Slashdot Mirror


Prankster Calls NSA To Restore Deleted E-mail

First time accepted submitter manu0601 writes "Since the NSA snoops, intercepts and store our e-mails forever, why not use it as a backup service? It just lacks the API to restore files, therefore this guy [YouTube video] called the NSA to ask for a backup restoration. Guess what? It did not work." After all, why should we have to pay twice for services already performed with tax dollars?

221 comments

  1. No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm telling you, the government just isn't providing service. So what are we paying them for, anyway?

    1. Re:No service. by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

      So what are we paying them for, anyway?

      To be allowed to live... To avoid 'detainment'. These are the things you pay for. I don't know why people are so repulsed when the mafia does these kinds of things.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:No service. by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought it was to build roads, sanitation and the basics of civilization. Your local mafia does that?

    3. Re:No service. by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, they do the actual building...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:No service. by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      I thought the mafia was quite good at 'disposal' tasks. Rum runners were quite good at creating transportation routes... I think you're on to something ;)

    5. Re:No service. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yes they do, actually. If you don't take care of your area, someone else will take it from you. It's called husbandry, and any good business owner must understand it. Anyway if you want a direct answer to your question I have two words for you: Las Vegas.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:No service. by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      I'm telling you, the government just isn't providing service. So what are we paying them for, anyway?

      They ARE providing service - the kind a bull provides to a cow.

    7. Re:No service. by cod3r_ · · Score: 1

      Federal government doesn't do that either... the local county governments are doing a piss poor job I might add especially with the roads. Don't get me started with how bad the education system is.

    8. Re:No service. by Entropius · · Score: 0

      They did help out in Japan after the earthquake...

    9. Re:No service. by Razgorov+Prikazka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yup that is correct! The government builds roads, schools, sanitation and they will even recover your lost email for you! ...If you pay... They clearly refused this caller because he lives in Amsterdam (--> The Netherlands --> Yurp) and therefore didn't pay a single penny to the good old IRS. So why /would/ they help him? No $$$ --> No service...

      Otherwise I am CONVINCED that they would help him out. That is how the government works, right?
      Helping the folks that pay for their wages, comfy chairs, first class coffee on their long leisurely coffee breaks?
      Always at the service of the people in a jiffy and with a smile!
      Always doing that little extra to make sure your every tax-penny is a well-spend-penny.
      The government that always goes for the 110% customer care.
      A wink and a tip to the hat whenever you merrily walking out of some government building where they truly understood your case.
      Where papers and forms are kept to a bare minimum in order to keep the well oiled machine running as cost-effective as possible.
      <bleep-bleep-bleep-bleep>
      The government that <bleep-bleep-bleep-bleep>

      Wait... what? Is that my alarm clock? <bleep-bleep-bleep-bleep-bleep-bleep>
      I just KNEW I was dreaming...

      --
      rm -rf --no-preserve-root / ...and let /dev/null sort them out...
    10. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would if they were getting $3 Trillion for it, and yes, I would trust them more than I trust the US Government.

    11. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Protection as a member of the herd the bull is the dominant member of?

    12. Re:No service. by Titan1080 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      no, and neither does the obama regime.

    13. Re:No service. by deadweight · · Score: 1

      I work for the fed and I have no comfy chair nor first class coffee. Where did I go wrong?

    14. Re:No service. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Being a ward of the Bureau of Prisons is not the same as working for the fed.

    15. Re:No service. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      So what are we paying them for, anyway?

      To be allowed to live... To avoid 'detainment'. These are the things you pay for. I don't know why people are so repulsed when the mafia does these kinds of things.

      Why is satire so hard for the mods to comprehend?

      This comment (presently modded 'Troll') is only trollish from the point of view of those who seek to repress others.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    16. Re:No service. by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

      On occasion they do make contributions to the asphalt and concrete used in building.

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    17. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, especially on the roads thing. I don't see any way to organize people to build roads without a government. Man you'd have to be a fucking genius to find a way to do something as crazy as that.

    18. Re:No service. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I can't say how 'local' it is, but yes it does, and it protects us from other mafias that would try to muscle in on our territories. It is entirely plausible that governments arise from powerful criminal organizations. They are the ones with all the tools already in place. It's a perfectly natural evolution. For instance, look who regulates the liquor industry.. The liquor industry. Former bootleggers and run runners, who then become your major generals and presidents and prime ministers and kings... These are the people who built up the business, churches, and schools, pirates, all of them. Politics and crime are as distinguishable as Kang and Kodos. The relationship is well documented, and well cemented, heh, so to speak...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apply at the post office, put in ten years, then revisit your comment.

      Join the army, serve your tour in the middle east, somewhere fun and sunny, then come back here and revisit your comment.

      Battle a forest fire, man a post at the top or the bottom of the planet, or just get a job at the DMV or veterans administration, then, well, you get the idea.

      The lazy government worker is an over-generalization spread by people with Ayn Rand swimsuit calendars on the wall next to their Gadsden flag, which is usually found above an empty bookshelf.

      No, I don't work for the gov. I work for a big evil bank.

    20. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With how torn up most of the roads are and how poor a job they do keeping the cities clean, I'd say they aren't even doing that.

    21. Re:No service. by countach74 · · Score: 1

      While I've never worked for the fed, I have worked for the State of Oregon. What a mess. The majority of workers *do* fit the stereotype. And they are lead often by exceedingly inept management. I imagine the fed is that and worse, considering the even greater bureaucracy. No, the lazy government worker is not over-generalized. This is not to say that every government worker is lazy (or that every government manager is inept), but in my mind it is an accurate generalization.

    22. Re:No service. by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If your state is like mine (CA), the county can't keep up with the roads & education has gone down the drain because the state has been taking/keeping a massive percentage of the funds usually allocated for that... The state in turn is doing so in hope of covering the budget shortfalls caused by a mixture of:
      -- rising costs, due in large part to the needs of the massive wave of low/no-income immigrants, including the explosion of kids needing expensive bilingual teachers full-time for several years
      -- a weak tax base related to both the high number of low-paid/unemployed residents and various loopholes for corporations & affluent residents/citizens

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    23. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could re-say that and replace "government" with any company name, and it'd be the same. The problem isn't "the government" but the people that work in the government. Since it appears that there are waaay more people in America that are of the mindset that "the point of America (what makes it great) is to eventually get to a job where all you do is show up (if that) and enjoy the atmosphere, and get paid a shit-ton".

      Until Americans (an of course I'm not talking about all Americans) learn the value of working (besides getting paid money), they will never be what they want everyone else to be, and therefor others won't be that either. And yes this same thing applies to other countries, maybe some other, even more-so, but this story is about America, so...

    24. Re: No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I work in small govmt. The state keeps mandating that we spend $X000 on this program and $Y000000 on that program while progressively providing less funding and capping the tax rate. Its as if they are TRYING to tank the economy and bankrupt the smaller gov. entities.

    25. Re:No service. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Funny

      All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    26. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I live in Orange County and we have none of problems you describe. We have vibrant local economy with many hard working immigrants from Asia and Americas.

      Maybe your bigoted enclave needs a few of them to help get whiny projecting lazy people back on track.

    27. Re:No service. by aiht · · Score: 1

      Being a ward of the Bureau of Prisons is not the same as working for the fed.

      Yeah, that's more like being a contractor than an employee.

    28. Re:No service. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I thought it was to build roads, sanitation and the basics of civilization. Your local mafia does that?

      For Sanitation, they do in New York. Look into:
      United States v. Franco, et al.
      United States v. Giustra, et al.
      United States v. Lopez

      Indictments handed down last January in a case involving the mafia becoming entwined in the commercial waste disposal industry.

    29. Re: No service. by easyTree · · Score: 1

      If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. What you should be asking is why and what comes after that.

    30. Re:No service. by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, methinks you have no experience with cattle-raising operations.

    31. Re:No service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the mafia doesn't. The local left wing anarchs build those things, and probably grow a self sustainable food source while they're at it, to avoid the capitalist system and its consumerism.

      Problem is, the state mafia removes all the stuff you build, because of stupid property laws, regulations and such stuff.

      We tried building a roof to the poor pushers of the local neighborhood mafia, so they'd keep out of our house where the feminists and queers meet to crush cisheteropatriarchy. It can be cold outside, even when you burn off containers. The state mafia removes it every time.

      Not even when we try to built shelters or occupy houses for the African immigrants are they allowed to stay there. Well, not even the Africans possessions, or themselves, are allowed to stay there. The cops come all in riot gear and send them through the asylum terror regime, such that they return demotivated and die easily.

      I'd rather have those state fucks stay away, with their police violence and their murdering military. But it'll take a revolution. It'll be fun! :-)

  2. Lawyers already trying that by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Lawyers are trying to do that for evidence in ordinary criminal court cases. Not likely to work.

    Although if people are interested, I'm sure the government could start that service. Just like google they would probably reserve the right to scan your email. If you want it, write your legislators.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Lawyers already trying that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lawyers are trying to do that for evidence in ordinary criminal court cases. Not likely to work.

