Slashdot Mirror


Dotcom Alleges Megaupload Raid Was Part of Deal To Film The Hobbit

c0lo writes "Kim Dotcom alleges, in an 20 min interview with the Australian public television, that Megaupload was offered up by the New Zealand's PM 'on a silver platter' as part of negotiations with Warner Brothers executives for shooting The Hobbit in New Zealand. He promises that he'll substantiate the claims in court. He also says that the extradition case the U.S. government is weak and the reason behind the latest delay in extradition hearing (postponed from August this year to March next year) is an attempt to bleed Dotcom dry of his money. Also interesting, Dotcom says that the latest debacle of the massive scale online online surveillance by U.S. spy agencies has triggered an 'explosion' of interest in mega.co.nz, the 'cloud storage' site with user generated encryption."

112 comments

  1. I for one welcome our new fat internet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm also switching from Gmail to Megamail, even if it doesn't erase my Google history.

    1. Re:I for one welcome our new fat internet overlord by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      As long as the NZ government prefers to be a lap dog to Uncle Sam, you can switch to "Gigamail" or "zentagigantamail" also they can tap your emails

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    2. Re:I for one welcome our new fat internet overlord by ebno-10db · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uncle Sam or the MPAA? What the NZ and US governments have in common is subservience to the real PTB. The big revelation in massive online surveillance is going to be that they ignored stuff about nuking NYC but put high priority on "pirated" movies.

  2. Warner Brothers exec was overheard saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your eggses precious, we wants them. Yes, precious...

  3. Conspiracy theory? by mitcheli · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Normally, I'm one who rails against conspiracy theories for being ridiculous, but somehow, this one, well... It deserves a listen to.

    --
    Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    1. Re:Conspiracy theory? by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Easy enough to look at the trends right? Just take a look at the current scandals going on from the IRS, to attacks on reporters, to silencing political opposition groups. And it's not that far of a stretch at all.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Conspiracy theory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "conspiracy theories"

      It think the concept of "conspiracy theories" died a few years ago, right about the time when it was confirmed beyond all doubt that our government had/has a torture program, has an assassination program, has secret prisons, has a mass surveillance system on innocent citizens, is actively lying to our allies, is actively lying to us, is actively lying to congress, etc. About the only conspiracy theories that are still on the books are the ones involving Aliens & UFOs, so far.

    3. Re:Conspiracy theory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And like all conspiracy theories, it is based not on evidence, but on a "theory" that some random know-nothing made up on his own. It sounds good to him, it sounds good to you, and you just KNOW your enemies are all liars, so if they say it's false, it must be true.

      Stupid fucking conspiracy idiots.

    4. Re:Conspiracy theory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, conspirasy theorists do exist. There is a whole bunch of people who hold crazy ideas. Real conspiracies do exists however. The point is that a lot of people will believe something without enough evidence.

      Not because you were right would it mean you had good proof of what you though,

  4. Not a surprise by redmid17 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is about as surprising as either Bush, Obama, or any future/past president violating some type of civil right in a severe fashion

    1. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Civil rights, Hollywood movie. Most people chose the latter.

    2. Re:Not a surprise by Major+Ralph · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And as a huge LOTR/Tolkien fan, what they did to the Hobbit movie was disgusting. Then to top it all off, this happens. I am sickened.

      --
      I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.
    3. Re:Not a surprise by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Mon Mothma: (with gravitas). Many freedoms...died...to bring us this Radagast.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as a huge LOTR/Tolkien fan, what they did to the Hobbit movie was disgusting. Then to top it all off, this happens. I am sickened.

      Ya, I had hopes it would be a decent film, and was able to stifle my discontent up to the point where Radagast was wheeling around on a sled pulled by rabbits. At which point I vomited, shit myself, got up and left the theater.

  5. That guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    he's good at what he does, whatever he's actually doing...

    1. Re:That guy... by kid_wonder · · Score: 1

      He is good at what he does, and I can't figure it out either

      1. Comes up with believable (albeit conspiratorial) story lines railing against government and big industry, and that you have proof
      2. Say your business model is a protection against intrusive government and industry
      3. Profit???

      --

      "Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called everyone, they meet at the bar."
  6. NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When John Key is done with politics, he'll be packing his bags and leaving New Zealand for his very nice place in Hawaii. Right now he is finalising the deals selling off NZ's state-owned (ie taxpayer-owned) assets. He is guaranteed a knighthood, and several boardroom positions with the newly-privatised companies.

