Slashdot Mirror


The Yin and Yang of Hour of Code & Immigration Reform

theodp writes "The weeklong Hour of Code kicks off tomorrow, with Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates doing their part to address a declared nationwide CS crisis by ostensibly teaching the nation's schoolchildren how to code. But a recent NY Times Op-Ed by economist Paul Collier criticizing Zuckerberg's FWD.us PAC as self-serving advocacy (echoing earlier criticism) serves as a reminder that Zuckerberg and Gates' Code.org and Hour of Code involvement is the Yin to their H-1B visa lobbying Yang. The two efforts have been inextricably linked together for Congress, if not for the public. And while Zuckerberg argues it's 'the right thing to do', Collier argues that there are also downsides to the tech giants' plans to shift more bright, young, enterprising people from the poorest countries to the richest. 'An open door for the talented would help Facebook's bottom line,' Collier concludes, 'but not the bottom billion.'"

220 comments

  1. Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    telling the rest how it's done.

    1. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      yeah spending hundreds of millions of dollars eradicating diseases like malaria in poor countries is so immoral...oh right but you only care that Windows is closed source.

      To be fair, Gates got that money by breaking the law. His unfair competition resulted worldwide adoption of an insecure system, causing untold hardship across the industry (against more robust systems with few security flaws).

      Should we cheer Al Capone for the good he was doing for Chicago?

    2. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should we cheer Al Capone for the good he was doing for Chicago?

      Nobody said you should cheer anybody, only that some people clearly have a warped sense of morals when their own choice to use Windows funds cures for diseases in third world countries and they are bitter about it.

      To be fair, Gates got that money by breaking the law.

      no, to be fair he did it by clever business in the early days (in the days of IBM vs Microsoft there weren't many people cheering on IBM to win) and the later attempts to lock in to internet explorer were the subject of anti-trust trials (and retribution) but this was after he had made his fortune and really MS were simply ahead of the curve, what consumer internet device these days comes without a browser built in? shit even your phone and tv ship with them. private APIs? yep pretty much every system has them too these days.

      the reality is the competition at the time was worthless (OS/2) or unwilling to separate hardware and software (the various unixes), by the time a viable alternative emerged (GNU/Linux in the late 90s when it became somewhat decent and supported common hardware) the use of Windows was already the defacto standard and people didnt want to change.

      His unfair competition resulted worldwide adoption of an insecure system, causing untold hardship across the industry (against more robust systems with few security flaws).

      what a load of crap, Windows may not have been the most secure system but against the horrible burden of IBM and the infancy and general lack of usability of GNU/Linux, Windows was the obvious choice and a choice made by people who were indeed free to choose. To this day some people would rather pretend they were completely helpless and at the mercy of big bad Microsoft than admit they made a poor choice.

      That aside it does indeed prove my point that even if you took this "Robin Hood" mentality of doing something "evil" in technology and using the gains to help cure diseases and improve the quality of life in poor countries there are still people who feel that's a terrible thing.

    3. Re: Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually up until the point of the gates foundation, Bill Gates was the ultimate Scrooge. He gae away not one penny, it wasn't until he was called out on that very fact that the Gates foudration was formed.

      Even much of the supposedly altruistic efforts also seem to have an angle:
      http://m.slashdot.org/story/171367

      http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/07/31/bill-gates-corporate-profit-vs-humanity.aspx

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates#Philanthropy

    4. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, Okian is right. You and the some of the mods are probably too young to have remembered what MS did in the late '80s and '90s. They (along with Intel) controlled the PC platform, which was over 95 percent of the personal computing market (Apple was a marginal player back then), and MS made damn sure that

      1) operating system competitors were crushed - even OS/2, which Microsoft originally co-developed with IBM. Microsoft made PC manufacturers like Dell buy Windows licenses based on the number of PCs they shipped, regardless of whether they had Windows installed or not. Microsoft also made sure that Windows 3.x would only run on MS-DOS, and not DR-DOS from Digital Research, by deliberately introducing incompatibilities.

      2) PC application software competitors were crushed - Windows 3.x, although popular, was one of the most unstable operating environments that ever shipped in volume, although I supposed the Mac OS at the time probably gave it competition on that score. There were ridiculously low (often 64K) system-wide limits on several different kinds of resources, and if that resource were exhausted you'd get a blue screen. The COM-based OLE/ActiveX mechanism pitched by Microsoft as the biggest technical advance of the OS was poorly designed and incredibly hard to program. But the Microsoft Office developers worked closely with the Windows team and stayed on top of all the changes in the APIs and got the inside scoop on how to get the best performance and avoid some of the instabilities (I should mention there were thousands of system calls; Bill Gates himself acknowledged during the trial there were about 6000). Microsoft would make subtle changes in the kernel from release to release that would affect compatibility of applications, often timing changes to occur right after a competitor released their product (these were the days where application software was sold via shrink wrap and it was very costly to recall a product). TA guy named Andrew Shulman did some kernel-level hacking and wrote a couple books about this, one of which was called 'Undocumented Windows'.

      3) Microsoft came close to stealing IP from other companies, including Go - Jerry Kaplan gave Gates and Jeff Raikes a demo of his pen-operated tablet under an NDA, and discovered six months later that MS had started the Pen Windows project under the direction of Raikes - and Sybase (why do you think both companies sell a database product called SQL Server?).

      4) When Netscape made the then-novel decision to release their browser (Navigator) as a free download for a trial period, Microsoft decided to "cut off their air supply" (their words) by releasing Internet Explorer (a browser they purchased from a company called Spyglass after Navigator's release) as part of Windows. Not just as an app that happened to ship with Windows, but as a necessary PART OF WINDOWS - as they claimed themselves, they were unable to satisfy European regulator's demands that they allow manufacturers to ship with Netscape instead of IE. The best they could do, MS told them, would be to allow OEMs to ship with both browsers if they chose.

      Gates was a robber baron in the mode of Rockefeller and Carnegie, whose biographies I'm sure he read. And he followed their example of turning to philanthropy later in life.

    5. Re:Two of the most immoral people by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Informative
      MS had already engaged in some serious antitrust behavior circa 1990, before they were anywhere near the behemoth they are today.

      what a load of crap, Windows may not have been the most secure system but against the horrible burden of IBM and the infancy and general lack of usability of GNU/Linux, Windows was the obvious choice and a choice made by people who were indeed free to choose. To this day some people would rather pretend they were completely helpless and at the mercy of big bad Microsoft than admit they made a poor choice.

      Have you considered that the lack of viable competition might have been the result of robust set of anti-competitive practices? Also, by grossly oversimplifying things like you did, you forget that things weren't all that simple. MS was strong-arming OEMs if they dared to install competing OS's or browsers, and they ignored standards in IE while actively breaking compatibility of plugins.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Two of the most immoral people by spmkk · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...Microsoft decided to "cut off their air supply" (their words) by releasing Internet Explorer (a browser they purchased from a company called Spyglass after Navigator's release) as part of Windows. Not just as an app that happened to ship with Windows, but as a necessary PART OF WINDOWS...

      The skeeziest part of that deal actually wasn't Microsoft's attack on Netscape - it was their raw screwing of Spyglass. For those who don't remember this history, Microsoft licensed Mosaic (which they re-branded as Internet Explorer) from Spyglass for a minimal quarterly licensing fee plus a cut of the revenue from every copy of the browser that they sold. They then proceeded to give the browser away for free** with every copy of Windows, thereby not owing Spyglass any of the commission. Spyglass threatened legal action but apparently never took any, opting to settle for an $8M payout for a piece of technology that made Microsoft hundreds of billions.

      ** I never understood why Spyglass didn't sue Microsoft on the basis that (by Microsoft's own declaration, as AC pointed out) Internet Explorer was an integral part of Windows, and thus some share of the sales revenue for every copy of Windows was de facto revenue from the sale of Internet Explorer. Maybe someone more familiar with the back-story can fill in this blank?

    7. Re:Two of the most immoral people by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Clever, aggressive, and at times outright illegal business practices. Windows may have won because of a lack of good competition (in part due to MS efforts to sabotage OS/2), but they also used a bundling technique to kill off competition for browser and media players, and a lock-in technique to achieve dominance for a time in media technology.

      The old 'divx ;-)' codec was actually just Microsoft's video codec with a hack. The codec was fine, but the decoder shipped with Windows was deliberately limited to only decode if the data was coming from an ASF/WMV file - so if you wanted to use this very advanced (for the time) codec, you had to use only Microsoft's encoders and playback software. Further, if you actually read the license for the ASF specification, one of the requirements for implementing it was that your software must not save video in any format other than ASF - making it impossible to legally transcode their Windows-playable-only format into anything else. That's why they threatened the creator of virtualdub with legal action. Lock-in tricks like that served to effectively place great barriers in the way of interopability. You could use linux or BSD - but you won't be able to play video, at least until someone cracks and rebrands the codec.

    8. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with the backstory, but my intuition tells me, and this article agrees (http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/january/new0122d.htm), that once the payout happened it replaced the royalty deal. That settlement was January 1997, long predating any serious integration of IE with Windows (IE4 was the first with shell integration in October 1997).

    9. Re:Two of the most immoral people by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Gates was a robber baron in the mode of Rockefeller and Carnegie

      What was Gates' equivalent to the Homestead Strike? Please, stop the hyperbole. It doesn't help your arguments. I remember Microsoft in the 80's and (especially) the 90's. Their sleazy business practices should have been stopped. They did economic harm to customers (the main concern of anti-trust law). The company should have been broken up after the anti-trust trial (MS Office on Linux would make Linus desktop adoption much easier). Nevertheless, last I checked, Microsoft IP goons are generally unarmed.

    10. Re:Two of the most immoral people by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Should we cheer Al Capone for the good he was doing for Chicago?

      Many people do. He donated a significant amount of money to charity, and ran several soup kitchens during the depression.

      Unlike Bill Gates, he helped people throughout his career, not only after he'd become filthy rich and needed a tax deduction.

    11. Re: Two of the most immoral people by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Actually up until the point of the gates foundation, Bill Gates was the ultimate Scrooge. He gae away not one penny, it wasn't until he was called out on that very fact that the Gates foudration was formed.

      Even much of the supposedly altruistic efforts also seem to have an angle

      That's right. Gates was hated, and he wanted to do something about it before Congress held any more hearings and found something (like antitrust) to prosecute him for.

      The philanthropy thing was created by his PR agency, and they did a good job. At their advice, he did fund some important projects, like international disease programs that were exactly what all the public health people knew would give tremendous returns for only a relatively few (billion) dollars.

      He was like John D. Rockefeller, the other billionaire (after inflation) who was also hated, and hired a PR firm to improve his image. They had him give away shiny dimes to little children. He also did some good things, like his medical research. Fortunately cancer is a favorite rich folks' cause (along with opera).

      The problem is that he also followed the advice of the corporate right wing. He was part of what Diane Ravitch called the "billionaire boy's club" of school "reformers" http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/sep/29/school-reform-failing-grade/ who wanted to privatize public schools, humiliate the teachers, destroy their union, rate them with high-stakes testing, and turn education into an assembly line of short-answer questions.

      We've turned this country over to the billionaires. It shows you the benefits and problems of letting dictators run things. Gates did some good things (world epidemics) and some bad things (charter schools).

      When he gets involved in (tax-deductible) charities that bring his own interests into conflict with the interests of others, like immigration "reform", you know whose side he's going to be on.

      I personally don't think this would be a very good country if we turned it into a billionaire's playground rather than the imperfect democracy it used to be.

    12. Re:Two of the most immoral people by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Here is something that gets me. And I am no windows fanboi by any means, but I still for the life of me do not understand how MS got in trouble for bundling a web browser. I mean by that logic should we not be looking into apple for locking down everything? Apple bundles safari lets stone them! oh what? android bundles chrome on chromebooks? break out the lawsuits! I mean I followed the case I just dont get it is all

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    13. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Gates has ulterior motive for his interest in vaccines. What an interesting form of (real) warfare -- to emplace a culture and mechanism of mass vaccination as a delivery vector for biowarfare. Gates' peeps in Mama Israel have been hard at work. They got caught in Ukraine attempting this hocus pocus. They can solve their Palestinian problem. They can depopulate South Africa once the Whites are gone. The possiblities are endless.

    14. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      yeah spending hundreds of millions of dollars eradicating diseases like malaria in poor countries is so immoral...oh right but you only care that Windows is closed source.

      The harm done by the organization and the companies that the foundation fund invests in does too much damage for the disease mitigation efforts they spend some of the money on. They created, lobbied for and are funding the implementation of "Common Core" (and, yes, Common Core is bad. I trust what the teachers say about it).

      And despite what you have heard about the foundation's funding for immunizations in poor countries, a great amount of money goes to fund sterilization and abortion programs. It's all part of the foundation's population control efforts. This is Bill Gate's plan for dealing with climate change: depopulation through vaccines.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    15. Re: Two of the most immoral people by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that he also followed the advice of the corporate right wing. He was part of what Diane Ravitch called the "billionaire boy's club" of school "reformers" http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/sep/29/school-reform-failing-grade/ [nybooks.com] who wanted to privatize public schools, humiliate the teachers, destroy their union...

      While I largely agree with most of your post, I don't see what the problem is with this part.

      I mean, the current US system, with its overload of money sucking administration and teachers unions that are far more interested in themselves than the kids they are supposed to be teaching, likely does need to be thrown out the window.

      What we have now clearly is NOT working...and pretty much any new approach at this point is worth exploring.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re: Two of the most immoral people by nbauman · · Score: 1

      There are some very good K-12 public schools in the US.

