Slashdot Mirror


BlackBerry Sues iPhone Keyboard Maker Typo

judgecorp writes "Typo Products, which makes a physical keyboard for the iPhone 5 and 5S is being sued by BlackBerry. The firm — co-founded by media personality Ryan Seacrest — provides an iPhone case which includes a physical keyboard, whose keys are sculpted very like those of a classic BlackBerry phone. 'From the beginning, BlackBerry has always focused on offering an exceptional typing experience that combines a great design with ergonomic excellence. We are flattered by the desire to graft our keyboard onto other smartphones, but we will not tolerate such activity without fair compensation for using our intellectual property and our technological innovations,' said Steve Zipperstein, BlackBerry’s General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer."

226 comments

  1. All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    who?

    1. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blackberry used to be a maker of devices that at first were glorified pagers, then started becoming phones. They had a good reputation for security, but BIS was demanded to be backdoored by India, and BES, well, just got shoved to the side by Exchange and SSL/TLS connections and Windows Mobile, then subsequently, iOS/Android devices.

    2. Re:All I can say to that is... by multisync · · Score: 4, Insightful

      who?

      Apparently he's a celebrity. Wikipedia says he's a radio personality and hosts a show called American Idol.

      I had to look it up too.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    3. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My xbox controller has a keyboard.. Maybe Blackberry invented that too!

    4. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      who?

      Apparently he's a celebrity. Wikipedia says he's a radio personality and hosts a show called American Idol.

      I had to look it up too.

      Steve Zipperstein?
      I thought he was a jewish porn star.

    5. Re:All I can say to that is... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      When I lived in Los Angeles, there was a radio announcer by that name. Is he the same person?

    6. Re:All I can say to that is... by multisync · · Score: 1

      Probably. It says he hosts "On Air with Ryan Seacrest, a popular morning radio show on KIIS-FM."

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    7. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      My xbox controller has a keyboard.. Maybe Blackberry invented that too!

      Unlikely, your Xbox controller has rounded edges, and therefore was invented by Apple.

    8. Re:All I can say to that is... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      If you actually look at the keyboard attachment, even the form is identical, the way the keys are molded, everything. Its not quite the same as rounded corners

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    9. Re:All I can say to that is... by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well for ages, Blackberry owners were raving about the quality of their keyboards, on how easy it was to type on such a small keyboard. Blackberry spent a lot of money and R&D to come up with that style, which also meant a lot of engineers got paid to do such work. Now just because blackberry is unfashionable it doesn't mean that a third party company and just go and steal their ideas. especially after Blackberry put the patent on it.
      I know slashdotters have I HATE PATTENTS mind set. But this isn't a software patent which is covered by Copyright law and Patent law, this is a hardware patent, of a physical invention. Where blackberry deserves credit for their design.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:All I can say to that is... by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Not exactly identical, a couple of keys on the right side are labeled differently. But hey, it's not like Blackberry's using it's keyboards lately...

    11. Re:All I can say to that is... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1, Insightful

      this is a hardware patent, of a physical invention. Where blackberry deserves credit for their design

      I would say that you are prejudging. The extent to which the look and feel of a keyboard can be protected by patent must be established by the courts. By the way, note: six keys on the bottom versus four.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    12. Re:All I can say to that is... by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

      Well, except that SSL / TLS will never be as secure as symmetric encryption with per-device keys. You're right that it got shoved to the side, but for what it did and was designed to do it was quite good. I feel like iOS / android is just now getting to where blackberry has been for ages, at least in enterprise messaging.

    13. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. He also has a show on 5FM in Johannesburg. He telecommutes.

      While I have no respect for this brand, this is clearly Blackberry clutching at straws -- the same kind of keyboards have been seen on numerous devices, such as Nokia, Samsung, and many others. Blackberry is just bullying this new brand. It just reinforces my opinion of Blackberry as being utterly finished, on the ropes, and willing to stoop to any low to make a buck.

    14. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what else is a "hardware" patent? Rounded corners.

      But it isn't that we hate patents, we just hate obvious patents, and ridiculously broad patents, and the less-easily-defined silly patents. And on the surface, this seems like none of the above. Though I could see some people arguing that this is one of the above.

    15. Re:All I can say to that is... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spending a bunch of money on R&D does not magically make something non-obvious. I'm not saying a court will necessarily determine that Blackberry's "invention" was obvious (because this seems to happen pretty rarely), but I am saying that I think that the concept is obvious, even if the specific implementation is not.

      Yes I think it's important to do research to figure out how big the keys on a keyboard of size X need to be. I also think it's important that a hammer has a handle of the right diameter. If Stanley spends $1 million to determine the perfect handle diameter for a hammer, I still don't think it makes sense to allow Stanley to have a patent for hammers with handles of that diameter.

    16. Re:All I can say to that is... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It only obvious because you have seen it in action...

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re:All I can say to that is... by mopower70 · · Score: 1

      who?

      Apparently he's a celebrity. Wikipedia says he's a radio personality and hosts a show called American Idol.

      I had to look it up too.

      That is some world-class hipsterism, right there. I tip my hat to you.

    18. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company with the poor idle lawyer to income ratio.

    19. Re:All I can say to that is... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Actually I haven't seen it in action. I've never used a blackberry or even seen a person using one up close. I am saying that this keyboard (as far as I know) doesn't contain any new inventions. It's just well designed from an ergonomic standpoint. While this does require effort to do well, I don't think it makes sense to allow patents on good ergonomic design for the same reason we don't allow patents on food recipes or fashion designs, or board game rules.

    20. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a hipster; I totally watch shit tv.

      But, critically, I'm not american. So I had no idea who ryan seacrest was.

      If someone had said the name to me; I'd have been like: "a Z grade celebrity?" (because I *had* heard the name before) but I didn't know if or what he did anything.

      Captcha: Cultural

    21. Re:All I can say to that is... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Actually I haven't seen it in action. I've never used a blackberry or even seen a person using one up close

      Yet I am confident enough to comment on whether this thing I have never seen contains any new inventions or not. Because I just know..

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    22. Re:All I can say to that is... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      That's some world class meta-hipsterism. I wag my finger at you.

    23. Re:All I can say to that is... by multisync · · Score: 1

      That is some world-class hipsterism, right there. I tip my hat to you.

      The twenty and thirty-something crowd where I work got a real kick out of your "hipster" comment. Yeah, I guess I'll have to get a fedora and some skinny jeans.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    24. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have contempt for the very idea of property. Saves a lot of boring discussions that way.

    25. Re:All I can say to that is... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1
      I think you need to improve your reading comprehension skills. Here is what I said:

      I am saying that this keyboard (as far as I know) doesn't contain any new inventions.

      And yes, I am confident in saying "IF any device has no novel inventions in it, and only contains good ergonomic design (which as far as I know includes this device), then it shouldn't be able to be patented."

      Note that this is slightly different than saying "I am confident that this device has no new inventions."

      If you know of any new inventions in the blackberry keyboard, I'd be happy to hear them. Even if there are some new inventions in blackberry's keyboard, this doesn't change my overall argument, it just means that it no longer applies to this specific keyboard.

    26. Re:All I can say to that is... by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      You know what else is a "hardware" patent? Rounded corners.

      Design patent, actually.

