Slashdot Mirror


Taiwan Protests Apple Maps That Show Island As Province of China

itwbennett writes "Taiwan is demanding Apple revise its mapping software and remove a label that describes the island as a province of China, rather than as a sovereign state. The complaint was lodged after local media reports said that users on the island had noticed the change in Apple's latest iOS and Mac OS versions. 'The maps don't acknowledge Taiwan as its own nation. We voiced our disapproval, and hope Apple will make the change,' an official with Taiwan's foreign ministry said Wednesday. This isn't the first time such a mistake was made. Google also labeled Taiwan as a Chinese province in 2005."

262 comments

  1. H-1Bs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Maybe if the U.S. Megacorps weren't hiring so many chinese this wouldn't be happening.

    1. Re:H-1Bs ? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Maybe if the Chinese weren't buying all the U.S. Megacorps (and everything else in the U.S.), this wouldn't be happening.

      FTFY

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:H-1Bs ? by wisty · · Score: 1

      > Maybe if the Chinese weren't buying so many U.S. Megacorp products this wouldn't be happening.

      FTFY

    3. Re:H-1Bs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current trade imbalance says otherwise.

  2. Everyone is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese in southeast Asia.

  3. news for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stuff that matters

    hmmm... can't remember what new cite had that tagline.

    1. Re:news for nerds... by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      It matters very much if you're in Taiwan.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:news for nerds... by steelfood · · Score: 0

      No, really, it doesn't. Taiwan is still a province of the ROC. People forget that there are technically two Chinas. One government operates out of the mainland (PRC). The other operates out of Taiwan (ROC). Technically, the ROC doesn't recognize the PRC as a legitimate government, and for a short time, the rest of the world did not either.

      Irrespective, they both share very similar claims to sovereign territory and have the same areas divided out in similar ways. The only exception is that the ROC doesn't recognize Mongolia as its own country, which was done largely by the ROC and PRC at the time as a concession to Stalin's Russia.

      Even people in Taiwan forget this and instead think they are a country independent of China. They are both the seat of the (only recognized--by them) Chinese government, and one province in that China.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:news for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think you got that backwards, you said PRC is mainland and then u said the world doesn't recognize PRC as legitimate when in fact its the ROC that the world does not recognize.

    4. Re:news for nerds... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Sorry, your claims are just nonsense.
      Taiwan is its own country since WWII ended and certainly so since the early 1950s.
      Taiwan cares a fuck about what is going on inside of mainland china.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:news for nerds... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      Cross straight relations and history are sometimes difficult to parse. What he said was correct, the ROC still doesn't recognize the PRC as legitimate (and vice versa) and in the immediate years after the Chinese Civil War, most of the world continued to see the ROC as the legitimate government of China in exile. After a several years it became obvious that the PRC wasn't going anywhere and world opinion about legitimacy flipped.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    6. Re:news for nerds... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      ROC technically controls part of two provinces, not only Taiwan but some minor outlying islands that are considered part of Guandong IIRC.

      Regardless of the legal fantasies of the KMT, the majority of Taiwanese see themselves as independent (not just the DPP and the pan greens, but independence is only one issue, and people aren't going to ignore all of the domestic policy issues of the political spectrum just because of how they feel about independence, so there are quite a few KMT and pan blues who would consider Taiwan independent as well).

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    7. Re:news for nerds... by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 0

      Taiwan cares a fuck about what is going on inside of mainland china.

      What does that even mean? Maybe you meant "doesn't give" instead of "cares", or maybe "cares a fuck load"?

      Anyway, try reading your crap before posting so at least one other person can understand what you are trying to say.

    8. Re:news for nerds... by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the government in Beijing. The only thing that has prevented mainland China from taking over Taiwan is direct confrontation with the US. So in a way, Taiwan is a "country" that exists because of the US, very much like South Ossetia exists because of Russia, but in fact it is still part of Georgia.

    9. Re:news for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the government in Taipei. The only thing that has prevented Taiwan ROC from taking over China is direct confrontation with the Chineese Communist Party. So in a way, China is a "country" that exists because of the CCP, very much like South Ossetia exists because of Georgia, but in fact it is still part of Russia.

    10. Re:news for nerds... by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      ROC technically controls part of two provinces, not only Taiwan but some minor outlying islands that are considered part of Guandong IIRC.

      Kinmen and Matsu are part of Fujian province

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    11. Re:news for nerds... by varmfskii · · Score: 1

      In 1895, China transferred control of Taiwan to Japan. In 1911, China became the Republic of China (ROC). In 1945, as a result of the loss of WWII, Japan transferred control of Taiwan to the ROC. In 1949, the mainland became the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the ROC govenrment went into exile in Taiwan. Since 1949 the ROC has controlled Taiwan and a few minor offshore islands (like Jinmen) and the PRC has controlled the Mainland and a number of other offshore islands. Currently, only the PRC has a seat in the UN and few countries officially recognize the ROC.

    12. Re:news for nerds... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I get for trying to go on memory.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    13. Re:news for nerds... by TokyoJimu · · Score: 1

      Taiwan is still a province of the ROC.

      Right. Even their license plates say "åç£çoe" (Taiwan Province).

    14. Re:news for nerds... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The point is: Raiwan is a souvereign state since 1949, and so the Taiwnas see themselves as well. Who cares if they have a seat in the UN?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:news for nerds... by JimCanuck · · Score: 1

      Close, the USSR wanted the PRC as the legitimate government, mainly for the extra pro-communist seat in the UN Security Council and if you have enough nuclear weapons to throw around, people tend to listen to you.

    16. Re:news for nerds... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Hence the qualifier "most".

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  4. Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not a mistake. China's market is far more lucrative than Taiwan's for Apple, and since they have to choose which one to piss off....

    1. Re:Not a mistake by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      It was probably a condition for their deal with China Mobile.

    2. Re:Not a mistake by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

      In theory they don't have to choose. They could show different things depending on which country the user sets the OS to.

      Given that Taiwan's standard script is "Traditional Chinese" script and most of China uses "Simplified", there is additional motivation for Taiwanese to select "Taiwan" for their OS. And the Taiwanese who set their OS to China[1].

      Hong Kong and Macau might use "Traditional" too but they can select the correct location if they want.

      [1] Note there's a diff between Peoples Republic of China vs Republic of China (Taiwan) etc. ;)

      --
    3. Re:Not a mistake by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this...easy choice.

      Taiwan, just do what you usually do: Just keep quiet and let China believe they own you while you do your own thing.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Not a mistake by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Now they can sell the "Taiwan App" which changes the representation.

    5. Re:Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good idea. The North Korean version could label NK as Korea, SK as Enemy and everything else as Wasteland.

    6. Re:Not a mistake by TheLink · · Score: 1

      oops should be "And the Taiwanese who set their OS to China[1] probably want it that way"

      --
    7. Re:Not a mistake by unixisc · · Score: 1, Informative

      Good idea. That's how the 'Persian Gulf' is labelled - in Arabic, on the Arabian peninsula side of the gulf, it's called 'Arabian Gulf' while on the Iranian side of it, it's marked in Farsi as the 'Persian Gulf'. (Although they could have renamed it to the 'Gulf of Islam' and made everybody very happy)

    8. Re:Not a mistake by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, Google can perform the same trick as for the "Japan sea": for a long time Google Maps just removed the label: the sea had no name (Recently they gave it back to Japan...).

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    9. Re:Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good idea. The North Korean version could label NK as Korea, SK as Enemy and everything else as Wasteland.

      According to Pyonyang, there is one country called Korea and the southern half is currently under the control of a Rebel force.
      According to Seoul, there is one country called Korea and the northern half is currently under the control of a Rebel force.
      According to the rest of the world, there are in reality two de facto countries which are referred to as "North" and "South" Korea.
      If you want to do business in the North, you refer to it all as one country or you pack your shit and go home.

      Similarly, according to Beijing the PRC owns Taiwan and the ROC is a rebel government controlling the land. If you want to do business in mainland China, you call Taiwan part of China or you pack your shit and go home. If you want to do business in Taiwan, you call it whatever the fuck you want and ignore any pissing by the locals because nobody is really going to do anything about it.

      The difference is that mainland China is a massive market, but North Korea isn't worth jack shit. So if your goal is money, and that is 100% the goal of Apple, you call it part of China and ignore the locals in Taiwan. If they get too loud about it, you alter your applications so anyone viewing from within Taiwan sees it differently from anyone viewing from anywhere else in the world. The locals aren't pissed, and the PRC is ok with it- they're ok with you appeasing the locals in Taiwan but get pretty grumpy if you do it publicly in front of the rest of the world.

    10. Re:Not a mistake by msauve · · Score: 1

      The Republic of China (informally, Taiwan) is taking this wrong. The RoC claims sovereignty over all of China, including the mainland. The PRC claims sovereignty over the mainland and Taiwan.

      Google is simply agreeing with both of them - it's one China. Let the governments sort out which one holds the legitimate claim to everything. Only if the RoC formally gives up any claim to the mainland will they have a complaint.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:Not a mistake by Clsid · · Score: 1

      That issue can be solved easily by using a regional system. So apart from locale, you can just follow national standards for things as defined borders, etc. For instance, in Google Maps in Argentina, you could see the Falklands labeled as Malvinas, while in the UK version you could see the Malvinas labeled Falklands. Same deal for the rest of places in dispute. No more controversy.

