Slashdot Mirror


NSA Collect Gamers' Chats and Deploy Real-Life Agents Into WoW and Second Life

An anonymous reader writes in with news that some NSA agents were trying to dig up info by joining the horde. "To the National Security Agency analyst writing a briefing to his superiors, the situation was clear: their current surveillance efforts were lacking something. The agency's impressive arsenal of cable taps and sophisticated hacking attacks was not enough. What it really needed was a horde of undercover Orcs. That vision of spycraft sparked a concerted drive by the NSA and its UK sister agency GCHQ to infiltrate the massive communities playing online games, according to secret documents disclosed by whistleblower Edward Snowden.....The agencies, the documents show, have built mass-collection capabilities against the Xbox Live console network, which has more than 48 million players. Real-life agents have been deployed into virtual realms, from those Orc hordes in World of Warcraft to the human avatars of Second Life. There were attempts, too, to recruit potential informants from the games' tech-friendly users."

58 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Well, of course. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Funny

    We've read recently that the NSA types are becoming disaffected by their jobs.

    So letting them play WoW on company time will help with that, eh?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Well, of course. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But more seriously, that disaffection that MMO players seem to exhibit in spades is one of the characteristics of al qeada era terrorists. Being middle class, disillusioned, Muslim, male, single, and approaching middle age is the basic profile of an ideal recruit to them.

    2. Re:Well, of course. by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 2

      I thought there was a story a while back about the games communication channels (sorry, I am not a gamer so please forgive my terminology) being used by some actual terrorist types? No telling if it is true, of course, since it seems to be no more than security through obscurity, which is no security really. Anybody else recall anything of the like?

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    3. Re:Well, of course. by mlts · · Score: 2

      With what a lot of WoW players write, I'm amazed the NSA doesn't sue them for pain and suffering when some poor slob has to look through the stored Barrens chat logs.

      The command "grep -v -i 'anal'" will cut out 99% of the text though.

    4. Re:Well, of course. by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      With what a lot of WoW players write, I'm amazed the NSA doesn't sue them for pain and suffering when some poor slob has to look through the stored Barrens chat logs.

      On the bright side, it's a promotion for the guy who used to read Slashdot posts for the NSA.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Well, of course. by ememisya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am middle-class, disillusioned, Muslim, male, single and approaching middle age. Thankfully I don't play WoW, nor do I facebook, and exactly for these reasons. I got into a fight in highschool for being from Turkey during 9/11 because one kid decided to scream, "Turkey did it!", you know, they're all the same those brown bastards. Now I fear that guy might be employed by the pick-your-3-letter-agency, and no I'm not going to be like Yakov Smirnoff and walk around with a flag pin to show my patriotism, and I hope this insanity will stop before we reach the "burn a number on your skin" stage, I'm hoping even way before, lets round up all the Japanese stage.

    6. Re:Well, of course. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, I didn't mean to tar an entire group of people. That really wasn't my intent, but it does come across exactly that way. Which is indefensible, and you have my apologies, if nothing else. I know that even if I didn't mean it as a judgement, the kind of people who would judge you would see that kind of statement as validation of their beliefs.

      I, in no, way, shape, or form think that even a tenth of a percentage of people meeting those descriptors would actually even consider terrorism morally acceptable.

      Again, sorry, that post was, at the very least, insufficiently clear.

  2. Sir! Sir! It's an emergency, sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We have word that xXxNoScopezN00bKill3rxXx will dip his balls on the President at 21:00!

    1. Re:Sir! Sir! It's an emergency, sir! by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, we have a hefty blackmail file on him to get him to back down. Our sources indicate that his mother has had sexual relations with a majority of people who have played against him, I'm sure he wouldn't want that to get out...

  3. SecondLife?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good thing someone is watching over SecondLife. Maybe they can finally get enough data to fully explore the sexual proclivities of furries in an unconstrained environment.

  4. Everybody calm down!!! by jddeluxe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're not infiltrating anything; some of the sharper razors there have scammed their PHB's into letting them play WoW all day and get paid for it....

    1. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 2

      They're not infiltrating anything; some of the sharper razors there have scammed their PHB's into letting them play WoW all day and get paid for it....

      Now THAT is a theory that meshes with my bureaucratic experience!

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    2. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you mean:

      The actualized concept of a next-generation cloud-based synergistic teambuilding-as-a-service ad-hoc exercise correlates with the data previously acquired through empirical research regarding organizational executive judgement calls in relation to morale and outreach endeavors on an accelerated timeline.

      I've been working directly under C-level execs on and off for the past decade. It's not too obvious, is it?

