Slashdot Mirror


PayPal Freezes MailPile's Account

rysiek writes "Remember MailPile, the privacy-focused, community-funded FOSS webmail project with built-in GPG support? The good news is, the funding campaign is a success, with $135k raised (the goal was $100k). The bad news is: PayPal froze MailPile's account, along with $45k that was on it, and will not un-freeze it until MailPile team provides 'an itemized budget and your development goal dates for your project.' One of the team members also noted: 'Communications with PayPal have implied that they would use any excuse available to them to delay delivering as much of our cash as possible for as long as possible.' PayPal doesn't have a great track record as far as fund freezing is concerned — maybe it's high time to stop using PayPal?"

80 of 443 comments (clear)

  1. Who leaves money in a paypal account. by queazocotal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's well known that they do this sort of stuff - not regularly sweeping it out to a bank account is a really bad idea.

    1. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      regularly sweeping money into a bank account will also get your account frozen.

      At least it won't get your account frozen with your money in it!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by peragrin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Visa and mastercard have prepaid cards that work just as easily as a credit card you put fixed amounts onto them and then spend it as a credit card.

      It is much safer than paypal. I only use paypal when i am forced to. 1 out of 10 transactions go bad for me when using paypal.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...regularly sweeping money into a bank account will also get your account frozen.

      I'm not saying I trust PayPal all that much, but this is simply untrue. I have businesses that use a couple of different PayPal accounts, and regular sweeps are de rigeur for us, and we've never had any account frozen by them.

      Part of the reason we sweep them is to guard against just that possibility, however.

      It's also important to sweep the account you are sweeping into... usually, the wire transfer capability works both ways. So they can, without additional authorization, suck funds back out of your bank account. (if anyone happens to know a bank that will let you prevent this sort of outgoing transaction, I am all ears)

      If the funds aren't in that account, you could get hit with an NSF charge from your institution, but you'll have an easier time arguing with them about it than with PayPal, and a $30 bounce charge is a lot less than $50,000 or whatever amount PayPal might decide to sit on instead.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    4. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like using credit cards since as dodgy as they are they are still less dodgy than PayPal. What is my liability limit with PayPal? Also can PayPal do charge backs like credit cards can?

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by brain159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's poor form to use a referral link that will personally benefit you in this sort of context. It diminishes your point, making you look like any other spammer or paid shill.

    6. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used PayPal once or twice when they first started up, but it very quickly became evident that they were on the fast track to becoming complete dicks.

      Since then, if a merchant doesn't provide an alternative to PaylPal, I find an alternative source for whatever it is that I want to buy. If there is no such alternative, then I suddenly discover that don't want the item as badly as all that. End of story.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    7. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by CaseCrash · · Score: 2

      It's also important to sweep the account you are sweeping into... usually, the wire transfer capability works both ways. So they can, without additional authorization, suck funds back out of your bank account. (if anyone happens to know a bank that will let you prevent this sort of outgoing transaction, I am all ears)

      I think most banks will provide an account like that. I found out at work that we have an incoming only account (outgoing only to another account of ours) where our customers pay us when someone started trying to cash fraudulent checks on it. Since it doesn't allow it, we didn't lose anything. We use Bank of America.

      --
      No, that link you posted to a web comic we've all seen a hundred times is not "obligatory."
    8. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, a lot of people use PayPal. Failing to use it reduces your customer/client/whatever base. While in theory it is nice to say "I will take a moral stand and use XYZ service instead", but in practice anything that decreases the ease of which people send you payments is a bad business plan unless you have a strong enough fanbase to overcome it.

      There is also the problem that many services are integrated with PayPal, so if you want to use them and their systems you have to use PayPal too.

    9. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by cusco · · Score: 2

      Same here. If the only way to pay for something is through PayPal then I won't buy it because I refuse to have an account with them. Besides, how many times has PayPal gotten hacked? In at least a couple of occasions they lost huge amounts of data including customer credit card accounts, billing addresses and real names. Those are the 'crown jewels' of personal financial transactions. It's bad enough that they're asshats, it's worse that they're too cheap/incompetent to adequately secure their customer database.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    10. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree it's spam, but it *is* on topic so your assumption it's just at shill troll is not a good one.

