Slashdot Mirror


Over 100 Missing Episodes of Doctor Who Located

MajikJon writes "The BBC junking policies of the '60s and '70s resulted in the loss of hundreds of episodes of the classic series in its earliest years. Through the work of ardent fans over the succeeding decades, dozens of these lost episodes have been painstaking recovered and added back into the BBC archives. Now, it seems, the searchers have struck the mother lode. According to the Wikipedia, there are currently 106 missing episodes of the serial. If reports are correct, we may finally get to see all the episodes."

158 comments

  1. This is still not actually confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The BBC have not confirmed this and it has been rumoured already for months now, hardly an exclusive by the Sunday People as the article claims, but maybe there is a chance the BBC will say something about these rumoured negoiations this time.

    1. Re:This is still not actually confirmed by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No problem, being a fan is talking about the series, not watching them. I even secretly hope it's not true, otherwise I have to wade through hundred passed episodes.

    2. Re:This is still not actually confirmed by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it turns out to be a cache of old I Love Lucy episodes, the BBC will have some 'splainin to do.

    3. Re:This is still not actually confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Pics or GTFO.

    4. Re:This is still not actually confirmed by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      This story has been evolving throughout most of the day. RadioTimes posted a story, rather late UK time.

      "BBC Worldwide will put the previously lost episodes from different stories – both believed to be from the Patrick Troughton era – for sale on digital platforms such as iTunes from Wednesday, RadioTimes.com understands."

      http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2013-10-06/doctor-who-newly-discovered-lost-episodes-to-be-released-for-sale-this-week?ref=Article.RelatedNews

  2. Interesting. by Delusion_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not a fan of the series in any incarnation, but assuming the report is accurate, I'm thrilled that those that are fans may finally be able to dig a little deeper into the archives.

    And thanks to the internet being the world's most effective copying machine, if these episodes do release, we'll never have to worry about this particular series going dark again.

    I'm always a little intrigued by some of the other long-running shows where archival is not (at the time) a financially sound move. I have to wonder exactly how many episodes of, say, daytime soap operas are lost. Many? Most? The airing schedule on some of the longest-running is so frequent that catching up from a series from beginning to end (if it were possible) would take 6 or so years if you tried to plow through at 40 hours a week.

    1. Re:Interesting. by Shimbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not a fan of the series in any incarnation, but assuming the report is accurate, I'm thrilled that those that are fans may finally be able to dig a little deeper into the archives.

      It's a tabloid newspaper, on a Sunday, when all the journalists are at home, and they just make shit up instead. I'm going for 100% untrue, until proved otherwise. Fan sites seem completely dismssive also.

    2. Re:Interesting. by stud9920 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to wonder exactly how many episodes of, say, daytime soap operas are lost. Many? Most? The airing schedule on some of the longest-running is so frequent that catching up from a series from beginning to end (if it were possible) would take 6 or so years if you tried to plow through at 40 hours a week.

      Generally, when you skip a year or so, the same conversation is still ongoing. So watching an episode per season is enough

    3. Re:Interesting. by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2

      And thanks to the internet being the world's most effective copying machine, if these episodes do release, we'll never have to worry about this particular series going dark again.

      Why do people have so much more faith in the Internet than any other medium before it? It is young and requires an incredible level of infrastructure to exist and advanced factories to maintain. Do you know how much data you would lose access to if your country were without even power stations for even a couple of days? How long did it take for civilisation to be able to build a thermionic valve, let alone a modern CPU?

    4. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly this happens a lot, rumors of all those lost episodes being miraculously found. Most of the time it's either wrong or greatly exaggerated.

      You would be surprised how much you can watch if you really want to watch all of something. I have a very broad taste in anime and as such this has lead me to watch a ton of anime. It's fair to say I've watched hundreds of series with some of those series being multiple seasons. Anime series are either 12 or 24 episodes and sometimes have a couple extra episodes to tie up loose ends or provide closure, that's per season.

      Despite all that time spent watching anime I've had time to: build a large patio deck, the entire inside of a house, chop a few trees worth of wood, and wrote a ridiculous amount of programming code. I honestly have no idea how I manage to get so much done when I watch so much anime. I literally turned white when I realized just how much I had watched but my skin color returned when I realized I pulled it off without losing hold of my life.

      Man I really should get on making a website to review all of the ones I watch. Could probably make a decent living off from it if I improved my writing skills.

    5. Re:Interesting. by Delusion_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because copying data is exactly what the internet is for. If this "incredible level of infrastructure" - the internet, the power grid, and modern computing - ever goes away, I'll have much bigger concerns than idly thinking about the fact that someone out there has a hard drive with Dr. Who episodes that they can no longer watch.

      Short of that sort of civilizational collapse, that content is effectively around forever.

      It took three years for OiNK to archive 200,000 torrents. It took nine months for the biggest of the trackers that OiNK's closure caused to get to that point, six more months to double to 400,000, and has grown since.

      So, yes, I have faith that either the internet will archive this content adequately, presuming the shit doesn't hit the fan so hard that video entertainment and the preservation of history is the least of our worries.

    6. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a tabloid newspaper, on a Sunday, when all the journalists are at home, and they just make shit up instead.

      Yeah, the generally focus on kiss and tell sex exposés, football, sex, some more football, paedo news, stuff for women, and an occasional piece of useful news.

    7. Re:Interesting. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They started repeating Neighbours on UK Gold from the start, so someone must be keeping those tapes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Interesting. by gallondr00nk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I also wonder what condition the reels will be in.

      Someone on another thread discussing old Doctor Who episodes pointed out that early tape stock was an absolute nightmare to keep in decent condition, and the expense was sufficient enough that the BBC decided it was too expensive.

      It wasn't that they just carelessly throwed their archives away.

    9. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The important thing in all that is that it's Doctor Who, not Dr. Who.

    10. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and now their here. so we should ignore them being here and go back to beta and 8-track?? or are you saying we shouldn't back anything up except on floppy discs? carve 1's and 0's onto stone tablets?
      what point are you trying to make, new stuff is all bad? there's a drawback for every advancement.

