Slashdot Mirror


8 US States Pushing For 3.3 Million Electric Cars

An anonymous reader writes "A coalition of eight U.S. states, including New York and California, have announced a plan to get 3.3 million zero-emission electric vehicles onto their roads by 2025. 'The states, which represent more than a quarter of the national car market, said they would seek to develop charging stations that all took the same form of payment, simplify rules for installing chargers and set building codes and other regulations to require the stations at workplaces, multifamily residences and at other places.' An editorial in Quartz says that while the initiative itself is fine, the states should really take cues from Tesla if they want to plan out an infrastructure that will convince people to switch. ' For longer distances, [Tesla drivers] can stop at "Supercharger" stations strategically placed along highways that let them add 150 miles of range in as little as 20 minutes. Currently, [government] money is being spent on installing much-slower chargers at stores, shopping malls and other urban locations in the hope that drivers will use them. Tesla says it will blanket the US with its Superchargers for a fraction of the cost, because it studies the driving patterms of its customers and installs charging stations only where they tend to travel. This isn't hard; most other electric cars also record their drivers' habits. If privacy concerns could be addressed and automakers would be willing to share that data with government transportation planners, the rollout of public charging stations could be more targeted and cash-efficient.'"

23 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. One thing is for sure by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can be sure that Texas is not one of those eight states.

    1. Re:One thing is for sure by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      All 8 states have Democratic governors; in fact they're all in one of the two solid blue blocks of the country, the West Coast and the Northeast Corridor. As a Mass. resident, I'm not surprised that 4 of the 6 New England states are represented; of the missing, Maine has a Tea Party Republican governor. Not sure what happened to New Hampshire, but that's a purple state that prides itself on small government.

      This is all that Rat Bastard RINO Eisenhower's fault. If it wasn't for his liberal socialist handout program to build the interstate highway system, we wouldn't have this automobile problem.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. Re:still doesn't compute by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes if you are standing around waiting for it. If they had slow charging stations in parking locations it doesn't matter, and at some locations a 20 minute gas stop is normal even for gasoline cars. Last time I took I-80 westbound we had to wait for 15 minutes to get to a pump, then 5 minutes to pump with another 10 minutes to wait for traffic to get out of my way so we can get back on the highway. Instead, if there was a charging station at the oasis I would plug in, go inside to use the bathroom, get a coffee, and walk back out in those 20 minutes instead of sitting in my car while the guy with the F950 pickup truck fills both his 300 gallon gas tanks.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  3. Re:There is no Magic Energy Fairy by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Large fossil-fuel power plants can be made a lot more efficient than internal-combustion engines, even counting transmission and distribution losses (especially if you count distribution costs for gasoline). Running a car on energy from the electric grid is greener than running on gasoline, even if your power comes from coal plants -- and in most places, not all grid power is derived from coal.

  4. Re:still doesn't compute by Immerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, they are still sub-optimal for long road trips. However, as long as you can get a full day of normal driving in on a single charge, and recharge overnight in your own garage the picture looks much better, especially as a primary car where the second car where the other is gasoline powered. Weight it largely irrelevant to most people - once you can't pick it up it's just one more factor in the efficiency and performance characteristics. And cost, well that is what it is for now, the early adopters always pay a premium.

    As someone said "There's nothing wrong with electric cars that batteries with twice the capacity at half the cost wouldn't fix", and there's plenty of promising new battery technologies on the horizon, we just need one of them to make it out of the lab.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  5. Electric cars are *not* more energy efficient by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Running a car on energy from the electric grid is greener than running on gasoline, even if your power comes from coal plants.

    Not true. In city driving Tesla claim a 292 mile range off a 85kWh battery, or 651kJ/km. Adding in battery manufacture and allowing a generous 1000 cycles, that goes up to 923kJ/km. Allowing for losses in electricity generation (40% at best) and transmission (~7%), the overall consumption is 1653kJ/km.

    A medium size diesel gets about 60mpg (UK gallons), equivalent to 1690kJ/km. The difference is just 2%.

