Slashdot Mirror


Homeless, Unemployed, and Surviving On Bitcoins

An anonymous reader writes "Wired profiles a homeless man who's supporting himself primarily through Bitcoin. Jesse Angle, a former network engineer, earns small amounts throughout the day by visiting various websites that pay him to look at ads. He then converts it to gift certificates and uses the certificates to buy food. '"It's a lot less embarrassing," he says. "You don't have to put yourself out there." And unlike panhandling in Pensacola, using an app like Bitcoin Tapper won't put him on the wrong side of the law. This past May, Pensacola — where Angle has lived since April — passed an ordinance that bans not only panhandling but camping on city property.' Angle learned about Bitcoin from a charity organization called Sean's Outpost that wanted something better than PayPal for accepting donations over the internet. The organization has even opened an outreach center paid for solely with Bitcoins. Founder Jason King said, 'Bitcoin beats the s#!% out of regular money, We've resonated so well with people because it's direct action. There's no chaff between donation and helping people.'"

403 comments

  1. What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    eHobo?

    1. Re:What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No there's an app for that called iHobo.

    2. Re:What's the word by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This sounds like something from a Futurama episode.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who knows if this story is true or not, it just doesn't seem to add up. Thanks to Jimmy Kimmel you can't trust ANYTHING you see on the internet anymore. The internet's best days are behind it.

    4. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      With the support of the homeless, there is no stopping bit coin.

    5. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth do you pan-handle bitcoin?

    6. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a word for it! It's BULLSHIT. Nothing to get the weekend going like another bit coin bullshit story!

    7. Re: What's the word by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey man would you gimme some bitcoins so I can get a bite to eat? My address is 31uEbMgunupShBVTewXjtqbBv5MndwfXhb

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re: What's the word by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would, but you'll only spend it on Silk Road.

    9. Re:What's the word by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      The internet is OVER!

    10. Re: What's the word by Linsaran · · Score: 1

      Give it to me, I'll waste it on mining hardware from BFL that will never be delivered ;p
      1MEEyqA6DooLBtamSMAdvTv8doz1e4beZg

      --
      In a bit of shameless internet panhandling, I accept Litecoin Donations at Lbd2oH9QsthD1GfuUXPyka12YxvWJYnBVf
    11. Re:What's the word by behrooz0az · · Score: 0

      There is always someone saying something like that, Of course it gets worse every day, use it now before it gets more unreliable and PRISMatic.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    12. Re:What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iHobo, uHobo, 'eHobo.

    13. Re: What's the word by dirtaddshp · · Score: 1

      dont hate AC

    14. Re:What's the word by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Is that what they call the guys camping in front of apple stores for their new shiny?

    15. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Address start with a 1 you moron

    16. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. You can't trust anything that is being said and everything said, is being watched.
      It does seem to be going more rapidly down hill than usual.
      I think we have gone past the windmill on the Carson spur and there is not much to do about it anymore

    17. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst.
      Internet.
      Ever.

    18. Re: What's the word by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Spam-handling.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      safer than buying it on the street

    20. Re: What's the word by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      hahah nice one, but forget the kidding, this is another story of the impending success of bitcoin, we all want it to supersede the $ and if we want really hard, it will

    21. Re: What's the word by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      lulz funny after funny, it's hard to beat these smart guys on /. and get modded up, keep this thread going, hey man

    22. Re: What's the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a true story. I live in Pensacola and have worked with numerous groups in helping these people out. These guys are real and they also have a homeless shelter here that is fueled by bitcoin.

      The real question people keep over looking is, where did homeless people, that can't get off their asses long enough to get a job, get brand new laptops, tablets and smartphones ? Last I checked you can't buy electronics with foodstamps. If they have money coming in to be able to afford these things then why the fuck are they still homeless ? If they truly didn't want to live the life they do they would get their priorities straight and not focus on a marketing scam like Bitcoin and get into HUD housing or one of the million other options that people have in this oversized underpopulated city.

      Btw don't pity party these fuckwads. None of them are mentally disabled. They're just shitty people that do shitty things to fuck other people over and deserve less or they're just fucking lazy and would rather leech like some communist bum.

  2. Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    We've reached peak hipster.

    is it a failure of the US social safety net that this man has to do this?

    1. Re:Oh my god by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Probably more of a failure in our mental health system. Also, young men are last on the list when shelters are overcrowded.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Oh my god by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      is it a failure of the US social safety net that this man has to do this?

      Maybe, or maybe not. If he has to do this, because he's unable to obtain any other employment even with heavy searching, then yes. If he prefers this to any other position or hasn't tried to find such a position, then no.

      The biggest problem in charity is telling the difference between the two.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Oh my god by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      Lets not forget that second case can be very aggressive at seeking things to enable there choice.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    4. Re:Oh my god by slim · · Score: 1

      Surely if he has the computer skills to maintain a BC wallet, he's capable of doing something that pays more than clicking linkfarms.

    5. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When there's still more than three job seekers for every opening (in the northeast, anyway. Haven't seen anyone else turn JOLTS into a nice graph), chances are better than 50:50 that any given petitioner isn't able to obtain employment. Bring back your snobbery when we get to two job seekers for every opening, then you might be on par with a coin toss.

    6. Re:Oh my god by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Social safety net? The man is working although in an unconventional way. He should by all rights be excluded from the statistics.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Oh my god by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      He's in Florida. Please pull your head out of your ass, the whole world doesn't revolve around New York.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Oh my god by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      is it a failure of the US social safety net that this man has to do this?

      Of course not. He is earning a living. Why would it be better if he was on the dole? The safety net should be for people that can't work, not those who just don't want to.

    9. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then go somewhere else. Please pull your head out of your ass. If you're homeless it's not exactly as if you're bound to any one location.

    10. Re:Oh my god by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The Right says No you can't have that (well the government won't pay for it)
      The Left says you can have that but you need to jump threw so many hoops to get it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's homeless, I'd be hard pressed to call that a living.

    12. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How? Walk?

    13. Re:Oh my god by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a major difference between being capable of doing a job, and being able to hold the job. Mental illness isn't often evident in a quick interview, but after a few months on the job it may be obvious. He could then be fired for "poor attitude" or similar reason, especially if the employer doesn't understand the illness. After a few such events, his job history is full of short jobs that ended with him being fired, and that effectively ends his career.

      IT specifically is a field full of outcasts. We have disproportionately high rates of several mental illnesses, especially on the autism spectrum. The people who never fit in anywhere else? They still don't fit in here, but it's okay because the rest of us don't, either.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    14. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno where you're at, but in my experience and those of friends a person lacking "experience" linked to previous employers on a resume doesn't count when it comes to the human resources department. It really sucks, but in this current socioeconomic situation skills and talent often tend to mean nothing. Unfortunately nobody seems to care enough to remedy the situation, so there's a lot of wasted productivity among people boxed into doing minimum wage jobs when they really should be doing other things.

      Only exception might be really small companies where the boss personally does the hiring and firing. But such small companies tend to give jobs to friends and family first despite qualifications (or lack thereof), or they'll use temp agencies in which case the potential employee is back to dealing with the H.R. bullshit brickwall again.

    15. Re:Oh my god by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I think you over-estimate how difficult it is to use Bitcoin. Here's what they have to do:

      1) Install app on phone (perhaps a charity case, or perhaps one they had before they lost their home)

      2) Retype Bitcoin address from screen to laptop when receiving money for "microwork tasks" like spamming YouTube

      3) There is no step 3.

      Alternatively, step 2 can be "show someone the qrcode on your screen to receive money in person". Anyone can do it.

    16. Re:Oh my god by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Florida is even worse. There is jack shit down here for the most part.

    17. Re:Oh my god by blue+trane · · Score: 0

      The safety net should be a basic income, giving each of us a choice whether we want to enter the greedy, sociopathic, mendacious, morally hazardous world of perverse incentives that is the free market.

    18. Re:Oh my god by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      No... the real left is thinking that a basic income guarantee is becoming very close to feasible. Perhaps not yet, but we are getting close to the point where the labor generated by people who work for either self fulfillment or access to luxury goods and services can produce enough wealth to provide every household with a basic income capable of covering rent, food and basic utilities.

    19. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a failure of the economic system, more specifically the economic system not keeping up with the times. The majority of people are no longer in a position to produce any of life's necessities - food, shelter, clothing - and exchange these for other necessities. All they can do is produce money, any which way they can. This guy sells his time looking at ads, another makes money off day-trading, etc. None of these people produce anything substantial, just money. And when one money-making scheme stops working, all they can do is find some other way to make money.

    20. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I’m proud to say (as AC...) that I work for a large-ish organization (17k employees) where hiring for technical positions is still done without HR bots getting in the way. You send in a resume, a human techy will read it, and based on its contents schedule a phone screen. The bar for the phone screen is pretty low. The bar to get *past* the phone screen to an in-person interview, quite a bit higher.

      No doubt we’re in a minority among US companies, but it’s working pretty well for us.

    21. Re:Oh my god by digitalsolo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For what? To sit at home and watch TV?

      I have no problem with the concept that everyone needs (deserves?) a basic income provided by society. I have a huge problem with the concept that they do not, in turn, owe society for that.

      Give them a basic salary and then choose what menial position the Bureau of Suggested (Forced) Labor deems is best for their skills. Maybe that is doing stupid shit on the internet, I don't know, nor care, but they damn well should be doing SOMETHING.

      Giving everyone 25k a year (okay, 40k a year in some places) to live, with no expectation that they will do anything other than convert oxygen to CO2 and reproduce is rather short sighted insomuch as it ignores the vast laziness of so very, very many people.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    22. Re:Oh my god by nschubach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He's not "making" a living though. According to the article, he's actually living on food stamps and using bitcoin to supplement. Since he's not paying into the system, he's more of a drain than a benefit. I also assume he's doing it by choice and doesn't want to do anything more with his technical knowledge. Maybe he's just waiting for a position in management.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    23. Re:Oh my god by DeadTOm · · Score: 0

      ...greedy, sociopathic, mendacious, morally hazardous world of perverse incentives that is the free market.

      Good lord, I don't think I've ever heard a better description. :)

    24. Re:Oh my god by digitalsolo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely. All we have to do is take it from those that are earning the money, and give it to those that aren't. If 50% of the society works really hard and makes a bunch of money, but we just pay 100% of society equally, it'll all work out.

      Of course, that 50% number is going to dwindle in both number and quality of output as you remove any and all reward for their work. "Atta boy" will work for some, but I think the math is going to fail on that one in the long term.

      To put this differently; I have a cousin who doesn't do shit. At all. She's a worthless drag on society with 5 children. I work my ass off to the tune of 60-70 hours a week, every week, sometimes quite a bit more than that. If she and I are suddenly paid the same, I am staying home and playing XBOX, fuck this work stuff.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    25. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Megabus, it's only $1.50

    26. Re:Oh my god by irving47 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure what to think... I'm in Pensacola, and I'm seeing job listings for IT personnel that by all rights should be a minimum of 60K (VMWare Hypervisor and all other IT tasks, including database admin.)... Offering 30.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    27. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The safety net should be a basic income, giving each of us a choice whether we want to enter the greedy, sociopathic, mendacious, morally hazardous world of perverse incentives that is the free market.

      That's called "life".

      If you don't want to participate, and just want to collect free money from the gubmint while watching TV and spawning additional leeches, do us all a favor and die.

    28. Re:Oh my god by mc6809e · · Score: 2

      The safety net is fine but the trapeze and high wire have been in storage for years now.

      We tried things with a new clown in office, but it's still the same circus.

    29. Re:Oh my god by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      For what? To sit at home and watch TV?

      I have no problem with the concept that everyone needs (deserves?) a basic income provided by society. I have a huge problem with the concept that they do not, in turn, owe society for that.

      Well, if they stay the hell off the roads, my morning and afternoon commutes are that much better. I'd say that's a service to society!

    30. Re:Oh my god by DeadTOm · · Score: 2

      This all goes back to our ridiculous and broken excuse for a health care system in the US. If we had proper, accessible mental health care, we'd have a lot less homeless people and also a better system of determining who is actually unable to work a steady job due to mental health issues, and who is just milking the system.

      I work at a public library and we deal with homeless people every day, lots of them. To say that they are simply lazy is completely inaccurate. Sure, there are a few people that just don't want to work but they are in the very small, infinitesimal minority. Then there are the ones who simply fell on hard times, where I've been myself, and those ones never stay homeless for long (however, without what little social assistance they do receive, they would stay homeless a lot longer). The vast majority of homeless people are incapable of functioning in, and dealing with, normal society. Holding down a job is impossible for these people because they can't deal with any sort of schedule, structure or even the smallest amount of stress/pressure.

      With proper mental health care, a great deal of those people could be medicated, counseled and otherwise treated to the point where they could become contributing members of society, and the ones that are too far gone for that, could be off the streets and getting proper care somewhere.

      A great many problems in this country could be solved with properly accessible health care. However, due to our dog-eat-dog, every man for himself attitude, combined with the out of control corporate greed that maintains our economy, that will probably never happen.

    31. Re:Oh my god by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No... the real left is thinking that a basic income guarantee is becoming very close to feasible. Perhaps not yet, but we are getting close to the point where the labor generated by people who work for either self fulfillment or access to luxury goods and services can produce enough wealth to provide every household with a basic income capable of covering rent, food and basic utilities.

      Not even we here in Norway which is about commie-red by US standards goes that far, in fact we just took one baby step away from socialism in the last election. The problem is quite simply that if people don't feel it pays off to work they won't. If they put the "basic income" too low, the poor can't actually afford to use it. It'll only become a cheaper way for the middle class to take a year off as many people dream of doing to fulfill some sort of self-realization but find too expensive. If they raise it too close to a low-end job, who really want to struggle eight hours a day in a dead end, physically demanding job when they can bum around and play video games? Because obviously we'd have to tax the shit out of people to pay for all this, so it's not like your pay would become your current pay + your basic income, that'd require us to create tons of money from nothing.

      Already we're seeing certain trends in welfare abuse, not directly fraud as such but people who try very hard to get disabilities claims or to keep their unemployment claims by not being very employable. Statistically we know these trends aren't real because we don't have the sickest population in Europe and our working conditions are very gentle compared to many other countries yet we have one of the highest disability ratios in the western world. It just doesn't add up. These are the kind of people who are already looking to get out of the job market, they'd all take basic income and never return. Recently we've had some changes to the pension system where you could elect to retire earlier for lower pensions and lots of people got out at 62 instead of 67. Really, all the signs point to that if people can get a living paycheck without working, damn many would get the hell out.

      Of course, the naive say that for each one that takes a year off a position opens up for someone else. That's not how it works, businesses aren't going to hire a dropout who is also now on basic income and probably happy with it just because they lost someone, they're not that desperate to keep the headcount up. If we decrease the talent pool, the jobs are just likely to disappear or move overseas. I think such a system would belly flop miserably but I'd be the first one on it, I'd see it as a once-in-a-lifetime chance to take a year off at a reasonable cost. I'm thinking I'm not alone in that respect, good luck replacing all of us from the ranks of the currently unemployed.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    32. Re:Oh my god by war4peace · · Score: 1

      "Hey, man, back in the old days with J.C., we used to walk everywhere."

      (quote from Dogma, 1999)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    33. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Give them a basic salary and then choose what menial position the Bureau of Suggested (Forced) Labor deems is best for their skills. Maybe that is doing stupid shit on the internet, I don't know, nor care, but they damn well should be doing SOMETHING.

      Why? Are there rational reasons that support this argument, or it is emotional? You may be able to get someone to report to a desk or some other post 5 days a week, but you'll not be able to extract any useful value from that. It will cost more to supervise someone who does not want to work than it will to automate the job or hire someone productive.

    34. Re:Oh my god by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      young men are last on the list when shelters are overcrowded.

      As a single young man I can say that single young men are last on the list for just about everything.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    35. Re:Oh my god by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with that is it encourages weird subcultures and cults to try to overbreed us all and take over the country without needing to support their members. They can grow their rural compounds without limit with the ever-increasing government income based on population growth.

      Conservatives have a ton of bad ideas, hysterical beliefs, and problematic behaviors, but I think they're right that if you give people a free ride, many will contribute nothing but mouths to feed and violence, and will be a drain on us all.

      I'd love to free up people's time and make having a job stop being a life and death situation, but if you give people the potential for a free ride, you start needing to add all kinds of regulation to stop abuse, and I see it needing to go as far as restricting parenthood to productive people, so maybe we're better off with the current situation.

      We've made some progress with the ACA, so jobless people don't have to die in the streets, and I think we should be happy with these small steps. Reforming prisons so they rehabilitate prisoners would be a good next step. We don't need to turn our whole culture and economy upside down with a completely socialist system at this time.

    36. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The safety net should be a basic income, giving each of us a choice..."

      So you want others to finance your choices without you being liable to finance theirs?

    37. Re:Oh my god by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      When I lived in Pensacola as a software engineer, I pulled down crap too.

      Granted that the cost of living is a lot lower than a big city like SanFran, or New York, but its not low enough that would feel comfortable anywhere near 30k.

    38. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lazy people like that are useless in job situations also. I don't see why people care so much about what the other guy is doing anyway. It's not like they'd be living the "good life" on $20k/year. Give them basic housing, food, water, and sanitation. Who cares? "But why do *I* have to work, when Bob doesn't??" you say... Yeah, Bob's living a shit life in a shit house and eating shit food. You're not. You get to live in a nice house, eat nice food, have nice toys, etc... That's your reward for working and contributing.

