Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Hotel Sues Guest For $95K Over Bad Review, Bed Bugs

An anonymous reader writes "A guest at at Quebec hotel was bitten by bed bugs, brought some down to the front desk and asked for new room. While the fully booked hotel offers to get him another room in a different hotel, he stays out the night then leaves — telling people at the hotel — some of whom also check out. When he wrote about it on Trip Advisor, the hotel demanded he take it down and when he did they sued him for $95,000."

40 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. Free speech by MooseTick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free speech is for those people who know how to keep their mouths shut!

    1. Re:Free speech by GrBear · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was more likely he was sued because his review wasn't bilingual. This IS Quebec we're talking about afterall.

    2. Re:Free speech by FunPika · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The hotel is not denying that this guy had bedbugs in his room on the night of his stay. Apparently the hotel's justification for suing comes down to them believing that only his room was infested, and that this was an isolated incident.

      --
      After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
    3. Re:Free speech by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Free speech is for those people who know how to keep their mouths shut!

      C-eh-N-eh-D-eh, not YOOSA

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Free speech by JustOK · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quebec is NOT bilingual.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:Free speech by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The hotel is not denying that this guy had bedbugs in his room on the night of his stay. Apparently the hotel's justification for suing comes down to them believing that only his room was infested, and that this was an isolated incident.

      Yeah, I'm pretty sure there's no such thing as "only one room infested with bed bugs" in a hotel. (Think about how they're serviced.) This could be an entertaining lawsuit. The problem I see is that the hotel taking him to court puts even more media attention on the hotel being infested.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Free speech by JustOK · · Score: 4, Informative

      New Brunswick is the only bilingual province. Quebec is uni-lingual.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    7. Re:Free speech by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His review was of his room; he didn't sleep in the entire hotel and didn't claim to find the bugs anywhere but his own room. I'm no lawyer but the backlash from doing something as stupid as suing a customer for telling the truth will likely cost the chain much more than the $95k they wanted from him. I wouldn't be surprised if they ended up paying him in the end (or at least his legal fees).

    8. Re:Free speech by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      The very first paragraph of that document also states clearly that the government only protects those freedoms so long as it deems reasonable to do so. There is no definition of what they think is reasonable.

      Not quite. The specific formulation is:
      "the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society"

      So they have to demonstrably justify every instance of restricting the freedoms. This is subject to judicial review, and the Supreme Court of Canada has established a test for it. It is still subjective, but it is not something that is decided unilaterally by the legislature.

    9. Re:Free speech by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is trumped by hate speech laws, for example. It stands in all cases where it is not overridden for some reason thought reasonable by the legal system. So lawsuits can happen about anything, and will come to court as long as the plaintiff can convince the judge that the nullification of freedom of expression is reasonable in this instance.

      Seems like in this case, they're trying to trump freedom of expression with libel/slander laws. Possible, but not likely in this case, and this is NOT the kind of publicity a hotel should be wanting to bring on itself.

      Here is the thing of it. Hate speech laws are not about trumping anything but rather balancing out the rights of two different individuals and their rights. With hate speech, you are threatening the fundamental rights from section 1 which are life, liberty and security of person. This differs from the American version which is life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

      If your life is being threatened then you cannot exercise the right to life or security of person effectively. This is a fundamental and important difference between the two systems. In Canada, you have to be able to feel "free" in order to be free and it focuses on individual security rather than security of the state or society.

      If the Americans had the right to security of person, perhaps they would not have such a huge surveillance state.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    10. Re:Free speech by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also note that this isn't really fundamentally different from the situation in the USA, where the same thing exists by convention. If the First Amendment, for example, was absolute, it would be protecting slander and libel, imminent threats, arbitrary disclosure of classified information etc - but it does not.

    11. Re:Free speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked in 3 hotels for about 6 years, big names, one was a Bestwestern. In all three hotels, we got bed bugs on a regular basis. We have protocols on how to put the room and the linens in quarantine as soon as this is discovered. Then we call someone to spray something ll over the room to kill the bed bugs. It's also common thing to put in quarantine the rooms beside the affected room.

      So there is such a thing as "only one room infested", I also think that the guest over-reacted... Was it it's first time in an hotel ?

      I still agree that the hotel should not sue the guest, maybe just explaining to the public what I just said... Informing them.

