Slashdot Mirror


Imitation In Dogs Matches Humans and Apes

sciencehabit writes "The next time your dog digs a hole in the backyard after watching you garden, don't punish him. He's just imitating you. A new study reveals that our canine pals are capable of copying our behavior as long as 10 minutes after it's happened. The ability is considered mentally demanding and, until this discovery, something that only humans and apes were known to do."

181 comments

  1. THAT explains it! by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stop chewing on your wife's best shoes and the dog will stop doing that too! Oh and also don't chew on the sofa cushions either.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    1. Re:THAT explains it! by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's behavior that most mammals do when they teethe due to physical discomfort.

      Just give your puppy his own chew toys that he KNOWS are his and quickly correct him when he tries to chew on things not his and he'll soon learn what he can and can't chew on. Of course, different breeds are easier to train than others so YMMV.

    2. Re:THAT explains it! by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoooooooosh!

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    3. Re: THAT explains it! by nbritton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Easy fix... put the shoes away. It's all about operant conditioning with dogs. I suggest an e-collar, an alternative him to chew on, and positive reinforcement when he does something you want. I hear imitation also works, you could fetch some of his toys to chew... ;-)

      The other neat thing that dogs can do is figure out what you mean when you point at something, apes just can't seem to grasp this. NOVA did a documentary that attempted to qualify ape intelligence by showing the diffrences between human children and other animals. It was eye opening, particularly the use of tools and the crafting of weapons to kill prey by chimps. I think animals are a lot smarter then we give them credit for, anyhow here is a link: http://m.video.pbs.org/video/1200128615/

    4. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If your dog misses a joke in the next 10 minutes now you'll know why.

    5. Re:THAT explains it! by ikarys · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dog: Woooooooofsh!

    6. Re:THAT explains it! by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on guys, that was ruff.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    7. Re: THAT explains it! by rikkards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      E-collar? Put that on your kid and see how they react (or Children's aid). The latter two suggestions are the right answer. If you have to resort to shocking your dog then you are doing something wrong.
      Your second paragraph is very true, we are becoming more and more aware that animals are not purely instinct driven. Well they are but so are we, we just don't realize our needs and wants are just that.

    8. Re:THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ahhh ... so this explains why my dog drinks out of the toilet.

    9. Re: THAT explains it! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      E-collar? Put that on your kid and see how they react (or Children's aid).

      There are a LOT of children that need that. I fully support the deployment of these things in schools for kids that are troublemakers.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:THAT explains it! by flyneye · · Score: 4, Funny

      My Jack Russell is pretty good at copying. He now sits up against the back of the couch and watches T.V. He'll snipe your beer, right from the bottle. Sleeps on his back with his head on the pillow. Shits on the neighbors lawn. Just like me!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    11. Re: THAT explains it! by pspahn · · Score: 0

      There are a LOT of children that need that. I fully support the deployment of these things in schools for kids that are troublemakers.

      Often, it is enough to simply single them out. Maybe it's a collar, maybe its only being allowed to use crayons because they're throwing pencils, it doesn't matter. Give them a reason to be embarrassed and watch them begin to listen.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    12. Re: THAT explains it! by azav · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people's kids who should be hooked up to a car battery rather than just an e-collar.

      Sometimes, one painful lesson is a much stronger NO that is needed.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    13. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The other neat thing that dogs can do is figure out what you mean when you point at something, apes just can't seem to grasp this.

      Similar brains have similar learning curves. Dogs have an advantage with pointing, because it's akin to throwing. Maybe an ape trained to fetch just like a dog will have an easier time figuring out pointing. Or normal ape behavior makes hand gestures too ambiguous or specialized for other purposes, preventing them from figuring out what we mean.

      In a lucky coincidence, I was just taking care of a young dog this past week, and I pointed at several things on different occasions and it never turned it's head to look at anything except my hand. That dog also hadn't been taught to fetch. So, I'm treating this subject as a discussion of learned behavior because it doesn't seem to be instinctive. I believe pointing is much more symbolic than people consider it to be, and that's why most animals can't figure it out. For a dog, the similarity of fetching to a basic survival task like hunting provides a first step. Then an object being cast at a location makes it possible for a dog to comprehend a 'point of interest'. From a dogs perspective, the pointing gesture resembles a hand after throwing an object. That means researchers are testing most animal's comprehension of symbols they normally wouldn't have any associations for. Since apes have arms and hands I'm not sure why they're at a disadvantage compared to dogs then, except maybe the pointing gesture for them is already associated with a bunch of other things. The way an ape would indicate a point of interest might be leaning forward, or some action combined with vocalization that's unrecognized by us. And if we aren't aware of them having such gestures or symbols, it's really a stretch to expect them to figure out ours.

    14. Re:THAT explains it! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stop chewing on your wife's best shoes and the dog will stop doing that too! Oh and also don't chew on the sofa cushions either.

      Also, it's a very good reason not to have sex with your wife in front of your pets.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now I'm replying to myself with an idea for an experiment... If a group of apes in dense cover (so they can't easily see around themselves) is approached by a silent intruder, how does the first ape to see them signal alarm? Do the apes consistently face the intruder while making noise? If an intruder appears opposite to the original direction, does it surprise the other apes nearby who have reacted only to the first alarm (whether or not they've actually seen the first intruder themselves)? Their surprise may be an elevated alarm response or confrontation of other apes (different than the first apes actions), which may even redirect the first alarmed ape to the second intruder.

      If apes are successful at identifying the directions of intruders to each other, then a person mimicking some of those behaviors with a different (calm) group of apes might be able to point in a way they'll respond to (or point at something out of their line of sight, which then draws their interest).

    16. Re:THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh ... so this explains why my dog drinks out of the toilet.

      He/she sees you bent over the toilet with your head deep in the bowl every morning after you've been out drinking or after you've kissed your wife before she brushes her teeth.

    17. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      E-collar doesn't mean the same thing as a shock collar. An e-collar is the large plastic cone that is put on a dog by a vet (typically after a surgery) that prevents the dog from chewing on the area that was operated on. The "e" in e-collar is is short for 'Elizabethan' as a reference to the big poofy collars that Shakespeare used to wear.

    18. Re: THAT explains it! by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      You don't necessarily need to be shocking the dog. Many of the electronic collars (which the OP may not have been referring to at all, considering the other type of collar that's actually called an e-collar) have a "buzz" function that's just a high pitched dog whistle-like noise that you can use as positive punishment in a manner similar to using shocks, but without the cruelty. Obviously, you still have to provide an alternative and provide positive reinforcement for it to work, but if they're really stubborn it's an option.

    19. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or resent you and turn worse.

      I'm guessing you don't do much with children. Positiver reinforcement does more than negative, just like dogs.

    20. Re: THAT explains it! by jittles · · Score: 1

      E-collar? Put that on your kid and see how they react (or Children's aid). The latter two suggestions are the right answer. If you have to resort to shocking your dog then you are doing something wrong. Your second paragraph is very true, we are becoming more and more aware that animals are not purely instinct driven. Well they are but so are we, we just don't realize our needs and wants are just that.

