Slashdot Mirror


Limitations and All, Chromebooks Appear To Be Selling

puddingebola writes "A number of different websites are commenting on NPD's consumer research numbers that claim Chromebooks are getting 20-25% of the sub-$300 PC market. From the article: 'The NPD says that Google's Chromebook has now gained 20 to 25 percent of the sub-$300 laptop market in the U.S. That's a huge gain for a computer that's only been on the market for two years. It's even more impressive when you consider that Chromebooks were seen as nothing but a self-serving experiment on the part of Google for the first year of their existence.' Stephen Vaughan-Nichols is also blogging about this over at ZDnet. While the PC market shrank again in the second quarter of 2013, Chromebooks seem to have grown."

40 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Love mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Got a Samsung ARM Chromebook. Perfect little netbook. Boots in 5 seconds, all day battery, 1 kg, plenty fast, does everything I need it to do. Can load linux in chroot environment if I want/need more functionality (hardly ever do). Prefer it to a tablet for browsing and media consumption.

    1. Re:Love mine. by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same. Picked one up for the gf for Valentine's Day. She's loved it and hasn't found any issues that she's irritated with. So, last week, I bought one for myself. Since I do all my writing in Google Docs, anyway, and all I want to use it for is writing and researching shit I'm writing, I didn't see an issue. As you mentioned, all day battery, lightweight, fast boots, I'm pretty tickled with it. And it was $250. If it gets stolen, it's much easier to fork out $250 than buying a new Macbook Air.

      I still have a "primary" laptop that I use for gaming/heavier work. But I don't need to carry that everywhere with me.

      If I could submit a feature request for the next iteration of this Samsung, it's to add a backlit keyboard. That'd make it perfect.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  2. most people never wanted local storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Outside of a minority of technically minded folks, most people never wanted local storage in the first place. They don't want to understand it, manage it, back it up, or deal with it in any way. That simple fact is one of the key drivers toward cloud computing, web apps, and away from the local-storage model of computing.

    People's data is generally safer in the cloud than locally. Yes, yes, we all know that those service can go away. But the fact is that even so, it's still safer than Joe Schmoe trying to keep his data safe locally.

    So the market is pushing heavily in this direction, driven by the demand of the consumer masses. It's a slow transition over time, but eventually, that's going to be where the economies of scale are. Sure, workstation-type computers will still be available for the few people doing CAD, etc, but they will be far more expensive and not generally purchased by most of the general public. This is already starting to happen, and it's only going to accelerate.

    I know very few people who really want a PC any more. They virtually all prefer tablets, smartphones, and so on.

    1. Re:most people never wanted local storage by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Outside of a minority of technically minded folks, most people never wanted local storage in the first place. They don't want to understand it, manage it, back it up, or deal with it in any way. That simple fact is one of the key drivers toward cloud computing, web apps, and away from the local-storage model of computing.

      If that is so then why do 2 terabyte harddrives sell like hotcakes?

      People's data is generally safer in the cloud than locally. Yes, yes, we all know that those service can go away. But the fact is that even so, it's still safer than Joe Schmoe trying to keep his data safe locally.

      Most users use the same minimum length easily guessable password for all of their online accounts, There is no way you can call that safer.

      So the market is pushing heavily in this direction, driven by the demand of the consumer masses. It's a slow transition over time, but eventually, that's going to be where the economies of scale are. Sure, workstation-type computers will still be available for the few people doing CAD, etc, but they will be far more expensive and not generally purchased by most of the general public. This is already starting to happen, and it's only going to accelerate.

      And how pray tell are they going to get there data to the cloud? I know many nontechnical people with hardrives filled to the brim with assorted movies, music, pictures, documents and more throwing a few gigs in the cloud is easy moving terrabytes of high def home vaccation video, is going to take forever assuming you isp doesn't cut you off for using up you data allotment. I have friends that like to remix music there is no way in hell cloud music vender's like Pandora or spotify are going to let you touch their music library and let you make you own remix how is he to get the music if he depends only on the cloud to provide? the cloud suffers many problems from licensing, to cost, to security, to privacy, to bandwidth/data allotments, and more. the only real problem it fixs for the average joe is remote access.

      The home pc is going to become a hybrid of pc/workstation/home server. it is not going anywhere. It is just not going to be replaced as often as it was before.

