downloaded the file, what will you say?

    22. Re:Too large to be useful... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      You're probably confusing bit and byte again.

    23. Re:Too large to be useful... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Uh you do know that networking speeds are still measured in bits, yea?

      Oh, seven digit UID. Never mind.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    24. Re:Too large to be useful... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      You're barely six-digit yourself. I don't even see how what you're saying is relevant to the post you're replying to.

    25. Re:Too large to be useful... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Well known fact about slashdot proven in a study (which enables me to disable all advertising on the site) poster intelligence drops rapidly once you hit seven digit uids.

      And that's apparently true up into the mid million and then some given your failure of a post above. You seriously seem to know nothing about the limitations of DSL. Like I said - take your ignorant self a few thousand feet from the CO and see if you get your advertised speed. Protip: you won't - not even close.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  6. I am a 1337 hax0r by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have 2.0 GB of source code for Windows 8, Windows 9 alpha, Call of Duty Ghosts, World of Warcraft Annihilation and Donkey Kong Junior. I have encrypted the file and am withholding the key in case I get arrested. But trust me, it's all there.

    1. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have 2.0 GB of source code for Windows 8, Windows 9 alpha, Call of Duty Ghosts, World of Warcraft Annihilation and Donkey Kong Junior. I have encrypted the file and am withholding the key in case I get arrested.

      But do you have the good copy of Duke Nukem that was suppressed by Bill Gates? (to delay the alien invasion, of course)

    2. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by liamevo · · Score: 1

      When you start releasing info on yet to be confirmed or released hardware, services and sdk's, which are then verified, then you can take the piss.

    3. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      It does say he "leaked loads of accurate new info to Kotaku about the then unnamed Xbox One and PS4 earlier this year," which is possibly why the generally-not-born-yesterday kotaku may be taking it somewhat seriously.

    4. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      You needed Donkey Kong Junior just to make you hit 2.0 Gigabytes exactly. Right?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by X0563511 · · Score: 2
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      which is possibly why the generally-not-born-yesterday kotaku may be taking it somewhat seriously.

      My faith in Kotaku has diminished quite a bit following the attack piece they published against Silicon Knights and Dennis Dyack. Dyack (who is certainly no saint, but is also not the embezzler he's made out to be) later did a point-by-point rebuttal to it, providing convincing information and evidence to contradict each of its claims, and even managed to get a hold of a copy of an e-mail from a Wired editor to the freelance author of the Kotaku attack piece, in which the editor turned down the article due to its unsubstantiated claims that had no basis in fact. It turns out that the article was shopped around to a number of other magazines, all of which turned it down, before it finally got sold to Kotaku, who apparently saw no issues with publishing an attack piece that didn't have a scrap of evidence and was based solely on claims made by disgruntled anonymous sources that couldn't even have had access to the information they claimed to have.

    7. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He accurately leaked the specs of the XBox One and PS4 before their announcements earlier this year to Kotaku apparently according to the article cited in the /. post.

      I think that somewhat makes his claims reliable.

    8. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying they're great journalists. I'm not even saying they're great for a video game news website, just that they are a little more skeptical than supermarket tabloids usually.

    9. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I can agree with that. On the whole, they're "not bad", but they are certainly not as careful as they should be.

    10. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by steelfood · · Score: 1

      It's collectively worth $200 million. If you wire me $20,000 right now, I can get it out of the country and you can take 20% of the profits from the sale.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    11. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      British people have sexual fetishes involving urine (so called "golden showers") at the highest rate per capita in the world. Most Brits have engaged in it at least once in their lives. Something with such a strong cultural association is bound to creep into slang eventually, that's all.

      Do you really want to play that card without citation?

      Consider the number of uses of "ass" and "butt" that have not just crept in, but become firmly lodged in US slang. I'll get you started...

      • Shove it up your ass
      • Blow it our your ass
      • Kiss my ass
      • I'll kick / whoop your ass
      • His ass is grass / toast / history
      • His ass is mine
      • That chaps my ass / burns my butt
      • I'll have his ass in a sling
      • Big-ass (house, car, whatever)
      • Asshole
      • Asswipe
      • Asshat
      • Ass-clown
      • Butthurt / buttsore

      ... to name but a few (pun intended).

