Slashdot Mirror


The Case of the Orca That Killed Its Trainer

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the homicidal killer whale, who killed his first trainer, 20-year-old Keltie Byrne in 1991. Then in July 6, 1999, a 27-year-old man who stayed after the park closed and evaded security to enter the orca tank was found dead and nude, draped over Tilikum's back with his genitals bitten off. Tilikum's most recent victim was Dawn Brancheau, the SeaWorld trainer he crushed, dismembered, and partially swallowed in 2010. 'Almost all students of orca believe that they are deranged by captivity, some more than others. Tilikum's record puts him at one end of a continuum. There have been dozens of attacks on trainers by an assortment of orcas in the marine parks around the world. [The movie] "Blackfish" shows video from several of these episodes at SeaWorld,' writes Brower. 'What is remarkable about Orcinus orca in marine parks is not these rare episodes. What is remarkable is their monumental forbearance.' For its part SeaWorld is attempting to cast the filmmakers as the true villains, characterizing them as anti-captivity zealots. The company says '"Blackfish" is inaccurate and misleading and, regrettably, exploits a tragedy that remains a source of deep pain for Dawn Brancheau's family, friends and colleagues.'"

250 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Disney movie by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Funny

    Willy eat me.

    1. Re:Disney movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Willy eat me.

      Come on. Why not just "Feed Willy"?

    2. Re:Disney movie by davester666 · · Score: 2

      That's the last time he'll ever say "Bite Me!"

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Disney movie by algoa456 · · Score: 1

      Where is Captain Ahab when you need him.

    4. Re:Disney movie by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Willy eat my willy

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    5. Re:Disney movie by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like he ate his willy.

  2. Started under Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just want to point out that though these killings continue today, they were started while George Bush Sr. was in office.

    1. Re:Started under Bush by fustakrakich · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nope, they started while Carter was in office... More proof he was the worst president ever :-/

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Started under Bush by uberjack · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Started under Bush by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Carter was a heck of a lot better than Reagan or W. Bush.

      And anything is better than Rogaine on bush!
      "Honey, that thing is tasting really... fuzzy..."

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:Started under Bush by mcarp · · Score: 2

      That's odd. I seem to get mod points every time I post a reply to anything. This. Admittedly, I probably post once a year.

    5. Re:Started under Bush by somersault · · Score: 1

      I read a journal before where a guy had figured out that he gets mod points when he only makes a moderate amount of posts. Lots of posts, or no posts, and you don't get any mod points.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re: Started under Bush by Nocturna81 · · Score: 1

      Well, I rarely post (once every four months) but get mod points a lot of times in between. So it's a bit more complicated then that I suppose

    7. Re: Started under Bush by almitydave · · Score: 1

      Looking back at my history, it seems like I post a few times per week on average, and it seems like I get 15 mod points (at a time) at least once per week. I'm a "conservative" (wacko-ness is subjective), but I try to post constructive or at least innocuous comments. Most don't have anything to do with politics or ideology one way or another. My karma is "excellent."

      Although there are plenty of partisans here, the Slashdot community is not so ideologically-driven that mods only award points to posts they agree with. Certainly that happens, but I've had "conservative" posts modded up, and I know I've modded up posts that espoused an ideology that I disagree with, but I nevertheless thought were good posts that contributed to the discussion.

      So there are mods that assign points for all sorts of reasons. Fashionable posts get modded up. Good posts get modded up too. If there's anything the Slashdot community is not, it's "monolithic".

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    8. Re:Started under Bush by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      not true, I rarely post but somehow I've got lots of mod points (whether I want them or not)

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
    9. Re:Started under Bush by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Nope, they started while Carter was in office...

      I think you'll find that they started before Taylor or Fillimore was POTUS (judging from Melville, 1851).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    10. Re:Started under Bush by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Then there is Jonah.. But apparently he lived to tell about it. If whales had hands with an opposable thumb, we would be finger food...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. Almost all students of orca believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, I do believe it is entirely plausible that captivity is a negative thing for sea mammals.

    However, statements like "almost all students of orca believe" are not helping make their point. I assume they found all the "students of orca" (what does that even mean? Do you sit in a classroom with an orca at the board?) and polled them at a scientific level? Even if they did, what does "almost all" mean?'

    Let's have numbers here. Opinions of experts. Show your work. Until or unless you do, I'm going to dismiss that statement as really meaning "I believe this and some other people I know also do," which isn't close to a consensus.

    There is way too much crap like this in "journalism" these days, and I'm calling it out when I see it.

    1. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by reve_etrange · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas not in captivity: 1 documented.

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas in captivity: > 27 documented (3 fatal).

      Killer whale attacks on humans

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    2. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by reve_etrange · · Score: 5, Informative

      Missed a closing tag.

      Killer whale attacks on humans

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    3. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by cheater512 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mind you if you divide the attacks by the number of people in close contact with Orcas in both situation, the wild Orcas would look like human eating machines.

      The number of people with the opportunity to come within 100 meters of a wild Orca would be extremely small, let alone within biting range.

    4. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by peragrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      you forgot

      Killer Whalenado. the dumb busty blond gets eaten first.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Some of the attacks in captivity look likely to have been provoked by the humans as well, which is something less likely to happen in the wild.

      I can't tell you for sure what happened here, but it sure doesn't sound like the orca initiated it:

      in July 6, 1999, a 27-year-old man who stayed after the park closed and evaded security to enter the orca tank was found dead and nude, draped over Tilikum's back with his genitals bitten off

      Why was he nude? Why specifically his genitals bitten off? My guess is that it was not a case of sexual assault by an orca that stripped him.

    6. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2

      Given that humans routinely swim in close proximity with captive Orcas multiple times a day, not to mention ride on their back and stick their head in Orcas mouth for a show, while any human contact with wild Orcas is extremely rare, I agree with your point that Orcas not in captivity are statistically far more dangerous.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    7. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      any human contact with wild Orcas is extremely rare,
      Not to mention the chances of anybody making it back to complain of a wild Orca attach is pretty low.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Do you sit in a classroom with an orca at the board?) and polled them at a scientific level? Even if they did, what does "almost all" mean?'

      There were bits of fishy stuff in two of the articles I read as well

      I remember reading of Daniel Dukes the person who was found dead apparently swimming with Tillikum but that's all I read, it was a very short piece.
      Got a lot more from their local paper but the way it was written kept me looking for the next literary er whatchamacallit's

      http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/
      marijuana-smoking drifter with a string of petty arrests. (drug addict)

      a worn-out Florida Department of Motor Vehicles identification card. (it doesn't work anymore?)

      had to scale a 3-foot-high Plexiglas barrier (Must of been a very small person)

      On Christmas Day 1998, he was charged with misdemeanor marijuana possession in Marion County.(addicted drug addict)

      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/
      The National Geographic refers to Daniel Dukes as a drunk (highly unlikely - but gives one an "ah ha, I see")

      "There is strong circumstantial evidence that Tillicum may have killed again," I went on. "He was moved to SeaWorld Orlando,
      where a drunk climbed in over the wall one night and was found drowned in the whale's pool the next morning."

      Just after that is this:
      "This second case, the 1999 death of Daniel Dukes, was more ambiguous, because there were no witnesses." (don't think there were many in Daniel Dukes's
      case either) ,/p>

    9. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Missed a closing tag.

      Killer whale attacks on humans

      "On April 1, 1989, Nootka IV of Sealand of the Pacific pulled her trainer, Henrietta Huber, into the whale tank after the 6-year-old female bit down while the trainer had her hand in the mouth of the orca in order to scratch its tongue. Huber needed several stitches in order to close her wounds"

      Not one of the "almost all" students of orca.

    10. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not really. People kayak around them all of the time. If they were particularly aggressive, we would know about it. Sea Lions are more obnoxious. Not that I would go out and try and pet one, but I've been within 50 yards of them before. It does get the heart going - the could crunch the kayak or small boat and find the chewy nugget inside but they don't seem to care one way or the other.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by runeghost · · Score: 4, Informative

      Go read the first linked article. Then read the years worth of articles on the subject by the author, filled with the references you claim to want. This is exactly what good journalism is - that you can't understand that because you're unwilling or unable to do a modicum reading doesn't give your dismissal any validity.

    12. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by plopez · · Score: 1

      If the Orca were human it would be a serial killer.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    13. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Number of humans in close contact in an enclosed space with an Orca not in captivity: 0.

    14. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Orcas like eating other mammals. Usually seals, sea lions and other whales though.
      Sharks like eating fish.

    15. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Camael · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas not in captivity: 1 documented.

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas in captivity: > 27 documented (3 fatal).

