Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay Founder Warg Being Held in Solitary Confinement

From Torrent Freak comes news that one of the Pirate Bay founders is now being held in solitary confinement after Sweden turned him over to Denmark. From the article: "In a recent letter sent to Amnesty and shared with TorrentFreak, Gottfrid’s mother Kristina explains her son’s plight. She says that Gottfrid is being kept in solitary and treated as if he were a 'dangerous, violent and aggressive criminal' even though his only crime — if any — is hacking. Gottfrid’s lawyer Luise Høi says the terms of his confinement are unacceptable and are being executed without the correct legal process. 'It is the case that Danish authorities are holding my client in solitary confinement without a warrant,' Høi explains, noting that if the authorities wish to exclude Gottfrid from access to anyone except his lawyer and prison staff, they need to apply for a special order."

192 comments

  1. Solitary Confinement by fluffythdestroy · · Score: 1

    I don't know about other countries rules or law but when your sent in Solitary Confinement its usually because of your attitude or certain actions that are done in present... not related to your crime that was judged in a court of law

    --
    PC Gaming enthousiast that gives comments, opinions and reviews on Games. I'm just having fun with games while doing let
    1. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In Scandinavia it's a common pre-court procedure to deny the suspect of news and other means to by which they might influence or be influenced by the world outside.

      And no, Amnesty does not like it.

    2. Re:Solitary Confinement by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the real world, solitary confinement is often used as extrajudicial punishment by unaccountable authorities.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Solitary Confinement by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      In Scandinavia it's a common pre-court procedure to deny the suspect of news and other means to by which they might influence or be influenced by the world outside.

      Damn, some way in which the USA is better? Fact is stranger than fiction. Well, we used to have something called the Bill of Rights, which was part of the supreme law of the country. Nowadays it's largely ignored, being a 200+ year old relic and all, but perhaps a few minor authorities still have a sentimental attachment to it.

    4. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about other countries rules or law but when your sent in Solitary Confinement its usually because of your attitude or certain actions that are done in present... not related to your crime that was judged in a court of law

      The only other time solitary confinement is typically imposed for an inmate/prisoner/detainee is if the person's life would be endangered by being amongst the general prison population. Are the other inmates threatening to kill or otherwise harm Gottfrid?

    5. Re:Solitary Confinement by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Informative

      This really depends on WHERE you are talking about in the USA. There are plenty of cases where the police and the jail system are used as arms of the corporate class.

    6. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is probably not as bad as my comment made it look like, the thing is: in theory it is not so bad because as mentioned in the summary a special order *is* required, and just like actually keeping people confined pre-trial it there is a mandatory periodic overview where the prosecutor has to make his/her case why these restrictions are needed. Which sounds pretty reasonable - the problem is reality: rubber stamping judges who probably aren't as impartial as they ought to be due to the snug relationship between judges and prosecutors (judges are often former prosecutors and they all know each other by first name and are members of the same clubs).

    7. Re:Solitary Confinement by EasyTarget · · Score: 2

      In the real world, solitary confinement is often used as extrajudicial punishment by unaccountable authorities.

      Too true..
      Watch 'Cool Hand Luke' or 'The Great Escape' if you want to see powerful examples of how it is used to try and control 'troublemakers'.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    8. Re:Solitary Confinement by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Informative

      This really depends on WHERE you are talking about in the USA.

      I was thinking about the part that consists of 50 states and a few territories. I was about to say that at least we don't throw them into pre-trial solitary, but then I remembered Kevin Mitnick.

      Mitnick served five years in prison — four and a half years pre-trial and eight months in solitary confinement — because, according to Mitnick, law enforcement officials convinced a judge that he had the ability to "start a nuclear war by whistling into a pay phone"

    9. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Once again, someone learns far too late: If your entire plan is to willingly piss off people in power because you think you know the "right" social order better than they do, make sure you have an exit strategy FIRST. Otherwise, you'll learn that people in power don't like being taunted and disrespected any more than you do, and they actually have the ability to do things to you in meatspace.

    10. Re:Solitary Confinement by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think that in almost all of the US law enforcement has been corrupted into a posture of resisting change and sustaining the status quo at any cost. Beggars on the sidewalks are bad for business and therefore get arrested. Chronic drunks and the mentally ill are also unpleasant and dampen business and therefore get arrested. Wives feel threatened by prostitution and therefore prostitutes get arrested. And it gets worse. Laws may regulate what you can grow for food in your front yard and even in your backyard. Style of clothing can also get you arrested easily. The young folks that like to have their underwear sticking out of the back of their jeans often find out about that. In some suburbs even the paint on your home is subject to approval in advance by the city. The line between perpetuating a certain view of what the city should look like and enforcement of what all people call crime no longer exists. Palm Beach,Florida makes it illegal to feed the poor. Would you believe that? It is a theory similar to laws about feeding the pigeons. The city feels that is the poor are fed it will attract more poor people. And the same county has made it illegal to beg or even hold a sign asking for help.

    11. Re:Solitary Confinement by amalcolm · · Score: 2

      Whilst what you say maybe correct, "The Great Escape" was hardly a documentary. Not sure about "Cool Hand Luke" ... too long ago :(

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    12. Re:Solitary Confinement by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Informative

      California makes a lot of use of 'not solitary confinement' as a way to combat prison gangs.

      It involves prisoners being kept in single cell for 20 hours a day, with four hours allowed for exercise in a small yard and no communication permitted with other prisoners. Entertainment is not provided. Even books are not permitted, and these conditions can continue for years at the discretion of the head warden. Note that this is not legally solitary confinement, because *that* could be legally considered a form of torture if conducted for so long. Legally, it's simply a means to isolate suspected members of prison gangs.

      In much the same way that certain other branches of the US government decided that waking inmates up every hour to verify they are not dead is only a means of preventing suicide, and not intentional sleep deprivation. Because that would be torture.

      There's very little outrage about the California situation, because there is very little public sympathy for prisoners, and politicians fear being attacked by their opponents as 'soft on crime.'

    13. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only ignored by pussies too passive to fight for it. That document only lists your rights, if you want them you still have to defend them and fight for them. You still have to stand up for yourself, the law is in your favor, if you're willing to fight for it.

    14. Re:Solitary Confinement by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Cooler! 90 Days!

    15. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or suspected (but innocent) gangbanger. Or someone that the authorities don't like but conveniently label as a gangbanger in order to torture. I mean it's not as if authorities would ever be so petty as to apply such punishments to petty crimes like, oh I don't know, (alleged) copyright infringement is it?

      But hey, if you've nothing to hide you've nothing to fear, right?

      Fuck you, you jackbooted apologist.

    16. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And have millions of dollars to do so.

      Freedom ain't free.

    17. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The land of the free and home of the brave. [insert Muntz Ha Ha]

    18. Re:Solitary Confinement by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Palm Beach,Florida makes it illegal to feed the poor. Would you believe that?

      No, I do not believe it. I believe that you just made it up. Do you have a citation? Because a Google search finds nothing except a law banning "aggressive begging" (blocking traffic, badgering or pursuing people, loitering next to ATMs, etc.).

    19. Re:Solitary Confinement by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or insulting guard. Or protesting against other ill-treatment. Or being targeted by another prisoner looking to start a fight. There's no judicial oversight or accountability involved, as the prisoner is, well, a prisoner. A warden simply announces 'that guy is a troublemaker, throw him into the isolation cell.'

    20. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a job in a cubicle.

    21. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about other countries rules or law but when your sent in Solitary Confinement its usually because of your attitude or certain actions that are done in present

      Yeah, that's it. For sure. No doubt that this guy's just a "difficult" inmate. Wake TFU, dude.

    22. Re:Solitary Confinement by Splab · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the guy is charged with hacking into the police central servers, he is and should be considered a threat to national security (including terrorism).

    23. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The several cases I have heard about were over-zealous city workers demanding health inspection permits in order to give away food to the poor. Try these search terms to see several examples: homeless health permit

    24. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your police is handling matters of national security I hope you live in a small country...

