Slashdot Mirror


Florida Law May Accidentally Ban Computers and Smartphones

GrueMaster writes "Did Florida ban computers and smartphones? They tried banning Internet Cafes, but the wording in the law is overly broad. '... it's the wording that's problematic, as it defines a slot machine as "any machine or device or system or network of devices" that can be used in games of chance. Turns out the Internet is full of gambling sites, which is where the definition runs into some problems. Consuelo Zapata, owner of the Miami-Dade county Internet cafe Incredible Investments, LLC, is suing the state (PDF) to overturn the ban, saying that definition is too broad and could be applied to any number of electronic devices. "

155 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. florida's governor is a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    fuck Rick Scott.

    1. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by sabri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would abstain from the profanity used, but I think that banning internet cafes should be susceptible to a constitutional challenge.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    2. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I meant he was a criminal *literally*.

      Go look at his record as a corporate CEO.

    3. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by eric31415927 · · Score: 1

      I find Internet cafés most helpful for tourists. It doesn't make sense to (try to) pass laws against them. I was in London recently and could web browse easily enough with my tablet. When it came time to compose an email, I was very happy to find an Internet café with computers having full size keyboards.

    4. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I meant he was a criminal *literally*.

      Go look at his record as a corporate CEO.

      I don't think "criminal" was the profanity that he had in mind

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think "criminal" was the profanity that he had in mind.

      Well what the fuck was the profanity he had in mind?!!!

    6. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Georules · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The internet cafes in Florida are not like internet cafes in countries outside of the USA. The computers there were literally there to be gambling machines. One such "internet cafe" near me was called "Lucky Day Internet Sweepstakes." I have also been to some of the internet cafes in London and found them to be convenient as a tourist.

    7. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is because you don't understand what is being called an "internet café". There are places here that call themselves "internet cafés" who offer "games" which are actually nothing more than slot machine parlors using virtual slot machines running on PCs.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    8. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "internet cafe's" are not what you think of as an internet café. Basically, these are slot machine casinos. You can't get on the internet to check your email or visit a random website. All the computers are essentially virtual slot machines.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    9. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Randle_Revar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This sounds like the story in, where was it, Ohio? Where "Internet Cafe" was basically slang/cover for "illegal casino".

    10. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Georules · · Score: 1

      Making gambling itself legal is a different issue entirely. It is illegal at the moment, and these shops were providing it illegally.

    11. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Same thing, different location.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    12. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by dgatwood · · Score: 1, Funny

      When it came time to compose an email, I was very happy to find an Internet café with computers having full size keyboards.

      And the eighteen people who now have your email password are very happy, too.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by DragonTHC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well Florida is the "right to scam" state.

      As a naturalized FL native, I can honestly say I've seen scammers at work. I've contracted for scammers, I've been stiffed contracting payment by scammers. I've been paid by scammers for legitimate work.

      Florida is the place everyone comes to bleed through investors before opening up a new LLC when the money runs dry. I've seen it in at least 3 separate occasions over the past 10 years. Some businesses will change names and locations when they stiff too many people. They still called to get new cables run for their new offices.

      Lest you forget about FL pill mills.

      So when the state tries to ban Internet cafes, despite the verbiage being off, it's a good thing. Such businesses exist only to scam people.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    14. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by sg_oneill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Im convinced half of these laws that get passed don't get passed through a competent lawyer to validate and check. So many utterly ludicrous laws get passed that completely violate constitutional protections or are so poorly written they practically handball themselves to completely arbitrary interpretation by possibly hostile judges all of which a simple rewording by a competent lawyer could correct.

      I mean how many times do laws get passed banning porn only to get bounced by the courts who by now are surely bored silly with conservative (and under obama occasionally progressive) politicians who havent bothered to even glance at the constitution

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    15. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by pipatron · · Score: 1

      That's not the point of the law. The point is to be able to taxate the losses so that the state gets its cut. One could say it's a "stupidity tax".

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    16. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      So ban that instead of banning what they did ban, if they need to ban something.
      Actually they don't need to ban anything. The world will keep running. It's only Florida.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    17. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      http://flalottery.com/

      Florida's legislature can go fuck themselves. Gambling is either bad or it isn't. If the government is running the largest gambling operation in the country and then turns around an makes other types of gambling illegal, they're doing nothing more than eliminating competition.

    18. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by bieber · · Score: 1

      Actually, they were providing it legally. Which is the "problem" this horribly drafted law set out to "solve" in the first place.

    19. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is Florida, if they were to pass a law against axe murderers it would probably ban lumberjacks and the whole state would end up covered in trees.

    20. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you(Georules) are a bit wrong there, because of the amount of money bet each time, from 8~25 cents, it was perfectly legal. unfortunately one of the owners behind a chain of these gambling places was supposed to be giving most of the profit to veterans, but was doing no such thing. The group of people who had stakes in these places were shut down and arrested for fraud. This was a big step in shutting these places down, I think they should have just been converted to regular internet cafes such as those found in other countries.

    21. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So why not call them what they are and then see if that classification falls into a bannable category? The way it is at present they could all re-emrge as "supermarkets of fortune" or some similar name. Then the next law will ban supermarkets. Continue looping round various names and bans until everything is illegal in Florida.

