Slashdot Mirror


The Biggest Tech Mishap of 2013?

Nerval's Lobster writes "Some high-profile tech initiatives really crashed-and-burned this year. Did BlackBerry executives really think that BlackBerry 10 would spark a miraculous turnaround, or were they simply going through the motions of promoting it? That's the key question as BlackBerry 10 devices fail to sell. Then there's Facebook's misbegotten attempt at 'skinning' the Android OS with its Home app. Or maybe Healthcare.gov counts as 2013's biggest debacle, with its repeated crashes and glitches and inability to carry out core functions. What do you think was the biggest software or hardware (or both) mishap of the past twelve months?"

162 comments

  1. All of the above by dubdays · · Score: 0

    Let's face it...BB is circling the toilet bowl, the Facebook skin was DOA, and the Healthcare.gov launch was a farce. They're all shit...the only difference is the smell.

    1. Re:All of the above by Onuma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Arguably, the mistakes RIM made with Blackberry go back about 7 years or so. When they didn't react smartly to the advent of the iPhone and Android devices, they started hammering the nails into their own coffin.

      --
      What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
    2. Re:All of the above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Amateur Hour is over!

    3. Re:All of the above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FWIW, similar reasons got into demise of Nokia as well.

    4. Re:All of the above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberry is only dead to Americans, I realize you want it to go away though. I traded my nexus for one, and plan to snatch up another soon in case the local carriers stop selling them. I love it! Of course, you don't have to be a top seller to continue selling - we'll see what happens.

    5. Re:All of the above by Optali · · Score: 1

      The latter didn't affect the rest of the world. People outside of the US don't give a fuck about Healthcare.gov... and I bet it's not even close to many of the mayor epic fails that populate the pages of The Register and similar.

      You should just see the mess we have here with our digital travel cards (OV Chipkaart) which is ongoing for a few years right now and which is like a pearl necklace of fuck ups one after the other, from the hardware (easy to crack, 100% error rate) to the software and ending in the administration and politics.

      Of course, we are only 1.7e7 inhabitants in this country but it this happened in the US you would be rioting in the streets.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
  2. My company by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My company got bought by private equity. It's depressing to watch as the company is managed by people who don't understand our products and don't care.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:My company by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Was your company Dell? In which case, it was an opportunity

    2. Re:My company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company got bought by private equity. It's depressing to watch as the company is managed by people who don't understand our products and don't care.

      At least they're outsiders. We've got company folks like that. At the top.

    3. Re:My company by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      if you haven't changed jobs, please accept whatever happens to your career as obvious and totally your fault.

      That's happening, but I'm not worried about my career. I'm get hired for my skills and one of my skills is knowing how to make a resume look good.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:My company by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I'm get hired for my skills and one of my skills

      is clearly not proofreading grammar in the morning.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:My company by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      I was hired for my charm and amazing good looks. Oh, and I know grammar, too.

    6. Re:My company by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I know grammar, too.

      Is that sentence the demonstration of your grammar skills?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:My company by drkim · · Score: 1

      I'm get hired for my skills and one of my skills

      is clearly not proofreading grammar in the morning.

      and i"m detale oriented,

  3. NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NSA leak was the most damagind and biggest tech fail.
    They still don't know what was taken.

    1. Re:NSA leaking by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:NSA leaking by MobSwatter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Then why does the economic damage predate the leak? Everyone knew what was going on from the days of the AT&T disclosure, Snowden only provided the physical evidence for Americans to act on it. I happen to have a little experience with the intelligence community, had a great uncle that was OSS when it incepted to be the CIA in 1947. Keep secrets they did, spy on Americans; no they didn't, weaken encryption resulting in fraudulent sales of security devices, no they did not, were they saints, not really however that was a matter of prospective, but as a nation we were stronger. Our constitution meant something then, so did a mans word, and sworn oath.

    3. Re:NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately we can't believe a word they say about anything. I wouldn't even waste my breath asking them the time of day.

    4. Re:NSA leaking by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      That happened NSA leak was not the fall by itself, but that we learnt that most hardware and software is backdoored already or in the process to be, and that any expectation of privacy for anything that resides or goes through US should be discarded. What failed is internet security as a whole, badly. And, of course, any trust that you may had on US government, but that is not tech.

    5. Re:NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should hope it was damaging. The NSA doesn't need to persist.

      captcha: euphoric

    6. Re:NSA leaking by codeusirae · · Score: 1

      "NSA leak was the most damagind and biggest tech fail. They still don't know what was taken".

      Given the size of the organization and number of people that have access to NSA 'secrets', I wouldn't be surprised if the Russians don't already have the files ..

    7. Re:NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apparently they pretty much do".

      Who in their right minds keeps names of undercover agents on a computer that anyone can walk in off the street and copy to a USB device or their Britney Spears writeable DVD ..

      'Last month British and U.S. intelligence officials speculated Snowden had in his possession a “doomsday cache” of intelligence information, including the names of undercover intelligence personnel stationed around the world' ref

    8. Re:NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our constitution meant something then, so did a mans word, and sworn oath.

      So did an apostrophe. So did grammar.

    9. Re:NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You understood the recent revelations wrong. There aren't any backdoors besides the ones NSA has put in specific devices through exploitation of previously unknown security vulnerabilities. None of it suggests any collusion from the manufacturers. NSA simply employed people to hack the devices and software day and night and given motivation and limitless resources, any software platform will fall.

    10. Re:NSA leaking by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing out the damage done to the edumacational system you gobermmenent schill.

    11. Re:NSA leaking by romons · · Score: 1

      There were two sides to the CIA when it was formed; the I guys, and the spy guys. OSS was the spy guys, wasn't it? Weren't they doing things like overthrowing democracies to set up puppet governments?

      Gore Vidal pointed out that the CIA was never really a legal organization; it was always a bit outside the law. They could do whatever they thought would be 'best' for the country. If that meant spying on US citizens, I'm sure they would have done it (and probably did do it) without a thought. Spying on citizens is certainly less onerous than experimenting on citizens using LSD, without the subject's knowledge or consent.

      What the NSA is doing was instigated by Cheney and Bush after 9/11. They had astonishing resources and little oversight, so they ratcheted up. Why not? Bureaucracies exist to expand themselves. I'm disappointed that Obama and his gang didn't do any oversight when they came in. I guess they were too busy saving the economy and helping the poor to set themselves up as culpable if a terrorist attack happened.

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
    12. Re:NSA leaking by vac65 · · Score: 1

      Moooooh....

      Snowden is where...?
      The asylum request was granted as a decoy, probably?

    13. Re:NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just piss off, it really doesn't add to the conversation. now go home and play with the shift key on your typewriter.

  4. Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    taco must be turning in his grave

    1. Re:Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Every year even worse, even more generic layout. How pathetic

    2. Re:Slash!dot Beta by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      taco must be turning in his grave

      Bring out your beta! Bring out your beta! Bring out your beta! Bring out your beta!
      Here's one
      9 pence
      I'm not dead!
      What?
      Nothing, here's your 9 pence.
      I'm not dead!
      'ere, he says he's not dead.
      Yes he is.
      I'm not!
      He isn't?
      Well, he will be soon, he's very ill.
      I'm getting better!

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Slash!dot Beta by chromas · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's a good Python script you got there. Unfortunately, Slashdot is written in Perl.

    4. Re:Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say this like they're not still planning to roll it out in 2014.

      Perhaps you're one who has been lucky enough not to get the "accidental" redirect to beta every once in a while (that sticks until you clear your cookies)? I has been happening to me with increasing frequency for the past month or so.

    5. Re:Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At the bottom of the page for Slashdot Beta is a link they have now added to go back to Slashdot Classic which works for me whenever I am forced to that Beta monstrosity.