    27. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I haven't seen it in action. I've never used a blackberry or even seen a person using one up close

      Yet I am confident enough to comment on whether this thing I have never seen contains any new inventions or not. Because I just know..

      Which is pretty much what the PTO did when they awarded the patent. They have no scientific basis for deciding whether something is original or different. It's all based on handwaving. Except unlike a throwaway slashdot comment they cost the economy an extraordinary amount of money in artificial scarcity and legal fees.

    28. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      patent only lasts 10 years - if that keyboard design is more than 10 years old (which it is) - patent is no longer enforceable.

    29. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >But this isn't a software patent which is covered by Copyright law and Patent law, this is a hardware patent, of a physical invention. Where blackberry deserves credit for their design.

      If you dig down into it, hardware can be emulated with software and vice versa. They aren't very different. That is why stating something is a "physical invention" is a superficial distinction.

    30. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's no more ridiculous than Apple suing over rounded corners.

    31. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so in your opinion if someone doesn't know every two-bit celebrity out there, they are somehow a hipster? Sorry, but I think you've gotten that reversed. I, like GP, had heard the name before but also had no idea who the guy was; and I live in LA where KIIS FM is broadcast. The last DJ I know of from that station was Rick Dees, but that was back in the early 90s when I was just a dumb "hip" teenager. In fact, I didn't even know KIIS FM still existed, since the only radio stations I listen to these days are on AM.

    32. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you mean a couple of keys being transposed, yeah. Otherwise, they are identical. They even *admitted* to ripping off BlackBerry's design.

      Interviewer: So it’s the best thing about a BlackBerry, within the iPhone.

      Ryan Seacrest: That’s kind of how this came to fruition.

    33. Re:All I can say to that is... by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he really didn't help his company out by saying that. Being a handsome celeb doesn't mean he's the brightest bulb in the bunch. If you are going to blatantly steal another companys R&D, don't ever admit to it. May be he's too honest to be a spokesperson?

    34. Re:All I can say to that is... by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      Looking at the picture the size of the keys, the horizontal and vertical spacing between keys, and the way the keys are tilted all look identical to the BlackBerry Bold keyboard. Given BlackBerry's obsession with both keyboards and patents I suspect some of that would be covered.

    35. Re:All I can say to that is... by speedplane · · Score: 1

      I don't think it makes sense to allow patents on good ergonomic design for the same reason we don't allow patents on food recipes or fashion designs, or board game rules.

      Actually, board games, food recipes, and fashion designs are all patentable.

      Board Games: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/12/22/patenting-board-games-101/id=21356/
      Recipes: http://www.uspto.gov/inventors/independent/eye/201306/ADVICE.jsp
      Fashion: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/10/16/nike-sues-walmart-on-design-patents/id=217/

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    36. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(as far as I know) doesn't contain any new inventions. It's just well designed from an ergonomic standpoint. While this does require effort to do well, I don't think it makes sense to allow patents on good ergonomic design"

      The same could be said of the Apple 1, The apple ][ , The Macintosh..... the iPhone5S, etc.

    37. Re:All I can say to that is... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, we don't want everyone else to be forced to produce keyboards with metal spikes in the keys that deliver an electric shock as you type just to avoid patents on a comfortable design. Especially since the function largely dictates the form.

    38. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True... but I thought they were dead already and if not they should just die quietly and take their money for the keyboard quickly.

      Other companies should learn from Blackberry's mistakes... cough (Apple) cough.

      Making yourself irrelevant except to a minority of disillusioned users is not actually a good move.

    39. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The link you give for food recipes pretty much says that recipes *as most people understand them* are *not* patentable but Industrial food processes may be patentable.

    40. Re:All I can say to that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well for ages, Blackberry owners were raving about the quality of their keyboards, on how easy it was to type on such a small keyboard. Blackberry spent a lot of money and R&D to come up with that style, which also meant a lot of engineers got paid to do such work. Now just because blackberry is unfashionable it doesn't mean that a third party company and just go and steal their ideas. especially after Blackberry put the patent on it.
      I know slashdotters have I HATE PATTENTS mind set. But this isn't a software patent which is covered by Copyright law and Patent law, this is a hardware patent, of a physical invention. Where blackberry deserves credit for their design.

      Agreed, I am first to excoriate USPTO when another insane patent article is up, but in this case I would have to side with Blackberry. The groupthink displayed by Slashdotters is common.

    41. Re:All I can say to that is... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      For the things I listed, people in practice are unable to get patents because the novelty standard as set by the courts is either too low or too high.

      If the novelty standard is too high, then it is impossible for anyone to get a patent because it is too hard to prove that nothing like your product has ever existed before.

      If the novelty standard is too low, then anyone can circumvent your patent by trivially changing the design.

      So yes, you can technically pay for and try to get a patent in these areas, but for the most part this is just a waste of money, and that's why almost nobody does it.

      There is a quantifiable difference with these industries and one like the pharmaceutical industry that completely revolves around patents.

      Also ipwatchdog is probably not a reliable/unbiased source since it is run by a patent attorney, who stands to gain if people believe that patents are more effective/necessary than they are.

    42. Re:All I can say to that is... by qubezz · · Score: 1

      In Chris Rock voice: "hipsters looove not to know!"

    43. Re:All I can say to that is... by Khopesh · · Score: 1

      Actually, board games, food recipes, and fashion designs are all patentable. Board Games: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/12/22/patenting-board-games-101/id=21356/

      Hm, interesting; According to Copyright.gov, games cannot be protected under US copyright law. I had thought the same applied to patenting game mechanics, but I've lost my reference to that one.

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  2. Do those things actually sell? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that anyone who's used a decent touch screen would want a micro-qwerty. Admitted I have only used Blackberry keyboards occasionally, but they didn't strike me as very easy to use.

    1. Re:Do those things actually sell? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      it's way better for longer inputs.. 'cause you can see what you type and go by feel.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      it's way better for longer inputs.. 'cause you can see what you type and go by feel.

      That would explain why I didn't think much of it - I didn't use it for nearly long enough to be able to type by feel.

    3. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Imagix · · Score: 2

      Give me a choice between the touch-screen keyboard and a physical, I will pick the physical almost every time. (It would have to be a pretty bad physical keyboard for me to pick the touch-screen one...) I've used the Blackberry keyboards since the beginning of Blackberry. They've always been better than the touch-screen versions (Blackberry, Android, iOS, all of them). (Of course, this is all IMHO)

    4. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used to be like that as well (although never liked the BlackBerry keyboards). Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way.

    5. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried the touch screen of nearly every Android device I can find, and none are anywhere close to a physical keyboard. I can't stand BB, so I have a sliding keyboard case for my S3.

      Even Swype sucks in comparison.

    6. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Antipater · · Score: 2

      I don't know what qualifies as a "decent" touchscreen, but if they're out there I've never found one. I have never found a touchscreen that I was able to use without at least two typos per sentence. Large hands + small keys = no fun.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    7. Re:Do those things actually sell? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      The issue with Apple is that you don't have the choice of software keyboard.

      A physical keyboard isn't as interesting in Android, where you can Swype or Swift, or whatever.

    8. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      years back i had a palm treo pro that had a really nice little physical keyboard. i think the tactile response of real buttons made it easier for me to type.