      Surely the reason that language has different words, is to apply them to different things? Not just to allow lawyers ti weasel out of complying with an intention.

    22. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by trentfoley · · Score: 1

      Please explain to me what is a "naturalized FL native". Does it have anything to do with hanging chads?

    23. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Georules · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. I'll admit I actually do not know anything about what the laws are on gambling, I just assumed they were breaking them. Regardless, the only point I really hoped to make is that these "internet cafes" are not internet cafes.

      There is no demand here for internet cafes like those found in other countries -- I've seen businesses like that start and fail many times. People bring their own devices and expect to use free wifi. I even see many homeless people bring in netbooks to McDonalds, buy an oatmeal for a dollar, and sit down to use the free internet connection.

    24. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Isn't he the one who pushed for all people on welfare to be drug tested....by the company his wife owns? Cha-ching!

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    25. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was very happy to find an Internet cafÃf© with computers having full size keyboards.

      Did you happen to notice if those establishments also supported Unicode?

    26. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Now, be fair. They thought they were voting for Pat Buchanon.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    27. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well what the fuck was the profanity he had in mind?!!!

      "Rick Scott"

    28. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by bfandreas · · Score: 2

      Yep. What we need is more ATF SWAT teams breaking down doors. Busting low-stakes friendly poker games alone don't justify massive spending on law enforcement. Also privately run prisons aren't anywhere running near capacity and there clearly aren't enough of them.
      There clearly is a need for Stephen Seagal driving a tank through the window of an internet cafe.

      Do new laws not get checked if they are clearly worded and can only be used for what they are intended for? The sheer amount of sloppyness in the legislative branch boggles the mind. And since these are laws they need to be followed. And since they make no sense they fill up prisons.

      What about that kid who is in custody since February for making hateful, stupid remarks online without even having had his day in court? He could be facing up to 10 years based on anti-terrorism legislation. They even set his bail to 500k. For an 18yr old internet troll! On a level that would qualify for a year of community service and no prior convictions on his record.

      Overily broad anti-internet cafe laws, my ass. Overly broad legislation full stop. Legislation has left the realm of common sense and each and every existing law has to be checked if the wording and the use fit the intent of the legislative at the time.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    29. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Cenan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It should be possible, without a law degree, to deduct the laws of a society directly from common sense. If that is not possible, law makers have failed. Full stop. Problem now is, that whenever a hole in a legislation is found, it is patched with more text, not rewritten. This creates a demand for people who can read obscure texts (lawyers, who are otherwise completely useless to society), but more dangerously, it also creates a system in which you can't be sure you are following the law, even if you're just going about your business.

      And once someone breaks one of the obscure laws, revenge is enacted (as opposed to justice) and a prison gains a new resident. Without regard for the fact that a prison is little more than a higher education in criminal conduct. Fixing problems is not on anyone's radar, filling prisons is, because it makes you look tough on [whatever] and let's face it, the person was a criminal, so who cares? There is no incentive to fix the problem, because if crime went away completely you would have to come up with a new topic to appear tough on. Crime is easy, because everyone agrees that it's bad, and that the solution is to take the criminals off the streets, not examine what lead to them becoming a criminal to begin with (and that is even ignoring all the people who didn't know they were committing a crime to begin with).

      --
      ... whatever ...
    30. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by drkim · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they pass this they will have to eliminate voting machines in Florida, since the way they work their voting is a "game of chance."

      Could be good for the rest of the country...

    31. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by dj245 · · Score: 1

      That is because you don't understand what is being called an "internet café". There are places here that call themselves "internet cafés" who offer "games" which are actually nothing more than slot machine parlors using virtual slot machines running on PCs.

      Ah, so they run World of Warcraft and Diablo III then.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    32. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Actually, in many Indian Casinos here in Oklahoma that's all they are, windox boxes running some software. I've seen them bluescreen to NT, and one of my friends is a network admin at a large company that provides these systems and the pretty large network that runs them all. Many of them build odd off of each other, like the huge Wheel of Fortune and such, all of those are tied together for the jackpot.

    33. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by Jaysyn · · Score: 2

      Yup, he's a total scumbag.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    34. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by Lissajous · · Score: 1

      Ah, so they run World of Warcraft and Diablo III then.

      *clap* *clap* *clap*

      You, sir, win one Internet*
      ----------
      *Except in Florida, where winning an internet for posting on /. would be considered the proceeds of unlicensed gambling.

    35. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Yeah because everyone who uses a computer after me also has either my phone and unlock code to get to Google authenticator or the pad of 10 one-use passwords in my wallet; just because you can't be trusted to use a public computer safely doesn't mean no one else can.

    36. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Really? The couple I checked out, neither had wifi and there was no way to break out of the games.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    37. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I meant he was a criminal *literally*.

      Go look at his record as a corporate CEO.

      I don't think "criminal" was the profanity that he had in mind

      I agree, it was probably the words "Rick Scott".

    38. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Shortguy881 · · Score: 2

      The Florida Lotto pays for the Bright Future Scholarships. That pays for every Florida high school student to go to college in state for 50%, 75% or 100% off, and its not hard to get. Yeah, terrible shame.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    39. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Common sense is a myth.

