Google Floats Balloons For Free Wi-Fi

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Google Floats Balloons For Free Wi-Fi

Posted by Soulskill on Saturday June 15, 2013 @01:31AM from the shannon-hartley-bernoulli-theorem dept.

New submitter BrokenHalo writes "Google has revealed that it has 30 balloons floating over New Zealand in a project to bring free Wi-Fi to earthquake-stricken, rural or poor areas. They're calling it Project Loon. '[W]e’ve built a system that uses balloons, carried by the wind at altitudes twice as high as commercial planes, to beam Internet access to the ground at speeds similar to today’s 3G networks or faster. As a result, we hope balloons could become an option for connecting rural, remote, and underserved areas, and for helping with communications after natural disasters.' Eventually, as the balloons move across the stratosphere, consumers in participating countries along the 40th parallel in the Southern Hemisphere could tap into the service. The technology will be trialled in Australia next year, possibly in Tasmania. If the latter happens to be true, then you'll probably hear the telcos' screams in New York."

81 of 115 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

I thought that Loonies... by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 01:36 · Score: 5, Informative

were Canadian dollar coins.
1. Re:I thought that Loonies... by ArcadeMan · 2013-06-15 02:15 · Score: 2
  
  AC is not a troll. Off-topic maybe, but not troll.
  
  --
  Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
Tech specs by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 01:38 · Score: 5, Informative

Each balloon is 15m (49.2ft) in diameter - the length of a small plane - and filled with lifting gases. Electronic equipment hangs underneath including radio antennas, a flight computer, an altitude control system and solar panels to power the gear. Google aims to fly the balloons in the stratosphere, 20km (12 miles) or more above the ground, which is about double the altitude used by commercial aircraft and above controlled airspace. Each should stay aloft for about 100 days and provide connectivity to an area stretching 40km in diameter below as they travel in a west-to-east direction. [1]
1. Re:Tech specs by mcgrew · 2013-06-15 01:56 · Score: 1
  
  Each balloon is 15m (49.2ft) in diameter - the length of a small plane - and filled with lifting gases. Electronic equipment hangs underneath including radio antennas, a flight computer, an altitude control system and solar panels to power the gear. Google aims to fly the balloons in the stratosphere, 20km (12 miles) or more above the ground, which is about double the altitude used by commercial aircraft and above controlled airspace. Each should stay aloft for about 100 days and provide connectivity to an area stretching 40km in diameter below as they travel in a west-to-east direction. (Citation)
  I wish that guy would get an account, I would have never seen his comment if it wasn't that there were only two comments (in the last half hour!) higher than -1. Far better FA than the one linked in TFS.
  
  --
  Free Martian Whores!
2. Re:Tech specs by aliquis · 2013-06-15 02:30 · Score: 2
  
  Helium? I think we are wasting so much.
3. Re:Tech specs by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 02:38 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  Each balloon is 15m (49.2ft) in diameter - the length of a small plane - and filled with lifting gases. Electronic equipment hangs underneath including radio antennas, a flight computer, an altitude control system and solar panels to power the gear. Google aims to fly the balloons in the stratosphere, 20km (12 miles) or more above the ground, which is about double the altitude used by commercial aircraft and above controlled airspace. Each should stay aloft for about 100 days and provide connectivity to an area stretching 40km in diameter below as they travel in a west-to-east direction. [1]
  
  Can normal 802.11 b/g/ac devices talk to a base station 20,000 meters away?
4. Re:Tech specs by jones_supa · 2013-06-15 03:03 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  It was me. I even submitted another version of this particular news item with those specs included, but someone else's submission was chosen instead. Ah well. :)
5. Re:Tech specs by wonkey_monkey · 2013-06-15 03:56 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  Can normal 802.11 b/g/ac devices talk to a base station 20,000 meters away?
  TFA says nothing about 802.11 (aka Wi-Fi) - it seems that was an invention of the submitter.
  From the video:
  
  The balloons communicate with specialised internet antennas on the ground.
  