      Hey buddy. I use a shock collar on my dog and I don't shock her at all. So you ask, why do I have it? Because she's a hound, and I like to let her roam freely whenever safety allows. The problem? She's a hound. She gets onto a scent and does not want to get off of it. She completely stops hearing my voice. Here is where the shock collar comes in handy. See it does more than just shock. I can also make it beep. And that beep snaps her out of her sniffing spree. It also works great when she's too far away to hear me well (I don't have a very good yelling voice). I beep the thing and she has been trained to come to me immediately.

    21. Re: THAT explains it! by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      I find too many people are quick to know that there understanding encompasses "the right answer" for all dogs. After the first year+ of trying hard and working with trainers to use redirection and positive reinforcement without and positive punishment, I have to say that the e-collar has been an indispensable tool for my dog. And yeah, I put it on myself to see what it feels like at various levels. It goes from 0 to 127, and I typically use it on him at 20. I've given myself a 60, and am very hesitant to go above that on him or me.

      I haven't used it for chewing because he rarely does that, and I only find out about it when it's far far too late for the e collar to do anything. But, I could potentially see it being an effective strategy to deliver the stimulus exactly as he puts his mouth on the shoes. Please note, if you don't already know, that I'm not talking about painful (ok, yeah, that's subjective), yelp-inducing shocks, but instead an irritating stimulus that you've first trained him how to stop. This training is the first thing that the last trainer I've used did with me when I asked him about the merits of using one. We first found the lowest level that he showed any sign of noticing (to me, this level feels like an irritating tickle), then spent some time using negative reinforcement by taking away the shocks the moment he obeyed a well-known command.

      I have, and occasionally still do, however, use it to direct his attention when outdoors. See, the reason I was having so much difficulty is that he simply didn't care about food, happy rewarding praise, or most anything else I was able to offer, when there was another dog in nose-shot. I had limited success using a command that meant he could sniff around and pee on things for a while as a reward for not pulling on the leash, but I simply wasn't making enough progress. Now that's I've gone e-collar, I have been much more successful at getting him to be able to behave and recall off-leash and on, which means I now get to let him run around whereas I simply could not before (mind you, he's a pit bull, and not being able to recall your pit bull when he's running towards a stranger's dog or child is unacceptable of the owner). It also stresses me out far less now that I can reliably get his attention, and that's improved my relationship with him. So as I see it, the e-collar has greatly improved his (and my) quality of life.

    22. Re:THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The first rule in training puppies is that you need to be at least as smart as the puppy.

    23. Re: THAT explains it! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      E-collar? Put that on your kid and see how they react (or Children's aid). The latter two suggestions are the right answer. If you have to resort to shocking your dog then you are doing something wrong.

      Oops, I'd better take it off. Hold on while I take off his muzzle, remove his leash and collar, and put him back in his cage. Oh wait, like you, I just confused my dog with a person.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    24. Re: THAT explains it! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Pointing is definitely learned in humans, too - or at least it is with my kids. If you think about it, it's a pretty crappy way to indicate something unless your heads are nearly together or you are far enough apart that you can interpolate the line between the person's face and finger.

      Or if it's a huge alien spacecraft and so accuracy doesn't matter much.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    25. Re: THAT explains it! by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 2

      Beep collar. Okay, that can work.

      I've had eight dogs over 35+ years, and tried to use a radio collar only once, and only for a brief time. There were RC hobbyists and ham radio nuts in the neighborhood and someone's equipment was causing false signals to the collar. Perhaps the new ones have better protection from that now.

      Every dog I've owned has been trained with a silent whistle in "Come", "Drop", and "Stay" commands. I carried the whistle on my key chain. Its effective range was over a quarter mile on open fields, far beyond my yelling distance, and comparable to the range of a radio collar. Advantages over the radio collar is that the whistle was always with me, there were no batteries to bother with, it was unaffected by water, it was not a potential noose (collars can get hung up on wire fences, etc), and the big one: with distinctive patterns of long and short blasts, it can deliver more than one command. Such as "Drop, Stay" when the dog had gotten on the other side of a busy road.

      High tech is kewl. Appropriate tech is better.

      --
      Will
    26. Re: THAT explains it! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The other neat thing that dogs can do is figure out what you mean when you point at something, apes just can't seem to grasp this. NOVA did a documentary that attempted to qualify ape intelligence by showing the diffrences between human children and other animals. It was eye opening, particularly the use of tools and the crafting of weapons to kill prey by chimps. I think animals are a lot smarter then we give them credit for, anyhow here is a link: http://m.video.pbs.org/video/1200128615/

      Since becoming a dog owner I have been surprised by what he seems to understand. As you said, he understands what I mean when I point to something. But he has even followed commands the first time I have given them, with no training. The very first time I told him to go to bed, he hopped off my bed and got in his own. Once when I was walking him in the snow he got cold and wanted to go home. He started down the neighbors driveway and resisted me when I tried to get him to come back to the street. Finally I said, "This is not our house" and he promptly came back over and went down our driveway! I can't explain it, but he seems to understand much more than I would have expected.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    27. Re: THAT explains it! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Positive reinforcement does more than negative, just like dogs.

      I wish the world would understand that this is a general principle that applies in most situations.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    28. Re: THAT explains it! by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More to the point, dogs and man have co-evolved. They are symbiotic species: they evolved in such a way that each species had a much better chance of raising progeny to mating age than either species had on its own. That's a strong natural selection process.

      Part of this is that dogs and man learned to communicate with each other to a greater degree than dogs in a pack communicate with each other. They seek eye contact and use a rich gesture language to communicate their feelings to each other. Human pointing is an extension of that. The evolutionary advantages of pointing are pretty much obvious.

      It should not be surprising that many of man's social structures-- lodges, tio-spayes, clans, small villages, high school cliques, gangs, etc-- are more dog-like than they are ape-like. Humans would not be like they are if they had not teamed up with dogs.

      --
      Will
    29. Re: THAT explains it! by jittles · · Score: 2

      Beep collar. Okay, that can work.

      I've had eight dogs over 35+ years, and tried to use a radio collar only once, and only for a brief time. There were RC hobbyists and ham radio nuts in the neighborhood and someone's equipment was causing false signals to the collar. Perhaps the new ones have better protection from that now.

      Every dog I've owned has been trained with a silent whistle in "Come", "Drop", and "Stay" commands. I carried the whistle on my key chain. Its effective range was over a quarter mile on open fields, far beyond my yelling distance, and comparable to the range of a radio collar. Advantages over the radio collar is that the whistle was always with me, there were no batteries to bother with, it was unaffected by water, it was not a potential noose (collars can get hung up on wire fences, etc), and the big one: with distinctive patterns of long and short blasts, it can deliver more than one command. Such as "Drop, Stay" when the dog had gotten on the other side of a busy road.

      High tech is kewl. Appropriate tech is better.