    6. Re:Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are you using that gawdoffal interface? Just use the classic interface. I tried the beta for all of two minutes, UGH!

      It's telling, though, that the beta interface is so horrible that an offtopic comment that only mentions how horrible the beta is gets moderated 4, insightful. Slashdot staff, are you listening to your users?

    7. Re:Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the bottom of the page for Slashdot Beta is a link they have now added to go back to Slashdot Classic which works for me whenever I am forced to that Beta monstrosity.

      Heh, "Classic". Remember when "Classic" was Beta?

  5. I'd say the target hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They lost credit card numbers... pin codes!? and the c v v codes?!?!?!? what. the. fuck.

    Why were they even storing those. at all. thats some world class fuckup that's going to cost many thousands of people real money. Theres no writeoff for regular people unlike businesses. People are Fucked...

    Altho it's slightly more than a "mishap".

    It's either that or the obamacare fuckup. But really who expected a goverment website to work right... Thats like a normal fuckup for us.

    Or maybe the NSA being such treasonous completely useless wastes of space and money who should all be swinging at the end of a rope.
    But that goes beyond just this year too. They've been shitheads for a long time. We just now know about it for sure.

    1. Re: I'd say the target hack... by supersat · · Score: 1

      Encrypted PINs and the magstripe CVV, which is different than the CVV2 on the back of your card.

    2. Re: I'd say the target hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      card number and cvv. that's enough to clone you up some cards and go on a shopping spree.

    3. Re:I'd say the target hack... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Adobe security breach, with millions of passwords recovered in plain text (and published) could be pretty close to Target's one, a lot uses the same password everywhere (or a trivial modification of a base password like adding site name), so wasn't just adobe account hacked, was that a good percent of those people got every major site they use hacked.

    4. Re:I'd say the target hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Target using amazon to do their E-commerce for awhile? Guess they should have kept using Amazon instead of bringing it in-house. It will be interesting to hear how the hackers managed to access all of this information if it ever is released you know Target will want to cover it up if its really embarrassing.

    5. Re:I'd say the target hack... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      As I recall, * from several years ago when I worked for a firm that had similar data to keep safe, adhering to the PCI contractual requirements would keep credit card numbers from being saved in unencrypted form, period. If memory serves, * not updating our software to meet that standard on January 01 (of 2006? 2007? *) would have meant either not processing credit card payments (unthinkable) or paying a fine to the credit card companies of some substantial amount of money (also unthinkable). How big a fine? $10,000/day is the figure that comes to mind. *

      If my recollection is close to correct, and Target was also bound by that contractual requirement, they owe a metric $#!+-ton in PCI violation fines. (And somebody in charge of auditing Target for compliance really, really dropped the ball.)

      * Best to seek confirmation/correction of what I think I recall. I'm sure it's not horribly mistaken, but it's probably not completely accurate. A couple of queries to get you started:

      http://duckduckgo.com/?s=pci+credit.card+encryption+fine+noncompliance

      http://duckduckgo.com/?s=pci+credit.card+encryption+deadline

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  6. That's easy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Some high-profile tech initiatives really crashed-and-burned this year. Did BlackBerry executives really think that BlackBerry 10 would spark a miraculous turnaround, or were they simply going through the motions of promoting it? That's the key question as BlackBerry 10 devices fail to sell. Then there's Facebook's misbegotten attempt at 'skinning' the Android OS with its Home app. Or maybe Healthcare.gov counts as 2013's biggest debacle, with its repeated crashes and glitches and inability to carry out core functions. What do you think was the biggest software or hardware (or both) mishap of the past twelve months?"

    Healthcare.gov? That's a junior league fuck-up... I nominate the NSA for getting pwned and punked by one Edward Joseph Snowden who walked out of their secure computer facility with all of Americas dirty laundry on a USB stick.

    1. Re:That's easy.... by dubdays · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Healthcare.gov? That's a junior league fuck-up... I nominate the NSA for getting pwned and punked by one Edward Joseph Snowden who walked out of their secure computer facility with all of Americas dirty laundry on a USB stick.

      Too bad it's pretty much amounted to nothing positive thus far. The president hasn't done shit to change anything, congress critters NEVER do shit (except contribute massive amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere), and the general public pretty much doesn't give a shit. Don't get me wrong, Snowden's a hero in my book, but the revelations really haven't had a significant impact on US society as a whole, sad as that may be.

    2. Re:That's easy.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It has cost US companies money. Money is the only language that the US government, owned by corporations, seems to understand. I'm still hopeful that it has a bigger effect, but it will take time. Contracts won't be renewed, business will be lost to other countries.

      Once it becomes clear that the NSA is affecting US corporations profit, once the first poor quarterly earnings are blamed on them, once the people holding the purse strings (lobbyists) start to care...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:That's easy.... by joeboomer628 · · Score: 1

      Conspiracy Alert: Healthcare.gov was likely screwed up on purpose to keep the general population in the dark about what it is going to cost. They will probably keep screwing around with the information (lying) until after the mid term elections.

      --
      JoeR
  7. My vote is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The NSA's exfiltration detection system...

  8. Snowden by supersat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm pretty sure it was hiring Edward Snowden as your SharePoint admin.

    1. Re:Snowden by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Is that worst than hiring Aaron Alexis to upgrade your PCs?

    2. Re:Snowden by fredrated · · Score: 1

      The post is talking about mishaps not miracles assface.

    3. Re:Snowden by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Or, more importantly, giving your Sharepoint admin who has a copy of the constitution sitting next to his keyboard, wears an EFF hoodie that mocks the NSA to work every day, and has turned down promotions due to moral objections to the agencies activities full admin access to everything you have.

    4. Re:Snowden by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      An organization whose information is secured by "hiring the right people" rather than dividing responsibilities is rather dysfunctional.

      Wasn't Sarbanes-Oxley (or one of its friends with an even funnier name, like L-1011 or PT-109 or BR549) supposed to prevent this sort of thing?

      Guess that only applies to businesses, not to the federal government itself.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  9. Obligatory by dubdays · · Score: 5, Funny

    The year of the Linux desktop. But, dammit, 2014 is DEFINITELY going to be THE year!!!

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the soft failure of the GPL?

      For all the Revolutionary Nerd talk, it seems that GPL has died due to a combination of...

      - lawers finding ways around it
      - engineers finding ways around it
      - people just not bothering (enforemnt potential is nil)
      - domiance of other licensing schemes
      - a general failure of the OSS model in general, as with a few high profile exceptions notwithstanding, the OSS model has failed to produce the variety and quality of software and applications that the competitive world has done.

    2. Re:Obligatory by binarylarry · · Score: 2

      Windows 8 is definitely helping the cause
      Linux dominates the mobile world with Android
      ChromeOS (another Linux-based operating system) is apparently very popular and already has nearly 25% of new laptop sales in the US
      There's SteamOS which is a big question mark still

      ZOMG It could actually happen in 2014!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:Obligatory by binarylarry · · Score: 0

      "OSS" is much bigger than the GPL.

      GPL is mainly Stallman-ish "Free Software" flag waving bearded digital tailban types who don't use the internet because it impinges on their freedoms.

      OSS is everything between that and proprietary software.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chome OS is just the new freedos, to get around the windows tax. I would not take those numbers seriously.

    5. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure. but i still contend that OSS, painted with a broad brush, is mostly a hollow joke. as i see it, and im sure people will disagree, is that for profit companies have basically taken the best of the few truly good OSS projects out there and have commercialized them in a way that the difference between them and proprietary software is basically zero and the whole enterprise, from GPL on up, has amounted to a huge wealth transfer from naive do-gooders to corporate or at least entrepreneurial interests.. which would be fine IF there wre some "philosophical win" associated with it, but for all practical purposes there hasn't been. AndroidOS is a good example of this.

