Slashdot Mirror


The Case of the Orca That Killed Its Trainer

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the homicidal killer whale, who killed his first trainer, 20-year-old Keltie Byrne in 1991. Then in July 6, 1999, a 27-year-old man who stayed after the park closed and evaded security to enter the orca tank was found dead and nude, draped over Tilikum's back with his genitals bitten off. Tilikum's most recent victim was Dawn Brancheau, the SeaWorld trainer he crushed, dismembered, and partially swallowed in 2010. 'Almost all students of orca believe that they are deranged by captivity, some more than others. Tilikum's record puts him at one end of a continuum. There have been dozens of attacks on trainers by an assortment of orcas in the marine parks around the world. [The movie] "Blackfish" shows video from several of these episodes at SeaWorld,' writes Brower. 'What is remarkable about Orcinus orca in marine parks is not these rare episodes. What is remarkable is their monumental forbearance.' For its part SeaWorld is attempting to cast the filmmakers as the true villains, characterizing them as anti-captivity zealots. The company says '"Blackfish" is inaccurate and misleading and, regrettably, exploits a tragedy that remains a source of deep pain for Dawn Brancheau's family, friends and colleagues.'"

26 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Disney movie by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Funny

    Willy eat me.

    1. Re:Disney movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Willy eat me.

      Come on. Why not just "Feed Willy"?

  2. Started under Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just want to point out that though these killings continue today, they were started while George Bush Sr. was in office.

  3. Almost all students of orca believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, I do believe it is entirely plausible that captivity is a negative thing for sea mammals.

    However, statements like "almost all students of orca believe" are not helping make their point. I assume they found all the "students of orca" (what does that even mean? Do you sit in a classroom with an orca at the board?) and polled them at a scientific level? Even if they did, what does "almost all" mean?'

    Let's have numbers here. Opinions of experts. Show your work. Until or unless you do, I'm going to dismiss that statement as really meaning "I believe this and some other people I know also do," which isn't close to a consensus.

    There is way too much crap like this in "journalism" these days, and I'm calling it out when I see it.

    1. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by reve_etrange · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas not in captivity: 1 documented.

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas in captivity: > 27 documented (3 fatal).

      Killer whale attacks on humans

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    2. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by reve_etrange · · Score: 5, Informative

      Missed a closing tag.

      Killer whale attacks on humans

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    3. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not really. People kayak around them all of the time. If they were particularly aggressive, we would know about it. Sea Lions are more obnoxious. Not that I would go out and try and pet one, but I've been within 50 yards of them before. It does get the heart going - the could crunch the kayak or small boat and find the chewy nugget inside but they don't seem to care one way or the other.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      If they attack/kill a human in the ocean, who's gonna document them?

      The other humans at the scene maybe? A single human alone in the ocean is not as common as you seem to think.

      Orca's hunt in packs, and coordinate their attacks. So they might communicate to organize an attack on a group of humans. Here is a video of a pod of orcas executing a very organized training session to teach the juveniles orcas how to isolate and kill a crabeater seal on the pack ice. It is hard for me to believe that they could do this without some sort of high level communication. They are very intelligent animals.

    5. Re: Almost all students of orca believe... by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oracs are not whales, they normally hunt whales and ignore humans. Orcas will even work with humans to catch whales. No, not just scavanging around during a hunt like a shark does, but actively herding the whales into twofold bay, alerting and directing whalers to the prey, assisting with the kill, and fending of sharks should one of boats be capsised.

      The Orcas only ate the tounge of the humpbacks, the rest they left for the humans. I've been to the small museam in Eden several times over the years, it's fantastic, one of the best in Australia IMHO. It's main drawcard is the skeleton of "Old Tom" on display, several of his front teeth are missing due to being worn through by the harpoon rope, one tooth still in place has a large grove in it from gripping the rope.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Why was he nude? Why specifically his genitals bitten off?"

      Think of it as evolution in action.

    7. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Xest · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The number of people with the opportunity to come within 100 meters of a wild Orca would be extremely small, let alone within biting range."

      Rubbish. I swam with them in the fjords of Norway. I was one of many tens of thousands of tourists that do this every year.