    9. Re:Do those things actually sell? by csumpi · · Score: 0

      "I'm surprised that anyone who's used a micro-qwerty would want a touch screen keyboard."

      There, I fixed it for you.

    10. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To each their own. I'll take a physical keyboard over Swype any day.

    11. Re:Do those things actually sell? by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      It took me a long time to finally upgrade from a slider phone with a physical keyboard to one without. The physical keyboard gives tactile feedback and is much less sensitive to fat-fingered typing than any on-screen keyboard I've used... both of which make typing considerably faster. I would have gotten another slider phone, but they don't seem to make them anymore except for a few very low-end models.

    12. Re:Do those things actually sell? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      For some tasks, there's no substitute for a physical keyboard, if there were, we'd have have switched to them on computers everywhere.

      But that's not my point. My point is that on Android, where you can pick and choose between numerous on-screen keyboards, the option of a physical micro-keyboard isn't as big of a deal as it is on Apple, where you have exactly one system keyboard.

    13. Re:Do those things actually sell? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way.

      I have to second this ... I can type faster with Swype on a touch screen than I can with the key-press on the virtual keyboard.

      Obviously, nowhere near as fast as I can with a full-sized keyboard, but the spell out the word in a continuous motion works really well for me.

      My mother in law can't do it, because she finds she has to think about the key locations (she touch types, but doesn't consciously know where the keys are). For me, I think it's a pretty nice way to type.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to be like that as well (although never liked the BlackBerry keyboards). Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way.

      Exact opposite for me. I tried "swyping" for about 30 seconds before purging it from my phone with extreme prejudice. Regular QWERTY on a touchscreen is bad enough. I really want my H/W keyboard back.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    15. Re:Do those things actually sell? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, recently used my mother-in-law's phone over the holidays, and I have to say that I abhor the Apple keyboard. The keys always show upper case letters, which comping from somebody who's used to Android, I found this quite annoying. The only difference between "shift" being pressed is whether or not the arrow is filled in, and I can't tell you if filled in arrow means that the shift key is on or off.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    16. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved physical keyboards til I found the voice typing button on my phone. Click button, say a few sentences, correct if necessary, even quicker than swype. Still I feel weird talking to my phone, but it is so much faster its incredible.

    17. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't type without looking at the screen w/ Swype, but on a BlackBerry or Nokia or anything else w/ a physical keyboard? I can type one-handed without looking at the screen, so I can read the screen briefly and compose a reply in my head, then write it out as I'm walking elsehere without ending up nose-in-screen and forehead-in-lamppost.

    18. Re:Do those things actually sell? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Did you ever try MessagEase? It takes a little getting used to, but it's a lot easier to use for those who don't have emaciated, spindly little fingers.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    19. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, right, so large hands + microscopic bb keys = full of win ?

    20. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yeah... For me it was the same with sex. After 30 seconds, I didn't have an orgasm, so I just gave up on sex.

      More seriously, you are an idiot.

    21. Re:Do those things actually sell? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I used to be like that as well (although never liked the BlackBerry keyboards). Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way.

      I use swype as well. Far superior to normal onscreen keyboards. I still would prefer a physical keyboard. That Tactus keyboard that put out some prototype videos last July looks like a good solution. I don't see a single product featuring Tactus yet, though. Seems like it's been long enough that they should be in full swing if they were going to be.

    22. Re:Do those things actually sell? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I was a little hesitant about going for a phone with no buttons, but personally, It's been the best phone I've ever had. My phone without buttons (not and iPhone, but brand doesn't matter here) has actually lasted the longest of all my cellphones. In every other phone I've had, some of the buttons, or the flip of screen, or some other movable aspect of the phone brakes. When there's no moving parts on the phone, there's just much less to brake. Actually, my phone still has volume and power buttons, which I'd wish they'd find a way to get rid of.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    23. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      opposite for me as well. I wish there was a good Android phone that had a real physical keyboard. If blackberry ran phones with Android this would also solve my problems. touchscreen for typing is unacceptable.

    24. Re:Do those things actually sell? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I know that is why I've hung onto my LG slider for so long, once you've used a real keyboard and seen how you can whip off an entire letter in less time than it takes to send an sms there really is no comparison. I've pitted it against those who say "Oh you don't need that with these new touch keyboards" and it never fails that no matter how fast they think they are when you figure in the time it takes them to type a message of the same length (and fix all the typos they end up with) my slider runs rings around them.

      As for TFA I'd say they can't own the rights to everything that has round buttons but as fucked up as the USPTO has been with handing out bad paper? It really wouldn't surprise me if they win any court battle.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re:Do those things actually sell? by allo · · Score: 1

      Try Swiftkey. The swype function is way better than the original.

    26. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .... Just like a physical keyboard bro....

    27. Re:Do those things actually sell? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Im in the same boat, I have used the original droid up to the 4 before I finally went sans keyboard and the first week or 2 i really hated it. However after that im pretty used to it, I use the voice to text quite a bit although after looking at some of the bluetooth slider cases I might have to go back - http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=sliding+keyboard+case&N=-1&isNodeId=1

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    28. Re:Do those things actually sell? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I think I may be the last remaining blackberry fan, and I just got a Nexus 5. I was sure I would be suffering without the blackberry keyboard (I had a torch before), but SwiftKey is amazingly good. I prefer it greatly to blackberry keyboards now-- I can type 1 or 2 handed equally well, and can very nearly do it by touch.

      Plus, when you have voice input as good as android does, the keyboard just isnt that big a deal anymore.

    29. Re:Do those things actually sell? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I like that when I'm driving alone. Otherwise, I prefer the privacy that comes with swyping/typing.

    30. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... with capslock instead of shift keys and a LED that toggles between yellow and purple.

    31. Re:Do those things actually sell? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I can with a quick initial glance at the screen. My fingers are pretty used to the distance and location between letters.

      That said, I need to look at a physical keyboard too before I start my two finger typing :)

    32. Re:Do those things actually sell? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Same here. Blackberry apparently has their fans, though.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    33. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... Just like a physical keyboard bro....

      That's his point. Android (unlike Apple) has moved beyond 1850s technology.

    34. Re:Do those things actually sell? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      The thing that pushed me to finally ditch my old slider for a new touch-only is the improved voice-to-text. It does a surprisingly good job and is more than sufficient for texting and short emails, my two main tasks. The only thing I find sorely lacking is when I RDP from my phone. The physical keyboard's arrow keys were a huge plus when navigating a larger resolution RDP connection from the much smaller phone resolution.

    35. Re:Do those things actually sell? by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      This is why I want a neural interface for my phone. Fail in that... maybe a nice Throat Mic would help with the privacy thing, if I could get one for my phone. Not a perfect solution, but whispering a message is still better than shouting one.

    36. Re:Do those things actually sell? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      At least with the bb keys you can feel where the edge of the key is. With a touchscreen you can't even SEE the edge of the key because your damn finger is in the way!

    37. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After 30 seconds, I didn't have an orgasm,

      I had a different experience.

    38. Re: Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tap shift to make the next character uppercase.

      Double-tap shift to toggle caps lock.