    11. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Nevertheless, the signs were there very early in the piece that they were going to take the douchebag route, I've seen no evidence to the contrary in the years since, and I prefer not to do business with douchebags, even if I'm not myself affected.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    12. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by lightknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. PayPal has become synonymous with the word 'scam.'

      The banks / credit unions should just drop the cost of wire transfers, and be done with it; the result would probably destroy PayPal in a week, provided the cost was low enough, and painless enough...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    13. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by contrapunctus · · Score: 4, Informative

      tried to sign up to dwolla a while ago.
      half way through, they asked for my ssn.
      at the time, i didn't think it was worth it so i didn't provide it.
      but magically, i ended up on their spam email list.
      fuck them and they shitty spam emails, will never use them now.

    14. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Also can PayPal do charge backs like credit cards can?

      They can, but they don't. They'll chargeback from the seller, but hold it and not give it to the buyer. I always use PayPal with a credit card. I got scammed by a "yes, I sent it" shipper who never sent it, so I tried to get my money back through PayPal and they refused. The credit card dispute had my money in my account almost instantly.

      Of course, every seller claims buyers are scammers, and buyers claim sellers are scammers, and PayPal just tries to scam both.

    15. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by dissy · · Score: 2

      Failing to use it reduces your customer/client/whatever base

      So I risk alienating a potential customer and their money, thus should accept paypal and risk having that customer send me money that I quite possibly will never see?

      Doesn't sound like too much of a risk either way as both end up with me not getting paid, so might as well go the least effort route.

    16. Re:Who leaves money in a paypal account. by xelah · · Score: 2

      If you're any sort of serious business you should go to a bank and get a proper merchant account instead. For me, nothing screams 'part-time trader who normally only uses eBay' than someone accepting money only via PayPal.

      Bigger multi-million turnover customer might get a better deal (but how many of those do you see accepting PayPal?), but PayPal's model seems to be to essentially very cheaply bulk 'retail' payment accounts with almost everything automated. I think that's one reason so many people have problems - do anything outside their idea of mainstream and their computer will freeze your account. And you can forget the idea of trying to talk to a human - if you do, all you'll get is one who's not much more than a voice recognition system for their computer. Having to put some actual effort in to dealing with someone properly seems to be just too expensive for their model.....easier to just go with the flawed computer risk model, shut someone out, and make your money from the next person.

  2. "Maybe?" by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "High time to stop using paypal" was years ago. They've been famous for this scummy behavior since even before ebay bought them and forced you to use them.

    1. Re:"Maybe?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why does PayPal have any say in how the funds raised are to be spent? That is like the bank demanding an itemized weekly budget and a yearly fiscal and activity plan before they'll dispense funds from your account.

    2. Re:"Maybe?" by orgelspieler · · Score: 3, Informative

      What else is there? Look, if I see a vendor on eBay who doesn't use PayPal, my first thought isn't "oh, this person is a conscientious objector to PayPal's malfeasance." Instead, it's an instant scammer alert. The one time I used BidPay, I got scammed. Never again. On the other hand, it's way to easy for shitty buyers to screw you over on PayPal.

      I don't know what the other options are, though. Even on Slashdot, there seems to be a lot of "don't use PayPal" but not a lot of "use $SERVICE instead" as an alternative.

    3. Re:"Maybe?" by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It stinks of the government and/or IRS abuse. Forget boycotting business for its behaviour [read: complicity]. Isn't it time we start boycotting government a bit?

    4. Re:"Maybe?" by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Okay, lets rephrase the question ...

      Why are you still using ebay? It hasn't been a worth while way to buy things since roughly 2006 or so.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:"Maybe?" by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Shhh, you'll ruin a perfectly crazy rant!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:"Maybe?" by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Informative

      High time was when I first read a few stories on here:

      http://paypalsucks.com/

      In like 2006.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:"Maybe?" by shaitand · · Score: 2

      You can get a lot of this stuff on Amazon now at Ebay cheap prices. Most of it is just cheap chinese wares that aren't used but new and some of those vendors sell through amazon now as well as Ebay.

