Slashdot Mirror


Official: Microsoft To Acquire Nokia Devices and Services Business

Many submitted, and symbolset emailed me to wake up, sending this bit of interesting news out of Redmond: "Microsoft Corporation and Nokia Corporation today announced that the Boards of Directors for both companies have decided to enter into a transaction whereby Microsoft will purchase substantially all of Nokia's Devices & Services business, license Nokia's patents, and license and use Nokia's mapping services. Under the terms of the agreement, Microsoft will pay EUR 3.79 billion to purchase substantially all of Nokia's Devices & Services business, and EUR 1.65 billion to license Nokia's patents, for a total transaction price of EUR 5.44 billion in cash. Microsoft will draw upon its overseas cash resources to fund the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, subject to approval by Nokia's shareholders, regulatory approvals and other closing conditions." And, yep, Elop is part of the deal (quoting Ballmer): "Stephen Elop will be coming back to Microsoft, and he will lead an expanded Devices team, which includes all of our current Devices and Studios work and most of the teams coming over from Nokia, reporting to me."

112 of 535 comments (clear)

  1. Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A classic Trojan horse manouver pulled off in style by Steven Elop. Now he can go back to Redmond, where they'll hold a Triumph in his honor.

    1. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful
      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So apart from the vision, agility, quality, execution, origination of new ideas, brand recognition, marketable "face", and retail presence, they are the new Apple.

      Gotcha.

    3. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Rational · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. The quip about "two turkeys not making an eagle" is applicable here.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
    4. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the conspiracy theory is now cemented. Impossible to prove or disprove, and just too likable to not believe.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    5. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A long time Finnish stock analyst wonders the same (on the record)

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/terokuittinen/2013/09/02/nokia-sells-handset-business-to-microsoft-at-a-shockingly-low-price/

    6. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Symbian? Probably not. Meego? Definitely.

    7. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As god is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!

    8. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh bullshit. First of all when it comes to MSFT pretty much ALL of their successes in the past can be preceded by "and then the other guy did something REALLY dumb" thus giving MSFT a free shot, from BE-OS tying itself to one niche CPU after another to netscape putting out the abomination that was NS4 not once did MSFT "come up with some brilliant plan" they just got lucky and were able to capitalize on having a competitor that was a moron.

      Second of all Nokia WAS ALREADY TOAST by the time the board called in Elop, they had not one, not two, but THREE OSes, not one of which was up to the task of competing with Android and iOS, the ONLY place they were ahead was in dumbphones which was like being the biggest 8-track manufacturer in 1987, they couldn't go with Android because not only was the Android market then as now the most cutthroat commodity market in mobile (only HTC and Samsung has made any real money and I'd argue they are on borrowed time, Hong Kong was showing off dual core Android phones that retail for $70 not 4 months ago so like PCs its gonna be profits measured in pennies) but Samsung and HTC frankly would have curbstomped them as nobody does high end Android units better, and they just didn't have the money to compete with HP for WebOS which IMHO would have been the best choice. Add in the fact that a couple of Maemo devs were quoted as saying Maemo wouldn't have been ready for another year and a half MINIMUM (it was having serious memory corruption and CPU issues at the time) and the app devs wouldn't have made shit for maemo anyway after Nokia burnt their bridges to the community by changing the framework? yeah there really wasn't any choice, it was take WinPhone or close the doors and give the money back to the shareholders.

      All those that hate MSFT frankly ought to be dancing in the street, as this gives ballmer the chance to piss away...what? 9 billion US dollars? And while shitting away a mountain of money Ballmer's retarded attempt to turn Windows into a WinPhone is frankly killing the Windows desktop, talking to other shop owners we have all even stopped carrying Win 8.x anything as its a bigger bomb than WinME, and finally you KNOW that Ballmer is gonna push hard for his little yes man Elop to get the big chair because it will let him still push his "vision" which consists of burning the desktop and server business to the ground so he can push half assed Apple clones that are worse in every way compared to the real thing, worse walled garden, worse performance, worse app selection, everything mobile under Ballmer/Elop has been half assed and piss poor and I don't see that changing if Elop gets the big chair.

      But I leave you all here with a warning, be careful what you wish for. So many wanted MSFT dead for being douchebags they aren't even noticing they are replacing one douchebag for an even worse one, Between the big brother levels of data that Google is gathering on every android user and the fact that their new ChromeBooks took what SHOULD have been a completely bog standard X86 laptop and made it so proprietary that the ONLY way to install a different OS is to throw it into "Dev mode" and then and ONLY then can you install not whatever you want, but only one of a handful of Linux distros supported by some guy in his basement? say what you want about MSFT but at least i could grab any Windows desktop or laptop and be booting to install not only any previous MSFT OS but pretty much any other OS, Linux,BSD,Haiku, whatever, in under 20 minutes.

      So while we all know where this is gonna end, another shitpile of money pissed away, declining sales on the X86 front and flatline numbers in mobile for MSFT, lets not replace one asshole company for another shall we? as for Nokia...oh well, between Samsung, HTC, LG, and a bazillion Chinese brands there really isn't a place for Nokia anymore now that the dumbphone market is dead. Hell when I was shopping for my Android phone several of the shops had refurb android phones starting at just $20 and new for $50, with prices THAT low for smartphones? Nokia might as well pack it in, no point in even making dumbphones anymore.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

      Considering Elop successfully tanked Nokia's stock, I would say mission accomplished.

    10. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Symbian was definitely dying. But would Nokia have fared as poorly if it had gone for Android and Meego? It's hard to say.

      With Android, Nokia would have been competing against all of the other Android vendors. That's an extremely difficult thing to do - aside from Samsung, and Motorola which is bankrolled by Google, the other Android device vendors are struggling. But that way at least Nokia would have been using the most popular mobile operating system. By using Windows Phone, Nokia was still competing against all of the Android vendors and also was handicapped by having an unpopular mobile operating system. In return for that, they got more input on what Microsoft did with Windows Phone and a nice cash infusion.

      It's possible the company was fucked regardless, and anything Nokia could have done to save itself should have been started three or five years before Stephen Elop took over.

    11. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK Potsy... People still supported Nokia - they had a huge market. Killing off their OSs for Windows effectively killed their market - check what market analysts were saying at the time. Feature phones make alot of money and are stepping stone to smartphones.

    12. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by c · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's one way to look at it.

      The other way to think about it is that the rest of Nokia just unloaded a boat anchor of a mobile phone business and a horrific CEO onto Microsoft, with the added bonus of him possibly becoming CEO of that combined corporation.