      I would be more impressed by those figures but for these facts :-

      1. Orcas not in captivity roam free in the ocean. They are not being tracked/documented. If they attack/kill a human in the ocean, who's gonna document them?

      2. Free orcas have substantially less contact with humans. Less contact means less opportunity to harm humans.

      3. Captive orcas are invariably held in aquariums, where most of them put on public performances and come into close contact with their trainers and the public. Of the 46 captive orcas today, 22 are held by SeaWorld . More contact means more opportunity to harm humans.

      Those figures you quoted do not lead to any conclusions except that increased contact between two parties gives rise to increased chances for accidents/incidents to occur involving both parties. Which is true for pretty much everything.

    16. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by plopez · · Score: 1

      I just want to point out dogs get, at most, two attacks before they are put down. Lethal or not. This one killer whale killed three times. Sea World is showing a reckless disregard for safety.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    17. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      Not in my county. Around her, the law says that nothing gets done after the first attack other than recording the attack. After the second attack, the animal get registered as a "dangerous animal" and the owner is required to actually keep their dog under control with a kennel. I don't know how many times a dog must attack a human before it gets put down around here, but it is definitely more than twice.

    18. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Of course, without any sort of "time spent in vicinity of orcas" scale the number of attacks is rather meaningless. Not to mention that 100% or attacks by orcas in captivity will be documented whereas by definition that is impossible in the wild.

    19. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      If they attack/kill a human in the ocean, who's gonna document them?

      The other humans at the scene maybe? A single human alone in the ocean is not as common as you seem to think.

      Orca's hunt in packs, and coordinate their attacks. So they might communicate to organize an attack on a group of humans. Here is a video of a pod of orcas executing a very organized training session to teach the juveniles orcas how to isolate and kill a crabeater seal on the pack ice. It is hard for me to believe that they could do this without some sort of high level communication. They are very intelligent animals.

    20. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas in captivity: > 27 documented (3 fatal).

      Number of humans dressed like seals (AKA Orca chow) in close proximity to Orcas in captivity - ??

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    21. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Funny

      John Whale Gacy?

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    22. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by nbauman · · Score: 1

      If you read the article more carefully you'll see that the author quotes several experts from Blackfish, and he wrote a book himself about the orca Keiko.

      If someone writes books and articles like that for a living, he can easily interview two dozen researchers or more, and find out what all the researchers think. "Students" of orca are scientists who study orca.

      If you want scientific research with references, Science magazine has had some articles about orca.

    23. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Go read the first linked article.

      I did that, specifically because I wanted to know the evidence backing up this quote: " 'Almost all students of orca believe that they are deranged by captivity, some more than others."

      Was there evidence backing it up? No, there wasn't. Although there was a quote by a psychologist suggesting it's a bad idea to treat orcas as if they had human mental illnesses....

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    24. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More worryingly, TFA suggests this particular orca is SeaWorld's most prolific sperm donor (as in, of all the SeaWorld parks). The documentary apparently has video of them having him ejaculate on command for sperm collection.

      Responsible dog breeders would not breed a dog with a history of attacking humans, certainly not one that's killed humans.

    25. Re: Almost all students of orca believe... by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oracs are not whales, they normally hunt whales and ignore humans. Orcas will even work with humans to catch whales. No, not just scavanging around during a hunt like a shark does, but actively herding the whales into twofold bay, alerting and directing whalers to the prey, assisting with the kill, and fending of sharks should one of boats be capsised.

      The Orcas only ate the tounge of the humpbacks, the rest they left for the humans. I've been to the small museam in Eden several times over the years, it's fantastic, one of the best in Australia IMHO. It's main drawcard is the skeleton of "Old Tom" on display, several of his front teeth are missing due to being worn through by the harpoon rope, one tooth still in place has a large grove in it from gripping the rope.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    26. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by davester666 · · Score: 2

      God, it's already scheduled to air on Friday at 9 PM on SyFy.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    27. Re: Almost all students of orca believe... by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 4, Informative

      Orcas are members of the dolphin family (delphinidae) of toothed whales (odontoceti), which means they belong to the order of whales (cetacea). I.e. orcas most definitely are whales. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orcinus_orca).

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    28. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      What about dogs?

    29. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I think it's just amazing that it weren't put down after it had killed.

      I mean, it can remember having killed humans before. it's no big deal for it. so who he fuck are they going to find for it to eat next? can't seaworld let go of the investment?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    30. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Why was he nude? Why specifically his genitals bitten off?"

      Think of it as evolution in action.

    31. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The flip side of that argument is that humans very rarely get in the water with wild orcas whereas contact with captive orcas is almost constant. Nor would humans be petting and nuzzling wild orcas or attempting to ride them etc. So the chances of contact and harm are that much less.

      I suppose a comparison could be made with horses or dogs. Number of people killed by wild horses or dogs (or wolves) is probably a very small fraction of people killed by domesticated horses and dogs.

    32. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Xest · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The number of people with the opportunity to come within 100 meters of a wild Orca would be extremely small, let alone within biting range."

      Rubbish. I swam with them in the fjords of Norway. I was one of many tens of thousands of tourists that do this every year.

      This is far more people than swim with them in captivity that only includes trainers and authorised personnel.

      You're jumping to a conclusion based on a theory you've simply made up but that is false. If anything your point acts counter to the conclusion you've come to - I'd wager given the size of the tourist industry that far more people encounter them in the wild with far less experience of the animals than the experienced people who get injured and killed by them in captivity. If the threat was equivalent in the wild to how it is in captivity then tourists wouldn't even be allowed to swim with them because it'd almost certainly be deemed too dangerous, but that's not the case.

    33. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 2

      Darwin was just making sure :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    34. Re: Almost all students of orca believe... by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't really at all true. Orcas are whales, that particular suggestion otherwise is completely false.

      But regarding feeding habits, they vary greatly in this species, some groupings dine entirely on smaller fish and hunt in packs to circle them, herd them up, and eat them, whilst others, particularly those in the Antarctic are solo hunters and hunt larger prey like seals and penguins. I believe Orcas off the coast of California work together differently again to attack calves of larger (Grey IIRC?) whales.

      Whilst the example you give is a local population it cannot be extrapolated to the species as a whole which has very distinct populations with very distinct traits.

      They're a versatile species with differing and complex feeding habits depending on where they live so it's not something that can be trivially generalised as to the habits.

      If anything I'd wager this scenario as in TFA is an example of killer whales adapting their habits to another new habitat we've created for them - the artificial living area in which they're dependent on us for food and entertainment and if we can't fulfil that then it's not surprising they've decided to use us as food/entertainment.

    35. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      If it was a dog it would have been put down already. But killer whales are much more expensive and difficult to procure. Their training is also an expense. Human trainers are an inexpensive commodity in comparison.

    36. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Although there was a quote by a psychologist suggesting it's a bad idea to treat orcas as if they had human mental illnesses

      Seems an odd claim to make. They have somewhat similar brains and similar brain chemistry. Claiming no similarity in mental pathologies sounds about as odd as claiming no similarity in physical pathologies.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    37. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Awesome, now make a similar chart where you show the number of deaths as a percentage of interactions - because having an orca in captivity kind of implies a lot of human interaction. If they were really so dangerous, not many of these "students of orca" would get in the damn pool, so I'm quite skeptical.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    38. Re: Almost all students of orca believe... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless Orcas are whales or do you like to redefine classifications of speciems?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    39. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Free Orcas have in fact more contact with humans than captured ones.
      All over the world people jump into the water to play and swim with Orcas and Dolphines.
      As far as I know in the last hundret years was only one human killed by an Orca in the wild (I guess it was an accident?)
      Anyway, Orcas are not stupid. Dolphins in captivity tent to commit suizide. They ram the walls with high speed to crush their own skull.
      I guess the basins for the Orcas are to small, and relieving their anger at the captors/trainers might be short term more revarding anyway.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    40. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      There are reports that Orcas "teaching" their young how to hunt seals which are "hiding" on ice floes, where the Orcas are taught to make a wave to flood them from the ice. And after successfully flodding them down, the older Orcas rescue the seal to put it back on the ice. So they can repeat this.
      Or another story that I saw in a video from national geographics: Orcas hunting seals at a beach. After they gad feeded they rescued a few baby seals and put them back on the beach.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    41. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      Great White Sharks love eating seal.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    42. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

      Why was he nude?

      That orca had a pretty blowhole.

    43. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Some orcas like eating other mammals, but the vast majority eat fish, and will ignore anything that isn't a fish. Mammal hunting orca are equally prey-specific (i.e. they ignore fish), and given the fact that there are no notable physiological differences between the groups, it is likely that prey preferences together with effective hunting strategies are learned at an early age, and become ingrained.

