Slashdot Mirror


Apple Announces iPad Air

Today Apple held a press conference to unveil its updated software and hardware products. The biggest news was the announcement of the 'iPad Air,' which has a 9.7" Retina display. It's 7.5 mm thick, which is 20% thinner than the older iPad. The weight has dropped from 1.4 lbs to 1.0 lbs, and it runs on a 64-bit A7 chip with an M7 motion coprocessor. Apple claims performance has doubled over the previous-gen iPad. The iPad Air will be available on November 1st. The iPad Mini is getting a new revision as well. The display has been upgraded to 7.9" at 2048x1536, which is the same resolution as the iPad Air. The new Mini has an A7 chip as well.

Apple also announced that the new version of Mac OS X (10.9 Mavericks) is available now and is free to all Mac OS X users. It includes better multi-monitor support, tabs in Finder, and a number of performance optimizations. The Macbook Pro is getting updates to the 13" and 15" models, which are now running on Intel Haswell processors. They both have PCIe SSDs, 802.11ac Wi-Fi, and Thunderbolt 2 support. Apple also talked about the redesigned Mac Pro line. As you may recall from WWDC, the new model takes up about about 1/8th of the volume as the old one. It's cooled by a single fan, uses 70% less power than the earlier model, and puts out 12 dB of noise when idling. It'll be available in December. On the software side, Apple has been updating a lot of their software to add 64-bit support and mesh with the new iOS 7 style of design. This includes iPhoto, iMovie, and Garageband, as well as the iLife and iWork software suites. iWork is also getting collaborative work features, and it's now free with new Macs and iOS devices.

35 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. Major shot at Microsoft, too. by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    iWork is now free, and include collaboration features that MS Office will have a hell of a time trying to match.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Major shot at Microsoft, too. by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

      It has been working on any device for a while now. It's similar to O365, it's browser based but free.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Major shot at Microsoft, too. by Roadstar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Office only has a native client on Windows,

      I beg to differ.

    3. Re:Major shot at Microsoft, too. by BLToday · · Score: 5, Interesting

      iWork is surprisingly very functional on a Surface. Don't laugh. I've used iWork for iCloud on my Surface (no keyboard cover) and works much better than the built in MS Office that comes with the Surface since Office pretty much requires the keyboard cover.

    4. Re:Major shot at Microsoft, too. by ljw1004 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I went here and tried to log in with my AppleID. It said:

      Set up iCloud on a device to use iCloud.com.
      Your Apple ID must be used to set up iCloud on an iOS or OS X device before you can use iCloud.com.

      So for Linux and windows users, no, iWork doesn't work.

  2. I gotta admit by Andrio · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's pretty impressive engineering. Think it allows Android to be installed on it? :)

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re: I gotta admit by supertrooper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speak for yourself. Now that it's twice as fast, I can finish the movie in half the time.

    2. Re:I gotta admit by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is it abusive? It's their hardware, their rules.

      You just answered your own question: because once I pay for it, it's not their hardware anymore. It's mine, and I'll do whatever I damn well please with it.

      And yes, I apply that logic to every single one of the greedy bastards who prevent consumers from having full control over their own property, not just Apple.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:I gotta admit by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's pretty impressive engineering. Think it allows Android to be installed on it? :)

      Except the bootloader probably isn't designed to boot 32-bit OSes, ARMv8 isn't terribly impressive in AArch32 mode, and Android isn't 64-bit native yet.

      Most of the speed ups the A7 gets are from 64-bit code as it cleans up a lot of the architecture. 32-bit code works, but the speedup is minimal.

      And yes, the bootloader has to be 64-bit and then switch the CPU to 32-bit mode in order to boot a 32-bit OS. Running a 32-bit OS means you can't run 64-bit code at all. When you go down the privilege levels (secure monitor, hypervisor (VM), kernel, user) you can go from 64 to 32 bit mode, but to go the other way requires going up the stack.

  3. iPads seem to overcome moore's law by etash · · Score: 5, Funny

    since every new version is twice as faster as the previous one, given the fact that we see new versions in less than 18 months.

    unless apple's engineers are optimizing this infamous loop:

    for(i=0;i1000000000;i++);

    1. Re:iPads seem to overcome moore's law by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      since every new version is twice as faster as the previous one, given the fact that we see new versions in less than 18 months.