    39. Re:Oh my god by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >To put this differently; I have a cousin who doesn't do shit. At all. She's a worthless drag on society with 5 children.
      >I work my ass off to the tune of 60-70 hours a week, every week, sometimes quite a bit more than that. If she and I are suddenly paid the same,
      >I am staying home and playing XBOX, fuck this work stuff.

      I don't think anyone is suggesting you'd be paid the same. I haven't seen anyone suggesting that we ban work. In a free basic income system, people would still be able to earn more money, they just wouldn't have a miserable life if they're poorly adapted to our current society. Your "worthless" cousin might have some more money in her pocket, but you can still make widgets to sell to her to improve your situation. A purely communist country would be just as bad as a completely capitalist one. You always need balance between a free market and social services.

      Even if everyone was paid the same, which I think is a terrible idea, many of us are smart, capable people who enjoy and take great satisfaction from our work.

    40. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Homeless != mentally ill.

    41. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes but mentally ill becomes homeless quite fast, especially in a third world banana republic where the citizen comes last.

    42. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, holding down a job is tough when you are struggling with things like depression or any other mental illness. I compare it juggling with an extra ball added. While we are all juggle with ups and downs in life, I go into severe funks and cut myself off from the world.

      I have been fighting it for years and it makes it hard to concentrate. I also take things really hard when I don't know something or can't figure out something right away. So people think I just don't care sometimes when the opposite is actually true.

      While I can hold a job and went to a good school...its pretty middling work and I had poor grades. It makes me very frustrated and angry when I look back at this because I lost a good chunk of my youth sitting around waiting for the world to come crashing down on me.

      My experience has been that hard work and really investing in therapy has paid the most dividends. While I do take medicines like Prozac, and it does help, being totally honest with a strong group of people (led by a very competent counselor) about my situation and past gets me away from the crushing isolation I feel sometimes. The sad thing is, the whole mental health system in this country (US) puts almost all its stock to treat illness it doesn't really understand with medicines that they don't really seem to understand. Also the US has a rapidly deteriorating safety net and more and more people that could be treated and put back into circulation as productive members of society are just falling through the cracks of this country.

      I don't mean to be too political, but I have taken food stamps at one time and I can't believe the politicians are trying to cut it off.

    43. Re:Oh my god by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      I forgot that we've run out of ditches to dig, trucks to unload and trash to pick up.

      Not everyone has the physical acumen to dig ditches, but they can work in the day-care center for the ditch digger's kids.

    44. Re:Oh my god by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It will cost more to supervise someone who does not want to work than it will to automate the job or hire someone productive.

      No it doesn't. If their job is to do an automated task, the task can have a built in quality control. If they don't meet a minimum standard, then they don't get paid.

      Example: My wife runs a educational website where teachers/parents can upload content. But before kids can access the content, it must be reviewed for inappropriate content (porn, profanity, etc). She uses Amazon's Mechanical Turk to hire workers to screen the content. 90% of the content is new, but 10% is randomly inserted content that has already been screened, and is known to be either be either appropriate or inappropriate. If the Turkers don't handle these tests properly, then their work is discarded, and they don't get paid .

      The workers she hires are from India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, etc. But never from America. I see no reason that welfare recipients shouldn't be put to work on tasks like this instead of munching potato chips in front of the TV.

    45. Re:Oh my god by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      True, but they are highly correlated. This guy practically screams mental illness. His roommates all moved out? He used to be in IT? No friends or family to stay with? Hmm... Let me ask you: if you had a friend who you knew was sleeping in a carport, wouldn't you offer them a bed - or at least whatever space you do have? If your answer is "it depends on", then many of the things you are about to say tend to be traits common in someone with mental illness.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    46. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully your children end up in the same situation for all the sympathy you have shown. You are a terrible human being. Kill yourself. Fuck your family.

    47. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The failure of the social welfare system and the failure of the mental health system are tied together; a very large number of homeless people are mentally ill. You don't get mental health care with a Medicaid card, and if you're crazy and your family isn't rich you're going to be in the social welfare system.

    48. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the difference between the basic income and what you can make at a job. I live in a country where working your ass off doesn't pay a whole lot better than sitting on your ass and collecting welfare, so close to 1 in 4 people (well over 1 in 3 among Gen. Y) have (perhaps rightfully) decided that work is for suckers.

    49. Re:Oh my god by digitalsolo · · Score: 2

      Valid point, and I was being overly dramatic in my point.

      To better state it, there are 2 issues I see:

      1. I think there are a lot of people who work because they must. If they can maintain a living without having to work, they won't work.
      2. Giving everyone the money you described is going to cost a lot of... money. That has to come from somewhere, and the only place that can be is the pockets of everyone working. As item 1 becomes worse, the difference in income between me (hard working) and my cousin (lazy ass) is going to become more and more narrow.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    50. Re:Oh my god by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      A rather huge side benefit I had failed to consider

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    51. Re:Oh my god by Beorytis · · Score: 2

      True, but they are highly correlated.

      Of course one reason they are correlated is that a previously mentally healthy person can become mentally ill after spending a little time homeless.

    52. Re:Oh my god by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      I want to be very, very clear about something. I in no way intended to paint everyone without a job as lazy. I do not think that is at all the case. Now, there are a TON of lazy bums (such as my cousin, she's not crazy, just lazy) but there is an at least equally large issue with mental health. The problem is fixing mental health issues, like the rest of our healthcare problems is hard, and no one gets elected (or stays elected) by working on the HARD problems.

      I'm also 100% behind you on the corporate greed. I'm rather proud to work for a large, not-for-profit hospital that actually 1) pays its employees decently well and 2) actively works to help the community. Not a common thing to find in healthcare today.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    53. Re:Oh my god by tqk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      young men are last on the list when shelters are overcrowded.

      As a single young man I can say that single young men are last on the list for just about everything.

      Wait'll you're a single old man, and we'll talk. Oh yeah, I'll be dead then.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    54. Re:Oh my god by pla · · Score: 1

      2) Retype Bitcoin address from screen to laptop when receiving money for "microwork tasks" like spamming YouTube

      I think you meant "point the phone's camera at the QR code on the task completion page". Type it in? How... archaic! :)


      So yeah, managing to use BTC doesn't really take a rocket scientist. That said, while the sort of tasks underlying these crappy online less-than-minimum-wage bounties don't actually take much skill, successfully satisfying the payout terms often does. I did a few of those through Amazon's Turk a few years back just for the hell of it, and they had the most absurd terms - Things like "check the following websites to look for pictures containing more than one species of baby animals", with the fine print disclaiming that getting paid required you to log your start and end time for the task, it couldn't take less than 85 seconds or longer than 95 seconds, and any pictures of iguanas invalidated all other results.

      I made 18 cents total before I got bored with it. Took me about three hours. I could probably have made more "mining" Bitcoin block hashes by hand.

    55. Re:Oh my god by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Give them a basic salary and then choose what menial position the Bureau of Suggested (Forced) Labor deems is best for their skills. Maybe that is doing stupid shit on the internet, I don't know, nor care, but they damn well should be doing SOMETHING.

      Finding a job is, itself, a full time job. What you're proposing is a bad idea, because once you get into a workfare system, it's damned near impossible to get out of it because you don't have the time to either upgrade your skills or search for a better job. Meanwhile, every time it's been implemented to date, it works out to paying *significantly* less than minimum wage.

      Some people will abuse the system. People will always find a way to abuse the system. But the system should *not* be set up to penalize everybody for the actions of a few, especially not when setting it up that way ends up making it impossible to get out of the system.

    56. Re:Oh my god by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Informative

      With proper mental health care, a great deal of those people could be medicated, counseled and otherwise treated to the point where they could become contributing members of society, and the ones that are too far gone for that, could be off the streets and getting proper care somewhere.

      We have free/public health care in Canada, as well as public drug plans like the Trillium plan here in Ontario, which can offer up to 100% drug coverage depending on your income level. We still have homeless people with mental illness. We probably have less than in the US, but you can only help people who want to be helped, and some people will always choose to live on the street. (some people will end up there because they don't realize they have a choice, but that is a different discussion entirely)

    57. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it isnt. A basic living income could only exist by taking from those who do work and giving to those who dont. Thats not a strawman, its the reality of the implementation of the described LaLa land fantasy.

    58. Re:Oh my god by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      The workers she hires are from India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, etc. But never from America. I see no reason that welfare recipients shouldn't be put to work on tasks like this instead of munching potato chips in front of the TV.'équote.

      Because if they`re stuck doing menial tasks for less than minimum wage, then the ones who want to do better won`t have the chance because they won`t have the time to look for a job or upgrade their skills?

    59. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you over-estimate how difficult it is to use Bitcoin. Here's what they have to do:

      1) Install app on phone (perhaps a charity case, or perhaps one they had before they lost their home)

      My phone hasn't been supported by any service for two years (it does 911 and the camera works), and it's a five year old dumb phone.

    60. Re:Oh my god by pla · · Score: 2

      He's homeless, I'd be hard pressed to call that a living.

      He hasn't died yet. I'd be hard pressed to call that not a living.

    61. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's on food stamps. He's in the safety net. It caught him.

    62. Re:Oh my god by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      My concern is that the "few" will be an appreciably significant enough number so as to impact the long term fiscal viability of such a system unless the system could have a positive output appreciable enough to help offset the "few".

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    63. Re:Oh my god by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      With a basic income, everyone gets the "handout", even if they do work.

      So you wouldn't end up slaving away 8 hours a day to make barely more than survival. Instead you could work as much or as little as you want, depending on how much extra you want for luxury goods and services.

    64. Re:Oh my god by tqk · · Score: 1

      Giving everyone 25k a year (okay, 40k a year in some places) to live, with no expectation that they will do anything other than convert oxygen to CO2 and reproduce is rather short sighted insomuch as it ignores the vast laziness of so very, very many people.

      If you treat people like cattle and expect them to act like cattle, there's a pretty fair chance that a lot of them are going to end up acting like cattle. A society based on "treat me how I expect to be treated or I'll sue" or "conform to what the authorities claim are norms or go to jail" is not going anywhere anyone needs it to go. Those aren't human conditions.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    65. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully your children end up in the same situation for all the sympathy you have shown. You are a terrible human being. Kill yourself. Fuck your family.

      Says the one damning an entire family for the opinions of one member. You have more in common with Kayser Soze than with a human being (and don't say he is fictional; that's what he wants you to believe). "Waaaa, waaaa, waaaa; I don't like his opinion; we should keep throwing useless gestures and money at problems and not worry if it actually helps; I think he should die because he is mean and doesn't want to give me his money."

    66. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes it does.

    67. Re:Oh my god by doubletalk · · Score: 1

      Not only this, but after a couple of years being unable to keep your jobs, it's easy to become very frustrated, you feel that your life goes nowhere, so you're searching for other ways to get money.

    68. Re:Oh my god by tqk · · Score: 1

      ...greedy, sociopathic, mendacious, morally hazardous world of perverse incentives that is the free market.

      Good lord, I don't think I've ever heard a better description. :)

      It's generally referred to as State of Nature.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    69. Re:Oh my god by green+is+the+enemy · · Score: 1

      Are you actually arguing that being homeless is a sensible choice for a person? That this person does not need some sort of help, be it financial or medical (mental health)? I'm sorry, people are not adapted to living outdoors, and they are living on someone's private or public property when homeless anyway. I just do not see any rational argument for letting people remain homeless. The harm to society far outweighs the advantages in my opinion.

    70. Re:Oh my god by pla · · Score: 1

      It will cost more to supervise someone who does not want to work than it will to automate the job or hire someone productive.

      Cool, you've just filled two menial jobs in one go! You've got the right idea, friend! XD

      You really need a "why" for this? Okay, purely on a practical basis, if you don't give people a motivation to put down the Cheetos and the remote, get off the couch, and do something - Most of them won't. I mean, I love what I do, but I sure as hell don't like that I need to whore myself out doing it so the corporate execs can get matching A8 W12s this year instead of those crappy ol' "base model" A8s. If I didn't need to work to live, I wouldn't.

      And I make pretty good money at a cushy desk job, at that. People killing themselves for minimum wage at McDonalds? Who do you seriously expect would put up with that for similar pay to doing absolutely nothing?

      So, how do you motivate the majority of able-bodied people to actually contribute to society rather than leech off it? "You can take a thankless but dignity-preserving job to make your living, or you can scrape gum off public sidewalks - your choice". Simple as that. Until we can automate every menial job on the planet, we need to have people who would rather do them than put up with some unpleasant alternative. When you make the alternative not all that unpleasant, goodbye food service, goodbye discount retail, goodbye agricultural workers.

      Of course, as an alternative, we could pay McSlaves significantly more, so they want to work there... Except, in doing so, you've just tripled the price of a Big Mac, meaning that it now costs more to live, so that base-level government paycheck intended to let everyone survive now doesn't qualify as enough to get by.

    71. Re:Oh my god by pla · · Score: 1

      Are you actually arguing that being homeless is a sensible choice for a person?

      For some people - Yes. Living in a house costs a hell of a lot. Financially, it would make a lot more sense (particularly outside urban areas, where you need a car) to simply live in your car.

      That said... No, I don't naively believe the guy from TFA lacks a home for pragmatic reasons. Most likely, he lacks a home because he can't hold down a job because the demons (whether bottled or "real") won't let him. In a less cruel world, the wolves (real actual Canis lupus, not imaginary or metaphorical ones) would eat him and everyone would go their merry way. In our world, we will instead force him to endure his demons, making a living watching ads in the library, for the next 40-60 years. Woo-hoo, go Western civilization!

    72. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if we paid them for each head (just the head) they bring on on a list? That list being made up of other people who get paid to bring in heads? Seems like a perfect solution.

    73. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget that apparently right after he was told which app to use, he asked what app he should use. At least that's how the story read for me.

    74. Re:Oh my god by turgid · · Score: 1

      "There's always the army!" As any right-thinking, upstanding, hard-working, striving citizen will tell you...

    75. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said his unemployed cousin would be getting paid the same as he would for his 60-hour work weeks. He deliberately turned "minimum income" into "equal pay for everyone no matter what they do" That's a strawman, because his parent poster was making no such suggestion. It makes him a liar, and defending it makes you a liar too.

    76. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I see no reason that welfare recipients should be put to work on tasks like this.

      i cut out the strawman and fixed that for you, now please cut down on the anti-social dope you're smoking.

    77. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what? To sit at home and watch TV?

      I have no problem with the concept that everyone needs (deserves?) a basic income provided by society. I have a huge problem with the concept that they do not, in turn, owe society for that.

      Give them a basic salary and then choose what menial position the Bureau of Suggested (Forced) Labor deems is best for their skills. Maybe that is doing stupid shit on the internet, I don't know, nor care, but they damn well should be doing SOMETHING.

      Giving everyone 25k a year (okay, 40k a year in some places) to live, with no expectation that they will do anything other than convert oxygen to CO2 and reproduce is rather short sighted insomuch as it ignores the vast laziness of so very, very many people.

      If I may quote Thomas Paine, the basic income is for the "loss of his or her natural inheritance, by the introduction of the system of landed property". The Bitcoin hobo in this story never agreed to give up his birthright to Earth's natural resources, but we're forcing him off our property anyways - that's aggression and he's entitled to restitution.

      Should he be doing something? Sure. We should hire him to not revolt, to tolerate a necessarily unfair system which works out to our benefit. He's selling us a civilized society.

    78. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Giving everyone the money you described is going to cost a lot of... money. That has to come from somewhere, and the only place that can be is the pockets of everyone working. As item 1 becomes worse, the difference in income between me (hard working) and my cousin (lazy ass) is going to become more and more narrow.

      Why, are you a dull and lazy lackwit that would stay home forever if you got a $1,000/mo from the government/taxpayer? Or would you want to work once in a while out of boredom to get $1500, or all the time as you do now, presumably, to get 3-4-5-10x the base wage? Imagine your daughter's boss couldn't take out his bad personal day on her because he knew he didn't have a financial club (the threat of termination) to legally beat her with, since she had a guaranteed basic income?

      I'm not a drudge - tax everyone at 90% and I'll still work. I like my work, if not the BS politics involved at times. Better yet, if high earners were taxed higher (say 30% income level at 30% and 90% at 90%, or whatever the models optimize on) and fairly (labor and capital at the same rate), then I could ditch my corporate load and apply those skills to the (public) education market, a net win win for myself and the educational system. I love science and would make a great teacher. What I wouldn't enjoy is the current pay and working environment. If you can get people who work only to survive out of a given field, those left in the field get MUCH more productive.

      We canned 2 managers in my office, and half the developers for various reasons other than budget. We didn't even replace them. The ones remaining don't have to clean up after the others, and bugs have gone done, we hit our milestones and everything is running smoothly. Imagine the halfwits in your office could stay home and watch TV instead of making anti-work for you to deal with. Less meetings, etc.

      The alternative is turning the nation and world into a master-serf society. Eventually those who have capitol with further concentrate it and it will be a few hundred families who own the self-directed, human-slaying machine who decide to pre-emptively liquidate the serf population. If you have less than a hundred million dollars today, you won't be in that group. If you have less than a billion, you may still be left out.

      When a robot capable of replacing a grunt worker is cheaper to power than the human is to feed, then the shit will hit the fan. If society decides the value of the bottom half of the population is net negative, that society is owed nothing by the people they have discounted, and fires will burn.