      And while it is true to say that most (but not all) sharks will eat fish, there are several species that actively hunt other sorts of prey, e.g. the great white's known propensity for seals and sealions; the tiger-shark's love of sea turtles; and the grey/bull/whaler (same shark, different names) which seems to be an equal opportunity hunter that can move freely between fresh and salt water, and is responsible for the majority of shark attacks on humans.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    44. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Of course, this could also be due to (lack of) opportunity. How often do humans and Orca come within killing distance while the Orca is not in captivity? And how often while he is?

    45. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by graphius · · Score: 2

      ...y human contact with wild Orcas is extremely rare...

      There is an entire whale (orca) watching tourist sector here in the Pacific Nothwest to GUARANTEE you will spot some orcas. Granted you will not be swimming with them, but there are many companies with multiple trips daily. This doesn't include private boats or kayaks. Many people, including scientists, say the wild orcas have a real sense of curiosity, and will come up to the boats to see what is going on. If they really were that aggressive, it would be too easy for them to grab a snack or two.

    46. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Some of the attacks in captivity look likely to have been provoked by the humans as well, which is something less likely to happen in the wild.

      I can't tell you for sure what happened here, but it sure doesn't sound like the orca initiated it:

      in July 6, 1999, a 27-year-old man who stayed after the park closed and evaded security to enter the orca tank was found dead and nude, draped over Tilikum's back with his genitals bitten off

      Why was he nude? Why specifically his genitals bitten off? My guess is that it was not a case of sexual assault by an orca that stripped him.

      If you sexually assault an orca, this is what happens.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    47. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Maybe. If a human acted like an orca, even perfectly healthy orcas in the wild, you would call him insane or deranged. The problem is you have no idea what parts are similar and what parts are different.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    48. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Immerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      >any human contact with wild Orcas is extremely rare

      Not at all, there are many places where tourists swim with Orcas just as they do with other dolphins. Someone a little way up pointed out that thousands of tourists in Norway do so every year. So on one side - trained professionals w/captive orcas - many attacks. Ignorant tourists with wild orcas - not so much.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    49. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by samwichse · · Score: 2

      They're shooting Tomorrow and Wednesday.

      SFX will be added Thursday.

      Editing... if they have time Friday morning?

    50. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      any human contact with wild Orcas is extremely rare,

      Not to mention the chances of anybody making it back to complain of a wild Orca attach is pretty low.

      Yeah, if you were attached to a wild orca you would probably drown.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    51. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas not in captivity: 1 documented, but primarily UNKNOWN.

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas in captivity: > 27 documented (3 fatal).

      Killer whale attacks on humans

      FTFY

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    52. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas not in captivity: 1 documented.

      Number of attacks on humans by Orcas in captivity: > 27 documented (3 fatal).

      Killer whale attacks on humans

      For those numbers to be meaningful, one would have to control for the proximity of orcas and humans. I don't think we need a scientific study to say that orcas in captivity are within sight of a human far more often than their relatives in the ocean.

    53. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by houghi · · Score: 1

      It is hard for me to believe that they could do this without some sort of high level communication.

      I hope the NSA is taping all these communications so we are able to prevent attacks.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    54. Re: Almost all students of orca believe... by Smurf · · Score: 2

      Orcas are members of the dolphin family (delphinidae) of toothed whales (odontoceti), which means they belong to the order of whales (cetacea). I.e. orcas most definitely are whales. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orcinus_orca).

      If you are willing to state that all dolphins (including orcas) and porpoises are whales, then you are 100% correct and some zoologists will agree with you.

      But other zoologists will claim that whales, porpoises, and dolphins are three clearly distinct suborders of Cetacea, and thus dolphins (including orcas) cannot be whales.

      I'm not a zoologist so, as long as you acknowledge that orcas are dolphins, I don't give a $#+ whether you call them whales o not.

    55. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by plopez · · Score: 1

      *groan* :)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    56. Re: Almost all students of orca believe... by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      Cetacea is the order of *whales*. "Cetacea" derives from the greek for whale! So if porpoises and dolphins are cetacea, they are whales.

      There are 2 branches within the order of whales, the toothed whales and the baleen whales. Toothed whales include porpoises, dolphins, etc. The baleen whales are the filter feeders, with baleen combs instead of teeth, such as the right whale, blue whale, humpback, etc.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    57. Re:Almost all students of orca believe... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Orcas like eating other mammals. Usually seals, sea lions and other whales though.
      Sharks like eating fish.

      I'm not sure that is completely accurate. As I recall from something like "Quirks and Quarks", there are at least two genetically separate (they don't cross breed) populations of Orca along the Pacific coast of NAmerica. The "resident" population who pretty much stick in the same place, and the "transient" population who travel up and down the coast. They have completely different diets - one of which I think is pretty much purely salmon, and the other which is mammalian. They each completely ignore the other food source.

      http://www.orcaspirit.com/vancouver-island-marine-wildlife/vancouver-island-orcas-killer-whales/item/orcas-transient-versus-resident

      I just looked up the above link - looks like since 1991 we've known about a third population "offshore" orca who eat sharks! Mount some lasers on the heads of those!

  4. Genitals Bitten Off..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Genitals Bitten Off.....

    Yep, that's enough internet for the day.

  5. The Cove by Dj+Stingray · · Score: 1

    I recommend this documentary about dolphins, but is also related

    In it's like okay, in my opinion, man.

  6. "Killer whale" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The name says it all, really. Orca are carnivores, their natural prey includes seals - which are of comparable size and, for all I know, tastiness to a human.

    The way the species has been rebranded as a "dolphin" is one of the triumphs of marketing over reality. They're whales, and they're killers. Get in a tank with one at your own risk.

    1. Re:"Killer whale" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention they are rather sadistic in their treatment of their prey in the wild.

    2. Re:"Killer whale" by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Plus, 'Sea World' is pretty much a life term in Supermax, except with more gawkers, for something of the size (not well proportioned to live in a swimming pool) and intelligence (relatively high) of a killer whale.

      If you are a lifer anyway, and the guard is dumb enough to come into your cell, why not shiv him just on principle?

    3. Re:"Killer whale" by NIK282000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More so now that it knows that it's situation does not change when it attacks people. They aren't stupid animals and this one figured it out quick.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    4. Re:"Killer whale" by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Orca are carnivores, their natural prey includes seals - which are of comparable size and, for all I know, tastiness to a human.

      No, seals definitely taste better.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:"Killer whale" by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      Plus, 'Sea World' is pretty much a life term in Supermax, except with more gawkers, for something of the size (not well proportioned to live in a swimming pool) and intelligence (relatively high) of a killer whale.

      And the gawkers have less intelligence than their usual diet...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:"Killer whale" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The name says it all, really. Orca are carnivores, their natural prey includes seals - which are of comparable size and, for all I know, tastiness to a human.

      The way the species has been rebranded as a "dolphin" is one of the triumphs of marketing over reality. They're whales, and they're killers. Get in a tank with one at your own risk.

      Oh fuck you're so wrong. Shut up, quit spouting incorrect drivel, and grow a brain.

      They ARE dolphins, and not true whales:

      The killer whale is one of 35 species in the oceanic dolphin family, which first appeared about 11 million years ago. The killer whale lineage probably branched off shortly thereafter. Although it has morphological similarities with the pygmy killer whale, the false killer whale and the pilot whales, a study of cytochrome b gene sequences by Richard LeDuc indicated that its closest extant relatives are the snubfin dolphins of the genus Orcaella.

    7. Re:"Killer whale" by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2

      They aren't stupid animals and this one figured it out quick.

      1991, 1999, 2010. One attack every decade is "quick"?

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    8. Re:"Killer whale" by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The way the species has been rebranded as a "dolphin" is one of the triumphs of marketing over reality.

      "Rebranded"? Orcas belong to the family Delphinidae, the oceanic dolphins. They're commonly referred to as "whales" but that's not technically accurate. But hey, don't let science get in the way of your little speech about "marketing."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:"Killer whale" by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Seals and humans don't taste much alike at all. Seal is a rather bloody meat and tastes a lot like fish (not suprising since that's what they eat). Humans are said to taste a lot like pork from all accounts.

      (not suprising since that's what they eat).

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:"Killer whale" by mooingyak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Orca are carnivores, their natural prey includes seals - which are of comparable size and, for all I know, tastiness to a human.

      No, seals definitely taste better.

