Slashdot Mirror


Snowden Document Shows Canada Set Up Spy Posts For NSA

An anonymous reader writes with news that even Canada is getting its hands dirty in the international dragnet fiasco. From the article: "The leaked NSA document being reported exclusively by CBC News reveals Canada is involved with the huge American intelligence agency in clandestine surveillance activities in 'approximately 20 high-priority countries.' ... Wesley Wark, a Canadian security and intelligence expert at the University of Ottawa, says the document makes it clear Canada can take advantage of its relatively benign image internationally to covertly amass a vast amount of information abroad. 'I think we still trade on a degree of an international brand as an innocent partner in the international sphere,' Wark said. 'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'"

177 comments

  1. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought it was common knowledge for quite a long time that the canadian Communications Security Establishment set up all the american embassies with their SIGINT gear and such.

    1. Re:Old News by OptimalCynic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I don't see why there's so much shock. "US ally assists US spy agency in spying." Wow. My flabber is truly gasted.

    2. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was common knowledge for quite a long time that the canadian Communications Security Establishment set up all the american embassies with their SIGINT gear and such.

      True.

      I also thought it was common knowledge that very large joint programs between US and Canadian forces have been going on for decades.

      People may not know what goes on inside Cheyenne Mountain, but it's clearly no secret as to who comprises the leadership controlling NORAD at the highest levels.

    3. Re:Old News by X.25 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, I don't see why there's so much shock. "US ally assists US spy agency in spying." Wow. My flabber is truly gasted.

      What they are doing is not spying.

      I surely hope you understand that. If you do not, then no amount of talk will explain you the difference.

      You have to understand it for yourself.

    4. Re:Old News by EasyTarget · · Score: 4, Interesting

      .. common knowledge for quite a long time

      If I had asserted it in public prior to the Snowdon leaks, anonymous apologists would have popped up saying: 'Where is your proof'.
      Now we have that proof the same anonymous apologists are saying it was: 'Common knowledge'.
      Hummm.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    5. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what would you call it?

    6. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's been proof before, just Snowden's expose AND the US Gov's reaction to it made it more obvious.
      http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/2/2889/1.html
      http://cryptome.org/jya/echelon-dc.htm
      http://cryptome.org/echelon-baby.htm

    7. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in this case I mean since about roughly 1994 when Mike Frost had Michel Gratton write the book on the topic, Spyworld.

      This doesn't excuse the activity, it's just news thats 20 years old or so.

    8. Re:Old News by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Message for Mohammed McMohammed, Afghanistan:

      The cheese is on the bread.

      Repeat:

      The cheese is on the bread.

      (Let's see if the NSA can figure out the recipient of that. Or what it means. Gee, they've just been completely defeated by a 100-year old idea...)

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then what would you call it?

      A clandestine social network utilizing the oneway mirror protocol?

    10. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Documentary evidence makes a world of difference.

    11. Re:Old News by davecb · · Score: 1

      If they snoop on their masters, treason.

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    12. Re:Old News by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      True, and when you have a technologically advanced country with limited resources and population, being good at being covert is a serious asset.

      Consider for a moment the historical reality of Canada's leadership in the Iran hostage crisis in 79/80.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    13. Re:Old News by TheP4st · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then what would you call it?

      Covert Operation Collecting Knowledge, or COCK for short? Which clearly would not be the same as spying.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    14. Re:Old News by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Nope, this stuff is spying, this is regular old SIGINT, not metadata collection. You know how you can tell, there's a crap tonne of evidence.

    15. Re:Old News by Xest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not just US ally, Canada is one of the five-eyes group of nations (US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand). It's pretty well established that these nations security services all work together in unison on just about everything now.

      I'd wager given the status of five-eyes that New Zealand similarly uses it's benign image to spy where the US/UK can't get away with it on their behalf.

    16. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, do you really believe all this surveillance is to counter terrorism?

    17. Re:Old News by Desler · · Score: 1

      Your "proof" would have been that they're one of the Five Eyes group which is publicly documented that they shared intelligence with each other.

    18. Re:Old News by Desler · · Score: 1

      My bad. That should be *share* since obviously they never stopped.

    19. Re:Old News by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Consider for a moment the historical reality of Canada's leadership in the Iran hostage crisis in 79/80.

      Canada had nothing to do with it. Ben Affleck saved the hostages.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    20. Re:Old News by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Me? Not at all.

      --
      No sig today...
    21. Re:Old News by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mr. McMohammed is the only Scottish Muslim in Afghanistan, so it shouldn't be hard to track him down.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    22. Re:Old News by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Ben Affleck is Canadian.

      QED.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    23. Re:Old News by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      And they say the British Empire is dead.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    24. Re:Old News by leomekenkamp · · Score: 1

      I have a sneaking suspicion that the intersection of the sets of WIYP anonymous apologists and the CK anonymous apologists is probably empty.

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    25. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I don't see why there's so much shock. "US ally assists US spy agency in spying." Wow. My flabber is truly gasted.

      As a Canadian I am disturbed by this. I didn't agree for our government to give a foreign power, that is an allegedly an ally, the right to spy on me, my family and my community.

    26. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      We sold it to the American's and were kept on as consultants.

    27. Re:Old News by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While perhaps funny, it misses the point. The story here, and with Germany, and with Britain, and with Italy, etc.. is not about those countries spying. The story is about these countries colluding to oppress their own citizens by said spying. The oppression/suppression of OWS is a verifiable example, and there are numerous stories from the UK and Germany that show how law enforcement used the same type of data to squash dissent.

      Intelligence gathering on foreign countries is not a shock, and not a surprise. Nobody sane would argue that we can't monitor what happens in the world. It's what we do with that intelligence that matters, and all of the supposedly "Free" countries have failed in their responsibilities to their own citizens.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    28. Re:Old News by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      No, we've disowned him now. You or one of your friends may be able to guess why!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    29. Re:Old News by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Shut up and apologize.

      We're not taking him.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    30. Re:Old News by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      If I had asserted it in public prior to the Snowdon leaks, anonymous apologists would have popped up saying: 'Where is your proof'.
      Now we have that proof the same anonymous apologists are saying it was: 'Common knowledge'.
      Hummm.