    79. Re:Oh my god by flimflammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let me ask you: if you had a friend who you knew was sleeping in a carport, wouldn't you offer them a bed - or at least whatever space you do have? If your answer is "it depends on", then many of the things you are about to say tend to be traits common in someone with mental illness.

      Is it really that simple, though? Sure if I learned a friend of mine was homeless I would offer them a couch to crash on until they got back on their feet but this is also only possible due to my lifestyle. If I had a family to worry about, this might not be such an easy commitment to make, let alone the added cost of taking care of a homeless person no matter who they are with potentially no foreseeable fix in sight.

    80. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he's surrounded by assholes.

    81. Re:Oh my god by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Is it really that simple, though?

      No, of course not. I was just trying to illustrate a point.

      If I had a family to worry about, this might not be such an easy commitment to make, let alone the added cost of taking care of a homeless person no matter who they are with potentially no foreseeable fix in sight.

      Agreed. But most functional people have more than one friend to lean on. I mean, it is possible that this guy just had an amazing run of bad luck. And, if you were going to find people with amazing strings of bad luck, checking homeless populations would be a good place to start... but that bit about all of his roommates moving out set off little alarm bells :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    82. Re:Oh my god by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Who hit him with microwaves when he's trying to sleep?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    83. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the naive say that for each one that takes a year off a position opens up for someone else. That's not how it works, businesses aren't going to hire a dropout who is also now on basic income and probably happy with it just because they lost someone, they're not that desperate to keep the headcount up. If we decrease the talent pool, the jobs are just likely to disappear or move overseas. I think such a system would belly flop miserably but I'd be the first one on it, I'd see it as a once-in-a-lifetime chance to take a year off at a reasonable cost. I'm thinking I'm not alone in that respect, good luck replacing all of us from the ranks of the currently unemployed.

      Rebuttal of your points in order:

      1) Sure it does, if the position was necessary to begin with in the first place. There may be transaction costs, but the employer needs to address them any way in case you don't come back in a year.

      2) They won't do it for headcount, they'll do it because having a checkout clerk is required for a retail store, or a plumber for a plumbing company or radiologist for a hospital. Any job that can be done cheaper over-seas is already overseas. There are coordination costs which prevent the local Walmart greeter or whatever from working from Cambodia. The radiology dept. probably already consults with India/Malayasia at this point anyway.

      3) If you decrease the talent pool, either salaries will go up (increasing the talent pool, eventually), or capitol will be spent to replace labor. If capitol is cheaper than labor, they're doing that now anyway.

      4) Assume it [$12k/yr basic income] is not a scarce once in a lifetime opportunity. Are you so unengaged in your job and career field that you would abandon it at the first chance? If so, perhaps society as a whole would be better if you did something else, either sleeping and watching TV, or perhaps making furniture, shaping naturalistic dams by hand for salmon to run or whatever you'd do if you had that year off, maybe even spending time with your kids.

      5) If you are so unattached that you "all of us" would jump ship, as in #4, you would not be that difficult to replace. Freed of survival based drudge work by the basic income, some people who would find that work engaging would train up for it rather than clean toilets/fling burgers/roast moose or whatever.

      As for the scum jobs, cleaning toilets/sewers etc, those would be harder to fill, but not really hard. Plumbing type work is of interest to mechanical types, including myself. I'd do it for a week to play with the tools as a Mike Rowe Dirt Jobs style work-cation. Boring low skill jobs, like basic toilet cleaning, can easily be handled by drudges who want to get the new XboxStationCube+1 a year early for their kids Christmas or whatever, since a basic income won't cover it until the price drop hits (or whatever).

      In the meantime, nearly all crime will vanish. No need to shoplift or break into cars when it risks your basic income enhanced freedom. Jail is a bigger deterrent when it means losing cable tv and xbox free time than it does to a nearly homeless person in a cold hungry winter. Happier, healthier populations will save money in not just prisons and police forces, but medical costs and reduce busy-work/anti-work, so the actual tax burden will be quite modest, possibly even net beneficial in time.

      By way of comparison, had the USA spent the $3T Mid-east war funds on PV panels, at even the current $1/watt panel price, they would be able to produce somewhere around 3TW/hr ~6hr/day (avg)... 6570TW/yr ~550TWhr/mo in solar. That's a hundred times what Germany just got as a record for a summer month and we would be doing it every month (again, on average). It need not all be in Arizona so distribution issues on the grid are also bypassed, even if we didn't add a cent to infrastructure beyond the war's costs. That's economics that a real fiscal conservative could back.

      I'd do it for a week to get to play with the tools

    84. Re:Oh my god by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      You have basically just described one of the reasons why the US debt is at the level it is.

    85. Re:Oh my god by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      "Except, in doing so, you've just tripled the price of a Big Mac"

      So, you're claiming that a government regulation that significantly raises the costs of doing business (to a point above its current break-even point) might actually result in that business demanding more money for its product? And that that event might itself be used as input to a feedback loop?

    86. Re:Oh my god by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Back in the '80s, I talked with a few people who had either lived in East Germany or Poland or who had relatives living there. They described exactly the situation that the AC responding to digitalsolo described. They saw society breaking down because it took no more than three generations for nearly everyone (basically those not working in high end physics or the secret police) to lose any desire to actually work. They had basically two reasons. 1) Why bother working when I don't get paid anymore than the guy down the street who doesn't and 2) it wouldn't matter if I got paid more because there isn't anything to buy anyway.

      Another prevalent attitude was that what we would consider theft was considered normal. People would walk into a store and simply walk out with stuff. When questioned, their response was "Why should I pay have to pay for it? We all own everything equally."

    87. Re:Oh my god by pla · · Score: 1

      So, you're claiming that a government regulation that significantly raises the costs of doing business (to a point above its current break-even point) might actually result in that business demanding more money for its product? And that that event might itself be used as input to a feedback loop?

      Erm... Yes? I think you've fairly described the intent of my final point. :)

    88. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've made some progress with the ACA, so jobless people don't have to die in the streets, and I think we should be happy with these small steps. Reforming prisons so they rehabilitate prisoners would be a good next step. We don't need to turn our whole culture and economy upside down with a completely socialist system at this time.

      People didn't need to die in the streets without the ACA/Obamacare. The ACA just enables basic preventative care instead of waiting until its a chronic emergency room issue, which should eventually lower the total cost. Most people in prison are there on drug possession charges due to lobbying by privately owner prison companies and right wing driven media hysterics dating back to at least NY's Rockefeller 3 strike laws. A basic income woul dlet them smoke weed at home instead of going out and breaking stuff and then going to a privately run $40,000 a year facility, $30,000+ of which is often profit to the contractors that run it. Sheriff Arrapho or whatever in Arizona may claim to feed the prisoners on $1 a day, but he sure as hell collects more for his dept than $1/day on them.

    89. Re:Oh my god by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      and all it takes is robbing someone at gunpoint. Isn't that such a wonderful idea?

      We already have 10% of the people making 40% of the income and paying 60%+ of the taxes. Additionally, we have 49% paying no taxes. How much more do you require of the top end before you have achieved "fairness?"

    90. Re:Oh my god by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Of course they're right. Chicago, Milwaukee, New York, Detriot, etc. are perfect examples of that.

    91. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 100% increase in the labor cost McDonalds would cause a 17% in the price of goods sold if the profit margin was to be maintained at current levels.

    92. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for jobs, I'm pretty sure.

    93. Re:Oh my god by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      If you were to double the burger flipper's salary it does not triple the price of the product. I'd be surprised if there was more than 2 minute's total labor in getting a burger from the chiller to the drive-through window. At minimum wage that's 20 cents or so, doubling the minimum wage for the burger restaurant staff doesn't come close to tripling the cost of a big mac, even less so a full meal. With the cost of oil, land, water etc. I would imagine that the minimum-wage human labor cost component of the raw ingredients was pretty low too, sure there will be labor costs for marketing etc. But those guys aren't on minimum wage.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    94. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally, we have 49% paying no taxes.

      No, we don't. Think very carefully before you try to "prove" this statement. It will not turn out the way you expect.

    95. Re:Oh my god by Linsaran · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives in one of the most liberal states in the Union, I imagine that our social security here is one of the more abused ones in the nation, and still you can't get more than 933 a month from SSI. That's a far cry from 25k a year. Heck 25k a year is a livable wage for someone with no dependents, 11k from SSI? Not really.
      Of course I agree with your idea of 'Suggested Labor' for their SSI, unless they're physically disabled they should work for their living.

      --
      In a bit of shameless internet panhandling, I accept Litecoin Donations at Lbd2oH9QsthD1GfuUXPyka12YxvWJYnBVf
    96. Re:Oh my god by c · · Score: 2

      young men are last on the list when shelters are overcrowded.

      As a single young man I can say that single young men are last on the list for just about everything.

      That's not entirely fair. Single young men are first on the list for military conscription.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    97. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In capitalist USA, where being homeless is a private business choice, you'd be actually better off with Natural Selection than religious care for each other? Mind-boggling.

    98. Re:Oh my god by TCM · · Score: 1

      The worst religious country - whose religion preaches love thy neighbor - actually has the worst social care? Color me surprised. Or maybe not.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    99. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      single young men are last on the list for just about everything.

      The draft?

    100. Re: Oh my god by DeadTOm · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    101. Re: Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be more angry as to why more Americans are having to depend on food stamps to begin with combined with the top 1% getting richer at a far greater pace to that of the remaining 99%. I say Tax them till their middle class! Not rich, not poor. I'm tired of either not having a job, or working 75 hours to the bone!!! There's middle ground for the rest of us slaving away just so the top 1% can live a life of luxury of the backs of the rest of us!!!

    102. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you actually arguing that being homeless is a sensible choice for a person?

      No, but why is it MY problem, and not his relatives' or people who *choose* to give their money away?

    103. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Facebook is more socialist then Google+!

    104. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so special about your wife that people should put up with a lifetime of lousy prospects and no future just to make her rich? I can see not wanting to pay someone else to sit around watching tv, but I can't see claiming that the typical person's prospects at the low end of the payscale count either as 'incentive' or particularly morally appealing either.

    105. Re: Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just find the nearest disaster like ca fires and claim your house and family burned to get free shit. Or do what those coupon people do on TV and buy 600$ worth of food for $3.58 net.

    106. Re:Oh my god by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Probably more of a failure in our mental health system. Also, young men are last on the list when shelters are overcrowded.

      Sounds like discrimination to me... how about you use some of those bitcoins to file a lawsuit over prejudicial witholding charity based on age, sex, and gender?

    107. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been on the streets in Canada for more than ten years, I have not consumed alcohol or drugs for more than 15 years, I have no access to health care (Autism Spectrum disorder), I have sought help and been flat out refused, yet the crack heads can go collect cheques to fill their pipes on a constant basis.
      You can trust me when I say... "Nobody out here choose to live on the streets", it is a very large sinkhole, impossible to climb out of on your own.

    108. Re:Oh my god by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      A society based on "treat me how I expect to be treated or I'll sue" or "conform to what the authorities claim are norms or go to jail" is not going anywhere anyone needs it to go. Those aren't human conditions.

      And living as a homeless person is a human[sic] condition? A lot of those individuals would be far better off in a controlled, managed environment where they are taken care of. Getting labour out of it means that they're are doing "their fair share" for the benefits they receive.

      Don't get me wrong, people should be allowed to be as free as possible. But when government has turned half the environment that we inhabit every day into a fictional concept called "public property", then we have to accept that society in general has some sort of say as to who is allowed to do what on that private property. They can be free to be homeless, destitute, and crazy for all I care. Either they accept the "workfare" system as a way for them to pay back society for the benefits, or they live in freedom and leave the rest of us alone. That includes them not guilting us at every traffic stop and street-corner.

      Obviously the work camps would have a point system that allows people to get back out after accumulating enough capital. If they decide to then spend/waste all that accumulated capital when they get released, then they get worse off. Whatever the implementation, the point is to make it feasible for the homeless willing to work to rejoin society.

    109. Re:Oh my god by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Hit the nail on the head right there, AC. The irony in that statement you quoted is astronomical. He wants to force everyone to enable his decision to not work. In actuality, completely avoiding the question of whether or not people deserve the choice to not participate in such a system.

      He did choose the wrong word, definitely. But it points to a much larger issue that I see so rampant in our society. I know a lot of people like to bemoan the "entitlement" culture, but there is no other way to put it succinctly. When you feel that society owes you something, that society will take care of you when you lag behind, then you really have a perverse incentive to not take responsibility for your own actions. I'm not saying people are to blame for the situations they get into out of no fault of their own. But you have to add the caveat that people are not learning from others' mistakes. Why are individual people not taking steps to prevent scenarios that could cause them, a functioning member of society, to fall down and become destitute? There are larger forces at play here.

    110. Re:Oh my god by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      You have to think of it in relative terms, because that is how people will perceive the resulting system. Let's say that "basic income" is $1000 a month for every individual out there. Now, let's assume that a local mechanic works as an employee, full-time, and his salary is $1700 a month. The difference between working and not working now becomes $700 a month. That is the benefit the mechanic will get by working full time, as opposed to the individual that does not work at all. The value he gains from working is diluted.

      Granted, that $700 difference may be quite significant to the mechanic. But the spectrum of salaries is quite diverse. How long do you think it'll take for all garbage collectors to switch over to not working? Let's assume they get paid a lot less than the mechanic because they possess less technical skill. Perhaps their salary is only $1200. Now, let's try to imagine the cost/benefit scenario playing out in the garbage collector's head. For 160 hours of manual labour, he will get $200 more than the guy next door that doesn't work. I don't know about you, but I will gladly take a 1/5th or 1/6th pay cut so that I could stay at home and play around with my hobbies.

      So now that the majority of the garbage collectors are starting to quit and go stay at home to party/watch tv, who do you suppose will start collecting the trash? Let's assume that garbage collectors possess a skill that enables them to do that work. Well, in that case, the salaries for garbage collectors will rise as the companies try to fill the vacancies. Imagine this scenario happening across the board in all low-paid, skilled, perhaps even unskilled jobs. You'll quickly realize that the cost of living will generally go up as now business increase their prices to cover the increased cost of employees. Either that, or the jobs get automated/worked around entirely. It's a very similar effect to what minimum wage does to the market.

    111. Re:Oh my god by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      People do routinely dig ditches, pick up trash and unload trucks (though it's more accurate to say ditches are dug by machines). There are already people doing those jobs, that's the general workforce you dumbnut! And you won't find such a kind of job all that easily in a country with mass unemployment.

    112. Re:Oh my god by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Suing charities is rarely a successful tactic.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    113. Re:Oh my god by dryeo · · Score: 1

      In BC the mental health services have been cut way back, at that just this week the municipalities got together to beg the Provincial government to re-open the main mental health facility as there are so many homeless and otherwise mentally ill people who's only recourse is the police who know that they're not equipped to deal with them. The government turned them down, the heartless bastards.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    114. Re:Oh my god by superdana · · Score: 1

      single young men are last on the list for just about everything

      I'm sorry, what? Is this a joke?

    115. Re:Oh my god by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You are reminding me of the time a bit over decade ago when there were plenty of people with computer skills looking for a job, myself included, and those that couldn't work out how to get around clueless HR clowns and didn't have other stuff they could do as a stopgap ended up waiting for a very long time.
      Apparently the job market sucks even more now than after the tech crash.

      Skills don't matter so much if you can't show them to anyone that appreciates them, and doing an end run around HR is not something that's so easy to work out cold.

    116. Re:Oh my god by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I also assume he's doing it by choice and doesn't want to do anything more with his technical knowledge. Maybe he's just waiting for a position in management

      When did the USA hit an unemployment rate of zero? Oh, obviously it didn't but the above poster seems to think it has.

      I think I've just seen a good example above of why technical jobs are being shipped to places where education levels are improving instead of slipping such as India. There's not so many jobs where smug ignorance and hatred of those less fortunate is a criteria, but if there is then posters like the above or similar ones that have come through an education system with little evidence of it providing them with any benefit have a good chance of getting one.

    117. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no reason that welfare recipients shouldn't be put to work on tasks like this...

      I see no reason that welfare recipients should be put to work on tasks like that. People should not be paid welfare to work for someone else. If you're working for someone, then it's their job to pay you, not let the various support organisations do it and pocket the wages for themselves.

      But then, we also come to another layer of bullshit. 1-10% of the population are straight out unable to do that kind of work, and it's not because they're lazy. A lot of self-righteous people, much like you, will decide that these people are lazy, but as I understand it, it's classed as an autism-spectrum disability.

      These people also can't grade colours from dark to light ("Why is that red lighter than that blue? They're both the same shade!"), recognise faces that aren't intimately known to them, memorise routes from maps, work from paper documents, or follow instructions without being too literal ("You knew what I meant!") or skipping crucial parts.

      You want to try living with that shit - things are frustrating enough, until I come across dickheads like you who insist that hard work and using one's brains is all it takes.

      n.b. I cut your strawman out for sanity's sake. Can't go promoting opinionated bullshit like that as if it were the truth.

    118. Re:Oh my god by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Make the shit jobs graveyard. Everybodies happy.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    119. Re:Oh my god by Keybounce · · Score: 1

      And how many of those are filled by either fresh-out-of-school, too-young-to-know-their-value graduates, or by people imported through the "high tech visa"s?