      Maybe half the (unionized) public schools in New York City are up to international standards. Parents fight to get their kids in. You'd be crazy to throw those schools out the window.

      The other half are in low-income neighborhoods, where the kids have real problems. The good parents are the ones who work two jobs and aren't home to help their kids with their homework.

      Diane Ravitch was assistant secretary of education for the GWH Bush administration and the Clinton administration. She believed all that stuff -- until she looked at the data.

      Ravitch said that the one factor that affected standardized test scores more than anything else was family income.

      When you fire teachers because their students did badly on high-stakes testing, you're punishing teachers for teaching low-income students. And that's what Obama's Race to the Top, which Gates supported, is doing.

      The only way to bring those low-income kids up is to make them middle-income. You can't solve problems by throwing money at them, but you can cause a lot of problems by reducing people to poverty. (And destroying unions is one of the best ways of reducing people to poverty.)

      The NAEP, which runs the best-designed standardized tests, compared charter schools with public schools. They found that charter schools overall did worse than public schools. Yet Obama and Gates want to throw public schools out the window and replace them with non-union charter schools.

      Read that article by Ravitch that I linked to. She explains it all -- supported by solid evidence, unlike Obama and Gates.

      If you believe in testing, and you want to change the schools, look around the world for the students that test best -- usually Finland. They have a public school system with unionized teachers.

      Finland is also the country with the greatest economic equality and mobility in the world. They've eliminated poverty, with government handouts when necessary.

    17. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They then proceeded to give the browser away for free...
      ...for a piece of technology that made Microsoft hundreds of billions.

      there's a disconnect there. i would like to see where you get the idea that spyglass' browser made microsoft hundreds of billions, actually i would like to see any particular technology that has made them hundreds of billions.

    18. Re:Two of the most immoral people by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Here is something that gets me. And I am no windows fanboi by any means, but I still for the life of me do not understand how MS got in trouble for bundling a web browser. I mean by that logic should we not be looking into apple for locking down everything? Apple bundles safari lets stone them! oh what? android bundles chrome on chromebooks? break out the lawsuits! I mean I followed the case I just dont get it is all

      The issue is the monopoly, anti-competitive behavior isn't actually illegal. You have highlighted the issue with browsers which is exactly the same behavior and of course there is also the bundling of their curated app stores (imagine the backlash if Microsoft had done that back in the late 90s) and the usage of private APIs - which was a key element of the anti-trust trial wrt Office.

      Google and Apple need eachother because if one were to drop off in their competing markets the other would be faced with the same anti-trust problems as Microsoft was, they only escape by not being a dominant market force. Microsoft's mistake was to crush their competitors (like OS/2) rather than letting them thrive and the saving payment to Apple was not enough to offset their market power.

    19. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monopolies are held to higher standards than other companies, so that competition is maintained, and Microsoft were very deliberately removing competition, which a monopoly is not supposed to do. Microsoft also employed a range of nasty tactics, such as strong arming OEMs to stop installing Netscape, etc.

    20. Re:Two of the most immoral people by bbsalem · · Score: 1

      MS had already engaged in some serious antitrust behavior circa 1990, before they were anywhere near the behemoth they are today.

      what a load of crap, Windows may not have been the most secure system but against the horrible burden of IBM and the infancy and general lack of usability of GNU/Linux, Windows was the obvious choice and a choice made by people who were indeed free to choose. To this day some people would rather pretend they were completely helpless and at the mercy of big bad Microsoft than admit they made a poor choice.

      Have you considered that the lack of viable competition might have been the result of robust set of anti-competitive practices? Also, by grossly oversimplifying things like you did, you forget that things weren't all that simple. MS was strong-arming OEMs if they dared to install competing OS's or browsers, and they ignored standards in IE while actively breaking compatibility of plugins.

      I always thought that Gates was a simple thief that got away with it. He stole Basic from Gary Killdall, and MS-DOS was a ripoff of PC-DOS, and DOS-Shell was a dumbed down Bourne Shell. What really get my goat is people insisting that MS-DOS was ever better than UNIX, and especialy once X11 and a decent window manager existed, which was maybe right around the time DOS 3.1 existed.

      I have had all of the Windows OS up to Vista, and ran versions of UNIX and Linux along side and there was no question at all that *NIX was superior in every way. The only reason for the popularity of Windows was market capture and the OEM agreement that shipped it with every x86 machine, a deal which should have been declared illegal under anti trust law from the get go. I don't buy the crap that conservatives have been putting out about the government being anti-business. I think they (the Congress, the cabinet agencies) are in bed with the biggest corporations in America and always have been regardless of which of the duopoly is in power. The ability of M$ to ship Windows with every PC is proof to me of that, and if the Congress, the courts, and most administrations had been enforcing anti-trust law Gate's wings would have been clipped years ago.

      Even with the supposed ease of use issues, not every one should be restricted to a UNIX shell ( Or was DOS-Shell that much different? Not really), UNIX/Linux has been much more secure than Windows, and if you can imagine that a company allows its business partners to get into your system the moment it is powered up the first time, then what is to stop some hacker? Not much. Anyway the ease of use issues are largely non-existent and Linux runs on systems that are too small for recent Windows releases. I ran Ubuntu 12.04 on a system that was too small for Vista, that was running XP and would not run any later release of Windows. Windows will persist because of legacy, and the illegal market capture it has, not because it is worth a damn.

    21. Re:Two of the most immoral people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they intentionally wove it into the very fabric of the OS which forced you to use it or fuck your system.

  2. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An iDot? Is this Apple's new next thing to tell you when you're about to expire?

  3. Parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uses complex offshore shell companies in order to not pay taxes to fund roads, schools, community, civilization.
    Wont train Americans (or anyone else) in IT, actively seeking to import labor again that someone else paid for their education

    how is this company even got a voice in America? in the old days they would be run out of town or worse

    today ? fuck you you i got mine and there is nothing you can do to stop me

    1. Re:Parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wont train Americans (or anyone else) in IT, actively seeking to import labor again that someone else paid for their education

      It isnt their responsibility to train you, stop being such an entitlist cockbag.

      All the big tech companies should just leave America, with all the complaints that they are avoiding taxes and that they are just hiring offshore workers they would be better off setting up in another country anyway. In the global economy you need to give companies an incentive to stay and support your local economy. Why should they even stay in America?

    2. Re:Parasites by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uses complex offshore shell companies in order to not pay taxes to fund roads, schools, community, civilization.

      They pay plenty of taxes, including payroll taxes, sales taxes, and taxes on dividends and capital gains paid by their shareholders. They only avoid income tax. But corporate income tax comes out of the pockets of some combination of their employees, customers, and shareholders. If you think employees should pay more, then raise payroll taxes. If you think customers should pay more, then raise sales taxes. If you think shareholders should pay more then raise taxes on dividends and capital gains. Any of those would make far more sense than continuing a poorly designed corporate income tax is easily avoided, collects little revenue, and pushes jobs and investment out of America.

    3. Re:Parasites by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The new America: Crushing the middle class, consolidating wealth to the 0.25% of the wealthy, and importing cheap labor and/or outsourcing work. America is starting to become the new Mexico where we have a new have and have-not society. The middle-class is a threat to those in power and wanting to stay in power. This nation is fucked. And we haven't even talked about soon-to-be hyper inflation spurned by insolvency. But that's ok right? Hyper inflation will just create an even larger disparity in wealthy. By design!!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new America: Crushing the middle class, consolidating wealth to the 0.25% of the wealthy, and importing cheap labor and/or outsourcing work.

      I'd suggest you to stay with an eye on the GINI index: it doesn't look that bad (yet).

    5. Re:Parasites by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      how is this company even got a voice in America? in the old days they would be run out of town or worse

      Nah, in the old days people would've tried to run them out of town, but they would've hired some private thugs (Pinkertons, etc.) to run the other people out of town instead.

    6. Re:Parasites by couchslug · · Score: 1

      " in the old days they would be run out of town or worse"

      In which alternate universe were those "old days"?

      In the real old days, companies hired Pinkertons etc to kill laborers who resisted them, and had little problem importing coolie labor.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    7. Re:Parasites by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      stop being such an entitlist

      Why? FB/Zuck and MS/Gates are the ultimate entitlists. They think they're entitled to not pay taxes, unlike us middle class schnooks. They think they're entitled to special government programs, like the H-1B visa program, to increase the profitability of already wealthy corporations and their major stockholders.

      By contrast, you play the useful idiot, regurgitating propaganda like the "global economy you need to give companies an incentive to stay and support your local economy". As for "why should they even stay in America", they would have left a long time ago if they thought it would increase their profits. They have no commitment to the United States, or the slightest shred of patriotism, or belief in the ethics of reciprocity towards the country that fostered the creation of those corporations and their immense personal wealth.

    8. Re:Parasites by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Its not their responsibility to train you but we probably should ask the question whey they don't want to. Is it because the American education system is not turning out young adults that are even fit for entry level positions in tech firms?

      Is it that other nations are turning out young adults that are so much better qualified?

      Do companies no longer see a benefit from developing and retaining talent in house? People used to have entire professional careers at just one or two organizations. Why has this changed?

      It is a problem that companies don't seem to want to hire anyone without a decade of experience now. Those of us who are fortunate enough to have than but young enough not have ageism close the doors to us as well can do okay, for now...

      I like many of my peers I talk to at different organizations, get great reviews but never "promoted" I mean we get title promotions where they add additional roman numerals on our business cards and pay bumps but the job does not really change. When something like a team lead position opens up they almost always hire an outsider. It was clear at one company I spent a lot years at I was never going to get moved up in the organization sense. As soon I left an went somewhere else laterally for a little while though, I saw the position I had wanted their open up and got the job with no more than a phone call "So you want to come back? Great!". I am certain though had I still be occupying my old desk I never would have been considered for the potion.

      As I have stated before I have many friends with very similar experiences. Its weird as a policy I don't really understand it. Maybe the idea is it brings outside ideas in. I can understand seeking to do this if the business practice/unit at a given organization is immature in terms of process or unsuccessful but when you have a sub organization that is working why not promote from within?

      What is going on?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    9. Re:Parasites by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      They pay plenty of taxes ...

      How did you determine it's "plenty", by noting that they pay more in the way of taxes than you do? "Plenty" should be in proportion to income.

      But corporate income tax comes out of the pockets of some combination of their employees, customers, and shareholders.

      "Some combination" leaves a lot of latitude and the biggest question of all unanswered. You did however make the observation that there's no such thing as a free lunch. Let me add that the sun rises in the east and that water is wet. They're all truisms, but so obviously true as to make the mention of them trite.

      If you think customers should pay more, then raise sales taxes. If you think shareholders should pay more then raise taxes on dividends and capital gains.

      I'll vote for the last. Taxing "long term" (greater than 1 year is long term?) capital gains at a a max marginal rate of 15%, even if you're a billionaire, while middle class schnooks pay a higher marginal rate on their earned income (IRS term), is obscene. Have you noticed the vast political movement to change that? Or that the average person in the street, fed "information" by the sycophantic media, are even aware of such an absurd disparity?

      a poorly designed corporate income tax is easily avoided

      To the extent that it's poorly designed, it's because of all the loopholes "requested" by the likes of Gates and Zuck. Despite the bleatings of major corporations and their sycophants, the US effective corporate income tax rate is modest by world standards. I'm all for eliminating the loopholes and reducing the nominal rate, but there seems to be little push for it. Why? Because those that have been most effective in pushing their political/economic agendas are the ones who benefit most from those loopholes.

    10. Re:Parasites by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I'll vote for the last. Taxing "long term" (greater than 1 year is long term?) capital gains at a a max marginal rate of 15%, even if you're a billionaire, while middle class schnooks pay a higher marginal rate on their earned income (IRS term), is obscene. Have you noticed the vast political movement to change that? Or that the average person in the street, fed "information" by the sycophantic media, are even aware of such an absurd disparity?

      The problem here is there are people who are middle class and people who think they are middle class. You are middle class if you have a professional job or are a tradesmen with some savings and the ability to make choices. You quit and move to a different city because you want to for example. If you nothing but debts and your credit is maxed out and would be looking at foreclosure after a few months if you lose a job, you are not middle class. I don't care how big your McMansion is or have many SUVs you have parked on the driveway with no equity in. You sir are still poor.

      The actual middle class has savings in investments and that 15% tax rates helps them lots. Its what enables them to save enough to retire and maintain their standard of living. Does it also function as give away to the very wealthy yes, but rates should be the same for everyone. Maybe it should be 15% on the first 100K and go up from there but just blanket raising the capital gains would be bad for middle class America.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    11. Re:Parasites by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The actual middle class has savings in investments and that 15% tax rates helps them lots.

      The vast majority of middle class investments are in IRA's and 401k's, where they should be, and where you don't pay taxes on them until you retire anyway. Very few retirees pay above a 15% tax rate, so the limit on capitals gains rates doesn't help them at all.

      Maybe it should be 15% on the first 100K and go up from there but just blanket raising the capital gains would be bad for middle class America.

      That's the same idea as the progressive rates on other forms of income. Ergo, there is no need to do anything other than eliminate the 15% ceiling on capital gains rates. Even Reagan thought that was a good idea, and signed into law a bill that did that.

    12. Re:Parasites by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      In which alternate universe were those "old days"?

      But, as the AC immediately above you pointed out, at least people would have tried to run them out of town. Or, at the very least, people would have wanted to run them out of town, and thought they deserved it.

      Compare that to today where most people don't think they should be run out of town. Talk about effective brainwashing! At least most people back then understood economic reality, despite supposedly being less educated. Maybe the absence of TV, not to mention the existence of an actual opposition press (as opposed to today's supposedly "balanced" media) made it harder to brainwash people.