    12. Re:Free speech by LifesABeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did the lawyer represent the bed bugs, or the hotel owner?

    13. Re:Free speech by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I also think that the guest over-reacted

      I don't think there is such a thing. If he had burned the hotel to the ground and detonated a small nuclear device in the rubble, I'd admire his restraint.

      Bedbugs need to become extinct as a species. A biological weapon is the best approach, IMO. If it accidentally takes out a few thousand other species, that's just acceptable collateral damage.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Free speech by dargaud · · Score: 4, Informative

      They may not transmit deadly diseases like ticks or mosquitoes, but the only time I was exposed to bedbugs, each bite led to an allergic reaction as big as an egg that lasted for a week (with medication).

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  2. Babs, look what you did again by davebarnes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When will businesses learn?
    I know, never.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
  3. You know the Hotel Quebec? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read somewhere that it is shit.

    is it true that the Hotel Quebec is shit?

    Could it be that it's full of cockroaches, and that the waiters ejaculate into the food?

    Has anyone said that the manager hurls racial abuse at his staff and non-white customers?

    Did anyone find any reports about guests having their personal property stolen by the room cleaners?

    1. Re:You know the Hotel Quebec? by Shoten · · Score: 4, Funny

      I read somewhere that it is shit.

      is it true that the Hotel Quebec is shit?

      Could it be that it's full of cockroaches, and that the waiters ejaculate into the food?

      Has anyone said that the manager hurls racial abuse at his staff and non-white customers?

      Did anyone find any reports about guests having their personal property stolen by the room cleaners?

      I did know this one waiter there.

      "Do not watch. I can't go if you watch."

      Apart from seasoning the lobster bisque, he farted on the meringue, sneezed on braised endive, and as for the cream of mushroom soup, well...

      (chuckling in the background)

      "Go ahead. Say it."

      You get the idea.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  4. mistake in editorial entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "the hotel demanded he take it down and when he did they sued him for $95,000.""
    should be
    "the hotel demanded he take it down and when he didn't, they sued him for $95,000.""

    1. Re:mistake in editorial entry by gweilo8888 · · Score: 5, Informative

      He hasn't taken it down. It is still online: http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g155033-d183336-r158988363-L_hotel_Quebec-Quebec_City_Quebec.html Therefore the summary is demonstrably wrong.

    2. Re:mistake in editorial entry by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mod parent up. Article summary is wrong.

      But that's why we come to slashdot -- Two stories for the price of one!

      The summary is usually different from the article and two separate discussion (one about summary another one about article) are carried out in the comments section. I assume this is intentional, because no editor would allow it otherwise, right? :)

    3. Re:mistake in editorial entry by markov_chain · · Score: 4, Funny

      This does not happen often on Slashdot, it was only this one story. The adjacent stories were all unaffected.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  5. How can you win over facts? by fructose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assuming that the story the guest told was true (and it seems it was, based on the hotel admitting it), how can the hotel possibly win when the reviewer is stating facts? If the review was completely made up, I would assume libel laws would side with the hotel. But when the whole situation is based on facts, and the reviewer is merely passing those facts on to the public, how can the hotel even expect to win?

    The article is right, the hotel should have helped him out more from the get go instead of trying to do damage control.

    1. Re:How can you win over facts? by gp824 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't assume that civil law suits will be treated how they are in the US or in any other provinces in Canada. Quebec treats civil suits under French civil law.... a complex different system that we are used to. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_law

    2. Re:How can you win over facts? by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Informative

      In many places, truth is not a defense. If it harms someone, it did harm. You can't badmouth certain industries in TX or FL, for example, regardless of the truth of the statements. Too bad free speech doesn't exist in the US anymore. We should move to some place more free, like Soviet Russia.

      That is plainly incorrect. As a constitutional matter, truthful negative statements are protected speech in the United States. You have misinterpreted the precedent.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
  6. Summary is wrong by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The summary says he took the review down and then they sued him. The article says he did not take the review down. I will admit that I wasn't immediately able to find the review, but there are three others on tripadvisor about the Hotel Quebec having bedbugs. It is a chain, though so not sure if it is the same one.
    Aren't bedbugs really tiny and hard to see? Isn't it more likely that these were not bedbugs the species, but some kind of other bugs on the bed?

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Summary is wrong by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a seriously major bed bug infestation going on right now on the east coast of North America. There hasn't been this large of a problem with bed bugs in this area for more than 60+ years.