      Depends on which side you're on, and how you use it. For example, if your client is accused of destroying documents, you could argue that they merely deleted redundant copies of documents, knowing that all of those documents had been backed up by a third party, the NSA. You don't actually have to convince the NSA to produce the documents for your side of the case--in fact, the success of this argument hinges in part on the fact that they would not produce them (for the prosecution to use against your client).

    2. Re:Lawyers already trying that by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Feel free to try that strategy. I wouldn't recommend it.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. CoS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the NSA could restore all of the sites the Church of Scientology has brought down over the years. You know the NSA is monitoring them since they act like domestic terrorists.

  4. Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's funny, but could you get yourself into legal trouble with this?

    I'm sure they could come up with some trumped up charges under the Patriot Act or something.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Hmmm ... by barlevg · · Score: 2

      Haven't watched the video. Is it a recording of a phone call? Because if the person on the other end didn't consent to being recorded, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to make the recording, and doubly so to broadcast it.

    2. Re:Hmmm ... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the dude's name is Nicholas S. Adams - so he's covered by a broad FISA declaration.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He made a skype vid call so there is implied consent and since he posted the permission would be needed from the NSA.

    4. Re:Hmmm ... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I doubt that you would get into much legal trouble directly - perhaps over some sort of nuisance law or complaint to the phone comany. You could draw the attention of the national security apparatus to yourself, however. Since this sort of prank most likely seems like a good idea when you are high, that is probably a bad idea since people that get high tend to do so more than once. Resupply efforts might be ... regrettable... once that attention has been gained. You could try a similar experiment by calling (select as appropriate) 911 | 112 | 000 | 999 and telling them that the pharmacy has Prince Albert in a can and they won't punch holes for him to breath - he might be dying.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Hmmm ... by Arduenn6058 · · Score: 5, Informative

      He made the recording in the Netherlands. It's legal to record anyone there, on film and on tape. It's illegal to publish those recordings without the subjects consent, if they can be recognised in those publications. So the guy is in the clear (in the Netherlands). Then again, he can be extradited upon US request. Because it's on YouTube, which means it's published physically on US soil. I guess they could catch him at customs too, when he enters the US. But then again again, he's Dutch, of Iranian decent, so they'll do a total body cavity search at customs no matter how well he behaves.

    6. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double standards, double standards everywhere...

    7. Re:Hmmm ... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      If the guy that posted the video was in the U.S., then it would depend on which state he was in. Federal law provides for 1-party consent, where only one side of the conversation would need to consent, in order to record the entire conversation. 38 states have adopted that law as state law. The remaining 12 states require 2-party consent. Then again, the guy isn't in the US anyhow, so it's a moot point.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    8. Re:Hmmm ... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Wrong Prince Albert. The tobacco is named after his son, who was originally named Albert Edward.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    9. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's illegal to record a phone call without consent, how come the NSA is allowed?

    10. Re:Hmmm ... by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Double standards, double standards everywhere...

      ... and how our freedoms shrink. Double standards, double standards everywhere, they now know what you think.

    11. Re:Hmmm ... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ, the signal to noise ratio has gone insane at /.

      In the US, the law is dictated by where the call is generated. Some states allow recording, some states do not, some states allow for "single party consent" (as along as ONE of the parties know) and some require notification before the call starts or beeping tones every $x seconds.

      He called from outside of the US, so US law is irrelevant here.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that's too much effort for the US. I bet the NSA is just checking that lots of windmills won't be a problem for drones before launching them.

    13. Re:Hmmm ... by aevan · · Score: 1

      Well as long as it's over the internet then there is no expectation of privacy so it's all good right?

    14. Re:Hmmm ... by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Phone recordings where only one party has knowledge of the recording are legal in most US states. Maryland (presumably where the operator was located) isn't one of them but international calls would fall under federal jurisdiction which does also permit recordings with consent from one party (i.e. the caller making the recording).

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    15. Re:Hmmm ... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      The guy lives in the Netherlands. I hope the offense is not huge enough that they can get him extradited.

    16. Re:Hmmm ... by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      It depends on the jurisdiction of the guy doing the recording. In the US it's on a state-by-state level and some states allow recording phone conversations if only one of the callers knows about it. If you had listened to the recording you'd know the gent was calling from Amsterdam, so in this case it depends on Dutch law.

      That said, yanking the NSA's chains may not be a good idea, especially if he ever wants to fly to, in or over the United States.

      And I've probably been put on the no-fly list just for pointing this out.

      (Not posting anonymously because they're the NSA; they can figure out who I am anyway.)

  5. Cant help you, give me your information by dadelbunts · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I love how the lady kept trying to get this guys information even tho they supposedly couldnt help him. WE HAVENT BEEN KEEPING TRACK OF YOUR EMAILS BUT WE SURE WOULD LIKE TO.

    1. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by guttentag · · Score: 1
      At first I thought she was just trying to keep him on the phone so they could complete the trace. I was sure that after about 30 seconds she would cut him off and say:

      "Mr. Mohammadi? Mr. Mo... OK, OK, Masood? We're not going to be able to help you over the phone, but if you'll drive over to the Delta terminal at JFK we'll have someone meet you there. No, no need to pack a bag. No, it should only take you 23 minutes. There's no traffic on Van Wyck, but just avoid Lefferts and Sutter because there's a traffic jam there. I can guide you, but you must do exactly as I say. OK? The street outside your house is empty... go now."

      Even though he stayed on the line long enough for them to trace it through multiple countries she still kept asking... which makes me think the video is a fake.

    2. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love how the lady kept trying to get this guys information even tho they supposedly couldnt help him. WE HAVENT BEEN KEEPING TRACK OF YOUR EMAILS BUT WE SURE WOULD LIKE TO.

      Well yeah... it's like the guy that called the BATF to ask which assault rifle would be better to use for destroying his computer, which he was upset with. The agent dead panned with a reply of, "Well sir, that depends... how much have you had to drink?"

      But I will admit... if someone rang me and wanted to restore deleted e-mails, and I was a law enforcement officer, I'd want to know what kind of e-mail could be so important it'd compel people to call me too. If nothing else, I'd want to investigate the guy just to make sure he really was just another harmless drunk, and not one of the perenially stupid people who buzz the police to complain about being ripped off by their drug dealer, or who gave money to a prostitute who then left without rendering service. Take enough phone calls from the general public, and you will have no faith left in humanity to speak of... at which point you just dutifully take down the information, be as polite as possible, and then file it under "Yet Another Probably Drunk Person, But Since It Could Be A Really Stupid Terrorist, Please Sign This Search Warrant" and move on to the next idiot caller.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first I thought she was just trying to keep him on the phone so they could complete the trace. I was sure that after about 30 seconds she would cut him off and say:

      That's a Hollywood plot device. A real phone trace takes a fraction of a second.

    4. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. I can't even get most webpages to load that fast.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Khyber · · Score: 0

      Just by using ping time alone I can get within 20 miles of your location.

      Give me a few more servers along that outer rim of 20 miles, I can get your location down to 5 mile diameter.

      That's maybe ten seconds of work with data interception and routing.

      Give me another ten seconds, I can get it down to within 10 feet if you're using cell towers, and exact address if you're using DSL or cable or fiber. Satellite's a little harder but only a little due to the higher latency and uncertainties in retransmission.

      Not even a minute to really have your as nailed down.

      Source: I used to do open video signal tracking with the Redlands police. A data signal is no harder to deal with.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's to add him to the list of "troublemakers." Then the first time he sorta-slips-up they won't just "throw the book at him," they'll use all the books to crush him like a bug. He wouldn't be the first...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ping time can geolocate? Within 10 feet. I'm about to piss on myself laughing. Ping is more determined by quality of network than distance, and varies according to the route each ping takes. You assumptions assume every route is the same, or is on a cell phone. They are not.

      Go play network expert somewhere else, and get off my lawn.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      She was undoubtedly low enough on the totem pole to where she couldn't tell him to fuck off and be sure she wasn't going to get fired for it, or at least wasn't sure. I'd wager she'd only get in trouble for handing blatant spam onto her superior. "Yes sir, a Dr. cAnAdA tried to contact you about... ahem, 'c1@1is enl@rge y0ur d1ck!!!'"

      Getting as much information about a problem someone brings to you is decent handling, even if you know someone above you is at most going to laugh and throw away the contact information.

    9. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Livius · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

      It was on Pop-Up Video.

    10. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      It is not about how long does it take to trace. The thing is, once you made a call, there will be a record created at every relay server you passed through and eventually it will be possible to find the exact device you were calling from or, for a cellphone, your approximate location. No need to stay on the line.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    11. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by tragedy · · Score: 1

      A phone trace is done by getting the records from the phone company. Back in the days of operators manually switching lines, you actually did have to keep someone on the line to complete a phone trace because a phone trace would have required having the manager at the local switching office call around to find out where the call was coming from. All of those manual operators were replaced by electronic switching and electronic record keeping. As soon as the record-keeping became electronic, it became unnecessary to keep the person on the phone. Just making a phone connection (for that matter, probably just picking up the phone and getting a dial tone) makes an electronic record no matter how long you're on the phone. So, all that was required for a phone trace after that was an electronic records search. Today that records search is very automated and many law enforcement agencies and intelligence agencies have their own direct access to the phone company records or even have their own comms equipment set up in parallel.

