Slashdot Mirror


Harvard Bomb Hoax Perpetrator Caught Despite Tor Use

Meshach writes "The FBI has caught the student who called in a bomb threat at Harvard University on December 16. The student used a temporary anonymous email account routed through Tor, but the FBI was able to trace it (PDF) because it originated from the Harvard wireless network. He could face as long as five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine if convicted. He made the threat to get out of an exam."

59 of 547 comments (clear)

  1. In the kitchen by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whenever you peel back the layers of an onion, someone is bound to cry.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re: In the kitchen by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Committing a felony already loses him the right to vote or own a firearm, and will make employment prospects difficult.

      Sure is a lot to give up to keep from having to take an exam.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    2. Re:In the kitchen by Loether · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah. I bet he was the only one (or a very few) at the time on Harvard's wifi and TOR. Then some good old fashioned police work, by telling the suspect some well crafted white lies closed the case. ie (we know what you did, sign this confession and make your life easier.) Unless I missed it, the court document never said they traced the specific message to him. Just him to TOR and TOR to the email. Then he admitted to it. At any rate, I'm glad they caught him. There are easier ways to avoid taking a test.

      --
      TODO create witty sig.
    3. Re: In the kitchen by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bad example -- in Mass., felons don't lose their right to vote. They do lose their rights to own guns but the gun laws are so draconian that they never really had that right in the first place. Most people who own a gun are breaking the law in doing so.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re: In the kitchen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I shouldn't state it, but I hope an example is made from this person. At the uni I graduated from, they had many of these incidents, all timed around midterms or finals week. It got old having the police stop and lock down everyone in a building or having to wait hours for them to clear a parking lot with the dogs. Of course, when trying to focus on passing, it doesn't help either when a final is moved/rescheduled and one has spent a good long time preparing for it.

    5. Re:In the kitchen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      So once the FBI subpeona'd Tor to get the IP number that sent the threat, it was a done deal.

      Tor is not an entity.

    6. Re:In the kitchen by PIBM · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you had taken the time to read the deposition, when confronted he said that he did it and why.. so yeah, he's toasted.

    7. Re:In the kitchen by terbeaux · · Score: 4, Informative

      So once the FBI subpeona'd Tor to...

      That's an awful long post for someone that doesn't seem to know what they are talking about. Tor cannot be subpoenaed for information. It is a peer to peer network, not a legal entity. They got this guy because to get on university wifi you need to login, which then associates your mac address with your account and allows traffic to flow. They also monitor your traffic and could associate his account with Tor use. This gave the FBI enough information to question him and he probably was so scared and guilty feeling that he freely confessed. You can change the mac address on most network adapters. You wouldn't need to buy a throwaway usb wifi adapter. The FBI would have had much less to go on if the perp had simply used a free wifi hotspot.

      It is difficult to understand what was going on in his head but it obviously wasn't rational thought.

    8. Re: In the kitchen by Qwaniton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The person you replied to was talking about gun laws in Massachusetts. You're talking about gun sales in the United States of America as a whole, completely ignoring state-level differences. If you don't see the obvious, slap-you-in-the-face error here, then you should trust that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. If you are indeed a United States citizen, which I heavily doubt, you're a fool. Pick another topic to try to sound smart about.

  2. Heckler veto by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We can either live in a future where little jackwagons can effect a denial-of-service attack on society, or
    we can spank the crap out of the idiots so that this kind of noise is minimized. Same goes for rape/hate crime hoaxes.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Heckler veto by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We can either live in a future where little jackwagons can effect a denial-of-service attack on society, or we can spank the crap out of the idiots so that this kind of noise is minimized.

      OR we can stop over-reacting and instead apply a rational evaluation of the facts. This knee-jerk "all threats must be taken seriously" where "seriously" really means "total freakout" is the vulnerability here.

    2. Re:Heckler veto by zwei2stein · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you are in charge, rational thing to do is to take threat seriously amd act on it.