      Or, if you prefer, "beware of Finns bearing gifts".

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    13. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree Nokia was already toast.

      I think Microsoft is making their best possible move, given the situation. The future is mobile. There will always be servers, and there will always be desktops and laptops, but their share of the world market is diminishing. Phones are the future of computing, if Microsoft isn't a major player in that market in ten years they will be declining. They are a huge company with billions in the bank and billions in profit, they won't fall quickly. But if 90% of home users do most of their gaming on a tablet and most of their computing with a phone that uses MHL to plug into a monitor and bluetooth to connect the keyboard and mouse, then Microsoft will start to see its fortunes fade.

      The advantage with Android is that it's open source. Amazon has their own flavor of Android. Vendors in China have their own flavors of it too. If Windows Phone is ever killed, Microsoft could put out an Android core, compatible with Android apps, but with Bing for search and Nokia's Navteq for maps. Instead of having multiple competing mobile operating systems, you have one dominant mobile operating system with multiple competing proprietary layers on top.

      If Google's flavor of Android just becomes dominant, then I agree too that it's a serious problem. I think Google's behavior has shown that they're fundamentally no different from other big tech companies. They're open precisely until they get a dominant market position, and then they're closed in order to slam the door against the next set of innovators. Hence Google Plus has no open third party API - Google wants to suck users into their social network, not make it easier for Facebook (or the next Facebook, whatever that is) to suck users out.

    14. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by denzacar · · Score: 2

      Microsoft eloped with Nokia?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    15. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you have another explanation?

      From what I can see they sent in Elop to use Nokia to make WinPhone popular and if that failed were prepared to buy Nokia to keep it selling WinPhone.

    16. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Since Jobs came back. So you might say well Jobs got lucky with the iPod. And the iPhone. And the iPad. Or you could say Apple knows what it was doing. MS had both smartphones and tablets for years before Apple. Windows Mobile is a memory now and Windows Tablets never sold well. If you want to ignore all that, Apple is still doing well in computers. Sure they don't have a high overall marketshare unlike Dell or HP or Lenovo. The main difference is that they are highly profitable in computers. Why? Because long ago they decided they were not going to fight those other three for the low margin, high volume parts of the market.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    17. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Oh bullshit. First of all when it comes to MSFT pretty much ALL of their successes in the past can be preceded by "and then the other guy did something REALLY dumb" thus giving MSFT a free shot,

      That's some rather revisionist history. Did MS competitors make mistakes? Yes, but lest you forget MS was convicted of abusing their monopoly. The evidence from the trial of how they threatened OEMs not to install Netscape certainly didn't help Netscape.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    18. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      Taking Nokia board's intent at face value, Elop was invited to do something to help the situation. Once they'd decided to concentrate on Windows Phone, they became so dominant on the platform that the other WP OEMs started having second thoughts. So Nokia's devices unit became a more and more attractive purchase target as it went along. Keeping the R&D diverse might have been a good hedge against that, but it does not look like a good business strategy to me: after all, companies exist to make money, not to shit into their books for the specific purpose of staying independent.

      Selling the unit to Microsoft might have been the plan B from the beginning, too. But I think it's naive to assume that Nokia's board and shareholders fell victim to the evil scheming M$.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    19. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by AVee · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Absolutely, I've been looking at buying an N9 at that time. Every review I read boiled down to the same thing, 'brilliant phone, but don't bother cause the platform is dead already'. It had lots of potential, but it never got a change. This was GSMArena's conclusion at the time:

      Beautiful. Simple. Brilliant. Out of place and hardly on time. Timeless. The Nokia N9 is a story with no happy ending but you want to enjoy every word. Sad story. Post-coital kind of sad.

      And that’s not because the Nokia N9 let us down. On the contrary, we found it to be a revelation: gorgeous design and the divine simplicity of the all-screen experience.

      If anyone is let down, it's the Nokia N9 itself. The platform is as good as doomed. Forsaken by its own creator. With Nokia giving up on MeeGo and a price tag that confines the N9 to a premium niche, it will be next to impossible for the OS to grow a substantial user base. Without users, developers won’t be too interested in MeeGo either. And the limited number of apps is the platform's biggest weakness.

      Google a few other reviews and they will all be along those lines. I didn't buy it because it was dead on arrival, I bet a lot of others did the same. And it's a shame because it could have been a great platform, especially because it was a fairly standard Linux system below the hood.

    20. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by kirkb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read a little Tomi: http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/

      NOK was not even close to dead/dying when Elop was brought in. His 'burning platform' memo killed it.

      --
      Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    21. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

      I started reading wikipedia, and it looks like you have a point. Nokia was getting eaten alive by iOS and Android in 2010. But it was getting eaten alive slowly. Nokia didn't start rapidly hemorrhaging market share until they switched to Windows Phone.

      Thanks for the correction. Again, the company could still be in a downward spiral today if they weren't using Windows Phone. But it's possible I was overstating how weak their position was in late 2010.

    22. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by plover · · Score: 2

      Please tell that to the many millions of people that bought apps for the Nokia Feature Phones, who used the Ovi store, etc.
      Nokia did very well in making money using Feature Phones for quite a while.

      Of course they did, and I never claimed otherwise. Nokia made money by the truck-full off of feature phones back in the 1990s and early 2000s. But those massive profits completely dried up five years ago. Nokia kept on making feature phones even after the cheap clone phones came out, and suddenly found they had to compete on price alone against a product that was perhaps $20.00 cheaper than their product. If your profit margin drops from $20.00 dollars per phone to $0.50 per phone, you have to run your very expensive factories for 40 times longer just to make the same amount of money you used to. You then have to try to sell 40 times as many phones to customers - but most of them would really rather have iPhones or Androids.

      Stockholders see that as "devaluation" and sell their shares. That means you have even less money to keep those expensive factories and salesmen working.

      The world changed, but Nokia didn't keep up. They made a deal with Microsoft and produced some really nice phones, but the marketplace has mostly ignored them as a Johnny-come-lately to the smartphone party.

      --
      John
    23. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by zyzko · · Score: 2

      N9 was moderately successful, but would Maemo have taken off as a competitor to Android and iOS markets? Hard to say - and Jolla might still give it a shot.

      But Maemo was far from ready, Nokias HW partner on Maemo (Intel) was (and still is) far from ready, and the whole thing was a management mess. Yes, it could have been fixed - maybe, but frankly Windows Phone was not that bad choice compared to Maemo at the time. The only thing that made N9 come out at all was because Maemo was axed, and the team got "let's show them" -attitude after the fact.

