Slashdot Mirror


Lost Star Wars Footage Found On LaserDisc

drxenos writes "A LaserDisc purchased on eBay was found to contain raw footage from Star Wars VI: Return of the Jedi. From the article: 'The origin of the LaserDisc isn't entirely clear, but it was purchased for $699 off eBay, apparently once used to demonstrate Lucasfilm's EditDroid station — one of the first digital film editing systems sold nearly 30 years ago. Ironically, George Lucas himself never used EditDroid to make a movie; the Star Wars clips were loaded simply to show off its capabilities to prospective buyers.'"

41 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Some more star wars footage? by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

    May the force be with us all...

    1. Re:Some more star wars footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      May the force be with us all...

      Sometimes I think the kids of the 1970s are going to go to their graves moaning and bitching about Star Wars.
      You seriously can't make this shit up.

    2. Re:Some more star wars footage? by ruir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Goodgracious. As if the film was not already bad enough, and yet paying 700 dollars for that rubbish is quite over the top. Hey, if I tick the publicity button, do I get rid of this shameless plug to resell the worthless laserdisc?

    3. Re:Some more star wars footage? by meerling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He paid $700 for unreleased and presumably lost recordings of a Star Wars movie of the original trilogy on an obsolete media format.

      He'll get at least $7000 if he sells it to a collector, or even to Lucas or Disney so they can take it off the market. I bet if it went to a collectors auction, it could go for x10 that. Yeah, sure, he paid too much for it... NOT

    4. Re:Some more star wars footage? by ruir · · Score: 2

      And now he is making publicity in slashdot hoping some sucker living in his parents basement is gullible enough to buy it.

    5. Re:Some more star wars footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You seriously think Lucasfilm (now Disney) doesn't have in their archives ALL possible footage pertaining to Star Wars ?

      If George Lucas is to be believed, then no they do not. The original, unaltered footage which was released on the LaserDisc format was damaged irreparably when they were making one of the special releases in the 80's. I don't recall the whole story but supposedly they were cleaning up the original filmstock and in the process damaged it. Suspiciously the only portions to be damaged in such a fashion are scenes such as the "Han vs. Greedo Mos Eisley Shootout" scene.
      The originals allegedly had shown Han clearly firing first, in contradiction to Lucas's claims, but the VHS versions were far too low resolution to serve as a final word on the matter. With the loss of the originals, the matter was never fully resolved.

      So you can say that "nobody cares" about having original, unaltered footage from one of the most popular and successful sci-fi franchises of all time. And you can even believe that if you choose, but it doesn't make you right.

    6. Re:Some more star wars footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The originals allegedly had shown Han clearly firing first, in contradiction to Lucas's claims, but the VHS versions were far too low resolution to serve as a final word on the matter. With the loss of the originals, the matter was never fully resolved.

      I have all the releases on VHS and laserdisc up to the "Special" Editions. The scene goes like this:

      Greedo: "I've been looking forward to this for a long time."
      Han: "Yeah, I'll bet you have!"
      (BLAM - smoke rises, Greedo's face hits the table)

      That's the way it was in the original release, Lucas-retcon notwithstanding.

  2. footage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:footage by stewsters · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cool, an actual link. Also contains no Jar Jar, so its safe to click.

    2. Re:footage by drxenos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because it didn't warrant it. Why are you suspicious?

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    3. Re:footage by ArbitraryName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your sig, on a response to someone asking why you posted as AC, is hilarious.

  3. Check it for lost Doctor Who episodes by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The BBC is still looking.

  4. JarJar by Iniamyen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unless JarJar makes a cameo, I no care

    1. Re:JarJar by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If by cameo, you mean "dies in a fire" then I'd agree.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  5. Re:Ewoks getting Force-choked? by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nope, it was the original sequence in which Greedo and Han shoot simultaneously.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  6. Painfully obligatory joke by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

    It turns out these *are* the EditDroids we're looking for!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  7. I saw this back in the 80s by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Mon Calamari battleships shoot the Death Star first.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  8. So yet another version by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So I guess there will now be a "special extended digitally remastered unseen original footage director's uncut edition" that everyone will have to buy.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  9. Re:Content Control by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    It has been known about for a while so if they were going to act I'd imagine they already would have, which is surprising. They could sell this stuff as part of the extras on yet another re-release, and there could potentially be some things they wouldn't want released (a lot of shots of Carrie Fisher in that bikini had to be dropped because of wardrobe malfunctions).

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  10. Re:Digital? by mungewell · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wikipedia has a good explanation... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EditDroid

  11. Re:Content Control by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since it was not a part of the released film, it could be argued that it was never copyrighted. Of course the argument would cost millions...

    Er... what? The act of creating something - no matter what you do with it - assigns copyrights to the person who or group that creates it. If you run out with your smartphone, right now, and shoot some never-plan-to-"release it" footage, you own the copyright on what you create. Period.

    You're probably confusing that basic fact with the question of whether or not the person who creates the work registers that work with the US Copyright Office. Registering the work allows you to go after an infringer in federal court, and to seek damages beyond the normal value of the work. If you don't register the work, you still own the copyright, and can use the courts to stop someone else from infringing on it, and you can sue them for what you'd normally have charged them for that use, if they'd asked you first. No punitive damages.

    Federal venue for infringement or not, you make something, you own the copyrights. If you assign those rights to someone else, they own the copyrights. But someone who finds some media that contains the work? That doesn't convey copyrights.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  12. Re:Content Control by dbraden · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's my understanding that copyright is bestowed at the moment a work is created, whether it is officially filed or not.