    40. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      And any time someone in a political discussion resorts to the phrase "common sense" it means "I don't have anything better to go with here."

    41. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      mod parent up! Do *not* welcome your lawyer overlords!

    42. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      No, TX governor Rick Perry is a _total_ scumbag. Tried to make it a requirement that all adolescent females receive HPV vaccine, which just happened to be produced by one of his big campaign donors. Both offenses are disgusting examples of political graft, but somehow, forcing medical procedures on children, especially by a governor who is, in public, so big on "freedom", seems especially twisted.

    43. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Is that his Christian name?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    44. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That doesn't make it a good thing. (My tuition was paid for by a combination of Bright Futures and grants.) Bright futures is not needs based, it's merit based. Consider that buyers of lotto tickets are generally poor, trying to hit it big and that socioeconomic background is well correlated with academic merit. Therefore, the bright futures program is simply wealth redistribution from the poor to the already rich. It's completely ass-backwards. A strong progressive tax structure funding it would make much more sense.

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    45. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      If that's the only thing you can hate the governor for, there's others who've done worse who are far more deserving of your scorn. Do you think mandatory vaccinations are unusual?

      Have you tried living in NYC recently?

    46. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      90% of the residents of FL came from other places, in my case, New Jersey when I was 4.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    47. Re: florida's governor is a criminal by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Even if it does, who says he was actually logging into his email account rather than a server that merely passes on the credentials and remains logged in after he leaves? I mean, sure, they might not have his password, but they can probably change it. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    48. Re:florida's governor is a criminal by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > Have you tried living in NYC recently?

      Perfectly safe....if you are white, dress professionally, and have an appropriately submissive attitude towards the police.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  2. Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Florida is a stupid as Texas, and twice as swampy.

    1. Re:Florida by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 3, Funny

      By my reading of the summary, it seems to me that a coin (which can be used in the noble game of Two up) would be considered a "Device that can be used in Games Of Chance."

      Not only have they banned computers. They seem to have banned currency. I wonder how they will pay the police to police this.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    2. Re:Florida by TheReaperD · · Score: 2

      I wonder how they will pay the police to police this.

      Prepaid debit cards.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    3. Re:Florida by PPH · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they will pay the police to police this.

      They'll have to raise their wages so they can pay them with some of that fancy folding money. Or .....

      ..... Bitcoin.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Florida by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 2

      No football coin tosses?

    5. Re:Florida by mirix · · Score: 2

      Cards are banned too.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    6. Re:Florida by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      "Bitcoin. If you cant hold it, you can't flip it."

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    7. Re:Florida by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      By my reading of the summary, it seems to me that a coin (which can be used in the noble game of Two up) would be considered a "Device that can be used in Games Of Chance."

      Not only have they banned computers. They seem to have banned currency. I wonder how they will pay the police to police this.

      'Device that can be used in Games of Chance' would seem to cover all RNGs and all but the most trivial PRNGS, as well. Luckily nothing important uses those.

    8. Re:Florida by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Given the volatility of exchange rates, that could be considered gambling too.

    9. Re:Florida by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Tennessee might be a good contender. They've something of a track record for passing stupid laws, a strong creationist presence, and a lot of barely-concealed racism.

    10. Re:Florida by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Even worse, simple machines such as the lever fall into this as well!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:Florida by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Any and all matter can be used in games of chance. Luckily for Florida, physical laws don't have to obey civil laws or Florida would suddenly cease to exist.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re:Florida by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The rot goes deeper than that... Regardless of whether those pointy-headed intellectuals end up deciding that the universe is fundamentally stochastic at some low level, and basically all matter is fundamentally suited to games of chance, or they end up deciding that it's fundamentally deterministic; but with limits to observability, in which case the designers will have to work a little harder; but basically all matter is fundamentally suited to games of chance.

      Florida itself presents any number of exciting betting opportunities!

  3. Computers are a passing fad by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They will be forgotten in a few years...

    1. Re: Computers are a passing fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Breaker, breaker, 192.168.1.1

    2. Re:Computers are a passing fad by trentfoley · · Score: 1

      So, are you saying I should upgrade from 23 to 40 channels on my CB? I was wondering if I should just go for something with upper and lower sidebands. :)

    3. Re:Computers are a passing fad by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      640k computers should be enough for everyone...

  4. Penalties for bad wording by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People responsible for crafting laws should be penalized for poor and vague wording.
    Even if it was unintentionally vague (I suspect it is frequently intentional, too).

    1. Re:Penalties for bad wording by sjames · · Score: 1

      They and their family should be forced to live up to the letter of their stupid law.

    2. Re:Penalties for bad wording by sjames · · Score: 1

      So it is your contention that the Republicans like Obama too much?

    3. Re:Penalties for bad wording by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      People responsible for crafting laws should be penalized for poor and vague wording.
        Even if it was unintentionally vague (I suspect it is frequently intentional, too).

      They are subject to public ridicule, having their law overturned in court, and being tossed out of office by voters. If they go for the gold they could be caught up in corruption charges. Of course a politician being a disgrace doesn't really seem to matter to some voters. These two still seem to find enthusiastic audiences.