      So there are advantages and disadvantages to both technologies. We go to the dog park on a regular basis and there are often 8 or more dogs there. With the collar, I can get her attention only, and not bother the other dogs at the park. It is also waterproof (a must because my beast loves the water). It also has different channels, with support for up to 4 collars at a 300 yard range. I thought about the whistle, but it just wasn't ideal for the dog park. I've left the collar turned on for about 4 days before the battery died. It has pretty good longevity. Of course, mine is a hunting collar and they expect you to use it for days at a time in the sticks. But you are right, there is not much I can do about the collar being a choking hazard. That's why we only use it when I plan to let her off the leash.

    30. Re: THAT explains it! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Pointing may be learned in humans, but it comes pretty damn naturally. We can recognize a pointing a gesture at an extremely early age, and months before we've learned how to linguistically communicate (although babies can communicate surprisingly well themselves with gestures such as pointing *far* earlier than they start to speak).

    31. Re:THAT explains it! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Peculiar that your dog would watch television, unless it is a very new one with an extremely high speed refresh, since dogs eyes have a different persistence of vision characteristics to humans and would not perceive motion on a regular television the same way we do

    32. Re: THAT explains it! by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I'm not sure that is what nbritton meant. As you said, it keeps the dog from chewing on itself. But the goal here is to keep it from chewing on other things. And if the dog can still eat, then it can still chew on other things. So although an e-collar may be the Cone Of Shame, I'm thinking nbritton meant a collar that would deliver a small electric shock, similar to the invisible fence collars.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    33. Re:THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's behavior that most mammals do when they teethe due to physical discomfort

      I think mammals all share a lot more traits than expected. Cats certainly mimic; kittens are taught to use a litter box, to chase mice, etc by their mothers. If you have a cat who was separated from its mother as soon as weaned, it will never be a mouser. When my cats want to be petted, they'll come up and pet YOU.

      I saw just this morning that they've demonstrated that dolphins have names. I doubt the researchers were surprised, but newspaper reporters all seemed to be. I would be surprised to find that there is any species of mammal that doesn't have some level of verbal communication, and even names.

    34. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for fun, go touch the terminals on your car battery right now. You back yet? That's right, nothing happened. Also, your car won't explode if you get in an accident. Oh, being shot won't throw people backwards (usually through a window). Too many movies dude.

    35. Re: THAT explains it! by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 2

      I left something out in my description of using whistle commands.

      I often had two dogs at a time. I learned early on that I needed a distinctive whistle pattern for each dog, basically a "Pay attention!" command, to be followed with the action command. So basically I gave each dog its own name in whistle-speak. The equivalent of teaching "Diogi! Come!" "Juna! Stay!"

      As Wolters said, the first command every dog needs to learn is their name. That is a command, and the command is "You, pay attention to me!" Same thing goes with whistle training.

      A dog trained in whistle-speak with its own whistle-speak name will do fine in a dog park. It is doubtful that any of the other dogs would respond to the whistle (each person's whistle has a its own distinctive pitch as well as its own distinctive patterns of short and long toots. Dogs hear those differences, and they are as distinctive as differences in voice.)

      --
      Will
    36. Re: THAT explains it! by plopez · · Score: 1

      Tabasco or some other such sauce can work as well. And is cheaper.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    37. Re: THAT explains it! by Xest · · Score: 1

      "The other neat thing that dogs can do is figure out what you mean when you point at something"

      I think it depends on the dog, my Lab/Collie crosses have no problem with this, but my parents Jack Russel/Doberman cross (yes, really, and no we don't know) just walks up and sniffs and then licks your finger if you point at something.

      I find dog intelligence does vary a lot from breed to breed.

    38. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know there's some debate on this subject, however, my beagle will track across the screen and howl at any dog-like (or horse-like) image. I was curious if it was an audio cue, but she does it with the sound off, too. She doesn't react to a CRT, but pretty much any LCD or plasma (and not the fast refresh ones. The plasma in question is maybe a first or second gen plasma) I've run into has been good enough for her. Trying to watch Up was a funny experience. She freaked out the second the dog first appeared.
      One of our bulldogs will growl at dog images for a bit, then seems to realize that it's not real and ignores it until the next one shows up. The other bulldog ignores everything (even most real dogs, so I can't really be sure that he sees them on tv)
      Maybe there's significant difference throughout the dog population in this regard.

    39. Re:THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're all barking.

    40. Re: THAT explains it! by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      I think that most of us who understand humans are animals do understand that other animals can be as smart in dealing with their environments as we are in dealing with ours. A random beaver can build a better dam than a random human can.

    41. Re:THAT explains it! by santax · · Score: 1

      That might be true, but my jack russell also likes to watch the tele. He can also easily recognize dogs and cats on the television even with the sound off. You should see him watching youtube. He just loves kitten-video's! And that's no lie.

    42. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must give us directions to this perfect world that you inhabit.

    43. Re: THAT explains it! by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

      Same for employees spending too much time on /.

    44. Re: THAT explains it! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      ... with distinctive patterns of long and short blasts, it can deliver more than one command.

      Your dogs know Morse code? I'm impressed!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    45. Re: THAT explains it! by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      I don't usually respond to ACs, but this is an exception.

      Read Wolters' book, Family Dog. Do try to remember the guy was not a writer but a dog trainer. The writing is good enough to get his message across. This is a very quick read, but also a book to come back to, time and again.

      Then read Monks of New Skete books on training german shepherds and other breeds: How to Be Your Dog's Best Friend: A Training Manual for Dog Owners is the one to start with. The monks are both articulate and highly skilled in training dogs.

      Then synthesize what these guys are saying.

      Do that right, Grasshopper, and you will begin the journey to the more perfect world of man and dog that you seek.

      --
      Will
    46. Re: THAT explains it! by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Jack Russel/Doberman cross (yes, really, and no we don't know)

      Well, I can guess. I met a guy once who had a Dachshund/Doberman mix; I asked him how that happened and he said he got the dog from a breeder who specializes in this cross, and did it by holding up the male Dachshund behind the female Doberman while they did their thing. Neither dog seemed to object, so what the hell ...

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    47. Re:THAT explains it! by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Stop chewing on your wife's best shoes and the dog will stop doing that too! Oh and also don't chew on the sofa cushions either.

      I'm not allowed on the sofa :(

    48. Re: THAT explains it! by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      We cant keep them on the engineers of programmers here. They are too clever and find a way to remove them.

      The Marketing and Sales department, Yeah, they cant get them off even if we told them how.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    49. Re:THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And mind your masturbation techniques, although I suspect dogs are just rubbing it in with their superior flexibility.

    50. Re:THAT explains it! by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Don't make me come over there and bite you!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    51. Re: THAT explains it! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I once caught a small terrier standing on top of the couch in order to reach the Labrador bitch.