  --
  systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
6. Re:Tech specs by __aaltlg1547 · 2013-06-15 04:13 · Score: 2
  
  Is there any reason not to use hydrogen for this application? It's much cheaper. These balloons run unattended. They could be designed to automatically vent their hydrogen if their altitude gets too low. That would prevent any danger to people on the ground.
7. Re:Tech specs by ShanghaiBill · 2013-06-15 05:18 · Score: 1
  
  Is there any reason not to use hydrogen for this application?
  How do you know they are not using hydrogen? TFA does not say what gas they are using. So maybe they are using hydrogen but don't want to say so because of the idiots that associate it with the Hindenburg or hydrogen bombs. Thousands of people drown every year in a liquid that is 2/3 hydrogen, so there is no denying that it is dangerous stuff.
8. Re:Tech specs by ShanghaiBill · 2013-06-15 05:28 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Helium? I think we are wasting so much.
  The market is already fixing this. Helium prices are rising. The primary reason for this is shale gas. Helium is a byproduct of natural gas production. Some gas wells in Texas contain as much as 4% helium. Gas wells outside the USA contain very little helium, making America the dominant producer. But America is switching to shale gas, which contains very little helium, and the helium producing wells are being shut down because they can't operate profitably with historically low gas prices. So helium prices are climbing, and frivolous uses are being curtailed. Disneyland Tokyo has already stopped selling helium balloons of cartoon characters.
9. Re:Tech specs by Brianwa · 2013-06-15 05:40 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  No, your laptop by itself couldn't, but the protocol is certainly capable of handling the distance if you tweak the timeout settings and have a powerful radio and a good antenna setup.
  They probably wouldn't actually use wifi though, some of the cellphone-based standards are more suitable for this type of system.
  To use this you would probably need an antenna and modem set up on your house, much like satellite Internet. It would still be a challenge though, I've streamed data off a balloon before and we were tracking it manually with a high gain antenna and used extremely slow data rates. They're going to be limited to solar power too, which limits their radio output power a lot.
10. Re:Tech specs by i.r.id10t · 2013-06-15 06:14 · Score: 1
  
  I would imagine that you'd need some sort of specialized antenna to reach 20km, no matter what signals are being sent or what is encoded in them.
  Still no mention of actual frequencies/protocols/etc
  
  --
  Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
11. Re:Tech specs by __aaltlg1547 · 2013-06-15 06:28 · Score: 1
  
  Did I say they were using helium? No I did not. Why are you asking me?
12. Re:Tech specs by aliquis · 2013-06-15 10:10 · Score: 1
  
  Thousands of people drown every year in a liquid that is 2/3 hydrogen, so there is no denying that it is dangerous stuff.
  AND 11,89%? :)
13. Re:Tech specs by aliquis · 2013-06-15 10:16 · Score: 1
  
  Good.
  Much better to use it for science and preferably only when you have no other option (well, depending on what the alternative is =P), seem so bad to just let it fly away into the air, litteraly.
  In this case I guess the amount used is different whatever it's 15m diameter on the ground or at their final destination.
  Anyway, I would feel guilty with regular ballons :D
14. Re:Tech specs by geezer+nerd · 2013-06-15 14:32 · Score: 1
  
  One of the videos I watched about this said the wireless service would be "3G-like", but gave no specs. It is clear that it is not WiFi as we know it at home.
  
  When I read about this, I first wondered how it was going to play out with the effort of the NZ government to bring "ultra-fast broadband" to most of the country. That has been going on for several years and offers to continue for several more years before anyone can actually sign up. Even so, the government effort is only targeted at 75-80% of the potential users in the country. So much of NZ is remote and rural, that deploying physical internet infrastructure is a huge undertaking. After reading more about Project Loon, I realize it is not meant for NZ alone, but if it works it might be a cheaper way to have attacked the problem for NZ in the first place. Good luck to this effort. If it proves to work, I might well sign up.
15. Re:Tech specs by khallow · 2013-06-15 16:52 · Score: 1
  
  Much better to use it for science
  
  Science uses aren't magically better than party balloon uses. I don't see ITER, for example, being a better use of helium than character balloons at Tokyo Disney.
  
