Slashdot Mirror


BBC Unveils Newly Discovered Dr.Who Episodes

BigBadBus writes "Putting an end to months of speculation, the BBC announced at a press conference today that it had recovered 9 previously lost episodes of Dr.Who, from the Patrick Troughton era (1966-69). The episodes complete 'The Enemy of the World' and almost complete 'The Web of Fear' (leaving one episode outstanding). The episodes were found in a relay station in Nigeria by Phillip Morris; previously Nigeria had been checked and had returned 6 lost episodes in 1984. The episodes are now available from UK and US iTune stores and can be for pre-ordered from Amazon.co.uk"

44 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. The public paid for them, the BBC threw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and now they want to charge for them. Making them available via Bittorrent would be the moral choice.

  2. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by moteyalpha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Suppose a person taped that missing episode at that time for themselves. Would they get a share of the profit they make for archiving their stuff for 50 years or would they be prosecuted for theft if they came forward? Copyright is very strange. I suppose it depends on the local laws. It seems there is a statute I recall from grade school called "Finders keepers, losers weepers".

  3. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by mysidia · · Score: 2

    Having "lost" the episodes turns out to be lucrative for them, perhaps...... if they ever find them, they can make a killing selling them for $$$

    You think a person having taped the episode, will have a high enough quality rendition for them to use? I doubt it.

  4. OMG OMG OMG!!! by RedBear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh my goodness I'm freaking out and waving my hands like a schoolgirl right now.

    But seriously, the Web of Fear is one of my favorite classic Doctor Who episodes, despite the fact that the only available version is almost entirely an audio reconstruction with still-photograph accompaniment. Notably, this episode is where the much beloved stiff-upper-lip character Lethbridge-Stewart is first introduced. He is of course instantly recognizable even as part of an audio-only soundtrack.

    As much as I enjoyed the 3rd (Jon Pertwee) and 4th (Tom Baker) Doctors, like everyone else, I'd go so far as to say that many of the 1st (William Hartnell) and 2nd (Patrick Troughton) Doctors' episodes were some of the most interesting and entertaining of the entire series, just as many of the most original and memorable episodes of Star Trek and TNG came during their first and second seasons. The more I watch the older episodes of Doctor Who the more I appreciate what they accomplished, especially in the context of the fact that the series started out in 1963 in seriously grainy black and white as basically a televised live-action play. So finding more old episodes is a big thing for me. I love 'em.

    I'm also one of those weirdos who thinks the most recent few seasons of the show are boot-licking, Doctor-worshiping, ultra-melodramatic, vomit-inducing crap that caused Doctor Who to go from one of my favorite shows of all time to something I cannot physically stomach watching anymore. But I digress.

    Hooray for more classic Doctor Who!

    1. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by jamesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh my goodness I'm freaking out and waving my hands like a schoolgirl right now.

      But seriously, the Web of Fear is one of my favorite classic Doctor Who episodes, despite the fact that the only available version is almost entirely an audio reconstruction with still-photograph accompaniment. Notably, this episode is where the much beloved stiff-upper-lip character Lethbridge-Stewart is first introduced. He is of course instantly recognizable even as part of an audio-only soundtrack.

      As much as I enjoyed the 3rd (Jon Pertwee) and 4th (Tom Baker) Doctors, like everyone else, I'd go so far as to say that many of the 1st (William Hartnell) and 2nd (Patrick Troughton) Doctors' episodes were some of the most interesting and entertaining of the entire series, just as many of the most original and memorable episodes of Star Trek and TNG came during their first and second seasons. The more I watch the older episodes of Doctor Who the more I appreciate what they accomplished, especially in the context of the fact that the series started out in 1963 in seriously grainy black and white as basically a televised live-action play. So finding more old episodes is a big thing for me. I love 'em.

      I'm also one of those weirdos who thinks the most recent few seasons of the show are boot-licking, Doctor-worshiping, ultra-melodramatic, vomit-inducing crap that caused Doctor Who to go from one of my favorite shows of all time to something I cannot physically stomach watching anymore. But I digress.

      Hooray for more classic Doctor Who!