    8. Re:"Maybe?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll move to Somalia if you move to North Korea. I'd rather have no government than a totalitarian one.

    9. Re:"Maybe?" by godefroi · · Score: 2

      Just the one guy handing out his dwolla affiliate referral link. I thought those went out of style?

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    10. Re:"Maybe?" by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hell, even with CASH transactions the government likes to take first and then asks questions

      well, that's because cash is the easiest and most obvious form of money laundering, and we all know that criminal proceeds are laundered by terrorists to fund their evil activities, so when you next see someone using cash, just point to them and shout "a terrorist, a terrorist". If they complain, get a group together to chuck them in some water, if they drown they were innocent and will get 27 virgins in the afterlife.

      (and before anyone says, that's witches... witches are so 10th century, terrorists are today's excuse for government control).

      Oh, any Paypal is not regulated nearly as much as other credit providers. That's the problem - Visa, for example, is not allowed to freeze anyone's account unless they are suspected of being a wit... terrorist, or just disliked by the US government.

    11. Re:"Maybe?" by jonwil · · Score: 2

      I suspect a lot of what PayPal does (e.g. freezing accounts with "suspicious" transactions and refusing to unfreeze until you provide proof you are who you claim to be and proof of where the money came from/where its going to) has to do with the international rules designed to prevent money laundering.

      When you open an account at a regular bank, you generally need to show ID to prove you are who you claim to be (usually at least one piece of ID that can be linked back to government databases such as drivers license, passport, birth certificate or whatever). This means the banks can then hand those details over to the government alongside any transactions that meet the government (or bank) criteria for "suspicious" transactions under money laundering laws

      With PayPal on the other hand, the identity checks they perform when you sign up are much less strict which means that they dont have sufficient proof-of-identification to comply with money laundering laws and hence if they see transactions that they need to report under money-laundering laws they have no option but to freeze the account until sufficient information has been obtained to allow them to properly report the transaction.

      Someone ought to start putting pressure on the US government to start treating PayPal as a bank and require they follow all the rules banks have to follow (better yet, why not convince the banks and credit card companies that its in their best interest if PayPal has to follow the same rules as they do since that will increase PayPal's costs and level the playing field)

    12. Re:"Maybe?" by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      Banks do do stuff like this.

      Just one example - Wells Fargo instantly freezes the bank accounts of someone who files bankruptcy, until the bankruptcy trustee tells them to unfreeze them. WF claims that they are required by law to do this, though strangely no other major bank interprets the law that way and the feds have not prosecuted them. Lots of fun for example over a holiday weekend, for someone who is already financially in a bad way.

    13. Re:"Maybe?" by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "High time to stop using paypal" was years ago.

      No, it wasn't. What passed years ago was "It's high time PayPal was regulated as a bank."

    14. Re:"Maybe?" by cusco · · Score: 2

      When all your neighbors follow suit the drain fields from the septic tanks will contaminate your well. Off-grid is fine for a few isolated mountain-man types. You can't run a civilization that way.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  3. FE F1 F0.fm by return+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I smell the NSA.

    1. Re:FE F1 F0.fm by tgd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I smell the NSA.

      I don't. I smell Visa and MasterCard... which is worse.

      PayPal is on the hook for chargebacks when MaiPile doesn't deliver. They're on the hook based on their own internal policies, and the policies of the big card networks.

      Given how many of the crowd sourced projects never come to fruition, it doesn't surprise me that there's pushback from the companies that handle the payments. (Especially now that so many of them are pushed as more than a simple donation and are really a pre-purchase of a product or service.)

  4. Don't use US services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They will betray you.

  5. We need to push regulators to treat them as a bank by Isca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's the only way to stop this nonsense. There will be new, different nonsense at that point but at least they will have to justify and backup what they do.

