Slashdot Mirror


China Has a Massive Windows XP Problem

An anonymous reader writes "The Chinese are going to have a very, very hard time kicking the Windows XP habit. The deadline for the retirement of Microsoft's most successful operating system ever is eight months from tomorrow: April 8, 2014. That's the day when the Redmond, Wash. company is to deliver the last XP security update. According to analytics company Net Applications, 37.2% of the globe's personal computers ran Windows XP last month. If Microsoft's estimate of 1.4 billion Windows PCs worldwide is accurate, XP's share translates into nearly 570 million machines. In the U.S., 16.4% of all personal computers ran Windows XP in July, or about one in six, Net Applications' data showed. But in China, 72.1% of the country's computers relied on the soon-to-retire operating system last month, or nearly three out of every four systems."

50 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. xp still works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ive got at least 4 workstations that are still running xp, we have legacy software and drivers that wont work on win7, and win8 blows. but we dont worry about updates, since these dont connect to the web. m$ is going to be a dinosaur very soon, the signs are there....

    1. Re:xp still works by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still use Windows XP and Windows 2000. They were good operating systems and, from my perspective, Vista, 7, and 8 haven't brought anything to the table. Quite the opposite, in fact: I went full penguin after Vista came out. It was patently clear that Microsoft was going in a direction I didn't want to go.

      Yes, but what of the botnets? Who will take care of them? Without care and feeding of ineffective security updates to make users believe they are safe from such things, the botnets will wither and die.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:xp still works by symbolset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have three xp units left. We will migrate to Linux.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:xp still works by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      DOS still works too, if you find the right hardware to run it on or use it in a virtual machine. Does that mean we should all be using DOS?

    4. Re:xp still works by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean the all so horrible instant search where I can start word and view files by subject in 1\9 of a second without a mouse?

      You couldn't pay me to go back to XP style start menu! Yuck.

      Some people are so stuburn and hate change so much they refuse to learn anything new including Windows 7 features as I am not referingto 8 at all.

    5. Re:xp still works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, Linux boxes are far from immune from them. As soon as they take an interest, the botnet creators will be happy to make sure that their software is safe and sound on your Linux and MacOS boxes.

      Warms the heart, really.

    6. Re:xp still works by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Informative

      Windows 95 used to do that and I forgot about that.

      When I am on a Windows 7 if I am thinking of something I wrote 3 years ago I just hit th windows key and type acme sales 2010 and enter to find the documents. Beagle under Linux tried similiar functionalty.

      I show all die hard XP users this and within 10 minutes they are hooked. I do not care about the menus as I am so hooked on instant search now that I cant live without it. Jumplists and aero snap make me a windows 7 diehard.

      Sorry I lost faith in Linux after gnome 3. Windoes 8 might make me reconsider though :-)

      Windows 7 for a crappy Windows OS really was the best version and to me even eclipsed XP.

    7. Re:xp still works by deroby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Off course said theory isn't busted. It's not like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware doesn't exist, it's simply hardly worth the effort to focus on Linux.

      On top of that, the typical/average Linux-user is much better informed about security issues than is the typical/average Windows-user (**). So making a website to trick people into clicking/downloading/running something malicious is more likely to work in the latter case.
      Switch mom&pop to Linux and before you know it they'll be clicking the same links and the botnets will live happy ever after.

      Linux might never see the sheer volume of malware that exists for Windows because it's "late in the game" and because simply put both the developers and the users have learnt quite a bit over the years making it harder for viruses etc to propagate.

      (**: Apple used to be 'virus-free' too. As its user base is growing (and dare I say dumbing down?) there is an uptake on the amount of malware too...)

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    8. Re:xp still works by deroby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then do both, like I do... doubly-so.

      * I use the search function to start quite a lot of things
      but
      * I also use the 10-ish icons on the start-menu that represent the things I've worked with lately/often (not sure what the logic is, it works). Added bonus is that (a lot of them) are able to show a sub-menu with the most recent documents I worked with for that given program; I even can pin those if I want. Genius!
      * Old-school as I am I also revived the Quick-Launch toolbar and have like 20 icons of things that I work with most often.

      Yep, there is some overlap between 2 & 3, but as far as usability goes I am quite happy with this setup.

      PS: I don't like pinning stuff to my system-bar for some reason. Tried it, annoyed me and haven't done it ever since. Everyone's different I guess.

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    9. Re:xp still works by jrumney · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I do not care about the menus as I am so hooked on instant search now that I cant live without it.