      The pups were bigger than their dad within a few weeks after being born ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    52. Re:THAT explains it! by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Did you know there are some humans that have more vertebraes than others? Why, tv signal is supposed to be fine for the average human, do you know there's humans that perceive flickering well above 100hz?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    53. Re:THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop chewing on your wife's best...

      Well, that explains where the dog learned that.

    54. Re: THAT explains it! by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

      In what school districts is a principal promoted to general?
      Although there might be a colonel of truth in the concept. Perhaps a proper stance a corporal punishment is key?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    55. Re: THAT explains it! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If you have to resort to shocking your dog then you are doing something wrong.

      It really really depends on the dog.

      A friend had a shitzu who wouldn't stop barking. Put one of those collars on it that zaps it, and it barks until it's practically cooked. Put one of those collars on it that sprays in its face, and it keeps barking.

      After she went through every technique anybody could recommend, she had no choice but to have the dog debarked. The dog never stopped barking -- leaves, shadows, wind, you name it, the dog would bark at it. Constantly.

      She's owned plenty of other dogs before and since -- but this one particular dog was essentially un-trainable in a lot of regards.

      It was debarked or destroyed at a certain point.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    56. Re: THAT explains it! by pspahn · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you don't do much with children.

      Not anymore, no. I used to work in a day treatment facility that had nothing but students with behavior issues (among others with genuine development issues).

      Time and time again, positive reinforcement with these students only worked to let these kids continue to behave poorly. I'm all for positive reinforcement, but unless you back it up with real consequences, it is completely ineffective in many cases.

      But go right ahead, keep giving kids positive reinforcement up until they do something illegal and/or dangerous that they need to be called out on. You have now become the most untrustworthy person in their lives.

      From the get go, a child needs positive direction, not false positive reinforcement. Show them the proper way to go (especially when they don't like it) and the issues that would arise when they eventually fuck up won't destroy that professional relationship.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    57. Re: THAT explains it! by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Also, consider that children, especially in a school setting, are often at the mercy of their social standing, unlike your pooch at home.

      The punishments that are given to one student for specific behavior set the tone for similar potential behaviors from other students.

      I certainly hope my children are not taught by a feel-good everything is happy teacher that refuses to discipline a child. If the child is throwing pencils several hours every day, what positive reinforcement are you going to use to get them to stop? Show them that pencils can do great things instead like art and literature? And if they're going to resent you and "turn worse" because you forced them to do math tables in crayon (something they will be able to joke about next week) instead then they are already beyond help.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    58. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An E-collar is a hood that looks like a lampshade that goes around the dog's head, to keep it from biting or licking things. It's not a shock-collar.

    59. Re: THAT explains it! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not sure if you're kidding with me, or if you don't know the difference between principle and principal.

      Either way, here you go.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    60. Re: THAT explains it! by dantotheman · · Score: 1

      wooosh...

    61. Re:THAT explains it! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Just a regular old lcd t.v. refreshin at 60hz.
      He isn't real particular about what's on either. He will sit by himself, but mostly he does when others are watching t.v. too.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    62. Re:THAT explains it! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Jack Russells are a cut above most dogs in the intelligence dept.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    63. Re: THAT explains it! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Okay, I guess he was kidding with me!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    64. Re: THAT explains it! by dantotheman · · Score: 1

      Yep. Lots of puns/wordplay going on up there.

      principal/principle
      colonel/kernel
      general/colonel/corporal (military ranks)

    65. Re: THAT explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ham radio nuts...? I beg your pardon, but that is REALLY offensive

    66. Re:THAT explains it! by santax · · Score: 1

      They are pretty smart and independent as you already know from owning one, but poodles and border collies top the smartest dog list. My Jack Russell likes to use his intelligence for things he gets an instant reward from. He does like to 'work' for me though. I also learned him to close doors, get stuff, some things by name other things by pointing. Most of these tricks took me between 10 minutens and 1 hour to learn. Incredible fast learners once they know they will get a reward. The clicker-training helps tremendously to speed up the learning process. The one thing I can't learn him is to control his hunting drift. If it's small and cute, it's dead. I let him walk without a leach wherever it's safe to do so. He is gone when he sees another dog. He just has to go greet and play. Which can be dangerous because not all dogs accept that. Ah well, I love that dog with all my heart.

    67. Re: THAT explains it! by mpdcsup · · Score: 1

      Really? I conjecture that it's the parents of these kids that need to be fitted.

    68. Re: THAT explains it! by mpdcsup · · Score: 1

      If the child is throwing pencils for several hours per day, they are not being challenged. No teacher is able to challenge every mind that finds itself into his or her charge. For positive reinforcement to have a positive impact *you* have to have leverage, an upper hand, or a figurative carrot to dangle.

  2. So when i see a dog licking the balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know i shouldn't kiss the girl that owns him

    1. Re:So when i see a dog licking the balls by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, why does your dog do that to my leg? Just what have you been letting him watch you do?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:So when i see a dog licking the balls by Molochi · · Score: 1

      You just lost my dog's rape fight. /Willard reference.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    3. Re:So when i see a dog licking the balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be an appropriate punishment for a dog for sexually molesting humans?

    4. Re:So when i see a dog licking the balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      wrong, you DO want to kiss that girl, she will make you happiest dude in world, just make sure she brushes teeth and uses mouth wash before kissing you :P

  3. Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans Evolved from Apes and Dogs Evolved from Wolves.

    There has to be lots of mimicry.

    1. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 3, Insightful

      P.sure that evolution is about retention of particular traits more suited to the environment. Whether that environment is dominated by non-organic or organic processes, and whether those organic processes are floral, bestial or human, is irrelevant. So, a breeding programme is an excellent demonstration of evolution at a fast pace.

    2. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by jamesh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dogs didn't evolve from wolves. Dogs were bred from wolves. There is a world of difference. And that breeding program was designed to maximize certain aspects of canine intelligence. A dog is a man-made creation that has no relation to evolutionary development. In this light, the fact that dogs exhibit mimicry while almost no other animal does is not surprising.

      The difference is purely semantic. The difference is that dogs didn't evolve from wolves through natural selection, they evolved via human selection (which may still considered natural), but it's still an evolution.

    3. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. Let's contrast populations and individuals. Populations evolve and individuals mutate or are naturally selected. In this case individuals are selected for breeding or culling based on their traits. You can't define a population (a group of multiple individuals where genetic diversity is shared by mating) for a breed of dog until the breeding stops. They are just individuals being bred until the breeder is happy. When the breeding stops, evolution can occur on the population. Contrast this with the case of evolution via natural selection. In this case the individuals are naturally selected while within a population. Thus, the population evolves. In breeding, the population is created. There is no A->B->C->(D->E & F->G & H & I->(J->K & L)) (where '&' indicates branching) progression for the population. It is simply A + Q + R (not branching, simply creation where the initial population was completely unaffected).

    4. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      -1 Overrated?

      The only reason a moderator would ever give a 0 scored comment a "-1 Overrated" moderation is if they disagreed with the comment and used the moderation as a method to attack the poster. They are admitting that they don't think it is a troll, flamebait, offtopic, or redundant, but they didn't want others to see it. This is pretty cowardly stuff right here.