  6. Who do people still use PayPal high value accounts by Tukz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't get it.
    I hear stories like this all the time.

    Why do people insist on using PayPal for high value accounts?

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  7. People still use PayPal? by durin · · Score: 2

    I cancelled my account years ago due to their fishy tactics.

    --
    Why, yes! I AM new here.
  8. What right does PayPal have? by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aside from the fact that PayPal holds the money, what right do they have to demand a business plan from an indiegogo funded project? Is there a business connection between PayPal and Indiegogo? Or is PayPal just performing a dick move?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:What right does PayPal have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because fuck you, that's why. Also, they keep bribing congressmen to not regulate them so there is no enforced law saying they can't do that.

    2. Re:What right does PayPal have? by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably something in those terms of service people don't read.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:What right does PayPal have? by fnj · · Score: 2

      Probably something in those terms of service [paypal.com] people don't read.

      Funny; I don't see it there.

  9. Surprise! by kintamanimatt · · Score: 2

    As tiresome as it is to read the same kind of PayPal horror story, I hope they keep coming. The world needs to be continually reminded not use PayPal because of they way they treat their customers. Why people voluntarily continue to use PayPal is beyond me. There are an increasing number of less evil alternatives.

    I hope PayPal becomes a relic of the past, like AltaVista and other things I can no longer remember.

    1. Re:Surprise! by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 2

      "Google Checkout is an online payment processing service provided by Google aimed at simplifying the process of paying for online purchases. Users store their credit or debit card and shipping information in their Google Account, so that they can purchase at participating stores by clicking an on-screen button. Google Checkout provides fraud protection and a unified page for tracking purchases and their status. According to a Google update[1] on May 2013, Google Checkout will be retired on November 20, 2013."

      Wiil be retired on November 20, 2013.

  10. Re:Don't feel sorry for anyone using PayPal by Surazal · · Score: 2

    Sometimes there are services that don't have another option for online payment *other* than PayPal. It kind of sucks, but there it is. Just make sure you never keep any money in the account. PayPal's been pulling this kind of shit for years. I'm surprised no one has taken them to court over it yet (or if they had, why it hasn't made the news).

    --
    --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
  11. Paypal freezing is old news by LoRdTAW · · Score: 5, Informative

    Paypal froze Notch's account after Mincraft went gold and began selling. Supposedly in just one day he managed to get over one hundred thousand dollars in sales which prompted paypal to freeze his account.

    This is thanks to the US patriot act, bank secrecy act and possibly some other nanny state laws. Large transactions are red flagged and reported. The owner of the account must provide an explanation of what they are doing with the money. This is one of those risk mitigation plans we were talking about the other day which helps the US government find the "bad guys". Eventually paypal will unfreeze the account once they learn the money won't be used for terrorism, drugs, racketeering or other boogeyman bullshit. I feel safer already.

    1. Re:Paypal freezing is old news by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Paypal froze Notch's account after Mincraft went gold and began selling. Supposedly in just one day he managed to get over one hundred thousand dollars in sales which prompted paypal to freeze his account.

      This is thanks to the US patriot act, bank secrecy act and possibly some other nanny state laws. Large transactions are red flagged and reported. The owner of the account must provide an explanation of what they are doing with the money. This is one of those risk mitigation plans we were talking about the other day which helps the US government find the "bad guys". Eventually paypal will unfreeze the account once they learn the money won't be used for terrorism, drugs, racketeering or other boogeyman bullshit. I feel safer already.

      As if Paypal unfroze Notch's account out of the goodness of their hearts. No, the only way to get unfrozen is to have a huge crowd of fans making a big stink and generating lots of bad press. Does anyone remember Something Awful's Katrina fund? Paypal will try to steal your money, or at least sit on it for as long as they can to make interest on it. That this is a surprise to anyone is a surprise to me. (yes, that is what I meant to say there)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:Paypal freezing is old news by TheSpoom · · Score: 2

      What? PayPal freezing accounts has nothing to do with bank regulation and everything to do with the fact that they're not a bank. Think of PayPal like a shifty uncle who offers to let you store your money in his safe. Store too much and he might decide to keep it, and there's not a goddamn thing you can do about it.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:Paypal freezing is old news by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

      Paypal froze Notch's account after Mincraft went gold and began selling. Supposedly in just one day he managed to get over one hundred thousand dollars in sales which prompted paypal to freeze his account.