    11. Re:Interesting. by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the show yet, but have heard a little about it. Dr. Who is a sort of time traveling detective, that is apparently victorious once-again having re-released his complete recorded video-taped series for the masses to consume and enjoy; thwarting, for now, his time-traveling enemies. I hope I've accurately understood the gist of this current episode. Long live Dr. Who!

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    12. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one gives a shit over your extremely minor accomplishments.

    13. Re:Interesting. by NoMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Someone on another thread discussing old Doctor Who episodes pointed out that early tape stock was an absolute nightmare to keep in decent condition, and the expense was sufficient enough that the BBC decided it was too expensive.

      But these would be (if they existed, which they probably don't) distribution copies for foreign broadcasters, not the original tapes.

      These distribution prints - which were 16mm film, not tape - were passed from country to country, usually ending up in the tail ends of the empire in Africa & Asia. They were supposed to have been returned or destroyed at the end of their tours, but it wasn't unusual for them to be put into storage, grabbed by local staff for their own archives, or sold on the sly to broadcasters in neighbouring countries.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    14. Re:Interesting. by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a tabloid newspaper, on a Sunday, when all the journalists are at home, and they just make shit up instead. I'm going for 100% untrue, until proved otherwise. Fan sites seem completely dismssive also.

      The proof is in the pudding, but I will point out that the tabloid newspapers tend to have better fact checking than the mainstream news because of the risk of getting sued for libel. It's unlikely that somebody'll sue them for reporting incorrectly that episodes of Dr. Who have been recovered, but they employ people to verify facts because it's *very* likely that somebody'll sue them if they report that Celebrity X got arrested after a 3-hour high speed police chase, and that they were high on cocaine, completely naked, and had a dead hooker in the boot at the time.

    15. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people have so much more faith in the Internet than any other medium before it?

      It is not about internet as a medium really.
      The big difference is that the decision of what needs to be saved and what needs to be stored with redundancy is left to the population as a whole rather than made by a single person that may or may not represent the population.

      The first episodes of Monty Python weren't received that well when first aired either, if things had gone differently those could also have been lost.

    16. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Murica. Where the English language went to die and became a disfigured zombie.

    17. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be vacumn tube in American no?

    18. Re:Interesting. by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's unlikely that somebody'll sue them for reporting incorrectly that episodes of Dr. Who have been recovered

      Hence the increased possibility that if they had to make something up to fill space they decided to go for this instead of something involving Harry Styles, Hazell Dean, a lorryload of quaaludes and a goat.

      The proof is in the pudding

      No, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating".

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    19. Re:Interesting. by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Informative

      The first episodes of Monty Python weren't received that well when first aired either, if things had gone differently those could also have been lost.

      Apparently the BBC *did* consider erasing the Monty Python master tapes.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    20. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you avoid mentioning what tracker that is to protect its anonymity, as though everyone doesn't already know it exists.

    21. Re:Interesting. by Tapewolf · · Score: 2

      These distribution prints - which were 16mm film, not tape - were passed from country to country, usually ending up in the tail ends of the empire in Africa & Asia. They were supposed to have been returned or destroyed at the end of their tours, but it wasn't unusual for them to be put into storage, grabbed by local staff for their own archives, or sold on the sly to broadcasters in neighbouring countries.

      I wouldn't be shocked if someone had been striking copies of the films either.

    22. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite all that time spent watching anime I've had time to: build a large patio deck, the entire inside of a house, chop a few trees worth of wood, and wrote a ridiculous amount of programming code. I honestly have no idea how I manage to get so much done when I watch so much anime.

      Big deal. I did that when I was a child. It isn't that much of an achievement.

      Posting as AC just to avoid flamage. But it's true.

    23. Re:Interesting. by ezdiy · · Score: 1

      When you are forever alone, everything is possible! Ganbatte!

    24. Re:Interesting. by BigBadBus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I talked to the head of the TV department at the British Film Institute in 1993; he used to be head archivist at the BBC. He told me that the BBC would send staff overseas to check that their material wasn't being shown outside of its allotted contractual period.

    25. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These distribution prints - which were 16mm film, not tape..

      Yes, and one has to ask oneself the following question;

      Why the fuck didn't the BBC keep an archive copy of these 16mm film copies of the programme tapes they then subsequently wiped?

      Consider: they produced the film copies anyway, what was so fucking difficult about keeping one in an archive somewhere?

      I'm not so much interested in the missing Doctor Whos (though as they're slap bang in the middle of my early TV exposure to the good doctor, they do have some interest), there are a lot of other things the bastards at the beeb wiped that I'd have liked to see again, so I hope that this story isn't 100% bullshit and that some of the other wiped material I am interested in survives.

    26. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why#? yout empires dying so fast it will be a mere footnote in the history books as how not to run an empire.

    27. Re:Interesting. by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Actually according to Chuck at SFDebris it WAS true at one time,late 80s/early 90s, but they were destroyed along with the TV station and half the countryside during the civil war.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    28. Re:Interesting. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting that the governments and corps are becoming one and the corps don't want you watching or listening to anything that they don't get a cut of and certainly not in a DRM free format. All it would take is the countries tightening that noose a little bit tighter (six strikes anyone?) for your amaing Internet to become nothing but a home shopping channel and propaganda outlet for the government. Now break out your CC and watch the latest approved DRMed video from Michael Bay, that is a good citizen.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    29. Re:Interesting. by Princeofcups · · Score: 2

      I also wonder what condition the reels will be in.

      Someone on another thread discussing old Doctor Who episodes pointed out that early tape stock was an absolute nightmare to keep in decent condition, and the expense was sufficient enough that the BBC decided it was too expensive.

      It wasn't that they just carelessly throwed their archives away.

      Uh, no. The BBC was too cheap to buy more tapes, and reused the Doctor Who (and other aired show) tapes to record new shows. Losing tapes has NOTHING to do with tape quality. As a matter of fact, a few episodes were digitally reconstructed from tapes in worse shape than anything sitting in the BBC archives.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    30. Re:Interesting. by BigBadBus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its because the different departments of the BBC didn't speak to each other. Occasional filmed episodes of many TV shows wound up at the BBC Film Archives, but BBC Enterprises held just about all the original kinescopes/films for overseas sales. When BBC Ents decided it didn't want their episodes, they didn't bother to check with the archives whether they would want them instead of ditching them. BBC Ents held videotape copies of the original shows, but the master tapes were held by the Engineering Department who would wipe and reused the tapes after a number of years.