      For a nice (but long) history about Maemo / MeeGo read:

      http://taskumuro.com/artikkelit/the-story-of-nokia-meego

  2. Times of India has the MS Email by symbolset · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  3. Hmm... by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

    That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:Hmm... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One article says the share price is down 53% during his tenure, just under three years. That's damn fine work, especially in this market!

      [aside: yes, we know pretty much everybody on Slashdot called this from day 1]

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Hmm... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Informative

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

      EMBRACE EXTEND EXTINGUISH.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:Hmm... by Urkki · · Score: 2

      MS did not buy Nokia, MS bouth Nokia phone business, which I think is roughly half of Nokia. Nokia shareholders will not become MS shareholders here.

    4. Re:Hmm... by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's incredible is that I haven't seen any mention of the shareholders or board of directors attempting to sue Elop's ass off for malfeasance.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    5. Re:Hmm... by Dracos · · Score: 2

      That was precisely the plan all along. The only surprising piece of this is that the this purchase is about a year earlier than expected. The remaining parts of Nokia, including the patent portfolio, will be snapped up by Redmond soon enough (read: after the stock value deflates more).

    6. Re:Hmm... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      If Elop becomes CEO at Microsoft, it will essentially prove the company still has absolutely no idea how to move forward in today's technological world.

      And I'm perfectly okay with that.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Hmm... by guttentag · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What the hell was the Nokia board thinking?

      The New York Times has that quote:

      In a statement, Risto Siilasmaa, chairman of Nokia’s board and Nokia’s interim chief executive, said that “the deal offers future opportunities for many Nokia employees as part of a company with the strategy, financial resources and determination to succeed in the mobile space.”

      In case you missed it in all that PR-talk, the Nokia board believes that Microsoft has the strategy to succeed in the mobile space, despite the fact that Microsoft's failed strategy and partnership with Nokia is what caused Nokia's failure. In other words, he's been asleep for the last three years.

      A better question is "what was Microsoft thinking?" Nokia makes good hardware, but so does Microsoft. What Microsoft needs in the mobile space is a good operating system, which Nokia had until Microsoft convinced it to supplant it with Windows. Nokia's not failing because it didn't make a good phone, it's failing because it filled good hardware with Microsoft's software. Now Microsoft is buying a company allegedly for its expertise in cramming poor MS software into good hardware? It doesn't make any sense. If your head doesn't hurt yet, wait for the claims that Microsoft only bought Nokia to get Elop back to take a leaf out of Apple's playbook, buying next to get Jobs back.

      A brief history of Stephen Elop:
      -CIO of Boston Chicken (Boston Market) when it filed for bankruptcy protection and left that year. The company was bought by McDonald's for its real estate holdings two years later.
      -CEO of Macromedia, acquired by Adobe three months after he took the job.
      -Worked at Adobe for a year, resigned.
      -Worked at Juniper for a year, resigned.
      -Worked at Microsoft for two years
      -Named CEO of Nokia three years ago this month, big contribution was throwing out in-house work and betting the company on Windows mobile, and ultimately oversees the sale of the company to Microsoft.
      -Next up: Back at Microsoft, poised as the only act who could possibly top Ballmer as worst CEO ever. For the record, he doesn't throw chairs... he throws phones. "I can take care of that for you right here. It's gone!" Remember those words when Windows is the next "burning platform." The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

    8. Re:Hmm... by rastos1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now the next step is to return to Maemo to raise the share price back.

    9. Re:Hmm... by symbolset · · Score: 2

      The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

      Attachmate is where old software goes to die.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What the hell was the Nokia board thinking?

      Best guess seems to be: The largest shareholders of Nokia (the type that get people on the board) are even larger shareholders of Microsoft. Microsoft has been clearly failing (I don't mean losing money; failing to keep mindshare and deliver new things) for several years. The idea was to sacrifice Nokia's success to bolster Microsoft's. This move seems to back that up. How the hell someone would prove this I have no idea, but anyone who is employed at Nokia, has evidence of this and hasn't given it to the Finnish financial authorities should do that now.

    11. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A brief history of Stephen Elop:

      -CIO of Boston Chicken (Boston Market) when it filed for bankruptcy protection and left that year. The company was bought by McDonald's for its real estate holdings two years later.

      -CEO of Macromedia, acquired by Adobe three months after he took the job.

      -Worked at Adobe for a year, resigned.

      -Worked at Juniper for a year, resigned.

      -Worked at Microsoft for two years

      -Named CEO of Nokia three years ago this month, big contribution was throwing out in-house work and betting the company on Windows mobile, and ultimately oversees the sale of the company to Microsoft.

      -Next up: Back at Microsoft, poised as the only act who could possibly top Ballmer as worst CEO ever. For the record, he doesn't throw chairs... he throws phones. "I can take care of that for you right here. It's gone!" Remember those words when Windows is the next "burning platform." The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

      So is Elop a raging idiot who runs companies into the ground out of incompetence or rather a stealthy hitman who failed his missions inside Adobe and Juniper? I'm inclined to believe the latter.

    12. Re:Hmm... by dbIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the hell was the Nokia board thinking

      He's giving me this much to recommend Elop?

    13. Re:Hmm... by Alomex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yet he's touted as the likely heir for CEO when Ballmer retires.

      It reminds me of the resume of Gil Amelio, who had a similar record of failures yet people managed to convince themselves that he was some sort of CEO genius. He took Apple to the lowest point, when in desperation tried to buy BeOS. He fscked up that deal and then, to his incredible luck, bought NeXT instead. Jobs forced the board to fire Amelio and the recovery of Apple began then.

    14. Re:Hmm... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Considering the layoffs the devices only have a very short term value. The goose is dead and the eggs are getting old.

    15. Re:Hmm... by HyperQuantum · · Score: 4, Funny

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

      EMBRACE EXTEND EXTINGUISH.

      Well in this case it looks more like: INFILTRATE - WEAKEN - ASSIMILATE

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    16. Re:Hmm... by F.Ultra · · Score: 2

      The numbers are almost funny, Nokia on the NASDAQ OMX Helsinki market is up 41.6% since yesterday but down 41.2% since three years ago (3 sep 2010)

    17. Re:Hmm... by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      A better question is "what was Microsoft thinking?"