      Says someone who clearly doesn't know how to properly prepare human.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    11. Re:"Killer whale" by voss · · Score: 1

      Except as a rule they dont attack humans in the wild. Even the one documented attack was a non-fatal one.
      If that orca wanted to kill the human he wouldnt have let him go. I even suspect the killer whale mistook
      a surfer in a black wetsuit swimming among seals for a seal. You dont swim in the waters of northern california without one.

      http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2245&dat=19960117&id=GIo1AAAAIBAJ&sjid=QiEGAAAAIBAJ&pg=3872,1646286

      Why dont orcas attack humans? 1) Orcas that attack humans would tend to be hunted down 2) Humans are not part of the regular diet
      of an orca.

    12. Re:"Killer whale" by NIK282000 · · Score: 2

      Can you think of any people who have killed once a decade, been in the news for it and not been punished? They probably stopped doing shows for a while but that's not really a negative change for the whale, just a change that it would notice.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    13. Re:"Killer whale" by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Humans are of little nutritional value to Orcas. We don't have a crap load of fat. Not the humans that regularly engage in water sports anyway.

    14. Re:"Killer whale" by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Everything tastes like chicken, or does chicken taste like everything?

    15. Re:"Killer whale" by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 4, Funny

      So given what Tilikum did to that guy who snuck into his tank, I'm guessing he'd taste like sausage.

    16. Re:"Killer whale" by jkflying · · Score: 1

      OK, how about renaming them "Killer Dolphins". Seriously, what GP was talking about was the removal of the 'killer' from their name. If we were hearing about a lion, tiger, pack of hyenas or grizzly bear that killed people that snuck into its cage after dark nobody would care.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    17. Re:"Killer whale" by leereyno · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So they're Killer Dolphins then.

      You can call them Killer Butterflies if you want. The point is, they're PREDATORS. You can train them, but you can't tame them. Sooner or later, they're gonna decide you look better than the fishes you're tossing at them, and have themselves a little snack.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    18. Re:"Killer whale" by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Toothed whales are whales. That there are 2 branches in the whale family doesn't make one 'true' or the other 'false'.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    19. Re:"Killer whale" by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      Orcas are delphinidae, which *are* a part of the cetacean order. So they are very much technically whales, and it is quite correct to call them that.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    20. Re: "Killer whale" by stokessd · · Score: 1

      " We don't have a crap load of fat. "

      Please visit the Midwest, we have deep fried everything.

    21. Re:"Killer whale" by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      I think the previous poster's point was figurative, not literal; they were saying that it's been rebranded as "dolphin" (ala 'fun, playful sea creature that does tricks for humans') as opposed to the murderous-sounding 'killer whale'. For people - who are roughly the same size/shape of the orcas' main prey animals - to get into a tank with them is either insanity or a staggering level of naivete.

      So aside from your pedantry, their point was correct: that they are top-tier predators who probably haven't "humanistic" sensibilities about killing another living creature.*

      *there are giant swathes of humanity that likewise don't have such sensibilities, and to be absolutely honest, dolphins aren't necessarily the charming, lovable, "smiling" playful ocean clowns they've been portrayed as, either. #brutalgangrapistsofthesea

      --
      -Styopa
    22. Re:"Killer whale" by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Lord Dagon's Tithe only comes due from time to time.

    23. Re:"Killer whale" by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Dolphines are true whales too.
      What ever you might mean with true and untrue whales.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    24. Re: "Killer whale" by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Note the later clarifying sentence "Not the humans that regularly engage in water sports anyway."

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    25. Re:"Killer whale" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you think of any people who have killed once a decade, been in the news for it and not been punished?

      Not been punished? The perp you are talking about has been in prison the whole time.

    26. Re:"Killer whale" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The way the species has been rebranded as a "dolphin" is one of the triumphs of marketing over reality.

      Accuracy (or lack thereof) aside, this is actually only because the marketing for dolphins is such ridiculous bullshit. Everyone loves to think of them swimming with ships but nobody likes to think about the rape gangs. Dolphins are varied individuals just like all complex organisms.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:"Killer whale" by el+jocko+del+oeste · · Score: 1

      Says someone who clearly doesn't know how to properly prepare human.

      I'm still looking for a good humanitarian cook book.

    28. Re:"Killer whale" by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Says someone who clearly doesn't know how to properly prepare human.

      Maybe he just needs a good cookbook.

      --
      That is all.
    29. Re:"Killer whale" by Zynder · · Score: 1

      And "technically correct" is the best kind of correct!

    30. Re:"Killer whale" by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      The poster you're replying to is either ignorant, or using some extremely non-mainstream zoological classification. Dolphins are one of the cetacea, the order of whales.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    31. Re:"Killer whale" by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Orcas are delphinidae, which *are* a part of the cetacean order. So they are very much technically whales, and it is quite correct to call them that.

      Except not all members of the order Cetacea are whales. All cetaceans are marine mammals, but just like some cetaceans are whales, others are dolphins and porpoises. Similarly, humans are of the order Primates, but that doesn't make a human the same thing as a monkey, because while monkeys are primates they are not apes.

      To sum up, scientists have invented a system by which to classify animals. Order is one level of it, but it gets much more specific than that, and that wasn't done for "marketing" or "branding" reasons. Furthermore, it seems silly to justify one's own ignorance by pointing the finger at the people who know what they're doing like they're purposefully trying to confuse everybody, when they're really trying to do the opposite.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    32. Re:"Killer whale" by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      [citation needed].

      Cetacea derives from the Latin for 'whale'. Its extant 2 branches are called "toothed whales" and "baleen whales", i.e. each branch is a class of whale and the encompassing order is therefore 'whales', so far as any living animal is concerned. Dolphins and porpoises come under "toothed whales", and are thus whales.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  7. Ahem by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1, Informative

    "There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the homicidal killer whale,.."

    Homicidal . . . I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    1. Re:Ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      homo human being + Latin: caedere to cut, kill

      this use is entirely appropriate. the 'homo' in homocide is an objective use rather than a subjective one. it means that a human is being killed, rather than that a human is doing the killing.

    2. Re:Ahem by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, bringing pedantry to a new level.

      Not that that's necessarily a bad thing. If my wife or kids get tired of my pedantry, I can just point them here. They ain't heard nuttin' yet.

    3. Re:Ahem by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't mean what you or the moderators apparently think it means.

      A homocide is a killing of a human. Someone or something which kills or tries to kill humans is thus homocidal.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    4. Re:Ahem by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      I did. By definition of every dictionary I checked, homocide encompasses when a human kills another human.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    5. Re:Ahem by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      Well, the dictionaries constantly add new words and new meanings and usages for old words. My pet peeve: pretty soon "begs the question" will have an accepted definition "raises the question" instead of circular argument fallacy . Insecticide is something that kills insects. It need not be insect on insect violence. So it is time we expand the meaning homicide to anything that kills humans.

      BTW in most barbershops in the USA they have a jar of disinfectant where they soak the combs, brushes and clippers, brandname "Barbicide". Shhh, don't tell them it is a liquid that kills barbers.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Ahem by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Homicidal . . . I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      So, then... Patricide isn't when a father is killed? Ah, then it must be when he flushed my goldfish.

    7. Re:Ahem by fldsofglry · · Score: 1

      "There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the homicidal killer whale,.."

      Homicidal . . . I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      Must have been an awesome thought process for the reporter though: There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the human killer whale. Oh wait. No, that doesn't work. There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the homo-killer killer whale. That sounds stupid. There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the killer killer whale. That sounds even worse. There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the human killing killer whale. Fuck it. There's an interesting read at National Geographic by Kenneth Brower that probes the case of Tilikum, the homicidal killer whale.

    8. Re:Ahem by Arker · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would actually be a liquid that kills beards. Still not accurate.

      Homicide, however, fits perfectly in this case. Would-be pedants take note, m-w are idiots and always have been. If you cant find several places where they are wrong and you know they are wrong, you are not qualified to engage in pedantry.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    9. Re:Ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I could be terribly mistaken but last time I checked Homo did not refer exclusively to humans its root is "the same".
      If it was in this instance the killer whale killing another killer whale it would in fact be a case of homicide. However it is a killer whale killing a member of another species.

    10. Re:Ahem by aevan · · Score: 1

      But is it still regicide if you weren't a subject?

    11. Re:Ahem by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      No, but Dean Wormer is arguably an attempted fratricide.

    12. Re:Ahem by c0lo · · Score: 1

      The definition of homicide means when both the killer and the person being killed are humans.

      <pedantic_mode>
      Not exactly right.

      Latin hominus: "of a man" + Latin caedere: hacking or hewing (the verb is caedo)

      A woman hewing a man would still be called hominus caedere
      A woman being killed with an axe would still be called mulieris caedere not matter if the wielder of that ax is an Orca, a man or another woman.