      Then, I'd say the people you know are pretty much ignorant of the world around them. In Canada, this has been known since the 50's, my great uncle worked in Ottawa as a liaison between the Federal Government and the Canadian Intelligence Services. I got to meet some interesting folks before he died, and at his funeral when he was laid in Beechwood. Which is the Canadian equivalent of Arlington. But I grew up in a small town of ~20k people in the Southern part of Ontario, and people knew this was going on, they knew that the government had constructed bunkers in Ottawa and Hull to protect themselves in the event of nuclear war, they knew that the Canadian Intelligence apparatus worked very closely with US letter agencies. It wasn't until the Charter came into being that it quieted down, and wasn't quite so visible to the public.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    31. Re:Old News by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      They really don't care whether you use beef or poultry gravy on your poutine (for the record, poultry is better). At best, most of the domestic surveillance being done by CSE is keyword searches as part of the former Echelon program, but most of us aren't even on their radar -- they just don't have enough people to worry about the minutiae of all of us when there's real work to be done. There've been a few instances where they looked more closely at individuals closely associated with major events, such as the G20/G8 summits a few years ago, but most of the resources that CSE has are focused on external sources. The RCMP is there to act on internal threats, but only when there's a clear reason to do so, such as a background check on somebody looking for security clearance, or when there's a tip that somebody's involved in something stupid. None of this should come as a surprise to you.

      Privacy is an illusion. You can hope to keep stuff from the general public, if you don't put it on the Internet, but most of the details of your life are there for the consumption of anybody with access to it. The only thing that keeps your details private is that they just don't care enough to have a human look at it as long as you're not giving them a reason to care.

      I'd post anonymously, but I honestly don't care what they know... I'm not saying anything that shouldn't be public knowledge, and they've looked into my background on multiple occasions already.

    32. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also sent you Celine Dion as a punishment for not understanding that American Woman by the Guess Who is about the Statue of Liberty...

      "...I don't need your war machines; I don't need your ghetto scenes. Coloured lights can hypnotize, sparkle someone else's eyes."

    33. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see if the recipient of that can figure out the recipient of that. Or what it means.

      Oh, you mean in order for your clever idea to work you had to, at some point, actually reveal your secret details. So the NSA already knew who both of you are and what you were talking about.

    34. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were a few interesting bits in there:

      But the latest secret Snowden missive shows CSEC and the NSA becoming physically intertwined.

      "Co-operative efforts include the exchange of liaison officers and integrees," the document reveals, a reference to CSEC operatives working inside the NSA, and vice-versa.

      It notes the NSA also supplies much of the computer hardware and software CSEC uses for encryption, decoding and other state-of-the-art essentials of electronic spying needed for "collection, processing and analytic efforts."

      physically intertwined... NSA supplied hardware... When one of you American foreigner NSA types comes to work in Canada for the CSEC, I wonder what foreign countries of interest you might be asked to spy on, hmm? I wonder how much you're allowed to take back the NSA. At least the hardware is compatible though...

    35. Re:Old News by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Then why did you spell 'color' wrong?!?!?!?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    36. Re:Old News by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Apply meat now. Apply meat now. The tomato is about to be placed. The tomato is about to be placed.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    37. Re:Old News by enemite · · Score: 1

      In other words, it depends on what the meaning of "is" is?

    38. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden is one of those kids who just wants friends. He attempts to reveal secrets about everyone in hopes that he gets respect. Unfortunately all his revelations are common knowledge if you've been paying attention for the last 15 years.

      I'll bet his stolen documents has dirt on every country actually and he traded asylum in Russia to not release that information. China probably traded as well in exchange for sneaking him out of the country.

      In the end it's all politics and nothing is going to change.

    39. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or COCK for short?

      Hey, speak for yourself.

    40. Re:Old News by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      That's the impression I'm getting!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    41. Re:Old News by Curate · · Score: 1

      Covert Operation Collecting Knowledge, or COCK for short? Which clearly would not be the same as spying.

      The eye of justice is always watching.

    42. Re:Old News by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Canada as an "innocent partner in the international sphere" was the idea in the late 1940's to early 1950's.
      By the early 1950's Canada was finally ready to totally sign over to the US via memoranda of understanding, letters i.e. become totally dependant on the USA.
      The main fear of the US was a UK, Australia, NZ, Canada swap that would leak quality US material/methods with no way of tracking any cleared staff outside the US.
      Just as Snowden showed a standardisation of junk US telco encryption spreading world wide, the USA also wanted US security standardisation within its UK, Australia, NZ, Canada teams.
      Another fear of the US in the 1950-60's was that the UK and Canada would sell/use their own unique UK based crypto equipment. The US did not want such equipment on the global market. Expert staff in the UK and Canada been too smart with their own emerging crypto was also something the US wanted to avoid.
      Over the years US encryption, security was the set as the 'only' method for its closest partners.
      The idea that any other nation did not know of the role of Canada after the 1960's in a US global signals effort is strange.
      Microwave relay information gathering was exposed via the "Tryst", "Broadside" and Canadain 'Stephanie' efforts in the press in the late 1960's - early 1970's.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    43. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apply meat now. Apply meat now. The tomato is about to be placed. The tomato is about to be placed.

      My interpretation: Kill all the hostages now. Cruise missile inbound in 3 minutes.

    44. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, I'd say the people you know are pretty much ignorant of the world around them. In Canada, this has been known since the 50's, my great uncle worked in Ottawa as a liaison between the Federal Government and the Canadian Intelligence Services. I got to meet some interesting folks before he died

      Anyone working for CSEC and CSIS are specifically forbidden from revealing their employer and this begins at the application stage.

    45. Re:Old News by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The meat is not halal - requesting substitute. Mutton is preferred, but we can make do with beef if needed, just get it here fast.

      Don't worry about the timing with the tomato - the boy has cut himself while slicing it, so it will take more time for him to finish the job than originally expected.

    46. Re:Old News by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Apply meat now. Apply meat now. The tomato is about to be placed. The tomato is about to be placed.

      That is one dramatic BLT :)

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    47. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OWS was not suppressed. They were simply a bunch of whiny, greedy retards wanting a handout, with no real plan because they studied bull and shit in college, and found some leftover aimless hippies to hang out with them.