    25. Re:Solitary Confinement by fnj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While entirely true that The Great Escape was not a documentary, it was based on a non-fiction book of the same name by Paul Brickhill, who was in fact involved as a POW in the very real Great Escape, though due to claustrophobia he did not participate in the actual tunneling or the escape itself.

      The characters in the film were based on real men and composites of real men. The character "Cooler King" Virgil Hilts, played by Steve McQueen, whom we see sent to solitary multiple times, was based on David M. Jones, who participated in the Doolittle Raid, survived same and escaped captivity at that time, only to be shot down in North Africa and sent to the very real Stalag Luft III. He actually led the digging team on the real tunnel "Harry".

      On balance I believe The Great Escape is about the closest thing to an accurate depiction of such an arresting historic episode as you can get in a dramatic film.

    26. Re:Solitary Confinement by scarboni888 · · Score: 2

      And Bradley Manning.

    27. Re:Solitary Confinement by fnj · · Score: 2

      Once again, someone learns far too late: If your entire plan is to willingly piss off people in power because you think you know the "right" social order better than they do, make sure you have an exit strategy FIRST. Otherwise, you'll learn that people in power don't like being taunted and disrespected any more than you do, and they actually have the ability to do things to you in meatspace.

      And regardless of their high and mighty air of superiority, they don't mind violating human rights in the least - whereas if the Pirate Bay founder ever violated anybody's human rights, I am not aware of it. He may have violated non-real "property" rights codified in law, but that is not at all the same level of offense.

    28. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right about the prostitution, btw. I was very lucky to have discovered it before getting suckered into marriage which is, when you think about it, often times once the honey-moon period is over, an even more expensive way to NOT get sex! when you need it!

    29. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > (including terrorism).

      Inigo Montoya would like to have a few words with you...

      I know that politicians and the media have just about succeeded in redefining "terrorism" as "absolutely anything or anyone we that don't like for any reason whatsoever" but I had hoped that the general slashdot population would understand that the word actually has a very specific and quite limited meaning. "hacking into police computers" does not equate to terrorism any more than "driving over the speed limit" equates to plotting to assassinate the president.

    30. Re:Solitary Confinement by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why allow a suspect to build a good defense by any possible (legal) mean? The suspect is clearly guilty due to the arrest.

    31. Re:Solitary Confinement by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't make it illegal to feed the poor, that just means you need a permit to do so. As long as those permits aren't ridiculous then why is that a problem? Silly sure...

      I need a permit to drive on a public road, does that mean it is illegal to drive?

    32. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about when they asked mentally challenged people to help them run a sting operation and then charge them with the crimes they asked them to commit? ATF uses rogue tactics in storefront stings across nation.

    33. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perspective, find some.

    34. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    35. Re:Solitary Confinement by houghi · · Score: 2

      On the other side, there are luckily agencies that do not lie and just admit they torture.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    36. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kept in single cell for 20 hours a day, with four hours allowed for exercise in a small yard and no communication permitted with other prisoners. Entertainment is not provided. Even books are not permitted, and these conditions can continue for years at the discretion of the head warden

      Cool, can we also poke these people with cattle prods? USA! USA! USA!

    37. Re:Solitary Confinement by ebno-10db · · Score: 0

      Sense of humor, find some.

    38. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was kept in solitary for >36 hours (without the "hour out") after being pulled over for failure to appear resulting from an argument over proof of auto insurance. (I _had_ the insurance, but one has to appear and say that.) They cleaned out my pockets when they arrested me and wanted me to sign an inventory of what they took, and stuff was missing from their inventory, so I refused to sign it. As retaliation for this, they put me in solitary, and told the people trying to bail me out that they couldn't because I was being "uncooperative" (at which point, I know half of slashdot will latch on, "well, the word is true, so whatever they did is justified." STFU.) Three guards shifts changed, and I would call the guy over, and say "What's going on," and he just says, "They'll come get ya when they're ready." Nobody seemed to know why I was there, or care. The first guy presumably fucked up the paperwork so I would just rot in there.

      I do not know if county jails were always like this, but these guys are stupid disgusting little fascists. Specific rights and sane treatment for prisoners and suspected criminals are a core part of the founding of this country, or so we were taught in patriotic indoctrination in elementary school, but when I look around me at my fellow citizens I see a bunch of screaming blithering autistic jack-booted little proto-thugs who, like you said, reserve their outrage for petty little sophist class wars over busses or "animal rights" or some other bullshit, and get all slippery when it comes to torture. I don't want to discuss what Warg did. I get it---he's being punished for making them feel stupid, somehow, or for not behaving as though his spirit is broken. These sick fucks... I want out of the US, and it's really scary to see this stuff happening elsewhere though a relief there appears to be some kind of procedural relief and social consensus against it, both of which are missing here.

      I was not woken up every hour. I was kept there for 1.5 days, not years. And still, my reaction is, fuck you, fuck you all. I do not want children in this place. I can never relax here. I do not respect my neighbors who consent to this.

    39. Re:Solitary Confinement by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are sitting in the park. You are in a hurry and not all that hungry so you give half of your ham sandwich to a homeless person and go back to the office. The city claims you have broken the law. No reasonable person would believe that you were operating a restaurant.

    40. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Muslim murdered would get less.

    41. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And as much as Manning's scenario is horrible, being a military case, comparing it to these civilian cases is like comparing apples to oranges.

    42. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, but just exactly where do you think you're going that's better, that is, where in the human world do you expect to NOT find this stuff happening?

      I am NOT justifying this BS and it should be decried and fought, but will you please send us a postcard when you find utopia?

    43. Re:Solitary Confinement by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Nobody was charged for that. It's people that set-up events, still some bullshit though.

      My statements aren't fact, but based on what I have read.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    44. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ACLU doesn't charge.

    45. Re:Solitary Confinement by qbast · · Score: 2

      Charge him with genocide as well. It is well known that hackers can cause nuclear war by whistling to a pay phone and it wa just matter of time until he did it.

    46. Re:Solitary Confinement by dargaud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is not having books any form of... I'm at a loss for words... not being torture ? Not being a form of punishement ? I mean many people would be OK left alone with a book. But left alone with the only option being watching already dry paint get drier ? How does that improve them as human being in any way ? It would turn anybody into a raving lunatic. I swear, people who run US prisons should be the first ones locked up in them.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    47. Re:Solitary Confinement by similar_name · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, I do not believe it. I believe that you just made it up. Do you have a citation? Because a Google search finds nothing except a law banning "aggressive begging" (blocking traffic, badgering or pursuing people, loitering next to ATMs, etc.).

      I wouldn't go so far as to accuse him of just making it up. There are several places he might have picked up the idea. Some, the courts overrule the laws or parts of it. Some are just proposed. Some require a permit to 'gather' (eg more than 5 people). On Thanksgiving, the church should have 1 person with food in the park. 4 at a time, the homeless could come over. Then, walk away and 4 more could come up. I think the homeless should not be able to look at each other either ;) Get a permit right? I believe in the Orlando case, the problem was, you can only get a permit twice a year for each park so you have to move around. Are the activist intentionally getting in trouble making their point? Sure. Does feeding the poor in the same park, week after week, putting wear and tear on the park? Sure.



      Orlando, FL
      Raleigh, NC
      Las Vegas, NV
      Los Angeles, CA
      Philadelphia, PA
      Dallas, TX
      Houston, TX
      NYC, NY
      USA Today
      LA Times

    48. Re:Solitary Confinement by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Solitary cells, and prison cells in general, are usually constructed to minimise any form of stimulation. Uniform grey walls, undecorated. Grey bedding on grey beds. Nothing that can be picked up or moved.

