Slashdot Mirror


The Middle East Beats the West In Female Tech Founders

PolygamousRanchKid writes with this except from the Economist: "Only 10% of internet entrepreneurs across the world are women, according to Startup Compass, a firm that tracks such things. Except in Amman and other Middle Eastern cities, it seems. There, the share of women entrepreneurs is said to average 35% — an estimate seemingly confirmed by the mix of the sexes at 'Mix'n'Mentor,' a recent gathering in the Jordanian capital organised by Wamda, an online publication for start-ups. Reasons abound, and they are not always positive, says Nina Curley, Wamda's editor. Although more than half of university graduates in many Middle Eastern countries (51% in Jordan) are women, the workforce is dominated by men (women provide only 21% of it overall, and a paltry 16% in Jordan). The internet, however, is a new space that is more meritocratic and not as heavily male. The technology also lets entrepreneurs work from home, making it easier to raise children."

88 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. 3. ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems that the cultural contribution of the West that Middle Eastern women should wear less hijabs and more bikinis has not, surprisingly, been a primary vector for women to reach equality in high-status tech roles.

    Perhaps the secular plan should be filled-out a little better in implementation, before being forwarded as an essential requirement to leave behind their primitive religion, with all the benefits that seems to be failing to entail.

    1. Re:3. ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Breastpounding of this being a western influence aside, if the times for women to be tech founders in the ME is now, then as a result it will be more popular and more will do it (and this is all good) but that does not mean it is a lasting effect, it could level out much lower than in the west or it could level out much higher, only time will tell - but for now we should be happy for the people who now have one more choice of path to make their life better.

    2. Re:3. ??? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      TFS indicates that this is due to sexism holding women out of traditional jobs, leaving starting your own tech company as the only possibility, and you somehow interpret that as a negative for secularism? Wow.

  2. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Says the person who uses arabic numerals instead of the more cultured roman ones.

  3. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And the U.S. beats the world in sending drones to kill people.

    Point?

    You have a case of obviously asymmetrical warfare, and you attack the necessities of what's available on their side of the economic asymmetry, and praise the means of death we use on the rich side of the asymmetry.

    If we had a war where one side had muskets and the other arrows, you'd probably be praising the innovativeness in killing of the guys with muskets and reserving special outrage for the "savages" using killing-by-arrow...

    Oh wait.

    Yes, you definitely aren't alone, demographically or historically. Still, remains unarguable fact you're all ridiculous hypocrites.

  4. Arab potential by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Up to about the years 1200-1400 the Arab world was pretty cool. While we Europeans were living in an age appropriately designated the Dark Ages much of the Arab world was doing cool math, Cool science, Exploration, trade, arts, and medicine. They were fairly tolerant of other religions and were one of the few bright spots on this planet. Then around 800 years ago it all seems to have gone wrong. "Trouble in the Middle East" has been a newspaper headline since the invention of the newspaper. Personally I would love to know what changed 800 years ago as it might give a clue as to how to make it right again. Maybe lots of female internet entrepreneurs is a step in that direction. I wonder if there were more female entrepreneurs in the middle east 1000 years ago?

    So all I can say is good luck!

    1. Re:Arab potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If by "tolerant of other religions" means "forcing other religious groups to pay a poll tax" then I guess that's true. And that was in that 1200-1400 bracket, and of course in that same period those same "peaceful people" were slaughtering, ransacking and still persecuting people in Spain after the Umayyd Conquest of Hispania nearly 500 years earlier. It really hasn't been any different at any point in time over the last 1500 years. People were slaughtering each other, by the time muslims finished up in the 1300's, they'd killed, captured or slaughtered anyone who was in a semi-advanced civilization and were riding on the coat tails of them. Until the smart people dried up, or fled to other countries.

    2. Re:Arab potential by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      If by "tolerant of other religions" means "forcing other religious groups to pay a poll tax" then I guess that's true.

      Meanwhile, in most of Europe, the Christians were busy killing anyone who disagreed with them, sometimes with spectacular methods like burning at the stake. Yes, paying a tax was far more religiously tolerant than their contemporaries.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Arab potential by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, in most of Europe, the Christians were busy killing anyone who disagreed with them, sometimes with spectacular methods like burning at the stake. Yes, paying a tax was far more religiously tolerant than their contemporaries.

      And meanwhile in the muslim world, they were burning people alive, quartering them, and throwing them out in the desert with no water when they committed heresy. And if you refused to pay the poll tax, they killed you. Also to note, that said religious minorities had a weaker standing in all laws, but still ranked higher than women.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Arab potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also to note, that said religious minorities had a weaker standing in all laws, but still ranked higher than women.

      "Had?" In the past tense?
      Take a look at the current traffic fines if you happen to kill men and women of various religious backgrounds. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diyya#Saudi_Arabia
      In Saudi Arabia, when a person has been killed or caused to die by another, the prescribed blood money rates are as follows:[9]
                      100,000 riyals if the victim is a Muslim man
                      50,000 riyals if a Muslim woman
                      50,000 riyals if a Christian or Jewish man
                      25,000 riyals if a Christian or Jewish woman
                      6,666 riyals if a man of any other religion
                      3,333 riyals if a woman of any other religion

    5. Re:Arab potential by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Personally I would love to know what changed 800 years ago as it might give a clue as to how to make it right again

      Civilizations are suprisingly like any living creature: they rise and collapse. Do not only look at collapse reasons, the raise reasons may also be insightful.