    1. Re:Electric cars are *not* more energy efficient by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with this comparison is that it assumes no energy is consumed in producing and transporting diesel fuel or gasoline.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Electric cars are *not* more energy efficient by haruchai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It doesn't make sense that city driving in a car with the Model S' strong regen braking would be lower than motorway driving at 55 mph, for which the estimate is 301 miles.
      So the difference must be because you don't normally charge to the full 81 kWh if you're not going on a long trip aka "range charge"

      If you look at the range vs speed curve at http://www.teslamotors.com/goelectric#range , you'll see that a speed of 30 mph gets you approx. 400 miles which is borne out by the real-world testing of teams in Florida & Holland

      http://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/tesla-model-s-goes-388-miles-in-the-netherlands/

      So it's about 500 kJ/km.
      That difference gets swallowed up by the other factors, assuming they are accurate and you don't say how you derived the numbers for battery manufacturing.

      You're also assuming that no energy is used in getting the diesel from well to vehicle tank? According to the DOE, the efficiency of refining and distribution is 83%.
      And your number for MPG seems too high but leaving that aside and assuming all other numbers are correct we get 1552 kJ/km for the Tesla and 1690 * 1.17 or 1977 kJ/km for the diesel which is a difference of 22%
      Clearly nothing to sneeze at.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:Electric cars are *not* more energy efficient by amorsen · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can run the Tesla Model S on the amount of electricity used to refine the gasoline for an equivalent car. Or put another way: a gasoline car uses as much electricity as pure electric, PLUS the gasoline.

      "Chris: It's funny they make that argument, because they're one of the largest users of electricity in the country, to refine gasoline. That's why the power cords go into refineries. Something like 4 to 6 kilowatt hours of electricity to refine every gallon of gasoline. They're pulling that electricity from the same source as they're critiquing on electric cars and they get much less result out of it.

      Elon: Exactly. Chris has a nice way of saying it which is, you have enough electricity to power all the cars in the country if you stop refining gasoline. You take an average of 5 kilowatt hours to refine gasoline, something like the Model S can go 20 miles on 5 kilowatt hours. You basically have the energy needed to power electric vehicles if you stop refining.

      BI: 5 kilowatt hours, that's to refine and transport one gallon of gas?

      Elon: Chris, does that include transportation?

      Chris: I think it's just refining. It does not include transporting it from the Middle East or Venezuela. The more efficient your refinery is, the lower that number is. The lowest number in the DOE study I read was 4, and the highest was 7, it depends on what your refinery is."

      Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-and-chris-paine-explain-how-the-electric-car-got-its-revenge-2011-10

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    4. Re:Electric cars are *not* more energy efficient by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No you extended it beyond simple to a very skewed comparison, taking a leaf out of the nuke fanboy book that assumes fuel rods appear by magic in the reactor while comparing it with 1970s photovoltaics when zone refining used a couple of orders of magnitude more energy than can be done today. However making a proper comparison would be difficult and local conditions would make the variation so huge it's hard to say whether it would be worth it or not.
      Everything has consequences but highlighting the consequences of one thing while singing the praises of another while pretending it has no consequences is somewhat dishonest. By parroting such dishonestly people are assuming you are a liar instead of just naive.

  6. Re:There is no Magic Energy Fairy by swillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Running a car on energy from the electric grid is greener than running on gasoline, even if your power comes from coal plants

    To put some numbers to this, the EPA says that the average car emits 423 grams of CO2 per mile, and that the average US coal plant emits 1216 lb (551 kg) of CO2 per megawatt-hour produced, which is 551 g per kwh. My Nissan LEAF gets about four miles per kwh. Assuming pure coal power, and ignoring line losses, that means my car causes 138 grams of CO2 to be emitted per mile I drive.