      Probably:

      "Oohh, look at all those delicious patents we're acquiring from Nokia. Hey, Apple, Samsung, Google... tell your IP lawyers to cancel their vacations! Fol-de-rol!"

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    18. Re:Hmm... by Engeekneer · · Score: 2

      Sure, Nokia was not in the perfect shape. Symbian was getting old, but there was a migration strategy. Also Nokia still had 40% mobile phone marketshare IIRC, and Symbian was still pulling in TONS of money (there was a great writeup about this by an ex-Nokian a while back). Elop with his comments and strategies sent Nokia into a nosedive it never recovered from. From the outside at least, he pretty much singlehandedly took a "meh" situation and killed Nokia.

      As for the emergency solution, Nokia had good (well decent at least) plans and roadmaps before Elop came. Elop made a totally horrible deal with the Windows *#%&, and the whole motivation of that deal is pretty obvious.

    19. Re:Hmm... by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      Nokia still to this day makes extremely good hardware. They were looking for a new CEO and found Elop. The thing is, what if they'd found someone else? Someone with just a little bit of focus and vision? It surprises me that people can't consider the idea of Nokia ditching Symbian and focusing on MeeGo or even going Android; their phones easily rival or even surpass stuff from Samsung and HTC and their brand is renown. If they managed to survive three years with the failure that is Windows Phone, they could've done the same with MeeGo.

  4. Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Suddenly, the big money is being earned from hardware (a reversal of the PC industry, where hardware companies slugged it out for razor thin margins and software makers raked in billions). Both Google and Microsoft recently purchased established phone hardware manufacturers. While many hypothesized that they did it to compete with Apple, I think they did it to combat the threat from companies like Samsung, LG and HTC. If you look at Apple's sales figures, the reason is crystal clear: the iPhone is both their highest margin and most profitable product. There is no point in Google and Microsoft doing all the hard work to build and maintain a mobile operating system only to have companies like Samsung walk away with tens of billions of dollars in profit from premium handset sales each quarter. Google, Apple and Microsoft want to dominate the flagship handset market with a handful of must-have devices each year, forcing Korean and Taiwanese companies into the low end.

    1. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by symbolset · · Score: 2

      Nokia has been losing billions on Windows phones. Never made a dime of profit on that, even after their "platform support payments".

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Dzimas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure. Currently, only Apple and Samsung are making money in this market. Google plans to join them. And now Microsoft is moi ing the party. This wouldn't be the first time that MS has come from behind: Word utterly crushed Word Perfect to become the standard in the early 90s, Excel pushed Lotus 1-2-3 into has-been status, Internet Explorer killed Netscape as a viable company, and people were surprised when MS released the Xbox and went on to make a fortune in the console industry. Now, they're trailing in the mobile market. They have $68 billion in the bank, a solid hardware manufacturer in their back pocket. Next up? My guess is that they'll take a page out of Google's Nexus playbook (ugh, bad pun) and release surprisingly solid mid-range handsets at very good prices until things stick.

    3. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's vastly easier to acquire a company when it is failing... People have been known to sabotage a company just to drop the stock prices to the point that they can buy a controlling interest in that company, then stop the bleeding and turn things around.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or the LG deal (2009). Or the Motorola deal (2003). Or the Nortel deal. Or the Verizon deal. Or the Ericsson deal. Or the Sendo deal.

    5. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know what's sad? Nokia's smartphone division, back in the Symbian days, was consistently profitable. They used to sell more phones than Apple and Samsung put together. Since the move to Windows Phone, they were never profitable. Not a single semester out of the red... except that one time when they sold a building and did some scuzzy math with that.

    6. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by NickFortune · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This wouldn't be the first time that MS has come from behind: Word utterly crushed Word Perfect to become the standard in the early 90s, Excel pushed Lotus 1-2-3 into has-been status, Internet Explorer killed Netscape as a viable company, and people were surprised when MS released the Xbox and went on to make a fortune in the console industry

      Hmm. Of course most of those victories were achieved at least in part by leveraging MS' control of the underlying operating system. Admittedly the Xbox didn't have that advantage. That said, while the platform is certainly making money, it's still not clear that MS have recouped the massive investment they needed to brute force their way into the market.

      This situation is different again. MS aren't competing against Apple, Google and Samsung. They're competing against Apple and Android. Every hardware manufacturer in the far east is eyeing Android and thinking "we could sell our phones under our own brand". So all the hardware guys that usually support are potential competitors. That's on top of Apple, Google and Samsung.

      Even worse, they're pretty much tied to the windows brand for whatever phone they use. So the symbol that everyone sees when they're bored at school in computer class and the one that everyone sees when they're bored at work and wishing they were elsewhere doing something, anything else ... that's going to be the brand on the phone. All the Nokia ads I say downplayed the Windows brand as far as possible, which I think was clever of them. But I don't think MS' corporate pride will allow that.

      What might save them in this market is big business. If they can get some large corporations to declare themselves as winphone shops and make everyone use the platform for all work related activities they could use that to make inroads into education and home use. But the business dudes all have iPhones or Android already and it works for them. It's going to be hard work getting them to give up those machines for windows. Especially with BYOD as an emerging trend.

      If you ask me, their best hope might be to launch an Xbox phone. Xbox users tend to like the platform; load it up with plenty of free mobile games and they could build a user base pretty quickly, to say nothing of finally finding takers for their app store. But that wouldn't get them a "serious" offering so I don't think they'll do it.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    7. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      Nokia used to be a solid hardware manufacturer. One of Elop's bone-headed moves was to move to the same outsourced manufacturing model as the competition.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    8. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Error27 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google bought Motorola for the patents. Microsoft bought Nokia because everyone else had almost abandoned Windows phones and Nokia was about to abandon them as well.

      Only Samsung and Apple make money from phones. Nokia, HTC, Blackberry, and Motorola all make a loss. Btw, Nokia and HTC are 9th and 10th on the top smartphone list. Blackberry and Motorola aren't in the top ten.

      At this point the phone business has turned into the PC business. Phones are a commodity. They all have 300-400 ppi screens. Anything higher than that is silly. The screens are all as large as you can hold comfortably. They all have the same CPU and and the same RAM and the same battery life. It's easy to design a high end phone.

      For some reason it's harder to make money with smartphones than with PCs. You have to first become one of the few subsidized phones. I think the phone companies know you have to go through them so they don't pay very well?

    9. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      the difference now is that everybody's used Microsoft's software for a couple of decades, and have decided that they really would rather use something else when given the option.