      I know very few people who really want a PC any more. They virtually all prefer tablets, smartphones, and so on.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:most people never wanted local storage by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Outside of a minority of technically minded folks, most people never wanted local storage in the first place. They don't want to understand it, manage it, back it up, or deal with it in any way. That simple fact is one of the key drivers toward cloud computing, web apps, and away from the local-storage model of computing.

      Everyone wants local storage. The non-technically minded folks just don't know it. The only drivers towards cloud storage are marketing hype, marketing hype, and more marketing hype. "Cloud" is the new "E-".

      People's data is generally safer in the cloud than locally.

      Safer from what? Hackers? The NSA? I think yuo aer confusssed.

      Sure, workstation-type computers will still be available for the few people doing CAD, etc, but they will be far more expensive and not generally purchased by most of the general public.

      Oh, I see now. Its still the 1990's, and the desktop PC is still dying. We'll all be going back to the client-server structure.... any day now.....

      I know very few people who really want a PC any more. They virtually all prefer tablets, smartphones, and so on.

      That's funny, because everyone I know already has a smartphone, and the few who also have tablets found they can't actually do anything with it, and still use their PCs/Macs.

      The death of the PC is being predicted by retarded market analysts who look at PC sales instead of PC ownership. PC sales are down for multiple reasons:
      1. 5 year old PCs are still fast enough
      2. windows 8 is terrible
      3. we are (still) in an economic depression

      Big companies WANT us to buy shit computers that can't do anything, because then we'll HAVE to use gay "cloud" apps for everything, and pay monthly fees for the privilege. It's the first step in instituting a 21st century techno-serfdom, with IP owners replacing the land-lords of old.

      Don't think so? Wade through the annoying and insulting Office2013 install process, and then tell me Lord Balmer isn't telling us piss-ants to get back to the turnip fields.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    3. Re:most people never wanted local storage by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everyone wants local storage. The non-technically minded folks just don't know it. The only drivers towards cloud storage are marketing hype, marketing hype, and more marketing hype. "Cloud" is the new "E-".

      I had an application that had a cloud option and someone convinced the CEO he needed it. So we go through the hassle of migrating the data for it and first week out, the internet goes down for 3 days. Construction site cut some lines. So we got a redundant connection and have it fail over. Only the static IP is different now so the certificates need to be swapped out when it goes to the other internet source. Not a big deal.

      I lost the account to someone who underbid me. A storm came through and dropped a tree on the side of the building, they had to relocate temporarily. I get a call asking me to help with this and of course I did so (while charging a premium). Creating new certificates and getting the app working was the first and easiest thing to do. One server with local data was damaged in the move. It took 2 days to get everything moved and wired and 26 terminals wired with about 10 hours being dedicated to restoring local data and binging up the damaged server. They were finally able to work again.

      Both have advantages and disadvantages and both can be shown to be the best way. In the situation I described, outside of the 10 hours repairing a server, neither had a compelling advantage. If you have a reason- like it does what you want it to do, then use whatever fits that purpose. For me, the redundant internet connection and paying someone to transfer files is reason not to go cloud. Others might not mind.

      Safer from what? Hackers? The NSA? I think yuo aer confusssed.

      From data loss. No more "my computer died and now I lost 20 years of digital photos along with all the letters written to my now dead grandmother".

    4. Re:most people never wanted local storage by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are increasingly more people who aren't replacing their PCs with another PC when they die, but rather with a tablet.

      When that time comes, I'm thinking more along the lines of replacing all my gear with a granite marker, or maybe a small urn.

    5. Re:most people never wanted local storage by donaldm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly. Chromebooks are not anything like a PC. It is a dumb terminal connected to remote resources controlled by a third party.

      While I have not done an exhaustive study on Chromebooks I find that in many ways they are very similar to a PC since they do have a disk drive (SSD), USB ports and WiFi which means you can store basic data on the drive and copy, move or read/write your data to a USB connected disk drive or another networked device (ie. Remote Services aka "the Cloud", or a PC). For people who want portability and long battery life Chromebooks are excellent however they don't have a huge amount of internal storage so you will not be able to install a large video library on them unless you put your library on a USB connected hard drive which will reduce battery life.

      And yes, compared to MS Windows 8 it probably is a success.