      If the person is being bit it is most likely bed bugs. They are parasites that suck blood and because of this they are far worse than cockroaches, they also tend to breed as fast as roaches. The very presence in one room indicates they are present or will soon be present everywhere in the building. Standard treatment protocol for bed bugs is to spray not only the dwelling they are in but every adjacent dwelling area. In an apartment building this would mean the apartment in question plus all the surrounding apartments including above and below. Its not unusual to require treating the entire floor they are found on but the floor above and below as well.

      Bed bugs are nasty business.

  7. welcome to reality by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it was me the hotel was suing, I'd tell them to take up the complaint up with my department of go fuck yourself, of which Barbara Streissand is the department head.

  8. I will avoid this place like the bedbug plague by generic_screenname · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I will never stay at a hotel that responds to a complaint on the internet with a $95k lawsuit.

  9. This is the review and it is still up by davebarnes · · Score: 5, Informative

    "At first this hotel looks ok....until you wake up in the middle of the night at 3:00AM because you've been scratching all over and realize your bed is infested with BED BUGS!
    What a nightmare! When I reported the situation to the managing stuff, there were no emergency to handle the situation because the decision maker was not available during the week end and it was a Saturday.
    Instead they offered to transfer my son and I to a hotel nearby where a room was available because they were concerned I was going to cause Mayhem
    They finally offered to investigate the room despite the 4 BED BUGS I had contained in a glass and pictures and videos I had showed them.
    I was supposed to stay one more night but instead chose to move to a hotel nearby; turned out to be cleaner-up to date-bigger room- and cheaper rate and that was the Holiday Inn Express down the road at 3145 Avenue de Hotels.
    Beware of BED BUGS! If you are looking for a scratch free night sleep, stay elsewhere, you will be doing you and your loved ones a favour! Trust me...and that's why the Internet is a great tool!
            Stayed April 2013, traveled with family"

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
  10. Lawsuit = Billboard saying they have bedbugs by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I realize the negative publicity they received from his Trip Advisor review has hurt their business but by filing the lawsuit they're guaranteeing that every person who hasn't read the review will now become aware of their bed bug problem. And with the hotel not denying there were bedbugs the lawsuit is a horrible idea.

  11. Yesterday vs. Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yesterday: I figured there were hotels in Canada, but I never really thought about it.

    Today: If I ever go to Canada, I'd better avoid the Hotel Quebec, because those bastards have bedbugs and sue people out of house and home rather than fix their problems. Either that, or the place attracts crazies with some pathology that causes them to make things up. Regardless, I'll just avoid it.

  12. Interesting Anecdote by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My girlfriend and I take weekend trips often during the summer, and we use hotels.com to book lodging. While in Ohio earlier this summer, one of the places we stayed was terrible. No bedbugs, but poor repair, smelly room, bad service, the list goes on and on. IN addition, thier entry on hotels.com stated that they offered contentinal breakfast, which they did not.

    Upon returning from our trip, we decided to rate and write a hotels.com review to warn others. We were not disrespectful or profane. We stated the facts and our displeasure with them only. A week or so later, my GF noticed the review still had not posted. Then she received an email stating that it would not because it violated the TOS of hotels.com. No explanation of how, just that we had. There were no names given (except the name of the hotel), and as I stated earlier, nothing but facts about ther visit, and our displeasure (admittedly and opinion).

    I know where hotels.com gets its bread buttered now, and it is not from us customers. A chain hotel can exert much more fiscal pressure than a single customer.

    I am owed a free night from them, and I am thinking of booking hotels using another source after that, but will the result be any different? My cynical brain says no.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  13. Re:New insecticide by suutar · · Score: 5, Informative

    no, it's because DDT worked really well against bedbugs while it was legal. It's taken a while for the survivors to repopulate.

  14. Re:New insecticide by puppetman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about diatomaceous earth? It's fossilized algae, and a natural insecticide, absorbing the lipids from the exoskeletons of insects.

    I've read that if you pull your bed from the wall, take 4 empty/clean tuna cans with diatomaceous earth in them, and put one under each leg of the bed, you can get rid of them. They crawl in and out of it on their way to feast on you.

    If I had them, in addition to the cans-under-legs, I'd be dusting the floors, the sheets, the bed-frame, the bed-boards, the electrical sockets, etc, to get rid of them.