      They started playing Doctor Who from the start here (Australia) a while back, and I really enjoyed it. One episode was entirely set in the tardis where the tardis seemed jammed and was trying to tell them something and they had to figure out what it was. And the hand to hand combat fighting was absolutely awful. And the Dalek's spaceship wobbled on the string it was suspended on. Awesome stuff :) Unfortunately The timeslot ended up conflicting with meal times and hungry kids aren't compatible with TV watching, so i gave up watching it. This was before I had a PVR or anything.

    2. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Noughmad · · Score: 3, Funny

      One episode was entirely set in the tardis where the tardis seemed jammed and was trying to tell them something and they had to figure out what it was. And the hand to hand combat fighting was absolutely awful. And the Dalek's spaceship wobbled on the string it was suspended on. Awesome stuff :)

      Don't forget the time they filmed a gecko and claimed it was a crocodile.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    3. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm also one of those weirdos who thinks the most recent few seasons of the show are boot-licking, Doctor-worshiping, ultra-melodramatic, vomit-inducing crap that caused Doctor Who to go from one of my favorite shows of all time to something I cannot physically stomach watching anymore. But I digress.

      They turned him into a trickster God. A bit different from what came before and what you want perhaps but I quite like a lot of the stories of the Doctor as a trickster God.

    4. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by RedBear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They started playing Doctor Who from the start here (Australia) a while back, and I really enjoyed it. One episode was entirely set in the tardis where the tardis seemed jammed and was trying to tell them something and they had to figure out what it was. And the hand to hand combat fighting was absolutely awful. And the Dalek's spaceship wobbled on the string it was suspended on. Awesome stuff :) Unfortunately The timeslot ended up conflicting with meal times and hungry kids aren't compatible with TV watching, so i gave up watching it. This was before I had a PVR or anything.

      Sounds like "Edge of Destruction", the third episode. A short two-parter, but great. Fortunately you can find all the existing classic episodes and reconstructions on torrent sites these days.

      Every time I restart the series from the beginning I'm always amazed that the Daleks are introduced already in the seven-part second episode (The Mutants). One of the greatest things about the old stuff is that it was more of a serial format, where if they needed seven, eight or nine 23-minute parts to tell the complete story then that is how many parts were made to tell that story. Which resulted in quite a few "episodes" of classic Doctor Who that are really more like awesomely epic multi-threaded 2-hour and 3-hour movies. The modern "wrap it up in a single 41 minute episode or leave a cliffhanger for next season" seems incredibly lame and creatively limiting by comparison.

      I wish somebody today had the balls to start some new shows using the old serial formats and the same kind of shoestring budget special effects they used to use. If they had decent actors and compelling stories it would be an absolute gold mine.

    5. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by BigBadBus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And they din't use the sonic screwdriver as a deux es machina to get out of any tricky situation, rather than the Doctor using his intelligence and wits. Today, the screwdriver is a euphemism for lazy, sloppy writing. No wonder John Nathan-Turner got rid of it in 1982!

    6. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by RedBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm also one of those weirdos who thinks the most recent few seasons of the show are boot-licking, Doctor-worshiping, ultra-melodramatic, vomit-inducing crap that caused Doctor Who to go from one of my favorite shows of all time to something I cannot physically stomach watching anymore. But I digress.

      They turned him into a trickster God. A bit different from what came before and what you want perhaps but I quite like a lot of the stories of the Doctor as a trickster God.

      Yeah, that pretty much sums it up in one sentence. They turned a fun sci-fi show that happened to mainly star a quirky character called the Doctor who likes to travel to strange places and get himself into trouble and solve mysteries into a show that is almost entirely _about_ the Doctor, and changed the character so drastically he might as well be called Magical Space Jesus. You can practically see the stars in the eyes of every other character who looks at him or talks about him, as if he's the love child of Rassilon and Yahweh. Blech.

      I'm glad there are lots of people who are enjoying the new show but as far as I'm concerned it is no longer Doctor Who and the character bears little resemblance to what the Doctor was as a character for the ~45 years prior to the Matt Smith seasons. It was a sad day when I realized that I just couldn't handle watching my favorite show anymore. I'll probably never find a true replacement either. Doctor Who has been quite a unique show from the very beginning.

      Of course I am also one of those who hold the remarkably unpopular opinion that Man of Steel was a silly abomination directed by someone who is apparently incapable of comprehending what the Superman archetype is even supposed to represent, and that the new Star Trek films are dramatic but hollow imitations of things that already exist, but again I digress. Oh, look, explosions and lens flares 'n stuff!