      I would not call "Windows 8" a failure although IMHO it is one of the worst GUI's I have ever seen. Basically if you purchase a new Laptop/PC you are normally going to get MS Windows 8 as the Operating System although it would be interesting to see how many MS Windows licenses were purchased by people wanting to upgrade the OS on their PC.

      But compared to hardware people want, it is not.

      I think you will find that the majority of people that want a portable PC like device are going to want either a tablet (PC or Apple), laptop (PC or Apple), smart-phone (Android or iOS) or a Chromebook and while a laptop may be the more flexible it normally has the worst battery life. Basically if you have an Android or even iOS phone and are happy with it but would like a larger screen with excellent battery life and a convenient application store then a tablet or Chromebook is a serious contender.

      Please note I did not mention a Microsoft Smartphone since it's GUI is more in-line with MS Windows 8 which is definitely different to the Android or iOS GUI's.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    6. Re:most people never wanted local storage by sirlark · · Score: 2

      I have to disagree. The two biggest reasons for a home PC in 80's and 90's were text document writing and gaming. In that order. Parents wanted the first, kids used the PC for the second. That a changed slightly with after the endless September, including two more uses: email and web browsing, again in that order. Tablets and phones etc STILL SUCK for writing documents. It's not just the lack of keyboard; the biggest issue is cutting and pasting. When my folks want to write a letter (yes an actual letter) to their local ward councillor, they go back to the laptop every time. Drafting a will, writing a letter to the paper/lawyer/bank/etc, printing out documents; These are all things that are still a regular enough occurrence to make having only a tablet infeasible. Tablets are fundamentally bad at facilitating text generation larger that a quick email, and as a society the written word is still enmeshed far too deeply with our lives for us to say that no one ever needs tow rite anything longer that a quick email.

  3. It was me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, only about 100 of them, but a small blip. I'm wondering how many of these were sold to schools or for other mass consumption functions. As a school principal, I see that chromebooks--limitations and all--are still a much improved value over a $1200 windows laptop. (yes $1200 after the kid-proof warranty). I know i could roll my own, but I would rather bring back my librarian, nurse, music teacher, and instructional aides before hiring a sysadmin to make linux laptops go.

    Chromebooks have all the "it just works" of a mac at 20% of the cost. They are tamper-proof out of the box and lightning fast for 99% of things that students use the computers for.

    The only thing I think is a gaping limitation is the lack of IP printing without a middleman. It's kind of stupid that i need to have an XP machine running somewhere in order to print. Organizations looking to supplement their hardware options with chromebooks shouldn't need to buy special printers to go with them.

    1. Re:It was me. by fiziko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a teacher who was about to say what s/he said. Our students already use Google Docs for their work, so these make a great, cost-effective fit that eliminates a lot of the educational environment security headaches.

      FYI, we circumvent the printing issues by having students share documents with staff accounts when they are ready to submit. The staff can either print or mark and comment online through the existing format, depending on whether a printout is really needed. Doesn't scale well for large student loads, but it's enough for us.

      --
      - W. Blaine Dowler
      http://www.bureau42.com
    2. Re:It was me. by blackest_k · · Score: 2

      There isn't really a need for special printers any printer will do, my printers are not directly supported but anything that can run the chrome browser , eg linux mint for example is capable of being a gateway for existing printers.

      For my android devices they can use googles cloud printing service which routes to my netbook which hands the job over to my nas which has the physical printers.

      It's a pretty good system to be fair as your unlikely to run into the unsupported printer problem. What you are actually asking for would be for a 100 / x number of chromebooks to be configured to use each individual printer.
      Sounds like a lot of work to me even assuming you don't miss any.

       

    3. Re:It was me. by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      The only thing I think is a gaping limitation is the lack of IP printing without a middleman. It's kind of stupid that i need to have an XP machine running somewhere in order to print. Organizations looking to supplement their hardware options with chromebooks shouldn't need to buy special printers to go with them.

      Just buy a better printer. A lot of newer ones support practically every print protocol available - from de-facto lpr/lpd, IPP, AirPrint, Google Cloud Print (for Chromebooks, this is what you need), Bonjour, Windows, ...

    4. Re:It was me. by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Needing to buy a better printer somewhat detracts from the Chromebook's "low price" appeal. Having to add £100 to the cost of a £350 purchase is no small thing.