      Moore's Law is an observation about transistor density, not CPU speed.

  4. Unix Workstation by psergiu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple haters or not, the saddest thing to realize is that the only UNIX(R) Workstation on the market is now the Mac. As Apple is the only UNIX 03 certification holder who is still making desktops and laptops. All the other UNIX 03 hardware produced at the moment is Datacenter-only rackmounted servers.

    So $2999 for a powerful UNIX(R) Workstation is a fair price.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    1. Re:Unix Workstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What use do you have for a UNIX(R) Workstation when you can use Linux or Freebsd for some UNIX-like goodness? Are their compatibility issues with something you work with?

    2. Re:Unix Workstation by stewsters · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forget the workstation, I'm thinking of getting a couple of the mac pros and putting them in a rack.

    3. Re:Unix Workstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, you could just take any just about any workstation and put Solaris on it.

      then you'd have 2 problems

    4. Re:Unix Workstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What use do you have for a UNIX(R) Workstation when you can use Linux or Freebsd for some UNIX-like goodness?

      Chicks dig Unix certification.

  5. Re:Mini seems to go without M7 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not true... http://www.apple.com/ipad-mini/specs/ specifically lists the chip as: "A7 chip with 64-bit architecture and M7 motion coprocessor"

  6. A shot at other OS, computer *and* device makers by perpenso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    iWork is now free, and include collaboration features that MS Office will have a hell of a time trying to match.

    -jcr

    A major shot at other operating system, computer *and* mobile device makers. Free (as in beer) major OS update (computers) and free productivity apps (computers and mobile devices). Bundling the productivity apps with new computers and mobile devices will help Apple maintain their price points. Once again, Apple demonstrates that they are a hardware company at heart, that software is a tool to sell that hardware.

  7. Re:Why is iPad so much better than iPhone? by BaronAaron · · Score: 4, Informative

    To be fair the Sony Xperia Tablet Z is only 6.9mm thick and only 1.1 pounds... The rest of the specs are also about the same, and that's been out for a month or two now.

  8. thin thing by swampfriend · · Score: 4, Funny

    wouldn't a better name have been "ipod hair"

  9. Re:Mac PRO starts at 3K only 256GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Mac Pro is intended to be a graphics/video workstation. You use external disks to hold your data because you have massive amount of data you need to deal with.

    No internal drive is big enough for the workloads it is intended to be used for, you attach a external cage with a bunch of disks via thunderbolt or a SAN.

  10. Re:Mavericks is free? Hmmm... by fox1324 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple makes their money primarily from selling hardware. By making OS updates free it makes moving to the Mac ecosystem that much more attractive.

  11. Re:Why is iPad so much better than iPhone? by BaronAaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The SXTZ display: 10.1". iPad Air display: 9.7"

    If you won't care about the extra 128x336 pixels, I won't care about the extra 0.4 inches... Or the likely $100 price difference...

  12. Re:Incompetent Press by purpledinoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet, 64-bit processor. Now I can have more than 4 billion friends on facebook!

  13. Re:Why is iPad so much better than iPhone? by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Moving goalposts for the win!

    Post a tablet priced cheaper, better specs, but 0.1 lbs heavier? The claim will be that the iPad is better because its more portable.
    Post a tablet priced around the same, better weight / thickness, but not as good screen? iPad is better!

    I will admit that when it comes to being exactly like an iPad, Apple does it best.

  14. Re: install on any machine by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not really true. It just needs special bootloaders to emulate Macs' EFI, and a few customized drivers, and a healthy disregard for EULAs.

  15. Re:Why is iPad so much better than iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Android is going to be with us forever.

    Like Herpes.

  16. Re:Only 16GB by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Informative

    If it was at least linear, I could deal with it. Buy why does upgrading from 16 GB to 32 GB (an additional 16 GB) cost $100, while upgrading from 64 GB to 128 GB (an additional 64 GB) also cost $100? $100 for 64 GB extra is almost reasonable, assuming they are using quality NAND storage chips like you find on hard drives, and not the kind of stuff you find in SD cards. But $100 for 16 GB of storage is just robbery.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  17. Re:Why is iPad so much better than iPhone? by non0score · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Troll fail often? iPad and iPhones tend to have the top of the line internals at the time of release, CPU and GPU (they do skimp on RAM, though). If it wasn't for them maintaining screen resolution to help developers, they probably would've held on to the highest res screens title as well.