  Part of the point of having a functioning market with relatively competent buyers and sellers is to decide who gets scarce resources without having to make dubious and subjective moral judgments. As the price goes up, the more spurious demands will drop out. Tokyo Disney finds some other way to entertain its guests while ITER gets the helium it wants.
16. Re:Tech specs by dbIII · 2013-06-15 20:17 · Score: 1
  
  The scramjet for one thing would not have got this far if not for using helium in the experiments (for many years on a tight budget). The gas used as the medium in the shock tunnel had to be different to the hydrogen used as fuel, but also had to be something with as high a wave speed as possible. That leaves a single choice.
  With respect to whatever you know about (there must be something so someday please demonstrate it here), just about everything on this planet is of more importance than character balloons at Tokyo Disney.
17. Re:Tech specs by BrokenHalo · 2013-06-15 20:41 · Score: 1
  
  TFA says nothing about 802.11 (aka Wi-Fi) - it seems that was an invention of the submitter.
  
  No, it was in the title of the article I originally linked to. A few things got lost/changed in the editing process.
18. Re:Tech specs by mcgrew · 2013-06-16 00:07 · Score: 1
  
  You should have logged on. I hope a couple of moderators saw it because it deserved to be seen (probably did, the comment I'm responding to is sitting at 4).
  
  --
  Free Martian Whores!
you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by mcgrew · 2013-06-15 01:49 · Score: 4, Insightful

I heard about the balloons this morning and thought hey, Google wants as many people as possible to see their ads. It's good for Google AND good for me, I applaud this.

--
Free Martian Whores!
1. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by c0lo · 2013-06-15 02:23 · Score: 1
  
  you'll probably hear the telcos' screams
  Telcos? Who give a (sexual intercourse) about telcos, just imagine the scream at NSA when the traffic suddenly stops going through a backbone they control.
  
  --
  Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
2. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 02:33 · Score: 1
  
  And great for the NSA!
3. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 02:36 · Score: 2, Funny
  
  I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Google, is in fact, NSA/Google, or as I've recently taken to calling it, NSA plus Google.
  - RMS
4. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 02:58 · Score: 1
  
  NSA have their pipeline to google. Google probably do a better job at analytics than the average telcos.
5. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by AbsGeekNZ · 2013-06-15 20:15 · Score: 1
  
  Well your NSA can just get the fuck out of my country!!!!
6. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by BrokenHalo · 2013-06-15 20:52 · Score: 1
  
  You're missing the point. Telstra and Optus have got away with selling patchy, over-subscribed and under-performing services in Tasmania for years. They obviously consider it non-viable given the population base, despite their widely advertised claims. I experience this at first hand, since although I only live 30 minutes drive from what passes for a major town here, I can't get any kind of wired broadband to my home, and the closest cell tower I can access is 35km away.
  
  If an interloper can come along and provide a better service (at any cost, but free is even better) then those telcos will get a well-deserved kick in the pants.
7. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by c0lo · 2013-06-15 22:01 · Score: 1
  
  You're missing the point. Telstra and Optus have got away with selling patchy, over-subscribed and under-performing services in Tasmania for years. They obviously consider it non-viable given the population base, despite their widely advertised claims. I experience this at first hand, since although I only live 30 minutes drive from what passes for a major town here, I can't get any kind of wired broadband to my home, and the closest cell tower I can access is 35km away.
  Tricky. What's the NBN status there?
  Missing the point or not, I wouldn't hold my breath for Google loonies. If you do have direct line of site with somebody you can trust and closer to the node, you may consider P2P long range WiFi. It's not that unusual.
  
  --
  Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
8. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by BrokenHalo · 2013-06-16 13:32 · Score: 1
  
  Tricky. What's the NBN status there?
  I would gladly help with the digging if the NBN was likely to come anywhere near me, but unfortunately it isn't.
  