    12. Re:Not a mistake by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      In practice, though, who they have to satisfy are the governments of the two nations, not the peoples therein.

      And government operatives read the news too.

    13. Re:Not a mistake by wisty · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. It's like saying "You can put a nude scene on the disk, and lock it in countries where the censors won't approve".

      No .. you can't. Because someone will find a way to bypass your safeguards, and the censors will be angry. It's not a "cultural sensitivity" thing, it's a "this product will get banned from import" kind of thing.

    14. Re:Not a mistake by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Agreeing, but one additional point, Republic of China also claim sovereignty over Mongolia. Here is a map of land and sea claimed by Republic of China. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    15. Re:Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mongolia was only split off from china to keep the soviets happy by having a buffer state. Seems legit to have the original republic of china claim sovereignty over it since they would have never let the soviets dictate what they did with their own territory.

    16. Re:Not a mistake by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Depends which Islam you mean. The true type of the heretical type that they follow on the other side of the gulf?

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    17. Re:Not a mistake by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      In practice, though, who they have to satisfy are the governments of the two nations, not the peoples therein.

      Which government says Taiwan is not a province of China? The current Republic of China President Ma Yingjiu re-iterated quite clearly that Taiwan IS a province of China during a conference with the Wyoming Governor just 12 days ago. The only objections he's likely to make are about the concessions to the Russians north of the Amur river being legitimised and the fact that Outer Mongolia is not shown as a province of China.

      Sure, the DPP is pretty convinced that there is in fact a country called "Taiwan" but they're certainly not in the position to crack down on software promoting opposing views.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    18. Re:Not a mistake by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That's the beauty of my solution. Each side will believe that their respective Islam - the true one - is the one that the Gulf is named after. Since they don't recognize the heretical type as 'Islam'.

    19. Re:Not a mistake by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Maybe, but Mongolia is racially & ethnically a different country from China - even more than Taiwan is. Would the Chinese embrace Genghiz Khan as one of their own? Jochi? Hulegu? Chagtai? Only one they do seem to accept is Kublai, since he started a Chinese dynasty. But otherwise, none of the others that I listed - all Mongol - would be regarded by anybody as Chinese. I doubt even the KMT would call them 'Chinese'.

    20. Re:Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have the means to display selective maps by location. This just means they have to update one region's map.

      Having used my iPad in the US, Australia, HK, Macau and a few places in China, the map app will automatically use location information and change the map. When I opened the map app in Shanghai many roads displayed with Chinese script as well as English, however when I use the map app while located in Tennessee and look at Shanghai on the app, it has all English.

    21. Re:Not a mistake by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add - the double entendre that would result from such a name - the 'Gulf of Islam' also figuratively - and geographically - separating the Arab Sunnites from the Iranian Shiites

    22. Re:Not a mistake by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Next up, they label Canada as a semi-autonomous region of the US.

    23. Re:Not a mistake by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Years ago, I once had a globe that showed all the 50 US states & 10 provinces all in different colors. It was one of those globes that showed you a political map when lit, and physical map when unlit. A beautiful showpiece, except that today, w/ the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and some other countries, it's badly outdated. Ironically, had they shown the Soviet Republics separate and the US & Canada as 2, they'd still be more or less current.

    24. Re:Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In practice, though, who they have to satisfy are the governments of the two nations, not the peoples therein.

      And government operatives read the news too.

      And the governments doesn't care what the maps says as long as the "right" thing is shown to the people.

    25. Re:Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can make both happy. Communist party likes to see Taiwan included in the "territory" of "China". Here China is seen as a cultural thing(like being "Chinese"), not a government. Taiwan doesn't disagree with this too much, but it's when they're included as being a "province", hence under mainland's control is when it gets rude.

    26. Re:Not a mistake by zsau · · Score: 1

      There are still parts of Mongolia under Chinese control, and Mongolian is still an official language of Chinese. The Mongols from Inner Mongolia are indeed considered Chinese — just not Han. Of course, we're not so big on that distinction in the west.

      --
      Look out!
    27. Re:Not a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American who has lived in Taiwan and China, I want to set Taiwan to be a separate country as well - not simply by country code.

    28. Re:Not a mistake by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Arguably, the best way to go about it is to ask the Mongolians. Last I checked, they were quite happy being an independent state.

  5. Serious consequences by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The mistake is more important than one may think at first, because Taiwan is one of the places the navigator will take you through in the path from your home to the local grocery store.

    1. Re:Serious consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one.

      I found the Apple maps are totally out of date for my city - about 4 years out. Neither my house, nor my place of employment is visible, never mind the roads. Even the satellite photos are out of date. It is totally useless.

    2. Re:Serious consequences by Pope · · Score: 1

      Mine just says "Formosa." Isn't that a cheese?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Serious consequences by unixisc · · Score: 1

      When Apple was using OpenStreetMaps, couldn't map editors in Taiwan have done some edit wars to make it appear as they wanted?

    4. Re:Serious consequences by Guppy · · Score: 1

      Mine just says "Formosa." Isn't that a cheese?

      It's a historical term from the Portuguese name Ilha Formosa, meaning "Beautiful Island".

    5. Re:Serious consequences by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Mine just says "Formosa." Isn't that a cheese?

      No, it's a drink made by mixing champagne and orange juice.

    6. Re:Serious consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a mimosa, dummy.

  6. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but apple maps will probably show it as second post.

  7. Province or nation? by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

    If the map says Taiwan (ROC) is a nation, that will offend mainland China (PRC). If the map says Taiwan is a province of PRC, that offends Taiwan.

    Really, they're screwed either way.

    At $work, we are mandated to call ROC a "region". That's as accurate as we can go without offending anyone.

    1. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's common to lable these sorts of places as "governed by X, claimed by Y", "disputed" or something similar. Not difficult at all.

    2. Re:Province or nation? by stewsters · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, there is a solution to this. Apple maps is used on a device with gps tracking, so when you are physically located in mainland China you can say that Taiwan is a province of China, and when you are in Taiwan you say that it's a separate nation. Problem solved, everyone happy except fishermen using the app. But get a real waterproof gps if you are on a boat.

    3. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Facts aren't decided by politics. Can the Chinese government tell residents of Taiwan what to do? If not, then Taiwan is de facto independent.

    4. Re:Province or nation? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1


      If the map says Taiwan (ROC) is a nation, that will offend mainland China (PRC).

      Apple could have used GeoIP to give the politically correct answer inside China ... not sure if the great firewall is doing deep packet modification yet.

      I don't think anybody outside China goes to China first when dealing with Taiwan.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Province or nation? by TWiTfan · · Score: 0

      Really, they're screwed either way.

      No, they're not. Taiwan is a small, relatively stagnant market. China is a huge, rich, powerful, and growing market.

      Apple knows damn well which to kneel before.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    6. Re:Province or nation? by schneidafunk · · Score: 2

      Just use Google's solution: "Google also sparked anger on the island when the company's maps listed Taiwan as a Chinese province. Now the company's maps simply call the island Taiwan, adding nothing more."

      --
      Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    7. Re:Province or nation? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      When you are not in mainland China or Taiwan what does it say? I doubt Chinese government would accept that as they have a problem with Taiwan being displayed as a separate country to anyone in the world.

    8. Re:Province or nation? by pmontra · · Score: 1

      Yes. In my (little) direct experience with Asian politics Asia was always made of "countries and territories", not stating which one is what. Other areas of the world are made only of countries. Region is another safe choice.

    9. Re:Province or nation? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 0

      Let us just roll back to before the disputes and call it Formosa.

    10. Re:Province or nation? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Facts aren't decided by politics. Can the Chinese government tell residents of Taiwan what to do? If not, then Taiwan is de facto independent.

      Binary decision trees also tend to be of limited use in the real world: Does Beijing deliver the mail and fine you for traffic violations in Taiwan? No. Are there things that Taiwan could theoretically do; but never would because that would make China rage out? Quite possibly.

    11. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it is still called Formosa, quite commonly.

    12. Re:Province or nation? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a solution to this. Apple maps is used on a device with gps tracking, so when you are physically located in mainland China you can say that Taiwan is a province of China, and when you are in Taiwan you say that it's a separate nation. Problem solved, everyone happy except fishermen using the app. But get a real waterproof gps if you are on a boat.

      Google and China are on "Fuck You" terms so I don't see why Google would bother making China happy.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    13. Re:Province or nation? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Taiwan should just go to the UN and threaten to bombard China with Iranian nukes until the UN acknowledges them as a sovereign nation.

      Really this dispute is so stupid that at this point I'd just launch every ICBM in Taiwan at Shanghai so we don't have to deal with it anymore.

    14. Re:Province or nation? by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's common to lable these sorts of places as "governed by X, claimed by Y", "disputed" or something similar. Not difficult at all.

      Or, even easier, just mark it as Norway or something.