    13. Re:Parasites by Xest · · Score: 1

      Why is it the job of corporations to train people?

      I've always been willing to forge my own path to learning, I learn what I want to learn and I'm willing to dedicate my time and money to doing so.

      All the greatest developers I've known are those who have a passion for learning, and they keep doing so, they never stop. If someone has this entitlement attitude where industry owns them training then they don't have that trait, sure you could send them on a training course for this, that, and the other, but if they have to insist on being sent on those courses then they don't have that required trait of ongoing development.

      So if you think you're owed training by corporations, and that it's up to them to train you, rather than you to train yourself to be useful, then you don't have the inherent traits required to be truly great anyway.

      If you can't self-learn, or organise self-learning, then no amount of training will make you the sort of person high tech companies need because learning and research go hand in hand and they want people who can do both to take their technologies forward. It's the necessity of cutting edge - it's not like bricklaying or whatever where you can be taught it in an apprenticeship and then get a job doing it over and over for life. The world of software especially at companies like these is ever changing and you have to be capable of ensuring your skills are ever changing and evolving to be fit for the field.

      I'm with you on tax avoidance etc., but I think if you think others need to train you then you simply don't have what it takes to work at the forefront of this sort of field anyway and those that do will have trained themselves, and enjoyed doing so.

    14. Re:Parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They pay plenty of taxes, including payroll taxes, sales taxes, and taxes on dividends and capital gains paid by their shareholders."

      That's not them paying taxes, that's employees, customers, and shareholders paying taxes respectively. That's not the same thing.

      "But corporate income tax comes out of the pockets of some combination of their employees, customers, and shareholders."

      I don't know the US tax system well, but assuming corporation tax in the UK is the same as what you call corporate income tax then what you say is nonsense. Corporation tax comes off after other deductions and before profits, which by definition is the money left over once everyone else has been paid and costs taken into account. If you wanted to pay employees more you could do so and reduce your pre-profit income on which corporation tax would be paid. If this money is to be reinvested then that can happen as an expenditure to be taken into account before corporation tax is applied. The only thing it does is lessen the ability to stockpile money which reduces the ability of a company to cope in a crisis, or to create a war chest for the future, but there are various mechanisms to cope with those anyway - i.e. bankruptcy protection, the ability to defer tax and so on and so forth. So it actually has the exact opposite effect to what you suggest - given that it's a tax only on idle money it means companies have a choice of giving even more of it to their staff, investing regularly (which helps the economy), paying a higher dividend, reduce their profit margins making products cheaper for consumers, or simply giving it up to the government if they otherwise didn't want to do any of that and were just going to have it sat around unproductively. Shareholders, employees, and consumers actually lose out from companies that hoard cash, because it means the former two could be getting a better payout, or the latter one could be seeing cheaper products.

      The idea that companies should pay corporation tax stems from the fact that they benefit from state institutions - they're protected by the police, fire, and military services, their employees are educated on the state dime, their goods transported on tax payer funded road and rail, and in progressive countries are kept healthy by the state healthcare system. Given that companies benefit so greatly from tax payer funded institutions it makes sense that they contribute back into it either directly from their pre-profit earnings, or by paying their staff and shareholders more who subsequently pay more tax on their earnings instead.

      Either way, simply hoarding money helps no one, as much as the fantasists like to pretend "Oh but they'll use it one day!" - yes, when their company is fucked, in dire straits, and draining down the pan and it's too late to save it is normally what happens.

      Do you honestly think Apple's $100bn+ is being used efficiently sat in banks in places like Dublin not doing much? do you genuinely not see how it'd be more efficient if it was redistributed to shareholders, to employers, by way of reduced product costs for consumers, or for purchase of other firms to integrate their products or produce new products, or to the government to be used on infrastructure programs or better schooling or similar?

    15. Re:Parasites by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      All Taxes are regressive. ALWAYS. Liberals always talk about "equity" of taxes, but they never realize that taxes themselves are regressive. The rich can always avoid taxes via their wealth. The poor can never avoid taxes. Targeting the rich at their wealth, does nothing but hurt those that it is designed to help.

      If you want to punish the successful, reward failure, you're going to have a really backwards country. And since you are a liberal, I doubt you'll ever understand this simple little truth.

      You want successful tax policy, tax things society doesn't want, like cigarettes. Tax the use of things like gas and use that to build public transportation, if that is what you want. But what you'll find is eventually those taxes diminishing as people quit the activities you're taxing.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    16. Re:Parasites by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      It isnt their responsibility to train you

      Yet they came up with the curriculum, dubbed it "Common Core", and are helping fund the implementation. But, yea, they expect the middle class taxpayers to fund the actual training for the next generation of corporate cogs.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    17. Re:Parasites by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      They pay plenty of taxes, including payroll taxes,

      H1-B employees get a significantly lower salary. That very much reduces the payroll taxes that they end up paying. If H1-B employees actually received comparable salary and could easily jump ship to another company, the problem would resolve itself (i.e. they would only be hired when local talent is indeed unavailable)

    18. Re:Parasites by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Why should they even stay in America?

      Well, they have offices outside of america already. it's just a status thing to keep the main offices near valley(or seattle).

      one incentive to stay is actually your poor data laws..

      anyhow, most facebooks and microsofts customers/users are not from USA to begin with.. so who the fuck the "bottom billion" is referring to, since last I checked USA doesn't have a fucking billion+ population. if something is hindering moving to USA to start a business it's that legally it's cumbersome to do so!

      limitation of movement and choosing the place to live is a benefit for the billions of poor people on earth now ?!?!? what the fuck?!?!? it's good for them that they're stuck either working on rice patty that's barely worth farming or go into slavery conditions into another country vs. going on to another country and having actual rights as an actual human being?? it's the fucking controlled slave importing that's the fucking problem, be it nepalese imported to saudis or mexicans(controlled by being illegit) imported to USA that is the problem for the "bottom billion" since they're made to immigrate under different rules and the rules keep them ready to be exploited(since they're not free to find a decent employer or a place of business).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    19. Re:Parasites by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Training yourself is great. Having the opportunity to buy books or attend organized training classes is also great. One does not preclude the other.

    20. Re:Parasites by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Not all H1B employees get a significant lower salary. Some companies do abuse H1Bs that way (e.g. Tata), others do not (e.g. all large IT companies that I know of - Google, Facebook, MS, Amazon).

    21. Re:Parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is this company even got a voice in America? in the old days they would be run out of town or worse

      Problem is running people out of town was done in olde towns which weren't all that civilized. Nowadays most high-tech is done in big cities with all the major benefits of civilization, alas, one of those is a decent police force who prefer that people don't get run out of town. People in high-tech also are more the type for mental action, not physical action.

    22. Re:Parasites by exomondo · · Score: 1

      What is going on?

      The aversion to promoting people to their level of incompetence. Look at this site and look at how many people complain about managerial incompetence, most of those managers got to where they were by being promoted up from entry level positions by virtue of simply being there for a long time not because they were any good at the actual positions they were being promoted to.

      If you are good at the job you do it makes sense to bump your pay from time to time and continue having you do a good job in your position than to change your position to something you are potentially not good at at all. Of course if you are proactive and engage your managers about training and your desired career path then you should be able move positions assuming you prove yourself but you would have to be a diabolically incompetent manager to move good resources out of their effective positions, unfortunately we have seen this happen plenty of times before.

    23. Re:Parasites by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      All Taxes are regressive. ALWAYS.

      You evidently don't understand the definition of regressive tax. It's perfectly possible to give a wealth tax that is inherently progressive, by definition. We don't tend to do that (wealth taxes discourage reasonable savings and planning).

      If you want to punish the successful, reward failure [...]

      You just finished saying that it was impossible to have a progressive tax, so this is a non-issue.

      Regardless, how do people think that progressive taxes (or, if you must, "less regressive" taxes) punish the successful and reward failure? Punishing the successful and rewarding failure means that the failures get more than the successful. But that's not true. Somebody in a hypothetical country who makes 200K per year and pays 80K in taxes has 120K net dollars per year, while the guy in the same country who makes 20K per year and pays no taxes has 20K net dollars at the end of the year. The guy who was more successful was "rewarded" 6 times as much as the guy who failed. To put it another way, taking a voluntary 50% paycut in order to dodge taxes is basically never a good move (leaving aside from BS with capital gains taxes).

      And since you are a liberal, I doubt you'll ever understand this simple little truth.

      And since you're a jerk, you just can't resist.

      You want successful tax policy, tax things society doesn't want [...]. But what you'll find is eventually those taxes diminishing as people quit the activities you're taxing.

      Good, that sounds wonderful. Two birds with one stone. If we need more revenue later, we can tax something else.

    24. Re:Parasites by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      "They pay plenty of taxes, including payroll taxes, sales taxes, and taxes on dividends and capital gains paid by their shareholders."

      That's not them paying taxes, that's employees, customers, and shareholders paying taxes respectively. That's not the same thing.

      Who are you referring to as "them"? You seem to have a weird mental model of how taxes work, so could you please explain whose pocket the taxes would come from if not from employees, customers or shareholders?

    25. Re:Parasites by Xest · · Score: 1

      I agree but that's exactly what the GPs implication was - that Americans aren't getting these jobs that are going to H1-Bs because American companies aren't training people.

      My point is that that's simply nonsense, there's another path to obtaining those acquired skills - self-learning. If the companies aren't training that doesn't prevent you obtaining the required skills.

      Sure it's nice if you can have both, but given the US has an advantageous education system compared to many H1-B countries of origin it seems understandable that companies should ask why they'd waste money hiring someone and training them when they wont learn off their own back when they could just hire someone from somewhere else that has learnt off their own back in a less advantageous economy for learning. If an American wont spend $40, maybe a hundredth of a percentage of his income on a book and read it but someone from say, India will spend 1% of his income - 100x more based on wealth then why would you want to waste money on the American layabout? The Indian is clearly a far superior employee due to a far superior passion for the profession.

      Expecting others to train you if you wont learn yourself is stupid, if you are willing to learn yourself then it's more worth a company sending you on training courses as well - because they know the money will be well spent in that you'll take a lot away from the course because you have a clear passion for it evidenced by your self-learning.

    26. Re:Parasites by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Self training is not recognized by alot of organizations. If I go into an interview and say I read a book and set up my own test lab, it should look good and it does to a minority subset of managers. Unfortunately, it never looks good to HR and when you are stacked up against, I took some classes on that, you will lose every time.

      There are also vast gulfs between what I can setup in a test lab and what an experienced instructor can create. Not to mention the vast difference between the test lab and the working environment that an instructor should be knowledgeable about.

    27. Re:Parasites by Xest · · Score: 1

      Self-training doesn't preclude you from getting qualifications, it just means you're not dependent on the company for them.

      I did my degree alongside working full time and paid for it whilst I was working out of my earnings. I've also done other qualifications off my own back, a lot of them are certainly affordable and I wasn't exactly earning highly at the time.

      But regardless I'm convinced the HR departments don't recognise self-learning and so forth is just a myth. Even if it's true of some companies it's far from universal and all you need are the companies for where it's not true. I say this because I didn't exactly get stellar GCSEs, and I dropped out of my A-Levels and still got an IT support job followed by a development job before I even had my degree and although it wasn't highly paid it was still comfortably above the national average wage. Maybe I didn't get some interviews because of the lack of degree, A-Levels and so forth or maybe it was something else, but either way it certainly shouldn't be a hindrance if you know the topic in question. I find getting jobs easy, it takes a few weeks at most if I want something new, and I can command the wage I honestly feel I'm worth rather than the wage someone else thinks I'm worth.

      I'm pretty certain that "oh HR filtered me because of my qualifications" is simply an excuse for "My CV is shit and I'm too close minded to accept that's why". Who even deals with HR anyway nowadays? I normally deal with recruitment agents who deal directly with the hiring IT/development managers at which point it's just about how good you are at talking to recruiters and expressing your abilities and skills.

      It's always within the realm of possibility that I've always been insanely lucky, but I can only go off my own experience - I've self-learned, and I've always got jobs based on what I can do rather than what my qualifications are or aren't. I'm not some runaway millionaire but I live comfortably and am far above the majority of the population in terms of perks, benefits, and salary I receive so I'm happy with that.

      I just don't have a lot of sympathy for those who sit and blame everything else because often they're in a lot better position to get jobs than I was but still can't - that implies the problem is wholly them because I've done exactly what they claim is not possible or is too difficult multiple times.

    28. Re:Parasites by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Nice to see there are still people out there who base everyone's situation on their own experience. Thanks for keeping it real.

      I don't deal with recruiters and I have interviewed at many places and both rejected offers and not received offers. Usually HR just looks at resumes and interviews are with technical managers.
      Undoubtedly, the wages being offered are lower then they should be. Many companies are interviewing for jobs that don't exist, but might exist if they can fill the spot cheaply enough. Most of these are bad companies that I wouldn't want to work for, but it takes a bit of research to suss that out. Don't worry about me though, my career path is still on a steady upward trajectory. However, I don't use that fact to assume that everyone who's career is stalled or sliding is personally to blame and some sort of incompetent.

    29. Re:Parasites by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Nice to see there are still people out there who base everyone's situation on their own experience. Thanks for keeping it real."

      My experiences are real. The fact is if I can get a job without being given any formal training then that's a simple proof by counterexample that the theory you can't get a job without training is false. It may not proof that it's globally true but it proves given that I've done it a number of times that there are a number of companies out there that don't fit the argument people like you are making.