      This is thanks to the US patriot act, bank secrecy act and possibly some other nanny state laws. Large transactions are red flagged and reported. The owner of the account must provide an explanation of what they are doing with the money. This is one of those risk mitigation plans we were talking about the other day which helps the US government find the "bad guys". Eventually paypal will unfreeze the account once they learn the money won't be used for terrorism, drugs, racketeering or other boogeyman bullshit. I feel safer already.

      Actually put this way, and after what's happened recently with the US going after bitcoin companies for money laundering...it actually makes sense for paypal to protect itself (from the government) by making a reasonable attempt to verify that the money passing through it is not obviously money in the process of being laundered.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  12. Re:Depends on what you do via Gaypal by kintamanimatt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gay isn't a synonym for bad.

  13. Re:We need to push regulators to treat them as a b by kintamanimatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PayPal in Europe is a bank and they still suck. The way to stop PayPal's silliness is to stop using PayPal.

  14. High time to stop using PayPal? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    Shit man, that was 14 years ago. You know, when they started abusing accounts under protection of "not a bank".

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:High time to stop using PayPal? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Worse than this, I have friends that tell me, "Oh no PayPal is fine, just only use it for sending money, not receiving."

      No, just no. By supporting them you are helping perpetuate the scam that is PayPal. How do you think they make money? By getting people to use their service.

      Stop supporting people that make PayPal possible, and they will disappear.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  15. Re:Who do people still use PayPal high value accou by c0d3g33k · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why do people use PayPal at all?

    Mainly as a convenient means to avoid giving credit card numbers to those I trust even less than them. Nothing beyond that.

  16. Re:Who do people still use PayPal high value accou by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

    You'd have to be a fucking moron to use them at all. Why would anybody with a brain give their banking information to this company, even for a "low value" account?

    That's why you don't give them your normal bank account. Instead you create a separate checking account (which you can get from some banks with no monthly fee) and link that account to PayPal. Regularly transfer the money from that account into your real account. That way, if PayPal does decide to do something stupid, the amount of damage they can do is strictly limited.

    If you're an eBay seller, this is the only sensible way to go.

  17. War on Privacy by sociocapitalist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone who is funding any project that the US government does not like should know better than to use Paypal at this point.

    Paypal is a tool of the US government, for whatever reason(s). and this is hardly the first time they use Paypal as an attack vector.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  18. you may not like it but, yeah, it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gay has been used as a synonym for bad for a long time. The PC police may not like it but that doesn't change the facts.

  19. Re:Who do people still use PayPal high value accou by Rockoon · · Score: 2

    The sellers, not the buyers, are effected by paypals overly-liberal freeze-the-funds policy.

    Because of this, even though there are alternatives to paypal, most sellers continue to accept paypal or they will lose customers that prefer paypal.

    The policies of paypal will eventually put them out of business unless they change their ways, but its a long way down unless they start messing with the buyers too.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  20. Re:We need to push regulators to treat them as a b by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not just Paypal they have to worry about. Look at what normal financial institutions did to Wikileaks. Mastercard stopped procesing payments, and Julian Assange's swiss bank account was frozen. If you challenge the powers that be, you will be retaliated against.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  21. Re:Don't feel sorry for anyone using PayPal by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A bigger question is why. What do PayPal gain by "randomly" freezing accounts like this?

    You'd think the goodwill hit would be more costly than the interest on the frozen funds for the time they hold the cash until forced to finally pay it back.

    They've already got your customers in check, but they go ahead and take an extra pawn, because -- why not? Who else they gonna play with?