    7. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Megane · · Score: 2

      But at least The Doctor saved a few quid on his TARDIS insurance.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    8. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by RedBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And they din't use the sonic screwdriver as a deux es machina to get out of any tricky situation, rather than the Doctor using his intelligence and wits. Today, the screwdriver is a euphemism for lazy, sloppy writing. No wonder John Nathan-Turner got rid of it in 1982!

      Indeed a good point. If I remember right it wasn't even introduced until episode 42 (Fury From the Deep) and used quite sparingly for the most part. Of course, since the Doctor has now transformed into Magical Space Jesus, he doesn't even need his now ridiculously powerful and versatile sonic screwdriver to work miracles. He can just stand up on a rooftop or a rock and tell a whole alien battle fleet to run away, and instead of him being immediately reduced to a pile of smoking ashes the powerful aliens actually run away! Isn't that great?

      Aaaaand that pretty much sums up why I can no longer watch any new Doctor Who. Or Bond films, for that matter. Same phenomenon. So many things these days have become caricatures of themselves with no substance beneath the immaculate surface.

    9. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What about the first few seasons of the rebooted BSG? That was undoubtably an improvement on the original, took a vacuous but fun space opera into new territory as a dark and edgy SF psychodrama. "33" was one of the most sublime SF TV experiences that I've had in my life. Such a pity they ruined it towards the end... actually, that's unfair. They didn't ruin it, but it did drop dramatically in quallity.

    10. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Cylons may have had a plan, but the writers were making it all up the night before filming.

    11. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Princeofcups · · Score: 2

      And they din't use the sonic screwdriver as a deux es machina to get out of any tricky situation, rather than the Doctor using his intelligence and wits. Today, the screwdriver is a euphemism for lazy, sloppy writing. No wonder John Nathan-Turner got rid of it in 1982!

      Fuck John Nathan Turner and everything he did on Doctor Who. His tenure is directly responsible for the decline in viewers, immature sappy idiotic plot lines, and the eventual cancellation of the show. He took it from it's top rating during Tom Baker and trashed it with his arrogance. Talk about someone not listening to the fans. It was only that very last McCoy season when Turner had already abandoned the show that things started getting back on track, but by then it was too late.

      Turner's sins:
      - Replacing a first class Shakespearian actor with a TV star pretty boy
      - Replacing intelligent strong companions with googley eyed teenagers
      - Getting rid of K-9
      - Reversing everything that Douglas Adams tried to do to elevate the show to a new level
      - Putting celery on the Doctor, still a WTF

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    12. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Nyder · · Score: 2

      And they din't use the sonic screwdriver as a deux es machina to get out of any tricky situation, rather than the Doctor using his intelligence and wits. Today, the screwdriver is a euphemism for lazy, sloppy writing. No wonder John Nathan-Turner got rid of it in 1982!

      Indeed a good point. If I remember right it wasn't even introduced until episode 42 (Fury From the Deep) and used quite sparingly for the most part. Of course, since the Doctor has now transformed into Magical Space Jesus, he doesn't even need his now ridiculously powerful and versatile sonic screwdriver to work miracles. He can just stand up on a rooftop or a rock and tell a whole alien battle fleet to run away, and instead of him being immediately reduced to a pile of smoking ashes the powerful aliens actually run away! Isn't that great?

      Aaaaand that pretty much sums up why I can no longer watch any new Doctor Who. Or Bond films, for that matter. Same phenomenon. So many things these days have become caricatures of themselves with no substance beneath the immaculate surface.

      While I can basically agree about what you are saying, I think you are missing out on the new bond films. Danial Craig is a more realistic James Bond then any ever before and the movies seem to capture a more truer essense of what it would be like spying, then the bond movies with cheese galore before him.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    13. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      They turned him into a trickster God.

      It even has a name: Cartmel Masterplan. I quite like Sylvestor McCoy's take on it-- it made a nice change from the sixth doctor rubbish.

  5. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any quality is better than no quality.

  6. Glad by BigBadBus · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm glad that this got accepted! Apologies for the slightly garbled last sentence; I typed that at about 2am and was extremely tired. The reporting embargo was due to be lifted at midnight, but two papers had prematurely reported the news on their websites. These news items were pulled; an irate BBC contacted one of them and read them the riot act (mind you, it was the Northern Echo, my home newspaper which has a murky reputation, so what do you expect?)