    31. Re: Interesting. by Dzimas · · Score: 2

      In the early 1970s, there was no home video industry, and a live action drama like Doctor Who wasn't seen as valuable once it had been sold to other markets. The BBC also faced extreme budgetary pressure, forcing them to cut back nonessential services such as archiving. So they focused on the "important" stuff like news clips and current affairs and allowed plodding Saturday night sci-fi to fall through the cracks.

    32. Re:Interesting. by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In other words, the episodes would be lost forever if not for blatant copyright infringement.

    33. Re: Interesting. by iankphone · · Score: 1

      Why? Before the BBC made mad money exporting for anglophiles, they were a cut rate incompetently run no budget tv studio that cost money and Dr Who was seen as a silly kids show with no cultural value.

    34. Re:Interesting. by mikael · · Score: 0

      The program tapes were steel magnetic tape. It wasn't the responsibility of the individual production teams to archive material. They had a deadline to make and at that deadline they had to have everything in a can, ready to send. Once sent out at the end of the week, they re-used all the tapes to produce the next episode and discard the ones that were too worn out.

      There wasn't any archive department at the time. These days, a master copy is sent to an archive as well as sent out to the distributors.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    35. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already does, hypothetically speaking (and posting AC), there has been a complete copy of all of the DW episodes (incl the 'lost' ones) floating around on FTP since the 90's. Its amazing and fantastic how much content is already preserved 'ad-hoc' once people had an easy mechanism of sharing with each other.

      Now, recently we've hit the point where content is easy to find and transfer and that's really quite some achievement (not to mention the boost in local storage), as long as our governments don't take it away.

    36. Re:Interesting. by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

      Twenty odd missing episodes held by Sierra Leone were destroyed in the civil war there in 1999.

    37. Re:Interesting. by Delusion_ · · Score: 2

      The history of the last ten years is one of the RIAA and MPAA trying and failing to put this genie back in the bottle via lawsuits and legislation.

      Frankly, I find these failures a bit of a back-guard action. We need to decide, as a society, whether or not we want to be participants or mere consumers in our culture. Never-ending copyrights run contrary to the intent of copyright law (assuring a productive public domain), and contrary to participation in the culture (record labels looking for a paycheck every time someone remixes, samples, or plays anything). Five years - no extensions - would be sufficient in a world where culture travels at the speed of light around the world.

    38. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The airing schedule on some of the longest-running is so frequent that catching up from a series from beginning to end (if it were possible) would take 6 or so years if you tried to plow through at 40 hours a week."

      I know what I'll be doing come the next regieme change, who's with me?

    39. Re:Interesting. by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

      I was referring to shows that have run for decades without any real secondary market: shows like Guiding Light, As the World Turns General Hospital, Days of Our Lives, and One Life to Live.

      If you want to power through those, that is a dark place and I cannot join you.

    40. Re:Interesting. by caspy7 · · Score: 1

      No, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating".

      Oh crap, then what's this pile of brown stuff in front of me?

    41. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, you are aware that 90% of stories in the tabloids are entirely manufactured right?

      People like Max Clifford have made their millions orchestrating this, it's a win-win situation for all those involved. People like Simon Cowell and various footballers get to keep pretending they're manly super studs and are as straight as they come so they can pretend to themselves we can't see right through their insecurities about their homosexual tendencies despite the fact we'd respect them more if they just came out and the papers get a juicy story about how said insecure celebrity slept with 10 trillion women in one night or whatever fantasy they agreed to cook up for the papers.

      The papers don't avoid being sued because they're fact checking, they avoid being sued because the stories are created with the consent of those involved because they get a financial kickback from selling their names to the tabloids to use in whatever way they've agreed.

      It's rather disturbing that there's someone who thinks that stuff the tabloids publish is actually true. At least it explains the Slashdot username I suppose.

    42. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT WAS ME, I ate sheep shit.

    43. Re:Interesting. by markhb · · Score: 1

      Counting its radio incarnation (of which the TV show was a continuation, not a reboot), Guiding Light was around for 70 freaking years! Now CBS has a lame talk show (or a lame Let's Make a Deal copy) in its place. Daytime honchos nowadays can't even come up with new game shows!

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    44. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all know how government bureaucrats are totally effective all the time and completely immune to bribery when thousands of miles away from supervision.

    45. Re:Interesting. by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Because keeping archive copies was expensive. They took up a lot of space that the BBC needed for other purposes. The Beeb is far from the only media organization that discarded archives; all the major US networks and many film studios are also guilty.

    46. Re:Interesting. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I don't know when this stopped being the case, but in the early days, the daily soaps were broadcast live; there were no tapes.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    47. Re:Interesting. by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

      Game shows (except QI which isn't really a game show so much as a chat comedy show, which I download) and soap operas are so far out of my peripheral vision that I sometimes forget they still exist. I don't have a cable subscription or use broadcast television, so anything I watch is something I stream or download.

      My last connection to them was when I still lived with my parents during high school, and my mother had a few favourites she'd watch. The entire idea of watching a show at a pre-scheduled time is practically alien to me these days, and I suspect the same is true for most people younger than me.

  3. Mailed to the BBC in a blue envelope by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Funny

    With a note that read. "You're welcome; please be more careful next time. -The Doctor"

    1. Re:Mailed to the BBC in a blue envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      spoilers...

    2. Re:Mailed to the BBC in a blue envelope by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Sweetie!

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  4. Old news? or confirmed rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://bleedingcool.com/2013/06/13/wqill-doctor-who-have-a-very-special-surprise-for-us-in-november

  5. 3 month old rumour by Pop69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Printed in a sleazy tabloid newspaper with no corroboration ?

    I don't think so somehow, is this what passes for news on /. now ?

    1. Re:3 month old rumour by narcc · · Score: 4, Funny

      is this what passes for news on /. now ?