      "We can't fill this job, so there must not be a supply in the US, so we have to import" -- that's what people say to washington.

      Not: "We're not willing to pay what this is worth, and actually train people who are skilled in how to use our system, so give us cheap people from overseas instead".

    120. Re:Oh my god by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, people are not adapted to living outdoors

      Seriously?? You have heard of this thing called evolution right?

      There is a whole lot of freedom that comes with being homeless. Get educated, go talk to some homeless people.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    121. Re:Oh my god by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      If you gave everyone 25k a year, your prisons would probably be empty and you'd have a surplus.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    122. Re:Oh my god by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, mental illness is a direct product of the society that produces it. Which is why different societies have different classifications. Want to eliminate mental illness, create the perfect society. At the very least, create a society that's responsible enough to handle it's byproducts.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    123. Re:Oh my god by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Some people don't believe in the society we've created, even less so in the past decades. There are other reasons for being homeless than mental illness and no job.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    124. Re:Oh my god by doccus · · Score: 1

      We've reached peak hipster.

      is it a failure of the US social safety net that this man has to do this?

      More likee failure of the ARC Net ;-) Remember his prior occupation!

    125. Re:Oh my god by tqk · · Score: 1

      Whatever the implementation, the point is to make it feasible for the homeless willing to work to rejoin society.

      Your point is. They likely have a far more expansive view of what they would consider life. Was Thoreau homeless, or charting another course?

      There are *a lot* of things that the rest of you do that I'd never consider if I had multiple lives. Your idea of what life entails could be mirror opposite to how I live.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    126. Re:Oh my god by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      "There's always the army!" As any right-thinking, upstanding, hard-working, striving citizen will tell you...

      Not so much. High-frequency hearing and orthopedic issues said no to that for me, when I was young enough to be eligible. That was three branches of service, and excellent ASVAB score.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  3. Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until the tax man tries and shut him down, enforced by overzealous cops and a few tasers

  4. Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly has bitcoin to do with getting paid for looking at ads? Why not in regular dollars?

    1. Re:Why bitcoin? by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bitcoin has extra marketing value. People can donate Bitcoins rather than dollars, and they feel like they're somehow working outside "the system", as though the US government couldn't see or track what's going on. Really, the government can't track cash, either, but cash is old and familiar, where Bitcoin is new and exciting.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Why bitcoin? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plus, sending cash doesn't tend to work well over the internet. It keeps clogging up my ethernet ports.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not very knowledgable about how the US works, but don't you guys have normal bank accounts with which you can transfer money?

    4. Re:Why bitcoin? by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Those who are paying him are using fradulent methods to inflate view counters, so they want to stay anonymous.

    5. Re:Why bitcoin? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So lets put you charity spending in a place where you cannot get tax deductions for it. Smart, way to stick it to the man!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not cash (and certainly monitored by the government).

    7. Re:Why bitcoin? by Aaden42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Opening a US bank account generally requires a permanent address and proof of [traditional] employment. Not something the homeless are likely to get. Even an account established pre-homelessness likely had some minimum balance required to keep it open. Keeping that last $100 or so locked up to maintain an account when you’re hungry isn’t a choice I think many would make.

    8. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, the government can't track cash, either

      Every bill has a unique identifying number on it. At the end of each day, most retailers deposited all cash they receive in a bank. The NSA is plugged into every bank. Even if your cash changes hands 2 or 3 times before it passes through a retailer, that only blurs the chain a little bit. I do not know if the government actually tracks cash, but I question the the source of your confidence that they cannot do it.

    9. Re:Why bitcoin? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You just have to shoot a poker chip through there to unclog your personal internet.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So lets put you charity spending in a place where you cannot get tax deductions for it. Smart, way to stick it to the man!

      If you want to deduct something from your taxes, then you need to identify yourself and say how you earned it.

    11. Re:Why bitcoin? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      You know crappy banks. Most of the big banks require you keep $1 in them to keep the account open.

      Bitcoin is interesting but at $124 a coin, pretty expensive to get into (IDK, can you buy $5 worth of bitcoin? or just what you need to pay for something?)...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    12. Re:Why bitcoin? by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      Most banks at the $1 level are hitting you monthly fees for the privilege. Those add up in a hurry, and are actually worse than a larger minimum balance since you don't actually have the (small amount) of money to fall back on. Some credit unions will give you the $1 minimum no-fee option, but they're not always available in any particular place.

      You can indeed buy fractional Bitcoins. Works like dollars and cents.

    13. Re:Why bitcoin? by Jack9 · · Score: 2

      > Opening a US bank account generally requires a permanent address and proof of [traditional] employment

      Why do you say you need proof of employment to open a bank account? Credit Unions don't. None of the major US banks do.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    14. Re:Why bitcoin? by Rob+Bos · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is divisible into 100-millionths, the "satoshi".

    15. Re:Why bitcoin? by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Having worked for a few retailers and knowing others who do and also who own retail outlets. I can assure you that the individual retailers are not tracking who gave them what bill. So you get a bill from the bank and The Retail Store gives it back to a bank. Did you give it to The Retail Store? Or did you give it to The Sandwich Shop who gave it to Joe who gave it to Sue who gave it to The Gas Station who gave it to Fred who gave it to the Retail Store?

      Only a seriously delusional nitwit would believe that the second chain is at all traceable.

    16. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAX Machine :D

    17. Re:Why bitcoin? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I've apparently been lucky to avoid banks with higher minimum balances or ones with fees for the account.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    18. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the bartender walks down the street with a sharpie magic marker..then what happens?

    19. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am now using capitalone360, (www.capitalone360.com) for no fee checking. So far, I'm happy with them, and I've had my account for at least 5 years. Previously I was with NetBank, then they were taken over by ING Electric, who recently sold them to Capitalone360.

      No fees and they even pay a little interest. Paying bills is very convenient and free. I have a free MasterCard debit card with a small amount of overdraft too. It was important to use the online (free) ATM finder, and even then it said a few places had ATMs when they didn't. But with persistence I did locate free ATMs. PayPal verified too.

      Depositing cash is a no-go however, as there is no office. Still, I do not want a bank account with costs associated with it!

      If you're reading this, I hope it isn't because you're homeless yourself.

    20. Re:Why bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're using Bitcoins as a way of working around the banking system (the one that requires an address to open a bank account), why would you care about getting tax deductions for charity?

  5. Homeless? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    Homeless guys drinking Monster energy drinks? That crap is very expensive.

    1. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than drinking a 40 out of a paper bag. Paper bags are expensive.

    2. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. This isn't a real homeless person -- the type who not only doesn't have a job, but doesn't have much chance of getting a job (any job). This is merely a person who refuses to work "beneath himself". We all know he could have a job at Wal-Mart, 7-11, or McDonald's within a few hours. He just refuses to do it.

    3. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have a heart, they're homeless sysadmins. Caffeine is more important than such mundane things as clothing and shelter.

    4. Re:Homeless? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      But he's got to be an EXTREEEEEEEME homeless guy. That requires Monster or Mountain Dew or Red Bull or Doritos.

    5. Re:Homeless? by unixisc · · Score: 2

      That would play havoc w/ his work history on his resume

    6. Re:Homeless? by slashmydots · · Score: 2

      I would have through drugs or alcohol are preventing him from holding down any job but you may be right too. I'm a very social, user-friendly IT manager that also does field work so I'd make one of the best car salesmen ever let alone someone selling TVs and computers and Best Buy or something. I totally don't want to do that though but if I got fired (for posting on Slashdot all day, loooool) I'd probably hop on that pretty quick.

    7. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think he needs to put it on his resume?

    8. Re:Homeless? by Ardyvee · · Score: 1

      You sure? Unemployment rate seems to be around 7% in the USA and from what I've read around those numbers don't actually count the number of people that aren't employed, just the ones that are registered in welfare (or something like it, I forget). Two, he can't really move from where he is, so he can't move to where jobs may be. And considering the numbers, I doubt anybody outside of his city would be willing to pay him to move.

      So, tell me where would he be able to find a job where many others have failed? You probably heard of not being accepted by being overqualifies, or because h1b, or culture, or many other reasons discussed here in slashdot.

      --
      I don't care if I'm wrong. I only care about everyone obtaining something from the discussion.
    9. Re:Homeless? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      So Electric Hobo looks good on your resume?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:Homeless? by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      How can people refuse to take some menial job that can easily be automated (self-service checkout, roomba...)? How dare they choose not to do what benefits me by satisfying my need to control others' choices? By Jove, I must find some excuse to compel them ... how about economics? Of course I know by the Modigliani-Miller theorem that debt doesn't matter, but I'll cynically use it as an emotional ploy to reassert my divine right to force others to behave according to my whims!1

    11. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really. He sounds creative and clever enough to spin it correctly. Just like how you can spin playing D&D as a kid while smoking cigarettes as "Mentoring at risk youth" or running a MMO Guild as "Operating manager of a group of 25(40, 10, whatever) individuals" though I am sure you could word either of those better. Just write this off as some fancy sounding research. If he is keeping accurate enough records claim it is a "self-study project in the sociological evolution of e-homelessness" and try to publish (either traditionally or as a documentary) in the same way Morgan Sporlock got famous for eating at McDonald's daily for a month.

    12. Re:Homeless? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Best Buy does not want people who know what they are doing they want people who can sell and sell rip off geek squad stuff and useless protection plans

    13. Re:Homeless? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Why can't you move if all your possessions can fit inside a single backpack?

    14. Re:Homeless? by Nadaka · · Score: 2

      A job at wal-mart, 7-11 or McDonalds does not pay well enough to pay rent, food, transportation for a person. And those are jobs that will require a home address and transportation. Even combining 2 such incomes does not allow a pair of people to have reliably cover basic costs. That requires 3 or more people in such positions per household.

    15. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The advertising he is getting paid to look at must be very effective!

    16. Re:Homeless? by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      Bus & train companies generally want money to move that single backpack (and the back carrying it) from point A to point B. Depending on how badly off you are, that may or may not be within your means. It also means moving from a place where you may have some kind of idea what meager options are available in terms of charity & pickup employment to a place you have no clue about and no connections to. That’s a terrifying thing to do if you’ve got a job waiting and cash in the bank to carry you for a while. Imagine doing it with nothing more than the clothes on your back.

      See also: Mental illness, which can easily be an insurmountable block to relocating successfully.

    17. Re:Homeless? by orthancstone · · Score: 2

      Maybe he could pretend that it was his DJ name in the clubs?

    18. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem very confident in that assessment. The fact is, McDonalds is getting pretty picky these days, and you can't just show up one day and work there. There is no magical job fairy, and you are deeply deluded if you think there is. And you do seem to think that.

    19. Re:Homeless? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where Monster stands on the dollars/calorie ratio. It's not considered healthy. If he can find a way to boil water, he should consider bananas+tea as the absolute best way to get bang for your buck in an energy boost. It'd also be better for his long-term health. BTW, if you google around for dollars per calorie, fast food comes up as cheap. The homeless don't eat at McDonalds because they love it. They eat there because it's one of the cheapest ways to fuel a body. The pizza he mentioned is also a good way to do that. Bananas are actually at or near the very top of the list. Very cheap calories.

      You've got to have some movement to stay healthy though. Just powering cheaply is OK for a month or two; but in the long run it's probably not such a hot idea.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    20. Re:Homeless? by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      Says who?

      It's not a great life, but there's a whole world of people living on less than $300/week. Even with a modest $800/mo after taxes, with no public assistance of any sort you can eat, have your own studio apartment, and take the bus to work -- just like everyone you've ever seen on the bus does. Do you have to get a roommate - or just rent a room - if you live somewhere where housing is expensive? Probably. Do you have to eat "poor people food" from actual grocery stores? Probably.

      But this idea that you're somehow OWED more than private living, food and shared transportation for the most basic of jobs is silly.

    21. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have done those kind of jobs to get by and you don't know what you are talking about. You can't even get by in many cities with two of those jobs. Also I know absolutely brilliant highly skilled people that basically got screwed because they got sick. My former manager, with very good technical skills, got lupus and she is now basically stuck.

          Once you get out of the system of having a "professional" its tough to get back in. I had a hell of a time and went through all kinds of fucked up shit with my stomach, panic attacks, severe depression, etc...

      Unless you actually know this guy is a real leach and just prays on other people (I know those types and ironically, they pretty much get around any kind of obstacles designed to weed them out) and they system do us all a favor and shut up. I don't know this guy's situation so I don't judge him to be a "real" homeless person or not.

    22. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound bitter. You were turned down by McDonald's, weren't you?

    23. Re:Homeless? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Electrohobo B-)

      Almost as cool as Electro Gypsy.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    24. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unemployment rate seems to be around 7% in the USA [bls.gov] and from what I've read around those numbers don't actually count the number of people that aren't employed, just the ones that are registered in welfare (or something like it, I forget).

      Then you either didn't read much, or read stuff away from the BLS website you just linked. National unemployment and several other metrics are based on surveys, not on the number of people on welfare. The myth that the numbers doesn't account for the people that have been unemployed long enough to lose benefits is BS, coming down to either conspiracy theories or people trying to spin the numbers to help their view. People getting unemployment benefits are used for a relative comparison of some small, local areas where surveys are not detailed enough, but not for any of the larger statistics, which go into quite a bit more detail than you could get from such benefits anyway. There are some complaints about how exactly they define unemployed and treat things like underemployment, but that is a lot more subtle.

    25. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked at a competitor's store which had a very similar model I must agree. However these guys, not knowing any more than I do, don't really garner much sympathy from me. The most nutritious thing on that park bench picture is the water. Not to mention the cigarettes.

    26. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. You can't live where you want to, but you can most certainly live on the effective minimum wage. The economy works that way. Low end rents are accessible to the effective minimum wage in every metro area. You might not like where you live, but economoics forces that to happen, (unless rent control, which has a horrible affect on young poor people).

    27. Re:Homeless? by happyhamster · · Score: 1

      Amen to that.

    28. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to the $8 a pack cigs that I'm sure he's buying at the most over priced store too. A fool and his money (even fake money) are soon parted.

    29. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know he could have a job at Wal-Mart, 7-11, or McDonald's within a few hours. He just refuses to do it.

      Let me guess, your experience with this predates the recent recession, doesn't it?

      Nowadays not only are there many people applying for every job out there, but most of them don't look and smell like homeless people...

    30. Re:Homeless? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      That just shows how completely ignorant you are about how expensive it is to be poor. Studio Apartment? Studio apartments cost over $600 a month, not counting utilities. Oops. now you can't eat or pay for transportation.

    31. Re:Homeless? by Nadaka · · Score: 2

      No. Low end rent is not accessible to the minimum wage. Where I live in the Florida panhandle, the minimum cost for rent and utilities exceeds the monthly pay from a 40 hour per week minimum wage job. Now you also need to cover food and transportation. Minimum wage jobs require reliable transportation, bus service (even in the rare case it is available) does not count, you have to have access to a car or you will not be hired.

    32. Re:Homeless? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      You don't need a car to get a minimum wage job, and I simply call BS that there's not cheap housing available for people making that kind of money. It might not be the sort of place that YOU want to live, but it's out there. Don't make me spend the next 20 minutes on Criagslist and Apartments.com showing you how silly you are.

    33. Re:Homeless? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      No. They don't. Set your standards a little lower, and pick a shittier part of town -- one that doesn't advertise on the internet.

      I assure you, it's right on the bus line, and they take cash.

    34. Re:Homeless? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      And... ...the bus.

      Who, exactly, then, are all these people on the bus in the morning? By your logic, none of them can have a job.

      Moron.

    35. Re:Homeless? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      The "fact" is that McDonalds and others aren't that picky at all.

      They hired our mentally ill kid TWICE, and that was after he walked off the job mid-shift the first time.

      The bar is set pretty damned low.

    36. Re:Homeless? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      They are people not employed by wal-mart, 7-11, mcdonalds or another major retailer/fast food joint. If you do not have a car, none of those companies will hire you.

    37. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "fact" is that McDonalds and others aren't that picky at all.

      They hired our mentally ill kid TWICE, and that was after he walked off the job mid-shift the first time.

      The bar is set pretty damned low.

      That's not a sign of the bar being set low. That's a sign of a corrupt revolving door where the candidates with history of screwing up keep getting favored over better ones.

      Then again, seeing as how even the highest position in US government experience the same thing (Bush, Obama, doesn't matter), I'm not surprised.

    38. Re:Homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    39. Re:Homeless? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Except that they will, and you're completely wrong.

    40. Re:Homeless? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      No. It's simply a sign that they're always hiring.

      Is there competition for corporate minimum wage jobs in the inner-city? Sure. Those might be tougher to land. Anywhere else? You can be a mental patient they already fired once for walking off the job and they'll still hire you.

      There are no better candidates.

      Speak English.
      Walk upright.
      Hired!

    41. Re:Homeless? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      No they do not, and no I am not.

      15 years ago I was in a position of doing menial labor. One question on ALL applications for those menial positions with major corporations is "do you have access to reliable transportation?" And every interviewer asked specifically about having a car, emphasizing that public transportation was not an option (often because public transportation is non-existant outside of the larger cities in the US).

    42. Re:Homeless? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Public mass transportation is only relevant in major cities, and completely non-existant in the vast majority of the US. And in those smaller cities where it exists, bus schedules are rarely reliable.