    15. Re:Province or nation? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      This is about Apple Maps not Google Maps

    16. Re:Province or nation? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you label it on chosen locale of the phone - that locale dictates what the countries are called anyways.

      it becomes complicated of course, since you have to eventually go as far as to check what every country the locale might be set to thinks about the issue.

      OR they could just go the easy way and say that they called Taiwan and they said they were a sovereign country and that be the end of that. eventually china has to concede that it's a different country, since you can do that call from china too. or what do they say to people who try to go to taiwan from china? there's plenty of trade so it's not like they didn't know how the issue is...

      I mean, Taiwan doesn't try to say that they own all of china anymore either.

      another possible weasel out is to just label it straight there on the map that chinese think they own it but that they're a sovereign nation that acts internationally as if they were a real nation and have a link to the history of uncensored versions of both countries histories.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:Province or nation? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In what? Portugese?

    18. Re:Province or nation? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Maps are never a fun job. Especially over disputed regions.

      Hell, Microsoft had the problem when they allowed people to select the time zone using the map (as may Linux distributions do these days). There were huge fights over a few pixels.

      Google and China are on "Fuck You" terms so I don't see why Google would bother making China happy.

      Technically, Google is banned in China - so Google Maps doesn't even have to care. It's also why Android phones sold in China have to come with third party app stores because Play store isn't available, and why Chinese phones usually end up with epidemics of Android malware. (The Chinese app stores are really bad about cleaning their crap up and often accept cracked and pirated apps).

      It's just another thing anyone who does a map has to deal with in the end.

    19. Re:Province or nation? by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      Even if Taiwan was a province of China they probably wouldn't do those things. Here in England, my local council fines me for traffic violations, and I've yet to see much evidence that anyone delivers the mail.

    20. Re:Province or nation? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Ask Chen Shuibian. He came nearly as close to reigniting open war with China as anybody since the Nixon era. The fact that it didn't happen suggests that Taiwan's options remain fairly open so long as they can get external cooperation (that's where China has its real leverage, leaning on potential allies of Taiwan to not sell them things or make certain political arrangements). Then again it hasn't been much of an issue since Ma Yingjeou's administration has made it a policy to fellate the PRC in secret back-room concession fests at every opportunity.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    21. Re: Province or nation? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      This (multiplied by everywhere else in the world where there are similar territorial disputes) is why the time zone tool in Windows mo longer shows a map.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    22. Re:Province or nation? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Formosa has colonial connotations. It's remained somewhat in use because it's denotative meaning is flattering, but yeah... it's a reminder of the various European occupations.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    23. Re:Province or nation? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Google maps seems to label Taiwan as 'Taiwan'. No complications there.

    24. Re:Province or nation? by unixisc · · Score: 0

      I recall when Windows 95 was out, Microsoft got into trouble with the Indian government for showing a part of Kashmir within Pakistan. I forget in which version they dropped the maps and made it simply a list of the major cities in each time zone.

      I'd like to see someone produce a map that shows Tibet as a separate country, label China as 'Greater Taiwan' or better still, as 'Taiwanese Beijing' (as a spoof on the IOC's label of Taiwan as 'Chinese Taipei'). Maybe one of those Muslim mapmakers who always show all of Israel as 'Palestine' or show all Kashmir as a part of Pakistan could mark Xinxiang and other Uyghur portions of China as 'East Turkestan' and really piss them off. A China vs the Jihadis would be an Alien vs Predator war - worth popping the popcorn bag over

    25. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Here be dragons"

    26. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the people and places within Taiwan itself. Have you ever even been there?

    27. Re:Province or nation? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Taiwan is aa souverain nation!

      According to who?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    28. Re:Province or nation? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      It would help if Taiwan declared itself an independent state. The rest of the world can't treat Taiwan as one until Taiwan stops farting around on this issue.

    29. Re:Province or nation? by mpe · · Score: 1

      I recall when Windows 95 was out, Microsoft got into trouble with the Indian government for showing a part of Kashmir within Pakistan. I forget in which version they dropped the maps and made it simply a list of the major cities in each time zone.
      I'd like to see someone produce a map that shows Tibet as a separate country, label China as 'Greater Taiwan' or better still, as 'Taiwanese Beijing' (as a spoof on the IOC's label of Taiwan as 'Chinese Taipei').


      In the case of a timezone map the more obvious thing would be label the Hawaiian islands as "Occupied by the USA".

    30. Re:Province or nation? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      If the map says Taiwan (ROC) is a nation, that will offend mainland China (PRC). If the map says Taiwan is a province of PRC, that offends Taiwan.

      Really, they're screwed either way.

      At $work, we are mandated to call ROC a "region". That's as accurate as we can go without offending anyone.

      Ya, too bad computers aren't able to be programmed to show a different thing based on the location, or maybe the language would clue it. But I guess that is too complicated for today's computers...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    31. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But TFS does address Google Maps at one point. Did you even bother to read it or are you so despirate to keep the focus on Apple and away from your beloved Google that you fly into such a tizzy over the mere mention of their name?

    32. Re:Province or nation? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Sounds pretty sad. I'd hate to be ordered to bend the truth my bosses.

    33. Re:Province or nation? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Equally offensive to all, so it would be fair at least.

    34. Re:Province or nation? by Dahan · · Score: 1

      I've been there many times--was just there two months ago. Of course, people recognize it as a former name of the island, but they don't commonly call it Formosa (or fuermosha, for that matter).

    35. Re:Province or nation? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Even if the PRC, ROC, US, and UN all declared Taiwan a peninsula, it wouldn't change the fact that it is an island.

      What in the name of the nine worlds of Sol are you talking about?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    36. Re:Province or nation? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      worlds of Sol are worlds? According to who?

    37. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They attend the Olympics as "Chinese Taipei" (named after the capital). Maybe just call the rest of it "Area surrounding Chinese Taipei"?

    38. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived there twice for a total of five years. I heard and saw it more frequently than you imagine.

    39. Re:Province or nation? by chilvence · · Score: 1

      Dear sir, I will adopt your colourful neo-retro exclamation with gusto. By the twin moons of mars!

    40. Re:Province or nation? by chilvence · · Score: 1

      Pfft. When a computer is savvy enough to detect my personal opinion on political issues, then I will give you a cookie.

      (and by detect I don't mean make an educated guess. I mean actually get inside my head and agree with me)

    41. Re:Province or nation? by SEE · · Score: 1

      It's an analogy.

      Taiwan is an island. It wouldn't matter if the People's Republic of China, Republic of China, United States, and United Nations all deny it is one; it clearly is surrounded on all sides by water. "According to who?" is a pointless question; it's an observable fact. If the PRC, ROC, US, and UN all denied it, it would simply mean they're all denying reality.

      Similarly, Taiwan is a sovereign nation. It doesn't matter if the People's Republic of China, Republic of China, United States, and United Nations all deny it is one; it clearly is not actually under the control of China or anyone else and just as clearly is not in control of the mainland. "According to who?" is a pointless question; it's an observable fact. That the PRC, ROC, US, and UN all deny it simply means they're all denying reality.

    42. Re:Province or nation? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      There is a VAST difference between physical geography and legal status. The definitions of island, peninsula, etc are not under dispute. The definition of sovereignty and what constitutes a sovereign state is. One theory states that a region is not a sovereign nation until it is recognized as such by other nations. This has subtleties such as what constitutes recognition: from full on ambassadorial exchanges, treaties, etc; to mere visits by foreign representatives. Another theory states that a nation must have a defined territory, a permanent population, a government and a capacity to enter into relations with other states. There is also the theories of legal heritage and de facto statehood. For example, the United States gained de facto independence in 1776. However, legally, it wasn't independent of England until the English said so (which they did in the Treaty of Paris in 1783). These issues also play an important role in places like Sealand, and other so-called micronations, as they do in all sorts of disputed territories, and they are far from clear and observable fact.

      As far as Taiwan is concerned, both the ROC and the PRC claim the whole shebang - mainland and islands. Technically, since the Chinese civil war never actually ended, these two groups are still at war, and the question of who rules is up in the air.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    43. Re:Province or nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "According to who?" is a pointless question

      You're absolutely right. It should be "According to whom?".

    44. Re:Province or nation? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      According to reality. Taiwan exercises full de facto sovereignty within its borders.

    45. Re:Province or nation? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How would the Chinese like it if China was called by someone as 'Taiwanese Beijing'?

  8. Manny being Manny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple being Apple?

  9. Re:Fuck iTards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So, this fixation on homosexuality is telling. When are you coming out of the closet?

  10. And if they change it they will still be wrong by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Because the PRC has a billion potential customers who think Taiwan is a province of mainland China.

    1. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by neonKow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correction: nobody actually thinks that. It's just the official government policy to refer to it that way.

    2. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Correction: nobody actually thinks that.

      Oh, yes, they do. The Chinese government very definitely regards Taiwan as one of its provinces. Temporarily not under its control, of course, but rejoining the mainland is inevitable. I'm not saying that's true, or right, but there's no doubt they regard it that way.

    3. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a difference between being wrong, and people thinking something is wrong. For instance, it doesn't matter how many people think Global Warming is a hoax - they're wrong.