      Lupica: Sleazy New York politicians Spitzer, Weiner just refuse to stay away

      Endgame: New poll shows Anthony Weiner leading in race for NYC mayor

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Penalties for bad wording by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Ban hands so they can't play Rock, Paper, Scissors, Lizard, Spock.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:Penalties for bad wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just imagine if George W. Bush had tried to issue decrees like he was some sort of king. The howls would have deafened us all.

      Why imagine? Google "signing statements". There was plenty of howling, at the time Republicans were howling back about a unitary executive who was tasked with implementing the law (or not) as he sees fit.

      Those of us who thought it was a bad idea then and a bad idea now are just stuck voting third party and hoping the rest of you wisen up.

    6. Re:Penalties for bad wording by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      People responsible for crafting laws should be penalized for poor and vague wording.
        Even if it was unintentionally vague (I suspect it is frequently intentional, too).

      Often laws under a jury system are designed to be vague catchalls. This is because the jury is there to act as the final check on whether the law should actually apply in each individual case. Juries do not just decide whether the person did something, they also decide on guilt as well and that is more complicated and includes an element of whether the actions of the defendant should actually be a crime.

      The best examples of wide reaching vague laws are usually found in the laws pertaining to military secrets and espionage.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  5. Banning loose change? by Tea-Bone+of+Brooklyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Talk about overly broad, isn't a coin a device that can be used in a game of chance?

    1. Re:Banning loose change? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Decent programming? Every time I turn on the TV it's a gamble whether or not the actual channels will still be there. History channel: gone. AMC: gone. Space: gone. Peachtree: gone. BET: gone. Spike: gone.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Banning loose change? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      You have to pay the cable/satellite bill if you want to keep them...

    3. Re:Banning loose change? by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      Or the guy at the pawn shop.

    4. Re:Banning loose change? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You have to pay the cable/satellite bill if you want to keep them...

      Ha Ha! Seriously, though. Rogers has been eliminating channels from their basic cable lineup for the past couple of months. They're switching everything over to digital.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Banning loose change? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      I had no idea any major locations were still doing analog cable. Seattle and Corvallis, OR are all digital for years now. I figured if Corvallis was, most places were.

    6. Re:Banning loose change? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you used a wheel? Lever?

      Oops, you're a criminal!!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  6. Just the -idea- of making internet cafes illegal by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Its mind boggling. Hey! They have a whole lot of hotels in Florida. MOST of them will have a complimentary computers to use in an office setting. Are they going to ban those computers so they cannot be used in Internet gambling? That will make an impression. It will impress people that Florida is braindead.

  7. It can't be a conspiracy by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    I thought everything that government did was well planned and orchestrated, directed by the corporations that own everything, including politicians. Next thing you know, somebody will challenge the idea of the all powerful military-industrial complex that has had its share of resources in the US budget reduced from 38% of GDP in 1945 to ~ 4-5% today. That is crazy talk.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:It can't be a conspiracy by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Yes, but by the same token you don't need to have corruption for idiocy to occur either. People make mistakes, but due consideration can help reduce them. That is why the current trend of the US Congress passing 2,000 page bills without giving members of Congress a chance to read and digest them before a vote is such an appallingly bad idea. These bills are often being changed up until the last moment and written with the help of outsiders. There is no way that anybody can read them, there is no way that anybody can understand them and consider the consequences. I think it is exceedingly dangerous to democracy, liberty, transparency, and good government.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:It can't be a conspiracy by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "There is no way that anybody can read them."
      tell that to a linux kernel, i'm running a vm with several cores and 7233 bogomips. 7 billion instructions per second that is suitably fast enough to read and understand the meaning of the words spewing out of Washington.

    3. Re:It can't be a conspiracy by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      LOL, I think you're an optimist. Awk! I've sed too much already. Look! Perl!

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:It can't be a conspiracy by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Congress is a job just like any other, only everyone is the Pointy-Haired-Boss.

      In this case the silly PHB is that any Congressman has been able to read and understand every bill he votes on at any time since Lincoln took office the Federal government got really activist. At that time technology started getting complex, the government started regulating it more, the government got into more areas, etc. More importantly lawyers got a lot more picky, so bills are basically unreadable to anyone who isn't intimately familiar with the exact sections of the US Code they deal with.

      Since then a Congressman's job has been mostly to be an expert in a handful of areas (aka: his committee) and understand the bills his committee works on. He should probably avoid reading every bill, because even if he's actually a lawyer he's probably not familiar with the exact language of the US Code that's affected by the Bill, therefore it would take him hours to figure out what his staff can tell him in 15 minutes.

      More importantly bills change up until the very last minute. There are 435 of them. They have a $3-4 Trillion government to oversee. The 435 of them have gotten used to brinksmanship as a negotiating strategy, so refusing to vote for a bill unless it's changed at the last minute is just something they do.

      Now maybe if we passed a Constitutional Amendment mandating clear language, including a no-BS clause so future Supreme Court Justices couldn't pull a Scalia and insist the exact dictionary definition of every damn word wasn't the only possible legal interpretation; while greatly increasing the number of Congressman (and thus reducing workload per congressman), we could pull that off.