      They were never going to amount to anything, and didn't, and the ones who protected thieves and rapists should have gone to jail. Sadly, only a few did.

      If they'd been treated like any other gathering of criminals, you'd likely have wet your pants and cried.

      Yes, some cops were out of line. I want those cops punished, too. But don't pretend the Occupussies were anything but whining, pathetic little douchebags getting in the way of decent human beings trying to earn a living (and I mean those of us trying to use the sidewalk, not the banks.)

      Their only complaint about the Wall Street bailout is that they didn't get a cut.

      The NSA may have recorded their goings on automatically, but no one would give a shit, because they're not relevant to anything except their own whining greed.

      Do some quick math and on a global basis, you'll find most of them WERE the 1%. But as narcissistic racists, they don't really give a shit about Africa or Asia as long as someone pays for their Macbooks and worthless degrees.

    48. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been standard since Spycatcher showed the problems of not sharing intel.

    49. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While everybody has been looking south, and completely unnoticed, Canada , in large part due to it's "harmless" and peaceable image, has set up an intelligence network second only to perhaps Israel, or maybe Russia. Now, America may have a lot of "tentacles", but that hardly makes it a good program. Effective goals, no likelyhood of disgruntled agents, and effective interdepartmental communication are tops on the list, plus at least *some* trust in the other employees.

      The evidence is plain. Daily, and even before the latest breach with Snowden, dissatisfaction in the agency has been leaking out. It's like a sieve.. The fact that it's rumored there's a kill order on Snowden would never have leaked out anywhere else. Admittedly it's only a rumor, but it had to have come from somewhere.

      It's unlikely that any rumors will escape from the Canadian agency unless they're entirely made up!

    50. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he had dirt on China or Russia they wouldn't be negotiating you fucking idiot, he'd be in a mass grave somewhere after "authorities lost track of him". Please, try to think things through before you dismiss reality and prove yourself to be stupid.

    51. Re:Old News by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      So are http://www.canadians.ca/ these people.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  2. Enough by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They can't be trusted. Obama's unspecified "checks and balances" aren't working. Time to start encrypting everything by default.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Enough by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      It's time to demand Clapper be hauled away in handcuffs

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Enough by f.van.der.meer · · Score: 1

      Encrypt the coffers! Firewall the moat!

    3. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blaming one scapegoat will not resolve the deep deep deep corruption in our governing system(s). Short of a complete revolution with heads rolling, it would be futile and would only serve the propagandists.

    4. Re:Enough by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No the problems start at the top, Senators, Presidents, powerful Congressmen, generals. The problem is the system has no way to deal with them because at those levels it basically depends on the punishing themselves and they have learned to circle the wagons when the people get riled up.

      The only option is to target their enablers, folks like clapper. If enough political pressure can be brought to bear and you give them the option to toss someone like Clapper under the bus along with a few low level admin types like snowdens coworkers who broke some rule somewhere some time they will.

      Do this often enough and they won't be able to find these facilitators who are willing to go a long with what they know to unethical, immoral, illegal or some combination there of because they will also know that when it comes to light and it will someday, it's going to be them that pays for it.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "encrypting".....yeah, that's all that's needed. After you do that everything will be "all better".

      LOL!!!

      Put that "right to bear arms" to the task it was intended for already..............it SURE AS FUCK was NOT for "defense", and you know it.

    6. Re:Enough by Burz · · Score: 2

      A darknet is the only proper way to do that. Otherwise, they get most of the metadata anyway: Who, When, Where. Those are important details.

    7. Re:Enough by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Fixing that will be *very* difficult..

      Whatever method you use you rely on other people to be relays for your data. They can set up fake relays, they're tapped into the backbones so they can track packets and see how they bounce, they might even be able to insert their own delays to get the packet timing perfect for them, etc.

      How about we start with encryption and go from there...?

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Time to start encrypting everything by default.

      Can we please start with https://slashdot.org?

    9. Re:Enough by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      And your brilliant solution was....?

      PS: If you're a terrorist reading this, here's how to communicate securely without any encryption tools needed: Publish your messages in places where a million people can see them, eg. Twitter, a newsgroup, youtube video comments...anything with a lot of readers. Just agree that it will be done on Tuesdays and Thursdays on Youtube's most popular video of the moment at 4:30pm (or something like that). You can upload the message via an Internet cafe if you're really paranoid.

      (It's nothing new, just a 21st century variant of publishing special adverts in newspapers).

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I disagree. I think if we executed a few Senators, Congressmen and lobbyists in the public square we would see a significant change in their behavior and the laws that are passed.

      The thought of being hanged, then drawn & quartered and then having your pieces parts burned at the stake will motivate enough lawmakers to change things.

    11. Re:Enough by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      What's funny is that he outranks the president. Look what happened when Clinton lied to congress... Then Clapper... and Clapper lied about important shit, many times.

    12. Re:Enough by smpoole7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > PS: If you're a terrorist reading this ...

      I'm NOT defending the NSA, but remember that this type of communication requires ... communication. In other words, you have to arrange in advance that the phrase "the chair is purple" means "proceed to site B." The US Government's plan has been to

      (a) freeze the assets of the terrorists so that they're constantly strapped for cash
      (b) via drone strikes and etc., make it clear that when they DO try to meet to arrange things, they'll possibly be blown up
      (c) look at every single communication between the groups when they DO try to arrange things.

      That's their plan, anyway. But anyone with any sense at all should have known that, once all of that surveillance was in place, it would be abused. As it has been.

      Counter argument: if the government had *allowed* details of the surveillance to leak, it might deter the terrorists. Kind of like during the Cold War, the US and Soviets *wanted* each side to at least have a rough idea of their capabilities, to further discourage anyone with an itchy finger on the Big Red Button.

      But the truth is, intelligence agencies want to know everything. Absolutely everything. It's just like a dog licking his privates: if he can, he will. Likewise, if they can monitor everything you do, they will. They can't resist it.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    13. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's funny is that he outranks the president. Look what happened when Clinton lied to congress... Then Clapper... and Clapper lied about important shit, many times.

      Yes, but Clinton lied about sex!