      I've turned companies down, if the industry was so bad I wouldn't be able to do that. The fact I can pick and choose between hundreds of companies means the job market isn't anything like is being painted by those just seeking an excuse for their own failings. Go look at some of girlintraining's posts, she's always whining about how the industry is unfair, how companies suck and how they're not reasonable about recruiting, then she goes on in other threads to show a distinct lack of knowledge about software engineering - that knowledge is going to come out in the interviews and that's why she wasn't getting jobs, because she had no idea what the fuck she was on about, yet she blamed everyone else. That's precisely the sort of problem we're dealing with here.

      "Undoubtedly, the wages being offered are lower then they should be."

      What "should" they be? If developer wages are above the national average, which they are, then why do you think they're too low?

      Personally I think developer wages are high, very high. I've actually chuckled to myself over the last few years more than once at how easy it is to get a hefty raise and decent wage. I feel guilty that it was largely luck of the draw that I ended up in a profession where wages are so good and job opportunities so vast when there are people struggling to make ends meet because life just didn't happen to end up putting them in such a lucrative career.

      When I can change jobs every year and command a 30%+ salary increase every single time from an above average starting point it's hard to argue that the developer market is somehow bad. Sure we don't get banker or football star wages, but we're doing far far better than most, and employment is easier to find in this industry far more so than pretty much any other mainstream industry.

    30. Re:Parasites by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      One counter-example does not make a problem disappear. Low-wages, H1B abuses, and concentration of capital are all real problems that we should be working to fix. I've personally seen wages stagnate and benefits disappear. Anyone who entered the workforce after the 90's can probably tell you the same stories. BTW, I'm a sysadmin/network guy, not a developer.

      I don't think I can change the world. I don't get the impression girlintraining does either. I'm just trying to open some eyes. I have been very fortunate to have the ability to leverage my skills to have a great career that pays the bills and allows me to take care of my family. My guess is you are a single guy, or your kids have grown up and you don't see the way the world has changed. Good luck in your future endeavors.

    31. Re:Parasites by Xest · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that says more about you, than me. That article doesn't say what you seem to think it says precisely because I don't think I'm better than everyone else, and the only area I think I do better than average (which the article you linked confirms) is in my ability to recognise my faults and weaknesses and work to improve them as well as recognising when there are people I can learn from. People whom I actively prefer to seek out precisely because there's so much value in recognising those who are better than you and learning from them.

      What I do know however is that I suffer none of the complaints people make about the job market, nor have I ever seen any evidence of them in practice. I have never once known a skilled candidate persistently be unable to get a job. Not once have I ever seen such a thing.

      I have seen a lot of people who think they're skilled candidates be unable to get a job, but it only takes 5 minutes to recognise that they're precisely the sort of people the article you linked is talking about - those who think they're incredible, but actually suck. It's the same 5 minutes that the interviewer will take to realise the exact same thing.

      But there's a numerical explanation as to why pointing out I have a job doesn't mean I think I'm better than everyone else, or better than average. Unemployment in my field is around 2%, so by saying I have no problem getting employment in the software development field I'm not saying I'm better than everyone else, or better than the average - not even close, I'm simply saying I'm in the 98% of the field that does manage to obtain employment just fine - the only implication of my claim is that I'm simply saying I'm obviously not in the bottom 2%, nothing more.

      The only claims I make are those I can back up with figures - yes I am paid well above the national average, yes I am in the 98% of developers who get jobs. Those things are facts, not opinion.

    32. Re:Parasites by Xest · · Score: 1

      "BTW, I'm a sysadmin/network guy, not a developer. "

      This probably explains the disparity in our views then, I left that field precisely because I agree benefits and wages went down there, but I assumed we were talking about software development given that that's the subject of this story.

      I do however think there's a good reason why IT support salaries and benefits have decreased and that's the simple fact that it's a profession that has become easier over the years, and as it's become easier, it's become open to more candidates and salaries have decreased as a result. I say easier coming largely from a Windows background because it simply has gotten much easier to manage Windows networks. The OS has become more stable and less fault prone, recovery has become much easier, and it's become much less secure. Fundamental software management tasks have become more centralised from AV management to patch and software deployment. It's become more point and click than ever. It was in fact a large part of the reason I got out of that field - I like a challenge and it just reached a point where I wasn't being challenged in the slightest.

      There are other problems the field suffers from - it's far easier for blaggers to get IT support jobs than it is for them to get software development jobs. There's a certain baseline of required knowledge and understanding in software development that's just almost impossible to bluff your way through compared to IT support roles.

      I do sympathise with the declining wages in your field and I do understand it must be frustrating. I've also seen first hand how annoying it can be to see that your wages are often decreasing because the field is being flooded by blaggers who can talk a good talk but have neither the fundamental passion or knowledge to be truly great in an IT support role, though have just the bare minimum to get by without getting fired. But that field is not software development, software development is very much a job seekers market, it's very much a market where there is a genuine shortage and where wages have been increasing over the last decade. Those who proclaim otherwise are those blaggers frustrated that it's a field they just cannot blag their way into and nothing more, the other 98% of us are doing just fine. It's always nice to want more and do I wish I was paid bankers salaries? of course, don't we all? but being realistic I think we can't complain about what we have - we're doing much better than just about all engineers (telecomms, mechanical, electrical), veterinarians, journalists, corporate sales staff, museum archivists, architects, solicitors, and so on. It's really only lawyers with a lot of years behind them, high end medical staff (i.e. surgeons), high end financial services staff, upper management, and that sort of thing that do noticably better than us on average. It's hard to scoff at that - perhaps my only real concern is that it's a bubble that's going to burst at some point, but it's ridden the wave that was the risk of outsourcing which turned out to be an almighty failure in practice for most firms so fingers crossed it'll remain a well paid profession for some time yet.

      Whatever the relevance is no, I'm not a single guy, I have a girlfriend of 8 years, to be married soon. I don't have kids, and don't really plan to, I'm not a fan. I prefer dogs, you can leave them at home longer without them burning the house down or requiring a baby sitter.

      So perhaps the difference in fields explains our differences in perception, IT isn't one big field, there's drastic disparity within it.

    33. Re:Parasites by OdinOdin_ · · Score: 1

      because the people at the top like and want to be the top of the american lifestyle, not the off shore one.

  4. When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Consider the interests of the would-be reformer.

    1. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Consider the interests of the would-be reformer

      Apparently that economist, Mr. Paul Collier, doesn't even have any braincell to think.

      From the TFA:

      Collier argues that there are also downsides to the tech giants' plans to shift more bright, young, enterprising people from the poorest countries to the richest

      MOST of those young, bright and enterprising people from the POOREST COUNTRIES won't get ANY chance to tap on their potential in their own country, and I am speaking as someone who had been through exactly that scenario.

      When I came out of China, back in the early 1970's, China was in a VERY TERRIBLE STATE.

      Millions of ordinary citizens had died of hunger.

      Social upheaval were everywhere - goons waving that little red book were ransacking/looting people's houses they accused of "anti-revolutionary".

      If I WERE to stay in China, I had only two choices: Either joined those goons in doing all the WRONG THINGS they had been doing, or to stay absolutely low key, go into a remote village somewhere, and work as a farm hand.

      But I got out of China and ended up in America.

      In America, I got to further my education (I already had high school education back in China), I got to learn many things from many very brainy people who came to America from all over the world, I got the chance to participate in the American dream, I got to start my own companies, I got to sell my companies for huge profit and re-invest the monies into even more startups.

      I could NEVER do any of that had I stuck in China.

      Nowadays I am helping many young, bright and very enterprising people in poor countries in Asia, Africa and South America, by either inviting them to become my co-workers in the companies that I own (full or part), or I invest in their startups.

      That Mr. Paul Collier is nothing but a talking head.

      Most of the poor countries in the world simply do not have the infrastructure to allow those young, bright and enterprising people to do what they can do.

      Most of the governments in those poor countries are mired in unbelievably mountains of bureaucratic red tapes, red tapes that do nothing but making the lives of their own citizens even that much more miserable.

      I came from one of those poor countries, I know what was/is happening.

      I am not saying that Bill Gates and/or Mark Zuckerberg are right to do whatever they do, but at least they are offering many young, bright and enterprising people from poor countries A CHANCE TO PROVE THEIR WORTH TO THE WORLD, and also to themselves.

      As for Mr. Paul Collier, other than being a talking head, what did/does he do to help out those young, bright and enterprising people in the poorest countries in the world ?

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    2. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nowadays I am helping many young, bright and very enterprising people in poor countries in Asia, Africa and South America, by either inviting them to become my co-workers in the companies that I own (full or part), or I invest in their startups.

      Are you helping them IN the poor countries in Asia, Africa, and South America -- or are you bringing them to America and "helping" them here?

      If all you ever do is bring people here, how the hell are the poor countries ever going to become anything other than poor? Build things THERE. Don't bring them here, to take opportunities from American citizens. Yeah, yeah, you have your little pity stories to tell about poverty and oppression, and I'm sure it's all true. But I care about that, and your "young, bright, and very enterprising people" from all over the world, to the exact same extent you care about anyone in America -- not at all.

      The American Dream was supposed to be FOR Americans. Make your own damn dreams. No, seriously -- make all those other countries WORTH staying in, and living in, and being in. Or can you only have your dreams here in America, with the infrastructure paid for by Americans, with the legal systems built and maintained and paid for by Americans, with the society and ideals fought and paid and died for by Americans?

    3. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Immigrants are an integral part of the American Dream and much of the success America has seen. Also, having success in the US doesn't mean that they can't come back at some point and also try to help their native country.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The issue isn't whether the best and the brightest from overseas should be able to fill the gaps in the demand for skilled workers. The issue is whether they should be doing it through the flawed H1-B program. If Zuckerberg and Gates were arguing for a streamlined path to citizenship or even green cards for workers with skills that are at a shortage in the US, that would be a different matter. But the H1-B allows companies to pay 60%-70% of what they would pay a citizen for 3-6 years before they get sent home.

      If the workers could become US citizens, they could build their lives here and be active members of the community invested in our collective future. But the tech giants want disposable talent to use and send home. It's short-sighted and will ensure that we have a lot more foreign competition as skilled talent leaves at the end of their H1-Bs and build competing technology in their home countries.

    5. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immigrants are an integral part of the American Dream and much of the success America has seen.

      Agree. Every time an H1B story is posted here, we get a lot of Tea Party-type comments from people who have the benefit of college educations and should know better. People should go back and look up the Know Nothing party of the 1840's, that was similar to the anti-immigrant stuff in America today.

    6. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh for fuck's safe, "The American Dream was supposed to be FOR Americans"?? Which Americans were those? Are the Irish and Italians and Jews allowed to prosper, or is success only for the WASPs? Anyone who's willing to follow our laws and pay their taxes should be welcome. They certainly contribute more than the tax-dodging, money-laundering elite.

    7. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1B is not an immigrant visa.

      The H-1B is a non-immigrant visa in the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 101(a)(15)(H). It allows US employers to temporarily employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. If a foreign worker in H-1B status quits or is dismissed from the sponsoring employer, the worker must either apply for and be granted a change of status to another non-immigrant status, find another employer (subject to application for adjustment of status and/or change of visa), or leave the US.
      -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-1B_visa

    8. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      Zuckerberg is worth 19 billion. Assuming facebook saves 50k$ per year with every H1B hire...assuming zero costs for the hire...and assuming all of this is going straight into Zuckerberg's pocket, that's still chump change...

    9. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Not expressis verbis. But it is a dual intent visa. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_intent

      --
      bickerdyke
    10. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you're missing the part where being released/fired from the position is a direct deportation back to the home country. Essentially, the H1B also let's the company hold serious harm over the employee's welfare if they don't conform to whatever is required. Whether that breaks the country's work laws, or the person is forced to work 16 hour days for 8 hours pay, or even reduced wages in reality versus the recorded wages on the H1B application, the world may never know.

    11. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on a H1B working for Microsoft. My salary is at the same level as my American coworkers, and if Microsoft decides to lay me off tomorrow, I have 30 days to move to another tech company. Furthermore, Microsoft and Intel (I can't comment on the other companies) offers apply for a greencard on your behalf as standard when you start employment.

      If you have a Masters degree, this greencard application takes around 2 years to complete.

    12. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      People should go back and look up the Know Nothing party of the 1840's ...

      Those people include you, because you don't understand what the Know Nothing party was about. Mostly it was anti-Catholic, because supposedly Catholics would obey what the pope said and hence were anti-democratic. Nevertheless there were more general xenophobic sentiments, but don't view things from a 21st century POV and underestimate the strength of anti-Catholic sentiment back then.

      Contrast that to today. Do you see any concern here for guest workers having different religious beliefs than most Americans? Or because of the color of their skin? Didn't think so.

      Nice try though trying to smear the people who have economic concerns about guest worker programs by associating them in any way with a 19th century nativist movement.

    13. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Great.

      I'm a native of America and I'd like this opportunity too!

      All I have to do is pretend I won't complain that they pay me a third the standard, and that they can deport me at any time based on a whim.

      Anyone in India willing to sell their identity to me?

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    14. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      But it is a dual intent visa.

      Why do we need a "dual intent" visa? Many of the people here, who join Zuckerberg and Gates in extolling the virtues of an expanded H-1B program, confuse the issue by saying things like "immigrants are an integral part of the American Dream". I agree with their sentiment about immigrants, but how does immigration of the past compare to today's H-1B program? Amongst other things, American immigration law eschewed guest worker programs, and forbade employers from seeking out or hiring people in foreign countries for jobs in the US. Back then people understood that that would undermine labor in the US. Nowadays people are propagandized into thinking that that's a good thing.