      So, no citatation needed, it's just another one of those stupid movie things. The record creation is concurrent with the call being made, so it really is a fraction of a second (probably a negative fraction as the record certainly exists before the phone even rings). The interface used to look at the trace information probably is web-based in this day and age, of course, so that probably does take a brief amount of time to load.

    12. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might shock you, but not all movies are documentaries. Don't be sad, some people believe books always tell the truth so it was only a matter of time until someone made the same mistake with movies.

    13. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I guess your dumb ass missed the point where I use a few other servers to figure out how to work it out.

      Or maybe your old ass forgot that we had a story about this on Slashdot like... two years ago?

      How about you get off my lawn, old fart? You don't even know where yours is!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Cant help you, give me your information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. How is that arrogance working out for you? Not that great, huh? Perhaps you should take a hint. If you're capable.

  6. attention whores get raped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't envy the hell that (s)he has unleashed on their self

  7. Boring by Acid-Duck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rather boring and uneventful. How did this ever get posted anyways?

    1. Re:Boring by belatucadros3918 · · Score: 1

      Agreed...saw this a few days ago elsewhere (no surprise), don't get why it ever showed up here.

    2. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rather boring and uneventful. How did this ever get posted anyways?

      An endless, lustful thirst to invent new reasons to hate all them thar gumbermints, or at least some way to keep dragging the old reasons around? Overeagerness to indulge in a narrow-minded, black-and-white "them versus us" attitude cultivated by a generation of pop culture indoctrination? Cultural addiction to snideness and uncreative sarcasm coupled with a desire for, though only cursory understanding of, irony? The constant glorification of people disrupting the lives and jobs of low-level grunts in a horribly misguided belief that doing so "sticks it to The Man"?

    3. Re:Boring by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      They obviously forgot to contact you and ask you if you had seen it before before posting it! I am as outraged as you are. I'm sure that, now that you have complained, they will consult you before posting links and deny all the people who haven't seen a particular article, news item, or video the opportunity if you personally have already had said opportunity.

      Maybe Dice could spin Slashdot off and create a separate website where all they do is post links to articles nerds might be interested in along with a summary of what the link points to. I hope you are listening Dice!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather boring and uneventful. How did this ever get posted anyways?

      An endless, lustful thirst to invent new reasons to hate all them thar gumbermints, or at least some way to keep dragging the old reasons around? Overeagerness to indulge in a narrow-minded, black-and-white "them versus us" attitude cultivated by a generation of pop culture indoctrination? Cultural addiction to snideness and uncreative sarcasm coupled with a desire for, though only cursory understanding of, irony? The constant glorification of people disrupting the lives and jobs of low-level grunts in a horribly misguided belief that doing so "sticks it to The Man"?

      !!DING DING DING!! We have a winner!

      "I forgot my bank account number so I called the Securities and Exchange Commission and they refused to give it to me! This proves they're even more evil than we thought!"

      "Millions of Americans have been KIDNAPPED and thrown in dark dungeons where they are forced to wear orange uniforms and get assraped daily! People are MURDERED for refusing to go!"

      "We are bombing al-Qaeda for NO REASON!!! Support the legitimate resistance of the poor al-Qaedean people! END THE OCCUPATION!"

      Same shit, same idiots, same reason.

    5. Re:Boring by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      How did this ever get posted anyways?

      The NSA posted it. Slashdot was forced to comply with a Secret Court ruling, and give the keys to the editor desk to the NSA. They posted this so no one else tries it, as it is a waste of their secretary's time.

      So we all know that the NSA can read our email. That's no big deal, given a fistful of Secret Court rulings.

      But can they read Bashar al-Assad's email? Probably not. They're too busy recording calls made by Presbyterian grandmothers in Ohio.

      Frankly, I wish that they would spend a wee bit of effort trying to gather intelligence on the world's serious security threats, instead of picking the easy fruit of US telecommunications providers.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motherfucking brilliant. Agree 100% Mod parent up +5 insightful.

    7. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, what is it that you expect from such a childish 'above it all' posting? Psychologically, what do you get out of such behaviour?

    8. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd reply that you must be new here but your UID + silly twitter icon already demonstrate that.

    9. Re:Boring by belatucadros3918 · · Score: 1

      ha ha ha. I simply never expected to see this on slashdot. It's not even an article with any sort of a followup...just a link to youtube. Ugh.

    10. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republican rant about how OP is wasting taxpayer dollars that could be better used to destroy more liberties here

      TL;DR.

    11. Re:Boring by globalist · · Score: 1

      Wow, very insightful. I'd like to hear more of your thoughts. Reads like a breath of fresh air among all the internet hate and paranoia.

  8. At least then you know who's the bad guy by Arduenn6058 · · Score: 1

    If, for the sake of retribution and showing muscle, the NSA feels the need to waste tax money on bullying this Iranian/Dutch young man by intimidating him, at least the rest of the world knows who can't be trusted with spy tools that are meant for protecting the Ustated Nites of America.

  9. Re:First Post by 3vi1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn you, XKCD. See what you did?

  10. customer service by Toast+or+Rice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great demonstration of great telephone manner and customer service for a challenge customer, Respect NSA. I for one welcome our new customer service overloads!

    1. Re:customer service by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure a receptionist counts as a customer service representative. That being said, I'm sure she gets out of line whenever she can be sure that nobody is listening in on her calls.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:customer service by dobbshead · · Score: 0

      I'm sure she gets out of line whenever she can be sure that nobody is listening in on her calls.

      Given her employer, she can be assured that somebody is always listening in on her calls.

    3. Re:customer service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That being said, I'm sure she gets out of line whenever she can be sure that nobody is listening in on her calls.

      Just because you're an asshole, don't assume everyone else is.

    4. Re:customer service by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You're super quick on the uptake!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re:customer service by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      WHOOOSH!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:customer service by dobbshead · · Score: 0

      Touché! In my defense, I had just been reading an NRA thread prior to this, which makes for a lot interference on the old sarcasm compass. Will run a figure of eight round the room next time to reset. ;-)

  11. Freakin Hilarious!! by JoeyJam · · Score: 1

    We should all call in to obtain copies of our emails. Maybe even offer to typographically error correct them. But I wonder what would happen if everyone created fake suspicious emails to themselves and bombarded the NSA's systems? Would it become a "white noise" to the search algorithms?

    1. Re:Freakin Hilarious!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real problem is that even if you did get your email back it would be heavily redacted. :-)

  12. Now on the No-Fly list... by tekrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just wait until this individual attempts to travel in the near future. If you phone the NSA and acknowledge that they have your email, they will retaliate.

    After all, the government right now is persecuting a "leaker" who they "claim" is lying because after all, they swore up and down that they weren't reading email and listening to phone calls of average Americans. And the government wouldn't LIE, now would they? So the leaker has to be wrong. And yet, they pursue him like he has some relevant information that can cause damage.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Now on the No-Fly list... by aggemam · · Score: 1

      I wonder how this scenario would go;

      "Hello, NSA. Ma'm, my name is , I'll be flying in to LAX on Sep 16 and just wanted to see if this very call would put me on the no-fly list or otherwise bring me in for questioning. You could say this is some kind of media stunt. Thanks, see you, bye!"

    2. Re:Now on the No-Fly list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't lie about 9/11, so why would they lie about this??

    3. Re:Now on the No-Fly list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until this individual attempts to travel in the near future...

      Won't he be surprised when they pull the email out of his ass.

    4. Re:Now on the No-Fly list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change the caller ID to register as from the house of congress, and explain how you're xyz congressman and that you're carrying an Illudium Q-36 Space Modulator on your next trip home. (leaving out the obvious keyword between 36 and Space of course)...

      Happy no-flying mr congress-critter.

  13. no, no fucking irony to be found there by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    SHUT UP Alanis!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  14. What are we paying them for? by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is the water you drink clean?
    Is your food supply safe?
    Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?
    Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?
    When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?
    Can you read this message?
    Are you speaking English?

    Because if you are, you can be assured that your government is doing at least some things you find useful. There are places - quite a few actually - for which the above do not all apply. The taxes there are exceptionally low, and you may wish to consider relocating to take advantage of the savings and buy the above items yourself. Note: if you form a group to provide such services, that's cheating. another word for that kind of cheating is called "Government."

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of what you described is provided by the private sector, ie nothing to do with government. So moot.

    2. Re:What are we paying them for? by butchersong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of those services are provided by state and county government. The federal government does not educate you for instance... Several of them (like electricity) are typically provided by private companies though there are a few large federal projects left over from earlier last century. The stuff you cited that does apply to the federal government applies to regulation. The vast overwhelming (pretty much all) majority of our taxes do not go to anything in this list.