      Why? Because if you are wrong about it being hoax, you are the one who has been responsible for preventing any and all deaths or injuries related to bomb going off.

      Your life would be instantly ruined - you failed to do your job and people died. Media and Internet would make sure everyone knows for year (up untill your deaths).

      Best thing to do is to do your job properly and when someone tries to abuse that, kick the fucker in the nuts enough so that it is not worth it for him.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
  3. Of course, he'll have affluenza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And therefore they'll put him in rehab rather than prison.

    Unless he's not affluent enough for his affluenza to be strong enough to cover this crime, after all, he called in a bomb threat, rather than killed four people in a drunk-driving incident.

    1. Re:Of course, he'll have affluenza by isorox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You should look at the statistics for people who attend Harvard. 30% of their students have a family that pulls in 150k or more.

      I'm amazed it's that low.

    2. Re:Of course, he'll have affluenza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't be, the other 70% just don't have an income, they're living off trust funds.

    3. Re:Of course, he'll have affluenza by isorox · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mightn't call being in the top 9% of households incomes "exceptionally affluent", but the other 91% of people probably do.

      I'm in the bottom 91%, but I certainly don't think a household on $150k a year is "exceptionally affulent". The median is about $70k.

    4. Re:Of course, he'll have affluenza by sandytaru · · Score: 3, Informative

      Naw, Harvard has a huge endowment. There are some very poor kids who are very very smart and who'd love a Harvard brand name on their degrees. Harvard wants only the smartest poor people, so will offer the diamonds in the rough free tuition. The kids are still on the hook for housing, food, and books, but those costs are closer to $10,000/year if you live very frugally. It's win/win - Harvard gets a crop of geniuses, and the geniuses go to a college they'd otherwise never be able to afford.

      The valedictorian at my high school went this route. With a perfect SAT and ACT score and a bunch of academic achievement awards she probably could have gone anywhere, but she picked Harvard because they waived all the tuition and fees for her. Since her parents were Army, they couldn't provide much financial support outside of the scholarships, but their little girl got into Harvard so they were going to try.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  4. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by The1stImmortal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not neccessarily. His access to Tor via the campus wifi matched the timing of the emails enough to get him in a room, and then he confessed. Without the confession there'd be a lot less certainty of conviction, as the presumption of innocence would probably compel a jury, in the absence of any other compelling evidence, to find him not guilty.

    Moral of the story: Don't talk to cops.

    (also, don't make false bomb threats. They're stupid)

  5. So he didn't get caught from the e-mail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...but because he was the only one on the whole campus wifi that used Tor that day.

    Lesson to learn: Keep your endpoint traffic able to be lost in the noise, or ya' stick out like a sunflower in a coal mine.

    I.E. SSH somewhere *THEN* Tor.

    1. Re:So he didn't get caught from the e-mail... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      His mistake was admitting it. They basically had nothing on him, he could have been using Tor for any number of reasons and was not required to explain himself. All he had to do was deny sending the email and assuming he properly secured his browser there would have been no evidence to the contrary.

      Tor is still fine, even if you are the only one on campus using it. That fact alone is meaningless.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:So he didn't get caught from the e-mail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless they had probable cause to grab his computer and he wasn't savvy enough to have wiped the drive. Cookies for the offending email address would be pretty incriminating.

      i dont think you know how tor software works.. in using the preconfigured tor software that utilizes firefox, cookies are disabled by default, also java. and at the end of every session all history, cache and any traces to what you were doing are deleted automatically.. save if you download or bookmark something...

    3. Re:So he didn't get caught from the e-mail... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's be honest, someone who makes a bomb threat to get out of an exam isn't exactly tipping the scales on the brightness side.........

      He could make a great banker, though.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:So he didn't get caught from the e-mail... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "His mistake was admitting it."
      And this is what is wrong with the world. His mistake was calling in a bomb threat to get out of taking an exam.
       

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  6. What an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really?! Smart man.

