Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Kills Xbox One Phone-Home DRM

One of the biggest criticisms of Microsoft's recently-announced Xbox One console was that it would require an internet connection once every 24 hours in order to keep playing games. Enough people complained about the DRM, and Microsoft listened. Today, they announced that they're removing the phone-home requirement. "After a one-time system set-up with a new Xbox One, you can play any disc based game without ever connecting online again. There is no 24 hour connection requirement and you can take your Xbox One anywhere you want and play your games, just like on Xbox 360." They've also scrapped the game trading and resale system they'd built, which allowed publishers to set their own rules with regard to used game sales. "There will be no limitations to using and sharing games, it will work just as it does today on Xbox 360." Unfortunately, that also means users won't be able to take advantage of the good parts of the original system, such as trading and gifting games without needing the disc, or sharing games with remote family members. "While we believe that the majority of people will play games online and access the cloud for both games and entertainment, we will give consumers the choice of both physical and digital content. We have listened and we have heard loud and clear from your feedback that you want the best of both worlds." Also noteworthy: they've dropped region-locks as well.

95 of 547 comments (clear)

  1. Whoosh by Gr8Apes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whew, that chair was clos.....

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    1. Re:Whoosh by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whew, that chair was clos.....

      That they even thought of such a concept and it was approved, which it must have been, at the highest level, Mr. Ballmer should be wary of himself wielding chairs and he may be his most worthy target.

      Does anyone reading about this Phone-Home DRM hold out much hope of a re-org which will position Microsoft as a viable and large player in the business (and consumer) markets in time to come?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Whoosh by cod3r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah exactly. How could they not see this coming?? Another scenario of people creating a product that they don't use..

    3. Re:Whoosh by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meh - I smell a trial balloon that fell with a thud.

      I can see them floating it out there to get reactions, that they can then show the bigger and more assholish game studios (*cough*EA*cough*) and say "See? We told you this is a bad idea." ...that or Ballmer really is that frickin' stupid...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Whoosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah exactly. How could they not see this coming?? Another scenario of people creating a product that they don't use..

      Easy. Cynical ploy to get us to all think about the not-so-much-suck parts now and think Microsoft's not so bad. They were never going to go through with those crazy ideas in the first place. Now we're all going to be talking about them again and putting them right in the public consciousness again. Thanks for falling right into their marketing trap.

      This has been a free lesson in psychology that the internet wishes it could ignore: Hatred is so easy to exploit and control. How's it feel to be a tool? Does it make you want to RAAAAAAGE all over the internet? Good, good, you'll be useful to them later. They'll find you when they need you.

    5. Re:Whoosh by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If it wasn't for the PS4, MS would have never dropped those requirements.
      As it was, PS4 was vastly superior (atleast on paper) to the XBone offering.
      Now, the XBone is on par on some key consumer issues and may just be able to offset expense, inferior hardware and lack of indy gaming with their Kinect.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:Whoosh by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not impossible that this is the case, but I can't help thinking it might have been better for them to pull back the sheet at E3 instead of doing Sony's job for them.

      That said, fuck 'em. Still ain't buying any of them.

    7. Re:Whoosh by Miseph · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmm... interesting, but no, it almost certainly didn't happen that way.

      For one thing, the retraction will never make as much news as the initial announcement. For another, there is enormous risk that, whatever they say, people will suspect that these schemes still exist (even if they are, for the time being, disabled) and avoid the system out of fear that they will be implemented later.

      If this manages to work out in their favor, which is almost certainly not going to happen, it will be a miracle. Far more likely is that they are hoping to win back those customers who were fleeing toward the PS4 due entirely to the DRM issues but honestly prefer the XBox experience and crossing their fingers that by the time the consoles actually drop people have either largely forgotten (which is certainly possible) or, even better, that Sony screws something up even more (which is also certainly possible, Sony did think it was a good idea to deploy pirated rootkits). Expect them to walk on eggshells for the next few months, just to make sure they don't reignite the matter.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    8. Re:Whoosh by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unexpected. Maybe next we'll hear that the government is listening to us too. Oh wait...

    9. Re:Whoosh by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Yeah exactly. How could they not see this coming?? Another scenario of people creating a product that they don't use."

      Despite some of the other replies, I definitely agree with "How could they not see it coming?"

      I don't think it's a matter of a product they don't use. I think it's a lot more about just being completely disconnected from their actual customers. They really don't have a f*cking clue what people want, despite years of people screaming at them that they DON'T want DRM or "phoning home". When I say years, I mean like 15 years.

      I think the only reasonable conclusion is that they literally don't listen to their customers. And that's Not A Good Thing.

    10. Re:Whoosh by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      "Declining share price"? Have you looked at the stock chart lately?

      Collapsing companies are more profitable than growing ones - less to invest in, more of the Gross is Net. A better picture would be looking at Microsoft's Year-on-year revenues.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:Whoosh by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well it would be kind of interesting to see what the legal case would be in Europe etc, if you buy one without having internet connection now.