    3. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the water you drink clean? NO
      Is your food supply safe?NO
      Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?YES
      Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?YES
      When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?YES but it's licenced to makemoney not provided by gov't
      Can you read this message? YES,but it's not a gov't servoce
      Are you speaking English? NO I live in Miami USA

    4. Re:What are we paying them for? by tom229 · · Score: 1

      None of that is provided for you by the federal government. All of that is paid for by the state, property taxes, etc. I'd like to reiterate the question and see if you can answer it: What are we paying [the federal government] for?

      If you can come up with anything outside of the Military, and interest to private banks, I'll be impressed.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    5. Re:What are we paying them for? by rea1l1 · · Score: 1

      All of those costs require a tiny percentage of what we pay them for.
      My water isn't clean (flouride)
      My food isn't safe (full of chemicals/GMO),
      the lights do indeed come on - no complaints there
      I can travel through the air so long as I'm not randomly selected as a terrorist)
      When I turn on the radio in my car sounds do come out - I immediately turn it off because the sounds are brainwash pop media bullshit that's been playing in a loop over and over again for the last 2 years..
      Education in the most populous state is the 2nd worse of all 51 states.
      Yo hablo espanol.

      There are some useful things in there, no doubt. I bet about 10% of taxes collected is actually used in a constructive manner. The rest is given away to the wealthy, one way or another, probably to heads of corporations, which overcharge our government for massive quantities of weapons used to deconstruct other civilizations.

    6. Re:What are we paying them for? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is the water you drink clean?

      Yes, but that's because it's a well on an underground river, which I then run through a series of three filters before it's allowed to come into the house, and which then goes through four more filters before it is used for food or drinking water.

      Is your food supply safe?

      Yes, but that's only because I don't just eat anything that the government approves, and cook most of my food myself.

      Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?

      Yep. Working towards doing it on a totally off-grid solar system.

      Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?

      Only after ritual sexual abuse.

      When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?

      Only if I play an mp3. I don't listen to the dirty, dirty radio. Commercials are disgusting. Literally.

      Can you read this message?

      Snicker snort.

      Are you speaking English?

      This then is a feature?

      Because if you are, you can be assured that your government is doing at least some things you find useful.

      You mean like preventing me from being able to purchase carbon-neutral 1:1 replacements for gasoline? Wait, that's not useful. You mean deciding what I'm allowed to put into my body? Hmm, I'm not a big fan of that. I do appreciate national defense, but I would prefer it to be less offensive...

      There are places - quite a few actually - for which the above do not all apply.

      At this point, I feel like I'd especially like to live in one of those places where the last item on that list is not the case.

      The taxes there are exceptionally low, and you may wish to consider relocating to take advantage of the savings and buy the above items yourself. Note: if you form a group to provide such services, that's cheating. another word for that kind of cheating is called "Government."

      Why is government cheating? This government is shitty. It has grown well past its original mandates and has perveted many of those. That doesn't mean government is a bad idea, it just means you have to be vigilant. Americans weren't and it went off the rails even as far as we went, let alone anyone else in the world.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:What are we paying them for? by PraiseBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is every phone number you call stored in a big database, to be used against you later?
      Is every word you type into the internet carefully saved, to be used against you later?
      Is your participation at a religious worship service documented, to be used agaisnt you later?
      Do citizens get a free dronestrike for talking to the wrong people, saying the wrong thing, and going to the wrong church?

      Thank you tax dollars!

    8. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot.

      Is the water you drink clean? Yes, because I pay my city municipality every month to supply me with clean water.
      Is your food supply safe? Nope. My food supply would be safer without the government allowing companies like Monsanto to operate.
      Do the lights come on when you flip a switch? Yes, because I pay the power company every month to provide electricity to my home.
      Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars? Yes, because I pay an airline to take me where I want to go.
      When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers? Yes, because advertisers pay the radio stations to play their ads, thus providing profit and income for the station and its employees.
      Can you read this message? Yes, because I pay for internet service every month and this site is available for free.
      Are you speaking English? Yes, because I was raised by English-speaking parents.

      The government provides none of that to me. So, what are we paying them for?

    9. Re:What are we paying them for? by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      I didn't know the government cleans my food for me. And my taxes don't seem to allow me to travel through the air at the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars. Did my parents teach me English or the government?

      Huh?

      Are these things supposed to be worth paying 1/3 to 1/4 my paycheck for?

      And what if I don't want the money I earned to go towards paying for baby murder?

    10. Re:What are we paying them for? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Learned English from my mother, before I was school age. I could be pedantic and argue a few other points. If we're still alive in 2013 then obviously all our ancestors had no trouble finding clean water to drink and adequate food to eat, for the past billion years or so since life started. So government is not "responsible" for that, they just make you think they are. Electricity, now there's a funny one. One could argue that government interference in the generation of electrical power has caused the energy market to be far less efficient than it could be. Monopolies are only the ideal case if you're the monopoly. No, sorry, I don't buy the "I owe the government so much" excuse. I live in the 3rd world, where the government is more corrupt and more impotent than in the US and guess what - life is possible - even MORE enjoyable down here. I am more free than you. Of course I have a greater chance of being mugged, but that's a risk I am willing to take to be free.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:What are we paying them for? by internerdj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My electricity is provided by a government corporation because the private sector failed to reliably do so. Just because the private sector can, doesn't mean they will.

    12. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were all of those things possible before the government was in place? You put way too much faith in the government. And let's think about these for a moment.

      Is the water you drink clean? According to who? The government? Why of course it is. Those chemicals in ppm are really no big deal after all.
      Food supply safe? Of course except for mad cow, saminilla, aviary flu, and who knows what else. Just because it's regulated doesn't make it safe. It just means more palms need to be greased to look the other way.
      Lights come on? Yes. Whatever would we do without the government to regulate electricity? After all those pesky power companies don't really like to sell electricity and would make more money if it were completely unreliable. (In case you're confused that's sarcasm).
      Travel through air for a few hundred dollars? Without all of the governement regulation it would proabably be cheaper and safer if all other government intervention was any indication.
      Hearing sound from a radio? If it weren't regulated we'd probably have way more choices than a handful of clearchannel variants.

      The government does not teach people to write or speak english. In fact, they've historically had a bad track record there. It's parents who do that which is why when parents don't speak english their children have a much tougher time and usually graduate from high school (a public funded entity) without knowing how.

      All your examples are bunk if they're meant to point to government success.

    13. Re:What are we paying them for? by ackthpt · · Score: 0

      Most of those services are provided by state and county government. The federal government does not educate you for instance... Several of them (like electricity) are typically provided by private companies though there are a few large federal projects left over from earlier last century. The stuff you cited that does apply to the federal government applies to regulation. The vast overwhelming (pretty much all) majority of our taxes do not go to anything in this list.

      If you aren't learning anything from the government about how the government prioritizes or carries out its duties then you are the problem. Claiming to learn anything from Faux Nooz, the political blowhards of the airwaves or your local Tea Party goobers isn't education either, though to know your enemy you should pay attention to how people continue to buy into their garbage without doing some thinking of their own.

      Most of the things which the Federal Government does spend on have ensured our quality of life, directly or indirectly. Think DoD, FDA, Dept of Interior, Department of Ed, etc. It could probably do things more efficiently, but it usually has to deal with an increasingly ornery populace who do not truly understand why they are ornery.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    14. Re:What are we paying them for? by Zordak · · Score: 1

      If you can come up with anything outside of the Military, and interest to private banks, I'll be impressed.

      I'm pretty sure that the U.S. Federal Government is the single biggest supplier of pork in the entire world.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    15. Re:What are we paying them for? by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      Is every word you type into the internet carefully saved, to be used against you later?
      They guy tried to test that bit out and didn't get any help. So he'll have to wait until the court case. If he actually gets one.

    16. Re:What are we paying them for? by njnnja · · Score: 1

      Education in the most populous state is the 2nd worse of all 51 states.

      Usually I can tell the difference between ignorance and sarcasm (or even meta-sarcasm), but I must admit, you have me stumped here. Well played.

    17. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are these things supposed to be worth paying 1/3 to 1/4 my paycheck for?

      Odd. Usually people start with the lower value. you know, like it will cost $5 to $10. Sounds strange the other way around. Paying 33% to 25% of my paycheck. Hm. Maybe a negative comment about the government run education system is in order...

    18. Re:What are we paying them for? by rvw · · Score: 0

      Is the water you drink clean?

      Yes, but that's because it's a well on an underground river, which I then run through a series of three filters before it's allowed to come into the house, and which then goes through four more filters before it is used for food or drinking water.

      Hey, if you live up to your name, drinkypoo, why clean it at all?

    19. Re:What are we paying them for? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You will note that Overzeetop stated that 'goverment' provided the enumerated services. Not the "US Federal Government", not the Taliban, not the Federation. Perhaps he should have used 'Government' to imply a broader sense of the term but his initial position still stands. Without a functional civil governing system - which can have multiple levels and even some, gasp, redundency, you end up sitting in a dusty field dying of thirst and an number of other unpleasant circumstances.