    14. Re:Enough by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      > PS: If you're a terrorist reading this ...

      I'm NOT defending the NSA, but remember that this type of communication requires ... communication.

      Yes, but once you get the ball rolling it self perpetuates.

      Agreed that the real problem is the mentality of the people running the show who just want *everything*. That's why we need to start encrypting now, and later to start increasing the signal to noise ratio.

      (Shouldn't that be "decreasing"? Everybody says always "increasing", shrug...).

      --
      No sig today...
    15. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No the problems start at the top, Senators, Presidents, powerful Congressmen, generals. The problem is the system has no way to deal with them because at those levels it basically depends on the punishing themselves and they have learned to circle the wagons when the people get riled up.

      That's why the metagovernment project was born. There's no way to change the system from within. And there's no (sane) way to violently overthrow it. So metagovernment simply replaces it; slowly and methodically, over a long period of time.

      It's the only thing that can possibly free us; and it is something you can work on today.

    16. Re:Enough by ImOuttaHere · · Score: 2

      I think this is too simplistic. You can replace every single president, senator and congress-critter in Washington and you'll have the same outcome as you're faced with today. The reason is that members of three letter agencies feel, with all their bleed'n-red-Amerikan-hearts that they are responsible maintaining "continuity". They don't care which political party is in power. They know politicians will come and go.

      I think you're very close with your inclusion of generals on your list of those needing to be replaced. Broaden that a bit to include anyone who can set policy and direction without public review and oversight , and I think you'd have something to work with.

      Which is the reason behind my ongoing snickering over a recently /.'d article that described how "hurt" NSA employees are that Obama has not paid them a personal visit. I can't imagine who died and left them in charge, but in charge they definitely feel. Think about it from my perspective and the underlying meaning of their being "hurt" might take on new weight and meaning.

      No the problems start at the top, Senators, Presidents, powerful Congressmen, generals...

    17. Re:Enough by bytesex · · Score: 1

      It's like key negotiation: if your key has leaked, or you have a feeling it might be about to leak, you change it. Requiring another round of communication.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    18. Re:Enough by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Exactly right.

      I happened to be in Europe at the time. The French couldn't understand what was so scandalous about a leader having a mistress or three.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    19. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allahu Akbar!

    20. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counter argument: if the government had *allowed* details of the surveillance to leak, it might deter the terrorists. Kind of like during the Cold War, the US and Soviets *wanted* each side to at least have a rough idea of their capabilities, to further discourage anyone with an itchy finger on the Big Red Button.

      Indeed. I am reminded of Doctor Strangelove: "Of course, the whole point of a doomsday machine is lost if you keep it a secret! Why didn't you tell the world, eh?"

    21. Re:Enough by number17 · · Score: 1

      toss someone like Clapper under the bus along with a few low level admin types like snowdens coworkers who broke some rule somewhere some time they will.

      Wouldn't it be easier to just not renew the contract for the private company that Snowden worked for?

    22. Re:Enough by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It's like key negotiation: if your key has leaked, or you have a feeling it might be about to leak, you change it. Requiring another round of communication.

      If you meet somebody in the flesh you can exchange any number of keys. Change it once a week, it doesn't matter.

      Use the valuable, single-use, keys to exchange more lists of keys. Give one key list to each agent via their list of disposable keys. You only need a single known-secure key exchange to enable thousands of other people to communicate securely.

      I imagine you could knock up a piece of software to automate all of that in a couple of weeks. The key lists could be plain text files posted anywhere on the internet.

      --
      No sig today...
    23. Re:Enough by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Before that happens, they'll write laws making that illegal.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    24. Re:Enough by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      It wasn't what he lied about... it's where he lied. If that had been you or I... we'd probably just be getting out of federal prison now. It's good to be King... but even the king got some flack. Clapper didn't even get scolded.

    25. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to equate citizens retaking control of their government to international terrorism, eh?

      You'll get a treat from your master for that. Who's a good boy?

    26. Re:Enough by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Now, that depends on what the definition of "lied" is...

      Due to aforementioned travel, I didn't follow the whole thing very closely, but as I understand it, Clinton answered honestly according to the definitions agreed upon... it's just that those definitions were not really ubiquitous, and certainly not clarified by the scandal-loving media.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    27. Re:Enough by dryeo · · Score: 1

      . I can't imagine who died and left them in charge, but in charge they definitely feel.

      J. Edgar Hoover, especially read the second paragraph.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:Enough by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Time to start encrypting everything by default.

      Except encryption is not a universal answer.

      It does NOTHING to stop "metadata" collection - your IP packets still have source and destination addresses that have to be encoded in ways anyone can decode it (i.e., if you encrypt that, then every router needs to be able to decrypt it, making it essentially plaintext). Note: Tor solves this problem.

      It does nothing about traffic flow fingerprinting - that is, examining how the packets evolve over time to figure out traffic. It's possible to differentiate HTTP traffic from SSH and others just by watching enough packets.

      All encryption gets you is the ability to hide the contents of the transmission. Whether or not it's useful depends on a lot of factors. But let's just say with traffic flows the way it is, metadata analysis wil probably get you most of the way. And sometimes a little ingenuity can solve the content problem - e.g., if the target IP is a web host and the traffic flow implies HTTP, then the content can be reasonably inferred to be some HTTP content contained on the server, so all you need is to find out what domains that machine hosts.

    29. Re:Enough by Subm · · Score: 1

      It's time to demand Clapper be hauled away in handcuffs

      Blaming one scapegoat will not resolve the deep deep deep corruption in our governing system(s). Short of a complete revolution with heads rolling, it would be futile and would only serve the propagandists.

      I read the comment not as scapegoating someone but as applying the law to everyone and attaching responsibility and accountability to decisions people make. If nothing else, Clapper lied to Congress. NSA programs have been found illegal. If behavior like that doesn't at least lead to a trial, why won't others follow suit? They certainly benefit from growing their bureaucracies so they have motivation to.

    30. Re:Enough by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 1

      Obama's still getting the checks, and his balance is increasing. Perhaps you misunderstood what he meant.

      --
      Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
    31. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooo, when is Slashdot.org planned on going SSL.... Sometime soon after 'never' it seems.