    6. Re:Arab potential by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then around 800 years ago it all seems to have gone wrong. "Trouble in the Middle East" has been a newspaper headline since the invention of the newspaper. Personally I would love to know what changed 800 years ago as it might give a clue as to how to make it right again.

      I know I'm going to get mod-bombed to hell and gone for this, but christianity happened. There's an old African proverb, "Once we had the land and the white man had the bible. Now we have the bible and the white man has the land." The Arabs were busy unlocking scientific secrets and storing up knowledge during that time out of necessity -- it's not a forgiving land. It has limited resources, and if you aren't smart about managing it, you die. Generations of resource scarcity meant that their culture stressed history. The first written languages came from the same region. Moving from a barter economy to a cash economy also came from there. And the thing is, this knowledge was shared -- it wasn't kept secret, or considered blasphemous per-se. Not like it was in Europe where the idea that the Earth wasn't the center of the universe nearly got Copernicous nailed to a cross anyway.

      The Christians made numerous attempts to send armies into their lands -- and failed each time. But although the military campaign failed, the cultural changes that contact with them brought was ruinous to their civilization in the long-run. Think of it as being a bit like how America reacted to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 -- they really hadn't much exposure to terrorism before, so their first real taste of it caused a massive overreaction that has crippled the economy, sent millions into poverty, and triggered far-reaching changes in their way of life. But in reality, it was just a couple dozen guys who knocked down a few buildings. It did more damage though than fifty hurricanes.

      There's plenty of other historical examples too -- Japan and China's isolationist policies, for example. When America steamed into Japan, they forced them to open their borders, and thousands of years of culture caught fire and burned in a matter of years. Similar things have happened to China repeatedly when people have crossed the mountains into their territory.

      Cultural contamination is what brought them down -- specifically, from European christians.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    7. Re:Arab potential by Nimey · · Score: 2

      No, it was really the Mongols sacking Baghdad that brought an end to the Islamic golden age and the rise of fundamentalism.

      It's not unparalleled - in the Old Testament we see incidents of the Jews picking fights with bigger countries, losing, and deciding that they had lost because they'd been too socially liberal so they'd lost their god's backing, followed by a wave of fundamentalism.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Arab potential by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      You are viewing the history from a slanted angle. Yes, there were Crusades, but so too were there significant inroads by the Turks and Arabs before them into Europe. Recall that most of the Middle East was a set of Christian Eastern Roman Empire provinces when the Arabs attacked in the 7th Century. Christianity didn't "happen" to the Muslims, Islam happened to the Christians. It's just that they were fighting back ever since.

      Aside from in Spain, the most territory that the Crusaders every got their hands on was between the First and Second Crusades in the late 11th to early 12th Centuries. By 1250 or so, the Crusader states were pretty much history.

      On the other hand, the Turks steadily attacked into Anatolia and the Balkans well into the 17th Century, and were still considered a major threat into the 18th. Constantinople fell in 1453. Trebizond in 1461. And Vienna was under siege in 1683. All of these moves were aggressive Ottoman actions into the heart of Christian Europe.

      Please don't get the impression that some Christians with red crosses on their tabards spelled the end of Islamic civilization. Ottoman and Arab society in general broke down under it's own weight, and they had plenty of time at the top, despite some petty Crusader states that barely controlled the cost of Palestine.

    9. Re:Arab potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the cited article above, they mention this:

      And he who kills a believer accidentally must pay Diyyat to the heirs of the victim except if they forgive him.

      Now, this part unwittingly explains why honor killings are not crimes in the Muslim world, since believers are the property of their relatives. Therefore, if someone kills his wife/sister/daughter/mother, then the sentences for it are pretty light, if at all. And the new Sharia regimes that are coming up - including the one that's attempting to take over Syria with Western support - are seeing to it that honor killers do not get ANY sentences AT ALL, since the Quran allows them to kill their relatives.

      Some of these women entrepreneurs (ha!) had better make sure that they're not degrading their family honor by their innovation (bida), which is another strict no-no in Islam

    10. Re:Arab potential by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I was attempting to be kind to the poster I replied to before hand, but that's pretty much the point.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:Arab potential by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      The West had the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Enlightenment. The Middle East had a few attempts at secularism (most notably with Ataturk), but for the most part has remained stuck in the past.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    12. Re:Arab potential by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That's impossible to say for sure, and IMO hard to justify. The Mongols had conquered pretty much everyone they contacted until Europeans (specifically the Hungarians, IIRC) figured out that light cavalry (as the Mongols were) couldn't deal with castles.