    15. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      I'm on a H1B working for Microsoft. My salary is at the same level as my American coworkers

      Microsoft is one of the few companies that's actually pretty good about that.

      and if Microsoft decides to lay me off tomorrow, I have 30 days to move to another tech company

      30 days, woo-hoo! But if you're out of work for the unheard of period of 5 weeks, you're supposed to be deported.

    16. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      You're confusing the supposed market value of Zuck's stock with FB's income. FB has a P/E of 123. If they don't reduce that, somebody may eventually wake up and issue a lot of sell orders for FB. Besides, there's the principle of the thing. Even if Zuck didn't personally like the idea (admittedly a very big "if"), the Wall Street buys will derate your stock if you're not doing everything possible to screw your American employees.

    17. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America wasn't built upon "immigrants". It was built by nation builders. If you are worthy, then why didn't you stay in your own country and make the sacrifices to make it livable -- instead of parasitizing the civilization that someone else built. I notice that Asians are conspicuously absent among America's war dead. Immigration is a genocidal weapon used by American Jews against America's Whites. There are books on the subject. America went to the moon 40 years ago. What do we need you for? Selling more shiny junk?

    18. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or can you only have your dreams here in America, with the infrastructure paid for by Americans, with the legal systems built and maintained and paid for by Americans, with the society and ideals fought and paid and died for by Americans?"

      Taco Cowboy is an American citizen you fucking racist idiot.

      Anyone who enters America LEGALLY can engage in the American Dream. There is nothing wrong with legal immigration. That's what he did.

      What you are mad about is legalizing illegal immigration. Direct your anger somewhere else, not at a guy who busted his ass to be successful and worked hard to get the most out of his American citizenship.

    19. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people include you, because you don't understand what the Know Nothing party was about. Mostly it was anti-Catholic, because supposedly Catholics would obey what the pope said and hence were anti-democratic

      Workers were trying to protect their jobs from what they saw as a flood of unqualified, low-wage, "un-American" competition. Today it's Hispanics and most people realize that overt racism will cause them not to be taken seriously, at least in the way they intended.

      We have to study history to find parallels, especially American history for American parallels. What happens is, whenever one of these is pointed out someone will say "No that was totally different!". Well then, you have to apply judgement. There will ALWAYS be differences. Was the difference between the two situations an essential difference that invalidate the comparison, or was it mere variation due to historical circumstances?

    20. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Was the difference between the two situations an essential difference that invalidate the comparison, or was it mere variation due to historical circumstances?

      The former. If you have a valid criticism of my characterization of the Know-Nothing party, then please cite it. Your "just kind of know" version of history is not very convincing.

    21. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The historical American immigration law was very simple in the first century or so: you come to the country and stay for a year (in some states, two), you are a citizen.

    22. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is one of the few companies that's actually pretty good about that.

      And so is Google, Amazon and Facebook, judging from anecdotes of my coworkers with past experience there.

    23. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

      Collier argues that there are also downsides to the tech giants' plans to shift more bright, young, enterprising people from the poorest countries to the richest

      MOST of those young, bright and enterprising people from the POOREST COUNTRIES won't get ANY chance to tap on their potential in their own country, and I am speaking as someone who had been through exactly that scenario.

      When I came out of China, back in the early 1970's, China was in a VERY TERRIBLE STATE.

      Millions of ordinary citizens had died of hunger.

      Social upheaval were everywhere - goons waving that little red book were ransacking/looting people's houses they accused of "anti-revolutionary".

      If I WERE to stay in China, I had only two choices:

      Well, there was the third choice... Do something to make it better. Allowing people like you out of the country also acted as a kind of relief valve, reducing the internal pressure to change. You leaving has retarded the social growth of China. That is just one of the downsides.

    24. Re:When You Hear Talk About Any Reform by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Why do we need a "dual intent" visa?

      Beats me. Probably because you want to have another type of visa that strictly forbids any steps that might least to immigration?

      --
      bickerdyke
  5. Company Towns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Mr. Potters of your nation want to train your children to work their machines.

  6. There are plenty of American coders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They just don't want to play American wages.

    1. Re:There are plenty of American coders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out that there aren't "American" wages -- just wages.

    2. Re:There are plenty of American coders by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What is the "American wage", exactly?

      Let's be specific. Say, how much would be an "American wage" for a software developer with 5 years of experience, doing Java or .NET, in Seattle?

    3. Re:There are plenty of American coders by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They do, for some code. Part of the problem is that coding has become a commodity resource. Not as many people are coding up cool things, building the first computers, building the first networks, building the first compilers, etc. Instead a lot of people are essentially building middle level technology stuff, often copies of each other, things like phone apps, web pages, and so forth. You can't pay full wages for the entire world of programmers and engineers based only off of advertisement revenue! Advertising revenue from first world web sites or phone apps is not enough to pay for first world experienced programmers.

      So there is a market for programmers for American wages but it is relatively small, and mostly only for people who really understand computers, preferrably computers plus other skills (EE, math, etc). But the overall computer market is vastly bigger than that.

      The other problem with programming becoming so big is that the mindset that does really well at this is relatively rare. Most programers today are no longer enthusiasts, geeks, hackers, or otherwise people really interested in the technology and how to make it do things, they don't care about the semiconductors or circuits (analog or digital). These are things for nerds. However in the past a few nerds was all that was needed to build up the industry. Today the market is too big and needs mass appeal and can not rely on the nerds but on masses of average workers who don't know too much.

      When computing first started getting big there was also a big national push towards the sciences because of fears that the Soviets were overtaking US and Europe. Today science is somewhat deprecated, even math is being downplayed. Coders are becoming factory floor jobs. And so we have two college dropouts going around encouraging very young children to code on a black box.

  7. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parasites.

    Uses complex offshore shell companies in order to not pay taxes to fund roads, schools, community, civilization.
    Wont train Americans (or anyone else) in IT, actively seeking to import labor again that someone else paid for their education

    how is this company even got a voice in America? in the old days they would be run out of town or worse

    today ? frell you you i got mine and there is nothing you can do to stop me

  8. Fuck you assholes by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I taught myself DOS, then Windows, and I'm a rollout, packaging, migration specialist. I get hired to do the hard work and hand it over to H-1B's to do the migration and I'm out of work again. So fuck you guys who'll only pay for quality work for as short a time as possible then dump it to "best shore" people. Fuck you assholes who've screwed over everyone who built America's infrastructure. I'm sick of drinking bitter H-1B tea. /rant

    1. Re:Fuck you assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah mark it troll... wait who is he trolling Bill Gates? lol

    2. Re:Fuck you assholes by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      For too many Slashdot mods, "flamebait" means "opinion I don't agree with".

  9. Ten years of unemployment as a software engineer by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm just getting off about ten years of unemployment as a software engineer. I'm competent, I graduated from Carnegie Mellon University, and my major pass time at home is programming. For whatever reason I couldn't seem to find a job. I put out thousands of resumes on monster and Dice, but had less than ten interviews in ten years. Thankfully I just recently got a job doing hardware. It is just weird what this world can do to you. No matter how much talent you have, or how hard you work, if no one wants to give you a chance, the world is a rough place. I think lots of people are seeing this today with the lack of jobs for even talented individuals.

    Anyway, that is my point. There are plenty of talented and educated people in this country. The tech companies just don't want to pay a fair wage in a regular display of union busting. I know my story might be on the edge of a bellcurve, but I'm just saying I understand personally what it is like to never get a chance at a job. If you don't watch, it can grind into your very self worth.

  10. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by fredprado · · Score: 1

    That is weird. Maybe you were asking for too much or your specific area of expertise is obsolete. I say that because I don't see many people having that much trouble finding a programmer job. The programmer market is still very on the side of offer. Outsourcing and H-1B are surely pushing into the other direction but we are not quite there yet.

  11. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least Zuckerberg and Gates will be among the first up against the wall, come the revolution.

  12. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bizarre. I get a ton of postings and emails from recruiters all the time and my linkedIn profile is not that good.

    I find this hard to believe, but I did not post this, so......

  13. CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is to by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is to much class room time.

    also IT jobs do not need CS much less 4 years pure class room

  14. Open borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here is how I have been affected by our immigration "policy".

    1) needed a tech from a Canadian company to go to Detroit to fix a system. He got turned back at the border. They had to get an American to come in and do the job days later.

    2) a friend had her undocumented husband who lived & worked 20 years in the US and had teenage kids deported without warning after a misdemeanor traffic infraction.

    3) A Danish family renting a house I own got thrown out of the country because of an H1B mixup, now I am out a few months of rent.

    Screw it. I'm for open borders.

    1. Re:Open borders by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      needed a tech from a Canadian company to go to Detroit to fix a system

      That's your first reason? You want "open borders" because you were inconvenienced?

      a friend had her undocumented husband who lived & worked 20 years in the US and had teenage kids deported without warning after a misdemeanor traffic infraction

      Good heavens, they got caught violating laws that they knew perfectly well existed, even before they came here. They also received a "punishment" that was no more than ending the violation that they were getting away with or 20 years. Is there no justice?

      A Danish family renting a house I own got thrown out of the country because of an H1B mixup, now I am out a few months of rent.

      You poor dear - an economic loss to you (that was far less than the economic loss of an American losing a job due to the H-1B program).

    2. Re:Open borders by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      1 and 3 I am with you on but 2, I cant agree. Plain and simple for number 2 the man broke the law by living here illegally for 20 years, he knew the risks, and he got burned. I dont feel sorry for him one bit

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Open borders by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Here is how I have been affected by our immigration "policy".

      1) needed a tech from a Canadian company to go to Detroit to fix a system. He got turned back at the border. They had to get an American to come in and do the job days later.

      2) a friend had her undocumented husband who lived & worked 20 years in the US and had teenage kids deported without warning after a misdemeanor traffic infraction.

      3) A Danish family renting a house I own got thrown out of the country because of an H1B mixup, now I am out a few months of rent.

      Screw it. I'm for open borders.

      1) isn't an immigration policy issue, it is a work visa problem. While we might take issue with visas from other countries, the US and Canada really need to work on this. In reality, the system is tilted so the vast majority of cross-border workers are Canadians working in the US.

      2) is a legitimate issue. I don't care who you are. I shelled out a lot of money and invested a ridiculous amount of time getting my wife into the country legally. If you want to be an illegal immigrant you take all the risks of that. No other country in the world has immigration policy like the people who use the term "undocumented" propose. The US is already one of the most open countries in the world with our "born in US = citizen" policy.

      3) That is unfortunate, if it was truly a mixup perhaps they should have gotten a good lawyer. Or maybe it wasn't a mixup and they just told you that as a sob story so you wouldn't charge them lease-breaking fees.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  15. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    Actually, the internets disagree with you:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin_and_yang

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  16. Blue collar society by Required+Snark · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The goal is to make every job in the US blue collar with no benefits. This is not hyperbole or metaphor.

    I have friend with decades of film production experience and he is de facto unemployable. The jobs are outsourced, or filled by 1H-B holders. He can't find work outside the film industry because he is "overqualified". When he applies for retail like Target or Starbucks, they don't want him because younger workers are easier to push around and abuse.

    If you think that you are immune because you are "a professional", just wait. Get 10 or 15 years of experience and watch that become the reason that you won't be hired.

    Meanwhile, Wall Street hits new highs on a regular basis. There is a direct causal relationship going on here. The wealth going to the rich is being siphoned from the rest of society. If things don't change the US will have a economic/social structure like the Spanish speaking part of the Americas. Don't be surprised when this happens, you had plenty of warning.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:Blue collar society by swillden · · Score: 1

      If you think that you are immune because you are "a professional", just wait. Get 10 or 15 years of experience and watch that become the reason that you won't be hired.

      Hmm. I have 26 years of experience. How much longer do I need to wait? I work with a couple of guys who've been professional programmers for nearly 40 years. The industry had better hurry up and ruin them pretty quickly, or they'll retire first.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Blue collar society by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      since when is blue collar a problem?

      that is right since the 1980's when some wanna be hipppy farts decided we are a country of innovators, repersenting less than 1% of the population, how well has that worked.

      the industrial might of the united states was not gained by a bunch of middle managers with their cracker jack degrees bought from the local strip mall, but its downfall most definitely has been

    3. Re:Blue collar society by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      since when is blue collar a problem?

      Perhaps the problem is rather "blue collar with no benefits" and perhaps no unions that would pave the way to a new manchester capitalism.

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:Blue collar society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats, you won the friend lottery. Now ask yourself what your position is compared to everyone who is equally qualified. You don't know that, do you?

      Here's the cold, hard facts: For every one of you who win that fucking friend lottery, there are thousands of people who don't.

    5. Re:Blue collar society by khallow · · Score: 1

      Here's the cold, hard facts: For every one of you who win that fucking friend lottery, there are thousands of people who don't.

      That sort of observation is only relevant when a) it's actually a "fact", and b) a different bunch of "thousands of people" for each person who won the "friend lottery".

      An actual survey found that more than half of all jobs offered were filled internally or by referral. That indicates to me that a lot of people, not merely one in a few thousand, found jobs via the "friend lobby".

      I personally, have picked up at least three jobs via the "friend lottery". I don't think I'm even remotely unusual in that.

    6. Re:Blue collar society by buddyglass · · Score: 2

      I've been in the software job market 14 years. Everyone I know who's good at what he or she does has a job. The two folks I know who have trouble staying employed are, not coincidentally, not that great at what they do. Nice people, just not great coders. And even they manage to stay employed 90% of the time. Both are over 45, btw.

    7. Re:Blue collar society by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Those guys apparently offer better ROI than your friend. If your friend worked for H1B money then he might have a job. Also, I call B.S. on not being able to get a job at Starbucks or Target. I regularly see older folks working in those positions. Maybe he should parlay his film experience and get a job at a specialty camera store? Or hell, somewhere like Fry's or Best Buy?

