Slashdot Mirror


Apple Retailer Facing Class Action Suit Over Employee Bag Checks

aitikin writes "Former Apple employees say the company requires workers to stand around without pay for up to 30 minutes a day while waiting for managers to search their bags for stolen merchandise." The filing. It looks pretty illegal: mandatory unpaid checks of personal belongings before and after work and all breaks.

353 comments

  1. The incredible irony of.. by assemblerex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hiring people to work in your store who can't afford the product. Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card. Apple store has to search it's workers to prevent theft. Maybe if they paid them better they wouldn't have to worry about this.

    1. Re:The incredible irony of.. by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      hiring people to work in your store who can't afford the product.

      Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card.

      Apple store has to search it's workers to prevent theft. Maybe if they paid them better they wouldn't have to worry about this.

      well, they're geniuses, so they might get sneaky!
      how they think this isn't unpaid overtime though... it's pretty fucking obvious.

      also, who is checking the managers bags? they must be managers only in title because I've never seen a real manager do shit like bag checks.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:The incredible irony of.. by show+me+altoids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Too bad I don't have mod points, I get them very often. Treating your employees like criminals is stupid. And you are 100% right about Ford, but for better or worse the world is different now in many ways, Apple's employees are a tiny part of the total population.

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    3. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Apple Store wages are plenty to buy a lot of products they sell. Not everything, but I doubt that 90% of electronics store employees could buy the most expensive 20% of the products on sale either. That's besides the point because retail theft isn't about "oh, I can't afford this and want to own it" anyway. It's about "oh, I can resell this and supplement my income quite handsomely". Most of the stuff people shoplift from supermarkets (staff or customers) isn't stuff that's very overall expensive, but stuff that's easy to steal and fences well like batteries and razors. High value per unit volume, lots of volume available, fungible.

      Apple basically has no reason to be doing these checks because there's nothing about their employees or product that makes it any more likely to be stolen than anywhere else. They hardly keep anything out on the shopfloor for deus' sake.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it's just a LITTLE bit easier to smuggle an iPod out of the store than a car. Or in more realistic terms, a muffler.

    5. Re:The incredible irony of.. by jjohnson · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most loss in retail is employee theft. When I worked at a department store, the loss prevention guys were at the doors at closing, letting employees out and checking their bags. When they were patrolling the floor during business hours, they kept a closer eye on employees than on customers. That's just a fact of life no matter what your retail segment is. In fact, I'd bet it's worse for Apple stores because their products are small, easily stolen, and fetch much higher prices than razor blades.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    6. Re:The incredible irony of.. by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      Treating your employees like criminals is stupid
      I fail to see the difference.

    7. Re:The incredible irony of.. by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      OOPS I meant to say:
      Treating your employees like criminals is stupid
      . Our government spies on us every day.
      I fail to see the difference

    8. Re:The incredible irony of.. by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card.

      No, he didn't. He didn't even pay them well so they could afford his cars.

      Ford paid them well because he was suffering horribly from employee turnover as they worked for him long enough to learn their job and then moved on to a better-paid job elsewhere. Increasing their wages lead to a dramatic reduction in employee turnover, and increased productivity enough to justify the extra pay.

      I've no idea why this urban legend continues to flourish when it's so clearly retarded. If he'd paid them more so they could afford his cars, they were at least as likely to spend the money with a competitor, or spend it on something more useful to them.

    9. Re:The incredible irony of.. by sjames · · Score: 2

      One piece at a time?

    10. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Maybe if they paid them better they wouldn't have to worry about this.

      You expect people in a jewelry store to afford all the jewelry in the store? If you handle one of Intel's E7-8870 processors it sells for $4616 in bulk, a pretty solid post-tax income if you could say it broke and sell it on eBay instead. Sure bring out the Apple hate but I'm thinking they DO have to worry about this almost regardless of how much they pay them. Never mind that I've had a friend that's been a grocery store manager, even for absurdly small sums you have employee theft. As long as they think they can get away with it, it seems some have no problem making themselves a crook over petty change.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > also, who is checking the managers bags?

      Obviously, VP of Bag Checking and Chief Bag Checking Officer, duh.

    12. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is, the people in government are supposed to be our employees, not us theirs, so it's even worse.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    13. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Given that this is only at two stores, I would bet heavily that this is two managers' policy, not Apple's. Certainly at previous crappy jobs (not at apple) I've met managers that have thought it was entirely okay to try and make you turn up half an hour early for things like team briefs and bag searches. The head office HR department had a shit fit, and said it was nothing to do with the company when I phoned up and suggested that that violated minimum wage law.

    14. Re:The incredible irony of.. by oobayly · · Score: 2

      It worked for Radar O'Reilly in the 50s.

    15. Re:The incredible irony of.. by mjwx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      hiring people to work in your store who can't afford the product. Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card. Apple store has to search it's workers to prevent theft. Maybe if they paid them better they wouldn't have to worry about this.

      Ford made the car affordable and raised workers wages. Apple has done the opposite.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:The incredible irony of.. by gagol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you are 100% right about Ford, but for better or worse the world is different now in many ways

      Corporations now expect a profit margin so large, the only way to make it happens is to produce their products in low income countries... very VERY sad.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    17. Re:The incredible irony of.. by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      I've no idea why this urban legend continues to flourish when it's so clearly retarded.

      Wasn't it simply because Henry Ford himself used that as a justification.

    18. Re:The incredible irony of.. by sjames · · Score: 1

      And for Johnny Cash.

    19. Re:The incredible irony of.. by gagol · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We caught an employee stealing many $K worth of specialized maple sap pumps at my job. There is no use for them nor black market for them (tracability and all). I would be more inclined to believe most stealing is caused by cleptomania than poverty. After all, all he stole was not worth more than 6 weeks of pay, and he could not move the stuff (we got it all back...).

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    20. Re:The incredible irony of.. by YukariHirai · · Score: 2

      Most loss in retail is employee theft.

      That's just a fact of life no matter what your retail segment is.

      Not necessarily. It may depend on the size of the store and how it's managed, but in my more than a decade of working in retail the shoplifting has been by customers, not staff.

    21. Re:The incredible irony of.. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      It's not affordability, it's fashion

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    22. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've no idea why this urban legend continues to flourish when it's so clearly retarded. If he'd paid them more so they could afford his cars, they were at least as likely to spend the money with a competitor

      Highly unlikely, a few years back I was doing some work for Volvo and in the parking lot there was a rather overwhelming share of Volvos. Sure, nobody expects you to sell or scrap an existing car that works well but somehow I don't think a Ford worker arriving in a new non-Ford car would get very well received by neither coworkers nor management, it's a pretty clear message you wouldn't want to eat your own dog food. That they could use the money for other things sure, but if they bought a car I'd say it was a very safe bet it'd be a Ford.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    23. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hiring people to work in your store who can't afford the product. Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card. Apple store has to search it's workers to prevent theft. Maybe if they paid them better they wouldn't have to worry about this.

      Ford employees could not drop a Model T car in their pocket. I'd wager a lot of tools went missing though. My father had a well paying job with great benefits doing repair work for a public utility. Every couple of years they were buying new hand tools, wrenches and such. Did the old tools wear out or break? No, they simply disappeared.

      I once worked in a warehouse while I was still in school. My buddies and I thought our pay was good. Merchandise disappeared all the time.

      Some employees will steal regardless of good pay and benefits. If they can steal they will, its as simple as that.

      That said, Apple is being ridiculous.

    24. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Grumpinuts · · Score: 2

      Story I got told about a car plant, long closed, not far from where I live. At the end of a shift, a group of workers leaving were milling around, laughing and shouting at one lad who was perched on top of his mate's shoulders. The security guard asked one of them what all the fuss was about. The worked replied "Oh that's Wullie, it';s his stag night tonight.". The security guard smiled and waved them through. Once out of sight, Wullie and his carrier took off their jackets revealing the complete exhaust assembly they'd had hidden up their backs (It was a small car btw),

    25. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This Ford thing always drives me nuts:

      Henry Ford did it to reduce worker attrition... Paying them higher was not to make them consumers (this has been debunked A LOT, but keeps showing up in pop management science/econ):

      http://corporate.ford.com/news-center/press-releases-detail/677-5-dollar-a-day

      Also, the pay required moral/religious/at home visits from their own sociology department and there was significant encouragement to save at the Ford employee bank (Ford Savings and Loan).

      The requirements to receive the additional pay was a level of corporate worker surveillance that would shock most people today, and was deemed illegal long ago.

    26. Re:The incredible irony of.. by The+Rizz · · Score: 3, Informative

      My father had a well paying job with great benefits doing repair work for a public utility. Every couple of years they were buying new hand tools, wrenches and such. Did the old tools wear out or break? No, they simply disappeared.

      I work doing repairs, and have to replace missing tools all the time - but not because of theft. Occasionally you drive off after forgetting your screwdriver sitting next to whatever you were working on.

    27. Re:The incredible irony of.. by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      More likely the employee car scheme was pretty generous

      I know our scheme is where I work

    28. Re:The incredible irony of.. by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not sure I follow... Perhaps a Unix analogy?

    29. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well obviously you were either a watchee not a watcher.... or you are a really lousy watcher, believing the employees can be trusted. because it is true that employees steal more than customers...

    30. Re:The incredible irony of.. by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      most car manufacturers provide very generous discounts to employees on cars manufactured there, the discounts are normally sufficient enough that the majority will buy the brand they manufacture.

    31. Re:The incredible irony of.. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3

      I think you should update this page then with the true reasons including all your references.

    32. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am surprised it is even legal but then you have less human rights over there. To search like that is an accusation and if unfounded should require at least an apology or lots of litigation but then when I was in the US they used to go through customers shopping trolleys as they left the supermarket and treat the actual customers like thieves and no one said a word. They gave up on me as a crazy foreigner when I told them that if they wanted to search they would have to buy it back first, they said it was their trolley so I took my goods out of their trolley and walked away. I would go similar crazy if an employer wanted to accuse me of theft like this. I thought that you had a similar right to know what you are suspected of before you can be searched.

    33. Re:The incredible irony of.. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Apple thieves just have to think different. Perhaps when I turn up I show my iPhone in a shocking pink bumper to Mr Security Guard. When I leave I show the same phone in the same bumper and the guard waves it through. Except that I switched a broken 16GB iPhone 4 for an 64GB iPhone 5 during the day and walked out with that instead. And during the day I booked the iPhone 4 for minor repair for a confederate to pick up and sell later. Or maybe I just palm off a device to a confederate. Or stuff a high price phone into a low price box that the confederate buys. Or switch devices while seeming to pick up and examine the confederate's device. So many ways it could be done with the security theatre or not. Having said this I expect Apple isn't some dumb adversary. Perhaps the bag search is just the tip of the iceberg. I wouldn't put it past them to have hidden cameras all over the place, to do frequent random stock checks, to use RFID / NFC tech to figure out when devices are entering and leaving the store or display area and all the rest. Thieves should probably assume all of this and more.

    34. Re:The incredible irony of.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      hiring people to work in your store who can't afford the product

      Who said they can't afford it? An iPhone 5 currently goes for about $500 on eBay. US minimum wage is $7.25/hour, so it takes about 70 hours (1-2 weeks) to earn that much, pre tax. Even if they're paid double minimum wage, an iPhone 5 is something that you can easily slip into your bag, and selling it on eBay will double your weekly income for a tiny extra effort. If you manage to average one every week, then it's a nice extra income, and if you're willing to steal from your employer then you probably aren't going to be in too much of a hurry to declare the income for tax purposes either, so it will more than double your take-home pay.

      Forcing employees to spend time on the premises without pay is clearly illegal, but to pay them enough that there was no economic incentive to steal would mean paying 10 or more times minimum wage and I don't think any retailer can afford that.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:The incredible irony of.. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Most car companies have a discount scheme for employees. I recall walking into a Ford dealer (in the UK) and he said that most of his low mileage second hand cars came from Ford employees since they got a discount so they could afford to buy a new car every few years and the old one would be sold off through the network. I assume they do it as a cheap perk for their employees which as a side effect increases car sales and second hand sale throughput.

    36. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently I read/heard somewhere a great term applied to...Walmart? Walmartization? (BTW, I'm old enough to remember when the found Mr. Walmart was still alive, and he proudly claimed everything or a lot of stuff was made in America) .
      Anyway the behavior is: short term profits that in the log term undercut the buying power of the general public, and eventually your own company.
      The term: cannibalism. Or maybe economic cannibalism.

    37. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card. Maybe if they paid them better they wouldn't have to worry about this.

      Maybe they're pocketing them to sell on eBay.

      --
      No sig today...
    38. Re:The incredible irony of.. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      No Unix analogy handy, but I presume that he means that employees can get the cars at a (much) reduced price.

    39. Re:The incredible irony of.. by SandraMcgowan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The department store I worked at had this same policy but only after half a dozen employees had tried to sneak out a few items in the past. They try to make it as painless as possible though. We had a locker room where we could store all our stuff and it was connected to the main floor. That way, they only had to give us a simple pat down when we entered and left the locker room and they did not need to check our bags anymore.

    40. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember hearing in the mid 70's that the parking lot of general motors contained mostly general motors cars. When a Japanese car was seen in the parking lot, there was a high risk of it being vandalized. (Japanese cars at the time were just beginning to make major inroads in the US auto market, for those who weren't at the time).

       

    41. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That *only* happens, if you treat your employees like shit, and give them zero authority and zero responsibility.
      They won't see the company as *their* company. They won't see themselves as part of it, but at best they will become the passive I-don't-give-a-shit type who's only there for the money, and at worst they will feel like the abuse victims they are.

      If your company is like that, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!

      EVERY employee needs a part where he's the boss. A part where you hired him, because HE is (to become) the expert, and hence HE gets to say how things are done.
      The moment you take that away, you lose an ally.

      Be *proud* of your employees. Even if it's just to create a self-fulfilling prophecy of them being something to be proud of.
      They are the most valuable asset of your company. Hell, they ARE your company. Treat them like shit, and you treat your company like shit. Giving them the best possible wage is like giving the beloved car that you yourself built the best possible care and gasoline.
      Why would anyone NOT do that?

      Or course that's still completely unthinkable in the company of a control freak psycho monster like Jobs.

    42. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first teaching job was at a technical college, teaching programming to Electronic Engineering students. All the multimeters were of the large building block size variety and I asked why seeing as the really small ones are cheaper. I was told that the big ones do not fit in a pocket.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.

    43. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyway the behavior is: short term profits that in the log term undercut the buying power of the general public, and eventually your own company.
      The term: cannibalism. Or maybe economic cannibalism.

      You misspelled "capitalism".

    44. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to the manager after the discussion with HR?

    45. Re:The incredible irony of.. by couchslug · · Score: 2

      US auto production, both "foreign" and "domestic" global brands, is massive. We even export BMWs to China.