      At this point the Islamic world had fractured quite a bit and the Abbasids (rulers of Baghdad) were much reduced from the height of their power. They were also not the primary Islamic nation in contact with the Crusaders - those were the Ayyubids based in Egypt & controlling the Levant. The Abbasids only controlled part of modern Iraq.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  5. Re:Oh yeah? by jythie · · Score: 1

    I don't know, it is still a pretty popular one.

  6. Dr. Tyson has a fairly good bit on it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1te01rfEF0g

    In particular the part you are interested in starts at 23:45, though the overall segment starts at around 19:20.

    The short version? Religious fundamentalism.

  7. Re:Oh yeah? by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    Says the person who uses arabic numerals instead of the more cultured roman ones.

    Except, of course, that the name is somewhat of a misnomer; since they actually come from India, and are known as "Hindu numbers" in the middle east.

  8. Re:Feminism by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

    In Britain, feminists are campaigning for this practice to be made part of the law, and the government are supporting it. I wrote about it in this article.

    --
    Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
  9. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even though we call the numbers we use in the west 'arabic', they are actually hindu.

  10. Also had female head of state before most of us by terjeber · · Score: 1

    Pakistan, a fairly radical islamic country had a female head of state before the vast majority of western democracies... Just sayin'.

    1. Re:Also had female head of state before most of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Might be more impressive if her daddy wasn't prime minister before her.
      Political families don't impress me much.

  11. Re:Feminism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm confused ... help me out here.

    Men have testicles, which means we have significantly higher levels of testosterone coursing through our veins compared to women.
    Now, testosterone gives rise to certain characteristics:

    * men are larger, stronger and faster than women
    * men also have a much higher libido (sex drive)
    * however testosterone means that men also more violent, aggressive and risk-taking

    Given all this, shouldn't men get LIGHTER sentences than women for most crimes?

    On the one hand, how can a society chemically castrate men for sex offences, and on the other hand deny lighter sentences due to hormonal influence?

    Meanwhile, women have successfully used PMS (menstruation) as a legal defense
    Even the government-funded Australian Institute of Criminology has written about PMS as a legal defence (PDF)

    Can anyone explain the double-standards to me? Anyone?

  12. gender/class/ comfort by redwagonfive · · Score: 1

    This is interesting. It may be the harsher conditions that limit options, and part of it is likely class. Part of it may be the acceptance of over-the-top misogynistic behavior in some Western tech communities is constrained by tighter constraints on speech overall. The US is doing terribly at inclusion of women in cs and engineering. The percentage of women in engineering and in CS peaked in the eighties and continues to decrease. Microsoft being cool with a rape joke for Xbox One and the widespread acceptance of rape not only as a trope for every female character in gaming but also as a trivializing verb is part of the problem. Gender hate speech in tech culture is a problem in the West, I do not know if it is a problem in tech forums in other languages. The same sexual repression that harms women may have a minor positive secondary effect in the prohibition of the explicitly sexually violent language. In India, for decades nearly half the engineering classes have been female. So there is a significant pipeline issue. If women are 50% of the graduates and 35% of start-ups, well that is better than the numbers here. (About 14% in EE last year, about 3% of start-ups.) Another possible explanation is that these are places where rape is more endemic and there are more women is start-ups. The happy idea that the internet is a gender-free meritocracy is funny to anyone with access to a search engine. However, if some people are actually prevented from traveling alone outdoors, either by law in Saudi or by threat of rape, then doing your own start-up is one of fewer employment options. So women may be driven to this. Constraints on women working with men in some cultures may mean that there can be no situations where one woman gets a team of men. A college education is much more of a luxury good in these countries. A much much smaller percentage of the population has a college degree. Thus, those with those degrees are more likely to have access to capital to have a start-up; even if it is as simple as having housing, health insurance and subsidized Internet. This is interesting. There are many possible explanations. Perhaps we could learn something applicable locally.

    1. Re:gender/class/ comfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just how many women are raped in computer games?
      I know what you're thinking: just 1 woman is 1 too many. And you'd be right in thinking that.

      But in contrast 99.9% of victims in computer games are men, and these men are routinely:

      * eaten alive
      * burnt
      * drowned
      * cut in two
      * shot by regular guns
      * shot by plasma rifles
      * shot by arrows / javelins
      * blown-up
      * stabbed
      * crushed
      * ejected into the vacuum of space
      * ripped apart
      * dropped into acid
      * electrocuted ... shall I go on?

      You see, men are the disposable gender. Society is hyper-sensitive to violence against women (oh noes, that scene implied that the woman was going to be raped) but doesn't react to violence against men.

      Heck, even "Funniest Home Videos" -- a show aimed at the whole family -- routinely shows clips of men being struck in the testicles. Could you imagine a regular segment dedicated to women having elongated objects thrust against their vaginas? With canned laughter played in the background?

      You are right about one thing, redwagonfive: there are double-standards in this world.

    2. Re:gender/class/ comfort by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The anonymous coward is right. Our society even accepts rape as an institutionalized punishment for men. Raping men is considered comedy in the west.

    3. Re:gender/class/ comfort by Fab774 · · Score: 1

      Source for 99.% ?