    Not bad for a couple years in politics. Of course, he was previously a currency trader with the nickname "the smiling assassin" so it's no surprise to learn that he was already wealthy (NZ$50m +) before entering politics, but he's one hell of a lot richer now. Between the MPAA bribe money and the shares he gained in sweetheart deals from the state-asset firesales to friends, this guy will be sitting even prettier.

    All I can say to the USA is "You're welcome to the cunt."

    (Oh, and I forgot to mention that he only became Prime Minister of NZ as a result of his leaking to the media the sensitive private emails of his then-boss Don Brash, thus causing his resignation. Key grabbed that throne before the cushion even had time to cool.)

    1. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      In 1995, he joined Merrill Lynch as head of Asian foreign exchange in Singapore. That same year he was promoted to Merrill's global head of foreign exchange, based in London, where he may have earned around US$2.25 million a year including bonuses, which is about NZ$5 million at 2001 exchange rates.Some co-workers called him "the smiling assassin" for maintaining his usual cheerfulness while sacking dozens (some say hundreds) of staff after heavy losses from the 1998 Russian financial crisis. He was a member of the Foreign Exchange Committee of the New York Federal Reserve Bank from 1999 to 2001.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Key

    2. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      When John Key is done with politics, he'll be packing his bags and leaving New Zealand for his very nice place in Hawaii.

      Sounds like Ferdinand Marcos...

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      The people get the leader they deserve. Even in the U.S.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    4. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the US got the people it deserved, The poor uneducated peasant classes of the world. They havent changed much since Ellis island except for straighter teeth,

    5. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      The asset sale policy may very well be quite annoying to a lot of people, however Key made it clear that asset sales were necessary when he was campaigning for his second term. In short, "Give me the mandate."

      Well, we voted him in for a second term. Now we're shocked and horrified that he's selling the assets to us on our stock exchange?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    6. Re: NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I always admired about English speaking foreigners (me being American), is the ease and grace that they let loose with the word "cunt". Over here you can drop F-bombs all day, but cunt is taboo for some reason.

      Also, "shit" seems to be used more liberally outside the US, I wonder why?

    7. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we voted him in for a second term. Now we're shocked and horrified that he's selling the assets to us on our stock exchange?

      We did? I thought fewer than a third of the population voted in favour of him. Given that approximately half of the population voted in general, that means no, no, a thousand times no! We did not vote him in. A few voted for him, but the majority did not, therefore the majority did not want him.

      So yeah, we can be shocked that he's selling the assets.

    8. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      A few voted for him, but the majority did not, therefore the majority did not want him.

      So after he cut his boss's head off for the party leadership he went on to commit the slickest election fraud in New Zealand history?

      Is there no end to this man's villainy?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    9. Re:NZ's PM retiring to his Hawaiian mansion. by Bazar · · Score: 1

      How about some perspective.

      The assets are being sold from the NZ government, to mostly the NZ population. The money made is being used to keep debt repayment insurance low, and help pay for new health infrastructure like hospitals.

      Mr Key was born in a state owned house, with a single parent. He wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth, but hes made it to be the prime minster of our country.

      I believe its a wise choice for leader, that we pick someone who (despite the poor start in life,) manages to be successful in life. Electing someone who can't run their own business, to the largest business in the country, The Country itself, is a recipe for disaster (*cough*Bush*cough*)

      In the 2+ terms his party been running the country, he has managed to bring our country from the brink of a debt that could never be repaid, into surplus, while dealing with a earthquakes that obliterated our 3rd Largest city, Christchurch.
      It hasn't been easy, as hes cut all new funding resulting in a lot of job losses, but the results are speaking for themselves. We are now in surplus with one of the best outlooks on the future in all the oecd

      If the opposition had their way, we'd be worse than australia, who despite having a booming mining sector, are predicting record deficits because they only know how to spend money.

      --
      To avoid criticism; Say nothing, Do nothing, Be nothing.
  7. naaaaahhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c'mon.

    this is just publicity, nothing else. the name "kim dotcom" tells us about everything ...

  8. Hard to know who to believe here by DeathToBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kim Dotcom's main business seems to be publicity for Kim Dotcom, with the evidence postponed to a future date. On the other hand, somehow, in some way I can't quite put my finger on, this sort of thing is just that little bit more believable this week. Not sure why.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
    1. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Kim Dotcom's main business seems to be publicity for Kim Dotcom

      Yes, that has always been his thing.

      Whom to believe? Both are equally morally broken and liars. They are in it for power and money.

      Yet, Dotcom serves a purpose by undermining the much, much bigger evil so in this case I'm strongly for him. He is a horrible person and the world would be a much better place without such types, but if he's doing his part in bringing attention to the Real Evil the early 21th century faces, then... I am accepting this. Sometimes you need to fight fire with fire.