    6. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The excuses never end, but they do get worse with time. Also, your spelling is ... horrible, to say the least. You should try to improve it, if you want to be taken seriously.

    7. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the soft failure of the GPL?

      For all the Revolutionary Nerd talk, it seems that GPL has died due to a combination of...

      - lawers finding ways around it
      - engineers finding ways around it
      - people just not bothering (enforemnt potential is nil)
      - domiance of other licensing schemes
      - a general failure of the OSS model in general, as with a few high profile exceptions notwithstanding, the OSS model has failed to produce the variety and quality of software and applications that the competitive world has done.

      I think it's about time you bought yourself a new keyboard :)

    8. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horrible spelling? They most likely made a typo by skipping the "r" in Chrome. From that single mistake, it's unfair to say their spelling is horrible. You're just trolling because they stated a fact you don't like and you don't know how else to respond, Larry.

    9. Re:Obligatory by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      It was the year of the Linux tablet and smartphone, that by now is a market bigger than the desktop one. Maybe 2014 or 2015 would be the year of a proper linux (as in not android) tablet, if Ubuntu touch and others adaptations over android kernel succeed.

    10. Re:Obligatory by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      That you or at least normal people can't install Windows in Chromebooks means that that 25% is not a get around to avoid windows tax, but proper linux sales from the ground up, somewhat the "market share" of linux, at least for the laptop area, jumped to 25% with that alone.

    11. Re:Obligatory by LinuxRulz · · Score: 1

      The year of the Linux desktop. But, dammit, 2014 is DEFINITELY going to be THE year!!!

      Well, Android smartphones and tablets are thriving which makes for linux on mobiles. And now that Steam is available on linux and the steambox is announced, so I can certainly see more people sticking to Linux for most uses. Heck, I'm in a windows software development firm and convinced my boss before the holidays that I was more effective on linux with Debian+git+Vim+KVM+Wine+mono than whatever the "MS suggested dev environment" is.

      So for all that's practical from my point of view, 2014 is already THE year!

      Cheers!

    12. Re:Obligatory by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      They wont.

    13. Re:Obligatory by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Pedantry is just another name for nothin' left to say.

    14. Re:Obligatory by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Twasnt I, asshole.

      I'm not really a huge ChromeOS fan, I think web apps are made of fail.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  10. Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For demonstrating that forcing a tablet interface on desktop users does not help your bottom line.

    1. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Initial release August 1, 2012; 16 months ago.

    2. Re:Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Initial release August 1, 2012; 16 months ago.

      And that stench still hasn't wavered after 16 months. The split personality of semi-touch and semi-desktop was as natural as sewing the two outside halves of Siamese Twins together. Frankenstein would be proud, but he didn't even like Windows 8.

      The Surface product line had a lot of potential, but not at that price point. And the write-offs Microsoft took on Surface & Surface RT make HealthCare.gov look like lunch money.

    3. Re:Windows 8 by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd vote for Windows 8 as well across the board - Windows 8/RT/Phone8. Actually, the last ain't so bad, but the 3 of them, taken together, demonstrates the worst about Microsoft this year.

    4. Re:Windows 8 by throughfresheyes · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. To compare Windows 8 and Windows 7, Windows 7 was an ugly girl in a dress from Ross, while Windows 8 was an ugly girl in a dress from Nordstrom. But, however you cut it, it is still the same ugly girl, no matter what dress you are putting her in. And that basically sums up Windows 7 and 8. 8 just has a nice start menu. Otherwise, it's pretty much the same as 7.

  11. Windows 8.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 8.1 brought back the Start Button.

    1. Re:Windows 8.1 by dubdays · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The implementation of which (if you can call it that) is just as useless as not having one at all. MSFT basically said "fuck you" and gave us a useless little button that doesn't do anything new.

    2. Re:Windows 8.1 by oji-sama · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you set it up to use the same background as on the desktop the transition is less disturbing. After tweaking the location of the little squares I find it usable, although not an improvement. I set a few updating columns to left, then a couple of columns of static icons related to different tasks and now along with the win+q (which doesn't open the whole modern UI anymore) can find/open stuff pretty quickly.

      I still dislike the way right button is handled in the modern UI. Give me my context menus back. Unnecessary useless movements are unnecessary.

      --
      It is what it is.
    3. Re:Windows 8.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why it's moderated Troll.
      After all, this impacts a lot of people all over the world (more than Healthcare.gov or SimCity whatever) and Windows 8.1 still a big downgrade compared to Windows 7 as far as I understand it.

    4. Re:Windows 8.1 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that when you buy a new laptop here (Japan) most shops offer to either pre-install or sell you software to bring the start menu back.

      To be fair to MS they did listen. I was surprised when they brought the start button back and allowed booting directly to the desktop. The start button fixes the biggest UI problem with Windows 8, which is that it wasn't obvious how to get back to the start screen. Okay, it's not exactly what people wanted, but it's not as offensively bad as the original implementation.

      What really pissed me off about Windows 8.1 is the fact that it wouldn't let me log in without a god damned Microsoft account. I made one years ago to take advantage of the free 25GB Skydrive they offer (no personal details given, drive contains only a massive encrypted container and some ISO images of MS operating systems I sometimes need to download and install) so logged in, then prompty detached my local account. Still irritating though, almost as bad as the way Google is trying to drive YouTube users to G+ by forcing them to have a G+ account.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Windows 8.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win+Q... how didn't I notice that before? +1 internet point for you.

    6. Re:Windows 8.1 by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The start menu is one of the most sadly hilarious case studies I've seen recently. In Windows Vista, Microsoft made changes to the start menu that everyone complained about.

      Then in Win8, their metrics said no one was using the start menu, so they removed it. Facepalm.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Windows 8.1 by dysmal · · Score: 1

      I'd still rather hit myself in the face with a hammer than use Win 8.1

    8. Re:Windows 8.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The implementation of which (if you can call it that) is just as useless as not having one at all. MSFT basically said "fuck you" and gave us a useless little button that doesn't do anything new.

      The REAL change was making boot-to-desktop a simple checkbox, and that's not useless...

      The button in the corner replaces the ridiculous four pixel square you had to click on in 8.0 to get back to the start screen which is still there, and still replaces the start MENU from Windows 95-7

      You still have the other 99 ways of launching a Windows app, the system tray, the bar, desktop shortcuts, win+r, search

  12. HealthCare.gov, by a mile by PapayaSF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No contest. It's got everything: hubris, cronyism, bureaucratic bungling, political idiocy, numerous huge IT errors, hundreds of millions of dollars. Once all the details come out, this massive fail will be studied in universities. Books will be written. The political consequences will last for years. Coming soon: the doctor shortages. And does everyone know that in 2014, the health plan tax kicks in? I don't mean the "Cadillac plan" tax, or the tax if you don't have insurance. I mean the 2% tax on every health plan. Yes, in order to make health insurance more "affordable," they are taxing health insurance! Words fail.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Doctor shortages? Big deal.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doctor shortage? There are thirteen of him and he makes house calls anywhere in time and space.

    3. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No contest. It's got everything: hubris, cronyism, bureaucratic bungling, political idiocy, numerous huge IT errors, hundreds of millions of dollars. Once all the details come out, this massive fail will be studied in universities. Books will be written. The political consequences will last for years. Coming soon: the doctor shortages. And does everyone know that in 2014, the health plan tax kicks in? I don't mean the "Cadillac plan" tax, or the tax if you don't have insurance. I mean the 2% tax on every health plan. Yes, in order to make health insurance more "affordable," they are taxing health insurance! Words fail.