      Now consider the strength of the cultural association that let to such popularity of usage. Finally, consider again whether you really want to tug at that thread.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    12. Re:I am a 1337 hax0r by oztiks · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have 2.0 GB of source code for Windows 8, Windows 9 alpha

      Please, if you're going to steal something you should check to make sure it's of real value to someone first. Donkey Kong Junior is perhaps the biggest ticket item you've mentioned!

  7. Fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These retards give the word 'hacker' a bad name. Goddam imbecile, I hope he rots in jail.
    --
    I never user products from companies who feed customer data to the NSA. Are you listening, Google?

    1. Re:Fucking idiot by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      THAT'S what you're upset about?

      Okay, call him an "Information Liberator." He doesn't appear to have referred to himself as a hacker, at least not in the short article, so lets assume he never did. Do you still hope he dies imprisoned?

      If not, why are you getting so bent out of shape about a trivial use of a trivial word?

    2. Re:Fucking idiot by ae1294 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I never user products from companies who feed customer data to the NSA. Are you listening, Google?

      So how are you posting this again? Every Internet company is feeding data to the NSA sooooo?

    3. Re:Fucking idiot by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      So how are you posting this again? Every Internet company is feeding data to the NSA sooooo?

      Even in China? The NSA is bigger than we thought!

    4. Re:Fucking idiot by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      So how are you posting this again?

      I guess through a VPN hosted in, say, Sweden.

      Maybe you should, too.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    5. Re:Fucking idiot by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      The NSA is bigger than we thought!

      That it certainly is.

    6. Re:Fucking idiot by dubbelj · · Score: 1

      Sweden is also evesdropping it's citizens since 2008...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FRA_law

    7. Re:Fucking idiot by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      I don't want to live on this planet anymore. You people have turned it into a collection of zoos for humans.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
  8. 1.7tb of stuff.. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    ..that nobody knows what it is?
    that's a lot of hd to keep as insurance for some random dude.

    and ftp? wtf? ever heard of bittorrent. or tor.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re: 1.7tb of stuff.. by pellik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but when he gets arrested and the key is released it will be pretty awesome to have the file already.

    2. Re:1.7tb of stuff.. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Why would a torrent swarm of people download a giant file that they cannot decrypt?

      You know what, don't answer that. I am sure enough file hoarders will grab the file to keep the torrent alive alive.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:1.7tb of stuff.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      keep the torrent alive alive.

      We wouldn't want it to be dead dead.

    4. Re:1.7tb of stuff.. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      No, but we could hang it by it's neck until dead, dead, dead!

      Oh, wait - does data have a neck?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:1.7tb of stuff.. by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      The only people I see downloading this are sysadmins with access to servers/pcs/clusters with extra free space.
      No home user is going to give up a full 2TB disc just for some usless data that MAY be useful some day.

  9. Insurance? by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 2

    Insurance from whom, against whom? Like, Valve is going to call in its favor and get the FBI to get off his case, for fear of their DRM being compromised? I can totes see that happening.

    1. Re:Insurance? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Insurance from whom, against whom? Like, Valve is going to call in its favor and get the FBI to get off his case, for fear of their DRM being compromised? I can totes see that happening.

      pretty much all games on steam have had their checks cracked. not much to defeat there.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Insurance? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I assume you are referencing the HL2 leak. Where valve got the guy to come to the states for a job interview at which point the FBI arrested him. And the same trick was used by valve years before.

      So this guy should be skeptical of any job offers he gets from valve, rather than hold an insurance file.

    3. Re:Insurance? by dittbub · · Score: 1

      I assume the guy is planning to release the source code chunk by chunk but hes at risk of being interrupted and arrested. His insurance policy makes sense because hes saying "you can arrest me but if you do then hundreds more will have access to the source and then you'll have to find them all too"

    4. Re:Insurance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I assume you are referencing the HL2 leak. Where valve got the guy to come to the states for a job interview at which point the FBI arrested him. And the same trick was used by valve years before.

      Did you even read the article you linked in your own post? It says that Valve failed to get the guy to come to the states for a job interview, and that the FBI did not arrest him; he was ultimately charged in Germany.

    5. Re:Insurance? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Oops! I didn't. Sorry.

    6. Re:Insurance? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem realistic. But he is seventeen - he may well expect it to work, being still naive about the level of assholery humans are capable of.

