Slashdot Mirror


President of Brazil Lashes Out At NSA Espionage Programs In Speech To UN

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "The Guardian reports that Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff launched a blistering attack on US espionage at the UN general assembly, accusing the NSA of violating international law by its indiscriminate collection of personal information of Brazilian citizens and economic espionage targeted on the country's strategic industries. 'Personal data of citizens was intercepted indiscriminately. Corporate information – often of high economic and even strategic value – was at the center of espionage activity,' said Rousseff. 'Brazilian diplomatic missions, among them the permanent mission to the UN and the office of the president of the republic itself, had their communications intercepted.' Rousseff's angry speech was a direct challenge to President Barack Obama, who was waiting in the wings to deliver his own address to the UN general assembly, and represented the most serious diplomatic fallout to date from the revelations by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Washington's efforts to smooth over Brazilian outrage over NSA espionage have so far been rebuffed by Rousseff, who has proposed that Brazil build its own internet infrastructure. 'Friendly governments and societies that seek to build a true strategic partnership, as in our case, cannot allow recurring illegal actions to take place as if they were normal. They are unacceptable.'"

25 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Enough said.

    1. Re:Good by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder what the NSA folks were saying about this speech in the hours before it was given?

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    2. Re:Good by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering that contents of the speech were widely known quite a while before it was given by the press, I imagine they were probably stepping up their efforts to pour money into Rousseff's political opponents pockets while preparing an assassination mission, as US has usually done when a Latin America leader didn't please them.

    3. Re:Good by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not every country is as bad as the USA and UK. Many don't have mass surveillance programs targeting all citizens, for example. The NSA is probably the worst example in any democracy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Good by morgauxo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I think we are just happy to see Brazil is angry about it because we percieve our government as being more likely to listen to foreign diplomats than it us, it's own people. There might actually be some kind of consequence to pissing off enough UN member nations. What will the citizens do? Vote for the other lizard?

  2. Can we get rid of Bush yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait until Bush is no longer president so all these foreign countries no longer hate the US. Between Iran stil enriching uranium, Syria using chemical weapons daring us to do something, Russia ridiculing the US, and now Brazil making this speech the standing of the US in world view is at an all time low point.

    Whats that? Bush isn't president and the DNC has the White House. Nevermind, all of this is acceptable as long as a Democrat is running things.

    Carry on.

    1. Re:Can we get rid of Bush yet by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, it was Bush's fault Obama got elected

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Can we get rid of Bush yet by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nevermind, all of this is acceptable as long as a Democrat is running things.

      I'm not sure what alternate universe you just came over from. But in this universe, most of us here on Slashdot have plenty of disgust with BOTH major political parties in the U.S., and their leaders. The closest thing to a consensus here is that the "Democrats" and "Republicans" are both just wings of the Corporationalist Party that really controls everything here now.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  3. Small problem with summary by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Informative

    represented the most serious diplomatic fallout to date from the revelations by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden

    Really, "the most serious diplomatic fallout" was a (justifiably) angry speech?

    How about when Vladimir "Polonium 209" Putin suddenly became the world's defender of human rights? Or how about when the US and EU countries grounded Evo Morales, President of Bolivia, so they could search his plane for Snowden (a rough equivalent here would be the Chinese stopping and searching Air Force One)?

    Rousseff is almost definitely speaking for more than just Brazil: Her government is the strongest of a group of left-wing South American countries that have resisted the US for about a decade. Others in that group include Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and of course Cuba.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  4. Brazil has a lot of things going for it ... by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Brazil has a lot of things going for it ... but the moral high-ground one of those things. Brazil isn't exactly spotless when it comes to human rights abuse. Sure, it's not wide-spread mass surveillance, it's just regular police state concerns (non-existent rights for both the accused and the convicted, and systemic government corruption), though they're not doing so hot in promoting equality (or addressing their widening income gap and widespread poverty).

    But hey, they're not wrong, and that doesn't excuse what the NSA is doing. Has done. Is accused of doing.

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    1. Re:Brazil has a lot of things going for it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Brazil's income gap is at the lowest point of the last 120 years. Kind of like the US, only in reverse.

    2. Re:Brazil has a lot of things going for it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Having lived in Brazil, that place felt like old timey Chicago. Yes, there's corruption on the government side, but there's crime on the other. The corruption and surveillance is nowhere near China, and the crimes are not sadistic as the Mexican cartels. Brazil prides itself in modeling after the French, but that is just an ideal. And about the economic gap, Lula made it better and it has been better (relatively speaking) than the time around Collor's disgraced presidency. Keep in mind, it's a big country with very dense major cities, so change takes time.

      Brazil has a treaty with the neighboring nation to basically not attack or invade each other. Hence, the military is only there to support the regional police, acting more like a national guard but for violent crimes (as opposed to natural disasters in the US). It would be unfair to characterize it as a "police-state." The police "thuggishness" is comparable to the police brutality in NYC (cop pushing Critical Mass cyclist; Stop-and-Frisk program), Oakland (BART shooting), etc etc. Basically, this is the usual problems you'll find in any large city. I grew up during a time when the police would hit up local places for protection money or they'll find some discrepancy with your business and fine you (watch Tropa de Elite), but I believe that is on the decline.

      Overall, Brazil is one of the "good" countries, by US standards, and it's offensive for the NSA to spy on them based on any terroristic grounds. The US was spying on Brazil purely for economical and trade advantage, especially now that Brazil is becoming oil independent and has a growing economy. And Obama can't come up with a good excuse why the NSA was spying on Brazil, short of saying that Brazil is a dangerous breeding ground for criminals. Brazil doesn't even export mafia gangster like Russia.