      Similarly, it doesn't matter if a billion customers think Taiwan is part of China. The real objective truth is Taiwan operates independently. The clue might be that the Taiwan Government is the one complaining.

    4. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And coerces the Chinese, to the point that we've had chinese developers walk away from projects that refused to bow to the Chinese version of reality (probably because they were afraid of repercusions if they didn't).

    5. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese government != the people.

    6. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      dot dot dot regardless of what the government says.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by fliptout · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, they do. I remember telling a group of Chinese doctors that I thought it strange that Taiwan has its own currency, defense force, and government if it was part of China. Oh, China liberated Tibet from an oppressive regime, too.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    8. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      ROC government headquartered in Taiwan thinks exactly the same thing. Mainland China is simply temporarily not under its control. Both governments view entirety of China, including mainland and island of Taiwan as their territory.

    9. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Some of the British Colonies have their own currencies. All of them have their own governments.

    10. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ROC government headquartered in Taiwan thinks exactly the same thing. Mainland China is simply temporarily not under its control. Both governments view entirety of China, including mainland and island of Taiwan as their territory.

      Not really. The ROC government has for a long time only had seats for districts in Taiwan itself. Really, only the fear of a violent PRC reaction (an invasion would be unlikely but not unimaginable) keeps Taiwan from just declaring itself independent of the rest of China.

    11. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Very true, but in this case there's a strong nationalist strain of opinion among the people on this subject. If anything, they hold the idea of China's ownership of Taiwan even more strongly than the government does.

    12. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by wiredog · · Score: 1

      Taiwan, like Tibet, is a part of China, and always has been. Just ask any PRC sockpuppet.

    13. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still have thousands (millions?) of uneducated people in the US that don't know New Mexico is a state. Does that make the US map right or wrong?

    14. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by neonKow · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is what governments do in general. The PRC doesn't just coerces the Chinese. Taiwan used to be in the UN until the PRC said "it's us or them."

      Meanwhile, Taiwan and Chinese companies happily do business in the high-tech manufacturing industry.

    15. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by cyfer2000 · · Score: 2

      Ma Ying-jeou, the president of ROC government, just gave a talk on several days ago, claiming mainland China was part of ROC under the R.O.C. Constitution. link 1 link 2 link 3 link 4.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    16. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure, and the south will rise again.

    17. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by rhazz · · Score: 1

      and none of them are considered a British "province".

    18. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's still the official position, primarily because of fear of China's reaction. But few still really believe it.

    19. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just under the Kuomintang instead of under the Communists.

    20. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and we keep our blinkers on and ignore this fact. The 'Little China' (Taiwan) lays claim to the mainland as much as the mainland claims ownership of it. And we wonder why the Chinese are so aggressive against it. What if Cuba referred to itself as Republic of the America's and laid claim to North America? This is directly analogous to the Taiwan/China situation.

    21. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Armies do not move on "beliefs", especially when said beliefs are nothing but result of massive propaganda. They move on orders of their generals. Generals move on orders of their governments. President and government have official position that China is their territory, occupied by the enemy.

      I'm sorry, you cannot dodge this particular bullet. It's just far too much in your face.

    22. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      We call our provinces "countries", but it is the same thing.

    23. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's propaganda. That's different from "anyone actually thinks that"

    24. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      And what have those orders been? Not the general assertions of the constitution and official policy, but the actual orders to take actual actions? There haven't been any.

    25. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Well, you certainly sound like brits and french before WW2. "So they're arming to take us on, they talk about it all the time, their leader is aggressively talking about their right to more land, but show me the exact (and obviously not available to the dumb public) orders!"

    26. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Are you really, honestly, expecting Taiwan to attack the PRC? Are you that divorced from reality?

    27. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      If they get a chance, like internal collapse in China of some sort? Absolutely.

      Just like China would if something of that sort happened to ROC.

      Are you really so divorced from reality to not understand that people in power who threaten each other with war on constant basis and who are technically still at war are perfectly willing to go to war? They only dropped the "we must conquer all of China by military means" from government agenda in 1992, and they're still just one election away from yet another president who'd be willing to put it back on.

      Sometimes I really get the feeling that we're entering another one of those periods in human history when humans who've lived in peace for their entire lives forget what's it like to hate the other country so much, you'd be willing to go to a full out war with them.

    28. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by zsau · · Score: 1

      No it's not. "Province" in the context of China has a similar meaning to Canada; it's an integral part of the country. When China calls Taiwan a province, they don't mean they're a colony, they mean they're the same as Beijing and Guangzhou.

      It's more like if Yorkshire had its own currency and government.

      --
      Look out!
    29. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      It gets more complicated than this. Both the PRC and the ROC lay claim to ALL of China -- Taiwan, Hong Kong, Mainland China, etc.

      PRC is located on the mainland and has the bigger army. ROC is located on Taiwan, and has the earlier historical claim. Neither government "officially" recognizes the other. It's basically an extremely protracted civil dispute with lots of posturing but minimal military action.

      Of course, in reality, ROC policy controls Taiwan and PRC policy controls everywhere else.

      If you want a parallel, think US Civil War, except the PRC is the south, and they won, but Rhode Island held out for the North and the South left them alone (for the most part). Not a perfect parallel, but it gets the point across (including why it's a hot topic for some in China).

    30. Re:And if they change it they will still be wrong by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      No it's not. "Province" in the context of China has a similar meaning to Canada; it's an integral part of the country. When China calls Taiwan a province, they don't mean they're a colony, they mean they're the same as Beijing and Guangzhou.

      It's more like if Yorkshire had its own currency and government.

      ...and the monarchy moved there.

      Maybe it's more like the situation between Italy and the Vatican?

  11. Re:A Breakaway Province by unixisc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it isn't. Beijing doesn't control anything that goes on in Taiwan, much as they'd like to. Yeah, they used to make hostile noises in the past whenever Taiwan spoke of formally declaring independence, but it ultimately didn't amount to much. But Taiwan controls everything of its own, including its foreign & defense policies - not something that can be said about the province of any country

  12. Editors? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    Taiwan is demanding Apple revise its map data

    FTFY. There is a difference between data and software and we should understand that.

    1. Re:Editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between data and software and we should understand that.

      Ever tried to explain that to John Von Neumann?

  13. Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by jfruh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Both the government of the People's Republic of China (which controls the mainland) and the government of the Republic of China (which controls Taiwan) believe that Taiwan is a part of China. The two just disagree about who China's rightful government is. I realize that over the past 60 years Taiwan has grown more and more self-contained and has become a de facto state independent of China, but in theory there's nothing either side should object to in portraying Taiwan as part of China.

    1. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by McGregorMortis · · Score: 2

      In another sense, China is a province of Taiwan. It just happens to be under the control of a band of rebels at present.

    2. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Informative

      My wife was born in Taiwan. She and anyone in her family gets extremely angry if you refer to them as "Chinese," despite being ethnically Chinese, speaking Mandarin, etc. Good luck convincing her, her family, or frankly anyone else Tawainese I've ever met that they're "part of China" and that there is "nothing they should object to."

      That said, this is a result of using ISO codes instead of FIPS codes. We had a customer escalation come through a while back about Taiwan being listed as a province of China in our geolocation information. We had switched from a FIPS 10-4 source to an ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 source, which ad the side effect of pissing off our Taiwanese customers.

    3. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3

      "My wife was born in Taiwan. She and anyone in her family gets extremely angry if you refer to them as "Chinese," despite being ethnically Chinese, speaking Mandarin, etc."

      My dad's wife is from Taiwan and is exactly the opposite. Although I never asked what she thought about Taiwan being a part of China.

    4. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by trmj · · Score: 1

      The argument is less over which one controls all of China than it is over which one is the "Real China". The current governing bodies of both refer to a "One China, Two Areas" rule which allows them to cooperate economically without fighting.

      Having spent some time in Taiwan, the people there refer to themselves as Chinese, not Taiwanese. They don't speak Mandarin, they speak Chinese. Which is to say, their national identity is "Chinese" and that's what works for them. They also have a standing military that is completely independent of PRC.

      That said, the only reason they can maintain that independence is because of how close they are tied to the US. RoC knows it, we know it, and Mainland China knows it.

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    5. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Arker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's actually a topic of controversy in the ROC today.

      The ROC and the PRC, recall, were united for a time under Dr. Sun Yat Sen and they both claim the same territory as that original, united ROC claimed. That means both officially define Taiwan as a province of China, and themselves as the lawful government over all the provinces of China. This is not new.

      But there is also a significant undercurrent of nativist and japanophile sentiment for independence in Taiwan, and not everyone agrees with that de jure interpretation. This faction is not new either and has actually become popular enough to control the government at least part of the time, so it's not hard to find officials asserting the very opposite. It's a very contentious issue. The apparent impossibility of liberating the PRC held territory, and a strong desire not to be absorbed by it, is probably a main cause of the increase in independence sentiment.

      I dont live there and am not pretending to be an authority, just a sinophile sharing what I have observed.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    6. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Half of my blood family is from Taiwan and, while they don't recognise PRC authority, none object to being called Chinese.

