Slashdot Mirror


New Keyboard Accessory Shocks Users When They Try To Go On Facebook

cartechboy writes "Two Ph.D. students from MIT have created a keyboard accessory, the Pavlov Poke, that shocks you every time you go onto Facebook. The project comes as a result of the students finding the waste over 50 hours a week combined on the social network (instead of working on their dissertations) So the pair created an Arduino-based keyboard hand-rest that shocks computer users who spend too much time checking the social network. The hack is 'intended to generate discussion' — not actually turn into a business." Inventor Robert Morris describes it as "something of a joke," but I'm sure there's a market out there.

27 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. The real market by gewalker · · Score: 3, Funny

    The real market is for sado-masochists that are addicted to farmville (or is that redundant). If you just want to stop wasting your life, give up or moderate your FB (and slashdot) usage.

    1. Re:The real market by neminem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The real market is for overly controlling bosses who would love to install these on their employees' desktops.

    2. Re:The real market by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Sorry boss, I didn't mean to link that up to your keylogger software, honest!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:The real market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now, commenting on Slashdot on the company dime, on the other hand...

    4. Re:The real market by neminem · · Score: 2

      Says someone who is almost certainly posting that from work. :p

    5. Re:The real market by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      better yet, fire people who don't get their work done and not worry about the details of "Why"

      I don't care if you're running a nail salon and a tattoo parlor from your smartphone while you're at work as long as you're getting quality work done on time for me. The idea that an employer can monitor and badger a bad employee into a good one is one of the oldest, most idiotic myths I've ever heard. Enough already.

    6. Re: The real market by techprophet · · Score: 2

      Thankfully, there is +5 funny for posts like yours.

    7. Re:The real market by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you hiring ?? That kind of enlightened attitude intrigues me.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    8. Re:The real market by bmk67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do not ban Facebook however, it makes my life much easier. You get hired, if during your first 90 days I see Facebook opened on your machine, you get released on the spot.

      So, what you're saying is that you DO ban Facebook, you just don't tell your employees that you do, until you fire them for it.

      While it's certainly your right as an employer to act like a complete asshat, I feel sorry for your employees.

      Do you put them on double secret probation as well?

    9. Re:The real market by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 2

      lol.
      Let's rewrite the PR a bit there. I don't know what the actual situation is so I am going to just talk as much BS as the original guy, but the other way round.

      Let's begin:

      --
      I have such an easy solution for FB: Tyranny.

      Primarily because of years of union hating and political apathy by the middle class, workers right are so shite in this country I can just fire people on the spot for having the wrong website open even once when I happen by. (Ed's note: Seriously america...WTF?!) This makes me feel like "a real man"(TM) because there is nothing like reasserting your alpha male status deeply rooted in the primitive parts of your brain from your biological origins like shitting on staff.

      I don't "BAN" FB (but actually I do in an even worse way) and allow slashdot (Mostly because I don't understand how it is used by intelligent people) because that helps me sleep at night and provides a wonderfully believable cover story (as least in my sociopathic mind) that I am a "good boss"(TM) and so very smart and on the money and with it and up with the play and trending.
      Even though none of the above makes any sense at all to anyone rational.

      No one complains of course. That would make them "disruptive" and they will have to be similarly dealt with. Mostly they just say "Yes MEIN FUHRER!!!!" and then goose step to their desks to pretend to be productive. Because there is no better measure of productivity than looking at someone's screen! KPI's, modern management theory and piles of research to the contrary be damned!

      This creates a culture of fear (and loathing...are you based in las vegas per chance?) and since I am the monkey at the top of the tree all I see when I look down are happy, smiling and productive workers. (when they look up however....)

      End result: My small and insignificant company has 5 bootlickers and/or slaves who 9-5 their jobs and are very great each day when they are finally allowed to go home and leave their shitty jobs and boss behind them.

      My business is going to be sooooo successful and rich one day.....