      Mankind has never come up with a good system of governing large numbers of humans that is equitable, sustainable and marginally effecient. But if you'd like to dump the whole process and wither away in Somalia, be my guest.

      So save your libertarian rants for Reddit.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    20. Re:What are we paying them for? by Solozerk · · Score: 1

      Replying to undo wrong moderation.

    21. Re:What are we paying them for? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      If you think maintenance and enforcement of regulation is free, you should try it some time.

      The largest slice of the pie we (taxpayers) pay for is the military - hence the speaking English tongue-in-cheek comment. Do we need a military to defend America? That's another question entirely, though had you asked that in 1937, or in 1958, you'd probably get the same answer as today - a big shrug. Though in a world with nuclear subs, rockets, and fighter jets it may no longer be sufficient to rely on personal arsenals - even unrestricted ones - to defend against an organized attack by an outside standing army. And, besides, if you took a trillion dollars/yr out of the US economy tommorrow, life would suck.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    22. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the water you drink clean?
      Is your food supply safe?
      Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?
      Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?
      When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?
      Can you read this message?
      Are you speaking English?

      I don't know where you live, but here in the US, most of the things that you list aren't provided by the US Federal Government, of which the NSA is a part.

    23. Re:What are we paying them for? by clovis · · Score: 1

      "I didn't know the government cleans my food for me"
      Well, what is does is shutdown, fine, or imprison people who sell you food that isn't clean.
      Do they not make children read Upton Sinclair in school anymore?

    24. Re:What are we paying them for? by KingSkippus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yep. Working towards doing it on a totally off-grid solar system.

      You're building an entire solar system just to power your house? You must go through a LOT of light bulbs.

    25. Re:What are we paying them for? by jeffclay · · Score: 1

      if you took a trillion dollars/yr out of the US economy tommorrow, life would suck.

      It really depends on which funds you cut. If we cut out all the free food we're giving away to other countries, all the bail-out money to other countries, the weapons we're giving to other countries, etc. life in the US would probably be much nicer. If we (the US) stopped trying to rule/fix the world and focus on ourselves we could become more stable and eventually be in a position where we could graciously assist other countries if/when they asked for it.

    26. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you aren't learning anything from the government about how the government prioritizes or carries out its duties then you are the problem. Claiming to learn anything from Faux Nooz

      I like how you take his valid point that states and municipal governments set curricula, raise taxes to fund and implement the lower education system, and turn it into some slam against biased media outlet. His point is that the city property tax I pay, funds the local schools. There is federal funding availible to states and municipalities is they meet certain criteria under No Child Left Behind and Common Core, but both programs have proven to decrease learning outcomes and hurt the overall educational experience of schools.

      Think DoD, FDA, Dept of Interior, Department of Ed,

      Department of Education only doles out federal tax money in the form of subsidies and land grants to the states, and runs a horrible student loan program that has caused a bubble in higher education inflation. It does not employ any teachers at local schools, it doesn't set circulum that local schools must follow. It doesn't hold a standard to which schools must comply -- as all of those things are rights of the states. The Department of Education should be abolished.

      Department of the Interior isn't doing anything that the local and state haven't done in the past, and arguably the states did a better job of it. The local governments are closer to the lands that DoI seek to protect, see direct benefits in protecting it, and have more flexibility to fund preservation. Moreover, what the DoI has done in regards to the Native American reservations is atrocious.

      Our DoD budget is larger than any other nations. In fact, adding every country's budget together, except China, and we still spend more. That is not defense spending. That is spending of an imperialistic nation practicing military Keynesianism. The NSA doesn't need another data center, and we don't need to maintain bases in 105 countries world wide. If any other nation decided to build a base on US soil, we'd be declaring war on them; but it is perfectly alright for us to occupy the world?

      Most of the things which the Federal Government does spend on

      Are mantory spending on entitlements. Social Security, Medicare, and Medicade make up 60% of the US federal budget each year. Meanwhile, the program fail at providing what they promise, dispite the huge expendatures. You cannot comfortably retire on just these services, but that is what a number of generations were promised.... "We'll take care of you in your old age." These system were all built with the false assumption that population growth is a given; sadly it isn't and we now face a whopping 350 trillion in unfunded liabilities, when we have a GDP of about $16 trillion dollars (all the wealth created in the US in a given year), and a national debt of $17 trillion dollars. Over the past 60 years, life expectancy has increased 20 years, and the retirement age rose only 5 years. The system is not sustainable, and anyone who tells you otherwise is misinformed or lying to you. I'm not saying kill these programs immediately, but we cannot run them they way they are currently being run. We cannot borrow against them, and we cannot tie them to federal bonds (because the Federal Reserve set the price of bonds, and has been pegging them bellow the rate of inflation to "stimulate" the down economy [wtf?]).

      Our government is trying to do much, and it simply can't. We have to start relying on private citizens, private companies, the free market and non-profit corporations to start performing the tasks we've saddled the government with in the past 60 to 70 years. Tasks the government can't perform well, was never intended to perform, and lacks the Constitutional authority to perform. We need smaller government.

    27. Re:What are we paying them for? by Hobadee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes and no...
      > Is the water you drink clean?
      In some places, the local government is in charge of the water supply. In others it's subsidized and regulated by them. Either way, the government is in the loop.

      > Is your food supply safe?
      While this is always provided by private industry in this country, it is rather heavily regulated by the government at all levels to ensure a safe food supply.

      > Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?
      Again, in some places, the local government is in charge of the electricity supply while in others it's subsidized and regulated by them. Either way, the government is in the loop.

      > Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?
      While the actual air travel is provided by private industry, you can thank the government for not having to worry about crashing into other planes midair, parts falling off the planes, (Due to safety regulations) and safety from terrorists and other baddies on planes. (#3 is debatable, although they are *trying*...)

      > When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?
      This is another area where, although private industry provides the actual service, the government makes it possible. The FCC licenses frequencies to certain groups and ensures they don't interfere with each other. Think of the madness if anyone could broadcast anything they wanted on any frequency!

      > Can you read this message?
      > Are you speaking English?
      Although there is private education in this country, there is also free public education. It's highly likely that a person picked at random went to public school and learned to read and write there.

      The government may not be perfect - none is - but it is functioning on some level and you are getting services from it, whether you like it or not. Your job as a citizen is to try to fix the parts of it which are broken.

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    28. Re:What are we paying them for? by tokiko · · Score: 1

      But apart from better sanitation and medicine and education and irrigation and public health and roads and a freshwater system and baths and public order... what has the government done for us?

    29. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are we paying [the federal government] for?

      Killing brown people? (*)

      (*) I'd rather that they stopped doing so, personally.

    30. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never heard of a federal grant?

    31. Re:What are we paying them for? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Most of those services are provided by state and county government. The federal government does not educate you for instance...

      If you're black, and living in the South, the Federal government is undeniably responsible for your education.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    32. Re:What are we paying them for? by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea what reciprocals we're getting from those other countries and/or their allies in return? No? Stop talking, then. If you think we (as a country) give away food, money, and military supplies purely because of our philanthropic nature, you've got another thing coming.

    33. Re:What are we paying them for? by jxander · · Score: 1

      I pay local companies for my utilities. (Water, Electricity, garbage removal)
      I pay local grocery providers for food
      I pay airline fees for travel.
      I listen to ungodly amounts of commercials on terrestrial radio, or pay for music via satellite, radio, etc

      The government may have had a hand in getting these things started, and might run oversight to keep them in place ... but the individual companies run like any other private business and expect to turn a profit. At best, the government keeps them from running amok with monopolies or collusion so that my electricity bill isn't as extortion laced as my cable bill.

      P.S. if you form a group to provide a service, you're not a government. You are a service provider.

      --
      This signature is false.
    34. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mankind has never come up with a good system of governing large numbers of humans that is equitable, sustainable and marginally effecient

      True, but maybe a small group of revolutionary legal philosophers could design a union of smaller governments, each of which serves a smaller, geographically clustered population with dissimilar needs, and they could tie this federation together with a small "federal" government that only exists to handle foreign affairs and inter-state disputes.

      I don't know how to solve the problem of bureaucratic bloat, but I'm sure such a system could work well for about 200 years before becoming too top-heavy to be worth supporting.

    35. Re:What are we paying them for? by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      It has grown well past its original mandates and has perveted many of those.

      I do have to make a serious response to this, though. You seem to be under the false impression that there were "original mandates" that limited the federal government. This simply isn't true. The current Constitution was written after the dismal failure of the Articles of Confederation, which established a federal government but explicitly denied any enforcement capabilities to it. It basically said that the name of our new country was the United States of America, and each of those states acted like little mini sovereign entities. As a result, when the federal government asked the states to pay their taxes, the states politely told it to go fuck itself, resulting in the Continental Army to fall apart and damn near resulted in the destruction of our new country.