      Yep.

      The idea that there is even some question about what the biggest tech mishap of 2013 is says a lot about Slashdot/techie politics. When you go all in for someone, it's very hard to admit later that you were wrong.

    4. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And does everyone know that in 2014, the health plan tax kicks in? I don't mean the "Cadillac plan" tax, or the tax if you don't have insurance. I mean the 2% tax on every health plan. Yes, in order to make health insurance more "affordable," they are taxing health insurance! Words fail.

      Well, I'm assuming the goal is to use that money to provide health plans to those who can't afford them, obviously if more people get coverage than before and the costs per person don't go down the total will go up. Here in Norway it's a tax for employers when they pay me income, essentially for every 100 NOK I get they must pay 7.80 NOK to the government. If there's a street bum with no income, get still gets the same healthcare as me and obviously that's coming out of the pockets of everyone else. If we took away the tax and let everyone get their own insurance I'd be paying for just me, right? And the bum would probably die, but let's leave morality out it for a second.

      By making sure everyone is in good health and vaccinated, we reduce the spread of disease and infection. If some of the uncovered people could get back into taxable work they could become an asset or at least less of a tax burden. Desperate people who need money for surgery can lead to crime and exploitation. And most of all, we don't throw hot potatoes around in the system trying to deny or revoke their coverage. The overhead is far less. I'm also fairly confident I will get an appropriate treatment based on medical needs, of course our doctors and nurses are just as human as anyone else but at least I'm not fighting a giant insurance company who want my treatment to be cheap as possible without getting sued and lose.

      If you want to take non-tech mishaps then Obamacare is taking on all the challenges and costs of socialized medicine while providing little to none of the benefits other countries have. The Democrats sacrificed the soul of the system, while the Republicans have poisoned the apple so it's set up to fail. In a few years it'll be a disaster and everyone in the US will agree socialized medicine can't work, despite all the pointing to what happens in pinko commie land.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only input the Republicans had was forcing Congress to have to use the same plan. Any claim they changed the bill otherwise is an outright lie, period.

      The subsidies, to make it affordable, are tax credits. If you pay no federal income tax (47% of the country) you get no subsidy. If you make under $17K you get no subsidy. It caps out, so if you make over $43K you get no subsidy. The amount of tax you pay on $43K is not much because of our tax system and deductions, and if your subsidy is greater than what you pay in federal income tax you don't get that extra.

      The subsidies will help some people, but the LARGE MAJORITY will get nothing from it. The 47% who pay no taxes, or those who make too much, will get nothing leaving only a small percentage of citizens able to qualify for anything. Those who do qualify will get tiny amounts, regardless of what was promised by the web site.

      The DNC knows this and is trying to figure out how to spin it. One of their failed attempts is to blame the GOP for writing it bad, like the above poster did, but everyone knows the GOP had nothing to do with it and didn't vote for it at all. They even managed to call it Obamacare, and Obama himself said he was proud to have it called that, now he regrets saying that and people are spinning that its only called that because of the GOP.

      Just watch over the next year as the GOP is blamed for every single failure despite it being 100% written by, voted by, run by, and owned by the DNC.

    6. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's funny is that the person you are quoting barely even mentions the TECH mishap - he sums it up as "numerous huge IT errors" but then goes on a rant about things that have NOTHING to do with the fucked up launch of healthcare.gov, but you want to claim that other people can't seem to separate their politics from their ability to assess the success or failure of a tech project. What the ever loving fuck does someone saying there will be doctor shortages, or a 2% tax, have to do with the website sucking? Nothing. Stop projecting your partisanship onto other people.

      Personally I hate the ACA because it isn't single payer and all it will wind up doing is delaying actual healthcare reform in this country by decades while simultaneously keeping a useless industry alive. In any case, this story isn't about politics, it's about tech fuckups in 2013. So:

      As an IT project, Healthcare.gov was an abortion. You had project management that was behaving in a fairly schizophrenic fashion (namely, political leadership who were battling over the ACA trying to repeal/defend it) leading to delays in starting implementation, you had incompetent contractors hired to put it out, you had incompetent developers building it (my god, the amount of pointless data streaming up and down was staggering, the front end code we could see was incompetent at best, the whole mess was completely non-performant) and then to top it off, as a post-mortem it seems that most were trying to assign blame and score political gotcha points and throwing up all kinds of irrelevant shit rather than just dealing with reality and trying to do a solid job implementing the law of the land.

      I do agree there can be no doubt that Healthcare.gov is the absolute biggest fuck-up of the year.

      Though my vote for worst tech issue of the year definitely goes to the NSA stuff - I'll take a thousand shitty websites over big brother any day.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    7. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Isn't that situation normal with a lot of SAP, IBM etc contracts let alone whatever IT pilot fish are hanging around Washington to gobble up crumbs? Blaming such a thing on anyone other than the contractor that fucks it up reveals more about the person pointing the finger in the wrong direction than anything else.

    8. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The subsidies, to make it affordable, are tax credits. If you pay no federal income tax (47% of the country) you get no subsidy. If you make under $17K you get no subsidy. It caps out, so if you make over $43K you get no subsidy. The amount of tax you pay on $43K is not much because of our tax system and deductions, and if your subsidy is greater than what you pay in federal income tax you don't get that extra.

      FYI, Refundable tax credits are not the same as tax deductions. That's a big fraud concerns, as the IRS pays out billions in unwarranted tax credits.

      From: http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=97

      "To help make premiums affordable, federal subsidies in the form of tax credits will be available for eligible individuals and families who purchase insurance through an exchange (see "Eligibility for Subsidies" below). The tax credits are refundable, which means that eligible taxpayers receive the full amount of the credit, regardless of how much they otherwise owe in federal income taxes."

    9. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by PapayaSF · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm assuming the goal is to use that money to provide health plans to those who can't afford them, obviously if more people get coverage than before and the costs per person don't go down the total will go up.

      But the 2% tax applies to all health plans (except Medicaid, I believe). Obamacare was sold as reducing the the cost of insurance for the average person. You don't lower the cost of anything by taxing it. And note that it was also sold as reducing the deficit, or at least not adding to it. That's another claim since exposed as untrue.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    10. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by PapayaSF · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think the contractor deserves all the blame. They screwed up big-time, true, but they had a very difficult task, perhaps an impossible one. Communicating in real time with dozens of pre-existing government and insurance company databases is hard. They also had to dance to the tune of their political masters, so they got requirements late because the administration didn't want Republicans to know the gory details before the 2012 elections, and because the website flowchart was complicated by the fact that the administration didn't want visitors to see plan costs before subsidies, to reduce sticker shock.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    11. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      What the ever loving fuck does someone saying there will be doctor shortages, or a 2% tax, have to do with the website sucking? Nothing.

      No, it's all connected. The entire "health care reform" project was a top-down, centrally-planned attempt to remake a huge portion of the economy. It was assembled into a massive bill that no one read, and forced through Congress on partisan lines. The website had to manifest this confused, partisan mess of idealistic hopes, economic fallacies, and outright lies, and it couldn't. It still can't. As originally conceived, it had to query existing databases at the IRS, HHS, Homeland Security, and Treasury. It had to check 50 state Medicaid systems. It had to communicate with all the insurers. But they haven't been able to make it work. When you hear about the "back-end" not being done, that's what they mean. Applicants are on the honor system, because the planned automated verification checks aren't working yet. And all of that verification is needed because of the political requirements for subsidies.

      On top of that, there were delays in giving website requirements to the contractors because the administration wanted to hide things before the 2012 elections, for fear of giving ammunition to Republicans.