    39. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Your loss. 30 Seconds isn't enough. Heck a full day isn't enough. I used swype for a week and was hooked. Micro Keyboards were barely functional for me, and now, I can't even stand not having swype. I picked up an iPad and instinctively tried to swype and was horrified to go back to hunt n peck typing.

      "A keyboard ... how quaint!"

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    40. Re:Do those things actually sell? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but on the other hand capital letters are easier to recognise instantly on their own than lowercase letters, you know shift is pressed because you just pressed it, and the fact that a big 'flag' appears above the letter when you've pressed them is very helpful visual feedback. On android the stock keyboard's letters light up under your fingers, which is a bit pointless.

      Why do you think physical keyboards have capital letters on them, when people write lowercase letters far more often?

      Not that I'm arguing that you shouldn't be able to install different keyboards on an iOS device, just that I think the apple on-screen keyboard is actually really very good indeed.

    41. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I use voice typing for quick texts. "Text ____ I'm running late be there in a few" sends a text message "I'm running late be there in a few" to whomever. Enunciate for excellent results.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    42. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Can't type without looking at the screen w/ Swype

      I do that all the time. You still have to look down and maybe correct a few misinterpretations before sending but I'd hope you weren't blindly sending messages without a quick proofread anyway.

    43. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I actually tried a physical keyboard with my iPhone 4, since I missed my slide-out keyboard from win-phone days of old. I hated it. Oh I liked the physical keys, but the autocorrections were missing and turned out to be more efficient than the hard keys.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    44. Re:Do those things actually sell? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I have used various on-screen keyboards and still think the keyboard on my Nokia N900 beats the lot of em.

    45. Re:Do those things actually sell? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I think it may be the way you were using it. My wife swipes with big swirling curlicues, and the software appears to suggest random crap instead of every other word. She hates it with a passion.

      I draw angular shapes that go from letter to letter, sometimes with pauses on double letters, and only rarely need to correct it. I love it.

      My mental model of how it works is by matching shapes (points here, curves there, pauses there) with a dictionary of words that could be created with letters near the shape's distinctive features. I'm sure that's not exactly how it works, but when I act on that mental model, I end up drawing over specific letters, with as clear a line as possible to the next one. Consider trying it this way, and you might find you like it better.

    46. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Eythian · · Score: 2

      30 seconds is not long enough. I gave it a few days of feeling a bit awkward before it became natural. Now you can pry it from my cold dead thumb.

    47. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually Default Google Keyboard is better than all these.

      I would know, I started with Swype on a Galaxy S1, moved to Swiftkey on a Galaxy Nexus, moved back to Swype briefly

      Then I bought a Nexus 4, it had Gesture Typing in the default Keyboard. Now I don't need Swype or Swiftkey.

    48. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. it's utter crap.

      Tap shift... keyboard didn't change... does this shift key actually work? tap it again. no change...

      Start typing to experiment. oh it's still lower case...

      Really? the only indication that shift is on is something obstructed by your finger?

      So lets get to gesture typing, oh wait, can't do that.

    49. Re:Do those things actually sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a physical keyboard it's quite easy to tell if the shift button is pressed or not.

    50. Re:Do those things actually sell? by allo · · Score: 1

      The recent stock keyboard is good, but swiftkey is still better. Better swiping, easier to add new words (just touch it), using multiple dictionaries at once ... maybe some features i do not notice when using, but would notice when using another keyboard ...

    51. Re:Do those things actually sell? by steveg · · Score: 1

      I had an OG Droid, partly because I wanted the physical keyboard. However, I tested Swype on it during one of their early beta test enrollments, and I almost immediately stopped using the physcial keyboard for anything other than Connectbot sessions. Swype was lots easier and faster, even on a phone that actually had a hardware keyboard.

      From that point on, having a physical keyboard was no longer a positive attribute for a phone (for me.)

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  3. Typo? by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 4, Funny

    The name of a smartphone keyboard manufacturer is Typo?

    Also, Ryan Seacrest is a founder of the company.

    1. Re:Typo? by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      The name of a smartphone keyboard manufacturer is Typo?

      Or is it really Tpyo and their publishers keep "correcting" it?

    2. Re:Typo? by thoriumbr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, and you can use it as an excuse when you "mustype" something:
      -It was the keyboard! It's a typo!

    3. Re:Typo? by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      They should make an IPhone case that turns it in to an N-Gage next. Then change name of company to FuglyCase

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    4. Re:Typo? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i don't think any case can turn iphone into what ngage really was: the cheapest smartphone on the market. ..only reason if it lost money was the stupid expensive marketing drive(it was just 3650 in different case + extra ram - camera).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Typo? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I hope that's true.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  4. If the case goes to trial... by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    their attorney will need to spend his entire opening argument introducing the jury to Blackberry phones.

    1. Re:If the case goes to trial... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seacrest out.

  5. IP trolling begins for dying telecom provider. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A network of IP trolls, these phone companies. There can be only one, the quickening!

    1. Re:IP trolling begins for dying telecom provider. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is not trolling since they actually sold BILIONS of devices with that type of keyboard, some people say that 90% of value of blackberry is keyboard so if cheapest blackberry device is $300 than i don't see problems with iPhone users paying 90% of that ($270) for opportunity to use that (really great) physical keyboard on their iPhone.

      they even said themselves they don't want to stop it from selling, they just want their fair share of profits since they spend a lot of money marketing and developing that specific product

    2. Re:IP trolling begins for dying telecom provider. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of the value is the backend and security of the system.

    3. Re:IP trolling begins for dying telecom provider. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 90% is keyboard, 10% phone, you're making my argument for me...

    4. Re:IP trolling begins for dying telecom provider. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not for people i talked with, all of them said best feature of blackberry phone and biggest advantage/reason for purchase was its "perfect" keyboard

  6. Why? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

    The keyboard on a Blackberry is a fucking joke, made for people with tiny fingertips..at least, on my Bold touch model. I can barely use the thing, I hate it. It's my work phone though, so I had no choice in the matter.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Why? by csumpi · · Score: 1

      No way you used a blackberry keyboard. I have fat fingers and can type many times faster on the blackberry keyboard than on any other smartphone keyboard, be that physical or touch screen. _The_ best thing about blackberries is the keyboard. Although I have to say the new blackberry OS is pretty good, too. Shame it's too late.

    2. Re:Why? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah, pretty sure... it says BlackBerry right on it, and "Bold" on the back. :D The keys are so tiny and cramped. I constantly keep hitting adjacent keys. The entire keyboard is only 2 1/2 inches wide. That's about 3/16 ths of an inch per key. Granted I have pretty wide thumbtips but still.. I'll take my iPhone or an Android over that anyday, I don't really have a problem with soft keyboards (especially if they give an audible "click"). Also, I hate having to hit "alt" just for a period or comma. (I know, dbl space adds a comma but that doesn't help when you're typing an IP address)
      At least this one has a touch screen, which helps a bit when navigating.. not real crazy about the center button either.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:Why? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      The keyboard on a Blackberry is a fucking joke, made for people with tiny fingertip

      You're supposed to type with your dick.

      That's funny, coming from a RIM licker.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    4. Re:Why? by jittles · · Score: 1

      No way you used a blackberry keyboard. I have fat fingers and can type many times faster on the blackberry keyboard than on any other smartphone keyboard, be that physical or touch screen. _The_ best thing about blackberries is the keyboard. Although I have to say the new blackberry OS is pretty good, too. Shame it's too late.