    Avoid exam?
    Bomb threat!

    Police arrive?
    Immediately confess!

    The evidence itself was completely circumstantial. Without a confession they surely had nothing.
    They had no way to prove anything other than:
    1. Guerilla Mail was accessed by Tor to send the e-mails.
    2. Kim is a Harvard student that recently accessed Tor.

  7. Sounds like he visited torproject.org recently... by WoTG · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read the PDF (shock).

    It sounds suspiciously like they just checked the logs to see who had visited Tor related websites and then went and interviewed the handful of people who happened to visit these sites within a few days. Maybe interview those who had exams in the 4 listed buildings at the designated time?

    Or, possibly, they just checked who had used Tor in the last few days on their network - can you ID a Tor packet by looking at it?

    It doesn't sound like they needed to crack Tor.

  8. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by Krneki · · Score: 5, Informative

    In our next lesson we will learn delayed email deliver functionality. Stay tuned!

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  9. Re: "because it originated from the wireless netwo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    also, don't make false bomb threats. They're stupid

    Don't make real ones either. They're even stupider.

  10. So he was clever enough ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to use TOR, but then gave a full confession during an "interview", throwing his right to remain silent (and to have a lawyer present during questioning) out the window?

    1. Re:So he was clever enough ... by SB9876 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He called in a bomb threat to delay taking a final. This is a dude that has already shown that he has poor decision making skills.

    2. Re:So he was clever enough ... by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... to use TOR, but then gave a full confession during an "interview", throwing his right to remain silent (and to have a lawyer present during questioning) out the window?

      We can assume that someone who needs to avoid a test isn't the brightest spark. We can assume that someone who sends a bomb threat to avoid a test is reckless and stupid. We can assume that if someone who is reckless and stupid mails in a bomb threat, and his identity is discovered, then there _will_ be evidence. For example, they had easily enough to get a search warrant for his computer. What are the odds that there is evidence, like a draft of the email, on his computer? Remember: This is not an evil genius trying to disrupt US universities, it is a reckless idiot trying to get out of an exam.

    3. Re:So he was clever enough ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm not sure that it's really that surprising that he confessed - most people who are convicted of crimes plead guilty.

      You plead guilty right before the trial would start, if anything.

      pleading guilty can get you a pretty hefty discount on your sentence

      And you waive that discount by confessing to a law enforcement officer during an "interview". Because in that case, the court has sufficient evidence to convict you regardless of your plea.

    4. Re:So he was clever enough ... by quadrox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That doesn't change the fact that most likely he would be better of consulting a lawyer and not saying anything to the police/FBI/whoever.

    5. Re:So he was clever enough ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Informative
      This sounds like a plea bargain so it'll never see a jury.

      He just gave away any bargaining leverage by confessing to a law enforcement officer. Being able to skip a few days or weeks of trial and the associated costs will be the only advantage of a guilty plea.

      "if you cooperate with us, you'll get a lesser sentence"

      That is a lie, by the way. Law enforcement officers may lie when "interviewing" suspects.

      If faced with 50% risk of jail time and felonies compared NO jail time and felonies, the option with the lowest risk will always win.

      Confessing a to cop will get you all the jail time, every time. It's among the worst possible choices in such a case.

  11. How did they do it? by it0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the pdf

    "Harvard University was able to determine that, in the several hours leading up to the
    receipt of the e-mail messages described above, ELDO KIM accessed TOR using Harvardâ(TM)s
    wireless network."

    So Harvard keeps track of your connections. Still circumstancial but he confessed.
    "KIM then stated that he authored the bomb threat e-mails described above."

    1. Re:How did they do it? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All the campus networks I've seen remotely recently do some sort of access control, if only to avoid being a free wifi provider for every porn-torrent enthusiast in the neighborhood. Sometimes 802.11x, sometimes that bloody awful Cisco VPN monstrosity.

      What's more notable is that they apparently keep traffic logs for some amount of time, at least long enough to catch this guy, who knows how much longer?