    32. Re:Enough by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Your point would only be valid if the person had stated to do nothing but haul Clapper away. Putting Clapper in the Pen (not a safe house) would be a starting point. The people doing these things are cowards! It's cowardly to hide their intent, their beliefs, and their actions. You think they would suddenly become heroic when faced with being someone bitch in a real jail? Not a chance of that.

      A few of these people in jail would begin a nice series of confessions, and more arrests and people in jail. The problem is getting the start of the chain, not what happens next. Cartels all fall the same way, but it takes a ballsy police agency to start the chain.

      I'm not sure we have such an agency in the US any more, but I don't lose hope.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    33. Re:Enough by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      That's been been tried before... the results usually aren't so good.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    34. Re:Enough by Burz · · Score: 1

      I do think that darknets (like I2P) start with encryption and build on that. You can choose the number of additional hops used for each application down to 0 and the link stays encrypted.

      It seems that its the attack you describe which is very difficult; the attacker would have to masquerade themselves internationally on a huge scale. The NSA doesn't seem able to manage this with Tor, and I2P makes the problem more difficult where everyone is re-routing others' packets by default. So just collecting the metadata becomes orders of magnitude more difficult.

      For that reason (making mass surveillance prohibitively expensive) Bruce Schneier has called for better-integrated anonymity tools and sees a larger role for them. The additional benefits are well worth it: A cryptographically-based network address that no ISP can censor, and which becomes the basis for a type of identity that puts disclosure entirely under the users' control.

      I say integrate I2P to the point where they are assumed to be the normal network stack-- under normal circumstances don't even use apps that use plain TCP/IP; Cover everything with encryption by default and have every app show the level of anonymity that the user can adjust like the volume slider for audio.

    35. Re:Enough by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Tor does actually protect against traffic analysis too. Packets are split, concatenated and padded at random and a constant stream is generated.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    36. Re:Enough by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I am talking about anything like a great purge, my point was we the people can't get something like that done even if we wanted to do it.

      Which is why I want to have people down the food chain hang drawn and quartered. My hope is the Clappers of the world come to understand when the public get upset their masters will quickly abandon them to protect their own interests. That way when they get asked to follow orders that are wrong they just might say "No sir, I won't implement a massive domestic spy program it's un-American."

      Will the pols just get someone else to do it? Probably but those someones will be the incompetents to dumb to see it's going to become a personal calamity

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  3. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    eh?

    1. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha Kanada

    2. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TETSUOOOOO~

  4. Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    watches child porn. No one over 10 believes in Canada. It's a metaphor for everything that could be right about other countries.

    1. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      This is why Canada is going to take over the world.

      By the time anyone is willing to take the reports of some fisherman in slicks and a dingy sinking battle ships seriously we'll own three quarters of the world. The only country that *could* do anything about it is the US and we'll just stop printing Canada on world maps and globes, the Americans will never find us. The plan is working perfectly, eh.

    2. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US gets its maps printed in Canada? Well then - I guess then they've signed they're own death warrant.

    3. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I still remember when I first moved from Nova Scotia to North Carolina and having an argument with the geography teacher over where Nova Scotia was located. After about five minutes of arguing we went to the map and I was kicked out of class for the rest of the year for "show boating" as he put it. Then even when I was living in Bar Harbor, Main I still met people that didn't know where *Canada* was. It's like come on, Main is right on the border with New Brunswick and there's a ferry that runs from Bar Harbor to Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, How could you not know where Canada was?

      The rest of the world loves to joke about how bad Americans are with geography, but I've lived it first hand. To be fair though, we did have to spend a lot of time memorizing the 50 states and their capitols and the 100 counties in NC. So I can see where geography for the rest of the world might get neglected. When I was in middle school in Nova Scotia we covered the ten provinces and two territories (it's three territories now) of Canada, which is a piece of cake as long as you don't have to spell Saskatchewan.

    4. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I still remember when I first moved from Nova Scotia to North Carolina and having an argument with the geography teacher over where Nova Scotia was located. After about five minutes of arguing we went to the map and I was kicked out of class for the rest of the year for "show boating" as he put it. Then even when I was living in Bar Harbor, Main I still met people that didn't know where *Canada* was. It's like come on, Main is right on the border with New Brunswick and there's a ferry that runs from Bar Harbor to Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, How could you not know where Canada was?

      Your geography teacher didn't know where Nova Scotia is? SMH. And then he/she kicks you out of class for making him/her look bad for not knowing his/her own damn material. BTW, it's spelled "Maine". ;-)

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    5. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      BTW, it's spelled "Maine". ;-)

      Thanks, I wasn't paying attention.

      And yes that actually happened. I was given a "pass" on geography because the teacher didn't want me back in his class, and frankly I didn't want to be there. I don't know what my Mom was screaming at the principal, but I'm guessing because I was only at that school for six months anyway the principal didn't think it would be worth the PR nightmare to fail me.

    6. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, NC is part of Jesusland. They don't like being contradicted with facts. It's lucky you weren't thrown in prison.

    7. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      It's actually kind of weird because that's what I expected, but most of the people I met in NC were actually really nice and didn't come off as the super major bible thumpers I was expecting them to be. It's a shame their very visible representatives or overly vocal religious extremist make them out to look so foolish.

    8. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Minwee · · Score: 1

      It's true. The biggest tip off is the presence of Canadian Intelligence Gathering Centres throughout the USA.

    9. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      Boston cream donuts actually contain mind control drugs, and the coffee is primarily nicotine and chocolate to get people addicted and keep them coming back for the donuts. I know, I use to work there baking and filling muffins with hallucinogenics.

    10. Re:Yeah, sure, and Santa Claus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, I need to know where to get those muffins.

  5. "There's not that much known about Canadian intel" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ones I've met are fairly bright.

  6. What? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 5, Funny

    * 'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'*

    As A Canadian, I kinda resent that :)

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    1. Re:What? by korbulon · · Score: 2

      Nobody was implying that it doesn't exist, they were simply referring to it within the Rumsfeldian epistemological category of "unknown unknown".