      Ita est, you may be right, but for the wrong reasons: "homi" doesn't imply "the same", but only that whoever "homicided" the human was able to wield an axe.
      To describe a situation in which an Orca hacks another member of the same species with an axe, one should use "homocide", not "homicide"

      </pedantic_mode>

      Since "hew" has the meaning of: "to make or shape with or as if with an ax", an Orca commiting a homice is actually a correct expression (hew a human as if with an axe but using its teeth instead)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    13. Re:Ahem by pne · · Score: 1

      I could be terribly mistaken but last time I checked Homo did not refer exclusively to humans its root is "the same".

      That is correct in Greek but not in Latin.

      "Homicide" is a Latin-Latin compound (the first part is from Latin "homo", human), not a Greek-Latin one like "homosexual" (the first part is from Greek "homo", same).

      --
      Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    14. Re:Ahem by semiotec · · Score: 1

      Maybe "Barbicide" was originally created to kill Barbie dolls (say, in case they get possessed by evil spirits and start murdering people) and they just found that it's more useful and commercially viable to sell as a disinfectant.

    15. Re:Ahem by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      :)

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    16. Re:Ahem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Begging the question and raising the question are both circular argument fallacies.
      Perhaps "begging the question" is not a wide used term in american english.
      However it is certainly an old and not a modern english term. Ofherwise I had not learned it in school 30 years ago and would not find it in hundret years old books.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:Ahem by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I could be terribly mistaken but last time I checked Homo did not refer exclusively to humans its root is "the same".
      If it was in this instance the killer whale killing another killer whale it would in fact be a case of homicide. However it is a killer whale killing a member of another species.

      Homicide, not homocide.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    18. Re:Ahem by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Now you're arguing the fine points. What caught my eye first is that "homocidal killer whale" must be the pleonasm of the week. I mean, it's called a killer whale, WTF do you expect?

    19. Re:Ahem by aevan · · Score: 1

      *snicker* took a moment to click, but good one

  8. Not a surprise, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You take a highly intelligent creature, put it in captivity and then get in its enclosure. What the heck do you think is going to happen? It's amazing more people are not killed and a testament to the tolerance of the orcas.

    1. Re:Not a surprise, really by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Or good, old-fashioned, learned helplessness! It's amazing what sorts of useful institutions that little quirk can keep operational!

    2. Re:Not a surprise, really by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      You take a highly intelligent creature, put it in captivity and then get in its enclosure. What the heck do you think is going to happen?

      Hmmm...

      a 27-year-old man who stayed after the park closed and evaded security to enter the orca tank was found dead and nude, draped over Tilikum's back with his genitals bitten off.

      A gobble gone wrong? Worst blow-hole job ever?

    3. Re:Not a surprise, really by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      You take a highly intelligent creature, put it in captivity and then get in its enclosure. What the heck do you think is going to happen?

      You get amazing footage?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmXTsxxT9po
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxPaUUaxGlM
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0RCYUa3Kbg
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXnOzsRaYU0

    4. Re:Not a surprise, really by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of (IIRC) "Stranger in a Strange Land" - Heinlein. The Martian is brought back and kept essentially in a cage. Eventually someone is amazed that "they've managed to keep you alive and sane.", at which point the Martian says, "alive, not sane." More details not listed to prevent spoilers for those who have never read it.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  9. What did you think was going to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are locking up intelligent animals for our amusement. Animals much bigger and stronger than humans. Of course some of them are going to kill us. That's what we get.

    1. Re:What did you think was going to happen? by Provocateur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plus, they must have gotten really tired of being fed fish all the time.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:What did you think was going to happen? by Ghjnut · · Score: 1

      But...but...we just want them to play with us.

      --
      MouseClass extends ScrollClass, which extends TabClass, which extends SidebarClass, which extends PowerClass, w
    3. Re:What did you think was going to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seals are too expensive, and would squick the audience.

      Fish are on the 'not real animals' list, along with insects and rodents. That means you can do anything you want to them and only the PETA-nuts will object. They don't trigger an emotional response in humans. Seals, with their big eyes and human-scale size, do.

  10. They are called "Killer Whales" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The strange part is they don't eat people first chance/every chance.

    1. Re:They are called "Killer Whales" by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They're not called Killer Whales because they kill people.
      They're one of the only "whales" that kill whales.

  11. Where are the editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do the editors continue to approve submissions by " Hugh Pickens DOT Com"? It's clearly spam/advertisement for some crappy movie, but I've seen it a few times in submitted stories. C'mon now.

  12. Dangerous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These Orca things are dangerous! to stop people voluntarily getting into the tanks with them I suggest a name that's also a warning. Maybe 'Killer aquatic mammal'.

    1. Re:Dangerous! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      Or "Sea Orks".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  13. Animal Rights Group Alarmism by VinylRecords · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes...orcas are killers. Seen the wild they will use a baby seal like a volley ball. Torturing it for quite some time before it dies. They are 6-ton predators who rule the waters. Evolved natural killing machines. It is a risk to swim with them of course.

    But for the most part they don't kill humans. In fact some of the deaths have been result of the orcas playing too hard and not fully understanding that their human companions are land based creatures not capable of being underwater too long. Some, I guess I'll call them 'water show entertainment' deaths, were because the whales kept a trainer in their mouths for fun but ended up swimming beneath the surface for two or three minutes. Drowning their human trainer.

    But the safety records are fine. If the Animal Right's Groups are saying that the wild animals should not be kept captive because they are dangerous to humans it is a terrible argument. The overwhelming majority of captive animals don't kill or harm humans. If these groups were against animal captivity they need to argue about the exploitation of animals and effectively animal slavery for corporate profits. Instead they are wasting time exploiting deaths, many accidental, many not even of actual trainers but of idiots who jumped over the fence to play with killer whales, giant monkeys, and fully grown lions.

    This is the same alarmist response the news media does whenever a shark attack kills someone. "Oh my god it was 20 feet long...fin those sharks....for the children". Sharks kill a few people a year and there are millions of sharks and millions of humans who swim in the ocean. No need to sensationalize.

    Personally I don't think that most zoo animals enjoy captivity. But most zoo animals are smart enough to know that they are at the mercy of their human masters. The humans provide them clean living conditions, food, and water. They can get a whale to swim ten laps and fly out of the water for a fish treat. But sometimes a killer whale remembers that animal instinct and forgets his training. The trainers know the risks. It's not like these whales are flying out of the stands like a NASCAR crash gone wrong and killing people in the crowd.

    1. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not like these whales are flying out of the stands like a NASCAR crash gone wrong and killing people in the crowd.

      Yet.

    2. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      What we need is to put lasers on the orcas so that they can clearly show their dangerous nature by frying people from afar when they feel like it. I'd wager people would be a bit less likely to swim with them then.

    3. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by cybaz · · Score: 1

      Someone call the Syfy channel, I think we have a Sharknado sequel

    4. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If these groups were against animal captivity they need to argue about the exploitation of animals and effectively animal slavery for corporate profits

      They talk about that all the time. Even if you disagree with them, how have you not heard of them talking about such things, almost to an excess of some anti-captivity spiels being a thinly veiled anti-corporate spiel? If anything, it happens so much it gets tuned out, and most people don't care. That is why some groups will try to go at it from different angles. If they know the caring about the animal angle doesn't work, they try things that have more direct impact on humans.

    5. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the safety records are fine.

      They're acceptable, but they're not fine. One of the points made by a former trainer when talking about the movie is that being an orca trainer should be classified by OSHA as a dangerous job, which I gather would cost Sea World a bunch of money in extra pay, safety precautions and insurance. But because of lobbying by Sea World, it's still classified as being no more dangerous than office work.

    6. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by plopez · · Score: 1

      For the most part dogs don't kill humans. But when they do we put them down. Sea World is showing a reckless disregard for the safety of their employees. All in the name of profit.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    7. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by Kagato · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First off Orca's don't kill humans in the wild because they swim in cold waters that don't have humans. It's not like they are native to the coastal Florida beaches. The bit about animals being smart enough to know who the human masters are. That is factually untrue. In most zoos the protocols are all about keeping the zoo keepers out of harms way of the animals. Feeding the animals is one of the most dangerous parts of the job. Making a grab for a keepers during feeding time is quite common and equipment and protocol are designed to reduce the risks.

      Make no mistake, most real zoos wouldn't even fathom having an Orca show with close trainer interaction. There's a night and day difference between non-profit zoos and a multi billion dollar entertainment company.

    8. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by handleym99 · · Score: 1
      " It's not like these whales are flying out of the stands like a NASCAR crash gone wrong and killing people in the crowd.

      I smell a hit movie: Orcascar!!!