      This is far more people than swim with them in captivity that only includes trainers and authorised personnel.

      You're jumping to a conclusion based on a theory you've simply made up but that is false. If anything your point acts counter to the conclusion you've come to - I'd wager given the size of the tourist industry that far more people encounter them in the wild with far less experience of the animals than the experienced people who get injured and killed by them in captivity. If the threat was equivalent in the wild to how it is in captivity then tourists wouldn't even be allowed to swim with them because it'd almost certainly be deemed too dangerous, but that's not the case.

  4. "Killer whale" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The name says it all, really. Orca are carnivores, their natural prey includes seals - which are of comparable size and, for all I know, tastiness to a human.

    The way the species has been rebranded as a "dolphin" is one of the triumphs of marketing over reality. They're whales, and they're killers. Get in a tank with one at your own risk.

    1. Re:"Killer whale" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention they are rather sadistic in their treatment of their prey in the wild.

    2. Re:"Killer whale" by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Plus, 'Sea World' is pretty much a life term in Supermax, except with more gawkers, for something of the size (not well proportioned to live in a swimming pool) and intelligence (relatively high) of a killer whale.

      If you are a lifer anyway, and the guard is dumb enough to come into your cell, why not shiv him just on principle?

    3. Re:"Killer whale" by NIK282000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More so now that it knows that it's situation does not change when it attacks people. They aren't stupid animals and this one figured it out quick.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    4. Re:"Killer whale" by mooingyak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Orca are carnivores, their natural prey includes seals - which are of comparable size and, for all I know, tastiness to a human.

      No, seals definitely taste better.

      Says someone who clearly doesn't know how to properly prepare human.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  5. Not a surprise, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You take a highly intelligent creature, put it in captivity and then get in its enclosure. What the heck do you think is going to happen? It's amazing more people are not killed and a testament to the tolerance of the orcas.

  6. What did you think was going to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are locking up intelligent animals for our amusement. Animals much bigger and stronger than humans. Of course some of them are going to kill us. That's what we get.

    1. Re:What did you think was going to happen? by Provocateur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plus, they must have gotten really tired of being fed fish all the time.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  7. Tenuous relationships with animals by multiben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've always been fascinated by people who keep dangerous pets or work with them. They often seem to hold the belief that their relationship with these creatures transcends their instinctive nature to kill. And for a time it seems that they are right. But you only have to piss off a grizzly bear one time, and all of a sudden you're on the latest episode of "People Who Domesticated Animals Which Shouldn't Have Been Domesticated."

    1. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And even then, if your pet tiger really likes you, but takes a nip at you, or tries to wrestle with you like he does with his siblings (that he also likes), you're not strong enough to handle it and you die.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. Re:Ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    homo human being + Latin: caedere to cut, kill

    this use is entirely appropriate. the 'homo' in homocide is an objective use rather than a subjective one. it means that a human is being killed, rather than that a human is doing the killing.

  9. Genes matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know an ex Sea World Orca trainer. She never had anything bad to say about the program. The killer Tilikum has been used for breeding more than any other male Orca though. I wouldn't think that was a good idea. Why not try to breed the aggression out of them?

  10. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not like these whales are flying out of the stands like a NASCAR crash gone wrong and killing people in the crowd.

    Yet.

  11. Ron White said it best... by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tilikum is a "Serial Killer Whale". Also, that's why they are called "Killer Whales" and not "Ocean Ponies."

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  12. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by Kagato · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First off Orca's don't kill humans in the wild because they swim in cold waters that don't have humans. It's not like they are native to the coastal Florida beaches. The bit about animals being smart enough to know who the human masters are. That is factually untrue. In most zoos the protocols are all about keeping the zoo keepers out of harms way of the animals. Feeding the animals is one of the most dangerous parts of the job. Making a grab for a keepers during feeding time is quite common and equipment and protocol are designed to reduce the risks.

    Make no mistake, most real zoos wouldn't even fathom having an Orca show with close trainer interaction. There's a night and day difference between non-profit zoos and a multi billion dollar entertainment company.