  ...you may consider P2P long range WiFi [wikipedia.org]. It's not that [whirlpool.net.au] unusual.
  Now there's a thought..
9. Re:you'll probably hear the telcos' screams by c0lo · 2013-06-16 15:37 · Score: 1
  
  Tricky. What's the NBN status there?
  I would gladly help with the digging if the NBN was likely to come anywhere near me, but unfortunately it isn't.
  
  ...you may consider P2P long range WiFi [wikipedia.org]. It's not that [whirlpool.net.au] unusual.
  Now there's a thought..
  wireless community networks in Tas, with the warning of: may be outdated.
  But perhaps a good point to start "digging" before starting to actually dig.
  Cheers
  
  --
  Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
The Eye of Google by peppepz · 2013-06-15 01:51 · Score: 1, Troll

Will Eric Schmidt allow one of those to float over his house? He doesn't like drones. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/apr/21/drones-google-eric-schmidt
1. Re:The Eye of Google by ArcadeMan · 2013-06-15 02:17 · Score: 1
  
  I think 20km up in the stratosphere doesn't qualify as "over his house" anymore.
  
  --
  Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
2. Re:The Eye of Google by cfsops · 2013-06-15 03:07 · Score: 2
  
  Some would argue that 20km or 20,000km above is, indeed, "over [my] house".
  From the wiki article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_rights:
  "the Latin phrase Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad caelum et ad inferos ("For whoever owns the soil, it is theirs up to Heaven and down to Hell.")"
  In addition, the so-called "drone debate" has led to things like this: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/01/31/oregon-drone-bill-would-claim-the-airspace-above-your-shoestrings
3. Re:The Eye of Google by peppepz · 2013-06-15 17:45 · Score: 1
  
  Can the drone spy his house from 20km up in the stratosphere? If that's the case, then the fears of Schmidt about non-Google drones spying him are not addressed.
4. Re:The Eye of Google by smash · 2013-06-15 22:58 · Score: 1
  
  The SR-71 was doing reconnaissance from 100,000 feet (i.e., ~33km up) in the 1960s. So probably yes.
  
  --
  I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
In the end? by hedgemage · 2013-06-15 01:54 · Score: 3, Insightful

Ok, I skimmed through both articles in search of one answer.
What happens to the balloons when they inevitably drift out of the intended coverage area and then crash? This technology is useful for a short-term disaster relief solution, but over the long term you're going to end up with a lot of balloons and electronic packages coming down all over the world.
1. Re:In the end? by flyingfsck · 2013-06-15 01:59 · Score: 1
  
  Most will fall in the sea. Then they will get eaten by turtles. Think of the turtles...
  
  --
  Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
2. Re:In the end? by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 02:03 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Ok, I skimmed through both articles in search of one answer.
  What happens to the balloons when they inevitably drift out of the intended coverage area and then crash? This technology is useful for a short-term disaster relief solution, but over the long term you're going to end up with a lot of balloons and electronic packages coming down all over the world.
  Evidently, you didn't skim enough. From TFA:
  '
  But using free-floating balloons introduces another problem: how to ensure they are where they are supposed to be.
  "We didn't want them to go just wherever the winds took them, we wanted them to go where the internet is needed on the ground," said Mr DeVaul.
  "You have to cause them to move up or down just a little bit through the stratosphere to catch the appropriate wind - which is how we steer them.
  "So we have to choreograph a whole ballet of this fleet, and that requires some impressive computing science and a whole lot of computing power."
  The balloons will communicate with Google's "mission control" where computer servers will carry out the calculations needed to keep them on track, monitored by a small number of engineers.
  The software makes adjustments to each balloon's altitude to take advantage of forecast wind conditions, and nudges the balloons up or down to find a more favourable stream when the predictions are not accurate.
  '
3. Re:In the end? by ian_mackereth · 2013-06-15 02:07 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  From Google's page:
  
  A parachute attached to the top of the envelope allows for a controlled descent and landing whenever a balloon is ready to be taken out of service.
4. Re:In the end? by Hentes · 2013-06-15 03:04 · Score: 1
  