      So the founding fathers convened another Constitutional Convention for four months in 1787 to address these problems. They decided that the federal government HAD to have power, and that the new Constitution needs to be fairly open-ended to account for new legal needs to refine our government. That's why they put phrases in such as "promote the general Welfare" and left out phrases such as "and such is an exhaustive list of the only things this governmental entity can do".

      While I would never pretend like the "founding fathers" were a monolithic hive mind in complete agreement on all points, and I do recognize that some of them fought to limit the power of government, those people were generally overruled or else had their concerns addressed by enumerating things that are explicitly denied to government, especially in the Bill of Rights ("Congress shall make no law..."). Most of them understood that we would be facing completely new and unforeseen challenges today than we were in 1787, and they deliberately avoided enumerating things that government could only do.

      So there was never any kind of set of "original mandates" that government has grown past, other than a handful of don'ts, such as don't trample of free speech, don't establish a state religion, don't inflict cruel or unusual punishment, etc.

    36. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to bake an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

    37. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cook your own food, you didn't mention anything about growing it, or slaughtering your own animals...

    38. Re:What are we paying them for? by r_naked · · Score: 1

      Is the water you drink clean?

      You are delusional if you live in a big city in the US and think your water *that you drink* is clean

      Is your food supply safe?

      Are you out hunting and killing your own food? Even then it is debatable since you don't know where they have been drinking. But I guarantee you that anything you buy in the store is not safe.

      Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?

      Most times, but the power grid in the US is so unstable to the point that might not always be the case (need a citation -- LOOK IT UP FOR YOUR FUCKING SELF)

      Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?

      No, I can not. I am on a blacklist because I happened to speak out against this SHIT HOLE FUCKING GOVERNMENT that is is the USA

      When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?

      I hear music, but I sure as hell don't hear "voices". I think you may need to seek some professional help.

      This country (The good ol' US of A) is FUCKED. You need to get that through your thick, fucking, skull.

      -- Brian (Proud member of TOCB -- Take Our County Back)

      --
      -- http://anonet.org -- The internet the way it was meant to be. Check it out, you may be surprised.
    39. Re:What are we paying them for? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      So, why don't you just emigrate to one of those countries? I'm pretty sure Somalia has very flexible immigration laws.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    40. Re:What are we paying them for? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      And people from tribes living in a jungle are even more free. Of course they have a far greater chance to be eaten by a wild animal, but isn't that a small price to pay for your freedom?

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    41. Re:What are we paying them for? by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      That's why they put phrases in such as "promote the general Welfare"

      "General welfare" only exists 2 places in the US Constitution: In the preamble and in the enumeration of congresses power to tax:

      We the People of the United States, in Order to ... promote the general Welfare ... do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

      The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

      In both cases the "general welfare" is not an enumerated power, but a justification. In order to promote general welfare, the constitution is established. In order to promote general welfare and provide for a military, the US may establish taxes. At no point does the constitution just say "as long as you are promoting the general welfare, do whatever you want and to hell with the idea of federalism".

      If anything, the "general welfare" clause is a restriction on congress. They may not collect taxes for personal or private concerns, such as taxing blank discs and sending that money to MPAA like organizations.

      and left out phrases such as "and such is an exhaustive list of the only things this governmental entity can do".

      No they didn't.

      Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
      Amendment X : The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

      Or as Madison put it:
      "It has been objected also against a Bill of Rights, that, by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power, it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication, that those rights which were not singled out, were intended to be assigned into the hands of the General Government, and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I have ever heard against the admission of a bill of rights into this system; but, I conceive, that it may be guarded against. I have attempted it, as gentlemen may see by turning to the last clause of the fourth resolution."

      So there was never any kind of set of "original mandates" that government has grown past, other than a handful of don'ts, such as don't trample of free speech, don't establish a state religion, don't inflict cruel or unusual punishment, etc.

      Public schools pretty much cover the 10 amendments to the US constitution and completely ignore the entire rest of the text. That doesn't excuse any intelligent person from doing the same.

    42. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the water you drink clean? Not really, they keep raising the "safe" limits for contaminants to keep people from panicing.
      Is your food supply safe? Not really, how many allergens get mixed into foods that have nothing to do with them? How many poisons have been approved for use by the FDA?

      Do the lights come on when you flip a switch? Not always. The local electric monopoly doesn't care about the little people until the big corps have their power back first.

      Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars? Nope, not even close. They stopped the Concorde flights.

      When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers? Nope, speakers are broke - when will the Gubernment fix them?

      Can you read this message? That I can, because I taught myself to read. Most kids under the "no child left behind" aka "no child gets a real edumacation" program read at 3rd grade levels now when they leave college.

      Are you speaking English? No, I'm speaking the American dialect of the English language.

    43. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the water you drink clean?
      Is your food supply safe?
      Do the lights come on when you flip a switch?
      Can you travel through the air at nearly the speed of sound for a few hundred dollars?
      When you turn on the radio in your car, do you hear voices/music coming out of the speakers?
      Can you read this message?
      Are you speaking English?

      Water kinda has a petroleum / petrochlorate odor and taste at the moment
      Depends, is it windy or raining if so most of the time
      Wouldn't know, name shares a word with a terrorist group, so I'm on a list
      Yes, but that is because of the podcasts, etc loaded up on my music player
      That depends on what the meaning of the word read is, 2nd grade level comprehension?
      Nope, I speak American or American English (if you prefer), I flatly refuse to speak the King's or Queen's tongue

    44. Re:What are we paying them for? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You cook your own food, you didn't mention anything about growing it, or slaughtering your own animals...

      I'm choosy about where I get food. For example, I make an effort to source meat which I suspect is not bad for me, and if it makes me feel bad I don't buy it again — which is why I no longer eat meat from Costco, for example. Mostly I buy meat from a local butcher who has really amazing porterhouses. I mostly buy organic produce as well, except for some of the stuff which tends not to absorb pesticides. We do produce some vegetables in a garden at home, notably tomatoes and basil. Both of these are expensive in the store, especially organic basil, and store-bought tomatoes taste like Tomatoes Lite!(tm). I don't buy dairy products associated with rBGH, I buy eggs from a relatively local processor which lets chickens out to run around and eat bugs... I would like to join an intentional community and get more involved with meat production but I don't want to just become a farmer and have to get up every morning to feed the animals and so on.

      Cooking your own food from scratch is much of the battle, though, because nobody's recipes will have them eating pounds of unnecessary synthetic chemicals every year, and nobody's recipes will replace veg oil with HFCS+citric acid, etc. Even if you just shop around the border of your local chain supermarket, and give even a little care to eating healthy meals with appropriate caloric value, you'll still be well ahead of people who think cooking involves opening a package and putting a tray in the microwave, waiting for the ding (and possibly a resting period) and then consuming the contents.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:What are we paying them for? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you live up to your name, drinkypoo, why clean it at all?

      If I were planning to live up to my name, I'd certainly need to clean it, because clean water makes for better booze.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:What are we paying them for? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Wow...a lot of what you say here is pretty foolish. I guess if you can't trust the food we have in supermarkets, you can't trust that we went to the moon either, right?

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    47. Re:What are we paying them for? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Lights come on? Yes. Whatever would we do without the government to regulate electricity? After all those pesky power companies don't really like to sell electricity and would make more money if it were completely unreliable. (In case you're confused that's sarcasm).

      Wasn't that part of Enron's reason for deliberately sabotaging energy distribution in California to make it unreliable? They were trying to manipulate prices and make a fake case for deregulation.

    48. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: if you form a group to provide such services, that's cheating. another word for that kind of cheating is called "Government."

      That kind of cheating is only called government when the group extracts money to provide such services under threat of force.

    49. Re:What are we paying them for? by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      Shutting down unclean food distributors does not do the work of cleaning food or preparing food in a clean way, but that doesn't stop the government and others from taking credit for it.

      By the way, Upton Sinclair was a private citizen who exposed something without the help of any public agency. Nobody had to pay Upton for his work, but he was recognized for it anyway. That approach is far, far better than having the FDA dictate to people what they should or should not eat. If credit reporting can be accomplished just fine without government intervention, so can food reporting.

    50. Re:What are we paying them for? by romons · · Score: 1

      Federal money subsidises states to a very large degree. During the economic meltdown, my state (California) had its federal budget slashed, causing the state to clobber basic services (like education spending). This is called the federal allotment. Look here for more information.

      Here is the breakdown of federal spending:
      Defense - 19%
      Medicare/Medicaid - 21%
      Safety net programs - 12%
      Interest on Debt - 6%
      Benefits for federal retirees and veterans - 7%
      Transportation and Infrastructure - 3%
      Education - 2%
      Science and Medical Research - 2%
      Non security international: 1%
      All other - 5%

      This is based on 2012 estimates by the center on budget and policy priorities

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
    51. Re:What are we paying them for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tl;dr The idea of a democratic government isn't broken, it's just your government that's broken.