    9. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      Well... maybe not large zoos. But at the smaller end, there are plenty of zoolike entities that deal with big cats (leopards, jaguars, tigers, lions) that have official policies against "fraternizing with the animals", but quietly look the other way when a few select individuals get some quality time with the kitties. I'd say the fatality rates are probably pretty comparable... every few years, someone gets killed under circumstances that, in retrospect, make it clear that the individual wasn't quite in tune with the cats(*), but divided by thousands of daily interactions, the number really IS small.

      Common themes to most of the orca attacks: someone was in the tank when they weren't supposed to, sometimes under rather questionable circumstances.

      I do, however, agree that Sea World fucked up its handling of the situation badly by making it consequence-free for the Orca. Some kind of punishment would have certainly been appropriate, if only to make it think twice before attacking a human again in the future. Unfortunately, it's too late now, and if there WERE some kind of punishment imposed after the next killing, the Orca would be unlikely to make a direct connection between the attack and punishment since it's gotten away with it three times already.

      (*) Strictly speaking, NO cat is "domesticated" in the sense dogs are. With cats, socialization early in life is everything. A fourth-generation feral tabby, Siamese, or moggy can mess you up as badly as any small wildcat... and will. A second- or third-generation leopard, cheetah, or cougar socialized with humans from an early age and raised like a house cat will snuggle with you on the couch and purr. Temperamentally, they really AREN'T any different from "house cats". When you really get down to it, ALL cats have a wild side, and socialization is what suppresses it.

      Size matters. The difference between the size & strength of a human and a random house cat is pretty big. They might bite and scratch, but humans have a big enough size advantage to prevail 99.999% of the time. In contrast, an adult female leopard (the smallest of the big cats) is pretty much a dead-even match for an adult human, and any lion larger than a cub is likely to win in hand-to-hand combat with a human. A pissed-off tabby can scratch you badly enough to need sutures. A playful lion or tiger can seriously mess you up by mistake with an inappropriate "love swat", and demonstrably feel bad about doing it afterwards.

      Almost without exception, the people who get killed by big cats are people who thought they could impose themselves upon them like a dog and/or feared them. Recognition of a cat's boundaries and respecting them is NOT the same thing as "fearing them". Even a tabby gets a headache or feels grumpy occasionally, and will lash out at you exactly the same way if you insist upon annoying them when they want to be left alone. A dog can be "trained" to be subservient to humans. Cats negotiate treaties on favorable terms ;-)

    10. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by Talderas · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're already doing Sharknado 2.

      Perhaps they could have a spinoff. Typh-orca.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    11. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If these groups were against animal captivity they need to argue about the exploitation of animals and effectively animal slavery for corporate profits.

      That'll fly in countries that can handle moral ambiguity, but in the USA most people still think that we eat certain animals because they're just meant to be eaten or something. They'll eat a deer but not a goat, a cow but not a horse, when the most relevant differences are in our heads and not those of the critters we're eating. Consequently, in the USA the only available approach is "won't someone think of the poor stupid humans". If humans have to admit that some of the things we call animals are people, then they will have to start thinking about whether their food is made out of people — just people with different arrangements of limbs and lobes, and inhabiting a different portion of the food chain.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by houghi · · Score: 1

      First off Orca's don't kill humans in the wild because they swim in cold waters that don't have humans.

      Are you sure? From the site http://www.orcasafari.co.uk/ :
      See Orcas or Killer Whales in their natural environment and still be home for bed ! Your day trip destination to see the Orcas or Killer Whales is in the fjords to the far north of Norway, and one area in particular where every year large numbers of Orcas congregate.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:Animal Rights Group Alarmism by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Someone call Blizzard. I've come up with a great idea for a game!

      Orcas Vs Humans

  14. Tenuous relationships with animals by multiben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've always been fascinated by people who keep dangerous pets or work with them. They often seem to hold the belief that their relationship with these creatures transcends their instinctive nature to kill. And for a time it seems that they are right. But you only have to piss off a grizzly bear one time, and all of a sudden you're on the latest episode of "People Who Domesticated Animals Which Shouldn't Have Been Domesticated."

    1. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And even then, if your pet tiger really likes you, but takes a nip at you, or tries to wrestle with you like he does with his siblings (that he also likes), you're not strong enough to handle it and you die.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      I've always been fascinated by people who keep dangerous pets or work with them. They often seem to hold the belief that their relationship with these creatures transcends their instinctive nature to kill.

      Back in the Seventies there was an article on these folks in the short-lived US edition of Geo Magazine. The writer interviewed some, and noticed a recurring thread: they stoutly maintained that Leo would never hurt them; they had a good-sized bandage somewhere on them; and the first thing out of their mouths was a lame description of a kitchen accident...

    3. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I've always been fascinated by people who keep dangerous pets or work with them. They often seem to hold the belief that their relationship with these creatures transcends their instinctive nature to kill. And for a time it seems that they are right. But you only have to piss off a grizzly bear one time, and all of a sudden you're on the latest episode of "People Who Domesticated Animals Which Shouldn't Have Been Domesticated."

      I should like to see that show - what time and channel is it on?

    4. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I've always been fascinated by people who keep dangerous pets or work with them.

      Nearly ALL pets are dangerous. Birds, cats dogs, ALL can maim or kill you if they are sufficiently motivated.

      But you only have to piss off a grizzly bear one time

      The same is true of a medium to large dog. Bears are at least smart enough (like dogs) to know better. There are locations in Canada where people feed polar bears quite well, in exchange for them not eating their dogs, and they behave quite well. Watching polar bears and dogs playfully wrestling with one-another is a sight to see.

      Big cats are far more instinctive. Siegfried and Roy deserve lots of credit for going so long before a maiming, but they're also the exceptions. Buddhist monks seem to be the only ones with the proper temperament to keep large cats. Contrast this with dogs, where the majority of people will do fine and not get themselves killed.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by plopez · · Score: 1

      But if a dog is vicious it is put down. You do not keep sending your employees into close contact with it.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      One of them did manage to get a highly acclaimed documentary about their inevitable demise. Good ol Timothy Treadwell aka 'the Kodiak snack'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Just view it at your convenience.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      we have these crazy rednecks who have private zoos full of wild beasts. of course you're going to get eaten. what's not natural is for man NOT to fear them.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    9. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      And that, over many centuries of contract with humans, is a reason why dogs are safer than wolves or orcas.

    10. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by leereyno · · Score: 1

      "Hey Ya'll... watch this!!"

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    11. Re:Tenuous relationships with animals by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      I've always been fascinated by people who keep dangerous pets or work with them. They often seem to hold the belief that their relationship with these creatures transcends their instinctive nature to kill.

      Back in the Seventies there was an article on these folks in the short-lived US edition of Geo Magazine. The writer interviewed some, and noticed a recurring thread: they stoutly maintained that Leo would never hurt them; they had a good-sized bandage somewhere on them; and the first thing out of their mouths was a lame description of a kitchen accident...

      Battered owner syndrome.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  15. Genes matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know an ex Sea World Orca trainer. She never had anything bad to say about the program. The killer Tilikum has been used for breeding more than any other male Orca though. I wouldn't think that was a good idea. Why not try to breed the aggression out of them?

    1. Re:Genes matter by Camael · · Score: 1

      I think we humans owe it to the rest of the animal kingdom we share the Earth with to breed the aggression out of ourselves first before we meddle with the lives of other thinking creatures.

    2. Re:Genes matter by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps aggression is not genetic? Perhaps it's not that easy either, since it takes 15 years for an Orca to reach breeding age, how many centuries do you think they have to spare?

    3. Re:Genes matter by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      The first captive bred Orca was born in 1985. So they have already wasted nearly two full generations.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    4. Re:Genes matter by internerdj · · Score: 1

      I can't help but think breeding aggression out of a carnivore might have detrimental side effects for the species.

  16. Citatioin needed? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    "Almost all students of orca believe that they are deranged by captivity, some more than others."

    I really wish the author had gone into more detail on this point, it sounds interesting. The closest he got was a citation from a psychologist who said, we really should be careful applying psychological terms to animals that diverged from us 200 million years ago.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. Normally once a kept animal kills or even bites a human, it is destroyed, under the theory it will be far less likely to do so in the future. I assume this wasn't done for half a dozen reasons stacking up, from it's too big, too hard to let go, how dare you, etc.

    > with his genitals bitten off

    Ouch! I wonder if he whaled.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:So by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      I assume this wasn't done for half a dozen reasons stacking up, from it's too big, too hard to let go, how dare you, etc.

      I think you left out "You can't buy a new orca for the price of a dolphin"...