  10. Encrypted blob by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I totally believe it's possible to exfiltrate data from multiple game companies (or indeed any companies). But how do we know he didn't just upload a 1.7 TB encrypted blob of random garbage? The word of a 17-year-old script kiddie is not exactly a lot to go on.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    1. Re:Encrypted blob by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And it seems odd that there would be so much data. Source code doesn't take that much space, and neither do development kits. Perhaps he's including game assets like textures and cut scenes from the games, but I don't really see much point in including that, since it would mostly be easy to extract from the actual game files themselves.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Encrypted blob by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      I totally believe it's possible to exfiltrate data from multiple game companies (or indeed any companies). But how do we know he didn't just upload a 1.7 TB encrypted blob of random garbage? The word of a 17-year-old script kiddie is not exactly a lot to go on.

      We need to crowdsource decrypt it and laugh at him.

    3. Re:Encrypted blob by loufoque · · Score: 4, Informative

      The xbox 360 base SDK is 2GB. If you count all extra stuff for Kinect etc. it's even bigger.
      And they probably have tons of other middleware software, some of which could come with their own editing and authoring tools. That alone could account for a hundred gigs if not more.
      Then there is source code. It's not unusal for a piece of software to have sources that account for 500MB, and several gigabytes if you include binaries.

      All in all they probably also have binary assets of some sort, but software does take quite some space on a disk.

    4. Re:Encrypted blob by cyberfunkr · · Score: 1

      Remember, this is encrypted, not compressed.

      I run a small-sized website. Not including graphics, I have almost 40MB of data.
      Heavily commented source
      Archives of old, or out-dated source
      Upgrade scripts
      Notes
      API information
      DOC files
      UI examples
      etc...

      It doesn't take that long to build up data now a days.

    5. Re:Encrypted blob by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      And it seems odd that there would be so much data. Source code doesn't take that much space

      Um, it's really not that uncommon for source code to occupy much more space than it's compiled form. Perhaps you need to stop writing so much stuff in debug..

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    6. Re:Encrypted blob by psithurism · · Score: 1

      I suspect he hasn't sorted through it. e probably grabbed everything he could find on a dozen different servers / company and never bothered to cut out identical files along with all the garbage that accumulates in projects under development; e.g. versioned backups of the 80 variations of each texture the team went through to vote out later.

      I suspect it still won't be useful to your average person once decrypted, until someone with way too much time on their hands goes through it, if they do at all.

    7. Re:Encrypted blob by Subject-17 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention if he has asserts like project files for models. You know, like Maya and Blender project files (not just the renders). That'd be pretty awesome

    8. Re:Encrypted blob by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      One would hope that he had compressed it before encrypting it. It does seem fairly high though. He could store 42,500 copies of your small sized website and that's assuming he didn't compress it.

    9. Re:Encrypted blob by tepples · · Score: 1

      it's really not that uncommon for source code to occupy much more space than it's compiled form

      Then why are .pyc (compiled Python bytecode) files roughly the same size as .py (Python source code) files?

  11. lol wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Insurance in what sense?

    1. Get arrested;
    2. Release password to unencrypt source code for old software;
    3. Get charged with yet another crime;
    4. ???

    1. Re:lol wat by bjb_admin · · Score: 1

      4. Don't drop the soap

  12. The insurance file idea WILL work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just like Wikileaks two insurance files. Anyone remember those? They still haven't been cracked. Anyone still care? Well, whatever, I'm sure this will work.

    1. Re:The insurance file idea WILL work. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a few people are holding on to them. Just in case. Assange is a true fanatical idealist - if he at any point believes he is going down, he won't hestitate to release the key and take a few percieved enemies with him. The only reason the key hasn't been released yet is his ability by luck and skill to evade all attempts to get him somewhere the US or allies could charge him.

      He's still in the Ecuadorian embassy - he's shown no signs of wanting to move, Ecuador has shown no inclination to kick him out, and the UK isn't going to start a major diplomatic incident by trying to take him by force. His situation appears stable, so long as he doesn't pull of any stunt great enough to upset his current host.

  13. Hang on a sec by DrXym · · Score: 2

    Since this is encrypted this could be 1.7TB of shit for anyone knows. Or is there a sampler or something people are supposed to download to know it isn't?

