Slashdot Mirror


New Tech Money, Same Old Problems

An anonymous reader writes "Following the publication in May of George Packer's alarming article in the New Yorker revealing the state of the communities surrounding California's tech boom, the LA Times reports that despite the wake-up call, things are getting even worse in the Bay Area as tech companies seek to completely insulate their employees from ever having to interact with the real world. Quoting: 'Every weekday starting at dawn and continuing late into the evening, a shiny fleet of unmarked buses rolls through the streets of San Francisco, picking up thousands of young technology workers at dozens of stops and depositing them an hour's drive south. It's an exclusive perk offered by Apple, Facebook, Google and other major Silicon Valley companies: luxury coaches equipped with air conditioning, plush seats and wireless Internet access that ease the stress of navigating congested Bay Area roadways. The private mass transit system has become the most visible symbol of the digital gold rush sweeping this city, and of the sharpening division between those who are riding the high-tech industry's good fortunes and those who are not.'"

63 of 372 comments (clear)

  1. Next thing you know... by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they'll all be in a huge space station... Hey, waaait a minute!

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Next thing you know... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really. So companies provide employees with a free benefit, thereby reducing pollution, and relieving traffic congestion, and this means that things are "getting worse"? This is the stupidest article I have read so far today.

    2. Re: Next thing you know... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Rich people walling themselves off from poverty all around them? What could go wrong?

      Have you ever been to San Francisco? There are rich people, and richer people. Googlers, Applers, etc, are choosing to live in SF to enjoy the lifestyle of the city. They are not "walling themselves off" just because they take a bus to work.

      Some people will whine about anything. If we find a cure for cancer, someone (probably the author of this article) will complain that grave diggers are out of work.

    3. Re:Next thing you know... by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Really. So companies provide employees with a free benefit, thereby reducing pollution, and relieving traffic congestion, and this means that things are "getting worse"? This is the stupidest article I have read so far today.

      I think the problem is that it's turning SF into a "bedroom community" for employers far to the south rather than having the workers live *and* work in the city (thus they are spending less time and money in the city. When I worked in SF during the first dot-com boom, my coworkers and I all went out to lunch at local restaurants and met after work at local bars. The worker that leaves the city at 7am on a bus, and them comes home at 7pm to be dropped off in his neighborhood is probably not spending as much time going out and supporting local businesses. Further, the added influx of SF residents are driving up rents, so even those that *do* work in SF find it difficult and expensive to find a place to live. Oh, and the city receives no payroll tax for those employees, so not only does the city earn less tax revenue due to reduced spending by these workers, but they receive no payroll tax either.

      Rather than subsidizing bus travel to make it more attractive to live in SF and work 40 miles south, it would be nice to see the Peninsula cities and tech companies work on making it more attractive for their employees to live closer to work. It's no fun to live next to an office park that becomes a big unwalkable, bike unfriendly concrete wasteland after working hours.

    4. Re:Next thing you know... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the problem is that it's turning SF into a "bedroom community" for employers far to the south rather than having the workers live *and* work in the city (thus they are spending less time and money in the city. When I worked in SF during the first dot-com boom, my coworkers and I all went out to lunch at local restaurants and met after work at local bars. The worker that leaves the city at 7am on a bus, and them comes home at 7pm to be dropped off in his neighborhood is probably not spending as much time going out and supporting local businesses. Further, the added influx of SF residents are driving up rents, so even those that *do* work in SF find it difficult and expensive to find a place to live. Oh, and the city receives no payroll tax for those employees, so not only does the city earn less tax revenue due to reduced spending by these workers, but they receive no payroll tax either.

      Rather than subsidizing bus travel to make it more attractive to live in SF and work 40 miles south, it would be nice to see the Peninsula cities and tech companies work on making it more attractive for their employees to live closer to work. It's no fun to live next to an office park that becomes a big unwalkable, bike unfriendly concrete wasteland after working hours.

      So let me get this straight. These people are commuting out of the city they live in to go to work on company supplied buses and this is causing the city to loose money? It would be no different if they drove themselves to work. These people may be even less likely to live in the city if they had to drive themselves everyday. In which case the city would get nothing from them. As it is, the city is collecting property and local taxes from these people. They probably also do most of their shopping in the city, so the local businesses are making money and the city is getting sales taxes. It''s my understanding that most of these tech places also have their own food services and such, so I fail to see how the city is losing much from the lunch crowd either.