      I agree with the GP. The keyboard on the blackberry is terrible. You must not really have fat fingers or you know some secret that we do not. I can barely type on the blackberry. Give me a touchscreen with a good autocorrect or Swype and I can type pretty fast on a smart phone. I have turned down a work phone on more than one occasion to avoid the Blackberry. Thankfully most companies don't use them anymore.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing something wrong. My hands are huge and I have no problem typing on a blackberry.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You type with your thumbs. i've owned a BB 8330 once, and I can definitely say that typing on it is quicker than on an iPhone or any touch screen.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6'4", hands to fit, and the BB keyboard works much better than any touchscreen. You must be holding it wrong, or physically deformed. The 45 of os at work who have them foisted upon us all agree that the keyboard is superior, and nothing else about it is valuable, at all.

    8. Re:Why? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Then what's the secret? If your thumbtip is an inch across (for example), how do you manage to nail a key that's only 3/16 " by 3/16" without hitting ones next to it? Or perhaps you have more rounded thumbtips, mine are actually kinda flat.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just press in the general area. You will quickly learn a certain part of your finger exerts more pressure and thus activates a button first. Generally it is the center of your finger/thumb, but can vary for others. Once you feel the correct key underneath that spot, you press, and it all works.

      I've used a BB for nearly 10 years and despite having stubby fat fingers with chewed up fingernails (nasty habbit) it's never once been a real issue. If I'm typing like a madman (50+ wpm) my error rate gets pretty bad, but that happens on real keyboards too if a typist is pushing themselves too hard. I've typed several paragraph emails without complaint.

      It's all up the individual, though. Personally I have a Q10 because I love the keyboard. It also has almost perfect android emulation with the latest beta, so that makes me really happy.

    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with the previous AC. The surface of the key is angled toward your finger, so just put your thumb in the appropriate area and press.

      If, for example, you accidentally hit to the left of the one you were aiming for...aim a little farther to the right the next time.

    11. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry to hear about your little dick, but mine is much bigger than my fingers. Ask your mom if you don't believe me!

  7. Obviousness by mbstone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They shamelessly copied the look of the BlackBerry keyboard. So what. The design of a QWERTY keyboard isn't an original work of authorship, nor is it nonobvious, nor are QWERTY keyboards associated with BB in the minds of members of the public.. No copyright, no patent, no trademark.

    Case dismissed.

    BB should buy the thing if it has any money left.

    1. Re:Obviousness by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not so quick... The design of the BB keyboard is original. If you have ever held one in your hand you would see what I mean. There is a slight pitch and the keys are angled a certain way. I am no fan of BB keyboards, but I can see the attraction by some. This is a blatant copy, and does deserve to be sued. For example this is like Samsung and its phones. They are blatant copies. In contrast look at the Sony Xperia's, or the Nokia's and you see original design.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They shamelessly copied the look of the BlackBerry keyboard.

      It's an open and shut case.

    3. Re:Obviousness by mbstone · · Score: 2

      1. Patent all the possible angles of key tilt and pitch on QWERTY keyboards.

      2. Demand $3000 from each owner of a QWERTY keyboard, just less than the cost of a bare-bones legal defense.

      3. Profit!!

    4. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to agree. I thought it was a blackberry for a moment when I opened the page.

      http://i.imgur.com/FXQaOjx.png

    5. Re:Obviousness by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

      The USPTO disagrees.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:Obviousness by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      BlackBerry has been sued (and lost) many times over obvious shit. This is just the nature of the game.

    7. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. S3 user here but if you think that the NSA doesn't have a backdoor into every Android device there is, I have a bridge to sell you.

    8. Re:Obviousness by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      That's not a compelling argument. USPTO is quite easy to fool.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    9. Re:Obviousness by Salgat · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the two? They are virtually identical. It's so blantantly obvious they stole it that it's hard to argue against Blackberry's case unless copying identical designs is considered okay.

    10. Re:Obviousness by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      The design of the BB keyboard is original. If you have ever held one in your hand you would see what I mean. There is a slight pitch and the keys are angled a certain way.

      The optimal pitch and angle of the keys can be easily found using a structured search. Anyone who performs such a search will arrive at the same outcome, simply because it is structured. Hence, no patent should have been awarded to this particular design.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    11. Re:Obviousness by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      1. Patent all the possible angles of key tilt and pitch on QWERTY keyboards.

      Why bother patenting all those permutations? Your process can be simplified into the following:

      1. Patent evenly spaced sequences of rounded cubes.
      2. Sue everybody.
      3. Profit!!

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    12. Re:Obviousness by msauve · · Score: 1

      It's not a compelling argument against the claim of "no patent?" You're the fool.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    13. Re:Obviousness by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      are you saying adding pitches and angels to an establish design makes it unique and therefore patentable?
      That's an interesting way to view patents.

    14. Re:Obviousness by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      4. Get patent thrown out in court

      5. Get sued for damages and legal costs.

      6. Bankrupt.

    15. Re:Obviousness by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      It's not a compelling argument against the claim of non-obvious or novelty, the lack of either meaning that the patent is invalid. I know that it's sometimes difficult to understand exactly what another poster is meaning, but when mbstone said "No copyright, no patent, no trademark," they most likely meant that there is no valid reason for it have any of those, not that they haven't been granted one.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    16. Re:Obviousness by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The optimal pitch and angle of the keys can be easily found using a structured search.

      A structured key pitch and angle search wouldn't have resulted in Blackberry's keyboard.

      The (marginally) non-obvious innovation here was the realization that people type on mobile devices differently than on a full keyboard. If you hold a mobile device like the original Blackberry with two hands, you notice the base of the thumbs are towards the lower end of the device (closer to the body). Consequently, the thumbs point upward at an angle as they rest on the keyboard. By angling the keys as Blackberry did, the keys present the largest target perpendicular to the thumbs, but can be slimmed down in the other axis so as to reduce the keyboard's width without increasing the chances of inadvertently hitting two keys (check out their earlier devices - the keys are not square).

      For your search to have stumbled upon Blackberry's keyboard design, it would've needed to search key pitch, aspect ratio, and angle. I'm not sure if this is patent-worthy, but it's pretty clear Blackberry put a lot of thought into creating a functional keyboard design. A helluva lot more than rounded corners. A full-size keyboard analogue would be the natural keyboards, where the left and right halves are angled to meet the diagonal caused by your elbows. I'm pretty sure someone has a patent on that as well.

    17. Re:Obviousness by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      If a way is found to add angels to anything, there's a lot more to be concerned about than mere keyboards.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    18. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    19. Re:Obviousness by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      -1, irrelevant rant.

      Blackberry does not claim the QWERTY layout, so a rant about how they don't own the QWERTY layout is pointless.

    20. Re:Obviousness by msauve · · Score: 1

      Nice stretch, I hope you didn't hurt your groin. Since a patent exists, it won't be the simple "Case dismissed," which was claimed. Invalidating a patent requires significant legal work.

      And, the patent has already been successfully licensed to Palm (who at the time was much bigger than a celebrity startup), a strong indicator that others believe it to have some validity.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    21. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Allow company that has no assets that you had "sold" the patent to to go bankrupt.