      If you have a network of any nontrivial size, and want to keep it from falling in a screaming heap (especially with the lousiness of wireless links in the mix), taking steps to ensure that most of the users are the ones you are supposed to be providing service to, and doing some QoS to keep them from stepping on each others' toes is basically necessary. Keeping traffic logs, though, is an additional chunk of effort and expense, and all so that people will be motivated to come bug you for access to them. I wonder when they started keeping logs, and why.

    2. Re:How did they do it? by Rhywden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While we were forced to use DPI in order to catch people torrenting movies (our university threatened to pull the plug otherwise!), we also used it to catch the inevitable Worm infections or Botnets.

      Such computers were isolated from the rest of the net and (almost) all HTTP traffic was redirected (save for traffic to know antivirus software providers) to a page which stated that their computed was infected with Zeus, Conficker or whatever else is floating around there. And that they were to clean up their PCs and that we also recommended a complete wipe. They then had to type in "Yes, I understand" and were given a 24 hour grace period. If, after that time period, their PC was still infected they were off the net until they proved a complete reinstall to us.

  12. Well it worked by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    He made the threat to get out of an exam.

    he won't have to worry about that any more

  13. Harvard by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I expected more from a Harvard student.

    A couple of hours of online research should have taught him to, at least, connect through a cracked wifi far from his neighborhood. Or, if he was computer illiterate, to convince someone from another country to send the mails for him.

    Also, once he decided to avoid the exam in a way that could land him in prison, why use a method he didn't understand, instead of burning down the building or paying someone to send the teacher to the hospital?

    However, the first question I would ask him would be if he had considered that simply approaching the teacher and explaining him that he and all his family would be killed unless the exam was postponed, carried a shorter jail time than a terrorist threat.

    In conclusion, clearly in Harvard they are not teaching how to deal with real world problems pragmatically.

    1. Re:Harvard by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The best Harvard students learn that you have no need to conceal your crimes if you can commit them from a position of enough influence to simply make them legal. That's where kiddo slipped up.

  14. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The wonderful thing about shows like CSI is that it convinces criminals to implement absurd technical defences when their crimes will almost certainly be dealt with by old-fashioned police work.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  15. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was the guy ever catched ? Nope.

    Did this happen during an English class?

  16. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by RivenAleem · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They didn't know it originated from the wireless network. They knew it came from Tor. I could have sent it, for all they know. What they did know was the time it arrived. They played a hunch that it came locally (someone who planted/discovered the bomb on campus) and checked to see who had used Tor on their network at around that time, it's plain old fashioned detective work.

    Put the suspect in a room with an interrogator and extract a confession ("We have you on the Tor network the exact same time the email for the bomb hoax came through", "You were the only person using it at the time (whether that is true or not) so we know you did it", "This will go a lot easier on you if you confess now"). Will the confession stand? Did they read Miranda rights? Was he offered legal council?

  17. Re: "because it originated from the wireless netwo by oobayly · · Score: 4, Informative

    This reminds me of the news the other day - there have had a few bombs going off recently in Northern Ireland - with warnings. Anyhow, on Monday the news said that a man was being treated for burns in Belfast, which was thought to be linked to sectarian violence, my first thought was "FFS, now they're setting each other on fire", quickly followed by laughter when it turned out the incendiary device he was carrying detonated - serves the stupid fucker right.

  18. Re:Sounds like he visited torproject.org recently. by qbast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... and they are not going to use it for this kind of case.

  19. Re:Sounds like he visited torproject.org recently. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or, possibly, they just checked who had used Tor in the last few days on their network - can you ID a Tor packet by looking at it?

    Depends on who the "you" is. The list of entry nodes is public knowledge. Telecoms/Government agencies probably keep historic lists of entry nodes. So it should be trivial to show a connection to the Tor network. The PDF implied (to me) that the FBI just crossreferenced Harvard's log with their list of entry nodes.