      Efficiency means we don't need a vast number of workers to do that.

      The rest of the world figured out how to MAKE THINGS, and the decades-long post-WWII boom (WWII was the best thing to happen to the US in the last century) finally petered out.

      Now we must compete, and in many cases the US competes effectively.

      Have some Lincoln:

      http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/12/13/for-the-63rd-straight-year-at-least-this-remarkabl/

      Have some Hypertherm:

      http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120617/NEWS02/706189908

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    46. Re:The incredible irony of.. by oobayly · · Score: 1

      I'm with AC, what happened with HR? I think everyone would like to hear a story where HR benefited the employees and not themselves.

    47. Re:The incredible irony of.. by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Most of the stuff people shoplift from supermarkets (staff or customers) isn't stuff that's very overall expensive, but stuff that's easy to steal and fences well like batteries and razors. High value per unit volume, lots of volume available, fungible.

      and hard to trace. One reason why bottles of Tide is the fencing item of choice these days.

    48. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      uh, not that I like apple or anything but Ford had teams of thugs that would inspect your home to make sure you were "American" enough to work there...

      The $5-a-day rate was about half pay and half bonus. The bonus came with character requirements and was enforced by the Socialization Organization. This was a committee that would visit the employees’ homes to ensure that they were doing things the “American way.” They were supposed to avoid social ills such as gambling and drinking. They were to learn English, and many (primarily the recent immigrants) had to attend classes to become “Americanized.” Women were not eligible for the bonus unless they were single and supporting the family. Also, men were not eligible if their wives worked outside the home.

    49. Re:The incredible irony of.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      maple sap pumps

      That's fun to say.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    50. Re:The incredible irony of.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If they paid well their employees wouldn't risk their jobs by stealing. Nothing creates loyalty and the desire to do right by your employer like a reasonable wage that says you are valued. Conversely nothing say "disposable, replaceable generic worker who we don't expect to last six months" like low wages.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought of about fifty things wrong with that about two minutes after I posted it and I've been avoiding this thread all day. The pleasant, enlightening tone of your post makes me feel better.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    52. Re:The incredible irony of.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Car factory employees usually get a discount on the cars they produce and of course things like spare parts and maintenance are cheap too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re: The incredible irony of.. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      hiring people to work in your store who can't afford the product.

      http://osxdaily.com/2010/10/05/apple-store-pay/

      Did you actually bother about researching before you posted that?

    54. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are 100% right about Ford, but for better or worse the world is different now in many ways

      Corporations now expect a profit margin so large, the only way to make it happens is to produce their products in low income countries... very VERY sad.

      On the other hand it's really impressive that we can ship products halfway around the world fast, and reliably enough for less that the cost of paying the workers enough to live locally.

    55. Re:The incredible irony of.. by YttriumOxide · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm with AC, what happened with HR? I think everyone would like to hear a story where HR benefited the employees and not themselves.

      In the company I work for, our HR recently started an initiative to make salary scales and schemes more transparent and fair. We're a very large organisation that has evolved from one very large merger around a decade ago and very many acquisitions both before and since then.

      Because of this growth, we've generally had a lot of people with different pay schemes and structures in place, sometimes even with vastly different incomes and benefits for the exact same jobs.

      This prompted the idea to try and make everything more fair and even by implementing a new system. Doing so, they could've gone a few different ways - including some ways that would not have been in the employees best interests at all. What they've done however is something I'm extremely impressed with.

      All new employees will be under the new system. Existing employees are given an offer to migrate in to the new system (for generally very similar or only slightly more pay than currently), however they can decline to do so and remain on their existing structure if they so choose. The new structure is based on "job families" and "job levels" whereby each job family describes (very generally) a type of work, and the job levels define the seniority/experience/complexity within that family. Each job level (regardless of family) has a specific pay scale associated with it and so while you can't know exactly what a co-worker is earning, you can know they are within a particular range.

      Should an existing employee who did not choose to go in to the new structure change job in the future, they'll change in to the new structure when they do so (essentially like a new hire for that job; but of course taking their existing experience/skills/etc within the company in to account). Beyond this, the ability to discuss the position within the new structure is also not only allowed but also encouraged so that every employee feels they have been put in to the family and level that truly fits their work. The members of my team for example were all put in to a job family that I feel doesn't fit the real work that we do, so I've asked for a meeting with HR tomorrow to get them in to the job family that I feel fits better (technically the same "level" so no difference in pay; but better options for advancement in the future and just generally a better fit for the actual job). I don't foresee it being a big problem for this change (but who knows, maybe I'll reply to this post tomorrow with an angry rant... let's see!)

      So overall, I'm pretty happy with the way HR has handled this process and applaud them for doing it in a way that no employee is going to feel short changed or in a worse situation because of it.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    56. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We caught an employee stealing many $K worth of specialized maple sap pumps at my job. There is no use for them nor black market for them (tracability and all). I would be more inclined to believe most stealing is caused by cleptomania than poverty. After all, all he stole was not worth more than 6 weeks of pay, and he could not move the stuff (we got it all back...).

      I would posit that your example thief did not realize the market was so poor for that item.

      As a general rule you can fence anything, as a pawn shop will usually give you some petty cash for just about any object. Most likely the pump(s) were stolen with the intent to sell, but being a very specialized and easily traceable item the thief got caught instead of succeeding. If that thief had tried the same trick with a iPhone het'd probably have gotten away with it.

    57. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Who said they can't afford it? An iPhone 5 currently goes for about $500 on eBay. US minimum wage is $7.25/hour, so it takes about 70 hours (1-2 weeks) to earn that much, pre tax.

      Apple pays more than minimum wage.

      http://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Apple-Salaries-E1138.htm

    58. Re:The incredible irony of.. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      yes. how dare that evil Apple company be in the business of making money!
      dont they know they exist only to pay money to other people and provide jobs?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    59. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      maple sap pumps

      That's fun to say.

      True, but the more I say it the more impractical they seem for evening wear...

    60. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Threni · · Score: 1

      > const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)

      Care to explain this sig file? I've seen it around a little, if only on your posts. Surely it's just 0x00010000 - a fixed point one, which will fit into modern int types?

    61. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Ford did this to stop churn -- employees stuck around only 9 months on average IIRC, and training was not trivial.

      That he did it so they could afford to buy the cars was a myth. That also makes no sense economically since it would just lead to runaway inflation if you magically boosted everyone's salary to $200k or a million.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    62. Re:The incredible irony of.. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      i believe that to be backwards. in that its not so much that people are ashamed or afraid to drive the competition to work, because after all, cars are expensive, and like a house, you buy or drive what you can afford, and if a cheapo foreign car is it, so be it. but that a lot of motor companies give employee discounts for buying the company product because THEY (the company) dont want someone to be able to go through the parking lot and make the claim of "see? not even their workers will buy it").

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    63. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you would buy more expensive stuff made in better working conditions, businesses would get the message and stop hiring wage slaves. You're just as much to blame.

    64. Re:The incredible irony of.. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Um...it's already there if you had bothered to read it. midway down:
      "Furthermore, Ford substantially increased its workers' wages, in order to combat rampant absenteeism and employee turnover which approached 400% annually, which had the byproduct of giving them the means to become customers."

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    65. Re:The incredible irony of.. by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Actually, he is right. I've read similar stuff to what he's referencing, as well as the hatchet job that the Ford family apparently engaged in, at a later time, because they felt their ancestor's image didn't jive with the philanthropist views that they, now sitting on a massive pile of wealth, wished to convey. Apparently, if the research is correct, the Ford family paid off some historians, or something akin to them, to rearrange things...and the rest is now a part of common lore.

      And yes, high turnover was the reason given that Ford raised the wages of his workers -> it cost a month of profits to train a worker, they only stayed around for two months (something like that), his profits were as bad as his rivals. He gambled that if he increased their wages, the turnover would slow, and he could realize a better profit...which turned out to be true. Thus a new equilibrium was established...Ford would pay better wages than his rivals, his workers would linger in their employment with him, both them and him would realize better profits than trying to find someone who would work perpetually for less.

      Unfortunately, this little gem has been lost to time...not many business schools, I imagine, teach this kind of history, or if they do, perhaps they are not reaching their students. I say this because it does appear that we are engaging in a bit of repeat history...businesses have, for the last decade or so, in my observation, tempted to find that fabled worker who works essentially for nothing and doesn't quit...despite history warning them of the price they'd pay for engaging in such things. As such, those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it, and it's hard to learn what has been covered up in shame...so we will relearn Ford's lesson about wages, it seems.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    66. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      No one, apparently.

      Mind you, this doesn't seem to be limited to Apple. In my experience (from the few retail jobs I had in my younger days), the managers were always crooks. One of them stole enough merchandise to start up his own store.

    67. Re:The incredible irony of.. by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      It's Apple's HR. They'll probably release a statement along the lines of "Look, deal with it or we'll replace you with someone from the long line of hipsters BEGGING to work at this store."

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    68. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. This is not like MS employees not using Windows phones. Most people love the products they make.

    69. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Given that this is only at two stores, I would bet heavily that this is two managers' policy, not Apple's.

      You would probably lose. According to the complaint, "These personal package and bag searches" ... are a uniform practice and policy in all Apple retail stores nationwide"

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    70. Re:The incredible irony of.. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Where you punched in when they did this?

      That is the only issue here, anytime they require you to spend there they must pay you.

    71. Re:The incredible irony of.. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I am sure they can afford Apple products.
      It is just that they do not get paid enough to always refrains from wanting to stick an iphone in their pocket and make a few extra hundred dollars that week.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    72. Re:The incredible irony of.. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily since Ford was not able to increase the total money supply in the system. That is what causes inflation.

    73. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the late 1980's to early 1990's I worked for the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta Georgia. I worked on the direct deposit system along with 5 or 6 other guys in the group. To this day, I still demand to be paid by a paper check.

      Nathan

      Captcha: prosper

    74. Re:The incredible irony of.. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Which is as much about theft as forgetfulness.

      How often have people placed a tool at work in their pocket, found it when they got home ,and failed to return it due to fear of firing?

    75. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Half the tools in my garage are tools left behind by various contractors and handymen over the 30 years of repairs and home improvements. I have six hammers, two ladders, three shovels and and assorted screwdrivers, pliers, wrenches, and levels, none of which I bought. I've even called the owners to let them know, but they never bother to swing by to pick them up. I almost think they do it on purpose, because when I see the tool, I remember the worker, and sometimes that will get me thinking about something else I need to have fixed, and I call them again

    76. Re:The incredible irony of.. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      The managers are probably the thieves and blaming the employees. Employees are a major source of theft but as you stated the managers also employees and just as culpable. So who is watching them? Its then easy for them to blame the kids working for peanuts when stuff goes missing. The searching may be a method of diverting attention from the manager to the employees. I would be curious if after the lawsuit the search policy is dropped along with a reduction in "lost" merchandise.

    77. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... don't think a Ford worker arriving in a new non-Ford car would get very well received by neither coworkers nor management...

      On a business trip, a colleague and I drove into a GM factory in a Ford car. The entire floor stopped their work to boo and catcall us.

    78. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Given that this is only at two stores, I would bet heavily that this is two managers' policy, not Apple's.

      Irrelevant.

      As a manager, the guy is representing Apple to the employees under his/her command.

      Apple will respond to this actions the same way.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    79. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time for Tim Cook to do a hidden CEO programme.

    80. Re:The incredible irony of.. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card.

      Those were factory workers. These are retail employees. I was a retail employee. When I eventually became a manager, I had to fire these thieving bastards. They were mostly kids working for spending money, most from pretty well-off families. Some were from family friends - that is awkward as hell when you have to tell a friend that you fired their daughter. It was like babysitting, and the social dynamic was like high school. I'm soooo glad I went to college.

      Remember that it's your worst employees that shape policy. Sad, but true. You'd hire better people, but there's a finite number of well-adjusted people willing to work retail, even if you pay slightly better than the place next door.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    81. Re:The incredible irony of.. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You could certainly refuse the search... once.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    82. Re:The incredible irony of.. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

      Just because your employees cant afford the product you sell does not mean its okay for them to steal. You cant justify theft. Should every person who works for Ferrari be entitled to afford an Ferrari (Car analogy!)? If Apple chooses to pay shit then don't work for them. Retail jobs are high turnover because its unskilled labor and they don't want to pay 30k+/yr + benefits to someone who could be replaced by any schmuck who walks in of the street. So they pay shit in the hopes that the employee gets tired of making nothing and moves on to a new job. Its a job for young kids out of high school or college looking for pocket money while still living at home with mom and dad. Its not a job that supports an independent life or family.

      It would be nice if every job could enable someone to live independently but it simply doesn't work like that.

    83. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. how dare that evil Apple company be in the business of making money!...by breaking the law (in this case). Obviously Apple should not be subject to employment law (or any other law) because they are just soooooooo fantastic.

      Appletards out in force, I see.

    84. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. how dare that evil Apple company be in the business of making money! dont they know they exist only to pay money to other people and provide jobs?

      In the business of making money? I thought they were in the business of selling consumer electronics. But see that's the issue right? So many companies are on the business of making money that they seem to not really care what else happens.

    85. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also worked retail - for about 4 years. "Shrink" was caused by both customers and employees. Employees often did it on a large scale - leaving boxes of items outside behind the cardboard bales while unloading trucks and picking them up after hours. "Customers" also did this - once stealing an entire hand truck of cigarettes that was ready to be stocked. But from my few years I probably saw an equal amount of customer and employee theft. Since there are more customers than employees - the employees were responsible for a much higher per-capita.

    86. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am surprised it is even legal but then you have less human rights over there. To search like that is an accusation and if unfounded should require at least an apology or lots of litigation but then when I was in the US they used to go through customers shopping trolleys as they left the supermarket and treat the actual customers like thieves and no one said a word. They gave up on me as a crazy foreigner when I told them that if they wanted to search they would have to buy it back first, they said it was their trolley so I took my goods out of their trolley and walked away. I would go similar crazy if an employer wanted to accuse me of theft like this. I thought that you had a similar right to know what you are suspected of before you can be searched.

      Get the rubber hoses, this one's got some self respect left.

    87. Re:The incredible irony of.. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      maple sap pumps

      That's fun to say.

      True, but the more I say it the more impractical they seem for evening wear...

      But they go with everything!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    88. Re:The incredible irony of.. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The employer isn't 100% responsible for whatever happened to a person before they became an employee. Many employees are damaged goods, and you only detect that when they do something wrong. If you blindly trust everyone in this world, you will be eaten alive. I worked in retail before and during college. Thank God that's over.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    89. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Most loss in retail is employee theft.