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Everybody calm down!!! by TrippTDF · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't getting access to Blizzard's servers make this a whole lot easier? Couldn't you just mine the player data and make Blizzard record the conversations that take place in-game, rather than actually walk around in WoW?

  5. Clever bastards by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm generally opposed to the NSA's actions, but I have to admire the ones who were clever enough to talk their superiors into paying them to play WoW all day in the interests of national security.

    1. Re:Clever bastards by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      I'm generally opposed to the NSA's actions, but I have to admire the ones who were clever enough to talk their superiors into paying them to play WoW all day in the interests of national security.

      Yeah, I built a proof-of-concept to convince my employer to manage our servers via a Minecraft interface, but had no luck there :/ It came out even better than http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URVS4H7vrdU ... there were levers and status redstone to bounce services, little sheep flowing in a river across a glass screen to indicate web traffic, even mooshrooms-on-minecarts for automated deployment pipelines...

      Anyway, I bow to our NSA overlords.

  6. The only thing the NSA will find is virginity by readandburn · · Score: 2

    I kid, I kid.

  7. thank goodness by phoenix03 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the government will know when Stormwind raids will take place.

  8. Great excuse to tell your mum by Bruce66423 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When she complains you're spending all your time in WoW, you can say you're trying to get a job with the NSA...

  9. oh look... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Here's yet another way we can funnel tax payer money to private contractors under the guise of our black budget." Brilliant. I bet he got promoted for this.

  10. Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The surveillance revelations so far have been scary, sinister, infuriating, offensive. But this one? This is just... sad.

    OK, bad guys could potentially use the in-game comms functions on X-Box live to plans their nefarious deeds, but do we really need to be paying teams of people to go into the games and play them all day long? If they really need to snoop on that shit (they don't) then couldn't they just hoover up all the conversations and analyse them offline like they do our emails, phone calls, texts etc? What additional benefit does having someone actually in the game world offer? Are they worried that somewhere out there a virtual ogre and elf controlled by kiddie-porn-terrorists are communicating in avatar sign language or something? This is fucking ridiculous.

    Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day. I get the feeling some very ballsy gamer put together a presentation to get paid taxpayers' money for playing CoD all day long and hit the jackpot. If there was any justice on this fucking planet we'd all be knee deep in fired "intelligence" agents months ago.

    1. Re:Pathetic by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

      The surveillance revelations so far have been scary, sinister, infuriating, offensive. But this one? This is just... sad.

      OK, bad guys could potentially use the in-game comms functions on X-Box live to plans their nefarious deeds, but do we really need to be paying teams of people to go into the games and play them all day long? If they really need to snoop on that shit (they don't) then couldn't they just hoover up all the conversations and analyse them offline like they do our emails, phone calls, texts etc? What additional benefit does having someone actually in the game world offer? Are they worried that somewhere out there a virtual ogre and elf controlled by kiddie-porn-terrorists are communicating in avatar sign language or something? This is fucking ridiculous.

      Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day. I get the feeling some very ballsy gamer put together a presentation to get paid taxpayers' money for playing CoD all day long and hit the jackpot. If there was any justice on this fucking planet we'd all be knee deep in fired "intelligence" agents months ago.

      If I had mod points you'd be a god.

      Woudl you settle for an "atta' boy!"?

      --
      Who did what now?
    2. Re:Pathetic by niado · · Score: 2

      Our government is telling us they can't afford basic shit like hospitals and education and welfare, but they can afford to pay dorks to play Xbox all fucking day.

      The point you are trying to make - that we spend too much on military intelligence (some of which seems quite silly) is a good one. However, you are stating as a false dichotomy.

      We aren't paying intelligence agents to play video games instead of paying for social services, because the budgets are not done with that level of granularity. The government (and, by extension, the voting public) has determined the priority of intelligence/military spending vs. social spending, and hashes out the budgets for these services at a very high level.

      If we weren't paying agents to play WoW, we would be paying them to do something else.

    3. Re:Pathetic by djmurdoch · · Score: 2

      If the budget for intelligence agents were not so bloated, they would spend it more wisely.

      The fact that you are paying agents to play WoW is just a sign that you are paying them to do all sorts of wasteful things. Cut their budget to 10% of its current level, and you won't have agents playing WoW. Or if you still do, then cut it to 1% of its current level.

  11. Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were a terrorist organization, you would play a video game where chats are monitored by the company as a rule? No you would not. Monitoring text is clearly in the EULA of these games, and private chats are logged just like group/party, raid, etc.. chats are logged. If you truly believe in this fantasy of propaganda please go visit your local mental health professional and request medication immediately.