  They plan to sail the high-altitude winds to maintain a constant direction and velocity, forming a circle around the globe. Yes, it's quite a big project, but not physically impossible.
5. Re:In the end? by __aaltlg1547 · 2013-06-15 04:16 · Score: 1
  
  It's cheap hardware. On average, Google thinks they will make more on the service to pay for the attrition.
6. Re:In the end? by __aaltlg1547 · 2013-06-15 04:18 · Score: 1
  
  Add a flotation device and GPS tracking beacon and they can recover most of them.
7. Re:In the end? by Jeremi · 2013-06-15 13:27 · Score: 2
  
  Most will fall in the sea. Then they will get eaten by turtles. Think of the turtles...
  Wi-fi enabled turtles, hacking into through the Google backbone and taking over the Internet. You'll long for the good old days when it was only the NSA...
  
  --
  
  I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
8. Re:In the end? by geezer+nerd · 2013-06-15 14:38 · Score: 1
  
  You did not read the article. The balloons have limited "steerability" in that they can be raised or lowered by signal, allowing them to move in differently-directed air currents at different altitudes. The plan is that when the balloon starts to falter, it would be "steered" over a collection center (multiple instances around the globe), where it would be "collected" and its payload become reusable. Sounds almost doable. In any event, there are not supposed to be lots of balloons randomly falling to earth, and they will not fall in the sea, either, if Google can help it.
9. Re:In the end? by olau · 2013-06-17 04:25 · Score: 1
  
  These will in turn be eaten by sharks.
Mike's talk by ZDroid · 2013-06-15 02:06 · Score: 2, Interesting

Mike Cassidy, head of the project, said:

"There are many terrestrial challenges to internet connectivity – jungles, archipelagos, mountains. There are also major cost challenges. Right now, for example, in most of the countries in the southern hemisphere, the cost of an internet connection is more than a month's income."
- Guardian
A Selfish Request by wackybadger · 2013-06-15 02:28 · Score: 1

This is a noble thing for Google to do and I applaud them for it. I can't help but wonder though, why they can keep doing all of this 'out-there' projects (wi-fi baloons, driverless cars, Google fiber) and can't do a seemingly simple thing like keep Reader afloat. It's difficult to commit to using a Google product if you're not sure how long it is going to be around.
1. Re:A Selfish Request by brunes69 · 2013-06-15 03:00 · Score: 1
  
  The cutting of reader had less to do with costs and more to do with pushing it's users into Google Plus (and Google Currents on Android). The simple truth is nearly any page that posts an RSS feed duplicates the content onto Twitter, Facebook, and G+ nowadays so the use of services like reader shinks more and more all the time.
Re:They stole my idea! by SuricouRaven · 2013-06-15 02:30 · Score: 1

I see no mention of lasers. They sound impractical - how will you get precise alignment with a moving target over such distance?
They need... by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 02:35 · Score: 2, Funny

69 more balloons, and they should be red.
1. Re:They need... by Mystakaphoros · 2013-06-15 02:47 · Score: 3, Funny
  
  69 more balloons, and they should be red.
  I think that project is being run by Google.de
NSA Email meta data by Anonymous Coward · 2013-06-15 03:03 · Score: 1

I think I know what the NSA was after that yahoo and Google fought against. The email meta data on everyone.
Yahoo used 4th Amendment, i.e. it was American data because 4th Amendment defence can only apply to Americans.
NSA took all the phone meta data, and we know they had internet taps so they would be use to grabbing the email meta data too.
So they'll have forced Yahoo to hand over the meta data on sent emails so that yahoo to yahoo mail is grabbed.
Facebook would have all the message meta data grabbed too (Zuck' is probably lying to rescue his business).
That would match NSA arguments about meta data on phones, and explain why yahoo raised a 4th amendment objection.
Re:stratosphere? by jones_supa · 2013-06-15 03:10 · Score: 3, Interesting

It's almost funny how the summary claims that this is based on WiFi. It would be impossible even with specialized antennas and very high transmit powers.
3G? by seven+of+five · 2013-06-15 03:36 · Score: 2

Balloon is too high for someone to receive a WiFi signal at ground level.
1. Re:3G? by wonkey_monkey · 2013-06-15 03:58 · Score: 2
  
  Indeed, and the article says nothing about Wi-Fi - the submitter added that in presumably because he thinks it means "any wireless data connection." TFA also isn't clear on how it's done, but one of the videos does mention specialised ground antennas.
  