    8. Re:Blue collar society by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      that is right since the 1980's when some wanna be hipppy farts decided we are a country of innovators

      Hippies (at least learn to spell it right - only two p's and ending in "ie"), a species that was extinct even back then, were responsible for the 80's loss of industry that was largely due to an overvalued dollar? Who knew.

    9. Re:Blue collar society by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I worked for one of the biggest Document Management software makers for a number of years and lost my job about 2 years ago now. Im only 28 and have been working since I was 15 (ran a network for a car dealership from purchase to installation to upkeep from 15-20) and it took me 2 years to finally get a new job. I got the job because my friend got a promotion and they needed to fill his job so he put in a word for me. Sure Im making 1/2 of what I was in 2011, but at least im working again. Now lets see if there is truth in the fact that its easier to get a job when you have one

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re:Blue collar society by swillden · · Score: 1

      Congrats, you won the friend lottery.

      I didn't know a soul at my current employer when I got the job. Nor at the last employer. Come to think of it, I haven't known anyone at any of my employers until after I started working there.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:Blue collar society by swillden · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know who's good at what he or she does has a job.

      +1

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Blue collar society by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I am anti union, they protect and reward the worthless in our workforce

    13. Re:Blue collar society by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends on country and time period.

      --
      bickerdyke
    14. Re:Blue collar society by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Some companies pay you for referring people who get hired. My son does contract law for a Fortune 50 company. He has twice gotten bonuses for referring someone.

  17. worker shortage and H-1B's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no shortage.
    There NEVER has been a shortage in 30 + years.
    We need to keep fighting this corporate marketing
    effort that blights the American workforce.

    We must remember that industrial efforts to sell this to
    people worked so effectively in the late 80's early 90's
    that every electronic and computer magazine, as well
    as IEEE bought into this oz-land concept.

    Please, people, stop buying this supposed shortage crap !!!

  18. The need four-year degree is the issue as well by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    The need four-year degree is the issue as well.

    Most community colleges don't offer them

    Lot's of IT / tech classes are offed non degree and some should be able to take classes and get some for doing that with out having to commit to the full degree time table.

    Also the college Tenure system leads to people with little to no real IT skills teaching the classes VS community / tech schools with real pros teaching.

  19. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should pay for a background check on yourself -- perhaps there is someone with a dubious history with the same name as you?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  20. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm just getting off about ten years of unemployment as a software engineer.

    How closely were your loss of your job and subsequent inability to get another one correlated with your claims of God talking to you? http://www.goodnewsjim.com/

  21. What about a TXT or free to cover basic health car by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    basic health care plan for all you must pay an added H1B tax.

  22. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you be more creative than to cite a website that doesn't stop psych ward patients from slinging whatever garbage up on it as they please?

    1. Re:Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's at least the second time you've used that joke. Please don't do that. It's awkward for everyone.

  23. remove health benefits from jobs and that will hel by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    remove health benefits from jobs and that will help with hiring older people.

  24. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sending out 'thousands of resumes' (or even hundreds) is usually a mistake. If you're mid-career (age 30 or above) you need to focus your efforts so you can be genuinely knowledgeable and up to date in certain areas (not just talk a good game, which experienced devs can see through).

    There may be thousands of unfilled IT jobs out there, but there aren't thousands of openings for any one individual except perhaps for college interns and (perhaps) freshly minted college graduates with CS degrees.

    BTW you misspelled "pastime". That's the kind of simple mistake that can send your cover letter/resume into the trash, so next time make sure someone looks over your resume, and think about hiring a coach.

  25. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If you're going to insist that he must be doing something wrong, focus on the fact that he's sending out resumes.

    Unless you are very lucky, you don't get jobs by sending out resumes. The only reliable way to get a job is by having friends obtain them for you.

  26. "...but not the bottom billion." by spmkk · · Score: 1

    'An open door for the talented would help Facebook's bottom line,' Collier concludes, 'but not the bottom billion.'

    By this definition of "help", the only way that the US can help even a small portion of the "bottom billion" is by becoming part of them, which isn't in the world's interests and certainly isn't in ours. This video explains it very succinctly. At current immigration levels, the US population is slated to reach half a billion people by 2070, and top 625M by 2100.

    Forget what this will do to our domestic standard of living -- consider what it will do to our ability to continue helping ANYONE in the developing world. With any luck, we will barely be able to maintain a poverty level here at home above that of today's banana republics.

    What the hell is so wrong with having a meritocratic immigration system, i.e. an "open door for the talented"? It gives those people who are genuinely pushing the boundaries of opportunity in their native countries a chance to realize their potential, while also enabling them to contribute to developments that will almost certainly benefit those same native countries. Symbiotically, it gives the US an influx of talent that is somewhat less expensive, enabling those developments to take place more rapidly and thus driving commerce both here and abroad.

    We can't take in the "bottom billion", and we won't do anyone any favors by killing ourselves trying. They have to, as the saying goes, bloom where they're planted. The best that we can do to help them is continue to contribute to the global economy, which we can do better with an increased talent pool that's achievable in part by being judicious about whom we take in.

    1. Re:"...but not the bottom billion." by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You seem to have a mistaken notion that the American standard of living is somehow tied to its population - like there's some kind of magical fountain of wealth in the country which has a limited output, and if you add more people then there's less for everyone.

      There is, of course, such a fountain, but it's not magical - it's powered by the very same people who drink from it. That's why the country's wealth keeps growing just as its population does - because the new people don't just take, they also contribute. So long as the society is set up in such a way that most contribute more than they take, it can keep scaling up. Broadly speaking, this set-up is a part of the society's culture.

      Immigrants (by which I mean people who come and stay, not temporary labor) are fundamentally different from natural-born citizens in one way only: hey bring the baggage of their culture with them. In some cases, that baggage gets in the way of being productive. But that baggage can be dealt away in the cultural "melting pot", so long as immigrants are truly assimilated (instead of being shoved into ghettos), which is generally true of America - in fact, it is a model "melting pot", with anyone who is willing to undergo assimilation welcome to do so.

      Now, the processing capacity of said pot is limited, in that it requires the proportion of new immigrants be significantly smaller than the rest of society, so that the latter majority can assimilate them in a reasonable amount of time. But this is a limitation on throughput, not on the total capacity.

  27. Dear people stuck with bad jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a better job where you are! All the good jobs are for Americans only.

    Signed - Paul Collier. American with a good job

  28. Re:CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Credential inflation coupled with supply and demand in the market place. If you have more people looking for a job with CS degrees than positions available as an IT administrator, then a CS is a *requirement* as part of the criteria of not having your resume filtered out. HR has to cut the stack somewhere, or so that's their rational. And yes, a CS degree isn't needed to be an excellent IT administrator. Again, just required to get an interview.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  29. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by game+kid · · Score: 2

    To be fair, AC's probably too busy with a Ying Yang Twins track whispering in their ear to think straight.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  30. Re:CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CS is worthless to an average admin position. Why do you need four years of math and programming for when you aren't crunching numbers or writing code? Four years of classes in business, management, accounting, protocols, standards, and best practices is what IT people need.

  31. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by fredprado · · Score: 1

    In my experience you don't need either. You just need to have your name in any online database and offers will come to you.

    Certainly having friends well placed will help you to get better jobs, I do not contend that, but you can manage well even without them.

  32. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by phantomfive · · Score: 0

    If you're not getting responses to your resume (happens to most people when they first start looking for a job) you need to rewrite your resume until you get responses.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  33. WTF, Zuck? by csumpi · · Score: 0

    I thought you wanted kids rotting their brains on your spam network. When would they have time to learn coding? Or you just trying to make it look like you are not just some money grabbing, stop at nothing asshole?

    1. Re:WTF, Zuck? by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 2

      His plan is essentially to produce enough low-quality** "code monkey"programmers to mirror the situation in 'service' jobs (e.g. retail), where there's a great enough excess of would-be employees even without H1Bs to force wages down into the minimum-wage part-time range. The reduction in incomes tends to have a ripple effect up through the ranks, so companies like Facebook couldd be able to slash their payroll/benefits costs down to a tiny fraction of what they are now. The only people fucked over would be the people doing the actual work.

      **Keep in mind that people living under those circumstances typically end up working two part-time jobs, under a great deal of stress, and not sleeping or eating terribly well; this means the vast majority of the talented ones too weary at the end of the day to focus on learning new skills, and thus would find it very, very difficult to rise above entry-point. The company wouldn't care, of course, as it will be able to continue hiring skilled/educated affluent new grads very cheaply, and the fear of potentially being replaced the same way is likely to keep them from even asking for a raise for a number of years even as they gain experience & learn new skills.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    2. Re:WTF, Zuck? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      His plan is essentially to produce enough low-quality** "code monkey"programmers to mirror the situation in 'service' jobs (e.g. retail)

      Come on. We ALL (and that includes Zuckerburg) know what a stupid plan that would be. Masses of simple coders produce only a tangled mess that would never work.

      The thing is everyone needs GOOD coders, people who are really good at it are hard to come by. So the plan is to get a million or so people to try coding who would not otherwise, and a small percentage find they like code who would not have otherwise, and are good at it. They aren't thinking they are going to get a million coders out of it because no-one would have any use for them!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:WTF, Zuck? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      yes they are trying to get an army of disposable low quality coders. Yes they need some good folks and will always need to some good folks to put together the infrastructure.

      A company like facebook though is a little bit of technology developed by good people, and whole lot monkeys that know just enough about it string it together with the presentation layer.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  34. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can not get a job because you are not as competent as you think you are, and demand too much for your level.

  35. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by csumpi · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, I'll bite No way you go 10 years unemployed as a software engineer in the US. Unless:

    a. you are lazy
    b. you are incompetent
    c. you printed the website you have in your sig on your resume

    But most likely, it's just all BS.

  36. paradoxial by PC_THE_GREAT · · Score: 2

    Agreed both Billgates and Zuckererg are great businessmen, but it is pushing it a bit too hard and too far to make them "exemplified coders", because on both of these characters resides charges (or rumors) of "having built an empire by taking other's codes". So I wonder what kind of good example that would be, "yeah son, steal or buy your friend's code, market it and be rich" :p, sure thing if you want to make your kid into a business man, bad if you want to have a bright kid just for the sake of brag right: "I fork problem solver"! +$3|v3n

  37. Talk about blind by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Wont train Americans (or anyone else) in IT

    What mindless babble is this? It's posted in the VERY STORY about the "hour of code" designed to train young people everywhere (which includes Amercia!) how to code!

    As for not paying anything - the U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate on earth. Lots of companies (and people for that matter) don't mind paying taxes but hate being robbed. Can you blame them? Well I know YOU can, but could anyone reasonable?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Talk about blind by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      It's posted in the VERY STORY about the "hour of code" designed to train young people everywhere (which includes Amercia!) how to code!

      A week long "hour of code" just puts a positive spin on their overall program, which focuses mostly on things like the H-1B program. If you're fooled by that propaganda effort, then I've got a bridge to sell you.

    2. Re:Talk about blind by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      As for not paying anything - the U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate on earth.
      Except for being completely wrong in the real world where most of the Fortune 500 are paying around 5% -- good points there.

      Lots of companies (and people for that matter) don't mind paying taxes but hate being robbed. Can you blame them? Well I know YOU can, but could anyone reasonable?

      I'm sorry, I'm too busy sending out resumes and keeping the lights on for my kids while my wife and I both work full time temp jobs without benefits to spend time on all this "being reasonable." It's kind of distracting to me and I've reverted from a person who worked 80 hours a week and studied to improve myself, to someone who uses butter and ketchup on spaghetti as a "dish" and merely entertains himself. It's completely the opposite of how I've heard Libertarians, NeoCons and Tea Party people explain how people are motivated by life sucking and stress.

      The financial services company I was at got bought out by a Dutch Company. Apparently they've survived a higher tax rate and still had money -- go figure.

      There are richer people making more profit and they want me to afford them the luxury of my reason? They are lucky I don't grunt like a Gorilla and pound my chest. I'm all for this compassion you speak of "in theory" -- just like these theoretically high corporate tax rates.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Talk about blind by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      We need to give MORE MONEY to really, really, really rich people, so they can do a few charities for AIDS and have after school programs for kids to play with code.

      Then we bend over and let them import labor from people who were college educated where it was subsidized getting paid less than an American to do a job. Did they mention how we pay for our own educations now?

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    4. Re:Talk about blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I earn $30 dollars, you steal $10 and then feel guilty and give me back $5, did you give me $5, or did you steal $5? That money is the wealth creator's (read: rich person) to begin with. If the Government gives them a tax break they're not GIVING any money, as that would necessitate that all money belongs to the Government, and only by the grace of God are us peons allowed to touch it. Instead the Government is taking less, which is still taking. How can you not understand this?

  38. Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every time an H1B story is posted here, we get a lot of Tea Party-type comments from people

    No you don't. I've been reading Slashdot for years and have never seen Tea Party members of any kind post against LEGAL immigration, which is healthy. In fact most of us stick up for H1B guys because we know a lot of them... it's the liberals who cry that H1B are stealing jobs from America and need to be banned.

    The problem the Tea Party has is with illegal immigrants, which generally are not nearly as desirable or productive members of society (and who would expect they would be when the very act of coming here starts out by committing a crime?)

    It's criminal how you and others cannot seem to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration, which are vastly different things.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by Frankie70 · · Score: 2

      I agree. Go to someplace like DailyKos. You will find a lot of anti-H1B rants by the same people who want illegals to be given amnesty.