    Now if you were asking "Are some corrupt fuckers in a 3 letter agency advocating that agents try to recruit people on these MMO sites?" my reply would be different. Sure they would. Numerous 3 letter agencies have made it a habit of trolling forums and Facebook looking for patsies. They even found a few of them and gave them everything they needed including targets so that they could heroically save the day by busting the patsy at the scene of the crime with fake explosives that the agency provided. I don't put any shitty tactics beyond these people at this point.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Rubbish by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you were a terrorist organization, you would...

      If I were a terrorist organization I would download on of the dozens of free encryption programs on the web and USE IT. Even a zip file with a long password would do the job.

      Any belief that the NSA is catching real, dangerous terrorists with all their spying is fucking stupid. The same goes for the TSA. The only reason nobody's shooting random people or blowing stuff up all over the place is because nobody wants it badly enough. If they did, well, look at what happened in Boston...

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Rubbish by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > The only reason nobody's shooting random people or blowing stuff up all over the place is because
      > nobody wants it badly enough. If they did, well, look at what happened in Boston...

      Exactly. Hell I was just hearing on NPR about a refugee camp where "home made rifles" were found. How hard is it to get a tank of propane or a sack of flour? How hard is it to get gasoline, sulfuric acid, or nitrate containing soil? Point is, if people want weapons they can and will make them, no matter what you try to do to stop them.

      anybody who is in touch with the world enough to be able to read, do math, and generally solve problems and make plans can put together his own weapons of some sort, including bombs. There are plenty of examples of people who did it (many of whom were not even terrorists and didn't hurt anyone; if not most, since there are more teenagers living in the sticks with fuck all to do than there are terrorists)

      So where does that leave us? If most teenagers who really set their mind to it could come up with a way to blow shit up, why is it shit isn't blowing up for the most part? Why do we not have bedlam?

      There really is only that one answer.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Rubbish by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2

      There really is only that one answer.

      I know! The NSA's snooping combined with the TSA's probing have kept us safe. Amen.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    4. Re:Rubbish by phorm · · Score: 2

      Might work out well enough if you had a pre-set bunch of codes that correspond to real events/locations in game.
      For example, "going on a raid tonight @ 12 against the great dragon in the keep of death, bring a LVL12 wizard, shaman, and a tinker" might translate out into a 3-person team with a bomb expert etc hitting a predesignated location. It would be pretty hard to differentiate that between real game chats, or prove in court (ha!) that it was actually terrorist double-speak. It would also be less suspicious than an encrypted VPN or tunnel, etc.

      Of course the above would assume that the terrorists were all versed in whatever codes were used. I could picture one guy with a bunch of rifles sitting in a real van waiting while his two buddies are wondering when he's showing up for the raid in WOW :-)

    5. Re:Rubbish by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      The very fact you have to go to documents that span a decade or more just to get their numbers up proves my point far more than I expect you will realize.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:Rubbish by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, in most other countries it would be over the line to provide all those and then provide motivational material too and to tell the potential-to-be suspect that its a cool thing - of course, busting them for the plan before they actually do it then too.

      so the end result is charges of planned terrorist attack, where the actual plan came from the coppers and nothing was actually done by anyone!

      or the case of the "biggest gun bust" in USA, which was a result of cops creating a market for out-of-state illegally imported firearms by continually buying anything they brought in(to the amounts that I'd be surprised if they had sold any to any other buyers). so they find some dude who needs money and tell him to go to another state and buy guns and to bring them back - once he does it they ask him to do it again and again and then later bust him and somehow by USA standards that isn't entrapment.

      anywhere else entrapment doesn't need the cops to have held a gun on the head - just the cops _suggesting_ that it would be a good idea to do the crime is enough and by any fucking sane standard it is... note that if someone is just suggesting that USA sucks or trying to incite someone to do the same things in Jemen or Pakistan he can get a fucking hellfire missile shot at him. So why the cops providing explosives and inciting plans for terror aren't being shot with hellfires?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 3

      More rubbish from the shill CF. Let me break down your list of trash: The Underwear bomber was pushed onto a plane by 3 letter agencies against all better judgement including a protesting police officer. A court case in Michigan proves that it was wrong doing by the 3 letter agencies and NOT some brilliant terrorist. All of the other cases of busted terrorists, every one, deals with a patsy working with a 3 letter agency who provided both the target and the materials. We used to call this entrapment, and should do so again.