    43. Re:Homeless? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Makes more sense. I can't imagine someone without a home having the ability to browse the web to get money that way. You need a computer or phone, which means either an ISP charge or phone charge, and those are not at all cheap. Maybe some cafe lets the homeless guy sit at a table and a free computer all day long but this would be very rare.

    44. Re:Homeless? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      So....your complaint is that McDonalds gave your mentally ill son a job, and then a second chance? You must own Atlas Wanked in paperback, hardbound, first run printing, DVD, BluRay, laserdisc....

    45. Re:Homeless? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Get a roommate. You don't _need_ privacy. Sharing a 2 bedroom, 4 ways is basically the cheapest you can live. Going bigger means larger groups and higher certainty of problems.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re:Homeless? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Not as much as a period of unemployment will.

      Any future employer is going to look more positively at you taking a job like that than having no job at all for a period because it at least shows a will to work and a period of interaction with customers and so forth.

      That's way better than a period of doing nothing and achieving nothing.

    47. Re:Homeless? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Well if he was a "network engineer" then chances are his not in the bottom 7% of the population so it shouldn't matter.

      Unless of course he is, in which case maybe that's why he's not a network engineer any more.

      We have even higher unemployment rates in the UK than the US right now I believe but I guarantee you if I came to work tomorrow and the doors were locked finding myself unemployed that by the end of the week I'd have a new job, even if it was just in McDonalds or whatever until I find the job I want.

      Most people who are unemployed have "failed" because they weren't trying hard enough or would prefer to lounge around on welfare. I even sympathise with them to some degree because for some losing your job can be soul destroying and if they're genuinely depressed finding motivation to look no doubt feels impossible, but ultimately they're not unemployed because there are no jobs out there. About the only time that holds true is in isolated rural communities, but even this doesn't prevent you moving somewhere where there are jobs.

      Someone competent enough to be a network engineer is only genuinely "unable to find employment" where there's no longer a single job listed on Monster.com paying under £30k a year or whatever the US equivalent wage would be and when McDonalds etc. are no longer recruiting anyone for an extended period.

      Regarding your mention of "overqualified" I'll give you a hint: that's an employers way of saying "We didn't like you because you came across like an idiot, but we don't want you to feel too bad about it, so we'll pretend you're just too good for us". No one actually doesn't hire specifically because of overqualification in itself.

  6. Seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of bitcoins as currency, but to sit around clicking ads all day for pennies doesn't make sense to me. Why not just work a minimum wage job and make a couple hundred dollars a week if you're that desperate..

  7. Smells Like Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This whole thing reads like an Onion story. Is this what slashdot has come down to?

    1. Re:Smells Like Bullshit by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      A few dollars' worth of free food coupons a day is not the same as rent and car and gas and $4000/year property tax because your heart beats.

      If Bitcoin gets too big, expect a clampdown to get taxes from it, though it will be couched in verbiage of For The People they will demand government scrutiny and regulation. But it's about money. It always is.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Smells Like Bullshit by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Informative

      expect a clampdown to get taxes from it, though it will be couched in verbiage of For The People they will demand government scrutiny and regulation.

      It doesn't need to be. Americans are already legally obligated to report capital gains from trading in Bitcoins, and any income measured in Bitcoins must be reported as income, converted to dollars. If people aren't reporting such details, they're actually engaging in tax evasion, and can be caught just like any other evaders.

      Having gone through the investigation process myself, it turns out it's not really that big of a deal. The IRS sends you a letter with a phone number, which you can call and talk to an agent about it. Being willing to correct mistakes is a big factor in resolving the issue quickly. If someone doesn't report Bitcoins because they don't realize they have to, they can just file an amendment to their return that reflects the correct figures, and send in a check to cover the difference. The IRS will check the return again, and determine whether they believe it or not. Repeat as necessary. Again, the key is to not be hostile towards the IRS. Believe it or not, they're people, too.

      In my case, I got a notice saying the IRS thought I owed a few thousand dollars. I rechecked my paperwork, found that I owed about $400, and sent in an amendment and a check. They responded saying they didn't accept a certain deduction for which I had no verifiable paperwork. I sent in a signed letter attesting that it was valid. They then sent me a notice saying that they owed me a few hundred dollars, along with a check. The numbers all finally matched, so that was the end of it.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Smells Like Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* If you truly cannot afford (coverage costs >8% of your income) health insurance, you can get an exemption from the health care requirement. So, if you really are poor, the law won't affect you.

      On the other hand, if you were gaming the system by only waiting until you needed very expensive care, before getting insurance, and thus sticking the cost onto everyone else, then yes, you will be hit with a $4k tax. In which case, I have little sympathy.

      If you don't like the explicit tax, an alternative would be a implicit tax by providing a subsidy for everyone to buy coverage (along with price regulation). Or, we could have a single payer system. Or, we could, as a society, agree that it is acceptable to let people go broke or/anddie because they are not able to afford the necessary health care. Or, we could do nothing an pretend that it isn't a problem while living in our fantasy world.

    4. Re:Smells Like Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I've had to deal with the IRS on a few occasions, including one in which they said I owed a very large sum of money and I was close to panic. Being open and honest with the agents is the best way to go, and they're incredibly helpful, which surprised the crap out of me. One year I had a $21k tax bill turn into a $200 tax bill, and the agent was the one who helped me get it the whole way down, because I was willing to admit where I'd (really, an accountant, and an online trading company) messed up. They weren't trying to toss me in jail at any point, and helped me find a deduction I'd missed, too, incidentally. Same process as you -- I sent in more forms and a check, they came back on something else (charitable deduction), I sent in a form and proof, and then it was all over.

      The only people I've known who have had problems with the IRS on a personal level were people doing shady things or who were arseholes talking to the (supposedly lowly paid) people who take calls their. Now, business level, that's a whole other story -- I've seen the IRS go crazy nasty against businesses for no good damned reason.

    5. Re:Smells Like Bullshit by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Of course the system is helpful in helping you comply with the tax laws. They have no reason to be unreasonable and detain you at the first hint of foul play or lying. It's like a farmer killing his cow the morning after it didn't yield any milk for the first time. The farmer will give the cow a break, send it to a greener pasture for a few days rest, and then voila, it's back to producing quality A-grade pure lactic money milk for the farmer again!! Oh, and did I mention that the cow is now super-happy and motivated to give the farmer even more money-milk?

    6. Re:Smells Like Bullshit by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Moo?

  8. At some point by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    At some point the city library will want to save money by switching off the external sockets - or charging a nominal amount. This will close him down

    1. Re:At some point by earlzdotnet · · Score: 1

      The amount of money they would probably save would be at most a couple dollars per year. Charging cell phones and even laptops every day or two uses a minimal amount of energy compared to keeping a room lit up

    2. Re:At some point by operagost · · Score: 2

      I'd let these guys use the inverter in my car for .001 BTC/min.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:At some point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is about politics, not money saved. A local story about "bums making cash from taxpayer paid resources" will likely inflame the locals enough that the outlets get turned off. Even if the total cost is about $10 a year.

    4. Re:At some point by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Politics. Why is panhandling banned? Because a lot of people don't want to see it. Why is camping banned? Because then the homeless will have to move and become Someone Else's Problem. If supplying free power eventually leads to a small 'homeless camp' appearing for a few hours a day as they all charge their phones, you can be sure the city would find some way to put an end do it.

    5. Re:At some point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet there are homeless shelters where the people staying there are not allowed to charge their phones, because of stupid policies that say the shelters can't give out any resources beyond a set list, or consider electricity an unnecessary resource which must be withheld from them in any quantities. This can actually be a serious problem for the homeless making a big effort to get back on their feet, where they need the phone as a form of contact when applying for jobs (many won't consider application with no phone number or skip over communal ones or ones that change), and aren't the type that sits around in the library or a shop all the time.

    6. Re:At some point by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Hipster bums lurk near library parks near me.

      There's wonderful gazeebos with sockets and nearby public WiFi.

    7. Re:At some point by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Double-standards for the win. That is mob rule / democracy for you. The majority, in your examples, has dictated that they are unhappy about the poor in society using whatever free thing the library provides, and the law will change accordingly. This is by design, so please let's not then continue and cry about how it's a problem and unfair. Democracy, and the double-standard arguments revolving around it kind of remind me of free-speech. You can't say that you favor free speech and then change your mind when someone says something you don't like. Same goes for democracy; you can't suddenly change your mind when the majority agrees with something you don't. You can act to change it, but the will of the people has spoken. To say otherwise, is to denounce a basic tenet of democracy: majority agreement. If you do, then all you're doing is attempting to enforce your minority-opinion over the rest of us.

    8. Re:At some point by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Same goes for democracy; you can't suddenly change your mind when the majority agrees with something you don't. You can act to change it, but the will of the people has spoken. To say otherwise, is to denounce a basic tenet of democracy: majority agreement. If you do, then all you're doing is attempting to enforce your minority-opinion over the rest of us.

      Democracy is not mob rule and mob rule is not democracy. The concept has been refined since ancient Athens and adopted more tenets, precisely to keep a democracy from degenerating into a game of Survivors. So no, as a matter of fact denouncing a action, no matter how popular, that solely exists in order to harm a minority is not denouncing democracy, it's denouncing a perversion of it.

      Compare and contrast civil rights, which weren't exactly popular in certain places (and still aren't).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:At some point by XcepticZP · · Score: 1
      Interesting analogy, calling democracy a game of "Survivors", assuming you're referring to Survivor Island. Pretty apt analogy, if you ask me. Special interest groups (aka minority groups of people) scheming, plotting, and allying with various other groups in order to get favor and benefit. All while the rest of us watch in anticipation/amusement and cast our votes.

      [...]denouncing a[sic] action, no matter how popular, that solely exists in order to harm a minority is not denouncing democracy, it's denouncing a perversion of it.

      And who gets to decide that it's a perversion of democracy? The minority, or the majority? If you say majority, then you're proving my point and contradicting yourself. If you say minority, then that's not democracy anymore and change will not be the result of democracy but by tyranny of a few over many.

      Right now, many minority groups are being harmed by the state, yet no one does/says a damn thing about it. This is precisely because those minority groups are past an invisible and arbitrarily drawn line. When you realize that your "minority/majority" argument is one of arbitrary lines, then you'll realize what a sham the whole thing really is.

  9. Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This past May, Pensacola — where Angle has lived since April — passed an ordinance that bans not only panhandling but camping on city property.

    They can pass all the laws they want, but until they do something about unemployment, mental illness, and drug abuse, people will continue begging for money and "camping" on city property. You can put them in jail (which, for some, would be a step up in living conditions), but then you'll spend a lot of money while doing nothing to address the actual problem.

    1. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can put them in jail (which, for some, would be a step up in living conditions), but then you'll spend a lot of money while doing nothing to address the actual problem.

      Well, what if you make panhandling and camping capital offenses?

    2. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extermination camps could fix it

    3. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll move back to San Francisco.

    4. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Florida, they can't possibly deal with the Cockroaches, let alone the Mosquitoes.

    5. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the private prison lobby, I wouldn't be surprised if eventually tossing them in jail is the intent. Most cities are far more interested in their stadiums than trying to deal with community issues.

      It is no wonder why city councilmen wonder why people get tired of being accosted at every traffic light, every street corner, coming back to burglarized vehicles, and anything public completely abused or so restricted by laws and ordinances that it is useless. Then the city wonder why people start moving and why there are suburban flight issues.

      It is sad, in the US, you basically have to move to a smaller town every 20-30 years in order to not end up a crime statistic. The few towns that do try to do something about this just get overwhelmed by busloads of incoming bums from other places. I can personally attest to both Austin and Santa Cruz having been made unlivable just due to this.

      In the US, you either find a suburban place to live, or allow your family to be at risk, which is a crying shame.

    6. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      This seems to be the way of things, in the modern age: don't solve problems. Understanding is hard (and even harder to sell to the sound-bite-governed masses, on a political level) but criminalization is trivial (and makes you look "tough" - whatever that means).

      The fact that it takes a manageable societal problem and turns it into a massive financial expense doesn't seem to phase those who love this way of thinking.

      After all, they don't want to solve problems but put them where they don't have to see them.

    7. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they are shooing them out of the city limits into the county.

    8. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop letting the poor breed, for fucks sake. Mandatory sterilization.

    9. Re:Homelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why does this comment have only score 4? that's exactly what should stood out from the whole story. wth making homelessness illegal? should be considered a crime to humanity to pass such laws.

  10. Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My sister's husband's nephew is homeless but makes $4,500 a month just looking at Internet ads!!! You can too!!!

    For more information go here:
    http://www.makemoneywhilelivingunderthebridge.com

    1. Re:Good news! by earlzdotnet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not sure if spam or genuine comment

    2. Re:Good news! by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Amusing either way.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Good news! by dmbasso · · Score: 2

      I started reading "My sister" and immediately thought "hookers accepting bitcoin! neat!"

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    4. Re:Good news! by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Since makemoneywhilelivingunderthebridge.com isn't registered, it would be a pretty ineffectual spam message. But then again, a good portion of the spam messages I get have broken, malformed, or incomprehensible links so I guess it's still probably unclear.

      Its otherwise correct spelling and grammar with the exception of multiple exclamation points makes me think it's a genuine comment, and above par for most Slashdot comments to boot.

    5. Re:Good news! by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Came here hoping someone had posted this. Left satisfied.

    6. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started reading "My sister" and immediately thought "hookers accepting bitcoin! neat!"

      May not be his sister, but strip4bit.com

  11. Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I saw large screen laptops, a smart phone, monster energy drink, bottled water, etc. in the articles photos. However, he was bummed out he lost power while playing a game on said large screen laptop. I guess it does suck being destitute in the US. Imagine your CoD game cut short. I will call BS on the poor homeless pity me routine.

    1. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And 2 packs of cigarettes, that like $8 right there. Like many who do the boohoo routine about being poor, they can't control their own spending and spend on the most frivolous things all the while saying "I can't live." What bullshit.

    2. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I suppose the way it can work is this - after a reasonable if not rich life style, they lose a job and lose the apartment. They now get food stamps, but it's not quite enough to live off each months, so they end up living on the street. Due to the lack of rent payments, they now have enough money from social security to buy OK food and drinks. They still have laptop and phone from before things went south, even though they might not be able to afford a new one.

    3. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      And 2 packs of cigarettes, that like $8 right there.

      In Florida??? Try more like $18.

      I don't know exactly what they cost nowadays (haven't bought a pack in almost 3 years! Go me!), but last time I overheard someone buying them I think it was almost $5 a pack.

      And that's rural Ozark Plateau pricing; $deity (and people who live there) knows what they charge on the coasts.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like eat. Or, let's see, $8/day * 30 days a month = $240/mo. That's about half of a payment on a small apartment.

    5. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They may have the laptop, but how do they get on the internet? They'll have to have an ISP or a mobile phone data plan, and that's a big expense when you don't have a job. At least the laptop can be recharged by using public electric outlets, but there's not much free internet except for a handful of towns or if you sit in a restaurant sipping the same cup of coffee all day just to get some spotty wifi.

    6. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Most libraries have free Internet.

    7. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      Why are people like you so pissy because some homeless people happen to live better than dogs?
      And why do you feel you have to care? if you want to live your self-centered, hateful and ignorant life then mind your own business.

    8. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a moron.

      He likely had those things before he became homeless. Selling them might pay for rent for one month but then what will he use to communicate with?

      It is people like who make this world such a shitty place.

    9. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $16-18 for each pack in New Zealand, your homeless have it sweet!

    10. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Xest · · Score: 1

      He had monster energy drinks and cigarettes from before he was homeless?

      What did he do, stockpile them thinking "Oh I better buy a load now in case I end up homeless"?

    11. Re:Wow the US sure has well off homeless by Xest · · Score: 1

      Because generally if you're homeless it means you can't afford rent or a mortgage.

      You may struggle to get a job if you haven't got a permanent address.

      So if you save up those dollars spent on cigarettes and energy drinks you could save up enough to rent somewhere with an address for a couple of months, during which time you could get a job and bank account given your new permanent address which would allow you to sustain that and not be homeless.

      The point is that by not living like "dogs" as you put it they're sustaining their current situation, whilst if they lived like "dogs" (seriously, giving up cigarettes and substituting energy drinks for something cheaper is hardly living like a dog) for a couple of months they'd then be able to have a much better lifestyle again.

      I take issue with people who moan about their predicament being long term when they have many ways of escaping their predicament, they just choose not to take them.

      So it's fine if this guy wants to leave like this and be homeless but have his smokes and energy drink, that's okay, but at the same time he needs to stfu about being homeless because that's actually a choice he's making when he opts for energy drinks and cigarettes rather than amassing a bit of cash to escape homelessness. You can't make a choice about something then complain about it.

  12. Internet Advertising by beernutmark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yet another reason that internet advertising isn't the great value it is said to be. Those of us who are targeted by the ads are using abp and the ads are being watched by people doing so only for the cash.

    1. Re:Internet Advertising by DogDude · · Score: 1

      As opposed to old media ads, which can't be measured at all...?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Internet Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No measure is better than a wrong measure.

    3. Re:Internet Advertising by reluctantjoiner · · Score: 2

      That explains the "make megabucks working from home" ads that I see. I assumed it was the usual money laundering "work". I'm not sure wether clicking on ads for things you have no intention of buying is morally better or worse than using your bank account to help launder money...

  13. Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have you compared the price of those energy drinks with a bag of apples or coffee?