      Sorry I lost faith in Linux after gnome 3.

      This is a strange combination of comments, because the changes from Gnome 2 to Gnome 3 were to deemphasize the application menus and introduce search as the primary way for interacting with the shell.

    10. Re:xp still works by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Linux malware is hard to write, although the SCTP vulnerability last year would have allowed a worm that ran in kernelspace and didn't depend on any installed software. Ubuntu malware, or Android malware, however, are quite easy. That 0.1% figure for Android malware in comparison to Windows malware is probably just about true if you're counting all malware written for both platforms since they were introduced, irrespective of whether it works on recent versions, but it's nowhere near close if you're counting new malware. Take a look at this list and tell me that a widely deployed Linux distribution is hard to write malware for. For example, the CURL CVE-2013-2174 allows a remote attacker with a crafted URL to run arbitrary code, and CVE-2013-1697 in Mozilla allows HTML emails displayed with Thunderbird or web pages displayed with FireFox to execute JavaScript with a privilege level that allows it to make calls to native libraries, effectively meaning arbitrary code execution with ambient privilege. CVE-2013-1052 would allow either of these attacks to upgrade privilege and then install a rootkit.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:xp still works by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uhhh...you wanna explain how a million infected devices is 0.1% Miss AC? because i REALLY want to hear the logic hoops you pull out of your behind to explain the evidence away, i REALLY do.

      Like it or not Android, which every Linux advocate has claimed as their own from day one, proves beyond a reasonable doubt what so many of us have said for so long...OSes are some of the most complex code ever written and because man is fallible there IS bugs which WILL be exploited once a target becomes big enough which tada! Is EXACTLY what happened when Linux on mobile went mainstream with Android.

      So welcome to the club, the coffee is in the back, ignore the guy rocking in the corner as that is Mac who felt like you he had magic armor and then he got a beatdown from macDefender and Guardian and is still traumatized. I don't know what they did to him but considering he's been like that for awhile and keeps muttering "You shore are purty"? Probably best not to ask.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:xp still works by RabidReindeer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Linux might never see the sheer volume of malware that exists for Windows because it's "late in the game" and because simply put both the developers and the users have learnt quite a bit over the years making it harder for viruses etc to propagate.

      Thank you for not saying "virii". You've actually used the correct plural.

      The main reason why Linux is more secure is history. Linux is descended from Unix, and Unix spent its formative years in University labs where students would routinely prank each other. Of necessity, Unix grew up with security being an issue almost from Day 1.

      In contrast, Windows grew out of DOS. Unlike Unix, where people were sharing a computer and had to play nice together, DOS was an environment where you owned everything, lock, stock and barrel. The thrust of the design was on usability, not on security. As a result, several fundamental system components were designed insecure and it was difficult-to-impossible to retrofit security on them.

    13. Re:xp still works by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OMG are you REALLY gonna drag out the old "Its not the OS, its the kernel" bullshit? Really? because by that logic windows is 100% bug free as well since no bug that I know of attacks the WinNT kernel but the stuff above it as well.

      I'm sorry dude but that bullshit won't fly, a kernel with nothing else is fricking worthless and every. single. mainstream. distro all come with the SAME APPS over and over AND OVER so that shit ain't gonna fly. Firefox, Chromium, Gimp, Libre office, you'll find those on pretty much every mainstream desktop distro there is so if any of those are pwned then yes Virginia Linux is pwned.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:xp still works by WuphonsReach · · Score: 3, Informative

      The main reason why Linux is more secure is history. Linux is descended from Unix, and Unix spent its formative years in University labs where students would routinely prank each other. Of necessity, Unix grew up with security being an issue almost from Day 1.

      That's a bit revisionist. Early unix was horribly insecure at multi-user stuff. It took a long while before security became something important in design.

      Easiest example to name is the storage of passwords in /etc/passwd. Since the file was readable by everyone, it was easy to grab the hashes and perform offline attacks. I'm not even sure that early password hashes were salted in unix, which meant that if you could crack one account you could easily see that your password would match accounts X, Y and Z.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    15. Re:xp still works by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And categorise by vendor rather than what the application does, because trying to promote your company brand is more important than letting users easily find the applications they need.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    16. Re:xp still works by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What are you talking about?

      Windows '9x grew out of DOS. Windows 7 grew out NT, which was most definitely designed with security in mind.

      I would argue that "pure" NT is more secure than pre-selinux Linux or Unix. Selinux is something whose true security I have never been able to calculate. unlike NT or IBM's (mainframe) RACF, the rules and support mechanisms are hard to fathom. So hard, in fact, that a lot of people give up, switch it off, and thus defeat its purpose.