      If they every re introduced that requirement I would thing you would a case under consumer law.

      Probably only aimed at the North American Market - the EU courts probably glare in Redmond's general direction enough they know better than to try any of that there.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    12. Re:Whoosh by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I still don't buy it, they were quick to say DISC BASED games would be just like on the X360, but isn't the Xbox S (for Stupid God damned name) suppose to install ALL games to the HDD by default? Unless they completely changed the mechanism, which at this late stage would be kinda doubtful, they may just be playing a game of weasel words.

      You still have to have an Internet setup just to unbox the thing (so much for our men and women in the armed forces) and until I see the thing in stores actually doing what they say it'll do? Sorry MSFT, don't trust you, especially not after the head of the Xbox division said "just deal with it" and "buy a 360" as his answers to critics. BTW did they fire that jackhole?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Whoosh by mjwx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For one thing, the retraction will never make as much news as the initial announcement. For another, there is enormous risk that, whatever they say, people will suspect that these schemes still exist (even if they are, for the time being, disabled) and avoid the system out of fear that they will be implemented later.

      Frog... Boiling...

      Wait until people become financially and emotionally invested in the XBone and then spring it on them. The system is already in place, it just needs to be activated. Because people are too emotionally attached to their favourite console and dont understand the fallacy of sunk costs they'll keep spending money on it.

      You have to admire Microsoft for this in a diabolical kind of way.
      1. Generate huge amounts of publicity with a bad idea(TM).
      2. Claim to revoke bad idea(TM) and generate even more publicity.
      3. People buy product.
      4. Bring back bad idea(TM), muhahahahahahahaha, fools.
      5. Fail to make a profit for years as the product is sold as a loss leader.

      It's almost Bond level of villainry. Bravo Microsoft.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    14. Re:Whoosh by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For one thing, the retraction will never make as much news as the initial announcement. For another, there is enormous risk that, whatever they say, people will suspect that these schemes still exist (even if they are, for the time being, disabled) and avoid the system out of fear that they will be implemented later.

      Frog... Boiling...

      Wait until people become financially and emotionally invested in the XBone and then spring it on them. The system is already in place, it just needs to be activated. Because people are too emotionally attached to their favourite console and dont understand the fallacy of sunk costs they'll keep spending money on it.

      You have to admire Microsoft for this in a diabolical kind of way.

      1. Generate huge amounts of publicity with a bad idea(TM).

      2. Claim to revoke bad idea(TM) and generate even more publicity.

      3. People buy product.

      4. Bring back bad idea(TM), muhahahahahahahaha, fools.

      5. Fail to make a profit for years as the product is sold as a loss leader.

      It's almost Bond level of villainry. Bravo Microsoft.

      This isn't any different than the RIAA, business lobbies, etc. Just look at copyright legislation in the Canadian Parliament or how banks became deregulated. Legislation is announced, people complain, a new watered down bill is passed instead. Cycle this through a few dozen times and all of the provisions in the original legislation is eventually enacted with lees than a whimper.

    15. Re:Whoosh by ZipK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Collapsing companies are more profitable than growing ones - less to invest in, more of the Gross is Net. A better picture would be looking at Microsoft's Year-on-year revenues.

      FY11 $69.94B
      FY12 $73.72B +5% Y/Y

      1Q13 $16.01B -8% Y/Y
      2Q13 $21.46B +3% Y/Y
      3Q13 $20.49B +18% Y/Y
      4Q13 TBA

      4Q12 was $18.06B, so even if revenue is flat Y/Y for 4Q, Microsoft would still show 3% Y/Y annual revenue growth.

    16. Re:Whoosh by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      While you are, of course, completely welcome to buy or not buy as you wish... we (the potential customers, and also the people who were pissed off by the announced situation) need to applaud this move. Microsoft (and the industry as a whole) needs to see that giving people what they want has benefits. If everybody says "Wow, took you long enough to figure that out... fuck you anyhow", then the message that the industry will take away is "The Xbox One was a flop anyhow; nobody actually gave a damn about the DRM". That's *not* the message we want to send.

      So... don't buy it if you don't want it. That's a completely reasonable stance. But don't refuse to buy it because the company originally planned to have more lockdown, and then backed off. That's not how you signal that you don't want lockdown!

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    17. Re:Whoosh by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good! Its a fucking console NOT a PC! if the only way they will allow the game to be installed to the drive is to make the DRM in every. possible. metric. WORSE than the PC (Fuck Steam gives you 30 days offline and is trivial to bypass, MSFT was giving you not even a whole damned day before it would brick) then they can keep it!