  14. Re:I smell... by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

    1. He's Australian not American
    2. He's announced he hacked these people previously
    3. He's already been raided
    4. He wants more attention

    http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/24/4024062/the-secrets-of-hacker-and-xbox-durango-leaker-superdae

  15. Re:Do it like Snowden by PRMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "China: Bastion of civil rights." Has kind of a funny ring to it...

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  16. He's obviously not Canadian by Kinwolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least we know this hacker isn't Canadian. With our current ISP plans, it would have taken 1.5 years to upload 1.7TB of data without busting the bank in extra fees for bandwith.

    1. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by tom17 · · Score: 1

      It would actually take a little over 2 months at 10MBps if you restricted it to the unmetered times (6 hours a day) (That's a TekSavvy example).

      But this would not apply if you were with one of the Big Two. Maybe that's what you meant? They barely count as internet service if you ask me. Rip-off merchants!

    2. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by tom17 · · Score: 1

      I made a mistake. Uploads don't go towards your 300GB cap. So it would, in fact, only take ~16 days.

    3. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Faster, yes. Cheaper? No.

      Given that the longest a direct flight could be is currently about 18.5 hours, (Lets call it 20 due to time taken on either end), your transfer of 1.7TB would result in a throughput of about 200Mbps.

      Not much of the world has a throughput that high, so the 'faster' part of your comment pretty much applies to the entire world :)

    4. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

      I thought Australian bandwidth caps were far worse, like 1GB a month...

    5. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      They do if you are with Rogers or Bell. In the EULA they talk about "combined" caps, which of course includes uploads.

      Rogers in terms of speed is pretty good if you get one of the Ultimate packages. Recently they randomly increased my cap, which was cool. Until I got a letter saying they were raising all the fees (which were already expensive), so it was really just justification for a money grab.

      I pay about 80$ a month for just Internet. That gets me supposedly 30 MB/s and 275GB cap.

      Also your 10MB/s and my 30MB/s are download speeds. Typical upload is MUCH slower. Mine is pretty fast a 2MB/s.

      So if I got MAX 2MB/s upload (which I wouldn't no more than I actually get 30MB/s download), but if I did, it would take 10 days to do it.
      1700000MB / 2MS/s = 850,000 /60min = 14166 /60h = 236 /24d = 9.8 days.

      What would actually happen, is I would get charged an extra fee over cap up to the maximum (it was 50$ but it is probably 75$ now), so 155$... However, I am certain that they would totally shut off my service well before I ever got 1.7TB, making the whole procedure moot. Since it was a BT, I could probably pick up from where I left off the following month once the cap resets. However how far I would get past the 275GB cap before they axed me for the month, is likely one of those arbitrary statements in the EULA that says something to the effect "RSVP the right to terminate service for exceeding the cap by a large amount, whereby Rogers RVSP the right to define/change what a large amount actually means"...

    6. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by tom17 · · Score: 1

      I actually said in my original post:
      "But this would not apply if you were with one of the Big Two. Maybe that's what you meant? They barely count as internet service if you ask me. Rip-off merchants!"

      By that I meant Rogers and Bell. Sorry to burst your bubble :(

      And I was talking upload speeds, not download speeds; With Teksavvy, 15Mbit down /10Mbit up costs less than $50. Less than $60 if you want unlimited downloads.

      For your $80-at-Rogers, you can get 25/10 with unlimited download or 50/10 with 300GB cap at Teksavvy.

      What would actually happen with Rogers is, as you say, $155 or a disconnect, but at Teksavvy it would be ~16.5 days(if you used off-peak, or and no overage charges/cut-offs, like I said :)

      BTW, your math is wrong*. If you only had 2Mbit/s upload, it would take you ~80 days. Unless you really meant you get 2MB/s upload, in which case you mean you get 30MB/s download which would put you at the 250Mbit/s product which costs $225/month. If you got that for $80, sign.me.up lol.

      *I realise now that I had a typo in my original post and put 10MBps. I meant 10Mbit/s

      Go on, do it :)
      (I am not affiliated with them, just a very happy customer)

    7. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Oh and I also got a letter from Teksavvy about fees too...

      That's right, they REDUCED them ;)

    8. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Which product do you have? I don't see one with 30Mbit/s upload...