    7. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Both the government of the People's Republic of China (which controls the mainland) and the government of the Republic of China (which controls Taiwan) believe that Taiwan is a part of China. The two just disagree about who China's rightful government is. I realize that over the past 60 years Taiwan has grown more and more self-contained and has become a de facto state independent of China, but in theory there's nothing either side should object to in portraying Taiwan as part of China.

      This is quite simplistic and as a result a little inaccurate. Taiwan has two major political camps, just like the US. They hate each other. The "pan blue" group is the KMT (currently in the majority and holding the presidency) and some aligned smaller parties. The "pan green" group is the DPP and some aligned smaller parties. The previous president was DPP. The problem is that the DPP in general are crazy, independence fanatics who want to announce at every opportunity that Taiwan is its own nation, even if they die as a result (they are not smart enough to realize this might happen). The KMT is more realistic, and reunification is truly their goal, yes, but not now. They look towards maybe 100 years or more in the future for that. China has to change a lot for them to agree to rejoin it. The KMT interprets "one China" in a very different way from China (they define "one China" basically as "Taiwan"). The problem is that the DPP dummies keep trying to say and do things that might get Taiwan invaded and the KMT is much better at playing the "Whatever you say, boss!" game. The DPP fails to recognize that some of what the KMT does (again, they are currently in charge of the government) is not sincere but just designed to placate China. So the DPP constantly accuses the KMT of "selling out" Taiwan to China and trying to secretly reunify them and the KMT fears that if the DPP ever got control of the government again (this is a very realistic possibility in the next presidential elections), their impatience would lead them to do something stupid and get Taiwan invaded. Given the recent posturing by China in the South China Sea, this is not a groundless fear.

    8. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2

      And yet the country calls itself "Zhnghuá Mínguó", which means "Republic of China".

    9. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MY wife is from Taiwan, and she's Hakka. You can call her "Chinese" because Hakka is a considered a Chinese minority. But don't call her "Taiwanese", because Taiwanese culture has its own distinctive traits.

    10. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2

      Or, is she one of the 2% of pre-Chinese indigenous population?

    11. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often wondered what does the US get in return for maintaining the independence of such a small place?

    12. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife was born in Taiwan. She and anyone in her family gets extremely angry if you refer to them as "Chinese,"

      Well, your wife and her family are idiots.

      Taiwan refers to itself officially as the Republic of China:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan

      http://www.roc-taiwan.org/mp.asp?mp=1

    13. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Kagato · · Score: 1

      At the same time the two are hitched economically. The long and short of it is millions of jobs in mainland China are at Taiwanese owned companies. An outright war between the two would devastate the Chinese economy. You're seeing more and more Taiwanese companies hedge their bets with new factories in other parts of Asia, India and Latin America.

    14. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Welcome to the pan green vs. pan blue dichotomy. Taiwan is NOT a monolith, people!

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    15. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Whoa there KMT lapdog, just because President Chen was a bit unrestrained doesn't mean everybody in the DPP is... that's like more than a third of the country, dawg. If you paid attention to Dr. Tsai's campaign she was much more moderate on the independence issue than Chen. She only lost because the chauvinists among the moderates would rather vote for a PRC collaborator than a woman. Keep on playing by the PRC's rules and you too can end up just like the boiling frog SARs. What a future.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    16. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by GoCats1999 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, just to clarify things a little bit more, and to provide at least some defense to the DPP... while it's true that one of the planks of the DPP is complete independence and autonomy from China, to say that the DPP is "crazy, independence fanatics" is a bit disingenuous.

      The majority of the DPP is actually pretty moderate, and while they philosophically would favor independence, they aren't willing to risk death, self-destruction, or losing favor in the international community in trying to do so. Similar to how the KMT tends to be pretty moderate when they look at the "100 year" view of some sort of reunification, most of the DPP is similarly moderate in having a "100 year" view of trying to establish a more definitive position of Taiwan's independent relationship to China and the rest of the world.

      Are there fanatics within the DPP? Absolutely. But the same can be said of the KMT. Both parties have minority factions that are a bit more radical in their philosophy and practice. In fact, if you do a quick google search for "Taiwan political assassinations" and you will find news articles over the past 8-10 years from assassinations and assassination attempts by and against members of both parties — with one attempt as recently as last year.

      And actually, analogizing Taiwanese politics to that in the US is actually pretty interesting, and one that I hadn't really thought of. Some of the more "crazies" in the DPP could very much be compared with the Tea Party faction of the GOP here in the U.S. — unable to compromise and a willingness to risk significant harm (e.g. government shut down, financial default, etc.) in the name of holding to core, fundamentalist principles.

      But by and large, just like in the US where a majority of both Republicans and Democrats tend to be more centrist/moderate in the name of finding common ground (maybe not publicly, but very much so privately), I would say that the majority of the KMT and the DPP favors moderation, especially with regards to their relationship with China.

      Yes, posturing can and will always be a part of politics, especially on the international stage. But the fact that not a single military artillery has been fired and not a single military causality has been suffered between the two nations in the 6+ decades of political tension should be telling enough.

    17. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, they may be Taiwanese aborigines, which would make them Taiwanese in the sense that no other place of themselves or their ancestors are their home (calling them Chinese would imply that they came from China at some point in time), and they are different even from the Han Chinese.

    18. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanophile? My sense from Taiwanese people is distinctly the opposite. Japan is reviled universally as far as I can tell. Japan may have been a nicer occupier in Taiwan than they were in some other places but there are/were enough former mainlanders that lived through WW2 horrors to tip the scales. I think you'll find few places in Asia outside of Japan that have a favorable view of Japan. Maybe my view is colored by knowing more people decended from the mainland.

      The (former) mainlanders see themselves as a continuation of "true" Chinese culture back through the centuries and the PRC as the recent usurpers. The refugees (maybe the wrong term but I'm going with it) brought with them artifacts from emperial China and other cultural relicts that might otherwise have been lost to reformist zeal. And to be fair, until the last ~15yrs Taiwan beat the pants off the mainland in terms of economic development. They are the proud, civilized, educated, trade oriented China that existed pre-revolution and would contrast that with the chaos and intellectual purging of the great leap forward and cultural revolution. The last couple of decades have brought the mainland and Taiwan closer together in development and admiration of emperial times, but governance from Beijing is still a tough pill to swallow. Taiwan doesn't want to be Hong Kong part 2. Also a huge fraction of the development on the mainland in the last couple of decades came from Taiwanese capital and know-how. The business people do not want a confrontation and have huge influence. The middle class, however, is pretty squeezed in Taiwan and that hardens nationalistic attitudes.

      PS plenty of rich mainlanders buy condos in Taipei in case they run afoul of local politics. It's their escape plan.

      My 2 cents...

    19. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Summary of post: "Taiwan is one person, namely my wife and the associations I have through her."

      Keeping in mind the history of ethnic Chinese in Taiwan, there has always been a subset of Taiwanese who are extremely bitter about the outcome of the cultural revolution, in much the same way that elements of the American South are still highly reluctant to be part of the federal government. If, however, your connection to the nation's politics is through these fringe elements, then you would not have an accurate picture of the country at large. How normal Taiwanese society sees these people is about the same as how American society sees people who drive around with Confederate bumper stickers. You married one.

    20. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by unixisc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      During the Cold War, there was a clear advantage - in the beginning, Beijing was allied to the Soviets, and later, even when they got divorced, they still were very independent of the US and ran against US interests all over - like support to North Korea, North Vietnam and so on. So it made sense for the US to still be wary of them, and treat them like an adversary, even though they were the China that the US recognized.

      Now, the advantage of keeping Taiwan free is containing China. This is a country that's still expansionist, and has territorial disputes w/ most of its neighbors. Granted, the Taiwanese have the same views on things like Tibet, but if they were to ever take over Beijing, it would be easier to get them to allow places like Tibet to go free and not claim islands that are closer to Philippines.

      Of course, if the world is gonna shift all its manufacturing to China, that ain't gonna happen. But it will be funny when China implodes, and there is a major shortage of products due to that

    21. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your are right, if you take a look at the party structure and party ideology of the KMT in Taiwan and CCP in China, you will notice that they are in fact long lost political twins separated at birth by a bloody civil war. Both sides favor authoritarian regime style of governing that has little regards for the will of the people. Of course KMT and CCP wants to be reunited, regardless of the people want. Just ask any Tibetan, Taiwanese, or peopled at Tienanmen Square. T

    22. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      There's a repo on github that has SVG country maps with this petty squabbling about Indian controlled Kashmir (or is it China? Or how about Pakistan?). A suggested solution to someone complaining was to have the variants put up as well and then it is up to them how they get served.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    23. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 1

      But China does not call itself "China". Zhong Guo means "the middle/central country".

      That is like saying that the United States are a part of the United Kingdom as both refer to themselves as "United".

    24. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Invaded? China doesn't own troop transport ships of meaningful size. They use cruise liners for simulation which couldn't possibly function against hostiles. What would they invade them with?

    25. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      "China" is just a western corruption of "Zhonghua" anyway The "Zh" is pronounched more like a "Ch" or "Jh" sound.

      I did once upset an American friend by referring to "European Americans", in an attempt make the distinction from "African Americans" and "Native Americans". He didn't like that!