      I fully expect this comment to be modded -1 Disagree (a/k/a Overrated).

    5. Re: Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People evolved via "human selection" so does that mean there was no evolution involved?

    6. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Why does the moderation system even propose Overrated for comments at 0 or 1?

    7. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      You're right. The overrated mod is -1 Overrated.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    8. Re: Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are telling me that most of history when children were born, if they were not the acceptable hair or skin color they killed the baby and then tried mating with others to get the desired traits?

      Or do you have ZERO clue as to how selective breeding works?

    9. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by NIK282000 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every daily task we do is mimicked, no one is born knowing how to use a shovel or how to put an object in a box until they are shown. In most cases for humans we only have to be shown once and then we can do it the rest of our lives but we have a little more thinking muscle to work with than a dog. Its not too surprising that they have the capacity to copy actions, what is really cool is that they have to map the action from a two legged human action to a four legged dog action. I'll bet the dogs that can do this can be taught a number of unusual tricks. Maybe even a dog version of sign language, dogs already communicate with body language to people (throw the ball, feed me) why not teach them how to express very specific wants or needs with a set of actions. Once they get the hang of that you could teach them to convey information that is not dog centric, the dog soldiers of Starship Troopers aren't that much of a stretch anymore.
       
      On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    10. Re: Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes that is what happened After all this is SPARTA!!!

    11. Re: Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read a basic biology textbook. Natural selection is just one of many mechanisms is evolution. Others include artificial selection (breeding), sexual selection (mating habits and preferences), and genetic drift (random fluctuations in the prevalence of certain genes).

    12. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying he is anti-semantic?

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    13. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is purely semantic.

      Uh, you mean the difference is _not_ a semantic one (i.e. it means the same), don't you?

    14. Re: Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's what happens in the most populous country on the planet.

    15. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by cusco · · Score: 1

      Sorry AC, but no Cro-Magnon ever sat down, looked at a wolf and said, "I'm hungry, I'm going to build me a chihuahua." Dogs evolved from wolves for several thousand years all on their own before humans took over the process. They first needed a wolf that would allow handling and confinement, and which was small enough to be able to feed. This is why populations of feral dogs almost all look the same everywhere in the world, that's the natural state of dogs before breeders started in on them.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    16. Re: Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are telling me that most of history when children were born, if they were not the acceptable hair or skin color they killed the baby

      Wasn't too long ago in China that if the first-born was a baby girl, the parents would drown the girl in milk and try again for a baby boy.

    17. Re: Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malda probably thought that it would be +1 Funny to do that.

    19. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not evolution if you are a creationist. Then it's always natural selection, which must be a very different thing.

    20. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Cro-magnon killed some wolves, saw the pups and took them back to cave; food is food. Eventually someone liked them enough to keep around (keep pests down, alert to sounds, are cute, etc) and the ones that bred and stayed friendly and neonatic (shorter snouts, less aggressive) kept breeding.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    21. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by cusco · · Score: 1

      A fully grown wolf eats too much for a Cro-magnon to keep happy. Predators generally taste nasty, and an injured wolf or one protecting its litter could take down a human, so that explanation has never made a whole lot of sense to me. If you're desperate enough that you'd eat a wolf then you probably don't have enough spare food to maintain its pups.

      The speculation that I've read most recently from dog behaviorists (because there isn't enough evidence in the archeological record) is that solitary wolves started out scavenging human leftovers. Wolves are naturally scavengers and opportunists anyway, especially when they don't have a pack to increase their hunting efficiency, and young abandoned or orphaned social animals can transfer their relationship needs to other species. They feel that wolves chose us, rather than the opposite.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    22. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      Very early on in the process of dogs coming out of wolves...it may have been more about natural selection. (Maybe) Early man only allowed the wolves that were tame to hang around...and it was beneficial for the tamer wolves. It seems when you select for tameness....you get more than just that as you go along. I am sure everyone has already heard of ths.

    23. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. Just about every village had a garbage pile nearby (good for archaeologists) and the age of dogs splitting off from wolves parallels human transition from nomadic to sedentary.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    24. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      The difference is purely semantic. The difference is that dogs didn't evolve from wolves through natural selection, they evolved via human selection (which may still considered natural), but it's still an evolution.

      I've seen a few articles, like this one that suggests wolves domesticated humans ... or this one that wolves/dogs domesticated themselves ... to co-exist.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    25. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason a moderator would ever give a 0 scored comment a "-1 Overrated" moderation is if they disagreed with the comment and used the moderation as a method to attack the poster.

      No, there are many valid reasons. A factually incorrect comment, a poorly written comment, a confusing comment, an obvious joke that just isn't funny. Personally, any time I see ignorance like "there car's are over they're but they won't start", even if the poster has a valid point, I mod "overrated" because I can't abide uneducated comments at a nerd site. Ignorance should always be modded down. It's just annoying.

    26. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have eaten dogs, wolfs and cats. And let me tell you dogs and wolfs are delicious. They have this goat meat taste without the stinkiness of the goat. Canines are so delicious I am tempted at adopting a new dog every month. Cats, they're taste somewhat like rabit and rabit does not tatste very good so I don't really recommend it. The first time I had dog was in Mexico, a precolumbian food restaurant, and the breed that I ate was Xoloitzcuintle aka the Mexican hairless dog. While traveling through East Asia I ate dog again, and it was just as delicious as the mexican dog. Wolf I ate in siberia.

    27. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by cusco · · Score: 1

      Lying sack of crap. No one is going to serve a dog that costs $600-$1000 in a restaurant. If you paid a couple hundred dollars for a plate of what you were told was Xolo it was probably actually goat, or maybe a roadkill mutt. And cats don't taste much like rabbit, either wild ones (bad tasting) or tame ones (delicious).

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    28. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by cavebison · · Score: 1

      A dog is a man-made creation that has no relation to evolutionary development.

      Seriously, that opinion deserves to be called out as inexcusable ignorance in this day and age. Did you actually listen in school?

      Evolution happens when animals breed. It doesn't matter if it's horses breeding in the wild, dogs in a kennel, hamsters up my ass or mice in a laboratory. DNA is exchanged, genes are mixed, errors occur, changes result and that's evolution. Stop going to church group and pick up a book.

    29. Re:Humans Co-evolved with Dogs! by cavebison · · Score: 1

      Humans Evolved from Apes

      Actually no, that's a common misconception. Humans and apes both evolved, along different paths, from a common ape-like ancestor. That is, we evolved from "primates", not "apes". People often equate the two, but they have different meanings. "Primate" is like an umbrella term. "Ape" is a specific type of primate.

      Actually, the fact that people commonly say "humans evolved from apes" has been picked up by some tricky Creationists. Their argument goes: "If humans evolved from apes, then why are apes still around? Surely they'd be gone, replaced by us!"