      MS didn't make a fortune in the console industry, the amount they paid to make the xbox successful has roughly only just been paid back. Any other company (ie without a big sugar daddy parent company) would have been bankrupt long ago. That's how 'successful' xbox has really been.

    10. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by horza · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft crushed its competition via illegal and immoral tactics by controlling the underlying operating system. Throwing up fake error messages when running rival products to make them seem unstable, using hidden APIs to give their own products an unnassailable advantage, even pretending IE was built into the OS to ensure it came pre-bundled onto every computer. The one I didn't like was when a new company announced a great new product, Microsoft would fake having the same product coming out shortly after. Everybody would wait for the "official" Microsoft version, the new company would go bankrupt, and Microsoft would buy them for pennies and release their software.

      On an even playing field Microsoft has never done so well. On phones and tablets their propensity to launch slow and buggy products has come back to bite them. The Xbox did ok but they took an awful hit to get it where it is today. The best product they ever made was their mouse, so I guess they can do hardware :-)

      Phillip.

    11. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by MrDoh! · · Score: 2

      MS bought Nokia for the patents too. The Apple/Samsung battles are going to be nothing compared to the upcoming GoogleSamsung/MicrosoftNokia wars. We've even seen the opening salvos, now the big guns are being brought up.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
  5. The End of Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft succeeded in its strategy to take-down and take-over a major phone rival. First plant a CEO to destroy the company and lower its shares.... wait... and take over the company. What is left of Nokia is not likely to survive as they all had synergies with the devices unit, which will be taken-over by Microsoft.

    Clearly, Nokia had problems when Elop took over... but he destroyed any potential Nokia had left (think N9/MeeGo). And now he gutted the company even further and will take the devices unit with him as a rejoins the Microsoft family he was clearly so fond of. The poor must have really missed his family.

  6. Struggling What to Say... by philovivero · · Score: 2

    ...I keep trying but no matter how hard I work at it, no useful syllables are formed.

    This probably encompasses the user experience of an MSNokia phone, so maybe that's apropos.

  7. MS will be free to dump more money into WP by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microsoft has been paying Nokia $1B/year. As part of a much larger organization, it will be much easier to hide how much money Microsoft is dumping into Windows Phone, including support for marketing and selling handsets below cost.

    Nokia handsets, meet XBox!

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:MS will be free to dump more money into WP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You break it you buy it.

  8. Re:aaaaand..... by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shoe! The other shoe drops. Yeesh.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  9. We saw it coming by ecloud · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked at Nokia from 2011-2012. Everyone was saying then that the reason for Elop (who was otherwise so useless) was to devalue Nokia enough that it would be a good deal for Microsoft. And here we are... the other shoe drops. But there will be a third shoe when he becomes CEO of Microsoft. They deserve each other.

    1. Re:We saw it coming by dyfet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its not that anyone didn't see this coming, both inside and outside Nokia. I wrote at that time that clearly Elop was doing the same thing Belluzo did to SGI, all the time working for Microsoft's benefit, not the shareholders of Nokia. And that the reason he would go along and do so is that he was promised to be Ballmer's heir when he returned after Microsoft purchased Nokia cheaply. But where are the Finnish authorities in all this? They should arrest that thug for securities fraud if nothing else, and run him out of the country.

  10. Glad they Sold Off Qt First by GumphMaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am certainly glad they sold off Qt first. If Microsoft got their hands on it the writing would be on the wall even in the face of pledges to KDE.

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    1. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by paugq · · Score: 2

      Except for that BSD-licensed Qt release would be X11-only, no Windows, Mac, VxWorks, QNX, etc

  11. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. What we need is not more Android but more choice. Nokia has been the only ones that has been serious about Windows 8 Phone Series for Handsets Professional Touch Edition 2013. In a world where everyone is moving toward Android we need something to balance that, and that's where Microsoft + Nokia makes sense. We should not live in a world where Google is the only choice.

  12. Inspiring... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How I read the open letter:

    "Nokia has an identity spanning 150 years of heritage, innovation, excellence, and change. That ends today. By this evening those 150 years will be a rumor. They never happened. Think about that. Today is history. Today will be remembered. Years from now, the young will ask with wonder about this day. Today is history, and you are part of it..."

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Inspiring... by havana9 · · Score: 2

      They are still making winter tyres. They're quite good.

  13. NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft will now add a NSA backdoor into every Nokia phone.

  14. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want "more choice", Nokia had that before. It was called MeeGo, and Elop killed it.

  15. He Never Sold his House in Redmond by Mr+Europe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do you find it peculiar the Elop never sold his house in Redmond and his family didn't move to Finland though Stephen said hey would ? Can you avoid thinking of a conspiracy ?

  16. Who didn't see that coming? by Ecuador · · Score: 2

    I mean, everybody and their mother could see his "moves" were suicidal, the only reason to not expect that he was destroying the company for MS to pick it up cheap was the sheer audacity of the fact...
    As a side note, I finally switched to a Galaxy S3 from a Nokia N9 over half a year ago, due to the fact nobody was developing for the abandoned platform. However, in every other way (except screen size I guess) the N9 and Maemo/Meego was so superior to S3/Android that for about 2 months I was constantly on the verge of getting another N9. In retrospect, my favorite feature of the N9 was how multitasking and switching between apps worked. On Android and iOS, apart from the fact that it is much slower to switch between apps, I am never certain my apps have not exited in the background and will launch from scratch and you have to jump some serious UI hoops if you actually want to force an app to restart. N9's swipe interface was the thing closer to a full desktop - fast switching between active apps (a swipe and a tap), exiting vs minimizing app having the same UI cost (single swipe from different side) and apps not dying by themselves in the background (at least in the same usage pattern that in iOS and Android kills them).

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Bogtha · · Score: 2

      On Android and iOS, apart from the fact that it is much slower to switch between apps, I am never certain my apps have not exited in the background and will launch from scratch and you have to jump some serious UI hoops if you actually want to force an app to restart.

      Alternative viewpoint: If apps are constantly running in the background, they are using up resources, and if you feel the need to force apps to restart, there's something wrong with them.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    2. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by real-modo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, everybody could see it coming, but it doesn't make sense from the POV of Microsoft shareholders.

      Nokia Mobile built its success on two things: excellent relationships with its channels, the telcos; and a superb market segmentation model. (Its designs were robust, reliable, and well-liked by their users, but conservative; and its manufacturing division ... did tolerably well, considering the tens of models and hundreds of variants. Not brilliantly, but tolerably; perhaps less so in the year before Elop was brought on board.)