    By about 11.50pm GMT the news had broken and links to iTunes gone up. Amazon links a short time later and then YouTube material. I put the iTunes and Amazon pre-order links on my website (see link in my signature)

    Sadly, I think the following quote from the BBC shows their contempt for us. This is from one of the papers that broke the embargo:

    "Asked whether viewers might also see the recovered episodes, without having to pay Apple £1.89 per episode or £9.99 to download the complete stories, BBC Worldwide said licence-fee payers had already enjoyed a chance to watch the programmes in the late 60s"

    Don't they realise that WE might have wanted to watch this stuff again at some point?

    1. Re:Glad by rylin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure they'll air them at some point in the future, but for now there's a cost for remastering the episodes, and so I'd say it's fair for the beeb to try and recover some of the cost through iTunes/Amazon.

    2. Re:Glad by DrXym · · Score: 2

      This is a really stupid argument. Walk into WHSmith, or HMV, or any other video retailer in the UK and you will see Doctor Who episodes for sale. Go onto Netflix in the UK or the US and you will see Doctor Who and other BBC series. Just because they were produced and broadcast on TV does not mean the BBC will not try to monetize them in other ways. Just because these particular episodes were rediscovered doesn't mean they were destined to be shown on TV any more than any other random show from the 60s.

    3. Re:Glad by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      Nah, I appear to have re-used the tapes.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Glad by Dzimas · · Score: 2

      By "we" I was speaking collectively. I wasn't born until 1971, but the sentiment echoed time and again by hundreds of people is the same: we paid for those episodes, technicians, actors and other production staff slaved over them, and some bean counter years later decided they were worthless. No one stopped to think that some people might have wanted to see them again.

      We forget how crude the television industry was fifty years ago. Here's a brief primer. Shows that were shot on videotape were captured on a 2-inch Ampex Quadruplex machine that recorded at 15.625 inches per second. A reel of two inch tape weighed about 14 lbs and was very expensive. Tape was in short supply at the BBC - at one point they had less than 16 reels available, so what typically happened is that after broadcast, the reels were placed in short-term storage to be erased (the tape decks didn't have erase heads). Because of the relative scarcity of tape, this sometimes occurred in as little as 24 hours. If a show was deemed to have value for international broadcast, a handful of 16mm reversal film copies (suitable for telecine projection) were made at 25 fps from the 50i source tape.

      Those 16mm film copies were distributed by BBC Commercial (now BBC worldwide) to markets around the world, under draconian terms - the broadcasters were only allowed to show them on air once or twice, and the the film copies were returned to the BBC and sent to another (less profitable) market afterward. Eventually, these films ended up at a broadcast facility in Nigeria that neglected to return them.

      The BBC archives were film-based until the late 1970s, so there was no chance that Doctor Who would have been preserved on tape (nor would it have been financially rational to do such a thing). Unless a film copy of a program was specifically made for the archive, the archivists would have to wait until one of the distribution prints was returned and retired before cataloging and filing it. My guess is that this wasn't seen as very important for a plodding space drama like Doctor Who (especially B&W episodes in the early days of colour), compounding the archiving problem.

  7. Why should I care? by basecastula+ · · Score: 2

    So, I am an american 25 year old cs student. Why should I watch this show and/or how can I convince my lady to watch it with me?

  8. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by Pi1grim · · Score: 2

    Oh, don't worry, they'll just extend the copyright term as they did for Mickey or Beatles. I mean there is still money to be made.

  9. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by jamesh · · Score: 2

    If I recall correctly from the previous Dr. Who story on here, the episodes fall to the public domain 50 years after their production (so 2016-2019 for these episodes). So BBC is capitalizing on the last few years when they can make money off these. Yes, I'm disappointed too but not the least bit shocked.

    http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/13/10/03/2232213/first-few-doctor-who-episodes-may-fall-to-public-domain-next-year?sdsrc=popbyskid

    Are they releasing the lost episodes verbatim, or is some remastering involved? And if they are remastered, does that constitute a new original copyrightable work?

  10. Another point to make by BigBadBus · · Score: 4, Informative
    The gentlemen who found these episodes did so of his own remit. He told fans in 2005 his plan:

    "'does anyone know,what ian levine,plans to do about the recovery of missing episodes,i myself have been considering,a little overseas travel, i work overseas and i think by traveling to some or even all countrys and searching ,is maybe the best way now,of finally putting the rumours,and stories to rest,if its there lets go there,and ask politely it can do no harm,who knows i might turn up a thing or two'

    'yes i see your point,i have contacted the restoration team,and offered my services,free at no cost to them ,whatsoever,but i have had no reply.you are perfectly right the beeb themselves should do this,but they dont seem to want to know,official paperwork and authorisation,from the beeb would have been great,but if not forthcoming i will go it alone with whatever ,background information i can find and see were it leads me,any help from anyone interested will be much appreciated,to all fans i will give it my best shot for dr who'"

    For those not in the know, Ian Levine is a superfan, who saved many of the early episodes from destruction and found many others. The above appeared on a forum dedicated to discussing missing episodes, and is partially run by BBC staff members some of whom restore the old episodes for DVD release. Apart from Ian Levine, everyone wrote him off. The BBC didn't seem to want to know. But if the story is right, he must have managed to acquire some paperwork to show how the episodes had been cycled round the world; when one TV station had finished with them, they would be sent to another one to reduce costs of producing new episodes from the negatives.

    Another thing I'd like to mention. In 1984 the BBC and Levine contacted old foreign TV markets who had bought the early years of the show to find lost episodes. Most stations didn't bother to reply; 6 did come back from Nigeria (the newly found episodes were from a relay station so its not surprising they were missed) and one from Australia. Iran said "Who in the name of Allah are you talking about?" But as Phillip Morris has shown, you need to go over there and physically sift through the paperwork and film cans. Expecting an overworked archivist to do it isn't going to work, especially if the documentation of what they have is fragmentary. But I do wonder what other "lost" TV shows were found sitting on the shelf. When Dr.Who has been found in the past, other TV has usually come back, but it is rarely, if ever reported. This makes TV historians fury with despair, as the archival side of things is so Dr.Who-centric.

    Normally, the episodes should have been returned to England when they had been shown an agreed number of times, or destroyed. Happily this isn't the case. I'm not too surprised that they were overlooked. My dad worked in Nigeria from about 1968-72 and I was born there. He says they are slovenly and corrupt. That's not being racist, that is what they are like over there, from his personal experience (like one local member of the Lagos glitterati who paid off the police to stop criminal proceedings after he nearly killed my mum in a speedboat accident). And yes my dad does recall Dr.Who being shown in Nigeria!

    1. Re:Another point to make by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, if some imperialist bastards from the other end of the world walked up and told me what to do I wouldn't be terribly motivated either, genocide threat or not.

      You do realise Nigeria was given independence in 1960, and, given the timeframe, the GP's father was probably there to assist with the oil boom which was making the country rich, right?

      But don't let that get in the way of your idiot leftyist rant.

  11. Dear Friend in God by KNicolson · · Score: 4, Funny

    (Please read the following in CAPITALS)

    Permit me to inform you of my desire of going into business relationship with you. I have the believe you are a reputable and responsible and trustworthy person I can do business with from the little information so far I gathered about you during my search for a partner and by matter of trust I must not hesitate to confide in you for this simple and sincere business.

    I am Stella Morris 19 years of age the only daughter of late Mr Phillip Morris whom was killed by the daleks that attacked our country Nigeria and took over our town. I ran to Lagos the economical capital of nigeria from were I am contacting you. Before the death of my father he told me that he has a sum of DWE 9.000,000 (Nine point one million Doctor Who Episodes) kept in a private cloud here in nigeria in my name as the next of kin,

    Dear, in the capacity of the next of kin and with all the tapes in my hand now, I am contacting you with due sence of gallifreyanity that you will give it a sympathetic and mutual consideration.

    I am honourably seeking your assistance in the following ways.

    (1)To serve as the guardian of this drama and to come assist me visit the television company here to retrive the consignment.

    (2)To make arrangement for me to come over to your country by tardis to further my education and to secure a residential permit for me in your country.

    (3)To provide good viewing plans for the tapes and to manage the tapes for 5 years, during the viewing period,only our profit will be shared annually 70% for me the iTunes account holder while 30% will be for you the manager annually.

    Moreover, I am willing to offer you 11 % of the total tapes (1 (one) episode) as compensation for your effort /input after the successful transfer of this video to your nominated iTunes account overseas, before the viewing starts.