    2. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had to sue someone once. If I told them what I was going to say in court, they'd have been able to manufacture evidence to contradict it. Waiting until court to state what my evidence was left them no time to cover-up (and yes, I followed all the rules of disclosure, it was something they provided to me but didn't expect me to be able to use to prove other of their statements false). But yes, I told them I thought they were lying before court, hoping they'd settle. They didn't. You can tell them you "know" without giving anything away, but telling them how you know would be giving something away.

    3. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe his strategy is to troll them.
      First he manipulates them into preparing a series of suspicious denials and preoccupy them coming up with it. Plus if he accidentally hits or something real he can scare the crap out of them into dropping it.

      Capcatcha: nonsense appropriately enough

    4. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Stumbles · · Score: 2

      My thoughts exactly; never announce publicly your intentions and plans when involved with a lawsuit. Kimmy should take a lesson from IBM; they rarely say anything when involved with a lawsuit and when they do say something it is very very minimal.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    5. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      First he manipulates them into preparing a series of suspicious denials and preoccupy them coming up with it.

      a) Why would they do that if it isn't true?

      Plus if he accidentally hits or something real he can scare the crap out of them into dropping it.

      b) This isn't the sort of thing you can prove by accident. Either there's proof or there isn't.

      (Of course, if there *is* proof they'll just claim he photoshopped it...it would have to be absolutely amazing proof for denial not to work - like the head of the FBI and three of the PM's best friends all siding with Kim Dotcom)

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Kim Dotcom's main business seems to be publicity for Kim Dotcom, with the evidence postponed to a future date.

      Seems the guy has decided that he wants to fight this out in the court of public opinion. That's his right, especially given some of the public statements the US government has made about him one could even say that they started it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What people mostly don't understand is that the world is not a Hollywood movie. Just because one side is the bad guys doesn't mean the other side is the good guy.

      In this case, it's a power-greedy, corrupt government vs. a greedy, criminal egomaniac.

      Let them tear each other apart and enjoy the show, because if you make the mistake of rooting with any of them, you're supporting the bad guys.

      Kimble's business has always been himself. If the fact that he changed his last name to "Dotcom" didn't tell you as much, I'm not sure if a huge sign with neon letters will.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll support a right bastard if it means supporting personal rights and opposing abuse of power by authorities. It doesn't mean I like the guy, but that is irrelevant.

    9. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      When they stole the AS/400 from DG, they eventually got their asses handed to them.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    10. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by dbIII · · Score: 2

      The low hanging fruit gets hit with injustice before anything else.

    11. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by maroberts · · Score: 2

      What people mostly don't understand is that the world is not a Hollywood movie. Just because one side is the bad guys doesn't mean the other side is the good guy.

      In this case, it's a power-greedy, corrupt government vs. a greedy, criminal egomaniac.

      Let them tear each other apart and enjoy the show, because if you make the mistake of rooting with any of them, you're supporting the bad guys.

      Kimble's business has always been himself. If the fact that he changed his last name to "Dotcom" didn't tell you as much, I'm not sure if a huge sign with neon letters will.

      But the thing is that legal precedent is often based on unsavoury characters. Ernesto Miranda was not a wonderful person, but the theory goes that if the law protects his rights then it should protect the rights of everyone else.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    12. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll support a right bastard if it means supporting personal rights and opposing abuse of power by authorities. It doesn't mean I like the guy, but that is irrelevant.

      The point the parent was making is that you don't need to support either of them.

    13. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you're an American (I realize many people here are not) then whenever one of the bad guys is the US government, you do need to support the citizen (whether he's bad or good). Whenever your own government is bad, then it is necessary that they lose, no matter who the opponent and no matter how hard you have to hold your nose.

      It is worthwhile and preferable to have a 9/11-like event every day, a street totally dominated by the Mafia where no person can go outside without paying them a toll, USSR nuclear superiority with forward missile bases in Cuba, and some asswipe selling pirated copies of The Hobbit, if that's what it takes to force the government to obey they law.

    14. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, if you're an American (I realize many people here are not) then whenever one of the bad guys is the US government, you do need to support the citizen (whether he's bad or good). Whenever your own government is bad, then it is necessary that they lose, no matter who the opponent and no matter how hard you have to hold your nose.

      So, you are in support of the Unabomber, the 9/11 terrorists, every rapist and murderer out there as well as every single criminal ever?

      Please explain your funny little theory to the parents of a little girl that was raped and killed at the trial of the guy who did it. That you support him because the government is evil.

      if that's what it takes to force the government to obey they law.