      I'm just glad i got the boys off the consoles when I did, at least on the PC as i said you have options, hell you can even go Humble Bundles or GOG and not have any DRM at all, whereas the consoles seem to be in a race to see who can treat their customers like thieves worse. hell at least Steam gives me things for putting up with the DRM, like free MP, updates, chat, and matchmaking, fricking MSFT makes you break out a CC just to play an online session of a game you already bought! Geez MSFT, could you BE any more greedy? Maybe you should call up Monty Burns, he'll probably have some advice on how to gouge customers a little more, damn.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    18. Re:Whoosh by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uhhh it'll be a flop anyhow not because of the DRM, but because they are releasing a console with shittier specs than the other guy for $500 in a down economy. I'm sorry but that is fucking RETARDED, and if the reports are true that a LOT of that extra cost is forcing everyone to take the fucking Kinect, which NOBODY liked the God damned Kinect so you have saddled your console with a higher price tag to push shit your customers never liked? Well i'm sorry but you deserve to lose for being stupid.

      Hell the Kinect is so damned bad the fans of Angry Joe keeping voting for Kinect games for him to play just because they know they'll be fucking awful and love to see Joe flip his shit trying to fight the damned Kinect. If you haven't seen Joe play Steel Battalion you really need to watch, he just fights and struggles against the kinect until he is just a ball of pissed off fury.

      Mark my words Kinect will go down like the NES glove or the Sega bazooka in the "man that was stupid" pile, but not until MSFT keeps flogging the dead horse long past anyone caring, like how they cranked out Zunes long after people gave a shit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    19. Re:Whoosh by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hell we have proof of that, look at the Windows 8 beta. You had no less that 3 betas, DP,CP, and RTM, and the entire time the testers were saying "OMG this fucking suuuuucks!" and the reviewers were calling it "Windows Frankenstein" and saying things like "Don't buy it" but what did MSFT do? Not only released that giant POS but we are now finding out Win 8.1 is everything you HATE about Windows 8 ONLY WORSE,, with even MORE focus on WinTablets (which nobody is buying), even MORE of the metro shit, its the Transformers 3 only without the cool robot battles to cover for the douchbaggery.

      So I don't see how anybody could argue that MSFT wasn't suffering from a MASSIVE disconnect with their customers, fuck you could have just walked into any shop that sold Windows PCs and we could have told you that shit wasn't gonna sell, i had people pass Win 8 systems for Win 7 systems half as powerful just so they wouldn't have to take Windows 8. Hell I didn't see as much hatred with Vista and WinME, the public DOES NOT LIKE IT yet they keep killing their sales by trying to force that piece of garbage down everyone's throats just because "hey Apple is big in tablets"...well you ain't fucking Apple so just cut that shit out already! YOU SUCK AT THIS, you know what MSFT reminds me of right now? You know the annoying "comic relief" they put in kid's cartoons that is always "watch how great I am...FAIL FAIL FAIL"? THAT is MSFT, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory by just being terribly inept.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    20. Re:Whoosh by MBC1977 · · Score: 2

      True, customers may not want DRM, but businesses don't want to lose money to pirates and the used games market. Personally, I think their implementation was flawed approach, but I understand the reasoning: you don't go into business and invest capital to give away the store.

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
    21. Re:Whoosh by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      Nope, thanks to the whiners, they've killed the ability to play without the disc in the drive, to access your games library from anywhere and to share with your family.

      buy your games from the online shop then.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    22. Re:Whoosh by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      How much does a working SNES go for?

      Checking Amazon, a working used SNES goes for about $40.

      What other hardware can play SNES games?

      This, for one. Or this. Or this. Or, if you have transferred the ROM contents to a PC-readable file, a PC running an emulator.

    23. Re:Whoosh by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They killed the "Family" sharing plan entirely, whether you bought the game from the online shop or on disc.

      These changes will impact some of the scenarios we previously announced for Xbox One. The sharing of games will work as it does today, you will simply share the disc. Downloaded titles cannot be shared or resold. Also, similar to today, playing disc based games will require that the disc be in the tray.

      Personally, I think they should have kept the digital sharing plan - it was the one thing that was significantly better than what the PS4 or WiiU offers, and I think would have done a lot to bring back the people they alienated last week. Oh, well.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    24. Re:Whoosh by macson_g · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    25. Re:Whoosh by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      All three consoles use ATI graphics.

      And almost no one in the robotics industry uses Kinect, because it is nowhere near best in class. What you mean is that it's been commandeered by so many people in the robotics hobby, because it is cheap and ubiquitous.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    26. Re:Whoosh by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Same(ish) CPU
      More modern GPU of same brand with more cores
      Same amount of RAM, more bandwidth from GDDR5, but no SRAM on-die

      In other words, PS4=more graphical power, less effective memory management overall. So PS4 is at best slightly superior to XB1, not "vastly."

      And of course, one other thing to consider is that the power and heat management of the XB1 is better than the PS4 - which no one will care about until they remember RRoD and YLoD issues stemming directly from heat in almost all cases.

      http://www.anandtech.com/show/6972/xbox-one-hardware-compared-to-playstation-4

      Now if by "vastly" better you meant in terms of the original DRM scheme implementations, then no disagreement here.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    27. Re:Whoosh by ynp7 · · Score: 2

      How about you try listing a few actual issues with Windows 8. I'm still waiting to hear any from the complainers, who seem to exclusively fall into one of two camps: 1) bitches who can't get over the start menu and 2) bitches who haven't fucking used it.

