Slashdot Mirror


Ford Exec: 'We Know Everyone Who Breaks the Law' Thanks To Our GPS In Your Car

An anonymous reader sends this report from Business Insider: "[Ford VP Jim Farley] was trying to describe how much data Ford has on its customers, and illustrate the fact that the company uses very little of it in order to avoid raising privacy concerns: 'We know everyone who breaks the law, we know when you're doing it. We have GPS in your car, so we know what you're doing. By the way, we don't supply that data to anyone,' he told attendees. Rather, he said, he imagined a day when the data might be used anonymously and in aggregate to help other marketers with traffic related problems. Suppose a stadium is holding an event; knowing how much traffic is making its way toward the arena might help the venue change its parking lot resources accordingly, he said." Farley later realized how his statement sounded, and added, "We do not track our customers in their cars without their approval or consent."

22 of 599 comments (clear)

  1. Herpin' the Derp by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Farley later realized how his statement sounded, and added, "We do not track our customers in their cars without their approval or consent."

    Approval or consent, English-American, verb: To use. To accept the licensing terms. To look at. To think about.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Herpin' the Derp by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By the way, we don't supply that data to anyone,' he told attendees.

      Well, until they show up with an NSL, in which case we'll supply the data forthwith. But don't worry, we'll still have to maintain we really don't.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    2. Re:Herpin' the Derp by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm assuming the "approval and consent" is buried somewhere in very small print and the default value is "accept".

      I'm also guessing his company is very unhappy with him right now.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Herpin' the Derp by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      how does that work for used car purchases?

      I seriously doubt that any original owner agreements would be binding. in fact, 'ford' won't know who the current owner is, only the dealer-based buyer's identity. the gov will know (due to registration and tags) though.

      the more I hear about modern cars self-spying, the more I want to keep my very old car running and in good condition.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Herpin' the Derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      'ford' won't know who the current owner is,

      Oh please. Every state DMV shares that information with vehicle manufacturers. How do you think they're able to send you a recall notice when you're not the original owner?

    5. Re:Herpin' the Derp by JeffAtl · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, until they show up with an NSL, in which case we'll supply the data forthwith. But don't worry, we'll still have to maintain we really don't.

      It doesn't take a NSL. A subpoena in a divorce case or a warrant from local law enforcement would be enough.

      Why does everyone think that the NSA is the only entity capable of obtaining private data?

    6. Re:Herpin' the Derp by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Informative

      The concept of ownership, title, and property are themselves products of having a state. Why am I not allowed to jump in "your" car, modify it as I wish (to start the ignition), and drive away? Because, somewhere in a filing cabinet, there is a magical piece of paper saying that the car is "yours" and not "mine" --- a property in no way inherent in the physical existence of the car itself. The "magic" of the paper that makes the car "yours" is that enough people agree to the rules of the state --- so, they probably won't try to drive your car; and, if they do, someone else may hunt them down and forcibly detain them (again, by power of the state). There is no private property without the state, besides the "private property" of whoever is strongest and nastiest to kill everyone else and grab their stuff.

      States may indeed have too much power --- but, if you want "private property" so that some magical piece of paper can dictate who gets to drive "your" car, then you'll need a state (a shared delusion negotiated with a sufficient number of your neighbors).

  2. Point taken. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't buy ford.

    1. Re:Point taken. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who do you buy your supplies from when every corporation is intrusive?

      Every thread at slashdot has some snide NSA comment, and that's understandable. Slashdot tends to be more enlightened, but there are far fewer snide comments and corporate entities being intrusive with data (and the ones there are tend to be about Google and Facebook).

      However, if EVERY corporation is intrusive (and car companies will all be if they aren't already) then where do you go? Do you buy from Huffy? Huffy will probably put GPS in their frames.

      The idiot comment about OWS was always "but.. but... but... they buy stuff from corporations!" But what else can you do if you live in the U.S. Do you go out and live in a shack like the Unibomber?

    2. Re: Re:Point taken. by rnturn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ``... or we all choose an Amish life.

      Boy oh boy... there are some days that this doesn't seem like such a bad idea.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re:Point taken. by thoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who do you buy your supplies from when every corporation is intrusive?
      [...]
      However, if EVERY corporation is intrusive (and car companies will all be if they aren't already) then where do you go?

      Depends on who you ask. The Ayn-Randian-objectivist-anarcho-liberterian-conservative-capitalists, who have complete faith in the correctness of the free market even in the absence of government regulations, believe that the free market itself will solve this: eventually, corporations that don't monetize everything about you, will emerge and compete for the business of people who care about stuff like how their data is used. They will charge slightly higher prices to offset the profit they lose by not selling your data.