      But you're never gonna get rid of interest groups writing legislation. Democratic Congressman like unions, if they wanna pass a bill that helps unions they are going to ask the unions what they want in it. Republican Congressman hate unions, if they want to pass a pro-business bill they are gonna ask the anti-union activists what to put in it. In other words outside interest groups get to write the bill. Period.

      Voting for a third party doesn't solve the problem, it merely changes the interest group writing the law. Greens are gonna be in the Sierra Club's pocket, Libertarians would tow the Cato line, etc.

      It's Democracy. Getting into power requires 50%+1. That means special interest groups that can credibly speak for large groups of people (ie: unions with large membership) have power.

    5. Re:It can't be a conspiracy by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      You do realize that particular section of the law was proposed in June 2012, so you're basically whining that you were too stupid to read the bill until after it passed?

      More importantly you do realize that in only applies until September, which means Monsanto is actually telling the truth when they say it will simply allow a farmer to finish growing crops he plants this year even if some activist group convinces Courts to order a re-do on seeds the government has already approved?

      Most importantly, good on you for posting this as an AC. "Bribe" is a specific legal term, which has no relation to campaign contributions, therefore you have just committed libel.

  8. They did it on purpose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is florida, afterall.

  9. Accidentally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you sure?

  10. This _AND_ sex by tgetzoya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://gawker.com/5800990/did-florida-accidentally-ban-sex So, what is there left to do in Florida? Die?

    1. Re:This _AND_ sex by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Delivering a turned calf makes the rancher/vet a sex offender, as does, I suspect, any of the common methods of artifical insemination used by same.

    2. Re:This _AND_ sex by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Old pople have sex too, you know.

    3. Re:This _AND_ sex by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Although humans are animals, the act does allow exceptions to the ban on sexual contact with animals in the case of animal husbandry and conformal judging. So... sex for procreation is allowed, as are biggest dick contests.

    4. Re:This _AND_ sex by mark-t · · Score: 1

      What.'s illegal in OK? Old people having sex?

      Somehow I don't think that's enforced, if accurate.

      Thanks for the chuckle though.

  11. Fark by bmo · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are reasons why Florida has its own tag on Fark.

    This is one of them.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Fark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are reasons why Florida has its own tag on Fark.

      This is one of them.

      --
      BMO

      The State of Florida banned from the Internet? ...and nothing of value was lost.

  12. Problem solved! by sjames · · Score: 1
  13. Stop distinguishing smartphones & computers by Bradmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please stop drawing a distinction between smartphones and computers (and tablets). They are all computers. Allowing the farce of distinction to survive is a major part of the reason smartphones can be classified as "applicances" and don't have to follow laws about openness and intercompatability.

  14. uh, yes its making internet cafes illegal by Marrow · · Score: 1

    I guess the rich dont need to use the cafes. But hey, I bet they are pretty handy for someone who didn't grow up with a computer. No setup fees. Maybe a little free help. No big startup cost on a fixed income. A reason to get out of the house. If there is any state in the union that should have them, its flori-duh.

    With one signature, Internet cafes in Florida close
    Effect on workers, patrons immediate when Scott makes bill law

    http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20130411/BUSINESS/304110024/With-one-signature-Internet-caf-s-Florida-close?nclick_check=1

    1. Re:uh, yes its making internet cafes illegal by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should visit one of these "internet café's". It would be amusing to watch you try to go online and visit Slashdot or check your email, because one can't. As you have never seen or experienced these places, you are going on the name they are using. They aren't calling themselves casinos, slot parlors, gambling dens, etc. because those are illegal. Instead they are using virtual slot machine software on networked computers. There is no general internet access.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:uh, yes its making internet cafes illegal by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      If these internet cafes were the kind of thing you describe they would not have any customers. Why? Because Florida has libraries. Libraries are free. It would be like running a book rental business, and sweetening the deal by offering to teach your customer's kids to read.

      The article you quote describes patrons as being heart-broken because they'll lose access to "entertainment, socializing and "legal gambling"," quotes around "legal gambling" in the original.

  15. Re:Stop distinguishing smartphones & computers by amirulbahr · · Score: 2

    Applicances are not intercompatible with appliances and intercompatability between the word 'compatibility' and the prefix 'inter' is dubious at best. As is any claim you make.

  16. Broadly defined... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

    "any machine or device or system or network of devices" that can be used in games of chance.

    Anyone driven a car in Florida? Going to the grocery store is a game of chance down there. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  17. Re: Stop distinguishing smartphones & compute by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I draw the distinction based on whether someone else's permission is required for a given program to execute. Android devices are computers; iProducts and game consoles aren't.

  18. Hysterical nonsense. by Wdomburg · · Score: 2

    This is roughly as stupid as when people claimed Florida banned sex a couple years ago. Read the bill. It clearly refers to devices that perform gaming function on activation; not general purpose devices.

    Common sense, people. What is more likely? A hundred and forty legislators voting to ban computers, or a bogus lawsuit with a silly premise?