    Now, the LEAF is a very small, very efficient car, significantly more efficient than most gasoline-powered cars (mainly for range reasons). So comparing 138 to 423 straight up isn't a fair comparison, but even if you assume a normal car is half as efficient as the LEAF, it's still 276 grams per mile vs 423 grams per mile. Throw in some line losses and the gap closes further... but it's pretty clear that electric vehicles cause less CO2 production than gasoline vehicles, on a per-mile basis, even if all of the electricity comes from coal.

    For me it's even better because although Colorado is primarily coal-powered, I mostly charge my car only at the office, and my employer (Google) pays a little extra to buy "green" power, mostly wind and hydro, I think. So my car's carbon footprint is much lower. This highlights another aspect of electric vehicles: if we switch to EVs (where appropriate -- they don't work for everything), it is at least possible to replace coal generation with something cleaner. Wind, hydro, wave, solar, nuclear, geothermal... there are lots of clean ways to generate electricity.

    I should also note that I, personally, don't care that much. I bought a LEAF not because I was anxious to save the planet, but because it's cheaper to own and operate than a gasoline-powered car, at least for my driving patterns. The fact that it's cleaner is a pleasant bonus. It's also a lot of fun to drive because electric motors have awesome torque and I love how quiet it is. It's a great little car, and I'm very happy with my decision to buy it (lease it, actually... I think EV tech is changing fast enough right now that there's value in being able to upgrade regularly).

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  7. Re:Uh... anyone check electric grid capacity? by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given the current state of the US electrical grid, I'm not confident it would fare well against a sudden increase of large battery packs being plugged in at once.

    Actually, having a large distributed storage capacity could (if the utilities had any will to take advantage of it rather than just do the absolute minimum necessary to keep the PUC from shutting them down) vastly improve the grid's overall resiliency. Each one of these cars stores roughly the same amount of electricity as a typical house uses in three or four days.

    It actually surprises me that Tesla hasn't actively promoted the idea of using the car itself as a necessarily well-maintained whole-house UPS. "Does the thought of losing power overnight cost you precious sleep? Never again! With Tesla's patented bidirectional charging station and crossover inverter, Mother Nature will need to throw more than a few flakes or gusts of wind or downed trees your way to keep you from enjoying the big game!".

    And that ignores the possibility of actually tapping into them to help smooth out the peak demand curve - Our baseline consumption would cost us around two cents per kWh, if not for the fact that normal residential rates average that against insane on-demand spikes of 30-60 cents for a few hours a day.

  8. Not about government, about economics by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All this blather and government planning and so on.

    I said nothing about government planning. I'm not sure your comment was directed at me?

    What I said is that it's not feasible to put charging stations in every parking spot. It is insane. There's no way you will ever make a return on that investment.

    Electricity is the future of autos; but not the kind where your car needs charging via electric cables to every home or parking spot.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. Re:Uh... anyone check electric grid capacity? by ballpoint · · Score: 5, Informative

    10 m2 * 150 W/m2 * 8 h/day / (150 Wh/km) = 80 km/day. (*)

    That covers the average commute quite nicely some of the time. In winter or inclement weather, not so much.

    Still, the smugness of travelling gratis - abstracting investments - is seducing.

    (*) Conversion to other units, including but not limited to BTU, miles (your pick), square feet and 1/32nds of a fortnight left as an exercise for the reader.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  10. Re:still doesn't compute by Zobeid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IF you have your car in a garage and charge it overnight, then you may rarely ever need to charge it away from home -- only for road trips, really. Depending on your driving habits, you may go months without visiting a charging station.

    Even then, if you have a Model S and stop at a Supercharger station, you'll have the option of paying for a battery swap, which can get you back on the road in about two minutes.

    Finally... Remember that even 3 million cars is only about 1% of the cars in the USA. Today's electric car technology can't meet everyone's needs, but I don't think it's much of a stretch to imagine it meeting the needs of 1% of the population. Things can grow from there as the technology continues to improve.