      The root of the issue is that a large chunk of society really struggle with the idea of 'rehabilitation.' Instead they can only see the justice system as a deterrant - in their view, prisoners need to be made to suffer as much as possible, because the threat of this suffering is what stops other people from breaking the law. Modern decency stops them from openly advocating for torture, but they don't feel much like protesting against it either. Any attempt to improve education for prisoners or provide them with help back into the workforce or support after their release is just regarded as a 'weakness,' lessening the terror that prison is supposed to inspire in those contemplating crime.

      So we end up with an industrial system for taking people who commit minor offenses, destroying them socially, destroying their education, ruining them financially, making them all but unemployable... and then we wonder why they turn to serious crime once they get out.

    49. Re:Solitary Confinement by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      It is a fundamental part of the human mind to classify all other people as 'my tribe' and 'not my tribe.' It's written in right at the genetic level. People are naturally hard-wired to have no empathy at all for anyone who falls into the latter class, and a tendency to believe only the negative things heard about them.

      It's the same basic mechanism behind racism or nationalism. Not my people? Not real people.

    50. Re:Solitary Confinement by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Waking a prisoner every hour to make certain that he is not dead is torture pure and simple. It makes no difference at all whether a prisoner has passed away and it will be obvious at the morning head count anyway. The body will not decompose in the few hours between meals. Keeping books, and radio and television away from inmates is also torture. It is obviously designed to induce mental illness and inmates should be able to sue over such barbaric actions. God forbid an inmate should read a book when he can not sleep thus improving himself. And i have to wonder at how stupid authorities can be, Do they expect that a convict will behave well after such treatment or upon release will the be putting a man full of abuse, rage and depression on the streets? I know if I were treated like that I would want to kill people and I might not even care which person I killed, harmed or whatever.

    51. Re:Solitary Confinement by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Or having the wrong tattoo. Or reading the wrong book. Or talking to (or being spoken to by) the wrong person...

      It's entirely arbitrary and at the whim of the warden.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    52. Re:Solitary Confinement by jbssm · · Score: 1

      Damn, some way in which the USA is better?

      If you consider that being denied access to certain aspects of the outside world while being held in jail waiting to go to court, is worst than being sodomized and stabbed in some American jail, then yes, USA is certainly better in that regard.

    53. Re:Solitary Confinement by John+Da'+Baddest · · Score: 2

      s/Bradley/Chelsea/

    54. Re:Solitary Confinement by scarboni888 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same country. Same mentality. Whatever the fruit the harvest is the same.

    55. Re:Solitary Confinement by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which doesn't make it illegal to feed the poor, that just means you need a permit to do so. As long as those permits aren't ridiculous then why is that a problem?

      For two reasons:

      1) Why should you need a permission to give away your stuff? Requiring a permit for an action is pure authoritarianism. It might be a lesser evil in some cases - for example, hunting licenses to keep an animal population from collapsing - but it's an evil nonetheless, and should only be used if grave consequences force the hand. And no, "I feel uncomfortable seeing poor people" is not a grave consequence.

      2) This particular permit is specifically aimed against poor people, and as such will cotribute the economic and moral decay caused by pretending poverty and prosperity are earned by vice and virtue respectively. It's our good old friend the Just World Fallacy doing its usual disgusting work, by both reassuring you that you are quite safe (since you're moral) and that the victims don't deserve a single cent of your help. Unfortunately, a fallacy is endangered by exposure to reality, thus the need ot keep the realities of poverty out of sight. So, this particular permit exists to help reinforce a particularly evil and self-destructive form of self-delusion.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    56. Re:Solitary Confinement by easyTree · · Score: 1

      A common misunderstanding - this happens at the level of the gene, not the individual containing the gene.

    57. Re:Solitary Confinement by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      It's only ignored by pussies too passive to fight for it. That document only lists your rights, if you want them you still have to defend them and fight for them. You still have to stand up for yourself, the law is in your favor, if you're willing to fight for it.

      Bullshit. The constitution is an enumeration of powers possessed by the government. The list of rights embodied in the amendments are only examples, and the founding fathers thoughtfully included the ninth AND tenth amendments as a reminder of that. There was an argument over having a bill of rights at all, and those opposed based their objection on the idea that, over time, an enumeration of rights would come to be seen as an inclusive, limited list and undermine freedoms instead of enabling them. And here we are today, where most people believe the part in bold above.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    58. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. He was in danger of death by being patted on the back, hard, by prison thugs, thanking him for bringing torrents to the masses.

    59. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is the nature of our world "I'm bigger than you so you get to do as as say". The rest is mere camouflage for the elephant in the room; providing a slippery slope to help people rationalize their powerlessness.

      Of course, this is changing - make the most of it you whilst you can, you fucks - soon, the power balance will change for ever.

    60. Re:Solitary Confinement by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      1) Because there are consequences of doing so that apply to others. You want to limit it to "grave consequences" but obviously not everyone does. Simple things like the other members of the community you are in not liking large numbers of homeless people descending upon them (which again is a stupid reason, but I'm sure there's an asshole somewhere who would classify that as "grave").

      2) This particular permit is usually aimed at food safety and preventing people getting sick from unsafe food. That a law that was likely written in order to apply to restaurants also happens to apply to a soup kitchen isn't that surprising really - enforcing it is though. I'm not sure what requiring permits to serve food to the public has to do with the just world fallacy...

      As I said that's a silly thing to do.

    61. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Palm Beach,Florida makes it illegal to feed the poor. Would you believe that?

      No, I do not believe it. I believe that you just made it up. Do you have a citation? Because a Google search finds nothing except a law banning "aggressive begging" (blocking traffic, badgering or pursuing people, loitering next to ATMs, etc.).

      You must not know how to use Google, that's pretty sad:

      http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/68583992448/florida-church-ordered-to-stop-feeding-the-homeless-in

    62. Re:Solitary Confinement by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I intented to say it is an inheritable characteristic, one which has been selected for because it confered a genetic advantage. Not for the individual, but for the gene, as it causes people to support their social and therefore genetic relatives at the expense of more genetically distant individuals. It's the trait that says 'Other tribes aren't people, so it's ok to slaughter them and steal their stuff to give to my own extended family.'

      I'm sure the encoding is a lot more complicated than a simple 'shun the heretic' gene. Like much of human personality, it's going to be down to the exact interactions between hundreds of genes and their associated controlling DNA.

      Taken in a modern context, it gives the ability to dismiss a whole class of people with ease. Like criminals. They get filed away in the 'not my tribe' box. Not real people. Probably a bunch of violent gansters, anyway. They must be scum, or they wouldn't be in prison, so let them suffer.

    63. Re:Solitary Confinement by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which doesn't make it illegal to feed the poor, that just means you need a permit to do so. As long as those permits aren't ridiculous then why is that a problem? Silly sure...

      I need a permit to drive on a public road, does that mean it is illegal to drive?

      What if they would only issue you a one-day driving permit a maximum of twice a year?

      See the problem now?

      The government doesn't want private citizens, churches, or other non-government-affiliated/controlled independent charitable organizations to come forward to help the poor.

      They insist that the poor effectively become wards of the State by being forced to sign up for government-approved programs for help instead of receiving help from those in their communities outside of any government-run/sponsored/funded programs.

      Gotta keep their folded faces to the floor.

      The milk of human kindness is a Schedule-1 illegal substance in the USSA.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    64. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was kept there for 1.5 days, not years. And still, my reaction is, fuck you, fuck you all. I do not want children in this place. I can never relax here. I do not respect my neighbors who consent to this.

      1) 36 hours is nothing. I was held for 138 days in a cell without air conditioning in the height of
              summer and the daytime temperatures in my cell exceeded 125 degrees F. Did I complain ?
              No. I used the time to read a long book I had always wanted to read and never had time to
              read before, and I enjoyed reading the book. Certainly the heat made things unpleasant
              but there is a lot of truth in the statement : "That which does not kill me makes me stronger"
              and I came away from that experience with a new toughness which has allowed me to shrug
              off things which bother other people. I consider that I am a better man for having had that
              experience, though I cannot say that that I'd care to repeat it.