    3. Re:Brazil has a lot of things going for it ... by ospirata · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the connection with Brazil's human right abuse with spying? This information has absolutely no connection with being subject of industrial spying. Moreover, the country has indeed managed to promote equality. It rescued more than 20 million people from above the poverty line in the last four years. If this isn't a big accomplishment to reduce inequality, I definitely can't know what it is.

  5. Re:Commendable by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That doesn't mean that they should just give up fighting. The data is probably 99.999% junk anyway, but that doesn't mean that we should just roll over and accept governments breaking international laws.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  6. Yeah, talk me more about those "Washington Efforts by xvan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Washington's efforts to smooth over Brazilian outrage over NSA espionage have so far been rebuffed by Rousseff

    Yeah, talk me more about those "Washington Efforts"...

    Obama with a poker face: Well we spy on you to protect the world against Terrorism
    Dilma: So I was suspected of terrorism, even if I was the candidate for the ruling party of an country without conflicts with the US.
    Obama: But with terror...
    Dilma: And If I was suspected of terrorism, the why did you spy on our major petrol company...
    Obama: Err terror...
    Dilma: Fuck-You.

    accusing the NSA of violating international law by [...]

    And the rest of the world, doesn't care what is the NSA, for us it's the US that's spying, so no she accused the the US...

  7. Hypocrites by wjcofkc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She's blowing all this steam and yet they refused asylum for Snowden.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  8. International Diplomatic Fallout? by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would much, much rather see Washington DC pay a very high, very personal price for their rampant criminality and violations of the Constitution, as in all of them swinging from the trees that line the national mall and DC itself burnt to the ground with large letters scored in the ground with a bulldozer that say, 'Don't Tread On Me! ---The American People"

    An angry speech by the president of Brazil is nice, but there need to be real consequences for these criminals.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  9. Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Brazil is about to buy some 36 advanced fighter jets. The three short-listed candidates were Dassault Rafale from France, SAAB Gripen from Sweden and the Boeing-Northrop Super Hornet from the USA. The NSA-Roussef scandal essentially negated the F-18's chances to win the tender worth many billions. Now the race is only about good political relations (Rafale) versus lower price with higher economic offsets (Gripen). Boeing's workforce must be grateful for the NSA's efforts in protecting american jobs...

  10. The anger is justified by ospirata · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The policy of saying "If it was anyone else than USA it would be worse" is simply ridiculous. Or even to mention concerns about terrorism to justify such spying.
    As many are forgetting, let's summarize the real reason for such anger: industrial spying (towards Petrobras, Brazil's biggest company) and spying over a government with more than a century of friendly relations.
    The article points this as well: "As host to the UN headquarters, the US has been attacked from the general assembly many times in the past, but what made Rousseff's denunciation all the more painful diplomatically was the fact that it was delivered on behalf of large, increasingly powerful and historically friendly state."

  11. I hear ya by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me tell all of you from outside the U.S. that our government's excuse "hey, we're only spying on foreigners, not Americans" would be disgusting even if it weren't a pack of lies.

  12. Re:Yeah, talk me more about those "Washington Effo by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The US has two main fears historically emerging from a Brazil like country:
    Exports outside the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar with countries like Japan, China - totally removing the need for any use of US currency.
    The formation of views such as a new http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Aligned_Movement locking up strategic materials and demanding market value.
    The CIA and NSA never want the US to lose control of their vision of soft dollar loans. Long term the loans get repaid with interest or the sale of local assets back to US entities by emerging countries.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Re:NSA's fucking job by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I've read this excuse a million times since Snowden did his thing, and I'm sick of it.

    The problem is it's an abuse of language. Saying "Every country spies. It's one of those things governments are supposed to do" is nothing but rhetorical sleight of hand. The word spy conjures up cartoons of men in pork-pie hats and long raincoats following some traitor in a car. The word is loaded with cold war imagery. It reminds people of a time when there was an "us" vs a "them" and spying was a very small scale and targeted activity done against "them" or, at very least, those of "us" working for "them".

    We need a new word to describe what's going on in todays world. Spying doesn't even come close to being the right word. How about totalitarian surveillance? But even that isn't strong enough to communicate the reality we are living in.

    In today's reality there's no us vs them. There's no good vs evil, capitalism vs communism. There's just bureaucrats and their power, exercised over their own people as readily as over foreigners.

    This is not only not "one of those things governments are supposed to do", it's often one of those things governments are expressly prohibited from doing by their own laws. And that's for good reasons!

    Please, don't flatter the NSA by calling them spies. They aren't spies at this point. They are real life equivalents of O'Brien, the dedicated agent of totalitarian control in 1984. O'Brien is a far darker and scarier character than anyone who could be described as a spy.

  14. Re:Protesting too much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are superior.

    My grandparents remember when a certain country between Poland and France had the same idea. It didn't end well, for anyone.

  15. Re:Yeah, talk me more about those "Washington Effo by morcego · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right now, Brazil is the world leader in deep sea oil exploration/extraction (way, WAY ahead of any other). Also, it has the most successful alternative fuel program in the world (most successful by any measure you chose, be it price, adoption, w/e). Those two things alone paint a big target mark in the country's back, and make it a prime target for espionage. The USA tried to buy those technologies in the past, and was mostly refused, if I recall correctly.

    Some people will say that Brazil once had a nuke program. Who cares? These fuel technologies are a bigger threat to the USA than any patched up nukes would be, by the simple fact Brazil is using them, and they are making a difference. See all the wars that are fought because of oil, and all the anti-ethanol lobbing always going on in the US.

    --
    morcego
  16. Re:Yeah, talk me more about those "Washington Effo by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect its mostly the petrodollar issue. Because lets face it; the US Economy is largely farcical.

    If a major non-dollar international trade circuit developed, the following drop in dollar demand would probably be so steep there is nothing the FED could do to control inflation.

    Stands to bring down the entire house of cards.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html