      Look at it this way: The news is only three months old, there isn't a dup on the front page (yet), and it's from a sleazy tabloid rather than a blog about someones blog about a sleazy tabloid article they saw on reddit.

      I'd say it's a step forward!

    2. Re:3 month old rumour by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's what gets published in the Sunday Edition of Slashdot, actually.

    3. Re:3 month old rumour by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      Can I quote you on that?

      is this what passes for news on /. now ?

      Look at it this way: The news is only three months old, there isn't a dup on the front page (yet), and it's from a sleazy tabloid rather than a blog about someones blog about a sleazy tabloid article they saw on reddit.

      I'd say it's a step forward!

      Yep, apparently I can.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:3 month old rumour by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      is this what passes for news on /. now ?

      "News for Nerds. Stuff That Matters.", it doesn't get any bigger than this.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  6. Lots of comments about this being a fake story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I;d love it to be true but even looking in to the article there are a lot of comments about this being and old fake story

  7. Nothing is lost, at least in space. by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

    All the BBC has to do is get the aliens that are watching them right now to turn on their tivos. Of course in another 50 years some might mistake this for a Dalek and come to earth with guns blazing! Or they might think that a Dalek compiler is where they are being manufactured and just blast Mountain View from outer space instead to save the poor enslaved earthlings from them.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  8. Re:Childish fad by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obvious troll is obvious, but depending on where you set your standards, all science fiction, all fiction, or even the wonder of life itself is reserved for "for adolescents who never grew up". Put another way:

    "We conceal it from ourselves in vain - we must always love something. In those matters seemingly removed from love, the feeling is secretly to be found, and we cannot possibly live for a moment without it." - Pascal

  9. Lost opportunity for digital gods. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Make fake episode
    2) record it on old VHS
    3) send it to BBC
    5) Bet on how long it takes for BBC to realize
    4) ????
    6) Profit

  10. Here's some from 1967 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomb of the Cybermen
    Episodes 1 & 2
    Episodes 3 & 4

    1. Re:Here's some from 1967 by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      These episodes were recovered in 1991.

    2. Re:Here's some from 1967 by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      And they're on Netflix... in Canada at least... :)

  11. What the effing fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    "This is a really big deal for the BBC and is set to make them millions from the sale of the DVDs."

    Hopefully the BBC doesn't make a penny selling anything related to these episodes. The BBC didn't want them. They shouldn't have them.

    1. Re:What the effing fuck? by Spottywot · · Score: 1

      "This is a really big deal for the BBC and is set to make them millions from the sale of the DVDs."

      Hopefully the BBC doesn't make a penny selling anything related to these episodes. The BBC didn't want them. They shouldn't have them.

      fta

      As the corporation still owns the copyright the shows could be digitally remastered and shown again. The prospect will delight millions of fans worldwide.

      Why do they need to own the copyright to remaster them? Fucking tabloid bs.

      --
      In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
  12. How things change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Through the work of ardent fans over the succeeding decades," who were EVERY SINGLE ONE committing the "Theft" of piracy and costing the world trillions of dollars in lost revenue...

    But the BBC aren't willing to join the dots here, are they. I guess that when this is all said and done, the BBC will take this hard work by ardent fans taken over decades and sell it and tell the fans to buy their stuff back. If it's stealing the work of peons, that's just capitalism!

    And no note about how this destruction indicates that they have been destroying public property (the public domain) which, if they hadn't been using the force of law to ensure that they were the only ones who were allowed copies, would not have been a problem: other people could have done it. Here, nobody else is alllowed, therefore the entire responsibility belongs to the copyright owner.

    But destruction of property is not a crime when you're powerful, it's just "Well, these things happen".

    1. Re:How things change by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      "ownership" of creative works are supposed to expire and these tapes are probably older than you are.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  13. Re:Childish fad by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    adolescents who never grew up

    That's me!

    The only people that want to be seen as grown up are people who aren't.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  14. Re:WHO by sjwt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, The World Health Organization does care..

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  15. I don't believe it by BigBadBus · · Score: 5, Informative

    This rumour started off in the summer as "90 missing episodes found" and even some big name fans were taken in by it, but the BBC (and those in a position to know and/or find out) always rubbished it. The story seems to be this: in the summer, someone in Africa (probably an old TV company, but a private collector has also been mentioned) sent a large package of old TV material to a company in the UK. The shows were to be remastered from old, obsolete formats into something that could be played with modern technology, something that the company specialised it. Somehow this news got picked up by the Dr.Who fraternity who made 2+2=106. So, almost certainly its a case of "move along, nothing to see here."
    At any rate, if Ethiopia has got anything, they never bought the broadcast rights to the Troughton era, so all we'd have to recover at best would be a handful of Hartnells, but still better than nothing.
    BUT just suppose the rumour is true, could the BBC have kept it quote for all these months? Ostensibly yes. The two episodes found in 2011 were "found" in the summer but this was a well kept secret until "Missing Believed Wiped" at the British Film Institute in December. Even the programme said they would be showing "1960s BBC Science Fiction" with no mention as to what it was. No one had a clue until much closer to the event. And when "Tomb of the Cybermen" was found in 1991, the BBC put out a cover story that it was simply four episodes of an already existing story. The secret was apparently kept hidden for at least a few weeks; all other missing episode "finds" have been quite quickly reported.
    Lastly, a little plug for my own website about the missing episodes of Dr.Who.

    1. Re:I don't believe it by nbritton · · Score: 1

      You catch more flies with honey... have the BBC put out a bounty per episode:

      Master tape - $100k
      Over the air recording - $50k
      Alternate duplicate recordings - $10k

      That's $10.6 million for whoever can find those 106 originals.

    2. Re:I don't believe it by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      so all we'd have to recover at best would be a handful of Hartnells, but still better than nothing.

      Whipersnapper.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:I don't believe it by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      I'm astonished at the amount of tinfoil expended over something of so little consequence, and which will be so easily proven (true or false) shortly?

      Above all, one has to ask: WHY would anyone contrive a story about lost/found episodes of a tv show?

