Slashdot Mirror


Students Hack School-Issued iPads Within One Week

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Los Angeles Unified School District started issuing iPads to its students this school year, as part of a $30 million deal with Apple. Now Sam Sanders reports at NPR that less than a week after getting their iPads, high school students have found a way to bypass software blocks on the devices that limit what websites the students can use. The students are getting around software that lets school district officials know where the iPads are, what the students are doing with them at all times and lets the district block certain sites, such as social media favorites like Facebook. 'They were bound to fail,' says Renee Hobbs, who's been a skeptic of the iPad program from the start. 'There is a huge history in American education of being attracted to the new, shiny, hugely promising bauble and then watching the idea fizzle because teachers weren't properly trained to use it and it just ended up in the closet.' The rollout of the iPads might have to be delayed as officials reassess access policies. Right now, the program is still in Phase 1, with fewer than 15,000 iPads distributed. 'I'm guessing this is just a sample of what will likely occur on other campuses once this hits Twitter, YouTube or other social media sites explaining to our students how to breach or compromise the security of these devices,' says Steven Zipperman. 'I want to prevent a "runaway train" scenario when we may have the ability to put a hold on the roll-out.' The incident has prompted questions about overall preparations for the $1-billion tablet initiative."

21 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good thing they didn't waste $1 billion on teachers or books.

    1. Re:well by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, at least the kids are learning something from their iPads, though it's not the lessons the schools intended.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:well by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful
      One lesson everyone can take away from this is that trying to lock down devices for patronizing reasons is foolish. Surprisingly, it appears the schools are at least sort of getting that message:

      "So we talked to students, and we asked them, 'Why did you do this?' And in many cases, they said, 'You guys are just locking us out of too much stuff.' " He says, after talking with students, that the Los Angeles Unified School District's iPad policy probably should be changed, allowing for some social media and music streaming sites.

      The memo from a sublinked article suggests that concerns for safety were the reasons the devices were supposed to be locked down. Can't have kids getting on facebook: they might meet up with child molesters and get raped and killed!

      I suspect their concern for avoiding that scenario was mainly "... and then WE'D BE SUED!!!" So perhaps they should have gone the permission slip route and only given out ipads to kids whose parents agreed that the parents are the parents and if anything bad happens to the children in connection with the ipads, or if they caught their kids looking at nudity (and subsequently were utterly scarred for life), that was on the parents and not something they could sue over. This however is not a lesson that school districts ever seem to learn.

    3. Re:well by Feyshtey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First, you cant enforce a contract that relinquishes your rights. If the school board fails to impliment policies that give "reasonable" protection to the child, then the contract is unenforcable. The trick is defining what "reasonable" is. Also, you cannot assume that parents understand the technology or the risks associated. You cannot ask them to enter into a contract without fully disclosing those risks, or the possible punishments. This is particularly important when you propose to use these devices in largely low education, low income populations like L.A., where providing these devices is meant to be a boost to kids who would not otherwise be able to obtain them.

      Second, lets say I refuse to sign the petition slip because I dont want to risk me taking the heat for what my kid does, or maybe because I dont want my kid to have access to a device that allows him or her to do things I do not approve of. Does that mean that the school must have a different curriculum that is paper-based? Or a different set of systems that can only be accessed from school? Does my kid have to do homework differently, turn in homework differently, or take tests differently? Can the school ensure that my child is not at a disadvantage because of these differences?

      How long do you think it would take for a parent of a failing student who didnt have an iPad/laptop to sue the school for unfair treatment. How does the school defend against that?

      --
      "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
    4. Re:well by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Well, at least the kids are learning something from their iPads, though it's not the lessons the schools intended.

      Back in the day I spent my pre-teens breaking the copy protection on Apple 2 games. Probably not what my parents had in mind, but it was excellent technical training and now I have a well paid career designing chips, crypto systems and related things.

      Breaking into security systems is a superbly educational thing to do. It requires a depth of understanding of the systems not commonly found in text books, it requires analytical thinking and the lessons learned often stick. If you spent your teens doing that, then the low level subjects they teach in school are not going to feel like a major challenge.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  2. I heard from a teacher in NC by sandytaru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    - whose school district had gotten all the kids iPads. She was complaining that the new toys, in conjunction with all the stupid assessments she had to do, had put her weeks behind the curriculum because she had to spend all her time helping her third graders learn to use the tablets. So I'm sure the teachers in CA who got stuck with this are frustrated about this and probably the ones who are now on delay are greatly relieved.

    Personally, I think that money could better be spent on good old fashioned computer labs. A good student PC is a heck of a lot cheaper, and these kids need to learn to type on a real keyboard or else they're going to be at a huge disadvantage compared to their peers who do.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  3. "They were bound to fail" by Xacid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kids bypassing security is a total failure for this program? Come onnnn. If anything it's giving them a reason to want to use them more and learn a little something about technology and security. But I guess they're not satisfied unless they have properly trained obedient creatures, not humans with the ability to think for themselves.

    1. Re:"They were bound to fail" by Valpis · · Score: 3

      Yes, one student learns how to bypass the security and the rest just follows the instruction like a sheep

      --
      who shot the cat in the hat to experiment is insane
    2. Re:"They were bound to fail" by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The program was a total failure at conception. There is no benefit to this other than to be able to claim that the school districts new and modern. Imagine how many teachers they could have hired for the cost of this program. I like computers, but they have no place in rudimentary education other than the computer lab.