    1. Re:Hysterical nonsense. by Roogna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Florida? You obviously don't live here.

      I'd go with A hundred and forty legislators voting to ban computers. A lot of them really are that bad at their jobs.

    2. Re:Hysterical nonsense. by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      Read the complaint. The business was shut down because it had a legal game promotion; it didn't run an internet gambling site.

      The Patriot Act clearly refers to stopping terrorism. That doesn't change the fact that it is primarily used to go after drug crimes.

    3. Re:Hysterical nonsense. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      What is more likely? A hundred and forty legislators voting to ban computers, or a bogus lawsuit with a silly premise?

      Is this a job interview question?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Hysterical nonsense. by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      The entire point of the new law is that the Legislature thought the old law was way too permissive of gambling, which means that her claim that her cafe was legal is not actually an argument against the new law.

      And, yes, if she got shut down she was running a gambling site. What happened was people came into her cafe and bought time on computers. The programs on the machines were games of chance. If you win you get more computer time. At the end of the day whatever computer time you have left turns into cash.

        It's possible her computers were actually connected to the internet, and the user could actually run a web browser. But that was not true of all "internet cafes" in the state. In the minority where you could use the computer as an actual computer nobody bothered because Florida has public libraries where you can browse the web for free. The business tactics used by these places could be really sleazy. I saw at least one news article about a cafe operator who had a competitor beaten up.

      It's possible that the law the Legislature passed does all the bad things she is alleging, but given the sleaziness of anyone involved in the industry, and Governor Rick Scott's proven ability to manipulate the legal system,* I'm thinking it's unlikely Scott fucked up this badly. It's much more likely the Internet Cafe business wants to go out with a bang.

      *He defrauded Medicare of Billion$, and the only consequence was that he got a $9.88 million forced retirement. Then the people who most depend on Medicare made him Governor. The man's a fucking genius.

  19. Simple solution ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... is to file charges against the governor for possessing these now-illegal things.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  20. ...that can be used in games of chance. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

    Just means they can't be used to compile C++ in Florida.

  21. Re:Is Florida filled with cunts? by JustOK · · Score: 1

    No, it's not filled with cunts. There's alot of dinks there too.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  22. Re:Is Florida filled with cunts? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    You may call the pensioners, but yes, same thing.

  23. Re:Just the -idea- of making internet cafes illega by Georules · · Score: 1

    The "internet cafes" near me (I'm in Florida) are certainly not there to be used as you would expect. You go in to buy credit to play games on the machines, which only have gambling programs. The definitions in this bill, and the word "internet cafe", are all being improperly used here. These shops were quite literally for gambling. The one closest to me was called "Lucky Day Internet Sweepstakes." I did see one where you could also browse the internet hourly, but this was clearly not the primary focus.

  24. OK. Who had ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... Florida in the pool for the next stupid law?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  25. I live in Florida by Andrio · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm breaking the law just by posting this :o

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  26. They aren't really "internet cafe's" by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, these aren't the kind of internet cafe' one can go to and get on-line and check one's email or visit a web site. The computers only have gambling program(s) and it is basically a virtual slot machine. These places don't even offer wifi so you can bring your own computer. They are, in effect, illegal casinos.

    Second, the law specifically defines the establishments and computers. It only applies to computers which are set up to ONLY run programs that are games of chance and the establishments that have them.

    Third, the reason the law talks about internet cafe's is because that is what these places call themselves.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:They aren't really "internet cafe's" by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I've never actually seen one of these places. Where are they typically found? I live in the Miami area and the closest thing I've seen to an Internet Café was a place in a mall that had gaming PCs set up so you could play games, basically a pay-by-the-hour LAN party.

    2. Re:They aren't really "internet cafe's" by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if they are only for purpose of gambling, then they are already banned. if they advertise the gambling service and only offer gambling service... are florida cops just stupid or paid off? a slot machine doesn't turn into a non-slot machine because it has a keyboard and a mouse.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:They aren't really "internet cafe's" by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      It's a loop hole in the law. This law is a (very bad) attempt to plug the loop hole. It has to do with how the machines are operated and how they operate. It's stupid, but it is another example of the law not keeping up with technology.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:They aren't really "internet cafe's" by Talennor · · Score: 1

      I just saw one while driving through Ocala. I don't know when this started, I don't live in the state anymore. It said "Internet Cafe" but was shady looking like a strip club. I was wondering about it until I was told it was for gambling.

      --

      //TODO: signature
    5. Re:They aren't really "internet cafe's" by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Come up to Cleveland. Go to any area where the most popular businesses are pawn shops or liquor stores. Pretty soon you'll find an "internet cafe."

      I've never been in one, because high local taxes = great libraries = why the fuck would you pay money to rent a desktop, but the signs out front all talk about games and gambling winnings.

    6. Re:They aren't really "internet cafe's" by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      It does if you define a slot machine as something you put money in, which then spits out money.

      These slot machines don't take in any money, but can only use them if you have computer time (which costs money), and spits out more computer time. At the end of the day you trade in your computer time for money.

  27. I'm sure it's been said... by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it's been said already, but I just wanted to say, on behalf of the remaining Internet: THANK YOU!