    4. Re:gender/class/ comfort by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Play any game.

  13. Re:Oh yeah? by _xen · · Score: 1

    Please come up with an innovation that is less the MM [ftfy] years old please.

    Just two off the top of my head for which we still use names derived from the Arabic, Chemistry and Algebra. There are plenty more of course.

  14. They pay a tax on the mind by Pathoth · · Score: 1

    Many people of all religions still "pay a tax" today. That being a weaker grasp of science limits their success in the modern world. Be it getting a tech job or just getting duped by bad food and medicine.

  15. I'll take a shot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Personally I would love to know what changed 800 years ago as it might give a clue as to how to make it right again.

    Part one of your question: What could have possibly caused change 800 years ago in the Arab world?

    Pulled off Wikipedia

    Reconquista (718-1492)
    People's Crusade (1195–1196)
    First (1095–1099) and Immediate Aftermath
    Second (1147–1149)
    Wendish (1147–1162)
    Third (1187–1192)
    Northern crusades (1193–1290)
    German (1195–1198)
    Fourth (1202–1204)
    Albigensian Crusade (1208–1241)
    Fifth (1217–1221)
    Sixth (1228–1229)
    Seventh (1248–1254)
    Eighth (1270)
    Ninth (1271–1272) and aftermath in the Middle East and North Africa
    Nicropolis (1396)
    Hussite (1420–1431)
    Varna (1444)
    Seige of Belgrade (1456)
    Arguably many more 'secular crusades' right up to the present day.

    Part two of your question: How to make it right again?

    I hope the answer is now self evident. :)

    1. Re:I'll take a shot. by _xen · · Score: 2

      Not to argue that the Crusades did not contribute (they clearly did), but your list omits the Mongol conquest of Baghdad in 1258, which is generally reckoned to be the end of the Arabic Golden Age.

      Also a few entries on your list --e.g. the Wendish, Northern and Albigensian Crusades --probably had little influence on the Middle East.

    2. Re:I'll take a shot. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You think the crusades were what caused the Middle East to change from a scientific powerhouse to a ethnic backwater? Isn't that a little Eurocentric? There are other things that happen in the world besides Europe. Not everything good, or bad, comes from there.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:I'll take a shot. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I hope you realize that throughout most of that, the Muslims were also attacking their way into Europe. Please don't get the impression that they sat down after the Crusades and got beaten down. Right before that Siege of Belgrade was something called the Fall of Constantinpole in 1453. And Turks were still besieging Vienna in 1683.

      The reason the Muslim empire fell apart was because it fractured internally. Eventually everyone and their brother wanted to be caliph. The Turks managed to get some control over things at the end, but they rotted from the inside as well. The crusades were a blip and frankly had little to do with anything. The Reconquista was different, but that was basically the Spanish fighting to get Spain back from the previous Islamic conquerors, and it really didn't go much beyond the Iberian Peninsula.

      The fact is, the Muslims had their time in the sun and they simply fell apart just like the Romans and Persians did before them. Indeed, much of the learning of the Arabs was as a result of absorbing Greek territories where there was a great deal of literature they picked up. People like Plato and Aristotle were on the reading list. The Islamic scholars added to that, just like the Romans did before them.

  16. Hindu-Arabic numerals by _xen · · Score: 1

    Except, of course, that the name is somewhat of a misnomer; since they actually come from India, and are known as "Hindu numbers" in the middle east.

    Except of course we lifted it directly from the Arabs (who use a system developed from Hindu numerals) as evidenced by the fact that we still write our numbers backward. (Ie. from small to large in Arabic right to left direction.) Which is the opposite of how we [used] to speak our numbers, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen ... four'n'twenty

    I've just been highlighting this fact in teaching why *nix, r, w, x run 4, 2, 1 instead of the other way round (the first 8 binary numbers thus forming a truth table).

    1. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by Livius · · Score: 1

      Well, we lifted it indirectly from the Arabs, as Arabic numbers came from the Western Muslims in Spain. The numbers used by actual Arabs look quite different.

    2. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The GP is right, and what's more, the Arabs didn't change or enhance anything that the Indians did, so calling it Hindu-Arabic or Arabic just misappropriates the credit. Even in the West, it was very often described either as Hindu numerals or sometimes, Hindu-Arabic.

    3. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by _xen · · Score: 1

      Well, we lifted it indirectly from the Arabs, as Arabic numbers came from the Western Muslims in Spain.

      Yes, I should have written we lifted them from the Arabic rather than the Arabs. Though I thought that Fibonacci learnt the numeral system in Algiers (still Berbers not Arabs) rather than in Spain. Nor was Fibonacci necessarily the first to attempt to import them into Europe. But yes, still Western-Arabic.

      The numbers used by actual Arabs look quite different.

      I'm pretty sure the numerals used by Fibonacci looked a tad different from those we use today as well. At least the 1 and 9 in modern Arabic numerals look similar :), none of the Brahmi numerals bear any resemblance to ours.

    4. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by _xen · · Score: 1

      The Arabs didn't change or enhance anything that the Indians did ...

      Sure they did.

    5. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Such as?