    2. Re:What? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Canada has much more snow than the US, and yet the US produced a Snowden. Maybe Canada will produce a Chaude Journée.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    3. Re:What? by Dreth · · Score: 1

      * 'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'*

      As A Canadian, I kinda resent that :)

      Dave Mustaine wrote:

      "Canadian Intelligence,
      two words combined that can't make sense."

      Then ripped about 20 solos before finishing the song.

      --
      All glory to Arstotzka!
    4. Re:What? by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      """
      * 'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'*

      As A Canadian, I kinda resent that :)
      """

      that just means they're doing a really good job. :)

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    5. Re:What? by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'

      As A Canadian, I kinda resent that :)

      that just means they're doing a really good job. :)

      Not much is known about secret stuff Canadians know...guess we're really good at keeping those secrets...secret, eh?

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    6. Re:What? by statusbar · · Score: 1

      I thought our Canadian Intelligence was busy guarding our Maple Syrup Reserve.

      *--jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    7. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing you know is that the Canada Goose are really drones and fitted with cameras and weaponized.

    8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian, Canadian intelligence isn't.

      Hope that helps!

    9. Re:What? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      * 'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'*

      As A Canadian, I kinda resent that :)

      It kind of works with the joke that every time a Canadian immigrates to the US, they increase the average IQ of both countries :-)

  7. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by Hamsterdan · · Score: 2, Funny

    We elected Harper, so I don't think so....

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  8. If only you knew the the power of the .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nationality most offended by this news: Canadian
    Nationality least surprised by this news: Canadian

    As long as Steven Harper and his "Conservative" cronies have power, surely the world knows that Canada has gone over to the dark side. There is still good here ... but it sure as hell isn't to be found amongst the ruling party. Shortcomings in our political system allow a government that has always been opposed by the majority of Canadians to hold the reigns of government.

    1. Re:If only you knew the the power of the .... by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Wow, I have never seen a score of "0, Insightful" before this.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    2. Re:If only you knew the the power of the .... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      People always forget that he's an hyphenated Conservative and it ain't progressive.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:If only you knew the the power of the .... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      When something gets modded down as "Overrated", it doesn't change the mod classification. You can get modded all the way down to -1 with a positive mod class that way. It also works the other way with "Underrated", leading to such things as "Score: 5, Troll".

    4. Re:If only you knew the the power of the .... by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that seems awkward. You would think there would be some sort of relationship between the two rating methods.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  9. Don't. by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    There is no higher praise.
    It's like being called a traitor by Dick Cheney ; ).

    On the other hand the amount of surprise at these revelations is surprising. Where is peoples sense of history? Remember the second world war (Axis and Allies anyone?) and extrapolate from that incorporating the events since.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:Don't. by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There isn't anything in any of these revelations many had not guessed or spotted. There were and still are tons of people who just wanted to live in denial about it. Snodens stuff is making that hard for them as they can't just dismiss the people saying it as tinfoil hat clad conspiracy nuts, with actual evidence floating about.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  10. Canadian Intelligence by rikkards · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.

    Too easy..

    1. Re:Canadian Intelligence by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 3, Funny

      When asked about collaboration with the National Security Agency, the PM responded with a puzzled, "NS eh?"

    2. Re:Canadian Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nova Scotia

    3. Re:Canadian Intelligence by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      No Surveillance! I'm having Nunavut!

  11. Thank you kindly, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That famed Canadian politeness has made you too polite to say NO, EH?

    1. Re:Thank you kindly, Canada by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      Well, that and they pay us.

    2. Re:Thank you kindly, Canada by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its the least we can do for the billions the US spends on their Navy and Air force that patrols our Arctic.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Thank you kindly, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no, that whole NORAD thing kinda forces Canada to go along with whatever the US want, since otherwise we'd have to have a real army and defend ourselves and all that expensive jazz. Politeness doesn't enter into the equation, Canadians are assholes when you get to know them.

    4. Re:Thank you kindly, Canada by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Without them Northern Canada would be overrun by armies of vicious polar bears and harp seals.

    5. Re:Thank you kindly, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without them Northern Canada would be overrun by armies of vicious polar bears and harp seals.

      ... being chased by 14' aluminum boats powered by 9.9hp outboards, armed with .22cal single-shot rifles, of the Royal Canadian Navy.

  12. 5 eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well given they are both part of the "5 eyes" club doesnt surprise me at all.

  13. Canada is ruined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The evil Americans have infected the Great White North, now it's dirty like yellow snow.

  14. Pantysniffers by frrrp · · Score: 1

    The NSA is like cancer spreading through the lymph nodes.

    --
    smilies are for reetards
  15. Will work for toques and beer, eh. by DaveyJJ · · Score: 1

    Throw in a box of Timbits or some bacon, and we're nothing but your bitches, you macho Yanks, you.

    --
    DaveyJJ
  16. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they have Internet in Canada!?

  17. Sweden too by Flammon · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Swedes 'cooperated' too.

    http://www.thelocal.se/20131205/sweden-spied-on-russia-for-nsa-report

    It's pretty hard to say no when the guy with the biggest guns and millions of murders to back them asks you to do something.

    1. Re:Sweden too by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It would be very easy to say "No" if they had wanted to, if it wasn't in their interests. But perhaps you haven't noticed that Sweden has security challenges of its own?

      You're also a bit confused regarding the "biggest guns and millions of murders" part. The US helped Sweden keep them out. Just a taste. .

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Sweden too by Flammon · · Score: 1

      It would be very easy to say "No" if they had wanted to, if it wasn't in their interests

      Very easy? You underestimate political power of the US.

      There probably wasn't any pressure with Sweden because of common enemy. I wonder who the common enemy was in the Canadian case; or did the Canadians feel the pressure.

    3. Re:Sweden too by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Cold the reason why Russia and the Soviet Union where/are so interested in 'neutral' Sweden is very simple and not a mystery.
      Sweden had deals with the UK to 'swap' elint from ground bases for UK airborne efforts.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Sweden too by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Sorry A., but no. The Soviet Union and Russia have long been interested in any country adjacent to their territory that wasn't under Soviet / Russian control. They make the same sort of runs against Finland, Norway, and other countries now, just like they either threatened or invaded their neighbors in the past. Examples: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, etc., etc.