  18. Re:iPad 2 because contracts, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's somewhat baffling that anyone these days would want an iPad 2.

    It's not baffling and it's not about "want." Apple has signed a lot of contracts with school systems for large volume, fixed price delivery of iPads and most likely those contracts included qualifiers that Apple must deliver products which are "commercially available" at the time of delivery. Discontinuing the iPad 2 would probably require Apple to deliver the newer products which have a lower profit margin and a higher consumer demand.

    Those are fairly common terms to put in when you're writing long term volume purchase agreements.

  19. And now, without the marketing bollocks by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    which has a 9.7" Retina display

    Let me just pass that through my "marketing bullshit" remover:

    which has a 9.7" display

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  20. Re:Why is iPad so much better than iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The issue is only mute if you broke the speaker and don't have headphones.

  21. Re:A shot at other OS, computer *and* device maker by farble1670 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple laptops are not magic

    but they are unix, and unlike linux, everything just works out of the box. for some of us, it's worth paying more to not have to dink around for hours on the weekend to hopefully get things running smoothly.

    macs are overpriced, but not as much as some folks say. consider this MBP,
    http://store.apple.com/us/buy-mac/macbook-pro

    it's $1800 with no upgrades.

    the most comparable thing i can find at dell.com is this,
    http://www.dell.com/us/p/xps-12-9q33/pd?oc=dncwi16b&model_id=xps-12-9q33

    it's $600 less, but it has 1/2 the memory, worse graphics, a slightly smaller display and lesser res, and a 128GB SSD vs. a next-gen 512GB SSD. also, it runs windows, not a unix-based OS.

    how about toshiba?
    http://www.toshiba.com/us/computers/laptops/kira/kirabook13/KIRAbook13-i5-touch

    $300 less, but has last-gen graphics, last-gen core processor, and a last-gen SSD that's 1/2 the size. it does have a touchscreen where the MPB does not.

  22. Re:A shot at other OS, computer *and* device maker by schnell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The vast bulk of the market has already turned it's back on this notion of "design". Once you take that away, Apple is nothing special at all.

    I promised myself a long time ago to stop replying in Slashdot Apple fanboy/troll wars, but this one really got me.

    Having used all modern OSes quite a bit, I can tell you plainly that if you think Apple is about fancy hardware cases and rounded corners, you don't get it. Please do not make comparisons to Windows commodity PCs solely based on hardware, because that's not what Apple is about on the desktop. Unlike almost anyone else in the industry, Apple is a software company that makes their money with hardware.

    Their goal is to sell you a high-margin, high-end piece of hardware that may not be differentiated based on hardware, but is differentiated based on shipping with a UNIX-based OS that has a slick and efficient UI; integrated cloud sharing and automatic backups; bundled office apps that can match or beat MS Office/LibreOffice; iLife apps (iMovie, iPhoto, Garage Band) that have so serious free competition; and an integrated entertainment ecosystem (iTunes) that nobody else but Amazon comes close to (sorry, Google Play is nowhere near competitive for a desktop user). "I can get the equivalent hardware for cheaper with Windows or Ubuntu" is a false argument, because it's the software that makes a Mac special. I know there are "lots" of people who buy Macs and install a different OS on them, but I think that's a Slashdot-centric view of "lots" - a.k.a. "lots of people buy Raspberry Pis."

    YMMV as to what that software differentiation is worth, but for those who buy Macs, the answer is clearly "it's worth a lot and still a bargain."

    --
    "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
  23. Re:A shot at other OS, computer *and* device maker by swell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > R&D

    It's simple. Were it not for Apple and a very few other companies that do research, who take chances, who bet their lives that you want to move ahead, we would be using DOS.

    R&D costs money. Dell and HP won't invest there; their money goes for marketing. Apple does real R&D and I am happy to support that.

    Additionally, some foreign companies are investing increasingly in R&D. Apple (and Qualcomm, a few others) may be the only viable American company that remains.

    Give your money to those who innovate, not to mass junk producers.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...