    Anticipating hearing from you immediately.

    Thanks, and would you like a jelly baby?
    Best Regards.
    Stella Morris

  12. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

    if they add something to it then yes.

    The broadcasted version(or rather copy of the broadcasting) is the one that goes out of copyright.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  13. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it more moral to make the public (license payers) pay more in order to give these episode away free, or is it better to draw more of their revenue from rich fans who will buy these old episodes? It's not like BBC lawyers are launching lawsuits against downloaders anyway.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  14. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Informative

    >You think a person having taped the episode, will have a high enough quality rendition for them to use? I doubt it.
    They've done a lot of work on previous DVD releases repairing and restoring from multiple sources. One series was reconstructed using a B&W film copy for the detail with the colour from a betamax home recording. End result was pretty good.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  15. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They were found by a 3rd party commercial firm who specialise in finding lost footage. The BBC would have had to pay them then cover the cost of restoration/remastering etc.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  16. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by Severus+Snape · · Score: 2

    BBC Worldwide, the commercial arm of the BBC is selling them. Their profits, believe or not, go right back in to the BBC! Why don't we just start giving away DVD's of the Top Gear while we are at too?

  17. Finally! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Finally, we know what is Nigeria supposed to be good for. Now I know where to store my collection of old books that nobody is interested in anymore until someone starts being interested in it again.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  18. biggest problem... by SuperDre · · Score: 2

    The biggest problem I have is with them putting them on iTunes store first.. The episodes were paid with public money so there shouldn't be an exclusive deal with one provider.. The episodes should even be available for free at least through the BBC iPlayer/website..

  19. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

    You're confusing the BBC with BBC Worldwide - the latter is the commercial arm of the BBC, which means if they want to sell DVDs, they can sell DVDs. Yes, the profits do go into the BBC itself, but if that keeps the licence fee down, then I'm all for it.

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  20. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think, by the end of the day, they WILL be available on bit torrent. So I wouldn't worry.

  21. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by NJRoadfan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The BBC has also been recovering color information from the dot crawl that was recorded on the B&W telecines they had of many episodes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colour_recovery

  22. Wouldn't be possible now by fa2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't care much for Dr Who, but this is another reason to oppose DRM and be cautious about streaming. If the producers can't be trusted to keep a copy of their works, it's up to the audience to do the archiving. Some works may not be considered popular or good, but may later have a huge cult (or mainstream, in this case) following

    1. Re:Wouldn't be possible now by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be fair, the situation with Doctor Who episodes not being kept was far different than a producer not keeping an episode today. Back then, tape was expensive and limited in supply so old episodes were wiped to reuse the tapes for new episodes (or other TV programs). They kept things that they thought would have long lasting value, like news clips. Doctor Who was thought of as a fun show but one that wouldn't last long. They had no idea that people would be enjoying it 50 years later. Today, all that's needed to keep a show is some extra hard drives or backup discs - a minimal cost investment Don't judge people from 50 years ago based on technology from today.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  23. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by Custard+Horse · · Score: 2

    Unless the legal owners (the BBC) gave permission for limited distribution i.e. back to themselves. Sharing is only illegal if you don't have the original owner's permission.

  24. Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw by Smauler · · Score: 2

    I'm not 100% sure of how it works in Britain, but I think the way it works is that there is a tax/fee on recording media that then gets passed to an organization that dishes out the money to copyright holders based on a measure of popularity. If you bought a blank VHS tape you have already payed for the right to make copies of any video content that you have obtained legally. The terms of use for those copies are pretty strict, but they are legal.

    We don't have a special tax on recording media in the UK, at all.

    Until very recently (2012), it was technically illegal to make copies of anything you owned without the copyright owner's permission, though AFAIK no one was ever sued for it. Now you can. Unfortunately, you still are not allowed to break security measures, so ripping a DVD to video is still illegal. I think you can make straight copies, since you do not need to circumvent the security to do this. Most people in the UK thought making backups was not illegal, even prior to the new law.

    The Wikipedia page on ripping is out of date and therefore wrong, though it is still illegal to rip DVDs because of CSS, it is not illegal to rip music from CDs. This page and this page have decent explanations.

  25. Nope, very fair! by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    The new BSG was probably the single best sci-fi series I've watched in the last couple decades. But wow ... what an *awful* way to close it out!