    3. Re:"They were bound to fail" by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this program was to replace all those heavy books, or give them access to the grand sum of human knowledge, then they should have gone for a kindle or sony ebook reader. Load the year's books onto it, and allow wifi internet access. Problem solved.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  4. Just proxy it out at the router. by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's no reason they can't block everything from the network end. Host.deny

    There's no reason to police what the students do at home either. That's just big brother and between the parents and students.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  5. I'm a tech coordinator for an Ohio district by CreepingDeath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Basically I could have told them this was going to happen because of how iOS is designed. We have about 200 and they don't leave our buildings (most of them are in classroom sets/charging carts) and I'd say at least 5-10 a week have to be factory reset because the kids remove the profile and lock the devices.

    How is it this easy? Well since iOS (Android has this same issue and more, sadly), unlike say, ChromeOS, isn't designed to be managed from an enterprise level. So everything we do with policies can simply be removed by the user. No password required.

    We tried the carrot and stick approach, the main profile contains the WiFi password, which they don't know, so when they remove it the devices drop off the network and are basically useless. This probably stops most of the folks from messing with them too much but we still have a few that just want to watch the world burn.

    However if you GIVE them to the kids, and let them take em home where they can use their own personal WiFi (even worse if they know the password for the school owned wifi) then the carrot is gone. There is little-no incentive for them to leave the iPad's locked down.

    This is why we've stopped buying iPads and started buying ChromeBooks. I hope Apple (and Google's Android group, too) takes note, were far from the only district going this direction.

    1. Re:I'm a tech coordinator for an Ohio district by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      So everything we do with policies can simply be removed by the user. No password required.

      I hate to break this to you, but you're a shitty 'tech coordinator.'

      You can lock down the profiles so they can't be removed by anything short of total reset of the iPad, and yes that means that you can't even use an admin password to remove or modify it. You can also configure them to use an http proxy for all internet traffic, again not changeable by the user of the device even with an admin password with reseting the device to factory default.

    2. Re:I'm a tech coordinator for an Ohio district by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's details in the linked story in the linked story. The students had a specific profile setup for them individually which they just erased because they had full rights to do so. This is a non-story unless you want to talk about incompetent IT.

    3. Re:I'm a tech coordinator for an Ohio district by CreepingDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For everyone blasting me this is part of the problem; grant money bought the iPads, no one has money for a MDM.

      Therefore we push profiles with the IOS Configurator, its the best we can mange with basically no money to support them. (though we are looking at the Meraki MDM; its free, so maybe things will improve in that regard)

      Thank your legislators for cutting our budgets to the bone.

      (also FWIW I'm the cisco / windows server / linux guy; one of my tech's does all the iOS stuff. But thanks for assuming I'm a total idiot.)

  6. thats nothing by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    the analog version of the chemistry E-Book has also been hacked. an enormous toothbrush mustache has been rendered in analog on Marie Curie making her look exactly like hitler...a clear violation of our zero tolerance policy.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  7. Re:Try that at work by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The alternative attitude is what happened recently in my hometown, where a student was nearly suspended for possessing "hacking tools" - a Linux live-cd.

    Part of the purpose of schools is to be a safety net, where irresponsible kids can test their limits and, while not getting away with anything fully, they are shielded from the worst repercussions and are given gentle encouragement that they are not supposed to be doing that. Unfortunately, that attitude doesn't mix with the "freedom is doing anything I want" or the "kids should be imprisoned in schools until they are perfect adults" mentalities that are so popular today, and it's made even more complex (as is everything else) by the ever-expanding community boundaries brought about by modern technology.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  8. ^This by globaljustin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Technology in the classroom...all of it...it's just **tools to teach**

    Anyone who things technology can reduce staff budget or allow larger class sizes is smoking crack.

    A professionally trained, well-paid *human* teacher is absolutely the only thing that educates a child.

    Everything else is just a tool.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:^This by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only?

      No.

      Lots of people learn in different ways. Especially if that professionally trained teacher is still a bad teacher.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:^This by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bad teachers are no justification for iPads. Either way, dont expect me to pay for your child to get tools that are not proven to do anything but entertain and have been around for all of 5 years.

      You cant even draw the parallel to the advent of computers: that was a whole new field. Noone in their right mind would claim that the future of technology looks like "iPads".

    3. Re:^This by leereyno · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A professionally trained, well-paid human teacher eh?

      If this is true, then how come our schools are so awful?

      We the people have been throwing more and more money at schoolteachers, and requiring ever-increasing levels of training and education to maintain their license to teach, yet the educational achievments of our students have been flatlined for 40 years, and have even fallen dramatically in some districts.

      Meanwhile home schooled children, taught by parents with no formal training as teachers, outperform government-schooled students so often that the high achieving home schooler has become a cultural meme, if not a cliche.

      Charter schools have also been able to deliver superior results at lower cost.

      No, I don't think we need professionally trained well paid teachers. What we need are voucher programs, more home schooling, teachers and schools that have to compete, the utter end to tenure of any kind, and pay/bonuses based on classroom performance instead of seniority. Opening up the teaching profession to anyone with a bachelor's degree and a demonstrated knowledge of a subject (english, math, science) would be even better. There is no evidence that having a master's degree in early childhood education helps someone teach 3rd graders how to multiply. Let those who want to teach and who are good at it take the field, and get rid of parasitic space takers for whom a teaching job is a state-paid sinecure.

      Most of all, outlaw public sector unions so that groups like the NEA aren't able to block real education reform.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.