      You are making the false assumption that that's what it takes. But if you look at history, then the opposite is true: Every single example you've listed has made the US government more powerful and more out of control, not less.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    15. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      'the enemy of my enemy is my friend'

      Who is a worse threat to our freedoms, the copyright cartels or Kim Dotcom? I hope he helps to destroy them, although the cartels are so stuck in their ways that they might just destroy themselves.

      And Kim D. has charisma, the cartels don't, they look and stink like s***

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    16. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize a quick settlement with EMC was getting their "asses handed to them". This lawsuit was very much debatable as IBM may very well have invented the technology in the 1970s but did not patent software (aka prior art). (Isn't that the sort of attitude we seem to extoll in 2013?). As far as I can tell, the quality of the patent was THE principal issue, which proving in court is a gamble. IBM does not gamble. At some point, (especially to IBM in 1999 whom was hurting at the time), it was completely pointless and less cost effective to litigate. So again, I guess the kid who doesn't show up for the street fight at 3pm because he conceded "got his ass handed to him".

      http://books.google.ca/books?id=ypJmzqt7JdUC&pg=PA216&lpg=PA216&dq=AS/400+Data+general&source=bl&ots=PozEgSVRW6&sig=k07JHo7KYmCcV4wnbDXoDtNdAzQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=eje7UbvzJo7e8wTlhIDYCQ&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=AS%2F400%20Data%20general&f=false

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    17. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by JeffAtl · · Score: 2

      Not sure about NZ, but the days of surprise witnesses are pretty much over due to pre-trial discovery.

    18. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, everyone should feel quite favorable of you.

    19. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are in support of the Unabomber

      So you babble random "when did you stop beating your wife" dumbfuckery instead of making a coherent argument.

    20. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. I think Kim is a bit of a cocksucker, but he's a cocksucker who isn't violating my constitutionally enunciated rights.

    21. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Tom · · Score: 2

      *lol*, no. The post I replied to specifically mentioned the 9/11 attackers as people to side with if it meant less government.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by greenbird · · Score: 1

      Seems the guy has decided that he wants to fight this out in the court of public opinion.

      Yeah, cause everyone knows the US government hasn't publish any information or press releases related to his prosecution. Add we won't mention how silent the MPAA/RIAA trolls have been about the whole thing.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    23. Re:Hard to know who to believe here by Ost99 · · Score: 1

      Re-read the GP.

      --
      ---- Sig. gone.
  9. Can't connect to mega.co.nz by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have a provider that still supplies Usenet/newsgroups as part of the service for no
    extra cost (Charter.Net), yet I can't connect to mega.co.nz. I've searched
    my HOSTS file, see that it's online http://pop.robtex.com/mega.co.nz.html#records
    I just can't connect, thepiratebay.sx not a problem.

    Hope it's a misspelling, or temporary.

    1. Re:Can't connect to mega.co.nz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can, from two different Canadian ISPs.

    2. Re:Can't connect to mega.co.nz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can from South Africa

    3. Re:Can't connect to mega.co.nz by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Score -9 offtopic
      and I thought it fairly on.

      12 hours later I have access to mega.co.nz. Now to give it a serious look over.

    4. Re:Can't connect to mega.co.nz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should make sure you can resolve the address...
      Addresses: 2405:f900:3e6a:1::101
                          2405:f900:3e6a:1::102
                          154.53.224.166

      If you don't get those or something similar just try to connect to the IP's.
      Otherwise traceroute the address and see where it stops

  10. Why not? We used to do it for bananas by Bearhouse · · Score: 5, Informative

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

    So why not for protecting that other 'strategic' resource, films & music!

    1. Re:Why not? We used to do it for bananas by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      When it gets down to it â" talking trade balances here â" once we've brain-drained all our technology into other countries, once things have evened out, they're making cars in Bolivia and microwave ovens in Tadzhikistan and selling them here â" once our edge in natural resources has been made irrelevant by giant Hong Kong ships and dirigibles that can ship North Dakota all the way to New Zealand for a nickel â" once the Invisible Hand has taken away all those historical inequities and smeared them out into a broad global layer of what a Pakistani brickmaker would consider to be prosperity â" y'know what? There's only four things we do better than anyone else:
      music
      movies
      microcode (software)
      high-speed pizza delivery

      unicode errors left uncorrected to demonstrate just how lame slashdot is

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Why not? We used to do it for bananas by shentino · · Score: 1

      Are these GMO bananas?

    3. Re:Why not? We used to do it for bananas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, clone bananas.

    4. Re:Why not? We used to do it for bananas by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      - Hey, those are the only things we export*. Let's destroy every other industry so we can be a bit more sure that other countries will keep buying it.