      That is likely not entirely true (if even partially true). I worked in retail for quite some time and that was the mantra of every head of loss prevention but one. That one explained that the statistics that statement is based on are flawed. The correct interpretation of that study was that employees caught stealing from the store admitted to stealing more from the store than outsiders caught stealing admitted. The original study that is the source of that statement was based on interviews with people caught stealing from the store. When employees were caught stealing they were more likely to admit stealing before they were caught than outsiders who were caught stealing. In addition, they admitted to stealing a higher monetary value of stuff than outsiders admitted to. There are several factors that would contribute to employees admitting to stealing more than outsiders do, but employees caught stealing are less likely to downplay the amount they have stolen in the past than outsiders.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    90. Re:The incredible irony of.. by ebh · · Score: 1

      I've wondered about this with regard to call centers. There are stories of call centers where you aren't on the clock until you sit down and log in at your terminal, regardless of how long it takes from the time you enter the employer's premises to get to your terminal. That can be the same amunt of extra unpaid time each day that this lawsuit describes.

    91. Re:The incredible irony of.. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I know a guy who is pretentious as hell, but overall a nice fellow. Anyway, he got a job offer at Ford, but was going to turn it down when he found out he'd be expected to drive one. I said, "You know, Ford makes Jaguar..." and his eyes went wide and he took the job the next day. Shallow, but there you go.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    92. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Nimey · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily. There's always someone who'll thieve no matter how well you pay them; it's human nature.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    93. Re:The incredible irony of.. by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      We had work done in our basement recently. We were doing the final walk through with the owner and we found about 5 nice spot lamps so asked him if they were his since they weren't ours. He responded with "No wonder my crews are always complaining about not having any lamps!" It's easy to forget things when you don't have to pay to replace them :P

    94. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop abstracting it out and blaming it on "The Corporation", Corprorations are owned by people, people like you and me who are shareholders. You expect your superannuation or bank deposits to have decent rates of growth, if they don't you move your money, this competition between funds and banks leads to the outcome we see in this article. They will do whatever it takes to make sure they are able to offer the best returns to their shareholders.

      So basically this is the product of our (you, me and most people who read this) greed, own it and do something about it rather than slinging shit at a vague externalised entity.

    95. Re:The incredible irony of.. by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      At Ford's auto plants, only fords are allowed in certain lots, the rest have to go in the lots in the back.

    96. Re: The incredible irony of.. by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

      Could I get a car analogy for this?

    97. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Sears Payment Systems did this back in the 80s. I eventually got canned by them for excessive tardiness due to a certain manager taking a dislike to me, making a point of holding me up for pointless "discussions" every 2 or 3 days, and then refusing to acknowledge any connection to the string of late logins she'd thus engineered for me.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    98. Re:The incredible irony of.. by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Given that this is only at two stores, I would bet heavily that this is two managers' policy, not Apple's.

      You would probably lose. According to the complaint, "These personal package and bag searches" ... are a uniform practice and policy in all Apple retail stores nationwide"

      Except they're not mutually exclusive. Other Apple stores may have the same policy, but the search is done on company time (there's nothing to say the manager can't search the bags prior to shift end and then hand them to the employee as they leave).

      The complaint isn't about bag searches (most places have them in retail). It's about being forced to wait half an hour after shift end, on unpaid time to leave. Yeah, it's only half an hour, but given Apple retail store pay, that's easily another $5-10 a day (Apple tends to pay on the higher end of the scale).

      So either other Apple stores do it better with the same policy and it's just a couple of douchebag managers (way too common on retail - a "manager" in retail parlance doesn't pay much more than a floor salesperson but has more power so the Peter Principle is very strong), or there's been a recent policy change. It's definitely not something that's been around a while (or we'd have heard it much earlier - Apple may be secretive, but ex-employees tend to make injustices transparent).

    99. Re: The incredible irony of.. by Kjella · · Score: 0

      Could I get a car analogy for this?

      Sure you can, just keep reading analogies until you get it. Though more than five rounds and I'll have to ask for your "intelligent being" card back (your geek card was already forfeit when you needed an analogy to UNIX).

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    100. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, a couple more places tools end up:

      1. Being 'borrowed' by another tradesman who forgot to give it back (okay, that's pretty much theft but without malice)
      2. Tools being sealed into sheet rock walls or left inside the shuttering when pouring concrete

    101. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not any longer--at least not in Sweden. (I know this because my partner works as an engineer at Volvo's plant in Eskilstuna.)

    102. Re:The incredible irony of.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ford paid his workers well so they could afford his card. Apple store has to search it's workers to prevent theft. Maybe if they paid them better they wouldn't have to worry about this.

      Costco pays their workers well above baseline but they still have people at the door checking every cart that leaves... to make sure that no one is engaged in a theft collaboration project with a checker. It's not to stop shoplifting, which it can't actually do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    103. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often that is because of a discount and not higher pay.

    104. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      HR benefits the employees when not benefitting the employees harms the company (like lawsuits, etc)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    105. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my grandfather has a good solution for tools and extension cables walking off.

      buy pink and purple tools. they don't sell with fences, they stand out on a job sight, and manly men types won't take them for their personal collection. Also, it acts as a bellweather for if that person is a team player or not if they complain about the tools or just go with it.

      Industry pro tip.

    106. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Card?

    107. Re:The incredible irony of.. by hodet · · Score: 1

      It's funny because its true. I built a house a few years ago and contractors would leave stuff. Even calling them to tell them and they would never come around and pick it up. Got a nice 300 ft 12Ga extention cord out of the deal. Why wouldn't you come back to get that? Although with the amount they charged me I pretty much paid for it anyway.

    108. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Apple's HR. They'll probably release a statement along the lines of "Look, deal with it or we'll replace you with someone from the long line of hipsters BEGGING to work at this store."

      And everyone else will find this an acceptable answer, because hey, it keeps the hipsters off the streets so we don't have to listen to them whine about how inferior our artistic tastes are, right?

    109. Re: The incredible irony of.. by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Once had a job at a major sports stadium. Since there was no free parking I asked if they would compensate for parking. They said yes and put in writing. When checks finally started arriving I noticed the parking fee ($20 a day, $100 a week) wasn't in there. When I asked about it again they said they would not pay. I showed them what they wrote and they said that person has been fired and they didn't represent the company. I quit and never went back.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    110. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with AC, what happened with HR?

      HR has become a tool of your capitalist masters to keep the proletariat downtrodden through oppression and denial of any improvements in wages and benefits. ;-)

      They aren't there to help you, they are meant to maximize profits and weed anybody who won't conform or tries to unionize.

      They're not there to benefit employees, they're just an arm of management intended to screw us as much as the law allows (and no more to shield them from liability).

    111. Re:The incredible irony of.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's an attempt to do a fixed point float. In C#. With a variable called "one". That's an int, so with only 15 bits that side of the decimal.

      Silvermoon is overall a bit half baked, and that particular line sums it up.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    112. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've wondered about this with regard to call centers. There are stories of call centers where you aren't on the clock until you sit down and log in at your terminal, regardless of how long it takes from the time you enter the employer's premises to get to your terminal.

      Those aren't stories. That's real.
      It's also perfectly fine IMO. Plenty of companies have timeclocks of one sort or another. I've worked at monument companies that still used paper cards and a timeclock thing that printed a timestamp on it. You had to walk into the building to get to it... which should be pretty obvious. This is no different.

      The real issue is if they try to impede your ability to clock in when you get there or after you punch out. For example, if you walk through the door, and they try to drag you into a meeting before punching in, that's a no-no. You go punch in, then go to the meeting.

      The other possible issue is if you are unable to log in due to a locked account, broken PC, etc. In those cases, the user should see their manager/supervisor, and have it manually corrected on their file. Same thing can happen with manual punch cards (ex. power outage... manager writes down times, and logs the info into the payroll system later). Those are edge cases with simple work arounds, not the norm.

      This Apple case is the same as pulling someone into a meeting before they punch in, or after they punch out. They can do all the bag checks they want... AFTER you punch in, and BEFORE you punch out. Once you punch out, you can walk out.

    113. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father had a well paying job with great benefits doing repair work for a public utility. Every couple of years they were buying new hand tools, wrenches and such. Did the old tools wear out or break? No, they simply disappeared.

      I work doing repairs, and have to replace missing tools all the time - but not because of theft. Occasionally you drive off after forgetting your screwdriver sitting next to whatever you were working on.

      There was in fact a lot of theft not simply leaving tools behind. Everyone knew, even local management. Local management didm't want to lose an otherwise good employee over something "petty" like a couple of wrenches, a first aid kit, etc. Again, a public utility, perhaps not the typical corporate environment.

    114. Re:The incredible irony of.. by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      In the late 1980's to early 1990's I worked for the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta Georgia. I worked on the direct deposit system along with 5 or 6 other guys in the group. To this day, I still demand to be paid by a paper check.

      Why's that? You do realize that your paper check has to be cleared through the same ACH system that direct deposits use, right?

    115. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the Great Maple Syrup Heist about a year ago (millions of dollars of syrup) up in Canada, maybe there's more to it than just stealing and failing to sell the pumps. Maybe they were actually used for their designed purpose?

    116. Re:The incredible irony of.. by superdave80 · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm not paid for the time it takes me to drive to work or walk from my car to the front door. Unless there is some 'work' you are doing while walking to your desk at the call center, I'm not sure I see the problem with this.

      That can be the same amunt of extra unpaid time each day that this lawsuit describes.

      What building takes a half hour to get from the front door to a desk? You could easily walk over a mile in half an hour...

    117. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many years ago i worked for Ford, you are pretty accurate that most of the cars were Ford. I had a Ford too, your car was very likely to be deeply keyed if it wasn't a ford.

    118. Re:The incredible irony of.. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      If you worked for one of the big 3 U.S. automakers, you drove American. In Detroit, LOTS of people wouldn't let a foreign car park in their driveway.

      --
      Good-bye
    119. Re:The incredible irony of.. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If that thief had tried the same trick with a iPhone het'd probably have gotten away with it.
      Iphones have serial numbers. If I were an iphone retailer I would have a record of all iphones that had come through my store, both ones that sold and ones that were supposed to be in stock.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    120. Re:The incredible irony of.. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Highly unlikely, a few years back I was doing some work for Volvo and in the parking lot there was a rather overwhelming share of Volvos. Sure, nobody expects you to sell or scrap an existing car that works well but somehow I don't think a Ford worker arriving in a new non-Ford car would get very well received by neither coworkers nor management, it's a pretty clear message you wouldn't want to eat your own dog food. That they could use the money for other things sure, but if they bought a car I'd say it was a very safe bet it'd be a Ford.

      While visiting Detroit I was told that employees who owned competitors cars had to park in an overflow lot which was across the highway from the regular employee lot. There was a pedestrian bridge over the highway.
      That being said, I have worked for a lot of places that won't use their own product.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    121. Re:The incredible irony of.. by nnnnnnn · · Score: 1

      Ford paid $5 a day to its workers in 1914. In today's dollars that's $116.75, or $14.60 an hour. The average salary at an Apple store is $11.64 an hour.

    122. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I follow... Perhaps a Unix analogy?

      It's like a Vim developer showing up to work using Emacs.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    123. Re:The incredible irony of.. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Most car companies have a discount scheme for employees. I recall walking into a Ford dealer (in the UK) and he said that most of his low mileage second hand cars came from Ford employees since they got a discount so they could afford to buy a new car every few years and the old one would be sold off through the network. I assume they do it as a cheap perk for their employees which as a side effect increases car sales and second hand sale throughput.

      My car is 12 years old. I guess I should have gone to work as an Auto Assembly worker instead of being a Software Engineer.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    124. Re:The incredible irony of.. by torkus · · Score: 1

      A few companies have gotten trouble for this over the years. IIRC Geico did this and lost a class action...so every employee was given x number of minutes to log on each day.

      What's a problem is the class-action waviers that are getting built into pretty much every contract these days. Even if you spent *40 years* at a company ... 5 minutes * 5 days/week * 52 weeks/year / 60 min/hr * $10/hr * 40 years = $8,667 (minus taxes). Hardly worth getting a lawyer out of bed.

      It would actually make more sense for the IRS to get involved. $216/year + 28,000 geico employees * 30% = $1.8M in taxes (yes I know it's not 30% to the IRS) Then figure in all the OTHER companies doing the same.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    125. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Same reason people steal toilet paper from company bathrooms. It's an impulse, not a need.

    126. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the manner of clocking in isn't the point. the point is, once in the building, you should be paid if you have to do anything company related, i.e. bag checks. those things are an impediment. if the above call centers did the same, then they should be clocked in once the checking process begins.

    127. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/03/04/the-story-of-henry-fords-5-a-day-wages-its-not-what-you-think/

    128. Re:The incredible irony of.. by bonehead · · Score: 1

      The local UAW office has 5 reserved parking spaces for foreign cars. All the way in the back of a rather large parking lot.

      And they get VERY serious about enforcing that rule.

    129. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Zinho · · Score: 1

      Which is as much about theft as forgetfulness.

      How often have people placed a tool at work in their pocket, found it when they got home ,and failed to return it due to fear of firing?

      It never occurred to me anyone should have a fear of that. Why would returning something to its rightful owner/place be punished? If someone were to return to me something of mine that they took, then I'd think of them as honest and trustworthy for returning it instead of keeping it.

      I have a picture in my head of a sociopathic boss chuckling to himself in the soundproof office, "I'll fire this guy, then NOBODY will ever bring my lost/stolen property BACK to me, EVER AGAIN!!!! BWAHAHAH!" It just doesn't scan, and seems quite comical.

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    130. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately, americans pissed their rights away when they started giving in to piss tests and bag searches. next they'll just start direct monitoring of all actions. drones are getting cheaper and less restrictive flight paths, and you have to have that company phone with you. as a whole, we've lost far more than we'll ever gain. we did it to ourselves.

    131. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he'd paid them more so they could afford his cars, they were at least as likely to spend the money with a competitor, or spend it on something more useful to them.

      Not if he set it all up through the job itself. Offer a discount with fixed, automatic payments in the amount of the raises. Make money in the long term and keep the employees happy. Throw in an employment clause for good measure.

    132. Re:The incredible irony of.. by ikhider · · Score: 1

      I love this comment! Yes, Apple has ENOUGH money to pay their workers well. Enable Apple workers to make commission. Not that I buy Apple, because they exploit workers. http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/activate/2011/09/201194144739197637.html Apple give it from the back AND the front. Nice. Pay your workers you cheap rich old monsters.

      --
      "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
    133. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm not paid for the time it takes me to drive to work or walk from my car to the front door. Unless there is some 'work' you are doing while walking to your desk at the call center, I'm not sure I see the problem with this.

      The problem is that this is time that your employer requires of you. Your employer does not require you to drive to the office (you could live across the street if you liked), but they do require you to walk from the front door to your desk, turn your computer on, and log in.