      7. Keep proceeds from extortions that didn't fail.

      8. Wash, wrinse, repeat.

    22. Re:Obviousness by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      The fact that palm licensed the patent doesn't make the patent valid, it only means that licensing the patent was cheaper than fighting it. Patent trolls usually set the licensing fee slightly cheaper than what it would cost to fight it, for this very reason reason (I'm not saying Blackbery is trolling here, I'm just saying that licensing does not prove validity)

      A slightly different example: It can cost a lot of money to evict someone from your property (as much as $30,000 in legal fees), so its not uncommon for a landlord to "bribe" a bad tenant to leave. The fact that money changed hands does not imply that the landlord somehow owned the tenant something.

    23. Re:Obviousness by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Case dismissed.

      Just stall the case until Blackberry goes out of business.

    24. Re:Obviousness by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Since a patent exists, it won't be the simple "Case dismissed," which was claimed. Invalidating a patent requires significant legal work.

      I think you are taking thing a bit too literally. It would case dismissed in an ideal world where companies don't get legal monopolies on trivial bullshit.

      And, the patent has already been successfully licensed to Palm (who at the time was much bigger than a celebrity startup), a strong indicator that others believe it to have some validity.

      Or, that the cost and risks involved with defending/invalidating the patent are greater than the licensing costs.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    25. Re:Obviousness by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      That patent goes on and on about oval keys, which the Typo keyboard doesn't use. Hmm.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    26. Re:Obviousness by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'm not a huge fan of either blackberry or patent lawsuits but the typo keyboard is clearly a blatant copy of the blackberry one. For those who haven't seen it, take a look at both keyboards side by side before making up your mind. They've copied a lot more than just the qwerty layout.

      https://businessincanada.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Screen-Shot-2014-01-03-at-2.26.22-PM.png

    27. Re:Obviousness by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      They copied the cosmetic elements that exist soley to say to the buyer "this is a Blackberry". Almost by definition that's "passing off", in British legal language, attempting to mislead a customer as to the product's origin.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    28. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    29. Re:Obviousness by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If anything Braun has the best claim of being copies, by Apple. It's not just the design, the minimalist style, but the form and function as well. Unlike Samsung, Apple can't show they were designing them before Braun revealed their products.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Braun's designs have a completely different application, the concept of Apple causing any damages to Braun by copying them is completely hollow. There would be absolutely no risk of someone, say, accidentally buying an iPhone (with it's calculator app) when they meant to buy a Braun calculator. Or buying an iMac when they meant to buy a Braun speaker.

      As to your claim that Samsung had been designing their infringing products before Apple unveiled theres, can you provide a link?

    31. Re:Obviousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Braun has the best claim of being copies, by Apple. It's not just the design, the minimalist style, but the form and function as well.

      I don't think those words mean what you think they mean.

      Hint: Apple's products are completely different functionally than Braun's.

  8. If you can't innovate, litigate... by ckhorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blackberry is dying. If their only move is to sue people trying to imitate their "exceptional typing experience," then the death knell isn't far away...

    1. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by guytoronto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who says it's their only move? Apple sues others trying to imitate the "Apple experience. Is Apply dying?

    2. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says it's their only move? Apple sues others trying to imitate the "Apple experience. Is Apply dying?

      That depends on who you ask. Apart from Microsoft Apple are the only major mobile device manufacturer who has not been sucked into the Android monoculture. To some people that's 'dying' to others it's competing.

    3. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      And so it begins...
      Blackberry (I preferred when they were called RIM, and every few months there was a story about RIM jobs being lost.) has begun their long descent into patent trolldom.
      Please die soon.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    4. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logical fallacy. Suing someone does not necessarily imply dying. But RIM is dying, there's no two ways about it.

    5. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Jobs is gone. I can see Apple sliding into oblivion again in a hurry.

    6. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even by their previous standards of "innovation" they're not putting out new products, just upgraded versions of their old ones with more power.

    7. Re: If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but BlackBerry is.

    8. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a trick question? Because given the recent iPhone Cheap Version (TM) with multiple colors that goes against everything Jobs wanted, I'd say that it started dying when he did. And frankly good riddance to both of them.

    9. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes- and its amazing they didn't die in the 1990s. Sadly our legal system makes it very very very difficult to kill off companies. Not so much for humans though. The US murders a lot of people every year (ie through our legal system and by way of the military in foreign countries).

    10. Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bite... yes, at least in the phone area.

      Apple is losing the "cool" factor at least in phones. Deny all you want, but I went from all my friends having iPhones to almost zero. So I looked outside my circle to see if I was outside the curve. I'm not. The cool factor largely sells the iPhone.

      They DO have the tablet market sewed up though! Apple will NOT be hurting any time soon, so don't despair.

  9. New joke? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    So, does this mean that Slashdot's resident patent critics will now now stop poking fun at companies who patent rounded rectangles and upgrade to three dimensional patent joking by making fun of companies who sue other companies over regularly spaced sequences of rounded boxes? I for one would welcome a change. That rounded rectangles joke is getting so old it has grown a long white beard , plus 3D patent joking is just way cooler that 2D patent jokes.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:New joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it keeps happening, wouldn't we poke fun harder?

      Or do you think going full retard and copyrighting the idea of something like a clock would silence us all and end the mockery?

  10. New Business Plan? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Litigation.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:New Business Plan? by csumpi · · Score: 2

      Works (at least for some time worked) for Apple. Why not give it a shot?

    2. Re: New Business Plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple could buy BlackBerry with a weekend's revenue.

      Bit of a different situation.

  11. What? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 0

    Blackberry should be grateful that anyone is even willing to copy them, the BB10 line of phone is the worst "innovation" in mobile technology, maybe of all time. Putting a keyboard on a phone is not a new concept, at one time all phone had at least some form of keyboard. It should be, in a fair system, extremely hard for Blackberry to defend that another company stole there keyboard design. Blackberry hardly innovated the mobile keyboard, in someways they did it injustice, except for the 9900 line, all other keyboards ever offered by Blackberry were just small and incorrectly laid out in every conceivable way.

    From an ergonomics stand point, the new BB10 line is a curse to use and operate. The interface design, which is the "staple" of any mobile system, has the layout and usability that would be expected from an elementary school child programming for the first time. It hides almost all functionally off the screen, under buttons in menus and side screens, it doesn't implement swipe properly and it's a cluttered, messy, disorganized shamble.

    In the last year I've had the opportunity to use the Q10, Z10, Z30, iPhone 4s, HTC One and S3. Without a doubt the Z10, 30 and Q10 left me wanting to throw my phone at wall almost constantly. It is so infuriating to try and do any meaningful work on the Blackberry that I ended up giving the phone back to the company I work for. It was a productivity curse, the drop in quality from the 9900 line to the new BB10 line is amazing, I don't know what Blackberry was thinking but they failed 100% in any attempt to change the company's image, I still see them as the trashy, cheap, garbage phones they always have been. They deserve to go out of business, as well as anyone who can honestly say BB10 is a good platform.