    It's a pretty sad situation in this country when shit food costs less than good food. A lot of that has to do with our fucked up agricultural subsidies that end up in the pockets of Monsanto and Cargill via the farmers. And people wonder why we have an obesity epidemic.

    And it's also fucking sad that this guy who's resourceful, creative and talented is on the fucking streets but yet, we have assholes in Silicon Valley bitching about the "lack of talent". I would NEVER have thought of doing what he's doing. I bet if you gave this guy a programming/systems problem, he'd figure it out and come up with a unique solution. Remember that SV asshole when you're working on your next dipshit social networking or push advertising (disguised as showing folks "what they will be interested in") or some other lame-o app that offers no value to society.

    Even though this guy is "old" at 42, he's using the cutting edge of not only technology of payment systems, but he is the cutting edge of what is going to happen to most of us. He's the on the edge of our spiral down to the bottom.

    Just think of that when you see some CEO getting 60 million dollars just because she's a cute blond who happened to be at the right place at the right time or some asshole who fucked up a company and then talked a bigger one to buy it out.

    1. Re:Pathetic by DogDude · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you compared the price of those energy drinks with a bag of apples or coffee?

      I wouldn't call coffee nutritious in any way, but I know that I can get about 5 pounds of bananas, 1 pound of beans, or 2 pounds of rice for the price of one of those "energy drinks".

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with drinking energy drinks, but how's he going to cook beans or rice without a stove? I don't think any stores will let him use an outlet for a portable hot plate.

    3. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Have you compared the price of those energy drinks with a bag of apples or coffee?

      It's a pretty sad situation in this country when shit food costs less than good food."

      Seriously I'm sick of this fallacy, it's the biggest lie ever told. Really let's look at bottled water I can get 384 ounces of bottled water for $10, 384 ounces of Monster energy drink costs me $48.50. I could get a McDonald's meal for 5+ dollars or I could get a pound of ground beef for 9 and make a bunch of bugers. I could buy an 18 count pack of eggs for $2 or an egg McMuffin.

      Also a 5 pound bag of fuji apples is 7 bucks or 3.5 cans of monster.

    4. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a pretty sad situation in this country when shit food costs less than good food.

      What? I'd say it's a good sign if shit food costs less than good food. If shit food costs more than good food, it just means the shit food is overpriced, and the people buy it anyway.

      In a working economy, the better things are more expensive.

    5. Re:Pathetic by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Sterno? It's a few bucks a can. Generic brands are cheaper.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    6. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could get a McDonald's meal for 5+ dollars or I could get a pound of ground beef for 9 and make a bunch of bugers.

      I don't think you are completely in the wrong on many of the items but in the case above you are comparing the wrong things. A "poor" person doesn't have to go for super size. You can get a McDouble of the dollar menu. If you are very frugal, you can eat for $3 a day plus tax not an easy feat with fresh food (with all the refrigeration, cooking, etc. infrastructure)

      Honestly, my fiance buys these cheap TV dinners for her kids (she is on disability due to a sudden illness). I originally scoffed a bit about how much that must cost compared to purchasing fresh and cooking. She can get a TV dinners for $1 a piece which is a full meal with protein, side, and little desert (and surprisingly the nutrition content not too bad). She then showed how much it would cost for everything to cook about the same; keeping in mind they don't sell meats and other items in exactly multiple of serving size needed. Flavor probably would be much better, but cost was surprisingly not. She does cook normally, but in a pinch, the TV dinners are needed.

      As always, your mileage might be different

    7. Re:Pathetic by Aaden42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That comparison holds in the case where someone has a low income but at least has a home or some sort of environment where cooking is possible.

      If you’re living on the streets, where are you going to cook your ground beef or eggs? Where are you going to refrigerate them so that you can take advantage of the lower per-meal cost spread over the course of several days? That type of economy of scale is only possible with a certain minimum level of capital. Namely that required to maintain or maintain access to a kitchen, IE a “home”.

      Honestly, caffeinated sugar solution is a subjectively “good” choice if you’re broke and hungry. Granted, it lacks in protein, so long-term it sucks. Short-term, though, it gives you energy (sugar) and a stimulant boost (caffeine) which will tend to make you feel less hungry. You’ll be digesting your own organs before long, but at least you won’t feel “starving”.

      You’d be better off trying to find some pre-cooked or raw-consumable, shelf-stable (no refrigeration required) protein, but I’m honestly at a loss to name any complete proteins that fit those requirements that are cheaper than a McWhatever...

    8. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he has the ability to "survive on bitcoins" then I'm sure he can apply the same moxy in order to cook some fucking rice.

    9. Re:Pathetic by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      Hand sanitizer >> Sterno.

    10. Re:Pathetic by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Also a 5 pound bag of fuji apples is 7 bucks or 3.5 cans of monster.

      A 5 lb. bag of Fujiis would keep well in my fridge for a while. In Florida, in a sack that I am lugging from shelter-to-bench-to-shelter... not so much. He's essentially camping and back-packing all the time. Five extra pounds of fully hydrated perishable, bruisable fruit in your pack is not a good plan. Trail mix is dry for a reason.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    11. Re:Pathetic by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      Soda cans and rubbing alcohol make cheap stoves. Bean cans make ok pots. Even at inflated vending machine prices, that's another $2-3 max.

    12. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a pot/pan/spoon to cook with. And a place to store your pot/pan/spoon and sterno, and you'll also need to keep replacing the sterno. There are a lot of unaccounted for costs in dealing with unprepared meals when you have no money. Although I do agree it is crazy he is drinking energy drinks, but perhaps it is a luxury he allows himself infrequently.

    13. Re:Pathetic by bmk67 · · Score: 1
    14. Re:Pathetic by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      Even cheaper, you can easily make a burner out of an empty alumninum soda can that burns rubbing alcohol for fuel.

    15. Re:Pathetic by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      You’d be better off trying to find some pre-cooked or raw-consumable, shelf-stable (no refrigeration required) protein, but I’m honestly at a loss to name any complete proteins that fit those requirements that are cheaper than a McWhatever...

      Spam. Around here, about $3 for a 12 oz can - over a thousand calories of protein and fat.

    16. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet pics show him plugged in no problem with his computer. What's the diff?

    17. Re:Pathetic by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      just buy pot noodles and use the microwave at the 7-11.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    18. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat food?

    19. Re:Pathetic by chihowa · · Score: 1

      A surplus or camping pot, a soda can alcohol stove, and a bottle of rubbing alcohol will set you back the cost of one energy drink and the fuel will last for weeks. An energy drink is only going to make you less hungry for an hour or two at best, but a bowl of beans and rice will hold you over much longer. I've used this setup for backpacking over weeks and it's small, light, cheap, and easy to use. Cooking without a house is easy enough if you keep it simple.

      You can keep most cooked food for a few days without it spoiling, though you're right that buying raw meat or eggs in bulk is not a great idea.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    20. Re:Pathetic by Lazarian · · Score: 1

      I don't think peanut butter would be a complete protein source, but it does keep well. There's also canned fish for high quality protein, but I've heard that eating a lot of it would end up giving a person trouble with mercury. Better than starving, though...

    21. Re:Pathetic by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that old adage. "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." If you ask me, we should be handing out pamphlets with instructions, and basic tools/items needed for meal cooking to the homeless/poor. Giving the poor food just keeps them barely above water in a sad existence.

      Unfortunately, in the country where I live, begging at traffic lights is a very lucrative business. Beggars often have "turf-wars" between each other for the best spots. Not only that, but they have sort of "pimps" that manage the child/disabled beggars, and take their money. And my word are a lot of them pushy, trying to guilt innocent motorists as they stop at the lights.

    22. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peanut butter

    23. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about sardines and bread? You can eat sardines from a can, and they aren't that expensive. The nutrients in sardines and typical vitamin fortified bread will keep you alive for quite a while. If you can figure out a safe reasonable way of cooking potatoes then you're in luck. You can live on potatoes and sardines for quite a long time- might even be quite healthy. For vitamin C and fibre eat kale or broccoli or raw potato (taking the usual safety precautions for raw consumption of these items). And/or buy a big bottle of multivitamins - they're actually quite cheap per pill and you don't need to take a pill every day.

      The thing is when you're poor, down and out, a caffeinated sugar solution might be a cheap way to cheer yourself up a bit. And that's why you buy it. It's not to survive. It's to live a bit.

    24. Re:Pathetic by Keybounce · · Score: 1

      Canned tuna. About 50 to 60 cents per can; about 1.5 meals per can. Eat 2/3rds of it now, and keep the rest for a snack in 2 hours. Combine with a banana.

      "Meal bars" -- some are basically soy protein plus vitamins and carbs. For about $1.25, you get a complete, but small, meal.

      What do both of these approaches lack? Fat. For some reason, our society thinks "fat is bad", when it's not only necessary, researchers say it's actually a better fuel than sugar for 75% of the population.

    25. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat 2/3rds of it now, and keep the rest for a snack in 2 hours

      In your pocket?

    26. Re:Pathetic by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      but I’m honestly at a loss to name any complete proteins that fit those requirements that are cheaper than a McWhatever...

      Mixing up your own trail mix from bulk bins would be the simplest and cheapest method. I assume that most grocery stores in other parts (I'm in the NW US), of the country have a bulk section with things like flours, nuts, spices, grains, beans, dried fruits, granola?

  14. Re:What a douchbag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homophobe. Maybe he just thinks he's hot.

  15. Re:What a douchbag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that escalated quickly

  16. Not bitcoins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    earns small amounts throughout the day by visiting various websites that pay him to look at ads.

    He's not "surviving on bitcoins", he's surviving off ad viewing.
    This has been around long before bitcoin, and will be around long after.
    What currency he chooses to get paid in really isn't important, but hey, you need people to click your damn story.

    1. Re:Not bitcoins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circlejerk adsense money making racket!

    2. Re:Not bitcoins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you deliberately ignoring the fact that bitcoin makes micropayments feasible by eliminating transaction costs, or are you just unaware of that fact?

  17. Not as embarrassing by inking · · Score: 1

    Surely it would be even less embarrassing for him if he actually did something productive. What kind of homeless person walks around with a laptop and a smartphone anyway?

    1. Re:Not as embarrassing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most, actually. A laptop and phone are much easier to afford than rent, and not having either makes the very act of FINDING a job much more difficult.

    2. Re:Not as embarrassing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most, actually"

      Complete and utter bullshit.

      No, most homeless people dont have laptops. Many do have cell phones yes - the cheapo metroPCS kind, usually. A laptop is something a homeless person would need to guard with their life at all times of the day and night, making it ~less~ easy to find a job.

    3. Re:Not as embarrassing by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      A homeless already has to guard his shoes and backpack with his life all day and night.

  18. So, it has come to this. by steelfood · · Score: 1

    ./ is plagiarizing headlines now. What, editors, can't think up your own?

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  19. Well that's new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Go away or I will replace your very small click fraud shell script with a fat hobo."

    This is stupid and makes no sense. If you have a laptop, internet access, and can deal with the dumb stuff you need to use bitcoin securely, you must have some skill that is worth more than fractions of a dollar a day.

    And when he does odd jobs for people around Pensacola — here in the physical world — he still gets paid in bitcoin, just because it’s easier and safer.

    What kind of people are these? If you're hard on cash, why limit yourself to the infinitesimal intersection of people who both have an odd job they want doing, and is willing to pay you in bitcoin?
    Why not take cash, which is easier for all parties involved, and keep it where you keep your laptop and phone?

  20. Shouldn't this story run on April 1? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >he still gets paid in bitcoin, just because it’s easier and safer. He doesn’t have to worry as much about getting robbed.

    Unless...someone steals his laptop.

    >> Angle used to work as a network engineer and a computer repair technician — as well as a carpenter and a pool cleaning guy, among other jobs — but the work eventually petered out.

    ...and now I'm buying him food stamps and energy drinks so he can help marketing departments game search engines? Awesome.

    1. Re:Shouldn't this story run on April 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1st of April is for fake stories meant to amuse and titillate. This is a fake story meant to attract clicks and hype bitcoins. Totally different things.

    2. Re:Shouldn't this story run on April 1? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have to worry as much about getting robbed.

      Unless...someone steals his laptop.

      Actually, if the wallet is deterministic and encrypted with a passphrase—the default for the Electrum client, among others—and he either memorized the seed or recorded it somewhere safe, then even that wouldn't be a problem. Of course, he'd still be out the cost of replacing the laptop, but he wouldn't lose his bitcoins.

      Physical theft of the device is less of a threat these days than malware. Malicious software running on your device has a better chance of being able to access your private keys.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    3. Re:Shouldn't this story run on April 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> he'd still be out the cost of replacing the laptop, but he wouldn't lose his bitcoins

      Remember, "he has earned somewhere between four or five bitcoins — about $500 to $630" - losing the laptop seems like the worse fate.

  21. And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Fencepost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We all know he could have a job at Wal-Mart, 7-11, or McDonald's within a few hours.

    It's quite possible that he could get such a job, though I don't know what the job market is like in Pensacola (I believe that's where the article indicated he was). That doesn't mean that he could afford rent somewhere - from the article, the main person being discussed became homeless initially after a multi-roommate apartment fell apart, and has bounced in and out of being able to afford a place since.

    The more interesting part of the article is that some homeless are now starting to use Bitcoin as a way to get around not having a bank account (hard to do when you have no fixed address, I believe). This ties in well with many low-income folks having (disproportionally?) good smartphones - they can do it because that's the Internet access they can afford, and if they actually have a contract they may be getting decent phones because they can manage the installments.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's worse than that. Yes, you need some kind of an address to get a bank account thanks to stricter AML laws passed in the PATRIOT Act.

      However, if you spend a while in the cash economy, when you do get back on your feet many banks will refuse to take your cash as a deposit. Because they don't know how you got that cash, they are afraid of being considered money launderers by allowing you to deposit it. So once people fall out of the banking system it can be hard to get back in, which then in turn keeps these people down (and more likely to be criminals). All in the name of fighting the terrorists.

      By the way, the US government knows the power of being evicted from the financial system full well. That's why they're starting to enforce US law internationally even though they can't jail people outside their borders. Instead of jail the punishment they use is being blacklisted from the financial system and having all your bank accounts closed. If you're a middle class guy with a home, a mortgage, kids etc and one day banks stop wanting to deal with you because you pissed off the US, then you could find yourself on the street faster than you might think. After all, what are you going to do when your bank accounts get closed - take out your life savings and pension as cash?

    2. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I don't ever recall my bank complaining when I made several thousand dollar deposits. If you have a sum of cash, there's no saying that you can't just go in and make a deposit weekly.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by geek · · Score: 2

      It's quite possible that he could get such a job, though I don't know what the job market is like in Pensacola (I believe that's where the article indicated he was). That doesn't mean that he could afford rent somewhere.

      So he can leave Pensacola and go where the jobs/money are. My dad moved our family from Florida to Michigan to Arizona and then CA for work. He never batted an eye, never thought to get hand outs or bitch that life wasn't fair. He went where the work is. I'm sick of the lazy bastards who wont move for a good job and a chance to better their life.

    4. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

      My mother is a bank teller. At no bank she has worked at, have they ever refused a cash deposit. There is a magic number (10K) at which they notify some authority in case it was gained through nefarious means (so they claim), but those people already know the magic number and instead stick to deposits of 9K or less at a time.

    5. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if you spend a while in the cash economy, when you do get back on your feet many banks will refuse to take your cash as a deposit.

      I had no problems opening a bank account with cash a year ago when I moved, and then opening a second one when I had some time to find out which banks had better service in the area. My father, after having a business fail, switched to dealing with cash only for a couple years of under the table repair work before getting a more stable job again. He also had no problem opening an account with bunch of cash one switching back to using banks.

    6. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So $1000 to start a checking account is money laundering? YouAreTheRealStupid.

    7. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But smartphones are very expensive, very high end, and the data plans combined make this much less affordable than a basic computer and ISP (especially ISP with dialup). But the phone is a status symbol, thus many poor people will get the phone just to seem less poor than they really are. I know people *with* jobs who are cutting back on phone data plans just to stay within budget.

    8. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Fencepost · · Score: 1

      Current-generation smartphones are expensive, older or lower-end ones are much less so. I can get lower-end prepaid Android phones at Target, Wallyworld or many other places for well under $100 with no contract whatsoever.

      Similarly, data plans have changed quite a bit in the past few years. In a quick survey of 2 carriers/resellers (T-Mobile & Cricket), I could get data service with at least 3G speed (first 5GB at 4G with a capable phone) starting from $30/month if I don't want a lot of minutes. Plans with more minutes or different bundles range up to $70/month, but it wouldn't be hard at all to keep it under $50.

      Further, depending on the phone and plan, you may even be able to tether a laptop through the phone's WiFi - you'll probably need the phone plugged in since it kills the battery, but it works.

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    9. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Structuring" It is a crime. Look it up.

    10. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      My dad moved our family from Florida to Michigan to Arizona and then CA for work. He never batted an eye, never thought to get hand outs or bitch that life wasn't fair. He went where the work is.

      Uh huh. And how did he do that - by giving you piggyback rides back and forth across the U.S., or giving blowjobs to hitchhike? Or did he pack you guys up in the family car and pay for gas along the way?

      I'm sick of the lazy bastards who wont move for a good job and a chance to better their life.