      They should pay you for all the time they require you to spend doing something (that's what they're paying you for, the right to tell you what you spend your time doing).

      What building takes a half hour to get from the front door to a desk? You could easily walk over a mile in half an hour...

      A building in which you have to go through a bag check, wait for your machine to turn on, wait for the crappy slow windows server to wake up and process your login, wait for it to copy a fresh home directory across the network, wait for the web browser to load for you to access the login system, turn your machine off in the evening, and go through another bag check.

    134. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, even if Apple Store employees were paid enough to afford an iPad, they wouldn't be paid enough to afford three iPads a week, but they could possibly steal that many if no one checked. The searches I don't have a problem with, but they should be done on the clock.

    135. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps I can get a discount on enterprise Java code for eCommerce from my employer.

      -- Posting as AC because its too hard to log in.

    136. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it avoid having to order one of those embarrassing Swedish devices...

    137. Re:The incredible irony of.. by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Got a nice 300 ft 12Ga extention cord out of the deal. Why wouldn't you come back to get that? Although with the amount they charged me I pretty much paid for it anyway.

      The reason why is because you're not going to dive 30 minutes out of your way to get a $20 extension cord, let alone a $5 hammer/wrench/screwdriver. Add in the fact that going back can make you late for the next appointment you have, and it's pretty much just not going to happen.

    138. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Lincolnshire+Poacher · · Score: 1

      "Look, deal with it or we'll replace you with someone from the long line of hipsters BEGGING to work at this store."

      Not sure why a hipster would want to work in an Apple store. Hipsters are about counter-culture.

    139. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Lincolnshire+Poacher · · Score: 1

      The local UAW office has 5 reserved parking spaces for foreign cars. All the way in the back of a rather large parking lot.

      Wow, only five spaces for made-in-Mexico Fords? Must be quite an incentive to buy an Alabama-assembled Honda.

    140. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please quit your straw-man arguments. Either you didn't, or you didn't want to understand what I said. I'll give you the benefit of doubt. (But only once.) (Although your usage of the word "God" in uppercase is a big warning sign for a mental illness [religious schizophrenia] where people obsessively don't want to understand and prefer to live in a fantasy world.)

      Nobody said anything about blind trust. It's more about acceptance.
      Just like when your leg hurts on humid weather, because you had an accident in the past, you also don't just cut it off, but continue trust it to do the walking and standing part for you, and try to cure and improve it. Because it's part of you.

      The problem starts, when you start to see your own employees as your enemies.

      Also, you're supposed to test them before you hire them. That's what those first 3-6 months are for! Hiring them is a contract that you trust them and trust their skills in their area of expertise over yours. Otherwise what's the point of hiring them? (No, being an abusive monster is not a acceptable reason.)

    141. Re:The incredible irony of.. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Although your usage of the word "God" in uppercase is a big warning sign for a mental illness [religious schizophrenia] where people obsessively don't want to understand and prefer to live in a fantasy world.

      I'm not religious, but I follow proper grammar rules. I would capitalize "Jupiter" or "Saturn" or "Zeus" or "Buddha" or any other proper name. "God" is considered a proper name in this context. I think you need to brush up on psychology - religion is by far more common than atheism and is not, by itself, a sign of mental illness. I know that I constantly fight my instincts to be superstitious.

      The problem starts, when you start to see your own employees as your enemies.

      I'm not saying to view them as your enemies, but certainly don't assume that they share your moral or ethical standards. Rules have to be very clear, and compliance has to be verified. There are a large number of people who will mistake kindness for softness and attempt to fleece you. You have to be mannerly, polite, but firm. I would never advocate being a "monster", but nor would I suggest trying the "best buddy" approach. It's a difficult balance to strike, and you have to adapt to different environments. I think that is why it is hard to find a good manager. I'm not sure I'd consider myself a good manager - I'm probably too hands-off.

      Also, you're supposed to test them before you hire them. That's what those first 3-6 months are for!

      I'm not sure where you are from, but in the US there is no 3-6 month probation period by statute. Generally work is at-will, so you can fire at any time for almost any reason except racial, age, or sexual discrimination. Chances are that you will not figure out that someone is a thief until after you catch them.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    142. Re:The incredible irony of.. by sjames · · Score: 1

      I suspect it lies somewhere between 'because I can' and a feeling that they're not being paid enough and so will extract some symbolic extra value somewhere.

    143. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Stratus311 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps when I turn up I show my iPhone in a shocking pink bumper to Mr Security Guard. When I leave I show the same phone in the same bumper and the guard waves it through. Except that I switched a broken 16GB iPhone 4 for an 64GB iPhone 5

      Except your new iPhone 5 won't fit into an iPhone 4 shocking pink bumper. At least not without some goatse-type stretching of said bumper.

    144. Re:The incredible irony of.. by Meski · · Score: 1

      But you turn your computer over when it depreciates to zero ( 3 years)

    145. Re:The incredible irony of.. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      But you turn your computer over when it depreciates to zero ( 3 years)

      No. I don't. I usually get the highest performance to dollar ratio computer (usually this is the about 95% as powerful as the top end, and about 70% of the price), and then I keep it for about 8 years before upgrading.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    146. Re: The incredible irony of.. by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

      I can't read this for the whoosh that's bursting my eardrums.

  2. Sounds like a slam-dunk by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative

    If Apple's actions are being described correctly, that's time that clearly belongs to be on the clock.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Sounds like a slam-dunk by gagol · · Score: 1

      THIS!

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    2. Re:Sounds like a slam-dunk by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I know when I interned at Lockheed Martin during college, some of the employees talked about working at one of its other offices that was a high-security location, and how they'd have to arrive an hour early in order to get through the security checkpoint each morning, just because every car had to be inspected before it could pass through the gates, and there were thousands of cars to inspect. They all said that it was unpaid time. Assuming that was legal, I don't see how this thing here can be illegal.

      I mean, IANAL, obviously, but I don't see how an employee electing to do something entirely optional and having to spend some extra time because of it is a slam dunk against the employer. The employee can simply choose to not bring a bag or personal belongings in, just as those Lockheed employees could have chosen to take public transportation and then walked through the gate to avoid the mandatory car inspection. Convenient? Certainly not, but still a viable option if that's what's going on.

    3. Re:Sounds like a slam-dunk by mjr167 · · Score: 2

      It depends on if you are exempt or non-exempt. If you are not a hourly worker the company can ask you to do things on your own time and not pay you.

    4. Re:Sounds like a slam-dunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. They certainly should be paid, perhaps even more since waiting around probably doesn't fit in their job description.

      You'd certainly have to pay me a lot more to stand in goddamn lines than to do my actual job...

  3. Why don't they just ban the bags? by epyT-R · · Score: 0

    Why don't they just ban the bags from the stores in the first place? A lot easier to enforce, a lot less time consuming, and a lot less legally dubious. I wonder if Apple management just enjoys lawsuits as well as any opportunity to violate the privacy of others.

    1. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      I don't care what they say about me, just make sure they spell my name right! - P.T. Barnum



      *Disclaimer* I may not be quoting directly/ correctly from memory :)

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    2. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think executions at the spot on styled iGallows controlled trough the cloud. Alternatively guillotine wiith an iPhone interface. Or just throw random people to the lions and put it on tv. The way justice system and state in general tend to work this little entertainment is the best we can hope for anyway.

    3. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Depending on where the Apple store is relative to your home/other jobs/schooling, employees might not relish the thought of going all the way to work and back every day with nothing but the contents of their pockets and wearing their work outfit.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I don't think they should be searching or banning the bags, but it would've been easier from their standpoint to just ban them. Their policy exposes them to unneeded legal risk.

    5. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      I don't think they should be searching or banning the bags, but it would've been easier from their standpoint to just ban them. Their policy exposes them to unneeded legal risk.

      the policy is so that the "managers" can feel like bigshots. it's not about easy. that's why they went along with it despite it being illegal.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depending on where the Apple store is relative to your home/other jobs/schooling, employees might not relish the thought of going all the way to work and back every day with nothing but the contents of their pockets and wearing their work outfit.

      They don't need to ban bringing the bag to work, just ban bringing it into the inventory control area. They could provide a locker room where people can lock up their bag before their shift, outside the inventory control point (the place where they were inspecting the bags). This is common practice at plenty of retailers, warehouses, and manufacturers. Try this: Go to Walmart and walk around. Okay, now how many employees do you see walking around the store with backpacks, purses etc? Answer: zero. They are in the locker room.

    7. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      Try this: Go to Walmart and walk around. Okay, now how many employees do you see walking around the store with backpacks, purses etc? Answer: zero. They are in the locker room.

      Nice try. The Wal-Mart employees generally have to walk through the entire store to the back to clock in. The area where the receiving docks are is where the break room and employee lockers are. Yes, they keep their purses/backpacks/lunchboxes in a locker while working, but they could also slip things into these bags in the store while on their way back, or take merchandise from the storage racks in back area by the receiving docks, then walk out at the end of the day with their bags on arm.

      For your idea to work the store has to have a separate employee entrance/exit outside the inventory control area. And you'll need someone to guard the door between the inventory control area and the employee area to make sure bags or merchandise to not cross between the two.

    8. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just ban the bags from the stores in the first place?

      Because 90% of women carry purses. Most women's clothing don't have usable pockets, so they need the purses. A ban would unfairly affect women more than men, and would result in another lawsuit.

      Also, if the store has any kind of dress code or uniforms, there's a good chance that many of the employees bring a change of clothes with them so they don't have to go straight home after work to change (and, to a lesser degree, go straight to work from home in the morning). Bringing your change of clothes in a bag is both vastly more convenient, and also required to protect said clothes from any bad weather.

    9. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you go home instead of going to the locker where you left your bag?

    10. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Because 90% of women carry purses. Most women's clothing don't have usable pockets, so they need the purses. A ban would unfairly affect women more than men, and would result in another lawsuit.

      Most womens' clothing that is sensible to wear at work has enough pocket space to hold a small key for a locker, and even if it doesn't, most women are smart enough to remember a combination to a lock that they use every day.

      There's a very easy solution to the problem, which has been suggested higher up the thread. :)

    11. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      ...and you're going to transport the contents of that locker to/from the store in a... ?

      Right, a bag. Or possibly a loose bundle of laundry, which might duck the letter of the bag-check policy but would be capable of concealing an iPod and probably end up being searched anyway.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    12. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Well, like men, women are supposedly adult human beings.. they could just deal. It sure beats having their bags searched like they're prisoner-slaves (oh wait, they're apple employees maybe they're used to it). I only meant that from Apple's perspective, it's legally safer to just ban the bags than it is to search. Even in today's broken PC culture, I highly doubt telling a woman not to bring her bags into the building would result in a winnable case.

    13. Re:Why don't they just ban the bags? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      What locker room? When I worked there a long time ago, there was just an area you could put your bags, and you had to hope nobody would steal your stuff.

  4. another reason to patronize an Apple VAR by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1, Funny

    I never go to Apple stores.

    1. Re:another reason to patronize an Apple VAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trouble is that I'm yet to find a VAR that does the VA bit of the acronym.

    2. Re:another reason to patronize an Apple VAR by gagol · · Score: 2

      WTF is a VAR? GIHA (God I Hate Acronyms...)

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    3. Re:another reason to patronize an Apple VAR by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value-added_reseller , I suppose. I had to look that up, so I agree with your sentiment about acronyms.

    4. Re:another reason to patronize an Apple VAR by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Trouble is that I'm yet to find a VAR that does the VA bit of the acronym.

      The value they add is to their own pocket.

      You thought they were adding value for YOU?

  5. Not surprising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked at a few retail companies that do this. CVS was the biggest offender. The CVS I worked at has the only cameras in the building facing employees, and a mandatory bag check on the way out, every shift. Switching out at 2:30 and ready to go home? Lets hope your store isn't busy or you will be sitting there for a while.

    1. Re:Not surprising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half Price Books does that too. Cameras mostly all pointing at the employees, while valuable books go out the door stuck under customers' shirts.

    2. Re:Not surprising. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You can't put cameras under peoples shirts. Well you could but you'd get in even bigger trouble.

    3. Re:Not surprising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geniuses Gone Wild.
      Probably the only video in the series to sell no copies at all.

  6. Class action suit vs a corporation by Kartu · · Score: 1

    Considering it is now legal to prohibit class actions in EULAs, it won't take long to put that into most job contracts. At least for Apple.
    But then IANAL, so pardon my ignorance if EULAs are somehow less restrictive.

    1. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      Bit, to be like most software EULAa, they will have to agree to it before they can read it. Just like a congressional law.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you ever read those bans they just say they wanna go to a arbiter first at that point the decision can be taken to court. and really if such a eula was put to the test im pretty sure it would get shot down fast.

    3. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by Gogo0 · · Score: 2

      not sure when that happened, but about seven years ago i was a security guard and we werent paid for the time we werent working our station. approximately thirty minutes both before and after work spent gearing up, signing in/out and unloading our firearm, and driving to/from the site to relieve the previous team was free time to the company. we had a three-week paid training period prior to working, and frequently were let out early. site supervisor kept bringing that up, said that things 'evened out'.

      after i had moved onto another job, someone filed a class-action lawsuit against the company (alaska native corporation) and i received nearly $1000 compensation (lawyers got over half of it -but not bad for something i didnt have to go to bat for).

      though mind that if it is indeed illegal to file a class action suit if prohibited by your corporate overlord, it is still legal to file a complaint, compile evidence to demonstrate the problem persists, and file your own lawsuit. someone had to go through those steps for the class action suit, its not unreasonable (though admittedly a huge PITA) to do it oneself. for the record, i think its inane to disallow class action suits when individual suits are allowed.

    4. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the record, i think its inane to disallow class action suits when individual suits are allowed.

      Individual suits aren't allowed under certain contracts - they specify that arbitration is to be used instead. The court doesn't much care what happens in arbitration, as long as its fair to both parties. The reason is simple:arbitration doesn't cost the state anything; it's paid for by the parties.

      In ATT v Conception, the arbitration clause was pretty customer friendly. (It paid customer arbitration expenses for non-frivolous claims, specified the venue as the county of the sales contract, and limited ATT's ability to steal recover it's own legal expenses.) And don't forget the decision was 5-4. It's not nearly as clear that EULAs or ToS in other context will be so happily supported.

      If the court doesn't like an arbitration clause it finds in a contract, it's not going to care about any connected class-action limitation. Courts like class actions, because court time is expensive. If a group of people all have the same case to bring to court, the court will hear the evidence and make a decision once.

      There's been no real change in the legal position of class action-lawsuits. They're still allowed whenever a lawsuit is allowed. What's been restricted is class-based arbitration.

      And for what it's worth, employment contracts are nothing like sales contracts; the laws governing them are quite different and protect different interests.