    2. Re:So by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Normally once a kept animal kills or even bites a human, it is destroyed, under the theory it will be far less likely to do so in the future. I assume this wasn't done for half a dozen reasons stacking up, from it's too big, too hard to let go, how dare you, etc.

      And don't forget what happened the last time someone tried to destroy a whale.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:So by plopez · · Score: 1

      Dogs get two non-lethal bites. Upon the second reported bite, they get taken to the county shelter and put down or shot by the Sheriff.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:So by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Pedantic mode on:
      So they only have ONE none lethal bite.
      If they get killed at the second, they don't have two.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  18. Capturer, not trainer by Reliable+Windmill · · Score: 2

    He killed his perceived capturer. If you capture and lock up an animal, you shouldn't expect anything else.

    --
    Signature intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Capturer, not trainer by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Yup. I'm cheering for the orcas here. Kill 'em all, Tilikum' kill 'em all,

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Capturer, not trainer by plopez · · Score: 1

      And if that animal were a dog it would have been put down after the first attack. It would have been classified a vicious and dangerous animal and not tolerated.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Capturer, not trainer by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I'm really wondering how you determined that the animal perceives them as 'captors'. It makes just as much sense that they would perceive them as 'food bringers.'

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Capturer, not trainer by Rary · · Score: 1

      Why one or the other? Most captors bring food to their captives.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    5. Re:Capturer, not trainer by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I just want to know how you have such deep insight into what the animal is thinking. At some level it may not even be aware that it is captured.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Capturer, not trainer by Reliable+Windmill · · Score: 1

      I'm really wondering how you determined that the animal perceives them as 'captors'. It makes just as much sense that they would perceive them as 'food bringers.'

      It's just perfectly obvious to most of us. To say that a creature would not be able to conceptualize its capture, restraint and placement in a strange and confined space into anything other than "I am in water, here is food, all is well." shows a huge lack of empathy on your part. I honestly hope you don't have pets, because you would only effort to become a keeper, never a companion or pack leader.

      --
      Signature intentionally left blank.
    7. Re:Capturer, not trainer by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Suddenly it makes sense why so much animal cruelty exists. Apparently many people are stupid enough to think animals aren't intelligent.

      I strongly suspect in these cases, the animals may actually be more intelligent than their keepers.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    8. Re:Capturer, not trainer by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's just perfectly obvious to most of us.

      That explains a lot about you. You're pretending to empathize with creatures you've never even met.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Capturer, not trainer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I just want to know how you have such deep insight into what the animal is thinking. At some level it may not even be aware that it is captured.

      At some level, you may not even be aware that you're captured.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Capturer, not trainer by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You are right, I am unaware of that at every level.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  19. Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Is that the attempted attack on Herbert Ponting or do we have at least two now? There's also been a few accounts of them breaking ice in an attempt to get sled dogs.

    1. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Sled dogs bark. Like seals. They never followed through all the way to actually attacking one of the animals either, perhaps indicating that they stopped once they identified that the dogs weren't the prey they were looking for.

    2. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by Talderas · · Score: 3, Funny

      *waves hand*

      These aren't the prey you're looking for.

      Move along.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Considering the outcome of a successful attack it's not like we'd ever know if it happened. Then again it's more likely that those Antarctic explorers that vanished on sea ice either fell through or were unlucky enough to be on ice that drifted out to sea.

    4. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      I counted the instances on the Wiki page (I forgot to close the anchor tag in my comment) where it seemed an Orca had initiated a successful attack based on the brief descriptions. The 1 is an instance where an Orca actually bit a surfer.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    5. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I know that goalpost shifting is the most popular sport here, but instead of that I prefer what's in the dictionary. I took what you had written at face value of "attack" instead of "successful attack". Thanks for clearing that up.

    6. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      It seemed like a lot of the "attempted attacks" in the wild were more like, the Orcas looked threateningly at our dogs, or the Orcas bumped into people in shallow water where it could easily have been accidental. Extraordinarily rare either way, captivity or no.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    7. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Either way Herbert Ponting's description of the attempted attack on him demonstrates that it was not only deliberate but the whales are very good at hunting things standing on sea ice, to the point of anticipating where he was going to cross to the next ice floe.

    8. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      No doubt, I just watched a video of a pod of them training juveniles to wave wash a seal of of a floe.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    9. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that link.
      I've been thinking about these whales a bit in the last two weeks since a few of them got stranded at a place where I used to swim as a kid. I had no idea that they ranged so far.

    10. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      They are probably pushing the boundaries of their traditional ranges to look for food. I wonder if that will put them into contact with pods from farther afield; apparently they don't speak the same dialects. The Wikipedia page (under Vocalizations) mentions that pod or region-specific call patterns are used frequently after calves are born.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    11. Re:Meanwhile in Antarctica ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      They are probably pushing the boundaries of their traditional ranges to look for food

      In this case I just thought of them as cold water whales but it turns out that they've probably been following humpback whale migrations into the tropics for a very long time.

  20. Go Orca! by ikhider · · Score: 1

    A few down, a few billion left. Who will win? Orca's or Skynet?

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
  21. The Most Dangerous Animal by elsuperjefe · · Score: 2

    "Contrary to popular belief, the most dangerous animal is not the lion or tiger or even the elephant. The most dangerous animal is a shark riding on an elephant, just trampling and eating everything they see." -- Jack Handy clearly, he never saw an ORCA riding on an elephant.

  22. Frustrated designer by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    was found dead and nude, draped over Tilikum's back with his genitals bitten off

    He was just trying to demonstration his new high-fashion concept of a Eunuch Tunic.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Frustrated designer by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      "Eunuch Tunic" That's a bit of a mouthful.

      ~Tilikum

  23. Ron White said it best... by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tilikum is a "Serial Killer Whale". Also, that's why they are called "Killer Whales" and not "Ocean Ponies."

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  24. What you eat by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    (not suprising since that's what they eat).

    If that were true in all cases we'd taste like Cheetos.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Stand your ground Willy! by voss · · Score: 1

    An orca that kills a human trying to capture it in the waters of florida is legally in the right.

  26. They are called Killer Whales... by RLU486983 · · Score: 1

    and they killed something. What exactly is the problem here?!? :-/

    1. Re:They are called Killer Whales... by plopez · · Score: 1

      That Sea World let it happen 3 times.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  27. This is an apex predator by Beeftopia · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) Killer whale teeth.
    2) Killer whale skull.

    The killer whale can weigh up to 22,000 lbs for males and 16,000 lbs for females, and be up to 32 feet and 28 feet long respectively. A great white shark can reach up to 5,000 lbs and 20 feet long.

    I saw a PBS video showing great whites feeding on seals at a beach. Suddenly the great whites fled and shortly thereafter, orcas showed up to begin feeding. The narrator noted that orcas can kill great whites.

    The male killer whales at Seaworld weigh 5-6 tons. It's quite remarkable that these orcas have not killed more trainers.

    1. Re:This is an apex predator by dasgoober · · Score: 1

      Given that it's equipped with teeth like that, and all they seem to get, in captivity, are fish that it swallows whole, I wonder if they miss/have an urge to just rip into something..

    2. Re:This is an apex predator by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      And that's a juvenile orca skull (image at bottom of page). Googling "killer whale skull" leads to a lot of results showing very large skulls, and it's unclear whether they're prehistoric. This was clearly labeled in that link so I linked to it.

      Secondly, there are different types of killer whales, ocean-going ("transients") and near-coastline ("resident") types. The ocean-going ones are the classical wolves of the sea, highly intelligent pack hunters devouring whales and other marine mammals, while the near-coastline ones typically dine on mostly fish.

  28. Streisand effect at work by Camael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:-

    In the week before advance screenings in Los Angeles and New York, SeaWorld sent out a "Dear Film Critic" letter that castigated the documentary as "shamefully dishonest, deliberately misleading, and scientifically inaccurate." Journalists and bloggers around the world, never averse to controversy, pricked up their ears. If the film's producers ever worried about insufficient funds for advertising, they can lay that fear to rest.

    I don't think free publicity was what SeaWorld had in mind. I have not even heard of this movie before this, now I have to admit I'm curious.

  29. Re:from the free-and-angry-willy dept. by plopez · · Score: 1

    Or have MASA send him to the moon.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  30. You own link proves you wrong by Camael · · Score: 1, Informative

    You are so wrong and your own link proves it. Let me set out the parts you clipped off in the definition:-

    murder
    noun
    the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another

    verb
    [with object]

    kill (someone) unlawfully and with premeditation

    By your own source, murder can only be committed by human beings on other human beings. Since whales are not human beings, they cannot commit murder, and by extension they cannot have homicidal tendencies.