      However, nothing runs "pure" NT. NT was forced to accept the Windows Gang of 3 core DLLs inherited from the DOS-based Windows predecessors, and they required wedging the security door open in order to remain backwards compatibility. Which is basically the same sort of problem as the Selinux complexity issue except that if you turn off Selinux, it's your own fault, not a core OS design decision.

      You have enumerated and expanded on those precise problems and I can't state it any better. The only thing I can can is Who the $%@!! thought that a Web Browser needed to be (squeaky Steve Ballmer voice quote) "An Integral Part of Windows" as stated in the anti-trust trial. What actual advantage did it give? No other OS I know of puts the web browser code into the OS itself and I've yet to see any performance or capability advantages that Windows has over those other systems in that realm. Security holes, yes. Actual advantages, no.

    17. Re:xp still works by KingMotley · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only the Windows 3.1 line grew out of MS-DOS, and the last in that line was Windows ME. The NT line grew out of VMS, which became Windows 95.

    18. Re:xp still works by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That might have held water except that Android phones vastly outnumber Windows phones and certainly would be a sweet target for a virus.

      Servers are also a sweet target and Linux has had Windows outnumbered there for quite some time.

      I wouldn't claim there is no Linux malware or that there won't be more, but it is notably rare in spite of some of the sweetest targets out there running Linux.

      Likewise, there exists malware for Apple, but not in proportion to it's popularity. It genuinely looks like Windows is a soft target even with the confounding factors accounted for.

      Linux also isn't particularly late in the game. While ads were gushing about the upcoming Windows '95, I was installing SLS Linux.

      The one thing that could screw that up is if a distro encourages new users to run as root so they can get the full 'Windows experience' they are used to.

      Remember, until MS came along, getting a virus from email was only a running gag. The idea that it could actually happen was absurd.

  2. That will be a lot of spambots by NixieBunny · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once the patches stop and they all get infected, they'll be so busy sending junk to each other that they won't have time to compute anything.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:That will be a lot of spambots by MurukeshM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What makes you think that isn't happening already?

  3. Interesting by pipatron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see how they will handle this. When I visited China, computer security didn't seem to be one of the top priorities among the computer users, so the majority of the population might just not care much about updates. If it starts breaking down completely, and Windows 7 or 8 isn't as easy to pirate, perhaps we'll see a Chinese mass migration to Linux.

    I wonder how difficult it would be for the Chinese government to make their own Windows patches. They could probably perform a MITM on the windows update servers and feed their own patches if a lot of unpatched Windows machines leads to an increased influx of CIA-sponsored viruses to China.

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    1. Re:Interesting by armanox · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll probably just push Red Flag Linux to everyone.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    2. Re:Interesting by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      perhaps we'll see a Chinese mass migration to Linux.

      Don't hold your breath. I went to a Linux User Group meeting in Shanghai a couple years ago, and more than half the people there were expat white guys. Linux has an astoundingly low adoption rate in China. You'd think that people that are at least nominally commies would more open to FOSS.

    3. Re:Interesting by interval1066 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pirated/hacked copies and Linux...

      The ability to hack Linux is by design.

      He/she meant Pirated/hacked copies of WINDOWS AND linux, genius. Learn to 'merican.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    4. Re:Interesting by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I found the opposite everyone from relatives to babysitters liked using Linux (Debian/Gnome3 or Bodhi or Magia) and asked about me installing it on their computer. So no not just dorks like Linux, the kids with the fancy $600 phones and the grandparents like is. Although my brother-in-law phoned me last week and asked if I could help him install and configure Slackware over the phone I told him no, then told him to try Mint.

    5. Re:Interesting by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I prefer Black Flag Linux. It only costs 35 dollars and a six pack to license.

    6. Re:Interesting by sdnoob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It will be interesting to see how they will handle this.

      windows 7 is nearly as easy to pirate as windows xp was.... so it's pretty obvious what chinese users will do when the time comes.

  4. Math much? by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But in China, 72.1% of the country's computers relied on the soon-to-retire operating system last month, or nearly three out of every four systems."

    This is Slashdot. I think we can do the math on that one.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Math much? by Lendrick · · Score: 5, Funny
    2. Re:Math much? by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But in China, 72.1% of the country's computers relied on the soon-to-retire operating system last month, or nearly three out of every four systems."

      This is Slashdot. I think we can do the math on that one.