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:I don't believe it by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      Ummmm? Yes, yes, yes my boy.. I loved Troughton but watching Hartnell from the beginning, he is up there with my core group of favorite Doctors. The prospect of seeing the First Doctor's regeneration in its entirety, rather than the short clip from Blue Peter, would be nothing short of a miracle to the fanbase. Elements of Hartnell's Doctor can be found in Eleven. Every time Smith says "Come along _________", it's a throwback to the original era.

    5. Re:I don't believe it by raburton · · Score: 1

      I've spent a little time in Ethiopia and I don't believe it either. I didn't go there to watch TV and don't claim to be an expert on the country, but it just seems highly unlikely. Sure, they have TV channels in Ethiopia, but the level of TV ownership now is nothing like in the west, let alone sometime around the 70's when these tapes might have been bought. I've seen no obvious references to science fiction in the popular culture. English isn't widely spoken outside tourist areas (and in medicine), it's becoming more used of course due to increased influence from the west (but again, that's today, not 30-40 years ago). Ethiopia has was never part of the British Empire, there was a brief relationship during/after World War 2, but no major historic links. Overall the idea of them buying British sci-fi to dub into Amharic in the 70s for a handful of people to watch seems implausible.

    6. Re:I don't believe it by BigBadBus · · Score: 2
      When "Tomb of the Cybermen" was found, we were told that a missing episodes office would be set up inside the BBC to find all kinds of lost TV around the globe and that a finder's fee would be paid. The BBC would pay whatever the material was worth. Then...it all went quiet. Nothing more was heard, and those who talked in favour of it (including one BBC engineer who pondered what kind of goodies this would prise out of the woodwork when word spread) soon began to dismiss it as a bad idea. One Dr.Who fan even offered to buy a full size Dalek replica to anyone who returned an episode and this was featured reasonably prominently in the news at the time. Again, this was dismissed as a bad idea. Why?

      I've seen lost TV shows go for auction on Ebay and consortiums of fans are happy to pay for the film prints, but when it comes to lost Dr.Who, their response is (and they have said this) is to email the seller and ask if they would be prepared to loan it to the BBC for copying. WHAT? And reduce the cost of it? And why not do this with other lost TV shows? Or is Dr. flippin' Who the be-all and end-all of archival chases?

    7. Re:I don't believe it by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

      That may be so, but Dr.Who was indeed bought and broadcast. I'm not sure of the exact number, maybe about 80 episodes?

    8. Re:I don't believe it by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      Actually, all 106 originals fit on just three master tapes: they're bigger on the inside than they are on the outside.

    9. Re:I don't believe it by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      It is similar to trolling, without the excuse of "I'm trying to populate my killfiles"

  16. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Where?

  17. What a damp blanket you must be: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Who really cares? Some old grainy black and white kinescopes? BFD. The artistic merit compared to the childish cult-like following is nil. Dr. Who is for adolescents who never grew up. It is like cabbage patch dolls or beanie babies."

    Dear heavens, isn't it horrible that someone might get enjoyment out of something you don't particularly like.

    Do you also blow out candles on adult's birthday cakes and then sternly lecture them about how "That's just for kids"?

    1. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      Given Auntie Beeb's treatment of previous episodes, expect them to throw whatever resources they can at it to restore it as close to crystal clear quality as possible and make an attempt to colorize them. Countless untold DVD sales are riding on it.

    2. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      But to play Devil's Advocate here...how many of you have actually WATCHED any of the first two Doctor's shows? I have watched a few and....its pretty sad actually, they treated it like a show for children and looks like they had a budget of something like 2 pounds, its pretty rough to watch some of them. Oh and lets not forget the first Doc had quite a few that were VERY un-PC, even saying nigger a few times on the show.

      Now don't take this wrong, I LIKE Dr Who, I used to watch the Fourth Doctor on PBS every weekend, it was a blast, but if you look STRICTLY based on quality, quality of sets, writing, costumes, etc, there are really only a handful of the first two Dr Who Doctors that are really worth watching for anybody but the most hardcore of completionist. If you were to magically have them show on my monitor right now? I'd watch the Daleks, the Cybermen, especially Tenth Planet, but the rest? The rest were sadly hampered by the way the show was treated by the BBC...Remember folks it was originally supposed to be an EDUCATIONAL show, think "Magic School Bus" for the 60s, with the dr going back to historical points for educating the childrens.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

      Can you give examples of when the word "nigger" was used or is this a case of "the memory cheats"? I don't think the word has been said once in the whole of the series.

    4. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by Hartree · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of shows that when you go back to them years/decades later are pretty campy. Look at some of the original Star Trek episodes. (I'm from the US, so can't comment on the BBC stuff as much.)

      But, people still enjoy them. That's the whole point. Yes, maybe it's making a big deal of something unimportant. It won't cure cancer or stop war, but most things won't in this world. But if it's true, people will get excited about it. Old friends will get together for an evening watching the newly-found old episodes.

      I'm not much of a Whovian. Watched a few episodes on the local public station years back. Chances are nearly nil I'd see these.

      An example from my cultural background (or lack thereof ;): I detest the song My Baby Does the Hanky Panky by Tommy James and the Shondells. But, it keeps getting lots of airplay on the oldies stations here in the US. That means a lot of people like it (though they may wisely not admit it too openly).

      They get a kick out of hearing it, and I can turn it down. Oh, I'll rant about it from time to time, but it's obvious it's in fun. What misery I get from hearing it, can be made up for by getting to grump about it. And in the end, the people who like the song get enjoyment from it. And the world is better for it (Though I shudder at the thought.)

    5. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he can't. Please don't feed the idiots.

    6. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      "The Celestial Toymaker" you can watch the review here which includes the nigger line. You have to remember it was 1964 and the actor was in his 40s so its not like its shocking,just compared to our time.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by root_42 · · Score: 1

      Do you also blow out candles on adult's birthday cakes and then sternly lecture them about how "That's just for kids"?

      He's Vulcan. He blows out the candles because there was a fire hazard.

      --
      [--- PGP key and more on http://www.root42.de ---]
    8. Re:What a damp blanket you must be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rumor is that the recovered episodes are from Patrick Troughton's run. As they were originally in B&W, they won't be colorized. They've only colorized episodes from Jon Pertwee's run, and only because they were in color originally and the recovered versions were B&W.

