Voynich Manuscript May Have Originated In the New World
bmearns writes "The Voynich Manuscript is most geeks' favorite 'indecipherable' illuminated manuscript. Its bizarre depictions of strange plants and animals, astrological diagrams, and hordes of tiny naked women bathing in a system of interconnected tubs (which bear an uneasy resemblance to the human digestive system), have inspired numerous essays and doctoral theses', plus one XKCD comic. Now a team of botanists (yes, botanists) may have uncovered an important clue as to its origin and content by identifying several of the plants and animals depicted, and linking them to the Spanish territories in Central America."
It was easy, common ciphertext.
it's full of plant descriptions. Sheeesh.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
hordes of tiny naked women bathing in a system of interconnected tubs (which bear an uneasy resemblance to the human digestive system)
Are there little wooly mammoths as well?
How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
I don't believe this. Botanists, really? And here I thought they were only good for fertilizing my plants. I'll have to stop composting them when I catch them prowling outside.
If we find out they can do other sapient stuff, like make fire and use Facebook, I may start feeling guilty about the whole composting thing.
safe search slashdot oxymoron
It's 500 pages, right?
They needed a thick enough book to reach the cookie jar.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
According to TFA, plant names in Nahuatl (the language of the aztecs) have been identified.
If indeed people who wrote it were writing in Nahuatl, and perhaps in a dialect, they may have needed to make their own script (since there was none around).
So given time, perhaps it can be deciphered...
Anyone know where can I find a good hardcover version of Voynich? Like a coffee table book?
A series of tubes? With naked women in it?
How could that be anything but the net?
Is it available as an Ebook?
Second image down:
http://www.midorisnyder.com/th...
Man, but medieval porn was tame.... :-)
Koans and fables for the software engineer
What an unfortunate name for a (I presume) 'legit' botanical journal.
That's not even remotely plausible. You can't develop a writing system overnight. The first and only thing surviving the invention of a writing system certainly wouldn't be a large codex. Such a work would also not be produced in a vacuum. Writing systems are developed with a future reading community in mind. They record things for posterity and allow for certain sort of communication that either need to be recorded or which are directed at people who are accustomed to writing. It's not plausible that everyone capable of reading the thing just died off without telling anyone, and the book floated itself into the hands of Westerners. Moreover, if you look at the examples of writing systems developed relatively late in history, they are derived from existing writing systems for other languages. You don't just invent such things from scratch, unless it's a personal system, in which case it's really a cipher. Moreover, if the system weren't derived from that of another language, it would have to be inspired to some degree by native iconography. If either case were true, the thing would have been easy to decipher. If people claim that they have identified Nahuatl, that identification is only possible if the system is derived from earlier Nahuatl iconography, which as noted, would have made the interpretation quite easy long since, or it's some sort of phonemic transcription, which is something they could only have learned from another language community with a writing system in so short a space. In the latter case, the system would certainly have been adapted from that system.
Codex Seraphinianus is an encyclopaedia of an imaginary world published in 1981 and written in a similar style to Voynich, but the illustrations are much more surreal.
I would've thought surely NSA could crack it by now....
The original "lorem ipsum" was De finibus by Roman philosopher M. T. Cicero. Lipsum.com has a translation of the famous passage into English.
I think that some of your points are valid, but not this bit: "It's not plausible that everyone capable of reading the thing just died off without telling anyone." Given the impact of the Spanish conquest, I would say thay is perfectly plausible, morover it could have happened in a single generation. People don't seem to understand the impact of disease and slavery on the native American populations. Even educated people aren't going to have much time for reading between shifts in the salt mines, and when you're dead from smallpox you don't read much of anything. This thing could have been written for a tiny surviving readership, for posterity.
I'm pretty sure that at least one plant was previously identified as American , and that would be the sunflower. These botanists have taken the idea a lot further though. Their paper is well researched, but I will leave it to the peer review process to ultimately determine its veracity. The identification of Nahuatl words in the script seems a bit of a stretch IMHO.