      I would think you've been around long enough to realize that not everything is about us. It is often about them, whether them is Russia or the Islamists. They have their own goals independent of our actions.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Sweden too by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Again Cold the reason why the "Soviet Union and Russia have long been interested in any country adjacent to their territory" is due to the real risk of repeated invasion.
      Russia lives in a very bad neighbourhood, historically surrounded by kings with faith based dreams, slavers,~ "colonialists" after Russian raw materials, fast moving fascists and a big spend military-industrial complex.
      Lets go down a simple short list:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Rus'
      Sweden with Teutonic Knights 1240-1242
      ~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Ice
      Poland
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish-Muscovite_War_(1605–1618)
      Sweden
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Swedish_War_(1788–90)
      Napoleon 1812
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_invasion_of_Russia
      Germany WWI
      UK and others in 1918
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_intervention_in_the_Russian_Civil_War
      Germany again in WW2
      Then the overflights and spy drops in the Cold war :)
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Georgia–Russia_crisis
      So Sweden did deals with the GCHQ over elint (bases, airborne), Russia would take an interest :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Sweden too by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      It's pretty hard to say no when the guy with the biggest guns and millions of murders to back them asks you to do something.

      Serious question: do Europeans ever take responsibility for anything, or do they just like to blame all their failings on the US or use some variant of `I was just following orders!'?

  18. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why is parent modded troll?
    We knew his platform, we banked on his minority status during his first two terms for him to not actually implement it. Then we give him a majority, then we cry bloody murder like raging retards when he gets to work on implementing his platform THAT WE ALL KNEW ABOUT ALREADY.

    It's true, Canadians aren't all that bright.

  19. Wesley Wark by khakipuce · · Score: 1

    "Wesley Wark"

    Wow, I really misread that name...

    --
    Art is the mathematics of emotion
  20. Always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always the quiet ones the ones that get you.

  21. Don't Blame Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blame Stephen Harper and his minions - not even Canadians trust him. And now that Rob Ford is the headliner, Harper will magically dust Duffy and Wallin under the carpet never to be heard from again. And no, I haven't forgotten about the contempt of Parliament thing.

  22. Not quite by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    No the problems start at the top, Senators, Presidents, powerful Congressmen, generals.

    No, the real problem is that after ten years of unfettered spying on everyone, the NSA is now at the top of that list, with dirt on everyone from the POTUS on down. THIS is why no real reform will ever occur.

  23. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by JustOK · · Score: 1

    Well, it is dark for like 6 months a year up there.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  24. What price freedom? by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    Little by little they thumb their noses at freedom. Slowly the door swings shut.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  25. Unintentionally Funny Comment by hduff · · Score: 1

    "'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'"

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:Unintentionally Funny Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post #4 with the same joke...

    2. Re:Unintentionally Funny Comment by Al+Dunsmuir · · Score: 1

      Without Canadian humour writers, Americans are stuck repeating stale jokes over and over again... We are truly sorry about Mike Myers, however. Nothing funny there since "I Married an Axe Murderer".

  26. this all goes back to WW II by joneil · · Score: 1

    The collusion & co-operation between Canadian and American intelligence agencies can be traced back to "Camp X" during World War II. Google it yourself to see, but Sir William Stephenson, who was I think head of British intelligence at the time, was a Canadian who was friends of both Churchill and Roosevelt, and head of Camp X.

      Just go get yourself a copy of the book A Man Called Intrepid, which was publish 4 or 5 years ago, and if you read it, none of this should come as any surprise to anyone at all. Canada does "fly under the radar" as far as world view is concerned, which sometimes makes us a perfect place or partner for intelligence for the big guys, but I can tell you, this country has very sharp teeth of it's own. You just never hear about it, which is exactly the way they want it.

  27. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

    Well, to be fair the Cons won the majority with just 39% of the vote so 61% of Canadians didn't vote for them. The problem is most of the seats are in Ontario (NDP/Con 95), BC (Con/NDP 28), Alberta (Con 21), Saskatchewan(Con 14) make up 158 of 282 seats, which is 56% of the seats for four out of 13 provinces and territories. Alberta, the Texas of Canada, and Saskatchewan are almost competently conservative. Ontario and BC are at least half Con. So conservatively speaking (pun intended) there's about 96 seats, or 37% of Canada.

    Nova Scotia (Con/Lib 11), Newfoundland (Lib/Con 10), PEI (Lib/Con 4) and New Brunswick (Con 7) only make up 32 seats altogether, less than 12%. The territories have 3 seats, just over 1%. Who cares how they voted, sorry guys. Quebec is the only province that has any amount of sway with 75 seats, but they voted almost completely NDP, which showed as the NDP is the official opposition with 103 seats. Then there's poor lonely Manitoba (NDP/Con 14) out there all on his own.

    The only way to get the conservatives out would be to get Ontario, Quebec and BC to vote NDP or Liberal. Saskatchewan and Alberta are always going to be conservative. The Maritimes can be swayed, but will always default to liberal, not that it matters with only 32 seats combine. We might as well join up with the territories and their 3 seats in the "no one cares about you" category. Ontario and Quebec are really the only two that matter for an election, they do have a large percentage of the population, but they were each guaranteed a minimum number of seats under confederation so even if they only had 100 people living in each province they'd still have the majority sway over Canada.

    Then there's the "The Fair Representation Act" (passed with the Con's majority in 2011 to take effect in the 2015 election) which grants even more seats to Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and BC so it's likely the Cons will win another majority because they basically set it up so the provinces that are most likely to vote them in, with the exception of Quebec, also have the most seats. For Quebec the Con's continue to give special rewards in the hope that catering to them will pick up a few conservative ridings. They basically set the board so they can't lose.

    Canada is much more left-wing (~60%) than right-wing (~40%), but we have two left wing parties that split the left vote allowing the right-wing to monopolize. Which consequentially was because of the 2003 merger of the two right-wing parties and the event that gave Harper his initial minority government and lead to the cons being in charge for the last 10 years. If it was still two right, two left parties the Con's wouldn't have a chance, and IF we ever go to a two party system because the Liberals and NDP merge they'll cripple the conservatives.