  --
  systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Re:stratosphere? by __aaltlg1547 · 2013-06-15 04:22 · Score: 1

WiFi is short range. WiMax is long range. This is more like WiMax, if it isn't WiMax.
Political complications by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · 2013-06-15 05:01 · Score: 2

Imagine the tantrum North Korea will throw when one of these drifts through its airspace and gives the population unfiltered Internet access.
They're not the only place that would have an explosion over uncontrolled Internet.
1. Re:Political complications by Jeremi · 2013-06-15 13:31 · Score: 1
  
  Imagine the tantrum North Korea will throw when one of these drifts through its airspace and gives the population unfiltered Internet access.
  Pissing off the North Korean government is indeed a nice extra feature... we enjoy pissing them off, they enjoy being pissed off. It's win/win!
  Of course it won't help the North Koreans citizens much unless they have a compatible antenna and a computer to attach to it, which seems unlikely for the forseeable future. :^(
  
  --
  
  I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
2. Re:Political complications by dbIII · 2013-06-15 20:22 · Score: 1
  
  That's already starting to happen in areas close enough to the Chinese border to get mobile phone coverage.
3. Re:Political complications by dbIII · 2013-06-15 20:29 · Score: 1
  
  Of course it won't help the North Koreans citizens much unless they have a compatible antenna and a computer to attach to it
  A lot of phones have been smuggled in from China and they work within range of the Chinese phone towers. There was even a BBC story about a guy in South Korea ringing a relative in North Korea about an upcoming shortage of a type of sweet that's close to being a black market currency. That's a massive change from the usual information black hole (I know someone who may have living relatives in North Korea but they've been unreachable for 40 years, and even trying to contact them from China would have potentially put them at risk).
design by gedw99 · 2013-06-15 05:12 · Score: 1

1. For energy they tak the water vapour and electrolysis it to hydrogen. Sthen store the hydrogen.
Being above the cloud line = tons of solar energy.
So the battery and hydrogen storgae does not need to be very big.
2. For altitude control just release hydrogen
3. for electricity to run the on board system just use a fuel cell ? Well its a bit cold. So i image they will use batteries.
4. For Moving left or right they COULD use some thruster. The amount of energy they are going to get from the PV energy collection system is immense so i see now reason why vector control thrusters cant be make to work. Mayeb even compressed air based.
5. The radio network with a mesh network is already solved. I imagine they could also use the "white spaces" technique.
In africa Google have been pushing to use the white spaces for this exact reason i suspect.
The downlink will then have enough bandwidth.
WiFi range by sjames · 2013-06-15 05:56 · Score: 2

TFA doesn't specify WiFi though the ISM bands are specified. However, it's not impossible that it is WiFi, it has a much longer range than you might think with the right equipment.
1. Re:WiFi range by jones_supa · 2013-06-15 06:55 · Score: 1
  
  The balloons are traveling above air traffic. WiFi is never going to be enough no matter how you amp it.
2. Re:WiFi range by sjames · 2013-06-15 07:34 · Score: 1
  
  TFA did mention specialized roof mounted antennae.
  In my experience, a sensitive receiver can work wonders, but not enough to make a laptop dongle work at that range.
3. Re:WiFi range by sjames · 2013-06-15 07:35 · Score: 1
  
  Did you even LOOK at the link. I think 150 miles would be sufficient since the balloons aren't in space.
4. Re:WiFi range by jones_supa · 2013-06-15 09:22 · Score: 1
  
  Sorry for the wrong conclusions. I had mixed up the numbers a bit there.
Re:stratosphere? by jones_supa · 2013-06-15 06:52 · Score: 1