  28. Re:Just the -idea- of making internet cafes illega by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    An article describing these "Sweepstakes" parlors http://www.businessweek.com/printer/articles/55670-the-casino-next-door

    BTW, I found this URL in a previous /. post, http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3638315&cid=43421823

  29. New York by Kunedog · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    In their rush to infringe on the 2nd Amendment, New York unwittingly banned cops from carrying certain guns earlier this year:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NY_SAFE_Act#Criticisms

    Poorly thought-out authoritarian extra-constititutional power-grabs aren't solely a left- or right-wing thing.

  30. gaming ban? by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    All the computers are essentially virtual slot machines.

    Then why can't the police just charge them under *existing* anti-gambling laws?

    I don't trust Rick Scott or FL Republicans....seems every law passed in these places must have a secret second purpose that kicks back money/power to conservatives and their allies.

    Who is benefitting from this 'internet cafe' ban?

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:gaming ban? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Because the places operate carefully in order to not meet the exact legal definition of a gambling establishment, even if they are one for practical purposes. It's one of those instances of someone circumventing the intention of a law by finding a way not to violate the exact wording.

    2. Re:gaming ban? by Jaysyn · · Score: 2

      Who is benefitting from this 'internet cafe' ban?

      If I had to guess, dog racing tacks & the Florida lottery.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:gaming ban? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      It is another example of the law not keeping up with the times. New tech created a loop hole and theses people are exploiting it. Who benefits from the law? Basically, the old and the poor. These places are almost exclusively in low income neighborhoods and mostly elderly neighborhoods. The victims of these places don't understand the technologies. While the machines are effectively slot machines, the operators call them sweepstakes. But, the "sweepstakes" involves multiple locations and the "player" hitting a button at the right time. But, there doesn't have to be winner where one is playing. Of course, how do you tell if there is ever a real winner?

      The only winners in these places are the operators.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:gaming ban? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Then change *that* law.

  31. Cafe owner was running a gambling den by Camael · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Before you jump to defend the internet cafe owner, read his complaint. The "internet cafe" was a disguised gambling den.

    TLDR:-
    1. Their computers all carry a "Game Display" programme.
    2. Buying internet time entitles the user to participate in sweepstakes where they can win prizes. The more time you buy, the more chances you get to join the sweepstakes.
    3. The "Game Display" was expressly created to, in their own words, "instill in the patron a sense of excitement and entertainment".

    Yes, the law is overly broad and should be reworded, but in this case it did not get the wrong victim.

    Having said that, the politicians appear to be equally dirty. There is some suspicion that this legislation was about politicians covering their butts and keeping legalized gambling interests happy.

     

  32. This is strange by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    If gambling is illegal in Florida, why are people still allowed to bet on Wall Street? It's just another bookmaking operation

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  33. Accident? by Horshu · · Score: 1

    Computers are tools of science, so maybe Florida really did intend on banning them.

  34. A worse law: by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    A newer law seeks to ban anyone who admitted themselves for a phyc eval from owning guns, whether you passed or failed....

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  35. Here we go again. by IanPhillips · · Score: 1

    Another government screwup, so what's new?

  36. Re:Just the -idea- of making internet cafes illega by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    This isn't about making internet cafes illegal, it's targeted at the small gambling rooms that lure mostly old people.

    but you can't actually ban one without the other.. well you could ban advertising gambling sites on the machines and the rooms the machines are in.

    in fact, it's probably already banned? so why don't they enforce it?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  37. Greece was first to do this, in 2002 by psymastr · · Score: 1

    The Greek government passed a similarly broadly-worded law in 2002 , also in its attempt to ban the games of chance (slot machines) that had infested cafes, pool halls and internet cafes. The wording of the law banned all video games, whether of chance or of skill, and whether they were played at home or at a business.

    The article I'm linking is exaggerating; nobody was arrested or charged for playing video games at home (although the law allowed the authorities to do so). What the law really did was to eradicate all arcades, even those that had no slot machines. Want to play Pac-Man, Metal Slug and/or Street Fighter? Sorry, no go. Arcades started re-appearing more than five years later, even though the law is still in effect as far as I know.

    Technology + lawmakers = stupidity. And we're not talking about cutting edge technology here, we're talking arcade video games that have been around since the 70s.

    --
    Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
  38. It's Part of the Criminalization of Everything by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    This is precisely what they intended, with "selective enforcement" being the tool of oppression.

    A tyrannical State makes everything illegal, but "lets it slide" for friends of the State. I just read "Three Felonies a Day" by Harvey Silverglate, and it was a real eye opener. You would be amazed at all of the stuff that we do every day and take for granted as being legal, that isn't, and could result in federal prison should the State decide it.

    The title of the book basically says it all - the average American unwittingly commits three serious felonies every day of their lives.

  39. Everyone is a criminal, by design by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

    That's the goal of far too much legislation. This way law enforcement always has something they can charge people with that they don't like and lets everyone else go about their business. We no longer have a "rule of law" in this country, we have a "rule of staying on law enforcement's good side." In all likelihood, you committed 3 felonies yesterday and will do so again today:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471504574438900830760842.html

    When I see my local politicians doing this, it just shows how much they like the current setup:

    http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/ken-cuccinelli-virginia-oral-anal-sex-sodomy

  40. Dice? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

    Hell, that wording probably bans dice. No D&D at the local game store, I guess.