      If you're going to claim Windows 7 is fine but Windows 8 is not you're an idiot who doesn't know what they're talking about. They're practically the same thing when it comes down to actually using them.

    28. Re:Whoosh by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry but here is the flag, bullshit on the field. the PS4 uses GDDR 5, the Xbone? Plain old DDR 3. That alone is gonna cripple the living fuck out of Xbone because as anybody with an APU will tell you RAM speed makes a HUGE difference in performance when it comes to those, I just went from 1066 to 1333 and got like a 20% boost on my APU so you can imagine how huge a difference ultra fast GDDR 5 is gonna have. Also IIRC the PS4 jag chip is like 20% faster and has more power on the GPU side than the Xbone, again with an APU those little changes make a BIG difference. finally the PS 4 is a whole $100 CHEAPER, which considering its gonna be Xmas will mean the difference between getting a couple of extra games with your system or not.

      So I'm sorry but if someone came asking me about the consoles i'd have to point them to the PS4, because even without the MSFT douchebaggery the PS4 has clearly better hardware and considering how long the last gen lasted you are gonna want every extra bit of speed you can get.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. I just had this conversation with a coworker: by stillnotelf · · Score: 2
    I just had this conversation with a coworker:

    "Microsoft has--"

    "Yeah, I saw."

    "Well...they didn't have a choice. They're halfway there."

    1. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by stillnotelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you've followed the Xbox One conversation at all (there, I used the real word, now I can call it Xbone), you know that there's only one thing Microsoft could possibly do as damage control at this point, and they just did it. Everyone has expected them to tone down the phoning home and used games policies. The "halfway" is, as many commenters below have pointed out, that they've yet to remove the built-in Kinect.

    2. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you've followed the Xbox One conversation at all (there, I used the real word, now I can call it Xbone), you know that there's only one thing Microsoft could possibly do as damage control at this point, and they just did it. Everyone has expected them to tone down the phoning home and used games policies. The "halfway" is, as many commenters below have pointed out, that they've yet to remove the built-in Kinect.

      So they've only shot themselves in one foot so far and are reloading for the other one ... still a chance to save that sock a holey demise.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a trap. They will just make more games online only, no disc and thus no lending or resale or offline play.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      to 'fix' the mic problem, do the following:

      1) find an old wall-wart power supply
      2) open it and remove the filter capacitors (yank them out or unsolder them)
      3) feed the low voltage output to the mic wires

      what you've done is created a NICE 60hz hum that will be so strong, nothing the mic will pick up will ever come thru.

      (you're welcome)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by stillnotelf · · Score: 2

      Yes, the tape solution has occurred to me...I've so far avoided buying a computer with a built-in webcam, but that's the solution I'd use. I fully expect there to be DIY microphone disconnection demos online within a week of the console releasing (who knows what functionality it would gimp, though).

      How awesome would it be if there was a line-in instead of an actual microphone? You could hook it up to something that would play pre-recorded taunts over Live (like that great robot-voiced "I am the alpha and the omega" from Unreal Tournament). Actually...maybe that would be a bad idea...

    6. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      For convenience, I've added the missing part of that conversation.

      I just had this conversation with a coworker:

      "Microsoft has me sexually arroused"

      "Yeah, I saw."

      "Well...they didn't have a choice. They're halfway there."

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by stillnotelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steam has huge regular sales. Microsoft keeps the digital versions of games in sync with the retail versions as much as possible. People don't build huge libraries of 60$ Steam games, they build libraries of 5$ Humble Bundle games, and they don't care about resale because they paid so little going in. Microsoft's digitial-instead-of-disc games that GP suggests are going to be 60$ digital. Not that I have any concrete evidence of what they'll do half a year from now...buy certainly on Xbox 360 the downloadable AAA games are the same price as retail MSRP.

    8. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by Seumas · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's what is wrong with it -- and the comparisons to Steam are always off the mark.

      On previous consoles, you can play any game you own. You bought it. It is yours. You physically have it somewhere. You can still play your PS2 games on a PS2. You can still play your NES games on an almost 30 year old NES. With digital games on console, you'll be able to play them until they decide to turn the download server off. Or turn the DRM system off. Or turn off XBox Live and move on to the next thing. It also means that there is no more going out and buying a Sega Jaguar from 20 years ago and a bunch of used games somewhere to play it on, because you enjoy it or because you weren't into games at the time the Jaguar came out, but you'd like to experience them.

      Then, there's also the issue of generations... A game you buy in September of this year on the 360 won't be playable when you upgrade to the XBOX ONE two months later. On Steam (well, PC in general - let's stop acting like Steam is the entirety of PC gaming) - I can still play games I bought ten years ago on my newest rig, even though it is the tenth machine I've built in ten years. I can still play PC games on my PC that are thirty years old.

