Slashdot Mirror


No Question: Snowden Was 2013's Most Influential Tech Figure

Nerval's Lobster writes "Lots of CEOs, entrepreneurs, and developers made headlines in 2013—but in hindsight, Edward Snowden will likely stand as this year's most influential figure in technology. In June, Snowden began feeding top-secret documents detailing the National Security Agency's surveillance programs to The Guardian and other newspapers. Much of that information, downloaded by Snowden while he served as a system administrator at an NSA outpost in Hawaii, suggested that the U.S. government swept up massive amounts of information on ordinary Americans as part of its broader operations. Whatever one's feelings on the debate over privacy and security, it's undeniable that Snowden's documents have increased general awareness of online vulnerability; but whether that's sparked an increased use of countermeasures—including encryption tools—is another matter entirely. On the developer side of things, when you consider the sheer amount of money, time, and code that'll be invested over the next few years in encryption and encryption-breaking, it's clear that Snowden's influence will be felt for quite some time to come—even if the man himself is trapped in Russian exile."

18 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. I Think I Was ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it was the guy mentioned in this article.

  2. Feel free to continue the recursion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it was the guy mentioned in this article.

    I think it was the guy mentioned in this article.

  3. You can smell the fear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that the federal government has. And it's not the muslim jihadists they're worried about. It's us.

    1. Re:You can smell the fear... by deconfliction · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...that the federal government has. And it's not the muslim jihadists they're worried about. It's us.

      Indeed, and since it seems so apropos to link to and quote slashdot today-

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4606965&cid=45806859
      "
      The insecurity is on the side of the NSA.
      They wouldn't go through such hoops if we didn't have the most powerful freedom tool ever, namely the Internet.

      Use it properly and they shall vanish.
      "

  4. Slashdot linking to Slashdot by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why the hell is this here? There have already been like 50 other stories about how important Snowden was/is and now /. feels it's important to post a ridiculously redundant story of their own that is JUST A BUNCH OF OTHER LINKS to other news sites? WTF /.?

    Seriously...

    wtf???

    1. Re:Slashdot linking to Slashdot by deconfliction · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it is getting ridiculous. All of this info has been suspected, and the paranoids were already taking steps to protect themselves. Most average people don't care and have much bigger issues to deal with that really will affect their lives.

      Thing is, "most average people" aren't the ones who shape human society for the next generation. Edward Snowden did that.

      It isn't like he invented something cool, advanced society through developing new technologies, or accomplished anything. He went in with an agenda and was able to hack the system from the inside, now he has some power and fame.

      I like to also think his Agenda was to "invent" a cool new world, where instead of NSA spook-community running completely rampant and rough-shod toward a dystopian neo-Stasi future, we now get to know and mitigate the threat to the 4th ammendment that they represent. That's is a freaking cool invention if you ask me. I'll take it over the crap that "most average people" like yourself churn out.

    2. Re:Slashdot linking to Slashdot by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      When your house is burning down around you, the topic may come up a bit more frequently than you'd like. But some situations are so dire, so tragic, that when they occur they eclipse all that surround them.

    3. Re:Slashdot linking to Slashdot by deconfliction · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know I shouldn't feed trolls, but...

      "You want to call him the most influential person in politics, fine... but tech? I think we can do better."

      Are you KIDDING me? He may not personally design the devices and write the code that we are using for the next 10 years, but *you can sure bet* that he seriously impacted those designs and that code by revealing the proof and scope, if not the existence of the insecurities that were rampant in the prior devices and code.

      We will be buying fundamentally more secure devices with fundamentally more secure programming in the coming years, due *primarily* to Snowden's revelations. Dinging him for being more like the tech-CEO who merely gets to decide the direction of development instead of writing the actual code seems just plain silly. Compared to the influence all the other tech-CEOs had in 2013 on the future of computing technology, I'd say Snowden wins hands down. No question. It's a different tech _landscape_ today because of him. What other tech person had a greater change on the nature of the technology we will use in the coming decade?

  5. NSA Has Full Access to the iPhone by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Der Spiegel reported on the NSA’s access to smartphones and, in particular, the iPhone back in September. Today, these reports expand to the NSA’s apparent ability to access just about all your iPhone data through a program called DROPOUTJEEP, according to security researcher Jacob Appelbaum.