  11. Re:Really doesn't compute by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're not reducing the capacity of a parking lot when you hook up spaces at places people already go. I've noticed libraries with electric car charging parking spots -- most people stay inside a while, so good spot. Grocery stores or all kinds of stores would be an obvious spot. It doesn't have to provide a full charge in the time people are shopping either, it just has to be a simple routine that tops off the battery in the course of normal activity.

    As far as long distance highway trips, existing highway rest areas would be an obvious spot.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  12. Re:Really doesn't compute by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's fine if 0.05% of cars around are electric. But it's totally unrealistic to think anything justifies the expense of putting an electric charging unit into every single parking spot.

    No, its not unrealistic.

    If the shopping center can put in electric charging spots gradually as the demand increased, the investment might be easily manageable.
    Further, if they make a few cents on the electricity/b they sell you, these slots will pay for themselves, unlike current parking spots which
    usually generate no revenue themselves, and are funded by increased prices in the stores.

    Places like Fairbanks Alaska have plugins for headbolt heaters so you can get your car started after sitting out in 50 below
    while you shop. Lots of these are free as well, but then the draw is way less than required to charge.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  13. Re: Really doesn't compute by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're already solving that problem just getting the juice in. The issue is really moving some packetry atop the 'trons.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  14. Re:Really doesn't compute by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But it's totally unrealistic to think anything justifies the expense of putting an electric charging unit into every single parking spot.

    The expense is paid by the person sliding his card through the reader on the charging station, you think you're going to get free electricity? A charging station should be a lot cheaper than a gas pump, there are few parts needed and nothing mechanical to assemble. And in the right climate a parking lot could have solar panels shading the cars, free money for the parking lot owner.

  15. Re:still doesn't compute by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unlike you, I know where this equipment comes from.

    There are only a few (less than 9) providers of gas pumps in the US, and they all compete.
    Fast delivery is key to profitability of gas stations in busy areas.

    The reason the EPA had to limit delivery rates was to prevent tank venting from blowing right by the
    recovery system. The EPA insisted they dial back the deliver rate.

    10 GPM is not difficult to achieve.

    How GPM A 1/2 inch pipe can deliver per minute depends on the pressure. If you have low pressure (flowing out of a slightly elevated tank), you can get about 7 gallons per minute. For average pumped pressure, you can assume you will get around 14 gallons per minute. If you have it set on a high pressure, you can easily get 21 gallons per minute. The nozzle of an unleaded delivery hoze is 0.840 inch, the inside diameter is slightly larger than 1/2 inch.

    However the vapor recovery systems can't handle the vent fumes coming out of the tank when it is being filled that fast, so stations were required to dial down the pressure. This is one of the things a State weights and Measures inspector checks.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  16. Interesting economics by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A lesser known fact involving the economics of electric cars is that by using electricity you typically are using a locally generated energy source. If this is combined with renewable energy sources such as solar panels on your house the economics become even more interesting. The key to all this being that money normally spent "fueling" traditional vehicles often leaves the country or even the continent completely. By switching to a more local source of energy this money is freed to be potentially spent on local goods. While this sucks for the oil producing areas and countries it really works for the vast majority of countries that import massive amounts of vehicle fuel.

    The above only applies to those areas that are able to source their energy locally.

    Why this economic fact is important is that it must be taken into consideration when looking at the cost of improving the grid or even putting solar on people's houses. The benefits of not exporting your money can easily outweigh a fairly sizable margin in the cost of fueling the vehicles.

    Some small countries with bounties of sun and no fossil fuels will really win when the combination of cheaper batteries and better solar cells become available.

    I have a sneaking suspicion that the concept of an oil war will be gone in 20 years.

  17. Re:still doesn't compute by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It costs tens of thousands to add more gasoline pumps. An electrical charging spot costs less than $900 and are trivial to install.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Re:Uh... anyone check electric grid capacity? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sigh. Then you push the big 'start charging now' button on the dash. I know this is Slashdot where perfect is the enemy of good, but for the majority, charging the car in the wee hours of the morning is perfectly fine, and is the solution to the OMG THE GRID WON'T HANDLE IT response.