      Boston, you have a 3 letter agency that kills a friend of a suspect cold blooded, and lots of questions regarding the rest. The naked unarmed teenager that was allegedly shooting at police from a boat for example. I'm not claiming the brothers are innocent, but that we don't know what happened from truthful eyes. We have proof that the supposedly "good" guys are out murdering innocent people. Two wrongs don't make a right and all that. Scratch that one from the list.

      Remove the mass shootings from your list, because they are NOT terrorist attacks. Those are cases of allegedly sick individuals that allegedly committed crimes.

      You have nothing on your list that is an actual "terrorist" attack. Nothing!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 2

      I smell another CF like shill. No you would not use plain text logged chats as a communication method for terrorism. An eight year old gets that they would be caught using this method of communication. So you are either less intelligent than an eight year old, or a liar.

      I think you should look at entrapment and how it's defined versus what we are currently allowing (which a very short time ago was illegal under entrapment). Just because it's being overlooked does not make it legal, or morally right. If you are so ignorant you can't understand that, well, see the 8 year old analogy above.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:Rubbish by sixsixtysix · · Score: 2

      Well, true that it isn't entrapment, it is true that most sting operations reek of desperation on the part of LEOs. If you have to facilitate/enable ANY part of the crime, you must really suck at your job. The crimes only happen because the LEOs are involved. Totally pathetic.

      --
      ...
    10. Re:Rubbish by s.petry · · Score: 2

      Which Al Qaida are you talking about fearing? The same ones that the US Government is now arming in Syria to overthrow Asad? The ones that we armed as the Mujaheddin to fight Russia? The ones we assisted in overthrowing Gaddafi?

      Don't accuse others of lacking perspective with this type of garbage.

      By the way, the US has done everything in your list of bad things Al Qaida, Japan, and North Korea has done. A rational intellectual perspective is to put the mirrored shades on your face and take a look at why so many people despise the US currently. Hint: It's not because we are out to help everyone and giving the kids candy. It's because we are killing a whole lot of people, many of them innocent, in the name of a war started on absolutely fabricated information. It's because instead of being a country to be admired for our freedoms, we have turned into a country to fear because of our military.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  12. Absurdity by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2

    I love gaming. I have spent far too much time at it. The thought that somebody in our nation's government is getting paid to do it and spy on the rest of us while doing so is ludicrous. The NSA will never be able to assemble enough SIGINT to prevent anything, only follow key words retroactively to find perpetrators after it's too late. In the meantime, the temptation to exploit casual behavior for political ends is too overwhelming.

    The NSA represents the most existential threat to our freedom as Americans that has ever been, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union combined & included. If we fail to put an end to the NSA, then what happens with China, Russia, and Islamic terrorism is entirely moot.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  13. Of course by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course the intelligence community is going to leak such a story, or ten, or a thousand. They want us to believe that they are actually catching terrorists, and they want us to believe that all they money they are pissing away is well spent. So, they'll tell us that they are catching Al Queda terrorists on WoW, and all the other gaming worlds.

    I certainly hope that they have infiltrated the online doll makers and doll costume crowd. I know of at least one red headed Pagan who frequents those sites. That woman is a holy terror, and God knows what kind of people she associates with!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Of course by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The potential is there. Isn't it one of the complains against the security agencies that they show a "failure of imagination" in dealing with potential terrorist threats, resulting in spectacular attacks like 9/11? Are you suggesting perpetuating that? Should the terrorists "out think" the security agencies?

      MetaTerror: The Potential Use of MMORPGs by Terrorists By Andrew Cochran - 2007

      While the makers of Second Life (Linden Labs) pursue an admirable utopian ideal these metaverse systems can potentially also be used by those seeking to pursue a radical agenda. Many of the overwhelmingly positive features of Second Life can be adapted for negative Real Life means. The rapid and potent way in which communication takes place would seem to be an ideal platform for recruitment into radical groups, especially given the age range of those engaged in the world, which is typically 18-34. The teaching capabilities of the world can clearly be adapted for use by terrorists.

      Streaming video can be uploaded into Second Life and a scenario can easily be constructed whereby an experienced terrorist bomb-maker could demonstrate how to assemble bombs using his avatar to answer questions as he plays the video. Using the decentralized organization effect, already successfully used by SL companies, the bomb-maker and his pupils can be spread around the globe and using instant language translation tools (available in the world) could be speaking a variety of languages. Just as Real Life companies such as Toyota test their products in Second Life so could terrorists construct virtual representations of targets they wish to attack in order to examine the potential targets vulnerabilities and reaction to attack. But possibly by far the most useful tool currently available to radical groups is the ability to transfer in-world money between avatars that can be translated into real currency. The Second Life currency of Lindens (approximately $270L to $1US) can be bought using a credit card in one country and credited to one avatar (account) and can be given to a co-conspirator avatar in another country. The person controlling this second avatar can then convert these lindens to the real-world currency wherever they are based using a local credit card or paypal equivalent. Clearly the ability to transfer money in this fashion is a very useful function. While Linden Labs sets a limit on the amount of currency an avatar can buy or sell (typically $5000US) this is likely to change and $5000 gets you a long way in many parts of the world.