      I'm sick of sociopathic shitbags who can't see past their own noses. Why don't you move your dumb ass under a bridge or into an efficiency with three roomates if you think the poor have it so easy. Or moving hundreds of miles away for a hope and a prayer that you might find a job, with no employement lined up, no place to stay and no money to support yourself at all.

    11. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      But smartphones are very expensive, very high end, and the data plans combined make this much less affordable than a basic computer and ISP (especially ISP with dialup).

      A basic computer with a dialup requires an electric and phone sockets and can't be carried around.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:And how does a McJob prevent homelessness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your bank. The issue is turning up at a bank and trying to open an account with cash.

  22. Bravo Sierra by mythosaz · · Score: 2

    Nope.

    Not buying it.

    He might be suplimenting his income by clicking on bitcoin ads all day long (or having a script do it), but he's not panhandling enough in just Bitcoins to do that. Getting paid in uBTC is tedious at best. You couldn't ge a single pack of the cigarette's he's smoking that way.

  23. Homeless by Choice by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Since there is such a shortage of IT workers that we have to open the borders of the US, it is clear this guy is homeless by choice.

    Anyone who thinks there is immigrant displacement of US workers is a neo-Nazi sympathizer at best.

  24. Homeless, unemeployed.... but by tekrat · · Score: 2

    But with a laptop, smartphone and internet access? Seriously?
    What this guy needs to do is get the hell out of Florida and into a state with an economy where he can get a job. Probably the only reason he's unemployed is Florida. Maybe he just wants to surf all day rather than spend time in the office. Somehow I'm doubting that a homeless man has all these digital toys, yet, didn't give those up to avoid being "homeless".

    Someone's being scammed here, and it's us Slashdot readers for even believing ONE WORD in this story. What's next, this homeless man gets his own reality TV series?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by captjc · · Score: 2

      Dumbass, doesn't he know that he could surf all day from the office?

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    2. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Somehow I'm doubting that a homeless man has all these digital toys, yet, didn't give those up to avoid being "homeless".

      If he sold all his "toys" (which are tools he uses to earn actual money) they would perhaps fetch a few months' rent in a cheap apartment. Then what?

      What you're suggesting amounts to consuming capital. Rather than giving up his tools, he needs to find a way to use them more productively than getting paid pennies per hour to stare at ads. That may or may not involve Bitcoin, though the ability to easily send and receive payments worldwide should certainly open up some new opportunities for the enterprising individual.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    3. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you bought a laptop when you had a job. Then your roommate moves out, which doubles your rent, and you can no longer afford the apartment. Do you:

      A) Attempt to sell a used laptop for 3/5 the cost of one month of rent (and greatly reduce your ability to communicate and look for jobs).
      B) Cancel your cell service and pay $300 in early cancellation fees (and no longer be able make/received job related calls).
      C) Keep the best items you can carry so you can use them in an attempt to get back the life you once had

      Do you expect him to hitch hike to another state? He can't afford a car to move and where is he going to move to? If you spend everything you have in a random move to some unknown location there's no reason to believe you'll be better off. In fact you'll probably be worse. You're in a new, unknown area with less money than before and no contacts.

      Why don't people use their brains anymore?

    4. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by DarkTempes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He doesn't pay for internet. He uses free public wifi in a park. He mainly survives off of food stamps but uses the bitcoin revenue to supplement that.
      I seriously doubt he pays a phone bill unless it's prepaid, certainly not for data. Bitcoin doesn't require a bank account (which often charges a monthly fee if you have too little money) and people can't beat you up and take your bitcoins.

      And exactly how is selling your laptop to maybe afford one more month of rent going to help your living situation? Then you're just homeless without a laptop.
      I think he has proved that keeping the laptop is worth its weight in food as a potential income source.

      I don't understand why people always hate on the homeless. Is it so impossible to imagine a situation where you're down on your luck and fall through the cracks? Not everyone has a safety net of family and friends. I almost feel like the idea scares people so much that they get reflexively angry about as a form of denial.

      "It's impossible! This could obviously never happen to me and so these people must be scammers, scum, or addicts!"

    5. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      D) Get a part time job to cover the cost of your roommate's rent while you get another roommate or a cheaper place to live.
      E) Just sign up for the public dole and start suckling at the gub'ment teat.

    6. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surf all day? on the gulf of mexico? bro do you even geography?

    7. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had any mod points, I'd give you all of them for this comment. -- said an anonymous homeless guy in the library.

    8. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why people always hate on the homeless. Is it so impossible to imagine a situation where you're down on your luck and fall through the cracks?

      You clearly don't understand. These homeless people chose to be homeless. Why, they could just find a job - any job - if they were dedicated enough. And I'll never be homeless, because I'm just too hard working, and I plan too well. I've never been lucky a day in my life - I got everything through sheer hard work! My $100,000/year job? It wasn't because the last guy burned out just before I'd managed to talk my way into it! It was because I worked hard. If I didn't work hard, I'd be poor and unemployed and homeless, which is why I work hard.

      Just think, once the homeless people find a job, all they need to do is work hard enough for their boss to notice them, and soon enough, their hard work will net them a management position that pays really well, and they'll be well off! Then, all their hard work will have paid off, and they won't be homeless!

      It's not like there needs to be a management position that's suitable for them, or that there actually need to be jobs for them to go to. No, it's just hard work that'll solve all their problem.

      Nobody every got anywhere without hard work in this world!

      If they're doing something and not making a fortune, they're clearly not working hard, now are they?

    9. Re:Homeless, unemeployed.... but by Xest · · Score: 1

      People don't hate on the homeless, they hate on people who have options to get out of a shit situation and don't take them because they favour some immediate comfort instead.

      For example, this guy is buying expensive energy drinks and cigarettes, he could instead save that money to rent somewhere even if only for a couple of months to get a bank account and get himself into a position where he's much better placed to get a permanent job.

      Compare and contrast this to a homeless guy here in the UK where I live, he's an ex-Afghan translator, given permission to stay after he translated for British troops in Afghanistan risking his life, he is homeless because he had no real money to bring with him. We have a program here called Big Issue whereby homeless people are given magazines that they sell for £2, £1 is paid back for the magazine, the other £1 is profit. This guy is out there every day of every year for 12 - 14 hours a day whether it's raining, freezing cold, or really hot, mostly, being the UK though, it's cold and rainy.

      But not a day goes by where he doesn't smile to everyone, sometimes does a little jig, or comically bows to people to make them smile and everyone loves him for it and he's getting somewhere. I gave him £20 on my last week of work before Christmas for a magazine and I've seen others give him more than £2 too - in fact one guy buys him a coffee just about every morning when it's cold. He's got himself a phone now, and some decent clothes and a new backpack so he's getting there certainly.

      That's really the issue. It's not that people hate homeless people, on the contrary when people see a hard working homeless person who also tries to cheer others up despite being in a shit place themselves people are happy to try and help them too by giving charity.

      But what people don't like are spoilt jerks with an entitlement attitude as in the article here who has a laptop, a smartphone, who buys cigarettes and energy drinks and then whines that he's so hard done by. If he's buying cigarettes and energy drinks then of course he wont ever save up enough capital to start improving his life - he's throwing away all the income he gets on unnecessary shit.

  25. how does bitcoin get rid of the "chaff"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand how bitcoin gets rid of the chaff. You still have to pay out bitcoin exchanges, of which there are fewer and fewer. Furthermore, you have to deal with the extreme fluctuation of value, fraudulent exchanges and other nefarious activity in the bitcoin market. I love bitcoin as a concept, but i don't think we should be banking our most extremely destitute on its success and integration into everyday use.

  26. Normally it is drugs or mental issues by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Generally to actually wind up without a place to live, one of those two things come in to play. With mental issues it is fairly easy to understand: The person is crazy, does not perceive reality, and makes choice most find very strange. Also, even if help is available (which it quite often isn't in the US), they don't want it since a sad part of many mental illnesses is to make you not think you are ill. After all they are a problem with the brain and your brain is what you use to tell if you have problems.

    Drugs, including alcohol, are the much more common problem. You get addicts who are so deep in to their addiction that nothing else matters to them. Not only can they not hold down a job, but they end up alienating all their family and friends. People give them chances but they keep abusing it and finally they kick them out. Eventually, they are out of people to go to.

    1. Re:Normally it is drugs or mental issues by vm146j2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, most mentally ill folks know very well that something is not right with their thinking; the sad part of mental illnesses is to make you not trust people who see you as mentally ill, and only some of that is irrational. Drug and alcohol abuse are almost always inseparable from mental illness as well; there is no such thing as a mentally "well" addict.

      --
      "Lost time is not found again."
    2. Re:Normally it is drugs or mental issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, even if help is available (which it quite often isn't in the US), they don't want it since a sad part of many mental illnesses is to make you not think you are ill.

      These mental illnesses are basically nothing more than behaviors or thought patterns that we've arbitrarily declared to be harmful or 'bad.' I agree that some of them are harmful, but it is entirely subjective, and it isn't as if some deity figure, whose opinions are automatically correct, descended down from the heavens and told us that these behaviors/thought patterns are wrong.

      Really, it's only in the opinion of individuals that other people are wrong. Homosexuality was once considered an illness.

    3. Re:Normally it is drugs or mental issues by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      I'd say using, and becoming addicted to addictive drugs IS a mental issue, so your two categories can be collapsed into one. Mentally-well people don't seek dangerous drugs, and if they should become addicted, have the resources to get some help.

      Drugs like Heroin, and excess alcohol use for a legal example, have allure for people who are unhappy in their lives, but not for happy, well-adjusted people.

    4. Re:Normally it is drugs or mental issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, fuckface? Well, I have seen several people going homeless because they lost a job in the beginning of a recession and could not find one for months. Drugs and alcohol is what your children will die from. Fuck your family!!

    5. Re:Normally it is drugs or mental issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you recognize how deeply the economic crisis and the collapse of the financial system has affected millions of otherwise normal people who now have no job or a place to live. There are many people in the United States who have no mental issues or drug/alcohol problems who have lost their jobs and cannot afford rent. The other day, our local NPR station interviewed a laid off software developer in Silicon Valley who once made $100,000+ in the mid-2000s, who now lives in a Winebago motor home and supports himself with part-time jobs. He would be considered "homeless" if not for living out of his Winebago. He cannot find a full-time job as he has been unable to pay for training to upgrade his skills, so he gets by with odd jobs and low-level short-term assignments.

      Bitcoin was created because of the corrupt central banking system responsible for this situation, so it seems perfectly appropriate that homeless people with moderate computer skills can benefit from its remarkable features.

    6. Re:Normally it is drugs or mental issues by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Check this out then : most of the general population is made of psychotic, mentally ill maniacs. Study: Average Person Becomes Unhinged Psychotic When Alone In Own House

      “We discovered that the private mannerisms of most people, if seen in public, would be considered nearly identical to the those of a person with a severe case of schizophrenia,” Gibbon stated. “For example, if you were to witness someone on a subway car obsessively pulling their elbow skin to check its elasticity or see an individual randomly say to themselves, ‘Okay, okay, I’ll call her’ to no one in particular, your immediate reaction would be to think, ‘This person is insane and needs professional help.’”

    7. Re:Normally it is drugs or mental issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He cannot find a full-time job as he has been unable to pay for training to upgrade his skills

      Really? He was already a fucking software developer at one point, so there's no excuse for him not to use the Internet to upgrade his skills himself. I mean, there's no excuse for people to spend ridiculous amounts of money going to college to begin with (other than shortsighted employers), but in this case it's even worse since he already had a job at one point, so he's perfectly capable of doing that.

  27. i tried those faucets sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I only got like 0.003 bitcoins in one month. Jesse Angle must've been lucky. sounds like the poor guy doesn't have any money in his savings account to rent an apartment or pay his bills. i guess he visits websites at a public internet cafe and uses blockchain wallet.

  28. What's the problem? Free market at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The free market (Bitcoin and all those ad companies) is able to provide for this guy. The alternative would be for him to sit on his ass collecting government (which as TFA noted food stamps wasn't enough for him)

    Jobs don't fall off trees you know, it's not like government can just magically create a job for him, let alone one which utilize his skills.

    The private sector has deemed that they only need him for small jobs like watching ads, and paid him accordingly. He gets paid, ad companies get a service they want. Everybody wins.

    And it's such an easy job almost anybody can do it. It's not like the bad old days of working on the farm.

    The libertarians are right, and this is just the beginning. In a libertarian paradise, almost everybody will do what these guys are doing. Imagine all the things you can afford at your job right now, but instead of having to do your job to afford all that, you go on youtube (or slashdot) all day and look at cat pictures

    1. Re:What's the problem? Free market at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The private sector has deemed that they only need him for small jobs like watching ads, and paid him accordingly. He gets paid, ad companies get a service they want. Everybody wins.

      Bullshit. He has decided he only wants to sell his time watching ads for profit. Everything else being the same (he's not a catpiss man or other form of mutant), the private sector would almost certainly hire a computer literate person for other types of jobs.

      This guy is just a parasite sucking on the tit of government assistance.

    2. Re:What's the problem? Free market at its finest by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that these sorts of things bypass mandatory minimum wage laws. He'd be out of work entirely if the government decided to enforce mandatory minimums for workers that work part time watching ads.

      Sure, he may be unable quite yet to get off the dole, but this is a step in the right direction. It's unfortunate that people have to live in such situations, but that is the way to true and meaningful change. Showing others that alternatives exist, and that they are valid examples despite a coercive and immoral system imposing restrictions around them.

  29. "Homeless" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was younger - early teens to late teens, my father would volunteer with food banks, homeless shelters and with the handicapped (these would frequently overlap with the same people). This meant that I too would volunteer (whether I wanted to or not). Anyways, I would hear the same story a lot of the time about how through no fault of their own these people would lose their job, their house and cars and would have nowhere to go. They wanted help in the form of food, place to stay, etc..

    In my experience maybe 1/10 of these people were genuinely down on their luck and looking for help to start over. They would do what it took to get back on their feet. The other 9 merely paid lip service to this. They actually preferred to live on the street and continue the lifestyle of not being a part of "normal" society. We'd help these people get into a program where they have food/shelter and a step by step system to start managing their lives and getting a job - they'd leave the next day because they cant' handle or don't want structure in their lives. They want to be "free" and "independent" but at the same time don't want to have to make an equal contribution to society to pay back these resources they use.

    I look at this guy lounging outside a library with his laptop, drinking monster energy drinks and eating chicken pot pies. He's taking food stamps to support himself and yet he buys shitty unhealthy food that's way too expensive for someone on a restricted income. I got one thing to say to this guy and his friends, "Go fuck yourself!".

    1. Re:"Homeless" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry your relationship and experiences with your father left you bitter about the homeless but you aren't seeing the whole picture. Part of the reason a homeless guy would have shitty food is because that is what's readily available and pervasive in donations or bought as comfort food. Keep in mind he doesn't have storage, refrigeration and anything that he takes with him he must carry on his back. They almost always have a short term mindset as well. When I was homeless I did what I could not to appear homeless so I wouldn't be kicked out of places where I could rest. Look at all the park benches and how they are designed with bars in the middle so you can't lie down and no they won't let you sleep in the library. That was important because of all the walking I had to do and the lousy diet. Being homeless is very time consuming to get the resources you actually need like shelter for the night (that and storage were the most difficult to come by). Food is not that hard to come by, but GOOD food is. Most likely the rockstar, etc. was donated. My guess is that he sold his food stamps for half price to buy cigarettes.(addictions suck) Information is worth more then it's weight in gold though. Finding places to plug in is important as well and often guides your movements. You also have to deal with depression and I suspect the vast majority of homeless people may say they want to be free and independent but they are really afraid of another blow to their already damaged ego and fear of failure is the real reason. Good luck if you're ever down on your luck because you'll also have to deal with guilt and self-loathing issues for accepting public assistance. All it would take is to be arrested. Jail for 30 days would make you homeless. Jails are homelessness factories

    2. Re:"Homeless" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly!! i had this realization pretty recently. (there are a ton of homeless people where i live). most homeless people CHOOSE to be homeless. because they'd rather be free to lounge about than to adhere to society. many tourists give them money and food for free. the homeless have it pretty good.

  30. need to improve schooling as well by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    need to improve schooling as well. As alot of people with autism spectrum don't do well in a collage setting but do a lot better in a smaller tech / trade school setting or even learning of the job.

    1. Re:need to improve schooling as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..don't do well in collage.." You mean, like learning to spell college correctly?

  31. Good for resume too. by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    Worked in internet advertising between tech jobs.

  32. they may not hire some with even 3 years IT to wor by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    they may not hire some with even 3 years IT to work min wage and even if they do get the job it may be 5-10-20 hours a week.

  33. You've never applied for those jobs, have you? by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We all know he could have a job at Wal-Mart, 7-11, or McDonald's within a few hours.

    You obviously don't know anyone who works in that segment of the economy. None of those places are "always hiring," and most have backlogs of resumes to go through. Worse, having a resume with a good job history on it is poison for low-end jobs, where people assume that you'll be jumping ship at first chance for a better job more in line with what you've done. Speaking from experience, no one wants someone with 7 years of development experience and a fresh law degree to deliver their pizzas.

    Plus, my friend who does work for Wal-mart? He'd be homeless too if he couldn't live with him Mom based on what they pay him in his eternally part-time position.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:You've never applied for those jobs, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, you just suck at two career options. Maybe you SHOULD be delivering pizzas.