  4. Chromebook is the ultimate in MOMputing by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2

    I have one, and it is pretty good for what it is. I think I am going to pass it down to my mother.
    Just about no effort to admin the machine, fast enough, and simple.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  5. Chromebook == Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chromebook == Awesome

    Bought my mom one when they first came out. A year later she accidentally stepped on it, ruining the power connector. They cheap enough that I just decided to buy her a new one. She logged in and all her stuff was just there. Completely seamless. And of course, I don't have to worry about her getting viruses.

    I almost bought the new ARM Chromebook instead of a new Macbook Air, but I had to go with the Air and OS X so I could run examination software. Chromebooks definitely rock, though. I spend most of my day in terminal windows. I still use mutt for e-mail, and tin for reading newsgroups, when I'm not working or browsing the web. The ARM Chromebook is like a dream come true. I'm pi$$ed I was stifled by the man.

  6. But it IS self-serving by CajunArson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Chromebooks most certainly are self-serving products for Google. Just because they aren't selling on the same scale as Android doesn't make them charity devices.

    To really use a Chromebook do you need to have a Google account? Yeah?

    Will you be bombarded with ads? Sure?

    Are the two complaints I just listed above huge bones of contention for Windows 8 & 8.1 (substituting Microsoft's online services for Google's)? YES.

    So just because the Google version is "free" does that make it insanely great while a Windows machine is full of spyware? Not necessarily. A Chromebook running real Linux is nice, but a better-specced Windows notebook that also runs real Linux can be quite a bit nicer.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:But it IS self-serving by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think that anybody is arguing that Chromebooks aren't a self-serving product for Google, just that they are a popular-with-users self-serving product for Google.

      As best I can tell, Google has diffused most of the serious-nerd hate by making it pretty trivial(not supported as in 'sure, we'll be happy to do customer support for your custom linux distro'; but supported as in 'there are official directions on how to bypass the Google-Blessed payload and boot your own') to turn them into quite competent(and very cheap) full linux machines if you don't like the 'chromebook' stuff, and the less serious end of the market (A) doesn't actually care all that much and (b) is choosing between multiple self-serving products, not between utopian products and self-serving products.

      Microsoft can't kill off its legacy OSes overnight, so scoring a Win7 system isn't rocket science; but 8 and 8.1(doubly so for RT) make it abundantly clear that the Redomond Future is app stores, Microsoft accounts, and Skydrive integration. Over in Cupertino, your iOS device makes the app store and Apple Account Exciting and Mandatory!, while your OSX device starts at $1000(barring only the mini, which isn't portable and doesn't even come with pack-in peripherals, making it a questionable buy for consumers, though attractive for lab/kiosk type work) and makes it increasingly clear that anything outside the app store is a second class citizen. Plus, of course, be it Windows or OSX, probably a good half of the users are going to have Gmail open pretty much all the time anyway, so they aren't exactly shying away from Google even if they choose otherwise.

      None of the major vendors give a damn about your desire(if you have one, and a good many people don't) to be free of the mothership, so it's understandable why Google's limited(but stalwartly idiot-proof) and crazy cheap offering would be popular.

    2. Re:But it IS self-serving by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Find me one product in any market that is not self serving.
      Buy a dozen eggs, the farmer not only uses the money to feed the chickens, but his own children as well as buying new shoes and maybe some beer.
      Its all self serving.

      And your discussion of nice and nicer without reference to price is totally non-helpful.

      The real problem that I see with chromebooks and the whole cloud storage issue is that the law basically says anything left un-accessed for 6months is abandoned, and fair game, and doesn't even require a warrant.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:But it IS self-serving by farble1670 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Will you be bombarded with ads? Sure?

      nope?

      if you never visit a google site, you'll never see a google ad on your chromebook. they don't insert ads at the OS level.

  7. How big is the market? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen these percentages reported a lot of places, but I have yet to be able to find anything that lists actual sales numbers. Without knowing how big the market for sub-$300 PC market is, it's a meaningless measurement. For example, if 50 million sub-$300 PCs were sold, 25% is a really respectable number. If two million sub-$300 PCs were sold then the 500,000 total sales are quite disappointing.