WiFi is short range. WiMax is long range. This is more like WiMax, if it isn't WiMax.
Yes, WiMAX seems much better candidate at first blush. Although even WiMAX has a typical maximum range of 50 kilometers. Going up 20,000 km, on the other hand... I don't know, I think we're actually talking about something relative to satellite broadcasting technologies.
Re:stratosphere? by __aaltlg1547 · 2013-06-15 07:18 · Score: 1

If WiMax's range is 50km, that means from 20,000 feet it covers an 18-mile across footprint. That would just be from a single transponder. You could design the satellite with multiple overlapping beams, each designed to cover about a 200 square mile area. It would be pretty effective out to a range of about 20 miles. At that distance, multipath and coverage in valleys starts to become a problem. So one balloon could cover maybe as much as 1200 square miles.
StratXX by Silas+is+back · 2013-06-15 07:55 · Score: 1

There's a company that has been selling blimps for cellular network coverage that float at 21 km height since 2006: http://www.stratxx.com/products/x-station/

--
this sig is useless
Re:stratosphere? by jones_supa · 2013-06-15 09:21 · Score: 1

Oh, I see where I went wrong now. At some point 20,000 meters changed in my head to 20,000 kilometers! What a stupid mistake from me, sigh...
Google Eyes by slash.jit · 2013-06-15 14:34 · Score: 1

I hope they don't have high resolution camera's on board.
Google Cloud by slash.jit · 2013-06-15 14:39 · Score: 1

I thought Cloud Computing was a joke, but Google seriously wants to take computing to cloud!
Helium? by b4upoo · 2013-06-15 16:23 · Score: 1

Helium is a rare and precious resource. Whether party balloons or industrial balloons we need to ban the use of helium. Once it is used up we will be without it no matter how great the need.
1. Re:Helium? by Mal-2 · 2013-06-15 21:00 · Score: 1
  
  Helium is a byproduct of nuclear fission (as alpha particles) and a direct product of the most common earthly nuclear fusion, Deuterium-Deuterium (D-D). I believe it also occurs with proton-boron fusion. Helium is something that can be created, and most of those processes are also exothermic, meaning we'll be using them for energy production. Unlike most elements, helium does not HAVE to come from the ground or air.
  
  --
  How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
2. Re:Helium? by ClassicASP · 2013-06-17 00:58 · Score: 1
  
  Agreed. They should just use kites and/or hot-air balloons.
The obvious question - economical for world-wide? by daboochmeister · 2013-06-15 20:16 · Score: 1

I haven't seen any analysis of the obvious white elephant in the room (and don't intend to provide any, because I'd be blundering around in an area where I have no expertise) - could this economically replace satellite-based telco operations? What would the tradeoffs be?

--
"Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
Re:stratosphere? by akanouras · 2013-06-15 21:13 · Score: 1

You're probably confusing WiFi (IEEE 802.11) with GSM.

Distance records (using non-standard devices) include 382 km (237 mi) in June 2007, held by Ermanno Pietrosemoli and EsLaRed of Venezuela, transferring about 3 MB of data between the mountain-tops of El Águila and Platillon.[46][47] The Swedish Space Agency transferred data 420 km (260 mi), using 6 watt amplifiers to reach an overhead stratospheric balloon.[48]
Emphasis mine; Source
Amy I really the only one ... by YoungManKlaus · 2013-06-16 08:28 · Score: 1

thinking of Doctorow's appearance in this XKCD? http://xkcd.com/345/
Hydrogen from stratosphere H2O vapors? by Bust0ut · 2013-06-16 12:25 · Score: 1

Why not use electrolysis to keep the balloons filled with hydrogen. Why do there have to come back down to earth? I know for a fact that there is water vapor in the stratosphere. Also, I had the same idea when I heard of the US government program to research solar panels. I wonder if these "thin cell panels" were developed by the private or public sector?

--
He is crazy if you think about it; I am not.
More of these please. by GaryWheatley · 2013-06-20 22:08 · Score: 1

We could use more of these. Telco bills are eating too much of my money already.