      Once you understand the "ape" thing is just a mistake in language, and people should really be saying "primate", then of course that Creationist argument has no meaning. They just say that to try to appeal to the odd individual who might go, "oh yeah.. they dun got a point!"

  4. MPIAA by codeButcher · · Score: 4, Funny

    I did not copy that song! I Swear! It was my dog!

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:MPIAA by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      But who did he learn it from smart guy!

    2. Re:MPIAA by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      But who did he learn it from smart guy!

      The only thing my dog copied from me is my smartness.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    3. Re:MPIAA by Provocateur · · Score: 2

      The only thing my dog copied from me is my smartness.

      That, and drinking from the toilet.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    4. Re:MPIAA by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      That, and drinking from the toilet.

      I wasn't drinking, I swear! I was splashing toilet water on my face. (My french cousin told me it makes me more attractive to women...)

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  5. Bah. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    "Doggie see, doggie do" just doesn't have the same catch as "monkey see, monkey do".

    Especially the "doggie do[o]" part...

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, spluh. It's "doggie see, doggie chew!"

  6. "Only humans and apes were known to do" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Er... parrots?

    1. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing in this context, imitation doesn't include speech or sound.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Does this include the ability to repeat a single act 10 minutes later? Genuinely curious, as I've never spent time around parrots(*).

      (*) Unless you include Daily Mail readers.

    3. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I used to have a cat that stood on her back legs and rattled the door handle when she wanted to be let in or out. But apparently this sort of mimicry has only just been expanded from monkey behavior to dogs. Do any of these scientists ever go outside the labs in their mother's basement and actually observe the outside world at all?

    4. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's imitating for different reasons i guess. it attempts to communicate with it's own breed. and obviously fails.

    5. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Would be nice but I never saw mimicry in our cats. They try out different thing when they want something, and learn what works and what doesn't. They can get pretty good at that when they get older.
      If you want to show them how to do something it can work when you take them and make them move in the way they have to move. That way we managed to teach one cat how to open doors, which was not such a good idea though ...

    6. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      After thinking about this, it could be that the making them move never worked, that they always had to come up with doing something by themselves.

    7. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      not only minutes later, years later. I originally had my parrot when I lived with my parents, they had a bunch of cats. My bird would imitate the cats meowing. I moved out 4 years ago. He would meow for the first couple months but the completely stopped. 2 years later he started doing it again out of nowhere, he hasn't seen a cat in years

    8. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Isn't that learning through repetition? I was thinking the hypothesis was that a dog could copy something observed once. Otherwise the discovery is entirely uninteresting. Must RTFA...

    9. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yeah, our smart dog has just now figured out how to turn doorknobs. Luckily, it only works when the door opens inwards. He'll let himself into the house but can't let himself out. Unless I turn a door around...

      Also had a cat that would jump up and hold on to doorknobs until they opened.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    10. Re:"Only humans and apes were known to do" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or.. movement? My quaker would bob his head, tilt his head, turn side to side mimicking me. It was as if I had the strangest mirror ever.

  7. Chihuahuas can imitate by Spy+Handler · · Score: 0

    human bipedal motions better than any other dog.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaYPWtNvJ-A

    1. Re:Chihuahuas can imitate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a border collie when I was a kid that would figure out just about anything. Opening doors, the refrigerator, digging up holes (and filling them in after getting an earful from my dad)... The most impressive thing she ever did though was picking vegetables from the garden. She could smell when they were ripe, and one year all the cantaloupe seeds that were planted sprouted. We had well over 400 cantaloupe that year, and it was very time consuming to pick them all. We would wake up in the morning with tens of fruit left at the back door, with teeth marks gently pressed in the rind from my dog.

      She also tried to pick other vegetables, with varying levels of success. The funniest was tomatoes, as she just couldn't manage to be gentle enough and always ended up leaving them semi-squished on the back step.

  8. Crows also learn and imitate by advid.net · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've seen a scientific documentary that shows how crows can learn just by looking at other fellows and imitate them to solve practical problems.

    Human, apes and dogs are hardly the only species to do so.

    1. Re:Crows also learn and imitate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I've had parrots, well, parrot my speech.

  9. fridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    my old dog watched me open the fridge one day, and carried on doing it and emptying the contents until a child lock was put on it

  10. That explains it.. by sjwt · · Score: 3, Funny

    So this is why I see many fat dogs lately..

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  11. Dogs are no dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dogs have been scrutinizing us humans for 400 centuries, so they're experts at understanding our moods and behaviors.

    1. Re:Dogs are no dummies by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      However, they have no way of passing this knowledge to their offspring, because we do not select them for human scrutiny. Unless you agree with Lamarck.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    2. Re:Dogs are no dummies by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      You are missing the word "consciously" in there somewhere.

    3. Re:Dogs are no dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Substantive evidence of dog-human cooperation only goes back about 15,000 years. You're off by quite a few centuries.

    4. Re:Dogs are no dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I disagree and so do scientists. I do not have access to it right now, but there was a really good PBS documentary that discussed how humans have bred dogs that are good to read our facial expressions. In an experiment they took baby foxes, some that have been bred to be tame and some where their parents had not been specifically bred that way. They placed two of the puppies in the same home, one of each. At first they behaved really similarly, but starting weeks in, the wild one started acting wild, while the tame baby fox acted like a puppy.

    5. Re:Dogs are no dummies by deadweight · · Score: 1

      ?????? My dog taught his pup a lot of things including how to swim. Sheepdogs are ideally trained by older sheepdogs.

  12. Like she needs you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, a girl that can lick herself? That is the ultimate self service.

    1. Re:Like she needs you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if she's licking her own balls.

  13. Slashdot sociopaths... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It may come one day to be recognized, that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum, are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps, the faculty for discourse?...the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? Why should the law refuse its protection to any sensitive being?... The time will come when humanity will extend its mantle over everything which breathes... "
    Jeremy Bentham (1748 - 1832)
    Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation

    1. Re:Slashdot sociopaths... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does some dead guys opinions on morals and laws of the 18th century have to do with dogs imitating people? Or are we supposed to actually read that shit?

      Its not that animals should be treated as well as humans - its that humans should not and should never have been treated as something other than animal.

  14. Cats Can Do This, But Most Can't Be Bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My cat imitates my actions, but then again he's a rare breed that has a reputation for acting more like dogs than cats. He's a Turkish Van who barks (short, loud verbalizations to get my attention instead of the traditional "meow"), fetches (some other cats can be taught to fetch... Turkish Vans teach their owners to play fetch), and generally exhibits the behavior of a pack animal that wants the favor and attention of the alpha animal (the human).

    As for imitative behavior, he loves to watch me wash dishes. Turkish Vans are fascinated by water (in nature they swim for fun and fish for food), so he has to be on the counter watching whenever I'm washing dishes. He sees me apparently rubbing my "paws" together under the stream of water, and if I turn to put the dish in the drying rack, he will invariably start pawing at the stream of water, and then rubbing his paws together under the stream. He's invariably very confused because he doesn't understand what this accomplishes, but he keeps doing it because he sees me doing it.