    If I was Blackberry I would humbled that anyone even wanted to copy me, Blackberry made one usable keyboard and that was it, they never innovated anything else to a point that would make a Canadian proud or an employe happy to go to work. Just cut your loses Blackberry, you've failed outright in creating a new mobile experience.

    1. Re:What? by narcc · · Score: 1

      You're delusional. The BB10 UI was nearly universally praised. For multitasking, it's still unmatched. Its gesture suite, unlike iOS, is simple and intuitive.

      It hides almost all functionally off the screen, under buttons in menus and side screens

      WTF are you talking about?

    2. Re:What? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyone who praises the BB10 UI, I don't want to know or develop with. It's multitasking is hardly impressive, I have used a variety of new phones and I can honestly draw the comparison from my own testing. Android blows the Blackberry out of the water, through the roof and through the sky, it's actually very sad.

      As for hiding under buttons and menu's, go into the Hub and press delete without opening a menu, when you can't do that, try to forward a message without going into a menu. If you, as a company, push new mobile innovation, make sure it's amazing and well laid out. BB10 has the chance to become ergonomic and usable but it's going to take a large UI redesign, in the way a user interfaces to the platform, that is what they badly messed up and that is what needs a massive overhaul.

      I know approx, 7 people who raved about Blackberry, were very excited about BB10, were expecting to pick up the Z10 and Q10 and support the company. 6 of them, including my father, hate the Q10 and Z10 so much that they have now cursed the death of Blackberry. My dad's own words, "Fuck this horrible piece of shit, did anyone at the Blackberry even given a second though to the interface!" If you like the phones the cool but I personally, and many I know, hate them. I've heard the platform cursed about 10:1, as in for every 10 people who hate it, 1 likes it.

    3. Re:What? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm drawing my opinion based on the fact I've used the Q10, Z10 and Z30. I don't need to read articles, I've drawn my own conclusions based on experience.

    4. Re:What? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      You know what's the worst "innovation" in mobile technology? The keyboard on iOS 7. Where the keys don't change when you are typing caps vs lower case.

      That would be exactly the same then as any existing keyboard on any typewrite or computer. Changing the display of the keys would be just irritating. And obviously when it counts (symbols, numbers etc. ) the display does change.

    5. Re:What? by Rigel47 · · Score: 1

      Interesting.. I came from android to BB10 and it was a pleasant upgrade. Android just feels like a desktop OS crammed onto a phone. multi-tasking sucks, apps get randomly killed, the whole things slows down. Z10, especially upgraded to 10.2 OS is smooth as butter. I can switch between apps, settings, and messages with total ease. And rumor is that shortly you'll be able to install apps directly from the Play Store.

    6. Re:What? by phorm · · Score: 1

      I like my Q10 for work stuff, but frankly the Q10's keyboard is not as usable as the old bold. The main reason for this seems to be that the keys are mashed together. I noticed that a "Q5" is available (how do they come up with these numbers??), which has keys spaced in the more usable "chiclet" fashion.

    7. Re:What? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Interesting you've have the exact opposite experience as me. I went from Android -> iOS - > Blackberry, quickly to, Android.

    8. Re:What? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      I found the Q10 keyboard springy to the point it's annoying, like a very very cheap desktop keyboard. It would be insane to suggest a mechanical keyboard for a phone but the Q10 / Q5 has a keyboard that feels so cheap and horrible it insults keyboards.

  12. Grasping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Once Blackberry changes its business model to litigation they will get back all the fans they lost.

  13. what is tolerable is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the incompetence that brought them to the brink of destruction.

  14. Not clear what the patent infringement is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There have been many, many non-blackberry phones with keyboards, I haven't heard of any of them being sued.

    For example, the Nokia 9000 had a keyboard in 1996: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_9000_Communicator

    Blackberry might have a valid case, but it would be handy if the specific patents were cited...

    1. Re:Not clear what the patent infringement is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is all about how the keys look, not that it is a keyboard. The beveling on the keys are made to make it easier to type with your thumbs. I see the novelty in it, but am not sure it should be patentable. Look for yourself:

      http://typokeyboards.com/
      http://www.dogtownmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/blackberry-mobile-acquired.jpg

  15. Patent? by ciurana · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article doesn't clarify if BlackBerry patented the keyboard layout and set up, and whether the patent is still in effect.

    If so, they are well within their rights to enforce it. Typo Products can probably work out a deal with them, et tutti contenti.

    If the patent has expired, or if it was never granted/never filed... suck it, BlackBerry. You should know better.

    Cheers!

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    1. Re:Patent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the form of the keys was clearly a trade secret which Typo blatantly spied on by looking on a BlackBerry phone. ;-)

    2. Re:Patent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typo Products can probably work out a deal with them, et tutti contenti.

      It would be probably cheaper if Typo would buy the Blackbery all together.

    3. Re:Patent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other articles do state that it's a patent-infringment lawsuit. Thus, I'd think there's a patent. Not surprising as even just an idea can be patented now.

  16. Hmm, that reminds me of something... by rfolkker · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's funny, when the Blackberry Curve came out, I remember thinking of how much the keyboard and layout reminded me of my Treo 600...

    And now, ~10 years later, Blackberry is suing someone for something they didn't even create... I don't see Handspring/Palm/PalmOne having a tiff about it (but then again, maybe if they sued everyone who came out with something more desirable than their product, they might still be around soaking up others' profits...)

    Don't get me wrong. I believe that someone who creates something has a right to profit off of it, without some second-rate hack coming in and stealing the idea out from under them.

    But, seriously, the keyboard design? It wasn't original when it was on the Blackberry, and it still isn't original now that Blackberry is going the way of the dodo.

    1. Re:Hmm, that reminds me of something... by netsavior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the keyboard they copied isn't the crappy one from the curve, which is a pretty standard smartphone keyboard, and was nothing special to type on... They copied the keyboard from the "Bold" which was the best "narrow" keyboard ever made for a device. The "Typo" is very clearly an EXACT copy of the bold keyboard, right down to the metal trim, color, genius button shape (keys gently raised on one side so you can use keys that are smaller than your fingers, but still have the keys touching).

      They keyboard IS something special, and IS subject to a patent. Is blackberry going to rise from the dead? no. Are they entitled to control the use of their design? I think so. The Typo is clearly a "distinctly blackberry keyboard for your iphone" which isn't really "fair"

    2. Re:Hmm, that reminds me of something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but still have the keys touching

      Why?

  17. Desperation or churning? by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 0

    Lawyers earn and no better way is there than to churn. In the interest of protecting a client, its a quick action to take because they can. Just because they could doesn't mean they should. SO this could be a legal action outside the sphere of Blackberry just doing what they do - churn to earn.

    OR Blackberry in its desperation could be attacking all comers to its last remaining properties. It's interesting that there exists professionals for whom Blackberry remains an essential AND want to integrate other devices adding keyboard functionality. But this device looked like it was too much of a ' kludge' for my personal tastes. I chose not to pursue the $100 case for iPhone with keyboard.

    AND I think that threshold barrier to purchase is reason enough that Blackberry have no case of patent infringement since keyboards have been around for awhile now. Adding a bluetooth keyboard case for iPhone doesn't equate to a Blackberry phone.