      Nokia's value resided in these two things: channel relationships, and a deep understanding of all market segments: a willingness and ability to make phones for every demographic and national market, and sell them via the established channels. Those were Nokia's core competencies, the places it created value, the things it did better than its competitors. Not manufacturing. Not design innovation. Marketing, market research, selling a large range, nearly everywhere. (The one geographical market in which Nokia didn't have good telco relationships was the USA. So it didn't sell many phones, except to the discriminating.)

      That was before Elop and the "only Winpho, only North America, Apple me-too" strategy. Elop has admitted to channel resistance to selling Windows Phone, and he has pruned Nokia's tree of products down to a stump, pretty much. He's ignored (at best) nearly all markets outside North America.

      Nokia's value is gone. Sacrificed to the belief that Nokia could out-innovate companies which excel at that.

      Microsoft's buying Nokia in the hope of obtaining massively successful product innovation is ... misguided? Optimistic? An interesting idea? Unlikely to be in the shareholders' best interests? What the hell is a suitable euphemism for "deranged lunacy"?

    3. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by real-modo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, right: it's a Ballmerism.

    4. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Bogtha · · Score: 2

      Yet generally, I do not seem to suffer from bad battery life or memory management issues on my N9 compared to the Android phones I have. Could it be that running closer to the silicon with C, C++ and Qt apps compared to Android's virtual machine compensates for some of that putative running-in-the-background inefficiency?

      Possibly. Or it may simply be the case that the apps on your Nokia phone are exiting in the background and you just aren't aware of it. I'm not familiar with the way apps running on your N9 work in this respect, but I'm an iOS developer, and I've lost count of the number of iOS users I've talked to who think that apps are running just because they appear in the app list when you double tap the home button. You can make quitting and restarting pretty seamless on iOS, the only perceptible difference from a user's perspective in most cases is a slight delay. There's no reason your Nokia couldn't be doing the same.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  17. Elopcalypse Complete. by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given that Microsoft all but ensured that it would be an acquisition, Elop was the person who burnt the platform.

    Shame that they took over Nokia and bastardized it to be an unremarkable Windows Phone platform.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  18. Before MS commits it to the memory hole... by sethstorm · · Score: 4, Informative

    As Quoted from: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2010/sep10/09-09statement.aspx: (Archive mirror)

    Microsoft Business Division Transition
    Sept. 09, 2010
    E-mail to Microsoft full-time employees from Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer.

    Sept. 9, 2010

    I am writing to let you know that Stephen Elop has been offered and has accepted the job as CEO of Nokia and will be leaving Microsoft, effective immediately. Stephen leaves in place a strong business and technical leadership team, including Chris Capossela, Kurt DelBene, Amy Hood and Kirill Tatarinov, all of whom will report to me for the interim.

    The MBD business continues to grow and thrive, with 15 percent growth in the last quarter. It has been good to see the great response to Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010, the growth of our Dynamics business and the way we have been successful in extending all our MBD products and services to the cloud. I appreciate the way that Stephen has been a good steward of the brand and business in his time here, and look forward to continuing to work with him in his new role at Nokia.

    Please join me in wishing Stephen well.

    Steve

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  19. Least they could do after sending Elop there... by zedrdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    You break it, you buy it...

  20. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Urkki · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft is buying the nav/maps too.

    Not according to the press release:

    Following the transaction, Nokia plans to focus on its three established businesses, each of which is a leader in enabling mobility in its respective market segment: NSN, a leader in network infrastructure and services; HERE, a leader in mapping and location services; and Advanced Technologies, a leader in technology development and licensing.

  21. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Urkki · · Score: 2

    I have a suspicion about what happens to Windows Phone sales, everywhere except the US maybe.

    Of course, you're aware of MS Phone's strong growth in all markets, right?

    MS does not (yet) make phones, so I doubt there's any growth at the moment... They just make a smartphone OS, and Nokia phones using this OS have seen some nice growth this year. On the other hand, sales of Microsoft's own tablets, with a sister OS... not so hot. So current growth of Nokia Lumia sales is not much of an indication of what will happen to future Microsoft phones, one way or another.

  22. Alternate headlines? by gargleblast · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any alternate headlines? Here are some:

    "Headless software company buys brainless phone company"
    "Rumours of Dinosaur extinction greatly exaggerated (And their mating habits haven't changed)"

    I'm sure there's more ...

  23. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by manplusdog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rubbish, not insightful. Nokia were a world leader and I loved their gear until Elop threw away their technology and embraced Windows phone crap. Look at Nokia most successful products, not based on Windows phone. He deserved to be sacked, quoted as being the worst CEO ever.

  24. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by 21mhz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MeeGo was another WebOS: late, buggy, and basically going nowhere with the organization they had and the cannon ball of Intel shackled to their leg.

    Nokia would have made a glorious last stand with it, open source geeks would support them (never mind an occasional grumble about the bugs, wanton platform changes, and closed components, what's this between friends), but in the end it wouldn't bring bread to the table without substantial cultural changes and a lot of development. Yes, I'm familiar with The Legend of Spectacular N9 Sales.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  25. Depressing inevitability by gnalre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depressing Inevitability
    This was the only likely scenario once Elop tied Nokia to the MS mast and cut away the lifeboats. It was always going to be we sail together and we sink together.
    In many ways Nokia has fulfilled their side of the bargain by generating some hardware which is as good as any phone out there. What has held them back is the OS, which despite having some good features is always lagging behind the iphone and android, and seems incapable of introducing the needed changes at the rate required in a consumer device.

    In a perfect world, Nokia would take over responsibility of the MS mobile division and it would be left alone to force the changes that the engineers of Nokia know are required. However what is more likely is that Microsoft will smother the innovative culture in Nokia to make it more like itself, so that we will get a company more concerned about how Office runs on the phone than offering the best consumer experience. I also can't wait to see how the trolls of Helsinki react to their first stack ranking session.

    What is confusing about this is the timing. Is this Ballmer's last hurrah or Elop's last desperate grab for power. If your CEO had just announced he would be leaving so would not be taking long term responsibility for such a decision, as a board wouldn't you say Whoa, maybe we will get the next guy in to look at this? Lets face it with Baller's acquisition track record it may be more profitable to take the billions of dollars, pile it the middle of Oulu and set fire to it....

    --
    Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
  26. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, I'm familiar with The Legend of Spectacular N9 Sales.