    2. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1

      Fine. Let's swarm every corner of this country with Homeland Security goons to collar anyone who looks a little brown, ask him Sus papeles, por favor, and beat the mierda out of him when he answers in English, all in the name of freedom. Let's build the Great Wall of Texas.

      And the Tea Party can be the ones to propose some taxes to pay for it all.

      --
      Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
      Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
    3. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Speaking as someone who would not be offended to be labels a TEA party member my problem with illegal immigration is its a basic question of rule of law. If the law does not work or we don't want to enforce it, than it should be repealed or amended. If its on the books it should be enforced. No exceptions no playing favorites, collar them a prosecute them; deport them. Its a stupid policy but we should change it not just ignore it and fail to enforce it.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time an H1B story is posted here, we get a lot of Tea Party-type comments from people

      No you don't. I've been reading Slashdot for years and have never seen Tea Party members of any kind post against LEGAL immigration, which is healthy. In fact most of us stick up for H1B guys because we know a lot of them... it's the liberals who cry that H1B are stealing jobs from America and need to be banned.

      The problem the Tea Party has is with illegal immigrants, which generally are not nearly as desirable or productive members of society (and who would expect they would be when the very act of coming here starts out by committing a crime?)

      It's criminal how you and others cannot seem to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration, which are vastly different things.

      Require that EVERY H1B visa holder receives a minimum of $500,000 pay per year, plus remove all job change restrictions, and you will see the sham that is the H1B visa program. This isn't for the "best and brightest". It is for importation of cheap labor.

    5. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by swillden · · Score: 0

      If the issue is illegal vs legal, give the illegal immigrants work visas, making them legal. Problem solved, right?

      You seem to think there's some bright line here, when there really isn't. The vast majority of illegal immigrants would love to come legally, and are here to work and to contribute, but we won't let them. It's insanely difficult to immigrate legally except as a wealthy student or with corporate sponsorship. Outside of those categories it is -- quite literally -- a game of chance, a system of tiny quotas allocated by big lotteries.

      It's criminal how you and others cannot seem to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration, which are vastly different things.

      That distinction is based on the lines drawn by our immigration laws, which are very arbitrary and capricious, in both design and implementation. I find it really interesting how none of the people who rail against illegal immigration actually know (or care!) how legal immigration works and whether or not the rules are in any way effective at dividing those we'd like to have from those we wouldn't.

      Put the cart in front of the horse: reform immigration laws so immigration is possible for those who just want to come and work, then enable all of the current illegal immigrants to make use of the revised laws to obtain legal status and then we can figure out how to secure the borders. At that point it will be much easier because there will be many fewer people anxious to sneak in.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Well obviously the solution is just to ignore all laws! That makes as much sense as your idiotic over the top answer.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You seem to think there's some bright line here, when there really isn't.

      Really, there is.

      It's insanely difficult to immigrate legally except as a wealthy student or with corporate sponsorship

      Fix that instead of giving criminals automatic citizenship.

      Yes, it really is that easy. If immigrants are desirable (and they are) then let in a lot more of them. But you have to be able to first control who comes in illegally and that we are ignoring.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re:Tea Party welcomes LEGAL immigrants by swillden · · Score: 0

      See, still putting the cart before the horse.

      Also, your characterization of illegal immigrants as criminals is factually incorrect in most cases. It isn't a crime to enter the United States without permission (there is one illegal immigration-related criminal statute, but it doesn't apply to the vast majority of illegal immigrants).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  39. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    You have to remember, companies would rather have an H1B with marginal qualifications rather than a citizen with marginal qualifications. I've seen programmers struggle because they have poor people skills even though they take "people classes". Should they just change careers?

  40. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    There's an odd preference for already-employed people, so there's this kind of self-reinforcing phenomenon where, if you already have a job, you can easily get five job offers, but if you have no job, you can't get any job offers. Especially true if you've been unemployed for a non-negligible period of time: 3 months or something is fine, looks like you're just between jobs, but 3 years and employers start to assume there must be some horrible dark reason, and pass on the resume. Basically a variety of "social proof".

    I suspect this is large part because companies have no reliable way of actually interviewing or screening potential hires, so they rely on these kind of tea-leaf-reading heuristics instead. Some of it is also that large companies are mostly looking to avoid bad hires, versus to get good hires. They might be passing up a great hire, but what they really care about is not hiring anyone who will rock the boat and cause problems.

  41. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    Do you realize that some people might want to get a piece of the cake ? USA used to be a land of opportunities, it has merely became a land of privileges for those rightly born. I will not say that US workers are lazy, but if there is someone equally competent want it hard, there is barely anything you can do but toughen and get better. I know, this is pretty damn difficult. Asking question about oneself, accepting that you are not the best for a task is hard, but this is what make you stronger. If you want to hide yourself behind laws to make you life easier, fine, but don't come and whine when you start losing. All these immigration laws are just artificial protection to a way of life you no longer deserve. Wake up sweetheart !

  42. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    Btw, yes, I am an immigrant in North America, coming from the old' Europe, currently in Canada, but YES, I *am* lurking hard to move south within the next 5 years. And YES, if that mean being a whore to a big tech company, I WILL be, without any remorse.

    Looking back, I should probably have moved to the US first, but well... life...

  43. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We really need a -1, Wallows in Wrongness mod.

  44. dude you are all a bunch of european immigrants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh man spare me the "usa! usa!" bullshit.
    not one of you "americans" can trace a grandparent to anywhere else but europe or asia or whatever.
    maybe the natives. not you.

    the great american nation... than why the f**k do you speak english (or spanish) !?
    tell you what, the american dream was and is a european dream. oh and chinese too. mmm and jewish too ... whatever

    1. Re:dude you are all a bunch of european immigrants by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the old "Europe is so much older than America" condescension. Not a one of you Europeans doesn't trace his or her ancestry back to Africa.

    2. Re:dude you are all a bunch of european immigrants by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      My ancestors are of cherokee decent.... so yeah some of us can indeed trace our roots back to america.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  45. immigration 'reformers'? Hang them for treason.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone who advocates for more immigration or even advocates for anything less than an immigration moratorium is a traitor and should be tried and convicted of treason, to be punished by public hanging.

    Period.

  46. hang zuckerberg for treason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    indict, try, convict and hang this traitorous zillionaire zuckerberg for treason.

    hang this punk in public. I wanna be there when they stretch this punk's neck for treason.

  47. Stupidest fucking ad I ever saw by nbauman · · Score: 1

    The stupidest fucking public service ad I ever saw was the Hour of Code video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FC5FbmsH4fw on YouTube that Google linked to today on its home page.

    It's full of women, minorities, older people, and every affirmative action group that has a lobby or a voting block behind it (with a few prominent product placements).

    But it doesn't tell you anything about what code is. (Nor does http://csedweek.org/)

    There's nothing in here that would actually appeal to some kid who would be interested in code.

    It's like the Richard Feynman critique of physics textbooks. You could replace "Hour of Code" with "Hip-Hop Dance" or "Basketball" or "Porn" and you wouldn't have to change the video.

    They're just repeating a slogan.

  48. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by StoutFiles · · Score: 0

    And that sums everything up right there. They want immigrants to come in as indentured servents, working as hard as possible with whatever pay they decide to give them. It's the dream of every CEO.

  49. umm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Attracting the best talent is good for an organization. The U.S. is an organization. If we suppose "increasing GDP per capita" is a worthwhile goal, then bringing in a bunch of highly productive people isn't a bad way to go about it. Now, "guy who does phone tech support" may not qualify, but "guy who earned a STEM Ph.D. or M.D. at a U.S. university" almost surely does. Those folks should be automatically fast-tracked for citizenship if it's something they're interested in.

    1. Re:umm by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should make it easy for the "guy who does phone tech support" to go to college for an undergraduate and even a STEM Ph.D or M.D. degree, rather than having to pay $20,000 a year for 4 years.

      He might turn out to be smarter than you think.

      Many of the European countries where these geniuses are coming from have free university education (with expenses).

      And before you tell me that the guy who does phone tech support could go to a community college part time, name a couple of Ph.Ds or M.D.s who graduated a community college.

    2. Re:umm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      I mentioned "guy who does phone tech support" as an example of someone we might not want to fast-track for citizenship. That is to say, if all the tech companies want to do is import "grunts" then those folks might not do much to increase the average productivity of "people living and working in the United States". The case for allowing unlimited immigration of less-than-superlatively-productive folks isn't quite as strong as the case for allowing unlimited immigration of superlatively-productive folks, so I went with the latter in an effort to find middle ground. Even someone who generally opposes increased ease-of-immigration should be able to recognize the benefit of importing a bunch of M.D.s, Ph.D.'s and highly-skilled tech workers.

    3. Re:umm by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      guy who earned a STEM Ph.D. or M.D. at a U.S. university

      Very few H-1B's have Ph.D.'s, and the program has nothing to do with M.D.'s.

    4. Re:umm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Was making a separate point. Regardless of the H1B situation, the U.S. should fast-track the most desirable would-be immigrants.

    5. Re:umm by x0ra · · Score: 1

      "Free university" is a myth. Geniuses do not comes from the universities, but from the very selective realm of the top "engineer school" and alike, which basically requires you to be born from an upper class family to have access to the best high-school, and then so-called "preparatory" school. To this respect, upper class are still going to the best schools, and the mob is going to the under-funded (remember, it's "free"), over-crowded, universities. Oh, and once in a while there is a guy from the mob lucky enough to be part of a "quota" system which get to go to a top school.

    6. Re:umm by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of Linus Torvalds, who described in an interview with Terry Gross how his university education was free, and he got a stipend for his living expenses, so he could sit in his dorm room playing computer games, which is where he came up with the idea of Linux.

      I don't think there is a great class divide in Finland, the way we have in the US. It has the greatest equality of income, and the greatest social mobility, in the world.

      I could also give the example of City College of New York, which graduated a dozen Nobel laureates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_affiliated_with_the_City_University_of_New_York If you go to the Nobel prize web site and read their biographies, you'll see that most of them came from working-class families -- their parents were tailors and butchers. City College also graduated titans of industry, like Andrew Grove, founder of Intel, who created the modern computer revolution. During that time, the City University system was free. The upper-class kids fought it out with the working-class kids, and the smartest, hardest-working kids won. A free university system is a meritocracy. The lazy rich kids went to NYU and Columbia.

      Now City University is charging tuition, and it's much harder to duplicate that success.

    7. Re:umm by x0ra · · Score: 1

      A single guy in Finland is hardly enough to generalize a concept. As for the CUNY, it's also rather difficult to draw any statistical significance compared to the big US universities, cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation. By using your metric, it might be argued that the heavy fee is not detrimental to Nobel prize winner production.

    8. Re:umm by nbauman · · Score: 1

      We have a working model in City College of a free university. Thousands of graduates of City College were successful and contributed to society.

      Many of the universities on your list were also free, like Berkeley (before the Ronald Reagan budget cuts) and the European universities. So it continues to demonstrate that free universities are a good model.

      For all practical purposes, the only people who can graduate expensive schools like Harvard are the wealthy. So free universities give access to education for people who are smart but not wealthy.

      It's not true that free universities are a myth. They exist and they are (or were) very successful.

    9. Re:umm by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Actually it's my bad. I thought you were talking about French's free university system, and thus only focused by analyse on these. In which case the problem is more on the implementation than on the concept... which is understandable knowing France...

  50. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by Stolpskott · · Score: 2

    The iDot... Apple's new (patent and copyright pending) way to end sentences and provide a break between the integer and fractional parts of a number. According to Apple, it looks better than the old "decimal point" that it replaces, it has more caché, has been designed with usability in mind, and it runs the latest version of iOS.
    It is also fully compatible with your web browser and email system, and all such systems will be automatically upgraded to work with the new symbol.
    A small licensing fee will be levied by Apple for the use of this incredible and ground-breaking new technology, and their lawyers will be in contact with each and every one of you in due course, to arrange your payment of this licensing fee, along with the pre-defined hourly rate for the lawyers' time spent on the case.
    Failure to pay the licence fee and other associated fees will cause a general reduction in your attractiveness to the opposite sex, and infestation of Locusts to descend on your house, you will be afflicted with Cooties, and you will henceforth be referred to by anyone who hears about the failure to pay the license fee for such a useful and necessary implement as "that iDot".

    Oh and if you believe the Urban Dictionary, ying-yang is the erroneous spelling of the phrase "yin-yang", which is the simplified form of "ynyáng", the Pnyn (phonetic method of representing Chinese characters in western script) spelling of the Chinese characters which define Yin and Yang. So, it looks like the OP is not the "iDot" in this case...

  51. Re:remove health benefits from jobs and that will by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Or allow employers to offer insurance that only pays out what Medicare doesn't cover first, for employes who are covered by Medicare. If Medicare is on the hook first then the expected health expenditures of an older employee (from the insurer's point of view) shouldn't be that out-of-whack compared to younger employees.

  52. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by Stolpskott · · Score: 1

    Bah, I hate it when /. blocks characters it knows nothing about... Pnyn should come out to be something like Pinyin, but with a bar over the i's :(
    Hopefully the community do not slaughter me for that mistake *prays*...

  53. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by nbauman · · Score: 1

    I don't think you're as smart as you think you are. And I don't think you understand the U.S.

    It's a lot easier to get an undergraduate degree in most of Europe.

    In the U.S., paying for a degree costs as much as the mortgage on a house. There are a lot of smart kids working at McDonald's, and it's pretty hard to earn college tuition at McDonald's.

    I usually hear that "toughen up and get better" line from rich conservative hypocrites whose parents handed it all to them.

  54. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    How closely were your loss of your job and subsequent inability to get another one correlated with your claims of God talking to you?