    To technically answer your question: Tor packets don't have a unique signature, but they all are of a known size.

    It doesn't sound like they needed to crack Tor.

    This is one of the best-known ways to deanonymize people using Tor: timestamping entering traffic and exiting traffic. Tor itself explains they have no theoretical way to fix that issue and still maintain a system that is low-latency (there may have been a third feature as well, where they got to pick-2-of-3).

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  20. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Precisely this. Harvard keeps flow type logs, they found someone using tor. Pigs barfed on him, he cracked and confessed. The kid's a fucking retard, mostly for cranking people.

    Please, don't use Tor to harass and be an asshole.
    Real freedom fighters need Tor, not you and your lulz.

    See who else really needs Tor: https://www.torproject.org/

    And quit being assholes.

  21. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    legal council? probably not. he's a terrorism suspect after all!!

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  22. Kids these days... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he'd just called it in from a pay phone, they'd never have found him.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Kids these days... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If he'd just called it in from a pay phone, they'd never have found him.

      In Luxembourg, a couple of students at the European School did exactly that a few years ago. They were caught pretty quickly, because, you know, payphones have cameras... ("officially" to catch vandalism, but these cams sure did come in handy in this case as well). So, cops just walked with the pix from classroom to classroom until they found the perps.

  23. The linked article is confused... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The linked article is confused... but Emerson Hall houses the philosophy department, so it was a philosophy final.

    Which is incredibly ironic, since those are generally a matter of opinion or history, which means he could likely have passed it in any case, given that he was a psychology major with a minor in Japanese, so it was kind of a pass/fail class for him anyway. I wonder if any of the news organizations have talked to Professor Gary King (Kim was his research assistant).

  24. Remember when this was no big deal? by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember the days when this story wouldn't even have made the local paper? Seriously, 25 years ago your average school saw one of these every few years. It headlined the school paper, the local cops investigated, but the FBI? National news? Heck no.

    Who needs terrorists when we now pay large corporations and government agencies to spread panic? Quit terrorizing the nation to protect your job security and let me know when something actually blows up.

  25. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by zerobeat · · Score: 4, Funny

    And in lesson three, we'll learn the age old trick of going down to the local busy Starbucks with a fresh install of *OS and then use the Tor. This might extend the time it takes the feds to knock on your door to over 24 hours!

    --
    What other people think of me is none of my business
  26. Protip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just study, it's easier.

  27. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Informative

    Moron. I don't care how innocent or guilty you are.

    Don't talk
    Demand a lawyer (only time you can talk)
    Don't sign anything
    Don't fucking talk!
    Did I mention not talking?
    By the time your lawyer arrives you should need a glass of water because your lips will be stuck together from all the not talking you were doing.

  28. Re: "because it originated from the wireless netwo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is that more or less work than actually studying for the exam?

  29. No it isn't by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No normal person calls in a bomb threat to get out of a final that will at most just end being delayed.

    That YOU were (and are) an idiot doesn't mean everyone is. If your moronic logic was true, then the phone at your average school would never stop ringing. This guy (and since you clearly identify with him, you) is an asshole who thought nothing of creating a major nuisance for teachers and students because he wanted to get out of an exam. Ten to one you and him are the type who then later grow up... grow older and at the slightest provocation threaten to sue anyone and everyone for any delay or inconvenience.

    It is the eternal excuse of the asshole: Everyone does it.

    Nope.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  30. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by rhazz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Except he didn't actually send the bomb threat! He only confessed to that lesser crime because what he was REALLY doing was seeding a pirated release of Gravity, and he knew if the police continued their investigation they might find out and he'd end up in jail for 10 years and have to pay $3 million in fines.

  31. Re:"because it originated from the wireless networ by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you weren't ready to make that post, you could've called in a bomb threat.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  32. Re: "because it originated from the wireless netwo by F.Ultra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TOR is not an entity and even if they managed to get hold of the exit node there is no logs left there to point back to the previous node and so on.