    9. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I may. I have looked several times, and teksavvy wasn't available in my market. However I looked again recently and I think it might be available now. As I am sure as one of those Mars projects engineers might say, my math is fine, my units however.... :)

      Anyway I think the only reason I haven't switch yet is that Rogers hasn't really ticked me off lately (which they usually do eventually) and inertia/momentum/lazy has kept me from changing. However I could see myself switching in the near future.

      Another thing thing that techsavvy has that Rogers doesn't is Static IP, or at least they used to. You used to be able to tack on a couple of Static IP addresses to your account for a couple extra bucks a month. Where both rogers and bell (of course because of all the competition you know) you are required to get a much more expensive business account rather than a residential. Which is quite handy if you don't actually have a business, but want to just mess about hosting all your own web servers etc... without having the extra complication of FreeDNS or all the rest of the Dynamic IP changing services out there.

    10. Re:He's obviously not Canadian by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Yep, the static IP is nice, though it has to be said that I am getting on just fine with non-static and the dynamic dns services work just fine for me. The ~1-5min outage when it auto-updates is only a mild annoyance, but not a huge issue to me as I only use my home server for personal stuff and testing. I have a few servers 'out there' for production stuff.

      And I hear you on the momentum thing. It's one reason I still have cable. I think their retentions dept is too good lol. But the moment I can find a legit way to watch F1 live, bye bye Rogers!

      If you do decide to try out Teksavvy and laziness/momentum is an issue for you (it's an issue for me too, I have not upgraded to my cheaper-but-faster or more-expensive-but-much-faster-VDSL service yet and I am still on legacy 6/0.8 :( ) then do be wary of the switch-over process. Though I painted them in a very good light above, they are ultimately at the whim of Rogers/Bell. One reason I have not yet gone to the 15/10 service is that Bell have been known to turn around and say, after the work order has been done, "sorry, you can only get 3Mbit/s up, so we'll put you on 15/1 which is not VDSL". I'm scared of that happening to me and there is nothing Teksavvy (or any other reseller) can do about it. Reality is, if my line only qualifies at 15/3, I'd rather get that and pay for 15/10 ($35) than get 15/1 ($33). But it's Bell/Rogers, what can you do?

      There is also a VDSL modem fiasco holding me back (Thanks, again, to Bell).

      Sorry, I'm babbling :)

  17. Re:Do it like Snowden by HarrySmoot · · Score: 1

    China: where they spy on you also, but at least they don't try to hide it

  18. Lovely logic there... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Following such way of thinking, you'd have to conquer most of Europe and murder 6 million Jews before you could "take the piss" out of Hitler.

    Don't forget commissioning a small economic car and being a vegetarian painter while doing all that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Lovely logic there... by liamevo · · Score: 2

      I was merely pointing out that there is some credibility that what he says is in the archive, actually is in the archive, and that acting as if it's just some script kiddie making stuff up has to ignore the fact that this kid has proven credible with the info already leaked.

  19. Honest and for true? by Hartree · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've released a file which contains the complete plans for the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator which can blow up the earth.

    The file is encrypted, and if the local parking meter attendants put anymore tickets on my suburban, I'll release the passphrase.

    I really, really will!

    That is all.

    1. Re:Honest and for true? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I cracked your encryption, and built it. Then I tried it out.

      To say I was disappointed would be an understatement. Where was the KABOOM? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering KABOOM!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  20. Useless at any size by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    This sounds like too large of an "insurance" to be useful. Most people don't have the bandwidth or the space to hold 1.7 TB of encrypted info.

    Some of us do have the space[1] and bandwidth[2], but are utterly lacking in motivation to do so. Motivation would still be absent even if the file were unencrypted and the download had the blessing of the games companies. Big clue: we're not gamers, so we're not in thrall to games or gaming companies.

    [1] We have 6 TB of available space in a single volume on a server at home
    [2] We have 100Mbps symmetric fiber (with no caps) at home

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  21. Re:I smell... by loufoque · · Score: 2

    You can't just decrypt stuff just because you want to. It's protected by the power of math.

  22. Re:So not only a hacker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's a minor himself. The "child pornography" could be pictures of his own dick for all we know, or a 17 year old girlfriend. The "drug" charges are "posession of cannabis and cannabis paraphernalia" so who gives a shit and the "weapons" charge was supposedly a stun gun. Not a taser, just one of those sparky things.