    26. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She and anyone in her family gets extremely angry if you refer to them as "Chinese," despite being ethnically Chinese, speaking Mandarin, etc."

      L2R

    27. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Dak+RIT · · Score: 2

      The annual independence vs unification poll was just released recently in Taiwan.

      Asked about their position on cross-strait relations, 66 percent of respondents supported the “status quo,” 24 percent wanted independence and 7 percent supported unification with China, according to the survey conducted by cable news channel TVBS between Thursday last week and Monday.
      However, the poll found that most respondents favored independence over unification if they were asked to choose between just those two options, with 71 percent supporting independence and only 18 percent supporting unification with China.
      With regards to identity, 78 percent of those polled identified themselves as Taiwanese, while 13 percent saw themselves as Chinese.

    28. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Yes. And RoC had the permanent seat in the UN Security Council until we (the US), decided to change our recognition of 'China' to the PRC instead of the RoC, in order to try and open divisions in the Communist Bloc during the Vietnam War. I know what Taiwan is and where it comes from. She's a Mandarin speaker and definitely 'Chinese' in an ethnic sense. She just hates being called Chinese for some reason, probably political. I don't know... maybe it's like calling a Scot and Englishman or something, but I've never been brave enough to try that :)

    29. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was already ruled out in the original statement "She and anyone in her family gets extremely angry if you refer to them as "Chinese," despite being ethnically Chinese"

    30. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Quila · · Score: 1

      want to announce at every opportunity that Taiwan is its own nation, even if they die as a result (they are not smart enough to realize this might happen).

      Sounds like the American colonies in the late 1700s. We won.

    31. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "With regards to identity, 78 percent of those polled identified themselves as Taiwanese, while 13 percent saw themselves as Chinese."

      That was obviously a question of nationality, not ethnicity. Most Taiwanese are well aware that they are not ethnic Taiwanese (Formosan).

    32. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never ceases to amaze me what people with racism and distrust of foreigners so deeply ingrained into their culture will delude themselves into thinking and violently (sometimes literally violent, yes) attack anyone who dare suggests otherwise. Particularly amusing since the place calls itself Republic of China.

    33. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife (and family) should probably get over her anger, or rather, direct it to her own government. The Taiwan government officially refers to itself as "The Republic of China", and "Taiwan" is an informal name.

    34. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Arker · · Score: 1

      Interestingly I understand the chinese phrase for japanophile is a taiwanese coining. Slashdot mangles it horribly though.

      At any rate, while the anti-independence people seem to use japanophile as something of a slur against pro-independence folk, I think it has limited validity. There are those that remember the period under japan as better days but from what I can see they are a pretty small minority, and most modern independence voters have rather different issues on their mind.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    35. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The situation is pretty complex - there's always another layer underneath to reverse your judgment. Some points to consider

      The people of Taiwan are not the government of Taiwan. The government is largely an import from China and the corrupt democracy in Taiwan doesn't well represent the people.

      The people of Taiwan are very divided, with differences often based on when their families immigrated to Taiwan (after WWII with the Chinese, prior to WWII, or prior to the Dutch).

      A brief history:

      Late 1500s or early 1600s (from memory here) the Dutch and Spanish create first civilized settlements in Taiwan.

      Less than half a century later a half-Japanese pirate with loyalties to the already deposed Ming dynasty drives out the Europeans and sets up kingdom.

      Pirate's grandson turns the parts of Taiwan he controls over to Qing dynasty (The Qing were non-Chinese Manchu who later came to be considered Chinese; the last emperor was Qing).

      From time of the Dutch through the late 1800s, Taiwan is settled civilized by Chinese immigrants in much the same way Mexico was by European immigrants. Fujian province supplied the bulk of settlers to Taiwan like Spain provided the bulk of settlers to Mexico. Rather than the aborigines being wiped out as in America, the Taiwanese aborigines were largely either assimilated or left unconquered (in the mountainous areas). At times Qing policies to prevent rebellion originating from Taiwan forbade Chinese womeon from going to Taiwan (so no permanent Chinese population would take root). What resulted is the saying "Everyone has a Chinese granddad and an aborigine grandma). The populations mixed with the richer (Chinese) culture being dominant. The primary language became Fujianese aka Taiwanese although aboriginal and other minority languages remained significant.

      In 1895 the Qing gave Taiwan to Japan in the Treaty of Shimonoseki as the result of a war in China. Japan moved in and were able to subdue the mountain aborigines, something the Chinese had never accomplished. Japan set about educating people, building infrastructure, introducing industrialization, and generally making Taiwan prosperous such that at the beginning of WWII it had the second highest per capita GDP in Asia (Japan was first).

      During WWII the Cairo declaration said Japan would be forced return all the lands it had taken from China once the war was over.

      In 1945 Japan lost the war and by the surrender agreement had to surrender their troops in Taiwan to the ROC troops under Chiang.

      The ROC unilaterally declared Taiwan to be part of the ROC.

      Trouble with the locals due to corrupt Chinese government resulted in 20,000 to 28,000 Taiwanese being massacred by Chinese troops in the "228 incident".

      Some 1 million Chinese immigrate to Taiwan (which only had a population of around 5 million) settling mostly in the north near the capital Taipei.

      In 1949 the ROC lost a civil war with the Communists (none of the fighting occurred in Taiwan).

      As a result of the loss, the ROC kept Taiwan under martial law until 1987. Forbidden topics of discussion included the idea that Taiwan was or should be independent of China.

      The contrast between the Chinese government and the earlier Japanese government makes Taiwan probably the only place in Asian where they not only don't hate the Japanese, they actually like the Japanese (obviously this opinion often depends on whether your family was in Taiwan prior to 1945).

      Since the Chinese takeover the government has forced Mandarin to be the language. Everyone speaks it, but people in the south often are more comfortable speaking Taiwanese.

      Public opinion polls show that most residents of Taiwan do not call themselves "Chinese". In my experience those who do think of Taiwan as part of China are people's whose parents or grandparents immigrated from China after WWII, while those who say they are just "Taiwanese" have ancestors who immigrated from China in the hundreds of years prior to WWII.

    36. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      I get a completely contradictory opinion from the Taiwanese that I know and work with. The Taiwanese were the Chinese government in exile - if anything, the "real" Chinese government. And therefore, "Chinese".

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    37. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still missing the "clear advantage" part.

    38. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by chilvence · · Score: 1

      That one is gold, thank you very much :)

    39. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanophile. Really?
      Must be a spin off from the Pearl Harbor chapter.

      Given that there were some fairly savage battles (saw some movie a few months back on local ethnic TV) between the Japanese and Taiwanese native population, call me surprised.

    40. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the history "lesson" Cold Fjord, sorry I mean anonymous coward.

    41. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your wife truly believes that, then---with all due respect---she is ignorant and you should tell her as much.

      The modern Taiwanese state was born when the Kuomintang fled from the communists in mainland China for Taiwan. They claimed they were the real capital of all of China, and for some time afterwards, the world recognized them as such. The Kuomintang is the ruling party of Taiwan, and they still hold this "One China Principle" today.

      As the person to whom you responded suggested, Taiwan is unquestionably a part of China. That's not the argument. The argument is whether the PRC or the ROC are the rightful rulers of all China, and whether Beijing or Taipei is the proper capital.

    42. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandparents all fled China following the Communist Revolution, and my parents were born in Taiwan. Thus, they were always considered to be "mainlanders," to differentiate them from the so-called "Taiwanese" people. I don't know about your wife's situation, but I don't mind being called Chinese (because it's too much work to explain the differences). On the other hand, I despise China and people from China...

      My company has an Irishman and previously had a Welsh person. I tried to learn the differences between England, the UK, and Great Britain, but I can never remember how to distinguish between the three! And neither person liked England.

    43. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PRC didn't not exist until 1949. Dr Sun Yat Sen was long dead. When Dr. Sun Yat Sen was alive, there were only ROC. Please get your fact and history right!

    44. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... KMT is realistic... the same KMT 30 years ago telling their people that PRC is all evil and all of their people are living in hell? Get your fact straight!!! And when you talk about pan blue being majority, please be clear and state that it is barely over 50%. In your post implied that most of people wants unification? that is not true. Recent poll shows that more than 70% of people do not want unification and only less than 5% of people support unification. That is the fact and be honest!

    45. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      maybe it's like calling a Scot and Englishman or something, but I've never been brave enough to try that :)

      More like calling an Irishman "British". Even if they're from Northern Ireland, and descended from 19th century British immigrants.

    46. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Arker · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_under_Japanese_rule

      Some savagery for sure, but the periods prior and proceeding from it were hardly perfect either. There were some good points to the period and some real progress.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    47. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      At that time, every place in the world was strategic, so the Western bloc was better off with Taiwan having a pro-Western regime, like the KMT, rather than a Communist one, even if it was one that was at some odds w/ the Soviets.

    48. Re:Isn't this what the Taiwanese believe as well? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      "China" is just a western corruption of "Zhonghua" anyway The "Zh" is pronounched more like a "Ch" or "Jh" sound.