    And yet, all this bad publicity -- for years and years -- and still no viable, widely accepted, competitor.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  22. Chargebacks by tepples · · Score: 2

    Consider this situation: Someone pays a business with a credit card through PayPal. Then he files a chargeback, claiming that he did not receive a service. PayPal wants to verify that the business is actually providing the service for which it is charging people. PayPal breathes down businesses' necks when Visa breathes down PayPal's.

  23. Indiegogo by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering how many Indiegogo campaigns this has happened to, I'm surprised the service hasn't switched to one of Paypal's competitors yet. Otherwise this is going to drive projects to Indiegogo's competitors instead.

  24. Few Alternatives... for now. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Informative

    The sheer amount of hate that banks, financial services and operators like Paypal have generated in the population at large is amazing. Exorbitant fees, slow transfers, arrogant customer service, publicly funded bailouts for amounts that almost defy imagination, systematic fraud reaching to the the highest levels of most governments of the world, few to no prosecutions of financial crime - the world of finance and banking it is a stagnated corrupt market that needs some serious competition, a bright light and a clean sweep.

    Bitcoin is a tiny flicker of a spark in the dark rotten world of finance - not even in its infancy. Sure like any currency it can be stolen or used and abused to perpetrate fraud. Sure it is damn inconvenient to use or exchange, hardly anybody accepts it - but despite all this there is an army of people and entrepreneurs, early adopters with more joining every day that are willing to bend over backwards and work through the teething problems simply because it could almost possibly eventually bring much needed change to the almighty financial sector to which our economies now serve (as apposed to the other way around).

    If you think mass media can drum up a propaganda campaign so the Military Industrial Complex can have their profitable wars, wait till you see how far and loud the corporate media "journalists" will willing to go when the financial sector stands to lose absolute monopoly over our currency for online global payments.

    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

  25. Re:Then why do people use eBay? by idontgno · · Score: 2

    Because "everything else" at Amazon doesn't include old-school retro hardware.

    Please, point out where I can get early-80s computer hardware at Amazon. Say, a TRS-80 Model I Expansion Interface. Or S-100 memory cards.

    Sorry. Asides from lots of usually fruitless google searching, there's no real market for retro hardware besides Ebay.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  26. Re:Law Suits By Donors by Skapare · · Score: 2

    Did you actually demand your money back from PayPal? I think people should do exactly that now ... because of the money being blocked. Then donate it by another means.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  27. Google recommends Braintree by tepples · · Score: 2

    Google Checkout will be retired on November 20, 2013

    For sellers of "digital goods" (whatever that means), Google Wallet will remain open. For sellers of physical goods, Google recommends Braintree. I'm under the impression that Google was shamed into closing Google Checkout for physical goods after one of Microsoft's "Scroogled" ad campaigns, which protested the fact that sellers could see buyers' postal codes.

  28. Re:Then why do people use eBay? by operagost · · Score: 2

    You mean I can sell items on Etsy or Amazon like the ones I sold on eBay for a nice profit?

    - A rare Tadpole Alphabook laptop computer
    - Multiple more common Alphaservers and VAXes
    - A small collection of trumpet mouthpieces, some used, some new, all different sizes
    - Two different trombone mutes
    - A nice sounding pair of Klipsch rear channel speakers with a big dent in one of the metal grilles
    - A 50 year old Vincent Bach trumpet case (no trumpet!) in nice shape but smelling a little stale
    - A bunch of old OS/2 software

    None of that is craft stuff, and most of it is either used or one-offs.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  29. Re:Who do people still use PayPal high value accou by Minwee · · Score: 3, Informative

    And giving PayPunk the card number is better?

    They won't let you delete all your card numbers from your PayPal account. You have to leave at least one.

    The only work around is to cancel the card.

    Actually, you can be used by PayUpPal without giving them a credit card number. They just go out of their way to make life difficult for you.