              Your whining about 36 hours makes you look like a goddamned pussy. Don't ever whine
              about this shit to other inmates if you get locked up again, because they won't have any
              sympathy for you and just might kick your ass because you annoyed them with your whining.

      2) Most people, your neighbors included, DO NOT KNOW about stuff that goes on in jails and prisons.
              Your lack of respect for your neighbors would be more correctly directed towards YOU because
              you are stupid enough to imagine that people should care about something they don't even know
              about.

      3) The prison system is ugly, and all sorts of bad things can happen in prison, but how you behave
              while you are locked up is what makes or breaks you in terms of how you are treated by other
              inmates or by the corrections officers who "guard" you. Act like a man and generally you will be treated
              with some respect. Act like a whining child and you will be preyed upon and your life will be unpleasant.
              Really, prison is a more honest version of life in the so-called free world, in that in prison it is much more
              likely that you will get what you really deserve, whereas in the "free world" many people get far better or
              far worse than they deserve, for trivial reasons which have more to do with luck than substance.

      4) Many countries will provide you with a MUCH more unpleasant jail or prison experience than you
              would get in the US, and they will also lock you up for things you might not imagine merit such action.
              So be careful when you pick your new home.

      ''

    65. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...a punishment largely avoidable by not being a gangbanger.

      History has proven you wrong.

      It is only by the purest chance of luck you haven't been arrested for the multitude of crimes, federal and local, you have committed this evening alone!
      But you have more than done enough to warrant that same treatment my good sir.

      You also shouldn't be so hard on yourself, labeling yourself a gangbanger for doing nothing more than spending money as well as not spending money today (both of which are federal crimes)
      If you happened to have put yourself in a motorized vehicle today, then you are also guilty of the local crimes of both being in a vehicle and moving, as well as being in a vehicle and not moving.

      I guess it's a sad sad day when you can sleep straight through the daylight hours and still break more than a couple laws. But here we are.

      I'm still waiting on you to courageously turn yourself in for your crimes and willingly accept life in prison or years in solitary confinement. You wouldn't want to be a hypocrite would you? Of course not!

      Once in prison for a year or so, don't forget that it is a crime to both be punched in the face, as well as to stop anyone from punching you in the face. Both are fighting, and will add another six months to your sentence.
      Of course fighting will occur more frequent than every six months.
      Solitary confinement is actually the best thing for you, otherwise you won't get released until you're over 90 years old.

    66. Re:Solitary Confinement by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      In Scandinavia it's a common pre-court procedure to deny the suspect of news and other means to by which they might influence or be influenced by the world outside.

      In this case this is also done due to the seriousness of the crime and the impact on Danish national security. After all, he's charged with the crime of stealing massive amounts of personal data on every danish citizen (most than enough to steal the identity of everyone), including police records and a few other specialized databases. The hacker did have unlimited access to the mainframe holding all these data for many months and petabytes of data was transferred out of the system so it's quite certain that most or all data found was stolen. Not exactly peanuts. It's not like a few millions passwords or a few million credit card numbers, it's the complete identity of every danish citizen in the world, something not easily changed.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    67. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, sometimes, simply for being in the same cell as a gang member.

    68. Re:Solitary Confinement by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      None of the google results for me were anything that a standard food service permit wouldn't cover. You may not have noticed but most Starbucks stores aren't only open a maximum of twice a year because those permits aren't in fact restricted to a maximum of twice a year.

      So what's the reference for your case and the paranoid rantings that followed?

    69. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manning threatened to self harm, and was treated like anyone else under those circumstances.

    70. Re:Solitary Confinement by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      None of the google results for me were anything that a standard food service permit wouldn't cover. You may not have noticed but most Starbucks stores aren't only open a maximum of twice a year because those permits aren't in fact restricted to a maximum of twice a year.

      So what's the reference for your case and the paranoid rantings that followed?

      The part about the "twice a year" restriction is referring to the permit needed to do this outdoors at a public location like a park, which is separate from a food service (restaurant) permit.

      The government is insisting that those trying to feed the homeless secure a building for food preparation and service and otherwise invest the same large amounts of money and pay the same costs and obey all the same rules that a commercial "for-profit" sit-down restaurant would, without the ability to earn money from the free food to ameliorate costs, making it so extremely costly that it's impractical to do.

      It's a practical proscription-in-all-but-name by thousands of regulations, codes, fees, permits, inspections, ordnances, and laws enforced to the letter.

      Here's a few links to related information.

      http://rt.com/usa/north-carolina-police-arrest-homeless-019/

      http://www.foodnotbombs.net/fnb_resists.html

      http://www.npr.org/2013/09/05/218891324/more-cities-sweeping-homeless-into-less-prominent-areas

      http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/19/bloomberg-strikes-again-nyc-bans-food-donations-to-the-homeless/

      If you can't see any problems with government behavior and laws/regs/ordnances/policies here, then there's really nothing I or anyone else can say to you.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    71. Re:Solitary Confinement by Optali · · Score: 1

      I don't think there would be much difference if they had new from the outside world anyway given how boring Scandinavian news are.
      Well, there's some shoot-out from time to time or some crazy blackmetaller burning some churches, but that's once in a decade. the rest of the time the news are made of the guy who lost his Ikea screwdrivers while mounting his Ikea chair model Skitten.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    72. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Palm Beach.

    73. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Palm Beach.

      Nah, Palm Beach is great.

      It's the motherfuckers running the place that's the fucking problem. Just like everywhere else that's extra fucked up.

      Gotta ask why the stupid cocksuckers living in Palm Beach keep electing the same kind of shady motherfuckers every damned time, but then are all fucking surprised and shocked that the shit just gets worse.

    74. Re:Solitary Confinement by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      " Never build a prison that -you- would not like to live in. " - Lord Havelock Vetinari

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  2. are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hackers like this are able to launch missiles with just a pay phone. Keeping him in the general population would be suicidal.

    1. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're making a joke, but you're not too far from the truth". He's in confinement for good cause.

    2. Re:are you kidding? by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      Troll? You're just ignorant about his allusion. Maybe you should drop the flamebait until you at least know something.

    3. Re:are you kidding? by utnapistim · · Score: 0

      > Hackers like this are able to launch missiles with just a pay phone.

      Hackers like what?
      The man was not a hacker, but a software developer: he co-created a website, and apparently the software used to run said website.

      --
      Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    4. Re:are you kidding? by Minwee · · Score: 2

      And the most dangerous hacker in the world, whose greatest skill was asking people nicely to give him things, was put into solitary for eight months for fear that he might use a pay phone to politely request a nuclear launch.

      Maybe you just missed out on some of the required reading for this class.

    5. Re:are you kidding? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Many judges wouldn't know the difference. Many prosecutors wouldn't care.

    6. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize this has been said about several hackers. Kevin Mitnick was accused of being capable of launching missiles using his cellphone.

      It's a joke, which you missed; and reference to the stupidity of many people employed in the process of interpreting law. Their ignorance or perhaps stupidity does not excuse them from their generalized comments.

      lol captcha
      > merchant

    7. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hackers like this are able to launch missiles with just a pay phone.

      They throw the phone?

    8. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize this has been said about several hackers. Kevin Mitnick was accused of being capable of launching missiles using his cellphone.

      It's certainly an exaggeration, but by today's standards, some of the early systems did have some astonishing vulnerabilities that were not fully appreciated.

    9. Re:are you kidding? by east+coast · · Score: 2

      Actually, I heard they caught him rattling a saber against the bars of his cell and he was threatening to make the guards "walk the plank" and "kiss the gunner's daughter."

      Why they'd let him in the prison with a saber, I'm not sure.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    10. Re:are you kidding? by Endloser · · Score: 1

      Someone doesn't get jokes... Do a little reading on Kevin Mitnick and what authorities thought he could do by whistling into a phone.

    11. Re:are you kidding? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't take those threats seriously if the prison was on dry land.

    12. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the most dangerous hacker in the world, whose greatest skill was asking people nicely to give him things, was put into solitary for eight months for fear that he might use a pay phone to politely request a nuclear launch.