      Now if you want to see the reverse of this, come to D.C. Damn near everyone who works in the city lives along the beltway in Virginia or Maryland. So the city gets all of the lunch crowd people. Then they go home and spend their money where they live and pay their taxes there too. Those areas are very well off for the most part. DC itself is broke. If it wasn't for the federal government propping it up it would be an even bigger hell hole than is already is. The 2010 violent crime rate> was 207% higher than the national average. Sanfrancisco was 73% higher. So no, Getting people to move away is not going to do anything for the city. Just look at Detroit.

      Your remark about driving the property values up I agree with, but that seems to be happening most places.

    5. Re:Next thing you know... by Macman408 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe these people aren't eating lunch in the city any more, but the people I know who have moved there want to live there exactly because they want to spend their time and money there. They aren't moving there because it's more convenient, or less expensive, or has better housing - they move there because there's better food, better nightlife, better social atmosphere.

      Of course, this ends up benefitting the high-class, trendy local establishments, possibly at the expense of the ones that are not.

      I'm sure they're pricing many people out of the housing market - but that's happening everywhere within about an hour of any of the tech companies, save for a few spots that have a reputation of being unsafe or in an undesirable location (adjacent to train tracks or highways, perhaps). It's not unique to San Francisco. Although the presence of a bus stop may amplify the effects of techies in a small area, the techies moved to the city before the bus service started. (I work for a company where it is a perennial request to run a shuttle from the city for the employees that already live there.) Additionally, there are bus stops in many other areas - a friend of mine often rides one from south San Jose, for example. And it's not just distant destinations, either; I have seen an Apple bus dropping off about a dozen employees a mere 3 miles from the mothership, in a completely boring (but still expensive) neighborhood.

    6. Re:Next thing you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The picture in the article was taken 100 feet from my house, and the rental units in our building have gone up from $1800/mo to $2800/mo within just two years. I'm not complaining, but the article is dead-on that this huge influx of intelligence and money has thus far failed to actually lead to any benefit for the large majority of people who actually live here. It's a bit of a disappointment so far, and possibly a prelude to what's to come for the rest of the country (?).

      I actually left Silicon Valley 14 years ago in order to escape the slit-your-wrists boredom of Silicon Valley. San Jose is loaded to the gills with money, but they never seem to prioritize perks for those who are not directly working for those companies. To give just one example, I distinctly recall having to drive quite a distance to get to the nearest bar, even when I was working for a great company. San Jose's idea of a solution to that sort of problem is to vigorously go after drunk drivers (as opposed to just creating more and better mass transit). Those who have lived in the Bay Area might have noticed the incredible difference between San Jose and San Francisco police officers.

      I think many people are legitimately concerned about what this culture brings with it. The human aspects of San Francisco which set San Francisco apart from the rest of the world -- the electronic music, burning man artists, etc -- have already mostly crossed the bridge to Oakland.

      In reviewing the comments here, I'm honestly not completely surprised that the people here would take a clinical view of the article. This is not exactly a reflective community. You guys probably won't get it until your tech company throws you away at age 45 or 50, as tends to happen when your pay gets too high. Will you know enough to start up your own company at that point? Those who have put everything they had into their work tend not to have the time to think about such things. The same things that make the Silicon Valley culture lacking in empathy also sporadically appear here too.

    7. Re: Next thing you know... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the "lifestyle" they crave is getting killed off by the gentrification the tech money is bringing in.

      Except that SF was fully gentrified forty years ago when the gays and DINKs* moved in. Other than the homeless, poor people haven't been able to live in SF since before you were born. I don't think many theaters, shops, bars and restaurants are shutting down because their customers are "too rich".

      *DINK = Double Income, No Kids

    8. Re: Next thing you know... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a cost effective solution. They can get their employees to work on the cheap -- and they don't have to park at Google HQ which is no doubt damn near impossible.

    9. Re:Next thing you know... by micheas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that it is more profitable to produce housing that is 25% occupied that is priced at > two million a unit than lower priced units that are actually occupied by residents of the city.

      The 25% occupancy rate was a fairly recent number from One Rincon Hill With units going for between $700,000 and $30,000,000. That is some of the densest housing in San Francisco.

      One of the effects of Prop 13 is that in California when your property goes up in value, your taxes go up no more than 2% annually, and when your property goes down in value you get a new lower cost basis for which to limit your annual increase from. This means that housing shortages that predominantly effect the young and entrepreneurs minimally effect the large voting block of older voters allowing rather unique real estate economic systems to form. Many of them encouraging a concentration of wealth.

    10. Re:Next thing you know... by CodeBuster · · Score: 2

      So companies provide employees with a free benefit, thereby reducing pollution, and relieving traffic congestion, and this means that things are "getting worse"?

      It makes sense once you consider the politics of the city and the people who live there. For example, it's obvious to most of us here that in a free society with a market economy the labor of some will be worth more than the labor of others and that over time this will invariably manifest itself in public displays of wealth inequality. However, in San Francisco it offends their delicate socialist sensibilities that something akin to mass transit is being offered privately to a privileged few and in a much finer manner than what is generally available to the public. Indeed, it's all the more galling to them that it's buses and not luxury cars because it invites an unfavorable comparison with the public mass transit system where, despite decades of effort, they have not been able to achieve nearly the same level of quality, reliability or luxury. In short, they're jealous of others' earned success and work themselves into a tizzy at what they view as a bourgeois privilege intruding upon what was formerly, at least in their eyes, a public and egalitarian method of transportation.

  2. Allegory by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every weekday starting at dawn and continuing late into the evening, a shiny fleet of unmarked buses rolls through the streets of San Francisco, picking up thousands of young technology workers at dozens of stops and depositing them an hour's drive south

    Huh.

    OK, maybe it's because I'm an old-school Missouri farm boy, but... that sounds an awful lot like cows at a stockyard.

    They're just one beat off from installing cattle chutes.

    MooooooooHeyisthataStarbucksooooooooo.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Allegory by MatthiasF · · Score: 3, Informative

      They have the cattle chutes, too. They're called security checkpoints. Most of these companies have them and some even search you on your way out.

    2. Re:Allegory by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there's this "turnip truck" thing, too.

    3. Re:Allegory by xaxa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Huh.

      OK, maybe it's because I'm an old-school Missouri farm boy, but... that sounds an awful lot like cows at a stockyard.

      Don't they have school buses in Missouri? This is pretty much the same thing.

      And maybe it's because I'm from a European city, but it sounds like the public transport isn't very good if companies run private buses. The Google, Facebook etc here don't need buses, nor (presumably) do the offices in New York. (We don't have school buses here either, children are expected to use the normal public transport. It's free for them.)

    4. Re:Allegory by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "... that sounds an awful lot like cows at a stockyard."

      It's worse than that.

      I've had A LOT of job opportunities in San Francisco. (I live far from there.) The cost of living there is significantly more than twice as high as it is here. (According to CNET's Cost of Living Calculator.) And that's not all... the "quality of life" is just plain different. Row houses with no yards, built an inch apart from each other. Lack of adequate opportunity for outdoor activities. Etc. I could go on for a while about how "quality of life" is just plain not as good there.

      I keep telling recruiters that if they want me to move, it would have to be an improvement over what I can get here. So that means they'd have to pay me at least 3 times what I can make here, in order for it to be an actual step up.

      They look at me like I'm crazy... but they're the ones who are crazy.

    5. Re:Allegory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "things are getting even worse in the Bay Area"?

      Who the heck is the retard who thinks it is a crime for employers to provide conveniences to employees? O, wait, it might be un-American to treat employes well. Is this schmuck an IRS agent? What is so alarming about these buses, I fail to see. I drive two miles to Caltrain station, pay $4 for parking, $16 for two way ticket, walk 1 1/2 miles to office in Downtown SF, all in all I spend two to three hours commuting. I would love my employer providing these bus rides.

    6. Re:Allegory by nojayuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I live in the centre of a city with the best public bus service in the nation, operating at a profit with regular clean modern buses, express services to the airport, park-and-rides, good handicapped access, night bus services etc.

      Despite this the big city centre employers like the financial services companies, healthcare, TV stations etc. all run their own shuttle bus operations as the public buses don't necessarily go from one office to another, although a few bus routes actually go into company campuses to pick up and drop off passengers at the office front door as well as passing through the business parks on the city outskirts.

    7. Re:Allegory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Within the past month I've started a job in San Jose, moving from the US East Coast to Silicon Valley.

      This area has the worst (inefficient, inconvenient, and slow) public transit system I've ever seen. I've opted to rent a car (at $250+ per week) until I can have mine shipped out here just so I don't have to rely on the light rail and buses. It's that bad.

    8. Re:Allegory by Stumbles · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sounds like the beginnings of "The Company Store" coal miners suffered in the 1800s. i wonder when Google will start paying their employees in Google dollars that can only be spent at Google stores. Of course Apple and others will have their equivalent money.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    9. Re:Allegory by Stiletto · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no serious public transport system between SF and the South Bay/Peninsula (or between tri-valley area and South Bay/Peninsula, or really between anywhere and South Bay/Peninsula). There's only Caltrain which is a sad joke. These companies are stepping up BECAUSE the government has failed. /Disclaimer, I do not work for a company that provides such bus service, but would love to--it's a HUGE benefit to not have to commute yourself 3+ hours to/from work

    10. Re:Allegory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google is hiding over $10 billion in offshore tax havens and Facebook paid no income tax in 2012. Public transportation sucks. I wonder if there's a connection.

    11. Re:Allegory by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder if there's a connection.

      It's the same government which is too incompetent to run mass transit or tax a business. Who here really thinks that if California and the US were to tap into these businesses that things would be even a bit better? It's not that these governments aren't getting enough revenue, but that they simply squander whatever they get. Double their revenue, and they'll just double what they squander.

    12. Re:Allegory by Stiletto · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, fuck you with facts:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Valley_BART_extension


      "In 2000 Santa Clara County voters approved a 30-year-long half cent sales tax increase to fund BART."

      "In 2008, to mitigate that fact, the voters were again asked to raise sales tax this time by 1/8th of one percent to come into effect when and if federal funding of the project was given the green light."

      "The project was cut into phases with service to northern San Jose at Berryessa originally planned for 2018 and to downtown San Jose by 2025 which may or may not include Santa Clara."

      So, after all these taxes, federal funding, and time, this government project has still gone nowhere, they don't plan to even be done until 2025, and even then, they will have failed to even include all the destinations they planned for.

      Meanwhile, these tech companies have given up waiting for the government to un-fuck itself, and just deployed their own damn mass-transportation system.

    13. Re:Allegory by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2

      There's only Caltrain which is a sad joke.

      Caltrain isn't perfect, but it's far from a joke. Ridership has been steadily increasing over the past decade. You can get from SJ to SF in an hour. That's barely longer than driving, and you can drink on the train instead of fighting for parking. Again, you can drink on the train instead of driving.

      Caltrain's biggest problem is it's lack of dedicated funding. It has to beg for money from SF, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties, and they're all hesitant to pony up despite the fact that Caltrain gets a greater percentage of its revenue from fares than any Bay Area transit service except BART. They could also use some more late night trains, especially on Thurs/Fri/Sat nights. But despite these warts, it's still a very useful and popular service.

    14. Re:Allegory by geezer+nerd · · Score: 2

      I think you got that right! BART has been in the works since the 1970s, and still has not reached San Jose. Santa Clara Valley has a light-rail system that was all implemented within the time that BART was "underway". I used to ride it from San Jose to Mountain View when my car had to go into the shop or something. It worked OK, but took an hour and a half for that ride, which is kind of a long time.

  3. We are not cattle. We are RUBYISTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How DARE you refer to us as "cattle". We ARE NOT "cattle". We are RUBYISTS.

    Ruby on Rails is my life. It is who I am. It is what I am. Ruby is what makes me A GOD among mere mortals.

    We Rubyists are the ones who make the world go round. It is our code that powers all that is truly important in this world.

    Because we are so critical to modern life, we deserve to be treated better than anyone else. We deserve to be driven around by those who require our services.

    We are not merely humans. We are RUBYISTS. We are superior, and we must be treated well because we are the best there is, the best there has ever been, and the best that there ever will be. WE ARE RUBYISTS!

    1. Re:We are not cattle. We are RUBYISTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks for alerting us to your presence.

  4. Wish my employer did that. by sackofdonuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Driving in the Bay area is horrid. Getting bus service to and from work would be great. Could get some extra sleep too.

    1. Re:Wish my employer did that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's even more confusing is the article treats this like a bad thing, but it's objectively making bay area commutes BETTER by taking thousands of cars off the roads. Can you imagine how much worse traffic would be if these shuttles weren't in place?

      It's not like other mass transit is an option. Caltrain is already overloaded.

    2. Re: Wish my employer did that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The more you isolate people from poverty around them, the more you'll hear stuff like "if people are starving, let them eat cake." It rots the soul. If a millage comes up to improve public buses, how would you expect them to vote?

    3. Re:Wish my employer did that. by MrEricSir · · Score: 2

      It's not like other mass transit is an option. Caltrain is already overloaded.

      Aaaand now we're finally getting to the crux of the problem: poor mass transit, people living too far from work, the fact that nobody wants to live out in the 'burbs anymore, etc.

      There's a lot of factors at play here. Trying to break this into a "rich vs. poor" thing like subby did here is ridiculously simplistic.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  5. This is good. by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The buses are better for the environment and road congestion than if each person had to drive individually. And they don't cost taxpayers extra money. This sounds like a win-win to me.

  6. WTF perspective by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Leave it to the mainstream media to take a bizarre perspective and pretend like it's real. They like to go on about public transportation but will you ever see a big name journalist on a bus? Oh hell no. Yeah, I'm not talking about taking the subway in New York City.

    I love how they harp on the fact that "the bus schedules are withheld from the public" like it's some sort of conspiracy theory. Unless your destination is their company, you've got no business sitting on that bus. I suppose they'd prefer the alternative, that employees drive themselves to work in private automobiles? Just more proof (if any was needed) that journalists ignore progress and immediately spring to interpret the next new events in whatever negative manner they can think of.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:WTF perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I want to agree with you but I it is getting more difficult to ignore the ways in which people are disengaging from the real world.

      When my former college hired crossing guards to help adults cross a minor city street because they couldn't take their eyes off their gadgets I became convinced something significant has changed. When I see a lack of pick-up games and activity in the parks on beautiful days but see the organized indoor summer camps bustling with kids and tight supervision I wonder if we've become unable to live in the real world.

      We live in a world that is safer than ever - whether we're talking about world politics or safety in our neighborhoods but we're also acting more fearful than ever.

    2. Re:WTF perspective by asmkm22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Despite the crappy summary, the articles aren't about public transportation. So I guess, leave it to the average slashdotter to not even bother reading.

      They talk about how the big ass buses are just one of many examples of how the gab between the wealthy and the poor keeps widening in that area. They have tons of billionaires and millionaires, yet record numbers of people on food stamps. Any rental property within half a mile of the various elite bus stops is apparently going for up to twice the normal rate, effectively pushing out anyone who doesn't make a google wage.

      They also complain about how the tech people don't even get out and interact with the community that they are taking over. They order stuff online rather than go shopping at local places; they bury their noses in smartphones when walking around, etc..

      Next time, RTFA.

  7. Sooo.... by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Informative

    So we're angry at rich large businesses for doing what poor public schools do? I'm confused -- why is this news?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Sooo.... by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure that's true. If you divide the cost among all the passengers it will probably be less than the cost for each passenger to drive separately. So getting paid more would actually mean less money for you after expenses.

    2. Re:Sooo.... by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      What's funny about this is that company buses are hardly new, and were never considered some sort of fancy way to get to work. Especially back in an era when many middle class people didn't have cars, big companies like shipyards and aircraft plants often had company buses. It was especially good for people working night shifts when public transportation shut down, and in many cases places that needed lots of land wound up in areas where there was no public transportation anyway.

      This is how we won WWII folks. Rosie the Riveter took the company bus to work. In at least one wartime Bugs Bunny cartoon you'll see him riding a bus clearly marked "Lockheed".

  8. And The Best Part Is by The+Cat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They are creating nothing of any real consequence. Everything made by Google, Apple, Facebook, Zynga, etc. is designed to be obsolete in months. They also have a habit of destroying working products and laying off workers for no reason at all.

    I have a perfectly usable 2G iPod that is perfectly unusable because it's no longer supported and it doesn't talk to anything except the mothership that disowned it.

    What was the last new (new as in it has no contemporary substitutes) COMMERCIAL software product (as in you pay real money to a company that employs people at grown-up wages to buy it) written in a real programming language and introduced with the same usefulness and value as say, Photoshop, Office, Quickbooks, Skype or Final Cut Pro?

    There isn't one. Why?

    Because all the developers are too busy shoveling pure crap into app stores as fast as they can to try and make rent.

    Truth is the "high tech" industry in America was deliberately bludgeoned into a coma in 2000 and 2001. All advancement of personal computers stopped then.

    Since no real efforts are being made to rebuild it, the industry will probably never recover. Any future high tech industry will happen somewhere other than America.

    1. Re:And The Best Part Is by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google and Apple do nothing of consequence? How in the hell did you get modded up past -10?

      Google is worth many many thousands of dollars/year to my company. There's no way to program in a modern system like RoR without being able to search and find answers to questions. That's not to mention all of the other stuff that I can easily search and learn about, like when I had shingles 4 weeks ago. What used to take me a day at the library 25 years ago now takes me 5 minutes. Sorry, that's value.

      Don't even get me started about my iphone.

  9. Worthless article from the legacy media. by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, the author is pissed off at Apple and Google for solving their own transportation and parking problems instead of waiting around for the incompetent local politicians to handle it?

    Guess it was a slow news day on the "bitching about non-problems" desk at the LA times.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Worthless article from the legacy media. by jcr · · Score: 2

      the companies don't pay much,

      Wrong. Apple is far and away the biggest local taxpayer in the bay area.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  10. The have's and have not's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quote: the sharpening division between those who are riding the high-tech industry's good fortunes and those who are not.'"

    How 'bout a little perspective? I'm not riding on one of those buses, but I do recognize the fact that the people who do aren't just lucky. They are actually contributing to the "good fortunes", which trickle down to everybody else.

    Sorry if you are one of those who only get a trickle, but that's a lot better than nothing - especially if you contribute nothing.

    If you want to get "upstream", try going to school for something useful (like STEM) and not liberal arts.

  11. This is nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Railroads have had private commuter club cars for a century. A bunch of wealthy people get together, purchase or lease a train car, add nice seating, waitstaff, & amenities, and pay Amtrak/Metro North/CNWR to haul it around with their regular commuter trains. In exchange for not sitting with the riff-raff, they subsidize everyone else's fare.

    Every so often, some young journalist realizes that rich people can afford nicer stuff and attempts to spin it into a scandal.

  12. From ivory tower to silicon valley by korbulon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a logical extension of the sort of the carefully cultivated isolation you encounter on a university campus. Why subject your employees to the outer-world that is - let's face it - such a nuisance and an eye-sore. Who wants to deal with the unpleasantness of ghetto-fabulous Oakland or South San Francisco? Fuck that. Reality is for suckers.

    To be fair, Silicon Valley merely compounds a problem that's been in the Bay Area for a while now - namely the ghetto-ization and nimby-ism that's been going on for decades now. The left-wing excesses begun in the sixties and seventies are now coming home to roost, though a lot of ex-hippies get to watch the drama unfold from the comfort of their homes in the Berkeley hills. Why yes I do bitter much.

  13. Wait, what? by quietwalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So organized door-to-door mass transit, reduces the environmental impact of rush hour, reduces roadway congestion in an already congested area, removing the need to drive the commute, your fellow passengers will be co-workers, so it's expected that they'll maintain a reasonable level of public decency, and you don't have to find and subsequently pay for parking, and it's not being paid for with taxes but as a perk to attract more workers - and somehow this is a class warfare thing?

    This is just a capitalistic thing.

    You wanna know how you can get on those luxury buses that ferry people from point A to a company's door? Just work for the company. You wanna know how you can get those big salaries that are driving the gentrification of the worst parts of town, making them safe and livable for a family? Just work for the company. You wanna know how you can end up a millionaire? Have an idea, work it, and sell it or start up a company to grow it.

    This isn't a class barrier, it's a time, effort, skill, and experience thing. That's how our economic system works.

    It does suck that an area becoming a better class of neighborhood results in raised rents, but that is literally the price to be paid. The good news is that the more affluent individuals are in an area, the better it is for everyone. It might not increase in equal measures, but it's been well documented - average pay goes up in those areas, following the trend for cost of living.

    It's not like a downtown of a city is ever going to be static. It was different than it was 20 years ago, and 20 years before that, and so on. It's always changing, and there's not anything wrong with that. Besides, what comes to mind when I think of a successful anti-gentrification trend is Detroit.

    You don't want to end up like them.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by neonKow · · Score: 2

      While I'll agree that the buses are a good thing, I suggest you read up more about gentrification before thinking that it's something so easily solved by working for the company.

      It's a real problem because the general effect is that it only serves to drive out existing residents and businesses. Poverty is linked to higher crime, so yes, it makes a area safer to live in, but only by displacing the people who gave it its character in the first place, and who are most likely to be socially involved. Also, it makes life unnecessarily hard for the unfortunate who suddenly cannot afford to live where they've built a life.

      Additionally, these companies and high salaries are linked closely to a few select fields of study and expertise (namely high tech). I would definitely say an area stands to lose something if it cannot cater to people outside these areas. I love geeks as much as the next Slashdotter, but I wouldn't want to live somewhere without painters, musicians, chefs, doctors, poets, scientists, writers, actors, students, and even lawyers, politicians, and public servants.

  14. Commuting by Animats · · Score: 2

    Google has to ferry their people. Mountain View voted down Google's plan to build a 1000-unit dorm complex.

    Bear in mind that most Google employees are not "techies". They're sales reps selling ads. When you think Google, think "Mad Men", not rocket science.

    1. Re:Commuting by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what I love about Silly Valley. On the one hand they complain about not being able to get enough people, in part because housing is too expensive, and on the other hand they won't allow construction of new, preferably higher density, housing. Either you want to be a major tech hub, or you want to be a low density suburb. Sorry folks, you can't have it both ways.

    2. Re:Commuting by swillden · · Score: 2

      Bear in mind that most Google employees are not "techies". They're sales reps selling ads. When you think Google, think "Mad Men", not rocket science.

      Um, roughly 50% of Google's 40,000 full-time employees are software engineers. The other half make up everything else. I don't know numbers for sales reps, but I'd be surprised if they comprised 20% of the FTEs.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  15. Re:Meritocracy is now a problem? by CommanderK · · Score: 2

    The employees are paying their taxes, and many of them actually fall into the highest tax rate (35% on income above a level, don't remember exactly how much). These people pay more than their fair share.

  16. Re:Can't win by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they were public buses instead of company buses, would they clog the streets any less? Whoever owns and rides them, they are mass transit. Only in San Francisco would people complain about folks using mass transit. I'm no big fan of Silly Valley and its satellite communities like San Francisco, but this has to be one of the silliest, and most hypocritical, complaints I've ever heard.

  17. Re:Can't win by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, you are missing the point. There busses, Caltrain and BART already ... instead of these corps. helping to make public transit even better they are opting out of paying their fair share and spending it on MORE busses that only their employees can ride ... which clog the streets even more. I pass a bunch of them each morning on my ride in. *shrug*

    Wait, What? Opting OUT?

    Do these companies somehow not have to pay all the local taxes that other companies pay to support the public buses that always run in the RED? Do these private buses opt out of all the road tax, licensing fees, gas tax that the public buses are exempt from paying?

    Would not the local buses also have to increase vehicles on the road to compensate if these private services were discontinued? Would those buses be direct routes? With WIFI, comfy seats, and no smelly vagrants sitting next to someone trying to write an email or looking at some proprietary code?

    Basically, I don't see the problem here, other than the local bus systems are deprived of the opportunity to LOSE MORE MONEY for every rider the private services handle.

    That and a great deal of envy and jealousy on your part.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  18. Wait, wait by drolli · · Score: 3

    Now the people who work hard and are not egocentric enough to fill the highway by their personal ton of steel senslessly produced are having a "luxury". Company busses exist in Europe and Japan since a very long time, connecting the next station/city with big branches of a company, even for factory workers.

    It is cost efficient and you have workers who are fresh and relaxed when they arrive at work. It makes economic sense for the company. Meetings start on time. It makes sense traffic-wise (for the space which one bus takes you can maybe have 3 cars, but there may be up to 60 people in the bus).

    Further indicaiton that the article is biased: Coaches have air conditioning? That does not make them "luxury coaches". Every car driving there has air condition. The city busses in the city where i live have air conditioning. It is reasonable to have it in such climate. Plush seats? Really? No please tell me: The seat in the cars are probably made of wood. And When did the last time travel in a normal travel bus when the seat where not soft seats? The time that publi transport had wooden seats only is a long time ago. Wireless interent access? The budget bus line in germany has wireless interent access, as have the high-speed trains in germany, japan, austria, france (these are the countries i know of). Having interenet access in a mass transit system makes sense. Just because it does not make sense in a [personal car does not mean it is "luxury". If your employees can chek the mail on the way to work, this qquickly pays off.

    So the bottom line is: This is not isolating the employees from the real world" but it is ecologically, economically, and socially reasonable approach. Only a complete moron woud turn around the need to hide yourself in your own car (and pay for it) as a sing of "being connected to the world". Instead of affording a car in a 40km ouside suburb i prefer to pay a little more rent, accept that there are time when the bus goes, get in the queue and relax, and do my private things by subway and walking/cycling.

  19. Re:Actually... by Stiletto · · Score: 4, Informative

    The cost of living is much more than 2X, especially for housing, which can be up to 10X the cost of normal areas in the USA. When I moved out here from "flyover" land, my salary increased by about 1.5X but my cost of living practically tripled. It was not a good deal.

  20. Re:This is bad. by Stiletto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Live closer to work? LOL. Let's see, where are these companies located? Cupertino, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Menlo Park... Where STARTER homes are $1 million??? In the Bay Area it is impossible for a regular tech worker to live close to work. Your only real option is a long commute. I'd rather do it in an air conditioned bus with my laptop open than in my old beater with the fan on and my blood pressure rising...

  21. Don't worry, it's only temporary. by mark_reh · · Score: 2

    When those workers get to be about 35 YO, they'll be back to reality when they're looking for work and a place to live that they can afford.

    Enjoy it while you can - your ass will be kicked to the curb before you know it.

    1. Re:Don't worry, it's only temporary. by swillden · · Score: 2

      When those workers get to be about 35 YO, they'll be back to reality when they're looking for work and a place to live that they can afford.

      Enjoy it while you can - your ass will be kicked to the curb before you know it.

      Not at Google. Google employs lots of older engineers. I was hired at age 41 and I'm far from the oldest around. One of the guys I work with is in his 60s. The company still tends to be skewed towards the younger end of the demographics, but I'll bet the median age is in the low to mid-30s and rising. The Colorado office, where I work, tends to be older still, because the cost of living in the bay area drives away people with families.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  22. Re:Actually... by Stiletto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Simple. They can't.

    Homes out here are not being purchased by middle-class families. They are being purchased by:
    * Foreign (mostly Chinese) investors
    * Hedge Funds
    * Real Estate investment trusts
    * Multiple families pooling their money (and planning on having 15 people living in a 3 bedroom house)

    If you're making 60 to 80 thousand a year, you're not even close to being able to afford a home. You're living in a 1br or studio apartment in a not-so-nice part of San Jose.

  23. They rent. Apartments. Or with roommates. by tlambert · · Score: 2

    They rent. Apartments. Or with roommates.

    Stiletto is right about who is buying houses. The market hasn't actually recovered in the Bay Area, it's actually riding a bubble by people who believe that they can buy the property for rentals, or can do a fix-and-flip again. Actual housing prices in places like the Inner Sunset in San Francisco are in the $535/square foot range, which puts a $180,000 house in Utah in about the $750,000 range in the Inner Sunset. Some of the flip condos that have been fixed but not yet flipped are sitting at $650/square foot.

    Compare this to Manhattan "Million Dollar Listing prices at $2600-$3000/square foot, which basically gets you a (purchased) apartment for in the $6 range. You have to work at it to find this in the Bay Area - like across the pond from the Columns Of The Palace Of Fine Arts park. Or near Robin Williams house in the Sea Cliff neighborhood.

  24. Re:Actually... by micheas · · Score: 2

    California has some, shall we say interesting, minimum wage laws.

    • Minimum Wage $8.25/hr.
    • Minimum Wage for Management (people that spend > 50% of there time supervising people), if you don't want to pay overtime, but instead offer paid time off. $16.50.
    • Minimum Wage for Computer Professionals if they are not management and you want to treat them like management $39.90/hr and $83,132.93/year
    • Minimum Wage for Physicians that you want to treat like management even though they spend less than 50% of their time managing other employees: $72.70/hr.

    The back story of these laws was that there were some companies that were hiring HB-1 visa holders at far sub market rate and using their immigration status to keep them in essentially indentured servitude. One of the results of this has been that desirable locations in California have become heavily populated by computer professionals.

  25. this actually affects my life by dryo · · Score: 2

    Alla y'all can shoot off your Slashdotting mouths, but this issue directly affects my life in a major way. I am an educator and artist with a strong technical skill set. But I am of no use to the Apples and Googles of the world, and they are, frankly, of no use to me either. So there is no place for me in the Bay Area any longer. After 20 years in San Francisco, I am forced out by the spiraling rents. And why is the rent going out of control? It's precisely because of the gold rush described here. The Mission neighborhood, in particular, is being gentrified at an extremely alarming rate. Rents have increased more than 400% in 20 years. That's a quadruple factor, my friends. And yet, the crime and misery on the street continues unabated. There are literally thousands of homeless on the streets of this one neighborhood alone. And the private buses taking the technorati to their business parks in San Jose are symptomatic of this very real problem. As for me, fuck it, I'm moving to Portland. This place makes me sick, and I used to love it. End of line.