      I came for this. I do wonder, though, for how much of the general population does "72.1%" go in one ear and out the other, but "three out of every four" sticks.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Math much? by sourcerror · · Score: 3

      "There was a 23% drop in temperature." is a worthless comment as well unless you mean it in Kelvin.

    4. Re:Math much? by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... or nearly 721 out of every thousand.

      721000 ppm?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  5. Embedded XP machines by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I own and operate a movie theatre, and my digital projector runs on Windows XP, believe it or not. (The server that talks to it runs on Linux.)

    In my case, this setup is not on the Internet; all of the gadgets in my projection room talk only between themselves, so there is no particular security concern in that regard. But I wonder how many other folks have very expensive hardware like this that will probably never be upgraded to run on anything other than XP.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  6. Microsoft will extend the deadline by tuppe666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft simply has no choice especially if it wants to protect its compatibility insurance with Windows Office. In reality its monopoly in Desktop Applications...Relies on on it being a Monopoly, and it has real competition. I have bought tablets, smartphones, rasberry pi, an Ouya replicating everything I do on a PC. At a fraction of the cost of a less desirable bottom end PC. Intel and Microsoft have been overcharging its hostages on massive gross profits of 70%(Its not working for Apple Macs either), and are finding it very difficult to adjust when its competitors with can produce devices like a Chromebook for $200 a Tablet for $100 a Smartphone for $100 a chromecast for $35. buying an *unpgrade* to the crippled version of Windows 8 at £99($150) is stupid.

    The bottom line is any money they earn from cutting off their hostages from essential packages is a potential export to another platform.

  7. The world has a Massive Windows problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But Ballmer, dog bless him, is slowly but surely solving it for us all!

  8. LPT bit banging by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does that mean we should all be using DOS?

    No, but it means that people with a need for DOS should still be using DOS. In a lot of cases, only DOS supports legacy or hobbyist hardware that bit-bangs the parallel port. Likewise, the AC that you replied to has a need for Windows XP for much the same reason: to use hardware that lacks an NT 6 driver.

    1. Re:LPT bit banging by foniksonik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is what VMs were made for.

      Apple managed it, why didn't MS? They should have put a transparent VM into Vista and 7 to run binaries, drivers, etc and called it Windows Classic. They could have had everyone migrated by now and made more money in the process.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:LPT bit banging by ai4px · · Score: 4, Funny

      can't... resist..... do we really want hardware that must bit bang ports used to maintain aircraft? Or a person working on airplains who cannot spell airplain?

    3. Re:LPT bit banging by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

      Webmasters are tired of IE 8

      The hell you say! Only just yesterday I had the joy, the pure joy I tell you, to debug an IE8 issue where it would show an error message helpfully informing the user that the website was unreachable because I had the audacity to send a PDF file over HTTPS and include the standard headers to disable caching. So now my application is technically broken for everything else in that it might allow caching of those PDF files, but hey, at least IE8 works with it again.

      IE8 is seriously a pure joy to work with. Any developer who has set up a page which features HTTPS and a Flash movie inside an iframe trying to launch an external URL to an Office file (but only with Office installed!) knows what I'm talking about.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  9. Re:EOL a product to force new sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When XP's EOL comes, Microsoft will have supported it for nearly 13 years. How long do you want them to support it for? Should they still be supporting Windows 3.1 and DOS 6.22?

    In the tech world, 13 years is an epic amount of time. Microsoft is not EOLing XP to force people to buy a new version of Windows. It's time to put XP to rest. It had an amazing run, but no one can expect any OS to be supported forever.

  10. Re:To eat or to upgrade? by shadowofwind · · Score: 3, Informative

    Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought people were starving in China and a very few (1%) can actually afford an iPhone or a new computer.

    You're wrong.

    http://www.zdnet.com/chinas-internet-population-surges-to-564-million-75-percent-on-mobile-7000009813/
    http://www.minyanville.com/sectors/global-markets/articles/Apple-Inc-Doubles-iPhone-4-Sales/6/21/2013/id/50472
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-26/apple-iphone-share-shrinks-as-china-s-huawei-to-zte-lure-users.html

    The market is huge, closer to 50% than 1%, and Apple's sales, while growing rapidly, aren't as large as Samsung's or growing as fast as those of Huawei or ZTE.

    It should be obvious that there are a lot of reasons besides poverty to prefer other smart phones over Apple phones.

  11. Re:EOL a product to force new sales? by Pinhedd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a horrible example. Car manufacturers do stop making parts for old vehicles after a while. Fixing up old junkers can be expensive because the parts can be quite rare. Owners certainly have the option of buying aftermarket parts just as PC users have the option of third party software.