    There was also a BBC show, either Edwardian Farm, or Victorian Farm, where they showed the housewife scrubbing bed frames down twice a year with lye to keep them under control.

  15. Re:How did he dare to disturb the bed bugs? by sjames · · Score: 4, Funny

    Won't somebody think of the bedbugs?

  16. Re:New insecticide by tibit · · Score: 5, Informative

    For all practical purposes there's no way, I repeat, no way to "heat the whole apartment block" to eradicate bed bugs. It's a myth perpetuated by the eradication industry. It's physically impossible unless you'd raise the building off the ground, isolate from all utilities, wrap air-tight with an insulating air gap between the plastic cover and the walls, and then heat up from inside. That's how I've seen someone get rid of a horrible infestation in a trailer home, and it's about the only way to pull it off. It did work, too - a year later, still no bed bugs. For normal buildings - forget it.

    You see, bed bugs scamper away from heat, and when you're heating a building up, there are always gradients that let the suckers find the way to the basement, the attached car garage, whatever. Good luck heating the concrete basement or other adjoining walls to 45C, as that would be necessary to really kill them. Never mind that most heat treatments do not isolate the walls from outside air, so the walls never get hot enough.

    The way heat-based bed bug eradication is normally done is you bring in a high-power space heater system that heats the air in the building. This is about the best scenario for bed bugs: due to slow heat exchange between hot air and the walls, the latter heat up slowly and let the bed bugs get out of the way before anything bad happens to them. That method doesn't kill any appreciable numbers of bed bugs, they simply go away for a while -- all the way to cracks and crevices in the foundation, if need be. It's then only a matter of time for the infestation to recover, as the suckers simply come back. Yes, their numbers will be reduced, but they'll come back all right.

    There is a big problem with how the heat-based methods are evaluated: the test methods don't address the issue of bed bugs simply relocating elsewhere.

    AFAIK, there are exactly zero pesticides that are approved for non-professional use the U.S. and that work against bed bugs. I repeat: ZERO. None. Nada. You're not buying anything unless you're licensed professional. The "higher test stuff" is not some nebulous thing either. There is exactly one category of insecticides that do work against bed bugs: organophosphates. Out of a whole lot of stuff, only one category. One that's highly regulated and universally toxic to pretty much anything with a nervous system, including humans. For all I know, if organophosphates came to be widely used against bed bugs, it'd be only a matter of time until those suckers found a way to cope with it, or even becoming totally immune. Perhaps whatever mutations would be responsible for it would also be of some use in humans - one can only hope.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  17. Re:Other posts? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because bedbugs are the ultimate venereal disease of hotel chains. They are very difficult to get rid of, and even if the hotel manages to wipe them out, once word gets out no one will touch them. Basically, the hotel chain feels the guy cost them real money. Though in truth, the hotel cost themselves the money by having the infestation in the first place; this guy just happened to be the patron who spoke out about it.

  18. His original complaint - in English by sabri · · Score: 5, Informative
    Bilingual or not, he posted in English:

    Quote:

    âoeBed bugs in our bedâ 1 5 étoiles Avis écrit le 27 avril 2013 Google Traduction At first this hotel looks ok....until you wake up in the middle of the night at 3:00AM because you've been scratching all over and realize your bed is infested with BED BUGS!

    What a nightmare! When I reported the situation to the managing stuff, there were no emergency to handle the situation because the decision maker was not available during the week end and it was a Saturday.
    Instead they offered to transfer my son and I to a hotel nearby where a room was available because they were concerned I was going to cause Mayhem
    They finally offered to investigate the room despite the 4 BED BUGS I had contained in a glass and pictures and videos I had showed them.
    I was supposed to stay one more night but instead chose to move to a hotel nearby; turned out to be cleaner-up to date-bigger room- and cheaper rate and that was the Holiday Inn Express down the road at 3145 Avenue de Hotels.
    Beware of BED BUGS! If you are looking for a scratch free night sleep, stay elsewhere, you will be doing you and your loved ones a favour! Trust me...and that's why the Internet is a great tool!

    Séjour du Avril 2013 - voyage en famille

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  19. Re:Hotels don't handle this stuff very well IMO by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "but it was the largest roach I've ever seen and the damn thing had wings too! "

    I saw one like that once. It was also a typewriter.

    --
    BMO