    Cats have the intelligence to imitate behavior, but they don't exhibit it because most domesticated cats do not have the pack mentality. They do their own thing unless there is a reward for doing your thing. You hear about people teaching their cats to flush the toilet, but that's usually because they're fascinated by the "reward" of getting to watch the whirlpool. Turkish Vans and dogs, however, will do things because they see you doing it and they want to win your approval by doing what you do.

    1. Re:Cats Can Do This, But Most Can't Be Bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks - have to post anon because of mods. Your post was informative and I'd mod you up if I'd left myself any points... :-c

    2. Re:Cats Can Do This, But Most Can't Be Bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hear about people teaching their cats to flush the toilet, but that's usually because they're fascinated by the "reward" of getting to watch the whirlpool.

      Why don't they just flush for the reward whenever they feel like it, not just having taken a dump?

    3. Re:Cats Can Do This, But Most Can't Be Bothered by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      They do, which many youtube videos show. :)
      So it is a mixed blessing.

    4. Re:Cats Can Do This, But Most Can't Be Bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had a Turkish Van, was my best friend for many years. He too played fetch, and had all the other traits you mention. He also had an extra digit on each paw, giving him mittens to fumble with.

      He spent his first few years alone with me. When I had gotten together with my wife and kids, he made it clear to them that he was still my cat, and ranked higher than the kids, in our pack. Heh, he had chased the youngest boy, 3 at the time, into the bathtub and was swatting at him as he cried for help. He was so much fun.

    5. Re:Cats Can Do This, But Most Can't Be Bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat is not a Turkish Van, but does all of those things as well. She doesn't exactly fetch (she loves balloons, and will chase and retrieve one for a certain distance until she gets distracted), but she LOVES water, and takes baths extremely willingly. However she isn't a fan of being wrapped in a towel to be dried off :)

      Her strangest feat yet though is somehow choking down spinach and carrots. I eat spinach at least twice a day, so she sees me eat it a LOT. Invariably when I've poured out a spinach salad, she will be nearby, stealing a few leaves and happily chewing them down. I can't believe she actually likes it, as it typically takes her over 30 minutes to eat one leaf. She persists though because I eat it so much.

  15. This is ridiculous by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2

    Mimicry is perfectly standard behaviour for animals. There have been studies on how parents teach their offspring how to hunt dating back decades. This applies on land, on/under water and in the air. Most of the studies I have heard about involve mammals or birds, I can't remember any involving reptiles, fish or (in particular) insects. Some larger spiders may have this ability - ones large enough to eat small ground-nesting birds for instance
    .
    The article itself is more about adapting behaviour by watching humans and that is self-limiting, apart from speech there is not much useful a bird can learn that way. I have a neighbour who used to look after the garden before it was turned into a lawn. Back then he had a fan - a blackbird which would hang around when he was digging, waiting for worms to be unearthed. It presumably recognised my neighbour as non-threatening and the digging as the same thing it would do but on steroids.
    I was attacked by a goose a few years back. We were sitting outside and someone had fun throwing it scraps, closer and closer to me. It tried to drive me off by driving at me while hissing and flapping its wings. I joined in the fun by advancing on it, hissing back and 'flapping' my arms the same way. Communication was achieved, goose withdrew to a safer distance.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    1. Re:This is ridiculous by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      I was attacked by a goose a few years back. We were sitting outside and someone had fun throwing it scraps, closer and closer to me. It tried to drive me off by driving at me while hissing and flapping its wings. I joined in the fun by advancing on it, hissing back and 'flapping' my arms the same way. Communication was achieved, goose withdrew to a safer distance.

      You were lucky. Usually geese go for the legs in such situation. Especially if you wore shorts. Geese just love to pinch human legs...

    2. Re:This is ridiculous by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And if you bend over, they will go for your eyes. Best to carry an umbrella into goose territory. Since they have poor 3d vision, they see the rapidly expanding umbrella as charging them.

    3. Re:This is ridiculous by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      And if you bend over, they will go for your eyes.

      Did you hope they'd go for your ass?

      Since they have poor 3d vision

      Maybe farting might help?

    4. Re:This is ridiculous by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      Or just clap your hands. I have yet to meet a goose that didn't run away from that. (I will get attacked by a pack of geese on the way home).

    5. Re:This is ridiculous by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      That works for a while, but geese get used to almost anything (even the umbrella trick). A green laser at dusk aimed at the ground near them will drive them bonkers, but unfortunately doesn't do anything during daylight.

  16. Big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some breeds of dogs surpass apes in some cognitive skills that humans value. Dogs are mentally capable of showing humans which direction to go. They can herd sheep. They can come and bark at me when Timmy falls into another well.

    1. Re:Big surprise by deadweight · · Score: 2

      My dogs LIE. Really. If they whine and point their noses at the door, they get let out. If they whine and point their noses at the kitchen, sometimes they get bones and sometimes we just say STFU we gave you enough bones already. So........they point at the door and you get up and when you are almost at the door they run back to the kitchen and point at the bones.

  17. Far smarter than they let on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dogs are far smarter than they let on. It's not just mimicry, they can talk, read, write, and operate heavy machinery. The only reason we don't ever see them doing this is because mankind would put them to work and tax them. I don't blame them really.

  18. How was this not known? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen cats and dogs imitate their human masters for ages. I've even seen a cat raised around by dogs where the cat barks instead of meowing. I'm confused on how this is news and not common knowledge?

    1. Re:How was this not known? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen cats and dogs imitate their human masters for ages. I've even seen a cat raised around by dogs where the cat barks instead of meowing. I'm confused on how this is news and not common knowledge?

      The readership of /. has been devolving for years replacing the usual intelligent discussions with mindless chatter. One of my canines has learned how to ask for a potato chip by simply tossing her head back when she sees me eating potato chips. She does not bark. She does not come over to me; I have to hand-deliver the potato chip to her...well she will accept it if I toss it directly to her.

    2. Re:How was this not known? by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      Thia is what passes for research these days.
      Did you know that angry people are more likely to yell?
      Did you know that 87.3% of facts in internet articles are made up?

      --
      No brain, no pain.
  19. Well that explains why my mutts are always farting by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

    Was wondering what the hell those dogs eat. They're always loafing around the house, stinking up the place with their nasty farts.

    Oh. Now I get it.

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
  20. Damn dog by azav · · Score: 2

    Still won't do my taxes.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Damn dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Still won't do my taxes.

      That's because you have to do them first.

  21. Chickens by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    My 2 anecdotes are about chickens. I keep a couple of bantams, more as pets than anything else.

    At a stage the one hen hatched a batch of chicks. Because the chicks can't fly or hop much yet (I've seen adult chickens fly a remarkable distance quite gracefully, and hop over obstacles 2-3 times their height with a single wing flap, much like a human would use his arms for balance when hopping over something), they can't get onto the perch in their coop for the night, so mom and chicks slept on the ground. There is however a ramp-like plank up which they could walk to reach the perch, if they where so inclined. So when they where about 3 weeks old I decided to teach them to use the ramp: I made one chick from the clutch run up the ramp (running away from my hands, which shielded it in all the directions it was not supposed to go. From there on all chicks slept on the perch at night.