      And, finally, Microsoft has shown no interest in discounting games. Their "on demand" selection is both pathetic in variety and price, usually charging more for the digital version of a game that is several years old than the actual physical copy would cost to order online and have shipped to your house. On PC - you have a massive collection of indie stuff directly from developers and publishers, a ton on Desura, many sold through Humble Bundles. You have tons of older stuff preserved through GOG, and you have unbelievably steep discounts on newer games, on Steam. Often, during the same year they were released. And all that without paying $60/yr.

      Gamestop's business model is irrelevant. Further, what do you or I care? I am not in the business of worrying about the financials of the game industry. I am in the business of watching my own finances and if I can save money, that is important to me. Gamestop is pretty crappy and so is their exploitive business model. Using that as some justification to diminish consumers' rights to own their purchased content and have portability and resale and so on is a bit like using the shit the Westboro Baptist Church says as an excuse for eradicating free speech.

    9. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by Seumas · · Score: 2

      Really? I see a ton of people with those little round dot bandaids and similar things over their macbook/pro/other laptop cameras all the time. In an age where the government petitions the court to use your webcam to monitor you and malware exists to monitor your webcam and stream it back to douchebags somewhere and so on, you'd be a fool *not* to. Or, at least, not to make a specific conscious decision to leave it uncovered.

    10. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by Vanderhoth · · Score: 2

      Why not just not buy it and save yourself the headache all around?

    11. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by Kardos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not just clip off the mic?

    12. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've so far avoided buying a computer with a built-in webcam,

      I just don't worry about someone turning on my webcam. If they turn it on, and manage to get an image, they will be easy to find. They will be the person curler up in the foetal position, yelling "My eyes, my eyes."

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    13. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by black3d · · Score: 2

      It is encouraging though to see a few of these publishers dumping some of their older titles over to GOG DRM-free, though. EA's released pretty much everything Origin ever did (Origin the studio, that is) on GOG. Would like to see them throw some more old IP they're not currently exploiting on there. And then some publishers throwing up even more recent games there - Torchlight, Neverwinter Nights 2, GRID, etc. I'd be nice if this expanded.

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    14. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by icebike · · Score: 2

      Not one that the mic can be remotely turned on.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    15. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by stillnotelf · · Score: 2

      Why would they remove the kinect? They want to make sure devs know it is a universal resource so they program for it.

      Because a lot of us do not want Kinect, or go further and hate or fear Kinect. First, because Kinect games are widely regarded as having poorer control systems than controller-based games, and second paranoia over webcams/microphones watching you in your living room. (I'm in the former camp).

    16. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2

      every webcam on every laptop i have seen has a tiny led next to it. if the camera is turned on, the light turns on. if your laptop were watching you all the time, the led would be on all the time. and it isn't. all this crap is just paranoid delusions.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    17. Re:I just had this conversation with a coworker: by Erikderzweite · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yet, it's called Autotune.

  3. GUYS~ GUYS~ by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmmm... but what will happen now? This might be good news, but this is what should have happened from the very beginning.
    So, even though they took it off for the Xbone, I fear that they simply paved the way for draconian restrictions by the next gen (if that happens someday).

    1. Re:GUYS~ GUYS~ by Rougement · · Score: 2

      They lost this round but expect them to continue pushing their agenda. The only way to stop these anti-consumer tactics is to not buy an XBone. Sony doesn't get a pass either, their anti-consumer exploits are legendary.

    2. Re:GUYS~ GUYS~ by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      I guess you haven't watched Sony financial news over the last couple of years, I think they WISH people could write it as $ony

    3. Re:GUYS~ GUYS~ by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1) I wouldn't be so quick to forgive Microsoft. Be one of the first to buy an Xbox One and you may be repaid by a system update in the not-to-distant future slowly re-implementing, bit by bit, this DRM scheme that they have claimed to be discarding.

      2) I do agree with you on Sony. Neither company can be trusted, really.

  4. Xbox 180 Confirmed by Spaztian · · Score: 5, Funny

    This new Xbox 180 pretty much evens the console war again, it's going to be an interesting new generation.

    1. Re:Xbox 180 Confirmed by Mishra100 · · Score: 2

      The new Xbox One Eighty?

    2. Re:Xbox 180 Confirmed by Vanderhoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      XBone Eighty, now with only 80% of the Bone.

  5. Herp, meet Derp by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have listened and we have heard loud and clear from your feedback that you want the best of both worlds."

    Actually, we just want one world: The one we had before. And thank you kindly to get your creepy kinect out of our living rooms, thanks. We're already giving the paranoid, who thrive quite well in an anarobic environment, a veritable algae bloom of justified looking over their shoulder. You stepped in dog shit like you were laser guided, Microsoft.

    I don't think your reputation can be salvaged at this point... most people have already decided on the PS4, and will be leary of signing up since you're just a firmware update away from returning to putting 'em over a barrel. And yes, we do think you'd do just that, once the furvor dies down. We saw your memo. We know how you think. You won't give up this easily on your DRM locked down to hell shitty ass XBone.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Herp, meet Derp by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm tired of being called "paranoid" for not wanting the NSA to log my phone calls and Microsoft to install a webcam in my living room. Speaking of the world we had before ...