    Whenever emissions or road standards change the car manufacturers don't retroactively update every previous production model to meet them. The owners either pay for a custom fix up, are SOL, or get grandfathered in.

  12. We need to understand what "retire" means by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'll let you in on a little secret -- a lot of embedded control systems are still running Windows 98. Test by: Stick around when a bottle return machine is rebooted.

    In other words. What is China going to do when XP is "retired"? You're kidding, right?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  13. Re:I think M$ will extend XP support by mrbester · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No there aren't. Extended support began 5 years ago. 5 years is long enough for even monolithic dinosaurs like government and hospitals to get their shit together to prepare for the inevitable. Except they did nothing and still expect everything. Bollocks to the lot of them.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  14. Taxes by ebonum · · Score: 5, Informative

    China's whole tax system works on a printed documents called a fapiao (fa-piao).
    Every company in China has at least one dedicated machine with a special dot matrix printer to print fapiaos.
    The software to print fapiaos only runs on Windows XP.

    It can not be understated how critical fapiaos are to China's tax system. Big companies use them to pay the 17% VAT (some services and logistics companies pay less than 17%). If you lose the fapiao you get from your supplier, you might as we have lost actual cash. You must have it to offset the VAT you owe. During your annual tax review, you must have fapiaos to keep your taxes low. These are so important, there is a booming business in faking fapiaos. This is mostly done through fake transactions. Faking the actual fapiao is not so easy these days. Each fapiao carries a unique number and can the traced.

    If you go out to eat, you can demand a fapiao. For westerners, this can be submitted to reduce your taxes. The top tax rate is 45%, so fapiaos are very valuable. For local Chinese, they submit them as a business/company expense. For people working in restaurants, this is a source of extra cash. If a customer doesn't ask for a fapiao, the employees can print one anyway. On the black market, these can be sold for 5-10 cents on the dollar. The same applies to cab drivers. Many passengers don't take their receipt. The receipt is a valid fapiao that can be used to reduce taxes. The cab drivers will sell them for extra cash. Just ask. :)

  15. That's how basically all companies do it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look at Ubuntu: They support standard releases for a year (they've reduced it) and LTS releases for 5 years. That means from the date of initial release. RHEL is 10 years of support for their 5 and 6 releases (7 for 3 and 4) and then you can buy 3 more years of support for extra money.

    OS-X is a bit different in that Apple supports two version older than the current one. That in practice means about 3-4 years of support, but is harder to plan since you don't know how fast releases will come, you don't get a defined, guaranteed, cycle.

    So... Where's the company that gives a much longer/better support cycle? Because I sure don't see it.

  16. Re:EOL a product to force new sales? by bazorg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does MS not realize how vividly anti-consumer this is? Even to non-tech types?

    so in your view, MS (and everyone else in business) should have dedicated resources for maintaining old products in perpetuity, just to ensure that people who ARE NOT BUYING new products can enjoy the old products?

    I think it's your comment (and the 2 Insightful mod points) that is out of touch with reality. With companies requiring to show sales and profit growth in order not to be considered dead by the stock market and therefore by the consumer and by the banks, it is quite amusing to read that the 10+ years support period Microsoft has invested on the XP product is a let down. It would be an interesting exercise to consider the implications of this perpetual support requirement for every other software/hardware and non-IT product you can use.

  17. Most Chinese computers are already infected by VernorVinge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In May, Panda Labs (not Express) published a study suggesting that 55% of computers in China are infected by malware. http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/half-chinas-computers-infected-malware-study-finds-1B8290982 I had the pleasure of cleaning up malware on friends' computers while living in China, back when XP was the dominant OS. Though my sample size was small, I believe the Panda Labs number comes much closer to reality than what is captured by the afterthought that is Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool. Popular programs like QQ are laden with security holes that essentially invite any hacker to take control of a PC. The end of XP updates may cause extra few million computers to be infected, but it will be a drop in the bucket compared to the true problem. My advice is- don't trust personal computers in China or email servers in China.

    --
    Stay skeptical, my friends.
  18. Charge for Updates by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm surprised MS hasn't announced they're moving to a model where XP patches are available as part of a subscription service - I'd pay $2 per month to keep Windows update running on my XP machine - Just tie Windows update to a Windows Live account, with a credit card attached to that. Corporate customers could purchase a site license. If there really are millions upon millions of XP machines out there, there must be some money to be made here.