    Spectacular reviews, and terrible sales because Elop sabotaged it.

  27. As a 520 user.. by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

    I use a Note 2, and have a Lumia 520 in the family. The thing which shone about the 520 is that, at the low price point, the touch and feel experience of the phone was simple marvellous. Nokia makes brilliant stuff. All they needed was a better OS.
    A Nokia phone with Android OS would have been the killer. Nokia still has a lot of goodwill, esp outside USA, and when you say Nokia people still Gush, and are willing to sacrifice on the OS front for the hardware. Now with M$, that is gone.
    I expect sales to go down due to two reasons
    1. Nokia is gone. The name is gone. Its M$ now
    2. The groups will be managed by Microsoft, and we all know how M$ has fared in hardware device management.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  28. consistently profitable? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 2

    By the time they lost the edge with symbian, they were losing money on smart phones. They tried several things before eventually ending up using only windows. The real problem was that they couldn't get back in the black fast enough and they simply didn't have the funds left to continue their own development and try to reach profit again. Maybe they were selling hand sets at a higher price than it costed to produce them, but the development costs were way higher than the profits they made on the hardware. This is why the got stuck with windows and MicroSoft saw an opportunity to trojan them.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:consistently profitable? by upuv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually the Android game is very very tight on margin.

      Samsung makes money only because the basically build the entire supply chain from essentially raw materials. HTC is loosing money badly. LG I don't know. Motorola well they are now google so those books will be cooked.

      I love Android it's just a game that Nokia would never have been able to profit. I thought they should have gone with Android myself back a few years ago. But clearly that was a bad idea in hind sight.

      Nokia was caught with their pants down. The worst thing was they didn't even know it for 3 more years. By then they lost the market they owned. They simply could not grasp touch screens. The N95 was a phone that should have opened the eyes at Nokia. Here was a popular device that did pretty much every thing. It had a huge screen for the day. Did it really have a successor. Did they try to innovate after it? Nope. They just rehashed the same format a few more times.

      The next device needed to be touch. And it needed to be good. They didn't even try. They put out what was it 4 rev's of the same format? Then they basically collapsed, living off the life support of a HUGE cash balance. Which is now long gone.

      In the end the only option was sell to MS.

  29. Show me the money by ThatAblaze · · Score: 2

    Once you forget about what microsoft did, consider what nokia did: They received over 5 billion Euros and get to start again with a clean slate. Man what I wouldn't give to be in those shoes right now!

  30. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nokia isn't going to enter the phone business anytime soon, but Nokia's former employees have already launched a new company called Jolla, and their phone (with Sailfish OS) is being produced as we speak.

  31. Re:Textbook case by voinageo · · Score: 5, Informative

    This should be a high profile case for investigation by the EU commissioner for industry. In the end Nokia was a EU company which was the victim of a hostile takeover from a US company. We should al send a formal complaint to this guy http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/tajani/contact/commissioner/index_en.htm

  32. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Frankie70 · · Score: 2

    iPhone has less than 2 in ten. Is that an acceptable number?

  33. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Znork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps he will replace Ballmer. He does appear to have the desired 'consumers should just shut the fsck up and buy what we tell them to' attitude to consumer relations and seems as adept at handling employees and morale to make the shift in leadership seamless.

    Somehow I suspect the problem at Microsoft is the board. They aquired the stock while liking the mindset of the management and having kept Ballmer for so long they obviously want that. They'll keep running it the same way, all the way into the eventual crash into the ground.

  34. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

    I think it is a certainty, and the deal was done before Elop went to Nokia.

  35. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Vollernurd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This ^^ Like you, am I the only one that remembers the Nokia Basket Case before Elop came aboard? Their phones were crap, all 300 of them in the catalogue, the N9 couldn't be bought anywhere it was supposedly available, networks were no longer foisting them on unsuspecting members of the public ("You can't afford an iPhone so here's the Next Best Thing!" *hands them a shitty Nokia 500*). Sheesh. I'm Glad no more phones will bear the Nokia name - I never forgave them from killing off the last good cellphone in the Nokia 6310i and for creating the Abomination N95 and every other Symbian/S60 POS. Nokia were the architects of their own demise, not Elop. Their arrogance and rank incompetence caused their downfall. I would cite the article where old or former Nokia employees berate the culture and organisation of the old company but can't find them. They appeared around the time Elop wrote his "Burning Platforms" memo.

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
  36. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Vollernurd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Meh, replying to my own post. Found this:

    http://www.telecoms.com/22503/nokia%E2%80%99s-problem

    The N97 was the phone I was thinking of although ALL of their Nxx devices were crap.

    And there were so MANY of them! Why have 5 SKUs where 500 will do? Always doing the networks' bidding...

    Yes, I have also discovered HTML formatting too - sorry about original post.

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
  37. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Informative

    Meego was another Maemo, not WebOS, it have its own lineage as example. Was sabotaged by Symbian fans inside Nokia first, then the days before it was released Elop said that it had no future, cut all future hopes for development for the platform, and released just one phone with it, just because already made it. Is even against that that sold pretty well. And yes, sold better than the Windows 7.x phones that Microsoft killed before they come out to the market saying that they will have no future neither (but most people that buys windows phone only hears windows phone, not version, so even with that had sales).

    Anyway, wasn't the end of the road, there is hope on Qt-based cellphones still. From it derived Sailfish that is about to come out (the first batch already sold out), and Tizen, that Samsung could start making phones with it.

  38. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by LavouraArcaica · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know some people that have (or had) a N9. Everybody, including non-geeks, says it's the best phone ever. It's ok if you don't believe me, go check the reviews.
    And, hey, It was launched even before the Windows Phone 7.5 (which actually "late, buggy"). Microsoft only made a competitive OS with WP 8, 2 years after the Meego was ALREADY in the market.

    I really don't understand how so many people buys the official MS-NOKIA-ELOP version of the history, where everything points the contrary.

  39. I exiled MS software from my desktops 18 years ago by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    if they think they will find a place in my mobile phone or tablet, they are loony.

    (gosh, that is how long ago I replaced Windows95 with Slackware ... and never looked back).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  40. Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Trolls by crizh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bollocks to it.

    We just can't let this happen, it's almost a full blown disaster, the one ray of sunshine is the patent deal.

    We need to find a way to buy Nokia out before this deal goes through.

    Seriously?!

    Microsoft gets a free pass for all the damage they did and gets a licence to all the Nokia patents that they know they cannot survive in mobile without?