  18. Re:Childish fad by denzacar · · Score: 1

    people who aren't

    Are we talking fast clones, androids or shape-shifting aliens masquerading as humans?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  19. We don't remember what we saw, only what we felt. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Human memory is a funny thing. It does not really remember what we saw, except for a few savants with photographic memory. What we generally remember is what we felt. I will cit two personal examples.

    When I was in seventh grade I saw a movie with a typical bollywood number set on the Moon. Craters and boulders and stuff with the leading pair dancing and singing. I remembered it as a magnificent big set. After some 40 years I happened to see the same sequence, in an old is gold DVD set. The set was cheesy, tacky, at most 40 feet by 30 feet, craters were of just two sizes, nearly perfect circles, in a kind of semi uniform spacing. The leading pair looked horribly over made up. The only thing that was still great was the song. I was humming it for a couple of days. [*]

    Whan I was young my dad used to take to the bank and I used to think the tellers were sitting on very tall chairs behind impossibly tall counters. Turns out that was just the perspective of a child who has to look up at everything. Once I grew up these counters seemed quite normal, at most 4 or 4.5 feet tall.

    The point is, even if we unearth all those missing 106 episodes, the actual episodes might not stand up to all the hype and expectation heaped up on them.

    [*]: For the Desis out there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6UeorX-aVo

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  20. Re:Yay, more feed for the pig trough by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Black and White?

    I actually prefer The Goon Show. Which is monophonic audio-only radio broadcasts.

    I used to have a 19" Black and White console (wooden cabinet) television. In a way I wish I still did.

  21. BBC used to wipe all their shows by media-dude · · Score: 2

    BBC used to wipe all their shows. Which means after airing it once, they would erase or record the tapes over with something else with no thought to archiving them for future generations. This was a short sighted and incredibly stupid move by the BBC as well U.S. broadcasting corporations at the time . Thus hundreds and thousands of hours of valuable, classic entertainment were erased and gone forever with the flick of a switch based on poorly conceived management decisions. Much of Johnny Carson's classic Tonight Show from the 50's to the 60's were also wiped as well as many other classic shows including sports shows like the Super Bowl and the World Series. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiping The subject of wiping is not limited to just video tape. The worst management decision of all time had to be when the suits at ABC/Dunhill decided to throw entire master recording tapes in the garbage to save a little money in the early 70's. Thus original session tapes, multi-tracks, outtakes and master single mixes were just thrown away, gone forever. This was done without informing the artists or their management. This is why you will never hear original master recordings by Three Dog Night, Steppenwolf or The Mama and the Papas . All that remained were the analog album masters which were mastered and Equalized for vinyl. Hell even the single mix of "Magic Carpet Ride" is a different take altogether than the album version and the single mix is only available on the original 45 rpm vinyl and no master exists of the single mix.

    1. Re:BBC used to wipe all their shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a short sighted and incredibly stupid move by the BBC as well U.S. broadcasting corporations at the time.

      Oh, come off it. You can only say it was short-sighted and stupid NOW, given you live in a culture where everything is designed from the ground up to be painfully target-marketed and re-sold over and over again as kajillion-disc box sets. But back before the entire concept of home consumer video was invented, nobody could reasonably be expected to even conceive of the idea that, in fifty years, this one very specific programme out of the hundred or so other nondescript programmes they shoved onto the airwaves will be a runaway hit AND that people will have near-ubiquitous access to watch it repeatedly in their homes at their leisure, all using technology that, at the time, was either completely absurd to think of, cost obscene amounts of money, and/or took up way too much physical space to be practical in any way, shape, or form.

      It's like saying that, in Edison's and Tesla's time, they were so incredibly short-sighted and stupid to not just use nuclear power plants to generate electricity. Or that Edison should've just come up with the iPhone's camera instead of wasting his time with the kinetoscope.

    2. Re:BBC used to wipe all their shows by media-dude · · Score: 1

      This was a short sighted and incredibly stupid move by the BBC as well U.S. broadcasting corporations at the time.

      Oh, come off it. You can only say it was short-sighted and stupid NOW, given you live in a culture where everything is designed from the ground up to be painfully target-marketed and re-sold over and over again as kajillion-disc box sets. But back before the entire concept of home consumer video was invented, nobody could reasonably be expected to even conceive of the idea that, in fifty years, this one very specific programme out of the hundred or so other nondescript programmes they shoved onto the airwaves will be a runaway hit AND that people will have near-ubiquitous access to watch it repeatedly in their homes at their leisure, all using technology that, at the time, was either completely absurd to think of, cost obscene amounts of money, and/or took up way too much physical space to be practical in any way, shape, or form.

      It's like saying that, in Edison's and Tesla's time, they were so incredibly short-sighted and stupid to not just use nuclear power plants to generate electricity. Or that Edison should've just come up with the iPhone's camera instead of wasting his time with the kinetoscope.

      Consumer video? Ever hear of reruns? Reruns were already popular on TV by the 1960's. Maybe reruns didn't exist in your country, but they were popular here in the States. If we followed your line of reasoning...All time classics like "The Honeymooners" , "I Love Lucy", "Superman" and other classic shows from the 50's, 60's and 70's would have been ended up in the trash compactor because 'consumer video' wasn't invented yet.

    3. Re:BBC used to wipe all their shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actors were dead set against reruns back then. They were terrified it would kill their jobs. Whenever a show was "rebroadcast," it completely redone, like a play.

  22. This could be as painful by plopez · · Score: 2

    As watching Star Trek TOS re-runs. And possibly as painful as watching $YourFavoriteSciFiShow in 20 years. :)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:This could be as painful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just watched The Doomsday Machine. If you can't appreciate that, I feel sorry for your lot. I'll grant that there are some goofy and awful episodes, but there's some real gold in TOS, too.

      Captcha: deaden -- yeah, it happens to lots of people as they grow older, Captcha. It's sad, huh?

    2. Re:This could be as painful by Reziac · · Score: 1

      By coincidence, I just recently started watching Blake's 7 for the first time. Looks straight outta 1950, for sure.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:This could be as painful by jcea · · Score: 1

      Babylon5 aged really well.