  41. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Florida shouldn't be allowed to make laws of vote. Seriously. They make California look good.

  42. Life is just not that simple by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It should be possible, without a law degree, to deduct the laws of a society directly from common sense.

    It should be possible but in practice it (unfortunately) is not. Our society is too complex and there are too many corner cases for any non-trivial problem to keep things simple. Furthermore you and I might very easily differ on what constitutes common sense and even if we do agree we could easily come to differing conclusions based on the exact same facts. I agree with you in principle but the real world just isn't as simple as you and I would like it to be. If you write a general rule trusting to "common sense" to fill in the details what you will end up with is a bunch of corner cases and people taking advantage of loopholes and causing problems until such time as the law is sufficiently clarified either through legal precedent or additional laws. The complexity will inevitably come.

  43. Doesn't this ban human beings? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    According to the Florida Senate's website, section 849.16 reads:

    (1) As used in this chapter, the term "slot machine or device" means any machine or device or system or network of devices that is adapted for use in such a way that, upon activation, which may be achieved by, but is not limited to, the insertion of any piece of money, coin, account number, code, or other object or information, such device or system is directly or indirectly caused to operate or may be operated and if the user, whether by application of skill or by reason of any element of chance or any other outcome unpredictable by the user, may:

    (a) Receive or become entitled to receive any piece of money, credit, allowance, or thing of value, or any check, slug, token, or memorandum, whether of value or otherwise, which may be exchanged for any money, credit, allowance, or thing of value or which may be given in trade; or

    The human brain and auditory system is a machine or device (both mechanical, through the eardrum, and electronic, because of the signals that pass along neurons) that can be activated (through a user saying "I bet you ...") and the user may receive or become entitled to money if the condition of the bet (which may rely upon an outcome unpredictable by the user) is satisfied. So unless the State of Florida has defined "machine" and "device" to exclude things with an organic component, which I'm guessing they have not done, a human being would satisfy the definition of "slot machine or device" according to a very technical reading and interpretation.

  44. Florida lottery is right by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I had to check for myself to verify they had one, but yeah...ugh the state Lottery...

    http://flalottery.com/

    for what it's worth they have Monopoly branded lottery tickets

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  45. Florida Man by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    Florida Man bans smart phones, computers, and the Internet!

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  46. Re:OK I'm lost by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

    In the US an internet cafe is not a place you pay money for time on a desktop. In my experience such a business would be absolutely useless, because local libraries in both states I've lived have free desktops with free internet connections.

    In Florida these "cafes" were basically gambling dens. You'd go in and buy an hour. This does not give you access to Internet Explorer, but it does give you access to a bunch of slot-machine like games. You click the buttons on the games, and you could win more internet time. If, at the end of the day, you still have internet time they refund it to you on a debit card.

    Technically under the laws of Ohio, and Florida prior to the ban, you haven't gambled. But in practical terms you bought a bunch of bets on a slot machine and it paid off (or it didn't).

  47. Re:Run by Democrats... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

    Which way is this post funnier:

    1) The OP knows that the GOP holds all state-wide elected offices in Florida, a 76-44 edge in the House, and a 26-14 edge in the Senate.

    2) He doesn't.

  48. Re:Florida lottery is right -- off-topic by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    Brings back memories of trips to my Grandma's house in Florida when I was a little kid. She had a list of all the winning numbers from the last X months of drawings. Then she would let me pick the numbers for the next go. I never did better than two. I'm pretty sure that set me up for a lifetime of nerdy math and stats obsession.

  49. So the answer is to ban them all? by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Whats the matter, is it too difficult to send in a undercover cop and bust the bad ones? They have to ban them all? Extend that logic a bit and know horror.

    1. Re:So the answer is to ban them all? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Do yourself a favor and read the fucking law, m'kay? Read the definitions they use and specifically what it says. There you will learn the law doesn't shut down internet cafe's that actually provide internet access. It only effects the ones running claimed "internet sweepstakes".

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  50. Ah, so there is no viable market ? by Marrow · · Score: 1

    I guess its ok then to make sure there cant be one. Forever.

    1. Re:Ah, so there is no viable market ? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Read the law carefully.

      If your primary purpose isn't gaming you're legal.

  51. Ban the lottery then as it is "Games Of Chance" by davidorourke · · Score: 1

    "it defines a slot machine as "any machine or device or system or network of devices" that can be used in games of chance. " I think they do not realize they are also banning the "State Lottery" Since it is a system or network of devices that is used in games of chance. I think they better rethink the wording in that law. or no more education funding......hmmmm

  52. Banning what can be used in games of chance by dakra137 · · Score: 1

    >> "any machine or device or system or network of devices" that can be used in games of chance.

    Besides card tables, this also includes Candyland and other board games with spinners or dice. The entire game is a "system."

    One way to get the governor voted out of office would be for the state to ban the dreidel.

    This is also a way to prevent any more Wheel of Fortune roadtrips to Florida.