      The politics of the whole thing is central to the failure of the website.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    12. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


      The only input the Republicans had...

      No. Republicans gave lots of input, by fighting the thing tooth & nail, and the RESULT of their resistance were many, many changes to the system; starting with the scuttling of single-payer system, continuing with all the gimmickery regarding providers being unable to use federal money for abortions.
      Just because there wasn't publicized negotiations with formal give and take does not mean there were no compromises and changes done.

      So claiming Republicans had nothing to do with the law is just outright lie. They may be able to weasel away from responsibility, sure, but their fingerprints are all over the place.

    13. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      The amount of tax you pay on $43K is not much because of our tax system and deductions

      Bullshit, I make a little more than that but I'm paying thousands in federal tax; I pay thousands in federal income tax and even more in SS and Medicare tax.

      As to Romney's "47% pay no federal tax", that's as much a lie as saying that Romney pays no Federal tax; his income is capital gains, which is covered by a different tax and not counted as regular income. Everyone who smokes a cigar or buys alcoholic beverages or drives or rides public transportation is paying Federal excise taxes on that tobacco, alcohol, and fuel. And the poor are probably paying a higher percentage of their income in excise taxes than Romney pays in capital gains taxes.

    14. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just watch over the next year as the GOP is blamed for every single failure despite it being 100% written by, voted by, run by, and owned by the DNC.

      Payback's a bitch, isn't it?

  13. Surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's surface write offs?

    1. Re:Surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to Obamacare Website and Snowden Leaks... Surface Writeoffs are chump change.

  14. Donglegate! by know1 · · Score: 1

    How soon ye forget.

  15. I nominate: by Xeno+man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm gona throw in a nomination for EA and the launch of Sim City. While probably not the largest screw up, I would say they had the most warning. With security breaches or even building a new Health care website, there are unknowns. You can't predict when someone is going to steal your data or how they are going to do it outside of a few tech guys that know how their systems work and whos warnings go unheard. EA had everyone screaming at them to not use DRM but they did anyway. They were warned that if they did use DRM that servers would be maxed out on launch day. They claimed that they were prepared for it but obviously they were not. They were warned and people begged for them to listen but they didn't and come launch day, everything they were warned about happened. It wasn't a minor hiccup either as it took a month for everything to be sorted out.

    If that's not a screw up, I don't know what is.

    1. Re:I nominate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Sim City 4 screwup is even larger than DRM servers.

      They claimed the need the servers to simulate a total lot of the cities and that this was too much for the average PC. So the need to simulate the cities on the server. That was a lie. Sim City 4 is not really a good simulation, it works with very simplified models which create all kinds of odd occurances in the cities (which are totally unrealistic). For example? They simulate Sims in packs of 1000s, so skyscrapers are empty when one "sim pack" leaves. Every Sim drives the shortest route to the closest(!) place of work and also from there to the closest (!) free house. That leads to jammed roades even if a bypass freeway is near (and empty), this leads to entire regions where people cannot find work even if there's a lot of shops, these simplified simulations lead to all kinds of stupidity in a game that claims to be a "simulation".

      Everyone said their maps are too small. They ignored it and now people complain the maps are too small.

      People did want to build their city, but now are forced to build several small ones in their "regions", I guess the developers and publishers had the wet dream to create a large, buzzing online environment where ten people each build their small, specialised city in their own region and happily working together. But totally neglected that their audience wants to build their own megacity, not ten small pieces or one small piece and work with someone else.

      Sim City 4 is acutally a bigger screwup than you make it out to be and what sets this apart from other "bad" games are two things: First the lies and the deliberate deception of game magazines and customers before the release who much the game would actually simulate. Second, the screwups are not issues of bad implementation or limited budget of a small developer who planned and wanted too much. Many of the really big, bad issues of this games are actually working as designed. They are not bad code, incompetence of a few coders, bad planning what you can do, but fundamentally wrong strategy, misunderstanding what the franchise is, the attempt to turn it into something that cannot work with the franchise and planning from the very core by the publisher and game designers.

      So yes, I do say Sim City 4 fully counts and EA/Maxis screwed up much more and on a much deeper level than parent is giving them credit for.

    2. Re:I nominate: by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Were you going for a "shame there wasn't a 4th" joke there? (SimCity 4 is a different game from this year's version.)

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:I nominate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pedantry point: SimCity 4 was previous in the series released in 2003, this one is called just "SimCity".

      Non-pedantry point: despite all this shit and all the negative opinions on the Internet, it sold 2 million copies - just like SimCity 4 or Civilization III. Or 200k copies more than Quake or half a million more than Duke Nukem 3D or twice as many as BioShock.

      That's the thing, people keep lapping it up, so calling it "mishap" doesn't really cut it when it keeps printing money.

    4. Re:I nominate: by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      Of interest: A group interview with the developers of SimCity months before the release date. They were told by thousands of people that DRM was a no-go.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    5. Re:I nominate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, very apparently and obviously I'm confusing the two. It would be a) a pretty lame joke and b) factually wrong if I actually spoke about SC4 - here's the corrected version:

      The current Sim City screwup is even larger than DRM servers.

      They claimed the need the servers to simulate a total lot of the cities and that this was too much for the average PC. So the need to simulate the cities on the server. That was a lie. Sim City is not really a good simulation, it works with very simplified models which create all kinds of odd occurances in the cities (which are totally unrealistic). For example? They simulate Sims in packs of 1000s, so skyscrapers are empty when one "sim pack" leaves. Every Sim drives the shortest route to the closest(!) place of work and also from there to the closest (!) free house. That leads to jammed roades even if a bypass freeway is near (and empty), this leads to entire regions where people cannot find work even if there's a lot of shops, these simplified simulations lead to all kinds of stupidity in a game that claims to be a "simulation".

      Everyone said their maps are too small. They ignored it and now people complain the maps are too small.

      People did want to build their city, but now are forced to build several small ones in their "regions", I guess the developers and publishers had the wet dream to create a large, buzzing online environment where ten people each build their small, specialised city in their own region and happily working together. But totally neglected that their audience wants to build their own megacity, not ten small pieces or one small piece and work with someone else.

      Sim City is acutally a bigger screwup than you make it out to be and what sets this apart from other "bad" games are two things: First the lies and the deliberate deception of game magazines and customers before the release who much the game would actually simulate. Second, the screwups are not issues of bad implementation or limited budget of a small developer who planned and wanted too much. Many of the really big, bad issues of this games are actually working as designed. They are not bad code, incompetence of a few coders, bad planning what you can do, but fundamentally wrong strategy, misunderstanding what the franchise is, the attempt to turn it into something that cannot work with the franchise and planning from the very core by the publisher and game designers.

      So yes, I do say Sim City fully counts and EA/Maxis screwed up much more and on a much deeper level than parent is giving them credit for.

    6. Re:I nominate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True... memories of days gone by sold 2 million copies of THIS... the problem is THIS will (or should) stop the next copy from selling that much.

    7. Re:I nominate: by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      Sure on paper it was a success, but take away the problems, the online boy cots, the bad press, add reviewers telling everyone how awesome this game is and you should buy it now. How many more copies would it have sold? Also, how many of those 2 million customers think that Simcity 2014 or what ever the next version will be called, is going to be worth the same hassles?

  16. Nokia by jbernardo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know, it's a slow motion train wreck that started in 2011, but the death by Elop was consummated only in 2013, with the fire sale to Microsoft.

    1. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? More than Blackberry? It's sales of smartphones actually went up, which is way more than can be said for BB.

    2. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nokia were dead long before Elop had the reins, he just tried to change the dieing horses direction....unsuccessfully. Though arguably they did do quite well the last 12 months gaining back some market share with the Lumia line.