    2. Re:You've never applied for those jobs, have you? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Since your "friend" doesn't work full time, does he use the other 10+ hours a week he's obviously free EACH AND EVERY WEEK to seek out better jobs, or does he just sit at home with his mom complaining that WalMart doesn't give him enough hours?

    3. Re:You've never applied for those jobs, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a company in the HR industry and about 3% of applicants for low-end retail jobs are hired.

    4. Re:You've never applied for those jobs, have you? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Since your "friend" doesn't work full time, does he use the other 10+ hours a week he's obviously free EACH AND EVERY WEEK to seek out better jobs, or does he just sit at home with his mom complaining that WalMart doesn't give him enough hours?

      ...and not just an authographed copy, but one personally given to you by Robert Welch Jr. Because someone in that position isn't looking for any kind of job he can find so he can eat and not be homeless.

      It's not a great life, but there's a whole world of people living on less than $300/week. Even with a modest $800/mo after taxes, with no public assistance of any sort you can eat, have your own studio apartment, and take the bus to work -- just like everyone you've ever seen on the bus does. Do you have to get a roommate - or just rent a room - if you live somewhere where housing is expensive? Probably. Do you have to eat "poor people food" from actual grocery stores? Probably.

      You first. Remember that bus routes rarely run late into the night when you're going to be getting off work at your McJob, or you might have to walk a few miles home through shitty neighborhoods. You elitists seriously need to move into a cardboard box for a couple weeks to get over yourselves.

    5. Re:You've never applied for those jobs, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a McJob at a TV Station. I'm contractually not allowed to look for other work while I'm there. Their reasoning is that, should I get another job, I'm not available to work at any time they feel they need me, and therefore they won't have me on staff. At the moment, I get 15 hours a week, which pays less than unemployment does, and these 15 hours are not guaranteed - at any time, they could be reassigned to another staff member.

      They can give me one week notice to let me go. I have no bonuses, no extras, no overtime pay, no time-in-lieu.

      No job security. No way to save enough to get ahead.

      This week, I'm lucky to have more hours than usual - Monday, I start at 10am and work until 6pm. On Tuesday, it's the same. On Wednesday, I start at 10am and work until 10pm, but they stop paying me at 9pm. Thursday and Friday, 10am-6pm.

      When I exceed 40 hours in a week, they stop paying me.

      If I fail to complete the 44 hours work I'll have this week, they will fire me. If I chose to contest it, I'd possibly win - however, I'd be fucking with a multimillionaire who owns several media companies, who has the ear of the local city council, the government - he recently got a grant of a little more than a million dollars to expand his business, which meant the loss of 3 full time jobs. (A multimillionaire was gifted more than a million taxpayer dollars so he could make more money for himself. Sounds like something he should foot the bill for, to me.)

      Complain, cite the law, and I'd most likely not find another job in this country.

      My pay is the minimum they can legally get away with - if they could, they'd pay me nothing. They actually have paid me nothing for several weeks work, in the past six months.

      I've worked a holiday, and rather than give me the 8 hours back - as stipulated by employment law - they simply claimed they did, and didn't action it. If I go to the Labour Department, I'll most likely find that I've got my one week notice. If I'm very lucky and I don't get that notice, I'll probably be in violation of the contract for anything they can find/imagine so they can fire me and won't owe me anything.

      Before you suggest that I shouldn't have signed that contract, I had no choice. It is illegal, in this country, for a job seeker to turn down an offer of work. To do so means no unemployment benefit. The contract was presented to me, and I was told that I could sign it or choose not to, but there was no negotiating for it - and that would mean, in the eyes and letter of the law, that I turned down the job.

      So, before you start bitching about people's circumstances, keep in mind that not everyone can tread a path of their own. When you're poor and have to take the first thing that comes along, you're fucked.

    6. Re:You've never applied for those jobs, have you? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you just suck at two career options. Maybe you SHOULD be delivering pizzas.

      Of course, because there can't be any other reason in the past 3-4 years that someone with a solid list of skills and lots of industry experience couldn't find a job. Couldn't have anything to do with a glut of experienced, freshly laid-off lawyers in the legal field or a three year experience gap during law school in the CS field.

      (Yeah, yeah... I know, don't feed the trolls, but seriously.)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  34. Bitcoin saved my home... by dex22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A few bitcoin donations helped me make my mortgage payment last month, and I have a little left over. Things are picking up but it's still really tight. I had to have emergency dental surgery (blessed wisdom teeth) too... There is a point that you reach when you're desperate that you still feel the shame of begging, but the need overwhelms it.

    I'll just leave this here: 17S6drtGpJXer6qA5V6XhP3snasGWANBjc

  35. Comparing apples and beans by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2

    Before you crow the victory of frugility with your beans and rice, you might consider that those are "unprepared foods".

    Same sort of problem that aid NGOs have: You can hand out 5 pounds of rice to a family to "feed them for a week" (or however long), but unless said family ALSO has the means to prepare that rice, you aren't FEEDING them.

    1. Re:Comparing apples and beans by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      The means to prepare rice? Seriously?

      The homeless can't cook, but anyone with heat and water can prepare rice.

    2. Re:Comparing apples and beans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone with heat and water can prepare rice.

      Well, water comes from the sky (in most places, during most seasons, occasionally), but it tends to run away unless you have some kind of container. Heat can be derived from fire, and I guess most of our urban infrastructure is more or less flammable. So as long as you can steal a bucket and set something on fire, I guess we're set. Problem solved!

    3. Re:Comparing apples and beans by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      > The homeless can't cook, but anyone with heat and water can prepare rice.

      There you have hit the nail on the head. Heat and water are not ubiquitous.

  36. Pan-handle bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today!" becomes "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a Bitcoin today!" or what?

  37. Or, he could get a job. Any job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject.

  38. Hey look, a curebie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame on you for claiming that autism is an illness.

    1. Re:Hey look, a curebie by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Autism should be considered a permanent congenital illness, like ADHD or a deformity. Like any other illness, it doesn't mean the person is any less of a human worthy of dignity and respect. They're a person with a particular condition, but first and foremost they are a person.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Hey look, a curebie by chihowa · · Score: 1

      And of course, like all other mental illnesses, if being autistic isn't causing you distress or affecting your ability to function then there's no "illness" label or imperative to be treated. On the other hand, if autism (or any other mental illness) is crippling someone's life and can be eased with some kind of treatment, it's not fair to them to deny that their condition is an illness when it clearly is.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    3. Re:Hey look, a curebie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The less human question statement you make is grey. They are less human. How many IQ points does one need to drop to being at chimpanzee intelligence? Clearly that is less than human. The reality is we do grade people by their strengths and weaknesses as being more or less valuable and thus more or less better. Using the word "human" as an emotionally charged clarion is just whining to flatten the curve. Play the hand you've been dealt and be happy. It's the only way to stop beating yourself up over your station in life.

    4. Re:Hey look, a curebie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further to my point, you say "worthy of respect". So someone who is an abusive, megalomaniac asshole is unworthy of respect, but someone who is emotionally incapable of sympathy / empathy and expressing themselves is not. Go f yourself. People are inherently unequal and not equally worthy of respect or being called human.

    5. Re:Hey look, a curebie by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Except that with a lot of hard work it isn't permanent. To think so is stupidity, it's like saying no one in the whole world can change their point of view.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  39. Not entirely by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Addiction is an interesting thing, and it varies with different people. People don't always get addicted because they are unhappy. In fact, the drugs can be a lot of fun to use in the beginning. Initially, it is all good. However as you continue on it becomes more pain, less pleasure, a bigger problem. The thing is, quitting will cause a lot of pain at that point and you may have already messed up your life to a degree, so it is harder to quit.

    Drugs with actual, physical, addictions can be real insidious in that way. That's also why you'll hear addicts talk about the need to "hit bottom". What that means is things have to get bad enough that you realize and accept what you need to do to try and recover, to deal with the difficulty of recovery. For some people, that bottom is pretty high. They'll stop the addiction early. For others, even death isn't the bottom.

  40. consequence of US social net by stenvar · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is more a conseqeunce of the US social safety net and well meaning regulation than a failure. Minimum wage laws, taxes, insurance, and numerous restrictions on hiring and firing mean that you can't just take a chance on this guy and hire him to do something. If you could, he'd probably make more in a couple of days than he is making now in a month. Zoning regulations, health and safety regulations, restrictions on rental housing and hotels, tennants rights, and all that means that there is no cheap housing at the low end. Between homelessness and a middle class apartment used to be a whole range of options, from flophouses to boarding houses, and residential hotels. By outlawing them, you don't magically convert the people living in them into middle class wage earners, you simply put them on the street.

    Bitcoin and online work fortunately are doing an end run around all these regulations. There is still no magical solution for the onerous restrictions on housing, though.

    1. Re:consequence of US social net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't just take a chance on this guy and hire him to do something. If you could, he'd probably make more in a couple of days than he is making now in a month.

      Other way around. He probably WON'T make money for the company that hires him. That's why most companies won't take a chance with this guy. Companies are here to do business, not gambling.

      The guy can start his own business if he wants. He can hire the first employee (himself) for practical free. He can take a chance on himself. What's he got to lose? He's homeless for crying out loud. If the state throws him in jail for violating some stupid regulation, that might actually be an improvement to his current living conditions.

      Like you said, there's no magical solution. He's not magically going to be more productive just because regulations are fixed/gone.

      Most of the easy jobs are (and should be) automated. People like him are being squeezed out not because of regulation, but simply because the jobs they can do aren't needed anymore. The jobs he could get... well, he's already doing them: clicking ads and watching youtube

      Sure, some Luddites end up finding new jobs. Some didn't. Death and decay is just as much part of the free market as the rags to riches stories.

  41. Ludicrous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This story is a lie, bitcoin is a fraud, just a ponzi scheme!! There's no way it can be useful for anything!

  42. Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of that money comes straight from the marketing budget of the asshole execs who lobbied for cutting welfare and criminalizing poverty. It's beautiful.

  43. Ringling kaching by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    the most absurd terms
    The most ingenious terms, you mean. Create some ridiculous hoops to jump through, plenty of suckers try to make book, few make book, you profit from clicks _and_ not paying. Barnum & Bailey would be proud.

    --
    I come here for the love
  44. I call BS by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

    A fraction of a cent a day?

  45. Begging is more rentable by doubletalk · · Score: 1

    It's been hours now I'm trying websites that give free bitcoins for watching videos and visiting websites. So far, I made 3 cents, USD. I think begging is more rentable.

  46. Re:Florida Bone Heads by doubletalk · · Score: 1

    If I was rich, I would be homeless. Traveling all around the country and sleeping in hotels, eating at restaurants, etc... Are you saying that if I don't have a home address, in Florida, it is illegal for a restaurant to serve a meal to me or someone to cook for me ?

    Stupid laws are stupid.

  47. Re:Florida Bone Heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a few visits to friends and family out in Florida, I can certainly say we need to crush the Floridians first. What an incredible array of ignorant white trash in every color. You have dumbshit laws because you are the most dumbshit people in the country. Alabama and Mississippi might have lower IQs and SATs, but when it comes to life skills, Florida is a cesspool with intelligence metrics propped up by the senile senior population.

  48. That's a hell of a walk by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    So you're advising that the homeless guy start walking to someplace he's not familiar with but where the employment prospects are better, right? Or are you offering to front him the money? I'm sure you can track this guy down and get him some money for travel - after all, all it requires is that you be able to send him some Bitcoins which you can do from wherever you happen to be.

    If he's willing to relocate and can get some help paying for it, he might be able to do quite well up in Montana/Wyoming where energy extraction is booming and unemployment is low, and his homelessness experience might stand him in good stead since there's a major shortage of housing. Of course, I'm not so sure September is the right time to move to the northern plains to live outside.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  49. "Sociopathic Shitbag" by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    In my experience maybe 1/10 of these people were genuinely down on their luck and looking for help to start over.

    If you think being poor and homeless is such a riot, why don't you try it yourself first before looking down your nose at other people. Like 9 out of 10 people choose to sleep under bridges, choose to carry shivs in case someone tries to beat/rob them, choose to deal with harassment from cops, and so on and so on.

  50. because getting a job would be... difficult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A network admin that can't get a job? I call BS. Even if you're just doing desktop support for your local library you could be making some reasonable money.

  51. Attn: Randians by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Why there's a perfectly good reason for homeless people to have smartphones: job hunting. Especially in a shitty economy, having access to a phone and internet can be vital when searching for jobs. If Wal-Mart can't call you back for a second interview, they'll just shrug their shoulders and hire one of the other 200 applicants from that week. That decent paying job that fits in with your education and work experience that you just found out about? Filled last week by an applicant that responded the same day it was posted.

    But aside from all that, it's truly disgusting how conservatives demand a certain level of misery of the poor before giving them an iota of "respect".

  52. Stable Employment No Longer Exists by KXeron · · Score: 1

    Today's job market is way too unpredictable. These unpredictable elements include things like employers hiring people only temporarily, laying them off at the end of their trial periods, hiring only part time while assigning practically full time hours (e.g. full time may qualify at 38 hours, but the employer may only want the worker to work 36-37) to dodge paying full time wages or benefits, extremely small contracts or nitpicking about job performance so they don't have to keep workers on.

    This is worsened by the fact the job market is divided between a "public" and "hidden" job market. All of the jobs on the "public" side are very unstable for the above reasons. The "hidden" market is only accessible if you know people pretty high up AND are pretty much already within the industry — which I guarantee most "ground floor" do not and are not.

    One significant aspect about the "public" job market is that it is one of service and manual jobs that are really only designed to be temporary, but many "uncertified" people are duped by the job market into ending up working these permanently.

    Now, I know many who have stable office/skilled jobs with job security may be of the belief that all one needs is hard work and determination to get a good job — this may have been true 20+ years ago, but not today. One needs contacts (if you're in a skilled industry, you likely already have 30+ contacts at a minimum outside of your company) in today's day and age, those already "in the system" to "bring you in" essentially.

    Now to talk on the whole element of education for a moment (which always tends to come up as an alleged silver bullet to solve any employment problem), given the state of the job market in how it has become a circle-jerk of self-gratification by those already in various industries, education is not a guarantee, in fact it is a truly unstable investment as there's far too many variables. Thinking of education in terms of a business deal, would you invest in something that 1) plunges you into debt; 2) you cannot guarantee that the product will be relevant any more by the time it is complete and 3) you cannot withdraw your funding and support from the project once it is committed and in progress to invest elsewhere... it is something that is a disaster waiting to happen from a business perspective. This doesn't even start to include the job market nonsense.

    I do not blame people for seeking methods to create their own systems to sustain themselves, as frankly until these barriers are lowered (and they won't as long as that self-gratification is going on by industries and businessmen alike internally), nothing will ever change. The HR expectation of "experience" is code for "we only want someone already deep in the industry". Though of course eventually industry will see these new systems as threats to the status-quo and demand them shut down or made prohibitive (look at the financial industry's aversion to bitcoins).

    Finally, look at how employment has shifted away from having managers having control over employment over to an HR model where HR has control over job postings, where hiring managers can only "suggest" people be hired. Often times HR doesn't even understand the jobs they are hiring for and as such just gets a list of keywords and if those keywords aren't in someone's resume, it is overlooked even if that person is the best in the industry. As such even application for most jobs is onerous and prohibitive.

    To summarize, the job market and current system is way too unstable for people to have faith in it anymore, thus people have stopped trying to have faith in it. I speak to homeless and unemployed on a regular basis and most of them want jobs, but many have lost faith in employers to give them one that won't be taken away in less than a year due to "economics" and the aforementioned instabilities.

  53. Homeless? Or Roofless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course he is a real homeless.
    There is no fake and real homeless, there is "a person that legally doesn't live anywhere.", aka, someone that does not pay rent in any accommodation whatsoever.
    If that means they are bouncing between houses without paying, they are still homeless.

    ROOFless is what you mean, which is a term that doesn't seem to have gained much use.
    It is similar to how people group everything of the anthropomorphic animal porn type under "furry" these days because "fuck it, who cares, they are all terrible, scalies, furries, whatever."
    The same thing happened with homeless and roofless, they are 2 very distinct terms and they should be legally different as well.
    Homelessness and Rooflessness are not at all the same and never should be.
    People without a roof suffer far far worse than those that don't own a home, they are open to the weather which can be horrible in places up north towards the North Pole.

    Also interesting thing, a lot of people are picking up being homelessness by choice.
    Using public places like gyms to shower and exercise, sleeping with people friendly enough to take them in and as long as they pay their own way, they have no rent to pay.
    Although there are some that would then be classed as "fake" homeless that do pay, but when you pick and pull at that difference, that is just nit-picking, renting from people not related or known to you is a bit different in all honesty.
    Then just doing cash jobs here and there, bouncing around places.

    Bitcoin is finally becoming more stable as it has exploded in use.
    As more and more virtual currencies come about, it will gain even more stability as they bounce off each other like real currencies do.
    No more will some silly twitter posts derail an entire currency, but usage and trade between will decide their fates.
    It will be an interesting time in the coming decades.
    Those that want to make a quick buck best get in on these new currencies to mine them in the early stages. The good part about that is it will also make them useful and gain momentum. It will then go through the same stages Bitcoin has, likely to a lesser extent now because people are smarter about these things, they won't jump the shark too early since with Bitcoin it was so unknown.
    I just find it sad governments aren't taking advantage of it and are seemingly trying everything to want to smash it to bits. Talk about being driven by the banks...