      DETECTING MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM FINANCING ACTIVITY IN SECOND LIFE AND WORLD OF WARCRAFT - 2010

      In recent years there has been much debate about the risks posed by virtual environments. Concern is growing about the ease in which virtual worlds and virtual reality role-playing games such as Second Life and World of Warcraft can be used for economic crimes such as financially motivated cybercrime, money laundering and terrorism financing. Currently, virtual environments are not subject to the strict financial controls and reporting requirements of the real world, therefore, they offer an excellent opportunity for criminals and terrorism financers to carry out their illegal activities unhindered and with impunity. This paper demonstrates the need for suitable approaches, tools and techniques which can be used to detect money laundering and terrorism financing in virtual environments and introduces a research project which aims to establish a comprehensive set of behaviour maps, rule bases and models to help in the fight against organised crime and terrorism.

      Technology is neutral - it can be put to purposes both good or evil. The surgeon's knife can heal or mutilate. When you integrate virtual worlds with the real world in some way, there is

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Of course by rainmouse · · Score: 2

      It's not as daft as you might first think. This is a genuinely serious avenue that many will believe should be monitored.

      When I worked for another huge online MMO catching exploiters, botters, real world traders and gold farmers, there was a genuine and perhaps justified concern about real life criminality among the player base. The fact is that virtual currency has real world value. Buying very sought after items or mountains of gold and then reselling it in a different currency gives you a perfect way to quietly transfer funds from one country to another or launder it. Even just using in game private messages to pass on information.

    3. Re:Of course by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Informative

      You offer scoffing and snark, not insight. Or is it just a failure of imagination?

      It's correct to scoff at folks who are scared of Terrorists. You're insinuating that terrorists are nothing to sneeze at, but The Flu Kills Six Times more people EVERY YEAR than a 9/11 attack. Cars and Cheeseburgers kill FOUR HUNDRED TIMES more people than a 9/11 scale attack. You're OK with pissing away taxes to have government agents protect us from WOW playing terrorists? Come the fuck on, man. You sound fucking hysterical and moronic to boot. Do you want to ask permission from a TSA agent before you're allowed to dial the phone? Do you want a DHS employee riding with you in your car, and tossing out your French fries to "protect" you? No. It's been over a decade since 9/11... The cost of our freedom and privacy spent by the NSA is far too much just to "protect" us from something that's one 4000th of the threat encountered on a trip to McDonalds.

      So fucking what if in-game currency is used to to channel funds. The threat is fucking pathetic compared to even the greater threat of falling down in the bathtub.

    4. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the difference between a cow and 9/11? You stop milking a cow after a few years.

    5. Re:Of course by EdIII · · Score: 2

      The threat is fucking pathetic compared to even the greater threat of falling down in the bathtub.

      I'm a big man and a I fell down in the bathtub once. It was terrible and awesome. Lucky to have survived quite frankly.

      That being said, I still fear the terrorists more.

      By terrorists, I mean our government. After all, they're the only ones taking away my freedoms, fucking up my economy, and conspiring with lobbyists and corporations to make themselves rich at my expense.

  14. Meh, no surprise by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Games could serve multiple purposes: out of band communications (i.e. not phone, email, or mail), rehearsals, and recreation. Since the Caliphate is going to be a while in coming they have some time to kill.

    I don't think there is any surprise that WoW or similar games would have broad appeal, even among terrorists. After all, the Harry Potter books have been among the most popular reading for inmates at Guantanamo Bay.

    What Prisoners Are Reading at Gitmo

    ... Harry Potter. He may not come riding in on the back of a hippogriff to free his favorite captives from their own version of Azkaban, but he shows up once a week on a cart of books from the prison library, offering an escape of the imagination treasured by many. Indeed, the Harry Potter series has been one the most popular titles among the 18,000 books, magazines, DVDs and newspapers on offer from the prison library at Guantánamo.

    Other offerings in the library started in 2003 include the The Lord of the Rings trilogy, the Twilight series and a self-help book called Don't Be Sad. Prisoners don't browse the shelves of this particular library; instead, they wait for a weekly visit by a cart of books prison officers think they might be interested in. There are mysteries and books of poems, copies of National Geographic magazine (a favorite), dictionaries and science textbooks. If the prisoners see something they like they are allowed to check it out for 30 days.