  30. Re:We need to push regulators to treat them as a b by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

    The real issue here is that the US, unlike a lot of other countries, allows businesses who act like commercial banks to not be regulated like commercial banks. That's actually something the CFPB is supposed to be doing, is adding duck-typing to the laws around customer disclosures, access to accounts, etc.

    Some examples of businesses who sometimes act like commercial banks but don't get the same regulations as commercial banks:
    - Mixed commercial and investment banks like BofA.
    - Mortgage brokers
    - Payday lenders
    - Check cashers (often linked to payday lenders)
    - Credit card issuers
    - Gift card issuers
    - Anyone who allows users to have an account with a dollar value that they can withdraw or redeem later

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  31. Re:Who do people still use PayPal high value accou by willith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's insane. If someone steals my credit card number, there's fast and quick legal redress. The most inconvenient part is waiting for the credit card company to overnight me a new card.

    Paypal, on the other hand, can lift actual money right out of the checking account they insist on linking to my account and actually defraud me. There is literally no instance where simply using a credit card number is less safe than dealing with paypal.

  32. Re:Few Alternatives... for now. by fast+turtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Paypal isn't a bank according to U.S. Regulations. Otherwise their doing this would get them slammed by the Feds in a hurry as it violates many regulations. In fact, under the Feds, they would be slapped down for Money Laundring and I'd suggest the Project Devs push RICO Charges in Federal Court against Paypal (Racketeering/Corruption) which if successful would give them punitive damages of not triple but six to ten times the amount of the monies stollen and the profit Paypal is making from holding that money to play with it. How much money is Paypal making by holding those funds as they are - Stocks/Bonds market - 2+ percent per day? That's a lot of money when you look at the totals.

    It's this kind of action by Paypal that pushed me to drop all family accounts with them and to quit using Ebay. It's not worth the agravation and I did vote with my wallet.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  33. Re:Few Alternatives... for now. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't confuse your little corner of the internet with the real world. In the real world, you're a tempest in a teacup, son.

    Right [1], back [2], at ya [3], son.

    [1] The 2012 Harris Poll Annual Public Summary Report (PDF)
    [2] Banking Stinks Like Cigarettes and Politics: Survey Shows Contempt for Industry
    [3] Banking Sector Is Slowly Replacing Big Oil As The Most Hated Industry

    ...

    The Harris poll asks consumers for their opinions on six key attributes of the 60 ‘most visible’ corporations in the United States. Rating companies’ social responsibility, emotional appeal, products and services, workplace environment, financial performance and vision and leadership, the Harris RQ survey seeks to get a snapshot of corporate America’s reputation among consumers.... Banking and financial services scored terribly.

    ...

    But the banking sector has screamed up the charts, and not counting the always-hated federal government, it was No. 2 with a bullet as of Gallup's most recent poll, taken way back in August 2012. Fifty-three percent of Americans surveyed had a negative view of banks in that poll, up from just 18 percent in 2007, before the crisis. The percentage of people with a positive view of banking has plunged to 25 percent from 50 percent in 2007.

  34. Re:Depends on what you do via Gaypal by whistlingtony · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gay IS a widely used synonym for "bad". But of course, it is also used to describe sexual orientation. We all know this, and all the arguing about it is silly.

    What is NOT silly is determining if we're going to let this continue. We all understand that using the word Niggerdly in polite company is rather gauche. Niggerdly has a meaning, and it's not very flattering. It's not a good word to use. Gay needs to become like that.

    Lets find a new word for Bad/Stupid. We all have friends/coworkers that are gay. Lets show them some basic respect.

  35. Re:So why don't they do what's asked? by Nadaka · · Score: 2

    Paypal has no right to withhold funds on demand of this information, that money belongs to the organization.

  36. Re:Other countries' immigration departments by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Funny

    As a U.S.-born U.S. resident with a B.Sc. in computer science, I sort of feel locked into U.S. services. What other country would let me use its services instead?

    If you get the M.Sc., you will know answers to all questions!

  37. Re:Depends on what you do via Gaypal by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you mean this word?

    Yes, sometimes being one letter off makes a whole heap of difference.