    6. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      the Arabs didn't change or enhance anything that the Indians did

      Unless you count the invention of algebra or codifying the algorithm, or any of the other great advancements in mathematics that came out of the Islamic Golden Age, of course....

    7. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Well the Arabs did change the shape of the numerals a bit, but I agree that they didn't enhance the number system.

    8. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Erm you think the Arabs invented algebra?

      It's the same problem as the numerals... we got the *word* for algebra from Arabs, but algebra had been practiced since at least the Sumerians.

      There actually weren't many great advances in math during the Islamic Golden Age.

    9. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by _xen · · Score: 1

      Such as?

      Change: they reversed the direction of position, which reversal, for better or worse (worse imho) we adopted. The Brahmic number system starts with cattle-grid (except horizontal) numbering, ie . 1 is one line, 2 is two lines, 3 is 3 lines, 4 is two lines crossed. The Arabic system gave each of these numbers an individual symbol which convention (albeit with different symbols) we still use (as incidentally do modern Indian numeral systems).

      Enhance: The decimal point.

    10. Re:Hindu-Arabic numerals by _xen · · Score: 1

      I agree that they didn't enhance the number system.

      Are you seriously saying that you never use numbers smaller that 1?

  17. Re:4. ??? by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Breastpounding of this being a western influence aside, if the times for women to be tech founders in the ME is now, then as a result it will be more popular and more will do it (and this is all good) but that does not mean it is a lasting effect, it could level out much lower than in the west or it could level out much higher, only time will tell - but for now we should be happy for the people who now have one more choice of path to make their life better.

    Large percentages of the ME men, (yes, even in fairly tame countries like Jordan) have been shunted off to jihadism or the armies that attempt to control it. So they have had a decade of war (or closer to two decades), with disproportionate male losses.

    Meanwhile the women start "companies", although the story says "Many firms run by women entrepreneurs deal with what are labelled female issues (weddings, parenting advice, recipes, and web businesses)". So other than keeping other women entertained, these are hardly the same thing as running industry, developing resources or running banks.

    If you count these empty-afternoon enterprises as business you have to realize that this kind of stuff doesn't even get counted in the west. (And in the US you can't even tell except by inspecting first names if businesses are owned by men or women, gender tagging business licenses just isn't done).

    It seems likely, when when the ME men settle down and stop trying to force Islam on the world, they will start forcing it on their families, and this "trend" of female entrepreneurship will disappear.

    When you can look at a news photo of an Arab street and see 50/50 ratio of men to women (instead of 100males to 1), call me. Because until then, all the filling of afternoons while the children are at school with pretend companies means nothing.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  18. Re:Again with women by icebike · · Score: 1

    Please tell me you didn't cite a television show as part of your argument!!!

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  19. Re:Meritocratic not so much by icebike · · Score: 1

    the Internet is mostly ruled by the clueless, and they gang up against the occasional visitor who tries to fix things

    Since you hide behind the same name as the people you lament, and several thousand others posting here, how would anyone know the relative percentage of clueless vs cluefull?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  20. Gender relations by Livius · · Score: 1

    I wonder is this could be one factor:

    In societies where male and female normally interact with each other at all ages, males with poor social skills in general might gravitate towards fields that are dominated by interactions with machines or technology rather than people. Therefore women perceive the male community in these fields as hostile.

    In societies with gender segregation, everyone has poor skills interacting the the opposite sex, so technology is the same as every other occupation.

  21. Just shows you how missoginistic the west is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another thing the west does is force black people to play in professional sports. Today a black man is not allowed to do anything but play mother fuckin basketball. Do you have any idea how demeaning it is for a proud black man to be forced to play what is essentially a children's game day after day. 'No negro you are not allowed to program computers, your moneky ass has to play basket ball day in and day out.' I really hate the west and our racism. Make some cracker play some bball once in a while. Black men are sick of it. We also don't allow women to start 'high tech' computer companies. The only people who are allowed to take math and science classes are East Asians. I really think there aught to b a law saying that only black people can study math. All east asian should b forced to make a living playing professional sports. All Whites and arabs should be killewd. Wites bcause they are all racists, and arabs bcause they are anit-semitic.

    No, but seriously we should have a commision to determine exactly how many people of every possible race / demographic are doing one pathicular thing, and then coorelate it to the world population as a whole. If these numbers don't exactly match up there neeeds to be an uproar on NPR. Personally I have found that there is a disturbing lack of female transgendered caucasian thirld world banana republic dictators. I can therefore only logically conlude that the 'third world' is systematically undermining the efforts of white transgendered females to take over and rule their countries.

  22. Re:4. ??? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a friend from Korea, he told me, "My grandpa always forced my mom to eat at a separate table from the men, until she started making the money. Then she didn't give him any until she could eat at the normal table." Now that tradition has disappeared from Korea.

    Making money is one potential road towards equality.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. Re:Oh yeah? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    Use of arrows, as opposed to muskets, doesn't require you to find civilians to use them on. You can stick an error in the eye of a soldier just as well as some kid eating lunch or shopping or watching a marathon.