  31. Re:Not too timely by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I don't. It's always been a few days late.

  32. what does a 6 tonne killer whale eat? by jsepeta · · Score: 4, Funny

    whomever he pleases

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  33. Re:1999 guy a whale lover? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    if someone dried to stick his dick up my nose, i'd probably bite it off too!

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  34. Or... by Molochi · · Score: 1

    Homo as a root often means "the same". As in homosexual, or homonym. If you classify some dolphins (like Killer Whales) as sentient then it could be a sentient on sentient attack resulting in homicide.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    1. Re:Or... by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      Not the case here though. Where homo means same, as in homogenous, it's coming from the Greek prefix homo- meaning same. The noun homo, hominis comes from the Latin. Of course the pain of figuring this stuff out only gets worse when you know both languages and find words haphazardly compounded from both Greek and Latin roots (given the context, homosexual comes to mind, a term coming from 19th c. psychology) in ways that make classicists twitch. Medical Latin is far worse than the admittedly idiomatic legal Latin in this regard, but scientific names just make a fellow want to drink away the pain. Honestly, though I recognize the need for unique terms, we may as well be using Klingon as some of the things they come up with.

    2. Re:Or... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Homo in the sense of "same" is greek.
      Homo in the sense of "man" is latin.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  35. So what? Animals are dangerous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder about the press more than the attacks.
    Here's some numbers for dogs:
    http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/images/dogbreeds-a.pdf
    Collies have gotten three, and note that there's even someone killed by a cocker spaniel (not surprising if you ever owned one).
    The hound group includes two people killed by dachshunds.
    Admittedly, there are many more people owning dachshunds and cocker spaniels than Orcas, but the point is that if you mess with animals enough, they'll kill you. So what is the big deal with Orca attacks? They're just another animal.
    Cows kill someone about every few weeks - about 20 a year
    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5829a2.htm
    How often do you see a article about someone killed by a cow?
    But every time a shark or Orca gets someone, it's international news.

  36. Caution! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Caution! Intelligent predator animals you keep captive and let do silly tricks may try kill you once they get the chance.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  37. Re:It could be worse.... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, whales are people too... unless you want to use a literal definition of the root for homicidal:
    homicide
    Noun
    The deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another; murder.
    Because then we would be talking about whale on whale crime... I don't care about that... "Whale on Whale Action" might get me to click... sorry, just morbid curiosity...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  38. The trainers don't know the risks. by mosb1000 · · Score: 2

    The trainers know the risks.

    Do they? Because the last time I checked, SeaWorld was still claiming that Tilikum was not actually trying to kill Dawn Brancheau when it grabed her by the arm, crushed her, dismembered her, and then ate her arm. They also claim the other two deaths were not deliberate (or that they don't know) when a review of the facts definitely indicates that Tilikum killed these people. I can't imagine anyone in their right mind working with this animal if they were in full possession of the facts. This is a safety issue, but SeaWorld is also deliberately downplaying that risk.

    1. Re:The trainers don't know the risks. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine anyone in their right mind working with this animal if they were in full possession of the facts.

      The actual known facts are right out in the open for anyone with two neurons to rub together to work with. If you don't understand that these animals are instinctive killers, you don't have any business getting anywhere near them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  39. Other movie by dargaud · · Score: 1

    I can't believe nobody mentioned the other excellent movie about killer orcas: rust and bones. OK, the orca is only the start of the story, but it's really good.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  40. Re:What's the point of this exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_film_accidents

    By your criteria shall we ban cinema as well?

    http://matadornetwork.com/nights/10-deadliest-concert-disasters-of-the-last-50-years/

    Live music is also dangerous.

    Perhaps a blanket ban on all entertainment is in order. People might die or get injured.

  41. Re:It could be worse.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who are you, Adolphin Hitler?

  42. Vote or die. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Users have the ability to mod and tag the submitted stories. You could have modded this submission down and tagged it "spam" before it hit the front page. You didn't. You have no one to blame but yourself.

    http://slashdot.org/recent is what you are looking for.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  43. prepare a human? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Where is the Orca going to get a nice bottle of chianti then?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  44. Some people are just jerks. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    That Sea World let it happen 3 times.

    And lobbied to prevent killer whale training being deemed a dangerous profession, with mandatory compensation and insurance commensurate with the increased risk.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  45. Re:Well, THAT settles it... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    The whale-huggers despise Sea World. Hence the film. Hence the article.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  46. We can afford it by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    What's the problem of people dying exactly? As a species, we can more than afford this and the people dying almost exclusively knew the dangers and chose voluntarily to expose themselves. People die for the most stupid reasons all of the time. It's part of life, not every death should have a significant meaning. People die from the most silly things all the time. Parachute jumping comes to mind as a good analogy. Stunt plane flying deaths haven't stopped people flying stunt planes either. The luxury we can afford as a species means people die from silly causes. As long as we can afford us these sorts of deaths, they will continue.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  47. Further Listening by mattington · · Score: 1

    I just thought I'd mention Ric O'Barry, Flipper's trainer. He's spent a life trying to eradicate captivity of Cetacea. Here's a link to an interview so you can listen to him in his own words. He's not a Seaworld fan and has some pretty good reasons why not. Hope someone finds this interesting, I sure did.

  48. Re:What's the point of this exactly? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    That's a false choice. Read one of the earliest entries on your list:

    Noah's Ark (1928). Three people died, one man lost a leg and a number were injured in a scene where several hundred extras were caught in the 'Great Flood'. The deaths were instrumental in the introduction of film safety regulations in the following year.

    People work very hard to avoid accidents in the film industry, and they are by no means a necessary to the production of movies. That said, some of the stunts they do are unnecessary and dangerous. I don't understand why someone would risk their life to make a movie, and if I were financing a movie, I wouldn't let it happen.

    On the other hand, working with large predators is always dangerous, and there doesn't seem to be any obvious way to avoid the risk. It shouldn't be done, and I can't imagine what people who run places like SeaWorld or wild animal theme parks could be thinking. I've seen grizzly bears and mountain lions in the wild. While it is thrilling, I do everything I can to avoid such encounters. I can't fathom why someone would want to work in close proximity with these animals, unless they did not fully understand the risk. It would be like working with live high-voltage lines just for the fun of it.

  49. Orca only eats testicles by jpallant · · Score: 1

    That an Orca, aka a Killer Whale, should actually eat something, like a mammal, is hardly surprising. Personally, I have no problem with it. Play with a giant, multi-ton monster that has been known to eat sharks and whales, and dolphins and seals, and what do you expect? These are predators. Keeping them confined will have consequences. This is what happens when the human races insists that it can dominate nature. Oops.

  50. Obligatory Neko Case by njvack · · Score: 1

    You know they call them killer whales
    But you seem surprised
    When it pinned you down to the bottom of the tank
    Where you can't turn around
    It took half your leg and both your lungs
    And I craved I ate hearts of sharks, I know you know it

    I'm a man man man man, man man man eater
    But still you're surprised, 'prised, 'prised, when I eat ya

    -Neko Case, People Gotta Lotta Nerve

  51. How stupid can humans be? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    We ourselves named them killer whales, why the hell aren't we taking the same precautions as we would with frickin' sharks?

  52. Re:Free Willy by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    I tried that once, I got arrested for indecency.

  53. Remember the 1977 move Orca? by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

    Orca

    This is a movie you should watch :)

  54. Re:That took some balls... by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    Into the orca pool == Out of the gene pool

  55. Seaworld by koan · · Score: 1

    Should be closed.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Seaworld by mikaere · · Score: 1

      I agree. Whenever someone mentions one of these places (Seaworld, Marineland etc), I say "are you talking about Aquatic Megafauna Incarceration World ?". Always gets them think about what a fucked up thing it is to imprison intelligent mammals.

      --
      It's good luck to be superstitious
  56. Ask Siegfried and Roy, Steve Irwin, et al, by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    about statistics and probability. If you have enough contact with animals that can kill you, the likelihood of an incident detrimental to your health approaches one. No one, not even a professor of orca, can predict when the beast is having a bad day. Or a sore tongue. Or a misunderstanding.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  57. Re:BEWARE OF MOOSE by Zynder · · Score: 1

    Off topic? Really mods? Turn in your nerd cards if you have never heard of a Swedish sister getting bit by a moose- a majestik one at that! Dammit mods, I really wish I could sack you all....more useless than a herd of 40 specially trained Ecuadorian mountain llamas, 6 Venezuelan red llamas, 142 Mexican whooping llamas, 14 North Chilean guanacos (closely related to the llama), 1 reg llama of Brixton, and 76000 battery llamas from "Llama-Fresh" Farms Ltd near Paraguay!