That's not even remotely plausible. You can't develop a writing system overnight.
Well not over night, but it doesn't take that long.
A Phonetic equivalence seems quite plausible, and you can whip up a phonetic equivalence chart for your private
use, or the use of a small group in a few hours.
And that might be the natural course of action for someone trying to document knowledge from an oral tradition.
That this book didn't contain the key to the symbols is also not that unusual. Maybe this scribe needed to retain
it for subsequent work.
Western letters drawn with a quill certainly speaks to the possibility of early Spanish origins deliberately trying to
encode information to be sent home such that it couldn't be used by just anyone. There may never have been more
than a dozen who knew the key or the symbology. Maybe they and the key went down with a subsequent ship,
even thought this book or perhaps a few others weren't on that boat.
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
Is it only me or the plant at page 16r (32 of 210) looks like a cannabis plant?
It isn't a new theory that the Voynich Manuscript is Nahuatl. Here's a book from 2001 positing that very thing:
Keys for the Voynich Scholar: Necessary Clues for Tahe Decipherment and Reading of the World's Most Mysterious Manuscript which is a Medical Text in Nahuatl Attributable to Francisco Hernández and His Aztec Ticiti Collaborators
The botany side seems to further reinforce this existing theory, as opposed to originating it.
Better known as 318230.
That's what happened to my junior high school art project.
They compared the flora to the period of the manuscript's assumed appearance - about a century after contact. Knowledge travels fast (as do people). The manuscript could have been written anywhere Europeans had gotten themselves into.
And we're talking the height of the Age of Exploration here.
That's not even remotely plausible. You can't develop a writing system overnight.
Sequoyah.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"In 1821 he completed his independent creation of a Cherokee syllabary, making reading and writing in Cherokee possible. This was the only time in recorded history that a member of a non-literate people independently created an effective writing system.[1][4] After seeing its worth, the people of the Cherokee Nation rapidly began to use his syllabary and officially adopted it in 1825. Their literacy rate quickly surpassed that of surrounding European-American settlers.[1]"
So, yes, it's remotely plausible, in the sense that it's absolutely happened (at least) once.
>you can't develop a writing system overnight
It is said that Hangul (the written Korean alphabet) was constructed by one scribe in a single afternoon.
google: how to learn to read korean in 15 minutes
, then click the pictures.
That's not even remotely plausible. The first and only thing surviving the invention of a writing system certainly wouldn't be a large codex.
Funny because the fact that such a large codex survives, would seem to indicate that indeed it's possible for it to have happened.
Writing systems based on an alphabet are, by definition, phoenetic. If you were to learn chinese, you'd probably use the roman alphabet to write down notes on how to spell it phoenetically.
Given that there probably are not a whole lot of speakers of Ancient Aztec it stands to reason maybe a phonetic representation of Aztec wasn't something easily figured out. (Remember the Navajo code talkers were unbreakable during world war II).
And, this is consistent with what is known about the manuscript if you check the wikipedia article. Specifically:
The language is quite unlike most European languages.
Between 20-30 glyphs could explain the entire text
The language resembles a natural language.
Ofc you can invent a writing system over night. ... I was still stuck withe the idea that a single person invented this writing system for his own purpose (regardless of underlying language).
Tolkien did plenty, and so did I as a child between 8 and 14. And I bet I was not a singular case. After 12 or 14 I however was more into simple encryption and 'secret codes'.
However I get your point
I don't think that it necessarily would need to be an adaption of "one" script. A spanish scholar of that time might have been able to read/write in several scripts (greek / coptic and latin etc.) and like Tolkien be simply very inspirated.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
Not to forget that the spanish invaders burned everything which looked like scripts or writing believing it was written in 'devils tongue'.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
A claim completely unsupported by your link.