    The library's offerings now span some 18 languages including Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, Pashto, Russian, French and English. Officers scan newspapers to stay up on the latest titles and try to meet requests from prisoners — though finding books in their native languages can sometimes be a challenge. "I tell ya, Dan Brown's been beating me up lately," says Navy Lt. Robert Collett, who as the officer-in-charge of detainee programs, is known as 'Dean of Gitmo U'. "All his books are very popular, but we don't have all of them in Arabic." When the military has trouble finding a title in a certain language, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) sometimes steps in. Martin De Boer, ICRC's deputy head of the regional delegation in D.C., says his group sometimes sends its representatives in far-flung places to local stores in order to answer requests for novels in Uzbek or magazines in Bahasa (the language of Indonesia). "Access to books and news from the outside is very important to the prisoners mental state," says De Boer.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  15. Job by AndrewOsiris · · Score: 2

    will spy for epic lootz...

  16. Chat logs by phorm · · Score: 2

    Do they really need to play? I'd imagine they were just have direct access to the chat logs and that those would be filtered for certain keywords or against certain suspect players.

  17. They are over funded by koan · · Score: 3

    It's that simple.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  18. Sounds dumb, but... by swb · · Score: 2

    ...it seems like every large web site/game has some kind of internal communications system, often a real-time chat function and an offline messaging system. These might be tough to monitor with any context simply off the wire, and in combat games it would be pretty easy to talk about organizing terrorist activity and trivially mask it in terms of game-based combat in a way completely opaque to an outside monitor.

    One of the oldest espionage tradecraft gimmicks (at least in books and movies) are coded messages places as advertisements in newspapers. If you've ever used IMDB you know that pretty much anyone who has a role in a movie automatically has their own IMDB page, including a message board about them. There are THOUSANDS of minor credited cast and crew members with totally blank or very low traffic message boards that likely to remain totally unseen and could be used for exchanging coded messages. Even the high traffic boards for popular actors or movies would be a good place to drop messsages.

  19. Damn right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In North America, more people are killed every year by their own furniture falling on them than by terrorism. Terrorism the single most over-hyped thing I can remember hearing about in my lifetime.

    Terrorists are cowardly criminals and even if they were blowing up a large government building every week they could not do any lasting and significant harm to an actual free and democratic society.

    However, people are over-reacting to terrorism, and allowing the media and authoritarian types in government to fear-monger about it and use it as an excuse to help push petty tyrannies like the TSA and even serious threats to liberty like the NSA spying on all of us. AMERICANS ARE DAMAGING THEIR GREAT NATION by allowing this to happen. Your Constitution used to mean something, something incredible and empowering. It made you the envy of the developed world and created great opportunities for those who were clever and worked hard to make a better world for themselves and others. You need to wake up, reclaim your country and stop this downward slide into totalitarianism.

    1. Re:Damn right by runeghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In North America, more people are killed every year by their own furniture falling on them than by terrorism. Terrorism the single most over-hyped thing I can remember hearing about in my lifetime.

      Terrorists are cowardly criminals and even if they were blowing up a large government building every week they could not do any lasting and significant harm to an actual free and democratic society.

      However, people are over-reacting to terrorism, and allowing the media and authoritarian types in government to fear-monger about it and use it as an excuse to help push petty tyrannies like the TSA and even serious threats to liberty like the NSA spying on all of us. AMERICANS ARE DAMAGING THEIR GREAT NATION by allowing this to happen. Your Constitution used to mean something, something incredible and empowering. It made you the envy of the developed world and created great opportunities for those who were clever and worked hard to make a better world for themselves and others. You need to wake up, reclaim your country and stop this downward slide into totalitarianism.

      Yep. Osama bin Laden, for all that he's dead, basically won. And his biggest ally was the US security industry.

    2. Re:Damn right by Sabriel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... No, you're right, he didn't win.

      ... We didn't either.

      Instead of an Islamic caliphate, we're up to our waist in an authoritarian plutocracy. If that is victory, one more such might undo us.

    3. Re:Damn right by styrotech · · Score: 2

      Are you a Muslim? Has the US replaced the Constitution with Sharia law? If the answer is No and No, then Bin Laden didn't win, or anything thing close to it. His demand was the US convert to Islam and implement Sharia law.

      Got any references for that?

      My understanding is that he definitely wanted the Muslim world converted to Sharia law. But his original goals for the US (and the west) were to get foreign troops out of Saudi Arabia, to end support for Israel, and for an end to western support/involvement/activity in Muslim countries (presumably to not get in the way of their goal of converting the Muslim world).

      Later on the strategy expanded to include causing the US economy to collapse by provoking them into more wars of attrition by invading/occupying new countries. That economic damage strategy was kinda working for a while. But the US got tired of playing along with it long before the economy would've collapsed. The financial crisis ended up hurting the economy far more anyway.

      But I've never heard any reliable source for the claim that he aimed to covert the US to Sharia and Americans to Islam (no doubt he obviously would've been happy with that though). I've only ever heard it from the "they hate us for our freedom" crowd.

      I'm not just arguing for the sake of it, I'm genuinely interested in anything you have to back it up.

      Confusion on this point is potentially dangerous, and frankly stupid.

      I look forward to you clarifying it for me then...

    4. Re:Damn right by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Happy to assist you. The first thing to realize is that much of what you recite is tactics. The ultimate strategic goal for Bin Laden and his followers is a world of Muslims living under Sharia law. It is a long term goal to be sure. But getting the US out of Saudia Arabia and all the rest is just short term goals. Ultimately they want to see the US converted to Islam, and living under Sharia law. The language is somewhat stylized, in accordance with their religious nature, but fairly clear if you will see. The demand for conversion is pretty straightforward, and the call for Sharia only slightly diffused but you can see it - and it follows naturally from the conversion demand.

      Full text: bin Laden's 'letter to America'

      (Q2) As for the second question that we want to answer: What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you?

      (1) The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam.

      (a) The religion of the Unification of God; of freedom from associating partners with Him, and rejection of this; of complete love of Him, the Exalted; of complete submission to His Laws; and of the discarding of all the opinions, orders, theories and religions which contradict with the religion He sent down to His Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Islam is the religion of all the prophets, and makes no distinction between them - peace be upon them all. ....

      (i) You are the nation who, rather than ruling by the Shariah of Allah in its Constitution and Laws, choose to invent your own laws as you will and desire. You separate religion from your policies, contradicting the pure nature which affirms Absolute Authority to the Lord and your Creator. You flee from the embarrassing question posed to you: How is it possible for Allah the Almighty to create His creation, grant them power over all the creatures and land, grant them all the amenities of life, and then deny them that which they are most in need of: knowledge of the laws which govern their lives?

      If you read in the area of the section I quote you will see many things that they hate that are generally allowed by our freedoms.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Damn right by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've gone wrong on a couple of points there. First, al Qaida and company do indeed want the entire world under Islamic rule. It is their goal. The Middle East is just closer to it since it has a majority of Muslims, a number of the countries already implement Sharia in some form, even if imperfectly. Indonesia, Pakistan, and Afghanistan are also high on the list. You may have noticed that they are subject to various troubles as well, not to mention India.

      The Future of Terrorism: What al-Qaida Really Wants

      They plan to take back lands formerly controlled by Muslims. Just one example: Spain

      Alarm in Spain over al-Qaeda call for its "reconquest"
      HAMAS Targets Spain

      As to the US, there is no such thing as "Christian" rule. The US is a secular democracy. It is a nation of primarily Christians (of various flavors and piety) living in a democracy. There is no theocracy, there is no meaningful movement towards theocracy, and it is unclear what one would even look like since there doesn't seem to be a biblical model for it this side of Christ's return. So your post on that is nonsense.

      Christian missionaries have been greatly beneficial to many lands. This is only one example.

      Matthew Parris: As an atheist, I truly believe Africa needs God

      If you look into the history of the last 100 years, you will see that officially atheist regimes were one of the great scourges of the planet. In their communist form they killed 100,000,000 people and brutalized and oppressed many more.

      Jesus lived his life as an observant Jew, is recorded to have fulfilled many prophecies associated with being the Messiah, and made statements declaring himself to be God. Many of his followers preferred to die painful deaths rather than denounce him.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:Damn right by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Yep. Osama bin Laden, for all that he's dead, basically won. And his biggest ally was the US security industry.

      Are you a Muslim? Has the US replaced the Constitution with Sharia law? If the answer is No and No, then Bin Laden didn't win, or anything thing close to it. His demand was the US convert to Islam and implement Sharia law.

      Confusion on this point is potentially dangerous, and frankly stupid.

      Terrorists want to spread fear and terror. Hence the name. And by that measure, his plan worked.

      --
      bickerdyke
  20. Re:Tin Foil Hat by BringsApples · · Score: 2

    Yup. I feel like the headlines these days are more like GTA radio commentary than reality.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  21. Re:Training ground for infiltrators. by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    The UK and US may just like to watch any forming "dissent" and hope online communities will show trends before they shape into visable anti war/human rights/environmental/finance reform protests.
    Web 2.0 and online gaming communities seem to offer what "peace groups", 'bars', 'clubs', "unions' and 'universities" did in the past to the intelligence services.
    Then certain well funded NSA/CIA/GCHQ "front" groups can be pushed as been wonderful and protesters will be attracted to 'their' unique community forming.
    Expect to see a lot of traction surround big 'name' brand protest groups and charming individuals ready to guide people into fake or totally infiltrated movements.
    http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_11_02/FBI-was-interested-in-selling-the-material-to-WikiLeaks-in-order-for-them-to-be-charged-with-espionage-Crabtree-3397/
    What did the past look like?
    "'Undercover police cleared 'to have sex with activists'"
    http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jan/22/undercover-police-cleared-sex-activists
    Another aspect is just for slang and keeping up with the ability to 'blend' in.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  22. Second Life by cstacy · · Score: 2

    I remember this recycled story from around 2008. The Linden Lab executive (who was also one of their main system creators originally) hasn't been with the company now for many years. This was all eons ago, but it's being brought back up in the wake of Snowden. The part about Linden Dollars and the Second Life economy is a little ridiculous, since the money is only useful for buying in-game virtual items. For example, terrorists getting some better high heels for their avatars. You can cash out Linden Dollars, but there are lots of limits and monitors on it, and you cash out through either your verified PayPal account or a bank check mailed to you. Neither of those are in any way anonymous, and they are tightly monitored by the feds at multiple levels. (You could get some IP addresses and in-game transaction information from Linden Lab if you were tracing back some accumulated cash-out; that might be useful intelligence, I guess.) Like any glorified chat system. The idea that terrorists are using Second Life for virtual training is a bad joke. No realistic scenario or actions could be created. You could use the primitive in-game 3D modeling to create a rough representation of the buildings and alleys or whatever. But very little could be communicated beyond that. Avatars can't actually do anything subtle - mainly they can just walk. Arms and hands don't do anything except point-and-click on scripted objects in the world. The scripting can make objects change texture/color and move around. Communication is a very primitive text chat system plus an in-game Voice system that doesn't work very well or reliably. So you could make a really crappy diagramatic 3D model of your bomb scenario, and walk your avatars around it. But you could do infinitely better by just looking at a street map, or Google Earth, and tracing your fingers and talking about it or whatever. Linden Lab advertises that it keeps Chat logs (etc.) for some period, six months was what they said at one point. However, I asked someone there once and they said, "Well, we've' never actually deleted any logs to date." Second Life is an interesting experiment along a number of axis, but it's capabilities are really quite primitive. They tried at one point to sell it to businesses as an online meeting system, and it was such a bad joke they gave up that marketing effort. IBM has an open-source version of the system that is integrated with some other IBM meeting software. There are other service providers running "grids" with the open-source version of SL. You can download the server and client onto your laptop if you want to play with it stand-along (or hook together with some other users and make your own network). But it doesn't have any specially great utility for terrorists. Any more than any other MUD/MOO/Mush type system. That was all just hype, years ago, from when Second Life was exciting and hyped and not understood. NSA monitors AOL chat rooms and whatever, too; it's just exactly the same thing. They didn't understand that a half decade ago when this "news" article first came out.

  23. More misdirection by Camael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The ultimate strategic goal for Bin Laden and his followers is a world of Muslims living under Sharia law. It is a long term goal to be sure. But getting the US out of Saudia Arabia and all the rest is just short term goals. Ultimately they want to see the US converted to Islam, and living under Sharia law. The language is somewhat stylized, in accordance with their religious nature, but fairly clear if you will see. The demand for conversion is pretty straightforward, and the call for Sharia only slightly diffused but you can see it - and it follows naturally from the conversion demand.

    Beware the person who uses weasel words like "ultimately", "fairly clear" and "follows naturally". It means he's trying to pull a fast one. Beware also a poster who selectively cuts and pastes passages out of context to push his own agenda. I strongly recommend that anyone who has an interest in the matter to go read the full, unedited letter rather than rely on someone who is, as others have already pointed out, likely to be a paid government shill.

    To show you the dangers of citing out of context, I point you to the following passage of the same letter :-

    We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest.

    Doesn't that sound very much like what some of the bible belt conservatives in the US are pushing for? Can I then exclude everything else in the letter and based solely on that one passage, argue that the Osama group's ultimate goal is to turn America into a land of "manners, principles, honour, and purity"?

    Because this manner of argument is exactly what the previous poster has done.