    Not that I would be inclined to use either one of them, since I have some idea what might (not) be good for me.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  38. Re:Who do people still use PayPal high value accou by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

    The whole system is broken, that's what's missing here. A couple numbers and a name contains all the information needed to withdraw money from my account, that is the real problem and it is seriously backwards early 20th century thinking. There is no reason that information should fly around unencrypted, heck it's written in plain text on my credit card for crying out loud, why does no one think that is an issue!? The sad thing is that something like Google Wallet, that has enough brains to be password protected and provide strong encryption, should have been the answer to all this, but the banking system is so incredibly backward that rather than encrypting the data in a way that makes sense (with one time pads a la secureID) they ended up broadcasting the same unencrypted string of data that can be copied right off a card.

    To summarize, the solution to the problem of buying from someone you don't trust with your CC information isn't to use paypal, it's to overhaul the CC system to the 21st century so that you aren't sharing the actually CC information with anyone but the bank to begin with.

  39. Re:Depends on what you do via Gaypal by sjames · · Score: 2

    Niggardly and the other word are false cognates.It's not a good choice of word these days because it will most likely be mis-understood by a significant number of people.

    Gay is interesting since it's use for homosexual is just as much slang as it's use for bad. meanwhile, bad==good and many years ago it was noted that you gotta be hot if you wanna be cool.

    While it certainly was a slur against homosexsuals to use gay for bad at one time, it's not clear that the association is intended anymore, though like niggardly, it may be best to choose another word to avoid mis-understandings.

  40. Remember, no. by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2

    Care, no...

    Actually I do. I could care less about the project, who gives a fuck. Another bleeding heart FOSS is your friend bullshit waste of time and money.

    But clearly since PayPal provides a crowdfunding platform they have a right to ask for LEGITIMATE reason to continue to fund a project if there is some question to how the money is being used, or no real information about the progress of a project.

    I am tired of people rising to the defense of open source and crowdfunded projects without thinking. There is no reason to assume that you can be handed thousands of investor's money and then have no real business strategy, budget, or timeframe to deliver on your goals. If your investor asks for progress, you fucking provide it. If your investor is calling you out, you better cover your ass with legitimate paperwork.

    So suck it up MailPile. You thought you could create some crowdfunded bullshit project, take the money from tens of thousands of people that will just throw anything at FOSS out of some vapid belief it matters and then provide what; a reskin of some existing open source mail program and call it a day?

    Hey, if MailPile is legitimate and well organized that information should be trivial and readily obtained so feed it to PayPal and tell them to shut the fuck up. But if its a bunch of stoners thinking they got away with ripping off a bunch of retards through PayPal, they should guess again.

    I think PayPal is clearly in the right here to ask for some information about how the money is being spent considering they offered the opportunity to have this project funded through their organization.

    Bam

    https://developer.paypal.com/webapps/developer/docs/classic/lifecycle/crowdfunding/

    Time to RTF-Guidlines

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  41. Re:My PayPal Experience. by c0d3g33k · · Score: 2

    I stopped using PayPal a few years ago. I forgot to renew the card it was associated when it expired. When I tried to update the details PayPal had blocked the account and refused to re-active unless I provided photographic ID. What, pray tell, do PayPal want or need with photographic ID? So, I, being the level headed and rational individual I am, smelled a huge fetid rat and stopped using their 'services.'

    One good reason is to prevent forgotten/inactive accounts from being fraudulently reactivated for nefarious purposes (id theft, money laundering, whatever). Asking for proof of identity seems like a good security measure to me, not some nefarious scheme to - well what were you afraid of exactly?

    I'm beginning to realize that despite genuine problematic behavior on their part, a lot of the PayPal hate seems to be the result of knee-jerk "I didn't get what I want so they suck", a whopping dose of conspiracy angst and just plain not thinking things through to understand why. I sure as hell don't trust them indiscriminately, but I don't think they are the great evil that some make them out to be. For the vast majority of their customers, they seem to do just fine, otherwise they would be out of business.