  23. One step by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Someone please tell me City of Heroes code is in there! Help me, I'm dyin' here!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  24. Re:Do it like Snowden by houghi · · Score: 1

    ": Bastion of civil rights." Has kind of a funny ring to it...

    FTFY

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  25. Password by Eleint · · Score: 2

    Has someone downloaded this and tried the password "up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, A, B, select, start"?

    --
    If someone tries to kill you, you try and kill them right back
    1. Re:Password by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I did, but I just keep launching fireballs out of my CDROM.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Password by Eleint · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I'm more impressed that your CDROM can shoot fireballs or that you somehow put 1.7TB of information on something, anything, that fits into your CDROM. :)

      --
      If someone tries to kill you, you try and kill them right back
    3. Re:Password by rts008 · · Score: 1

      ...you somehow put 1.7TB of information on something, anything, that fits into your CDROM.

      After all of the unlikely, improbable, and "Holy Shit! How did they even get the tray to close!" stuff I have encountered working on other people's PC's, I can only deduce that you have never worked tech support or repaired PC's for the public.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  26. bank account number on site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He has an Australian bank account on his site and there is more than enough info out there to track him down in 5 minutes :)
    This "insurance policy" might have been a good idea if he didn't have ongoing cases and not left a treasure of information online to track him down!

    By next week his a*r*s*hole will be the size of arizona

    1. Re:bank account number on site? by mcl630 · · Score: 1

      He was already arrested and released on bail. No need to track him down.

  27. Re:I smell... by loufoque · · Score: 1

    Maybe in a divergent future where they prove that P = NP and where rap music is actually relevant.

  28. I have all the Top Secret Data in the Universe by adisakp · · Score: 1

    Which I will release to the public in a 1.7TB archive. If I'm arrested, I will release the one-time pad decryption key.

  29. So? If they have nothing to hide... by mrdark5483 · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. If they have nothing to hide then they shouldn't worry about someone providing access to look over everything they do. They're probably worried because they're all criminals with something to conceal.

  30. Re:I smell... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    2. Doesn't matter. So what? All they'd do is confirm he is not bluffing.
    3. Is the flaw in the plan. It's based on the idea that the games companies he hacked are headed by executives who would ask the FBI to let him go free to protect their own trade secrets, and that the FBI is obliged to obey if such a request is made. Neither of these is true. Chances are at least one of those companies would rather crucify him to set an example, and even if they all back down the FBI can go ahead and prosecute anyway - and now this is all public they have little choice, as no prosecutor who values their career can be seen to back down to threats made by a criminal - especially now they have done their trawling and managed to find some drugs and something legally classed as child porn (I suspect he has pictures of a 17-year-old girlfriend).

  31. Re:So not only a hacker... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Which stinks of an FBI trawl - that's the type of charge list you'd expect when the FBI wants to take someone down but can't actually convict them, so goes hunting for anything else illegal they may have done instead.

    Everyone is a criminal in some way. Just got to dig deep enough to find how.

  32. Great. Leisure Suit Larry 1.0 rides again... by crovira · · Score: 1

    I can not imagine any greater waste of bandwidth or disk space than wasting my life with this shit.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  33. real name by Eddy_D · · Score: 1

    SuperDaeE Os0orne. Luckily his insurance is re-enforced with super sealskin bindings. Still an idiot though.

    --
    - I stole your sig.
  34. Re:Alleged and Possible.. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Should the headline read "Hacker allegedly claims to have 1.7TB of data that could possibly be something". ?

    I mean really. I can upload 1.7TB of cat pictures encrypted and claim it's CIA secrets. Right now he has nothing that one should describe as a "treasure trove"

    Is there any reason to doubt that he really claims it? Because that's the meaning of "allegedly claims".

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  35. Re:I smell... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    Wow. I tried to post serious contentions that I seen about this issue and I get knocked down for trolling, when in fact I wasn't trying to troll. Trolling isn't something I do here.

    Let me see if I can clarify it in a way that won't come off as trollish:

    First: I have never heard of this guy till Loadmaster directed me to an article about him. Until I did, I had the same reaction I had when I heard of Lulsec and various other high profile incidents (I will attempt to refrain from using the word "hacker" because that phrase isn't a correct description of this event), which was: Some lax in security invited some person to infiltrate and gather data. Then said individual wanted to seek attention and is/was acting all surprised when the law came after him. Basically: blabbing about it only draws the wrong kind of attention and in certain cases makes one look like an attention seeker. I'm not sure if that is what he is or not but what he is doing isn't a wise idea either way.