  13. Re:Content Control by Desler · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since it was not a part of the released film, it could be argued that it was never copyrighted. Of course the argument would cost millions...

    It could be argued but you'd be laughed out of court.

  14. Re: Ewoks getting Force-choked? by jd2112 · · Score: 2

    In the Re-remake Han and Greedo are in a Matrix-style bullet-time gunfight.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  15. Re:But did Han shoot first? by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, can answer the second question quite easily -- When they were filming the original film, they hadn't decided that Jabba would be a giant space slug yet, and used a human stand-in. The idea was that when they decided what he'd be, they could edit the alien in during post production.

    They included a copy of the original footage on a LucasArts bundle CD of the early LA StarWars games that I picked up some time around 1997, or so... along with film interview with Lucas explaining it. I still have the CD somewhere, probably in storage at my parents' place.

  16. Re:Digital? (No, but CAV or CLV is the real???) by gmezero · · Score: 2

    If it's CAV format laserdisc then this is a real find!

  17. The Real Story by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think we're all missing the real news here, folks:

    Somebody paid almost $700 for a fucking LaserDisc!!!

    mind == blown.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:The Real Story by snarfies · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is not a new phenomena. There was an anime OVA called To-Y that, on the open market, usually went for around $700. It was only printed once and didn't sell well, but has a strong cult following.

      Yes, I own one. Mine has been autographed by key animator Yuzo Sato, and as such I have no idea how much it will sell for after I die (since it will only be pried out of my cold dead hands).

    2. Re:The Real Story by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      I never said it was new, I implied that it's mind-blowing somebody would pay 7 Benjamins for a damn LaserDisc. That's nuts, bro.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:The Real Story by compro01 · · Score: 2

      People have paid nearly a million for a stamp.

      When it comes to crazy spending, this doesn't even cause the needle to twitch.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    4. Re:The Real Story by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Someone paid nearly 10 million dollar for a really old painting!
      mind == blown.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. Re:Content Control by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    Well, they have sold the content to someone. That someone is free to watch that material. However, the footage is still under copyright, so whoever currently owns the copyright can prevent it from being distributed to anyone else (except by selling the original LaserDisk).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  19. Re:Content Control by Joce640k · · Score: 2

    I'd pay to see him in court arguing that he owns the rights to Star Wars.

    --
    No sig today...
  20. Re:Content Control by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

    Prior to 1978, in the US, a copyright notice was required to claim copyright. Mere creation was not sufficient. That doesn't apply to a work created circa 1983.

    Until 1989, either a copyright notice or registration within 5 years was required, something which may apply in this case. My understanding is that the 1989 change in law also brought pre-1978 works which lacked a notice under copyright.

    As Wikipedia puts it "Until the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, the lack of a proper copyright notice would place an otherwise copyrightable work into the public domain, although for works published between January 1, 1978 and February 28, 1989, this could be prevented by registering the work with the Library of Congress within five years of publication."

    No doubt, an IP lawyer will pop up and clarify things, but the GP may be correct in thinking this may not be copyrighted. I doubt a copy of this work was registered, and it may lack a notice.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  21. Cutting room floor footage by Boawk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the fall of 1982 I saw a pre-release version of Return of the Jedi. Our high school had some connections to Lucas. An announcement was made that the front office had tickets available to a LucasFilm prescreening of "Twice Upon a Time" (I still have the large blue tickets saved away somewhere). They had booked a large theater in San Francisco for the screening. At showtime a person walked out and regretfully informed the full house that Twice Upon a Time wasn't to be shown, so instead they brought Return of the Jedi (wild cheers erupted).

    Some of the special effects weren't finished, and some scenes had only rough editing. I remember several of the scenes were trimmed down quite drastically in the release version. The dance scene in Jabba's palace was really, really (really!) long. At the end of the movie we were all given a questionnaire to fill out on how we felt about various scenes.

    All in all, a very cool experience for someone who grew up during the original releases of episodes 4 through 6.

  22. Re:Content Control by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Funny

    a lot of shots of Carrie Fisher in that bikini had to be dropped because of wardrobe malfunctions

    Video proof or it never happened.

  23. Re:But did Han shoot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lucas is a huge liar. He continually says he "meant" for certain things to happen. The truth is the stand-in WAS Jabba, and everyone realized it looked stupid, and they removed the scene. It also kills the film's pacing, Jabba repeats everything Greedo just said. It also kills the big reveal in ROTJ.

    They added it because Lucas had useable footage for the SE, and figured why the hell not. Anything to make more money.

  24. Re:Digital? by hondo77 · · Score: 2

    It's a digital disk, read by a LASER.

    No, LaserDisc was analog.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  25. Re:Content Control by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, they can try, but...

    The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more LaserDiscs will slip through your fingers.

    --
    FGD 135
  26. Re:Ewoks getting Force-choked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    laser bolt richocheted

    (as the physicists silently wept in the background)

  27. Re:Cycle Trooper Losing his Helmet by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    here's a scene in Return of the Jedi in which Luke goes mano a mano with a storm trooper riding one of those cycles used to zip around Endor.

    Luke knocks the guy's helmet off, revealing a dark haired guy with a rather skinny face.

    Yeah, and there's that scene in ANH where he throws the grappling hook twice... except it didn't happen.

    I don't recall if I saw this scene

    You can probably stop right there. Human memory is ridiculously unreliable.

    I used to have a perfect example of this from my own life, but I've forgotten it.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.