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    2. Re:Herp, meet Derp by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think your reputation can be salvaged at this point

      We've heard that before when Sony...

      • Shut down LikSang
      • Went through the rootkit debacle..
      • and the related tactless "damage control" ("why should users care")
      • Handled the PSN breach in about the worst possible way for about 3 weeks
      • Killed OtherOS

      I could go on. And now of course people are talking about how great Sony is.

      The point is, yes, their rep can be salvaged, because people really dont care that much for very long.

    3. Re:Herp, meet Derp by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jebus, we've heard this story before with MICROSOFT. Talk about tarnished reputations - their Java fiascos, refusing to allow other browsers to be installed, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows NT, and Vista. We're hearing it with Windows 8 as well.

      Face it, "reputation" is only significant with a very small portion of society, and unfortunately those people don't amount to much compared to the vast quantities of people that either can't be troubled enough to care about it, or people that just want their fuckin' toys and don't give two shits what it costs (speaking financially as well as privacy-wise). They have enough money to float for a few months, by which point we'll be pissed at someone else and will conveniently forget about Microsoft's transgressions.

    4. Re:Herp, meet Derp by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

      The point is, yes, their rep can be salvaged, because people really dont care that much for very long.

      Fair point, but Microsoft handed Sony the opportunity to reclaim their lost confidence with the gaming community and then some. Can't really fault Sony for taking full advantage of it.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  6. How comforting... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Hey guys! I used to be for DRM; but when I saw that it would ruin my launch, I became totally against it! Don't worry, though, just because it would be trivial to alter the deal at any future time, either over the internet or through exciting and mandatory system updates baked into new disk releases, you can still trust me!"

    1. Re:How comforting... by chuckinator · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are altering the deal. Pray they don't alter it any further.

  7. Still no sale for me... by VinylRecords · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forcing you to buy $100 Kinect with the system? Tracking your gaming habits and selling the data if you are connected? Tracking your movements with Kinect at all times? Putting online features that are on the discs of games behind an XBL Gold paywall? Forcing XBL Gold subscriptions to use other online services through your Xbox? Paying MS money for XBL Gold only to be bombarded by advertisements?

    I'll pass still. This is looking like a weak generation for gamers. Both the PS4 and XB1 have online locked behind paywalls (even for peer-to-peer games). The Wii-U is severely lacking in quality games geared towards older gamers. Hopefully the PC gaming developers take charge and win back some of the console players this generation.

  8. In the Navy *humming to herself* by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The fact that the Navy blasted XBONE ( http://www.navytimes.com/article/20130614/OFFDUTY02/306140030 ) is probably the biggest reason Microsoft took such a drastic 180, not us regular consumers.

    1. Re:In the Navy *humming to herself* by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That article discusses the kinect being labeled a security risk. They haven't taken the kinect out.

    2. Re:In the Navy *humming to herself* by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      No, the kinect is attached to the xbox one and you can't remove it. MS has allowed that you will be able to put it to "sleep," and promises cross their hearts hope to die that it won't still collect data, but we the consumers cannot take off the kinect without breaking the machine.

    3. Re:In the Navy *humming to herself* by lightknight · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seriously, after what's his face said they had a product for people who couldn't regularly access the internet...the XBox 360, I can only imagine the somewhere in Redmond, WA, a bespeckled Gates looked away from the monitor with some disdain, and then facepalmed harder than he had ever done before in his life.

      If I were an investment manager, watching that particular commentary live, the first words out of my mouth, immediately after I managed to pick it up from the limo's floor, would be to 'sell that stock, sell it all, and short it until the kingdom comes!' I'd borrow from my friends to short that stock, and when they ran out of stock to short, I'd go door to door looking for more.

      There are simply some things that cannot be said when representing a multi-billion dollar software company unveiling its latest product, and he said a few of them. Frankly I'm amazed he's still alive, as I'd have had the guys in black shirts throw him into the back of a black minivan and driven across town as soon as the cameras turned the first time. I'd cop an excuse about him having recently taken some powerful blood pressure medications, and that the words spilling out of his mouth were in no way reflective of what MS thought or planned. I'd pay a group of security minded people to sit on him at a high-rise apartment, somewhere on the outskirts of town, until damage control could give me an estimate of just how much boot-licking and open bribery it would take to prevent the board from hanging me, let alone keeping everyone else on staff.

      "We already have a product for them, the Xbox 360" -> No, no, no. When they ask you a hardball question like that, and you know that you don't have the answer, shut the f*ck up. Tell them the honest truth -> "I do not know, but I will look into it, and attempt to get back to you on that as soon as I can." Instead he goes for the smart ass answer "the XBox 360," which was as good as saying "the Navy will take whatever we damn well feel like giving them; yesterday's meet is good enough for the likes of them." Dumb, dumb, dumb, a thousand times dumb.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    4. Re:In the Navy *humming to herself* by Manfre · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Only a security risk if it has internet access. Without the mandatory internet access, it's easy to keep it off the internet.