      I did once upset an American friend by referring to "European Americans", in an attempt make the distinction from "African Americans" and "Native Americans". He didn't like that!

      Was he an Arabic American or an Asian American?

  14. Re:Fuck iTards! by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    I think he's just spanking his Android :)

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  15. It's complicated.. by Dynamoo · · Score: 2

    It's complicated.. basically it is de facto a nation, but it is not necessarily a nation de jure. But if you want one of the most likely kick-off points for World War III it is the issue of Taiwanese independence..

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:It's complicated.. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      But if you want one of the most likely kick-off points for World War III it is the issue of Taiwanese independence..

      Strange I always thought it would be "Macedonia" that kicks off WW III

  16. Because China matters, duh by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    And Taiwan doesn't.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Because China matters, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll

  17. "Mistake"? by J'raxis · · Score: 1

    This isn't the first time such a mistake was made. Google also labeled Taiwan as a Chinese province in 2005.

    I don't think this is a "mistake." Taiwan's status is an open question and Apple is probably choosing whichever side will benefit them more. Where's their bigger customer base, the island or the mainland?

    1. Re:"Mistake"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this is a "mistake." Taiwan's status is an open question and Apple is probably choosing whichever side will benefit them more. Where's their bigger customer base, the island or the mainland?

      Also to add the official US government policy is that Taiwan is part of china. Same thing in the UN. Apple is 100% correct in listing Taiwan as part of China.

    2. Re:"Mistake"? by jklovanc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is also the position of 22 nations that Taiwan is a separate country.

    3. Re:"Mistake"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also the position of 22 nations that Taiwan is a separate country.

      Out of 173 total nations. Again Official UN policy is that Taiwan in not a separate nation. Apple is 100% correct.

    4. Re:"Mistake"? by rourin_bushi · · Score: 1

      No, I think that just makes them 88% correct.

  18. Sure, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if the Chinese weren't buying all the U.S. Megacorps (and everything else in the U.S.), this wouldn't be happening.

    FTFY

    [citation needed]

    1. Re:Sure, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try google..

      Here they dropped the bid due to US resistance but it was an $18.5B bid by Cnooc for a US oil company.
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080200404.html

      Here is a successful takeover back in Sept.
      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-06/smithfield-receives-u-s-regulator-approval-for-shuanghui-deal.html

    2. Re:Sure, whatever by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      The largest ever takeover of a US company by a Chinese company is number 213 on the Fortune 500- and this is evidence of China "buying all the U.S. Megacorps".

      Seriously?

    3. Re:Sure, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's a death of a thousand cuts?

    4. Re:Sure, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Chinese were initially turned off by the whole "free enterprise but CNOOC cant buy some public companies" thing?

      They have a lot of USD stashed away, and one of the easiest things to do with it is buy US assets in USD.

    5. Re:Sure, whatever by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      The post specifically mentions "Megacorps", indicating large companies, the kind in the Fortune 500.

    6. Re:Sure, whatever by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      The previous post states that Chinese companies had already purchased "all the U.S. Megacorps (and everything else in the U.S.)".

  19. Re:Fuck iTards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful... what if his mom was dead? But I suppose if you were coming out of the closet about being a necrophiliac, then you'd really be coming out of a coffin, and not a closet, per se.

    Okay, this discussion has definitely turned weird. Goodnight.

  20. Land Division by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says "China's Taiwan Province" according to Google Translate, in that order (English possessive added). So, either Apple needs to change that, or rename Canada a US territory.

  21. Let's fix this once and for all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. and return ownership to it's rightful owners:

      the Dutch, of course.

    1. Re:Let's fix this once and for all by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, the Portugese. Where do you think the name 'Formosa' came from?

  22. One China Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only one China, and its capital is Taipai.

    1. Re:One China Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: What is the capital of China?
      A: C.

  23. Re:A Breakaway Province by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are wrong according to both Taiwanese and Chinese. Both view themselves as "China that has rights to controlling all of Chinese territory". I.e. Republic of China government that is located in Taiwan claims that entire mainland China is their territory and Taiwan is just one province.
    People's Republic of China that is located on mainland has the exactly same claim. It's basically two different regimes that (mostly, discounting Mongolia issue) agree that China encompasses both Taiwan and mainland, but disagree on which government is legitimate one. This is because both claimed to be legitimate governments back in the days of civil war, and one side was simply pushed out of mainland and into Taiwan, but never finished off.

    Even Taiwanese tend to forget this because official propaganda doesn't like to talk about this inconvenient truth. However you can check yourself both from history books, or even wikipedia and its sources.

  24. Re:A Breakaway Province by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    Taiwan is recognized by 22 countries. Many other countries have trade offices.

  25. Treaty of San Francisco by slew · · Score: 4, Informative

    I suggest reading about the Treaty of San Francisco, Treaty of Taipei, and the Treaty of Shimonoseki before commenting about the Taiwan / PROC dispute...

    The current status of Taiwan probably most similar to that of Germany. Where Germany was divided up into 4 zones after the war (US, UK, France, Russia), Taiwan is apparently effectively a US occupied zone until its fate is determined. It was recognized as an occupied territory of Japan before/during the war, but required that Japan relinquish control of Taiwan (and other territories acquired before the war) as a penalty for pre-war territorial aggressions. However, the treaty never specified to which government it was to go to (mainly because of the civil war between the ROC and the PROC which happened at the end of WWII).

    The Treaty of Taipei (a separate peace treaty between Japan and the ROC, since abrogated by Japan when they recognized the PROC government), specifically ceded Taiwan to the ROC government. It's sort of a title to Taiwan that the ROC has waived around in the past, but it is unclear how the PROC ultimately winning the civil war affected the status of this document.

    The US is pretty much in a conundrum. It could probably legally cede Taiwan to the PROC under the theory promulgated by the Treaty of San Francisco (give the island back to the country had it before Japan took it, this is what the UK wanted to do), or they can do nothing and claim that this is an internal issue between the ROC and PROC governments (I believe this is the continuing official US stance since the treaty), or they might twist the treaty wording and assert that Taiwan has the right to self-determination (which is of course what the US wants to do, but is opposed by the PROC and probably is too far a twist from a legal sense).

    Originally, the US was sitting on its treaty status over Taiwan as part of a greater anti-communist sphere-of-influence policy. Now, it is probably merely attempting to get better terms for a PROC takeover by sitting on their hands until they get a deal that Taiwan is okay with. This has basically stalled because Taiwan doesn't appear that it would be happy with any PROC takeover (however, they are no-doubt looking at the Hong Kong 2-system situation with great interest).

    1. Re:Treaty of San Francisco by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      Ugh you are talking like Taiwan is a US territory. They are not like HK was, no US entities pick who runs Taiwan or how. (Or you could be sure the DPP would never have won an election. President Chen was well known to have had the US State Department tearing its hair out.) Taiwanese people might consider the two system possibility in three decades when they can see what China really does to HK after the noninterference period is over. I expect it to go about as well as June 4, 1989.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:Treaty of San Francisco by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Ugh you are talking like HK was a US territory. It was a UK territory that we gave back in 1997.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    3. Re:Treaty of San Francisco by slew · · Score: 2

      Ugh you are talking like Taiwan is a US territory. They are not like HK was, no US entities pick who runs Taiwan or how.

      No Taiwan is not a US territory, that is why I said the closest analogy is with post WWII Germany (which wasn't a US, UK, French, or USSR territory either). It is technically a temporarily occupied territory.

      Under well established precepts of international law (e.g., the Hauge convention of 1907), if you temporarily "occupy" a country as a result of a war (as opposed to annex a territory), the occupier (in this case the US) shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country (in this case Taiwan). I don't believe respecting the laws in force in the country would include being able to pick who runs the country.

      As to what happens when such an occupation ends, that is generally a result of some treaty (in this case the Treaty of San Francisco) which said nothing about it. This is the basis of the current problem. In contrast, the same treaty specifically stated that Japan must give Korea back to Korea, and the various occupied pacific islands to the UN-trusteeship program administered by the US. There general wasn't any problem with these other territorial specifications of the treaty (although China has recently made some noise concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands)...

      In contrast, Hong Kong was "ceded" to the British as a result of the Treaty of Nanjing (which closed out the First Opium War) making it a crown territory of the British Empire (this was different than the 99-year lease that was made for the new territories). As a crown colony it was technically part of the British empire and not an occupied territory, they could pick who ran the territory.

    4. Re:Treaty of San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the Diaoyutai islands.

  26. United Nations by BradMajors · · Score: 2

    "Taiwan, Province of China" is the official name used by the United Nations: http://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html

    Other companies also use this same name, such as ebay.

    1. Re:United Nations by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      That's not particularly meaningful, given that totalitarian regimes are to the UN as the tea party is to the US Congress. They've got enough votes to accomplish a lot of things that don't make sense and they vote in blocks.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  27. Re:A Breakaway Province by tgd · · Score: 1

    No, it isn't. Beijing doesn't control anything that goes on in Taiwan, much as they'd like to. Yeah, they used to make hostile noises in the past whenever Taiwan spoke of formally declaring independence, but it ultimately didn't amount to much. But Taiwan controls everything of its own, including its foreign & defense policies - not something that can be said about the province of any country

    Clearly you've never been to Texas.