      Otherwise, those of us that don't live in a theoretical or academic fantasy land, will instead seek laws/regulations to limit this behavior.

  3. Re:Well by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fired, CEO, def.: To be given a bonus. To be handed large amounts of money. Given an early retirement with free company-provided yachts.

    Fired, you, def.: To be fucked. Screwed. Rendered destitute. Forced to sell everything of value and told you are a drain on the resources of society.
    --

    No matter how badly a CEO fucks up, they still get a "punishment" that's far in excess of any reward you'll likely get for your entire career, no matter how big the contribution.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  4. Approval & Consent by Diddlbiker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meaning it's listed somewhere in the bill of sale. "Well you bought the car, didn't you? There's your consent"

  5. Re:Why does Ford need this data? by Albanach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I want to know is, Why does Ford need this data?

    Of course they don't need it. My ten year old ford isn't sending them any info, but they were still quite capable of making cars a decade ago.

    The issue is why they want it, and it's because data is valuable. From a vehicle manufacturer's point of view it's actually most useful in anonymous aggregate. They are interested in trends. If they see lots of warranty claims, they may be able to isolate them to a group of drivers with similar driving style then mitigate this in future product designs.

    From a business perspective, they will always be looking at new markets like the one suggested by the exec.

    The biggest issue for me is the absolute lack of data protection laws in the US. There is an urgent need for some default rules that determine what can and cannot be done with customer data.

  6. Re:Why does Ford need this data? by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Informative

    Customers don't generally report casual breakdowns, for example. Also, habit trends can help with designing newer models. You'll always get a better picture of your customers' habits with transparent metrics.

    Let's not forget that a complete history of your driving habits can be sold to third parties for a nice profit. Oh, did I mention by third parties I mean anyone, ever? You don't need a search warrant... just pay the $5 to get a complete "enhanced driver profile". I know what you're thinking: Aren't there laws against this? Maybe, but you agreed to let them do whatever they want when you turned the key and drove it off the lot; says so in the small print.

    When you run a Vehicle Health Report, Ford Motor Company may collect your cell phone number (to process your report request) and diagnostic information about your vehicle. Certain versions or updates to Vehicle Health Report may also collect additional vehicle information. Ford may use the vehicle information it collects, as well as information regarding individual access to Vehicle Health Reports at www.syncmyride.com for any purpose.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  7. Re:Well, Ford does not track. But they keep the da by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course they don't track the customer. What they track is the vehicle,,, and the vehicle has no rights.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  8. Re:If I ever own a Ford.... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first thing I'll be doing is hunting around with ball-peen hammer for the GPS module.

    The end.

    Not if you have a spouse. [Annoyed grunt] They really don't care for principled economic losses (in this case, resale value). Ignorance-based losses (like not changing the oil) they're cool with. Principle, no.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  9. The solution will never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The solution will never happen. There is only two ways it'll happen:

    1. Boards stop that horseshit but they won't. They'll take care of their buddies and BS the shareholders by saying "We NEED to offer those compensation packages in order to get the best talent." And we all know that CEO talent has very little to do with business performance - although, the runup of Yahoo! because Meyer being hired - and no improvement in company fundamentals - showed the stupidity of Wall Street.

    2. Regulation - which won't happen because the majority of Americans are under the delusion that all they have to do is work harder and they can one day be in that position and therefore; any laws in that regard will hurt them down the line. And also, the propaganda about "Socialism" and what have you from the business/money'ed class' mouthpieces in the media.

  10. Re:Well by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fired, you, def.: To be fucked. Screwed. Rendered destitute. Forced to sell everything of value and told you are a drain on the resources of society.

    Synonym: Married.

  11. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    See also: Divorced.

  12. Umm... by anmre · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suppose a stadium is holding an event; knowing how much traffic is making its way toward the arena might help the venue change its parking lot resources accordingly, he said.

    ... or you could just count the number of tickets sold.

  13. Re:This data helps Repo guys steal the car back by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One reason car companies collect this data is to steal the car back from you (repossess it) in the event of non-payment. The GPS tracking is often turned over to the Repo operators when they need to go steal your car back.

    True. And it works because of the incredibly low level of understanding about modern technology. Anyone with a wire cutter, soldering iron, and a few long runs of wire can thoroughly disable such a system. It's usually just a box wired directly to the battery and has a relay in series with the ignition. Cut the power leads and solder a wire to bridge the relay and you're done. Total time: 10 minutes. For bonus points, buy a deep cycle marine battery, a 50 gallon drum, and throw the result inside then seal it up and drop it off in the nearest river. It'll happily chirp it's location as it floats nine states away and off into the ocean.

    But then, I was feeling really bitchy when I helped a friend do this...

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie