Slashdot Mirror


Bradley Manning Wants To Live As a Woman

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Reuters reports that Bradley Manning, the U.S. soldier sentenced to 35 years in military prison for the biggest breach of classified documents in the nation's history, says he is female and wants to live as a woman named Chelsea. 'As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Chelsea Manning, I am a female,' Manning, 25, said in the statement read by anchorwoman Savannah Guthrie on NBC News' "Today" show. 'Given the way that I feel and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible,' Manning said. 'I also request that starting today you refer to me by my new name and use the feminine pronoun.' A psychiatrist, Navy Reserve Captain David Moulton, testified during Manning's trial that Manning suffered from gender dysphoria, or wanting to be the opposite sex, as well as narcissism and obsessive-compulsive disorder."

127 of 784 comments (clear)

  1. Hormone therapy? by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will they really provide that in prison?

    1. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh look - a prison rape joke - and modded up no less.

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      Shocking as it may be to you, Alen, rape is not a part of prisoner reformation standards, gender dysphoria is a real thing, and jokes about forced sex aren't all that funny.

    2. Re:Hormone therapy? by madhatter256 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes. So as to avoid cruel and unusual punishment at a constitutional level, prisons have to provide adequate health care. Hell, it's worth it, you can get free chemo therapy, heart surgery, etc. Just recently, a judge struck down a law in Wisconsin that prohibited hormone therapy for inmates because it was unconstitutional.

      http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/89751122.html

      --
      Previewing comments are for sissies!
    3. Re:Hormone therapy? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes because the 8th amendment is an inconvenient obstacle for official justice. Just a reminder that your position puts you on the side of a murderer.

    4. Re:Hormone therapy? by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. The Armed Forces do not provide Gender Reassignment therapy or surgery. For at least the next 7 or so years, he/she's S.O.L. And then he/she's going to have to find a way to pay for it: it's not cheap (I have a friend who went f->m ) and he/she's going to have problems getting a job with a Dishonorable Discharge. . .

    5. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mod parent a TROLL, not funny. I really do like the word-play, but I don't think this deserves anything else.

      After reading the comments section of CNN for this story, I'm already severely disheartened that, despite that the attitudes for gays has greatly improved, comments with over 700 net positive upvotes over there say he should also serve 35 years as a prisoner within what he perceives to be a wrong body as an additional punishment.

      At first I thought Manning's sudden announcement of gender identity was a ploy, but if it was mentioned in court documents prior to the case and discharge proceedings, I sympathize for this person. I know individuals who rather chose to kill themselves then reveal the(ir perceived) shame of their gender identity.

      Considering how easy it seems to get into prison these days in the US, I am not particularly finding these rape jokes very funny anymore either.

    6. Re:Hormone therapy? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and he/she's going to have problems getting a job with a Dishonorable Discharge. . .

      with millions of supporters, this seems highly unlikely.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Hormone therapy? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hell, it's worth it, you can get free chemo therapy, heart surgery, etc

      So, if I'm uninsured and facing major narrowing of the arteries, I can go smoke a joint in a police station and get free heart surgery?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Hormone therapy? by bickerdyke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      Tells us a lot about how the US prison system thinks of human dignity.

      --
      bickerdyke
    9. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      He says he's felt this way since childhood, seems to have discussed the issue at length with a psychologist while in the military, and even suggested that he had joined the military in the hopes that it would somehow cure him.

    10. Re:Hormone therapy? by trum4n · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better than being on the side of a politician.

    11. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. If they let you go with a warning for smoking the joint, punch one of them.

    12. Re:Hormone therapy? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better than... umm...

      Ok, you won.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Hormone therapy? by wisnoskij · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Comedy is a legitimate form of social/political commentary.

      Everything is funny, everything should be discussed and criticize, and joking is a way to do that.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    14. Re:Hormone therapy? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In many cases, yes you can. There are probably rules around it, so something like a 90 day for possession isn't going to get you heart surgery, but if you were in for 35 years, you'd certainly get heart surgery. There are definitely people who try to get themselves thrown in jail for free medical care and food. Usually those are people who have already been there before and know the system, but it does happen.

      As for hormone therapy, I could have sworn I've heard of people getting that in jail before as well. Gender dysphoria is considered a legitimate psychological condition generally, so he'd have a case, but I don't know if it is life threatening or meets the usual criteria.

    15. Re:Hormone therapy? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      . . .but how many will remember it in 7 years ? Or get past HR, who tend to frown on things like a stint in prison and a dishonorable discharge. And even if he keeps his IT skills current (unlikely at Fort Leavenworth. . .) no employer will trust him for ANYTHING sensitive. . No, for the most part, his prospects look pretty dim for anything significant. . .

    16. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      comments with over 700 net positive upvotes over there say he should also serve 35 years as a prisoner within what he perceives to be a wrong body as an additional punishment.

      Most people are not aware that there is no effective treatment for people with gender identity problems. There is some mixed data regarding the effectiveness of reassignment surgery, but the general consensus seems to be that changing one's gender seems to be the only thing that helps keep these people from killing themselves. Once you have this conversation with people, they typically agree that it is the way to go, so don't get too upset with the CNN crowd - they aren't doctors and they aren't all caught up on gender disorders. All they see is an untreated crazy person.

      Humor is subjective. I have a very dark sense of humor, so I can empathize with people laughing about horrible things. I laughed the whole way through "The Increasingly Poor Decisions of Todd Margaret". Some of us cope with bad news through humor, it's our way of getting through a sometimes-terrible world without falling into depression.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    17. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not a human right, but gender reassignment is the only treatment for gender identity problems. The rational thing to do is treat the prisoner appropriately, not hold back for some ideological reason.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Saw this on imgur yesterday - worlds worst prisons.

      http://imgur.com/gallery/gndRs

      Only two US prisons were on it.

      No prison thinks much of human dignity.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    20. Re:Hormone therapy? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      My advice: don't try it before you knock it.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    21. Re:Hormone therapy? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      He'll be eligible for parole in seven years. It's unlikely that he'll serve the full 35.

    22. Re:Hormone therapy? by dywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      when you get the Big Chicken Dinner you become flat out ineligible for something like 45% of all jobs in the US. thats just the ones where its basically flat out regulated because they have ties or are involved with the government in some way. then theres the corproations where HR is going to see it say "nope", thats probably another 30-35%.

      The best options for people with the BCD basically boils down to small companies or friends without government ties/contracts, or entrepenaurship (which is itself hard, cause you gotta get customers, and some of them (such as against the governemnt and some big corps) have rules against who they will source from).

      the dishonorable discharge is no joke and very real burden to -anyone- who gets one.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    23. Re:Hormone therapy? by Velex · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know you're trolling, but attraction to women is fairly common in trans women. However, the desire to "be a lesbian" doesn't factor into the decision to undergo gender transition for the vast majority of trans women. All of the trans women I know have a horrible time of dating women and pretty much have to give up hope of finding a girlfriend after beginning transition. Additionally, they typically lose their current relationship if any in a spectacular explosion of drama.

      That's not to say that all trans women find women attractive. Some like me prefer men, which actually means additional soul searching before beginning transition and weighing alternatives such as adopting a homosexual identity.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    24. Re:Hormone therapy? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      Tells us a lot about how the US prison system thinks of human dignity.

      Tells us a lot more about how US citizens think of prisoner dignity. It's always seemed to me that to the vocal minority at least, and possibly the vast majority of Americans, people stop being human when they're locked up in Jail. Innocent until proven guilty, but once proven guilty (of anything), suddenly all human rights and freedoms go out the door, because nobody "normal" could be guilty of anything....

      I recommend that anyone making prison rape jokes go visit a few prisons and talk to people... inmates AND staff. Visit a few different places; low, medium, and high if they'll let you in.

    25. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a bit mystified as to why we do this. Hear me out:

      When people ask to have limbs amputated because the person feels that having the limb doesn't make them feel whole (strange how you don't feel whole until part of you is removed?! That and/or because they have a sexual fetish for amputated limbs,) modern medicine denies that request, considers it to be abhorrent, and any medical professional who obliges the request is jailed and/or has their license to practice revoked. The treatment for the above condition is the same as if the person had a mental illness, and the solution is to change thinking patterns rather than surgery.

      http://drmarkgriffiths.wordpress.com/2012/02/13/whats-your-crutch-the-bizarre-world-of-amputee-fetishes/

      Yet when they ask to have their genitals mutilated and hormones thrown so far out of whack to the point of permanently handicapping them to a degree, it is viewed as a human right, and in some cases this voluntary surgery must be provided for free by the government, and they are called brave in some circles? Worse is that today there is very little in the way of counseling done, and some half of them end up regretting it after the fact.

      http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Want-To-Reverse-Sex-Reassignment-Surgery/1608417

      I'm not taking issue with transsexualism BTW, I'm taking issue with the idea that surgery is the answer.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    26. Re:Hormone therapy? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US

      By-product of people living a sheltered life or a comment by someone not old enough to know how difficult life can be.
      There's little room for empathy when you've never had a point of reference.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    27. Re:Hormone therapy? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Only" two. Why is it that the US claims to be the best country in the world, but it comfortable sharing a list mainly populated by other shining examples of leading countries, such as North Korea, Thailand and Rwanda?

    28. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Egotistical nationalism?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    29. Re:Hormone therapy? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Informative

      part of humor is taking controversial things and making fun of them

      Another important part of humor is originality and creativity. Prison-rape jokes lost all hope of either many years ago. The GP was not making fun of rape, he was making fun of the rape victim.

      In a democracy, We The People are responsible for the ethical treatment of inmates. It's one thing to laugh at a random "FAIL" video on YouTube, quite another to laugh at the horrid abuse of people who could EASILY be protected if we took a few simple measures to change how our prisons are managed.

      http://www.justdetention.org/

      Don't forget, a quarter of the prison population is there for non-violent drug offenses. It's not the rapists who get raped in prison (ie: people who might justifiably deserve it), it's the weak ones who get victimized.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    30. Re:Hormone therapy? by gtall · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, he's eligible for parole in 1/3 of 35 years. He's eligible for pardon in 7 years.

    31. Re:Hormone therapy? by Velex · · Score: 5, Informative
      Came here for this.

      Yet when they ask to have their genitals mutilated and hormones thrown so far out of whack to the point of permanently handicapping them to a degree, it is viewed as a human right

      So delicious.

      Because she (Manning) was presumably born in the USA, her genitals were likely already mutilated at birth. Secondly, the organ between your ears also has gender just the same as the organ between your legs. The process of HRT brings one's hormone levels in line with normal female levels, so I don't understand why you think anything is going "out of whack."

      I used to experience very painful headaches on a weekly basis before I started estrogen HRT. Apparently, that's not an uncommon experience. There's definitely something going on, although research is admittedly lacking (there was a study I can't seem to find again that was able to use MRI to determine brain sex in 75% of individuals in the study).

      Worse is that today there is very little in the way of counseling done, and some half of them end up regretting it after the fact.

      Sorry, a link to Experience Project isn't evidence, and there have been many flawed, biased studies on the subject to boot, sort of like the studies that back up the practice of routine infant male genital mutilation in the USA.

      I'm not taking issue with transsexualism BTW, I'm taking issue with the idea that surgery is the answer.

      Yes, you are, because not all trans women undergo bottom surgery. Bottom surgery is a personal choice and not a requirement to live as a woman or get an ID as a woman, although it may be a requirement in certain states in order to amend or change one's birth certificate.

      If you're really as rational as you're trying to present yourself as being, I'd recommend the book Whipping Girl by Julia Serano.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    32. Re:Hormone therapy? by kno3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Only two US prisons were on it.

      I think you need to work on your counting skills. I counted 4 current US prisons and one closed (Alcatraz) out of a total of 20.
      25% is extremely bad given the US's self perceived high ground in all things moral. Remember this includes the entire world, most of which is comparatively very poor and lacks the resources to do much better.
      That said, imgur is hardly a reputable source and the list has clearly been skewed by US prison's notoriety in the west. I'm sure there are far worse out there.

      No prison thinks much of human dignity.

      I refer you to Norway: http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1989083,00.html
      Only fools support prisons that ignore the dignity of the prisoners. If you actually want to help society, you support and protect those that need it the most.

    33. Re:Hormone therapy? by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Informative

      some deep rooted psychological scar from being in the armed forces.

      I'm going to say that he was screwed up before ever entering the military; being in the military certainly didn't help though. One of the signs was that he was placed in a discharge unit. If his commanding officers had made the call he would have been kicked out and be free to transition today.

      Please note: I'm active duty and have an openly gay married* commander. I won't say that he hasn't had problems in his career, it having very much started during 'don't ask don't tell', but he hasn't been having problems with us.

      But at the same time I'm NOT going to make like the military is some utopia for trans people. It's much better for gay people, but I would state that as a category the US military is currently NOT a place you want to be if you want to transition. Bradley Manning will probably not be allowed to transition during his time at Leavenworth. The DoD just doesn't have any measures to allow it, which means that people would have to take the effort to do so.

      As a general matter, if you want to transition and you're in the military, your best option is to keep quiet and let your enlistment run out. If you're really desperate, there are a number of ways to get out quicker. A bit tougher since DADT ended, but there are still ways. You might lose some benefits, but there's plenty of things you can do where the military will decide to discharge you to be rid of you and not do much else.

      (BTW, I go by a '2 out of 3' standard: mental, physical outward, and DNA; he hasn't started transition yet so he's still a he).

      *I wrote it this way because I've known gay people who married the opposite gender for various reasons.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    34. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You ever been raped? You ignorant asshole.

      Why do you think so many rape victims commit suicide? Even after months or years of therapy and trying to forget?

      At least if the person is killed, the torment is over.

      This comment, and a few above, is from someone who knows what it feels like to have someone's dick inside them against their will. Also, someone who has contemplated suicide, as well as mass murder.

      I certainly wish my attacker had been raped in prison, and then killed, so my tax dollars doesn't keep him alive.

      If you can't appreciate that, you obviously have no experience in the subject, and can take your self-righteous indignation and shove it up your ass.

    35. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just lots of suicide because of complete isolation.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    36. Re:Hormone therapy? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      It is quite sad, but you fail at comedy.

      Shocking as it may be to you, Alen, rape is not a part of prisoner reformation standards, gender dysphoria is a real thing, and jokes about forced sex aren't all that funny.

      You are incorrect. Humor is subjective. Gender dysphoria exists, but so does male pattern baldness, habitual lying, codependency, and a host of other non-life-threatening issues that prisons do not generally treat -- It makes such punishments all the more heinous, IMO, and what they label "rehabilitation" laughable. Additionally, in order to protect prisons from prisoner's suing over systemic rape, they have begun instituting a reformation: Prisoners are now required to sign a waiver acknowledging that they accept the threat of rape exists, and won't sue the prison if they get raped.

      You might not think that's funny, but it is to me. I have a very dark and twisted sense of humor. Laughing at something doesn't mean that I think the issue less serious -- That's a false dichotomy. You must have never been to a comedy club if you think serious issues can't be joked about, and more frequently the more prevalent and serious the problem. See also: The slew of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" jokes, and the current rash of NSA spying jokes.

      E.g.: Mars One, because: Who the hell wants to live in a cramped shithole with no freedom or privacy where you're doomed to die an early death when you could do all that on Mars too?

    37. Re:Hormone therapy? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suggest you go to a rape counseling center, and ask the women there is they care that the man who raped them may face the possibility of being raped in prison.

      Go ask an adult survivor of child abuse if they feel upset that their uncle/father/priest/etc may be subjected to rape in prison.

      Keep a running tally of which one are as horrified as you are, and which one feel it is the least that should happen to them. Report back here when you are done.

      Done that; there are some people who have been so traumatized that even the subject of rape to anyone causes them to wall themselves off. There are others who consider their attackers so inhuman for doing the things they did that they take vindictive pleasure in the concept of their attacker being subjected to what they dished out. There are others who have healed more, who just want it all to stop, and share the same sadness (not horror) that this is perpetuated in prison.

      You see, most of those rapists in prison, if you dig into their past, were sexually abused themselves. Being sexually abused seems to snap something in the brain that allows you to easily see people as "not human". Recovering from that is extremely difficult, and some people turn to a life of crime/abuse as their coping mechanism.

      So my original point stands: it says something about the perspective US citizens (or at least some vocal minorities as I said) have on human dignity. Dehumanization never ends well; forgiveness is MUCH tougher (and some things may never be fully forgiven, especially if the person never really showed any regret or sorrow about what they did), but it's the best way to break the chain.

    38. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, if I'm uninsured and facing major narrowing of the arteries, I can go smoke a joint in a police station and get free heart surgery?

      Yes. Somebody did that, Not smoking a joint, but a totally and obviously incompetent armed bank robbery. Go to bank with unloaded gun, hand over "give me the money" note, then drop the gun and surrender. He reckoned that he would have more life after getting out with his medical conditions treated than staying out and dying soon, and uncomfortably, from untreated conditions.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    39. Re:Hormone therapy? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And that's just a Bad Conduct Discharge, which isn't actually a Dishonorable. An actual Dishonorable is much, much worse. Assuming you didn't get it as a result of a felony, you might as well have committed a felony for all the trouble you are going to have making a living when you get out. With a BCD, you forfeit benefits, with a DD, you are equivalent to an actual civil felon in many states AND you are not permitted to own a firearm by Federal law.

      Still, Manning is probably going to have a few more options than most DDs get based on what he did to get there, I expect a book deal at the very least. His real problem is going to be the next seven, sixteen, or thirty-five years he is stuck in Leavenworth and how that affects him when he does get out. Depending on how well he can turn his life around afterward, he may be better off not owning a weapon anyway.

      The sad thing about all of this is that, as much as people want to portray him as a heroic whistleblower or a nefarious traitor, he was also in all sorts of emotional turmoil at the time. I'm not so sure he would have made the same decisions if he was in a more stable frame of mind.

      In any case, I am really, really annoyed with the military for not removing clearance from someone who was doing things like violent outbursts and who had a history of instability all the way from boot camp on. I am also annoyed with, although not surprised by, about his commanders' reactions to his attempts to express his issues and both their failure to not take it seriously or even to just get him the hell out of work where your lifestyle is supposed to be considered fair game for whether you get a clearance. Manning was clearly an obvious security risk.

    40. Re:Hormone therapy? by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      Manning's gender dysphoria was on record going back to before the leaks even happened. So no, while the confinement and sentence have certainly been traumatizing, they're not the cause. Considering the timing of her announcement, I'd guess she waited until after the sentencing to avoid affecting, delaying or complicating the trial.

    41. Re:Hormone therapy? by gsslay · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Comedy is a powerful and many faceted thing. You can accomplish many things with a joke, good and bad. Amongst the bad is trivialising and victimising the subject. The acceptability of a joke doesn't depend on its subject matter, but on its content and intent.

      Where's the social/political commentary in the "don't drop the soap in prison" joke? It seems to me to be all about trivialising rape and normalising it as an acceptable (if not encouraged) part of the prison system. That makes it reprehensible and, just as bad, not funny.

    42. Re:Hormone therapy? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 2

      I would prefer to be a rape victim instead of a murder victim.

    43. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What the hell is wrong with teaching people acceptance?

      You really should look at the scientific evidence. Your 'solution' was repeatedly tried for many years *and failed badly*. Current methods are more successful. Do you not agree with evidence-based medicine? Or do you only agree with it when it fits your pre-conceptions?

    44. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can be sure that some nutcase judge will call it a "human right". and order it be done.

      If you have evidence that this is not a legitimate medical condition, then present it. Otherwise, your claim regarding "nutcase judges" is nothing more than childish playground name calling, based not on fact, but on your personal opinion regarding what is and is not a legitimate medical condition.

      By the way, how funny would it be if you found yourself in prison, with some medical condition, but a judge denied treatment because it was there personal opinion that your condition was not a legitimate medical condition? Oh, I'm sure it would not be funny for you at all. But for the rest of us, given your feelings on the subject, it'd be hilarious.

    45. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I cant exist at all points in the universe simultaneously and it bothers me, can we find a treatment for that too?

      Does it bother you to the extent that you will fall into depression and likely commit suicide? If so, then yes, you should probably see a doctor.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    46. Re:Hormone therapy? by Entropius · · Score: 2

      Why should a person with XY chromosomes who identifies as a woman not be in the military? Why, in particular, does that have anything to do with someone's aptitude to be a soldier?

    47. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So mutilated is the word now. I'll remember to use that next time I ask a doctor to stitch a wound closed and he trims away some skin.

      Infant circumcision is the deliberate wounding and sexual maiming of a child that removes 1/3 to 1/2 of the penile skin. The foreskin of an adult male is approximately FIFTEEN square inches of erogenous tissue which serves numerous functions throughout a man's lifetime. Not only does cutting up the genitals of healthy individuals without their consent violate human rights, it violates medical ethics to force unnecessary and damaging surgery upon healthy patients.

      But yes, forced genital cutting (whether the victim is male, female, or intersex) is a form of mutilation. Only someone brainwashed into thinking that cutting up the genitals of healthy children is perfectly normal would claim otherwise.

    48. Re:Hormone therapy? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gender is not binary. It isn't controlled or defined by a single physical attribute either. Just look at the difficulty sporting organizations have deciding on a person's gender. Hormones, physical attributes, chromosomes - individually none of them are definitive.

      In some cases people are born with a feminine mind but masculine body. In theory it could be corrected either by making the mind more masculine or the body more feminine, but our understanding of psychology has advanced to the stage where we understanding that trying to alter the mind can be extremely harmful and amount to torture. It's somewhat similar to the old debate about being able to "cure" homosexuality by treating it as a mental illness.

      To address your point about people wanting amputations the key difference is that being male or female is a perfectly natural state in which the human mind can be at ease. Removing limbs is not and usually indicates some other problem, where as gender issues usually just indicate gender issues. Of course, in both cases a trained psychologist has to do all they can to determine what treatment is in the best interest of the patient.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    49. Re:Hormone therapy? by dirtyhippie · · Score: 2

      Yes, but I really wish she had waited a little bit longer. It's just too soon not to affect people's perceptions of the leak. And given the way many Americans feel about Manning, this will also affect people's perceptions about transgender folks.Not a well thought-out move if you ask me.

    50. Re:Hormone therapy? by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 2

      People should not represent themselves in court.
      Doctors should not operate on their own family.
      Juries may not have personal knowledge of the plaintiff or defendant.

      First hand involvement compromises judgement. It's a sad fact of humans. Being emotionally involved in a crime does not make a person more qualified to offer opinion on the appropriate punishment for a crime. Unfortunately, it does make them more likely to be involved, which usually results in a distorted and poorly considered legal system. Our DUI laws are one example.

      Direct experience in a subject does not make a person more reliable. Empathy and a general systematic consideration do.

    51. Re:Hormone therapy? by kno3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course it is not a remotely typical prison, that is why I chose it. However, it contains some of the worst criminals in Norway.
      I find your view of prisoners rather disheartening, though it is not a surprise. We are all taught to view criminals with a them and us mentality; as if people that haven't been convicted of a crime are morally sound, and those that have are a cancer ruining the rest of society. However the line between them is far more blurred. Indeed, practically all of us would be criminals if the law were omnipresent, fact is that only a tiny percentage of crime is ever dealt with.
      The vast majority of prisoners entering prison are not stab happy psychopaths that will murder everyone around them given the chance. Most of them are decent people that have responded in a predictable manner to the difficult situations they have been in, or possibly have made a extremely bad and uncharacteristic decision under extreme conditions.
      Humans are social animals, and will conform to the surroundings in which they are placed. If you put them into a prison with a system of fear from the guards, a culture of crime from the other inmates, give them no responsibilities, they will behave as such. This is why the recidivism rates are so high. Change the system, change the culture, change the outcomes. Obviously this cannot be done overnight, it will take a long time to undo the damage done by the current system, but it could be done.
      I refer you to an excellent TEDx talk done by Prof Lesley McAra, head of my universities' law school: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWEqLcPTv9U

    52. Re:Hormone therapy? by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Only" two. Why is it that the US claims to be the best country in the world, but it comfortable sharing a list mainly populated by other shining examples of leading countries, such as North Korea, Thailand and Rwanda?

      You're joking, right? Some random person makes up a list based on unknown data, criteria, and extremely dubious fairness, and the US as a nation should feel humiliated by it? In one of those prisons people were claimed to be engaging in cannibalism. The North Korean prison system is a study in atrocity. US prisons are nothing like that. I'm reasonably certain that an honest list would have quite a few more prisons on it before getting to US prisons.

      But to help clarify things, let's try a thought experiment:

      A thought experiment list of the worst people that ever lived:
      Stalin
      Pol Pot
      Mao
      SleazyRidr

      Should you feel humiliated? Ashamed? No? Of course you shouldn't! Why? Are you a mass murderer responsible for the death of millions? No. So you don't really fit on that list, do you? Well guess what? Including the US prisons on that list is equal nonsense.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    53. Re:Hormone therapy? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Why? Women can do that job too.

    54. Re:Hormone therapy? by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a general rule, "use some willpower and get over it" is a poor approach for any psychosis. If it merely "bothers you", meh, whatever, but if your day-to-day activities are significantly impeded by your mental state, or you're a danger to yourself or others (a couple of ways of drawing a line between neurosis and psychosis), then treatment is called for. Especially if the root cause is a "hardware problem, not a software problem", willpower isn't going to help.

      Would you really argue that someone who has a problem with psychosis shouldn't take his meds, if meds are available?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    55. Re:Hormone therapy? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      No, it would not be funny.

      Why is it ok to rape a man and not the poor young teenage girl?

      Fuck you and your man-hating lack of morals.

    56. Re: Hormone therapy? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

      Honest question here, why is being raped so much worse than being tortured, brutally beaten or murdered? We make fun of a lot of horrible things including the holocaust yet some people think rape is the ultimate and shouldn't be touched. I'd never wish rape on someone but it's not the murder and torture of millions in prison camps. You either give it all up or jokes about awful events are acceptable no matter which bad thing is used in the joke.

    57. Re:Hormone therapy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think having a gay battalion would do a lot to 'further the country's foreign policy goals'.

      Could Saddam have survived the first gulf war if the republican guards where handed their asses by the 'lavender battalion'?

      Besides military bases are pretty ugly. They will get rid of all that boring olive drab.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    58. Re:Hormone therapy? by deanklear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's try another thought experiment:

      Which nations on earth operate a stateless prison camp where due process and the Geneva Conventions don't apply?

      Which nations on earth have military commanders that regularly order the assassination of individuals who receive no due process before their death?

      Which nation has the highest number of prisoners, both in raw numbers and per capita?

      In each of those answers, for the first time in her history, you'd have to say the answers include America.

      These crimes are regularly committed by other nations, and they are rightfully called violations of human rights by US Citizens and the government. But when the United States engages in aggressive warfare, a suspension of basic human rights, and a campaign of persecution against individuals, including journalists, who dare to talk about these items, somehow the conversation turns to talking about another nation instead of our own.

      Putin may be a despot, but he is, by all accounts, a superior despot to Stalin. Does that excuse his behavior? Should we wait until he's got a few hundred thousand dead under his belt before we start including him in criticism?

      The abject hypocrisy, ignorance, and hollow patriotism that plagues what's left of American culture is nauseating. Not only is our citizenry unable to have an intelligent conversation about world affairs, but they can't be led by facts or argument to any truth that conflicts with their jingoist worldview.

      But America, especially in this case, has no place for pride. We treat our dissidents as poorly as our culture will allow -- the same as every other nation on earth. It wasn't too long ago that we were putting dissidents to death, or simply murdering unionists in the street back in the 1920s and 1930s.

      Ahh, but who wants to talk about actual history when we can discuss the faults of others? The true mark of any great nation is not how it actually behaves, but only the stories that placate the masses with our nobility and purpose. Our treatment of the powerless, the dissidents, and our enemies can always be justified, as long as we tell ourselves that responsibility and accountability can be abdicated by pointing our finger at a few dead despots.

      Is that the extent of your patriotism? Excusing the nonsensical corporal punishment of a dissident to protect the broken, corrupted, and unjust institutions that run our country by stooping so low as to say it's justified since we kill and torture fewer people?

      "My kind of loyalty was loyalty to one's country, not to its institutions or its officeholders. The country is the real thing, the substantial thing, the eternal thing; it is the thing to watch over, and care for, and be loyal to; institutions are extraneous, they are its mere clothing, and clothing can wear out, become ragged, cease to be comfortable, cease to protect the body from winter, disease, and death."
      --Twain

    59. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seriously? As a survivor myself, I simply cannot understand where you are coming from. It's shitty, sure, but shitty things happen to people all the time: car crashes, cancer, burns, torture, war, etc. OK, If I were a vegetable I would probably rather be dead. But even if I had a spinal cord injury or amputation, I don't think I would rather be dead. Life's just too much fun. Granted, I was a kid when it happened, so I've had a lot of time for perspective, but even two years afterwards I didn't have any more suicidal thoughts.

      I have a daughter now, too. That's probably the best thing to live for. WTF, hug too much? There's no such thing.

    60. Re:Hormone therapy? by teg · · Score: 2

      From your link: "None of the windows at Halden have bars"

      That's not a remotely typical prison.

      The prisoners make their own meals. In a typical prison, that would result in 125 dead of stab wounds.

      It's not that different from most Norwegian prisons - it just happens to be the newest one. Norway puts a huge effort into rehabilitation, and as a result the recidivism rate is 20-30% - less than half of what it is in the UK, to give one example.

      While one part of me doesn't want prison to be to comfortable and cushy, intellectually I prefer this as it makes most ex-cons a valuable part of society afterwards and they don't go back to prison.

    61. Re:Hormone therapy? by Smauler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You ever been raped? You ignorant asshole.

      Yes.

      Why do you think so many rape victims commit suicide? Even after months or years of therapy and trying to forget?

      It's a horrible experience. Some people can't deal with it.

      At least if the person is killed, the torment is over.

      My torment was over years ago... it was tough getting over it, but I did, and am glad to be alive.

      I certainly wish my attacker had been raped in prison, and then killed, so my tax dollars doesn't keep him alive.

      I feel nothing but pity for my attacker. He never went to prison, by the way, his punishment was being deported back to his own country. I don't hate him any more, I don't care about him at all. I used to want revenge, but I figured out it was hurting me more than it would hurt him.

      If you can't appreciate that, you obviously have no experience in the subject, and can take your self-righteous indignation and shove it up your ass.

      I do have experience of this. You're the one with the self righteous indignation. You're the one claiming murder is almost equivalent to rape. I'm a happy, relatively well adjusted person now.

      Also, I resent the fact that you imply that no one can comment on the issue unless they have been raped. People are allowed opinions on stuff that has not actually happened to them.

    62. Re:Hormone therapy? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      See? The effects of the process are so bad, they even cause such behaviour in the past!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    63. Re:Hormone therapy? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I certainly wish my attacker had been raped in prison, and then killed, so my tax dollars doesn't keep him alive.

      In other words, you want personal revenge, not social justice.

      Which is fine, but prisons are not meant to be the tools of your personal revenge. Aside from your tax dollars, they're also funded by my tax dollars, and I certainly don't want them to be used for torture punishments.

    64. Re:Hormone therapy? by Smauler · · Score: 2

      Circumcision is a possible health benefit, and has few side effects. I'm against habitual circumcision too, but going stark raving sexual maiming about it doesn't help.

      I was circumcised when I was about 4, I think... I had a tight foreskin. I remember it, but don't miss it.

    65. Re:Hormone therapy? by Velex · · Score: 2

      There are two things specifically you're not being rational about because you're using hyperbole:

      • * Referring to bottom surgery as a "mutilation." It is a cosmetic procedure. I brought circumcision into my post to illustrate that. I call circumcision "mutilation" (and I'm glad you're against non-consenual circumcision), but as I understand certain individuals who are intact do decide to undergo it as adults for cosmetic reasons.
      • * Calling estrogen HRT "out of whack" when administered to trans women. Womyn-born-womyn sometimes seek estrogen HRT for menopause symptioms. Testosterone HRT is indicated in older men with "grumpyness" and trans men as well. Would you suggest withholding HRT when a doctor recommends it to a menopausal woman or to an older man just because it's not what their bodies are naturally doing? In addition, birth control pills are also typically a form of HRT. Do you believe birth control pills should be withheld as well?

      What is rational about any cosmetic operation, for that matter? What is rational about women who get breast implants? I've met a lot of men who disagree with breast implants. Yet, maybe the woman receiving the implant is a breast cancer survivor who only had mastectomy in one breast and desire a symmetric form?

      I also brought circumcision into the fold because I wanted to illustrate that your appeal to nature may not be correct as concerns somebody who was born male in the USA. It may not be a perfectly healthy limb... that's certainly the case with me, crap goes wrong, but I digress.

      The point is: A.) People have to take lots of different kinds of medications on a daily basis for a lot of different reasons; calling something "out of whack" because in your nonmedical opinion the unmedicated state of functioning is "natural" or "healthy" is simply ignorance. B.) People undergo cosmetic operations all the time; it is simply hyperbole and wrong to classify a cosmetic operation as "mutilation." (Feel free to call me a hypocrite since I refer to circumcision as mutilation, but perhaps I can justify it by saying that perhaps the difference between a mutilation and cosmetic procedure is whether or not the subject is consenting.)

      Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  2. And this is relevant how...? by skovnymfe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No offense to transpeople, but why is this on Slashdot? I don't give a fuck if he wants to be a man or a woman in jail.

    1. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Zaldarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because /. has been going down the tubes for years.

      --
      I write professional videogame reviews! http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/
    2. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If she wants to be a man or woman, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No offence to you, but I don't give a fuck about your opinion. And normally I wouldn't say it, but since you seem to think it's important to tell everyone what you don't care about...

      I find Manning's actions and any information about her history which would go toward explaining them both interesting and important. People do not act in a vacuum.

    4. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Statistic pulled out of ass - check.
      Non sequitur - check.
      lol, bigots.

      I struggle to identify an argument, but I think you're saying:

      1. 99.99% of people identify entirely as a gender which accords somehow with the sex organs they were born with - citation please.

      2. Correlation is causation - citation please.

    5. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Well, that's only appropriate, as Sen. Ted Stevens tells us, since the Internet is an entire SERIES of tubes. . .

    6. Re:And this is relevant how...? by lxs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In one sentence: Bradley was our hero. Now Chelsea is our hero.

      It's a story that many of us have been following since the beginning. For those among us that are not robots the lives of the people involved are at least of passing interest to us. In my opinion Manning has done a great thing. He/she deserves better than being relegated to obscurity the moment the story is over.

    7. Re:And this is relevant how...? by gregulator · · Score: 5, Funny

      In one sentence: Bradley was our hero. Now Chelsea is our hero.

      That is two sentences.

    8. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i dont think most people do care, I do think a lot of people care that it would cost american tax payers to have it done. I know thats my issue with it, if he/she wants to be a woman more power to him/her. but dont make me pay for it and dont try and convince me that it is somehow normal.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    9. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Joining Yet Again, thank you for your defense and compassionate attitude. (I would also argue that anything related to Manning is *Stuff That Matters* as I could at least imagine myself as a conscientious nerd wanting to defend the Constitution and Right the wrongs in a similar situation, thinking I was doing the right thing.) If by chance you live outside the US and there are more individuals like you, would you be willing to share your home country? I'm not transgendered, I just have grown tired of being surrounded by bigots...

    10. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now Chelsea is our hero.

      Bad move. Now no honest Arsenal fan can like him/her any more. :-)

    11. Re:And this is relevant how...? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He will always be a he no matter what psychological issues he has to deal with...

      Genetics is only one indicator of sex, and not even a good one when it comes to physiology, let alone psychology.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    12. Re:And this is relevant how...? by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given the current state of society as long as he insists it's one sentence then we all must agree that it is so.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    13. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Equally important is why this is news at all?

      Yes, Bradley Manning is an important person. But the details of his personal issues are not newsworthy, except as how they may have effected his decision to provide the information to Wikileaks. Its certain his sexual identity problems played some role in his unhappiness with his position in the army. But ultimately this is a man depressed about who he is and wanting to change. At root, it's not much different from scrawny guy wanting to be big and butch and - unable to live up to that fantasy - doing something reckless. But if that were all there was to the story, you can be sure it wouldn't get half the coverage this one does.

      And why is this so much more exciting? Because transexualism is still considered indecent and indicative of severe psychological problems by our society. Manning is being demonized as a a nut, a freak; certainly not someone to look up to as a patriot standing up for the ideals of his country. The release of this information is an attempt at distracting the public from the much more important problems his actions brought to light, and as a warning to other whistleblowers. It's an underlying message that says not only says "Fuck with the government and all your dirty laundry will be made public" but also "only weirdos and loons would consider a 'traitorous' act like Manning's in the first place!")

      So, yeah, not being personally involved with Bradley Manning I find the details of the problems that led to his actions inconsequential. They are his private demons that he needs to deal with alone. I'd rather the focus be on the other, far more newsworthy problems brought up by his case, be it the revelations in the leaks themselves, the response by the government to said leaks, or even how poorly the US Army is dealing with the psychologically vulnerable members of its armed forces. THAT is news, not whether Mr. Manning is happy with his dick or not.

    14. Re:And this is relevant how...? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      And give him a medal for it.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    15. Re:And this is relevant how...? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      99.99% of people identify entirely as a gender which accords somehow with the sex organs they were born with

      Can you find any pre-20th century literature or records showing a gender identification which was NOT based on sex organs? I dont mean adjectively referring to feminine attributes, or poetic language, and Im not talking about hermaphrodites-- I mean actually calling an individual born with testes a "she" or "female" or whatever.

      I would be really surprised if you found any at all.

    16. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Pikewake · · Score: 2

      Not at all! If your ancestry includes members of species that actually have races it's definitely worth mentioning.

    17. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Seumas · · Score: 2

      First, his gender identity issues are nothing new. It seems to me that they are only now coming out and being paraded around by news and other organizations that have reason to see him trampled into the ground. It seems this would have been more likely brought out a year or more ago, to fully discredit him. I presume they're doing it now to discredit him after sentencing to prevent others from finding any credibility in him and protesting or following in his steps, as far as whistleblowing.

      In short, this is not relevant in any way whatsoever. He did what he did and made the sacrifice he has been made to pay, whether he is a he, a she, or a guy who is confused.

      Now, why is it on Slashdot? Because as the Slashdot audience has gotten older, they've gone from defiant linux nerds spouting freedom, encryption, and open information to old men who can't help themselves but to spout their political, religious, and other bullshit on here even when it is only barely remotely related to anything, as if they were commenting in the Disqus forum at the bottom of a CBS or CNS news article linked to by Drudgereport.

    18. Re:And this is relevant how...? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because it's controversial and will generate tons of responses and lots of flaming. I don't care what he calls him/herself. It's Jerry Springer stuff and there is enough of that crap on TV so we sure as shit could do without it on a supposed techno/geek site.

    19. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      ugghh no. not what I said at all. Plus he is a criminal now and criminals should not get benefits such as this. If I told you I "feel" like a black person trapped in a white persons body, does that mean that the government should pay for me to be turned into a black person??? fuck no!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    20. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having to pay for a felon's health care is not the same thing as wanting only the rich to be able to afford it. Some people have the belief that the felon earned their situation and so certain procedures may be more elective than others and should not have to be paid for while in jail.

      If there is a suggestion that not getting HRT will actually physically kill him, then perhaps it should be paid for, but it is anything less than life threatening, I don't know that HRT becomes a health care issue.

    21. Re:And this is relevant how...? by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      The funny thing is, transpeople themselves are somewhat divided on the issue.

      The consensus among us seems to be:

      1. If treatment was started before prison, that should be continued.

      2. MTF Transpeople should probably be segregated from the men's population... that would mean women's prison for some of those into their transitions who were living as female before. For others..some kind of separate facility.

      3. No surgery while in prison.

  3. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't see this one coming.

    1. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Never do. Gender identity people generally feel so much deeply foundational shame that they go their entire lives, telling no one. Wasn't there news media coverage of a 40 year old married man that finally decided (after raising the kids was done and they were well on their way) that she couldn't take it anymore and needed to transition. I think a lot of regular Joe's natural reaction to hearing something like this is that the TG individual must be incredibly selfish and perverse to put their family through the pain of having their family fractured in such a way (familial identity especially is immutable!) But I think the reality is that a TG is experiencing pain which equals the combined expected pain and discomfort of their loved ones -- why else would they wait so long?

      In my anecdotal story my brother only told me, but didn't mention it in their suicide note, so I've told no one.. (... quadruple check that I'm posting anonymously..)

  4. Robert Anton Wilson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    is SO clearly behind this.

  5. Me too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Anonymous Cowardess, I am a female.

  6. Popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Getting popcorn - I fully expect this discussion to be mature and informative.

  7. Why is this on Slashdot? by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who cares if he wants to live as a woman, a man or a chipmonk?

    This inane crap belongs on Digg not here.

  8. No, because it's not insanity by QilessQi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Self-identifying as a woman is not a sign of insanity. There are quite a number of transgendered people in the world today, from young to old, pre-op or post-op, leading perfectly normal lives.

    While we used to refer to the condition as Gender Identity Disorder in the DSM-IV, it was replaced with Gender Dysphoria in the DSM-V because we now don't think of it as a disorder. In fact, the general "treatment" is not to make the mind match the body, but to make the body match the mind. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_identity_disorder .

  9. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by rwise2112 · · Score: 2

    Sounds like they thoroughly broke him. First apologizing and then this. Doesn't look like he is going for insanity (trial is over), seems like he got insane for his time in solitary. Not saying that because he self identifies as a woman (something that happens to some people naturally) but because of the timing of the whole matter.

    This was from before. His defense (I assume) even released photos of him in a wig and lipstick.

    --

    "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  10. Re:He's not a woman by eqisow · · Score: 2

    The idea is that sex and gender are not the same thing - one is, as you said, biological, and the other is psychological. Yes, in the end it's all biology, but you can't argue that gender dysphoria is not a real phenomenon. So, the question you have to ask, is what's the best way to treat this condition? Is it to say, "Deal with it, you were born this, you are this," or, is it to give them therapy and open the door to procedures that do, in fact, seem to lessen the psychological suffering of such individuals?

  11. Imma call him Bradley by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Saul: A man has the right to change his name to vatever he vants to change it to. And if a man vants to be called Chelsea, godammit this is a free country, you should respect his vishes, and call the man Chelsea!
    Morris: His mamma call him Bradley, imma call him Bradley.
    Saul: Then you're a putz. All of you are putzes. They should change the sign outside from My-T-Sharp to 'ze Three Putzes.

  12. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by eqisow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do believe he was struggling with gender identity issues before this whole ordeal.

  13. Section 8 by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Didn't work for Klinger in MASH, won't work for him either.

  14. Re:A public announcement on national TV. by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Funny

    Much to his distress.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  15. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Informative

    All accounts I have seen indicate that he was starting to feel this way long before any of this happened. I have some Tranny friends (will be camping with them this weekend in fact) and it isn't something one just suddenly one day decide, or that people go crazy and decide to do....its usually accompanied by lifelong feelings of not really being "right".

    Hell, I met one woman who lived as a man for years, never felt right, transitioned, and not till the age of about 50 did doctors find some small ovaries inside her. Had apparently really been part woman the whole time, never knew it.

    This transition creates an odd conflict. Bradley Manning is a household name. He leaked secrets, he is either a hero of villian. He is a symbol.

    Who is Chelsea Manning? She is just a woman going to jail. Nobody knows her. She is not a household name, not a symbol.

    Maybe that works out in her favor in the long run? I don't really know, it is a bit of a toss up.... but we have been talking about the plight of Bradley Manning so long, I wonder that maybe this is bad timing, but, maybe there is no good timing.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  16. Re:Insane plea by Mirage · · Score: 2

    His gender identity issues were visible in the chat logs with Lamo: http://boingboing.net/2010/06/20/was-alleged-wikileak.html

  17. Bravo, Washington Post by barlevg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read about this on WaPo about half an hour ago, where I noticed they did an incredibly intelligent and thoughtful thing: they disabled comments. Now if only that were possible on /.

    1. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no. screw that. I get annoyed as hell when places decide for me what stories i can and cant comment on. Thats why digg fell apart when they got bought out, they disabled all comments.

      slashdot IS comments. I can find these stories all over the web (in fact as we all joke we usually do before its here) but we come to slashdot for the comments. Sure the quality has dropped in the past 10 years but there are still alot of good posters here, and there is no reason to disable posts on a story because of fear of what will be said. In fact the entire Idea just tells me whatever is happeneing that we would even considering such a thing, is a horrible thing to begin with or something that is clearly wrong.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  18. Why is this relevant? by Bugler412 · · Score: 2

    Why is the gender choice or alignment or preference or whatever of Manning even relevant to any of the current discussions, and why of all things it it relevant here? Sigh....

  19. The Full Statement by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually, I heard that the following statement was made by Bradly Manning and picked up by the Associated Press. He made it to the President in a request for a pardon. In my opinion, these two statements don't sound like they came from the same person. With as much embarrassment and/or trouble as the Bradley Manning case has caused the government, adding a little spicy twist on the story in the end doesn't sound unlikely.

    Associated Press — FORT MEADE, Md. — The text of U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning’s statement that will be sent to the president, as read by defense attorney David Coombs following Manning’s sentencing Wednesday, below:

    --------

    Manning's statement, in full:

    The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating the risks posed to us and our way of life.

    I initially agreed with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I started to question the morality of what we were doing.

    It was at this time I realized that (in) our efforts to meet the risk posed to us by the enemy, we have forgotten our humanity. We consciously elected to devalue human life both in Iraq and Afghanistan. When we engaged those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians. Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified information in order to avoid any public accountability. In our zeal to kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.

    Patriotism is often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in power. When these cries of patriotism drown out any logically based dissension, it is usually the American soldier that is given the order to carry out some ill-conceived mission.

    Our nation has had similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy — the Trail of Tears, the Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, and the Japanese-American internment camps — to mention a few. I am confident that many of the actions since 9/11 will one day be viewed in a similar light.

    As the late Howard Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.”

    I understand that my actions violated the law; I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others.

    If you deny my request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society.

    I will gladly pay that price if it means we could have a country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all women and men are created equal.

    1. Re:The Full Statement by Princeofcups · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is as poignant and germane as any revolutionary war document. I'd vote for Manning as a member of the new constitutional congress.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  20. Re:First rule of espionage by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    They already are. A lot of conservative blogs and news sites have long been claiming that Manning is proof Teh Geys are a threat to national security and condemning liberals for endangering the country by letting them serve in the military. This is just going to revitalize their old gay-panic angle.

  21. So Mr. Manning "suffers from" narcissism? by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kind of an absurd turn of phrase, isn't it? It's a bit like saying that someone "suffers from" being an asshole.

    (Whether Manning deserves to be called a narcissist at all... that is, of course, a whole other question).

  22. Rape jokes are not funny by jellybear · · Score: 3, Funny

    unless they involve prison. Am I politically correct yet?

    1. Re:Rape jokes are not funny by bitt3n · · Score: 2

      unless they involve prison. Am I politically correct yet?

      you got modded funny, so no, not yet.

  23. Let's Not Be Jerks by assertation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Speaking as a straight, cisgendered ( transgender people's word for "normal" ), white, and quite handsome man.........please lets not make fun of Manning.

    He is a human being, some who consider to be a hero, who just happens to have problems.

    1. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by assertation · · Score: 2


      The actual term is "Sane".

      Really, it's no different than the delusions that one is Napoleon.
      Fierce denial of reality, construction their own delusions, self mutilation... these people need serious mental treatment, not coddling

      Manning and other transgender people know what reality is, therefore they are not insane.

      They have a mismatch between what their brain thinks their body should look like and what there bodies are like.

      It is similar to that story of the woman who wanted to cut her legs off because of a brain defect where the brain's sense of "normal" didn't include legs.

      She was perfectly sane, as are most transgender people, they were just born with a defective "checksum" in their brains.

      Now, hatred or loathing to people who have done nothing to you, that might just be a diagnosable neurosis, as well as one that might respond to treatment :)

    2. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by LateArthurDent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cisgendered means your brain gender matches your physical gender. The whole point of not using the word 'normal' is to avoid saying that people who are not cisgendered are not normal.

      Which is stupid PC crap. Being transgendered isn't normal. Which is not to say that's a bad thing, they're just being offended for no reason. Normal means, "according with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle". Think normal distribution. Most people are not transgendered, therefore being transgendered is not not normal.

      By itself, not being normal isn't offensive. Most people can't run as fast as Usain Bolt, therefore Usain Bolt isn't normal. That's not an insult.

  24. Name change? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bradley Womanning?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. If i was going away for 35 years by cod3r_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd ask to be put in a woman's jail as well.

  26. It's a matter of degree by QilessQi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Narcissistic Personality Disorder is narcissism taken to unhealthy extremes; it describes only about 1 percent of the population. One might argue that "being an asshole" affects a far, far larger percentage.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder

    1. Re:It's a matter of degree by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 2

      Narcissistic Personality Disorder is narcissism taken to unhealthy extremes; it describes only about 1 percent of the population.

      I was being flippant, but let me try to restate my point more seriously:

      There is something problematic with the idea of classifying a "personality disorder" as a type of medical disorder-- especially when the personality disorder is defined by qualities such as "arrogance" or "lack of empathy". The implication, which of course is never stated in so many words, is that "narcissism" is a condition similar to rheumatoid arthritis, and that we musn't blame those who are "afflicted" by it.

      (The diagnosis of "gender identity disorder" is problematic too, for a different reason. Most transgendered individuals would bristle at the idea that they have a medical disorder. They would point out that prior to 1980, homosexuality was classified as a medical disorder as well).

    2. Re:It's a matter of degree by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Being gay isn't a disorder because there are no life-threatening physical characteristics to simply being gay. A gender disorder is like you inheriting a body part that could threaten your life due to it's very existence, like perhaps a third deformed leg which might have poor circulation and have a tendency to gangrene.

      In theory, being a female in a male body is so traumatic that said "mental" female cannot handle the repercussions of their own body. I'd say that's a disorder.

      You need to remember a "disorder" does not represent any judgement about a person morally. No one is going to argue with me if I hack off an extra limb that I believe could cause my death.

      That said, I am following the logic of what is actually suggested is the way gender disorders work. You have a physical mismatch in your physical and mental gender. That mismatch is so traumatic that it affects your normal functioning, so it is pathological. It's a condition which is believed to be best treated by altering an otherwise healthy body. I'd say that is pretty much a disorder. Let's not redefine medical terminology in our zeal to see that this terminology isn't used against people.

      If you have a real argument, your argument should be against the characterization of those afflicted with diseases or disorders as somehow immoral or unclean.

      The only other argument I would have is if they had characterized him has having this disorder, but he really didn't. However, it is pretty clear he believes that he does, and did so well before he ran into trouble with the Army. So whether or not the disorder is will cause a further disadvantage to him, that disorder was not fabricated by the prosecution for their benefit.

  27. Swore it was an Onion headline by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    With this timing, I had to re-read the headline in my RSS reader 3 times to be sure it wasn't from The Onion. Apparently this isn't new information but it was the first I'd heard of it.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  28. Re:Utter crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... There's a mismatch between his physical sex and his gender identity, but that doesn't mean it's his brain is at fault.

    Actually, the brain may in fact be at fault. There's been several small studies that show that certain areas of the brain are different in volume and number of nuerons between males and females. Transsexuals (MTF), in the study, had a volume (and number of neurons) consistent with females. Gay males were consistent with males. Gay females were consistent with females.

    This study was small, and was conducted by sectioning the brain of cadavers. However it has been replicated by a different group of researchers, with a different group of cadavers, and arrived at the same results. Co-factors such as any prior hormone use was accounted for in the study.

    The chances are pretty good that transsexuality, at least in male-to-female transsexuals, is the result of a brain that developed with some female attributes, in a male body.

    The situation with transsexuality is not that you desire to be the opposite sex, but that you "know" that you are not the sex your body is. So, to use myself as an example, I knew from an early age I was not a male. It didn't matter what my body was, I knew, just as surely as anyone else knows their own gender, that I was not a male.

    Just thought I'd add a bit of real information to the transsexuality discussion.

    As for Chelsea Manning...we'll just have to take her word.

  29. Re:Utter crap by Seumas · · Score: 2

    That's clearly untrue. There was just an AMA on reddit recently by someone who changed their sex and then desperately regretted it.

    If there is a mismatch between the gender of your physical body and its guts and what you feel you are in your head -- then there is something wrong SOMEWHERE. It isn't some magical ethereal thing compelling you to have this mixup. That isn't to say "if you have balls and no uterus, but you feel like you are supposed to be a woman, then you are mentally fucked up and need to have your head fixed". It's just to say that may sometimes be the case. Sometimes it may not be. I'm sure there are multiple potential catalysts and many are probably even a simple case of "mother nature screwed up and made me one thing but made me feel like another thing".

    It would be a disservice to the health of people, I believe, to instantly treat everyone as either clearly the physical sex they seem to be but with a fucked up brain *or* as a perfectly normal person who just needs to whack off some bits and install some others.

    To further counter your point that there's supposedly nothing wrong and it isn't a disorder or illness and has nothing to do with the brain -- you can not have a gender reassignment surgery without an IMMENSE amount of psychological counseling.

    I think it is wrong to judge people with gender identity issues. I am sure that, whatever causing them, it is fucking awful to deal with (not to mention coping with society, along with it). We are definitely a long way from clearly understanding everything about it, though. Once we do, I'm sure we will be very far along the path to society being able to cope with it more rationally.

  30. Sounds like false flag to me. by Chas · · Score: 2

    Honestly,

    It seems like this tidbit of info, coming when it has, is pitch perfect to make people stop listening to the Bradley Manning situation and turn the whole fiasco into a bad joke.

    Isn't that just TERRIBLY convenient for the government?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  31. Propaganda? by imag0 · · Score: 2

    The timing seems... odd to me. Right when people are using this guy as a hero and poster boy for whistleblowing and BAM. Try to make him look "a little off in the head" instead.

    Just seems rather PSYOP-flavored story. I'm probably wrong, but it feels that way.

  32. BCD != DD by Firethorn · · Score: 2

    I'll just chime in that while it's probably 45% of jobs TOTAL, a BCD(Bad Conduct Discharge) is different and actually better than a Dishonorable. Most of them fixed on the point that people with one are felons, so any positions that ban felons also ban DDs.

    A BCD is a misdemeanor level discharge, a DD is a felony level. I'm not a military lawyer, but that's how I understand it.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  33. Chelsea 35, Bush 0 by Geste · · Score: 2

    What, 600 comments and nobody says how friggin' lopsided this is? A person with big personal issues -- but not a war criminal -- gets 35, while war criminals walk the streets unmolested, get thousands for speaking engagements and even get in our Face the Nation. Bradley, Chelsea, whatever. Not fair.