  28. Re:Fuck iTards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why have none of the offtopic comments in this offtopic thread meen modded offtopic? The whole fucking subthread is not only offtopic but stupidly juvenile.

  29. Preferences menu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just add a setting to the preferences menu:

    Show Taiwan as: (x) independent; ( ) part of China

    They could also include other regions such as Quebec, Catalonia, Scotland, Cyprus, Texas... the possibilities are endless!

    1. Re:Preferences menu by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That too would open up a can of worms - in this case, w/ China. If such choices are provided, the entities opposed to such choices being there in the first place happen to be the country/government with majority opinion. China would oppose such a feature on marking Taiwan, Greece & Cyprus would oppose a feature allowing Turkish Cyprus to be marked separately, India would oppose such a feature on marking Pak-occupied/Azad (depending on your POV) Kashmir, Arabs would oppose Israel being shown as an independent country and so on. At least the default settings would have to be the 'popular' opinion

    2. Re:Preferences menu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was half-kidding; the idea was to let users of the maps app to say "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" But of course it wouldn't fly politically. Plus, what would be the default? My suggestion, and again I'm half-kidding, is to choose randomly.

  30. Apple maps? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    What does Apple now use - Google Maps or OpenStreet Maps or something else? They might as well get Nokia's HERE, since that will be separate from Lumia once the Microsoft deal comes through

    1. Re:Apple maps? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      Apple developed their own mapping app and data over the course of the last 3-5 years....

    2. Re:Apple maps? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Where did they get their data from? OSM?

    3. Re:Apple maps? by Yer+Mom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some days it feels like it came from /dev/urandom...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    4. Re:Apple maps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A combination of OSM and data licensed from (iirc) TomTom.

    5. Re:Apple maps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, some applefan must be really butthurt to mod that as troll. It's hilarious.

    6. Re:Apple maps? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Same as everyone else when they first start offering world maps: It's based on multiple sources. The main provider is Tom-Tom. But they in their turn get data from other suppliers.

      Google isn't one of the suppliers, but OSM is.

      This is one of the things that makes mapping hard and error prone: Munging together data from multiple sources.

    7. Re:Apple maps? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      And true. I'm in New Zealand, and Apple Maps insists that Bondi Beach, NSW is in my city.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  31. Re:Fuck iTards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GGP could keep his mom's ashes in an urn in the closet.

  32. Re:A Breakaway Province by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it isn't.

    Yes, it is; Think Different. Apple Maps show that Taiwan is a province of China.

    Sent from my self-advertizing piece of iCrap.

  33. Simple solution by pla · · Score: 0

    I have a simple solution to this problem.

    Just stop showing national borders entirely. They matter less and less in the modern world, and if the increasingly impotent old-guard of national governments wants to pretend they still have relevance, let them make their own smartphones showing whatever stupid place-names they want. Within 50 years, country names will amount to a historical curiosity.

    Of course, personally, I would recommend taking the most antagonistic approach possible. Based on the GPS reading, show it as part of China while in Taiwan, as its own country while in China, and just black it out and write "don't go here until these clowns can figure out their own name" for the rest of the world.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Just stop showing national borders entirely. They matter less and less in the modern world.

      Until you try to cross one.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  34. WTF by tgd · · Score: 1

    Modded down in like ten minutes?

    PSA: Don't make jokes about Norway until its the middle of the night there. Sheesh.

  35. Quebec, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Taiwan controls everything of its own, including its foreign & defense policies - not something that can be said about the province of any country

    You obviously have not been to the Canadian province of Quebec. ;-)

    1. Re:Quebec, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So can Quebec recognize the al Shabaab Jihadis in Somalia as its legitimate government if Canada refuses to?

    2. Re:Quebec, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think Quebec defines its own foreign policy, and certainly not defence which is done via DND.

      English: The Department of National Defence
      French: Ministère de la Défense nationale

  36. Easy fix. by shokk · · Score: 1

    In China, the maps should show Taiwan as a province of China.
    In the rest of the civilized world, including Taiwan, the maps should show Taiwan as its own entity.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  37. Re:Fuck iTards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shut the fuck up, fag.

  38. Re:A Breakaway Province by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taiwan is recognized by 22 countries. Many other countries have trade offices.

    And all of that is irrelevant as far as international law is concerned.

    Taiwan is China

  39. Regrets? by organgtool · · Score: 1

    With all of the issues Apple has had over their map software, I have to wonder if they're starting to regret trying to reinvent the wheel just to modestly distance themselves from Google.

  40. Re:A Breakaway Province by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How's life behind that firewall there?

    Here's a hint for you - things were a lot better in Hong Kong before the takeover. And they're a lot better in Taiwan than in Mainland China now. So get out. Just leave. Go to the US, Canada, Taiwan, Australia, anywhere really. China sucks. The porn is better everywhere else and so is pretty much everything else too.

  41. Do they have a flag? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    That's some interesting history, but it sounds like southwest Asia where imperial powers carved up nations without regard to the people living there. Self-determination is some silly hippie idea.

    So it's a good thing Taiwan has a flag.

  42. Q&A by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Q: Has the Taiwanese government declared that Taiwan is an independant state?
    A: No.

    Until they do, they are a province of China. This isn't a troll, this is basic logic.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  43. Obviously done on purpose by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    China is the next big market for everyone to go after. Companies will want to please China, not Taiwan. Surely they can figure that one out.

  44. Dear Taiwan, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really?

  45. Clock city oddities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This hardly surprising and doesn't just apply to China/Taiwan versions. Apple's Clock app in iOS 7, U.S. edition has a long list of cities with their respective countries. There are only two exceptions: the capital of Taiwan and Jerusalem have no country given. I know. I waded through the entire list a few weeks ago.

    That is not a mistake nor is the failure to include cities in Tibet with over a million in population. Tibet's occupation by China is fiercely resented by Tibetans. Including the city would force Apple to choose between China and Tibet. That it refuses to do.

    There are other obvious examples of political cowardice. The Falkland Islands, with thousands of people and in a time zone of their own, aren't included, but research sites in Antarctica whose winter populations are around a dozen are included. Figure that one out. It is downright weird.

    In short, any time there's a nasty, dictatorial regime that has a POV, Apple cowers and goes along. But notice that they do not do the same for democratic societies such as Taiwan, Israel or the Falklands. The reason is all too obvious. Those countries may complain, but they're not going to shut down the sale of Apple products. The dictatorships might. In Cupertino, money rules.

    Someone once noted that "The problem with socialism is socialism. The problem with capitalism is capitalists." This is a great illustration of that. Apple may claim to support democracy and freedom, but when their bottom-line profitability is threatened, they quickly cow down and submit. You could actually come up with a fairly good Freedom Index by just looking at corporate policies. If global corporations pander to these madnesses, the country is not free.

    And yes, whoever compiled the list must live overseas and must be more than a little stupid. U.S. cities are listed without their states, including some names that are in multiple states. No one who lives here would do that.

    Compounding that stupidity, there are U.S. states with millions of people that include large cities with populations in the hundreds of thousands but not a single of those cities are listed. Since Daylight Savings is determined at the state level, choosing a city in another state can lead to mistakes.

    And that's in a list that includes mere U.S. towns (without states) that are so small, I've never heard of them. For instance, there's a "Beulah, USA." If that's the Beulah in North Dakota, it has about 3100 people. If it's the one in Michigan, it has about 350. But there's no "Birmingham, USA" meaning the one in Alabama with over 200,000 people and in a metropolitan area with about 1.1 million people.

    In short, Apple's city lists are an astonishing blend of knowing cowardice and utter stupidity. At best, we can assume that no one in Apple Quality Control looks at these lists.

  46. UK by unixisc · · Score: 1

    England, Scotland & Wales were originally 3 different countries, which united some point in time.

    Great Britain = England + Scotland + Wales

    United Kingdom = Great Britain + Northern Ireland

    British Isles = Great Britain + Ireland OR England + Scotland + Wales + Ireland

    Britain (w/o the 'Great') is variably used in place of either Great Britain or the UK, and worse, sometimes merely England. There are some more complications, like Wales was early on annexed to even England, and wasn't recognized as separate, and isn't even represented on the Union Jack. To complicate things further, there are international sporting events where England & Scotland field rival teams.

  47. Re:A Breakaway Province by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    It's even funnier than that. There are people in Taiwan who'd love to just declare it an independent country sovereign within its present de facto territory and be done with it, but PRC doesn't like it one bit. So long as Taiwan claims to be "one China", they're in agreement with PRC that there is "one China", and the only dispute is over who gets to run it... which, ironically, PRC much prefers to the notion that the countries truly are separate and can go their separate ways.

    So the Taiwanese party which claims authority over the PRC mainland is seen much more favorably by PRC than the party that does not. Go figure...

  48. Re:A Breakaway Province by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Politics have some fun contradictions. This situation reminds me of far right parties from all over Europe gathering for a summit a couple of years ago. I caught a glimpse of some of the footage, and it was hilarious - watching people who make their political platform to hate one another shaking hands and talking how others are right.