    5. Re:In the Navy *humming to herself* by DaHat · · Score: 2

      No, the kinect is attached to the xbox one and you can't remove it

      No, there is quite clearly a port on the back of the console where you plug in the Kinect... not unlike newer 360s... and while Microsoft says you the new Kinect with the Xbox One... I still look forward to seeing how aggressive the console is with this requirement. For all we know it just pops a warning message that you click "Ignore" on... or it yells at you until you plug it back in. Only time will tell.

  9. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's hilarious people are running back to them so fast. There's nothing stopping them from putting DRM in a year from now. It's still 100$ more than PS4, still has worse hardware, it still has Kinect, even though you're the type of person who doesn't care about rights it still makes the system less powerful as a segment of it is reserved for this telescreen

    Enjoy your Halo kiddo

  10. It would've made a neat Jack Bauer "24" game by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    While you are playing your games, the clock ticks down it the upper right hand corner, reminding you that need to play that other game in the background. Your quest is to find an internet connection before the "24" clock runs out.

    And you get tortured and hounded by government creeps in the process. Feels real.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  11. Lost downloading sharing by jader3rd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With this change they also removed the ability to share downloaded games, and the ability to share a game without lending the disk. Those must have been the primary drivers behind the phone home requirements.

  12. MS needs to stop assuming we're stupid by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The restrictions they put on the system were horrible their justifications for them were insulting.

    Above and beyond this could only happen if they thought we were idiots and simply wouldn't understand. They need to appreciate the distinction between lack of interest/awareness and actually being stupid.

    Most people are not stupid. They're oblivious. But not stupid. Explain the rules to people and they'll typically see what is going on pretty fast.

    MS tried to pull a fast one and was caught in the act. They've done this repeatedly with other product launches. It needs to stop.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  13. Surprising by Aaron+B+Lingwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as I enjoy bashing Microsoft, they have redeemed themselves a little by listening to their customers.
    They're reportedly on top of the security issue as well. A little focus on the areas of privacy, ethics, and standards might convince me to become a customer again.

    --
    [Rent This Space]
    1. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Make no mistake, MS were prepared to make this "generous" move from the word go. They figured they'd give the restrictions a shot first, but they implemented the firmware in a way that these features could easily be turned off if necessary. For the Xbox One to reach shelves in November, production pretty much has to have already started; if MS had indeed just suddenly changed their mind and altered the firmware at the last minute, they'd have to retest the whole thing and delay launch. No, this option has always been on the table, as plan B in case the public didn't turn out to be willing to bend over.

  14. Complained? Not really... by intermodal · · Score: 2

    People didn't complain. They simply told Microsoft off and said they'd choose Sony. Calling this complaining is like walking into your boss's office, telling him to go f*** himself, and walking out to another job that is just as good if not better that is waiting with open arms. Microsoft's response is basically like the old boss begging you to come back.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  15. Now can we get the start menu back? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now can we get the start menu back? and maybe even Modern/Metro' apps being able to run in a window. With out needed to use a 3rd party add ons?

    1. Re:Now can we get the start menu back? by luther349 · · Score: 2

      i think that was coming in the 8.1 patch.

  16. Re:Sounds like... by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The world where triple A titles will be on a system that RMS approves is the same world where communism works.

    That is, not this one.

  17. Re:selective listening by Applekid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they were so quick to listen to the gaming community, why have they been so deaf to the feedback about Windows 8?

    Because there's no EULA prohibiting you from selling your 360 to someone else, so those consoles will always be plentiful on the secondary market.

    Meanwhile, Windows 7 can be pulled from stores and you are prohibited from transferring your license to any other computer, whether you own it or not.

    In short, you don't have to listen to your customers when they're locked in and you control the market scarcity.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  18. Way too late. by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even the mainstream news cycle picked up the "Can you believe this shit" tone that was going around during and after E3. Many, many people have now firmly dismissed the Xbox One (or Xbone) as a choice based on that, and they're not going to be hearing that the restrictions have vanished because this correction isn't going to get nearly the traction the original story (and associated outrage) did. When you have active duty personnel penning columns in newspapers saying that Microsoft's basically decided to shit on all active servicemembers with the call-home and in-country requirement, a little retraction buried on page 29 isn't going to make it into many peoples' minds.

  19. Until MS Changes Course and Re-Enables Later by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

    What guarantee is there that Microsoft won't later re-enable the phone-home drm feature?

    (even if the system is never reconnected to the internet again after setup, it's conceivable an update could later be performed via a game disc with little to no notice to the user)

    Likewise, what guarantees are there that a game publisher itself won't roll out a game update that includes phone-home drm?

    On a related topic, what promises has Microsoft made regarding the always-on camera? Seems to me there's really no guarantee it can't be accessed without the user's knowledge unless there's a hardware way to turn it off (ie. an opaque cover over the camera).

  20. Reminds me of a great quote by neminem · · Score: 2

    Sadly, I don't seem to have it written down anywhere, but the gist of it was that advertisers and politicians have long known that the best way to get people to eat rat-shit sandwiches is to heavily advertise a "rat-shit and garbage" sandwich, then after that media blitz, start another blitz saying "we listened to you! Our sandwiches no longer have garbage in them!"