    The other anecdote concerns moving from a dish-tipe water bowl to a old milk jug fitted with Chick Nipples for drinking needs (click the link if you dare....). All I had to do is activate said nipples by hand so that they could see it releases water. Now they are happily drinking from this arrangement. OK, it could be argued that they peck at shiny stuff or water droplets in any case, and would learn in this manner, but still...

    Now chickens are not the most intelligent animals, I would be the first to agree. But they are a LOT smarter than what people normally give them credit for.

    Plus, they taste like chicken.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:Chickens by preflex · · Score: 1

      There is however a ramp-like plank up which they could walk to reach the perch, if they where so inclined.

      I see what you did there.

  22. shows how little we "know" by smash · · Score: 2

    My cats, both of them will attempt to do stuff like reach for the door knob to open closed doors. They are round knobs so they can't do it. But they know what they need to do. One of them has opened a bag of litter and knocked it over when we were out so she could do her business in it after the door to the room with her litter tray blew shut in the wind (I kid you not).

    Animals are a lot smarter than we give them credit for, a lot of the tests they "fail" is likely because they are simply differently motivated.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:shows how little we "know" by deadweight · · Score: 1

      When my new-to-me dog had seperation anxiety while I was at work, she tried to break in by attacking the door frame ONLY around the side with the knob. She knew what part she needed to attack. She also points at the knob when she wants someone to open it. Camping we made the mistake of letting her see how the tent zipper worked and she would constantly unzip it go outside.

  23. I didn't think this was news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have two dogs. One of them I got a year ago, and I went through the normal training process(on my own, without professional training). It may have taken a while for some things like 'shake' but she eventually got it all. She's well-trained now with only the exception that she sometimes jumps on people when she's excited(still working on it).

    My second dog is now 5 months old, and training her has been super easy. All I have to do is have them both in the same place while training, and the young one picks up on what the older one is doing right. Remove the old one, and the young one still knows all of the tricks. It has worked wonders on getting the young one to stop chewing on things. If she chews on something, she gets scolded. I offer the same thing to my older dog and she doesn't even try to chew on it, because she knows better. Then, the young one learns not to chew on that thing any more.

    Getting dogs to mimic each other is a super easy way to get them to learn new tricks, and it's something my family has been using for a long time...

    I also remember reading a study that showed that octopuses also have the ability to mimic other animals(and is one of their defensive mechanisms). I honestly can't believe this is news.

  24. Horses too by Ameryll · · Score: 1

    I've seen my friend's horses try to unlock the stall doors after the human locks the stall door, with disturbing accuracy. This doesn't seem unusual to me.

  25. my friend's dog does this by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    My friend's dog is always getting yelled at over voice chat because instead of going to bed at a normal time, she hops off the bed and watches him play Neverwinter. He plays on his TV with a controller and headset so the dog knows that he's playing with the controller. So she always licks it and bites at it because she wants to play too. One time he got up for a second and his character basically had a seisure that involved running around and falling off a cliff in game and it turns out she was messing with the buttons with her tongue. So she's not very good at Neverwinter but at least she tries to imitate him.

  26. Same old.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, dog behavior expresses traits similar to human frontal lobes, but in dogs, the trait is more universal. Apes exhibit a similar arrangement of the lobes and as such similar logic patterns. Both can be considered part of the human condition but applied to a different collectivee strategy. This is just anthropomorphism.

  27. Close the bedroom door! by andyring · · Score: 1

    I'll have to remember that...

  28. Many animals are mimics by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    It is a measure of human hubris that we fail to note the fact of animal intelligence that leads to their mimicing us. Another common example of this is the tendency of cats to become vocal and develop novel utterances as a result of observing human speech and interaction. Any keen observer will note that cats. left on their own will not develop such behavior. Upon observing and interacting with humans, at first a cat will simply meow in an utterly feline way, but then it will begin to experiment with varous gargling and purr/meow vocalizations. Finally, of course, there's the famous "silent meow", performed solely for the benefit of a human audience.

  29. Parrots also copy by stiggle · · Score: 1

    Parrots are intelligent enough to watch what you do and copy your actions to duplicate the effect.
    You cannot leave keys near my parrot as he will get hold of them and try the keys in the padlocks on his cage until he unlocks them. He knows this as he's seen me do it.

  30. Perhaps we'll learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not to hump each others' legs in front of the dog.

  31. Awwww! by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    He thinks he's people!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  32. Training schools by swb · · Score: 1

    I think there are a lot of dog trainers who are "positive reinforcement only" and probably ties into some kinds of animal welfare philosophy somehow.

    We went to dog training at the local humane society with our 10 month old rescue (half pit bull, half great dane, 95 lbs now at 2 years) and the focus was 100% on positive reinforcement.

    We found that for some behaviors it was just not effective -- ie, barking out the window at passers by. It worked well for some things like sit, stay, and come, but for behaviors that the dog did you didn't want them to do it didn't accomplish anything.

    We hired an in-home trainer recommended by friends and she recommended some simple "punitive" steps we could take -- grabbing the scruff and muzzle during an unwanted behavior and saying NO and if repeated, kenneling the dog and not letting him out until he stopped barking. She also recommended a pinch collar which did a lot to control pulling and lunging, although you still can't put a squirrel in front of this dog without some lunging.

    We found that the punitive behavior was MUCH more effective at controlling unwanted behavior than trying to teach an alternative behavior when the dog was so strongly motivated to do something we didn't want.

    I never got to the shock collar stage, although I have been tempted a couple of times. As the dog has grown older some of the annoying behavior has tapered and I think our training helped dampen a lot of unwanted behavior.

  33. depends on how the cat was raised by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Cats are a product of their upbringing and environment, like many critters, people included.

    Cats that grow up in very active households tend to be very sociable towards strangers (same for "shop" cats). Cats that grow up spending their lives with someone who doesn't socialize much, tend to be more skittish of strangers. Cats that grow up by themselves tend to be more sociable towards humans; cats that grow up with another cat tend to be more social with the other cats (playing, following, snoozing, etc.) and more aloof to humans.

    Cats can be passive, cats can be assertive. I dated someone whose cat decided that when we were making out on the couch, that was a swell time to climb up and sit on her back and purr and knead her back.

    I've known people who had cats who would play fetch; it's not that unusual - and my cat came when he was called, usually because he knew that it meant he'd get a warm lap, petting, or ear/chin scratching.

  34. Octopuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought octopuses learned behaviors through observation and imitation, as well.

  35. when my dog licks his balls, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i get this powerful urge to do the same. what does this mean?

  36. *cough* bullshit by cavebison · · Score: 1

    something that only humans and apes were known to do

    Octopuses, Crows and various birds, potentially mice.