    3. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2004 it started...long long long before Elop

      Captcha was "precise" ....

    4. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Nokia is not sold to Microsoft... yet
      furthermore only the mobile division is on sale...
      and the rest of Nokia may begin manufacturing mobile phones after 2 years.

    5. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They basically sold ALL of their infrastructure and independent manufacturing capacity. Now they are just another design company that doesn't build their own hardware or have their own OS. They pissed away all of their competitive advantage for nothing, but making some executives alot of money. those that cared about the company already jettisoned their shares. all that is left is the vultures expecting a fat payoff from Microsoft.

    6. Re:Nokia by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I would consider it a "mishap" as that implies it was accidental. Many here believe the plan for MS was to torpedo Nokia so that it would be cheaper for them to buy the remains of Nokia once Trojan horse Elop was done.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    7. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there was any actual positive development wrt Lumia, EXCEPT if one considers pre-Lumia slump caused by Elop's killing of Maemo/Meego line of products. So at best he effected a sort of Dead Cat Bounce.

    8. Re:Nokia by jbernardo · · Score: 1

      Not that many, it seems. I already got that comment modded "troll" and "flamebait".

      I just wish those modders would have instead had the honesty to explain how in their views the destruction of Nokia's mobile business, from #1 smartphone and phone builder in the world with over 50% of the market in the beginning of 2011 to the current pitiful state, with a global share in the single digits and forced to sell their mobile division to Microsoft, is anything but a disaster.

      I am not writing about Microsoft and Windows Phone, but about Nokia. And for Nokia Elop's "strategy" was a total disaster.

  17. Windows 8.1 by dubdays · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fail. Enough said.

  18. Website makeover by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Without a doubt, the biggest tech failure of the year is slashdot's new mobile site, and the horendous beta desktop site. I can't imagine the motivation behind the flashy, slow, non-functional mess. If classic.slashdot.org ever goes away, so too will I.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Website makeover by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      Could not agree more, somehow a week ago I got directed to the beta site. All I could think was "What the FUCK are you guys doing", Slashdot has gotten worse and worse with each new version but if that shit that is in beta goes live this place will become a ghost town.

    2. Re:Website makeover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can only recommend: pixelcity.com/s

      In that way should be slashdot!! Clean, fast... Just text.

      NOTE: I got to know about this from another slashdot post long ago :)

    3. Re:Website makeover by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Except that's just a striped down front page. Managing the horde of comments is the challenging part, and they made no attempt to do so.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Website makeover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot agree more. The beta site is great if one wants a SEO-spammy style blog type of interface for cat pictures, but for usability, it is pretty botched up and absolutely worthless for looking at any amount of decent threads.

      I give props to Slashdot/Dice Holdings though. The previous UI is still available, and that is a big saving grace.

    5. Re:Website makeover by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Ya, get rid of the ugly, round-cornered green rectangles, and instead use nice crisp, proper ones, just like a 7th grader in a novice programming class might.

      Design a product, gentlemen. Quit screwing with stuff for the sake of screwing with it.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:Website makeover by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Without a doubt, the biggest tech failure of the year is slashdot's new mobile site, and the horendous beta desktop site. I can't imagine the motivation behind the flashy, slow, non-functional mess. If classic.slashdot.org ever goes away, so too will I.

      Word.

      --
      Be seeing you...
  19. how about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the slashdot redesign?

  20. iOS 7 by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple basically threw away everything that made iOS look approachable and polished.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:iOS 7 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My girlfriend wanted an iPad Air for xmas, and when I suggested a Nexus 7 she thought I was just being cheap... So I got her one. I'm not that familiar with iOS or previous iPads but it was pretty disappointing out of the box.

      The box itself has the iPad, a USB charger and a cable. That's it. Not even headphones or a cleaning cloth or a stand or something. Turning the iPad on the first thing you see is a white screen that shows up how uneven the backlight is at the edges of the screen perfectly. The set up process is rather long... She set it to Chinese so I couldn't read all of it, but considering she already had an Apple account for her iPhone 4 I would have expected a single log-in to be pretty much all that was required. It seems to duplicate a lot of questions too, like asking you for interface language, then keyboards, then location... on a device with GPS, wifi and mobile network access.

      Once you get into the main OS it is slick enough, as smooth as my Nexus 5. None of her apps were installed though, she had to do that manually. That seems to be the way of iOS: it makes you work, do everything manually. For example, when you install an app it just dumps the icon on the home screen in the order you installed it. There isn't an app tray, no alphabetical list. You have to organize all apps yourself, sort and categorize them. No widgets, so you have to open an app to get some tiny bit of information. The notification area only has basic controls so most notifications require opening an app too. When you want to move data from app to app there is no simple sharing mechanism, it's a save/switch/load or copy/switch/paste operation.

      The UI is inconsistent too. Maybe this is an iOS7 thing, I don't know. For example, there is no back button, so backing out or cancelling things is handled differently by each app. In some apps it isn't even obvious what is a button and what isn't, which is an issue for Android as well but at least you can always just hit back if you don't want to do something.

      I suppose it's okay as a tablet. You can learn to use it. Not having used iOS extensively I assumed most of the issues I knew about were geek things that normal people didn't care about, but actually a lot of it is basic usability issues. I guess with all the hype I was surprised, I expected more. Definitely expected more for the money.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:iOS 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I just did the same. It brought all my stuff from my phone.

      And being an android developer, I can state that that thing is years behind. Sucks badly.

    3. Re:iOS 7 by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      I just wanted to offer some explanations for some of what you're talking about. I'm not really setting out to defend it, just explain it, since I agree with many of your observations.

      I know the iPhones come with a cleaning cloth and headphones with an in-line mic for use on calls. I'd assume the iPad comes with a cleaning cloth as well, likely tucked away in the back of one of the packages included in the box just like it is with the iPhones (I seem to recall it being folded neatly in the back of the package that had the manual or something).

      A single login really is all that's required if you've enabled iCloud backups, which have been around since iOS 5, if memory serves. It'll simply restore all of your apps exactly as they were on your old device onto the new one, along with settings, data, etc.. If you don't have that enabled for some reason, then that means that you've either chosen to stick with iTunes backups (which you can use to do a restore as well, though they're more of a hassle) or not doing backups at all (in which case you're on your own).

      Asking which keyboard you want to use after selecting Chinese as your language makes sense, given that there are several you may want to choose from, depending on your preference. If she had selected English, I'm fairly certain it doesn't prompt you the same way, though I may be mistaken. And asking you for your keyboard preferences before asking you to log in makes sense, since your login info might rely on input from a character set other than whatever default keyboard they might have chosen for you would have.

      I don't believe it prompts you for a location during setup. Rather, as I recall, it prompts you for whether or not you want to enable Location Services (i.e. the location-tracking technologies you're talking about), since by default all Apple devices have that functionality disabled in order to protect the privacy of the user. Since that functionality is important for a lot of features, however, they prompt you during setup to opt-in to having Location Services enabled.

      iOS 7 very much so has some issues with being clear about what is or isn't a button, since they removed a lot of the chrome indicating what users can or cannot interact with. Apple has a tendency to swing a bit too far whenever they completely overhaul a design, and then tone it down a bit with their subsequent iterations, and iOS 7 is no exception (see also: Final Cut Pro X, Mac OS X 10.0, the 2013 iWork overhaul, etc.). For instance, when OS X 10.0 originally came out in 2001, it had transparency and glow effects out the wazoo that were horrible for usability (but which they kept since the eye candy was a major selling point at the time). They started showing more restraint and toning the effects down by 10.2, and that trend continued until we've generally hit a point of equilibrium where they're only present inasmuch as they actually assist usability (which is why Mac fans got a chuckle out of Vista fans touting Aero's transparency effects, since OS X had already been down the path of overdone transparency and come back after realizing what a bad idea it was). Of course, they always find new things to overdo, be it brushed aluminum or this recent trend of minimalistic text-based interfaces.