      Maybe you just missed out on some of the required reading for this class.

      To be fair, it's entirely possible that there did exist at least one nuclear missile that could be launched by dialing the correct (unlisted) number and transmitting the correct analog signal (the handshake and launch order), and there do exist people with the capability of impersonating acoustic modems by whistling into a phone.

    13. Re: are you kidding? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      To be fair the launch codes were still "00000000".

      YOU are the threat when you accidentally find that all nuclear bunkers have unlocked screen doors in back.

    14. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard he once turned a refrigerator into a walking killer robot.

    15. Re:are you kidding? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Paper cups are okay, string is okay... but never the twain shall meet.

    16. Re:are you kidding? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Walking off the plank on dry land can be pretty bad depending on the size of the ship.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    17. Re:are you kidding? by Motor · · Score: 2

      Free Kevin!

      Oh wow... sorry... had a slashback to like... 1999.

      --
      We all know that crap is king
      Give us dirty laundry!
    18. Re:are you kidding? by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      oh that made me laugh - use source code to change the molecular structure of your CPU, explode with the power of a hand grenade, I'm surprised it didn't mention turning your children into prostitutes and goatseing your peen hole, spinning your HDD up to 500k revs then releasing the disk like a Frisbee of doom able to saw it's way through an entire city block, bringing your mouse to life and using it to strangle anyone who comes close enough... I would go on but I'm not as good at making stuff up as the article's author.

    19. Re:are you kidding? by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      not whistling but cshhhhhhh would sometimes get a 'connect' response from my old modem, max 1200bps was all I could manage though, never could get a v90 connection despite doing a great 'boing boing cshhhhhhh' impression.

  3. Lucky Ducky by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Solitary confinement in a Danish prison - doesn't that just mean he gets the jacuzzi all to himself?

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Lucky Ducky by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the article, he's not allowed free access to mail or his books, and he's stopped making daily calls to family.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Lucky Ducky by Cenan · · Score: 1

      Basically yes. And knowing the police here, they're probably more afraid of him than trying to punish him. We have a huge problem with people in prison getting their hands on cell phones. A few months ago it was even documented on camera how friends of inmates would walk up to a prison wall shared with an alley in Copenhagen and throw cell phones across.

      Warg + cell phone + solitary = somebody's missiles will launch.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    3. Re:Lucky Ducky by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      Joey, have you ever been in a... in a Turkish prison?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    4. Re:Lucky Ducky by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      Warg + cell phone + solitary = somebody's missiles will launch.

      then your current .sig

      --
      We need a -1 [Contains FUD] option

      Hummm.. We certainly do.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    5. Re:Lucky Ducky by dragon-file · · Score: 0

      Wish I had mod points for you. Great Airplane! reference.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    6. Re:Lucky Ducky by johnjaydk · · Score: 2

      Solitary confinement in a Danish prison - doesn't that just mean he gets the jacuzzi all to himself?

      The danish arrest house I walked past today is so ancient and run down that he's likely to get a shower in his cell whenever it's raining. At this time of year it's going to be a really cold shower.

      The thing we have going with solitary confinement is a disgrace. Solitary confinement for months is standard procedure for anything above shoplifting.

      --
      TCAP-Abort
    7. Re:Lucky Ducky by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I thought Denmark was a yurpean country, and everybody knows everything is better in yurrup.

    8. Re:Lucky Ducky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it just looks like that because things are so fucked up in Amurica :P

  4. He should have blown up the world's economy by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He should have blown up the world's economy, using criminal fraud. No criminal prosecution, or even investigation, despite enormous harm to millions and likely criminal action. Evil hackers? Give 'em solitary for life.

    1. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by kruach+aum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is interesting how much more intelligence is feared than malice and stupidity.

    2. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      It is interesting how much more intelligence is feared than malice and stupidity.

      Well, humans do have a tendency to fear and want to destroy things they are incapable of understanding...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by odie5533 · · Score: 2

      Many of the people working in the financial institutions knew what was going on. They just didn't see anything wrong with doing it.

    4. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but human fear that which they cannot control. Intelligent people aren't stupid enough to just go with what people tell them.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    5. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is interesting how much more intelligence is feared than malice and stupidity.

      Don't be idiotic. Only an Ayn Rand acolyte believes that, and then only until they've passed the age of blind naivete.

      People generally understand that an intelligent criminal has greater capacity to cause harm than does a stupid criminal. You got modded up to +4 insightful because a bunch of moderators like to feel they are persecuted because of their superior intelligence. That's childish preening at its silliest.

    6. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No criminal prosecution, or even investigation, despite enormous harm to millions and likely criminal action.

      This is unrelated to the crime committed. It doesn't matter if you crash the world economy, commits tax evasion, is caught with a bag full of marijuana or sexually harassed someone. The important factor is if you are rich or not.

    7. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      From the multiple ad hominems I take it you disagree. But then in the one sentence not containing an unwarranted attack, you write

      People generally understand that an intelligent criminal has greater capacity to cause harm than does a stupid criminal.

      which seems sympathetic to my point. I'm not sure why you are so angry, but I'm glad that you agree.

    8. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The important factor is if you are rich or not.

      Good point. I was assuming that people with the power to crash the world economy are rich. However, while I think that's true, I should have stated it as an assumption.

    9. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now you're preening again.

      One - you will be disappointed, but I'm not angry. Why would I be? This is just a debate. Are you getting too emotionally involved?

      Two - you're well aware I don't agree. I see I need to spell it out. People understand that an intelligent criminal has greater capacity to cause harm, and therefore understand the need for greater caution. That's quite different from blind fear, and completely antithetical from what you presume. Your statement infers a stupidity in the general population; in reality the public in general is far more adult, rational, and grown-up than you seem to believe.

    10. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      They just didn't see anything wrong with doing it.

      Irrelevant. If I commit criminal fraud, then it doesn't matter if I think it is wrong. That's no different from any other crime. It also has nothing to do with mens rea, which is about whether you knew or suspected that something was illegal, not about whether you agree with the law.

    11. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      I really can't see how you disproved the point there?

    12. Re:He should have blown up the world's economy by sjames · · Score: 1

      That doesn't follow. Wealthy criminals have far more ability to cause harm and have proven it by crashing the world economy, yet they often aren't even investigated.

  5. at least he's not in the terrible US of A by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

    Where they might, um, not put him in solitary.

    1. Re:at least he's not in the terrible US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but instead he'd be subject of prison rape right? Seems to be a common sentiment among 'murricans with internet that it's something almost every criminal should suffer.

    2. Re:at least he's not in the terrible US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brad... excuse me, Chelsea Manning disagrees.

    3. Re:at least he's not in the terrible US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moral of the story? If you're going to be a criminal in America, be a gay rapist. Then they can't punish you because, worst case, you get thrown in jail with lots of rape-bait.

      America - supporting gay rape since 1347

    4. Re:at least he's not in the terrible US of A by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I thought Chelsea was a Clinton.

      What did Bill do THIS time???

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is it with the Nordic countries always willing to be Americas proxy in these copyright/leak cases? Its very sad.

    And why are piracy cases being pursued like they were terrorism cases? Nordic countries are more like Gitmo than real nations, willing to whore themselves rather than have backbone. Thor would not approve.

    1. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Similarly with the UK helping us invade countries that we decide to attack despite them being no threat to us (*cough* Iraq *cough*). As an American I honestly hate to be insulting towards other people's countries, but why the hell do they play the lapdog to America? Serious question. Perhaps someone more familiar with UK or Scandinavian (actually Swedish, and perhaps Danish, not Norwegian AFAIK) domestic politics can explain it.

    2. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This was discussed in the diplomatic cables @ wikileaks. Our (I'm a Swede) rulers - our foreign minister especially - really like the feeling of being "important allies" to the Americans. (And they don't realize (or acknowledge, since they must know now after the leak) that the Americans are laughing at them behind their back for their servility).