    1. Re:How big is the market? by Xenoproctologist · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, if you look at the article's source, you get this gem:

      Chromebooks still remain a small portion of the total U.S. market for laptops and netbooks. The devices had about 4 percent to 5 percent share in the first quarter, though that was up from 1 percent to 2 percent in 2012, according to Mikako Kitagawa, an analyst at Gartner Inc.

      So, if the laptop market was ~33m units in Q1, that puts Chromebooks at ~1.5m for the quarter, which is the first thing approaching an actual number I've seen on Chromebook sales. Not sure how that spreads out between Samsung, Acer, and HP.

    2. Re:How big is the market? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Still pretty solid numbers though, certainly nothing to be sniffed at. While overall it may be a small percentage of total laptop tales for a handful of individual models it's rather good. The year-on-year growth rate is also very strong.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. Can't see much of a downside by transporter_ii · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Linux-based Netbooks were killed by MS right when they were fixing to take off. Maybe this means we are finally to a point MS can't just kill off competitors easily any more.

    Chrombooks don't make much sense to me...but it seems like a good thing that someone can launch something with a OS with a tiny market share, and it actually sell well enough to keep making them.

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  9. Sounds good until Google pulls the plug by dugancent · · Score: 2

    They wouldn't do that, though. Would they?

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    1. Re:Sounds good until Google pulls the plug by James+Carnley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, they wouldn't.

      Killing Reader doesn't mean Google is shutting down all of their products. Reader is the only "important" project they've shut down and that's only because we are all nerds and used Reader constantly. Most people on the internet don't use RSS or even know what it is.

      Chromebooks are one of the major pieces of Google's ecosystem. There's no way they will be shut down or neglected unless Google completely changes its business model. At that point we will have more to complain about than Google shutting down a few products.

  10. Perfect 2nd Machine for Business Travelers by McGruber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I fly a lot for work --two roundtrips per month-- and have been carrying my Chromebook as a second machine, to supplement my corporate laptop. Being a corporate machine, I do not have admin rights to the laptop and my employer tells me they reserve the right to monitor what I'm doing with it, so I assume the laptop has spyware on it.

    The Chromebook gets used for my personal stuff in the evenings, when I'm in my hotel room - I figure that my employer doesn't need to know what I'm buying/selling on ebay, nor do they need to know what political sites I read, nor do they need to know what stories I'm submitting to slashdot.... nor do they need to know that I prefer big breasted brunettes.

    When flying, I almost always sit in tiny "economy class" seats - the chromebook works well in those seats. I can actually open it up and actually type on it while sitting on a plane, even tiny regional jets. I usually can't open my corporate notebook up on a plane because it is too big to fit between me and the seat in front of me.... and that's before the jerk in front of me reclines back into my space.

    The Chromebook also came with a dozen free Gogo passes. Gogo passes were costing $14 each, if I remembered to buy them prior to my flight.... so the dozen free passes were worth $168 to me. All in all, I consider my $250 Samsung Chromebook was money very well spent.

  11. Sub-$300 notebook/netbook by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Chromebooks are about all that's left in this price range, aren't they?

    I couple years ago I bought an Acer Aspire One with Win7 loaded on it, but if I walk into a big box store, I only see Samsungs and Acer C7s (which are just rebadged netbooks from a year ago).

  12. Neighbor bought one by JoeCommodore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He's definitely not a nerd, and just a windows guy.

    He likes it, he says its nice and light, cool, and runs quite a long time on the battery. Most of what he does is just internet stuff so that works.

    He cant print directly to his printer, but he can go through his windows PC. Mainly he sees it as a great travel laptop as if its taken he can recover via Google and its not a major financial loss. I think for those who have a desktop and need a capable yet inexpensive travel laptop, this will probably hit the mark.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  13. Cap by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People's data is generally safer in the cloud than locally.

    At $10 per gigabyte to upload and $10 per gigabyte to download over a cellular network in the United States, this safety has a substantial cost associated with it.

    1. Re:Cap by farble1670 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At $10 per gigabyte to upload and $10 per gigabyte to download over a cellular network in the United States, this safety has a substantial cost associated with it.

      1. if you don't have access to broadband, this isn't for you
      2. if you need to transfer a substantial portion of your total data each month, this isn't for you

      in other words, it's for almost everyone.