That's probably true for your and me who have grown up with a phonetic system. I wouldn't think it to be true of someone who didn't grow up in a phonetic system and to whom the whole idea is new. The one historic example with which I'm familiar to twelve years to create.
Googling up the American Botanical Council shows that
1) they're unimportant enough that Wikipedia does not have an article aboutf them or their magazine
2) They are not part of any professional botanical organizations
3) Their facebook page calls them "Your source for reliable herbal medicine information" and shares links for organizatioins whose descriptions include phrases such as "holistic" and "alternative medicine".
4) Their own homepage is clearly aimed at the herbal medicine crowd and even includes a disclaimer that "The information on this site is intended for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for the advice of a qualified healthcare professional". Their magazine is called HerbalGram, for pete's sake.
I dare you to read their own site's news page at http://abc.herbalgram.org/site... and conclude that they are anything but a bunch of alternative medicine crackpots whose belief about the Voynich Manuscript should be taken as seriously as their belief that it's worth giving a presentation at an aromatherapy conference.
It's the Perl of the dark ages.
Table-ized A.I.
A botanist was working on a journal, ran out of tobacco, and decided to smoke some of the odd plants he was writing about rather than merely illustrate them.
Table-ized A.I.
And Spaniards didn't grow with a phonetic system? Don't think anyone was suggesting an Aztec independently figured out how to illustrate this is vellum, built a caravel and sailed across the Atlantic right on time to drop this in Europe before anyone else crossed the Atlantic as a prank. The scenario would be closer to a Popol Vuh without the Spanish translation. It is not unlikely the popol vuh also had such an original phonetic manuscript.
The Domincans created a Quechua/Spanish dictionary before Pizarro even reached Cusco, so it's not unreasonable. The dating is problematic though, unless perhaps it was created by the Portuguese or Venetian merchants that were suspected to have been using secret trade routs to bring rare items to Europe before the 'official' discovery of the Americas.
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
Maybe the manuscript's text is a one time pad, and the encrypted text belonging with the pictures is in another book.
The manuscript contains a small castle graphic, which displays peculiar dove-tail embattlements. Based on this architectural detail and taking into consideration the recent C-14 dating results, the Voynich book was written somewhere in early renaissance Northern Italy, like Venice or Milan.
If only the two authors were as good at researching historical mysteries as the American Botanical Council (ha!) is at writing press releases. Gosh, are we supposed to say "Hooray for the two plucky outsiders, disregarding or trashing everything that might possibly stand in the way of their flaky narrative"? Bless 'em, but this is the kind of super-selective nonsense that makes idiot TV history documentary producers go all moist and short of breath. Lord save us from such tosh. Anyway, here's a link to my rather more specific review of their New Spain Nahuatl Voynich theory:- http://www.ciphermysteries.com...
So, yes, it's remotely plausible, in the sense that it's absolutely happened (at least) once.
And it might even be the same sort of situation as Sequoyah. A native Aztec (or related dialect) speaker who can't read or write, but knows it is possible because the Spaniards could do it. So he or she creates a phonetic script and writes everything they can into the book.
The methodical nature of the book, with its natural division into somewhat identifiable subjects could indicate it is a knowledge dump perhaps for a posterity that might forget the past. Or maybe it's a crazy person with an opinion from some point in the last 500 years.
The radiocarbon date of 516 +/- 18 yrs bp only dates the time of life of the goats who's skin was used for the parchment. It does not date the construction of the book persé. It was not unusual at that time to use old parchment.
The manuscript contains several depictions that are clearly European: figures in European clothing, European equipment (e.g. a cross-bow) and some pages with Western (not indigenous American) constellations (e.g. Capricorn, the Balance).
So it is very clear, if it indeed shows American plants, that it must be post-Colombian and old parchment was used.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
Wow, (Do)Lorem Ipsum passage is a text defending the right to be a masoquist !
"..Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?"
There are still 1.5M Nahuatl speaking people alive. Why don't they let them read the manuscript and see what happens ?