    Secondly: Don't be so sure that Encryption == Keeps things secure. Without knowing how this individual encrypted the data, I can only speculate. However, and this greatly depends on how tech savvy the LE is, if the person assigned to decode it recognizes the algorithm as some kind of readily available tool, they might be able use that to decrypt it.

    Then again, I could be wrong and over grossly overestimating the tech savvy of the world's law enforcement tech skills. However that can be made up for by pestering/harassing/legal bombarding/forcing the individual to do that hard work for said law enforcement. That I am positive of regardless of your country origin.

    Thirdly: From the article it said he had source code from old games. I know game companies have from time to time released source code of their games. So I wonder what source code he has and if it is already publicly released SC, why the big deal? If it is publicly available, why encrypt it with the other stuff? It's not precisely "hidden info" and the game company isn't going to do anything. They said it was OK after all. If the FBI or LE wanted to jump him for it, it'd backfire in their face due to the fact it was already a publicly released work.

    Now if it is for something like a new game or from a game that the makers didn't make public, THAT would make more sense.

    Finally, whenever I hear stories of somebody who's done some dubious feat and is sharing the bounty of said feat, I fall back on the old children's lesson: "Never take candy from strangers". To me this is a 1.7 TB Encrypted piece of candy that I have skepticism about. If that gets me labeled as a troll, I have no issues as I'd rather be cautious than end up finding out the 1.7 TB Candy was laced with Digital GHB. Then again, I am not so skeptical that I am not willing to admit I'm wrong or not be further informed. In fact, that is what I'd like: To be convinced that my skepticism is wrong.

  36. I can't decide who's stupider... by AC-x · · Score: 1

    I can't decide who's stupider, him or anyone who believes him.

    Actually, no, it's definitely anyone who believes him.

  37. how is that insurance? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    Soooo his idea of insurance is collect evidence that he is indeed guilty so that if he is arrested he will more easily be convicted and face even more extensive charges? I don't get it, exactly how is that insurance unless he really wants to ensure he gets his free meals and accommodation for at least an extra 10 years?

  38. Upgrade my cell to solitary, please.... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More to the point, unless the 1.7TB contains something of interest in the first place (ex: stolen source code that isn't encrypted), who is going to bother to download it? See, you have to give people an incentive to download that much shit before they are going to act as your own personal distributed storage service.

    Bet when he gets arrested (not if), that there aren't any copies of his 'get out of jail card' in the wild.

    Also, just for the record, have there ever been instances of anyone successfully blackmailing the cops into letting them go? Ever?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Upgrade my cell to solitary, please.... by kkwst2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually I disagree. All you have to do is convince people there is a good chance it contains something of interest. That it is encrypted might entice people to download it in the hopes of discovering the key or decrypting it. I'll take your bet. I'll bet you a 2 TB hard drive.

      I'm also willing to bet someone has blackmailed authorities into letting them go. I'm also willing to bet that said authorities did not announce that they were letting the accused go because he had some really juicy dirt on them.

  39. Never gonna lock you up, never gonna let you go.. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Bet its a 'Rick Astley video, re-sized to massive resolution and the password is 'RickrollAll'.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  40. A perverse incentive by KingSkippus · · Score: 2

    So are we, the public, supposed to now cheer him and and support him not getting arrested? Oh, hell no, I want all of those goodies released. I hope they arrest his ass, and the sooner, the better.

  41. FFS dual box it! by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    People in the 10th century fucking wish they could teleport their castle into another dimension that nobody else could get into. Then nobody could break in and steal anything. Fast forward to now. Get 2 routers, 2 servers, pairs of 2 PCs, and one modem. TADA! You've got a LAN #2 (like a VLAN except real and physically separated) and you put all your game and console development data on the separated one. Then use your other LAN for internet access. Every desk gets 2 PCs and the internet and e-mail cruiser can be a pentium G series chip with a 60GB SSD so really the extra costs aren't insane. Not one single person in the entire world could hack into network #2 because they never ever touch. Simple!

    If you don't want your crap stolen, don't put it on the internet. Tada, magical trans-dimensional shifting super-fortress.