    10. Re:The real market by Garybaldy · · Score: 2

      Am always amazed at how some desk jockies feel the computer provided by the employer for work is their personal toy to do with as they please.

    11. Re: The real market by nbritton · · Score: 2

      I don't believe this is legal, while you do have the right to terminate an employment relationship in a employment at will relationship, you're exposing yourself to a tort claim for misrepresenting the terms of employment. You could end up paying for the damages that result from unemployment. At the very least, your actions are unquestionably unethical and a jury would find contempt in your admission.

      State clearly in writing what behavoir is acceptable and what is not in an employer handbook and have the employee sign something stating they have read it. This benefits you and your employees, and employee could have assumed they had flex time to make up for the time they spent on Facebook. All you've effectively done by not documenting these conditions is make yourself into an asshole.

      Review IBM's Business Conduct Guidelines if you need examples of what to write in your employee handbook: https://www.ibm.com/investor/pdf/BCG2013.pdf

  2. shut up and take my money! by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I need a second one for my sister!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  3. so... by andrewleung · · Score: 2

    the rivalry continues! so harvard, how do you respond?!

    1. Re:So... by HaZardman27 · · Score: 2

      Holy crap, do you not see the part in the summary(seriously, you don't even have to go RTFA) where it quotes one of the creators suggesting that this was a joke?

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  4. First the came for Facebook... by rsborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, I only see this sort of thing being useful for a) folks who want to discipline themselves or b) sadistic overlords who think users need to not just be blocked, but punished for succumbing to their weaknesses.

    In short, the target market is your average Megachurch.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  5. Wonderful idea! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    I'll just ignore the fact that everyone has smartphones and tablets, which all have FB on them, shall I?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  6. Thank Heavens by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank Heavens this is for Facebook. I'd hate to see the burn marks on my hands from my Slashdot habit.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Thank Heavens by readingaccount · · Score: 2

      If you're getting friction burns from pr0n, you're missing some of the necessary additional equipment (e.g. a lube of some sort).

  7. Not just Facebook by PPH · · Score: 2

    This could be extended to sites like Slashdot. And be used as a sort of aversion therapy for people who read posts by timo....[Ouch!]

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  8. Instructions unclear... by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...penis stuck to electrocuting device.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  9. BlockSite (for Firefox) worked for me by Neil_Brown · · Score: 2

    I realised I was wasting far too much time on Facebook a couple of years ago, along with other forums, and found it hard not to browse there - often, I found that I was just typing the URL without thinking about it, and loading the site without giving it any thought. A friend recommended BlockSite to me, and, whilst I felt a bit stupid at needing this crutch, I took it, and managed to get things back under control.

    Just add in the URLs of the site in question, and it blocks access to the pages (and elements at those URLs from loading as part of other pages). Editing a hosts file is probably just as suitable, but this worked for me...

  10. I made one too! by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It shocks me whenever I waste time on Slashdaaarrrrgh

  11. Just silly by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

    Let them fail in school. If they can't control their addictions to Facebook, what kind of focus will they have once they hit the job market. Like a friend of mine said the other day: "Darwinism is dead". If they are too dumb to realize what they are doing, let them fail. Self elimination.

  12. Pavlov..Interesting... by SuperCharlie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A while back I realized that the most social sites are actually Pavlovian driven drool buckets where you get a "treat" for every like, or comment or whatever.. so this little device is somewhat like putting a humidifier and a dehumidifier in the same room and letting them fight it out..

  13. unintended consequences? by stenvar · · Score: 2

    Socializing via Facebook is probably a lot faster and more efficient than socializing in the numerous ways that past graduate students used. So I'm not sure that this actually achieves what aims to achieve.

    1. Re:unintended consequences? by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      Jevon's Paradox: greater efficiency leads to greater resource use. Walking across campus to socialize with a friend over coffee: 20 minutes. Only going to do that once a day. Quickly glancing at your Facebook page, and firing off a one-liner response to a comment? Takes just a minute. Done hundreds of times per day...