    "Asymmetric warfare" is hit and run tactics on military and governmental targets by guerrilla forces. Blowing civilians up is plain old terrorism. Sometimes guerrillas use terror tactics as well. That just makes them assholes too.

    Please don't try and suggest to me that because we won't throw stones at them instead of bullets that they're now entitled to blow up women and children.

    Which is not to say that I agree with the "wall it off" sentiment, but I'm not buying that it is their "only weapon, so they have to use it". They don't have to do anything, they particularly don't have to blow themselves or anyone else up.

  24. Different culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in a third-world country where there is a similar phenomenon.

    We have a huge number of female entrepreneurs here - many of them are extremely successful even by Western standards, and many more earn a Western wage in a poor country, which gives them an extremely comfortable standard of living.

    What is the secret? It's largely down to motivation. The concept of family is extremely important here - much more so for women than for men. If a woman gets pregnant and has a child, the husband/boyfriend can leave without any financial consequences, and few social consequences.

    Women in general (in this country) are much more driven to help their parents, sibilings, children and extended family than their male equivalents (on average, of course). Men are still generally the biggest wage earners, and hold the top positions in most big companies, but women rule the world of small and family businesses.

    I am not saying it is fair or correct, but the absence of sexual equality and a benefits system here has had some interesting consequences. I'm not trying to give my opinion about sexual politics, just commenting on how things work here from my day-to-day personal experience. Counter-intuitively, inequality here has led to a large group of middle class female entrepreneurs. Perhaps a similar effect is in action in the Middle East.

    1. Re:Different culture by Velex · · Score: 2

      This is interesting.

      Coincidentally we seem to have the opposite situation over here. Women can choose to start families whenever they want with little regard for how they'll support their children, and they can also shut out the father from her life entirely with little to no consequences, both financially and socially. If she chooses to shut the father out of her life, we're more than happy to garnish his wages (no financial consequences whatsoever), and because women have the privilege of being presumed the victim, we'll even tell him that he must have done something abusive to get shut out (so perhaps that would be considered an opposite social consequence since we'll say good on her for throwing out somebody who just must have been a deadbeat).

      I work in a predominantly female environment. Sexism isn't limited to the male gender. Go back and re-read that before you moderate. Women have the privilege of being seen as above sexism---as the victims of sexism even, which women have the privilege of painting as a problem exclusively the fault of "all men," but women are people, too.

      I know the plural of anecdote is not data, but here's my anecdote anyway. I work in a call center, and when we upgraded our message taking software to a scripted system, I was promoted as a programmer. Drama ensued because customer service could no longer make changes to the questions we ask callers. So, I said, let's sit down and I'll teach you basic programming so that you can make changes again. We tried. And we tried. And we tried. And at the end of it, I found myself teaching remedial algebra and trying to overcome these women's math phobia. So, we scrapped it altogether, and I got a nice, secure job.

      The fallout of that, though, was that it came to be believed that somehow, because I'm forced to work as the male gender (another topic entirely and beyond the scope of this discussion), and because we know that "all men" are sexist (and that statement somehow isn't sexist), that the failure of my co-workers to learn how to make even very basic changes such as adding or removing a prompt was definitive proof that I was doing something or had set the system up somehow in a way that was sexist and an inaccessible to the female mind.

      I admit, I'm not the best teacher. That's why I don't teach for a living.

      What flabbergasted me was the ways that the womyn-born-womyn entitlement complex, as I've come to call it (very different from the "princess entitlement complex" that MRAs go on about---I'm not attracted to women, don't date women, am not interested in the reasons MRAs seek mail-order brides, and the term "womyn-born-womyn entitlement complex" is intended to be completely separate from romantic relationships) prevented my co-workers from learning. Then when I start throwing corner cases and unexpected input at her program, I'm presumed to be just mean and putting up sexist barriers and going hard on them just because they're women. I'm sorry, no. Users will do whatever they can to break what you wrote, and if what you want is to be able to make changes that don't just utterly foul up a message script, then you need to step off your entitlement complex high horse and start taking a more humble approach. But not, it's just easier to call me sexist, because my legal gender is male and all men are sexist, so obviously I, individually, am sexist, and walk off in a huff.

      What it came down to, and what it's come down to in other attempts of mine to help women out who are taking CS classes, is that they suppose that the computer can take vaguely worded requirements and know on its own how to do what she meant, much the same way her boyfriend or husband will know what she wants.

      I mean, it's just, excuse me, but didn't Ada Lovelace specifically say that wouldn't be the case? I look back on this history of CS, and I see women like Ada Lovelac

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  25. Middle East or just Jordan? by styrotech · · Score: 2

    Middle eastern countries are a somewhat diverse bunch in terms of overall attitudes. I can imagine quite a large difference in how well women do overall in say somewhere like Lebanon vs Saudi Arabia.

    I didn't notice any links in the TFA, but they only really mentioned (vaguely) stuff from Jordan. I don't think Jordan is at the Saudi end of the scale here.

    1. Re:Middle East or just Jordan? by shervinemami · · Score: 2

      Actually I worked in a university in United Arab Emirates near the border of Oman, and there were about 10x more females studying IT & post-grad in computer or engineering related fields than male students!