  15. Bad response. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was the NSA, I'd reply back saying his life is too pedantic and boring to record entirely, so they get filtered out ;)

  16. Naturally, they now DO have that video logged by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    It's on Google's Youtube, he mentions Iran, he mentions the NSA. If it didn't trip flags, their system isn't working.

    1. Re:Naturally, they now DO have that video logged by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, we have to enable the backup service first? No problem:

      al Qaida, Jihad, Backpack, Pressure Cooker, Fourth Amendment.

      There. That should do.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Naturally, they now DO have that video logged by Guru80 · · Score: 1

      Let me be the first to say that we will all miss your witty posts on good ole /. :D

    3. Re:Naturally, they now DO have that video logged by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how dupes at Slashdot get started

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  17. FOI by lkcl · · Score: 1

    tsk tsk - he should have put in a freedom of information request instead.

  18. thank you for bringing this to our attention by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    As a future convenience, you have been added to our service, all at no charge to you.

    Our whole goddamned civilization is going to collapse under the irony. It's all lolcats from here on out. Damn, the alienz are going to be dumbfounded when they finally stop by to check up on us.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  19. I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they just took really long coffee breaks and beat up people, who pissed that the work wasn't getting done, came over and attempted to do it themselves :)

  20. 10/10; would pay for this service by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    Once, in a previous life before becoming an enlightened free software user, I had a windows 95 install that got infected with a virus and died. For reasons that are obvious or easily guessed I probably deserved it but I also lost valuable data when I sanitized the harddrive. If the NSA could retrieve a pre-infection copy of my clipart folder from 1997 I'd pay up to a 5$ service charge without hesitation. I can't imagine I'm the only one who might actually have a legitimate use for my own intercepted data, either.

    1. Re:10/10; would pay for this service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once, in a previous life before becoming an enlightened free software user, I had a windows 95 install that got infected with a virus and died. For reasons that are obvious or easily guessed I probably deserved it but I also lost valuable data when I sanitized the harddrive. If the NSA could retrieve a pre-infection copy of my clipart folder from 1997 I'd pay up to a 5$ service charge without hesitation. I can't imagine I'm the only one who might actually have a legitimate use for my own intercepted data, either.

      They weren't gathering this kind of data at that point. We know because there hasn't been some unexpected catastrophic failure.... You can't do something this stupid, evil, and universal, for long, without some kind of horrible consequence.
       
        Not Karma, just human nature.

  21. NSA Email Backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This individual might consider a non-contra deal with the Oliver North School of Back-Up Management.

  22. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why do you equate the government "regulating" useful things with the government doing useful things?
    "Government regulation" of something usually refers to restrictions being placed on it. In other words, the opposite of providing that thing.

  23. They put stuff IN the cement. They dont make it. by Marrow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Becoming part of the foundation of a building is not considered construction.

  24. I already know the NSA is the bad guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.volokh.com/2013/09/01/illegal-sell-anti-nsa-shirts-bearing-nsa-logo/

  25. Re:Anonymous Troll by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The opposite of providing that thing ... poorly.

    See water, food, electricity.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  26. Ironiception by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why does getting jailed for recording a call to an agency known for recording everybody's calls without legal oversight, in order to get a recording of a conversation (even if by email) strike me as just a tad ironic?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re: Ironiception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like raaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiaaan on your wedding day!

    2. Re: Ironiception by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      A song about irony that, ironically, gives example after example of bad luck but no hint of irony...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  27. From the safety of Holland by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    The first thing I though when I read the headline was that it was someone in the US doing this. The second thing I thought was that this person has probably already been arrested. Then I watched the video and heard the guy is in Holland so I doubt he will be getting in trouble. Surely the long arm of the NSA doesn't reach so far as to have a citizen of Holland physically detained for abusing their phone line? Not yet anyway. I am wondering precisely what number he called. I would not expect the NSA to have a publicly posted customer service number, it would be bombarded with calls like this - but maybe I'm wrong. Really, I am curious to know the nature of the number he called.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  28. Re:Anonymous Troll by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Water is provided by the water cycle, by nature, by evaporation and by geography and geology. The government only decides the ALLOCATION of water. It does not "provide" water. In fact, its job is to DENY certain people water, in order to control.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  29. Most of what the Federal Governement does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would be hard pressed to find in the US Constitution the permission ("enumerated power") for much of what the Federal government does.

    That is not to say that what they are doing isn't "legal", it is, because they say so.

  30. My IP, my right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, the Patriot Act law (with 99% Republican approval) let them copy my Intellectual Property. Surely I have the right to demand at least a copy of my own product!!!
    Oh, wait, not in a Police State.
    Thanks Bush. Thanks Republicans. From 2006 to infinity...AND BEYOND!!

  31. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a strange thing to say. Where I live (in the US) water is provided by a small co-op. They recently had a huge rate hike to comply with new government regulation... for some reason they don't even get subsidized. Now who knows nothing?

  32. Re:What are we paying them for? Not much! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clean water? The Federal Government doesn't do this. State and local governments do this.
    Lights? The Federal Government does not supply electricity to homes. Local governments, usually through public corporations, and some private companies do this. (The TVA did sell directly to large manufacturers in the 2000's but I don't know if they are still doing this--regardless, manufacturers are not houses.)
    Air Travel? The Federal Government doesn't do this--they only "regulate" it. Airlines are privately owned.
    Radio? The Federal Government doesn't do this--they only "regulate" it. Local radio stations are privately owned.
    Reading? The Federal Government doesn't do this. Parents, siblings, teachers do this. I was taught by my mother and teachers--before the Federal Government turned the Public School into the Government School. With social promotions and "being there" promotions, very little reading happens.
    Speaking English? The Federal Government doesn't do this--they require "bi-lingual" education which obstructs the speaking of English. I learned English from family members, reading books and some teachers.

    The Federal Government of the USA has done very little to enable my pursuit of happiness. In fact, the Federal Government has taken definite and effective steps to disable my pursuit of happiness. The situation is atrocious now compared to when I was growing up and even more from when my father grew up. I love my country, America, but I fear the Federal Government.

  33. This was a prank, but what happens with a subpoena by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    They'd have trouble arguing that something was a deep black national intelligence secret after sharing it with the DEA. A prosecutor or someone in discovery in a civil suit can make legal demands for information.

    The resulting case would be educational, in that it would put more than one lawyer's kid through college.

  34. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    govt, doesn't provide food water or electricity... what socialist country do you live in?

  35. user on watch list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an anonymous source writes: "this user is now on an official watch list"

  36. Re:Anonymous Troll by clovis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, sort of. one government service is protecting water rights.
    I cannot dump my sewage in the stream upstream of you, nor can I dam up the stream and keep all the water for myself while you die.
    Nor can I dump the waste from my factory or hog farm into the watershed.
    This is a problem going back for millennia, and one of the reasons that people formed governments.

    It has to do with what economists call "tragedy of the commons", a problem that governments are probably the only workable solution.

  37. Local and private sector regulations at work? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Water, food, electricity, flight control, radio communications, the internet - all the result of FEDERAL government regulations. Without those, you have unfettered capitalism and race-to-the bottom economics. There's a reason most US cities are no longer completely socked in with smog, and it has nothing to do with local government spending or private sector voluntary efforts to reduce pollution.

    For all the bullshit money-wasting stuff the feds do, there is still a lot that you would sorely miss if it were never here or were to disappear tomorrow.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  38. Re:Anonymous Troll by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I cannot dump my sewage in the stream upstream of you, nor can I dam up the stream and keep all the water for myself while you die.
    Nor can I dump the waste from my factory or hog farm into the watershed.

    AKA denying people water!!! See government is EEEEEVILLLL!!!!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  39. Re:Anonymous Troll by mcl630 · · Score: 1

    You're right, food safety is completely useless. As long as you pay Monsato/Nestle/PepsiCo/McDonalds/etc/etc/etc for your food, it doesn't really matter if it's tainted and you die from it.

  40. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really??? Nature is conveniently pumping water from Lake Michigan into my home (40 miles away) so my sinks and shower work??? I really had no idea that pipes were naturally occurring features.

  41. Re:Anonymous Troll by mcl630 · · Score: 1

    Everywhere I've lived (also in the US), water has been provided by the city.

  42. Welcome to the new slashdot by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Rather boring and uneventful. How did this ever get posted anyways?

    If it is anti-government it goes on the front page, simple as that.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  43. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you are really stretching in order to make yourself correct.

    Yes, government does not create water out of nothing. The only one who can create water out of nothing (or for that mater, create anything out of nothing) is the FSM. But no one here was talking about creating water out of nothing.

  44. Re:Anonymous Troll by clovis · · Score: 1

    "a small co-op" Now that brings up something else interesting.

    Most people who live outside of cities have telephone service, electricity ONLY because some government entity enabled, cajoled, and forced the larger providers to supply services to the remote areas. See " Rural Electrification Act of 1935" as an example.
    For those that don't know, those "remote areas" are where our food comes from.

    BTW, Some detail about the regulation and the huge rate hike would have been nice.