      * Except that this is not true, but, whatever.

  11. Why bleed him dry? by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

    Wait, I seem to recall they already got his assets frozen and unavailable to him?
    If not, then there is nothing stopping them from doing so, so why the conspiracy to bleed him dry in court costs when they can just seize it over night?

    1. Re:Why bleed him dry? by Stumbles · · Score: 1

      Had to Google for a moment to confirm but your at least partially wrong; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaupload_legal_case (assuming wikipedia is accurate). If all he got back was $750K lawyers fees could eat that up in short thrift.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
  12. Dotcom could implement a new service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could offer encrypted web anonymizer service just to piss USA off.

  13. Keep if simple, stupid. by westlake · · Score: 2
    News at eleven:

    "Peter Jackson to shoot prequel to box office behemoth LOTR on location in New Zealand. Surprising no one."

    Essentially the whole of Middle Earth has been mapped to locations in New Zealand. The Lord of the Rings film locations Your production facilities are there. Your costs are known.

    You will in the end have six big budget feature length films that will look as if they were shot in the same world and time because they were shot in the same world and time. It is a strategy that has paid off handsomely for Warner Brothers before,

    1. Re:Keep if simple, stupid. by NonFerrousBueller · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Hobbit films being filmed in NZ was not a foregone conclusion. The studios got the NZ government to change labour laws in their favour under the threat of filming somewhere else (Eastern Europe).

    2. Re:Keep if simple, stupid. by pinkstuff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Hobbit films being filmed in NZ was not a foregone conclusion

      Sure, that was the threat they made - but I can't help but think it was just a bluff our PM fell for.

    3. Re:Keep if simple, stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It`s cute how you believe he could have "fell" for something he was obviously implicit in and cashed out handsomely on.

    4. Re:Keep if simple, stupid. by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      Time to dust off your face tattoos and your Patus and take your nation back.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    5. Re:Keep if simple, stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does that include the bit where both Jackson and his partner were outed for discussing how they had already signed with Warner Brothers, with the NZ Government, yet they still publicly announced - before the law change - that the movies might still go elsewhere unless the law was changed?

      Before you say "citation needed," hit google up. It'll give you the information you need. It was a big scandal a few weeks ago.

  14. Will anyone remember this? by murdocj · · Score: 1

    So if & when he actually goes to trial, will anyone remember this ridiculous assertion? Or will Kim have to announce that the "evidence" has "mysteriously disappeared"?

    1. Re:Will anyone remember this? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      It's like an episode of Wait Wait Don't Tell Me... lots of ridiculous-sounding lies, but with an occasional nugget of truth inserted, just enough to make people think twice. He's clearly a superb self-promoter.

    2. Re:Will anyone remember this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleeding the plaintiff or defendant dry is a time honored legal practice.

      The new 'surge' of inbound money to dotcom, thanks to PRISM, is going to trash that tactic. A well heeled defendant with a stack of money, and prior illegality by 'law enforcement' is not going to improve over time. The extra time will allow foreign (US) authorities to find more evidence - with the little hurdle that it will be legally inadmissible in NZ. But in this new world, evidence from torture, beatings, extradition and rape, is sometimes allowed if the right wheels are greased. With Assange still holed up, it's going to be risky to perjure
      assertions. So stall for time is the right thing. There is 1 in 70 chance the plaintiff drops dead.

    3. Re:Will anyone remember this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jislaaik did moet kak wees om in daai land te bly

  15. Easy Explanation by maroberts · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US believes Kim is a hobbit-ual criminal....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Easy Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US believes Kim is a...hobbit-ual criminal....

      YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!

    2. Re:Easy Explanation by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It does have the ring of truth to it.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Easy Explanation by c0lo · · Score: 2

      The US believes Kim is a hobbit-ual criminal....

      And... is this a reason to dragon the suit forever?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:Easy Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And... is this a reason to dragon the suit forever?

      No, but trying to get through all the corrruption and counter-allegations... everyone knows it is so hard to see through the Smaug.

    5. Re:Easy Explanation by Minwee · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Peter Jackson spends a lot of time working out -- It's hobbit-firming.

      And he can't stop taking bubble baths -- They're hobbit-foaming.

      Did I mention that he's always out planting crops? It's hobbit-farming.

      And that Chinese vase in his dining room? A fake. It's hobbit faux-ming.

      (Blame David Morgan-Mar for these. I would throw a fireball at him, but that would be hobbit-fooming.)

    6. Re:Easy Explanation by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      It seems to me he's just trolling, and that he will be dwarfed by the prosecution.