    3. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by Splab · · Score: 1

      Get off your fucking high horse and learn to read!

      He isn't arrested over some stupid copyright case, the guy is charged with breaking into the Danish Police central servers *and* one of the biggest Danish banks.

      The guy is probably looking at some serious time for this.

    4. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      Get off your fucking high horse and learn to read!

      Then:

      guy is charged with breaking into the Danish Police central servers *and* one of the biggest Danish banks.

      And if those charges against him fail he will be further charged with 'treading on the cracks in the pavement' and 'looking at me in a funny way'.

      You do get the difference between 'charged' and 'convicted'; yes/no? Or did you not learn that in your reading class.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    5. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but why the hell do they play the lapdog to America?

      The most common reason that have appeared in leaked communication between the US and Sweden have been threat of economic sanctions.
      The Pirate Bay case is a bit special since it appears as if pressure was put on multiple fronts. The White House specifically asked the minister for justice to do something about the Pirate Bay. He then went on and arrange things with the prosecutor. (It could be interesting to know that it is illegal for the minister for justice to take action in specific cases in Sweden.)
      On the other side the police officer leading the investigation was on Warners payroll.

      I can't say why Swedish politicians are so willing to bend over for U.S. interests, it doesn't really make sense to me. The only explanation I can find would be if the two cases of ministers being murdered by random madmen over the last decades were arranged by the U.S.

    6. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The most common reason that have appeared in leaked communication between the US and Sweden have been threat of economic sanctions.

      How could the US impose economic sanctions against Sweden without it affecting the EU?

    7. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The only explanation I can find would be if the two cases of ministers being murdered by random madmen over the last decades were arranged by the U.S.

      Naw. It's alien mind-control spores. They're putting them in the lime jello.

    8. Re:The Nordic "bend over and take" countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can't say why Swedish politicians are so willing to bend over for U.S. interests, it doesn't really make sense to me."

      Or you know, maybe Sweden is made up of human beings like everyone else and Sweden has its share of assholes that dont need the US or its approval to be, well, assholes?

      This whole euro "Ooo the evil US is making us do these things" is nothing but bullshit excuses. Its like when you talk to a German about WW2 and they go on about how it was all Hitlers fault. Utter bullshit.

  8. well of course there are definitions by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dangerous: Violent:: "your son violently thrust production executives and C-levels into a state of abject povery by freely distributing material from poor artists who hadnt the chance to sign up with a label. As a result these suffering destitute former billionaires are reduced to driving a mercedes and eating domestic caviar."
    Aggressive: "Your son aggressively refused to roll over and die when we attacked and litigated his userbase, his family, his friends and his civil rights. He was incomprehensively aggressive in opposing our bribery and extortion of his regional and local government officials in our pursuit of the definition of truth and justice"

    so you see ma'am, hes clearly a threat
    --MPAA

    "what he said but hes also a terrorist and he killed two cats that were about to make the kids laugh out loud."
    --RIAA

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  9. Re:Business as usual by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Informative

    I really wish you kids would stop discovering Mitnick and worshiping him like a hero.

    Lets get some facts about Mitnick straight.

    He wasn't a fucking hacker, he was a socially inept douche back who actually was capable of lying his way into accounts of people who didn't know that giving your password out to some random guy that calls you is a bad idea.

    Nothing he did was even a little bit impressive. Ever. Again, let me repeat since it might not have been clear: NOTHING HE EVER DID WAS EVEN A LITTLE BIT IMPRESSIVE.

    Well ... except for one thing: His ego that happened to be the size of Africa. Mitnick was made an example because he is an ignorant arrogant prick who kept acting like he was a bad ass even thought the cops and lawyers were frying his ass for doing it, so they just made it as unbelievably bad on him as they could.

    If you knew anything about the ACTUAL history of hacking and not what you read because some old dude told you about this guy that was 'the first hacker' as far as the american public was concerned ... you'd know he wasn't the first. He wasn't any good. And people with far better talent than him also went to jail for long periods of time. The only difference is that Mitnick's ego made him talk and act like he was a bad ass ...

    Other guys, the ones who ACTUALLY did shit, you didn't hear about, neither before or after they got caught (for those who did get caught).

    So anyway, back to my point. When you young'ens pull out the Mitnick name, its makes us old guys realize you're an ignorant cluebie who's name dropping trying to impress us with your knowledge of Internet lore ... We instantly see through you and that you're a fake douche trying to pretend you're something you're not.

    Mitnick was a fucking douche, learn the real history and stop treading on his name. It'll be far less embarrassing for you.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  10. Re:Mom is delusional by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Hacking, copyright infringement... either way, he is a non-violent offender. So why the solitary?

    Idealists like to see the justice system as a center for protecting the public safety and rehabilitating offenders. More often, it's used to satisfy the public's sadistic desire to see suffering and ruin inflicted upon those who wrong them.

  11. Re:Mom is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharing is caring.

  12. Re:Mom is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Innocence really isn't the point, the point is that those crimes usually does not warrant that kind of treatment. Hacking and copyright infringement (or inducement there of). are perfectly fine white collar crime which due to its non-violent nature usually affords you civil treatment and a more or less pleasant stay at a minimum security facility. Solitary is usually reserved (afaik) for violent criminals, cases were on-going criminality is an issue, a threat to the inmates life/the inmate being suicidal or if outside factors could be influential - these factors are supposed to be argued in front of a judge in order to obtain an order for solitary, which the article claimed has not happened.

  13. Re:Business as usual by fostware · · Score: 5, Insightful

    +1 - Since I have no points :(

    Social Engineering isn't hacking... Fortune Tellers and Used Car Salesmen have been doing it for years before networked computers were created...

    --
    "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
  14. Re:Business as usual by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    NOTHING HE EVER DID WAS EVEN A LITTLE BIT IMPRESSIVE.

    His social engineering skills were impressive.

    Sorry about being on you lawn.

  15. Re:Business as usual by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if what he did was impressive at all. The point remains: He did a few things, scared a few people, and was sentenced heavily as a public example, aided by prosecutors who were only too happy to outright lie about the threat he posed to add to the punishment. He may have been just douchebag who succeeded by persistence and luck rather than actual skill, but he was still sentenced and punished as if he were a super-hacker capable of bringing the world to its knees with a phone call.

    The objective of prosecutors is to either reach a plea agreement that makes them look good, or to get the harshest sentence they possibly can. They will fight dirty to achieve that, and they can be very good at doing so. In their skillful manipulation of the narrative, a script kiddie who needs a good telling off can turn into a terrorist who caused millions of dollars in damages. Any hope of rehabilitation is thrown out the window.

  16. Re:Mom is delusional by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    You're already modded troll. Nobody likes to hear that their beloved Pirate Bay isn't an excuse by entitled people to make money serving ads while they facilitate other entitled people's desire to not pay for the works of others.

  17. ok, so... by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    ...Is anyone out there in Denmark doing anything to protest this? I know that the Danes are not to be fucked with when it comes to crimes against humanity, but I wonder how much this matters to the general population. Sadly I suspect 'not much'. Solitary confinement is torture. Torture for a crime with no victim is out of line, and sends a message the someone is in a place of power that shouldn't be.

    It might sound silly, but if you're not in Denmark, you can keep this guy in your thoughts. Picture him with a smile, and embrace him internally. It's all that we can do. If you're in Denmark, then protest this torture in whatever way you see fit.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  18. It's For Safety by organgtool · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know many people on this site are going to start flapping their jaws (err, fingers) about how subjecting someone to such deplorable conditions for a nonviolent offense is unjust, but most of you don't understand how the prison system works. In the prison system, there is a hierarchy of criminals that control the behavior of all of the other inmates and hackers are always at the top of that hierarchy. As soon as a hacker gets sent to prison, he immediately finds out who is in charge and beats that person within an inch of their life. At that point, the hacker has earned his place at the top. In order to maintain this position, he must rule with an iron fist and beat people on a regular basis just to send a message that anyone that challenges him will end up nearly dead. The hacker is easily the most dangerous person in prison and the warden is simply keeping his prisoners safe by keeping this guy in solitary confinement. It has nothing to do with this particular hacker making some powerful people look bad and possibly marginally reducing the profits of some corporations via his web site, it's about safety.