      We assume it is because the local Emirati's in UAE are so rich that they don't need to study or work, but since females are expected to marry and become a house-wife & mother, the most obvious way for them to not have that way of life is if they become a professional. so we believe this explained why UAE has so many female IT & Engineering students of high quality, but almost no male IT or Engineering students and most of the males there are of very low quality since they are just doing it for fun.

  26. Re:Feminism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He's stupid. The main reason is because boys don't get pregnant. Think about it. Who pays the cost if the perp runs away and the girl finds herself pregnant? If the perp is the girl, the perp bears most of the cost.

    Fact is most of us boys don't want our "girl friend" to go to jail if its consensual. quote: "In most instances, the boys don't want to get the woman in trouble and are reluctant to tell authorities what happened. "

    In fact it might be that exposure to the US criminal "justice" system might be far more traumatic and scarring than a MILF's "abuse" of us.

  27. Re:Oh yeah? by _xen · · Score: 1

    These achievements where not made in a vacuum Algebra for example being a development on earlier Greek and possibly Chinese work.

    Of course ... human knowledge always progresses by out standing on the shoulders of earlier generations. And as regards Algebra and number theory, my understanding that it is Indian, even more than Greek mathematicians, who influenced Arabic scholars.

    [T]he whole history of the "Islamic golden age" is more properly titled the Arabic golden age ...

    Which term I employed elsewhere.

    ... and an example of exactly how bad fanatics are for science and progress.

    Well in any number of ways. Not only do we have Christian mobs skinning Hypatia, but it has been argued [citation needed] that one of the effects of the crusades was to shift the Islamic world from a relatively tolerant and free-thinking culture to one of defensive belligerence and fundamentalism. And in turn the adoption of this defensive posture re-inscribes the danger fanaticism poses to the growth of human knowledge.

  28. You might be on to something... by bayankaran · · Score: 1

    Your assertion on Islam versus Christianity might be true on a certain level. I am a Chrisitan from India. The Hindu beliefs I carry - which were not imposed by anyone - are far more stronger than whatever Christianity has tried to impose. India and the polytheist Hindu philosophy with its 33 1/3 million gods always found space for new religions. We absorbed any new god, compared to other Abrahamic and monotheist religions who felt a "new god" stole the thunder and the adherents had to be blocked/killed/raped/pillaged. This is the reason Hindu philosophy shines over others when it comes to tolerance and acceptance. Even the most rabid Hindu nationalists are tame compared to the Islamic and far right Christian counterparts. They are angry pussy cats rather than feral dogs. But if I follow your assertion fully, I have no answer why the science and technological development starting with European renaissance escaped India and China. May be everything is cyclical, a paradigm shift might be underway, India's young population - 65% is under age of 30, bodes well for the future unless we pick a dumb war with China or Pakistan.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:You might be on to something... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      China was fine until the Communists took over.

      Um... Opium wars? Boxer rebellion?

      China was well on its road to become the same thing in Asia that Ottoman Empire did in Europe.

  29. Re:Oh yeah? by _xen · · Score: 1

    Oh and I meant to write, the point of the post was not to claim Arabic invention ex nihilio of these disciplines, but to address the ignorant notion implied by the GP, that for the past 2000 (ahem ..) years, Islamic culture has been barbaric in comparison to that of Europe.

  30. Re:Feminism by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    In many (Most? All?) states in the US, women can dump their child off at any hospital or fire department and not have any more legal responsibility ever. On the other hand, not only will the state financially come after any man who is the biological father and not raising the child themselves, they even go after men who are not the biological father, but were conned by the the biological mother into thinking they were for a while.

  31. Re:It is not the females who excel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It has nothing to do with unemployment.

    It has everything to do with attitude.

    In the Middle East, the male species think that they are the KING, that they should be served by others, that their women are slaves.

    Or to put it more succinctly, in the Middle East, most of the males can be categorized as "Male Chauvinist Pigs".

    I am not being inflammatory, I am speaking the truth. I am from the Middle East myself, and I am sick and tired of watching lazy men sitting their twiddling their fucking thumbs while their women (mother, wives, daughters) working non-stops, just to feed the family.

    That is why I moved out of the Middle East when I was a young chap, for I do not want to have any association with those lazy religious fucktards.

    Everywhere I go, from Pakistan to Afghanistan to the Middle East, I see them lazy religious fucktards everywhere.

    And finally, I have left Islam and converted to Christianity, because the stone-age viewpoint of Islam goes counter to the world I am living in.

  32. Re:Yeah, well.... by Fab774 · · Score: 1

    Do you even know what and where France is ?

  33. That was surprising. by IanPote · · Score: 1

    "The Middle East Beats the West In Female Tech Founders" I did not expect that.

  34. Re:It is not the females who excel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And finally, I have left Islam and converted to Christianity, because the stone-age viewpoint of Islam goes counter to the world I am living in.

    So you went from one stone age religion, to a slightly older stone age religion? And you feel better about yourself for it?

  35. Cheap domestic help by Bruinwar · · Score: 1

    There is a higher percentage of female CEOs in the "third world" also. Cheap domestic help may be the biggest contributor.