    For the price of the Nokia-Siemens buyout?

    So Nokia shareholders are to sell their entire mobile business to the scumbags that ruined it for just enough money to own the rump end of their own business free and clear?

    Screw that.

    I'll offer the Nokia board $7.5B for 51% of the whole company, less any long term investors that want to assign their proxies to me, and I'll re-organize the whole company, turf out all the losers that have managed the company into the ground and spank the living crap out of the company that did this to them. The company that deliberately did this to them.

    If Microsoft thinks those patents are worth so much, stick 'em under a GPL-like licence that lets anybody play in mobile so long as they share and tell Microsoft and Apple to go screw themselves.

    I posted the following on Groklaw the day it died, in the desperate hope of getting some reasoned help. I was too late.

    Looks like I might be too late again.

    Stuff that for a game of soldiers, Slashdot might be full of loonies and Trolls but there are still some sane voices hidden amongst the noise.

    Have at it.

    ----------

    I've been working up to posting this for weeks.

    I don't really want to post it now but I may never get another chance.

    I'm not ready so the link will be to nowhere till at least tomorrow.

    Apologies in advance for any offence but I won't take the chance that I miss the opportunity to reach members of the Groklaw community that I may never be in contact with again.

    ------

    I'm hoping you guys will be able to help me out.

    I've been silently standing on the sidelines here almost since the very beginning. I, like you, feel very deeply that what we have been watching happen here is an outrage.

    Watching monopolies desperately trying to destroy the open-source world like a bunch of petulant toddlers makes me want to bang my fists and smash things with rage. (Yes I do see the irony there.)

    I have, for a long time, felt powerless to do anything about it but I have come to a decision to make a stand.

    The real problem is that we lack the sort of wealth and influence that the corporate elite possess. We are forced to contend with them on a battlefield of their choosing with little or no resources.

    I think it is about time we stopped putting up with that and started fighting fire with fire.

    If we want to win this war we need to acquire more money and influence than our opponents and, ludicrous as that idea seems on the surface, I don't think it's something that is beyond the realm of possibility.

    You see the thing is that the businesses that we face here are either monopolists or practising outmoded models, they are desperately trying to hang on to a way of doing business that has been out-evolved. They look on the surface like the 800lb Gorillas but in reality they are more like Giant Pandas. They are tottering on the edge of extinction because they are too myopic to realize that their ecological niche has gone or that they are in the process of destroying it with their own stupid greed.

    So here's what I plan to do and what I think I can achieve given a bit of help.

    I plan to buy Nokia.

    I think Nokia could easily be re-organized into a vastly profitable enterprise and its enormous collection of patents could be used to beat the snot out of the trolls and proprietary monopolists. I think a licensing scheme similar to the GPL could be created that forced everyone in the mobile space to 'share and share alike' and to compete on merit rather than in litigation.

    I want to create something that is inherently, by

    --
    Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
  41. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by andydread · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep but Microsoft products certainly is not it. I would rather and Open Source platform dominate than ANY proprietary platform.

  42. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by knarf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows 8 Phone Series for Handsets Professional Touch Edition 2013

    I think that needs just a little more cowbell:

    Windows 8 Phone Select Series for Handsets Executive Platinum Professional Touch Diamond Edition 2013

    There. Done. Ship it.

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
  43. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Znork · · Score: 2

    Well, on the bright side there are few things that work as well for collapsing profitability as mass producing expensive hardware that nobody actually wants. While Nokia shareholders certainly and deservedly (for hiring someone with the profile of Elop with the similarities to such as Richard Beluzzo) got thoroughly screwed, this may become a significant lodestone that sinks Microsoft faster than it would risk otherwise.

  44. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by dyfet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Indeed, that is exactly what I said would happen at the time, too... that he made a deal to return and be Ballmer's successor once he was done doing to Nokia what Belluzo did to SGI. The similarities are strong too; remember, Microsoft then needed Belluzo to take down a unix workstation vendor to help establish market presense for it's own crappy new proprietary workstation OS that nobody would want then either; it was called NT. Thugs rarely change their MO, unless or until they are finally imprisoned for it.

  45. Forgot the Chinese companies by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Only Samsung and Apple make money from phones."

    You missed the two mainland Chinese companies. Too lazy to Google for them right now but that would be two of the following: Lenovo, Huawei or ZTE. LG is probably still porfitable until they get steamrolled by yet another rising Chinese company.

  46. Resistance is futile .. by codeusirae · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a classical Microsoft move, a Microsoftie join a company ruins it and then rejoins the mothership, resistance *is* futile ..

    BBC failed Digital Project Cancelled

    Project Kangaroo Cancelled

    Highfield joins Microsoft after just four months at Project Kangaroo

    BBC appoints Microsoft man to control future media

  47. Barnes and Noble next? by technomom · · Score: 2

    The game now isn't the devices, it's the cloud. Google v. iCloud v. Microsoft Outlook+XBox+whatever else. These days, the device is just your entry point into your cloud of choice. One of the missing pieces I see is book content. Microsoft already made an investment in Barnes and Noble. Today, Amazon announced the MatchBook program which provides either a free or $1 e-book for certain Amazon physical book purchases made as far back as 1995.

    This has to sting an already reeling Barnes & Noble. I'm wondering if Microsoft is going to white knight them as well and add another piece to their cloud puzzle?

  48. Shareholder lawsuit? by JDG1980 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The CEO has a fiduciary duty to his company and its shareholders. Elop pretty obviously violated that duty by acting in the best interests of MS, not Nokia. It seems to me that there would be strong grounds for a Nokia shareholder lawsuit against Elop personally, and possibly against MS as well. Discovery proceedings could be quite interesting – civil attorneys can demand just about any relevant documents, emails, and so forth. Unless everything was done verbally with no record, there ought to be some evidence of Elop's malfeasance.

  49. Classic Quisling - Belluzzo Tactic by deppman · · Score: 2

    Who didn't see this coming? Remember Rick Belluzzo? He destroyed SGI by decimating its products, migrating huge chunks of IP to Microsoft (remember "FireGL?" It's now called "DirectX"), and sewing FUD in his own SGI customer base. Job well done, he took his golden parachute and softly landed back at MSN.

    Elop is Belluzzo reincarnate. He didn't care if he destroyed the lives of thousands to improve his career. If he gets the MS CEO position after wiping out 90% of Nokia's market value because of his sophomoric blunders, it will confirm how dysfunctional corporate governance has truly become.