  16. He's the new McAfee by Mike+Sheen · · Score: 1

    I look forward to the details.

    1. Re:He's the new McAfee by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      How can you have the new McAfee when you still have the old one? One of these posers has to go.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  17. "Filthy, Tricksy Hobbitses!" by tlambert · · Score: 1

    "Filthy, Tricksy Hobbitses!"

    There. I said it first.

  18. Dotcom Alleges Megaupload Raid Was Part of Deal To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dotcom claims he has been kept in "a golden cage" in New Zealand since the United States began extradition proceedings against him 18 months ago.

    "[Warner Brothers executives] came here they told [New Zealand prime minister John Key] - 'These Megaupload guys are really giving us a headache. The founder, you know, is moving to New Zealand. Can you help us?' And he did," Dotcom said.

    "They came here to New Zealand to negotiate with John Key about shooting The Hobbit movies here."

    Dotcom says his website was offered up "on a silver platter" as part of negotiations with executives.

    "So before they even shoot the movie, they have a business plan, they send that to all their license holders, they raise the majority of the money for a new movie before a single frame is shot," he said.

    "That is a business model with a license to print money. Obviously they don’t want to let that go.

    "That is why I am in this situation."

    Dotcom also says the staggering scale of online surveillance by US spy agencies has triggered an "explosion" of interest in his latest file-sharing website.

    Unlike its predecessor, Dotcom's new site Mega offers secure encryption, which he says protects each user's identity and data.

    "More people are now aware of the [United States] government capturing everybody's data," Dotcom said.

    "Growth has been exploding. [Mega is] a user-generated encryption. You are the only one holding the keys."
            See additional impormatsia site: http://moneyandpaymentsystem.com/

  19. what was the law change? by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Just curious, what change in the labour laws happened? Did it apply just to the film industry (e.g. actors, or film crews, conditions on a film set) or did it affect everybody in NZ (e.g. change in maximum working hours, minimum wages etc)?

    1. Re:what was the law change? by Inda · · Score: 4, Informative

      It affected everyone. It was something about being declared a contractor or an employee. One enjoyed sick pay and annual leave, the other not. A figure of over $30m was touted as a tax break too.

      It was all a bit underhanded, from what I remember.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:what was the law change? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Just curious, what change in the labour laws happened?

      Part of the answer

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  20. sounds like the man might have a point by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Megaupload was offered up by the New Zealand's PM 'on a silver platter' as part of negotiations with Warner Brothers executives for shooting The Hobbit in New Zealand.

    seems plausible since there are few jobs in New Zealand, and KDC seemed like a rather small egg to break for the omelette. Del Toro even said in parting words the film was "economically and politically" complicated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit_(film_series)#Del_Toro.27s_departure

    the reason behind the latest delay in extradition hearing (postponed from August this year to March next year) is an attempt to bleed Dotcom dry of his money.

    yes. yes it is. this is a very well documented business law tactic in which you leverage your significant legal and monitary resources against a competitor or target for acquisition and simply wait until they declare bankruptcy. in many cases the resulting acquisition (should someone decide to conveniently buy up kim dot coms holdings) can even be written off ones taxes.

    the latest debacle of the massive scale online online surveillance by U.S. spy agencies has triggered an 'explosion' of interest in mega.co.nz, the 'cloud storage' site with user generated encryption.

    here we see Kim jumping the deliniation between government and studio, and thats appropriate for a number of reasons. although the US government is by and for the poeple it rarely listens to anything but the most powerful lobbying groups. Hollywood lobbies through a number of channels. for example, it doles out cash to the department of defense in order to secure $war_devices for its latest blockbuster, and in return enjoys closer access to government foreign policy than had it simply made a sequel to waynes world. perhaps it kills a documentary on marijuana and gets cozier with the DOJ, it doesnt matter. these side-channel efforts are a caustic means of jack-booting the US government into wasting time and resources in bullying its NATO allies into violating the soverign rights of their citizens for the sole good of one industry. its not even our largest industry, but it serves a very important role in government and society. the TV series '24' for example is conjectured to have existed solely to acclimate the american public to the idea that torture was entirely acceptable and effective in the last-minute prevention of a terrorist attack. it makes, or was supposed to have made, the entire 'guantanamo' thing go down easier.