    1. Re:It's For Safety by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      You mean there are prisons just for geeks?

    2. Re:It's For Safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prisons just for geeks, I believe I spent some time in one of those. Kinda like a Gulag except they are called cubicle farms.

  19. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    A fact that many foreigners may not be aware of, is that Finns also hate Swedes, but I guess it's more in a humoristic way. Swedes are often viewed as faggots, douchebags, stuff like that. Also cheering Sweden in sports competitions is perceived lame. Of course Finland does not actually hate Sweden.

    It is probably because the slavic tradition of Finland conflicts with the more cheerful scandinavian atmosphere of Sweden.

  20. Re:Mom is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacking, copyright infringement... either way, he is a non-violent offender. So why the solitary?

    I cannot comment on Danish law and precedent (although I am educated on the pastries), but if I was ever convicted of something, I'd rather be in solitary than in the general population. Part of that is because I'm an introvert, and part of it is because it would keep me away from the "not quite violent enough for solitary" prisoners.

  21. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OK, let me guess, you went to school with Mitnick and he used to bully your ass, am I right?

    You got issues bro...

  22. Re:Mom is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delusional?

    He didn't live in the US -- when he was running TPB, what he was doing was not a crime in the country he was living in. His taunts were against foreign interests that were attempting to apply their carefully written and paid for laws in his country, and his response was basically "stop trying to bully people for making information available -- that's not a crime here, and should really be encouraged globally."

    Then the EU laws changed, and eventually the local laws -- they now look exactly like the MPAA wanted them to.

    However, on the computer crimes side, it is alleged that he DID break into some computer accounts, and that's what he's being questioned about. However, he has yet to be charged for that.

  23. I've always been in the opinion by C_Kode · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always been in the opinion that anyone who serves as a figure of authority (this includes government officials) and uses that authority to commit a crime should receive a minimum of double the maximum sentence of that crime in the same manner than you get double the fine for speeding in a work zone.

    If they commit a crime that is punishable by 5-7 years in prison using their given authority, then they should get a minimum of 14 years in prison period. No less.

    Of course, to get this double sentence, they have to be using their authority to commit the crime. They should also be removed from service and ban from ever working for the public in any form again. (which includes a private sector job that is doing government contract work)

    Abuse of power should have absolute ZERO tolerance.

    In this case, I believe putting someone in solitary confinement without a valid reason is abuse of power. Whoever made this decision should be removed from power and should have to serve twice as many days in solitary confinement as Gottfrid has.

  24. Re:Business as usual by roccomaglio · · Score: 2

    How about knowing how to change the phone tables so it looked like the call that was doing this was coming from someone else's house. They would know that someone was hacking, they could trace it back, but the trace would lead to the wrong house. Probably one of the reason he was so well known. If you can hack and no one knows it, you might not get famous.

  25. Which kind of Warg is he? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must reluctantly admit I have been exposed to various mythologies, and have no idea which one of them is The Truth.

    It he the kind of Warg that can actually transform himself into the form of a wolf, and potentially maul a prison guard? I can see how you'd need special precautions when dealing with such people. Or is he the kind that can just mentally take over an existing wolf or other animal, (presumably outside the prison where it doesn't endanger guards or other inmates)?

    1. Re:Which kind of Warg is he? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of worgen, not a warg. And he probably just has the market cornered on netherweave cloth on his server and won't stop undercutting the other tailors on netherweave bag prices.

      They should definitely throw the book at him. Or at a minimum isolate him from being able to purchase Rune Thread.

  26. Re:Business as usual by EasyTarget · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really wish you kids would stop discovering Mitnick and worshiping him like a hero.

    Lets get some facts about Mitnick straight.

    You would do well to follow your own advice.
    Nobody here is idolizing him, we are merely pointing out that he is perhaps the best example of a geek being punished out of all proportion to their actual criminality, and deliberately hounded by prosecutors and law officials who were behaving no better than the lowest sort of playground bully.

    That's all; the fact we keep mentioning him is not because we think he was a uberhacker; quite the reverse. The people bullying him were the ones claiming that.

    --
    "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
  27. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Scandinavia: Where everything is beautiful - even the hate" tbh I don't really know why but for some reason most people I know (Swedes, Danes and Norwegians) think it's more fun than insulting, even when it cuts close to the bone.

  28. Too much fucking hatorade. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    He wasn't a fucking hacker

    He fucking hacked fucking phone systems. Which makes fucking makes him a fucking hacker. Fuckity fuckity fuckity fuuuuck!

  29. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    Everybody makes fun of their neighbors. As a New Yorker I'm required to make fun of New Jersey. Americans make fun of Canadians. Germans make fun of Austrians. People on the other side of the planet? Who cares.

  30. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I wouldn't exactly call it 'hate'; it's more like siblings bickering between eachother. If anyone outside of the Nordic countries messes with one of us, we're instantly bro's.

  31. Dangerous Criminal by FuzzNugget · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course he's dangerous, he embarrassed someone with power.

  32. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is hacking in it's own right. hacking people. that said mitnick is about as impressive av last months milk. and he did get massively hacked to prove it.

  33. Re:Business as usual by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    No, I think it's more complex than that. Mitnick is a narcissist. He's actually a pretty successful one, as shown by the fact that we're discussing him in this thread. Him being mentioned in an otherwise interesting discussion turns it into a fanboy thread. And while that might not bother everybody, it dumbs down the discussion.

  34. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by Shatrat · · Score: 1

    It is probably because the slavic tradition of Finland conflicts with the more cheerful scandinavian atmosphere of Sweden.

    600 years of Swedish rule over Finland might not have anything to do with it?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  35. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody has a case of the Mondays!

  36. His only crime is hacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on. He may not deserve to live in solitary but he and his group at PirateBay were personally responsible for facilitating an immeasurable amount of copyright infringement. Even if only 1% of the copies would have been purchased legitimately, it's easy for me to believe that he was personally responsible facilitating tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of dollars of losses for the artists, writers, etc. So please. It's hard to imagine someone claiming with a straight face that he's anything but guilty.

    If you want to argue for him to be released from solitary, at least be honest about what he did.

  37. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Everybody makes fun of their neighbors. As a New Yorker I'm required to make fun of New Jersey. Americans make fun of Canadians. Germans make fun of Austrians. People on the other side of the planet? Who cares.

    But the interesting thing here is that Swedes do not have a similar "hate" relationship to Finland.

  38. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by hguorbray · · Score: 2

    there is a really good webcomic: http://satwcomic.com/ that gets into the cultural differences between the Nordics while poking a little bit of fun at them (and the rest of the world)

    It also namedrops hetalia and some other good graphics/comics

    -I'm just sayin'

  39. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bad, 8/10.

  40. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It even carries over the generations. I'm a Finn born in America, and Finns and Swedes born here will mock each other humorously, but when confronted with an Englishman, we'll side with our snow-loving distant cousins.

  41. Time to arrest the judiciary and media companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to arrest media companies and participating judiciary.

    Vote for change of law and make it happen.

    The problem is not going away until these media companies are put away.

  42. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The good ones don't get caught.

  43. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mitnick was made an example because he is an ignorant arrogant prick who kept acting like he was a bad ass even thought the cops and lawyers were frying his ass for doing it, so they just made it as unbelievably bad on him as they could.

    My money is on the bet that you think basically the same thing about Jesus.

  44. Re:Business as usual by sjames · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's the point. He certainly wasn't an uber hacker. He was closer to a con man except that it was mostly to satisfy his own curiosity and he did little ACTUAL damage. In spite of that, he was treated as extremely dangerous and his potential damage was inflated several orders of magnitude and treated as if it was actual. Meanwhile, con-men who cheat the elderly out of their retirement run free.