  23. Re:WHO by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Horton hears them.

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  24. Re:We don't remember what we saw, only what we fel by Tapewolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The point is, even if we unearth all those missing 106 episodes, the actual episodes might not stand up to all the hype and expectation heaped up on them.

    'Tomb of the Cybermen' actually did, for me, at least. I thought it was a rather slick production given the budget. Other stuff from that era is distinctly variable in quality (e.g. the little city model in 'The Krotons' which I honestly thought was supposed to be a heap of stones).

    Nostalgia doesn't really enter into it for me because I never got to see the original broadcasts. In actual fact I only got into Dr. Who really when they repeated the Tom Baker episodes in the 90s and I found them to my liking.

  25. Re:We don't remember what we saw, only what we fel by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

    The Doctor's crack at Jamie's kilt in 'Tomb of the Cybermen' did it for me.. XD

  26. Re:Childish fad by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    It's depressingly true. The people who have grown up simply look on at the "childish" passion with envy. Sometimes envy masked with disdain, but unmistakable envy.

    The exceptions to this rule are the people who are truly dead inside.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  27. Re:Childish fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Who is for adolescents who never grew up. It is like cabbage patch dolls or beanie babies.

    Better that than apparently being in a rush to get old and die.

  28. Re:Childish fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or murican football, oopps sorry forgot thats the official religion after Jeebus

  29. i never had a problem finding these by collect0r · · Score: 1

    seems like the bbc should look at http://watchseries.lt/serie/Doctor_Who_(1963) and http://watchseries.lt/serie/doctor_who they are quite easy to find

    1. Re:i never had a problem finding these by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Find me a complete copy of "The Power of the Daleks"; "Fury from the Deep", or "Marco Polo"-- then we can talk.

    2. Re:i never had a problem finding these by collect0r · · Score: 1
    3. Re:i never had a problem finding these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems like the bbc should look at http://watchseries.lt/serie/Doctor_Who_(1963) and http://watchseries.lt/serie/doctor_who they are quite easy to find

      Seems like you haven't actually tried watching them. The 106 missing episodes all exist in audio form. What that site links to in those cases are fan reconstructions. The audio from the missing episode, with production stills and stage direction from each ep overlaid. These have been traded amungst fans for years, but are a far cry from having the actual missing eps.

    4. Re:i never had a problem finding these by muridae · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother to watch them? They aren't the original episodes, they are reconstructions of the episodes. The audio from most of the lost episodes has been available for a while; I don't know why/how that was saved when the video wasn't. But the reconstruction places that audio with what available video there is and stills from on-set photographs, and publicity photos, and even viewers photos of the tv screen.

      So, yes, I can watch Macro Polo, and have. But I saw barely any movement, and half the action was just grunts and shuffling of feet over a still picture; worse than radio shows of the same era!

  30. Worth saving, but for different reasons by guytoronto · · Score: 2

    While it is very interesting that the missing episodes may be found, in reality, many of the early versions of Doctor Who are just painful to watch. Poor dialogue, agonizing slow pacing, terrible direction, etc, etc. If the BBC truly wants to revive the old episodes of Doctor Who, take the audio tracks (note: audio from EVERY episode survives) and created an animated series. Clean up the story lines and create something worth watching again.

  31. Jobs! did the unions do it? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    The BBC's old policy is being partially blamed on the actors unions of the time. They didn't want reruns without having the actors repeat the performance and had an agreement limiting replays. Once that limit was reached, the recording was useless.

    Thinking about how technology TAKES JOBS AWAY... just imagine if such policies continued... we would employ scores more actors than we do today; the big stars wouldn't get paid as much but they'd have to work more hours. We still have theater shows and without technology, TV and Movies would be more like that - fancy mindless FX would naturally be toned down... and actors would get sick of repeating vapid lines/characters... Cartoons would likely become bigger...possibly, as they could be a work around for the limitations.

  32. Re:Childish fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol. My douche older brother almost literally masturbates to baseball. Yet he makes fun of me for liking warhammer 40k and other sci fi/fantasy stuff. He's also almost 40 and still gets drunk 3+ times a week and has no family. I have an awesome wife and an amazing 5 month old son. But "I'M" the loser. rofl. Enjoy your overpaid arrogant prick douche bag druggies chasing a ball around fuck face.

  33. One Small Step by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'll find the Apollo 11 originals in the stack

  34. Hopefully by Horshu · · Score: 1

    Many of them involve an evil cactus as the villain.

    1. Re:Hopefully by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no, that was a single episode of "Outlaw Star"

  35. And this is important? by mendax · · Score: 0

    Undoubtedly, to people who have no life and are as bad as the most diehard of Star Trek fans/nutcases this is very important. Granted, "Doctor Who" is a cultural icon and it's nice that a big gap in the series has been rediscovered. However, I would be getting much more excited if, for example, some more lost or portions of fragmentary works of Archimedes were rediscovered.

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    1. Re:And this is important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it isn't important to you doesn't mean it isn't significant. So, go fuck your self.

  36. So why did copyright exist, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it wasn't going to be necessary because nobody could copy it, why the fuck were there laws against it?

    1. Re:So why did copyright exist, then? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      copyright was mainly intended for books, you know

  37. Re:Childish fad by Hartree · · Score: 2

    "The exceptions to this rule are the people who are truly dead inside."

    Londo Molari in Babylon 5:

    "Something my father said. He was old, very old at the time. I went into his room, and he was sitting alone in the dark, crying. So I asked him what was wrong, and he said, "My shoes are too tight, but it doesn't matter, because I have forgotten how to dance." I never understood what that meant until now. My shoes are too tight, and I have forgotten how to dance."

  38. And the Ark of the Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and they say Ethiopia has the Ark of the Covenant

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ark_of_the_Covenant#Ethiopia

    I suspect both reports are equally true.

  39. Re:We don't remember what we saw, only what we fel by sfraggle · · Score: 1

    Though it's interesting to see that with Tomb of the Cybermen, not everyone felt that way:

    Those fans who were too young to have seen the black-and-white stories when they originally went out were generally disappointed, because they had unrealistic expectations and a lack of understanding of what TV shows in general, and Doctor Who in particular, were like in the 1960's.