    The NSA claims a 100% success rate in installing the malware on iPhones. Functionality includes the ability to remotely push/pull files from the device. SMS retrieval, contact list retrieval, voicemail, geolocation, hot mic, camera capture, cell tower location, etc. Command, control and data exfiltration can occur over SMS messaging or a GPRS data connection. All communications with the implant will be covert and encrypted.

    It is unknown whether the backdoor was developed in cooperation with Apple, but Appelbaum doubts it. Video of Appelbaum's full speech is included in the article.

    1. Re:NSA Has Full Access to the iPhone by Chaz12 · · Score: 2

      The NSA and any national intelligence forces have ZERO access to messages that are encrypted 256 at source and only decrypted using long (eg 25 character non-dictionary) passwords that have been exchanged manually. Even a SuperComputer would take hundreds of thousands of years or more to crack these, and paper messages exchanged manually bypass ANY security altogether! So either stone-age bits of paper or very high tech encryption will suffice. If there is an additional random insert of characters based on a further password, decryption is totally impossible!

    2. Re:NSA Has Full Access to the iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if you're typing in the cyphertext and doing the encryption/decryption off-device.
      If they've got root on your phone, no amount of encryption will prevent access to the data (hint, your phone has to decrypt it at some point so you can use it).

  6. Most influential in Technology? by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most influential maybe in terms of politics, but technology? What was the technology he pioneered or employed? Copy? Not very influential in my opinion.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Most influential in Technology? by sribe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most influential maybe in terms of politics, but technology? What was the technology he pioneered or employed?

      Nothing. But his actions will have a huge influence on the future development and use of technology, thus it is reasonable to call him influential ;-)

  7. Re:So sad .... by Nyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So sad that a criminal is listed as an influential person. Especially one so cowardly and spineless as to flee instead of actually staying and working towards what he believed in. I hope he lives to a ripe old age and has to spend his life constantly hiding in the shadows in fear. In countries with worse personal liberties and freedoms than the one he fled from.

    I'm sorry you feel this way. Very few people here feel that way, in fact, the only people here that feel that way you do usually work for the NSA.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  8. Re:So sad .... by jeff13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, you say 'the only people who feel this way usually work for the NSA'? I disagree.

    Everyone at the NSA is aware of their "First Commandment"; “Thou Shalt Not Eavesdrop on Americans Without a Court Warrant.” Something that went out the window during the Bush Administration under Gen. Hayden (former NSA directors have stated publically he broke the (FISA) law. One even flat out said he should have been court-marshialed). Snowden isn't the first to blow the whistle over at the NSA in the last few years, Thomas Drake being one I can think of off the top of my head and he was a senior official at the NSA! So I think the people at the NSA rtake their jobs seriously, their directors not so much. I'd lay blame where it's due I think.

    Oh and what happened to Thomas Drake? Jailed! as were others (there were, what, like, 5 people from the NSA who have spoken out since around 2006? That's a lot!) I have to ask myself, if I were Snowden and watched senior officials being jailed for revealing the NSA is spying on everyone, would I skip town? You bet yer fat arse I would! I'd skip town, get all the docs to the newspapers, and make those rat bastards answer to the People!

  9. Re:Confused by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

    Because Slashdot has become a temple of the first Church of Snowden

  10. Re:Off-topic question by Strudelkugel · · Score: 2

    Snowden played this excessively smart, and that's the only reason he's sort of free now.

    I don't think Snowden is that smart or free. Today he does what the Russian government allows him to do. But consider the Russians have protesters in Moscow, protesters in Kiev, and suicide bombers in their midst. How long will the Russian government tolerate an icon for freedom from surveillance, especially given their history? I believe Snowden is in considerable danger.

    Another reference: Sergei Guriev

    Also Mikhail Khodorkovsky

    As for Snowden, I still think we know 10% or less of the story. There is a lot that does not make sense.

    --
    Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
  11. Re:Off-topic question by HBI · · Score: 2

    I don't think there is that much more to the Snowden story. The guy seems to be an idealist. Snowden is at risk in Russia, but he's at risk anywhere in the world. The US would like nothing better but to take him into custody. That's the sum total of his protection - his freedom amounts to thumbing a nose at the US government and pointing out its powerlessness. Same as the Soviet defectors back in the Cold War era.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.