Sounds Roman.
A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
> Writing systems based on an alphabet are, by definition, phoenetic.
Since when has "phonetic" completely changed meaning? Written English is based on an alphabet, but is not a phonetic language at all.
Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
I bought my house several years ago. At the time the basement had a lot of garbage in it but I was lazy and just left it lying there in the rafters. It wasn't until several years later I actually rented a dumpster and started cleaning. In amongst the old license plates, ancient signer sewing machine, and sheets of plate glass... I found it. A 12"x"12' piece of ancient looking wood. Dark grey in colour and very worn, like it had been sanded down. It was engraved with runic symbols or what I assume to be runes. But that's not the odd thing about it, because in complete darkness, the symbols glow a dark green. Now it could be bioluminescent bacteria or even radium, since that was popular at one time to paint things with radium at one time, but they glow none the less. Now the symbols I've researched and some people have suggested they are actually Freemason alphabet characters. One possible source of the wooden plank would be Oak Island. Oak island has long be associated with the Masonic order. I suppose that would also explain the salty musk the board has. Anyway... I'll take some pictures and post them at some point.
Sig. Sig. Sputnik
You're arrogant and dumb.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/cracking-maya-code.html
I didn't say it was unreasonable, I said the OP's contention that it could be whipped up in a short time was unreasonable.
Not believed by anyone not wearing a tinfoil chapeau that I know of.
Printing something on an old blank book is hardly an indication that a forger predicted carbon dating. It rather indicates that one of the best standard starters for creating a forgery is to use original materials.
1) The Gospel of Thomas manuscript is printed on paper from the Middle East dating to about seventy AD, with inks local to the region and time period, but with pollen embedded in the ink that dates to 1100 AD italy. The manuscript upholds Muslim claims about Jesus, at a time when Muslims were moving into Italy.
2) Even the fact that the manuscript is made on old paper doesn't demonstrate that the artist intended a forgery. Suppose the artist were painting on paper he recieved from a friend, who in turn recieved it from his Grandpa's estate?
Actually, I think that this manuscript is not very interesting.
Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
More likely the early Spanish simply used the Aztec names for plants, not having their own names for them yet.
This space intentionally left blank
You should probably re-examine old English before making such a stupid statement. Start with the number of borrows.
nice to see so many sailors giving advice !!!! people have been making "boats"since we noticed that some trees or branches of some trees float, we have been blown hither and thither for thousandsvof years,but small boats only carry small crews any survivors that turn up else where maybe lucky and the locals keep them alive cos their a new interest,or they may just kill them as some weirdo threat. if lucky they could live a full life but with such a small injection of genes,unless its a very small island population then the new genes probably just get swamped out by numbers. there will have been tens of thousands of folk stranded else where,and unless you have tge luck to turn up in right place and getvtaken into royal court or similar,no notes or items are probably lost
There were maps of large sections of the coastline of the Americas extant in Europe and China well before the time of Columbus, including a globe (IIRC, from 1492) that showed the west coast of Mexico with Baja California and possibly San Francisco Bay. Interestingly many of the maps were accurate to within a degree or two of longitude. Magellan claimed to have a map showing the straight that bears his name, seemed to know that Tierra del Fuego was an island, and encountered a large shipwreck as he passed through the Straight (no known European voyages of discovery had disappeared anywhere further south than the mouths of the Amazon).
Some of the merchant houses were richer than many of the kingdoms of the time, and not burdened with the expense of continual warfare. Timbuktu possessed an enormous library, some of it supposedly salvaged from the Great Library of Alexandria, and was a trading partner of both Portugal and Venice although it had no sailing fleet of its own. It would actually be surprising if they hadn't carried out their own voyages of exploration.
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
Timbuktu is a landlocked city hundreds of miles from the ocean. No shit it had no trading fleet of it's own.
And you're a clueless moron.
If I asked you what the word THREEP sounded like, would you have an answer?