    Personally I love the early Doctor Who episodes, especially Tomb of the Cybermen, but I have to be honest that the quality of some of these early episodes is very hit and miss, and while some are great, classic pieces of television, others have really not aged well.

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
  40. Re:We don't remember what we saw, only what we fel by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    The point is, even if we unearth all those missing 106 episodes, the actual episodes might not stand up to all the hype and expectation heaped up on them.

    Indeed. The show was much more firmly aimed at kids back in those days, compared to the more adult aim of recent years. Viewers accustomed to seeing the current show would be flabbergasted with those early episodes. It's the same show in name only.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  41. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the poster was musing that the reels were found in the garbage, mushed up with some pudding cups.

  42. More news by BigBadBus · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Radio Times, the BBC's listing magazine, has run an article saying that two "episodes" have been found, but when a BBC spokesman was asked for details, they were blanked. It looks like the BBC aren't talking to the BBC ... again! Now the Mirror newspaper is weighing in again, saying that there will be a big press conference in a London hotel on Tuesday evening, and the material will be made available to buy on iPlayer on Wednesday. A couple of friends have said its two Troughton "stories" but no one in the BBC is saying anything official. Make of that what you will :(

  43. Re:Yay, more feed for the pig trough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for the TV and the film versions.

  44. Smoke and Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see absolutely no reason to believe the episodes have been found apart from, really, the old adage about smoke and fire. And, to be honest, I’ve never put too much stock in that. I see people making stuff up all too frequently to believe smoke needs anything more than somebody willing to blow it. Talking of which

  45. Wouldn't it be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the BBC (or any other entity fitting a similar description) would lose the ability to copyright anything in the future due to their "losing" our cultural heritage?

    The absolute audacity in claiming perpetual copyright and then not saving the material... should be grounds for prosecution. Criminal and civil.

  46. Please... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Just hope they don't get sued in the likes of 20 million a tape...

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  47. Very strange indeed... by sharknado · · Score: 1

    My grade 4 teacher was crazy about the original Doctor Who, he said that he watched it from the beginning and recorded every episode. He used to bring them in to class and we would watch them. Over the course of one year we must have seen at least 50 episodes, and they were all sequential. I wonder if he was lying about having the entire series on tape. Surely he would have said something. Weird.

  48. tougue tied by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    It will be pretty cool listening to them in Amharic, it might finally make more sense.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:tougue tied by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Even if this story were true (which I have my doubts) but the audio was some localized dubbing, it would be very good news. The BBC has audio from all of the missing episodes. All they would need to do is strip out the localized dubbing, overlay the audio they have, and match it up to the video. It might not be 100% perfect, but they could get it good enough for fans to enjoy the lost episodes again.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  49. At best, a few dozen Second Doctor eps... by ghimmelmann · · Score: 1
    ...which would still be awesome of course! But The Mirror's version of the story doesn't even make sense. Full analysis of these claims on my blog but some conclusions follow:
    • Of the 106 missing episodes, no more than 75 are realistically recoverable from anywhere in Africa
    • If by some miracle, all 75 of those episodes were to be found in the one place, that place would be Zambia.
    • It's possible that the wild claims of 90 or more episodes recovered could be true, but only if the stash also included large numbers of episodes that the BBC already holds in its archives.
    • The claim that these episodes come from Ethiopia and the claim that they include Troughton stories are incompatible. Pick one.
    • If they do come from Ethiopia, they might complete seasons 1 and 2; Ethiopia was the last place on earth known to have transmitted these stories.

    My guess -- a trove of Troughton material has turned up in Nigeria that includes a big chunk of season 5; some of which the BBC already has, much of which it doesn't. (But I still hope it's 75 missing episodes from Zambia...) ;)

    1. Re:At best, a few dozen Second Doctor eps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT, but do you know why the episodes are so expensive and aren't available as boxed sets? Is it the expense of restoration?

    2. Re:At best, a few dozen Second Doctor eps... by ghimmelmann · · Score: 1

      TBH, I don't know. Cost of restoration would be one factor: the BBC really goes "above and beyond" with Doctor Who to restore the material to as close as possible to its original condition. I suspect a bigger factor is that the market for this stuff is a very small, niche market.

    3. Re:At best, a few dozen Second Doctor eps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's kind of what I figured. Thanks for responding.

  50. Re:We don't remember what we saw, only what we fel by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    It's sort of like when I saw Voltron on Netflix. I remembered loving that show back when I was a kid. So I played the first episode to relive the wonderful days of my youth. Only I was suddenly watching a show riddled with plot holes (I give some leeway for kids cartoons, but these were huge), bad character motivation, and really cheesy lines. It was horrible. I don't know if the first few episodes were just always that bad and it got better or if my memory of their quality has been "enhanced" by being a kid at the time. Either way, I'd prefer to remember the good Voltron times and not the horrible show that I've since realized it was.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  51. Finally! My /. sub pays off! by doccus · · Score: 1

    I would not have known otherwise.. looks like all these issues of checking through /. issues has finally paid off. Who needs to know about our impending doom? When we get to see more William Hartnell in all his grumpiness? Happy days are here again lalala...

  52. Radio Times not part of the BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was sold off years ago.

  53. Are these the episodes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that bounced back off a planet and were picked up by a radio telescope? I seem to recall hearing something about this 5-6 months ago.

  54. Press release postponed by ghimmelmann · · Score: 1

    The BBC press release has now been postponed to the end of the week.

  55. Re:Childish fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who really cares? Some old grainy black and white kinescopes? BFD. The artistic merit compared to the childish cult-like following is nil. Dr. Who is for adolescents who never grew up. It is like cabbage patch dolls or beanie babies.

    Grow up? Why the fuck would anyone want to do that?!?

    This being grown up deal is highly overrated...

  56. Story on BBC News Website: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    The BBC News website has a story on it seemingly confirming that some number of episodes have been bound and will be revealed at a press conference later this week.

    It's always possible this is one part of the Beeb not being in sync with the other, but it looks like it's more than just idle rumors.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-24448063