    1. Re:Desperation or churning? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      Im kind of torn about this one.

      In one room, Blackberry's main innovations were the keyboard and having mail in your pocket. (BBM being a semi-third, but harder to operate) The mail in your pocket was a goldmine while it was unique, but they never saw themselves as a single trick pony but as BLACKBERRY with some kind of pixie dust magic, and never did much past this. Their vision was short sighted, and got massively run over by companies (google/android, Apple) that saw the computer-in-your-pocket thing better.

      So... about the keyboard. Part of me "hey, just a keyboard" and how do you patent that? Part of me realizes that for all their faults, you can tell RIM/BlackBerry spent a lot of time/money specifically engineering that keyboard. Those curves really do help making the keys "bigger" than they are physically. The Typo is a pretty blatant copy (they'll get killed at trial where they're literally saying they want to take the keyboard from a blackberry). Shouldn't BlackBerry get some cash at least as R&D?

  18. I own the letter A-Pay up by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    Looking at the two keyboards, the only similarity is the indent on the inside corner of the keys.

    As it is, the shape of the keyboard is not the same, the BlackBerry is kind of the bottom half of an ellipsoid, the Typo goes to the edge of the iPhone, so is the bottom part of a rounded edge rectangle.

    Many of the keys do not even have the same function outside the qwerty So the only thing that is ismilar is that dropped corner. Is it patented?

    I suspect as in so many things, personal support for RIM's case is probably based on the user's dislike of Apple. Any bad news even for outfits that provide aftermarket devices for iPhone is good news for some folks

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:I own the letter A-Pay up by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I have a BlackBerry Bold (given to me by my work). I compared the keyboard on that vs the Typo one to see which keys had the same functionality. Ignoring the obvious QWERTY similarities (which would be true of pretty much any mobile keyboard), the first row had 8 keys exactly the same and 2 different. The second row had all 10 keys the same. The third row was 7 same and 3 different. And the last row was 2.5 the same and 4.5 different. (The "half" coming from a Bluetooth function on the Typo that isn't on my Blackberry's keyboard yet having the zero key in the same spot.) In total, that's 27.5 keys the same and 9.5 different.

      Functionality-wise, the keyboard is about 74% the same as the Blackberry Bold's keyboard. This is close, but gives enough room to speculate that it's not close enough to be covered under any patents Blackberry might have. Plus, other mobile keyboards might have similar layouts which would bolster Typo's case that they were just following some "industry standard" layout and not a patented Blackberry layout.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:I own the letter A-Pay up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you would have bothered to google for 5 seconds, you'd have found they're claiming infringement of functional patents US7629964 and US8162552 and design patent USD685775

  19. Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Now you can send embarrassing typos with complete wrong words instead of just mistyped characters?

    Seriously though, I thought that autocorrect was bad, but swype seems to have a real twisted sense of humor.

    1. Re:Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way? by allo · · Score: 1

      you sound, like you never used t9.

    2. Re: Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You punctuate, like you never learned to.

    3. Re:Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      you sound, like you never used t9.

      The funniest T9 autocorrect was typing "onsite", it came up with "morgue". Imaging telling your boss "I'm morgue."

      It took some adjusting but I do like Swype / Google Keyboard's equivalent. I do dread going to my iPod's hunt and peck keyboard.

    4. Re: Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr Shatner is, that you?

    5. Re: Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way? by allo · · Score: 1

      relative clauses, do you know them?

  20. Re:keys don't change when you are typing caps by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 0

    I never realized it before, but my pc's keyboard doesn't change case on the labels either! I'm going to have to demand a new keyboard that rectifies that problem.

  21. Prior to this article... by goofyspouse · · Score: 2

    ...how many of us knew this keyboard/case existed? It really is sad to see what has become of RIM/BlackBerry.

  22. Freud ... by allo · · Score: 1

    read Blackberry [User] Sues iPhone Keyboard Maker [for] Typo

  23. Typical failed company reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When you stop making relevant products. You start to file patent lawsuits to survive. Just because another product looks similar to your product does not mean its the same. We obviously have so many examples of similar products with no question of patent infringement. Yet who really is surprise by this from RIM?

  24. Tech company main sequence by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tech company main sequence: start as a brightly shining innovator, make too much money, get mired in politics, run out of ideas, run out of money, collapse into a dark, trollish corporate remnant. Blackberry has officially become the latest troll star.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  25. That's it RIM...grasp at those straws. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's it RIM...grasp at those straws.

  26. Re:keys don't change when you are typing caps by ganjadude · · Score: 1
    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  27. The BB wasn't even that great of a keyboard by DewDude · · Score: 1

    The Sidekick devices had much better keyboards. In fact, after all my use of modern smart phone keyboards; the Sidekick is *still* the one I compare everything to. Let's not forget the only thing Microsoft ever got out of buying that platform was the keyboard; which they put on an attachment for the 360.

  28. Seriously dumb/ballsy move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the pre-iPhone days, keyboard design was a massive part of smartphone design. All the major players spent a ton of money on R&D + patents. The net result is that almost every minute detail has been covered with patents.

    For any new entrant, its not really a question of if they infringe a patent, but how many patents they infringe, and whether or not they can get a feasible licensing deal.

    Typo either didn't do the due diligence (nobody can be that stupid), or decided they would take the risk that it wouldn't be worth suing them over. Guess they found out the hard way that RIM is digging into the couch cushions for spare change.

  29. Blackberry is rapidly turning into another SCO by jfdavis668 · · Score: 0

    Next they will sue Palm for inventing the smartphone.

  30. Typo for S4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please make a typo for my S4 what would be even better is a hybrid zerolemon monster battery/case + typo style keyboard. Days of battery life, real bar style keyboard rather than sliders so you can type without the onscreen keyboard taking up most of your displays real-estate and actual button press feedback rather than finger meets rigid slab making it more likely to develop health problems.

    As long as the damn thing can physically fit in my pocket I don't care about weight or aesthetics I just want something productive that works.

  31. This! by s.petry · · Score: 1

    BB has failed, and instead of trying to salvage anything they seem to be turning into the new patent troll company. Anyone else remember SCO? Hint: jump while you still can.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  32. Blackberry is just Jealous by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    Everyone on the board of directors at blackberry is kicking themselves for not thinking of this idea first. THEY could have been the ones selling their "world renowned" mobile keyboard to the apple masses, instead of getting beat by a Reality TV host.

    Moral of this story, either give your customers what they want, or someone else will.

  33. Hungry for love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shucks... The balance sheet doesn't look great... Seems like everyone hates us these days... Oh! I know how to gain moar appreciation from the public! We'll sue the shit out of the small guy!

  34. Client certificates by tepples · · Score: 1

    SSL / TLS will never be as secure as symmetric encryption with per-device keys

    Even if each device has its own TLS client certificate?

    1. Re:Client certificates by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Gets pretty close, but symmetric keys are generally a lot more secure than asymmetric keys.

  35. Someone please fix the headline by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    ...because there's a typo in it. *ducks for cover*

  36. Maybe I'm Alone but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still using a Nokia Symbian phone, prefer to use the traditional Num Pad predictive text to Qwerty...
    But then I'm old fashioned.

  37. surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im glad. ryan seacrest is a douche and typo was doomed to fail anyway.

  38. Darl McBride is their new CEO? by Evil_Idiot · · Score: 1

    I had no idea he was still in the game!