    what Kim notes of particular importance in the last quote is particularly critical to the course of american democracy as a whole. We've known for quite some time the american system has problems, but the government has always controlled the message and the people in turn have largely chosen to move on with their 3 sick days per year and sufficient paycheck. When an individual or group 'leaks' a particular piece of information publically, in a means that cant be controlled or filtered, it breeds dissent and unrest in groups it should not. to confirm american warcrimes for example in afghanistan and iraq serves to undermine the united states authority in conducting our 'freedom wars' guaranteed each 4 years. Leaking a domestic spy program serves to underscore the fact that the government understands the only means to prevent dissent and control information is to prevent 'leaks' at their source. Terrorism is the reason, but only so far as terrorism is a definition of the challenge to a governments authority or the ability to directly undermine it. I believe Kim is correct in saying the US government has an undisclosed vested interest in precluding american citizens from gaining access to an offshore, cryptographically secured resource to which they have no access.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:sounds like the man might have a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well of course it seems plausible. Everything Mr. Dotcom says is completely plausible. Just like Mr.s McAfee, Ventura, Lutz, Raymond. /snerk

  21. You wanted change? You got Chicago! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 3

    "Razzle Dazzle"

    You got nothing to worry about.
    It's all a circus, kid. A three ring circus.
    These trials- the wholeworld- all show business.
    But kid, you're working with a star, the biggest!

    Give 'em the old razzle dazzle
    Razzle Dazzle 'em
    Give 'em an act with lots of flash in it
    And the reaction will be passionate
    Give 'em the old hocus pocus
    Bead and feather 'em
    How can they see with sequins in their eyes?

    What if your hinges all are rusting?
    What if, in fact, you're just disgusting?

    How can they hear the truth above the roar?

    Give 'em the old Razzle Dazzle
    Razzle dazzle 'em
    Show 'em the first rate sorceror you are
    Long as you keep 'em way off balance
    How can they spot you've got no talent
    Razzle Dazzle 'em.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(musical)

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  22. Go away kim "dot com" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether it's New Zealand, a federal penitentiary, or Namibia. I don't care. Just go away and shut up, you self-serving prick.

    1. Re:Go away kim "dot com" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, you 'go away', dickless wonder...
      dotcom has done more for inertnet freedom (however sidelong and unintentionally) than a thousand little carping pricks like you...

  23. Mod parent up. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Did anybody actually read some of the wikileaks? The US state dept is always doing things like this and the people making the "crazy" claims for decades were vindicated, those people should be listened to even more today (track record, duh. Meanwhile, people who are always wrong stay employed in US media outlets.)

    NZ has an economy they do just fine on their own. But when huge movie projects come to promote their nation beyond what the tourism dept's could dream of doing, they'll CHANGE LAWS. This happens constantly in the USA state by state for movies where they'll heavily subsidize movie productions (both parties!) using demand-side economic arguments (which are usually despised.)

    Will it be fully conclusive proof that can hold up in court? No. Little is; especially in politics where everybody playing the game is skilled at self preservation. People with an eye for corruption will do well spotting the signs; however, it takes leaks on parties involved in their own words to prove it and even then an expert is often important/necessary to understanding it.

    As far as conspiracies about shows like '24' ( the show is supposed to be realistic but portrays greater conspiracies than the ones about the show,) it doesn't take any master plan for such things to happen. A like minded individual with connections can benefit from making decisions aligned with the powerful; being rewarded later or simply encouraged for their help for the cause. It could happen outside FOX and it's GOP TV wing, but since it was FOX it wasn't likely it was entirely organic.

    Despotism is on the rise in the USA. everybody living there should be seeing it by now... who isn't sticking their head in the sand...or more appropriately, in their "reality" TV. We have so much BS in all aspects of life, people crave reality so "realism" is popular... and what happens? We get pseudo realism to partially fill the need, creating another unhealthy addiction cycle that promotes consumption.

    1. Re:Mod parent up. by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      proving that laws were changed isn't really the goal. If KDC can prove that the PM or someone else offered him up as part of the deal? That's damning evidence. It should make kiwis stand up and question their government.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:Mod parent up. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      the show is supposed to be realistic

      You are joking aren't you? Playing out the "bomb is going to go off unless we torture somebody" bullshit that has never come close to happening in real life as some sort of way to feel better about the decline of the USA?

  24. NSA and the Desolation of Smaug by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 2

    And over time the men of Dale had become complacent on privacy, liberty and freedom of association, and yet they prospered. No longer content with the wealth of accumulation, they valued innovation and the free exchange of information. To this end they did help to build the greatest communications network that had ever been. Through it all their wealth flowed like a river --- real wealth --- not the dusty treasure hordes of kings locked in windowless rooms.