    2. Re:Cap by CronoCloud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Two words.

      Unlimited data.

      The kind of people who would make their tablet their primary device are those who would pay for unlimited data

    3. Re:Cap by readingaccount · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Never in my life would I have expected Slashdotter of all people to be promoting living in the Cloud and giving away all control over your data to a corporation. Sure, the needs of regular folk are likely less than what we'd require, but it's still a fundamental issue of control that we shouldn't' be promoting.

      Responsibility requires effort, but empowers the user. To basically give away that control simply because it's "too hard" to know how your files are saved and where on local storage, smacks of going backwards.

    4. Re:Cap by farble1670 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      never in my life would i have expected a slashdotter to promote keeping *your money in mutual funds* and giving away all control over *your money* to a corporation. To basically give away that control simply because it's "too hard" to *store all your money under your matress* and keep track of *where it is buried in the yard*, smacks of going backwards.

      sounds pretty stupid now doesn't it?

      i'm not going backwards, i'm just in touch with reality. people like you have drawn an arbitrary line in the sand with cloud storage. everything about you is already stored online. your medical records, your credit card history, your tax history, your financials, and so on. all under the control of corporations. but you think if you keep those pictures of your son's 5th birthday party, that no one gives a flying poop about, on a local disk instead of the cloud, you are somehow "under control"?

  14. Chrome books are great. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    It is basically a iPad minus all the sexy touch screen things. Built on solid reliable technology using well understood tested input devices and formats. And more open too. No wonder it is growing. I am actually thinking of getting a second and a bluetooth keyboard+thumbwheel to serve as the streaming device for the home theater. It has HDMI out and works with Amazon videos, Netflix.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  15. Patience by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Much like MS can afford to introduce something that is a loss at first, Google can too.

    They see a long term plan for these as more and more people move into the 'media consumption' arena, but still want an attached keyboard.

    Personally i'm glad we have more ARM options.. i'm tired of x86.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  16. Works OK by sk999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I picked up an Acer C7 to keep at a second office for occassional use. For what I do, Chrome OS doesn't cut it, so I installed the Chrubuntu distro in a separate partition. The only real complaint, I guess, is that the keyboard is cheap and doesn't have much "feel" to the keys. Lots of other minor complaints (Unity stinks, Gnome 3 stinks) but managed to work around them all. Wired ethernet and VGA connector for external display were used heavily (sorry Samsung, you don't have either - a big negative.) Biggest surprise was that the Celeron processor actually has decent performance.

    Having said that, my intent was actually to see if Chrome OS could be tweaked so as to do all the things I need, and the chroot'ed version of Linux may be the way to go to get new software installed. A project for the future.

    1. Re:Works OK by hazem · · Score: 2

      I have an Acer AO756, which has nearly identical specs as the C7, except it came with Windows 7 and not Chrome (and was therefore more expensive). However it was easy to just install whatever Linux on it I want.

      Does the C7 not allow you to do that? Just wipe the drive (or install a different one) and put whatever you want?

  17. Here's my magic formula for travelling.. by VValdo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1 Samsung Arm CB + x2go + Chrubuntu (13.10 xubuntu) =

    full access to running programs on my home Linux PC from anywhere, with HUGE battery life, at less than 2 lbs and $250. With x2go I can run applications remotely, and the chromebook only has to handle the UI, not the actual processing. As a result, I can run Intel apps and it feels pretty fast, even from 2000 miles away. If the computer gets stolen, it's only a loss of $250 as opposed to the thousands a lightweight laptop would cost, and the data is on my home computer, not the cb...

    x2go btw is amazing, tunneling linux application's interfaces through ssh, so they feel like they're running on the chromebook, but aren't. If you can set up ssh, you can set up x2go.

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  18. Using it less and less by Cobonobo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bought a Samsung ARM Chromebook a few months back. While it's absolutely perfect for web browsing on its own and its battery performance is exemplary, I find myself using it less and less. It's not because I mislike the machine, nor is it that I cannot do the majority of my work in a browser, it's simply that I prefer to have separate applications for separate tasks. I now just use a netbook with Arch Linux instead. I still recommend the Chromebook openly, though. It's a fantastic device with excellent build quality for the price and, as a web browser, it's not to be beaten any time soon.