  21. Re:Sounds like... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's nothing stopping them from putting DRM in a year from now

    To be fair, there's also nothing stopping Sony from changing anything and everything about their PS4 software at any point. And Sony does have a track record to create suspicion that they might.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  22. Re:Sounds like... by Seumas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nobody is taking out DRM from XBOX or Playstation. They're only talking about taking away region locking and phoning home for daily authentication. You're still going to have to deal with Ubisoft and their uPlay bullshit and redeemable one-time codes and so on.

    People also seem to be constantly conflating DRM with used games. The two have little to do with each other. Sony has said they won't infringe on your right to own your purchases and lend, give, trade, sell them and they won't let others do that, either. That doesn't mean DRM won't still be used.

  23. Awesome by WillgasM · · Score: 2

    I probably still won't buy one, but whatev. I've always been a PC gamer and never really got into the console market. I was contemplating hopping on board this gen, but the initial xbox specs instantly turned me off. PS4 just isn't an option. I refuse to buy anything from Sony even though the price is always right. I'd rather pay double somewhere else than give a penny to that shit-stain of a company. I even try to stay away from their movies. I've considered the Wii, but never seriously. If I want to play such casual games, I'll open my browser. Xbox was really my only option. That's where the games are. That's where my friends play. I definitely won't be standing in line on opening night, but this news gives me some hope. I'll wait and see how launch goes and just maybe with enough glowing reviews, I'll bite the bullet. Or maybe I'll keep dumping money into microtransactions on f2p mmos. We'll see.

  24. So Microsoft decided to listen to users for once by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

    That's great. Can we have the Start Menu back now on Windows? (And no, a button going to the same crappy Metro screen as before doesn't count.)

  25. Re:Sounds like... by maugle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Concerning this entire console generation, I believe Yahtzee said it best in his buyer's guide: "Don't."

  26. just relabeled by musikit · · Score: 2

    worked on xbox 360 titles where we were asked by MS to require a login to live in order to save. so you can play the game. but unless it phones home you can;t save.

  27. All part of the plan... by FuzzNugget · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make a ridiculous threat that you *know* will invite revolt, then relent and follow through with the slightly less ridiculous (but still ridiculous) plan you had interned all along.

    Next time, scheduled phoning home won't seem so ridiculous. Well, maybe not next time, but the time after that, or maybe the time after that ... but it's coming.

    Also known as the Anchoring Effect
    http://youarenotsosmart.com/2010/07/27/anchoring-effect/

    Just look at the shit we put up with MS Office and new Windows installations these days. No, you can't just have a disc, you need to spend a half hour entering all your personal info (mostly re-entering those fucking captchas because their shitty forms don't validate interactively) in an MS account so we can keep tabs on you and send you spam. Even then, you're not getting an installation package file, we'll only give you some brain dead all-in-one downloader that only works on *your* computer, provides absolutely no configuration options and doesn't tell you where the installer files are located (though they probably aren't even usable if you do find them). Sure, you *can* get installation discs if you cough up another $15 and wait a week.

    Fuck that, I'll head over to TPB and have a an ISO in 15 minutes.

    Do you think we'd have willing to choke down this shit sandwich even a few years ago?

  28. Declining share price? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 2

    MSFT is up almost 30% YTD.

  29. Sony, advocate of freedom? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    Sony comes out with a ground-breakingly open game console (as modern mainstream game consoles go) which forces Microsoft to open theirs up, and recently opened one of their smart watches...could they actually be turning over a new leaf, opening up and providing something their customers want? This seems wrong. They were definitely one of the most evil megacorps just a few months ago.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  30. Looks like... by klingers48 · · Score: 2

    Microsoft stuck the clutch on their paradigm shift.

  31. Big TV and multiple controllers by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As it is, I still see no reason at all to buy a dedicated game box when my desktop is more than equal to the task

    One reason is the ability to play a game on a big TV without having to carry your desktop PC back and forth between your desk and the living room TV. Another is the ability to play a video game with house guests who happen to be visiting you but aren't carrying their own gaming laptops.

  32. Re:Sounds like... by luther349 · · Score: 2

    rember sony has different sub company's what music does has no effect on what there gaming does. but yes it did hurt there name. its also true there all bought $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ but son removing other os to block hackers was a last resort wile wile it only efected very few who used the feature it also did not help a aruldy damaged name. Microsoft has been pushing there agendas on people for a wile now just to see how far they can take it and now they know the line they cannot cross. even windows 8 is doing bad not just because of the ui but secure boot and there shit store all bought locking your hardware to them. btw all my boxes are win 7 or linux and when win 7 dies all linux. at that point linux will be a dam solid os anyways it got steam after all.

  33. They listened to Sony by Mystery00 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It wasn't "the people" they listened to, it was the sounds of Sony destroying them at E3.

    --
    "we've got trenchcoats and bad attitudes" - John Constantine, HellBlazer