    The fortune and fate of Dale is bound with that of the dwarves, for it is they who had built it. "Long ago in my grandfather Thror's time our family was driven out of the far North, and came back with all their wealth and their tools to this Mountain on the map." They were especially skilled in working gold, copper and silver into thin filaments which they strung far across the land. Where ever dwarves settled dial tone was sure to follow. But their skill was even greater with jewels and crystals, from which they built magical devices of geranium and silicon to carry voices and information in the aether. Altogether those were good days for us, and the poorest of us had money to spend and to lend, and leisure to make beautiful things just for the. fun of it, not to speak of the most marvelous and magical toys [...] and the toy-market of Dale was the wonder of the North."

    But of all the wonders of that age the most precious was perhaps the least visible, hidden deep under the Mountain itself. "Discovered by my far ancestor, Thrain the Old, now they mined and they tunneled and they made huger halls and greater workshops." The Mountain they had built is actually many mountains and there is one in your own city. I refer to the telecommunications exchange points of Tier 1 and Tier 2 networks such as MAE-EAST and MAE-WEST, where rivers of voice and data converge into brilliant points of light, then spread out again.

    The dwarves had not valued privacy per se, they had just built it for maximum throughput with minimum delay. Their vision was broad and down-to-earth and the data it carried was of practical use for the greatest number. "We use our own devices and just enough magic to make them go. Devices such as the palantir are of no interest to us, the Elves of Valinor can keep their silly patents. The palantir does work for distance communication but it is incredibly expensive and uses a lot of bandwidth. It is also dangerous. If you wish to talk to family and friend, or close a simple deal, why would you wish to link minds, wrestle in thought or lock souls with the other party? The dwarves deliver only voices and runes and stay clear of elvish mind-fuck. Besides, the palantir uses a proprietary network and has no user-servicable parts. Like the Blackberry."

    But the dwarves' cleverness though inspired by wisdom was also their folly. While great wealth flowed through their network they were driven to perfect it, and that meant concentrating the flows of many through but a few interconnect points.

    "Undoubtedly that was what brought the dragon. Dragons burrow themselves into networks to steal information you know, wherever they can find it; and they guard their plunder as long as they live (which is practically forever, unless they are outed by Congressional hearing), and --- if you would believe them --- they do it for only noble purposes and never enjoy a brass ring of it. Indeed they hardly know a good bit of information from a bad, though they usually have a good notion of the current market value; so despite noble aims of vigilant protection, their omnificent awareness inevitably leads to dull and stupid ends that rend the fabric of society. Insider trading, scheming false flag operations and a 'selective failure' to divulge clear warning of terrorism if it would serve their own ends, a dragon is easily turned to the dark side by its very nature." As the dwarves tell it we would be better off without these dragons altogether, and if yo

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:NSA and the Desolation of Smaug by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Absolutely Fucking Brilliant.

      One of the best posts on /. I've ever read.
      Well Done!

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    2. Re:NSA and the Desolation of Smaug by Ost99 · · Score: 1

      You sir win the Internet.
      Might as well shut the whole thing down, we will never again see awesomeness on this scale again. Ever.

      --
      ---- Sig. gone.
  25. The Public Television? by CalRobert · · Score: 2

    "in an 20 min interview with the Australian public television," So do they all just huddle around the one television? Must get crowded.

  26. IRS? WTF? by bussdriver · · Score: 2

    Did you ever hear of wikileaks??? Do you know what they did to the US state dept?

    1. Re:IRS? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you ever hear of wikileaks??? Do you know what they did to the US state dept?

      They did to the US state dept what the NSA does to everyone.

  27. Grammar in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He also says that the extradition case the U.S. government is weak

    Should read "the extradition case of the U.S. government is weak."

    massive scale online online surveillance

    Should be obvious.

    Come on samzenpus, at least pretend to be an editor.

  28. years of drug use taking toll by peter303 · · Score: 1

    amazing fantasies

  29. never heard of Kim dotcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kim's last name is dot.com? like .com? kim.com? news to me. i need to get out more. lol i know a lady named Kim too.

  30. "Conspiracy theorists" by X.25 · · Score: 1

    10-15 years ago, people called me "conspiracy theorist".

    Now they are apologizing.

    Just because you can't believe someone would do something, doesn't mean it's not being done. Keep that in mind.

    1. Re:"Conspiracy theorists" by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like how psychics work - just keep spewing enough crap, and eventually something may actually be true.

  31. Who voted for him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not me, brother. Not me.

  32. Humle Kim by SwedishCoward · · Score: 1

    I think this time he is being humle. I mean he didn't claim to have written The Hobbit.

    1. Re:Humle Kim by SwedishCoward · · Score: 1

      Humble.

  33. and the oscar goes to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else see this saga ironically being made into a movie down the road? Dotcom will be played by Jim Gaffigan.