    Not that I have anything against the Cons. I personally don't like Harper or agree with his Bush Jr., ignorance is bliss, leadership style, but I like a lot of the core conservative values. Unfortunately, execution is everything and the Cons have just sucked at it since Harper took the wheel.

  28. Old News Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have thought Tim Horton's had WIFI for a while now.

  29. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by StrangeBrew · · Score: 1

    There is no hope for you if you honestly believe that the Liberals wouldn't cooperate with the U.S., Britain, or any other ally in exactly the same way. The NDP, on the other hand, would start spying for China and Russia instead.

  30. Other Unknowns by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    "'There's not that much known about Canadian intelligence.'"

    Clearly they also don't know that Canada became the 51st state during the Cold War. Kept secret so they could do stuff that we can't get away with.

    It's known in the intelligence community as the Maple Leaf State.

  31. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

    I don't think anything I said eluded to what I believe the Liberals, Conservatives or NDP would do if they were the ones in power. All I said, other than providing a bunch of factual numbers, was I don't like Harper's Bush Jr., ignorance is bliss, leadership style. Which is basically to lock the media out, fire or gag anyone that can provide evidence his policies aren't based on facts and and flood every channel with attack and economic action plan ads.

    The conservatives have done a few good things under Harper, but they choose to focus on things Trudeau said over a decade ago for a documentary taken out of context or his non-existent pot smoking habit (especially since the cons are the ones that legalized pot for medical use) or that he's having some female degrading women and politics event (because you know women don't need to know or care about politics) rather than saying, "Yeah, you like tax cuts? Guess what, we did that for you Canada! You like not being dragged into a world wide recession? We did that for you to! You like not having your housing market crash? Yep, that's us as well!".

  32. No wonder Canadian's are always so "Sorry" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They watch you pee in the shower.

  33. This shouldn't surprise anyone... by bluegutang · · Score: 1

    but surprise isn't the issue here.

    When it was revealed that the NSA spies on everyone and everything, there was some outrage in the US, but unfortunately not enough to change anything.

    Hopefully Canada is different, and now that Canadian citizens know rather than suspect what there government is doing, they will get together and force their government stop collaborating with the NSA.

  34. Even Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada and Australia do EVERYTHING at the behest of the UK. The sheeple of both nations are dumb, friendly, harmless, apolitical, and represent that 'new' breed that crosses traditional working class with the traditional middle class. Their masters are corrupt to a pathetic degree almost unknown in other Western nations, and are ALWAYS demanding to know who they are supposed to be bending their knee to in the Motherland.

    The people in these two nations have ZERO awareness of the greater agendas followed by those that rule over them. And this is very much by design- look at the formative history of Canada and Australia- Britain only needed ONE Britain II (what you call the USA), so neither Canada nor Australia would ever be permitted to follow the same path as the USA, despite having the land mass, natural resources, and potential access to the same migratory Europeans and others that caused America to develop as it did.

    The mistake people make when looking at these two nations is considering the relative 'satisfaction' of the people, and lack of American style "fist of authority" pounding astonishing numbers of citizens using legions of uniformed goons. But Canada and Australia are police states to a degree that would horrify Americans- it is just the model imposed by Britain is a PASSIVE police state, where the sheeple are brainwashed from birth to think 'political correctness' and 'societal stability' mean that people must always be self-censoring, and willing to bend over to take any abusive state policy. A visible heavy hand is not needed when your sheeple are passive, obedient, and unquestioning of authority.

    Controlling the populations of Canada and Australia is like shooting fish in a barrel. Britain always hoped that lessons learnt from the social engineering in these nations could be applied to varying degrees in the UK and USA, but this rarely works out to any useful degree. It is notable that today, both the UK and USA purposely create 'little Canadas' and 'little Australias' within their own borders (in the UK we call this region 'Wales'), with the idea that the weak, socially engineered people from these regions will help break down the 'immunity' of stronger, neighbouring regions. However, this tactic doesn't work well either, for obvious reasons.

  35. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Actually it was the Liberals who put in the regulations that saved us during the recession and housing market crash. Given a little more time the Conservatives would have removed all those evil regulations.
    As nice as the tax cuts were, the fact is that we are in more debt per capita then the Americans and cutting taxes instead of paying off the debt and actually increasing the debt seems as stupid as a household cutting back on going to work because they finally started paying down the credit cards and had their credit rating raised.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  36. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There's not that much known about Canadian intel"

    That means they're good at it.

  37. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, I was just trying to point out they'd stand a better chance of getting my vote if they focused on what they were actually doing/did rather than focusing on what their opposite is doing wrong. Especially when what they're focusing on seems to be extremely superficial non-political issues. Every time I hear a conservative poke fun at Trudeau's hair or how good he's only going to win because of his charming smile attracting the female vote it just makes me want to punch them in the mouth and vote Liberal for no other reason than to be spiteful to the ignorant racists sexist masses the conservative party seems to be turning into. Up until I actually researched the first attack ad the cons put out on Trudeau, days before he was even elected as the party leader, and found out it was all BS and taken completely out of context I would have voted against Trudeau in the next election. So really the cons screwed themselves over with that one.

  38. Oh please next you will say CSE has spies here by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And that would be laughable.

    Now excuse me while I finish my morning breakfast of poached eggs on english muffins and backbacon, followed up by some Earl Grey tea.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  39. As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOD ****ING DAMNIT.

  40. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by dryeo · · Score: 1

    The attack ad mentality is horrible for democracy with the Conservatives position being basically that those other guys have problems and trust us, we're Conservatives. And as you point out, most of the attacks are BS or worse anyways. The marijuana attack ads where they pretend that making pot harder for kids to get is a bad thing, the personal attacks on Trudeau, the lies about the NDPs plans for a carbon tax etc. If they actually campaigned on their real agenda they would never have got a majority and they know it. The sad thing is that Harpers promises of open government make Obama look honest and open.
    I usually vote for the Rhinoceros party but couldn't even do that last election due to the Conservatives changes to the elections act.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  41. Re:"There's not that much known about Canadian int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And... the Liberals beat out Brian Mulroney, then took credit for balancing the books on the backs of the GST that Mulroney brought in and Chretien promised to eliminate. All of the parties are the same, some just haven't had a chance to prove it yet.

  42. BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BFD