      That said, I wouldn't say that the back button is a point of inconsistency, though I can certainly see why it'd seem that way if you're coming from Android. With the exception of games or apps that have fully custom UIs, the back button is essentially always in the top left corner of the screen on iOS. The difference with Android, however, is that iOS' back button is more like Android's Up button in terms of functionality (i.e. it takes the user back through a hierarchically organized stack of screens, staying within the current app, whereas Android's Back button takes a user back through a chronologically organized stack of screens, potentially jumping between apps), and apps label the button with whatever the user will be going back to, rather than just the g

    4. Re:iOS 7 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarifications. It's interesting what you say about iCloud backups. I could tell she was getting frustrated with all the questions and just wanted to use the thing, so perhaps she never activated it. It did import get contracts though.

      Having said that, surely you don't need to back your apps up. On Android when you log in they obviously have a list of what apps you bought or installed so the Play app just downloads the compatible ones for your new device.

      The main impression I got is that the home button is overworked. When she couldn't see how to go back she just went to the home screen and reopened the app. There was a huge amount of app switching just to handle things like IM messages, and because there is no chronological history when you are finished responding you don't just go back to the original app you were in. I take your point about it being simple, but it seems like it's too simple. Almost insulting to the user.

      During setup she was asked which country she was in. Yesterday i noticed some shops selling of piles of third party cables incredibly cheap because they didn't work after the latest update. She wanted a spare for charging and the Apple ones are rather expensive and don't come in really short (100mm) or long versions. It seems like you can't just buy a peripheral or a accessory in confidence because a software update might break it. We feel locked in to an expensive revenue stream.

      One other interesting thing I noticed. She installed an alternative app store almost immediately. It just links back to the Apple app store, but she said it was easier to find the things she wanted on. It looked like you could watch TV and movies as well as download apps.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:iOS 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are saying is almost all incorrect and/or deliberately misleading.

      1. If you log in to your existing account during setup, it will setup all your apps and stuff for you. Not Apple's fault if you failed to use that option.
      2. Your claims of uneven backlighting are not supported by any reviews or anything, and I have not personally found that there are any notable issues with backlight evenness.
      3. It is asking permission to use your location data during setup. It gets it location data the GPS, you don't give it your location manually. You do give it your language preference, because it would be silly to set your language based on the GPS data.
      4. Why in the hell would you expect a tablet to come with a stand or headphones??? I guess a cleaning cloth might be expected, but note that most other tablets don't include this lately anyway (I guess they assume everyone already has a bunch of them).

      The other stuff you are complaining about is idiotic and just indicates that you never used the platform.

    6. Re:iOS 7 by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Yeah, iCloud backups don't literally backup your apps, though you can "restore" your apps from an iCloud backup, since the backups effectively just contain a pointer to the app in the App Store. Same sort of thing you're talking about with Android, in essence.

      The home button is definitely used a lot. It's just one of those differences with Android.

      Regarding Lightning-based peripherals, you can buy with confidence so long as they are officially licensed products, which you can tell, because they are marked as MFi (Made for iPhone/iPod/iPad). Apple's been getting some bad PR after a few faulty knock-off chargers in China electrocuted a couple of iPhone users to death, so they've been clamping down in any way they can on the use of unlicensed products. Lightning cables come with chips in them that can be authenticated before they're able to be used, so while Apple has generally been content to leave them alone in the past, they've started clamping down recently on any unlicensed ones in an effort to prevent this sort of PR disaster from occurring again.

      That said, if you're looking for some spare cables, try the usual culprits for grabbing spare cables, such as Amazon Basics or Monoprice. Both are MFi, and they come in a variety of sizes that Apple doesn't offer, as well as at a price point that is far better than what Apple offers.

      Also, it's interesting that it asked what country she was in. I didn't recall that it did that, but I'm upgrading to an iPhone 5S from my iPhone 4 once the 5S arrives in a few days (it was supposed to arrive earlier today from AT&T, but delivery has been pushed back to Thursday now), so I'll try to remember to follow up with you on any other places where I was incorrect or where I might have some new information/perspective.

      There are some apps that essentially just re-skin the App Store, since all of the data in it is publicly available and parseable, and it sounds like that's what she's using (and that it might provide some additional functionality too, which actually sounds pretty neat...I'd be interested if you know what its name is, since it might be worth checking out). I'm not aware of any alternative app stores akin to Cydia that can be installed without first jailbreaking.

    7. Re:iOS 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can your girlfriend can't figgure out an ipad you may want to consider what you're doing with your life.

      I handed my ipad to my Luddite, computer hating, non-powered-mechanical-typwritter-using grandmother for 30 minutes and she came home with one in an apple store bag not 3 hours later. She doesn't own a cell phone. (She likes her old rotary pre-bell-breakup telephones just fine. Four-prong-to-RJ11 adapters and all). Yet, she has an ipad with 3G.

      I had a great conversation with here over the holidays. She traded up to an air, and now has a mini too. (So I guess she's got LTE now too)

      It's a tool. It lets people use the internet. It's not some techno-fetish item to tickle your geek boner.

  21. ...and the winner is: by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Tech Companies" for allowing the NSA infiltration for fear of the federal and state governments frowning upon them and shifting their privileges to other industries and companies. It's like a no-choice NDA; it's just put on you without your agreement or consent, but with an expectation of fulfillment or consequence. For shame no decent leaks came from Google, Apple, Microsoft, random users/hackers/crackers, designers and manufacturers, etc. before Snowden. Only now companies position themselves with the product/customer, saying they were forced but are glad they can admit to (and hopefully reform) it. Strange and mistrustful times.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    1. Re:...and the winner is: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd say RSA specifically. It has been revealed that the NSA paid them for a backdoor and that they recommended insecure algorithms to customers. Their core business was undermined and shown to be flawed... It's hard to imagine how any company could survive that, although somehow they have.

      At least all the other companies were attacked by the NSA, and didn't just open the door for them. At least, as far as we know.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  22. The NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not know where to start. That they use tech to collect all that information - or that they have no idea at all what to do with it or how to actually use it to prevent all those things that are claimed they need to prevent.

    Given the money spent and the rights and principles of freedom, democracy and enlightenment violated we're seeing very little actual return but a lot of very questionable things...

    They (and their allied services from the UK, Canada, etc) are a rolling mishap of bad politics and technological clustering... it's like an obese person is stuffing even more chocolate in their belly, without thinking, plan or anything else but the will to go on stuffing choloclate for the sake of fighting the threat of chocolate being unhealthy to others.

  23. International Space Station by savuporo · · Score: 1

    Well, ISS weighs around 400 tons, a bit more now. One of it's coolant pumps spontaneously developed undocumented features recently, and the crew mounted a fix up mission with somewhat makeshift EVA suits and other merryness right around the time when everyone was stuffing their faces around christmas tables.

    So if we are talking about big mishaps, thats pretty big, coming in at 400 tons and whizzing about at 7km/s overhead. Fortunately, the fix worked.
     

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    1. Re:International Space Station by savuporo · · Score: 2

      Actually come to think of it, Proton faceplanting spectacularly at Baikonur might be a bit bigger, in terms of explosive power

      http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/07/01/spectacular-video-of-russian-proton-failure/

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
  24. The Year No One Learned From Mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2013 is notable for being the year the technology industry did not learn from its mistakes. There's no one single worst mistake. It's like the year Time magazine put a mirror on the cover - the entire industry is to blame!