See, it's phoenetic.
Now each letter does not correspond to a phoneme. That's why sometimes we combine letters to make sounds, like in "TH". And there are some words that are not pronounced the way they're spelled for historical reasons (but they used to be!)
But for romance languages (remember they thought the manuscript was spanish or italian) it is quite straightforward, and pronunciations and spellings match (with the exception of a few loan words from the anglais)
Also, a citation for the definition of alphabet (and yes they're phoenetic, unless you're using alphabet in the sense of DNA alphabet):
http://www.oxforddictionaries....
Reading comprehension fail, or did I just not write clearly? Portuguese and Venetian merchant houses traded with Timbuktu through its ports on the Gulf of Guinea. Maps of unknown origin existed in Europe, some of them claimed by authorities like Gerard Mercator to originate from the Great Library of Alexandria. Some of the merchant houses were enormously wealthy. It would be surprising if the merchant houses hadn't sent some of their ships on voyages of exploration using those maps in the search for new trading routes and rare goods.
Is that clearer?
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
Apparently these guys played Assassins Creed IV: Black Flag.
I'd give mod points if I had them - thanks for the valuable counterpoint. For those of us who aren't up to date on all the various theories, research, and past work, your take really cuts through the sensationalism of TFA.
Well, not overnight, but 5 years give or take http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangul
It's not really a made-up script, it's a variant of Latin minuscule. Obviously this was written in colonial time, so there was a script around (apart from the fact that Nahuatl did have a pictographic script). Did you really read TFA? I don't mean the press release, I mean the article they published on herbalgram.org. You have to read the PDF because the Voynichian script was stripped in the HTML version, and compare it to a hires scan of the manuscript. Their proposed decoding relates most letters to Latin letters that are pretty similar in shape, or ligatures ("tl") of them. They even encoded the words "Voynich manuscript" into Voynichian script on the first page, but didn't include a code table or an extrapolated transcription of the rest of the text.
They did burn a lot, but for example the Popol Vuh was written down (in Latin script) by Mayan scribes in colonial time and it survived.
You should probably re-examine old English before making such a stupid statement. Start with the number of borrows.
The problem with that statement is that "English" and "Old English" are two different languages. The Old English spelling system may have been largely phonetic and/or phonemic, but Modern English suffers badly from an increasing disjunction between written and spoken forms, making many words damn-near ideographic.
The English spelling system is phonemic (NB: not phonetic) in origin, but in its modern form it is the least phonetic and the least phonemic alphabetic orthography I know of. (Except possibly Faroese, which was designed to highlight Old Norse etymology during an era where history and misguided notions of linguistic purity were used by anyone and everyone to justify why their language and people were superior to everyone else.)
Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
The existence of a word that's phonetically spelt does not imply that the language is phonetic.
French is romance, and french is far from phonetic. (And much of the reason english is far from phonetic is because of the french influence.)
Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
As far as the Voynich Manuscript , the vast majority of researchers focused on trying to decipher the code letter. Great respect for them. According to me , the text is intentionally used a hoax aimed to engage readers in a fruitless search for the code of the manuscript just as deliberately scattered like puzzle Centuries of Nostradamus. I am in my searches focused on the symbolic meaning of illustration. For someone who has only a scientific look at the issue of encryption , all suggest it may seem too unreliable , not falsifiable . Therefore, please be patient - larger amount of illustration only confirms my theory that talked about that: Manuscript , namely the part of Herb is , according to me , a compendium of knowledge about the Evolution of Life on Earth - from its cosmological aspect , through Human Evolution (Theory Darwin ) to the Prehistory , History and Contemporary . In the following section, the author Herb encrypted all the important events of our common history with such precision that many a textbook of history might have envied accuracy. For more detailed information I put on the page : http://gloriaolivae.pl/
all I hear is 'baaaaa baaaaa' ie. THREesome with sheEP. are you sure threep was the word you were after?