    5. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      though mind that if it is indeed illegal to file a class action suit if prohibited by your corporate overlord, it is still legal to file a complaint, compile evidence to demonstrate the problem persists, and file your own lawsuit. someone had to go through those steps for the class action suit, its not unreasonable (though admittedly a huge PITA) to do it oneself.

      Actually it'll be much easier for you to bring your suit in that case - you simply look up the records of the previous suit and copy/paste into your own. Make sure you bring up that the company was ruled against in the previous, near-identical case, and the court time will be pretty low - courts base most of their decisions on previous court cases, so you're about 99% likely to win.

      Because of this, if a company loses a case like this, you can just send them a letter telling them you were screwed over the exact same way, and are willing to settle for the same terms as the previous case, and most companies will accept it in exchange for a waiver and an NDA.

    6. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Actually it'll be much easier for you to bring your suit in that case - you simply look up the records of the previous suit and copy/paste into your own. Make sure you bring up that the company was ruled against in the previous, near-identical case, and the court time will be pretty low - courts base most of their decisions on previous court cases, so you're about 99% likely to win.

      Your likelihood of winning might be high, but your chances of getting off with little court time isn't. The OP talks about getting a check for $1000. Your lawyer will probably ask for a retainer of $5000 before he'll file so much as a page. I wouldn't expect that to be sufficient to make it through the entire litigation. The company has every incentive to drag things out much as they can to deter future suits. If the company only wanted to minimize its own legal bills they would have opted for class action in the first place (litigating each case costs far more in legal bills if every case actually gets filed - it only works because 99% of the cases never get filed at all).

      The only way small suits like this are possible against large companies is via class action.

    7. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Well, these are former employees, so the contract is no longer valid. If Apple wishes to continue enforcing the contract, then they should continue paying the former employees.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:Class action suit vs a corporation by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Your likelihood of winning might be high, but your chances of getting off with little court time isn't. The OP talks about getting a check for $1000.
      [...]
      The only way small suits like this are possible against large companies is via class action.

      Not if you have a slam-dunk. In that case you file it in small claims court - small claims courts often expect you to represent yourself since it is for small amounts of money, and expect the court time taken to be proportionately small. The odds of the other company even spending the money to send out a lawyer for something they're sure to lose is minimal, and if a lawyer tried to drag a small claims fight out with trivial crap the judge would typically bitch-slap them for it, especially when you've got the court transcript of them losing a near-identical case under a near-identical situation.

  7. Typical by jjohnson · · Score: 1

    2/3rds of loss in retail is from employee theft. At a place like Apple outlets, where the products are small, expensive, and easily turned over for cash to friends or pawn shops, I'd imagine it's even higher. Not that this fact excuses forcing unpaid overtime on your workers, but I'm not surprised they're doing bag checks.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    1. Re:Typical by mjwx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      2/3rds of loss in retail is from employee theft. At a place like Apple outlets, where the products are small, expensive, and easily turned over for cash to friends or pawn shops, I'd imagine it's even higher. Not that this fact excuses forcing unpaid overtime on your workers, but I'm not surprised they're doing bag checks.

      The bag check isn't the problem.

      Employers reserve that right even in countries with real employer protection. What isn't Kosher is the fact they have to do it unpaid. If an employer wants to screen you on your way out that time must be paid for by the employer.

      Same for when an employee takes a break. In retail environments your breaks are timed (I've even heard they are even unpaid in the US), so a screening should not be permitted to detract from that time.

      I work in a secure facility, I clock on from the first the moment I enter the building. Even if it takes me 5 minutes to get to my desk. Then again I work in a country that punishes employers for taking advantage of employees.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What country is this - I'd love to move there.

    3. Re:Typical by gagol · · Score: 1

      I work in a country that punishes employers for taking advantage of employees.

      May I cordially ask which country is it? (Germany is my 1st bet...)

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    4. Re:Typical by Kjella · · Score: 2

      May I cordially ask which country is it? (Germany is my 1st bet...)

      From his posting history I'd say Australia is a safe bet - but same here in Norway. Currently they don't have a wall clock where I work so I'm awarded five minutes on the online check-in to compensate me for the time to take the elevator, get to my office, log in to my computer and sign in. So if I check in at 8:05 AM wall time, it registers as if I arrived at 8 AM sharp. First place I've worked that actually have a clock system though, usually I've just filled out time sheets manually.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Typical by mjwx · · Score: 2

      May I cordially ask which country is it? (Germany is my 1st bet...)

      From his posting history I'd say Australia is a safe bet - but same here in Norway. Currently they don't have a wall clock where I work so I'm awarded five minutes on the online check-in to compensate me for the time to take the elevator, get to my office, log in to my computer and sign in. So if I check in at 8:05 AM wall time, it registers as if I arrived at 8 AM sharp. First place I've worked that actually have a clock system though, usually I've just filled out time sheets manually.

      Yep, Australia.

      Not quite as good as Norway when it comes to workers rights.

      I'm covered by an agreement that specifies if I work, I get paid (but my employer is a bit of a special case). Other Enterprise Bargaining Agreements (EBA) in Oz give you time off in lieu rather than overtime pay but compensation for time worked is enshrined in law here. Some EBA's are abusive even though the courts crack down on it as much as they can.

      Even though we get clocked by the security system, we still do timesheets to account for when we take breaks (which are also paid).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Typical by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 2

      Similar protections exist in the UK; a call centre had such shitty software it could take 20 minutes for the tracking software to load, and so they made people go in 20minutes before work in order to log on. They were taken to court over this and lost.

    7. Re:Typical by gigne · · Score: 1

      Got any links for this? Would be... useful

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    8. Re:Typical by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      In retail environments your breaks are timed (I've even heard they are even unpaid in the US)

      That depends on what state you're in, how long you work, how long you are allowed for a break, and if you're allowed to leave during your break.

      I once got a large extra paycheck from a job I worked at because they were found to be violating this (we got one 30 minute break when working 7+ hour shifts - the state law said anything under 1 hour of breaktime in such a shift requires the breaks to be paid). AFAIK nobody actually sued them over it - it got brought to their attention and they sent out the checks to head off any litigation.

    9. Re:Typical by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Scopus was it - I use that when doing Iomega tech support (for Softbank / Clientlogic) in Dublin (they had moved from Watford). It was a complete dog to use.

    10. Re:Typical by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Well, here in the US, I once interned with Lockheed Martin, and several people there mentioned a secure Lockheed facility they used to work at where cars were inspected before they could pass through the gates each morning, which meant that they had to arrive an hour early, and they weren't able to clock in until they were at their seats.

      If that's legal behavior, then I don't see how these bag checks, which are fully avoidable by just not bringing a bag in, can be considered illegal.

    11. Re:Typical by yeshuawatso · · Score: 1

      Federal wage law states any break less than 20 minutes must be paid by the employer. Anything over that, you're riding your own dime. Funny thing, Federal laws don't require breaks at all. An employer could technically make you work an entire shift with no resting periods or to eat anything. However, doing so is a risk to the company since employee turnover will be through the roof, employee exhaustion will cause accidents, increasing workers comp claims, and OSHA violations are bound to pop-up everywhere. The State level is different since each state varies. Some states require rest periods after a certain number of hours worked. Some even require that lunches even be paid. Workers rights in the US are an abysmal failure, especially for hourly jobs. Your best bet is to find a salary job where breaks aren't that big of a concern and your quality and quantity of work are more important than how often you take a moment to breath.

    12. Re:Typical by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Your best bet is to find a salary job where breaks aren't that big of a concern and your quality and quantity of work are more important than how often you take a moment to breath.

      That's a tough bet, especially in an age with thousands of applicants for every skilled job and rampant unemployment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Typical by winwar · · Score: 1

      Well, your example may not have been legal behavior either.

      However, there is a very large distinction between cars being searched at a gate on the road outside the facility where you work and your personal bag being searched at your place of work. These distinctions matter.

    14. Re:Typical by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Honest question: what's the distinction? I'm not trying to be belligerent, I just don't quite follow.

      From what I can see, both cases involve people entering or exiting the private property of the company, both involve their personal belongings being searched, and both are done off the clock. The difference between a car and a bag may matter in criminal cases or when it comes to your rights when the police are searching your stuff, but for a private company conducting searches that the employees can withdraw from at any time by leaving their employment, I'm not aware of the distinction.

      Elsewhere in the comments, someone has suggested that the important distinction may be between exempt and non-exempt employees, that is, salaried vs. hourly employees. If the employees are salaried, which the ones in my example may have been (I honestly don't know), then the company can demand that they do more than 40 hours a week without having to compensate them. In contrast, retail employees are typically non-exempt, hourly workers, and as such need to be compensated for all time spent on the job. It's possible that applies here.

      As for the legality of what Lockheed was doing, I sure hope it was legal, since that facility was working on fighter craft technology for the military, i.e. it was a government contract related to national defense, hence the high security.

  8. I have no sympathy by cwebster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No sympathy whatsoever.

    As an airline pilot I do not get paid while I wait in line and am checked by the TSA. I do not get paid while I wait in line for customs. I do not get paid while I get the flight paperwork and verify it is safe and legal. I do not get paid while preparing and inspecting the airplane for flight. I do not get paid while I wait for everyone to get on the plane and coordinate with gate, ramp, fuel, maintenance and catering to ensure an on-time departure.

    1. Re:I have no sympathy by Jiro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would imagine that aiurplane pilots are not paid by the hour, which these guys are.

    2. Re:I have no sympathy by victorhooi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hi,

      Hmm, I believe airline pilots are a little bit different to other hourly employees.

      They're paid for time "in-flight" - which is why you probably don't get paid for say, the TSA security checks. However, apparently there's a minimum base amount they're paid, even if they sit around doing nothing.

      So we're not exactly comparing apples to apples here (that, and I suspect pilot salaries probably aren't exactly the same as retail employee salaries).

      Last time I heard, airline attendants were the same (http://mentalfloss.com/article/31044/10-shocking-secrets-flight-attendants).

      Cheers,
      Victor

    3. Re:I have no sympathy by dragonsomnolent · · Score: 1

      Question, as an airline pilot are you given a flat salary, paid per mile flown, or per hour at the controls?

      --
      I got nuthin
    4. Re:I have no sympathy by julesh · · Score: 1

      No sympathy whatsoever.

      As an airline pilot I do not get paid while I wait in line and am checked by the TSA. I do not get paid while I wait in line for customs. I do not get paid while I get the flight paperwork and verify it is safe and legal. I do not get paid while preparing and inspecting the airplane for flight. I do not get paid while I wait for everyone to get on the plane and coordinate with gate, ramp, fuel, maintenance and catering to ensure an on-time departure.

      I though airline pilots were paid an annual salary, not an hourly rate...?

    5. Re:I have no sympathy by agendi · · Score: 2

      Comparing salaried pilot to paid by the hour retail floor monkey. Totally the same thing. For what it's worth, I have sympathy for them and for your work conditions as you describe them. I think it sucks that you aren't paid time spent waiting on the TSA or flight paperwork etc. I think it is odd though that you complain about off-the-clock working, as they do, and you don't think it's okay for them to try to redress this?

      --
      I just can't be bothered.
    6. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a regular business traveller, I do get paid for all those things.

      This is why, when you announce a three-hour flight delay, I just sit back and think of all the overtime I'm making.

    7. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing paperwork, preparations, and inspections sounds a lot like work. You do all that for free, in addition to waiting around for all that other shit for free?
      No wonder pilots don't make any money. They're retarded.

    8. Re:I have no sympathy by mjwx · · Score: 1

      No sympathy whatsoever.

      As an airline pilot I do not get paid while I wait in line and am checked by the TSA. I do not get paid while I wait in line for customs. I do not get paid while I get the flight paperwork and verify it is safe and legal. I do not get paid while preparing and inspecting the airplane for flight. I do not get paid while I wait for everyone to get on the plane and coordinate with gate, ramp, fuel, maintenance and catering to ensure an on-time departure.

      Do you get paid by the hour?

      If not these duties are part of your regular salary. Get a better union and negotiate

      If so, get a better union and make sure you get paid for it.

      I've got no sympathy for an employee who wont stand up for themselves. At least these retail staffers are willing to fight for fair pay and conditions.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:I have no sympathy by lxs · · Score: 1

      I bet that when you do get paid it's far more than minimum wage, which is compensation for your terrible inconvenience. Besides, your lack of sympathy for people with worse jobs than you makes you a selfish dick.

    10. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just read this comment for what it is: Mr. C. Webster letting everyone know he's an airline pilot. Mr. C. Webster has a really cool, important job and he's a really cool, important person. Not like the poor schmucks working by the hour in the Apple Store. Mr. C. Webster has Made It.

    11. Re:I have no sympathy by BZ · · Score: 2

      > and I suspect pilot salaries probably aren't exactly
      > the same as retail employee salaries

      Not exactly, but closer than you might think. A look at the numbers: http://blogs.wsj.com/middleseat/2009/06/16/pilot-pay-want-to-know-how-much-your-captain-earns/

      The upshot is that variability is high, but for junior pilots pay is between about $20k (for regional airlines) and $50k (highest starting pay at a major ariline). Average major airline starting pay is $36k. Of course pilots fresh out of school don't get those major airline jobs.

      Retail salaries also vary widely. Minimum wage is 7.25/hr, which comes out to $14,500/yr if we assume 40-hour weeks and 2 weeks unpaid vacation. On the other hand, Costco pays $11.50 an hour for a starting salary: http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/03/06/of-course-costco-supports-a-higher-minimum-wage-it-already-pays-above-it/ and average pay for Costco employees is around $45k (see ), which is admittedly rather high for retail.

    12. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit wining bitch, you get paid too much already.

    13. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the daily pilot salary is probably getting close to what these apple employees get in a week...

    14. Re:I have no sympathy by BZ · · Score: 1

      Airline pilots are typically paid an hourly rate, but only for flight hours. It's pretty messed up.

    15. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your vector, Victor?

    16. Re:I have no sympathy by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is like saying "I'm a whiny gutless arse hole" because "I'm a whiny gutless arse hole" every one deserves to be like "whiny gutless arse holes". Sorry pal that's now how it works in a fair society. If an employer makes demands upon your time, you deserve to be fairly compensated for it.

      I have sympathy for anyone who gets ripped off by their employer or in any way abused. It's pretty lame to be a cowardly victim and then thinks it fair for every one to get abused that way. Gee's dude I also hope they grope your genitals, radiate you arse and probe you upon a regular basis because it sounds like they should as for the rest of humanity any employer that treats it's employees like that deserves to be run out of business by vengeful unions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re: I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sucks because it incentivizes you to cut corners. Bt then air Canada Jazz removed all the life vests on their planes to save a few bucks on weight, so I guess that's industry for you.

    18. Re:I have no sympathy by mendax · · Score: 1

      I believe that you are paid far more than the lowly Apple Store clerk, unless you are one of those pilots who work for one of those awful regional airlines. I find your lack of sympathy to be quite callous and arrogant. But I am hardly in a position to judge you.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    19. Re:I have no sympathy by Kjella · · Score: 2

      No sympathy whatsoever. As an airline pilot I do not get paid while I wait in line and am checked by the TSA. I do not get paid while I wait in line for customs. I do not get paid while I get the flight paperwork and verify it is safe and legal. I do not get paid while preparing and inspecting the airplane for flight. I do not get paid while I wait for everyone to get on the plane and coordinate with gate, ramp, fuel, maintenance and catering to ensure an on-time departure.

      With all due respect, it's the flight industry that's got this backwards not the other way around. Is it your fault if the plane has a problem and you're grounded for half an hour extra? No, you're on the job, in your job uniform, ready to do your job but the risk is now transferred to you so now you're working half an hour "overtime" for free. That's not how it should be. I'm a strict believer in the "any time spent at work is work" principle, you should be able to clock in when you walk in the door (or paid from the required attendance time to pass that door) and clock out when you walk out the door. And for a pilot I consider that to be entering the airport, the time required to get to your pilot's seat and from your pilot's seat to the exit and any part you spend idling in your seat is downtime at work, plain and simple.

      Obviously the hourly compensation would change to reflect that, in itself the pay might be the same. But now it's the employer's job to minimize the whole time you spend on your job, not just the "active" time. They take the risk of any delays, now they're wasting their money instead of your time. That is how it should be, but being such an international business as it is they've been able to evade many regulations simply by moving crew to work from whatever jurisdiction offers the least worker protection and is thus cheaper.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    20. Re:I have no sympathy by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      Uh, airline piloting is a wee bit different than retail.

      Salaried positions often give you more freedom and flexibility, a perk which is offset by additional occupational obligations. If you think you should be paid overtime for those additional requirements (and I'm not disagreeing with you), you or your union needs to negotiate a better contract.

      Retail is generally a wage position: the job says $start-o'clock to $end-o'clock, those are your hours, anything more is overtime.

      Oh, and you get to fly planes, not deal with idiots in a shitty retail position.

    21. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sympathy whatsoever.

      As an airline pilot I do not get paid while I wait in line and am checked by the TSA. I do not get paid while I wait in line for customs. I do not get paid while I get the flight paperwork and verify it is safe and legal. I do not get paid while preparing and inspecting the airplane for flight. I do not get paid while I wait for everyone to get on the plane and coordinate with gate, ramp, fuel, maintenance and catering to ensure an on-time departure.

      So because you allow yourself to be taken advantage of everyone else should to? Can you clarify your logic?

    22. Re:I have no sympathy by gagol · · Score: 1

      I know airline pilots are vastly underpaid, and mostly work out of passion. I am the same in y own field... But it is not a reason to let the whole society go down the spiral of the lowest denominator. If you want to have some shards of equality and fairness in your job one day, NOW is the time to take a stand.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    23. Re:I have no sympathy by gagol · · Score: 1

      THIS is why we can't have nice things... ;-)

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    24. Re:I have no sympathy by gagol · · Score: 1

      Go and yell it through the cockpit door next time you fly, or get surgery for all that matters (both have your life in their hands after all)... Let me know how it goes for you.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    25. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look it's a race to the bottom. i wonder who'll win. Oh right, everyone loses.

    26. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No sympathy huh? How sociopathic of you. Just because you have a shitty job, it doesn't justify bringing everyone else down to your level.

      This is why the USA is so fucked up right now. Whenever someone else has a job with better pay and better working conditions, instead of demanding that your pay and working conditions improve, people with your mindset complain that the other guy is lazy, overpaid and undeserving of better treatment. Your attitude is part of the problem, not the solution.

    27. Re:I have no sympathy by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Especially if it's an airline like QANTAS that flies in pilots from countries with lower wages to work on Australian domestic flights for a month at a time, and continues to pay them in the wage of the other country.

    28. Re:I have no sympathy by whois · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are actually, but every minute they're not paid has been negotiated by the airline unions. If you've ever had your flight delayed due to maintenance after they've pushed back from the gate? Yeah, that's an asshole pilot and cabin crew who knew the plane wasn't ready to fly, but wanted to start the clock on their paycheck.

      They don't get paid until the doors are closed and they're away from the gate, so sitting on the runway with no air conditioning is better for them than delaying your boarding. I won't say they don't deserve to be paid, but inconveniencing 300 people to please 10 isn't the right way to do things. Then topping that with federal laws that don't allow people to get up and go to the bathroom, or turn their phones on because the plane is "taxiing" technically even though it's sitting there with the wheels off, or whatever they're doing to it.

    29. Re:I have no sympathy by gigne · · Score: 1

      Hate the system not the people! I probably would do the same to top up the piggy bank

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    30. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously believe that you are lying about something here. If you were a pilot you would know that you get paid for the flight and that all the things you mention are a part of that.

    31. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the mechanic signs of the plane(atleast in europe) not the pilot, and thus its not the pilot that decides to delay due to maintenance, thats the mechanics decision, he has to sign off all the work, and thus he is responsible for anything mechanical that happends during the flight.

      I find your notion that pilots would delay a flight in such a way on purpose strange, and the mechanic would notice that nothing is wrong.

    32. Re:I have no sympathy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Nonsense. The cabin crew are paid from the time they start preparing the aircraft for boarding and helping to seat people. The pilots are paid from before they even enter the aircraft because they need to make sure they have up-to-date paperwork and check in with the airline.

      Unless you have citations otherwise?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:I have no sympathy by jasper160 · · Score: 1

      It is quite common and reported in the US.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished.
    34. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the linked article:

      The lowest top-scale captain’s salary was $123,480 at JetBlue Airways, and the highest among passenger airlines was again at Southwest: $181,270 a year. Many Southwest pilots pick up more trips than the minimum scheduled -– some fly right up to the federal limit of 1,000 hours of flying a year -– so their actual paychecks are higher.

      So no, once you get experience, they're really not similar.

    35. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airlines are a bit of a special case because you don't work at/for the airport. You work onboard the plane for the plane's owner.

      It's not terribly unreasonable for the plane's owner to consider you "clocked in" when you arrive aboard the plane rather than while you're stuck in traffic getting to the plane (even if that traffic is inside the airport).

    36. Re:I have no sympathy by dywolf · · Score: 1

      yeaaah....nope.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    37. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try being a truck driver wear you generally only get paid if your wheels are actually rolling.

    38. Re:I have no sympathy by dywolf · · Score: 1

      essentially its a minimum garunteed salary, that is broken down into an equivalent hourly rate in order to determine actual compensation from factors such as overtime, per diem, etc.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    39. Re:I have no sympathy by microTodd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not sure how reliable these citations are but I found these which contradict your assertion. Sounds like most pilots are paid for "flight time", and in fact are NOT compensated for when they are sitting at the gate.

      http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/278808/

      http://thetruthabouttheprofession.weebly.com/professional-pilot-salaries.html

      http://www.pilotcareer.info/Airline_Pay___Life.html

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    40. Re:I have no sympathy by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      From this, it looks like Apple Retail people are paid somewhere in the $10/hr to $18/hr range depending on if they are sales, a "specialist" or a "genius."

      So if they're median retail salary is above Costco, does that mean that Costco is the bad guy evil profit-hoarding destroying-the-world corporation around here now? I know, bringing data into an emotional conversation is never a good idea, but still...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    41. Re:I have no sympathy by BZ · · Score: 1

      Fwiw Costco's numbers are about $11.50/hr starting and $20/hr average. So somewhat better than Apple.

      But Apple is still way better than other retailers...

    42. Re:I have no sympathy by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Sometimes airplanes, being complicated pieces of machinery, do break at inopportune times.

      For instance, I was on an American flight that sat at the terminal after pushback for almost half an hour because the APU wouldn't start and it took a long while to get a starter truck out there. Since it was the height of summer it was a thoroughly miserable experience.

      You sound like you're prejudiced against unions.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    43. Re:I have no sympathy by Nimey · · Score: 1

      If it's common than I'm sure you'd have no trouble pulling up a citation from a reputable site. ...yeah, thought so.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    44. Re:I have no sympathy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That sucks for you, but the truth is that it is wrong for Apple to do this, and it is wrong for your employer to do this also, not that because it happens to you that it should happen to other people.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:I have no sympathy by cwebster · · Score: 2

      My citation is the contract governing how I am paid. Pay time begins when all exterior doors are closed and the parking brake is released. Pay time ends when the first exterior door is opened (our contract says the it should only be the main cabin door, but in reality the clock stops as soon as the rampers pop the bag door).

      And yes, pay is by the hour. The excuse of the airlines pushing for these pay rules is that our hourly rate is high enough that it covers all of that stuff too. They'd be happy to switch to pay by the duty day if we in turn halved our hourly rates. Just to put it in perspective, On a busy day I may be on duty 12-16 hours and only paid for 6-8 hours. The shortest possible duty day is a single flight day which will have a minimum of 1:00 of time I am "on duty" but not being paid, and that does not include getting through TSA which I am supposed to do before my duty day starts.

    46. Re:I have no sympathy by cwebster · · Score: 1

      We are paid by the hour from the time all exterior doors are closed and the parking brake is released at our origin until the parking brake is set and a door opened at the destination.

    47. Re:I have no sympathy by cwebster · · Score: 1

      Pilots are not salaried, we are hourly workers.

    48. Re:I have no sympathy by cwebster · · Score: 1

      My first 12 months as an airline pilot I grossed $22,000. Whether that is above or below minimum wage depends if you define my pay time as "flight time", "duty time", or "time away from base". It is for some of those and it isn't for others.

    49. Re:I have no sympathy by cwebster · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how far they go to really minimize "time spent on the job". We had to get special language put in our contract requiring our employer to make us eligible for FMLA because by their definition of "time at work", we did not meet the 1,250 hours that would otherwise require them to offer it.

    50. Re:I have no sympathy by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I bet that when you do get paid it's far more than minimum wage, which is compensation for your terrible inconvenience. Besides, your lack of sympathy for people with worse jobs than you makes you a selfish dick.

      Contrary to public opinion, airline pilots don't make a crap-ton of money. They start off at just over minimum wage, and if they have a lot of experience, might make 6 figures.
      35 years ago airline pilots DID get paid a crap-ton of money, roughly the equivalent of $300,000 today. But since then, fuel has gone up by a factor of 4, airline ticket prices have gone up by a factor of 5, pilot salaries have decreased by a factor of 5 and they eliminated two cockpit positions, decent food, legroom, and any other amenities they could think of. Ironically, they somehow seemed to be able to make money back when they paid the high salaries to pilots, and now they can't seem to stay afloat.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    51. Re:I have no sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate the system not the people!

      Nope, I am quite capable of also hating the people whose behaviour causes the system to persist.

      If no-one played the game, the game would cease.

  9. Evil Apple by mendax · · Score: 1, Informative

    In California, under state law it is very expensive for an employer to employ shenanigans like this. The fines can be quite large, the litigation can be quite expensive, and there is a potential for the employees to be paid wages while the issue is being resolved by the courts (at least as I understand the law). There is a reason why employers don't like California regulations, employees have the potential to grab the employer by the balls and twist and twist if the state EDD finds that the charges have merit.

    Anyway, this case is just another example of just how evil Apple is as a company. It is unfortunate because I like its products (mostly) and I've owned several over the years.

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    1. Re:Evil Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In California, under state law it is very expensive for an employer to employ shenanigans like this. The fines can be quite large, the litigation can be quite expensive, and there is a potential for the employees to be paid wages while the issue is being resolved by the courts (at least as I understand the law). There is a reason why employers don't like California regulations, employees have the potential to grab the employer by the balls and twist and twist if the state EDD finds that the charges have merit.

      Anyway, this case is just another example of just how evil Apple is as a company. It is unfortunate because I like its products (mostly) and I've owned several over the years.

      California has good labour laws, as good as they can get in the US of A.
      What a pity that the State doesn't let Corporations abuse their employees.

    2. Re:Evil Apple by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sure, in theory. But I had a case against an employer for unpaid wages and I was not informed as to when I should be there. I'm less than in love with California's employment protection system. I would have to drive for two hours just to file a case, where I live now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. But it's not about the hardware by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

    It's about that Apple "Experience"........

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:But it's not about the hardware by gagol · · Score: 1

      Dont Apple takes for granted the their customers are criminals and pirates? Well, this is just an extension of their corp. culture...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    2. Re:But it's not about the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont Apple takes for granted the their customers are criminals and pirates? Well, this is just an extension of their corp. culture...

      And of course Apple is the only company that searches employees to prevent theft when everybody knows that employee theft never has been, is not now and never will be a problem.

  11. Re:BS by maliqua · · Score: 2

    I don't even see how such a thing is legal..

    i think the whole point is that it is not legal

  12. You're wrong on all counts. by raehl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As an airline pilot, you've (well, your union, on your behalf) negotiated a contract with the airline where your pay is based on getting the plane where it needs to go, and you are paid for all activities necessary to accomplish the task for which you are paid for.

    Also known as, AIRLINE PILOTS ARE NOT HOURLY EMPLOYEES.

    I am sure that, once you add up all the time you spend on all of your job-related activities, your wage + time and a half for hours over 40 per week, greatly exceeds the minimum wage.

    Just like every other salaried employee who doesn't make any more money when it's crunch time and you have to pull 10-12 hour days to get shit done. It's called a job description, and being paid for the job (get plane from A to B) instead of the time (you were in airports/planes from 9 AM to 8 PM.)

    If you don't like the terms of your contract, either renegotiate it so you are paid by the hour instead of by the trip (or flight hour), or work somewhere else. I hear Apple stores are hiring.

    Note that Apple stores probably don't have benefits like medical, dental, or free flights on any domestic carrier on a space-available basis, and your hourly wage will plummet vs. your flight-hour wage, but at least you'll get a slight increase on your paycheck if customs takes a little longer to clear!

    1. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll just leave this here...

      http://thetruthabouttheprofession.weebly.com/professional-pilot-salaries.html

    2. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by abigsmurf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Former airport McDonalds worker here. Your post, and most of the posts replying to this guy amuse me a lot.

      I was an hourly employee and I had to go through security before starting my shift. This was unpaid and there were often queues. It was the same for all the staff working airside who were paid by the hour.

    3. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Former airport McDonalds worker here. Your post, and most of the posts replying to this guy amuse me a lot. I was an hourly employee and I had to go through security before starting my shift. This was unpaid and there were often queues. It was the same for all the staff working airside who were paid by the hour.

      Yes, but those delays were imposed by the TSA and/or airport, not McDonalds or the other vendors. I'm sure you sometimes got stuck in traffic on the way to the airport too - again not a delay caused by your employer. These people are having to wait at the direction of Apple, their employer, so your example is not comparable.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Just like every other salaried employee who doesn't make any more money when it's crunch time and you have to pull 10-12 hour days to get shit done. It's called a job description, and being paid for the job (get plane from A to B) instead of the time (you were in airports/planes from 9 AM to 8 PM.)

      Actually not all salaried employees have to do overtime with no additional compensation.

      I'm a salaried employee with a fixed number of working hours per week.

      If I work overtime as a matter of normal business (which I generally almost always do), I can take it off later in lieu - generally I get about one to two weeks extra holiday per year by doing this.

      If I am asked to work overtime by management, I can choose to either take it off later in lieu or ask for additional paid compensation, which is determined by dividing my salary by the "standard" number of work hours in the year (and a specific multiplier if it's "night", "weekend" or "public holiday").

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    5. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Also known as, AIRLINE PILOTS ARE NOT HOURLY EMPLOYEES.

      Apart from the citations from discussions on the web that show that airline pilots ae indeed paid hourly, many pilots are not paid enough to qualify as "exempt", so paying them as salaried employees would be illegal.

      Nevertheless, I don't understand how it can be legal to not pay pilots for time prepping the plane.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by cwebster · · Score: 1

      Airline pilots *ARE* hourly workers. If you know so much about how my contract is negotiated you should have taken a moment to actually read it.

      I'll give you the comparison on time on job related duties though, we don't spend 40 hours at work a week. We tend to spend 48-60 hours "on duty" a week being paid a maximum of around 30 hours (pay time and duty time tends to be a 1:2 ratio) and may only be home 2 nights a week sometimes.

      I don't need to negotiate by the hour pay, I already have it. I just don't get paid for all of the hours I am actually working.

    7. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Just like every other salaried employee who doesn't make any more money when it's crunch time and you have to pull 10-12 hour days to get shit done.
      Must be nice. We pull 10-12 hour days just to get stuff done every day. When it is crunch time, then you pull a 10-12 hour day, then go home and login and work for another 6 hours. Thanks to unpaid overtime, my effective hourly rate is 1/4 what it was 15 years ago.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Actually not all salaried employees have to do overtime with no additional compensation.
      You are correct. The Department of Labor specifies what an "Exempt" employee is, and 95% of people who are categorized as exempt by their employer do not fall under the classification of exempt as defined by the Department of labor.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    9. Re:You're wrong on all counts. by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      You are correct. The Department of Labor specifies what an "Exempt" employee is, and 95% of people who are categorized as exempt by their employer do not fall under the classification of exempt as defined by the Department of labor.

      It's probably also worth mentioning though that not being in the US, any classifications the US Department of Labor may or may not make isn't exactly relevant to me.

      Different countries have different laws; but in the majority that I know of, most salaried employees still have a concept of overtime and will get either additional pay or time in lieu for their work over and above their standard working hours.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  13. Apple is just an Electronics Company by tuppe666 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is the third story in a week, of Apple being an abusive employer, whether you are a top engineer, overworked factory worker, or minimum wage shop assistant. colour me surprised that the Apple treat profits over people.

    The bottom line is Apples profits are down! again, its margins are shrinking, its sales are plummeting, its market share is down, its technical edge none existent are they really not seeing that moving manufacturing abroad, becoming a purely (arrogant with out substance) design(sic) company, paying literally zero tax.

    Ironically I noticed in Harris Poll EquiTrend has Apple as coming out top for Brand of the Year distinctions in three categories - Computer, Tablet and Mobile Phone. All I could think is how irreparably damaged Apples old Techno Hippy Brand has been, and how actual Apples sales numbers reflect that.

    This is Apples sales numbers http://images.apple.com/pr/pdf/q3fy13datasum.pdf and hoe they comparing at IDC (its only smartophones but Apple is becoming a one product company..the iphone) http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24239313/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24239313 The numbers speak for themselves.

    Apple is not newsworthy

    1. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      wow, you're like the anti-fanboy. Same as a fanboy, but negative.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is not newsworthy

      Then how did you find so many things to link to?

    3. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by vakuona · · Score: 1

      You have a strange definition of plummeting!

      Apple is doing fine. It's iPhone are selling more than they were in the comparable period last year. iPod revenues are down but that is to be expected, and not surprising at all. iPad sales are down, and also to be expected. The same quarter last year saw the introduction of a brand new iPad.

      Mac sales are slightly down ($300m or so) which is much better than other PC makers are managing.

      So given that Apple hasn't really had any new products now for the best part of 9 months, I think they are doing fine

      Want to see trouble, look at Dell, HP, HTC and Nokia.

      And there is nothing more ironic than claiming that Apple is not newsworthy in the comments on an article containing news about Apple.

    4. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're a bunch of i Phonies and one-trick i Ponies ... fallen from grace for taking a byte from the big apple

    5. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shut up you ignorant lying moron.

      sales are plummeting

      It's seen a _small_ sales dip in _some_ categories but nothing close to "plummeting". And if you dare quote the iPad numbers, you will betray how daft you are. It's a channel adjustment - the actual sell through numbers only dropped 3% which is _EASILY_ attributable to people knowing a new iPad is on the horizon and choosing to wait before buying and if you consider a 3% dip "plummeting" then you are a moron.

      paying literally zero tax

      Apple paid more corporate taxes than ANY OTHER AMERICAN COMPANY! Now, I don't know what your definition of "literally zero" is but when they paid more than anyone else, that would suggest they did not, in fact, pay "literally zero". Unless every other corporation got money back, Apple did not LITERALLY pay ZERO taxes.

      I'm not going to pick apart any more of your post because you're a lying moron and not worth my time. Anyone who claims Apple is paying "literally zero tax" is flat out a liar.

      How does ignorant lying bullshit like this get modded up?

      Feel free to flame; feel free to mod me troll, but I'm sick of flat out bullshit ignorant posts like this being modded "Informative". I've been coming to Slashdot for many years to learn new things about tech and geek subjects but this is getting pathetic. Hate Apple, if you want, but at least base it vaguely on facts rather than complete and total bullshit lies.

    6. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Apple's problem is that they have become the old people's brand. Middle aged folks who are having a mid-life crisis so want something cool but are not tech savvy so buy the one that is simple to use. The younger people want something they can customize beyond changing the wallpaper and do cool stuff with.

      Apple's rivals have been pushing this angle a lot lately, especially Samsung. It's a problem because every middle-aged guy on the TV seems to have one and they all love to proudly wave it around and show off the apps they found.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the finance world, the word "plummet" is used to represent nearly any drop. Get used to it. Read the WSJ for a week. You'll see the word used more times than in the next year outside of business news.

    8. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      "Apple is not newsworthy" -- the one accurate part of your post.

      Yes, Apple is an abusive employer. Oh, wait, you mean those Chinese companies that produce parts for Asus, etc., are abusive. Wrong you are.

      Apple's profits are down and they are plummeting. Oh, wait, you mean that was just a dip and they really do make things beside the iPhone. Wow, wrong again.

      But you *are* right that Apple is not newsworthy. But for some reason everytime a journalist wants to popularize a negative tech article they write it up in a way that pushes Apple. Still, you're right. They aren't newsworthy, its just they get page hits.

    9. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't possibly think that sales are "plummeting" because they are going to be releasing a new phone in a month, which is widely reported anywhere that anyone could possibly look, do you?

      I'm sure sales usually go up on 9-month old models that are about to be replaced for every other company, ever.

    10. Re:Apple is just an Electronics Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you ignorant lying moron.
      you're a lying moron
      ignorant lying bullshit
      complete and total bullshit lies

      Oooo! Apple fanboi getting upset and angry...

      GP obviously getting a bit close to the truth for comfort.

      Tip 1:
      An old fashioned Appletard/fanboi would at least *try* to keep an air of dismissive smug superiority rather than losing it like this.

      Tip2:
      No normal person gets this angry unless they work for the company or are hopelessly, gushingly in love with it.

  14. Check bags after breaks??? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Surely if you're going to steal something, you'd do it on company time.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Check bags after breaks??? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      I think they do not want you to sneak in an Android phone and let customers realize they have a choice.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  15. Not really that surprising by cbope · · Score: 1

    When I worked at Tandy Computers in the late 80's at their manufacturing facility as a motherboard repair technician, they had a similar system to check employees as they left the facility. However, I recall that the time clock was AFTER the checkpoint, so you were being paid while standing in the queue waiting to be checked. This could take 10-20 minutes each shift, depending on how quickly you got to the queue. Most of the workers were relatively low pay, hourly production line workers.

    I do think the way Apple stores are handling this is very unfair to employees. You cannot expect that employees come to work without any personal belongings at all, so banning bags is not an option. But, they should be paid while waiting for these checks. They could provide lockers in a secure area outside the "sales area" where employees leave their personal items while at work, and they do not have casual access to these lockers while working.

  16. Best Buy in Los Angeles area by twistedcubic · · Score: 2

    At the West Hollywood Best Buy I saw employees being visually inspected by a manager as they exited the store single file after closing. At a Culver City Best Buy one of the employees told me they get searched. I didn't believe him until I saw it being done at another location. Pretty humiliating. Hopefully the kids who work there now realize this is not the type of job you want to do long term.

    1. Re:Best Buy in Los Angeles area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As most retail theft is done by employees, it isn't hard to understand why searches occur. Next time you go into a store, look at where the camera point. You will see many cameras watching the employees, especially those that handle money. If employees, and people in general, were honest and had some integrity, none of this would be necessary.

    2. Re:Best Buy in Los Angeles area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Best Buy Employee in Florida. We are not allowed to bring knives into the workplace only company issued. Likewise we do get checked after leaving from the store only a visual. I even let them check my work binder which isn't required to be checked but I don't want to be the guy who everyone suspects either. The difference is we get to edit our time and it is very easy to do so.

      Shrink is pretty high all around within Best Buy and most of it is employee theft. Customers are receipt checked upon leaving as well. Perhaps its just me who doesn't have an issues with the idea. I would rather them find the internal thiefs because honestly I wouldn't want to work with someone like that on my team.

    3. Re:Best Buy in Los Angeles area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at a Best Buy in the mid 90s. Although I don't think we ever got searched (I never did, but I never had any bags with me or anything), we used to have the same thing happen to us where we'd be waiting to leave after closing, and not getting paid for it. We had to clock out, call a manager, then wait for the manager to come up front to let us out. Sometimes it would take 30 minutes. At one point I said I'd wait for the manager before clocking out, but my supervisor threatened me. I wish I weren't so ignorant about worker rights back then, but although I knew it wasn't right, it never occurred to me they might be violating the law by doing so.

    4. Re:Best Buy in Los Angeles area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the West Hollywood Best Buy I saw employees being visually inspected by a manager as they exited the store single file after closing. At a Culver City Best Buy one of the employees told me they get searched. I didn't believe him until I saw it being done at another location. Pretty humiliating. Hopefully the kids who work there now realize this is not the type of job you want to do long term.

      I used to work at Toys R Us during summers and they had the same policy (90's). Anytime any employee left the store, they had to have a manager look in their bags. That was unpaid time but fairly quick (only glanced in open purses, guys didn't carry messenger bags bag then). Miniscule compared to the unpaid time we had to spend cleaning up the store.

  17. It could be worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they weren't strip searched like we were in prison.

  18. Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple trusts their own employee's less than it trusts its consumers.

    1. Re:Trust by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      Apple trusts their own employee's less than it trusts its consumers.

      I disagree. Apple can't DRM their own employees.
      DRM isn't trust.

  19. Re:Ubuntu LiveCD: Bring to Apple and Microsoft Sto by gagol · · Score: 0

    Your efforts are well received... but vastly misdirected. DO NOT EXPECT MEASURABLE RESULTS FROM IT.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  20. he who has less gold breaks the rules by epine · · Score: 2

    Jan Wong

    In 2006, Wong attracted attention by imitating the work of Barbara Ehrenreich and going undercover as a cleaning lady in wealthy Toronto homes. While employed by the Globe and Mail as a reporter Jan Wong impersonated a maid and then wrote about her experiences in a five-part series on low-income living.

    There were many social issues discussed in this series of articles, the majority of which I didn't agree with as framed. One issue she pointed out was that these barely-literate low-income scullery-scrubs few of whom had driver's licences were expected to haul vacuum cleaners through the Toronto metro system between jobs that were not as proximal as a modern UPS delivery route.

    Brown Down: UPS Drivers Vs. The UPS Algorithm

    No, the scheduling algorithm employed by the scullery-scrub dispatch office involved chewing up small bits of paper and spitting them at a map, because they were getting away with NOT PAYING for the delivery of vacuum cleaners by their downtrodden and raw-fingered cleaning staff. Many of these barely-solvent workers were putting in eight hour on job sites, plus another four hours (unpaid) moving between job sites, toting equipment that wasn't even their own for less than the cost of delivering the equipment by any other business method.

    Jan Wong could have gone to war over a clear violation of labour fairness, but she instead decided to do a lot of public hang-wringing over systemic issues unlikely to ever change.

    It's Apple's job to politely inform their store managers that this violates accepted labour practice and to put an end to it as thoroughly as they do with unwelcome rumours about unfinished products.

    I once spoke to an ex IBM employee in the early 1980s who said he left IBM because he could get anything done. His department was under such tight security that it took him an hour to get to his desk in the morning and another hour to leave it in the afternoon. I think part of that was fetching his work product from a secure area and returning it there again with an inspection. He was well paid for the whole ordeal, until it finally drove him nuts.

    The rule in a democratic salary market is that time is money. Even if the money is too small to spit at from the perspective of the person writing the cheques.

    An anecdote I liked from that series was the incident(s) where business owners tried to bully her out of using street parking in front of their stores (which they would prefer to see used by customers) on the presumption that she was timid and uneducated. It almost blew her cover confessing she knew how to drive in the hiring interview. I think she had to tell some huge sob story to make her desperation believable to take such a job as a person who could hold down a driver's licence.

  21. Re:BS by gagol · · Score: 1

    So... do you install crApps on your iPhoney?

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  22. Currys UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in a Currys Wareshouse for approx 7 years, I was searched every time I left the warehouse (this was after clocking out) ......during peak times we were there most days for 45 mins after our shift!

  23. self edit: s/could/couldn't by epine · · Score: 0

    ... left IBM because he couldn't get anything done ...

    Lameness severity is typically evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, with higher numbers indicating a more significant degree of impairment. A 1 rating suggests a horse with a minor gait deficit, a 5 is "broken-legged" lame, indicating that the horse will not put weight on the affected leg. Initial assessment may include a visual check for outward injuries such as cuts or swelling, observation of a horse as it travels at different gaits, particularly the walk and trot. Flexion tests may also be performed, and hooves will be checked for signs of injury.

  24. Boring by pbjones · · Score: 2

    This is just a story about 2 stores, and my guess is that it's about paranoid managers who have lost stock in the past. No news here.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  25. Not the only company to exploit workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CIBC Bank in Canada didn't pay its tellers for counting thier tills and waiting for the manager to put it in the vault after work. They only paid them until the bank closed the doors on the customers and worked for free to close up.

    1. Re:Not the only company to exploit workers by mark-t · · Score: 1

      And how long was it before they got in shit for this?

      Because unless those tellers who are forced to remain after their shift has ended are on salary, requiring that an employee stay on premises and not paying them for their time is illegal in every province in Canada.

  26. Re-hire Ron Johnson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Tim Cook should re-hire Ron Johnson (Apple's first manager of retail stores). It seemed like he did a good job.

  27. Amazing by readingaccount · · Score: 1

    It seems as though Apple has more security and protections on preventing stuff from being taken by employees than the NSA.

    1. Re:Amazing by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Data is easy to move. It's hardware that is likely to be found (or taken, for that matter) in a check at an Apple store. But if they want to hunt for it, they're still going to have to pay for that time.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  28. Re:Are they also suing to be paid to dress in the by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

    Up to 30 minutes, actually, and it is unpaid time - despite them actually working.

    Was that too difficult to understand?

  29. iStasi by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    "What we're doing here will send a giant ripple through the universe."
    -- Steve Jobs

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  30. +1, Funny by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

    So we're not exactly comparing apples to apples here

    I see what you did there.

    1. Re:+1, Funny by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      So we're not exactly comparing apples to apples here

      I see what you did there.

      With your i-eye ?

    2. Re:+1, Funny by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      So we're not exactly comparing apples to apples here

      I see what you did there.

      With your i-eye ?

      Yes, iDid.

  31. Meh nothing is going to change by rikkards · · Score: 2

    Look at the YMCA personal trainers, ask them about their "mandatory" volunteering they do each week
    .
    "But isn't the YMCA a charity you ask?" Why yes and no. The YMCA that gives aid to the homeless and such sure but the gym portion is a whoooole different entity.

    I knew an accountant who used to audit them and trust me they knew how to work the system and what was right and what was wrong.

  32. Stock control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is there a need to search all employees all the time? Surely they know how much stock is present or passing through the store, if stuff starts going missing then you can start cracking down on it.

  33. Here at Foxconn, by Snufu · · Score: 2

    if any of us complain about the abusive, slave-like working conditions, they threaten to send us to work in an Apple store.

    (Disclaimer: This is a joke. I do not work at Foxconn.

  34. Apple did LITERALLY pay ZERO taxes by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    I've been coming to Slashdot for many years to learn new things about tech and geek subjects but this is getting pathetic. Hate Apple, if you want, but at least base it vaguely on facts rather than complete and total bullshit lies.

    http://www.theguardian.com/technology/video/2013/may/29/apples-dirty-little-tax-secret-video

    This is my favourite video, to explain to you what is happening. Apple don't even use a tax haven :). In effect in America the taxman charges tax where a company is incorporated, Ireland charges a comapny where the company is managed. Apple tells the American taxman the company is incorporated in Ireland...and tells the Irish taxman Apple is managed in America. The senator proceeding over Apple said apple discovered "The holy grail of tax avoidance". They pay literally zero tax on those profits.

    1. Re:Apple did LITERALLY pay ZERO taxes by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2

      1) How much money did Apple fork over to the US government in taxes? I'm guessing that number is not-zero.

      So the claim that Apple paid literally zero in taxes is a lie. They paid LITERALLY billions of dollars in taxes. Last I checked, "billions" does not equal "literally zero". They, in fact, paid MORE than any other American company.

      2) What other companies make use of the Ireland tax situation? But let's focus on Apple, right? Apple generates page views and nobody cares about every other company that's doing the same thing. Also, you know IT'S LEGAL!

      Do you not take advantage of tax deductions that are available to you come tax time? Why is it wrong when a company works WITHIN the law to minimize their tax burden but its ok for an individual to do so?

      Regardless of point 2, point 1 clearly shows that the claim that Apple literally paid zero taxes is a lie. Unless you consider billions of dollars to equal literally zero.

    2. Re:Apple did LITERALLY pay ZERO taxes by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      So Apple paid no tax to the US on money not made in the US (which isn't entirely accurate, since they pay US tax on all revenues made in the Americas, which includes Canada, Central and South America), and not transferred back to the US. They also paid Ireland exactly the amount that the Irish government is owed according to their tax laws.

      What a bunch of assholes, following the laws as they were written, passed, and upheld.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:Apple did LITERALLY pay ZERO taxes by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Truly, the best laws money can buy.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  35. Any History by jasper160 · · Score: 1

    If their was a history of internal theft at these two stores than it is a non-issue. then again Apple should not make their products so expensive that their own underpaid employees cannot afford them. The overcharging-VZW store that I use at least gives their workers any phone while employed there. Manager said it is good advertising.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
    1. Re:Any History by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      If their was a history of internal theft at these two stores than it is a non-issue. then again Apple should not make their products so expensive that their own underpaid employees cannot afford them. The overcharging-VZW store that I use at least gives their workers any phone while employed there. Manager said it is good advertising.

      http://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Apple-Salaries-E1138.htm

      The average salary for the lowest job is $11.90/hour.

      Assuming a 20 hour work week and net after taxes of $8/hour....

      iPad Mini - 40 hours.
      iPhone (subsidized) - $25 hours
      MacBook Air - 125 hours.

      How many hours would I need to work if I were a construction worker to pay for the houses I build? An autoworker?

    2. Re:Any History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are comparing a house or a car to electronic toys. You do realize your analogy fails on scale, and fails due to an issues like a house will last you many many decades, and many construction workers can afford a house, they must get a loan like everyone else.

    3. Re:Any History by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      they must get a loan like everyone else.

      So an Apple worker couldn't get a loan/use a credit card like everyone else?

  36. who's surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked in all kinds of IT in my many years, and standing around in a line (after clocking out) waiting for a bag search is standard procedure for shops with large quantities of lesser skilled IT folk (retail, basic repair/upgrade operations). It's not just an Apple thing, and I'm really surprised it's even a concern. It's part of the job. Factory workers are at their machines when the pay starts and run through until the quitting bell rings. They're not paid for changing into/outof work clothes in the lockerroom, the walk to the line, etc. Same thing, different industry here. Keep on moving, nothing to see here.

    1. Re:who's surprised? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Such places are breaking the law just as much as Apple is. They are only getting away with it because nobody's done anything about it.

      If the employee must be on site, then they must be paid. The law is very clear on this point. Personally, I think it's appalling that it ever got as far as a class action suit, when a simple call to the regional employment standards office to file a formal complaint would have resolved the situation relatively quickly, and without any court costs.

  37. Sounds A Little Like Pre-Employment Piss Tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did the interviews, the job sounded great, received a written offer, accepted it, and then came the "welcome" letter that gave me 48 hours to take a drug test. Uhhhh... nope. I'd rather work for a company that doesn't treat employees like criminals right out of the gate, thanks.

  38. Best Buy Does it Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I worked at Best Buy there was never a 30 minute wait, but all employees and managers were searched entering and exiting if they had a bag.

  39. Not so Genius are they by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    I mean, do you really need to take your backpack with you on lunch, or even bring one at all, if you worked somewhere with this stupid policy. Take the sandwich out of the bag unless they think you will steal an iPhone between two slices of bread.

    The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:Not so Genius are they by jittles · · Score: 1

      I mean, do you really need to take your backpack with you on lunch, or even bring one at all, if you worked somewhere with this stupid policy. Take the sandwich out of the bag unless they think you will steal an iPhone between two slices of bread.

      The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results.

      You know that women work at Apple Stores, too. Women often carry purses. They often carry things in their purse that do not include lunch. Some of those things are personal care products that most women don't like waving around. At least that is what I have noticed from the view out the basement window.

  40. D.O.U.C etc. by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dubious Officer of Unpaid Checking and Harassment Executive - Bags

  41. Re:Brand Loyalty by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I don't know about ol' Henry Ford, but my uncle worked at a GM plant in Fremont back in the '60s, when no one dared drive a Ford into the employee lot. Things were changing by the '70s, but the first guys to buy imported economy cars got vandalised pretty hard.
    BTW, I'd always heard that Ford paid well to prevent the Labor Unions from getting their foot in the door.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  42. Not necessarily illegal by MarioMax · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a smaller semiconductor fab. The site itself was considered a foreign trade zone, which meant you were subject to search entering and leaving the building. It doesn't matter if you were paid or not, you were subject to search.

  43. Ya often as not it is a local tinpot dictator by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Back in the day I had a roommate that worked at a Baskin Robins that was breaking all kinds of employment rules. For example they were paid minimum wage but if the cash in the drawer didn't match up to what he thought it should, he'd take it out of their pay. Well employment law was the only thing he was breaking, I called the corporate office and it turned out that they had a rule that you had to pay more than minimum wage anyhow. You find that with chains sometimes, they have internal wage rules higher than the legal minimum.

    However he got away with it forever because none of his employees (including my roommate) would turn him in. I tried to convince her to, to let the corporate office and the state attorney know, but she wouldn't.

  44. Use a real FTP server by Skapare · · Score: 1

    scribd sucks ... no need to force people to be tracked

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  45. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just fix that for you:
    Appletards are naturally retarded, being unable to process any information that is not slavishly praising Apple, therefore it is quite natural that the Appletard would propagate a retarded myth.

  46. Not retail usually by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    While Apple makes a fuckton of profit, retail is normally very low margin. For example Target's profit margin is about 3.8%, and 3-4% is normally where it is around. That means that after you account all costs, the products, loss to theft, the stores, employees, taxes, etc, etc, etc there's 3-4% left over. That's fairly thin. Same deal with Safeway, about 1.2% currently. That means in those cases they actually can't increase operating costs much more before they'd slip in to unprofitability.

    That is not to try and give companies a pass at being bad to employees but let's be a little realistic here. Retail is, in nearly all cases, a very thin profit margin. It isn't like they can just afford to massively increase costs, and not raise prices, because there is just not the extra to do that.

    1. Re:Not retail usually by jxander · · Score: 1

      3-4% of what total? The entire store's business? And to whom does this money go? Once the bills are paid, and all other expenses accounted for, is that 4% just flowing straight into the owners' pockets?

      Quick napkin math : If we ballpark around $100 of sales per minute (combined amongst all of the registers, I've no idea how accurate this is, but it feels a bit conservative) for a 12 hour day ... you're looking at around 750k per day. Of which 4% would be $3000. Well over 1 million per year, depending on holiday spikes and things like that. Not bad for "just 3-4%"

      --
      This signature is false.
    2. Re:Not retail usually by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      3-4% total. The money goes to their cash reserves, to pay their debt (they have some $14 billion in debt), to employees that have profit sharing (not sure if any do), and to stock holders as a dividend.

    3. Re:Not retail usually by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Apple makes more profit per square foot of retail space then ANY OTHER RETAILER IN THE U.S.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Not retail usually by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      That has to be the dumbest statistic I've ever heard.

    5. Re:Not retail usually by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      So you think that retail square footage is completely divorced from the business of selling things? Its a significant and real metric in the retail world.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Not retail usually by tftp · · Score: 1

      Its a significant and real metric in the retail world.

      Only among like products. A warehouse that sells hay has to be larger than a jeweler's store that sells diamonds - and both are larger than a tiny office of a stockbroker who will sell you a piece of paper that has no limit on value.

    7. Re:Not retail usually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a significant and real metric in the retail world.

      Only among like products. A warehouse that sells hay has to be larger than a jeweler's store that sells diamonds - and both are larger than a tiny office of a stockbroker who will sell you a piece of paper that has no limit on value.

      Only one of those is retail.

  47. the lawyers cats will eat this RAW by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    The actual law in this case is very very very CLEAR if you are required to be there you are required to be PAID

    FULL STOP

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  48. This happens and it gets fixed eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife worked at a chip fab. They had to be on the floor in their clean suits to "start" work and could not leave the floor until their shift was over. It took at least 15 minutes to dress and undress so they were losing 30 minutes of paid time a day. A law suit was filed and they won. Back pay was given and the policy changed. Since the dressing and undressing into special suits was part of the job and was provided and required, the company had to pay for that time to suit and unsuit.

  49. Why in the world...? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Why would this practice have gone on long enough to create a class action suit? It's illegal, plain and simple. Since no employer/employee contract can override the law, so regardless of what a person supposedly agreed to participate in when they were hired, if they ever actually come out and say that the person isn't allowed to leave after their paid period has ended until they've been checked, it's just one simple call to the employment standards office afterwards to file a formal complaint. After they've been investigated for the practice, it's a fairly safe bet they won't be doing it again. If they need to inspect people before they leave, then any extra time that it takes them to take care of that had better be paid

  50. Re:Are they also suing to be paid to dress in the by mark-t · · Score: 1

    More specifically, you can sue your employer for doing something that is against the law... which in this case would be not paying you for time that they are demanding from you as condition for employment. No employer/employee agreement can overrule what is actually permitted by law.

  51. My Apple Retail Expeirence by IcarusMoth · · Score: 1

    I jumped on with Apple Retail in early 2008. As it stands, Apple Retail has one of the better compensation packages for both fulltime and parttime employees. Medical/Dental/Vision, Stock Options, Paid Vacation, Etc. Before Steve Jobs left the company for the last time, he mandated that EVERY Apple Employee be eligible for Health Insurance. More recently, Tim Cook re-adjusted all of the pay compensations nationwide to be more in line with the higher paying/higher cost of living regions (NYC/LA/SF). That said, employees were discouraged from bringing bags into work. However, when bag checks were nessesary the managers at my store would do them WHILE you were clocking out. But that may vary store by store, as a result of this suit though, I imagine that Retail Chain Management will mandate that bag checks be done before or at clock-out, not after. So, benefits, awesome. Pay, not bad. Stock options, yes. BTW, the managers check each other's bags.

  52. Covering wrong attack vector by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows to get the stuff out the door you hide it in the boxes of trash and pick it up after work. I knew a guy who knew a guy that worked at BestBuy and had a very lucrative side business.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  53. Apple is the largest theif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure Apple stole from Xerox Parc and flew a pirate flag above their office building.

    Hippocracy.

  54. Seems like there could have been a better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I work, we have security cameras everywhere, we have to be escorted to the exit, a metal detector we have to go through, and bags are searched. The going through the metal detector and having bags searched is unpaid time, but usually goes pretty fast. If you don't want your bag searched, you leave it in the lockers.

    I don't see why the apple employees just wouldn't leave all their stuff in their cars. It seems like a little common sense on both the management and employee side could have saved them all some trouble.