  45. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Government provides my water. Its called the Colorado River Compact. look it up. also something about a series of dams that were built on the river

  46. Re:What are we paying them for? Not much! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    Clean water? The Federal Government doesn't do this. State and local governments do this.

    The states and municipalities do the work of building and maintaining water supplies, but they do it to standards developed and enforced by the federal EPA, under the Clean Water Act, which means that you have few instances of a municipality skimping on, say, water main maintenance. The feds also sometimes get involved in interstate water deals and disputes between states over who gets what from a shared water supply.

    Lights? The Federal Government does not supply electricity to homes. Local governments, usually through public corporations, and some private companies do this.

    Again, the feds, specifically the Department of Energy, are involved in making that all work.

    Air Travel? The Federal Government doesn't do this--they only "regulate" it. Airlines are privately owned.

    Yeah, those air traffic controllers, crash investigators, aircraft inspectors, pilot license examiners, etc don't do anything important, right? I agree that private corporations play an important role in air travel, but it's not like the feds are not intimately involved in making everything run smoothly.

    Radio? The Federal Government doesn't do this--they only "regulate" it. Local radio stations are privately owned.

    And that regulation means that you don't have 10 radio stations in your immediate vicinity all broadcasting on 90.1 FM, or radio stations trying to drown out other stations by broadcasting a louder and stronger signal.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  47. Re:This was a prank, but what happens with a subpo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really. The Classified Information Procedures Act (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18a/usc_sup_05_18_10_sq3.html) would apply just like always. Ultimately, something would be produced by the NSA, but it might be a summary, heavily redacted, subject to a gag order, or reviewed only by the judge.

  48. NSA even has call takers collecting user info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably got the window cleaners taking names and personal details too. Lol.

  49. Re:This was a prank, but what happens with a subpo by PPH · · Score: 1

    Never mind the DEA. The IRS gets to look at that data as well (thanks to the Patriot Act). And they'll go after a dropped nickel, intelligence security be damned.

    Want to know what the gov't has on you? Short them a few hundred dollars and wait for the audit. They'll bring every scrap of information they can get their hands on to the audit. A bit of social engineering and they'll read your entire life history back to you. So you pay the tax plus penalties and you've got a peek at your dossier that the 10% penalty could never have bought spent elsewhere.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  50. Re:Anonymous Troll by losfromla · · Score: 1

    but you can dump all that and more that as long as you have the appropriate license from the government. It isn't like its all "safety first" the government is more about safety first, after profits, and also minimal fines for gross damage to the environment, etc. Polluting the waterways and watersheds are one of the rights of big business, because that's what lobbying gets them.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  51. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sounds like communism, in the UK it is provided by the private sector.

    Govt still regulates them however, but that's a far cry from actually providing said water.

  52. Re:Anonymous Troll by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

    The government regulates those things.

    Or are you just dense?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  53. This is Like Obama Care by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    When Obama Care kicks in full speed, I can drop my health insurance and pay the $360 health care tax. So since the NAS wants to save my emails to mom; why can't those folks in the Aloha State have a public page to allow me to aceess my emails, under the Freedom Of Information Act? The NSA couild turn this Snoden event in to a PR campain that states, "hay! we'ere the good guys, and we can help you out!"

    Instead the NSA acts like theyr'e selling an airplane ticket?

    1. Re:This is Like Obama Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and then you have no health care insurance dummy. So when you get sick you pay full price.

    2. Re:This is Like Obama Care by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Sad, another AC without a clue. Maybe if these AC's think this dribble, then maybe they may find their solution to be benefical to everyone?

  54. Water provided by the city? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Okay, I've actually moved around a lot. Right now my water is via personal well. Before that it was the town, before that a cooperative, before that a public company.

    Personally, I've always found I get the best service from the cooperatives. Partially as a result and thinking about the economics I think coops are the best economic model for utilities due to their monopolistic nature - if you at least have the customer owning them, it makes the company care more for serving their owner-customers than making a profit.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  55. Die NSA ist mein Eckermann by 12WTF$ · · Score: 1

    Just lifted this from boing boing because it fits ...

    Known for his biting satire and his dedication to Socialism, [dissident East German songwriter Wolf Biermann] chronicled his life under surveillance with a powerful sense of humor, and nowhere better than in the “Stasi Ballad” from 1974, with its classic refrain – “Die Stasi ist mein Eckermann.”
    That is a reference to the German poet Johann Peter Eckermann, who patiently chronicled the utterances of that Olympian figure of German literature, Johann Wolfgang Goethe – ultimately published in Goethe’s Conversations With Eckermann in the Last Years of His Life, which Nietzsche called the “greatest work in the German language”. Here is an English rendition:

    I feel a common humanity
    With the poor Stasi dogs,
    Required to sit through snow and downpours of rain
    Tediously listening to me through the
    Microphone they have installed
    Which catches every sound,
    Songs, jokes and soft curses
    Sitting on the toilet and in the kitchen
    Brothers from state security – you alone
    Know all my troubles.

    You alone can attest,
    How my whole human effort
    Is committed with passionate tenderness
    And zest to Our Great Cause.
    Words which otherwise would be lost,
    Are captured firmly on your tapes,
    And – I’m sure of it – now and again
    You sing my songs in bed.
    I sing my gratitude to you,
    Stasi is my Ecker,
    Stasi is my Ecker,
    Stasi is my Eckermann.

    --
    Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
  56. Try a FOIA request by mysidia · · Score: 1

    For retrieval of your data.... or maybe a lawsuit, with a subpoena for their copy of your files; or seek a court order for a copy of the data......

  57. Re:Anonymous Troll by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    You would be surprised at what people can do when they decide to get off their asses and work together. Ever heard of the early trading companies - East India trading co, United Fruit Co, etc? PRIVATE entities that built more infrastructure and did more for their territories than any government ever did. You don't have to have a government to get something done, all you need is leadership, organization and the will. How about all those churches you see everywhere all over the world. Government built those?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  58. Re:Anonymous Troll by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    You'd be surprised at what some people think. But honestly the point I am making is that a government is not some benevolent entity that tries to do things for you. A government is an entity that says "no you can't do that", and uses force to back it up. That's how you get power - by saying "No". 2 year olds know this. Ever wonder why most of licitation deals for the government are private and no one is allowed to see them? You think the government is doing people favors? Sigh.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  59. government "enforcement" is extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been there, dealt with that in a number of industries. I have yet to deal with ANY government employee who knows enough about the basis for the regulations to be anything but a useless twit filling out useless paperwork.
    The vast majority of "regulation" is man-made B.S. rent-seeking crony-capitalist extortion. I have "been" a real-deal Quality Control Engineer, so I have "done" enforcement the correct, not the government way.

  60. Congratulations by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Your jingoistic suckfest got 4 and my reasoned response got 0. You win! And what you win is a country that continues to go straight into the toilet bowl while you pretend that everything is OK.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  61. Re:Anonymous Troll by techsimian · · Score: 1

    Typically the testing is only when a property is sold.

    As for regulations...most came about because private industry did not provide adequate oversight. Whether a particular regulatory body is still needed is another matter.

  62. Re:Anonymous Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    East India company and others were set up as government regulated monopolies.

  63. What price glory? by JohnReynolds425 · · Score: 1

    This guy was hilarious, and I loved how he maintained his sincerity while frustrating the NSA's pursuit of his personal information... at least for the time being. By now, they have a dozen men on his trail. I fear for what's in store for him, especially when he travels. He needs to start using encryption tools for email, cell phone calls and text messages. And he has to take his file down from Dropbox, iCloud, or wherever, and stash them in a private cloud like Cloudlocker (www.cloudlocker.it), where they still need a warrant to get inside.

  64. Re:Anonymous Troll by clovis · · Score: 2

    True, sorta, but the worst excesses occurred before government intervention and "appropriate licenses" were required. here's an example: http://www.environmentalcouncil.org/priorities/article.php?x=264
    Also, ask anyone who lived in Los Angeles in the 1960-70's
      It was a free-for-all before the 1970's , and then we elected representatives who promised to do something about that and they did ( see Nixon, EPA (1970), Clean Water Act(1972) . BTW, I'm an old person, and I remember very well the days before local, state and federal government intervention into protecting the environment.
    What companies can get away with now-a-days is nothing compared to before government got involved.
    BTW, many people have made a good case that the reason so many jobs left the USA for third-world countries isn't so much cheap labor, but rather the non-existent environmental rules in those countries.

  65. Re:Anonymous Troll by clovis · · Score: 1

    I suspect you're playing irony here, but most Slashdot readers would not know the history of the companies you named.
    It would be difficult to come up with an example more evil than the East India Trading company.
    United Fruit is farther down the list, maybe only in the top ten.

  66. Re:Anonymous Troll by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    All corporations are government charters. That's how you incorporate. What's your point? Corporations are still private.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  67. Re:They put stuff IN the cement. They dont make it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps not, but it does give new meaning to the term "pillar of society".

  68. Dilbert by rpstrong · · Score: 1

    So am I the first to link to today's Dilbert?