    --
    SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
  36. That stuff was before Islam by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    The Arabs were busy unlocking scientific secrets and storing up knowledge during that time out of necessity -- it's not a forgiving land. It has limited resources, and if you aren't smart about managing it, you die. Generations of resource scarcity meant that their culture stressed history. The first written languages came from the same region. Moving from a barter economy to a cash economy also came from there.

    Seems to me all that happened before Islam. Islam seems to have put the brakes on mid-east progress.

    1. Re:That stuff was before Islam by dkf · · Score: 1

      Seems to me all that happened before Islam. Islam seems to have put the brakes on mid-east progress.

      Actually, they were doing OK — some political problems, but generally still OK — but the thing that really caused things to slow down was the discovery of trade routes round the Cape of Good Hope. That greatly reduced the amount of revenue from taxes on trade between India and Europe, particularly in spices, and made the Middle East a lot poorer (and Europe quite a lot richer). FWIW, it also caused a lot of problems for some European states that depended on the same trade (e.g., Venice) at the same time, so it's clearly not religion-linked.

      However, the current problems really rise rather later than that, probably with the rise of Wahhabism (founded in the 18th century) which is in many ways like the Reformation was for Christianity. Religious fundamentalism (of all types) tends to have problems with science, as science tends to produce equivocal answers that don't fit nicely with belief systems; when the fundies are in charge, scientific thought withers or departs for more hospitable parts of the world. None of this is Islam-specific, except in that they happen to be a current example.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  37. Re:4. ??? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

    This is some of the most sexist bullshit I've ever seen on Slashdot, and that is saying something. Why don't we equally discount businesses having to do with sports, car enthusiasts, video games, power tools and tech gadgets? A business is a business, and if they are making money then it counts. Just because it is a traditionally "female issue" doesn't make it any less useful to society. Guess what? Half of consumers are female, and they vote with their wallets what is important to them.

  38. Re:4. ??? by mjr167 · · Score: 2

    That is where the US was just over 50 years ago. We had a male labor shortage during the world wars and when the men came home and the fighting stopped, the women didn't go home. They started attending college for home economics so they could get jobs as teachers, decorators, party planners, institution management, and other "soft" jobs.

    Once the fighting stops and the men go home, you won't see things go back to the way they were. Societies do not change overnight. You do not wake up one morning and redefine an entire social structure. It took us the better part of a century and we can expect it to take them just as long.

    BTW, there are plenty of people in the U.S. "filing afternoons while the children are at school" and the money those companies make is not pretend. You can knock things like wedding planning all you want, but the reality is that brides are willing to pay people thousands of dollars to show up for an afternoon's work. You and I may think the work is stupid and silly, but the money is real. A friend of mine's wife is a wedding planner and it is insane how much money she gets paid just for in-law wrangling.

  39. Re:4. ??? by stdarg · · Score: 1

    Why don't we equally discount businesses having to do with sports, car enthusiasts, video games, power tools and tech gadgets?

    We do. If guys were only involved in those businesses, and women ran the banks, hospitals, factories, research labs, etc. then I would be very sad as a guy.

  40. Re:Anonymous Loooser by Exophase · · Score: 1

    By the very same (terrible, mind you) reasoning you would have to say that men are also coerced and cajoled into accepting traditional intercourse. So what's the story, are men and women mutually raping each other?

  41. Mohammed's wife by intermodal · · Score: 1

    One need only look at Mohammed's wife to be unsurprised that even today, Muslim businesswomen aren't exactly unheard of. Sure, there are oppressive countries, but that's government, not a core facet of Islam.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Mohammed's wife by intermodal · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khadijah_bint_Khuwaylid

      Actually, she was an impressively successful businesswoman. She was not only older than him, but also hired him at her business.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  42. Re:Yeah, well.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    France: Soon to be known as 'western greater Germany'.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  43. Re:Yeah, well.... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I think the proper name would then be "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" at that point.

  44. Re:Gender-tagging business by icebike · · Score: 1

    If you want to apply for those programs clearly you would have to reveal your gender.

    But to simply file for a business license, no gender information is requested.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  45. Re:4. ??? by icebike · · Score: 1

    That you can toll the internet and find the odd exception, merely proves the rule.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  46. Re:Oh yeah? by stdarg · · Score: 1

    but to address the ignorant notion implied by the GP, that for the past 2000 (ahem ..) years

    The OP specified "the Middle East" not "Islamic culture" so your "ahem" is unwarranted. And considering AC's "Please come up with an innovation that is less the 2000 years old please" was referring to Arabic numerals, it has nothing to do with Islamic culture since they were developed before Islam began.

  47. Re:It is not the females who excel ... by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

    Presumably he left to a more reformed Christianity...wonder why he didn't think about some of the more reformed islamist groups out there (the ones that value women's equality and acceptance of outsiders, they do exist...)

    --
    ...in bed
  48. That's what you get by Hentes · · Score: 1

    when you lock your women in the basement.

  49. in other news by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Pakistan beats the US in number of female heads of state.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.