    Windows 8. Gnome 3. Unity. iOS 7. What is the lesson? Users do not want gratuitous change that destroys workflow patterns and muscle memory, and yet technology companies keep cramming them down our throats. In 2013, Windows 8.1 came out and it was just more of the same. iOS 7 destroyed everything we knew about Apple's "it just works" usability, and threw in a snow-blindness photo browser with a white background just to put salt in the wounds. The only thing we can look forward to is more change for the sake of change.

    Healthcare.gov is just a symptom of a dysfunctional system of outsourcing to contractors who skim their money off the top, and then hire technology experts with whatever is left, insuring any technology project is going to fail. No one seems to care about quality. That's why software projects fail. Until structural changes are made in how technology is created, nothing will change.

    Lessons were there to be learned from, but in 2013, forget it - no one cared.

    1. Re:The Year No One Learned From Mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but I think the NSA setting up a system that made Snoden's caper possible takes the cigar.

      Also, I'd personally like to nominate the Yahoo groups 'upgrade' for (dis-)honorable mention.

    2. Re:The Year No One Learned From Mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Users do not want change...bring back the Program Manager, now!

  25. Wish it was just that by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Wish it was just that.

    Page source = 128KB.
    ctrl+a, ctrl+c, ctrl+v of page yields 16KB.

    Is that other 112KB of CSS really necessary?

    --
    I come here for the love
  26. Blackberry 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have the Z10. I don't play games. The phone was built around communication. E-mail, face book, phone calls, BBM. I feel sorry for anyone that chooses Android or iOS over a new Z10 or Z30 if they use it primarily for communications.

    There are less games/apps but I can do everything I want to do with it. There are enough games to keep me entertained. And with the exception of no Netflix, it does everything most would want. Thing is, you can install Android apps on the phone and support for that improves with every OS release.

    The phone's user interface also shows how last gen Android and iOS are.

    1. Re:Blackberry 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Z10 and kind of like it, but after Snowdengate nothing less than full GPL will suffice for critical software such as an operating system, communications and ecnryption software. I've gone as far as ditching my iMac and going back to desktop Linux. I'm waiting for the Neo900 open hardware to become available in 2014 and will be installing ReplicantOS on it. It is an Android distribution based on Cyanogenmod with all non-GPL licensed software and drivers replaced with GPL licensed equivalents where available, and the FDroid app store which contains only GPL licensed Free Software. I've been rooting for BlackBerry for years and was very excited about the launch of BB10, but ultimately I don't trust them not to have government spy tech built-in like iOS and Google's Android (such as maintaining a secret database of my location 24x7x365). Somewhere on their website they said that it is more secure than Android because it is closed source. They say open source is inherently insecure. We have a fundamental disagreement and so I can't buy their products or services.

    2. Re:Blackberry 10 by Octorian · · Score: 1

      The problems with this platform all stem from marketing and distribution channel issues, which I hope they can find a way to fix. The product itself is quite solid, and continually improving. Its just that its still having to fight against a product image of what the company was selling 3 years ago, and they're not meeting that challenge as directly as they need to be.

  27. Isn't it always? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought that 'not understanding the business' and 'not caring about the business' were core requisites for any manager out there.

  28. ObamaCare website by enharmonix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whether you agree w/ the Affordable Care Act or not, it is legally required that everybody have insurance. When you've got a government mandate to use a website* and that website doesn't work, that's a pretty big problem.

    * Yes, I am aware there are other ways to sign up. But a) have you ever had to wait for service at any office run by the government? and b) isn't this 2013? almost 2014?

  29. Not really by a mile by eclectro · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The political consequences will last for years. Coming soon: the doctor shortages.

    Spoken like a true TeaParty ideologue. While the initial rollout of healthcare.gov was an unmitigated mess, the recovery will in time be recognized as one of the greatest tech successes. The initial design goal was for the website to be able to accommodate 50,000 simultaneous visitors. On Monday December 23rd the website was supporting 83,000 concurrent users. About 2 million people have enrolled into healthcare plans, 1.1 million through healthcare.gov. Quite a substantial number from those six people that enrolled the first day!

    Regardless of what you think of the individual mandate or health care reform, that is a remarkable tech turn around - taking millions of lines of pre-alpha code in October to production status by the end of the year. Here is a short video interview with New Relic, one of the companies behind the turnaround.

    For all the bad politics our government might have, do not underestimate its propensity to solve a technical problem.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Not really by a mile by PapayaSF · · Score: 0

      Those "millions of enrollments" include:

      • – people signing up for Medicaid (which was already going broke and suffering from doctor shortages)
      • – people who have a plan in their shopping cart but haven't paid for it.
      • – people who think they have signed up, but their information never got to the insurer in usable form.

      The number not in those categories is still unknown. Let's see what the real numbers are when the administration decides to release them.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
  30. Fukushima by jasenj1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power plant continues to be mismanaged. Incompetence and corruption abound and give a giant black eye to nuclear power in general.

    healthcare.gov is a great example of corruption in government contracts and the cost of rolling out something that isn't done. Maybe nerds around the world will now have another line for over-eager managers: "Do you want another healthcare.gov?"

    - Jasen.

  31. Ouya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .....just Ouya.

  32. Just as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Healthcare.gov is performing, has performed, exactly as designed and intended. People that really still believe the PPACA had anything to do with healthcare and not unlimited power and control over the citizens amazes me.

  33. Missing Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. Polls of 2013

  34. Tech or management debacle? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Were these tech debacles or management debacles? Healthcare.gov was a management debacle. As for the rest, I'm not familiar enough to judge but most sound like management debacles as well.

    A tech debacle is when the technical people have everything they need to do their jobs and they screw it up.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  35. I'm sure you know this, but ... by dbIII · · Score: 2

    That's the responsibility which comes from taking on a contract that pays so well. If you can't get the resources together for such a thing you are not supposed to bid. If you don't have the expertise to communicate with the stakeholders then you are supposed to get people in who can or you are not supposed to bid.
    Whoever accepts the bid has only the track record of the bidder and their word to go by. Unless the bidder has a terrible, or complete lack of reputation, you can't really blame the person accepting the bid. The above poster has gone far beyond that - blaming the person that employs the person that accepted the bid of the people that fucked up. That's an insanely long chain of blame. As such it tells us that the above poster has an axe to grind and is grasping at straws to do it, or has been been conned by someone doing so.

    So just cheerleading.

    A complete waste of time on a technically leaning site where plenty of us don't give a shit about Republicans or Democrats but would like to hear about which contractors to avoid like the plague (or SAP, or IBM).

    1. Re:I'm sure you know this, but ... by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      Am I "the above poster" you are referring to? I can't tell. Sure, there are lots of lessons there for IT and project management types that are purely non-political, but as I said elsewhere, the Healthcare.gov mess in inextricably entwined with politics. Whether you care about politics or not, it's not off-topic to talk about how it make this disaster.

      Whoever accepts the bid has only the track record of the bidder and their word to go by. Unless the bidder has a terrible, or complete lack of reputation, you can't really blame the person accepting the bid.

      In this case, the contractor had a bad track record, but they had crony connections with the White House.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    2. Re:I'm sure you know this, but ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Am I "the above poster" you are referring to? I can't tell

      So now he's not only cheerleading but pretending to be stupid - hopefully just to be sarcastic.

      They ALL have crony connections. That's what people in politics DO after they get thrown out. A crony is the price of admission and most places will have someone from the two major parites.

  36. HIRE ME!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can do a MUCH better job of web dev. And. I NEED THE WORK. Alternately, y'all fellow tax payers can support me!