  45. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    That must really get under the Finn's skin.

  46. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But the interesting thing here is that Swedes do not have a similar "hate" relationship to Finland."

    Yes they fucking do, especially in Norrland. Also anywhere around Stockholm you can find tons of Swedes who will happily talk major shit about Denmark or even worse - Skane (those half-Dane fucks).

  47. Let's compare to the Nuremburg trials by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

    Fun to compare someone who hasn't been found guilty of a crime to War Criminal Albert Speer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Speer

    Speer served 20 years and was given more freedom in his confinement then Gottfrid, who has not been found guilty by Sweden.

    From wiki: "With the draft memoir complete and clandestinely transmitted, Speer sought a new project. He found one while taking his daily exercise, walking in circles around the prison yard. Measuring the path's distance carefully, Speer set out to walk the distance from Berlin to Heidelberg. He then expanded his idea into a worldwide journey, visualizing the places he was "traveling" through while walking the path around the prison yard. Speer ordered guidebooks and other materials about the nations through which he imagined he was passing, so as to envisage as accurate a picture as possible.[117] Meticulously calculating every meter traveled, and mapping distances to the real-world geography, he began in northern Germany, passed through Asia by a southern route before entering Siberia, then crossed the Bering Strait and continued southwards, finally ending his sentence 35 kilometres (22 mi) south of Guadalajara, Mexico."

  48. Re:Business as usual by jschrod · · Score: 2
    To whomever modded you informative: That Mitnick is not capable is the WHOLE POINT OF IT.

    You don't seem to get it. Having rights in the legal system is not reserved for über hackers. It's there for everyone, not even for, but especially for douchebags like Mitnick. That they put him in solitary confinement, him being not a good hacker at all, is the prime example of un-ethical behavior of authorities in the US judical system. (But then, this is a barbaric system with death sentences. So it's part of the system, FWIW.)

    Not that this is really different in other parts of the world, as we can read in TFA.

    --

    Joachim

    People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  49. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That he may be, but the authorities treated him as public enemy number 1 for that and in the process rubbed due process with their arse. For that I applaud people who treat Mitnick as a hero, not because of what he had done, but for enduring what was done to him.

    It is old farts like you that failed to see that and just assume all accolades showered on him are purely for his "uber l33t skillz". No matter the crime, the authorities should never overstep. When they do and the people let them get away with it, over time, you get people like the NSA.

  50. Re:I'm told Danes and Swedes don't like each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh. I've never heard Finns described as slavic before. Finns/Estonians/Hungarians are Finno-Ugric peoples. Slavs are like Russians, Ukranians, Polish, Czechs etc.

    Of course in reality European+Asian peoples have been interbreeding with enthusiasm for thousands of years, the lines are very blurry if they exist at all, but Finno-Ugric is actually whole different language group to the vast Indo-European group that most people fall into in Europe.

    So e.g. Irish (Gaelic Celtic Indo-European) and Croatian (Southern Slavic Indo-European) or even freaking Gujarati (Western Indic Indo-European) peoples are all in one group, but Finnish (Baltic Finnic Finno-Ugric) and Swedish (North Germanic Indo-European) are different groups, despite geographical mismatches involved.

  51. Re:Business as usual by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

    chopping idiots up with an axe is also 'hacking people' but would you consider an axe-murderer a hacker also?

  52. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats an awful lot of words to say that you're jealous of someone who ceased being relevant 20 years ago. The Mitnick story was original and interesting. He was creative and fascinated by systems - social and electronic.

  53. Re:Business as usual by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    I really wish you kids would stop discovering Mitnick and worshiping him like a hero.

    Lets get some facts about Mitnick straight.

    He wasn't a fucking hacker, he was a socially inept douche back who actually was capable of lying his way into accounts of people who didn't know that giving your password out to some random guy that calls you is a bad idea.

    Nothing he did was even a little bit impressive. Ever. Again, let me repeat since it might not have been clear: NOTHING HE EVER DID WAS EVEN A LITTLE BIT IMPRESSIVE.

    I'm certainly not impressed... by your comment and your complete lack of knowledge concerning the subject you're commenting on.

    First of all: Social Engineering is most certainly part of what professionals are calling hacking. It was never just about wardialing and guessing passwords. In the movie "wargames" the lead character does some guessing and goes to the library to figure out that many passwords are weak and that people often use named of family member as password, thus "Joshua". Today, in real life, much of this is done using social engineering. You can get very far just calling people connected with your target or one of it's suppliers (enter 'dumpster diving' which will tell you quite a bit 'innocent' information about someone). Using name dropping and a bit of charm-based persuation you can get just about everything you want. Kevin Mitnick made this an art and wrote the book on it, "The Art of Deception".

    Among the stuff he gained full access to was manufactorers of IT-infrastructure, defense sub-contractors etc. - it is not known what he did with all this (the Motorola hack is possibly the most well known) so the NSA is still watching him close to this day. He did modify firmware code to allow himself administrative access and he could "whistle into a phone" to get free long distance etc. - although no actual whistling was involved. He just punched a string of numbers and sent it to the exchange, which activated those hidden features. There was also a code which turned a cell phone into a bug. The phone and the exchange has to be Motorola but if they were, the phone would transmit audio while appearing to be idle. He didn't create this functionality - he just found it and learned how to activate it.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  54. Pirate Bay Founder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gosgog:
      S0 he's not a Technological Genius, not even a very good Hacker, somewhat of a "Con Artist" & smooth talker....BUT a FOUNDER of PIRATE BAY piracy outfit, where some of us go to download Movies, Operating Systems, Music, for FREE, made available generously by people willing to share and/or swap stuff that they have purchased, rather continue the INFLATION as a result of GREEDY CORPORATIONS supported by very High Priced LAWYERS using an OUTDATED system of PATENTING!!
    And for this YOU ASSHOLES think he should be in JAIL and in SOLITARY....well up yours!!

  55. terrerists by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    well, i guess he shouldnt have blown up the twin towers then ... tsk , STILL in solitary ? how long has that been ?

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  56. Re:Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really wish you kids would stop discovering Mitnick and worshiping him like a hero.

    Lets get some facts about Mitnick straight.

    He wasn't a fucking hacker, he was a socially inept douche back who actually was capable of lying his way into accounts of people who didn't know that giving your password out to some random guy that calls you is a bad idea.

    Nothing he did was even a little bit impressive. Ever. Again, let me repeat since it might not have been clear: NOTHING HE EVER DID WAS EVEN A LITTLE BIT IMPRESSIVE.

    Well ... except for one thing: His ego that happened to be the size of Africa. Mitnick was made an example because he is an ignorant arrogant prick who kept acting like he was a bad ass even thought the cops and lawyers were frying his ass for doing it, so they just made it as unbelievably bad on him as they could.

    If you knew anything about the ACTUAL history of hacking and not what you read because some old dude told you about this guy that was 'the first hacker' as far as the american public was concerned ... you'd know he wasn't the first. He wasn't any good. And people with far better talent than him also went to jail for long periods of time. The only difference is that Mitnick's ego made him talk and act like he was a bad ass ...

    Other guys, the ones who ACTUALLY did shit, you didn't hear about, neither before or after they got caught (for those who did get caught).

    So anyway, back to my point. When you young'ens pull out the Mitnick name, its makes us old guys realize you're an ignorant cluebie who's name dropping trying to impress us with your knowledge of Internet lore ... We instantly see through you and that you're a fake douche trying to pretend you're something you're not.

    Mitnick was a fucking douche, learn the real history and stop treading on his name. It'll be far less embarrassing for you.

    And a response like this makes us realize you're going to die before we are. So hurry up already =D

  57. Solitary safety more like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If by the time he's done his sentence he's not the sorriest a***hole in Denmark .....
    He will most certainly be the sorriest.....
    Solitary is the most safe in that prison for this dude

    1. Re: Solitary safety more like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *he will be the sorest