  42. Re:I smell... by tftp · · Score: 1

    10 MB of sources for a new and small game would be pretty bad because many coders can figure out how to compile the thing, and then perhaps improve or develop on it.

    1 TB of sources is useless to anyone. You need a building full of coders who coded this very thing from the day zero to even put it all together, with all the libraries, linker files, batch files, tests, models, setup projects, and so on. Hardly anyone on this Earth has time to sift through a terabyte of sources. If I need a game, I will not spend a year of my life to hack it from a snapshot that was taken who knows when and without a guarantee that it is complete. In some software houses the head of the tree may compile, but it doesn't mean that the end product is a usable build. Only tagged revisions are of some value. This means that if I need a game I will spend $50 and buy one, with the latest code and with all the updates that are available to this date.

  43. Re:I smell... by SwampChicken · · Score: 1

    Most of it could be game assets and not source code.

  44. Re:I smell... by tftp · · Score: 1

    Perhaps. But it's even more useless then. Who needs textures and models that are encoded with a proprietary editor for a very specific use, with zero documentation, and can be rendered only by a very specific engine? (Like the swaying grass in Far Cry 2, for one example.) Music could be the only readily usable asset - if somehow it pains one too much to plug the S/PDIF in and record it in all its digital glory. Sometimes studios publish the music separately, in better format. Such music is "out there" for many games, and it was not recorded during the game.

  45. Re:I smell... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    He also mentioned he's managed to get SDKs and secret licensed-developers-only tools, so there's probably something like a customised version of visual studio in there - and perhaps game asset sources, the PSD files complete with layers for all the textures. Things like that could bring it up to 1.7TB.

    Sources for a recent version could be used to easily subvert copy-protection, especially if he got code for a non-released server of a multiplayer game. Or used for cheating - if you can get it to compile, not hard to set wall.opacity=0.5 and commence pwning everyone. He's not just an inept boaster - he's confirmed as having broken into companies before, so it's plausible that he may not be bluffing.

    I can't see the bluff working though. Not at this stage. It might have been enough to convince a game company or two to back down, but now the FBI is involved - if you try to blackmail the FBI, it just makes them all the more determined to pile on the charges.

  46. Cable's monthly cap means 768 kbps sustained by tepples · · Score: 1

    Any old copper telephone line supports at least 512kbit/s.

    A DSL line supports service burstable to 512 kbps. But that's only if you happen to be able to afford real estate close enough to the DSLAM, as others pointed out. And for the file sizes we're talking about, the upstream is oversold. Comcast, for example, sells "6 Mbps", but if you read the fine print of the acceptable usage policy, you discover that that's a burst rate, and the 250 GB/mo cap makes it closer to 768 kbps sustained, or half a T1: 768 kbps * (86400 seconds/day) * (30 days/month) / (8000000 kbit/GB) = 248 GB/mo.

  47. Burst billing by tepples · · Score: 1

    I guess you never heard of the possibiliy of direct server-to-server transfer, did you?

    Internet connections in data centers have caps too, implicit in the phrasing x kbps burstable to y Mbps. For example, a 768 kbps CIR is comparable to the Comcast Cap of 250 GB per month.

  48. More useless than useless by quantaman · · Score: 1

    I'm sure a lot of pirated dev kits are floating around already, as for the source code, who cares? Another game company isn't going to go near it, I guess in the worst case if everything is there a bunch of devs could get together, strip out all the drm, and release a really good pirated version, but I just don't see this being a big risk for the game companies.

    Oh yeah,

    Recently, Kotaku reported that SuperDaE, a 17 year-old minor, was facing an array of eight legal charges, including "possession of cannabis and drug paraphernalia", "possession of a prohibited weapon", "possession of identification material with intent to commit an offence", and "possessing and copying an indecent or obscene article, possession of child exploitation material".

    So an Australian, being charged by Australian police for crimes that have nothing to do with computers, apparently thinks a bunch of American and Japanese game companies can protect him if he blackmails them?

    Good luck with that...

    --
    I stole this Sig
  49. I have the key. by janerules · · Score: 1

    He said if he is prevented access to a computer the file will be decrypted. He likely has the file set on an access timer, to self-decrypt if anything in his regular pattern changes. After all, what 17 year old has time to do anything but be on a computer?