    The irony is very amusing, all the more for how so many are oblivious to it. Many of those who join Zuck and Bill in being pro-H1-B visa program, liken those who are opposed to the Know-Nothings. Uh, folks, read your history - the Know-Nothings were primarily anti-Catholic. Meanwhile this sort of bigotry, where someone is made fun of for having religious beliefs, passes almost entirely without comment.

  55. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    Would you care to make an argument instead of a series of assertions? Otherwise your post is most likely BS.

  56. Re:CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is to much class room time.

    You mean the type of CS degrees that are a primary justification for H-1B's?

  57. Same goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see the two strategies as conflicting. They both aim to increase the number of available programmers, increasing talent and reducing wages. I mean, it's evil and manipulative, but unified for sure.

  58. Laugh by koan · · Score: 1

    Zuckerberg is typical of his ilk, cheap, doesn't want to pay and has no problem ruining things for others if he gets his way.

    Brain draining 3rd World countries so he can get a deal.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  59. Whee! Where is common sense? by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

    Yes! Let's teach all the kids to be programmers! Who needs butchers, bakers, and candlestick makers? With a whole nation of programmers, Obamacare is just a sampling of the good things to come.

  60. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Xest · · Score: 2

    I'll make an argument, software development is a profession with logic at it's core. It's inherent in just about everything you do as a developer.

    You hence need to be capable of logical thinking that is to be able to make logical deductions.

    When you get a job as a developer you'll hence most likely be working with very logical people, people who can deduce when your arguments and ideas don't make sense, and will expect you to back down if you can't logically defend your claim.

    GoodNewsJim.com is probably one of the most batshit crazy pits of insanity and illogic I have seen in a long time, hence, it's not surprising that for 10 years he has been unable to fit into a role that requires him to show at least some degree of logical reasoning.

    But for what it's worth, his post was full of assertions with no actual argument, he told us he's competent, he told us he had a degree from Carnegie Mellon. He asserts his competence, he asserts his talent, but he provides no actual evidence of any of that. What has he worked on? what has he done? How does he know he is talented? The employers he dealt with obviously did not think so.

    I got a job as a software developer before I even had any kind of degree. I can go out and find new development jobs within a couple of months if I wish to change jobs and I see very good payrises every time - even my first development job without a degree was paying well above the national average. I therefore have a hard time having any sympathy for people who claim they're awesome then whinge that they can't get a job given that I've always found it trivial even when I had less qualifications than guys like this, and despite living in a region that isn't exactly stand out for number of development jobs. People like him had every advantage over people like me, yet still couldn't find employment whilst I could. It's for this reason that I'm certain that they are the problem, not the industry. The wealth of listed jobs coupled with the incredibly low levels of unemployment in the industry back this up. If you can't get a software development job in a reasonable amount of time, then you are most definitely the problem. You're the 1 in 50 (the unemployed 2% in the industry) that are just unemployable.

    Seriously, if you only average 1 interview a year in this industry there's something very fucking wrong with you - that implies they were rejecting him before he even met them. That takes quite some doing and a pretty crappy CV. Perhaps he plastered his CV with comments about how god spoke to him too?

  61. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Xest · · Score: 3, Informative

    He's not making fun of him for having religious beliefs, he's making fun of him for being completely oblivious to the fact that maybe he's unemployable because he's suffering delusions.

    It's one thing to believe in some god, I think most people have no problem with that. It's not my cup of tea, but each to there own. However, it's a whole other thing to believe he speaks to you. That requires you to hear voices in your head. That requires you to be actually clinically insane.

    People who are clinically insane tend not to be the best workers.

    You'd have had a point if you'd instead talked about the fact we shouldn't joke about people who have mental health issues, then you'd be right.

  62. the education system was not meant for job skill by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    And we pushed to many people in to it while at the same time give tech / trade schools a bad rap.

    Now the tech / trade schools are hurt by being roped into the old college system

  63. What is this? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    weeklong Hour of Code

    How about 'learn to tell time' before 'learn to code'? If they don't know the difference between a week and an hour, I doubt they have much to contribute in the areaof education.

  64. Millions Died in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somewhere between 65-76 million people, most in the collectivization famine of The Great Leap Forward.

  65. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by darthlurker · · Score: 1

    "Do you realize that some people might want to get a piece of the cake?"

    So you're OK that I get forced out of a job to open a position for an immigrant. Why?

    Don't assume it's because I'm lazy. Put myself through college after serving in the military.

    Don't assume that it's because lack of skill. Executive came into the company I worked for, for over 10 years, and her first action was to open 3 positions so recent UCI graduates could stay in America on H1-b visas.

    In fact if you want to make an ass out of yourself, please leave me out of it.

    This isn't about immigration. It's about lowering wages to increase profit for a few. How about addressing my comment instead of spouting flame bait?

  66. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That requires you to be actually clinically insane.

    Provided, of course, that he is wrong.

  67. Re:immigration 'reformers'? Hang them for treason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear, hear! We don't need no more stinking niggers, kikes and wetbacks in this white country, God bless it!

  68. low wages by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    zuckerturd doesn't care how it's done he just wants to pay wal-mart wages.

  69. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    CrazyJim is literally crazy.

    It doesn't come across as well on Slashdot, but I'm sure anybody he's interviewed with in person picks it up in a fraction of a second.

  70. Re:YOU STUPID IDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a "-1, Whooosh" one.

  71. Did Not Survive by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The financial services company I was at got bought out by a Dutch Company. Apparently they've survived a higher tax rate and still had money -- go figure.

    And that's where you are wrong. The U.S. company had HIGHER tax rates than that dutch company! So in fact larger taxes killed the company YOU worked for.

    And yet you are still for the very thing that has led to your own demise. Astounding how powerful self-deception is, that it works right until the very end.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  72. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    There is a huge variety of programming jobs. The vast majority of them are dumb as rocks programming. Web pages, phone apps, etc. And you MUST know the latest fashionable scripting languages, know all the latest buzzwords, have a stack of certificates (college education not necessary, possibly a hindrance), etc. None of those people could build a computer or operating system from scratch even if it was from Ikea. The side of programming jobs that requires some real knowledge is smaller, small enough that it can also require a lot of experience, and requires knowing skills that are uncool like C, assembler language, networking, mathematics, or knowledge in other areas like hardware definition language. mathematics, cryptography, electrical engineering, etc.

    I do not doubt that a 50 year old C programmer has an extremely hard time finding a job in Montana for example. Retraining for Javascript in a browser won't help because the companies would still rather hire the 18 year old, or a 50 year old outsourced in Mumbai. Now silicon valley or Boston may be better places for those 50 year old C programers, but not everyone can live there.

  73. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    This is definitely true. When I was out of work after grad school in the 90s there seemed to be a lot of bias against me. They see this gap in the resume and assume something is wrong. I even had one phone interview flat out tell me that I seemed to be a good fit but that because there was a 6+ month gap in the resume that there must be some other reason I wasn't getting hired, and I never got a callback for a real interview.

    Essentially the longer you go without a job that harder it is to get the job. I even find myself looking at a person's resume and seeing if there's a gap, and I should know better. I am extremely confident that any of you reading this would have an immediate bias if they received a resume from someone with a five to ten year gap of no employment.

    So the advice here is to get a job even if it's not the dream job, just so that there's no gap in the resume. Maybe even try to change jobs before the current job blows up, just to avoid that gap.

  74. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    This is somewhat true. It's the best way to get a resume out there. Many places get a huge stack of resumes that never get off of an HR desk, whereas a referred resume goes straight to the hiring manager bypassing the filters. Almost all of my jobs came from referrals.

    But if you've run out of recommendations from friends then you're stuck to doing it the hard way just like the recent college grads.

    It's also a two way street: if your friend says it's a decent place to work and you trust the friend, then it encourages you to apply there as well. Whereas the friend who says "you would not want to work here" is a good warning. I have had a friend say I would never want to work in his department but he recommended other departments with reasonable managers where I should apply.

    As for calls coming to me... I get calls from recruiters. I've never followed up on them though. Somewhat that's because they only ever call when I don't want to change jobs, and because they're hard sell and pushy, and because I like to find out about a company and a job before applying and recruiters will never give you that information. Recruiters are never looking out for you and your best interests, and are not looking out for the company's best interests either; they just want a commission.

  75. Re:CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    IT is not CS, and are we really talking abouty IT jobs here? For a programming job then CS is very good, and there is no such thing as too much classroom time! Maybe you don't use those classes in your first job but they will usally come in useful eventually. Even if they never come in useful, the fact that class room time was spent means time was spent learning how to learn, learning how to think abstractly, learning that you don't know everything already, all of which are very useful skills. As for skill gaps, a good degree means that you will overcome any skill gap.

    Not having a four year degree can very often be a career limiter. Maybe it won't kill the career outright but it will stop the promotions after awhile.

  76. Re:CS degrees come with skill gaps and BS / BA is by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    What if the admin job is just a stepping stone to something better?

  77. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    If that can reassure you, I have strictly no legacy in North America, even in Europe. I come from a middle class family which sunk. I was indeed lucky to get my education in Europe, but my MSc is bs. It is a piece of paper which say I am an engineer. By European standard, I was a pretty bad student, not that I did not study a lot, but I wasn't giving a frack about what was taught at school (outdated bs). Yet, I was technically more competent than most of my classmates right out of school.

    I am not interested in understanding the U.S., I am interested in living in a land where, as a libertarian and weapons enthusiast (and yes, this include the possibility to conceal carry a handgun), I can be left in peace and not ostracized as I have been in France, and again in Quebec. For the privilege to be left in piece, I am ready to be a whore, even if this end up costing you your job.

  78. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    Why am I OK to get you out of your job ?

    For the sole reason that you are currently privileged, by your birth, in living in a land where I want to live. Go back a few generation, and the simplest thing your ancestor had to do to enter the US was to take a boat. The US is a nation of immigration, build by immigration. I want the same right that your forefather granted the People in the Bill of Rights. I want your privileges. Nation and border as strong as today are a fairly recent concept existing for the sole purpose of keeping the privileges of a group intact. To some extend, it might be argued that the harder and the tougher is the difficulty to join a group, the weaker is that group in that it has become afraid of losing. Though, trust me, I do not want to harm you or your family, but if that is my only way to immigrate to the US, you are in my way.

    You are seeing this as a wage problem because you have lost the sight of the privileges you are granted and the plentiful cheap resources you have access to. Being born in the wealthiest country in the world is blurring you vision. You will not see what I saw, you will not lived the ostracism I have lived merely because I did not want to have my ass cleaned and pampered by a centralized bureaucratic Government. I stood up and abnegated my own culture because I longed for something better.

  79. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    I would like to ask you a rather simple question. For this question assume that there is no immigration law, the US government is doing nothing but to protect the security of the people who are paying their taxes.

    Why do you believe that American should have the priority in IS job ? To some extend, why should the destiny of a man be predetermined by who his parents were, or where he was born ?

  80. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Xest · · Score: 1

    Which given that there's no known or provable physical phenomenon by which some god could exist or speak to you is the rational assumption to make.

    To start entertaining the irrational in discussion makes all discussion meaningless as you can argue against anything and can never reach a logical conclusion about anything at that point.

  81. Re:Ten years of unemployment as a software enginee by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    One way that seems to work in tech is just to "do a startup". This can be basically any idea, no matter how stupid, and doesn't need funding to count.

  82. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by nbauman · · Score: 1

    Go back where you came from.

    The US doesn't need people like you. (It sounds like Canada and France don't, either.) You don't want to contribute anything to society. You can't get along with people anywhere. You don't want to cooperate with your fellow workers. You're willing to bring everybody's wages down, in order to advance your own selfish interests.

    Why do you think you're being "ostracized"? You're doing something wrong.

    I hope you're just going through an Ayn Rand stage and you'll get over it. But unless you learn how to be a normal social human being, I don't want you in the country.

  83. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    As doubtful as it may turns out I met quite a few people in my travel who are thinking as I do. You are obviously not one of them. The question is whether you can accept difference of opinions. At first sight, you do not. Some would call that narrow mindedness. As I already mentioned, if accomplishing my goal lower your wages, well, too bad for you pal' (and maybe you did not deserve these wages to begin with).

  84. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    ps: I don't see the point following the flock. Being a "normal" social being... it is so.... boring.

  85. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by nbauman · · Score: 1

    I have never followed the flock.

    But there are benefits to cooperation (as any evolutionary biologist will tell you). It's necessary to get the job done. It's necessary to get ahead. If you try to get ahead by screwing everybody else, you may find out that it comes back to bite you.

    But it's all moot. You're not in the U.S., and you may never get here. You can't make up for bad grades by working cheaper. If you're willing to work for less in a free market, that means you're worth less.

    Ayn Rand died alone, without friends, attended by a paid nurse. That's where the virtue of selfishness gets you.

  86. Re:H-1B cap would make US workers 'privileged elit by x0ra · · Score: 1

    Even assuming society *not* a free market (which it is not). The system is biased by gain that are not of a monetary nature. While I may be paid less, I can gain culture, opinions and opportunities I would not have gained the other way. You can also consider that my worth is not a matter of how much I am paid, but how much I bring. Your strategy is shortsighted and anti-cooperative (if not just aggressive and competitive). Even if tomorrow I replace you, I can bring enough value and innovation on the long term to increase, the day after tomorrow, your standard of living. Though, by forbidding me to come, you choose the easy risk-avoiding choice of . I strongly believe that a true capitalist system would evolve to a thriving balance between cooperation and competition

    As for dying alone don't think I will, all in all, does it really matters ?

    Btw, I shall thank you for getting me to take some interest in Ayn Rand. I will have to read much of her stuff. I owe you a beer.